NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of QC Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, QC Financial Services, Inc., QC Auto Services, Inc., QC Loan Services, Inc., QC E-Services, Inc., QC Canada Holdings Inc. and QC Capital, Inc. (collectively, the Company). QC Financial Services, Inc. is the 100% owner of QC Financial
Services of California, Inc., Financial Services of North Carolina, Inc., QC Financial Services of Texas, Inc., Express Check Advance of South Carolina, LLC (ECA), QC Advance, Inc., Cash Title Loans, Inc. and QC Properties, LLC. QC Canada Holdings
Inc. is the 100% owner of Direct Credit Holdings Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, Direct Credit). QC Holdings, Inc., incorporated in 1998 under the laws of the State of Kansas, was founded in 1984, and has provided various
retail consumer financial products and services throughout its 29-year history. The Companys common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market exchange under the symbol QCCO.
Since 1998, the Company has been primarily engaged in the business of providing short-term consumer loans, known as payday loans, with
principal values that typically range from $100 to $500. Payday loans provide customers with cash in exchange for a promissory note with a maturity of generally two to three weeks. The payday loans are collateralized either by a check from the
customer (for the principal amount of the loan plus a specified fee), ACH authorization or a debit card. The fee charged on payday loans varies by state, but typically ranges from $15 to $20 per $100 borrowed, although recent legislation in a few
states has capped the fee below $2 per $100 borrowed. To repay the cash advance, customers may redeem their check by paying cash or they may allow the check, ACH or debit card to be presented to the bank for collection.
The Company also provides other consumer financial products and services, such as installment loans, credit services, check cashing
services, title loans, open-end credit, prepaid debit cards, money transfers and money orders. All of the Companys loans and other services are subject to state regulation, which vary from state to state, as well as to federal and local
regulation, where applicable. As of December 31, 2013, the Company operated 432 branches with locations in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. In December 2013, the Company approved the closure of 35 underperforming branches during first half 2014.
The Company began offering branch-based installment loans to customers in its Illinois branches during second quarter 2006 and expanded
that product offering to customers in additional states during 2009 and 2010. In 2012, the Company introduced new installment loan products (signature loans and auto equity loans) to meet high customer demand for longer-term loan options. These new
products are higher-dollar and longer-term installment loans that are centrally underwritten and distributed through the Companys existing branch network. As of December 31, 2013, the Company offered the installment loan products to its
customers in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, South Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. The installment loans are payable in monthly installments (principal plus accrued interest) with terms typically ranging from four
months to 48 months, and all loans are pre-payable at any time without penalty. The fee for the installment loan varies based on the amount borrowed and the term of the loan. Generally, the amount that the Company advances under an installment loan
ranges from $400 to $3,000.
The following table summarizes the average principal amount of each type of installment loan
product originated during 2011, 2012 and 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Branch-Based
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
Auto Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
79
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
On September 30, 2011, QC Canada Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Credit Holdings Inc., a British Columbia company engaged in short-term, consumer Internet lending in certain Canadian provinces. Direct Credit was founded in 1999 and has developed and grown
a proprietary Internet-based model into a leading platform in Canada. The acquisition of Direct Credit is part of the implementation of the Companys strategy to diversify by increasing its product offerings and distribution, as well as by
expanding its presence into international markets. See additional information in Note 4.
In September 2007, the Company
entered into the buy here, pay here segment of the used automotive market in connection with ongoing efforts to evaluate alternative products that serve the Companys customer base. In December 2013, the Company sold its automotive business to
an unaffiliated limited liability company (Buyer) for approximately $6.0 million. The purchase agreement provided for the sale of certain assets of the automotive business primarily consisting of loans receivable, automobile inventory, fixed assets
and other assets. In addition, the Buyer hired a significant number of the automotive business personnel. The Buyer assumed no liabilities in conjunction with the purchase of those assets, other than lease obligations for the four buy-here, pay-here
locations previously leased by the Company. The Company also entered into a lease agreement with the Buyer for the one location that it owns. All revenue, expenses and income reported herein have been adjusted to reflect reclassification of the
discontinued automotive business unit. See additional information in Notes 4 and 6.
NOTE 2SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Companys Automotive business is being presented as a discontinued operation in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a
result of the sale in December 2013 discussed above. The operational results of the automotive business have been reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Unless otherwise stated,
footnote references refer to continuing operations. See additional information in Note 6.
Use of Estimates.
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including
those related to allowance for losses on loans, fair value measurements used in goodwill impairment tests, long-lived assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, empirical data and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition.
The Company records revenue from payday and title loans upon issuance. The term of a loan is
generally two to three weeks for a payday loan and 30 days for a title loan. At the end of each month, the Company records an estimate of the unearned revenue that results in revenues being recognized on a constant-yield basis ratably over the term
of each loan.
The Company records revenues from installment loans using the simple interest method.
80
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
With respect to the Companys credit service organization (CSO) in Texas, the
Company earns a CSO fee for arranging for an unrelated third-party to make a loan to the consumer and for providing related services to the consumer, including a guarantee of the consumers obligation to the third-party lender. The Company also
services the loan for the lender. The CSO fee is recognized ratably over the term of the loan.
With respect to the open-end
product, the Company earns interest on the outstanding balance and the product also includes a monthly non-refundable membership fee. The open-end credit product is very similar to a credit card as the customer is granted a grace period of 25 days
to repay the loan without incurring any interest.
The Company recognizes revenues for its other consumer financial products
and services, which includes check cashing, money transfers and money orders, at the time those services are rendered to the customer, which is generally at the point of sale.
The components of Other revenues as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit service fees
|
|
$
|
7,194
|
|
|
$
|
6,731
|
|
|
$
|
6,192
|
|
Check cashing fees
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
2,887
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
Title loan fees
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
Open-end credit fees
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,334
|
|
|
$
|
15,123
|
|
|
$
|
13,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and short-term
investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates the estimated fair value at December 31, 2012 and 2013. Substantially all cash balances are in excess of federal deposit
insurance limits.
Restricted Cash and Other.
Restricted cash and other includes cash in certain money market accounts
and certificates of deposit. The restricted cash balances at December 31, 2012 and 2013 are restricted primarily due to licensing requirements in certain states.
Loans Receivable, Provision for Losses and Allowance for Loan Losses.
When the Company enters into a payday loan with a customer, the Company records a loan receivable for the amount loaned to the
customer plus the fee charged by the Company, which varies from state to state based on applicable regulations.
The following
table summarizes certain data with respect to the Companys payday loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Average amount of cash provided to customer
|
|
$
|
314.56
|
|
|
$
|
320.48
|
|
|
$
|
323.91
|
|
Average fee received by the Company
|
|
$
|
56.65
|
|
|
$
|
57.67
|
|
|
$
|
59.23
|
|
Average term of loan (days)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
When the Company enters into an installment loan with a customer, the Company records a loan receivable
for the amount loaned to the customer. At each period end, the Company records any accrued fees and interest as a receivable, which vary from state to state based on applicable regulations.
81
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The Company records a provision for losses associated with uncollectible loans. For
payday loans, all accrued fees, interest and outstanding principal are charged off on the date the Company receives a returned check, a rejected ACH or denied debit card submission, generally within 14 days after the due date of the loan.
Accordingly, payday loans included in the receivable balance at any given point in time are typically not older than 30 days. These charge-offs are recorded as expense through the provision for losses. Any recoveries on losses previously charged to
expense are recorded as a reduction to the provision for losses in the period recovered. With respect to title loans, no additional fees or interest are charged after the loan has defaulted, which generally occurs after attempts to contact the
customer have been unsuccessful. Based on state regulations and operating procedures, the Company stops accruing interest on installment loans between 60 to 90 days after the last payment.
With respect to the loans receivable at the end of each reporting period, the Company maintains an aggregate allowance for loan losses
(including fees and interest) for payday loans, title loans and installment loans at levels estimated to be adequate to absorb estimated incurred losses in the respective outstanding loan portfolios. The Company does not specifically reserve for any
individual loan.
The methodology for estimating the allowance for payday and title loan losses utilizes a four-step approach,
which reflects the short-term nature of the loan portfolio at each period-end, the historical collection experience in the month following each reporting period-end and any fluctuations in recent general economic conditions. First, the Company
computes the loss/volume ratio for the last month of each reporting period. The loss/volume ratio represents the percentage of aggregate net payday and title loan charge-offs to total payday and title loan volumes during a given period. Second, the
Company computes an adjustment to this percentage to reflect the collections experience in the month immediately following the reporting period-end. To estimate collections experience, the Company computes an average of the change in the loss/volume
ratio from the last month of each reporting period to the immediate subsequent month-end for each of the last three years (excluding the current year). This change is then added to, or subtracted from, the loss/volume ratio computed for the last
month of the current reporting period to derive an experience-adjusted loss/volume ratio. Third, the period-end gross payday and title loans receivable balance is multiplied by the experience-adjusted loss/volume ratio to determine the initial
estimate of the allowance for loan losses. Fourth, the Company reviews and evaluates various qualitative factors that may or may not affect the computed initial estimate of the allowance for loan losses, including, among others, known changes in
state regulations or laws, changes to the Companys business and operating structure, and geographic or demographic developments. In connection with the Companys decision in 2012 to close 38 branches during the first half of 2013, the
Company recorded a $1.3 million qualitative adjustment to increase its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2012. In connection with the Companys decision in 2013 to close 35 branches during the first half of 2014, the Company
recorded a $1.0 million qualitative adjustment to increase its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2013.
The
Company maintains an allowance for installment loans at a level it considers sufficient to cover estimated losses in the collection of its installment loans. The allowance calculation for installment loans is based upon historical charge-off
experience (primarily a six-month trailing average of charge-offs to total volume) and qualitative factors, with consideration given to recent credit loss trends and economic factors. In connection with the Companys decision in 2012 to close
38 branches during the first half of 2013, the Company recorded a $344,000 qualitative adjustment to increase its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2012. In connection with the Companys decision in 2013 to close 35 branches
during the first half of 2014, the Company recorded a $262,000 qualitative adjustment to increase its allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2013.
The Company records an allowance for other receivables based upon an analysis that gives consideration to payment recency, delinquency levels and other general economic conditions.
82
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Based on the information discussed above, the Company records an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses through the provision for losses. The overall allowance represents the Companys best estimate of probable losses inherent in the outstanding loan portfolio at the end of each reporting period.
On occasion, the Company will sell certain payday loan receivables that the Company had previously charged off to third parties for cash.
The sales are recorded as a credit to the overall loss provision, which is consistent with the Companys policy for recording recoveries noted above. The following table summarizes cash received from the sale of these payday loan receivables
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash received from sale of payday loan receivables
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses.
The direct costs incurred in operating the Companys business units have
been classified as operating expenses. Operating expenses include salaries and benefits of employees (branch personnel as well as employees of Direct Credit), rent and other occupancy costs, depreciation and amortization of branch property and
equipment, armored car and security costs, marketing and other costs incurred by the business units. The provision for losses is also a component of operating expenses.
Property and Equipment.
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Buildings
are depreciated generally over 39 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term (including renewal options that are reasonably assured), which generally ranges from 1 to 15 years with
an average of 7 years, or the estimated useful life of the related asset. Furniture and equipment, including data processing equipment, data processing software, and other equipment are generally depreciated from 3 to 7 years. Company-owned vehicles
are depreciated over four to five years. Repair and maintenance expenditures that do not significantly extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of assets sold or disposed
of are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is included in income.
Software.
Purchased software
is recorded at cost and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life. The Company capitalizes costs for the development of internal use software, including coding and software configuration costs and costs of upgrades and
enhancements. Computer software and development costs incurred in the preliminary project stage, as well as training and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Direct and indirect costs associated with the application development stage of
internal use software are capitalized until such time that the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Costs for the development of internal use software were immaterial for the year ending December 31, 2011 and
totaled $1.3 million and $1.0 million for the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Advertising
Costs.
Advertising costs, including related printing, postage and search engine marketing, are charged to operations when incurred. Advertising expense was $1.9 million, $3.4 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011,
2012 and 2013, respectively.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
Goodwill represents the excess of consideration over the
fair value of net tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed of acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, non-compete agreements, trade names, debt
issuance costs, and other intangible assets.
Goodwill and other intangible assets having indefinite useful lives are tested
for impairment using a fair-value based approach on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. The test for goodwill impairment is a two-step approach. The first step of the
goodwill impairment test requires a determination of whether the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its
83
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
carrying value. If the fair value is less than the carrying amount, then the second step is required, which involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the
first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). This process may result in the determination of a new amount of goodwill. If the calculated fair value of the goodwill resulting from this allocation is lower than the carrying
value of the goodwill in the reporting unit, the difference is reflected as a non-cash impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. The recorded amounts of
other items on the balance sheet are not adjusted.
The Company evaluates the goodwill at the reporting unit level and
performs its annual goodwill and indefinite life impairment test as of December 31 for all reporting units. With respect to reporting units, the Company has two reporting units with goodwill that require testing. The reporting units to test
include branch lending operations in the United States and the Canadian Internet lending operations (Direct Credit). The Company hired an independent appraiser to assist with the Companys impairment tests as of December 31, 2012 and 2013.
The independent appraiser assessed the fair value of the reporting units based on a discounted cash flows approach. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuations are discount rates and perpetual growth rates applied to cash flow
projections. Also inherent in the discounted cash flow valuation models are past performance, projections and assumptions in current operating plans and revenue growth. These assumptions contemplate business, market and overall economic conditions.
In connection with this process, the independent appraiser also provided a reconciliation of the estimated aggregate fair values of the Companys reporting units to its market capitalization, including consideration of a control premium that
represents what an investor would pay for the Companys equity securities to obtain a controlling interest. The Company believes that this reconciliation is consistent with a market participant perspective. The Company tests trade names with
indefinite lives for impairment by comparing the book value to a fair value calculated using a discounted cash flow approach on a presumed royalty rate derived from the revenues related to the trade name.
Other factors that are considered important in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or indefinite lived intangible assets might
exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, significant changes in the Companys business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset being
evaluated. Any changes in key assumptions about the Companys business and its prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge and such a charge could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition and results of operations.
The Company performed its annual impairment test as of
December 31, 2013 and determined that the fair values of both the Branch Lending and Direct Credit reporting units did not exceed their respective carrying amounts. The Company believes that certain factors reflect the recent declines in the
calculated fair values of its Branch Lending and Direct Credit reporting units. These factors include, (i) a significant decline in the Companys market capitalization during fourth quarter as the stock price declined by 22% (primarily due
to the suspension of the regular quarterly dividend in November 2013), (ii) recent underperformance compared to peers, (iii) historically high loss ratios on its loan portfolios during fourth quarter 2013 and (iv) a decline in
estimated cash flow projections for future periods. In connection with its annual budgeting and strategic planning process performed in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the review of its 2013 financial results, the Company assessed its existing
revenue growth opportunities and cost structure (primarily expected loss ratios) for future periods. As a result, the Company reduced its short term and long term revenue and gross profit forecasts from previous estimates which affected the fair
value calculated for each reporting unit.
The Company hired an independent appraiser to assist with the second step of the
impairment test. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a $21.4 million non-cash impairment charge to goodwill, which included $15.7 million to its Branch Lending reporting unit and $5.7 million to its Direct Credit
reporting unit. In addition, the Company performed an impairment test on its indefinite lived intangible assets as of
84
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2013 and determined that the indefinite lived intangibles of its Direct Credit reporting unit were impaired and as a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$669,000. See additional information in Note 10.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.
The Company evaluates all long-lived
assets, including intangible assets that are subject to amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. When the carrying amounts of these assets cannot be recovered
by the undiscounted net cash flows they will generate, impairment is recognized in an amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value.
Earnings per Share.
The Company computes basic and diluted earnings per share using a two-class method because the Company has participating securities in the form of unvested share-based payment
awards with rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends. Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The
computation of diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the year. The effect of stock options and unvested restricted stock represent the only differences between the weighted
average shares used for the basic earnings per share computation compared to the diluted earnings per share computation for each period presented. See additional information in Note 16.
Stock-Based Compensation.
The Company recognizes in its financial statements compensation cost relating to share-based payment
transactions. The stock-based compensation expense is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. See additional information in Note 17.
Income Taxes.
Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established
when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. Income tax expense represents the tax payable for the current period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Tax guidance pertaining to uncertain tax positions issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) clarifies what criteria must
be met prior to recognition of the financial statement benefit of a position taken or one that is expected to be taken in a tax return. The provisions of this guidance apply broadly to all tax positions taken by a company, including decisions to not
report income in a tax return or to classify a transaction as tax exempt. The prescribed approach is determined through a two-step benefit recognition model. The amount of benefit to recognize is measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is
greater than 50 percent likely of being ultimately realized upon settlement. The tax position must be derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not of being sustained. See additional information in Note 14.
Treasury Stock.
The Companys board of directors periodically authorizes the repurchase of the Companys common stock.
The Companys repurchases of common stock are recorded as treasury stock and result in a reduction of stockholders equity. The shares held in treasury stock may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees as part
of the Companys stock-based compensation programs. When treasury shares are reissued, the Company uses the average cost method. The Company had 3.5 million and 3.3 million shares of common stock held in treasury at December 31,
2012 and 2013, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
The fair value of short-term payday, title,
installment loans and open-end credit receivables, borrowings under the credit facility, accounts payable and certain other current liabilities that are short-term in nature approximates carrying value.
85
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The Company estimates the fair value of long-term debt based upon borrowing rates
available at the reporting date for indebtedness with similar terms and average maturities. As of December 31, 2012, the three-year term loan was paid in full. In November 2013, the Company entered into an amendment to its credit agreement to
convert $9.0 million outstanding under its revolving credit agreement to a term loan to be repaid in four quarterly installments beginning December 2013 (as discussed in Note 11). The balance of the $9.0 million term loan was $4.5 million as of
December 31, 2013. The fair value of the term loan at December 31, 2013 approximates the carrying amount. The fair value of the subordinated notes as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 approximated the carrying value.
Derivative Instruments.
The Company does not engage in the trading of derivative financial instruments except where the
Companys objective is to manage the variability of forecasted interest payments attributable to changes in interest rates. In general, the Company enters into derivative transactions in limited situations based on managements assessment
of current market conditions and perceived risks.
On March 31, 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap
agreement. The swap agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge and changed the floating rate interest obligation associated with the Companys $50 million term loan into a fixed rate. Gains or losses on derivatives designated as cash
flow hedges, to the extent they are effective, are recorded in other comprehensive income, and subsequently reclassified to earnings as interest expense to offset the impact of the hedged items when they occur. If it becomes probable the forecasted
transaction to which a cash flow hedge relates will not occur, the derivative would be terminated and the amount in other comprehensive income would generally be recognized into earnings. The swap agreement had a maturity date of December 6,
2012. Under the swap, the Company paid a fixed interest rate of 3.43% and received interest at a rate of LIBOR. On October 3, 2011, the Company terminated the swap agreement. Prior to refinancing the term debt on September 30, 2011 that
was associated with the swap, the swap was considered highly effective and therefore, the Company reported no net gain or loss during the year ended December 31, 2011. In connection with the termination of the swap agreement, the Company paid a
net cash settlement of approximately $343,000. The Companys remaining amounts deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss were amortized into earnings as an increase to interest expense over the original term of the hedged transaction.
Foreign Currency Translations
. The functional currency for the Companys subsidiaries that serve residents of
Canada is the Canadian dollar. The assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date, and the resulting adjustments are recorded in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of equity. Revenue and expenses will be translated at the monthly average exchange rates occurring during each period.
NOTE 3ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss
carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. This update specifies that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred
tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB amended the disclosure requirements regarding the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change the current
requirement for reporting net income or other comprehensive income, but requires additional disclosures about significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income including the effect of the reclassification on the related
net income line items. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
86
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
In July 2012, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the impairment
assessment of indefinite-lived intangibles. This update simplifies the impairment assessment of indefinite-lived intangibles by allowing companies to consider qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of
an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount before performing the two step impairment review process. This guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 4SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
Sale of Automotive Business.
In December 2013, the Company sold its automotive business to an unaffiliated
limited liability company (Buyer) for approximately $6.0 million. The members of that limited liability company include (as minority owners) the daughter and son-in-law of Mary Lou Early, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of QC Holdings,
Inc., (which individuals are also the sister and brother-in-law of Darrin J. Andersen, the President and Chief Executive Officer of QC Holdings, Inc.). The Company believes that the terms of this transaction with the related parties described above
was negotiated at arms length and were no less favorable to the Company than terms it could have obtained from unrelated third parties.
The purchase agreement provided for the sale of certain assets primarily consisting of loans receivable, automobile inventory, fixed assets and other assets. In addition, the Buyer hired a significant
number of the Companys automotive business personnel. The Buyer assumed no liabilities in conjunction with the purchase of those assets, other than lease obligations for the four buy-here, pay-here locations previously leased by the Company.
The Company also entered into a lease agreement with Buyer for the one location that is owned by the Company. To facilitate the willingness of one landlord to enter into a new lease with Buyer, the Company guaranteed the rental obligations of Buyer
for 12 months of the lease. The aggregate rental obligation under the lease during the guaranteed period is approximately $36,000.
The operating environment for the Companys automotive business had become increasingly challenging and operating results more volatile over the past several quarters, given the difficult general
economic climate. In light of these circumstances, the Company elected to discontinue its automotive business in order to focus on its consumer lending operations in the U.S. and Canada. See additional information in Note 6.
Restructuring.
In January 2013, the Company announced a restructuring plan for the organization primarily due to a decline in loan
volumes over the past few years as a result of shifting customer demand, the poor economy, regulatory changes and increasing competition in the short-term credit industry. The restructuring plan included a 10% workforce reduction in field and
corporate employees primarily due to the decision in 2012 to close 38 underperforming branches during the first half of 2013. In fourth quarter 2012, the Company recorded approximately $298,000 in pre-tax charges associated with its decision to
close these 38 underperforming branches. The charges included a $257,000 loss for the disposition of fixed assets and $41,000 for other costs. The Company recorded approximately $1.2 million in pre-tax charges during year ended December 31,
2013, associated with the restructuring plan. The charges included approximately $439,000 for lease terminations and other related occupancy costs and approximately $795,000 in severance and benefit costs for the workforce reduction. Excluding the
effect of the closed branches, the workforce reduction and related cost savings are expected to total approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million on an annual basis.
Closure of Branches.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company closed two of its lower performing branches by consolidating each of those branches into a nearby branch. In addition,
the Company approved the closure of 35 underperforming branches during first half of 2014. The Company recorded approximately $364,000 in pre-tax charges during the year ended December 31, 2013 associated with branch
87
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
closures. The charges included a $247,000 loss for the disposition of fixed assets, $74,000 for lease terminations and other related occupancy costs, $32,000 in severance and benefit costs and
$11,000 for other costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company closed 24 of its lower performing branches
in various states (which included four branches that were consolidated into nearby branches). In addition, the Company decided it would close 38 underperforming branches during the first half of 2013. The Company recorded approximately $699,000 in
pre-tax charges during the year ended December 31, 2012 associated with branch closures. The charges included a $398,000 loss for the disposition of fixed assets, $263,000 for lease terminations and other related occupancy costs and $38,000 for
other costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company closed 24 of its branches in various states (which
included four branches that were consolidated into nearby branches). The Company recorded approximately $553,000 in pre-tax charges during the year ended December 31, 2011 associated with these closures. The charges included a $283,000 loss for
the disposition of fixed assets, $252,000 for lease terminations and other related occupancy costs and $18,000 for other costs.
With respect to the branch closings in 2011, 2012 and 2013, a significant portion of the operations and closing costs are included as
discontinued operations (see Note 6). When ceasing operations in Company branches under operating leases, the Company incurs certain lease contract termination costs. Accordingly, in cases where the lease contract specifies a termination fee due to
the landlord, the Company records such expense at the time written notice is given to the landlord. In cases where terms, including termination fees, are yet to be negotiated with the landlord or in cases where the landlord does not allow the
Company to prematurely exit its lease, but allows for subleasing, the Company estimates the fair value of any assumed sublease income that can be generated from the location and records as an expense the excess of remaining lease payments to the
landlord over the projected sublease income at the cease-use date.
The following table summarizes the accrued exit costs
associated with the restructuring and the closure of branches discussed above, and the activity related to those charges as of December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31,
2012
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease and related occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
$
|
(509
|
)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
1,351
|
|
|
$
|
(1,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013, the balance of $58,000 for accrued costs associated with the closure of
branches is included as a current liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company expects that the liabilities for these costs will be settled within one year.
Sale of Automobile Receivables.
In December 2012, the Company completed two transactions involving $17.2 million principal amount of its automobile loans receivable. The Company received
approximately $11.9 million in cash proceeds in exchange for relinquishing its right, title and interest in the automobile loans receivable. The Company used the net proceeds it received to make a prepayment on the $32 million term loan under its
credit agreement. The Company was subject to recourse provisions, which required it to repurchase certain automobile loans receivable in the event of a default. The recourse period ended on May 9, 2013. As of December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2013, the balance of the recourse liability was approximately $350,000 and $0, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $522,000 as a result of the recourse
provisions.
88
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
With respect to the transfer of $17.2 million in automobile loans receivable, the
Company treated $16.1 million of this amount as a sale and recognized a $2.6 million loss from the sale. The Company was unable to satisfy certain criteria for sale accounting treatment with respect to the transfer of $1.1 million in principal
amount of automobile loans receivable. These transferred assets were classified as collateralized receivables and the cash proceeds received (approximately $618,000) from the transfer of these automobile loans receivable were classified as a secured
borrowing. At the end of the recourse period, approximately $156,000 of the collateralized receivables was retained by the third party to satisfy the secured borrowing and the Company recorded an additional loss for this amount.
During 2013, the Company separately sold automobile receivables to a third party resulting in a loss of $307,000.
Direct Credit Holdings.
On September 30, 2011, QC Canada Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired
100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Credit Holdings Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Direct Credit), a British Columbia company engaged in short-term, consumer Internet lending in certain Canadian provinces. The Company paid
an aggregate initial consideration of $12.4 million. The Company also agreed to pay a supplemental earn-out payment to the extent Direct Credits EBITDA as specifically defined in the stock purchase agreement (generally earnings before
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses) exceeded a defined target for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2012.
The Company hired an independent appraiser to evaluate the fair value of the contingent consideration and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The contingent consideration and the estimated fair
values of intangible assets acquired were fair value estimates obtained from an independent appraiser and were based on the information that was available to the Company as of the acquisition date. The Company believed that the information provided
a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of contingent consideration and of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the Company continued to monitor during the measurement period (one year from the acquisition date) any new information
obtained about facts and circumstances that were present at the acquisition date (including consideration of legal matters as discussed in Note 18).
The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement at the acquisition date was $1.1 million, which was recorded in current liabilities. In accordance with the stock purchase agreement, a
supplemental earn-out payment was not required as Direct Credits EBITDA for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2012 did not exceed the defined target. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a reduction to
the contingent consideration liability of approximately $1.1 million. This reduction is included as a gain in the other income component of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The fair value of the goodwill at the acquisition date was $7.6 million. As part of the Companys annual impairment testing
performed as of December 31, 2012 and 2013, it was determined that the fair value of the Direct Credit reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized a non-cash
impairment charge to goodwill of approximately $1.7 million and $5.7 million, respectively. See additional information in Note 10.
NOTE 5FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy Tables.
The fair value measurement accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability
to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset
or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for
89
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. There were no recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013.
Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis.
The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring
basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Non-financial assets such as property, equipment, land, goodwill and intangible assets are also subject to non-recurring fair value
measurements if they are deemed to be impaired. The impairment models used for non-financial assets depend on the type of asset. When the carrying amount of these assets cannot be recovered by the undiscounted net cash flows they will generate,
impairment is recognized in an amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value.
The Company
evaluated its goodwill and indefinite life intangibles as part of its annual impairment testing as of December 31, 2012 and 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a $21.4 million non-cash impairment charge to
goodwill, which included $15.7 million to its Branch Lending reporting unit and $5.7 million to its Direct Credit reporting unit. In 2012, the Company recorded a $1.7 million non-cash impairment charge to goodwill for its Direct Credit reporting
unit. In addition, it was determined that the trade name intangible associated with the acquisition of ECA in December 2006 was impaired and as a result, the Company recorded a charge of $600,000 to reduce the value of the trade name intangible
asset during 2012. The decline in value was attributable to the prior closings of ECA branches in South Carolina and the decision to close an additional 12 branches in South Carolina during the first half of 2013. With respect to the testing for
2013, it was determined that the trade name intangible asset associated with the acquisition of Direct Credit in September 2011 was impaired. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $669,000.
This impairment of the trade name intangible asset was primarily attributed to lower forecasted profits, reflecting more conservative growth rates versus those originally assumed by the Company at the time of acquisition.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded an impairment of $244,000 on fixed assets in connection with the 35
branches the Company has scheduled to close during first half of 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment of $257,000 on fixed assets in connection with the 38 branches the Company had scheduled to close
during the first half of 2013. The fair value measurements used to determine the impairments were based on the market approach based on liquidation prices of comparable assets.
The following table presents fair value measurements of certain assets on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2013
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
Total
gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment for Branch Lending and Direct Credit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,386
|
)
|
Indefinite lived intangible asset impairment for Direct Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
Impaired fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
(22,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table presents fair value measurements of certain assets on a
non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
Total
gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Goodwill for Direct Credit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,107
|
|
|
$
|
(1,730
|
)
|
Trade Name ECA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
Impaired fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,107
|
|
|
$
|
(2,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During 2011, the Company closed 20 branches that were not consolidated into nearby branches and sold one branch. In
2012, the Company closed 20 branches that were not consolidated into nearby branches and decided it would close 38 branches during the first half of 2013. In December 2013, the Company approved the closure of 35 underperforming branches during first
half of 2014. These branches are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income and related disclosures in the accompanying notes for all periods presented. With respect to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and
related disclosures in the accompanying notes, the items associated with the discontinued operations are included with the continuing operations for all periods presented.
In September 2013, the Company approved a plan to discontinue its automotive business. The operating environment for the Companys automotive business had become increasingly challenging and
operating results more volatile over the past several quarters, given the difficult general economic climate. In light of these circumstances, the Company elected to discontinue its automotive business in order to focus on its consumer lending
operations in the U.S. and Canada. In December 2013, the Company completed the disposition of certain assets of its automotive business through an agreement (Purchase Agreement) with an unaffiliated limited liability company (Buyer). The Purchase
Agreement provided for the sale of certain assets of the automotive business, primarily consisting of loans receivable, inventory, fixed assets and other assets, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.0 million. In addition, under the
terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company assigned the leases of the dealership lots to the Buyer. The Buyer also hired a significant number of employees from the automotive business.
All revenue and expenses reported for each period herein have been adjusted to reflect reclassification of the discontinued automotive
business. Discontinued operations include the revenue and expenses which can be specifically identified with the automotive business, and excludes any allocation of general administrative corporate costs, except interest expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash loss of $2.8 million in connection with the disposal of its
automotive business. This non-cash loss is included as a component of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Approximately $1.9 million of this charge was a non-cash fair-value
adjustment to customer loans receivable. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to a write-off of goodwill and intangible assets totaling $679,000. Other fair value adjustments to vehicle inventories, fixed assets and
other items accounted for the remaining charge of $256,000.
91
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Summarized financial information for discontinued operations is presented below
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
43,593
|
|
|
$
|
40,740
|
|
|
$
|
25,002
|
|
Provision for losses (a)
|
|
|
13,601
|
|
|
|
13,541
|
|
|
|
9,724
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
30,582
|
|
|
|
28,081
|
|
|
|
19,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
(3,808
|
)
|
Other, net (b)
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
|
|
(4,355
|
)
|
|
|
(3,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(5,237
|
)
|
|
|
(7,013
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(2,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
In 2013, the provision for loss amount includes $6.2 million from the discontinued automobile business.
|
(b)
|
In 2013, other, net includes a $679,000 impairment charge to goodwill and intangible assets.
|
In accordance with accounting guidance, the assets and liabilities of the automotive business have been segregated and are recorded as
assets of discontinued operations and liabilities of discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. There were no assets or liabilities carried on the Companys balance sheet related to the automotive operations at
December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the components of assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations consisted of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
196
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
672
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
|
51
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
In the third quarter of 2013, prior to the annual impairment assessment, the Company
also performed an interim goodwill impairment assessment relative to the goodwill associated with the reporting unit that included the automotive business. Based on the assessment, the Company determined that the fair value of this reporting unit
was less than the carrying value and therefore performed the second step of the goodwill impairment assessment, which requires estimating the fair values of the reporting units net identifiable assets and calculating the implied fair value of
goodwill. The fair value of this reporting unit was determined by a market approach, consistent with its last annual impairment assessment. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined to be zero and, therefore, recorded goodwill was impaired
and a non-cash impairment charge of $672,000 was recognized in the third quarter of 2013. The goodwill impairment was primarily a result of lower forecasted margins and increased working capital requirements within this reporting unit. In addition,
the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge for amortizable intangible assets totaling $8,000.
The asset fair values
utilized in the impairment assessments discussed above were determined using Level 3 inputs as defined by accounting guidance.
The automotive business was previously accounted for as a reportable segment.
NOTE 7SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys operating business units offer various financial services. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the
Company evaluated its operating segments and implemented changes to align the Companys operating segments with how the Company manages the business and views the markets the Company serves. The Company has elected to organize and report on its
business units as three reportable segments (Branch Lending, Centralized Lending and E-Lending). The Branch Lending segment includes branches that offer payday loans, installment loans, credit services, check cashing services, title loans, open-end
credit, debit cards, money transfers and money orders. The Centralized Lending segment includes long-term installment loans (Signature Loans and Auto Equity Loans) that are centrally underwritten. The E-Lending segment includes the Internet lending
operations in the United States and Canada. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on, among other things, gross profit, income from continuing operations before income taxes and return on invested capital.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Companys segments
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Branch
Lending
|
|
|
Centralized
Lending
|
|
|
E-Lending
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
133,199
|
|
|
$
|
11,556
|
|
|
$
|
7,227
|
|
|
$
|
151,982
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
32,520
|
|
|
|
8,658
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
44,449
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
59,135
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
63,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41,544
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
43,587
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
(15,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,371
|
)
|
|
|
(22,055
|
)
|
Other, net (a)
|
|
|
(27,439
|
)
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
(32,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Branch
Lending
|
|
|
Centralized
Lending
|
|
|
E-Lending
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
137,704
|
|
|
$
|
3,087
|
|
|
$
|
8,068
|
|
|
$
|
148,859
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
28,009
|
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
32,667
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
59,128
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
63,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
50,567
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
52,992
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
|
|
(2,330
|
)
|
Other, net (a)
|
|
|
(33,677
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
|
(36,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
16,290
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Branch
Lending
|
|
|
Centralized
Lending
|
|
|
E-Lending
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
143,954
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,903
|
|
|
$
|
145,857
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
27,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
27,673
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
57,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
58,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
59,543
|
|
Other, net (a)
|
|
|
(40,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
(40,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
18,585
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
18,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents expenses not associated with operations, which includes regional expenses, corporate expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest, other income and
other expenses. Corporate expenses are allocated to each reporting segment based on each reporting units percentage of revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the E-Lending segment includes a gain of $1.1 million for the reduction
in the contingent consideration liability.
|
Information concerning total assets by reporting segment is as
follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Branch Lending
|
|
$
|
113,286
|
|
|
$
|
90,141
|
|
Centralized Lending
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
E-Lending
|
|
|
13,417
|
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
131,700
|
|
|
$
|
108,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operations of the Branch Lending and Centralized Lending segments are all located in the United
States. The operations of the E-Lending segment are located in the United States and Canada.
94
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 8CUSTOMER RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Customer receivables consisted of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payday
and Title
Loans
|
|
|
Installment
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, interest and fees receivable
|
|
$
|
42,813
|
|
|
$
|
17,470
|
|
|
$
|
5,338
|
|
|
$
|
65,621
|
|
Less: allowance for losses
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(3,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,484
|
)
|
|
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, interest and fees receivable, net
|
|
$
|
39,946
|
|
|
$
|
13,549
|
|
|
$
|
3,854
|
|
|
$
|
57,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, interest and fees receivable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,503
|
|
Less: allowance for losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, interest and fees receivable, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,332
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payday
and Title
Loans
|
|
|
Installment
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, interest and fees receivable
|
|
$
|
50,772
|
|
|
$
|
14,642
|
|
|
$
|
1,656
|
|
|
$
|
67,070
|
|
Less: allowance for losses
|
|
|
(3,211
|
)
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(6,608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, interest and fees receivable, net
|
|
$
|
47,561
|
|
|
$
|
11,645
|
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
60,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, interest and fees receivable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,114
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,114
|
|
Less: allowance for losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, interest and fees receivable, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit quality information.
In order to manage the portfolios of consumer loans effectively, the
Company utilizes a variety of proprietary underwriting criteria, monitors the performance of the portfolio and maintains either an allowance or accrual for losses on consumer loans (including fees and interest) at a level estimated to be adequate to
absorb credit losses inherent in the portfolio. The portfolio includes balances outstanding from all consumer loans, including short-term payday and title loans and installment loans. The allowance for losses on consumer loans offsets the
outstanding loan amounts in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company had approximately $7.8 million in installment loans
receivable that were past due as of December 31, 2013 and approximately 36.8% of this amount was more than 60 days past due. The Company had approximately $3.9 million in installment loans receivable past due as of December 31, 2012 and
approximately 21.4% of this amount was more than 60 days past due.
95
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Allowance for loan losses.
The following table summarizes the activity in the
allowance for loan losses
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,410
|
|
|
$
|
3,908
|
|
|
$
|
7,045
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(64,283
|
)
|
|
|
(65,378
|
)
|
|
|
(75,572
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
32,092
|
|
|
|
30,398
|
|
|
|
34,607
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
32,689
|
|
|
|
38,115
|
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
3,908
|
|
|
$
|
7,045
|
|
|
$
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income includes losses associated with the CSO
(see note 13 for additional information) and excludes loss activity related to discontinued operations (see note 6 for additional information).
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses by product type during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Payday
and Title
Loans
|
|
|
Installment
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
3,435
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
7,045
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(57,107
|
)
|
|
|
(17,056
|
)
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
|
(75,572
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
32,005
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
34,607
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
17,295
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
2,867
|
|
|
$
|
6,092
|
|
|
$
|
1,484
|
|
|
$
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Payday
and Title
Loans
|
|
|
Installment
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,260
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
3,908
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(51,949
|
)
|
|
|
(12,549
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(65,378
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
27,951
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
30,398
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
25,661
|
|
|
|
11,549
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
38,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
3,435
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
7,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 9PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
18,263
|
|
|
|
18,403
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
21,730
|
|
|
|
22,959
|
|
Land
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,781
|
|
|
|
46,102
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(33,571
|
)
|
|
|
(35,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,210
|
|
|
$
|
10,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2005, the Company entered into a seven-year lease for a new corporate headquarters in
Overland Park, Kansas. In January 2011, the Company amended its lease agreement to extend the lease term and modify the lease payments. The lease was extended with a new landlord through October 31, 2017 and includes a renewal option for an
additional five years. As part of the original lease agreement and the amendment to the lease agreement, the Company received tenant allowances from the landlord for leasehold improvements totaling $1.4 million. The tenant allowances are recorded by
the Company as a deferred liability and are being amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the life of the lease. As of December 31, 2012, the balance of the deferred liability was approximately $270,000, of which $214,000 is classified as
a non-current liability. As of December 31, 2013, the balance of the deferred liability was approximately $214,000, of which $158,000 is classified as a non-current liability.
Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment totaled $3.5 million, $3.0 million and $2.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
NOTE 10GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill.
The following table summarizes by reportable segment the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branch
Lending
|
|
|
E-Lending
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
15,684
|
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
23,286
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2012
|
|
|
15,684
|
|
|
|
6,107
|
|
|
|
21,791
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(15,684
|
)
|
|
|
(5,702
|
)
|
|
|
(21,386
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company performed its annual impairment test as of December 31, 2013 and determined that the
fair values of both the Branch Lending and Direct Credit reporting units did not exceed their respective carrying amounts. For purposes of the step one analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit was estimated using an income approach that
analyzed projected discounted cash flows. The discount rates used for the reporting units ranged from 16.1% to 23.8%. The Company believes that certain factors reflect the recent declines in the
97
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
calculated fair values of its Branch Lending and Direct Credit reporting units. These factors include, (i) a significant decline in the Companys market capitalization during fourth
quarter as the stock price declined by 22% (primarily due to the suspension of the regular quarterly dividend in November 2013), (ii) recent underperformance compared to peers, (iii) historically high loss ratios on its loan portfolios
during fourth quarter 2013 and (iv) a decline in estimated cash flow projections for future periods. In connection with its annual budgeting and strategic planning process performed in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the review of its 2013
financial results, the Company assessed its existing revenue growth opportunities and cost structure (primarily expected loss ratios) for future periods. As a result, the Company reduced its short term and long term revenue and gross profit
forecasts from previous estimates which affected the fair value calculated for each reporting unit.
The Company hired an
independent appraiser to assist with the second step of the impairment test. The amount of impairment for each reporting unit was calculated by comparing the reporting units implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount, which requires
an allocation of the fair value determined in the step one analysis to the individual assets and liabilities of each reporting unit. Any remaining fair value would represent the implied fair value of goodwill on the testing date. The test results
showed that the implied fair value of the goodwill for each reporting unit was a negative amount after the allocation of the fair value to the individual assets and liabilities of each reporting unit and thus, a full impairment of goodwill was
recorded for each reporting unit. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a $21.4 million non-cash impairment charge to goodwill, which included a $15.7 million tax deductible charge to its Branch Lending reporting unit and a
$5.7 million non-tax deductible charge to its Direct Credit reporting unit.
With respect to 2012, the Company performed its
annual impairment testing of goodwill and concluded that no impairment existed at December 31, 2012 for its Branch Lending reporting unit. However, the test results showed that the fair value of the Direct Credit reporting unit did not exceed
its carrying amount and a step two analysis was required to determine the amount of the impairment. As a result, the Company recorded a $1.7 million non-cash, non-tax deductible impairment charge to goodwill for its Direct Credit reporting unit
during 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment of goodwill was recognized.
Intangible Assets.
The following table summarizes intangible assets
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Non-amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
$
|
1,456
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
2,603
|
|
|
$
|
2,603
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
|
|
4,016
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(2,010
|
)
|
|
|
(3,150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
3,627
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013 include customer relationships,
non-compete agreements, trade names and debt issue costs. Customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over the weighted average useful lives ranging from three to five years. Non-compete agreements are currently amortized
using the straight-line method over the term of the agreements, ranging from three to five
98
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
years. The amount recorded for trade names are considered an indefinite life intangible and not subject to amortization. Costs paid to obtain debt financing are amortized to interest expense over
the term of each related debt agreement using the effective interest method for term debt and the straight-line method for the revolving credit facility.
The Company tests trade names with indefinite lives for impairment annually by comparing the book value to a fair value calculated using a discounted cash flow approach on a presumed royalty rate derived
from the revenues related to the trade name. Based on testing results for 2013, the Company concluded that the indefinite lived intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Direct Credit were impaired and recorded an impairment charge of
$669,000 to reduce the value of the indefinite lived intangible assets.
Based on the results from its 2012 impairment
testing, the Company concluded that the trade name associated with the acquisition of ECA was impaired and recorded an impairment charge of $600,000 to reduce the value of the trade name intangible asset. In 2006, the Company acquired 51 branches in
South Carolina from Express Check Advance, LLC. The Company has closed the majority of these branches (31 branches as of December 31, 2012) and decided in December 2012 it would close 12 additional branches during first half 2013 due to a
change in the payday loan law in South Carolina in 2009 that had negatively impacted revenues and gross profits in those branches over the past few years. No impairment of intangible assets was recognized during 2011.
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was $780,000, $899,000 and $861,000, respectively. Annual
amortization for intangible assets recorded as of December 31, 2013 is estimated to be $863,000 for 2014 and $5,000 for 2015.
NOTE 11INDEBTEDNESS
Credit Agreement.
The following table summarizes long-term debt at December 31, 2012 and 2013
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
20,800
|
|
Less: debt due within one year
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with a
syndicate of banks to replace its prior credit agreement, which was previously amended on December 7, 2007. The credit agreement provided for a term loan of $32 million and a revolving line of credit (including provisions permitting the
issuance of letters of credit and swingline loans) in the aggregate principal amount of up to $27 million. In connection with amending the credit agreement, the Company capitalized approximately $1.0 million in debt issue costs, which it is
amortizing over three years, and recorded a loss on debt extinguishment totaling $462,000, which is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as part of other expense, net. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the
revolving line of credit at December 31, 2012 and 2013 was 4.3% and 4.1%, respectively.
The credit agreement contains
financial covenants related to EBITDA (earnings before interest, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization and non-cash charges related to equity-based compensation), fixed charge coverage, leverage, total indebtedness, liquidity and
maximum loss ratio. As of September 30, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with one of the financial covenants (minimum consolidated EBITDA) as set forth in the credit agreement. On November 12, 2013, the Company entered into an
amendment to the credit
99
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
agreement to (i) reduce the maximum amount available under the revolving credit facility from $27 million to $18 million; (ii) convert $9 million outstanding under the revolving credit
agreement to a term loan to be repaid in four quarterly installments beginning December 31, 2013; (iii) eliminate the minimum consolidated EBITDA requirement through the term of the facility; (iv) allow for the sale of certain assets
from the Companys automobile business, which include certain receivables, automobile inventory, equipment and real estate, provided that the greater of $3 million or 50% of the net proceeds is used to reduce the outstanding principal balance
of the new term loan; (v) increase the trailing twelve month maximum loss ratio to 30% through December 31, 2013 and 28% thereafter; and (vi) allow for an increase in subordinated debt. The amendment also prohibits the payment of
dividends and repurchase of the Companys stock through the maturity of the facility on September 30, 2014, except for the repurchase of up to $175,000 of stock in connection with vesting of restricted stock held by employees.
In February 2014, it was determined that the Company would not be in compliance with the financial covenant related to maximum loss ratio
as of January 31, 2014. The amendment in November 2013 provides that the loss ratio allowed is calculated as of the end of each fiscal month and measured on a trailing 12 month basis. The calculated loss ratio may not be equal to or greater
than (i) 30% for the monthly periods ending September 30, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and (ii) 28% for each monthly period thereafter. As of January 31, 2014, the computed loss ratio for the trailing 12 months was 28.4%,
which was in excess of the maximum amount allowed by the credit agreement. On February 28, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to the credit agreement to provide for a trailing 12 month maximum loss ratio of 30% for each of January and
February 2014 and 28% thereafter.
In December 2013, the Company sold substantially all the assets of its automotive business
to Buyer for a cash purchase price of approximately $6.0 million paid at closing. In accordance with recent amendments to the Companys credit facility, the Company used $3.0 million of the sale proceeds to make a mandatory prepayment on its
$9.0 million term loan. The remaining balance of $6.0 million on the term loan is required to be repaid in four quarterly installments of $1.5 million each, beginning on December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the balance of the $9.0
million term loan was $4.5 million.
The obligations of the Company under the current credit agreement are guaranteed by all
the operating subsidiaries of the Company (other than foreign subsidiaries), and are secured by liens on substantially all of the personal property of the Company and its operating subsidiaries. The Company pledged 65% of the stock of QC Canada
Holdings Inc. to secure the obligations of the Company under the current credit agreement. The lenders may accelerate the obligations of the Company under the current credit agreement if there is a change in control of the Company, including an
acquisition of 25% or more of the equity securities of the Company by any person or group. The current credit agreement matures on September 30, 2014.
Borrowings under the term loan and the facility are available based on two types of loans, Base Rate loans or LIBOR Rate loans. Base Rate loans bear interest at a rate ranging from 1.25% to 2.25%
depending on the Companys leverage ratio (as defined in the agreement), plus the higher of the Prime Rate, the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or the one-month LIBOR rate in effect plus 2.00%. LIBOR Rate loans bear interest at rates based on the
LIBOR rate for the applicable loan period with a margin over LIBOR ranging from 3.25% to 4.25% depending on the Companys leverage ratio (as defined in the agreement). The loan period for a LIBOR Rate loan may be one month, two months, three
months or six months and the loan may be renewed upon notice to the agent provided that no default has occurred. The credit facility also includes a non-use fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.625%, which is based upon the Companys leverage ratio.
In December 2012, the Company sold the majority of its automobile receivables and used the proceeds from the sale to pay down
its $32 million term loan. In addition to scheduled repayments, the $32 million term loan contained mandatory principal prepayment provisions whereby the Company was required to reduce the
100
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
outstanding principal amount of the term loan based on the Companys excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement) and the Companys leverage ratio as of the most recent completed
fiscal year. To the extent that the Companys leverage ratio was greater than one, the Company was required to pay 75% of excess cash flow. If the leverage ratio fell below one, the mandatory payment was 50% of excess cash flow. Under the
previous credit agreement, the Company made a $10.7 million principal payment on the $32 million term loan in April 2012, which was required under the mandatory prepayment provisions of the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the $32
million term loan was paid in full.
Subordinated Debt.
Under the current credit agreement, the lenders required that
the Company issue $3.0 million of senior subordinated notes. On September 30, 2011, the Company issued $2.5 million initial principal amount of senior subordinated notes to the Chairman of the Board of the Company. The remaining $500,000
principal amount of subordinated notes was issued to another stockholder of the Company, who is not an officer or director of the Company. The subordinated notes bear interest at the rate of 16% per annum, payable quarterly, 75% of which is
payable in cash and 25% of which is payable-in-kind (PIK) through the issuance of additional senior subordinated PIK notes. The subordinated notes mature on September 30, 2015, are subject to prepayment at the option of the Company, without
penalty or premium, on or after September 30, 2014, and are subject to mandatory prepayment, without premium, upon a change of control. The subordinated notes contain events of default tied to the Companys total debt to total
capitalization ratio and total debt to EBITDA ratio. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. The subordinated notes further provide that upon occurrence of an event of default on the subordinated notes, the
Company may not declare or pay any cash dividend or distribution of cash or other property (other than equity securities of the Company) on its capital stock. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, the balance of the subordinated
notes was approximately $3.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes future principal payments
of indebtedness at December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
20,800
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12DERIVATIVES
Derivative instruments are accounted for at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. For a derivative instrument designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in earnings in the period of change in fair value together with
the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item. For a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and is
subsequently recognized in earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is recognized in earnings. Gains or losses from changes in fair values of derivatives that are not designated as hedges for
accounting purposes are recognized currently in earnings.
Prior to amending and restating its credit agreement on
September 30, 2011, the Company was exposed to certain risks relating to adverse changes in interest rates on its long-term debt and managed that risk with the use of a derivative. The Company did not enter into the derivative instrument for
trading or speculative purposes.
101
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Cash Flow Hedge.
The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement during
first quarter 2008 for $49 million of its outstanding debt as a cash flow hedge to interest rate fluctuations under its prior credit facility. The swap agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge, and effectively changed the floating rate interest
obligation associated with the $50 million term loan into a fixed rate. Because the term debt associated with the swap was refinanced on September 30, 2011, the hedge no longer met the criteria for accounting of a cash flow hedge. On
October 3, 2011, the Company terminated the swap agreement. In connection with the termination of the swap agreement, the Company paid a net cash settlement of approximately $343,000. The Companys net loss on this transaction was deferred
in accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized into earnings as an increase to interest expense over the original term of the hedged transaction, which was scheduled to terminate in December 2012. For the years ended December 31,
2011 and 2012, the Company has recorded interest expense totaling approximately $69,000 and $275,000, respectively related to the termination of the swap.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in Other Comprehensive Income related to the interest rate swap agreement for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION
For the Companys locations in Texas, the Company began operating as a CSO, through one of its subsidiaries, in
September 2005. As a CSO, the Company acts as a credit services organization on behalf of consumers in accordance with Texas laws. The Company charges the consumer a fee for arranging for an unrelated third-party to make a loan to the consumer and
for providing related services to the consumer, including a guarantee of the consumers obligation to the third-party lender. The Company also services the loan for the lender. The CSO fee is recognized ratably over the term of the loan. The
Company is not involved in the loan approval process or in determining the loan approval procedures or criteria. As a result, loans made by the lender are not included in the Companys loans receivable balance and are not reflected in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. As noted above, however, the Company absorbs all risk of loss through its guarantee of the consumers loan from the lender. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, the consumers had total loans
outstanding with the lender of approximately $2.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Because of the economic exposure for potential losses related to the guarantee of these loans, the Company records a payable at fair value to reflect the
anticipated losses related to uncollected loans. The balance of the liability for estimated losses reported in accrued liabilities was approximately $100,000 as of December 31, 2012 and $985,000 as of December 31, 2013. In 2013, the
products offered to consumers in Texas (thru the CSO model discussed above) were expanded to include an installment loan product and a new online loan product. Consistent with the Companys historical experience, losses associated with new
product offerings are significantly higher during the initial launch of the product compared to long-term expectations. As a result of this experience and the Companys guarantee of losses under the CSO model, the liability for estimated losses
was significantly increased during 2013.
102
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in the liability for CSO loan losses during
the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
CSO liability:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,462
|
)
|
|
|
(3,224
|
)
|
|
|
(3,448
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14INCOME TAXES
The Companys provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations is summarized as follows
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
7,889
|
|
|
$
|
1,088
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
|
|
|
9,067
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
4,131
|
|
|
|
(1,616
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred
|
|
|
(2,005
|
)
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
|
|
(2,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
7,062
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
18,585
|
|
|
$
|
14,893
|
|
|
$
|
(4,052
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(7,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
18,787
|
|
|
$
|
14,629
|
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The sources of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Deferred tax assets related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
6,150
|
|
|
$
|
7,419
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
Unused state tax credits
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Book reserves
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
Accrued legal
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
13,190
|
|
|
|
17,542
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
|
|
(1,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
12,329
|
|
|
|
16,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Loans receivable, tax value
|
|
|
(6,069
|
)
|
|
|
(7,538
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
(3,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(9,770
|
)
|
|
|
(7,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
$
|
8,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has state tax credit and various loss carry-forwards of approximately $1.5 million and $1.8
million as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The deferred tax asset related to these credits and carry-forwards is approximately $861,000 and $1.1 million as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013,
respectively. The Companys ability to utilize a significant portion of the state tax credit carry-forwards is dependent on its ability to meet certain criteria imposed by the state for each subsequent year in which any portion of the credit is
utilized. Until certification to utilize these credits is received, the Company believes that it is not more likely than not that the benefit of these credits will be realized. The loss carry-forwards can only be utilized against income of a certain
character and the tax liabilities of specific subsidiaries in specific jurisdictions, one of which included a discontinued operation. Absent future taxable income of the appropriate character and taxable income in those jurisdictions, it is not more
likely than not that the carry-forwards will be utilized. Accordingly, a valuation allowance in the amount of $861,000 and $1.1 million has been established at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company also
has gross foreign net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $1.5 million that generally expire in 17 20 years. The Company believes it is more likely than not that these carry-forwards will be utilized prior to their expiration.
Accordingly, no valuation allowance for the related deferred tax asset has been recognized.
104
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Differences between the Companys effective income tax rate computed for income
(loss) from continuing operations and the statutory federal income tax rate are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) using the statutory federal rate in effect
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
5,120
|
|
|
$
|
(3,883
|
)
|
Tax effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes, net
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-taxable insurance policy proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Section 162(m) limitation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
7,062
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)%
|
Statutory federal tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2013 was (14.7)% compared to 40.7% in
the prior year. The decrease is primarily related to the goodwill impairment charge to the Direct Credit reporting unit and other certain non-deductible expenses as a percentage of the pre-tax loss.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the accumulated undistributed earnings of foreign affiliates were a deficit of $208,000 and $7.0
million, respectively. As the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest these earnings in the business of its foreign affiliates, no federal or state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes have been provided for amounts which would become payable,
if any, on the distribution of such earnings should they become positive in the future.
Uncertain Tax Positions
. A
summary of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Additions for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions taken during the current year
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Reductions for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $21,000 of the total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013, will, if
ultimately recognized, impact the Companys annual effective tax rate.
The Company records accruals for interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and operating expense, respectively. Interest and penalties, and associated accruals, were not material in 2011, 2012 or 2013.
The Company does not anticipate any material changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months.
105
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various
state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for
which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, respective tax authorities periodically audit the Companys income tax returns. These audits examine the Companys significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts
of deductions and the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. The following table outlines the tax years that generally remain subject to examination as of December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
State and
Foreign
|
|
|
|
Statute remains open
|
|
2010-2013
|
|
2009-2013
|
Tax years currently under examination
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
NOTE 15EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has established a defined-contribution 401(k) benefit plan that covers substantially all its full-time
employees. Under the plan, the Company makes a matching contribution of 50% of each employees contribution, up to 6% of the employees compensation. The Companys matching contributions and administrative expenses relating to the
401(k) plan were $473,000, $436,000 and $450,000 during 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
In June 2007, the Company
established a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain highly compensated employees, which permits participants to defer a portion of their compensation. Under the plan, the Company makes a matching contribution of 50% of each
employees contribution, up to 6% of the employees compensation. The Companys matching contributions and administrative expenses relating to the plan were $179,000, $188,000, and $181,000 during 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Deferred amounts are credited with deemed gains or losses of the underlying hypothetical investments. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $354,000 and $226,000,
respectively, as a result of deemed gains on the hypothetical investments. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized a reduction in compensation expense of approximately $60,000, as a result of deemed losses on the
hypothetical investments. Included in Other Liabilities (non-current) are amounts deferred under this plan of approximately $3.3 million and $3.7 million at December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The Company purchases corporate-owned life insurance policies on certain officers to informally fund the non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. The cash surrender value of the life insurance policies is included in Other Assets (non-current) and totaled approximately $3.4 million and $3.8 million at December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. This asset is available to
fund the deferred compensation liability; however, the asset is not protected from creditors of the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized gains totaling $351,000 and $532,000, respectively, on its
investments associated with the life insurance policies, reflected in the cash surrender value. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized a loss totaling $161,000 on its investments associated with the life insurance
policies, reflected in the cash surrender value.
106
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 16STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Earnings Per Share.
The following table presents the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for
the periods presented
(in thousands, except per share data)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
|
$
|
8,677
|
|
|
$
|
(9,463
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
|
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
|
(3,304
|
)
|
|
|
(4,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
10,168
|
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
|
$
|
(13,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,027
|
|
|
|
17,169
|
|
|
|
17,370
|
|
Incremental shares from assumed conversion of stock options, unvested restricted shares and unvested performance-based
shares
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,110
|
|
|
|
17,226
|
|
|
|
17,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has approximately 17.0 million shares, 17.2 million shares and 17.4 million
shares outstanding at December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. For financial reporting purposes, however, unvested restricted shares in the amount of approximately 928,000 shares, 604,000 shares and 315,000 shares are excluded from the
determination of average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic earnings per share in the above table for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Anti-dilutive securities.
Options to purchase approximately 2.6 million shares, 2.6 million shares and 2.5 million
shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively because they were anti-dilutive.
Stock Repurchases.
The board of directors has authorized the Company to repurchase up to $60 million of its common stock in the
open market and through private purchases. The acquired shares may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees in stock-based compensation programs. Under the announced stock repurchase program, the Company expended $1.1
million for approximately 273,000 shares, $415,000 for approximately 105,000 shares and $179,000 for approximately 66,000 shares during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the Company
had approximately $3.9 million that may yet be utilized to repurchase shares under the current program. As a result of the amendment to its credit agreement in November 2013 (see Note 11), the Company may not repurchase its common stock through the
maturity of the facility on September 30, 2014, except for the repurchase of up to $175,000 of stock in connection with vesting of restricted stock held by employees. Shares received in exchange
107
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
for tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock are included in common stock repurchased in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity.
Dividends.
In November 2008, the Companys board of directors established a regular
quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share of the Companys common stock. In addition to regular quarterly dividends, the Companys board of directors has also approved special cash dividends on the Companys common stock from time to
time. As a result of the amendment to its credit agreement in November 2013 (see Note 11), the Company may not pay dividends on its common stock through the maturity of the facility on September 30, 2014. For the years ended December 31,
2011 and 2012, the Company declared dividends on its common stock of $0.20 per share, in each year. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company declared dividends on its common stock of $0.15 per share.
NOTE 17STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Long-Term Incentive Stock Plans
. As of December 31, 2013, the Companys stock-based compensation plans
include the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (2004 Plan). Securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans approved by security holders consist solely of shares of common stock available
under the 2004 Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock of the Company originally reserved and available for issuance under the 2004 Plan was three million shares. In June 2009, at the annual meeting of the Companys stockholders, the
stockholders approved an amendment to the 2004 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under such plan from three million shares to five million shares. As of December 31, 2013, there are approximately
204,000 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan, which may be issued, in any combination, as incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance-based share awards, restricted
stock or other incentive awards of, or based on, the Companys common stock. In previous years, the Company has issued a combination of stock options (non-qualified) and restricted stock to its employees as part of the Companys long-term
equity incentive compensation program.
In accordance with the Companys stock-based compensation plans, the exercise
price of a stock option is equal to the market price of the stock on the date of the grant and the option awards typically vest over four years in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Generally,
options granted will expire 10 years from the date of grant.
Restricted stock awards and performance-based share awards are
valued on the date of grant and have no purchase price. Restricted stock awards typically vest over four years in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The vesting period for performance-based share
awards is implicitly stated as the time period it will take for the performance condition to be met. Under the 2004 Plan, unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested performance-based share awards may be forfeited upon the termination of
employment with the Company, dependent upon the circumstances of termination. Except for restrictions placed on the transferability of restricted stock, holders of unvested restricted stock and holders of unvested performance-based share awards have
full stockholders rights, including voting rights and the right to receive cash dividends.
108
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Share-Based Compensation.
The following table summarizes the stock-based
compensation expense reported in net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Employee stock-based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Non-employee director stock-based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
2,178
|
|
|
$
|
1,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The related income tax benefit was $817,000, $673,000 and $459,000 for the years ended December 31,
2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Stock Options.
The fair value of option grants are determined on the grant date
using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the Company to make several assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect for the expected term of the option at the time of the grant. The
dividend yield is calculated based on the current dividend and the market price of the Companys common stock on the grant date. The expected volatility factor used by the Company is based on the Companys historical stock trading history.
The Company computes the expected term of the option by using the simplified method, which is an average of the vesting term and original contractual term. The Company did not grant stock options during 2011, 2012 and 2013.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $240,000 and $43,000,
respectively. No options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2013.
The total fair value of options vested
during 2013 was approximately $201,000.
A summary of all stock option activity under the equity compensation plans for the
year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2013
|
|
|
2,639,536
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(96,784
|
)
|
|
|
11.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2013
|
|
|
2,542,752
|
|
|
$
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2013
|
|
|
2,542,752
|
|
|
$
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding and exercisable at
December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life of
Outstanding
(in years)
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1 to $5
|
|
|
525,492
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
525,492
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
$ 5 to $10
|
|
|
780,902
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
780,902
|
|
|
|
9.47
|
|
$10 to $15
|
|
|
1,173,508
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
12.24
|
|
|
|
1,173,508
|
|
|
|
12.24
|
|
$15 to $20
|
|
|
62,850
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
15.07
|
|
|
|
62,850
|
|
|
|
15.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,542,752
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
2,542,752
|
|
|
$
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants.
A summary of all restricted stock activity under the equity compensation
plans for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance, January 1, 2013
|
|
|
603,991
|
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
55,020
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(343,802
|
)
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
|
314,947
|
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2013, the Company granted 55,020 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the
2004 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to restricted stock agreements. The shares granted to the non-employee directors vested immediately upon grant and are subject to an agreed-upon six-month holding period. The Company estimated that the fair market
value of these restricted stock grants was approximately $188,000, which the Company recognized as stock-based compensation expense in the first quarter 2013.
During 2012, the Company granted 52,500 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to restricted stock agreements. The shares granted to the
non-employee directors vested immediately upon grant and are subject to an agreed-upon six-month holding period. The Company estimated that the fair market value of these restricted stock grants was approximately $181,000, which the Company
recognized as stock-based compensation expense in the first quarter 2012.
During 2011, the Company granted 532,040 shares of
restricted stock to various employees and non-employee directors under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to restricted stock agreements. The grants consisted of 487,200 shares granted to employees that vest equally over four years and 44,840
shares granted to non-employee directors that vested immediately upon grant subject to an agreed-upon six-month holding period. The Company estimated that the fair market value of these restricted stock grants was approximately $2.2 million.
As of December 31, 2013, there was $564,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted
stock grants. The Company estimates that these costs will be amortized over a weighted average period of 1 year.
110
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The total fair value of restricted stock vested (at vest date) during the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was $1.0 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The Company requires employees to tender a portion of their vested shares to the Company to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligations of the
Company with respect to vesting of the shares. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company repurchased shares from employees totaling approximately 73,100, 108,270, and 100,973, respectively.
Other Long-Term Incentive Compensation.
In 2012, the Company adopted a new Long-Term Incentive Plan, which covers all executive
officers, other than its Chairman of the Board and its Vice Chairman of the Board. The annual long-term incentive awards (LTI Awards) are made at targeted dollar levels and consist of Performance Units comprising 75% of the target value and
cash-based Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) comprising 25% of the target value. The ultimate value of the Performance Units and RSUs can only be settled in cash.
The Company granted Performance Units to various officers under the new LTIP during first quarter 2012 and first quarter 2013. The value of the Performance Units is based upon a performance measure
established by our compensation committee. The performance measure for the 2012 grant is the annual average return on assets for a three-year performance period (i.e., 2012 2014) at a targeted percentage return. The performance measure for
2013 is the annual average return on assets for a three-year performance period (i.e., 2013 2015 at a targeted percentage return). Performance Units will be paid in cash at the end of the performance period subject to continued employment by
the covered officer throughout the performance period and vest upon the occurrence of certain change in control events. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the balance of the non-current liability for the Performance Units was approximately
$242,000 and $83,000, respectively. During second quarter 2013, the liability for the 2012 grant was reduced to $0 as the Company believes the performance measures required for the 2012 grant will not be met. Compensation expense is recognized over
the performance period and is estimated based on the probability of achieving performance goals outlined in the plan. As of December 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation costs related to the Performance Units was approximately
$167,000. The Company expects that these costs will be amortized to compensation expense over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.
In first quarter 2012 and first quarter 2013, the Company granted cash-based RSUs to various officers under the new LTIP totaling 92,452 and 50,877, respectively. The RSUs vest at the end of the
performance period subject to continued employment by the covered officer throughout the performance period (i.e., 3-year cliff vesting as of close of business on December 31 of the third year of the performance period) and vest upon the
occurrence of certain change in control events. The payout of the RSUs will be made in cash at the end of the performance period based on number of RSUs times the average weighted trailing 3-month stock price of the Company as of December 31 of
the third year of the performance period. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the balance of the non-current liability for RSUs was approximately $101,000 and $141,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the total unrecognized
compensation costs related to the RSUs was $116,000. The Company expects that these costs will be amortized to compensation expense over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
The following table summarizes expense (income) reported in net income from Performance Units and RSUs (
in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Performance Units
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
RSUs
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE 18COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases.
The Company leases certain equipment and buildings under non-cancelable operating leases. The
future minimum lease payments include payments required for the initial non-cancelable term of the operating lease plus any payments for periods of expected renewals provided in the lease that the Company considers to be reasonably assured of
exercising. The following table summarizes the future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
Cancelable
|
|
|
Reasonably
Assured
Renewals
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,656
|
|
|
$
|
11,406
|
|
2015
|
|
|
6,151
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
5,527
|
|
|
|
8,667
|
|
2017
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
2018
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
12,683
|
|
|
|
13,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,275
|
|
|
$
|
35,413
|
|
|
$
|
56,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense was $9.9 million, $10.5 million and $10.5 million during the years ended December 31,
2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Other.
The Company is self-insured for certain elements of its employee benefits.
Self-insurance liabilities are based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported.
Under the terms of
the Companys agreement with its third-party lender in Texas, the Company is contractually obligated to reimburse the lender for the full amount of the loans and certain related fees that are not collected from the customers. See additional
information in Note 13.
Litigation
. The Company is subject to various asserted and unasserted claims during the course
of business. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, except for those matters for which an accrual is described below, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, in connection with the asserted and
unasserted legal actions against it. Although the outcome of many of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and that the ultimate cost to resolve these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. In addition to the legal proceedings discussed below, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings arising from normal business operations.
The Company assesses the materiality of litigation by reviewing a range of qualitative and quantitative factors. These factors include
the size of the potential claims, the merits of the Companys defenses and the likelihood of plaintiffs success on the merits, the regulatory environment that could impact such claims and the potential impact of the litigation on its
business. The Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of the legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party in accordance with accounting guidance. This assessment is subjective based on the status of the legal proceedings
and is based on consultation with in-house and external legal counsel. The actual outcomes of these proceedings may differ from the Companys assessments.
North Carolina.
On February 8, 2005, the Company, two of its subsidiaries, including its subsidiary doing business in North Carolina, and Mr. Don Early, the Companys Chairman of the
Board, were sued in Superior Court of New Hanover County, North Carolina in a putative class action lawsuit filed by James B. Torrence, Sr. and Ben Hubert Cline, who were customers of a Delaware state-chartered bank for whom the Company
112
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
provided certain services in connection with the banks origination of payday loans in North Carolina, prior to the closing of the Companys North Carolina branches in fourth quarter
2005. The lawsuit alleges that the Company violated various North Carolina laws, including the North Carolina Consumer Finance Act, the North Carolina Check Cashers Act, the North Carolina Loan Brokers Act, the state unfair trade practices statute
and the state usury statute, in connection with payday loans made by the bank to the two plaintiffs through the Companys retail locations in North Carolina. The lawsuit alleges that the Company made the payday loans to the plaintiffs in
violation of various state statutes, and that if the Company is not viewed as the actual lenders or makers of the payday loans, its services to the bank that made the loans violated various North Carolina statutes. Plaintiffs are seeking
certification as a class, unspecified monetary damages, and treble damages and attorney fees under specified North Carolina statutes. Plaintiffs have not sued the bank in this matter and have specifically stated in the complaint that plaintiffs do
not challenge the right of out-of-state banks to enter into loans with North Carolina residents at such rates as the banks home state may permit, all as authorized by North Carolina and federal law.
In July 2011, the parties completed a weeklong hearing on the Companys motion to enforce its class action waiver provision and its
arbitration provision. In January 2012, the trial court denied the Companys motion to enforce its class action and arbitration provisions. The Company has appealed that ruling to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. On February 4, 2014,
the Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court erred, and ordered the trial court to dismiss the lawsuit and that the parties proceed to arbitration. It is now expected that plaintiffs will seek review of this decision by the North Carolina Supreme
Court. That review is discretionary, however, so there is a possibility that the Supreme Court will refuse review. It is expected that the Company will know if the Supreme Court will review the case by mid-2014. If the Supreme Court accepts review,
the parties will file briefs and argue the matter before the Supreme Court. That would likely result in an issued decision from the Supreme Court no earlier than mid-2015.
There were three similar purported class action lawsuits filed in North Carolina against three other companies unrelated to the Company. The plaintiffs in those three cases were represented by the same
law firms as the plaintiffs in the case filed against the Company. Settlements in each of the three companion cases were reached by the end of 2010; however, the settlements do not provide reasonable guidance on settlements in the Companys
case, especially in light of the favorable decision by North Carolina Court of Appeals on the Company arbitration clause.
Canada.
On September 30, 2011, the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Direct Credit, a British Columbia company
engaged in short-term, consumer Internet lending in certain Canadian provinces. On October 18, 2011, Matthew Lee, an alleged Alberta, Canada resident sued Direct Credit, all of its subsidiaries and three former directors of those subsidiaries
in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in a purported class action. The plaintiff alleges that Direct Credit and its subsidiaries violated Canadas criminal usury laws by charging interest on its loans at rates higher than 60%. The plaintiff
purports to represent all Canadian borrowers of the subsidiary who resided outside of British Columbia.
Plaintiff seeks
(i) class certification for the class described above, (ii) a declaration that loan fees collected in excess of the 60% limit in the cited usury statute are held by the defendants in constructive trust for the benefit of the class members,
(iii) an accounting and restitution to plaintiff and class members of all loan fees received by the defendants, (iv) a declaration that the collection of the loan fees in excess of 60% per annum constitutes an unconscionable trade act
or practice under the Canadian Business Practices Consumer Protection Act, (v) an order to restore to the class members the loan fees collected by defendants in excess of 60% per annum, and (vi) interest thereon.
Direct Credit has not yet answered the civil claim of the plaintiff, but intends to defend itself, its subsidiaries and its former
directors. The parties are in discussions to settle this matter, and it is possible that the matter will be settled in first half of 2014. The Company cannot predict whether it and the other parties will reach a formal,
113
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
binding agreement for the settlement of this matter or whether the final agreement will be on the terms presently contemplated. The Companys exposure to this matter is limited due to an
indemnification provision in the Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and the former owners of Direct Credit. However, the Company is responsible for a portion of any settlement arising from post-acquisition alleged conduct. As of February
2014, the Company estimates that the total settlement will range between $1.2 million and $1.7 million, with the Companys un-indemnified exposure amounting to approximately 40% of that amount. The Company has reserved in the accompanying
financial statements its estimated liability for settling this litigation under the current parameters and recorded an indemnification asset due from the previous sellers.
California.
On August 13, 2012, the Company was sued in the United States District Court for the South District of California in a putative class action lawsuit filed by Paul Stemple.
Mr. Stemple alleges that the Company used an automatic telephone dialing system with an artificial or prerecorded voice in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227, et seq. The complaint does not identify
any other members of the proposed class, nor how many members may be in the proposed class. This matter is in the early stages of litigation. The Company has filed an answer denying all claims. It is expected that class briefing will occur in the
first quarter of 2014.
Other Matters.
The Company is also currently involved in ordinary, routine litigation and
administrative proceedings incidental to its business, including customer bankruptcies and employment-related matters from time to time. The Company believes the likely outcome of any other pending cases and proceedings will not be material to its
business or its financial condition.
NOTE 19CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS OF RISK
The Company is subject to regulation by federal and state governments in the United States that affect the products and
services provided by the Company, particularly payday loans. The Company currently operates in 23 states throughout the United States and is engaged in consumer Internet lending in the United States and certain Canadian provinces. The level and type
of regulation of payday loans varies greatly from state to state, ranging from states with no regulations or legislation to other states with very strict guidelines and requirements. The Company is also subject to foreign regulation in Canada where
certain provinces have proposed substantive regulation of the payday loan industry.
Company short-term lending branches
located in the states of Missouri, California, Kansas, Illinois, and New Mexico represented approximately 25%, 17%, 6%, 5% and 5% respectively, of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013. Company short-term lending branches located
in the states of Missouri, California, Kansas, New Mexico, Illinois and Idaho represented approximately 36%, 17%, 8% 5%, 5% and 5%, respectively, of total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013. To the extent that laws and
regulations are passed that affect the Companys ability to offer loans or the manner in which the Company offers its loans in any one of those states, the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be
adversely affected. In recent years, the Company has experienced several negative effects resulting from law changes, for example:
|
|
|
The Arizona payday loan statutory authority expired by its terms on June 30, 2010, and the expiration of this law had a significant adverse effect
on the revenues and profitability of the Companys Arizona branches. For the year ended December 31, 2011, revenues and gross profit from the Arizona branches declined by $1.5 million and $1.4 million respectively, from the same period in
the prior year. Prior to the expiration of the Arizona payday loan law, branches in Arizona accounted for more than 5% of the Companys revenues and gross profits.
|
|
|
|
In March 2011, a new payday law became effective in Illinois that imposes customer usage restrictions that has negatively affected revenues and
profitability. This type of customer restriction, when passed in other states such as Washington, South Carolina and Kentucky, has resulted in a 30% to 60% decline
|
114
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
in annual revenues in that state and a more significant decline in gross profit for the state, depending on the types of alternative products that competitors offered within the state. The
Illinois law provided for an overlap of the previous lending approach with loans issued under the new law for a period of one year, which extended the time period over which the negative effects of the new law occurred. During 2011, revenues from
branches in Illinois declined by $2.4 million and gross profit declined by $2.2 million. In 2012, revenues and gross profit from Illinois declined by $2.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively. During 2013, revenues and gross profit for Illinois
rebounded modestly from the difficult 2011 and 2012 periods.
|
There was an effort in Missouri to place a
voter initiative on the statewide ballot in November 2012, which was intended to preclude any lending in the state with an annual rate over 36%. The supporters of the voter initiative did not submit a sufficient number of valid signatures to place
the initiative on the ballot in November 2012. However, a similar initiative was submitted to the Missouri Secretary of State in December 2012 for inclusion on the November 2014 ballot subject to the proponents submitting the required number of
valid signatures in support of the initiative.
In 2013, branches in Missouri accounted for approximately 25% and 36% of the
Companys total revenues and gross profits, respectively. The loss of Missouri revenues and gross profit as a result of passage of a voter initiative precluding payday lending would have a material adverse effect on the Companys results
of operation and financial condition.
NOTE 20SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain cash activities for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(in
thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,531
|
|
|
$
|
4,715
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
115
QC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES