TSX.V: TORC OTCQB: TORCF
VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 2, 2023
/CNW/ - TinOne Resources Inc. (TSXV: TORC) (OTCQB:
TORCF) ("TinOne" or the "Company") is pleased to
announce it has completed its Phase 1 drill program at its Great
Pyramid Tin (Sn) Project ("Great Pyramid" or the
"Project") located in the tier one mining jurisdiction of
Tasmania, Australia.
Drilling has now concluded with a total of 4,687 metres
completed and data compilation and modelling are underway. The
program has been successful in continuing to define significant tin
mineralization near surface, at depth and adjacent to historical
drilling.
Highlights
- Great Pyramid mineralization extended to approximately 380
metres below surface.
- Interpreted granite source not encountered, therefore
mineralization remains entirely open at depth.
- Mineral Resources Tasmania geophysical modelling interprets
granite at depth below Great Pyramid in the range of 700 – 1300
metres.
- Mineralization remains open in all directions laterally.
- Integrated stratigraphic-structural model being developed to
assist numeric modelling.
"We are very pleased to have completed our Great Pyramid
Phase 1 drill program safely and within budget," commented
Chris Donaldson, Executive Chairman.
"The results of the program have been outstanding in delivering
consistent tin intersections from within the area of historical
activity and, importantly, outside this area. These results
and geological interpretation indicate that the Great Pyramid
system is of significant scale and has only been partially tested,
to date. Our geological team is developing its detailed
interpretation and will be using this information to plan our next
phases of drilling which will be focussed on fully testing the
system."
Key Results
The 2022 program was designed to:
- Test the depth and lateral dimensions of mineralization within
the vicinity of the historical drilling and resource estimate;
- Obtain grade and continuity data utilising modern drill and
analytical techniques, within the area of the historic exploration
activity; and
- Test a large-scale IP chargeability anomaly adjacent to the
historic resource.
Tables 1 and 2 present full results from the 2022 program and
compiled results from all historical drilling known from the Great
Pyramid area. The tables show that the 2022 program returned
results in line with historical data and includes outstanding
intersections of higher grade such as:
- 22GPRC012 78 metres @0.51% Sn (see Company news release
September 06, 2022)
- 22GPRC016 51 metres @0.29% Sn (see Company news release
September 06, 2022)
- 22GPRC021 14 metres @0.36% Sn (see Company news release
January 18, 2023)
- 22GPRC022 15 metres @0.45% Sn (see Company news release
October 11, 2022).
The 2022 Great Pyramid drill program was highly successful in
confirming the presence and tenor of significant tin mineralization
in the area of historical drilling activity and historical resource
estimate. Weighted average tin grade for all 2022 recorded
intersections1 was 0.23% Sn which is in accord with
historical drill data (Tables 1 and 2).
In addition, the program successfully defined significant
mineralization at depth below the historical resource estimate in
the area of sparse historical drilling. Highlights at depth
included:
- 22GPRC003 (see Company news release November 22, 2022)
-
- 18 metres @0.31% Sn from 308 metres downhole
- 5.4 metres @0.46% Sn from 330.6 metres downhole
- 13 metres @0.22% Sn from 359 metres downhole
- 22GPRC006 (see Company news release September 06, 2022)
-
- 49 metres @0.17% Sn from 65 metres downhole
-
- Including 8 metres @0.3% Sn from 86 metres downhole
These TinOne drill holes and the historical data have not
defined the lower limit of the system, which remains entirely open
at depth.
A relatively minor component of the program was directed to
testing the lateral extent of mineralization due to access, with
the network of historical drill access tracks being utilized to
obtain a more cost effective drill program for this first round of
drilling. However, despite this, the program has also delivered
significant results laterally away from the historical drilling and
resource estimate, with highlights including:
- 22GPRC021 (see Company news release January 18, 2023)
-
- 40 metres @0.13% Sn from 58 metres downhole
- 14 metres @0.36% Sn from 128 metres downhole
- 17 metres @0.21% Sn from 181 metres downhole
- 22GPRC002 (see Company news release June
29, 2022)
-
- 14 metres @0.18% Sn from 3 metres downhole
- 6 metres @0.22% Sn from 24 metres downhole
These drill holes and historical drill data have not defined the
lateral limits of the Great Pyramid system, which remains open
laterally in all directions (Figure 2).
_____________________________
|
1 See Table
1 and 2 notes for parameters.
|
|
Three drill holes (22GPDD010, 22GPRC018A, 22GPRC019, 22GPDD023)
were drilled (for a total of 1275.9 metres) to test IP
chargeability anomalies to the northeast and east of the area of
historical exploration activity. These holes intersected
sedimentary rocks of the Mathinna Supergroup with strong hornfels
effects at depth and variable amounts of pyrite (interpreted to be
both diagenetic and hydrothermal) and minor base metal sulphides.
No significant tin mineralization was encountered. The
chargeability anomalies may be explained by the presence of pyrite,
however more detailed analysis, including petrophysical property
measurements, will be undertaken and integration into the broader
Great Pyramid geological model undertaken.
Geological
Interpretation
The tin systems of northeastern Tasmania are regarded as classical examples of
granite-related tin-polymetallic systems (Taylor, R.G. 1979, The
geology of tin deposits). Well known systems such as
Anchor (Taheri and Bottrill, 2005, Devonian granites and
associated mineralization in northeast and northwest Tasmania), Aberfoyle2, Lutwyche2,
Story's Creek2, Rex
Hill2 (see TinOne news release July 07, 2022) and Royal
George 2 are hosted in or directly associated
with Devonian granites of the S-type alkali feldspar suite and it
is generally regarded that the granites are the source of
hydrothermal fluids and metals for formation of the systems.
In the Aberfoyle, Lutwyche and
Story's Creek systems, the bulk of mineralization is hosted in
Mathinna Supergroup sedimentary rocks above the granite body, with
deeper mining levels and drilling demonstrating the connection. In
these systems a clear zoning from tin-rich at higher levels above
the granite zoning downward to higher tungsten content adjacent to
and within the granite. The Aberfoyle system is known over a vertical
extent of in excess of 300 metres.
It is highly significant that in most respects (mineralogy,
metal association, alteration character), the Great Pyramid system
conforms to the granite-related model, yet no granite has yet been
encountered in the project area.
Mineral Resources Tasmania (MRT) developed an integrated
geophysical and geological model for the Scamander Mineral Field,
including Great Pyramid (Scamander 3D geological and geophysical
model). The Great Pyramid system occurs on a steep gradient
("shoulder") in the MRT model, and the model estimated that the
upper granite surface exists at between 700 and 1300 metres below
the Great Pyramid system (Figure 3).
(https://www.mrt.tas.gov.au/geoscience/3d_geological_and_geophysical_modelling/scamander_3d_geological_and_geophysical_modelling).
The TinOne 2022 drill program provided support for this model
and the granite association of the Great Pyramid system with the
key evidence being the consistent presence in deeper holes of
spotted hornfels3. However, despite drilling to depths
of almost 400 metres below surface, no granite has yet been
encountered at Great Pyramid. In the other Mathinna Supergroup
hosted systems in Tasmania (e.g.
Aberfoyle, Lutwyche, Story's
Creek), mineralization continues to the granite contact and also
within the granite. By comparison (and in context of the MRT model
and observed geology), it can be interpreted that the Great Pyramid
system may extend for a significant distance below current drill
levels and potentially continue into the interpreted underlying
granite.
____________________________
|
2 See
https://tinone.ca/project/aberfoyle-tin-resource/
|
3 Hornfels –
a contact metamorphic rock formed by the heating of sedimentary (or
other) rocks by the intrusion of a magma, including
granite.
|
|
The mineralization encountered to date at Great Pyramid is
interpreted to have two inter-related control mechanisms (Figure
4).
- Structure - north easterly striking, steeply dipping structures
(TinOne observations, historical exploration reports by Aberfoyle
Ltd and BHP Ltd) that transect the sedimentary package and are
interpreted to have acted as conduits for mineralizing hydrothermal
fluids arising from the granite at depth.
- Sedimentary rock type - not all of the sedimentary sequence is
equally favourable for the production of elevated tin grades and
therefore certain units are more strongly mineralized. These units
tend to be the more quartz-rich sandstone parts of the sequence and
it is interpreted that their brittle fracture patterns within the
favourable structural domains promotes mineralization. A
challenge is that the Mathinna Supergroup sedimentary rocks were
strongly folded at a time before intrusion of the granite magma and
formation of the related mineralization.
The interaction of the folded sedimentary geometries, structural
zones and interpreted granite is schematically shown in Figure 4.
The figure highlights the potential geometries and relationships
expected at Great Pyramid and illustrates why in some places the
mineralization is more laterally continuous than in other
places. The figure also illustrates that, based on knowledge
from other deposits in northeastern Tasmania, mineralization could be expected to
continue in favourable host rocks into the interpreted granite
contact.
Next Steps
With the successful completion of the Phase 1 drill program, the
TinOne technical team has significantly advanced its understanding
of the Great Pyramid system and focus has now shifted to
interpretation and integration of the various data sets. This
interpretation and modelling phase will develop an understanding of
the inter-related controls discussed above and guide more efficient
targeting of additional drilling and future resource
estimation.
TinOne has engaged a PhD-trained expert in the structural
geology of northeastern Tasmania
and a PhD-trained expert sedimentologist to work together with the
TinOne team and an external resource geologist to develop an
integrated structural-sedimentological-geostatistical model. This
model will inform additional drilling, principally targeting
lateral extensions and a resource estimation at the appropriate
time.
Table 1: TinOne Resources Great Pyramid RC and
core drill results.
Hole
|
Intersection
width (m)
|
From
(m)
|
Sn
(%)
|
Comments
|
22GPDD001A
|
23
|
0
|
0.23
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
26
|
29
|
0.22
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
11
|
61
|
0.45
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
8
|
120
|
0.28
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
5
|
148
|
0.38
|
Diamond cored hole.
Below historical resource area
|
22GPRC002
|
14
|
3
|
0.18
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
|
6
|
24
|
0.22
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
22GPRC003
|
39
|
3
|
0.25
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
Incl
|
16
|
18
|
0.34
|
|
|
18
|
308
|
0.31
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
5.4
|
330.6
|
0.46
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
13
|
359
|
0.22
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
14.1
|
379.15
|
0.15
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
6.2
|
398.8
|
0.12
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
7.15
|
420.85
|
0.16
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
22GPRC004
|
17
|
41
|
0.13
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
|
8
|
243
|
0.15
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
22GPRC005
|
30
|
8
|
0.26
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
23
|
64
|
0.12
|
Below historical
resource area
|
22GPRC006
|
9
|
48
|
0.20
|
Below historical
resource area
|
Incl
|
8
|
86
|
0.30
|
|
|
49
|
65
|
0.17
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
29
|
160
|
0.15
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
6
|
238
|
0.27
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area
|
|
13.5
|
250
|
0.14
|
Diamond tail. Below
historical resource area. To end of hole
|
22GPRC007
|
21
|
2
|
0.30
|
Inside historical
resource area, to end of hole, abandoned in
old workings
|
22GPDD008
|
8
|
4
|
0.20
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
14
|
24
|
0.20
|
Diamond cored hole.
Inside historical resource area
|
|
13
|
134
|
0.15
|
Diamond cored hole.
Outside historical resource area
|
|
4
|
171
|
0.25
|
Diamond cored hole.
Outside historical resource area
|
22GPRC009
|
|
|
|
No significant
mineralization
|
22GPDD010
|
|
|
|
Diamond cored hole. No
assayed returned yet
|
22GPRC011
|
5
|
1
|
0.41
|
Predominantly outside
historical resource area
|
|
25
|
12
|
0.16
|
Predominantly outside
historical resource area
|
|
7
|
42
|
0.30
|
Predominantly outside
historical resource area
|
|
4
|
82
|
0.40
|
Predominantly outside
historical resource area
|
22GPRC012
|
78
|
11
|
0.51
|
Predominantly outside
historical resource area
|
Incl
|
23
|
34
|
1.09
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
|
8
|
122
|
0.27
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
22GPRC013
|
20
|
3
|
0.14
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
14
|
36
|
0.16
|
Below historical
resource area
|
|
6
|
105
|
0.13
|
Below historical
resource area
|
22GPRC014
|
5
|
16
|
0.27
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
12
|
26
|
0.20
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
48.8
|
87
|
0.14
|
Outside historical
resource area. Part RC, part diamond tail
|
|
5
|
171
|
0.13
|
Diamond tail. Outside
historical resource area
|
22GPDD015
|
48
|
12
|
0.15
|
Diamond hole.
Predominantly within historical resource area
|
Incl
|
3
|
34
|
0.68
|
|
22GPRC016
|
51
|
2
|
0.29
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
Incl
|
20
|
4
|
0.43
|
|
22GPRC017
|
9
|
39
|
0.20
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
|
11
|
66
|
0.10
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
22GPRC018A
|
|
|
|
No significant assays –
diamond tail yet to be assayed
|
22GPRC019
|
|
|
|
No significant
assays
|
22GPRC021
|
40
|
58
|
0.13
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
|
14
|
128
|
0.36
|
Outside historical
resource area. Part RC, part diamond tail
|
|
17
|
181
|
0.21
|
Outside historical
resource area
|
22GPRC022
|
15
|
22
|
0.45
|
Inside historical
resource area, to end of hole, abandoned in
old workings
|
22GPDD023
|
|
|
|
Diamond cored hole. No
significant results. Only partially
assayed
|
22GPRC024
|
21
|
16
|
0.22
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
14
|
47
|
0.10
|
Inside historical
resource area
|
|
NOTES: All
intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with
maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.
|
All intersections
are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.
|
TinOne drill hole
numbering is in the form 22GPRCXXX for reverse circulation
(RC) holes and 22GPRDDXXX for diamond holes with numbering
allocated in sequence.
|
Analytical results
have been received for holes 22GPRC002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007,
009, 011, 012, 013, 014, 016, 017, 018A, 019, 021, 022 and 024.
Hole 22GPRC020 failed at 12 metres and was not assayed. The target
area for this hole was drilled by 22GPRC021.
|
Diamond holes
completed to-date and with assays pending are 22GPDD10 and
22GPDD023 (Part). Diamond tail extensions have been completed for
RC pre-collar holes 22GPRC003, 22GPRC004, 22GPRC005, 22GPRC006,
22GPRC014 and 22GPRC021 with assays pending for
22GPRC018A.
|
|
Table 2: Great Pyramid historical drill
results.
Hole
|
Intersection
width (m)
|
From
(m)
|
Sn
(%)
|
Year
|
Company
|
Comments
|
18GPD001
|
52.2
|
1.5
|
0.29
|
2018
|
TNT Mines
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
|
11
|
60
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
180
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
234
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
BHP001
|
16.45
|
22.56
|
0.20
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP002
|
15.24
|
0
|
0.22
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
10.98
|
24.38
|
0.12
|
1965
|
BHP
|
|
BHP005
|
16.46
|
4.27
|
0.12
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP006
|
3.66
|
29.87
|
0.47
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP007
|
34.75
|
0.61
|
0.25
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP008
|
14.63
|
20.73
|
0.15
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP011
|
17.07
|
0
|
0.23
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP013
|
13.41
|
0
|
0.22
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP014
|
49.38
|
9.75
|
0.14
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP015
|
6.1
|
0
|
0.34
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
9.15
|
13.41
|
0.19
|
1965
|
BHP
|
|
BHP020
|
32.11
|
6.9
|
0.36
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BHP026
|
29.26
|
11.58
|
0.17
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BPD001
|
39.4
|
15.7
|
0.15
|
1980
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
BPD002b
|
28
|
0
|
0.21
|
1980
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
BPD003
|
24.55
|
31.7
|
0.30
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
BPD005
|
14.8
|
0
|
0.17
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
BPD007
|
19
|
0
|
0.16
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
|
38.61
|
66.25
|
0.30
|
1981
|
BHP
|
|
BPD009a
|
26.65
|
21.75
|
0.18
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
BPD009b
|
14
|
4
|
0.53
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
18
|
24
|
0.14
|
1981
|
BHP
|
|
BPD010
|
33.3
|
14.8
|
0.25
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
BPD011
|
14.84
|
22.36
|
0.11
|
1981
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
|
10.74
|
64.3
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
13.75
|
113.8
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
DDS001
|
16.61
|
164.59
|
0.10
|
1965
|
BHP
|
Diamond hole
|
GPY001
|
10.66
|
28.96
|
0.15
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
GPY002
|
18.29
|
3.05
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
|
24.38
|
45.72
|
0.21
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
|
GPY003
|
28.95
|
10.67
|
0.43
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
|
35.05
|
44.2
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
GPY005
|
56.39
|
0
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
GPY006
|
44.2
|
0
|
0.39
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Diamond hole
|
MD001
|
10.66
|
137.7
|
0.20
|
1976
|
Tas. Mines
Dept
|
Diamond hole
|
MD003
|
12
|
27.88
|
0.23
|
1977
|
Tas. Mines
Dept
|
Diamond hole
|
MD004
|
10.82
|
15.68
|
0.20
|
1978
|
Tas. Mines
Dept
|
Diamond hole
|
|
11.07
|
75.2
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
SPG1a
|
10
|
30
|
0.24
|
1983
|
Shell
|
Percussion with diamond
tail from 121m
|
|
14
|
72
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
236.7
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
291.8
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
H001
|
16.84
|
4.5
|
0.31
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H002
|
10.67
|
12.19
|
0.14
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
9.14
|
30.48
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H003
|
9.14
|
13.72
|
0.22
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H004
|
42.67
|
0
|
0.22
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H005
|
30.48
|
13.72
|
0.45
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H006
|
16.77
|
9.14
|
0.33
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H007
|
7.62
|
1.52
|
0.35
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
30.48
|
15.24
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
H008
|
27.43
|
0
|
0.29
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
13.72
|
32
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
H010
|
13.72
|
1.52
|
0.34
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
10.67
|
32
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
H014
|
32.01
|
1.52
|
0.25
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H015
|
21.34
|
1.52
|
0.24
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H016
|
22.86
|
4.57
|
0.22
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H017
|
35.06
|
1.52
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H018
|
19.82
|
9.14
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H019
|
21.34
|
0
|
0.29
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H020
|
10.67
|
7.62
|
0.14
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
12.19
|
22.86
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
H021
|
10.67
|
0
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
16.77
|
19.81
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
H022
|
6.1
|
0
|
0.33
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
15.24
|
12.19
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
H024
|
6.1
|
0
|
0.37
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
22.86
|
10.67
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
H025
|
12.19
|
6.1
|
0.16
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H026
|
24.38
|
7.62
|
0.25
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H028
|
30.48
|
0
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H032
|
9.14
|
7.62
|
0.33
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H034
|
10.67
|
22.86
|
0.23
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H036
|
10.67
|
1.52
|
0.20
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H037
|
18.29
|
16.76
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H038
|
12.19
|
12.19
|
0.11
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H041
|
30.48
|
0
|
0.36
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H042
|
36.58
|
0
|
0.26
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H043
|
28.96
|
0
|
0.39
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H044
|
24.38
|
0
|
0.39
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H045
|
15.24
|
1.52
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H046
|
16.77
|
4.57
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H047
|
6.09
|
3.05
|
0.34
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H049
|
15.24
|
1.52
|
0.14
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
9.14
|
30.48
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
H051
|
27.44
|
1.52
|
0.49
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H052
|
22.86
|
1.52
|
0.33
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H053
|
9.15
|
4.57
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
4.57
|
18.29
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
H054
|
24.39
|
4.57
|
0.72
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H055
|
25.91
|
1.52
|
0.37
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H056
|
24.38
|
6.1
|
0.34
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H057
|
10.67
|
7.62
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H061
|
12.2
|
1.52
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H062
|
32.01
|
12.19
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H063
|
7.62
|
3.05
|
0.39
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
10.67
|
22.86
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
H064
|
9.14
|
3.05
|
0.34
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H065
|
9.15
|
27.43
|
0.42
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H066
|
24.39
|
1.52
|
0.25
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H068
|
12.19
|
10.67
|
0.23
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H069
|
10.67
|
24.38
|
0.19
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H072
|
6.09
|
6.1
|
0.48
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H080
|
10.67
|
1.52
|
0.31
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H081
|
27.43
|
6.1
|
0.15
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H082
|
25.91
|
15.24
|
0.34
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H087
|
16.77
|
12.19
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H092
|
10.67
|
4.57
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H095
|
16.76
|
15.24
|
0.13
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H096
|
10.66
|
13.72
|
0.22
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H097
|
6.09
|
21.34
|
1.23
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H102
|
10.67
|
3.05
|
0.23
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H103
|
18.29
|
1.52
|
0.64
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H105
|
9.15
|
9.14
|
0.35
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
10.66
|
28.96
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
H107
|
10.67
|
24.38
|
0.12
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H108
|
21.34
|
4.57
|
0.18
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
12.19
|
30.48
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
H109
|
10.67
|
3.05
|
0.20
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H111
|
10.67
|
10.67
|
0.86
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
9.15
|
27.43
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
H114
|
13.72
|
19.81
|
0.19
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H122
|
27.43
|
3.05
|
0.26
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H123b
|
39.62
|
3.05
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H124
|
10.67
|
25.91
|
0.19
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H126
|
7.62
|
21.34
|
0.45
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H128
|
9.14
|
3.05
|
0.27
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H130
|
10.67
|
15.24
|
0.23
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
9.14
|
30.48
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
H131
|
10.67
|
3.05
|
0.43
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H132
|
27.43
|
6.1
|
0.22
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
H135
|
10.66
|
21.34
|
0.14
|
1970
|
Aberfoyle
Ltd
|
Percussion
hole
|
|
NOTES: All
intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with
maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.
|
All intersections
are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.
|
|
18GPD001 analyzed by
lithium borate fusion ICP-MS or XRF.
|
BHP*** series holes
analyzed at an unknown laboratory by unknown method.
|
BPD*** series holes
analyzed at ALS Brisbane by XRF.
|
DDS001 analysed at
BHP Newcastle, method unknown.
|
GPY*** series holes
analyzed at the Aberfoyle Mine laboratory at Rossarden, method
unknown.
|
MD*** series holes
analyzed at Tasmania Mine Department laboratory in Launceston,
method unknown.
|
SPG1a analysed at
Comlabs, method unknown.
|
H*** series holes
analyzed at the Aberfoyle Mine laboratory at Rossarden, method
unknown.
|
|
The reader is
cautioned that the historical drill results are based on prior data
and reports prepared by previous property owners. The reader is
cautioned not to treat them, or any part of them, as current and
that a qualified person has not done sufficient work to verify the
results and that they may not form a reliable guide to future
results. Specifically, in most cases, analytical techniques
are not known and no QA/QC protocols are known for most drill holes
and as such analytical results may be unreliable. Drill core from
historic diamond drill holes DDS001, BPD001, BPD003, BPD005,
BPD007, BPD009A, BPD010, BPD011, GPY001, GPY002, GPY003, GPY004,
GPY006, MD001, MD003, MD004, SPG1A and 18GPD001 is available in the
Mineral Resources Tasmania drill core storage facility for viewing
and limited sampling.
|
|
About the Great Pyramid Tin
Project
Geological
Setting
The Great Pyramid deposit is located around a topographical
feature known as Pyramid Hill and is hosted by Silurian to Devonian
Mathinna Supergroup sandstones. The mineralization is formed
by closely spaced sheeted northeast trending, cassiterite (SnO₂)
bearing veins associated with silicification and sericite-pyrite
alteration. The deposit style and regional comparisons suggest that
a tin-fertile granite exists at depth below the deposit, however
this has not been encountered in drilling and the deposit is open
at depth. Geological interpretation indicates that certain
sedimentary units within the folded Mathinna Supergroup sediments
are more favourable hosts and diamond drilling being undertaken by
the Company during the current campaign, combined with numerical
modelling, will assist in developing a deeper understanding of
controls on grade for follow-up drilling.
The deposit is currently known over a strike length of more than
500 metres with an average width of approximately 150 metres. The
depth extent of the deposit is unknown with only nine historical
drill holes greater than 150 metres deep. These rare deeper holes
encountered encouraging tin mineralization to depths of
approximately 300 metres below surface2.
Historic Resources and Drill
Data1
A historical mineral resource estimate was completed on the
Great Pyramid Project (the "Historical Estimate") for TNT
Mines Ltd.1,2,3,4,5 (Table 2).
Table 2: Historical Estimate on the Great
Pyramid Project1,2,3,4,5
Great Pyramid Inferred
Mineral Resource - JORC 2012
|
Sn% CUT OFF
|
TONNES (Mt)
|
GRADE (Sn%)
|
CONTAINED TIN
(kt)
|
0.1
|
5.2
|
0.2
|
10.4
|
|
NOTES
|
1. Source:
"Inferred Mineral Resource for the Great Pyramid Tin Deposit in
Tasmania, Abbott, 2014" prepared by Jonathon Abbott of MPR for
Niuminco Group Ltd. The effective date for the Historical Estimate
is February 26, 2014.
|
2. The Historical
Estimate was prepared using the 2012 Australasian Joint Ore
Reserves Committee Code (JORC). The Historical Estimate was not
completed using CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and
Reserves and is not supported by a technical report completed in
accordance with National Instrument 43-101.
|
3. The estimation
of the Historical Estimate utilized close spaced historic
percussion (~85%) and lesser diamond drill holes with drill spacing
in the estimation area typically 15 x 30m and locally closer. The
Inferred Resource was estimated using Multiple Indicator Kriging
method of 1.5 metre down-hole composites within a mineralized
domain interpreted from tin grade. Continuity of tin grades was
characterised by indicator variograms at 14 indicator thresholds.
The estimates are extrapolated a maximum of approximately 30 metres
from drilling. Gemcom software was used for data compilation,
domain wireframing, and coding of composite values, and GS3M was
used for resource estimation. Resources were estimated into 15 by
30 by 3 m blocks (across strike, strike, vertical) aligned with the
067o trending drilling grid. Planview dimensions of the blocks
approximate average drill hole spacing. For precise volume
representation, resource estimates include the proportion of block
volumes within the mineralized domain below surface. The modelling
included a three-pass octant-based search strategy. Search
ellipsoid radii (across strike, along strike, vertical) and minimum
data requirements for these searches were: Search 1: 20 by 20 by 4
m (16 data), Search 2: 30 by 30 by 6 m (16 data), Search 3:30 by 30
by 6 (8 data). Model validation included visual comparison of model
estimates and composite grades, and trend (swath) plots, along with
comparison with estimates from alternative estimation methodologies
and previous model estimates. The Historical Estimate is restricted
to the area of close spaced drilling and 90% of the resource occurs
within 40 metres of surface. Although the limited deeper drilling
has encountered mineralized material this was not included in the
Historical Estimate. The mineralized domain wireframe used to
constrain the estimates was primarily interpreted on the basis of
tin assay grades and restricts estimates to the volume tested by
reasonably close spaced drilling. The wireframe was trimmed by the
cross-cutting dyke and soil units interpreted from drill hole
logging and geological mapping. Investigation of alternative
interpretations included resource estimation with assumed dominant
mineralization controls varying from flat lying to steeply west
dipping. These models did not give significantly different total
estimates.
|
4. The reader is
cautioned that the Historical Estimate is considered historical in
nature and as such, is based on prior data and reports prepared by
previous property owners. The reader is cautioned not to treat
them, or any part of them, as current mineral resources or
reserves. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to
classify the Historical Estimates as current resources and TinOne
is not treating the Historical Estimates as current resources.
Significant data compilation, re-drilling, re-sampling and data
verification may be required by a qualified person before the
Historical Estimates can be classified as a current resource.
There can be no assurance that any of the historical mineral
resources, in whole or in part, will ever become economically
viable. In addition, mineral resources are not mineral reserves and
do not have demonstrated economic viability. Even if
classified as a current resource, there is no certainty as to
whether further exploration will result in any inferred mineral
resources being upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral
resource category.
|
5. The Company
has determined that the Historical Estimate is reliable, and
relevant to be included here because it was estimated using close
spaced drilling with modern geostatistical methods and software by
an experienced resource geologist and provides a guide to the
location of the Great Pyramid mineralized zone. This will be
used to assist in targeting drilling to undertake testing of the
extent and grade of the mineralized system.
|
|
Quality Assurance / Quality
Control
Drill core and RC samples were shipped to ALS Limited in
Brisbane, Australia for sample
preparation and for analysis. The ALS Brisbane facilities are ISO
9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Tin and tungsten are analysed by
ICP-MS following lithium borate fusion (ALS method ME-MS85),
overlimit results are reanalysed by XRF (ALS method XRF15b).
Forty-eight element multi-element analyses are conducted by ICP-MS
with a four-acid digestion (ALS method ME-MS61).
Control samples comprising certified reference samples,
duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the
sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality
assurance / quality control protocol.
About TinOne
TinOne is a TSX Venture Exchange listed Canadian public company
with a high-quality portfolio of tin projects in the Tier 1 mining
jurisdictions of Tasmania and
New South Wales, Australia. The
Company is focussed on advancing its highly prospective portfolio
while also evaluating additional tin opportunities. TinOne is
supported by Inventa Capital Corp.
Qualified Person
The Company's disclosure of technical or scientific information
in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Dr.
Stuart Smith., Technical Advisor for
TinOne. Dr. Smith is a Qualified Person as defined under the terms
of National Instrument 43-101.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release includes certain "Forward–Looking
Statements" within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward–looking
information" under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used
in this news release, the words "anticipate", "believe",
"estimate", "expect", "target", "plan", "forecast", "may", "would",
"could", "schedule" and similar words or expressions, identify
forward–looking statements or information. These forward–looking
statements or information relate to, among other things: the
development of the Company's projects, including drilling programs;
and future mineral exploration, development and production.
Forward–looking statements and forward–looking information
relating to any future mineral production, liquidity, enhanced
value and capital markets profile of TinOne, future growth
potential for TinOne and its business, and future exploration plans
are based on management's reasonable assumptions, estimates,
expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on
management's experience and perception of trends, current
conditions and expected developments, and other factors that
management believes are relevant and reasonable in the
circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions
have been made regarding, among other things, the price of gold and
other metals; no escalation in the severity of the COVID-19
pandemic; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs
of development of exploration projects; TinOne's ability to operate
in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing
on reasonable terms.
These statements reflect TinOne's respective current views
with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a
number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered
reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant
business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties
and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could
cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from the results, performance or achievements that are or
may be expressed or implied by such forward–looking statements or
forward-looking information and TinOne has made assumptions and
estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such
factors include, without limitation: the Company's dependence on
early stage mineral projects; metal price volatility; risks
associated with the conduct of the Company's mining activities in
Australia; regulatory, consent or
permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company's
management team and outside contractors; risks regarding mineral
resources and reserves; the Company's inability to obtain insurance
to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all;
currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate
sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project
financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all
mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and
resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs
of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly
title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the
environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in
which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications
of COVID-19; the economic and financial implications of COVID-19 to
the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with
mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest
or unavailability; the Company's interactions with surrounding
communities and artisanal miners; the Company's ability to
successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of
exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing
quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility;
conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of
liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the
factors identified under the caption "Risk Factors" in TinOne's
management discussion and analysis and other public disclosure
documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue
certainty to forward–looking statements or forward-looking
information. Although TinOne has attempted to identify important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there
may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated,
estimated or intended. TinOne does not intend, and does not assume
any obligation, to update these forward–looking statements or
forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or
changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such
statements or information, other than as required by
applicable
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec3f/bec3f085232187dcdbcd918d3d997613327c88cc" alt="TinOne Resources Logo (CNW Group/TinOne Resources Corp.) TinOne Resources Logo (CNW Group/TinOne Resources Corp.)"
SOURCE TinOne Resources Corp.