This Amendment No. 1 (this
Amendment No.
1
) amends and
supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule
14D-9
(as amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Schedule
14D-9
) previously
filed by Tableau Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (
Tableau
or the
Company
), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC
) on July 3, 2019, relating to the exchange offer by
salesforce.com, inc., a Delaware corporation (
Salesforce
), and Sausalito Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Salesforce (the
Purchaser
) to exchange for each outstanding
share of Class A common stock of Tableau, par value $0.0001 per share (
Class
A common stock
), and Class B common stock of Tableau, par value $0.0001 per share (
Class
B
common stock
, and together with Class A common stock,
Tableau common stock
), validly tendered and not validly withdrawn in the offer, 1.103 shares of Salesforce common stock, par value $0.001 per share
(
Salesforce common stock
), together with cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Salesforce common stock, without interest and subject to reduction for any applicable withholding taxes (such offer, on the terms and subject to the
conditions and procedures set forth in the prospectus/offer to exchange, dated July 3, 2019 (the
Prospectus/Offer to Exchange
), and in the related letter of transmittal (the
Letter of Transmittal
), together
with any amendments or supplements thereto, the
Offer
). Salesforce has filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form
S-4
dated July 3, 2019, relating to the Offer and sale of
shares of Salesforce common stock to be issued to holders of Tableau common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn in the Offer (the
Registration Statement
). The terms and conditions of the Offer are set forth in the
Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, which is a part of the Registration Statement, and the Letter of Transmittal, which were filed as Exhibits (a)(4) and (a)(1)(A), respectively, to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed with the SEC on
July 3, 2019 (as amended or supplemented from time to time) by Salesforce and the Purchaser. Any capitalized term used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Schedule
14D-9.
Except as otherwise set forth below, the information set forth in the Schedule
14D-9
remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference as relevant to the items in this Amendment No. 1. This Amendment No. 1 is being filed to reflect certain updates as set forth below.
Item 8.
|
Additional Information.
|
Item 8 Additional Information of the Schedule
14D-9
is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:
1. By adding a new sentence at the end of the first paragraph of the section entitled
Regulatory Approvals HSR
Act
on page 44 to read as follows:
The
initial 15-calendar-day waiting
period under the HSR Act expired, effective July 15, 2019 at 11:59 pm, Eastern time.
2. The sentence under the section entitled
Legal Proceedings
on page 45 is hereby amended and restated by
deleting the sentence and replacing it with the following paragraph to read as follows
:
Subsequent to the filing of the Schedule
14D-9,
three civil actions were filed challenging the adequacy of certain disclosures disseminated in connection with the proposed transaction. On July 10, 2019, Shiva Stein, a purported stockholder of
Tableau, commenced an action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned
Stein v. Tableau Software, Inc. et al.
, Case No.
1:19-cv-01289,
against Tableau and each of the current members of the Tableau Board (the Stein complaint). The Stein complaint, asserts claims under Sections
14(d), 14(e), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act challenging the adequacy of certain public disclosures made concerning the proposed transaction. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing consummation of the proposed transaction,
rescission of the proposed transaction or rescissory damages in the event it is consummated, an accounting by defendants for all damages caused to the plaintiff, and the award of attorneys fees and expenses. On July 10, 2019, Marcy
Curtis, a purported stockholder of Tableau, commenced a putative class action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned
Curtis v. Tableau Software, Inc. et al.
, Case No.
1:19-cv-01290,
against Tableau, each of the current members of the Tableau Board, Salesforce, and Purchaser (the Curtis complaint). The Curtis complaint asserts claims under Sections 14(d), 14(e),
and 20(a) of the Exchange Act challenging the adequacy of certain public disclosures made concerning the proposed transaction. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing consummation of the proposed transaction, rescission of
the proposed transaction or rescissory damages in the event it is consummated, declaratory relief, and the award of attorneys fees and expenses. On July 11, 2019, Cathy OBrien, a purported stockholder of Tableau, commenced an action
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned
OBrien v. Tableau Software, Inc.,
et al.
, Case No.
1:19-cv-06447,
against Tableau and each of the current members of the Tableau Board (the OBrien complaint). The OBrien complaint asserts claims
under Sections 14(d), 14(e), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act challenging the adequacy of certain public disclosures made concerning the proposed transaction. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing consummation of the
proposed transaction, rescission of the proposed transaction or rescissory damages in the event it is consummated, an accounting by defendants for all damages caused to the plaintiff, and the award of attorneys fees and expenses. The
defendants believe the claims asserted in these civil actions are without merit.