RNS Number:1406K
BarclaysGlbl Inv Endowment Fd II Ld
17 April 2003


Embargoed until 00.01 17 April 2003

Barclays Global Investors Endowment Fund II Limited

    Interim Results for the six months ended 28
                   February 2003

Barclays Global Investors Endowment Fund II Limited
(BGIEF II), launched in December 1996, is a Jersey-
registered  closed-ended investment company,  which
invests in a range of traded with-profits endowment
policies.  These policies, which are written  by  a
variety  of life offices, have a diverse  range  of
policy terms and maturity dates, thereby seeking to
achieve  for shareholders a strategic objective  of
an  attractive level of capital growth coupled with
low  investment risk.  It is the intention  of  the
Directors to redeem one fifth of the original share
capital in each of the years 2005 to 2009.

Financial  results  for the  six  months  ended  28
February 2003 include:

Fall  in  Net Asset Value of 20.1% from 122.8p  per
share to 98.1p per share

Return per Ordinary share of  -24.68p

Share  price increased 4.5% (from 77.0p  to  80.5p)
compared  to  a fall of 14% in the FTSE  All  Share
Index

Prospective  returns after Company expenses  to  an
investor   holding   shares  to  redemption   (*see
assumptions in Notes to Editors)
16.3%  to an investor buying shares at 76.5p on  31
March 2003
3.6% to an initial shareholder who bought shares at
100p


Commenting on the results, Paul Seymour,  Chairman,
said:

"It is worth comparing these figures with the 92.1p
per   share   represented  by  the   life   offices
guaranteed  sums at 28 February 2003.  This  figure
backs  every  share, after payment  of  all  future
premiums   but   excludes  other   future   Company
expenses."

"We  can take comfort, however, that if bonus rates
remain  unchanged and are not increased from  their
current low levels a new investor at 31 March  2003
share  price  of  76.5p would  receive  a  compound
return  of  16.3% p.a. after all company  expenses.
That  return  is  sufficiently high  to  allow,  if
necessary,  for further cuts in bonuses  and  still
deliver a good return to new shareholders."

                    -    Ends-

For further information please contact:

Barclays Global Investors Endowment Fund II Limited
Paul Seymour                          01242 547 477

Barclays Global Investors Limited
Dan Nathanson                         020 7668 8030
Glenn Houchell                        020 7668 9089

Weber Shandwick Square Mile
Roddy Watt                            020 7067 0708

Notes to Editors*

Prospective return per annum after all Company expenses

The  net  asset  value at 31.03.03 was  96.44p  per
share. The TEP market's valuation currently assumes
that bonus rates will remain unchanged and that the
policies  held will grow at an average of 7.8%  per
annum to maturity.

Since bonus rates will change over the life of  the
Company the following information is provided.

If  the  guaranteed sums attaching to the  policies
held,  less the future premiums payable to  receive
those  guaranteed amounts, are substituted for  the
market  values  of  those  policies  the  resulting
figure  would  be 91.8p# per share.  In  the  table
below,  the  figures in the column  for  guaranteed
sums  assume  that  no bonuses  are  added  to  the
guaranteed  sums  in future years and  no  terminal
bonuses  are  added at maturity. These figures  are
generated from a worst case scenario.

The  prospective  annual  rate  of  return  to   an
investor holding shares to redemption, based on the
main  assumptions  listed  below,  at  current  and
alternative policy growth rates would be:

------------------------------------------------------
    Policy growth rate   Market  G'teed     4%    8%
                           rate    sums
                           7.8%
------------------------------------------------------
a)  To an investor
    buying shares on       16.3%    4.3% 10.5%  16.9%
    31.03.03 at 76.5p

b)  To an initial
    shareholder who
    bought shares at
    100p                    3.6%   -0.9%   1.4%  3.7%
------------------------------------------------------

These figures are for illustrative purposes and are
not guaranteed.

Main assumptions
*    No brokerage is charged on share purchases
*    All policies are held until maturity
*    Policy premiums are paid to maturity
*    The issuing life offices honour their
     contractual guarantees
*    Base rates continue at 3.75% per annum for the
     life of the Company
*    Administrative costs increase at 2.5% per
     annum for the life of the Company
*    No benefits arise from early deaths or other
     windfall gains
*    The Company is exempt from tax on gains
     throughout its life
*    One fifth of the Company's shares will be
     redeemed in each of the years 2005 to 2009


# Note that this figure allows for future premium
  payments, but does not take into account other
  future Company expenses. The prospective returns
  in the table allow for all future expenses.


Chairman's Statement

Overview

Most  economies continued to disappoint during  the
reporting  period, at least partly in  response  to
fears  of  terrorism  on  the  domestic  front  and
tensions  in  the  Middle  East.  The  major  stock
markets  resumed  downward  paths,  and  the  asset
shares  of with-profits policies suffered  further,
with   mid-year  bonus  cuts  becoming  the   norm.
Moreover,  it  became clear that some life  offices
were  seriously close to breaching solvency ratios,
and  have  been obliged to develop radical survival
strategies. Measures undertaken in recent months to
shore  up balance sheets have included a number  of
rights issues, as well as sales of subsidiaries and
closures  to  new business. The TEP market  in  the
meantime has become much more nervous; demand  from
UK  investors had largely dried up by the autumn in
response to continued bonus cuts, and the Company's
net asset value fell substantially.

Economies and markets

US  equities  fell  in 2002 for a third  successive
year,  which is only the third time this  has  ever
happened.  Other stock markets tumbled  along  with
the  US,  overshadowed by uncertainties surrounding
conflict  in  the Middle East. Disappointment  with
the  pace  of  recovery also helped drive  US  bond
yields down to their lowest levels since the  early
1960s.  A  string of profit warnings and  corporate
scandals  added  to  the  pain  of  investors.   In
November the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for
the  first time in 11 months in an attempt to kick-
start the lacklustre recovery.

Japan  experienced a strong stock market upturn  in
the  spring of 2002, driven by a recovery in  sales
to  the  US  and  its  Asian  neighbours,  although
Japan's performance peaked subsequently as  the  US
recovery faltered. Recovery problems in continental
Europe stemmed instead from rising unemployment and
higher-than-expected inflation,  especially  higher
energy  costs.  This  prevented  policymakers  from
cutting  interest  rates  for  much  of  the  year,
regardless  of the deteriorating economic  outlook,
and  stock market values declined for most  of  the
year.

Despite  the  UK being an exception to the  general
European malaise, posting its 10th successive  year
of  economic growth for the first time since  World
War  II, and buoyant household spending keeping  us
out  of  recession,  this  was  not  sufficient  to
prevent a continuing decline in equity prices, with
the  FTSE All Share Index falling by the end of the
period  to  around its lowest level for over  seven
years.

Faced with this background, the TEP market has been
in  disarray  for much of the period.  Pricing  has
often  been  confused  and turnover  slack.  Policy
supply  to  the secondary market has  increased  as
life  offices have been obliged since September  to
inform    surrendering   policyholders    of    the
alternative  possibility  of  selling  to  the  TEP
market,  while policyholders are also fearful  that
future payouts will not meet previous expectations.


At  the same time demand for TEPs has slackened  as
investors have become much more wary of making long
term   investments   in   life   funds   that   are
conspicuously  under pressure and  cutting  bonuses
sharply.  Falling bonus rates have hit  valuations,
and negative sentiment on with-profits policies has
dented   their   popularity.  Market   makers   and
investors  are now much more selective  about  what
they  buy, though it appears that one or two market
makers  are enjoying good sales in overseas markets
where  the  relatively  solid  values  of  UK  life
offices are still appreciated.

Shareholder Returns

In the six months to 28 February 2003 the Company's
net  asset value dropped 20.1% from 122.8p to 98.1p
per share in response to sharp bonus cuts. Over the
same  six  months  the FTSE All  Share  Index  fell
14.0%, and the FT Actuaries British Government 5-15
Years   Index  rose  2.4%.  Despite  this   unhappy
situation, the Company's share price increased 4.5%
over the same period from 77p to 80.5p.

It  is also worth comparing these figures with  the
92.1p  per  share represented by the  life  offices
guaranteed  sums at 28 February 2003.  This  figure
backs  every  share, after payment  of  all  future
premiums   but   excludes  other   future   Company
expenses. The most recent figures relating to
guarantees can be found on page 10  in the context
of the prospective returns  that may be generated
for shareholders holding until the final redemption
of their shares.

Bonus trends

Life office bonus cuts have rarely been out of  the
newspaper  headlines  during  the  period,  with  a
number  of offices cutting bonuses more than  once.
The  FSA  has  taken  a robust view,  warning  life
offices not to attempt to counter bad publicity  by
paying  out  higher bonuses than they  can  afford,
fearing that life offices could declare excessively
generous  bonus  rates and so  put  at  risk  their
financial  strength,  already  eroded  by   falling
equity markets.

In  the  latest  round of announcements  rates  for
annual bonuses have generally been reduced sharply.
In the most extreme cases a few offices decided not
to  pay  any annual bonus at all. However, a number
of other offices have declared annual bonuses at  a
nominal  level. Any such bonus represents a further
increase  in  the  guaranteed element  backing  the
policies  of  those  offices, though  the  rate  of
increase  in  that guaranteed element  has  clearly
fallen  sharply  over the year. It  is  also  worth
noting  that despite the upward-only ratchet effect
of   the  guaranteed  element  represented  by  the
attaching  bonuses, the net value of the  guarantee
can  still  fall. This arises because the Company's
annual  running  expenses  may  exceed  the  annual
increment in the guaranteed value per share.

The Life Assurance Industry

Faced  with  a very poor stock market and  business
background,  many life offices seem  to  have  been
preoccupied  with  a  struggle  for  survival.   In
contrast  to  recent years, there has  been  little
talk of demutualisations or inherited estates,  and
takeovers  and  mergers  have  occurred   only   in
connection with sales of subsidiaries by one  group
to  another  as part of the process to  rationalise
and reduce costs.

It  became clear earlier in the year that pressures
on  the  UK life assurance industry would be longer
and  deeper  than generally anticipated previously.
In  part  this  was  due to existing  pressures  of
recent years in which the industry had to bear  the
costs  of  pensions mis-selling, and the increasing
costs  of  reserving to pay for annuity guarantees.
To  these  has been added the mounting pressure  on
solvency  margins of the sustained bear  market  in
equities,  which  has obliged  the  FSA  to  loosen
regulatory restrictions for the fourth time  in  17
months.

Strategies  for  dealing with these pressures  have
included  a  number of rights issues, and  in  some
cases  a  willingness to close to new  business  as
part  of their effort to reduce marketing expenses.
It  is relevant that the greatest increases in  new
business   won   have   come  from   the   overseas
subsidiaries of larger offices which have been able
to  bear  the costs of establishing that  business.
Other cost-saving measures have involved reductions
in  dividend payments by proprietary companies, the
sale   of   assets,  sometimes  sales  of  complete
businesses, and inevitably  the dismissal of redundant
staff.  The picture  is  very  similar  in  most
other   major economies where life offices operate.

Outlook

Exceptionally  poor equity markets  have  had  this
year  a  big  impact  on the  bonuses  declared  to
policyholders.    Nonetheless,     the     low-risk
credentials of the with-profits contract have  once
more  played  a  part,  this time  helping  provide
protection through smoothing from the worst  impact
of  the  falls in equity markets in a way  that  is
denied to direct investors.

There  is  a  prevailing view that the Middle  East
situation will not get out of hand, and that  world
growth  can  then resume swiftly with share  prices
sustaining  their recent recovery. It seems  to  me
that  the  recovery we have seen so far is  fragile
and   that  share  prices  are  likely  to   remain
volatile.  Although analysts believe major  markets
valuations  to  be inexpensive, there  are  growing
concerns  about the prospects for world demand  and
the   risks  of  deflation.  I  consider  that  any
judgement  about  the  pace  of  recovery   remains
uncertain.

We can take comfort, however, from the accompanying
table at the end of this report. This shows that if
bonus  rates remain unchanged and are not increased
from their current low levels a new investor at  31
March  2003  share price of 76.5p would  receive  a
compound  return  of 16.3% p.a. after  all  company
expenses.  That  return  is  sufficiently  high  to
allow,  if  necessary, for further cuts in  bonuses
and   still   deliver   a  good   return   to   new
shareholders.

Resignation of Lindsay Tomlinson

Lindsay Tomlinson, who has given invaluable service
as  a  director of the Company since its inception,
resigned from his position on 11 April 2003. He has
made a very significant contribution and has helped
guide   the   Company  through   some   exceptional
circumstances. On behalf of shareholders,  I  would
like to express warmly our gratitude to him.

His place has been filled by the appointment of Dan
Nathanson who undertook the initial work to set  up
the  Company  in  1996 and who  has  acted  as  the
Company's   principal  fund  manger   since   then.
Shareholders will have the opportunity to  vote  on
the  re-appointment  of Mr Nathanson  at  the  next
Annual General Meeting in December.

Paul Seymour
Chairman
11 April 2003


Statement of Total Return (Unaudited)

For the six months ended 28 February 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------
                         6 months to    6 months to    12 months to
                            28.02.03       28.02.02        31.08.02
                               # 000          # 000           # 000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital
Realised gains on
investments                        8            168             182
Unrealised losses on
investments                   (5,609)        (2,293)         (1,913)

                              (5,601)        (2,125)         (1,731)

Revenue
Administrative expenses         (304)          (323)           (635)
Interest income                    -              -               4
                                (304)          (323)           (631)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Net return before
finance costs                 (5,905)        (2,448)         (2,362)
Interest payable                (266)          (220)           (465)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Return on ordinary
activities
for the period                (6,171)        (2,668)         (2,827)

Return per ordinary
share                         (24.68p)       (10.67p)        (11.31p)
Dividend per ordinary
share                             Nil            Nil             Nil
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Net assets
Attributable to
ordinary shares                24,529         30,859          30,700
Per ordinary share              98.12p        123.44p         122.80p
--------------------------------------------------------------------

The  full  accounts for the year  ended  31  August
2002, which have been summarised above, received an
unqualified   auditors'  report   and   have   been
delivered  to the Financial Services Authority  and
the Jersey Financial Services Commission.

Balance Sheet (Unaudited)

As at 28 February 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------
                         28.02.03  28.02.02   31.08.02
                            # 000     # 000      # 000
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fixed assets
Investments                37,258    40,782     42,024

Current assets
Debtors                        15       185          6
Cash at bank                  272       171        201
                              287       356        207
Creditors
Amounts falling due
within one year              (148)     (228)      (184)
Net current assets            139       128         23

Creditors
Amounts falling due
after more than one
year                      (12,868)  (10,051)   (11,347)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Net assets                 24,529    30,859     30,700
-----------------------------------------------------------

Capital and reserves
Called up share capital       250       250        250
Share premium              24,750    24,750     24,750
Capital reserve             4,761     9,969     10,363
Revenue reserve            (5,232)   (4,110)    (4,663)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shareholders' funds        24,529    30,859     30,700
-----------------------------------------------------------

Cash Flow Statement (Unaudited)

For the six months ended 28 February 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------
                         6 months to    6 months to    12 months to
                            28.02.03       28.02.02        31.08.02
                               # 000          # 000           # 000
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Net cash outflow from
operating activities            (344)          (549)           (687)

Capital expenditure and
financial investment
Payments to acquire
fixed asset investments         (130)          (318)           (486)
Payments of premiums            (721)          (721)         (1,439)
Cash received from
disposal of policies               -            116              16
Cash received from
policies ceasing on
death                             16            142             172
Receipts from windfalls
on policies                        -              -             178
Net cash outflow from
capital expenditure and
financial investment            (835)          (781)         (1,559)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash outflow before
financing                     (1,179)        (1,330)         (2,246)

Financing
Increase in loan               1,250          1,325           1,950
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase/(decrease)
in cash                           71             (5)           (296)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Reconciliation of net
cash flow to movement
in net debt
Increase/(Decrease) in
cash in the period                71             (5)           (296)
Drawdown of loan
facility                      (1,250)        (1,325)         (1,950)
Increase in borrowings
due to rolled up
interest                        (271)          (321)           (671)
Movement of net debt
resulting from cash
flows                         (1,450)        (1,651)         (2,917)
Net debt brought
forward                      (11,146)        (8,229)         (8,229)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net debt carried
forward                      (12,596)        (9,880)        (11,146)
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Distribution of Policies

Distribution by value of polices held on 28
February 2003

Maturity date                           %
------------------------------------------
Up to 31 August 2005                 25.0
1 September 2005 to 31 August 2006   16.9
1 September 2006 to 31 August 2007   20.2
1 September 2007 to 31 August 2008   23.5
1 September 2008 to 31 August 2009   10.3
1 September 2009 onwards              4.1


Life office                             %        Life office                          %
-----------------------------------------      -------------------------------------------
Abbey National:   Provincial          0.2       GE Life         National Mutual     0.4
                  Scottish Mutual     1.2       Halifax:        Clerical Medical    3.7
                  Scottish Provident  1.4       Legal % General                    10.9
Aegon             Guardian            1.7       Lloyds TSB:     Scottish Widows     3.0
                  Scottish Equitable  1.1       MGM                                 0.1
AMP               London Life         0.4       NFU Mutual                          0.1
                  Pearl               1.9       Prudential:     Prudential          5.5
Aviva:            Commercial Union    0.7                       Scottish Amicable   7.7
                  General Accident    2.3       Royal & Sun     Royal               2.0
                  Norwich Union      17.8       Alliance:       Sun Alliance        3.7
                  Provident Mutual    1.1       Royal London:   Refuge              0.6
AXA:              Equity & Law        0.7                       Royal London        0.5
                  Sun Life            1.1                       Scottish Life       2.4
Britannic:        Britannia           0.1       Standard Life                      16.0
                  Crusader            0.1       Sun Life of Canada                  2.2
Cooperative                           1.2       Wesleyan                            0.2
Friends Provident:Friends Provident   3.6       Windsor:        Gresham             0.2
                  London &                      Winterthur:     Colonial            1.2
                  Manchester          0.1                       Provident Life      0.8
                  National Mutual               Zurich:         Eagle Star          0.9
                  Life of Australasia 0.1      -------------------------------------------
                  UK Provident        1.1       Total                             100.0
                                               -------------------------------------------
                                                Number of policies held           2,353
                                                Total value of policies    #37, 257,650
                                               -------------------------------------------






The majority of policies have original terms of between 20 and 25 years.



                      This information is provided by RNS
            The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END

IR DQLFFXZBXBBD