Item 1. Report to
Shareholders
Institutional International
Growth Equity Fund
|
October
31, 2012
|
-
International stock markets were volatile.
Investor sentiment vacillated on economic news and the prospect of
waning
corporate revenues and
income.
-
The portfolio outperformed the MSCI benchmark
for the year ended October 31, 2012, but trailed in the final
six months
of the reporting
period.
-
Our investment focus remains on companies
with durable franchises that can grow their earnings and cash flow at a
double-digit rate over the long
term.
-
We continue to uncover companies with
attractive growth prospects, and we favor those that generate revenues
and
earnings in emerging markets.
The views and opinions in this report
were current as of October 31, 2012. They are not guarantees of performance or
investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment
decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to
change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any
time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast
of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to
affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial
reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
Managers Letter
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Growth Equity
Fund
Dear Investor
Global stock markets suffered violent
swings during the year as investors reacted to a range of macroeconomic and
political problems. Periodic bouts of heavy selling resulted in modest gains in
the second half of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2012. Through the turmoil,
we stuck to our disciplined stock selection process and maintained our focus on
generating long-term performance. The portfolio remains broadly diversified
across regions, countries, and sectors, and our goal is to own companies with
the best long-term growth opportunities.
Performance Review
The Institutional International
Growth Equity Fund returned 6.10% for the year ended October 31, 2012. As shown
in the table above, the portfolio and international stocks overall posted modest
gains in the second half of our fiscal year. For the year, the portfolios
performance versus the MSCI index benefited from stock selection and, to a
lesser extent, allocation decisions. Stock selection was especially good in the
industrials and business services, materials, consumer staples, and information
technology sectors. However, stock selection in financials and telecommunication
services hurt our comparison with the benchmark. The portfolios largest sector
allocationsfinancials and consumer discretionarygenerated positive absolute
results but lagged versus the benchmark. Sharp-eyed shareholders will notice
that we are comparing our performance with a new Lipper average. The fund rating
agency has determined that your fund now qualifies as an international multi-cap
portfolio, rather than its former large-cap growth designation. Wed like to
assure shareholders that the switch to a new Lipper category is purely
statistical and does not reflect a shift in our investment strategy.
From a regional perspective, stock
selection in developed European markets was the largest positive contributor
in our comparison with the MSCI All Country World Index ex USA. Stock selection
and an underweight allocation in Japan also generated a strong relative
performance contribution. Stock selection in the Pacific ex-Japan and Latin
America regions detracted from returns over the 12-month period. Although our
holdings in the emerging Europe, Middle East, and Africa region generated strong
returns, overall stock selection in emerging markets, which account for about
one-quarter of the portfolio, hurt our relative results.
Portfolio Strategy
Our investment strategy is to buy and
hold high-quality growth companies with a competitive advantage in their
respective markets. The fund focuses on long-term performance and shuns fad
investments and momentum trading. We believe that over the long term, stock
prices move with earnings and cash flow growth, meaning simply that if a company
grows free cash flow by 15% a year, its stock should appreciate at roughly the
same rate. We search for companies we think can generate double-digit earnings
growth over time by participating in expanding markets, taking market share, or
improving profitability faster than sales. We think that if we can find those
companies and pay a fair price for their stock, we can compound absolute returns
at double-digit levels and provide solid long-term relative results.
We work with T. Rowe Prices
specialized industry analysts and portfolio managers to find companies that fit
these criteria. We look for the best stocks wherever we may find them rather
than employing a regional, country, or sector focus. While we take note of the
broad economic conditions in regions and countries, the portfolios composition
is primarily determined by individual stock considerations.
At this time, our investment
decisions are being shaped by the following views:
-
Japan and Europe remain challenged to
generate
stable revenue growth.
-
Consumer spending in emerging markets
should
continue to be a strong global
growth driver.
-
Our call for faster growth in the larger
emerging
markets was premature, but we
believe that growth
in those countries
will accelerate.
-
We are drawn to the opportunities in
consumer
discretionary stocks, which we
view as cheaper
(versus their growth
prospects) than consumer
staples
companies.
-
When interest rates rise, which could be a
long way
off, we think low-risk,
higher-yielding stocks will
begin to
struggle, valuations will slowly narrow, and
investors will favor growth stocks.
-
Government policy continues to be
onerous
for corporations.
It has been a strange market.
Usually, when stocks go up there is a degree of ebullience. Theres an air of
happiness within investment offices and swagger among investment pros, who slap
each other on the back and say, Wow! That was a great/gutsy call on that
stock. For the past 12 months, the market has climbed the proverbial wall of
worry, but without relinquishing much of the worry. Stocks that have done
welllargely modest-growth firms that generate strong cash flow, above-average
dividends, and stable revenue and incomestill seem to be in favor as a proxy
for bonds (and an income stream). Although investors have warmed to a few of the
high-quality financials, it is a short list, and the price of admittance has
become very steep. At this point, investors are shunning most stocks that have
any degree of risk.
While performance has been
reasonable, it has felt like a more difficult year for your portfolio. Many
stocks in the portfolio performed well, but it was mainly due to rising
valuations rather than robust earnings, sales, or cash flow. Where we took a bit
more riskadding struggling or out-of-favor companies that appear to have good
prospects over a two- to three-year periodthe portfolio was punished. Over the
past six months, investors have been buying what is up and working and selling
what is down and failing. We believe that over time investors will be rewarded
for taking risk, but reward has been fleeting for investors with short time
horizonseven half a year. We are willing and comfortable with absorbing some
short-term blows to achieve long-term gains. Balancing risk and reward is a
combination of art and science, and while we are not dramatically repositioning
the portfolio, we are taking more risk at the margin and extending our
investment horizon to find opportunity. Our experienced and talented team of
analysts and I pledge to work diligently on your behalf.
Market Environment
Stocks rallied but the European
macroeconomic backdrop remained subdued. The worsening economic environment,
once confined to peripheral Europe, appears to be spreading to core eurozone
economies. The European Central Banks current bond-buying plan
is intended to help ease the ongoing eurozone sovereign
debt crisis. ECB President Mario Draghi explained that the bank would conduct
outright monetary transactions, buying bonds with maturities between one
and three years, to address severe distortions in government bond markets.
However, outright monetary transactions will only be carried out when a country
has requested a bailout from one of the eurozones rescue funds, thus
relinquishing some of its economic sovereigntya decision the Spanish and
Italian governments have so far been reluctant to make.
Fiscal austerity remains widespread
across the region as governments seek to reduce debt levels. Companies across
Europe have made decent progress in strengthening balance sheets by cutting
costs, leading to healthier earnings and cash flow generation. Faced with modest
demand in local markets, European companies are looking outside their borders
for opportunities to increase revenues, especially in faster-growing
emerging markets.
In Asia, developed equity markets
(except Japan) generally produced strong results. Policy easing in developed and
emerging markets has benefited sentiment for stocks. Japan continued to struggle
with generating growth and was a drag on the region. The Chinese economy
remained a key focus for investors as the government takes steps to revive
domestic growth. The economy is suffering from slowing domestic consumer demand
and faltering foreign investment. We do not expect a hard landing, and we think
the country can achieve sustained growth at lower levels, although there will
likely be periods of disruption. We remain optimistic on the long-term
structural growth story in Asia. Given the uncertain environment, we expect
volatility to continue and intend to use it as an opportunity to add
high-conviction names.
This is undoubtedly a challenging
economic and investing environment, but if we look beyond the political issues,
there are a number of positives. For example, banks are much better capitalized,
companies cost bases are lean, and corporations have not over-invested during
the recovery phase, in part given the short time frame since the last recession.
Perhaps most importantly, equity valuationsbroadly in Europe and selectively
around the worldare low, as evidenced by price-to-earnings, price-to-book
values, and prospective dividend yields. However, defensive stocks are currently
priced at a significant premium to the market. On the negative side, risk
aversion is extreme, and investors are shunning risky assets. At times, this
sentiment has overwhelmed all assessments of longer-term fundamental strength.
Portfolio Review
The industrials and business services
sector has consistently been a top relative and absolute performance contributor
for the past 12 months. The portfolios overweight was a slight negative, but
stock selection was exceptionally strong. At the industry level, professional
services represents a significant portion of the gains, and trading companies
and distributors also rallied.
Brenntag
was among the portfolios top contributors for the year.
It is the worlds largest third-party chemicals distributor with leading market
positions across Europe
and in Latin
America. The company continued to grow despite the slow economic environment,
and it has benefited from its pricing power in the fragmented chemicals
distribution market. (Please refer to the portfolio of investments for a
complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the
portfolio.)
Leading global credit information
provider
Experian
also generated excellent results for the year. Its core
credit data and analytics business is structurally attractive, benefits from
high barriers to entry, and offers solid long-term growth prospects. Growth
prospects for the company continue to look attractive due to limited
competition, strong profitability trends, and significant exposure to emerging
markets. The company made well-executed moves into analytics, marketing data,
and commercial credit data to add to its already strong credit bureau
business.
Intertek
also posted strong results for the
past 12 months. The niche firm has a worldwide group of testing laboratories serving the textile, footwear, toys,
petroleum, and chemicals industries. The company has done well due to heightened demand for safety testing from an
independent testing agency. The firms global reach and the recurring nature of demand for the companys services
have helped expand the companys market share.
Consumer staples stocks performed
well during the 12-month period, as many investors view the sector as a haven
from elevated market volatility. In general, staples companies are considered
conservative and less economically sensitive than the broad market. Cash flow,
revenue, and income tend to be somewhat stable and predictable. Stock selection
benefited our comparison with the benchmark.
Our best performers in the sector for
the year were Belgiums
Anheuser-Busch
InBev
,
Carlsberg
(Denmark), and
Want Want China Holdings
. Carlsberg has overcome its regulation and taxation
issues in the Russian market, where it has several leading brands and
approximately a 40% market share. We continue to see the company as a good value
and believe the market will continue to improve. InBev was the portfolios best
absolute and relative performance contributor for the 12-month period. Longer
term, we think the company is solid and can continue to generate steady revenue,
income, and profit margins.
Want Want is one of the largest food
and beverage companies in China with leading positions in several child-focused
product categories, such as rice crackers and milk. The company is attractive
because it offers unique products in several categories where it has high market
share, relative pricing power, little direct competition, and good control on
distribution.
Food and staples retailers
Tesco
and
X5 Retail
Group
were our poorest performers in the
sector. We thought Tesco had good growth prospects (we expected low double-digit
revenue gains) and that it would take market share in the UK. We were wrong on
both counts. The company is growing sales at a mid-single-digit rate, and it has
lost market share in the UK and globally. Regaining market share is proving to
be costly, and investor sentiment for the stock turned south in the second half
of our fiscal year. X5, the largest Russian food retailer by sales, suffered
throughout the period. Disappointing quarterly results and poor gross margins
drove the stock price lower. Additionally, integration costs associated with a
recent acquisition have been higher than anticipated, which is crimping
margins.
The telecommunication services sector
was the largest detractor in absolute and relative terms for the year. Stock
selection was responsible for the underperformancethe portfolios underweight
helped relative performance.
NII
Holdings
, also known as Nextel
International, which offers wireless communication services in Latin America,
was among the portfolios largest detractors for the year. The stock
has been pressured by a significant increase
in competition in Brazil and higher costs associated with its 3G upgrade. The
company also reported disappointing earnings results in August due to currency
weakness, larger-than-anticipated expenses, and a significant decline in new
customer additions. We continue to believe in the companys longer-term
prospects, and we have added to our position. Right now, the stock is trading as
if the company is going out of business.
Among the funds largest holdings, results varied widely.
Baidu
(China, information technology) and
Credit Suisse
(Switzerland, financials), our two largest positions,
were significant detractors. Similarly large positions in
Samsung Electronics
(South Korea, information technology)
and
WPP
(UK, consumer discretionary) generated strong performance contributions. Overall, our largest
sector allocationsconsumer discretionary and financialsgenerated underwhelming returns.
Investment Outlook
We believe that in the short term,
market performance will be shaped by policy decisions. We expect policy-makers
to focus on debt reduction in mature markets, which will inevitably cause global
growth to slow. It could also hurt growth in emerging markets, but we believe
that growth in these economies will remain more robust than in mature markets.
If extreme events can be avoided, stocks should move higher as many companies
are performing well, continue to report solid revenues and earnings, and have
fundamentally sound balance sheets. In our view, stocks are currently priced at
reasonable, if not cheap, valuations.
Markets generated good gains in the
final months of the reporting period, tempering our near-term expectations for
equities. Stocks rallied on accommodative fiscal policy announcements coupled
with central bank commitments to keeping rates low for an extended period of
time. We think the markets will continue to trade in a choppy fashion,
vacillating between the support of increased liquidity and low rates and the
threat of weak sovereign balance sheets and sluggish global growth. Chinas
efforts to rebalance its economy will remain a key focus for investors, and its
central bank will undoubtedly take more steps to bolster growth. Chinas
slowdown was more severe than expected; we view it as part of a transition to a
slower and more sustainable growth rate and have not lost sight of the country
and the regions long-term growth potential.
Despite our cautious near-term
outlook, we remain optimistic about medium- and long-term prospects, especially
in emerging markets. Emerging markets generally carry much less debt than
developed countries and are well equipped to withstand a financial crisis thanks
to conservative fiscal policies. Emerging markets stocks are trading at
attractive levels and current valuations appear to reflect the near-term risks.
We expect volatility to continue in
this uncertain environment and will use opportunities to add to high-conviction
names. As always, our focus is on owning high-quality growth companies with a
competitive advantage in their respective markets, especially companies that
generate strong free cash flow and have seasoned management teams. We search for
companies that have the potential to generate double-digit earnings growth over
time by participating in expanding markets, taking market share, or improving
profitability faster than sales. We believe these companies are best equipped to
navigate and thrive in the current unsettled environment.
Respectfully
submitted,
Robert W. Smith
Chairman of the Investment Advisory
Committee
November 9, 2012
The committee chairman has
day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee
members in developing and executing the funds investment
program.
Risks of International
Investing
|
Funds that invest overseas generally
carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets. Funds investing
in a single country or in a limited geographic region tend to be riskier than
more-diversified funds. Risks can result from varying stages of economic and
political development; differing regulatory environments, trading days, and
accounting standards; and higher transaction costs of non-U.S. markets. Non-U.S.
investments are also subject to currency risk, or a decline in the value of a
foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of
securities denominated in that currency.
Lipper averages:
The averages of available mutual fund performance
returns for specified periods in categories defined by Lipper Inc.
MSCI All Country World Index ex
USA:
An index that measures equity
market performance of developed and emerging countries, excluding the
U.S.
Price/book ratio:
A valuation measure that compares a stocks market price
with its book value; i.e., the companys net worth divided by the number of
outstanding shares.
Price-to-earnings (P/E)
ratio:
A valuation measure calculated by
dividing the price of a stock by its reported earnings per share. The ratio is a
measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the companys earnings.
Portfolio
Highlights
Performance and
Expenses
T. Rowe Price Institutional
International Growth Equity Fund
This chart shows the value of a
hypothetical $1 million investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year
periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is
compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a
peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which
are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and
indexes.
Fund Expense Example
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may
incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or
sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and
service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended
to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund
and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual
funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning
of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Actual
Expenses
The first line of the
following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and
actual expenses. You may use the information on this line, together with your
account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply
divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value
divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first
line under the heading Expenses Paid During Period to estimate the expenses
you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for
Comparison Purposes
The information
on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account
values and expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed
5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You
may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by
contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that
appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account
values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account
balance or expenses you paid for the period.
You should also be aware that the
expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect
any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the
second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not
help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the
extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that
fund is higher.
Financial Highlights
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Growth Equity
Fund
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
Portfolio of
Investments
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Growth Equity
Fund
October 31, 2012
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Assets and
Liabilities
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Growth Equity Fund
October 31,
2012
($000s, except shares and per share
amounts)
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of
Operations
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Growth Equity Fund
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets
T. Rowe Price Institutional
International Growth Equity Fund
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial
Statements
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Growth Equity Fund
October 31, 2012
T. Rowe Price Institutional
International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Institutional International Growth
Equity Fund (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company
established by the corporation. The fund commenced operations on September 7,
1989. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments primarily
in the common stocks of established, non-U.S. companies.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Basis of Preparation
The accompanying financial statements
were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP), which require the use of estimates made by
management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate;
however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations
reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value
ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions,
Investment Income, and Distributions
Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and
discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes.
Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend
income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend
income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as
income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date.
Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income
distributions are declared and paid annually. Capital gain distributions, if
any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation
Assets, including investments, and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar
values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and
asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank.
Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S.
dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The
effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized
security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and
losses.
Credits
The fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash
balances held at the custodian, which reduce the funds custody charges. Custody
expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction
for credits.
Redemption Fees
A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held
for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of
long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that
shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid
to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may
cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per
share.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In May 2011, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance to align
fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP with
International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011.
Adoption had no effect on net assets or results of operations.
In December 2011, the FASB issued
amended guidance to enhance disclosure for offsetting assets and liabilities.
The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2013. Adoption will have no effect on the funds net assets or
results of operations.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are
reported at fair value as defined by GAAP. The fund determines the values of its
assets and liabilities and computes its net asset value per share at the close
of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the
NYSE is open for business.
Valuation Methods
Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a
securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the
last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at
the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities,
which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that
is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the
exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed
securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest
bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale price for
international securities. Debt securities with remaining maturities of less than
one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local
currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to
reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities
with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at
prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an
independent pricing service.
Investments in mutual funds are
valued at the mutual funds closing net asset value per share on the day of
valuation.
Other investments, including
restricted securities and private placements, and those financial instruments
for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to
reflect fair value, are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the
T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the funds Board of Directors
(the Board). Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops
pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair-value
determinations. The Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments,
using a wide variety of sources and information, to establish and adjust
valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For
instance, in determining the fair value of private-equity instruments, the
Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, including the companys
business prospects, its financial performance, strategic events impacting the
company, relevant valuations of similar companies, new rounds of financing, and
any negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the
company. Because any fair-value determination involves a significant amount of
judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing
decisions.
For valuation purposes, the last
quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted under the
circumstances described below. If the fund determines that developments between
the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment,
materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund
will adjust the previous closing prices to reflect what it believes to be the
fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it
is necessary to adjust closing prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a
variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance
of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S.
markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. A
fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a
particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside
pricing services to provide it with closing prices and information to evaluate
and/or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use
closing prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those
prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation
process, the fund routinely compares closing prices, the next days opening
prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices. Additionally, trading in the
underlying securities of the fund may take place in various foreign markets on
certain days when the fund is not open for business and does not calculate a net
asset value. As a result, net asset values may be significantly affected on days
when shareholders cannot make transactions.
Valuation Inputs
Various inputs are used to determine the value of the
funds financial instruments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad
levels listed below:
Level 1 quoted prices in active
markets for identical financial instruments
Level 2 observable inputs other
than Level 1 quoted prices (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for
similar financial instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit
risk)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are those based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the fund, and unobservable
inputs reflect the funds own assumptions based on the best information
available. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or
liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level. For example,
non-U.S. equity
securities actively traded
in foreign markets generally are reflected in Level 2 despite the availability
of closing prices because the fund evaluates and determines whether those
closing prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require
adjustment, as described above. The following table summarizes the funds
financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their values on
October 31, 2012:
Following is a reconciliation of the
funds Level 3 holdings for the year ended October 31, 2012. Gain (loss)
reflects both realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) on Level 3 holdings
during the period, if any, and is included on the accompanying Statement of
Operations. The change in unrealized gain (loss) on Level 3 instruments held at
October 31, 2012, totaled $(84,000) for the year ended October 31,
2012.
NOTE 3 - OTHER INVESTMENT
TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment
objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to
certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies,
program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds
prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Emerging Markets
At October 31, 2012, approximately 26% of the funds net
assets were invested, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price
institutional funds, in securities of companies located in emerging markets,
securities issued by governments of emerging market countries, and/or securities
denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging market countries.
Emerging market securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less
liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities. In addition,
emerging markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social
uncertainty, and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact
the funds ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to
U.S. dollars.
Restricted Securities
The fund may invest in securities that
are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such
securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial
delays and additional costs.
Repurchase Agreements
All repurchase agreements are fully
collateralized by U.S. government securities. Collateral is in the possession of
the funds custodian or, for tri-party agreements, the custodian designated by
the agreement. Collateral is evaluated daily to ensure that its market value
exceeds the delivery value of the repurchase agreements at maturity. Although
risk is mitigated by the collateral, the fund could experience a delay in
recovering its value and a possible loss of income or value if the counterparty
fails to perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
Securities Lending
The fund lends its securities to
approved brokers to earn additional income. It receives as collateral cash and
U.S. government securities valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities
on loan. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not
less than the value of loaned securities as determined at the close of fund
business each day; any additional collateral required due to changes in security
values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Cash collateral is
invested by the funds lending agent(s) in accordance with investment guidelines
approved by management. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral, the fund
could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of
income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities or if collateral
investments decline in value. Securities lending revenue recognized by the fund
consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any
rebates to the borrower and compensation to the lending agent. In accordance
with GAAP, investments made with cash collateral are reflected in the
accompanying financial statements, but collateral received in the form of
securities is not. At October 31, 2012, the value of loaned securities was
$1,024,000; the value of cash collateral investments was $1,083,000.
Other
Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than
short-term securities aggregated $41,066,000 and $28,338,000, respectively, for
the year ended October 31, 2012.
NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME
TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes
is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated
investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and
distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions
determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in
amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial
reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent
book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary
differences.
The fund files U.S. federal, state,
and local tax returns as required. The funds tax returns are subject to
examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable
statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the
tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax
returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require
a provision for income taxes.
Distributions during the years ended
October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, totaled $1,289,000 and $966,000,
respectively, and were characterized as ordinary income for tax purposes. At
October 31, 2012, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets
were as follows:
The difference between book-basis and
tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the
deferral of losses from wash sales and the realization of gains/losses on
passive foreign investment companies for tax purposes. The fund intends to
retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. As
a result of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, net
capital losses realized on or after November 1, 2011 (effective date) may be
carried forward indefinitely to offset future realized capital gains; however,
post-effective losses must be used before pre-effective capital loss
carryforwards with expiration dates. Accordingly, it is possible that all or a
portion of the funds pre-effective capital loss carryforwards could expire
unused. The funds available capital loss carryforwards as of October 31, 2012,
expire as follows: $13,879,000 in fiscal 2017; $620,000 have no expiration.
NOTE 5 - FOREIGN
TAXES
The fund is subject to foreign income
taxes imposed by certain countries in which it invests. Acquisition of certain
foreign currencies related to security transactions are also subject to tax.
Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund upon disposition of securities
issued in or by certain foreign countries are subject to capital gains tax
imposed by those countries. All taxes are computed in accordance with the
applicable foreign tax law, and, to the extent permitted, capital losses are
used to offset capital gains. Taxes attributable to income are accrued by the
fund as a reduction of income. Taxes incurred on the purchase of foreign
currencies are recorded as realized loss on foreign currency transactions.
Current and deferred tax expense attributable to net capital gains is reflected
as a component of realized and/or change in unrealized gain/loss on securities
in the accompanying financial statements. At October 31, 2012, the fund had no
deferred tax liability attributable to foreign securities and $480,000 of
foreign capital loss carryforwards, including $32,000 that expire in 2013,
$29,000 that expire in 2016, $179,000 that expire in 2017, $110,000 that expire
in 2018, $57,000 that expire in 2019, $63,000 that expire in 2020, and $10,000
that expire in 2021.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price
Group, Inc. (Price Group). Price Associates has entered into subadvisory
agreements with T. Rowe Price International Ltd and T. Rowe Price Singapore
Private Ltd., wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates, to provide
investment advisory services to the fund; the subadvisory agreements provide
that Price Associates may pay the subadvisors up to 60% of the management fee
that Price Associates receives from the fund. The investment management
agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual
investment management fee equal to 0.70% of the funds average daily net assets.
The fee is computed daily and paid monthly.
The fund is also subject to a
contractual expense limitation through February 28, 2014. During the limitation
period, Price Associates is required to waive its management fee and reimburse
the fund for any expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and
extraordinary expenses, that would otherwise cause the funds ratio of
annualized total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its
expense limitation of 0.75%. The fund is required to repay Price Associates for
expenses previously reimbursed and management fees waived to the extent the
funds net assets have grown or expenses have declined sufficiently to allow
repayment without causing the funds expense ratio to exceed its expense
limitation. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the
date of any reimbursement or waiver or later than February 29, 2016. Pursuant to
this agreement, management fees in the amount of $252,000 were waived during the
year ended October 31, 2012. Including these amounts, management fees waived in
the amount of $768,000 remain subject to repayment by the fund at October 31,
2012.
In addition, the fund has entered
into service agreements with Price Associates and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily
share price and provides certain other administrative services to the fund.
T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services
in its capacity as the funds transfer and dividend disbursing agent. For the
year ended October 31, 2012, expenses incurred pursuant to these service
agreements were $123,000 for Price Associates and $1,000 for T. Rowe Price
Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service
agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial
statements.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe
Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve
Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds),
open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and
considered affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds
are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other
accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates and are not available
for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve
Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of T.
Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. and
Shareholders of T.
Rowe Price Institutional International Growth Equity Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying
statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and
the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the
financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Growth Equity Fund (one of
the portfolios comprising T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc.,
hereafter referred to as the Fund) at October 31, 2012, and the results of its
operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each
of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements
and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are
the responsibility of the Funds management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included
confirmation of securities at October 31, 2012 by correspondence with the
custodian and brokers, and confirmation of the underlying funds by
correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 14, 2012
Tax Information (Unaudited) for the Tax Year Ended
10/31/12
|
We are providing this information as
required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those
elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial
reporting requirements.
For taxable non-corporate
shareholders, $1,205,000 of the funds income represents qualified dividend
income subject to the 15% rate category.
For corporate shareholders, $5,000 of
the funds income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.
The fund will pass through foreign
source income of $1,205,000 and foreign taxes paid of $87,000.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and
Records
|
A description of the policies and
procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote
proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement
of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by
accessing the SECs website, sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting
policies and procedures is also available on our website, troweprice.com. To
access it, click on the words Our Company at the top of our corporate
homepage. Then, when the next page appears, click on the words Proxy Voting
Policies on the left side of the page.
Each funds most recent annual proxy
voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To
access it through our website, follow the directions above, then click on the
words Proxy Voting Records on the right side of the Proxy Voting Policies
page.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio
Holdings
|
The fund files a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and
third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available
electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and
copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549.
For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
About the Funds Directors and
Officers
|
Your fund is overseen by a Board of
Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters
affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance
matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and other business
affairs. The Board elects the funds officers, who are listed in the final
table. At least 75% of the Boards members are independent of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; inside or interested
directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of
each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about
the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price
representative at 1-800-638-5660.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name (Year of
Birth)
|
|
|
Year Elected*
[Number of
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price
Portfolios
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment
Companies
|
Overseen]
|
|
During the
Past Five Years
|
|
|
|
William R. Brody
(1944)
|
|
President and
Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 to present);
Director, Novartis, Inc. (2009
|
2009
[138]
|
|
to present);
Director, IBM (2007 to present); President and Trustee, Johns Hopkins
University (1996 to 2009);
|
|
|
Chairman of
Executive Committee and Trustee, Johns Hopkins Health System (1996 to
2009)
|
|
|
|
Jeremiah E.
Casey (1940)
|
|
Retired
|
2006
[138]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony W.
Deering (1945)
|
|
Chairman, Exeter
Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to present); Director, Under
Armour (2008 to
|
1991
[138]
|
|
present);
Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (2004 to present); Director
and Member of the Advisory
|
|
|
Board, Deutsche
Bank North America (2004 to present); Director, Mercantile Bankshares
(2002 to 2007)
|
|
|
|
Donald W. Dick,
Jr. (1943)
|
|
Principal,
EuroCapital Partners, LLC, an acquisition and management advisory firm
(1995 to present)
|
1989
[138]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J.
Gerrard, Jr. (1952)
|
|
Chairman of
Compensation Committee and Director, Syniverse Holdings, Inc. (2008 to
2011); Executive
|
2012
[90]
|
|
Vice President
and General Counsel, Scripps Networks, LLC (1997 to 2009); Advisory Board
Member, Pipeline
|
|
|
Crisis/Winning
Strategies (1997 to present)
|
|
|
|
Karen N. Horn
(1943)
|
|
Senior Managing
Director, Brock Capital Group, an advisory and investment banking firm
(2004 to present);
|
2003
[138]
|
|
Director, Eli Lilly and
Company (1987 to present); Director, Simon Property Group (2004 to
present); Director, Norfolk Southern (2008 to present);
Director, Fannie Mae (2006 to 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theo C. Rodgers
(1941)
|
|
President,
A&R Development Corporation (1977 to present)
|
2006
[138]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cecilia E.
Rouse, Ph.D. (1963)
|
|
Professor and
Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC (2011
to present); Member,
|
2012
[90]
|
|
National Academy
of Education (2010 to present); Research Associate, National Bureau of
Economic Researchs
|
|
|
Labor Studies
Program (1998 to 2009 and 2011 to present); Member, Presidents Council of
Economic Advisors
|
|
|
(2009 to 2011);
Member, The MacArthur Foundation Network on the Transition to Adulthood
and Public Policy
|
|
|
(2000 to 2008);
Member, National Advisory Committee for the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundations Scholars in
|
|
|
Health Policy
Research Program (2008); Director and Member, National Economic
Association (2006 to 2008);
|
|
|
Member,
Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Policy Council (2006
to 2008); Member, Hamilton
|
|
|
Projects
Advisory Board at The Brookings Institute (2006 to 2008); Chair of
Committee on the Status of Minority
|
|
|
Groups in the
Economic Profession, American Economic Association (2006 to
2008)
|
|
|
|
John G.
Schreiber (1946)
|
|
Owner/President,
Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate investment company (1991 to
present); Cofounder
|
2001
[138]
|
|
and Partner,
Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (1992 to present); Director, General
Growth Properties, Inc.
|
|
|
(2010 to
present)
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Tercek
(1957)
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 to present);
Managing Director, The Goldman
|
2009
[138]
|
|
Sachs Group,
Inc. (1984 to 2008)
|
|
*Each independent director serves until
retirement, resignation, or election of a
successor.
|
Inside
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
(Year of Birth)
|
|
|
Year
Elected* [Number of T. Rowe
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and
Other Investment Companies
|
Price
Portfolios Overseen]
|
|
During
the Past Five Years
|
|
|
|
Edward C.
Bernard (1956)
|
|
Director
and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the Board, Director,
and Vice President, T. Rowe
|
2006
[138]
|
|
Price
Group, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price
Investment Services, Inc.;
|
|
|
Chairman of
the Board and Director, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc.,
T. Rowe Price Savings Bank,
|
|
|
and T. Rowe
Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director, T. Rowe Price
|
|
|
International; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board,
Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Trust
|
|
|
Company;
Chairman of the Board, all funds
|
|
|
|
Brian C.
Rogers, CFA, CIC (1955)
|
|
Chief
Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Chairman
of the Board, Chief Investment
|
2006
[75]
|
|
Officer,
Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President,
T. Rowe Price Trust Company
|
|
*Each inside director serves until
retirement, resignation, or election of a
successor.
|
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
(Year of Birth)
|
|
|
Position
Held With Institutional International Funds
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
|
|
Ulle
Adamson, CFA (1979)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy H.
Adkins (1970)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
formerly
|
Vice
President
|
|
employee,
African Development Bank (to 2008)
|
|
|
|
Christopher
D. Alderson (1962)
|
|
Director
and PresidentInternational Equity, T. Rowe Price
International;
|
President
|
|
Companys
Representative, Director, and Vice President, Price Hong
Kong;
|
|
|
Director
and Vice President, Price Singapore; Vice President, T. Rowe
Price
|
|
|
Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
Paulina
Amieva (1981)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
student, Harvard Business School (to 2008)
|
|
|
|
Oliver D.M.
Bell, IMC (1969)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
formerly
Head of Global Emerging Markets Research, Pictet Asset
|
|
|
Management
Ltd. (to 2011), and Portfolio Manager of Africa and Middle
|
|
|
East
portfolios and other emerging markets strategies, Pictet
Asset
|
|
|
Management
Ltd. (to 2009)
|
|
|
|
R. Scott
Berg, CFA (1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn Hoi
Che Chu (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
formerly
|
Vice
President
|
|
Director,
Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Co-head of credit and
|
|
|
convertibles research team in Hong Kong (to 2010)
|
|
|
|
Archibald
Ciganer Albeniz, CFA (1976)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard N.
Clattenburg, CFA (1979)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group,
Inc.,
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
and T. Rowe
Price International
|
|
|
|
Michael J.
Conelius, CFA (1964)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe
Price
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
|
|
|
|
Jose Costa
Buck (1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard de
los Reyes (1975)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
Della Vedova (1969)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Cofounder and Partner, Four Quarter Capital (to 2009)
|
|
|
|
Bridget A.
Ebner (1970)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J.T.
Edwards (1957)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J.
Eiswert, CFA (1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Roger L.
Fiery III, CPA (1959)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Hong Kong, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price,
T. Rowe
|
Vice
President
|
|
Price
Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price
|
|
|
Trust Company
|
|
|
|
Mark S.
Finn, CFA, CPA (1963)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price
|
Vice
President
|
|
Trust
Company
|
|
|
|
Robert N.
Gensler (1957)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
T. Rowe
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
Price International
|
|
|
|
John R.
Gilner (1961)
|
|
Chief
Compliance Officer and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice
President,
|
Chief
Compliance Officer
|
|
T. Rowe
Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
Gregory S.
Golczewski (1966)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Campbell
Gunn (1956)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory K.
Hinkle, CPA (1958)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price
|
Treasurer
|
|
Trust
Company
|
|
|
|
Leigh
Innes, CFA (1976)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randal S.
Jenneke (1971)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Senior Portfolio Manager, Australian Equities (to 2010)
|
|
|
|
Kris H.
Jenner, M.D., D.Phil. (1962)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
T. Rowe
|
Vice
President
|
|
Price International
|
|
|
|
Yoichiro
Kai (1973)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Japanese Financial/Real Estate Sector Analyst/Portfolio
Manager,
|
|
|
Citadel
Investment Group, Asia Limited (to 2009)
|
|
|
|
Andrew J.
Keirle (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian D.
Kelson (1956)
|
|
PresidentInternational Fixed Income, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
President,
T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Kushlis, CFA (1976)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J.
Lawrence (1970)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Equity Fund Manager, Citi (London) (to 2008)
|
|
|
|
David M.
Lee, CFA (1962)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia B.
Lippert (1953)
|
|
Assistant
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Investment
|
Secretary
|
|
Services,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
Christopher
C. Loop, CFA (1966)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
T. Rowe
|
Vice
President
|
|
Price International
|
|
|
|
Anh Lu
(1968)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebastien
Mallet (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel
Martino, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan
H.W. Matthews, CFA (1975)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Analyst, Pioneer Investments (to 2008)
|
|
|
|
Susanta
Mazumdar (1968)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A.
Mills, Ph.D., CFA (1960)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe
Price
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
|
|
|
|
Sudhir
Nanda, Ph.D., CFA (1959)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua
Nelson (1977)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason
Nogueira, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Oestreicher (1967)
|
|
Director
and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.,
|
Vice
President
|
|
T. Rowe
Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services,
|
|
|
Inc., and
T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice President, Price Hong Kong,
|
|
|
Price
Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
T. Rowe
|
|
|
Price International
|
|
|
|
Michael D.
Oh, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A.
Orchard (1975)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Vice President, Moodys Investors Service (to 2010)
|
|
|
|
Gonzalo
Pángaro, CFA (1968)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy E.
Parker, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig J.
Pennington, CFA (1971)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International;
|
Vice
President
|
|
formerly
Global Energy Analyst, Insight Investment (to 2010); Senior
|
|
|
Trader,
Brevan Howard (to 2008)
|
|
|
|
Frederick
A. Rizzo (1969)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Rothery (1963)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federico
Santilli, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebastian
Schrott (1977)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah D.
Seidel (1962)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe
Price
|
Vice
President
|
|
Investment
Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Robert W.
Sharps, CFA, CPA (1971)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price
|
Vice
President
|
|
Trust
Company
|
|
|
|
Robert W.
Smith (1961)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
Price
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
Trust
Company
|
|
|
|
Joshua K.
Spencer, CFA (1973)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A.
Stanley (1963)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonty
Starbuck, Ph.D. (1975)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ju Yen Tan
(1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean
Tenerelli (1964)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric L.
Veiel, CFA (1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julie L.
Waples (1970)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
S. Whitehouse (1972)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Howard
Woodward, CFA (1974)
|
|
Vice
President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
International
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernest C.
Yeung (1979)
|
|
Vice
President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
Unless
otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe
Price International for at least 5
years.
|