
Annual
Report | November 30, 2022
2022
Annual Report
Closed-End
Funds

Midstream
focused
Tortoise
Pipeline &
Energy Fund, Inc.
(NYSE: TTP)
Upstream
focused
Tortoise
Energy
Independence Fund, Inc.
(NYSE: NDP)
Energy
value chain
Tortoise
Power and
Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
(NYSE: TPZ)
Multi
strategy focused
Ecofin
Sustainable
and Social Impact Term Fund (NYSE: TEAF)
www.tortoiseecofin.com
|
|
Beginning
on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Funds’
shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you
specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the
reports will be made available on the Funds’ website
(www.tortoiseecofin.com), and you will be notified by mail each
time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access
the report.
If you
already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you
will not be affected by this change and you need not take any
action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other
communications from a Fund electronically anytime by contacting
your financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or bank) or by
contacting the Adviser by calling (866) 362-9331, or by sending an
e-mail request to info@tortoiseecofin.com.
You may
elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge by
contacting your financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or
bank) or by contacting the Adviser by calling (866) 362-9331, or by
sending an e-mail request to info@tortoiseecofin.com. Your election
to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your
account if you invest through your financial intermediary or
(www.tortoiseecofin.com) all Funds held with the fund complex if
you invest directly with a Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise |
2022 Annual Report to
Stockholders |
|
This combined report
provides you with a comprehensive review of our funds that span
essential assets.
Closed-end Fund Comparison |
1 |
Letter to
Stockholders |
2 |
TTP: Fund
Focus |
6 |
NDP: Fund
Focus |
9 |
TPZ: Fund
Focus |
12 |
TEAF: Fund
Focus |
15 |
Financial
Statements |
21 |
Notes to
Financial Statements |
44 |
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
58 |
Company Officers
and Directors |
59 |
Additional
Information |
61 |
TTP and
TPZ distribution policies
Tortoise
Pipeline & Energy Fund, Inc. (“TTP”) and Tortoise Power
and Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (“TPZ”) are relying on
exemptive relief permitting them to make long-term capital gain
distributions throughout the year. Each of TTP and TPZ, with
approval of its Board of Directors (the “Board”), has adopted a
managed distribution policy (the “Policy”). Annual distribution
amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior
fiscal semi-annual period. In accordance with its Policy, TTP
distributes a fixed amount per common share, currently $.59, each
quarter to its common shareholders. TPZ distributes a fixed amount
per common share, currently $.105, each month to its common
shareholders. Prior to February 2022, the monthly distribution rate
was $.06. These amounts are subject to change from time to time at
the discretion of the Board. Although the level of distributions is
independent of TTP’s and TPZ’s performance, TTP and TPZ expect such
distributions to correlate with its performance over time. Each
quarterly and monthly distribution to shareholders is expected to
be at the fixed amount established by the Board, except for
extraordinary distributions in light of TTP’s and TPZ’s performance
for the entire calendar year and to enable TTP and TPZ to comply
with the distribution requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code. The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Policy without
prior notice to shareholders if it deems such action to be in the
best interests of TTP, TPZ and their respective shareholders. For
example, the Board might take such action if the Policy had the
effect of shrinking TTP’s or TPZ’s assets to a level that was
determined to be detrimental to TTP or TPZ shareholders. The
suspension or termination of the Policy could have the effect of
creating a trading discount (if TTP’s or TPZ’s stock is trading at
or above net asset value), widening an existing trading discount,
or decreasing an existing premium. You should not draw any
conclusions about TTP’s or TPZ’s investment performance from the
amount of the distribution or from the terms of TTP’s or TPZ’s
distribution policy. Each of TTP and TPZ estimates that it has
distributed more than its income and net realized capital gains;
therefore, a portion of your distribution may be a return of
capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or
all of the money that you invested in TTP or TPZ is paid back to
you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect
TTP’s or TPZ’s investment performance and should not be confused
with “yield” or “income.” The amounts and sources of distributions
reported are only estimates and are not being provided for tax
reporting purposes. The actual amounts and sources of the amounts
for tax reporting purposes will depend upon TTP’s and TPZ’s
investment experience during their fiscal year and may be subject
to changes based on tax regulations. TTP and TPZ will send you a
Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year that will tell you how to
report these distributions for federal income tax
purposes.
Tortoise
|
|
2022
Annual Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
Closed-end
Fund Comparison
|
Name/Ticker |
|
Primary
focus |
|
Structure |
|
Total
investments
($ millions)(1) |
|
Portfolio
mix
by asset type(1) |
|
Portfolio
mix
by structure(1) |
 |
Tortoise Pipeline
& Energy Fund, Inc.
NYSE: TTP
Inception: 10/2011 |
|
North
American
pipeline
companies |
|
Regulated
investment
company |
|
$93.5 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Tortoise Energy
Independence
Fund, Inc.
NYSE: NDP
Inception: 7/2012 |
|
North
American
oil & gas
producers |
|
Regulated
investment
company |
|
$70.8 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Tortoise Power
and Energy
Infrastructure
Fund, Inc.
NYSE: TPZ
Inception: 7/2009 |
|
Power
& energy
infrastructure
companies
(Fixed income
& equity) |
|
Regulated
investment
company |
|
$123.4 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Ecofin Sustainable
and Social Impact
Term Fund
NYSE: TEAF
Inception: 3/2019 |
|
Essential
assets |
|
Regulated
investment
company |
|
$249.0 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Tortoise |
2022 Annual Report to closed-end
fund stockholders |
|
Dear
stockholder
The 2022
fiscal year proved to be a volatile environment with numerous
headwinds for the broad market. Headwinds included recessionary
concerns, rising inflation, as well as the anticipation of higher
interest rates. The energy sector was an outlier with positive
performance for the second consecutive fiscal year. In fact, as of
December 31, 2022, midstream, represented by the Tortoise North
American Pipeline IndexSM, and broader energy,
represented by the S&P 500 Energy Select Sector®
Index, outperformed the S&P 500 Index for the past two calendar
years.
Renewable
energy investments had a volatile year due to a variety of factors
including inflation, sharply rising interest rates, political
uncertainty, China COVID policies, decelerating economic growth and
no end in sight to the war in Ukraine. Additional headwinds
included uncertainties surrounding incentives legislation in the
U.S., windfall taxes in Europe, security of energy supply, high
energy prices, availability of equipment and components, and high
logistics costs. However, the renewable energy sector was bolstered
in August with the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act
(IRA).
Social
impact investments continued to make progress post-COVID lockdowns.
The education sector was mixed. Despite the decrease in both
offerings and par value within the sector, 2022 was still the
second biggest year for K-12 charter and private school revenue
bond issuance by par value. Senior housing and care communities
experienced a significant recovery over the fiscal year bringing
occupancy levels back up to their pre-COVID measures.
Energy and power
infrastructure
The broad energy sector,
returned 74.9% for the annual fiscal period. Energy started the
year strong, sold off in June with the broader market on concerns
about a looming recession but rallied into the fiscal year end as
investors continued to rotate into the sector. The energy sector’s
weight within the S&P 500 Index rose to above 5% for the first
time since 2019 as investors sought inflation protection, rotated
to a value bias from growth bias, and saw the Russia and Ukraine
conflict bring energy security into focus. Potential concerns
around a recession were offset by a tightening global energy supply
as demand rebounds post-COVID. Global underinvestment resulting
from environmental, social and governance (ESG) commitments and
energy transition is likely to keep global stock balances extremely
tight for the foreseeable future, a dynamic that presents higher,
but perhaps more volatile prices as seen in 2022.
The
global energy markets were dynamic throughout 2022. Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries+ (OPEC+) production continually
undershot pledged production due to prolonged oil and gas
underinvestment and rapidly shut-in production in 2020. The lack of
supply coming to market complicates assessments over the actual
amount of OPEC spare capacity. Spare capacity is critical as it
guards against prices rapidly rising should a market exogenous
event occur. In early October, the crude oil market tightened as
OPEC+ responded to softening economic conditions in the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
namely Europe, by cutting production 2 million barrels per day (mm
b/d). Separately, sanctions around exports of Russian energy took
effect at the end of 2022 and are expected to increase in 2023
driven by an embargo of Russian crude oil above the price cap of
$60. While Russian crude oil was more resilient than expected in
2022, volumes are projected to decline and/or face longer transit
times to their end market. Given these disruptions, the focus
remains on the supply side of the equation. On the demand side,
global inventories continued to be drawn upon and are well below
their 5-year averages. The scarcity of commodities comes at a time
when global demand should be boosted by China re-opening from COVID
lockdowns in 2023. Chinese demand growth is expected to build
throughout the year.
2022 was
the eighth consecutive year of underinvestment in oil and gas. With
supply sources more finite there is a renewed opportunity for
short-cycle North American energy. In 2022, U.S. oil production
crossed 12 mm b/d, a level not seen since April 2020. For 2023, the
Energy Information Agency (EIA) forecasts that production will
increase 0.3 mm b/d to 12.6 mm b/d, up from 12.3 mm b/d at the end
of 2022. While production is projected to increase year-over-year,
the change is notably lower than previously thought. Rising capital
intensity for U.S. shale including inflationary materials and
service costs has operators messaging 10-20% year over year
inflation. The Permian basin, America’s biggest oil field, is
expected to be the primary driver of production growth with major
integrated energy companies expected to increase their production
by 10-25%.
Transitioning to natural
gas, the Russia-Ukraine conflict presents an enormous long-term
opportunity for U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG). Entering 2022,
Russian natural gas exports to Europe accounted for 13-15 billion
cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) or 35-40% of the EU’s gas supply. In
2023, we expect Russian exports of energy to further shrink. With
energy security a higher priority and low natural gas inventories,
Europe has been increasingly importing U.S. LNG. The U.S. LNG
market, while young, grew from zero market share to the top export
market in just over seven years. Throughout 2022, LNG exporters
contracted almost 6 Bcf/d of new contracts, signing 15-25-year
contracts with European and Asian counterparties. The market awaits
several Final Investment Decisions (FIDs) in 2023 which would put
the U.S. on track to roughly double LNG export capacity by end of
the decade. We expect a more mixed setup for natural gas in 2023,
as supply outpaces demand and unseasonably warm weather lessened
gas demand for Europe and North America. One short-term positive is
the expected restart of Freeport LNG, which has been offline since
the second half of 2022.
The
midstream energy sector returned 28.8% for the period. Investor
sentiment rounded with positive retail flows coupled with companies
buying back stock in the open market. Beyond the constructive
technical setup, we believe midstream serves as a hedge to many
current risks investors face. The midstream sector’s strong
fundamentals, attractive valuations, defensive characteristics in a
higher rate and inflationary environment, and improved free cash
flow should support outperformance on a relative basis.
Recession
concerns weighed on investor psyche the second half of the fiscal
year. While there were several recessions in the last 40 years,
energy demand increased in 38 out of the last 40 years (2008 and
2020 decreased). Due to actions taken during the 2020 recession, we
believe the energy sector, and specifically midstream, is well
prepared to deal with another potential recession. The world
remains undersupplied in energy, and we believe sector balance
sheets are in much better shape than in past recessions including
2001, 2008, and 2020. 2022 earnings exceeded expectations with
energy the one part of the market where earnings grew at an
accelerated rate.
(unaudited)
|
|
2022
Annual Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
As more
volumes flowed through pipeline systems in 2022, cash flow
increased for midstream companies. The balanced return of capital
story continued for investors via debt reduction, share buybacks
and increased distributions. Specifically, deleveraging continued
as companies targeted leverage between 3.0x-4.0x after years of
leverage between 4.0x-5.0x, distribution growth accelerated to 7%
in 2022 as companies targeted a return to pre-COVID levels, and
share buybacks accelerated with $3.4 billion repurchased through
Q3. The other use of capital has been mergers and acquisitions
(M&A). There were several accretive bolt-on acquisitions of
private assets completed by larger energy infrastructure companies.
These assets largely were complementary to existing assets,
allowing operators to control energy volumes across more midstream
activities.
With
inflation surging to 40-year highs in 2022, midstream provided
investors inflation protection. Pipelines typically have long-term
contracts with inflation protection from regulated tariff
escalators. Additionally, tariffs on regulated liquid pipelines
often include an inflation escalator aligned with the Producer
Price Index (PPI). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
indexing could be a material driver of cash flows with rates
potentially increasing over 13% next summer on top of an 8.7%
increase that went into effect July 1, 2022.
Interest
rates rose significantly in 2022 as the Federal Reserve took a more
hawkish approach and started raising the Fed Funds rate.
Historically, midstream energy displays strong historical returns
in rising rate environments. In the 15 time periods of rising rates
since 2001, midstream energy, represented by the Tortoise North
American Pipeline IndexSM, returned an average return of
7.7%, compared to a S&P 500 average return of 6.1%, and bond
return of -2.4% represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S.
Aggregate Bond Index.
With
energy supply short and energy security concerns emerging globally,
investors are reminded how critical energy infrastructure is to
daily life. Even before the Ukraine conflict, U.S. LNG cargoes were
rapidly replenishing Europe’s low gas storage levels via LNG
tankers. LPGs (liquid petroleum gases) were being exported to India
and China, where demand is driven by global population growth and
improvements in living standards. Whether it’s LNG, liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG), or crude oil, U.S. energy infrastructure
companies have signed long-term contracts and have been exporting
energy all around the world.
On the
regulatory front, it was another year of mixed news flow. In
August, the passage of the IRA was intended to benefit the entire
energy value chain and provide energy infrastructure significant
decarbonization opportunities. The IRA provides incentives for
three energy infrastructure decarbonization opportunities,
specifically a carbon capture and sequestration 45Q tax credit, a
hydrogen production tax credit, and support for renewable natural
gas. Following the passage of the IRA, Senator Manchin aimed to
reform infrastructure permitting through the proposed Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2022. Passage ultimately failed
but could be revisited in 2023. Permitting reform is needed. In the
northeast Marcellus Basin, pipeline infrastructure is constrained.
Despite this need, the one major pipeline which continues to be
under construction is the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) and during
the first half of 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit overturned federal approval of a key forest-crossing
permit.
Demand
for low-cost U.S. natural gas creates a need for additional natural
gas pipelines and LNG export terminals. Seeing the setback with
MVP, companies are doing what they can to avoid the red-tape that
comes with building new pipelines. For example, one company
announced that its pipeline expansion will increase the mainline
capacity from 2 Bcf/d to 2.5 Bcf/d through the planned installation
of three new compressor stations. Adding compression stations, for
example, can avoid some of the exhaustive permitting process
affiliated with building new pipelines.
Sustainable
infrastructure
The year
was volatile due to mixed developments at the macro and sector
levels. At a high level, inflation, sharply rising interest rates,
political uncertainty in several countries, China COVID policies,
decelerating economic growth, and no end in sight to the war in
Ukraine were powerful headwinds.
At the
sector level, uncertainties surrounding incentives legislation in
the US, windfall taxes in Europe, security of energy supply, high
energy prices, availability of equipment and components, and high
logistics costs all created volatility throughout the
year.
In that
context, cyclical (including autos) and tech sectors underperformed
the market. However, despite these difficult circumstances, the
renewables sector demonstrated its secular growth resilience
outperforming the broader market. US utilities outperformed their
European counterparts, while the utilities sector as a whole beat
the broader market.
Towards
the end of the period, the Federal Reserve chairman’s somewhat
dovish comments supported equity markets to the close of the
period.
The
following major developments affecting the sustainable
infrastructure and energy transition sector during the year are
worth mentioning.
Inflation Reduction
Act: The U.S. administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, which
was passed during the year, contains most of the clean energy
measures in the now defunct Build Back Better Act, and includes
even more domestic manufacturing incentives than we expected. The
$369 billion bill extends and upgrades various tax credits for
technologies such as wind and solar, while introducing new tax
credits and incentives for emergent technologies such as green
hydrogen and standalone battery storage which should materially
help accelerate deployment timelines. The manufacturing credits
provided by the IRA should also accelerate and expand the onshoring
of many cleantech value chains, from renewables and storage to
autos and materials. In our view, it is a game changer for the
entire energy transition and renewables value chain as it gives
10-year visibility to the space.
We expect
the IRA to add to an inflection point in U.S. electricity demand,
and demand for decarbonised electricity, delivering a growth phase
for a sector that has seen limited demand growth for over a decade.
We expect renewables developers to start announcing numerous new
projects and to enhance the value of existing projects by taking
advantage of more attractive incentives. We also foresee many more
equipment manufacturing plants to be built in the US. We believe
the positive impacts of the IRA aren’t yet
fully
baked into market expectations. We expect many of the impacts of
the IRA will move from drawing boards to revenues and earnings
impacts starting in 2024, as new factories and operating assets
start to come online.
Government
Intervention: Across Europe and for most of the year,
uncertainty on potential government intervention weighed on the
sector. Many of these concerns surrounded windfall taxes, a form of
government intervention which confiscate a portion of profits
companies gain due to the pervasive higher power price environment.
These confiscated profits are then redistributed to support
consumers facing unbearably high energy prices.
Upon the
close of the period, we finally gained much more clarity on power
prices and windfall taxes in Europe (UK, Italy and Germany) with a
better outcome than feared for the majority of countries. This
clarity will provide higher forward-looking visibility and
stability.
Energy
Security: During the year, the Ukraine war escalated both
militarily and in terms of gas supply volatility from Russia into
Europe, which drove gas prices to new highs. There is still a risk
to Winter 2023 gas supply and significant risk of further military
escalation. The consequences of these impacts are primarily being
felt in the EU Zone economy, but have a ripple effect beyond
Europe, as manufacturing costs, forward activity, and concerns
about access to energy-intensive materials become more
acute.
Waste
transition
The year
in review included several significant governmental and corporate
actions to promote sustainability efforts in the U.S. The most
influential event was the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022. The Act contains an array of economic incentives to support
the construction of new waste conversion facilities to produce
renewable natural gas, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation
fuel. Notably, the investment tax credits now available for biogas
facilities such as anaerobic digesters, and the provision for
multi-year fuel credits for facilities that produce renewable
diesel and sustainable aviation fuel, are expected to spur the
development and construction of many new facilities in the
sector.
Also at
the federal level, the U.S. EPA updated its “set” rules for the
Renewable Fuel Standard program, which encourages the displacement
of fossil fuels with renewable fuels. To promote stability, the EPA
set rules for a three-year period from 2023 through 2025, requiring
continued growth of renewable fuels as a percentage of the overall
transportation fuel mix, from 11.92% in 2023, to 12.55% in 2024,
and to 13.05% in 2025. In a major new development, the EPA also
proposed e-RINs to provide credits in connection with electric
vehicles powered by electricity generated from biogas or
biofuels.
At the
state level, the California Air Resources Board, known as CARB,
held public workshops to discuss potential modifications to its Low
Carbon Fuel Standard program. The LCFS program provides economic
benefit for facilities that produce biogas or biofuels for use as
transportation fuels in California. The current LCFS targets a
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 20% by 2030, whereas the
recent workshops have discussed increasing the target to 25%, 30%,
or 35%. Any increase in the emission-reduction targets should have
a positive impact on LCFS fuel credit pricing.
Separately, in the
waste-to-value sector, the driving force toward a more circular
economy is from corporations seeking to reduce the
Scope3 greenhouse gas emissions of their value-chain
suppliers and partners. The corporate support generally involves
entering into purchase contracts with recycling facilities to
improve the recycled content of packaging, reduce transportation
emissions, and/or reduce overall carbon intensity. These multi-year
purchase contracts are expected to provide meaningful support for
sustainability and recycling efforts in 2023 and beyond and are
expected to encourage the construction of new facilities to support
the production required by the purchase contracts.
Social
impact
Education
The
public bond market for new issuance of K-12 charter school and
private school revenue bonds in Q4 2022 declined to $810 million, a
46% decrease from the same period in 2021. For all of 2022, K-12
charter school bond offerings dropped from 203 to 148 and par value
issuance declined from $5.4 billion in 2021 to $4.2 billion in
2022. The market slowdown for K-12 charter school bond offerings
was primarily the result of the rising interest rate environment
throughout most of 2022.1
In
contrast to the shrinkage in the bond market, new data continues to
provide greater insights as to the scale and resilience of charter
school enrollment gains made during the pandemic. Driven primarily
by increases in the 2020 – 2021 school year, charter schools saw a
7.08% enrollment increase, gaining 236,742 students. During the
same period, all other public schools saw a 3.46% enrollment
decrease, a loss of 1,497,505 students. Despite reopening of
schools for in-person instruction in nearly all schools across the
nation, for the 2021 – 2022 school year, families chose not to
return to the district public schools they departed during the
pandemic. These findings are consistent with polling and analysis
published in August indicating that parents are demanding
high-quality school options, and more and more often, they are
“voting with their feet” when their assigned district public school
does not meet their expectations.2,3,4
Charter
schools also saw many legislative victories in 2022 in states
across the nation. Kentucky closed a critical loophole in its 2017
law by enacting a permanent funding mechanism for charter schools.
Missouri enacted a new law that requires the state department of
education to close any gap in state and local funding that exists
between the district and the charter schools within a district, a
change that could increase the funding charter schools receive by
as much as $2,500 per student. Finally, Illinois, New Mexico,
Florida, Tennessee, Colorado and more all passed legislation
providing additional facilities funding for charter
schools.5
As states
respond to increasing parental demand for school choice options,
the availability of school facilities to meet these demands has
proven to be a challenging hurdle. Despite the decrease in both
offerings and par value, 2022 was still the second biggest year for
K-12 charter and private school revenue bond issuance by par
value.1 While an interest-rate environment not seen in
decades and massive fund outflows served to limit most high-yield
municipal bond funds, for Ecofin, it resulted in an increase in
both the volume and credit
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
quality
of investment opportunities throughout the year. As economic and
education challenges continue to evolve, Ecofin will continue to
leverage its decades-long commitment to the sector to provide a
suitable financing alternative for K-12 charter school and private
schools while seeking to provide solid returns to our
investors.
Senior
Living
Senior
housing and care communities had a year of robust recovery in 2022.
After occupancy declines in 2020 and 2021, all units lost during
the pandemic were reoccupied in 2022 bringing occupancy levels back
up to their pre-COVID measures.6
In the
third quarter of 2022, the for-profit senior living sector recorded
its fifth quarter in a row of occupancy gains. Statistically,
nationwide occupancy for independent living and assisted living is
84.7% and 79.7%, respectively. Occupancy increased 0.9% for
independent and 1.1% for assisted living from Q2 2022. Recovery has
been slightly stronger in the higher acuity and needs based
assisted living setting; however, independent living is not far
behind. As of the third quarter, independent living had regained
4.9% occupancy and assisted living 5.0% since hitting lows in
2021.6
Non-profit senior living
has faired much better than their for-profit brethren since the
pandemic hit. As of Q2 2022, non-profit continuing care retirement
communities (“CCRC’s) were a full 6% better occupied than
for-profits and have continued to benefit from the same operational
tailwinds.6
Occupancy
recovery has been fueled by over two years of slowing construction
starts which, as of the third quarter 2022, recorded the lowest
primary market inventory growth since 2013. Rising interest rates
and elevated construction costs should continue to propel occupancy
in the months to come.
From a
macroeconomic standpoint, senior living has not been immune to
inflationary pressures and margin compression. To pass along
increased costs, 2022 was marked with significant rate growth
across the sector. In fact, the second quarter of 2022 had the
highest year over year national rate growth recorded. Independent
living increased 9.4%, assisted living 8.7% and memory care 8.7%.
Based on conversations with our operating partners, residents and
their families have been supportive of these increases and have not
pushed back.6 Many of our operating partners expect to
increase rates higher than the average 3% annual increase in 2023.
Furthermore, the independent living setting has become higher
acuity than it was ten years ago. The increased need for care
should help justify rate increases and further insulate the sector
from potential economic downturns in the future.
From now
until 2030, an average of 10,000 baby boomers will turn 65 every
day.7 With the combination of increased population and a
slower pace of new senior living inventory supply, we remain
confident in the senior living industry’s ability to rebound and
prepare for the upcoming “Silver Tsunami” as the population
continues to age.
Concluding
thoughts
With
continued positive trends for the energy sector, we stand by our
positive long-term outlook for the sector. With the help of the
IRA, we are encouraged and hope for improved performance of
sustainable infrastructure and climate action investments heading
into 2023. Our opportunities for investing in social impact
projects have been continuously expanding to meet the needs of
parents wanting better educational options for their children and
to accommodate the aging baby boomer population.
The
S&P Energy Select Sector® Index is a
capitalization-weighted index of S&P 500® Index
companies in the energy sector involved in the development or
production of energy products. The Tortoise North American Pipeline
IndexSM is a float adjusted, capitalization-weighted
index of energy pipeline companies domiciled in the United States
and Canada. The Tortoise MLP Index® is a float-adjusted,
capitalization-weighted index of energy master limited
partnerships.
The
Tortoise indices are the exclusive property of Tortoise Index
Solutions, LLC, which has contracted with S&P Opco, LLC (a
subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC) to calculate and
maintain the Tortoise MLP Index® and Tortoise North
American Pipeline IndexSM (the “Indices”). The Indices
are not sponsored by S&P Dow Jones Indices or its affiliates or
its third party licensors (collectively, “S&P Dow Jones Indices
LLC”). S&P Dow Jones Indices will not be liable for any errors
or omission in calculating the Indices. “Calculated by S&P Dow
Jones Indices” and its related stylized mark(s) are service marks
of S&P Dow Jones Indices and have been licensed for use by
Tortoise Index Solutions, LLC and its affiliates.
S&P® is a registered trademark of
Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“SPFS”), and Dow
Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark
Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”).
It is
not possible to invest directly in an index.
Performance data quoted
represent past performance; past performance does not guarantee
future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value
will fluctuate so that an investment, when sold, may be worth more
or less than its original cost.
1 |
Electronic Municipal Market Access
(https://emma.msrb.org/) & MuniOS
(https://www.munios.com/) |
2 |
National charter school enrollment flat after early pandemic
gains, according to report. Chalkbeat, November 23, 2022 |
3 |
Changing Course: Public School Enrollment Shifts During the
Pandemic, November 2022, National Alliance for Public Charter
Schools, Drew Jacobs & Debbie Venney |
4 |
Never Going Back: An Analysis of Parent Sentiment on
Education, August 2022. National Alliance for Public Charter
Schools |
5 |
2022 State Legislative Highlights for Public Charter
Schools, December 2022. Todd Ziebarth, National Alliance for
Public Charter Schools |
6 |
NIC |
7 |
census.gov |
|
|
|
|
Tortoise
|
Pipeline &
Energy Fund, Inc. (TTP) |
|
Fund
description
The Tortoise
Pipeline & Energy Fund (TTP) seeks a high level of total
return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to
stockholders. TTP invests primarily in equity securities of North
American pipeline companies that transport natural gas, natural gas
liquids (NGLs), crude oil and refined products and, to a lesser
extent, in other energy infrastructure companies.
Fund
performance
As
more volumes flowed through pipeline systems in 2022, cash flow
increased for midstream companies. The balanced return of capital
story continued for investors via debt reduction, share buybacks
and increased distributions. Specifically, deleveraging continued
as companies targeted leverage between 3.0x-4.0x after years of
leverage between 4.0x-5.0x, distribution growth accelerated to 7%
in 2022 as companies targeted a return to pre-COVID levels, and
share buybacks accelerated with $3.4 billion repurchased through
the Q3. The fund’s market-based and NAV-based returns (including
the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were 33.9%
and 34.7%, respectively. The Tortoise North American Pipeline
IndexSM returned 28.8% for the same period.
2022
fiscal year summary |
|
|
Distributions paid per share (fiscal year 2022) |
|
|
$2.3600 |
Distributions
paid per share (4th quarter 2022) |
|
|
$0.5900 |
Distribution rate
(as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
8.3% |
Quarter-over-quarter distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
0.0% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
59.5% |
Cumulative distributions paid per share to stockholders Since
inception in October 2011 |
|
$ |
17.2975(1) |
Market-based total return |
|
|
33.9% |
NAV-based
total return |
|
|
34.7% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
(17.7)% |
(1) |
Distribution
per share is unadjusted for the impact of reverse stock
split. |
Please refer to the inside front cover of the report for important
information about the fund’s distribution policy
The
fund utilizes a covered call strategy when appropriate, which seeks
to generate income while reducing overall volatility. No covered
calls were written during the fiscal year.
Key asset performance drivers |
|
Top five
contributors |
|
Company
type |
Williams Companies Inc. |
|
Natural gas pipeline |
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. |
|
Crude oil pipeline |
Kinder Morgan Inc |
|
Natural gas pipeline |
Energy Transfer LP |
|
Natural gas pipeline |
Cheniere
Energy Inc. |
|
Natural gas
pipeline |
|
|
|
Bottom five
contributors |
|
Company type |
ESS Tech Inc |
|
Other |
Equitrans Midstream Corporation |
|
Gathering & processing |
NextDecade Corporation |
|
Natural gas pipeline |
NextEra Energy Partners |
|
Diversified infrastructure |
Clearway Energy, Inc. |
|
Diversified infrastructure |
Unlike the fund return, index return is
pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance; past
performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other
stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an
investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original
cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing
management of the fund. References to specific securities or
sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or
its adviser. See Schedule of Investments for portfolio weighting at
the end of the fiscal quarter.
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022 |
|
Tortoise
|
Pipeline &
Energy Fund, Inc. (TTP) (continued) |
|
Value of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Pipeline and Energy Fund –
Market (unaudited)
From
November 30, 2012 through November 30, 2022

The
chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000. Performance
reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the
absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee
future results. Investment returns and principal value will
fluctuate, and when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may
be lower or higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained
by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of
capital gains and income distributions. The performance does not
reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund
distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of
Return as of November 30, 2022
|
|
1-Year |
|
3-Year |
|
5-Year |
|
10-Year |
|
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Pipeline and Energy Fund – NAV |
|
|
34.73% |
|
|
|
-6.51% |
|
|
|
-7.23% |
|
|
|
-2.92% |
|
|
|
-1.56% |
|
Tortoise
Pipeline and Energy Fund – Market |
|
|
33.85% |
|
|
|
-8.88% |
|
|
|
-8.96% |
|
|
|
-4.37% |
|
|
|
-3.68% |
|
Tortoise
North American Pipeline Index |
|
|
28.78% |
|
|
|
12.43% |
|
|
|
8.67% |
|
|
|
7.69% |
|
|
|
10.85% |
|
(1) |
Inception
date of the Fund was October 26, 2011. |
Fund structure and
distribution policy
The
fund is structured to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
(RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and
capital gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as
a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and
distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent of
the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and
capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification
requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of
the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with
each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent
of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or
other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax
rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of
net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise
tax.
The
fund has adopted a distribution policy which is included on the
inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has
adopted a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution
amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior
fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both
up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under
the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in February
and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and
November. The fund may designate a portion of its distributions as
capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in
the last quarter of the year to meet annual excise distribution
requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time
to time at the discretion of the Board.
Leverage
The
fund’s leverage utilization decreased $1.1 million during the six
months ended Q4 2022, compared to the six months ended Q2 2022, and
represented 21.1% of total assets at November 30, 2022. At
year-end, the fund was in compliance with applicable coverage
ratios, 50.6% of the leverage cost was fixed, the weighted-average
maturity was 1.1 years and the weighted-average annual rate on
leverage was 5.45%. These rates will vary in the future as a result
of changing floating rates, utilization of the fund’s credit
facility and as leverage matures or is redeemed.
Please
see the Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for
additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results
of operations, leverage and other important fund
information.
For
further information regarding the calculation of distributable cash
flow and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of
the tax impact on distributions, please visit
www.tortoiseecofin.com.
|
|
|
|
TTP Key Financial
Data (supplemental
unaudited information)
(dollar
amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
The
information presented below is supplemental non-GAAP financial
information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures
(e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction with
the full financial statements.
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
Selected
Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
paid on common stock |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
Distributions
paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.3700 |
|
|
|
0.3700 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
Total assets,
end of period(3) |
|
|
83,133 |
|
|
|
80,898 |
|
|
|
92,230 |
|
|
|
100,901 |
|
|
|
97,010 |
|
|
|
93,907 |
|
Average total
assets during period(3)(4) |
|
|
86,656 |
|
|
|
84,993 |
|
|
|
86,730 |
|
|
|
96,706 |
|
|
|
96,086 |
|
|
|
93,079 |
|
Leverage(5) |
|
|
20,557 |
|
|
|
18,143 |
|
|
|
20,143 |
|
|
|
20,943 |
|
|
|
21,343 |
|
|
|
19,843 |
|
Leverage as a
percent of total assets |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
Net operating
expenses before leverage costs(6) |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation), end of period |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
11,927 |
|
|
|
20,208 |
|
|
|
17,286 |
|
|
|
19,117 |
|
Net assets,
end of period |
|
|
62,043 |
|
|
|
62,289 |
|
|
|
71,653 |
|
|
|
79,443 |
|
|
|
75,181 |
|
|
|
73,509 |
|
Average net
assets during period(7) |
|
|
66,284 |
|
|
|
67,014 |
|
|
|
66,721 |
|
|
|
76,749 |
|
|
|
73,287 |
|
|
|
71,609 |
|
Net asset
value per common share(2) |
|
|
27.70 |
|
|
|
27.96 |
|
|
|
32.16 |
|
|
|
35.66 |
|
|
|
33.75 |
|
|
|
34.73 |
|
Market value
per common share(2) |
|
|
23.05 |
|
|
|
23.16 |
|
|
|
26.44 |
|
|
|
29.76 |
|
|
|
29.18 |
|
|
|
28.58 |
|
Shares
outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
(1) |
Q1 is the period from December through
February. Q2 is the period from March through May. Q3 is the period
from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through
November. |
(2) |
Adjusted to reflect 1 for 4 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
(3) |
Includes deferred issuance and offering costs on senior notes
and preferred stock. |
(4) |
Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(5) |
Leverage consists of senior notes, preferred stock and
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. |
(6) |
Computed as a percent of total assets. |
(7) |
Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022 |
|
Tortoise
|
Energy
Independence Fund, Inc. (NDP) |
|
Fund
description
The Tortoise Energy
Independence Fund (NDP) seeks a high level of total return with an
emphasis on current distributions paid to stockholders. NDP invests
primarily in equity securities of upstream North American energy
companies that engage in the exploration and production of crude
oil, condensate, natural gas and natural gas liquids that generally
have a significant presence in North American oil and gas fields,
including shale reservoirs.
Fund
performance
2022
was eighth consecutive year of underinvestment in oil and gas. With
supply sources more finite there is a renewed opportunity for
short-cycle North American energy. In 2022, U.S. oil production
crossed 12 mm b/d, a level not seen since April 2020. For 2023, the
Energy Information Agency (EIA) forecasts that production will
increase 0.3 mm b/d to 12.6 mm b/d, up from 12.3 mm b/d at the end
of 2022. While production is projected to increase year-over-year,
the change is notably lower than previously thought. Rising capital
intensity for U.S. shale including inflationary materials and
service costs has operators messaging 10-20% year over year
inflation. The Permian basin, America’s biggest oil field, is
expected to be the primary driver of production growth with major
integrated energy companies expected to increase their production
by 10-25%.
Transitioning
to natural gas, the Russia-Ukraine conflict presents an enormous
long-term opportunity for U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Entering 2022, Russian natural gas exports to Europe accounted for
13-15 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) or 35-40% of the EU’s gas
supply. In 2023, we expect Russian exports of energy to further
shrink. With energy security a higher priority and low natural gas
inventories, Europe is increasingly importing U.S. LNG. The U.S.
LNG market, while young, grew from zero market share to the top
export market in just over seven years. Throughout 2022, LNG
exporters contracted almost 6 Bcf/d of new contracts, signing
15-25-year contracts with European and Asian
counterparties.
The
fund’s market-based and NAV-based returns (including the
reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were 55.7% and
62.6%, respectively. The S&P 500 Energy Select Sector Index
returned 74.9% for the same period.
2022
fiscal year summary |
|
|
Distributions paid per share (fiscal year 2022) |
|
|
$2.0800 |
Distributions
paid per share (4th quarter 2022) |
|
|
$0.5600 |
Distribution rate
(as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
6.9% |
Quarter-over-quarter distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
0.0% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
80.6% |
Cumulative distributions paid per share to stockholders Since
inception in July 2012 |
|
$ |
14.8125(1) |
Market-based total return |
|
|
55.7% |
NAV-based
total return |
|
|
62.6% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
(15.2)% |
(1) |
Distribution
per share is unadjusted for the impact of reverse stock
split. |
The
fund utilizes a covered call strategy when appropriate, which seeks
to generate income while reducing overall volatility. No covered
calls were written during the fiscal year.
Key
asset performance drivers
Top five contributors |
|
Company type |
Cheniere
Energy Inc. |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
Devon
Energy Corporation |
|
Oil &
gas production |
EQT
Corp |
|
Oil &
gas production |
Occidental
Petroleum Corp. |
|
Oil &
gas production |
EOG
Resources Inc |
|
Oil &
gas production |
|
|
|
Bottom five contributors |
|
Company type |
ESS
Tech Inc. |
|
Other |
NextEra
Energy Inc. |
|
Diversified
infrastructure |
NextDecade
Corporation |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
Clean
Energy Fuels Corp |
|
Other |
Darling
Ingredients Inc. |
|
Other |
Unlike the fund return, index return is
pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance: past
performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other
stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an
investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original
cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing
management of the fund. References to specific securities or
sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or
its adviser. See Schedule of Investments for portfolio weighting at
the end of the fiscal quarter.
|
|
|
|
Tortoise
|
Energy
Independence Fund, Inc. (NDP) (continued) |
|
Value of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Energy Independence Fund –
Market (unaudited)
From
November 30, 2012 through November 30, 2022

The
chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000. Performance
reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the
absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee
future results. Investment returns and principal value will
fluctuate, and when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may
be lower or higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained
by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of
capital gains and income distributions. The performance does not
reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund
distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of
Return as of November 30, 2022
|
|
|
1-Year |
|
|
3-Year |
|
5-Year |
|
10-Year |
|
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Energy Independence Fund – NAV |
|
|
62.58% |
|
|
|
9.39% |
|
|
|
-10.16% |
|
|
|
-5.82% |
|
|
|
-5.90% |
|
Tortoise
Energy Independence Fund – Market |
|
|
55.70% |
|
|
|
8.41% |
|
|
|
-12.41% |
|
|
|
-7.21% |
|
|
|
-7.81% |
|
S&P
500 Energy Select Sector Index |
|
|
74.92% |
|
|
|
22.87% |
|
|
|
11.01% |
|
|
|
6.46% |
|
|
|
6.59% |
|
(1) |
Inception date of the Fund
was July 26, 2012. |
Fund structure and
distribution policy
The
fund is structured to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
(RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and
capital gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as
a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and
distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent of
the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and
capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification
requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of
the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with
each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent
of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or
other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax
rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of
net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise
tax.
The
fund has adopted a distribution policy which is included on the
inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has
adopted a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution
amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior
fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both
up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under
the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in February
and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and
November. The fund may designate a portion of its distributions as
capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in
the last quarter of the year to meet annual excise distribution
requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time
to time at the discretion of the Board.
Leverage
The
fund’s leverage utilization increased $0.1 million during the six
months ended Q4 2022 as compared to the six months ended Q2 2022.
The fund utilizes all floating rate leverage that had an interest
rate of 5.24% and represented 5.2% of total assets at year-end.
During the period, the fund maintained compliance with its
applicable coverage ratios. The interest rate on the fund’s
leverage will vary in the future along with changing floating
rates.
Please
see the Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for
additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results
of operations, leverage and other important fund
information.
For
further information regarding the calculation of distributable cash
flow and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of
the tax impact on distributions, please visit
www.tortoiseecofin.com.
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022 |
|
NDP Key Financial
Data (supplemental
unaudited information)
(dollar
amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
The
information presented below is supplemental non-GAAP financial
information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures
(e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction with
the full financial statements.
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
982 |
|
Distributions
paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.3100 |
|
|
|
0.3100 |
|
|
|
0.4800 |
|
|
|
0.4800 |
|
|
|
0.5600 |
|
|
|
0.5600 |
|
Total assets, end of period |
|
|
43,973 |
|
|
|
51,135 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
75,288 |
|
|
|
72,928 |
|
|
|
71,059 |
|
Average
total assets during period(3) |
|
|
45,851 |
|
|
|
49,036 |
|
|
|
55,216 |
|
|
|
67,737 |
|
|
|
69,811 |
|
|
|
71,651 |
|
Leverage(4) |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Net Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total
assets |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), end of period |
|
|
5,595 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
22,097 |
|
|
|
32,340 |
|
|
|
29,531 |
|
|
|
30,806 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
40,604 |
|
|
|
46,398 |
|
|
|
58,650 |
|
|
|
71,407 |
|
|
|
67,884 |
|
|
|
67,067 |
|
Average
net assets during period(5) |
|
|
42,801 |
|
|
|
46,787 |
|
|
|
51,521 |
|
|
|
64,733 |
|
|
|
63,623 |
|
|
|
67,687 |
|
Net
asset value per common share(2) |
|
|
22.00 |
|
|
|
25.13 |
|
|
|
31.77 |
|
|
|
38.68 |
|
|
|
36.77 |
|
|
|
38.24 |
|
Market
value per common share(2) |
|
|
19.49 |
|
|
|
22.24 |
|
|
|
27.59 |
|
|
|
32.47 |
|
|
|
32.37 |
|
|
|
32.41 |
|
Shares outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
(1) |
Q1 is the period from December through
February. Q2 is the period from March through May. Q3 is the period
from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through
November. |
(2) |
Adjusted to reflect 1 for 8 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
(3) |
Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(4) |
Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit facility. |
(5) |
Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
|
|
|
|
Tortoise
|
Power and
Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (TPZ) |
|
Fund
description
The Tortoise Power and
Energy Infrastructure Fund (TPZ) seeks to provide a high level of
current income to stockholders, with a secondary objective of
capital appreciation. TPZ seeks to invest primarily in fixed income
and dividend-paying equity securities of power and energy
infrastructure companies that provide stable and defensive
characteristics throughout economic cycles.
Fund
performance
As
more volumes flowed through pipeline systems in 2022, cash flow
increased for midstream companies. The balanced return of capital
story continued for investors via debt reduction, share buybacks
and increased distributions. Specifically, deleveraging continued
as companies targeted leverage between 3.0x-4.0x after years of
leverage between 4.0x-5.0x, distribution growth accelerated to 7%
in 2022 as companies targeted a return to pre-COVID levels, and
share buybacks accelerated with $3.4 billion repurchased through
the Q3. The utilities sector outperformed the broader market,
boosting power companies. The fund’s market-based and NAV-based
returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the
fiscal year were 14.9% and 14.4%, respectively. Comparatively, the
TPZ Benchmark Composite* returned -1.7% for the same period. The
fund’s equity holdings outperformed its fixed income holdings for
the fiscal year on a total return basis.
2022 fiscal year summary |
|
|
Distributions paid per share (fiscal year 2022) |
|
|
$1.1700 |
Monthly
distributions paid per share |
|
|
$0.1050 |
Distribution rate
(as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
9.2% |
Quarter-over-quarter distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
0.0% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
75.0% |
Cumulative distribution to stockholders since inception in July
2009 |
|
$ |
19.6350 |
Market-based total return |
|
|
14.9% |
NAV-based
total return |
|
|
14.4% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
(14.0)% |
* |
The TPZ Benchmark Composite includes the
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Energy Index (CIEN), the BofA Merrill Lynch
U.S. Electricity Index (CUEL) and the Tortoise MLP
Index® (TMLP). It is comprised of a blend of 70% fixed
income and 30% equity securities issued by companies in the power
and energy infrastructure sectors. |
Please refer to the inside front cover of the report for important
information about the fund’s distribution
policy.
Key
asset performance drivers |
|
|
|
|
|
Top
five contributors |
|
Company
type |
Energy
Transfer LP |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
MPLX
LP |
|
Refined
products pipeline |
Western
Midstream Partners LP |
|
Gathering &
processing |
Plains
GP Holdings, L.P. |
|
Crude
oil pipeline |
DCP
Midstream LP |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
|
|
|
Bottom
five contributors |
|
Company
type |
NextEra
Energy Inc. |
|
Power |
Enbridge
Inc |
|
Crude
oil pipeline |
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
Buckeye
Partners LP |
|
Refined
products pipeline |
Rockies
Express Pipeline LLC |
|
Natural
gas pipeline |
Unlike the fund return, index return is
pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance; past
performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other
stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an
investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original
cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing
management of the fund. References to specific securities or
sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or
its adviser. See Schedule of Investments for portfolio weighting at
the end of the fiscal quarter.
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022 |
|
Tortoise
|
Power and
Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (TPZ) (continued) |
|
Value of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure
Fund – Market (unaudited)
From
November 30, 2012 through November 30, 2022

The
chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000. Performance
reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the
absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee
future results. Investment returns and principal value will
fluctuate, and when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may
be lower or higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained
by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of
capital gains and income distributions. The performance does not
reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund
distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of
Return as of November 30, 2022
|
|
|
1-Year |
|
|
3-Year |
|
5-Year |
|
10-Year |
|
Since Inception(2) |
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund – NAV |
|
|
14.37% |
|
|
|
4.18% |
|
|
|
2.00% |
|
|
|
2.53% |
|
|
|
5.83% |
|
Tortoise
Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund – Market |
|
|
14.87% |
|
|
|
3.40% |
|
|
|
0.31% |
|
|
|
1.58% |
|
|
|
4.64% |
|
TPZ
Benchmark Composite(1) |
|
|
-1.69% |
|
|
|
3.71% |
|
|
|
3.56% |
|
|
|
3.14% |
|
|
|
5.81% |
|
(1) |
The TPZ Benchmark Composite includes the
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Energy Index (CIEN), the BofA Merrill Lynch
U.S. Electricity Index (CUEL) and the Tortoise MLP
Index® (TMLP). |
(2) |
Inception date of the Fund was July 29, 2009. |
Fund structure and
distribution policy
The
fund is structured to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
(RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and
capital gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as
a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and
distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent of
the fund gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital
gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification requirements
including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be
in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with each single
issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total
assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be invested in
any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The
fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of its investment
company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which
require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of net income
and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The
fund has adopted a distribution policy which is included on the
inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has
adopted a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution
amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior
fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both
up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under
the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in February
and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and
November. The fund may designate a portion of its distributions as
capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in
the last quarter of the year to meet annual excise distribution
requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time
to time at the discretion of the Board.
Leverage
The
fund’s leverage utilization increased $0.3 million during the six
months ended Q4 2022 as compared to the six months ended Q2 2022,
and represented 20.8% of total assets at November 30, 2022. During
the period, the fund maintained compliance with its applicable
coverage ratios. At year-end, 92.7% of the leverage cost was fixed,
the weighted-average maturity was 1.1 years and the
weighted-average annual rate on leverage was 3.47%. These rates
will vary in the future as a result of changing floating
rates.
Please
see the Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for
additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results
of operations, leverage and other important fund
information.
For
further information regarding the calculation of distributable cash
flow and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of
the tax impact on distributions, please visit
www.tortoiseecofin.com.
|
|
|
|
TPZ Key Financial
Data (supplemental
unaudited information)
(dollar
amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
The
information presented below is supplemental non-GAAP financial
information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures
(e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction with
the full financial statements.
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
|
Q4(1) |
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,468 |
|
|
$ |
2,056 |
|
|
$ |
2,056 |
|
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share |
|
|
0.1600 |
|
|
|
0.1800 |
|
|
|
0.2250 |
|
|
|
0.3150 |
|
|
|
0.3150 |
|
|
|
0.3150 |
|
Total assets, end of period |
|
|
124,958 |
|
|
|
123,000 |
|
|
|
128,994 |
|
|
|
132,902 |
|
|
|
128,405 |
|
|
|
124,715 |
|
Average
total assets during period(2) |
|
|
127,825 |
|
|
|
125,633 |
|
|
|
126,282 |
|
|
|
131,028 |
|
|
|
127,458 |
|
|
|
125,149 |
|
Leverage(3) |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
25,600 |
|
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
|
25,900 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total
assets |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), end of period |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
10,439 |
|
|
|
14,292 |
|
|
|
11,392 |
|
|
|
12,878 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
100,388 |
|
|
|
98,462 |
|
|
|
104,493 |
|
|
|
106,782 |
|
|
|
102,077 |
|
|
|
98,245 |
|
Average
net assets during period(4) |
|
|
103,705 |
|
|
|
103,148 |
|
|
|
101,888 |
|
|
|
105,651 |
|
|
|
99,912 |
|
|
|
98,208 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
|
15.38 |
|
|
|
15.09 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
16.36 |
|
|
|
15.64 |
|
|
|
15.85 |
|
Market value per common share |
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
12.92 |
|
|
|
14.08 |
|
|
|
14.15 |
|
|
|
13.66 |
|
|
|
13.63 |
|
Shares outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
(1) |
Q1 is the period from December through
February. Q2 is the period from March through May. Q3 is the period
from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through
November. |
(2) |
Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(3) |
Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit facility. |
(4) |
Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November 30, 2022
|
|
Ecofin |
Sustainable and Social
Impact Term Fund (TEAF) |
|
Fund description
The Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) seeks to
provide a high level of total return with an emphasis on current
distributions. TEAF provides investors access to a combination of
public and direct investments in essential assets that are making
an impact on clients and communities.
Fund performance
TEAF generated
slightly positive NAV performance in fiscal year 2022. Energy
infrastructure companies performed extremely well during the
period, driven by an increased focus on energy security and
constructive commodity markets. Listed sustainable infrastructure
companies faced some headwinds as inflationary pressures, and
regulatory responses to them, created uncertainty for renewable
developers and regulated utilities. Private sustainable
infrastructure investments faced some of the same headwinds that
listed sustainable infrastructure companies did, but overall
withstood these headwinds well given the market conditions. Social
impact investments performed strongly as industry fundamentals
continued a strong recovery from covid-related headwinds.
Looking ahead
to 2023, we continue to have a constructive outlook for the
underlying assets in the TEAF portfolio. We expect that listed
sustainable equities, TEAF’s largest allocation, will have to
continue navigating a difficult environment, primarily driven by
the inflation and its impact across stakeholders. Notwithstanding
the inflationary backdrop, there remains a global focus on
decarbonizing power generation and industrial activity that should
provide significant opportunities for these companies and drive
strong risk-adjusted equity returns in the sector. Energy
infrastructure equities are well positioned moving into 2023 as a
global focus on energy security has forced large, developed
economies to refocus on their domestic energy supply. While renewed
focus on energy security has made investors marginally more
comfortable with new capital projects, we continue to expect return
of capital to investors to drive equity returns. Finally, TEAF’s
social impact assets have performed very well post-pandemic and we
expect that performance to continue as new investment opportunities
accelerate. We continue to progress on transitioning the portfolio
to the targeted allocation of 60% direct investments. As of
November 30, 2022, TEAF’s total direct investment commitments were
approximately $113 million or approximately 45% of the portfolio.
On a dollar basis, this is down slightly since fiscal year end 2021
due to liquidations of private energy investments. Private social
and sustainable investments are up slightly for the year.
Listed energy infrastructure
● |
Listed energy
infrastructure equities were the strongest driver of performance in
the TEAF portfolio in fiscal year 2022, for the second year in a
row. |
|
|
● |
Strong equity
performance during the period was driven by a renewed appreciation
for energy security and the need for energy infrastructure
investment over time, along with continued strength in commodity
prices for much of the year. |
|
|
● |
Energy security is a
particular focus in European natural gas markets as the war between
Russian and Ukraine highlighted the continent’s reliance on Russian
natural gas to meet energy needs, leading to extreme natural gas
prices that have spread across the world as countries compete for
waterborne LNG. |
|
|
● |
Disciplined spending on
capital expenditures, increased volume, and constructive commodity
pricing continue to build confidence in the stability of energy
infrastructure company earnings, and we expect this environment to
continue to be supportive of valuation into 2023. |
Listed sustainable infrastructure
● |
The year was volatile
due to mixed developments at the macro and sector levels. At a high
level, inflation, sharply rising interest rates, political
uncertainty in several countries, China COVID policies,
decelerating economic growth, and no end in sight to the war in
Ukraine were powerful headwinds. Equity markets followed suit
responding accordingly, ending the year down over 11%. (MSCI ACWI,
USD). |
|
|
● |
At the sector level,
uncertainties surrounding incentives legislation in the US,
windfall taxes in Europe, security of energy supply, high energy
prices, availability of equipment and components, and high
logistics costs, all created volatility throughout the year. Around
the close of the period, we finally gained much more clarity on
power prices and windfall taxes in Europe with a better outcome
than feared for the majority of countries. |
|
|
● |
Within that macro
context, cyclical and tech sectors underperformed the market.
However, despite these difficult circumstances, the renewables
sector demonstrated its secular growth resilience outperforming the
broader market. US utilities outperformed their European
counterparts, while the utilities sector as a whole beat the
broader market. |
|
|
|
|
Ecofin |
Sustainable and Social Impact
Term Fund (TEAF) (continued) |
|
|
|
● |
In such context, TEAF’s
sustainable infrastructure sleeve struggled relatively. Towards the
end of the period however, the sleeve’s generally strong third
quarter earnings, combined with clarity on energy policy frameworks
in Europe, encouraged sentiment. |
|
|
● |
On the policy front, the
period saw the passage of the U.S.’s significant new climate
legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA is a
positive game changer for the entire energy transition and
renewables value chain as it gives 10-year visibility to the sector
and expands tax incentives to storage, nuclear, green hydrogen,
with substantial value creation opportunities for renewables
companies. |
|
|
● |
Power prices continued
to rise and especially significantly in Europe where governments
prepared for a cut-off of Russian gas supplies and a rationing of
gas. These higher power prices lifted cash flows for companies with
open positions or rolling hedges. Developers are also reporting
setting higher long-term power prices as buyers want predictability
on top of the fact that renewables are much cheaper than thermal
power. |
|
|
● |
The war in Ukraine and
its far-reaching consequences continue to present major risks for
economies and markets. Interest rates have been rising to combat
sharply higher inflation – the same inflation which should benefit
companies in the portfolio through direct adjustments in regulatory
remuneration rates and/or higher energy commodity prices. This era
of higher rates is not being ushered in without severe disruption
to market valuations. |
|
|
● |
The current environment
also marks a significant turning point in energy priorities and
policies and a deepening commitment to the energy transition by
countries and companies. Beyond near-term macro risks, there should
be exceptional, above market average growth opportunities in the
energy transition and renewables sphere which has been given a
major boost from the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and a
heightened sense of urgency as the Ukraine crisis redoubles efforts
towards energy security, reduced overall gas consumption, and
decarbonisation. |
|
|
● |
Looking ahead, the
clarity received on European government intervention will
ultimately provide higher forward-looking visibility and stability
to the energy transition and renewables space. |
|
|
● |
Finally, the
transportation infrastructure (toll road and air) traffic and
earnings recovery post-COVID has been stronger than many expected,
and deal activity is expected to continue while listed valuations
are at deep discounts to transactions in private
markets. |
|
|
● |
In summary, we are
positive about the underlying drivers for the listed sustainable
infrastructure space moving into 2023. |
Social impact
● |
TEAF completed six direct investments in the
social impact portfolio during the period. |
|
|
● |
In March 2022 and June 2022, TEAF completed debt investments in
Vonore Fiber Products, LLC, a sustainable packaging project located
in Vonore, Tennessee. The facility, which was previously used as a
biofuels demonstration site, will be repurposed to produce
biodegradable paper and molded fiber packaging products from
locally-sourced, high yield conservation crops and agricultural
biomass. |
|
|
● |
In May 2022, TEAF closed a debt investment in JW Living. JW
Living is constructing a new 130-unit senior living community
called Arbor Village at Smithville (“Arbor Village”) in Galloway,
NJ, a tertiary community outside of Atlantic City, to meet the
underserved need for senior care in the area. The project is being
developed by JW Living and will be managed by Windsor Healthcare,
both of which have significant experience with skilled nursing and
senior housing in the area. When complete, the facility will
consist of 130 Assisted Living and Memory Care units. In
combination with the Borrower’s equity and senior debt, the
investment will be used to fund construction and ramp up of
operations. While the investment is structured to include security
in all of the assets of the project, it is additionally supported
by personal and corporate guarantees from principals of the
developer with substantial net worth and liquidity. |
|
|
2022 Annual
Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
Ecofin |
Sustainable and Social Impact
Term Fund (TEAF) (continued) |
|
|
|
● |
In July 2022, TEAF closed a debt investment
in Phoenix Modern. New Learning Ventures dba Phoenix Modern is a
charter school located in Phoenix, Arizona that currently educates
K-8 students. In operation since the 2020 school year, Phoenix
Modern is on a mission to reimagine learning so that children can
flourish in a modern world. The instructional approach moves away
from the model of single age classrooms, standardized curriculum,
and fixed grading to an entrepreneurial, hands-on,
technology-driven educational environment — while still meeting all
student testing requirements. The school is located near downtown
Phoenix, in an area with high concentrations of students who
qualify for Free-and-Reduced Lunch programs — a group that has
historically struggled to succeed in traditional school
environments. Phoenix Modern’s approach is designed to elevate the
performance of these students, helping to lift them out of the
cycle of poverty. This senior debt investment will allow the school
to acquire its existing facility, and to further expand its
capacity with a build out and renovation of the third floor. This
expansion will allow Phoenix Modern to grow from its current
capacity of 135 students to 210. |
|
|
● |
In August 2022, TEAF closed a debt investment in Academir
Charter School, a new start charter school located in Champions
Gate, Florida near Orlando, that is looking to replicate its
existing, successful programs already operating in the Miami-Dade
area where they serve 3,300 students. The school was asked by the
local district/authorizer to bring its programs to Osceola County
to serve the fast-growing population and help alleviate school
overcrowding in the area. The new school will initially serve
grades K-5 with capacity for 600 students, starting in the 2023-24
school year. Academir’s program will mirror its successful
STEM-based curriculum from its six existing schools, all of which
have achieved an A or B Florida state letter grade since 2016. The
investment will be used to provide senior secured bond financing to
allow Academir to acquire the land and begin construction of a K-5
school. The land is large enough to allow for the construction of
an additional building for grades 6-8 in the future, but not as
part of the scope of this project. This is the first of 3 scheduled
draws. |
|
|
● |
In September 2022, TEAF closed a debt investment in Telra
Institute, a charter school located in Charlotte, North Carolina
offering a unique model of an open enrollment charter school with a
focus on high-performing gifted students. The school opened in Fall
2021 in temporary space serving grades K-3 and is enrolled at full
capacity with a waiting list of over 400 students. The school is
operated by a strong, experienced team of educators and community
leaders. The school’s original plan was to move into the new
facility serving grades K-5, with an eye towards expanding to serve
grades K-8 in the near future. However, because enrollment has
exceeded its expectations and projections, Telra was able to get
approval to expand to serve the higher grades much sooner than
expected. This investment is the fifth investment in the school and
consists of senior secured bonds. The new funding will be used to
build out the third floor, which will allow the addition of grades
6-8 much earlier than originally planned, as noted above. |
Private energy infrastructure
● |
We continue to have conviction behind
greenfield liquefied natural gas (LNG) development projects in
North America given the geopolitical landscape for natural gas and
favorable pricing spread between domestic supply and the global
markets. The fund made a new private investment in public equity
(PIPE) investment in Nextdecade, a LNG development company
currently focused on bringing its 27 million metric tonne per annum
(mmtpa) Rio Grande project to FID. |
|
|
● |
The fund also remains invested in MPL, a 14.1 mmtpa LNG
development project focused on bringing Permian sourced gas to the
west coast of Mexico and alleviating the additional transportation
costs and time it takes to bring LNG to Asian markets while
avoiding Panama Canal congestion. |
|
|
|
|
Ecofin |
Sustainable and Social Impact
Term Fund (TEAF) (continued) |
|
Private sustainable infrastructure
● |
TEAF did not invest in any additional
private sustainable infrastructure projects during 2022, as the
fund previously reached its targeted allocation. |
|
|
● |
Operating assets held at TEAF continue to operate as expected
with stable cash flow generation profiles driven by long-term
contracts with highly-rated counterparties. |
|
|
● |
TEAF expects the final solar project awaiting interconnection
to be fully online in 2Q 2023. |
2022 fiscal year summary |
|
|
|
Distributions paid per share (fiscal year 2022) |
|
|
$1.0500 |
Monthly distributions paid per share |
|
|
$0.0900 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
7.8% |
Quarter-over-quarter distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
0.0% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
|
|
20.0% |
Cumulative distribution to stockholders since inception in July
2009 |
|
|
$3.8105 |
Market-based total return |
|
|
1.74% |
NAV-based total return |
|
|
2.65% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2022) |
|
|
(15.4)% |
Performance data quoted represent past performance; past
performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other
stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an
investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original
cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing
management of the fund. References to specific securities or
sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or
its adviser. See Schedule of Investments for portfolio weighting at
the end of the fiscal quarter.
|
|
2022 Annual
Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
Ecofin |
Sustainable and Social Impact
Term Fund (TEAF) (continued) |
|
Value of $10,000 vs. Ecofin
Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – Market
(unaudited)
Since inception on March 29, 2019 through November 30,
2022

The chart
assumes an initial investment of $10,000. Performance reflects
waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of
such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance data
quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future
results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate, and
when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or
higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling
866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains
and income distributions. The performance does not reflect the
deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund
distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of November 30, 2022
|
|
1-Year |
|
3-Year |
|
Since Inception(1) |
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – NAV |
|
|
2.65% |
|
|
|
5.28% |
|
|
|
1.95% |
|
Ecofin
Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – Market |
|
|
1.74% |
|
|
|
3.56% |
|
|
|
-2.66% |
|
S&P
Global Infrastructure Index |
|
|
8.83% |
|
|
|
12.27% |
|
|
|
19.81% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Inception date of the Fund was March 29,
2019. |
Fund structure and distribution policy
The fund
is structured to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC)
allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital
gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as a RIC,
the fund must meet specific income, diversification and
distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent of
the fund gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital
gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification requirements
including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be
in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with each single
issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total
assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be invested in
any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The
fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of its investment
company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which
require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of net income
and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund
has adopted a distribution policy which is included on the inside
front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has adopted a
managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts
are expected to fall in the range of 6% to 8% of the average
week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal
semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both up and
down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP,
distribution amounts will normally be reset in February and August,
with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November. The
fund may designate a portion of its distributions as capital gains
and may also distribute additional capital gains in the last
quarter of the year to meet annual excise distribution
requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time
to time at the discretion of the Board.
Leverage
The
fund’s leverage utilization decreased $0.9 million during the six
months ended Q4 2022, as compared to six months ended Q2 2022. The
fund utilizes all floating rate leverage that had an interest rate
of 4.94% and represented 11.7% of total assets at year-end. During
the period, the fund maintained compliance with its applicable
coverage ratios. The interest rate on the fund’s leverage will vary
in the future along with changing floating rates.
Please
see the Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for
additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results
of operations, leverage and other important fund
information.
For
further information regarding the calculation of distributable cash
flow and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of
the tax impact on distributions, please visit
www.tortoiseecofin.com.
|
|
|
|
TEAF Key Financial Data (supplemental unaudited
information)
|
(dollar amounts
in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
The
information presented below regarding Distributable Cash Flow and
Selected Financial Information is supplemental non-GAAP financial
information, which the fund believes is meaningful to understanding
operating performance. The Distributable Cash Flow Ratios include
the functional equivalent of EBITDA for non-investment companies,
and the fund believes they are an important supplemental measure of
performance and promote comparisons from period-to-period. This
information is supplemental, is not inclusive of required financial
disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in
conjunction with the full financial statements.
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
3,036 |
|
|
$ |
3,036 |
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
$ |
3,643 |
|
|
$ |
3,643 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share |
|
|
0.2250 |
|
|
|
0.2250 |
|
|
|
0.2400 |
|
|
|
0.2700 |
|
|
|
0.2700 |
|
|
|
0.2700 |
|
Total assets, end of period |
|
|
262,769 |
|
|
|
260,153 |
|
|
|
255,662 |
|
|
|
264,262 |
|
|
|
254,726 |
|
|
|
251,239 |
|
Average total
assets during period(2) |
|
|
260,599 |
|
|
|
262,969 |
|
|
|
257,415 |
|
|
|
260,960 |
|
|
|
256,749 |
|
|
|
246,494 |
|
Leverage(3) |
|
|
29,700 |
|
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
30,400 |
|
|
|
28,800 |
|
|
|
29,500 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total
assets |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), end of period |
|
|
16,157 |
|
|
|
12,165 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
231,658 |
|
|
|
231,382 |
|
|
|
231,553 |
|
|
|
232,699 |
|
|
|
225,064 |
|
|
|
220,798 |
|
Average net
assets during period(4) |
|
|
229,497 |
|
|
|
235,252 |
|
|
|
230,747 |
|
|
|
233,287 |
|
|
|
225,251 |
|
|
|
214,321 |
|
Net asset value per common share |
|
|
17.17 |
|
|
|
17.15 |
|
|
|
17.16 |
|
|
|
17.25 |
|
|
|
16.68 |
|
|
|
16.38 |
|
Market value per common share |
|
|
14.40 |
|
|
|
14.64 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
14.55 |
|
|
|
14.74 |
|
|
|
13.85 |
|
Shares outstanding (000's) |
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
(1) |
Q1 represents the period from December
through February. Q2 represents the period from March through May.
Q3 represents the period from June through August. Q4 represents
the period from September through November. |
(2) |
Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(3) |
Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the margin
loan facility. |
(4) |
Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
|
|
2022 Annual
Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
TTP
Schedule of Investments |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Common Stock —
98.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 27.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
17.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enbridge, Inc. |
|
|
187,587 |
|
|
$ |
7,745,467 |
|
Gibson
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
50,815 |
|
|
|
922,123 |
|
Pembina
Pipeline Corp. |
|
|
118,304 |
|
|
|
4,319,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,986,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 9.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plains GP
Holdings LP |
|
|
523,256 |
|
|
|
6,922,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
53.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
9.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keyera
Corp. |
|
|
73,152 |
|
|
|
1,704,333 |
|
TC Energy
Corp. |
|
|
113,623 |
|
|
|
5,053,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,758,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 44.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheniere
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
26,342 |
|
|
|
4,619,333 |
|
Excelerate Energy, Inc. |
|
|
8,917 |
|
|
|
252,886 |
|
Kinder
Morgan, Inc. |
|
|
389,508 |
|
|
|
7,447,393 |
|
NextDecade
Corp.(2) |
|
|
89,812 |
|
|
|
487,679 |
|
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
|
108,675 |
|
|
|
7,272,531 |
|
Targa
Resources Corp. |
|
|
47,264 |
|
|
|
3,515,969 |
|
The
Williams Companies, Inc. |
|
|
263,979 |
|
|
|
9,160,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,755,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 8.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 8.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antero
Midstream Corp. |
|
|
101,317 |
|
|
|
1,147,922 |
|
Equitrans
Midstream Corp. |
|
|
307,343 |
|
|
|
2,578,608 |
|
Hess
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
78,784 |
|
|
|
2,460,425 |
|
Kinetik
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
8,934 |
|
|
|
304,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables and Power Infrastructure —
8.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 8.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archaea
Energy, Inc.(2) |
|
|
14,797 |
|
|
|
383,834 |
|
Clearway
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
779,680 |
|
NextEra
Energy Partners LP |
|
|
29,030 |
|
|
|
2,336,625 |
|
Sempra
Energy |
|
|
16,121 |
|
|
|
2,679,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,179,288 |
|
Total Common Stock
(Cost $60,512,754) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,093,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Limited Partnerships —
28.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 0.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NuStar
Energy LP |
|
|
40,806 |
|
|
|
666,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
14.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 14.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCP
Midstream LP |
|
|
47,653 |
|
|
|
1,874,669 |
|
Energy
Transfer LP |
|
|
367,070 |
|
|
|
4,603,058 |
|
Enterprise Products Partners LP |
|
|
172,483 |
|
|
|
4,279,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,757,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 2.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 2.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
73,911 |
|
|
|
2,068,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other —
0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westlake
Chemical Partners LP |
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
114,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refined Product Pipelines — 10.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 10.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magellan
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
56,630 |
|
|
|
2,984,401 |
|
MPLX
LP |
|
|
134,271 |
|
|
|
4,563,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,548,272 |
|
Total Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $13,616,411) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,154,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investment —
0.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Investment Company — 0.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional
Class, 3.727%(3) (Cost $294,645) |
|
|
294,645 |
|
|
|
294,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments —
127.3%(1)
(Cost $74,423,810) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,542,534 |
|
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets —
(0.3)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190,945 |
) |
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (13.3)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,800,000 |
) |
Senior
Notes — (5.4)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,942,857 |
) |
Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock at Liquidation Value —
(8.3)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,100,000 |
) |
Total Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,508,732 |
|
(1) |
Calculated as a percentage
of net assets applicable to common stockholders. |
(2) |
Non-income producing security. |
(3) |
Rate indicated is the current yield as
of November 30, 2022 |
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Tortoise |
21 |
|
|
|
|
NDP
Schedule of Investments |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Common Stock —
89.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
Pipelines — 1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enbridge, Inc. |
|
|
23,865 |
|
|
$ |
985,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 0.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kinetik
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
5,678 |
|
|
|
193,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
18.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
1.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC Energy
Corp. |
|
|
19,745 |
|
|
|
878,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 17.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheniere
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
37,456 |
|
|
|
6,568,284 |
|
Excelerate Energy, Inc. |
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
|
176,087 |
|
Kinder
Morgan, Inc. |
|
|
56,165 |
|
|
|
1,073,875 |
|
NextDecade
Corp.(2) |
|
|
65,669 |
|
|
|
356,583 |
|
Targa
Resources Corp. |
|
|
28,897 |
|
|
|
2,149,648 |
|
The
Williams Companies, Inc. |
|
|
36,175 |
|
|
|
1,255,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,579,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and Gas Production — 64.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
2.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suncor
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
40,528 |
|
|
|
1,332,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 62.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chevron
Corp. |
|
|
19,314 |
|
|
|
3,540,449 |
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
|
21,747 |
|
|
|
2,685,972 |
|
Coterra
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
21,071 |
|
|
|
588,092 |
|
Devon
Energy Corp. |
|
|
90,404 |
|
|
|
6,194,482 |
|
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
|
|
37,179 |
|
|
|
5,503,236 |
|
EOG
Resources, Inc. |
|
|
23,070 |
|
|
|
3,274,325 |
|
EQT
Corp. |
|
|
117,402 |
|
|
|
4,979,019 |
|
Exxon
Mobil Corp. |
|
|
30,377 |
|
|
|
3,382,175 |
|
Marathon
Oil Corp. |
|
|
81,694 |
|
|
|
2,502,287 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
|
|
43,302 |
|
|
|
3,009,056 |
|
PDC
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
9,914 |
|
|
|
736,808 |
|
Pioneer
Natural Resources Co. |
|
|
22,350 |
|
|
|
5,274,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,670,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other —
3.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baker
Hughes Co. |
|
|
38,763 |
|
|
|
1,124,902 |
|
Darling
Ingredients, Inc.(2) |
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
140,571 |
|
Denbury,
Inc.(2) |
|
|
15,079 |
|
|
|
1,353,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,618,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables and Power Infrastructure —
0.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Electric Power Co., Inc. |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
282,753 |
|
Archaea
Energy, Inc.(2) |
|
|
7,593 |
|
|
|
196,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,715 |
|
Total Common Stock
(Cost $32,027,202) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,737,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Limited Partnerships —
15.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 3.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plains
All American Pipeline LP |
|
|
189,849 |
|
|
$ |
2,357,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 2.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 2.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
48,607 |
|
|
|
1,360,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
9.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 9.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCP
Midstream LP |
|
|
50,351 |
|
|
|
1,980,808 |
|
Energy
Transfer LP |
|
|
241,059 |
|
|
|
3,022,880 |
|
Enterprise Products Partners LP |
|
|
43,433 |
|
|
|
1,077,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refined Product Pipelines — 1.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 1.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magellan
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
671,609 |
|
Total Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $7,375,146) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,470,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investment —
0.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Investment Company — 0.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio — Institutional
Class, 3.727%(3)
(Cost $556,213) |
|
|
556,213 |
|
|
|
556,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments —
105.5%(1)
(Cost
$39,958,561)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,764,759 |
|
Other
Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (5.5%)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,700,000 |
) |
Total Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,066,827 |
|
(1) |
Calculated as a percentage of net
assets. |
(2) |
Non-income producing security. |
(3) |
Rate indicated is the current yield as of November 30,
2022. |
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
22 |
Tortoise |
|
|
2022 Annual
Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
TPZ
Schedule of Investments |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Principal
Amount/Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Corporate Bonds —
57.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
Pipelines — 6.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
6.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enbridge,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.500%, 07/15/2077 |
|
$ |
7,042,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,167,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 20.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 20.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antero
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.750%,
03/01/2027(2) |
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,628,931 |
|
Blue
Racer Midstream LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.625%,
07/15/2026(2) |
|
|
5,900,000 |
|
|
|
5,737,750 |
|
EnLink
Midstream LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.375%,
06/01/2029 |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,770,000 |
|
Hess
Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%,
02/15/2026(2) |
|
|
4,160,000 |
|
|
|
4,089,238 |
|
The
Williams Companies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.550%,
06/24/2024 |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,967,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,193,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
20.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 20.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheniere
Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.000%,
06/30/2024 |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,054,208 |
|
Cheniere
Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875%,
03/31/2025 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,008,057 |
|
DT
Midstream, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.375%,
06/15/2031(2) |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,720,000 |
|
NGPL Pipe
Co LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.250%,
07/15/2031(2) |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,222,426 |
|
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.500%,
09/01/2023 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,021,356 |
|
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.350%,
01/15/2031 |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,076,950 |
|
Rockies
Express Pipeline LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.950%,
07/15/2029(2) |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,697,639 |
|
Tallgrass
Energy LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.500%,
01/15/2028(2) |
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
2,949,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,750,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other —
4.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 4.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Fortress Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.500%,
09/30/2026(2) |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,832,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refined Product Pipelines — 1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye
Partners LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.850%,
11/15/2043 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,512,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables and Power Infrastructure —
3.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NextEra
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.800%,
12/01/2077 |
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,601,404 |
|
Total Corporate Bonds
(Cost $60,197,220) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,056,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock —
37.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 2.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
2.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enbridge, Inc. |
|
|
53,741 |
|
|
|
2,218,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
2.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
2.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC Energy Corp. |
|
|
48,667 |
|
|
|
2,164,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 5.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 5.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plains GP
Holdings LP |
|
|
389,094 |
|
|
|
5,147,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 4.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 4.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EnLink
Midstream LLC |
|
|
90,965 |
|
|
|
1,169,810 |
|
Equitrans
Midstream Corp. |
|
|
108,596 |
|
|
|
911,120 |
|
Hess
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
66,901 |
|
|
|
2,089,318 |
|
Kinetik
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
11,954 |
|
|
|
406,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,577,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
18.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 18.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DT
Midstream, Inc. |
|
|
24,885 |
|
|
|
1,501,312 |
|
Excelerate Energy, Inc. |
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
334,279 |
|
Kinder
Morgan, Inc. |
|
|
190,405 |
|
|
|
3,640,544 |
|
NextDecade
Corp.(3) |
|
|
119,845 |
|
|
|
650,758 |
|
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
|
35,082 |
|
|
|
2,347,687 |
|
Targa
Resources Corp. |
|
|
69,258 |
|
|
|
5,152,103 |
|
The
Williams Companies, Inc. |
|
|
135,347 |
|
|
|
4,696,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,323,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables and Power Infrastructure —
4.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 4.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archaea
Energy, Inc.(3) |
|
|
26,704 |
|
|
|
692,702 |
|
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure Plc |
|
|
16,523 |
|
|
|
460,992 |
|
NextEra
Energy Partners LP |
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
|
644,966 |
|
Sempra
Energy |
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
2,813,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,611,758 |
|
Total Common Stock
(Cost $29,290,108) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,043,413 |
|
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Tortoise |
23 |
|
|
|
|
TPZ
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Principal
Amount/Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Master Limited Partnerships —
30.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
Oil Pipelines — 2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NuStar Energy LP |
|
|
90,687 |
|
|
$ |
1,480,919 |
|
PBF
Logistics LP |
|
|
30,650 |
|
|
|
609,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 3.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
135,715 |
|
|
|
3,797,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
13.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 13.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCP
Midstream LP |
|
|
73,982 |
|
|
|
2,910,452 |
|
Energy
Transfer LP |
|
|
407,632 |
|
|
|
5,111,705 |
|
Enterprise Products Partners LP |
|
|
202,757 |
|
|
|
5,030,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,052,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refined Product Pipelines — 11.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 11.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holly
Energy Partners LP |
|
|
30,993 |
|
|
|
580,189 |
|
Magellan
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
73,459 |
|
|
|
3,871,289 |
|
MPLX
LP |
|
|
195,684 |
|
|
|
6,651,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,102,777 |
|
Total Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $20,782,196) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,043,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investment —
0.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Investment Company — 0.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio — Institutional
Class, 3.727%(4)
(Cost $306,099) |
|
|
306,099 |
|
|
|
306,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments — 125.7%
(Cost $110,575,623)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,449,760 |
|
Other
Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
695,050 |
|
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (26.4)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,900,000 |
) |
Total Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,244,810 |
|
(1) |
Calculated as a percentage of net
assets. |
(2) |
Restricted securities have a total fair value of $26,877,634,
which represents 27.4% of total net assets. |
(3) |
Non-income producing security. |
(4) |
Rate indicated is the current yield as of November 30,
2022. |
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
24 |
Tortoise |
|
|
2022 Annual
Report | November 30, 2022 |
|
TEAF
Consolidated Schedule of Investments |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Principal
Amount/Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Common Stock —
51.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 10.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia —
1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APA
Group(2) |
|
|
442,606 |
|
|
$ |
3,361,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 9.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheniere
Energy, Inc.(2) |
|
|
30,700 |
|
|
|
5,383,552 |
|
Excelerate Energy, Inc. |
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
388,815 |
|
NextDecade
Corp.(3) |
|
|
234,507 |
|
|
|
1,273,373 |
|
ONEOK,
Inc. |
|
|
15,140 |
|
|
|
1,013,169 |
|
Targa
Resources Corp.(2) |
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
|
6,881,075 |
|
The
Williams Companies, Inc.(2) |
|
|
167,924 |
|
|
|
5,826,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,766,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 0.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hess
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
38,675 |
|
|
|
1,207,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other —
3.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australila —
2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlas
Arteria Ltd.(2) |
|
|
992,726 |
|
|
|
4,736,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain —
1.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrovial
SA(2) |
|
|
121,999 |
|
|
|
3,249,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power —
22.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
0.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Algonquin
Power & Utilities Corp.(2) |
|
|
166,889 |
|
|
|
1,260,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany —
1.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWE
AG |
|
|
68,204 |
|
|
|
2,980,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy —
5.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENAV
SpA(2) |
|
|
544,452 |
|
|
|
2,397,678 |
|
Enel
SpA |
|
|
1,109,060 |
|
|
|
5,925,112 |
|
Terna
SpA(2) |
|
|
503,846 |
|
|
|
3,832,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,155,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal —
2.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP —
Energias de Portugal SA(2) |
|
|
1,209,999 |
|
|
|
5,690,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain —
3.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa
SA |
|
|
244,955 |
|
|
|
4,511,752 |
|
Iberdrola
SA(2) |
|
|
371,053 |
|
|
|
4,162,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,674,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
Kingdom — 5.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
Grid Plc |
|
|
335,962 |
|
|
|
4,107,912 |
|
SSE
Plc(2) |
|
|
343,459 |
|
|
|
7,072,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,180,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Electric Power Co, Inc.(2) |
|
|
53,287 |
|
|
|
5,158,181 |
|
Atlantica
Sustainable Infrastructure Plc |
|
|
75,263 |
|
|
|
2,099,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,258,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables —
7.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada —
3.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innergex
Renewable Energy, Inc.(2) |
|
|
294,405 |
|
|
|
3,685,671 |
|
TransAlta
Renewables, Inc.(2) |
|
|
381,927 |
|
|
|
4,057,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,743,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France —
1.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition
SA(3) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,523,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 2.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NextEra
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
45,491 |
|
|
|
3,853,088 |
|
NextEra
Energy Partners LP |
|
|
26,688 |
|
|
|
2,148,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,001,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation/Storage — 1.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong
Kong — 1.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
Suntien Green Energy Corp Ltd. |
|
|
7,408,484 |
|
|
|
3,063,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewable Infrastructure — 1.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
Kingdom — 1.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greencoat
UK Wind Plc |
|
|
1,711,483 |
|
|
|
3,090,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archaea
Energy, Inc.(3) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar —
0.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunnova
Energy International, Inc.(2)(3) |
|
|
82,766 |
|
|
|
1,889,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities —
3.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
Corp. |
|
|
20,040 |
|
|
|
1,789,973 |
|
Essential
Utilities, Inc.(2) |
|
|
58,349 |
|
|
|
2,814,756 |
|
Public
Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
|
|
43,420 |
|
|
|
2,629,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,233,810 |
|
Total Common Stock
(Cost $117,286,808) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,068,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Investments —
20.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
1.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico
Pacific Limited LLC(MLP) Series A(4)(5) |
|
|
99,451 |
|
|
|
2,182,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables —
19.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 19.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewable
Holdco, LLC(4)(5)(6) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6,528,311 |
|
Renewable
Holdco I, LLC(4)(5)(6) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
23,777,381 |
|
Renewable
Holdco II, LLC(4)(5)(6) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
12,788,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,094,210 |
|
Total Private Investments
(Cost $43,549,238) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,276,563 |
|
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Tortoise |
25 |
|
|
|
|
TEAF
Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued) |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Principal
Amount/Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
Corporate Bonds —
17.4%%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare —
1.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
— 1.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
315/333 West
Dawson Associates SUB 144A NT, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.000%, 01/31/2026(5) |
|
$ |
3,770,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,549,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Finance — 8.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 8.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C2NC
Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.000%, 05/01/2027 |
|
|
10,715,000 |
|
|
|
10,442,539 |
|
Dynamic
BC Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.500%, 04/01/2028(5) |
|
|
8,110,000 |
|
|
|
7,842,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,285,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Living — 7.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 7.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contour
Propco 1735 S MISSION SUB 144A NT, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.000%, 10/01/2025(5) |
|
|
5,715,000 |
|
|
|
5,588,036 |
|
Dove
Mountain Residences LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.000%, 02/01/2026(5) |
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
1,025,360 |
|
Dove
Mountain Residences LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.000%, 02/01/2026(5) |
|
|
886,272 |
|
|
|
866,499 |
|
Drumlin
Reserve Property LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000%, 10/02/2025(5) |
|
|
1,705,311 |
|
|
|
1,674,220 |
|
Drumlin
Reserve Property LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.000%, 10/02/2025(5) |
|
|
1,412,880 |
|
|
|
1,389,642 |
|
JW Living
Smithville Urban Ren Sub Global 144A 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.750%, 06/01/2027(5) |
|
|
3,890,000 |
|
|
|
3,861,303 |
|
Realco
Perry Hall MD LLC/OPCO Sub 144A NT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000%, 10/01/2024(5) |
|
|
2,227,000 |
|
|
|
2,064,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,469,084 |
|
Total Corporate Bonds
(Cost $39,351,758) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,303,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Limited Partnerships —
10.9%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 0.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Midstream Partners, LP(2) |
|
|
39,385 |
|
|
|
1,101,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
5.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 5.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCP
Midstream, LP |
|
|
93,735 |
|
|
|
3,687,535 |
|
Energy
Transfer LP(2) |
|
|
424,800 |
|
|
|
5,326,992 |
|
Enterprise Products Partners LP(2) |
|
|
128,400 |
|
|
|
3,185,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,200,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refined Product Pipelines — 3.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPLX
LP(2) |
|
|
206,200 |
|
|
|
7,008,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables —
1.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 1.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enviva
Partners LP(2)(3) |
|
|
66,900 |
|
|
|
3,796,575 |
|
Total Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $19,274,086) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,107,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock —
2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines —
2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 2.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 7.250%(4)(5)
(Cost $6,034,639) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,582,050 |
|
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
26 |
Tortoise |
|
|
2022 Annual Report | November
30, 2022 |
|
TEAF
Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued) |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
Principal
Amount/Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds —
4.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona —
0.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County
Industrial Development Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.000%, 07/01/2033 |
|
$ |
138,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida —
0.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
Development Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.720%,
07/01/2025(7) |
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
422,750 |
|
Florida
Development Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.000%, 08/01/2032 |
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
309,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin —
4.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
Finance Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.500%,
06/01/2029 |
|
|
8,925,000 |
|
|
|
8,819,358 |
|
Public
Finance Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.000%, 10/01/2029 |
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
179,296 |
|
Public
Finance Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000%, 09/01/2031 |
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
458,288 |
|
Public
Finance Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000%, 09/01/2031 |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
133,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,590,828 |
|
Total Municipal Bonds
(Cost $10,645,897) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,452,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Notes —
5.1%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables —
1.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bermuda —
1.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturn
Solar Bermuda 1 Ltd.(4)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.000%,
06/30/2023 |
|
|
3,510,000 |
|
|
|
3,656,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
Equipment & Services — 3.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 3.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF WWW
Holdings, LLC(4)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.500%, 09/30/2026 |
|
|
7,268,888 |
|
|
|
7,486,954 |
|
Total Construction Notes
(Cost $11,047,792) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,143,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Loan —
0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education —
0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States — 0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village Charter School, Inc.
10.000%, 03/31/2023(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost
$800,000) |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
522,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Purpose Acquisition Company
Warrant — 0.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewables —
0.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France —
0.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition SA Warrant
(Cost $–) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
110,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investment —
0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Investment Company — 0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Government Obligations Fund, Class X,
3.664%(8)
(Cost $410,139) |
|
|
410,139 |
|
|
|
410,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments —
112.7%(1)
(Cost $248,400,357)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,977,853 |
|
Other
Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,320,102 |
|
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (13.3)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,500,000 |
) |
Total Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
220,797,955 |
|
(1) |
Calculated as a
percentage of net assets applicable to common stockholders. |
(2) |
All or a portion of the security is
segregated as collateral for the margin borrowing facility. |
(3) |
Non-income producing security. |
(4) |
Securities have been valued by
using significant unobservable inputs in accordance with fair value
procedures and are categorized as level 3 investments. |
(5) |
Restricted securities have a total
fair value of $88,863,645 which represents 40.3% of net assets. See
Note 6 to financial statements for further disclosure. |
(6) |
Deemed to be an affiliate of the
fund. See Note 7 to financial statements for further
disclosure. |
(7) |
Security in forebearance at
November 30, 2022. |
(8) |
Rate indicated is the current yield
as of November 30, 2022. |
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
Tortoise |
27 |
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Assets & Liabilities |
November
30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise Pipeline
& Energy
Fund, Inc. |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Investments in
unaffiliated securities at fair value(2) |
|
$ |
93,542,534 |
|
Investments in
affiliated securities at fair value(3) |
|
|
— |
|
Cash at
broker |
|
|
— |
|
Cash |
|
|
— |
|
Dividends,
distributions and interest receivable from investments |
|
|
135,254 |
|
Expense
reimbursement receivable |
|
|
121,379 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets |
|
|
107,579 |
|
Total
assets |
|
|
93,906,746 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Payable to
Adviser |
|
|
167,756 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
410,550 |
|
Deferred tax
liability |
|
|
— |
|
Credit
facility borrowings |
|
|
9,800,000 |
|
Senior notes,
net(4) |
|
|
3,931,758 |
|
Mandatory
redeemable preferred stock, net(5) |
|
|
6,087,950 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
20,398,014 |
|
Net assets
applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
73,508,732 |
|
Net Assets
Applicable to Common Stockholders Consist of: |
|
|
|
|
Capital stock,
$0.001 par value per share |
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
172,320,244 |
|
Total
accumulated losses |
|
|
(98,813,628 |
) |
Net assets
applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
73,508,732 |
|
Capital
shares: |
|
|
|
|
Authorized |
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
2,116,385 |
|
Net Asset
Value per common share outstanding (net assets applicable to common
stock, divided by common shares outstanding) |
$ |
34.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Consolidated
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (See Note 13 to the financial
statements for further disclosure). |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Investments in
unaffiliated securities at cost |
|
$ |
74,423,810 |
|
(3) |
Investments in
affiliated securities at cost |
|
$ |
— |
|
(4) |
Deferred debt
issuance and offering costs |
|
$ |
11,099 |
|
(5) |
Deferred
offering costs |
|
$ |
12,050 |
|
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements.
|
|
2022 Annual Report
| November 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise Energy
Independence
Fund, Inc. |
|
Tortoise Power
and Energy
Infrastructure
Fund, Inc. |
|
Ecofin
Sustainable
and Social Impact
Term Fund(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,764,759 |
|
|
$ |
123,449,760 |
|
|
$ |
205,883,643 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
43,094,210 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
103,816 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,208 |
|
|
|
235,797 |
|
|
|
1,261,881 |
|
|
|
2,112,171 |
|
|
|
50,943 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,664 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
71,059,163 |
|
|
|
124,715,331 |
|
|
|
251,239,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,452 |
|
|
|
196,169 |
|
|
|
543,426 |
|
|
|
157,884 |
|
|
|
374,352 |
|
|
|
346,766 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,306 |
|
|
|
3,700,000 |
|
|
|
25,900,000 |
|
|
|
29,500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,992,336 |
|
|
|
26,470,521 |
|
|
|
30,441,498 |
|
|
$ |
67,066,827 |
|
|
$ |
98,244,810 |
|
|
$ |
220,797,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,754 |
|
|
$ |
6,200 |
|
|
$ |
13,491 |
|
|
|
215,496,968 |
|
|
|
107,595,166 |
|
|
|
242,680,341 |
|
|
|
(148,431,895 |
) |
|
|
(9,356,556 |
) |
|
|
(21,895,877 |
) |
|
$ |
67,066,827 |
|
|
$ |
98,244,810 |
|
|
$ |
220,797,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,753,698 |
|
|
|
6,200,175 |
|
|
|
13,491,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.24 |
|
|
$ |
15.85 |
|
|
$ |
16.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,958,561 |
|
|
$ |
110,575,623 |
|
|
$ |
206,879,320 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
41,521,037 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Operations |
For the
year ended November 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
Tortoise Pipeline
& Energy
Fund, Inc. |
Investment
Income |
|
|
Distributions
from master limited partnerships |
|
$ |
1,778,345 |
|
Dividends and
distributions from common stock |
|
|
3,818,709 |
|
Dividends and
distributions from preferred stock |
|
|
17,591 |
|
Dividends and
distributions from affiliated investments |
|
|
— |
|
Less return of
capital on distributions(2) |
|
|
(3,159,480 |
) |
Less foreign
taxes withheld |
|
|
(186,339 |
) |
Net dividends
and distributions from investments |
|
|
2,268,826 |
|
Interest
income |
|
|
5,212 |
|
Total
Investment Income |
|
|
2,274,038 |
|
Operating
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Advisory
fees |
|
|
1,015,327 |
|
Administrator
fees |
|
|
49,682 |
|
Professional
fees |
|
|
178,959 |
|
Directors
fees |
|
|
77,145 |
|
Stockholder
communication expenses |
|
|
21,532 |
|
Custodian fees
and expenses |
|
|
14,735 |
|
Fund
accounting fees |
|
|
27,973 |
|
Registration
fees |
|
|
27,276 |
|
Stock transfer
agent fees |
|
|
8,449 |
|
Other
operating expenses |
|
|
27,829 |
|
Total
Operating Expenses |
|
|
1,448,907 |
|
Leverage
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
445,214 |
|
Distributions
to mandatory redeemable preferred stockholders |
|
|
400,770 |
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs |
|
|
11,374 |
|
Other leverage
expenses |
|
|
358 |
|
Total
Leverage Expenses |
|
|
857,716 |
|
Total
Expenses |
|
|
2,306,623 |
|
Less expense
reimbursement by Adviser (Note 4) |
|
|
(203,158 |
) |
Net
Expenses |
|
|
2,103,465 |
|
Net
Investment Income (Loss), before Income Taxes |
|
|
170,573 |
|
Deferred tax
benefit (expense) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
Investment Income (Loss) |
|
|
170,573 |
|
Realized
and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Foreign
Currency |
|
|
|
|
Net realized
gain (loss) on investments in unaffiliated securities |
|
|
1,799,732 |
|
Net realized
gain on written options |
|
|
— |
|
Net realized
gain (loss) on foreign currency and translation of other assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
|
|
(6,777 |
) |
Net realized
gain |
|
|
1,792,955 |
|
Net change in
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments in
unaffiliated securities |
|
|
18,113,560 |
|
Net change in
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments in affiliated
securities |
|
|
— |
|
Net change in
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of written
options |
|
|
— |
|
Net change in
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of other assets and
liabilities due to foreign currency translation |
|
|
235 |
|
Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) |
|
|
18,113,795 |
|
Net
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
19,906,750 |
|
Net
Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders Resulting
from Operations |
|
$ |
20,077,323 |
|
(1) |
Consolidated
Statement of Operations (See Note 13 to the financial statements
for further disclosure). |
(2) |
Return
of Capital may be in excess of current year distributions due to
prior year adjustments. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further disclosure. |
See accompanying Notes to
Financial Statements.
|
|
2022 Annual Report
| November 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tortoise Energy
Independence
Fund, Inc. |
|
Tortoise Power
and Energy
Infrastructure
Fund, Inc. |
|
Ecofin
Sustainable
and Social Impact
Term Fund(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
702,103 |
|
|
$ |
2,527,201 |
|
|
$ |
1,661,071 |
|
|
|
2,599,584 |
|
|
|
1,797,506 |
|
|
|
5,003,277 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
498,863 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
(816,650 |
) |
|
|
(3,382,254 |
) |
|
|
(4,599,443 |
) |
|
|
(26,455 |
) |
|
|
(41,575 |
) |
|
|
(398,992 |
) |
|
|
2,458,582 |
|
|
|
916,220 |
|
|
|
3,564,776 |
|
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
3,264,847 |
|
|
|
7,281,597 |
|
|
|
2,463,712 |
|
|
|
4,181,067 |
|
|
|
10,846,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
716,600 |
|
|
|
1,202,519 |
|
|
|
3,414,146 |
|
|
|
42,855 |
|
|
|
63,654 |
|
|
|
116,448 |
|
|
|
97,902 |
|
|
|
201,167 |
|
|
|
250,830 |
|
|
|
77,204 |
|
|
|
124,709 |
|
|
|
125,209 |
|
|
|
21,672 |
|
|
|
36,624 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
12,838 |
|
|
|
78,948 |
|
|
|
24,507 |
|
|
|
28,792 |
|
|
|
32,283 |
|
|
|
26,664 |
|
|
|
51,498 |
|
|
|
32,717 |
|
|
|
11,827 |
|
|
|
18,538 |
|
|
|
7,187 |
|
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
27,770 |
|
|
|
198,637 |
|
|
|
1,055,522 |
|
|
|
1,768,109 |
|
|
|
4,281,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,228 |
|
|
|
859,523 |
|
|
|
700,394 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
114,228 |
|
|
|
859,523 |
|
|
|
700,394 |
|
|
|
1,169,750 |
|
|
|
2,627,632 |
|
|
|
4,981,837 |
|
|
|
(176,058 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
993,692 |
|
|
|
2,627,632 |
|
|
|
4,981,837 |
|
|
|
1,470,020 |
|
|
|
1,553,435 |
|
|
|
5,864,536 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
57,377 |
|
|
|
1,470,020 |
|
|
|
1,553,435 |
|
|
|
5,921,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082,703 |
|
|
|
283,232 |
|
|
|
9,011,707 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
175,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
|
|
(187,075 |
) |
|
|
5,081,718 |
|
|
|
282,059 |
|
|
|
9,000,317 |
|
|
|
21,478,671 |
|
|
|
10,522,220 |
|
|
|
(12,563,646 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|