NOTE 1 SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
(A) Organization
and Basis of Presentation
Max
Sound Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated in Delaware on December 9, 2005, under the name 43010, Inc. The Company’s
business operations are focused primarily on developing and launching audio technology software.
Effective
March 1, 2011, the Company filed with the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation changing our name
from So Act Network, Inc. to Max Sound Corporation.
On
August 9, 2016, the Company moved a level down from OTCQB to OTC Pink Current Information where it is within the continued standards
and pricing requirements as found in Section 2 of the OTCQB Eligibility Standards. The Company’s services may re-apply at any time
after a price increase to meet all the OTCQB Eligibility Standards to be moved back to the higher OTCQB marketplace.
It
is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) have been made which
are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for the year.
(B) Risks
and Uncertainties
In
December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely
concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to several other countries and infections
have been reported globally.
Because
COVID-19 infections have been reported throughout the United States, certain federal, state and local governmental authorities have issued
stay-at-home orders, proclamations and/or directives aimed at minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Additional, more restrictive proclamations
and/or directives may be issued in the future. As a result, all of our office locations have been closed effective April 1, 2020.
The
ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations is unknown and will depend on future developments, which are
highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which may
emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or
the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced customer traffic and reduced
operations.
(C) Use
of Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(D) Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For purposes
of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at
the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had no cash equivalents.
(E) Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Depreciation
is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three to five years.
(F) Research
and Development
The
Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 350, Intangibles - Goodwill & Other (“ASC
Topic 350”). Costs incurred in the planning stage of a website are expensed as research and development while costs incurred
in the development stage are capitalized and amortized over the life of the asset, estimated to be three years. Expenses subsequent to
the launch have been expensed as website development expenses.
(G) Concentration
of Credit Risk
The
Company at times has had cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance limits. The Company had $0 in excess of FDIC insurance limits as of
December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(H) Revenue
Recognition
Effective
January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue
from the commercial sales of products, licensing agreements and contracts by applying the following steps: (1) identify the contract
with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction
price to each performance obligation in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. For the
comparative periods, revenue has not been adjusted and continues to be reported under ASC 605 — Revenue Recognition. Under ASC
605, revenue is recognized when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the performance
of service has been rendered to a customer or delivery has occurred; (3) the amount of fee to be paid by a customer is fixed and determinable;
and (4) the collectability of the fee is reasonably assured.
(I) Loss
Per Share
In
accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” Basic earnings (loss)
per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive
potential of shares of common stock outstanding during the period including stock options or warrants, using the treasury stock method
(by using the average stock price for the period to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock
options or warrants), and convertible debt or convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive
potential of shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive. Because of the Company’s net losses, the effects of stock
warrants and stock options would be anti-dilutive and, accordingly, is excluded from the computation of earnings per share.
The computation
of basic and diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, excludes the common stock equivalents of the following
potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options (Exercise price - $0.00250/share)
|
|
—
|
|
|
95,332,500
|
|
Convertible Debt (Exercise price - $0.0001 - $.000061/share)
|
|
117,980,324,264
|
|
|
117,980,324,264
|
|
Series A Convertible Preferred Shares ($0.01/share)
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
118,230,324,264
|
|
|
118,325,656,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company’s obligations to issue shares upon conversion of its outstanding convertible notes, the exercise of stock options and warrants
and conversion of its preferred stock (the “Convertible Instruments”) at current market prices for its common stock exceeds
by the 114,814,177,087 authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock as of the date of this report (the “Potentially Issuable
Shares”). While it is uncertain whether the Company would receive requests to issue all of the Potentially Issuable Shares and
the number of such shares fluctuates based on the market price of the Company’s common stock, the Company may increase the number
of its authorized shares of common stock or effectuate a recapitalization, or a combination of both, in order to make available additional
shares of its Common Stock for the Potentially Issuable Shares. Such action would require shareholder approval. Until such time as the
Company has a sufficient number of shares of its Common Stock for issuance to cover the Potentially Issuable Shares, the Company could
be subject to penalties and damages to the holders of the Convertible Instruments in the event it does not deliver the Potentially Issuable
Shares upon request by a holder of the Convertible Instruments. Furthermore, the lack of available shares of common stock may be deemed
a default under one or more of the Convertible Instruments.
(J) Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”) Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Deferred tax liability:
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
11,899,124
|
|
|
|
10,401,306
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(11,899,124
|
)
|
|
|
(10,401,306
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision
for income taxes has been computed as follows:
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statuary rate of 27.64%
|
|
$
|
(413,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,349,764
|
|
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Tax effect of differences in the timing of deductibility of items for income tax purposes:
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,777,347
|
)
|
Utilization of non-capital tax losses to offset current taxable income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
413,533
|
|
|
|
427,561
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The
valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is
necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to offset future taxable
income through 2038.
The net change in the valuation allowance for the
year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was an increase of $413,533 and $427,561, respectively.
The
components of income tax expense related to continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State and Local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and Local Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The company’s federal income tax returns for the years 2017-2017
remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service through 2024.
(K) Business
Segments
The Company operates
in one segment and therefore no segment information is not presented.
(L) Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
All other newly
issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
(M) Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts on the Company’s financial instruments including accounts payable, derivative liability, convertible note payable,
and note payable, approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.
We
adopted accounting guidance for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities (ASC 820). The adoption did not have a material impact
on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair
value and requires certain disclosures.
This
standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses
valuation techniques, such as the
market
approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to
replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable
inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level
2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level
3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us,
which reflect those that a market participant would use.
The
following are the major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis: as of December 31, 2020 and December 31,
2019, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
On December 20, 2019, the Company removed the variable
component and penalties related to its convertible debt and made it a fixed price. Therefore, as of December 31, 2019 there is no longer
an existing derivative liability.
(N) Stock-Based
Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. Under FASB Accounting
Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based
on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required
to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share
appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.
Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. The Company applies this statement
prospectively.
Equity
instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded based on the fair value of the instruments, as required
by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees
defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance
commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested.
The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each grant as defined
in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
(O) Reclassification
Certain
amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact
on the Company's net loss or cash flows.
(P) Derivative
Financial Instruments
Fair
value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments,
and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is
conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not
considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial
instruments.
Once
determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in
the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of
freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
(Q) Original
Issue Discount
For
certain convertible debt issued, the Company provides the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is
recorded to debt discount, reducing the face amount of the note and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.
(R) Debt
Issue Costs and Debt Discount
The
Company may pay debt issue costs, and record debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of convertible debt.
These costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate
share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.
NOTE 2 GOING
CONCERN
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements,
the Company has an accumulated deficit of $82,972,471, stockholders’ deficit of $12,652,995 and working capital deficit of $12,652,995.
These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to
continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan.
As the Company continues to incur losses, transition
to profitability is dependent upon the successful commercialization of its products and achieving a level of revenues adequate to support
the Company’s cost structure.
The Company may never achieve profitability, and
unless and until it does, the Company will continue to need to raise additional cash. Management intends to fund future operations through
additional private or public debt or equity offerings. Based on the Company’s operating plan, existing working capital at December
31, 2020 was not sufficient to meet the cash requirements to fund planned operations through December 31, 2021 without additional sources
of cash. The Company continues to explore various financing alternatives, including debt and equity financings and strategic partnerships,
as well as trying to generate revenue. However, at this time, the Company has no commitments to obtain any additional funds, and there
can be no assurance such funds will be available on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to obtain additional funding
and improve its operations, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected, and
the Company may not be able to continue operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and
do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
NOTE
3 DEBT AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Debt
consists of the following:
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
Line of credit– related party
|
|
$
|
402,203
|
|
|
$
|
384,000
|
|
Accrued interest – related party
|
|
|
1,185,747
|
|
|
|
709,039
|
|
Accrued expenses – related party
|
|
|
962,945
|
|
|
|
620,945
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
$
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
$
|
6,160,429
|
|
Less: debt discount
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: debt issue costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible debt - net
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
Total current debt
|
|
$
|
8,711,324
|
|
|
$
|
7,874,413
|
|
Line of credit – related party
Line of credit
with the principal stockholder consisted of the following activity and terms:
|
|
Principal
|
|
Interest Rate
|
Balance - December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
402,472
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2020
|
|
|
89,655
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest accrual
|
|
|
15,699
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(71,453
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Balance – December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
436,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable consists of the following:
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$814,239
|
|
$735,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable
|
|
$814,239
|
|
$735,845
|
(A) Convertible
Debt
The convertible
notes issued for year ended December 31, 2020 and year ended December 31, 2019, consist of the following terms:
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2020 Amount of
|
|
2019 Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Raised
|
|
Principal Raised
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
0% - 12%
|
|
|
|
0% - 12%
|
|
Default interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
14% -
|
|
|
|
14% - 22%
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2015 –May 22, 2019
|
|
|
|
November 4, 2015– December 7, 2018
|
|
Conversion terms 1
|
|
65% of the “Market Price”, which is the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
3,691,578
|
|
|
|
3,691,578
|
|
Conversion terms 2
|
|
65% of the “Market Price”, which is the one lowest trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
1,131,560
|
|
|
|
1,131,560
|
|
Conversion terms 3
|
|
70% of the “Market Price”, which is the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the common stock during the fifteen (15) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
Conversion terms 4
|
|
75% of the “Market Price”, which is the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
765,000
|
|
|
|
765,000
|
|
Conversion terms 5
|
|
60% of the “Market Price”, which is the lowest trading prices for the common stock during the fifteen (15) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
Conversion terms 6
|
|
Conversion at $0.10 per share
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
Conversion terms 7
|
|
60% of the “Market Price”, which is the lowest trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Conversion terms 8
|
|
65% of the “Market Price”, which is the two lowest trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
265,050
|
|
|
|
265,050
|
|
Conversion terms 9
|
|
65% of the “Market Price”, which is the two lowest trading prices for the common stock during the fifteen (15) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
204,579
|
|
|
|
204,579
|
|
Conversion terms 10
|
|
65% of the “Market Price”, which is the one lowest trading prices for the common stock during the fifteen (15) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
Conversion terms 11
|
|
60% of the “Market Price”, which is the two lowest trading prices for the common stock during the twelve (12) trading day period prior to the conversion.paid on conversion
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
|
|
paid on conversion
|
|
Conversion terms 12
|
|
61% of the “Market Price”, which is the average of the three lowest trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the conversion.
|
|
|
52,662
|
|
|
|
52,662
|
|
Convertible Debt
|
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
Less: Debt Discount
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: Debt Issue Costs
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible Debt - net
|
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
The debt holders are entitled, at their option, to
convert all or part of the principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at conversion prices and terms
discussed above. On December 20, 2019, the Company removed the variable component and penalties related to its convertible debt and made
it a fixed price. Therefore, as of December 31, 2019 there
is no longer an existing derivative liability.
Convertible debt consisted of the following activity and terms:
|
Convertible Debt Balance as of December 31, 2019 Borrowings
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
|
4%
|
-
|
12%
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debt Balance as of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,160,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B) Debt Issue Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Company’s debt issue costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
$
|
362,423
|
|
|
|
362,423
|
|
Accumulated amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
(362,423
|
)
|
|
|
(362,423
|
)
|
Debt issue costs – net
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
During the year
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 the Company amortized $0 and $3,525 of debt issue costs, respectively.
(C) Debt Discount
& Original Issue Discount
The
debt discount and the original issue discount recorded in 2020 and 2019 pertains to convertible debt that contains embedded conversion
options that are required to be bifurcated and reported at fair value and original issue discounts.
The
Company amortized $0 and $169,379 during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, to amortization of debt discount expense.
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Debt discount
|
|
$
|
13,221,839
|
|
|
|
13,221,839
|
|
Accumulated amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
(13,221,839
|
)
|
|
|
(13,221,839
|
)
|
Debt discount - Net
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(D) Line of Credit
– Related Party
During
the year ended December 31, 2020, the principal stockholder has advanced $89,655 and accrued $15,698 in interest and was repaid $71,453.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the principal stockholder has advanced $80,647 accrued $14,755 in interest and was repaid $3,220
under the terms of the line of credit. The line of credit balance and accrued interest as of December 31, 2020 is $436,373.
NOTE 4 STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
1. Common Stock
During the year
ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued the following common stock:
Transaction Type
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Valuation
|
|
Range of Value per share
|
Services - rendered
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.0002
|
|
Total shares issued
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company maintains on its books and within the above financials, debt to Venture Champion Asia Limited and ICG USA LLC or its designee(s)
which is currently in default and has not been converted due to ICG’s settled administrative proceeding with the SEC, where the
Company awaits any rightful exemption or regulatory no-action that would render any forward moving action compliant by all the parties.
The
Company announced that it entered into an Agreement with Vedanti Systems Limited and Vedanti Licensing Limited (VLL) that resolves their
dispute over the international Optimized Data Transmission (ODT) patent portfolio previously owned by Vedanti. The Agreement further
provides that VLL and the Company will become co-owners of the pioneering portfolio. In consideration of the patent portfolio purchase,
the Company issued 80,000,000 shares of its common stock to VLL. This patent portfolio consists of patents in the following countries:
The United States, Australia, Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Monaco, Portugal, Sweden,
Turkey, Belgium, Switzerland/ Liechtenstein, United Kingdom, Greece, Netherlands and Germany. The Company continues to pursue its litigations
against Google.
(B)
Stock Warrants
The Company had
no outstanding and exercisable warrants as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(C) Stock
Options
The Company had
no outstanding and exercisable stock options as of December 31, 2020.
The following
tables summarize all option grants as of December 31, 2020, and the related changes during these periods are presented below:
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (In Years)
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2019
|
|
|
95,332,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(95,332,500
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2020
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Exercisable – December 31, 2020
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
5 LITIGATION
On
June 1, 2016, the Company was named as a defendant in an action filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los
Angeles – Central District, captioned Adli Law Group, PC v. Max Sound Corporation (Case No. BC621886). Plaintiff alleges two causes
of action for Breach of Contract and a cause of action for Common Counts, all arising out of the Company’s alleged failure to pay
for Plaintiff’s legal services. Even though the Company was never served with the Complaint, default was entered against the Company.
The Default has been set aside and the Company has responded to the Complaint with an Answer and Cross-Complaint for Breach of Contract,
Professional Negligence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, and Fraud, due to the fact, that among other things, Adli Law reassigned
the Company's primary patent to itself. The parties had begun the discovery phase of the litigation and the Judge had set a status hearing
for January 19, 2018. On June 1, 2018, Adli filed a motion for summary judgment on numerous issues.
One
issue raised by Adli (at the very end of their motion and in only a single paragraph) was that Max Sound was a forfeited corporation
and thus, “is foreclosed from prosecuting any action in California courts.” Adli did not raise this issue before filing its
papers. Max Sound’s counsel, SML Avvocati, P.C. had since learned that the California Franchise Tax Board contended that Max Sound
owed back taxes, hence the forfeiture. Max Sound hired a CPA tax specialist to assist with paying its outstanding taxes which the state
finally agreed were approximately $8,000 instead of the $340,000 the state had arbitrarily wrongly calculated and the Company sought
to obtain a revivor to cure its forfeited status and thus be able to regain its ability to both defend itself in this action and prosecute
its counterclaims.
However,
despite working diligently with the hope of resolving this issue before the summary judgment motion hearing set for September 6, 2018,
Max Sound had not resolved its issues with the state of California and had not yet obtained a revivor. As a result of this issue and
glaring mistakes by the Company’s Counsel SML Avvocati, Max Sound had to respectfully request that the court grant a stay in the
proceedings until Max Sound was able to obtain a revivor or, in the alternative, a continuance of all proceedings. A stay or continuance
was necessary because Max Sound’s counsel would not be able to respond to the pending summary judgment motion (or any other substantive
proceeding), and Max Sound would be unable to defend itself against this action or prosecute its cross-complaint until Max Sound’s
forfeited status was cured. The court provided a summary default judgment in favor of Adli one day before Max Sound obtained a revivor.
In
response, the Company hired Klapach & Klapach, P.C. who filed an application for an extension to file an opening brief. The extension
was granted, and the opening brief was filed April 26, 2019. Adli responded with a Respondent Brief, Appendix and Motion to Augment.
Max Sound’s counsel filed a reply brief.
In the conclusion
of the brief, Max Sound’s counsel Mr. Klapach stated:
“The
trial court committed error in granting summary judgment in the Adli Firm’s favor. Based on the Adli Firm’s own evidence,
there were triable issues of fact regarding the Adli Firm’s claims for unpaid fees. With respect to the Steele Litigation, nearly
all of the unpaid invoices that the Adli Firm sought to recover were for legal services that were separately billed to Mr. Trammell for
Mr. Trammell, Mr. Wolff, and Audio Genesis’s defense. The record also reflects that Dr. Adli orally agreed to look solely to Mr.
Trammell and Mr. Wolff for payment of the Adli Firm’s fees. With respect to the patent prosecution representation, triable issues
of fact existed as to whether the Adli Firm’s admitted error in identifying itself – instead of Max Sound – as the
assignee of the MAXD patent was a material breach that excused Max Sound’s performance and/or entitled Max Sound to set off. With
respect to the Cross-Complaint, the trial court erred in concluding that Max Sound lacked the capacity to sue when Max Sound had presented
the court with a Certificate of Revivor prior to the summary judgment hearing. The trial court also erred in refusing to grant Max Sound
a short continuance so that it could pay its outstanding taxes and obtain a Certificate of Revivor.”
No
assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these actions or their effect on the Company however the Company is confident it
will receive a reversal in of the Summary Judgment and ultimately succeed in its cross complaint against the Adli Firm.
NOTE 6 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On
March 2, 2021, the officer advanced $1,025 under the terms of the line of credit.
On
March 4, 2021, the Company signed a 10-year exclusive licensing agreement with TIP Solutions (Licensee) to implement the MAXD HD Audio
Source Code into their mobile phone app and platforms. The Licensee was granted an exclusive license of MAX-D HD audio technology for
an annual payment of $100,000 or $25,000 paid quarterly for up to 10 years.
The
agreement also calls for a license fee split in the event the following occurs:
|
•
|
If
Licensor is TIP – 20% of total license revenue received by TIP will be paid to Max
Sound within 30 days of such receipts.
|
|
•
|
If
the Licensor is Max Sound and combined with TIP Solutions Smart Call Assistant, 20% of total
license revenue received by Max Sound will be paid to TIP within 30 days.
|
On
March 10, 2021, the Company received a $100,000 payment from the Licensee.
On March 8, 2021, the Company entered into a conversion
agreement executed by a note holder for 275,000,000 shares based on a conversion price of $0.0008 per share.
On March 23, 2021, the Company signed a 10-year exclusive licensing
agreement with Formula 4 Protocol (Licensee) to implement the MAXD HD Audio Source Code into their mobile phone app and platforms. The
Licensee was granted an exclusive license of MAX-D HD audio technology for an annual payment of $100,000 or $25,000 paid quarterly for
up to 10 years.
The agreement also calls for a license fee split in the event
the following occurs:
|
•
|
If Licensor is Formula 4 Protocol – 20% of total license revenue received by Formula 4 Protocol
will be paid to Max Sound within 30 days of such receipts.
|
|
•
|
If the Licensor is Max Sound and combined with Formula 4 Protocol, 20% of total license revenue received
by Max Sound will be paid to Formula 4 Protocol within 30 days.
|
On March 23, 2021, the Company received a $150,000 payment from
the Licensee.