Foran Announces Positive Metallurgical Results at McIlvenna Bay
June 20 2012 - 9:13AM
Marketwired Canada
Foran Mining Corporation (TSX VENTURE:FOM) ("Foran" or the "Company") is pleased
to announce positive results from initial metallurgical testwork ( the
"Testwork") commissioned by the Company on samples from its 100%-owned McIlvenna
Bay Deposit ("McIlvenna Bay" or the "Deposit"), located in east central
Saskatchewan.
Testwork was conducted on composite drill core samples from each of the three
main styles of mineralization in the Deposit, namely the copper-rich Copper
Stockwork Zone ("CSZ"), the zinc-rich Lens 2 massive sulphide zone ("Lens 2")
and the zinc- and copper-rich massive to semi-massive sulphide Upper West Zone
("UWZ").
Highlights of the Testwork include:
-- Recoveries of 94% Cu, 85% Au and 77% Ag in a Cu concentrate grading 29%
Cu, 6.4 g/t Au and 126 g/t Ag for the CSZ in locked cycle testing,
-- Cu and Zn concentrates for the UWZ in locked cycle testing, with
recoveries of 84% Cu, 60% Au and 50% Ag in the Cu concentrate (grading
24% Cu, 6.5 g/t Au and 216 g/t Ag) and recovery of 76% Zn in the Zn
concentrate (grading 54% Zn),
-- Recovery of 85% Zn in a Zn concentrate (grading 55% Zn) for Lens 2,
along with a bulk Cu-Pb concentrate in locked cycle testing (Table 1),
and
-- Bond ball mill work indices of between 11.6 and 16.1 kWh/tonne,
indicating the three styles of mineralization are of moderate hardness
(Table 2)(1).
Patrick Soares, President and CEO of Foran commented: "The results of our first
round of metallurgical testwork at McIlvenna Bay are extremely promising; in
particular, the results from the Copper Stockwork Zone, with 94% copper
recovery, combined with high precious metal recoveries. Today's results, along
with those of the approximately 17,000 metres of drilling completed by Foran
since the spring of 2011 and our recent resource estimate for the Copper
Stockwork Zone, continue to confirm the robust nature of McIlvenna Bay as we
move forward in de-risking this large, well-located base metal deposit." Mr.
Soares continued "As we advance toward a planned Preliminary Economic Assessment
and then into Feasibility Studies, we will continue to refine the metallurgical
testwork."
(1) Cu = copper, Zn = zinc, Au = gold, Ag = silver, Pb = lead, g/t = grams per
tonne, kWh = kilowatt hours
Table 1. Overall Metallurgical Response
------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper Stockwork Zone
------------------------------------------------------------------
Assay Distribution
-----------------------------------------------
Product Mass Cu Zn Ag Au Cu Zn Ag Au
(%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Feed 100 1.57 0.16 8 0.38 100 100 100 100
Cu
Concentrate 5.1 29.2 1.05 126 6.38 94.4 33.8 76.9 84.6
Cu First
Cleaner Tail 3.9 0.79 0.57 14 0.81 2.0 14.1 6.8 8.3
Cu Rougher
Tail 91.0 0.06 0.09 2 0.03 3.7 52.1 16.4 7.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upper West Zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assay Distribution
---------------------------------------------------------
Product Mass Cu Pb Zn Ag Au Cu Pb Zn Ag Au
(%) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feed 100 1.75 0.18 4.02 26 0.66 100 100 100 100 100
Prefloat 2.8 0.86 0.13 1.44 23 1.16 1.4 2.1 1.0 2.5 4.9
Cu
Concentrate 6.0 24.2 1.3 6.40 216 6.50 83.4 43.4 9.6 50.3 59.7
Zn
Concentrate 5.6 1.87 0.24 54.3 63 0.81 6.0 7.5 76.3 13.6 6.9
Zn First
Cleaner Tail 7.7 0.69 0.14 2.39 22 0.53 3.0 6.0 4.6 6.6 6.2
Zn Rougher
Tail 77.8 0.14 0.10 0.44 9 0.19 6.2 41.0 8.5 27.0 22.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lens 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assay Distribution
---------------------------------------------------------
Product Mass Cu Pb Zn Ag Au Cu Pb Zn Ag Au
(%) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feed 100 0.33 0.41 6.96 15 0.21 100 100 100 100 100
Prefloat 3.5 0.20 0.32 5.89 11 0.11 2.1 2.8 3.0 2.6 1.9
Bulk
Concentrate 1.6 11.9 15.4 9.18 332 5.27 56.0 59.1 2.1 34.4 38.5
Zn
Concentrate 10.8 0.63 0.46 55.0 38 0.29 20.5 12.2 85.4 27.3 14.6
Zn First
Cleaner Tail 17.8 0.16 0.15 0.96 10 0.15 8.4 6.5 2.5 11.6 12.7
Zn Rougher
Tail 66.3 0.07 0.12 0.74 5 0.10 13.1 19.5 7.0 24.1 32.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2. Bond Work Indices
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Composite Bond Ball Mill Grindability Bond Rod Mill Grindability
Test(1) Test(1)
---------------------------------------------------------
Work Index Work Index
(kWh/tonne) microns P80 (kWh/tonne) microns P80
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CSZ 16.1 80 17.0 882
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lens 2 11.6 83 12.7 869
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UWZ 14.0 81 15.6 852
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) kWh = kilowatt hours
Discussion of Results
Three composite samples were collected from halved HQ diameter core from 2011
drilling on the Deposit. The samples represent each of the three main styles of
mineralization in the Deposit, namely the CSZ, Lens 2 and UWZ, and together
totaled approximately 516 kilograms. The test program consisted of batch
flotation testing followed by locked cycle tests for all three composites. The
results of the locked cycle tests are shown in Table 1 and are further described
below.
CSZ composite:
Over 94% of the Cu was recovered into a Cu concentrate grading 29% Cu. Silver
and Au recoveries were also high, at 77% and 85%, respectively. Precious metal
grades in this concentrate were 216 g/t Ag and 6.5 g/t Au. At a primary grind
size of 100 microns K80 and regrind size of 35 microns K80copper sulphide
minerals were well liberated resulting in very good concentrate grades and
recoveries.
The Cu, Zn, Au and Ag head grades of the CSZ composite, as shown in Table 1, are
comparable to the grades of the indicated and inferred mineral resources
estimated for the CSZ in the McIlvenna Bay mineral resource estimate of October
28, 2011, which is summarized in the Foran news release dated November 9, 2011
and detailed in the Company's Technical Report dated December 9, 2011 (the "2011
Resource"). As such, the composite used in the Testwork appears to be a
reasonable representation of the overall grade of the CSZ.
UWZ composite:
About 83% of the Cu was recovered into a Cu concentrate grading greater than 24%
Cu. Silver and Au recoveries to the Cu concentrate were 50% and 60%,
respectively, with the Cu concentrate assaying 216 g/t Ag and 6.5 g/t Au. A
separate Zn concentrate grading 54% Zn had Zn recovery of 76%. The primary grind
size for the locked cycle test for the UWZ composite was 100 microns K80; the
regrind size was 12 microns K80 for the Cu circuit and 14 microns K80 for the Zn
circuit.
The Cu and Ag head grades of the UWZ composite, as shown in Table 1, are
comparable to the grades of the inferred portion of the 2011 Resource for the
UWZ, but lower than the indicated portion of the 2011 Resource. The Zn head
grade of the composite is slightly lower (approximately 15% lower) than the
grades of the indicated and inferred 2011 Resource.
Lens 2 composite:
In the second of two locked cycle tests on the Lens 2 composite, a Zn recovery
of over 85% was achieved to a Zn concentrate grading 55%. Copper and Pb were
recovered 56% and 59%, respectively, to a bulk Cu-Pb concentrate grading 12% Cu
and 15% Pb. Approximately 34% of the Ag and 39% of the Au was recovered to the
bulk concentrate, which assayed 332 g/t Ag and 5.3 g/t Au. The primary grind
size for the second locked cycle test for the Lens 2 composite was 73 microns
K80 and the regrind size was 16 microns K80.
The Cu and Zn head grades of the Lens 2 composite, as shown in Table 1, are
comparable to the grades of the indicated and inferred 2011 Resource for Lens 2,
whereas the Ag grade is lower (approximately 40% lower). Neither Au, nor Pb,
were estimated in the 2011 Resource, so no direct comparisons can be made
between the Au or Pb head grades in the Lens 2 composite and the grades in the
2011 Resource.
Bond Work Indices
Bond ball mill work indices for the composite samples ranged from 11.6 kWh/tonne
for Lens 2 to 16.1 kWh/tonne for the CSZ. Bond rod mill work indices for the
composite samples ranged from 12.7 kWh/tonne for Lens 2 to 17.0 kWh/tonne for
the CSZ. This data suggests mineralization is of moderate hardness from a rod
and ball milling perspective.
Looking Ahead
Further Testwork is anticipated to focus on optimization of these initial
results, as well as encompass a greater degree of variability in sampling and
testing. In addition, Foran plans to engage a concentrate marketing consultant
to review all results and provide initial economic parameters for concentrate
sale and tariffs for the Company's planned Preliminary Economic Assessment at
McIlvenna Bay.
Laboratory & Qualified Person
The Testwork was conducted by G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd. ("G&T") of
Kamloops, BC, Canada. G& T, an ISO 9001:2008 certified laboratory, is wholly
owned by ALS Canada Ltd. and independent of Foran.
The Qualified Person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 for the
Testwork is Mr. Ken Major, P.Eng. Mr. Major is a Consulting Metallurgist and is
independent of Foran. Mr. Major has read and approved the technical disclosure
relating to the Testwork in this release.
The in-house qualified person for drilling on the Deposit and the selection of
samples for Testwork is Mr. Roger March, Vice President Project Exploration for
Foran.
About Foran Mining
Foran is a diversified exploration and development company with projects in the
Flin Flon Mining Belt. The Company's flagship McIlvenna Bay Project is located
in east central Saskatchewan, 65 kilometres west of Flin Flon, Manitoba and
contains the McIlvenna Bay deposit, one of the largest undeveloped volcanogenic
massive sulphide ("VMS") deposits in Canada.
For additional information see the report entitled "Technical Report on the
McIlvenna Bay Project, Saskatchewan, Canada" dated December 9, 2011 at
www.sedar.com or www.foranmining.com.
Foran trades on the TSX.V under the symbol "FOM".
Forward Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are
based on information currently available to the Company and the Company provides
no assurance that actual results will meet management's expectations.
Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the
Company's future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that
the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur.
Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as "believes",
"anticipates", "expects", "estimates", "may", "could", "would", "will", or
"plan". Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address
future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks
and uncertainties. Actual results relating to, among other things, results of
exploration, project development, reclamation and capital costs of the Company's
mineral properties, and the Company's financial condition and prospects, could
differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements for many
reasons such as: changes in general economic conditions and conditions in the
financial markets; changes in demand and prices for minerals; litigation,
legislative, environmental and other judicial, regulatory, political and
competitive developments; technological and operational difficulties encountered
in connection with the activities of the Company; and other matters discussed in
this news release. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect
any of the Company's forward-looking statements. These and other factors should
be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on the
Company's forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by the Company
or on its behalf, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Vortex Metals (TSXV:VMS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Vortex Metals (TSXV:VMS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024
