MOUNT
KISCO, N.Y., May 18, 2023
/PRNewswire/ -- Edenbrook Capital, LLC (together with its
affiliates, "Edenbrook"), one of the largest public shareholders of
Absolute Software Corporation (NASDAQ: ABST, TSX: ABST) ("Absolute"
or "the Company"), with ownership of approximately 10.38% of the
company, today announced that it has delivered the following letter
to the Absolute Board of Directors.
May 18, 2023
Dan Ryan
Chairman of the Board
Absolute Software Corporation
Suite 1400
Four Bentall Centre, 1055 Dunsmuir Street
Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada
V7X 1K8
Dear Dan:
Our firm, Edenbrook Capital, LLC, is a large shareholder of
Absolute Software Corporation ("the Company" or "Absolute"), with
ownership of approximately 10.38% of the company, based on the
53,059,224 shares outstanding in the Company's 6-K filed on
May 15, 2023. We have been
patient, supportive shareholders for over five years, and in that
time, we have enjoyed a collaborative, productive relationship with
the Company. But following last week's announcement of a
proposed transaction for the Company to be taken private by
Crosspoint Capital Partners ("Crosspoint") at a price that
significantly undervalues the Company (the "Proposed Acquisition"),
we feel compelled to share our views publicly for the benefit of
all shareholders. In short, we believe this transaction is
unfair to public shareholders as it undervalues the Company and
allows a prospective new owner to benefit from share price erosion
caused by Company missteps, while public shareholders who supported
the Company's turnaround are left in the lurch.
Valuation, Part 1: Widening the Lens Makes the Price Premium
Look Paltry, if not a Discount
In the May 11, 2023 press release
announcing the Proposed Acquisition, Absolute CEO Christy Wyatt said that the deal would deliver
"immediate cash value to our shareholders," while the release also
stated that the "cash consideration represents a premium of 34% and
38% to the closing price and 30-day volume-weighted average price,
respectively, of the Common Shares on the Nasdaq on May 10, 2023." What the release fails to
mention, however, is that the proposed $11.50 per share transaction represents only a
$0.10, or 0.88% premium, to where the
stock was trading when the Company's fiscal second quarter results
were announced the evening of February
14, 2023. Further, the proposed $11.50 per share price is a 3.85% discount to the
2023 closing high of $11.96 on
February 2, and a 7.41% discount to
the 52-week-high closing price of $12.42 on October 5,
2022. While we believe that the sell-off in the
stock's price that occurred after that February earnings call was
an overreaction, given the strong fundamentals of the Company
(which were further reinforced with the release of fiscal third
quarter earnings after market close on May
15, 2023), we also believe that it was a combination of poor
communication by management and poor balance sheet decisions by the
Company that have caused Absolute to trade at such a sharp discount
to public peers. As we'll discuss later, we believe the
Company slipped on a banana peel that they are responsible for
dropping, paving the way for Crosspoint to harvest the fruits of
success that public shareholders planted. How heartbreaking
for public shareholders that the market's reaction to the
Valentine's Day earnings report and call, during which management
stressed the strength of the underlying business, caused the
Company to lose its nerve and sell in a panic.
Valuation, Part 2: Deal Price is Not Even in the Ballpark on
Private Market Value
While the February 14 earnings
report did include a modest reduction in overall revenue guidance
for the current Fiscal Year, the increased profitability guidance
in that same report should actually yield a higher level of total
profitability for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 than was originally guided to in
the Company's fiscal fourth quarter earnings report on August 23, 2022. More significantly, the
Company's Annual Recurring Revenue ("ARR") highlighted in that
February report continued to show real strength, growing once again
in the mid-teens on a percentage basis (and by a record dollar
amount on a sequential basis), with management projecting continued
similar strength for the remainder of the fiscal year. We
think ARR is a far more critical metric than reported accounting
revenue, as ARR shows the company's actual, ongoing book of
business, and gives a clearer picture of management's ability to
grow the business, while reported accounting revenue can be
optically impacted by changing deal lengths and other
factors. But don't just take our word for it: on that same
earnings call, management repeatedly stressed the importance of
ARR, as opposed to focusing on overall revenue, with CFO
Jim Lejeal stating, "we're notably
focusing on ARR as the right reflection of the growth of the
business."
We were glad to hear management's additional emphasis on the
importance of ARR on that earnings call because ARR is also the key
metric used in valuations for acquisitions in the cybersecurity
software space. And on that score, how did the Company
perform in securing value for its public shareholders under the
terms of the Proposed Acquisition? An Absolute
Failure.
The table below shows cybersecurity software acquisitions that
have occurred since the second quarter of 2021, which we believe is
the relevant time period because that is when the Company itself
announced its acquisition of secure access provider
NetMotion. As the table shows, multiples of ARR for these
transactions ranged from 6.7x to 16.4x, with the average being
11.3x and the median being 11.1x. Based on the proposed
$870 million enterprise value of
Absolute in the Proposed Acquisition announcement, and the
$229.5 million in ARR reported in the
May 15, 2023 fiscal third quarter
earnings report, the Board of Directors ("the Board") has thus
agreed to sell the Company for 3.8x ARR, approximately one-third
the average multiple in the table of comparable transactions.
The deal with the lowest valuation multiple in the table was for
Tufin Software, which had nearly identical revenue growth to
Absolute at the time of its deal announcement. But while
Absolute has adjusted EBITDA margins north of 25%, Tufin had
margins in the negative teens. In other words, a similarly
growing company with EBITDA margins nearly 4000 basis points lower
sold for approximately three additional multiple turns as compared
to the ARR valuation that the Proposed Acquisition
represents.
Target
|
Target
Symbol
|
Buyer
|
Deal Enterprise Value
($MM)
|
Target ARR
($MM)
|
Multiple of
ARR
|
Date
Announced
|
Absolute
Software
|
ABST
|
Crosspoint Capital
Partners
|
$870
|
$229.5
|
3.8x
|
11-May-23
|
KnowBe4,
Inc.
|
KNBE
|
Vista Equity
Partners
|
$4,256
|
$347.2
|
12.3x
|
12-Oct-22
|
ForgeRock,
Inc.
|
FORG
|
Thoma Bravo
|
$1,958
|
$212.8
|
9.2x
|
11-Oct-22
|
Ping Identity
Corp.
|
PING
|
Thoma Bravo
|
$2,800
|
$341.0
|
8.2x
|
3-Aug-22
|
SailPoint Technologies,
Inc.
|
SAIL
|
Thoma Bravo
|
$6,479
|
$394.7
|
16.4x
|
11-Apr-22
|
Tufin Software
Technologies, Inc.
|
TUFN
|
Turn/River
Capital
|
$481
|
$72.0
|
6.7x
|
6-Apr-22
|
Mandiant,
Inc.
|
MNDT
|
Google LLC (Alphabet
Inc.)
|
$4,213
|
$279.0
|
15.1x
|
8-Mar-22
|
Proofpoint,
Inc.
|
PFPT
|
Thoma Bravo
|
$12,325
|
$1,106.8
|
11.1x
|
26-Apr-21
|
|
|
|
|
Average (ex
ABST):
|
11.3x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median (ex
ABST):
|
11.1x
|
|
Source: FactSet, Bloomberg and company filings; PFPT
reports Billings; ARR shown from the full quarter ended prior to
deal announcement date
|
If you were to put the Tufin 6.7x multiple on Absolute's ARR,
you would get an enterprise value of approximately $1.538 billion. Subtracting the Company's
net debt of approximately $213
million would yield an equity value of approximately
$1.325 billion, and with 53.1 million
shares outstanding, a per share equity value of approximately
$24.97 per share, more than double
the Proposed Acquisition price of $11.50 per share. Even the lower 6.2x ARR
multiple that Absolute paid for NetMotion would yield an equity
value of approximately $22.80, nearly
double the Proposed Acquisition price.
As the Company has taken pains to discuss publicly many times
over the last few years, Absolute has significant strategic value
because of its undeletable presence in the firmware of over half a
billion devices, its ability to use that presence to protect other
software that sits on the application layer through its Persistence
offering, and increasing industry needs for solutions that solve
both secure endpoint and secure access needs in an integrated
fashion, which Absolute does. Because of its relatively under-sized
enterprise salesforce for the industry, we believe Absolute is much
smaller than it could be: were a larger strategic player with a
globally distributed sales force to acquire the Company, it could
reach a much wider audience more quickly. Out of more than
600 million devices it is embedded on, Absolute is activated on
approximately 14 million, or just over 2%. That gives the company,
on its own or with a partner, an enormous amount of runway to grow,
and the secular forces in the industry are increasing the need for
its offerings.
So why is the Board selling to a private equity firm, instead of
to a strategic acquiror who could better distribute the Company's
offerings? And why is the Board selling at such a discount to
private market transactions, especially when recent third quarter
earnings showed that the second quarter earnings report was not
symptomatic of a larger fundamental issue? We look forward to
reviewing the pending filing of the Circular that will show the
deal process that transpired. Did the Board really maximize
value by shopping the Company during a quarter that included a near
collapse of the regional banking system? Is that the best
time to get the attention of prospective buyers?
Valuation, Part 3: A Standalone Absolute is Worth Much More
than the Proposed Acquisition Price
As a standalone business before the announcement, Absolute was
trading at an approximately 60% discount to comparable security
software companies. Further, according to FactSet, here were
the 2023 target prices for Absolute, based on sell-side firm
estimates, as of May 10, the day
before the Proposed Acquisition was announced:
Firm
|
Analyst
|
Rating
|
Price Target
|
BMO Capital
Markets
|
Thanos
Maschopoulos
|
Hold
|
$10.90
|
Canaccord
Genuity
|
Mike Walkley
|
Buy
|
$17.00
|
TD
Securities
|
David Kwan
|
Buy
|
$16.00
|
Raymond
James
|
Adam Tindle
|
Overweight
|
$16.00
|
Needham
|
Scott Berg
|
Buy
|
$14.00
|
|
|
Average:
|
$14.78
|
That's an average price target for this year of $14.78, which is 28.5% above the Proposed
Acquisition price. In other words, based on sell-side
estimates, public shareholders could have achieved a nearly 30%
improvement over the Proposed Acquisition price as a standalone
company this year. Where's that immediate cash value public
shareholders were promised in the press release? And that
$14.78 is just a trading
estimate. Using the same 38% premium to trading price that
the Company cited in the May 11 press
release, and applying it to the average price target, would yield a
per share value of $20.40, nearly
$10, or 77% above the Proposed
Acquisition price.
What We've Got Here is Failure to Communicate
While we believe that Christy
Wyatt has built a business of extraordinary strategic value,
we also believe that numerous unforced errors related to financial
communications have held the stock back and created this situation
in which Crosspoint could swoop in during a moment of perceived
weakness to try to take the Company for a song. War and
Peace would be a shorter read than a full list of investor
relations missteps, but here are some of the more egregious
examples that have been costly to public shareholders:
1)
|
On the May 11, 2021
earnings call, the Company discussed the acquisition of NetMotion,
announced that same day. Former Absolute CFO Steven Gatoff
said on that earnings call: "we expect the acquisition to be
accretive on a forward-looking basis to ARR growth, revenue growth
and adjusted EBITDA margin." The market cheered this news,
sending the stock to $15.25, a level it has never seen again.
However, when the Company provided Fiscal Year 2022 guidance on
August 10, 2021, which was after the NetMotion deal had closed in
July, the Company guided for a slowing of revenue growth and lower
adjusted EBITDA margins. That is not what "accretive on a
forward-looking basis" means, and the stock sold off meaningfully,
the first of three consecutive quarters in which there was a stock
sell-off caused by a disconnect between what the CFO said and what
was produced in an earnings report.
|
2)
|
To finance the
NetMotion acquisition, the Company took on floating-rate debt at
the bottom of a historically low, Federal Reserve-suppressed,
interest rate environment, which had only one way to go: up.
We believe fixed rate debt at the time could have been secured for
closer to 6%, but instead, the Company stuck with floating rate
debt, refused to hedge the debt at all, and is currently paying
rates north of 11%, an unnecessary, and completely avoidable, tax
on cash generation. What kind of oversight did the Board
provide here?
|
3)
|
Also at the time of the
acquisition, then-CFO Gatoff claimed that the company would rapidly
de-lever, from over four times EBITDA at the time of the
acquisition, to under two times within two years. With one
quarter left on that clock, the Company is still approximately four
times levered. While the core business has generated, and
continues to generate, cash to comfortably service this debt load,
in our opinion it was an unnecessarily bold statement by the
Company, and it was not rooted in mathematical reality. We
believe that statements such as these eroded shareholder confidence
in management and weighed on the stock.
|
4)
|
After Mr. Gatoff left
the Company in March 2022, he was replaced on an interim basis by
Ron Fior, who we thought was excellent. One need only see Mr.
Fior's presentation at the Company's Investor Day in September 2022
to see how clearly and accurately he spoke about the Company's
financials. Unfortunately, Mr. Fior did not stay on as the
full-time CFO, and between his appointment and that of his
replacement in late 2022, no progress was made on refinancing the
debt, with its ever-increasing interest rate.
|
5)
|
Mr. Fior was replaced
by Jim Lejeal, who started as CFO in December 2022. Mr.
Lejeal was on one earnings call, the Valentine's Day
Massacre. We think it was a major mistake not to have Mr.
Fior stay on to bridge that call, as Mr. Lejeal had only been CFO
for a short while, and did not know the Company well enough at that
point to answer investor questions clearly, which turned minor
issues of contract length and a modest revenue guidance cut into a
referendum on the Company's balance sheet. This was a major
financial communications/investor relations snafu, and it was
completely avoidable. Is anyone on the Board thinking about
the impact of these kinds of decisions on shareholders?
|
Deliver Absolute Value for Shareholders
Persistence and Resilience are the names of two of Absolute's
core product offerings. It would have been nice if the Board
had shown more of both in order to maximize shareholder
value. Perhaps another enterprising buyer, realizing how
cheaply the Board is willing to sell the Company, will come along
and bid a higher price. Shame on you if you don't let
them.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Brolin
Founder and Managing Partner
About Edenbrook Capital
Edenbrook Capital, based in Mount
Kisco, NY, takes a private equity approach to public
markets, principally through concentrated, long-term investments in
small and mid-cap companies.
Disclaimer
This material does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities described
herein in any state to any person. In addition, the discussions and
opinions in this letter and the material contained herein are for
general information only, and are not intended to provide
investment advice. All statements contained in this letter that are
not clearly historical in nature or that necessarily depend on
future events are "forward-looking statements," which are not
guarantees of future performance or results, and the words "will,"
"anticipate," "believe," "expect," "potential," "could,"
"opportunity," "estimate," and similar expressions are generally
intended to identify forward-looking statements. The projected
results and statements contained in this letter and the material
contained herein that are not historical facts are based on current
expectations, speak only as of the date of this letter and involve
risks that may cause the actual results to be materially different.
Certain information included in this material is based on data
obtained from sources considered to be reliable. No representation
is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of such data,
and any analyses provided to assist the recipient of this material
in evaluating the matters described herein may be based on
subjective assessments and assumptions and may use one among
alternative methodologies that produce different results.
Accordingly, any analyses should also not be viewed as factual and
also should not be relied upon as an accurate prediction of future
results. All figures are unaudited estimates and subject to
revision without notice. Edenbrook disclaims any obligation to
update the information herein and reserves the right to change any
of its opinions expressed herein at any time as it deems
appropriate. Past performance is not indicative of future
results.
The publication of this letter does not constitute, and is not
intended to be, a solicitation of proxies under applicable Canadian
securities laws or SEC rules.
Media Contact
Michael Goodwin
mgoodwin@stantonprm.com
646-502-3595
View original
content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/edenbrook-capital-sends-letter-to-absolute-software-board-301829066.html
SOURCE Edenbrook Capital, LLC