/NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO US NEWSWIRE SERVICES
OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION
DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO
THE UNITED STATES/
TORONTO, Dec. 2, 2024
/CNW/ - Arizona Metals Corp. (TSX: AMC) (OTCQX: AZMCF) (the
"Company" or "Arizona Metals") is pleased to announce new drill
results from the Kay2 Zone at the Kay deposit in Arizona. Drill hole KM-24-170 intersected
20.1 m grading 3.6 g/t AuEq,
including 1.4 m @ 7.9 g/t AuEq. This
drill hole is located approximately 60
m below hole KM-24-166, which intersected 50.0 m @ 6.7 g/t AuEq in what appears to be a new
zone of mineralization in the Kay deposit (Figure 1). The new zone
of mineralization, the Kay2 Zone, is located approximately
100 m north of previously drilled
mineralization in the Kay deposit.
Duncan Middlemiss, President
and CEO of Arizona Metals, comments: "A second significant
intersection in the Kay2 Zone is very encouraging as we continue to
test the extents of mineralization in and around the Kay deposit.
These recently drilled Kay2 holes will likely be included in our
upcoming Mineral Resource Estimate which we plan to publish in H1
of 2025. Currently we have two rigs testing this new extension with
plans to drill 6,300 meters at Kay2 and Kay in the first quarter of
2025."
Four other drill holes at the Kay deposit returned favorable
results.
- Hole KM-24-165 returned several intervals, the best of
which is 14.6 m @ 5.0 g/t AuEq,
including 4.0 m @ 11.3 g/t AuEq. This
infill hole is in the core of the deposit, intended to fill a large
gap south of hole KM-22-74 (39 m @
4.2 g/t AuEq).
- Hole KM-24-169 intersected 17.4
m @ 1.2 g/t AuEq, including 4.3
m @ 2.2 g/t AuEq. Also located in the core of the deposit,
this infill hole is located in a large gap south of hole
KM-21-25B (numerous intervals,
including 4.3 m @ 1.8% CuEq)
- Hole KM-24-171 drilled 5.0
m @ 1.1 g/t Au and 1.5 m @
2.7% CuEq along the south edge of the deposit, stepping out ~35 m
south of hole KM-24-143 (20.1 m @
3.4% CuEq). Mineralization is open to the south in this portion of
the deposit.
- Hole KM-24-171A intersected 2.1
m @ 1.6% CuEq in a branch hole that extended mineralization
25 m south of hole KM-21-35
(5.5 m @ 2.3% CuEq)
Three holes in the North Central target intersected both the Kay
horizon and Pad 10 horizon: holes KM-24-164, 167, and 168
intersected anomalous Cu, Au, and Zn where expected within these
mineralization horizons.
With the completion of recent drill holes, Arizona Metals has
drilled a total of 124,000 meters on the property.
Table 1. Results of Phase 3 Drill Program at the
Kay Project, Yavapai County,
Arizona announced in this news release.
|
|
|
|
Analyzed
Grade
|
Analyzed Metal
Equivalent
|
Metal
Equivalent
|
Hole
ID
|
From
m
|
To m
|
Length
m
|
Cu
%
|
Au
g/t
|
Zn %
|
Ag
g/t
|
Pb
%
|
CuEq
%
|
AuEq
g/t
|
ZnEq
%
|
CuEq
%
|
AuEq
g/t
|
ZnEq
%
|
KM-24-164
|
no significant
assays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KM-24-165
|
680.3
|
682.8
|
2.4
|
0.28
|
0.98
|
2.67
|
52.1
|
0.49
|
2.43
|
3.98
|
6.31
|
2.02
|
3.31
|
5.25
|
KM-24-165
|
686.1
|
700.7
|
14.6
|
0.47
|
1.08
|
4.18
|
75.5
|
1.16
|
3.59
|
5.89
|
9.34
|
3.04
|
4.98
|
7.90
|
including
|
686.1
|
690.1
|
4.0
|
0.30
|
2.00
|
11.58
|
176.6
|
3.27
|
8.09
|
13.26
|
21.05
|
6.88
|
11.28
|
17.91
|
KM-24-165
|
712.8
|
718.0
|
5.2
|
0.22
|
1.53
|
3.79
|
28.9
|
0.56
|
2.96
|
4.85
|
7.70
|
2.47
|
4.05
|
6.43
|
KM-24-165
|
725.4
|
727.3
|
1.8
|
0.02
|
0.37
|
1.87
|
34.1
|
0.56
|
1.35
|
2.22
|
3.52
|
1.14
|
1.87
|
2.96
|
KM-24-167
|
no significant
assays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KM-24-168
|
no significant
assays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KM-24-169
|
719.0
|
736.4
|
17.4
|
0.05
|
0.47
|
1.02
|
13.6
|
0.20
|
0.88
|
1.44
|
2.29
|
0.73
|
1.19
|
1.89
|
including
|
732.1
|
736.4
|
4.3
|
0.03
|
0.70
|
2.15
|
23.1
|
0.56
|
1.59
|
2.60
|
4.13
|
1.33
|
2.18
|
3.46
|
KM-24-170
|
715.5
|
717.0
|
1.5
|
0.01
|
1.28
|
0.33
|
8.0
|
0.12
|
1.01
|
1.65
|
2.62
|
0.74
|
1.21
|
1.93
|
KM-24-170
|
731.5
|
751.6
|
20.1
|
0.55
|
1.59
|
2.64
|
7.0
|
0.03
|
2.60
|
4.26
|
6.76
|
2.17
|
3.56
|
5.65
|
including
|
737.9
|
739.3
|
1.4
|
0.27
|
8.03
|
3.10
|
4.0
|
0.03
|
6.40
|
10.49
|
16.65
|
4.81
|
7.88
|
12.50
|
KM-24-171
|
652.1
|
657.2
|
5.0
|
0.05
|
0.31
|
1.17
|
11.9
|
0.08
|
0.80
|
1.32
|
2.09
|
0.68
|
1.11
|
1.77
|
KM-24-171
|
673.0
|
674.5
|
1.5
|
1.95
|
0.68
|
1.16
|
16.8
|
0.21
|
2.99
|
4.90
|
7.77
|
2.65
|
4.34
|
6.89
|
KM-24-171A
|
627.0
|
629.1
|
2.1
|
0.59
|
0.62
|
1.96
|
16.7
|
0.13
|
1.88
|
3.08
|
4.89
|
1.63
|
2.67
|
4.23
|
The true width
of mineralization is estimated to be 50% to 99% of reported
core width, with an average of 76%. (2) Assumptions used in USD
for
the copper and gold metal equivalent calculations were metal prices
of $4.63/lb Copper, $1937/oz Gold, $25.20/oz Silver, $1.78/lb Zinc,
and
$1.02/lb Pb. Assumed metal recoveries (rec.), based on a
preliminary review of historic data by SRK and ProcessIQ, were 93%
for copper, 92%
for zinc, 90% for lead, 72% silver, and 70% for gold. The following
equation was used to calculate copper equivalence: CuEq = Copper
(%) (93%
rec.) + (Gold (g/t) x 0.61)(70% rec.) + (Silver (g/t) x 0.0079)(72%
rec.) + (Zinc (%) x 0.3844)(92% rec.) + (Lead (%) x 0.2203)(90%
rec.). The
following equation was used to calculate gold equivalence: AuEq =
Gold (g/t)(70% rec.) + (Copper (%) x 1.638)(93% rec.) + (Silver
(g/t) x
0.01291)(72% rec.) + (Zinc (%) x 0.6299)(92% rec.) +(Lead (%) x
0.3609)(90% rec.). Analyzed metal equivalent calculations are
reported for
illustrative purposes only. The metal chosen for reporting on an
equivalent basis is the one that contributes the most dollar value
after accounting
for assumed recoveries.
|
Corporate Update – Previously Proposed Spin-outs
The Board of Directors of the Company recently completed its
2025 strategy session, and as part of these discussions the Company
has decided to no longer pursue the proposed spin-out transactions,
which the Company had previously postponed in May of 2024.
Management, after careful consideration and consultation with the
Board of Directors, determined that at this time the proposed
spin-out transactions are not in the best interest of the Company
given the current stage of the Company's development and current
capital markets conditions.
Arizona Metals had previously announced its intention to seek
shareholder approval for the spin-out of the Company's Sugarloaf
Peak Gold Project, and the spin-out of a to-be-created net smelter
return royalty on the Company's Kay Mine Project. Neither spin-out
was voted on by shareholders or executed.
About Arizona Metals Corp
Arizona Metals Corp owns 100% of the Kay Project in Yavapai County, which is located on a 1669
acres of patented and BLM mining claims and193 acres of private
land that are not subject to any royalties. An historic
estimate by Exxon Minerals in 1982 reported
a "proven and probable reserve
of 6.4 million short tons at a grade of 2.2% copper, 2.8
g/t gold, 3.03% zinc, and 55 g/t silver."
The historic estimate at the Kay Deposit was reported by Exxon
Minerals in 1982. (Fellows, M.L., 1982, Kay Mine massive sulphide
deposit: Internal report prepared for Exxon Minerals Company)
The Kay Mine historic estimate has not been verified as a
current mineral resource. None of the key assumptions, parameters,
and methods used to prepare the historic estimate were reported,
and no resource categories were used. Significant data compilation,
re-drilling and data verification may be required by a Qualified
Person before the historic estimate can be verified and upgraded to
be a current mineral resource. A Qualified Person has not done
sufficient work to classify it as a current mineral resource, and
Arizona Metals is not treating the historic estimate as a current
mineral resource.
The Kay Mine is a steeply dipping VMS deposit that has been
defined from a depth of 60 m to at
least 900 m. It is open for expansion
on strike and at depth.
The Company
also owns 100% of the Sugarloaf Peak Property, in La Paz County, which is located
on 4,400 acres of BLM claims.
Sugarloaf is a heap-leach, open-pit
target and has a historic estimate of "100
million tons containing 1.5 million ounces gold" at a grade of 0.5
g/t (Dausinger, N.E., 1983, Phase 1 Drill Program and Evaluation of
Gold-Silver Potential, Sugarloaf Peak Project, Quartzsite, Arizona: Report for Westworld
Inc.)
The historic estimate at the Sugarloaf Peak Property was
reported by Westworld Resources in 1983. The historic estimate has
not been verified as a current mineral resource. None of the key
assumptions, parameters, and methods used to prepare the historic
estimate were reported, and no resource categories were used.
Significant data compilation, re-drilling and data verification may
be required by a Qualified Person before the historic estimate can
be verified and upgraded to a current mineral resource. A Qualified
Person has not done sufficient work to classify it as a current
mineral resource, and Arizona Metals is not treating the historic
estimate as a current mineral resource.
Qualified Person and Quality Assurance/Quality
Control
All of Arizona Metals' drill sample assay results have been
independently monitored through a quality assurance/quality control
("QA/QC") protocol which includes the insertion of blind standard
reference materials and blanks at regular intervals. Logging and
sampling were completed at Arizona Metals' core handling facilities
located in Phoenix and
Black Canyon City, Arizona. Drill
core was diamond sawn on site and half drill-core samples were
securely transported to ALS Laboratories' ("ALS") sample
preparation facility in Tucson,
Arizona. Sample pulps were sent to ALS's labs in
Vancouver, Canada, for
analysis.
Gold content was determined by fire assay of a 30-gram charge
with ICP finish (ALS method Au-AA23). Silver and 32 other elements
were analyzed by ICP methods with four-acid digestion (ALS method
ME-ICP61a). Over-limit samples for Au, Ag, Cu, and Zn were
determined by ore-grade analyses Au-GRA21, Ag-OG62, Cu-OG62, and
Zn-OG62, respectively.
ALS Laboratories is independent of Arizona Metals Corp. and its
Vancouver facility is ISO 17025
accredited. ALS also performed its own internal QA/QC procedures to
assure the accuracy and integrity of results. Parameters for ALS'
internal and Arizona Metals' external blind quality control samples
were acceptable for the samples analyzed. Arizona Metals is not
aware of any drilling, sampling, recovery, or other factors that
could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data
referred to herein.
The qualified person who reviewed and approved the technical
disclosure in this release is David
Smith, CPG, a qualified person as defined in National
Instrument43-101–Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr.
Smith supervised the preparation of the scientific and technical
information that forms the basis for this news release and has
reviewed and approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Smith is the
Vice-President, Exploration of the Company. Mr. Smith supervised
the drill program and verified the data disclosed, including
sampling, analytical and QA/QC data, underlying the technical
information in this news release, including reviewing the reports
of ALS, methodologies, results, and all procedures undertaken for
quality assurance and quality control in a manner consistent
with industry practice, and all matters were consistent and
accurate according to his professional judgement. There were no
limitations on the verification process.
Disclaimer
This press release contains statements that constitute
"forward-looking information" (collectively, "forward-looking
statements") within the meaning of the applicable Canadian
securities legislation, All statements, other than statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on
expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news
release. Any statement that discusses predictions, expectations,
beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events
or performance (often but not always using phrases such as
"expects", or "does not expect", "is expected", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", "plans", "budget", "scheduled", "forecasts",
"estimates", "believes" or "intends" or variations of such words
and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results
"may" or "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken to occur or
be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in
this press release include, without limitation, statements
regarding the expansion potential of the Kay Project, statements
regarding drill results and future drilling of the Kay2 Zone, the
contribution of the Kay2 Zone to the upcoming mineral resource
estimate for the Kay deposit, and the completion of the mineral
resource estimate in respect of the Kay Project. In making the
forward- looking statements contained in this press release, the
Company has made certain assumptions. Although the Company believes
that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are
reasonable, it can give no assurance that the expectations of any
forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Known and
unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the
actual results and future events to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
factors include, but are not limited to: availability of the
Company to stay well funded; delay or failure to receive required
permits or regulatory approvals; and general business, economic,
competitive, political and social uncertainties. Accordingly,
readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking
statements and information contained in this press release. Except
as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes
no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to
reflect actual results, whether as a result of new information,
future events, changes in assumptions, changes in factors affecting
such forward- looking statements or otherwise.
THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE HAS NEITHER REVIEWED NOR
ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS
RELEASE
SOURCE Arizona Metals Corp.