NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1: GENERAL
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and in compliance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Operating results for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending February 2, 2013 (fiscal year 2012). The financial statements include the accounts of Saks Incorporated and its subsidiaries
(collectively, we, our, and us). All intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 28, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but
does not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.
Our operations consist of Saks Fifth Avenue (SFA), SFAs
e-commerce operations (Saks Direct), and Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5TH (OFF 5TH).
Net Sales
Net sales include sales of merchandise (net of returns and exclusive of sales taxes), commissions from leased departments, shipping and handling
revenues related to merchandise sold, and breakage income from unredeemed gift cards. Sales of merchandise from our retail stores are recognized at the time customers provide a satisfactory form of payment and take delivery of the merchandise. Sales
of merchandise from Saks Direct are recognized upon estimated receipt of merchandise by the customer. Revenue associated with gift cards is recognized upon redemption of the card. We estimate the amount of goods that will be returned for a refund
and reduce sales and gross margin by that amount.
Commissions from leased departments included in net sales were $9,965 and $31,684 for
the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012, respectively, and $10,180 and $27,429 for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively. Leased department sales were $70,288 and $219,462 for the three and nine months
ended October 27, 2012, respectively, and $64,592 and $188,654 for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively, and were excluded from net sales.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash on hand in the
stores, deposits with banks, and investments with banks and financial institutions that have original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents totaled $69,370, $195,449
and $67,654 as of October 27, 2012, January 28, 2012 and October 29, 2011, respectively, primarily consisting of money market funds, demand deposits, and time deposits. Income earned on cash equivalents was $56 and $386 for the
three and nine months ended October 27, 2012, respectively, and $331 and $1,003 for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively, and is included in other income, net on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
6
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Inventory
Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include freight, buying, and distribution costs. We record markdowns related
to slow moving inventory, ensuring the appropriate inventory valuation. We receive vendor-provided support in different forms. When the vendor provides support for inventory markdowns, we record the support as a reduction to cost of sales. Such
support is recorded in the period that the corresponding markdowns are recorded. When we receive inventory-related support that is not designated for markdowns, we include this support as a reduction of the cost of purchases.
Impairments and Dispositions
Impairment and
disposition costs include costs associated with store closures, including employee severance and lease termination fees, asset impairment and disposal charges, and other store closure activities. Additionally, impairment and disposition costs
include long-lived asset impairment charges related to assets held and used and losses related to asset dispositions made during the normal course of business. We continuously evaluate our real estate portfolio and close underproductive stores in
the normal course of business as leases expire or as other circumstances dictate.
During the three months ended October 27, 2012,
we incurred losses on the disposal of assets during the normal course of business of $217. For the nine months ended October 27, 2012, we incurred asset impairment charges related to held and used assets of $4,292, store closing costs of $634
primarily related to final expenses associated with the Saks Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh store closing and losses on the disposal of assets during the normal course of business of $281. During the three months ended October 29, 2011, we incurred
asset disposal charges of $218. For the nine months ended October 29, 2011, we incurred charges of $3,252 primarily due to a lease termination fee related to the relocation of our Hilton Head OFF 5TH store during the second quarter ending
July 30, 2011.
Segment Reporting
SFA, Saks Direct, and OFF 5TH have been aggregated into one reportable segment based on the aggregation criteria outlined in the authoritative accounting literature.
Fair Value Measurements
The carrying value
of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses as of October 27, 2012, January 28, 2012, and October 29, 2011 approximates their fair value due to the
short-term nature of these financial instruments. See Note 5 for fair value disclosures related to our long-term debt.
Assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include our long-lived assets. During the nine months ended October 27, 2012, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $4,856 were written down to their
estimated fair value of $564, resulting in an impairment loss of $4,292, which is included in impairments and dispositions on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The fair values of long-lived assets held and used were determined using an income
based approach and are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Significant inputs include projections of future cash flows and discount rates. These inputs are based on assumptions from the perspective of market participants.
7
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Operating Leases
We lease the land or the land and building at many of our stores, as well as our distribution centers, administrative facilities, and certain
equipment. Most of these leases are classified as operating leases. Most of our lease agreements include renewal periods at our option. Store lease agreements generally include rent holidays, rent escalation clauses, and contingent rent provisions
that require additional payments based on a percentage of sales in excess of specified levels. Contingent rental payments are recognized when we have determined that it is probable that the specified levels will be reached during the fiscal year.
For leases that contain rent holiday periods and scheduled rent increases, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term from the date we take possession of the leased property. The difference between the straight-line rent
amounts and amounts payable under the leases are recorded as deferred rent. Tenant improvement allowances and other lease incentives are recorded as deferred rent liabilities and are recognized on a straightline basis over the life of the
lease. As of October 27, 2012, January 28, 2012, and October 29, 2011 deferred rent liabilities were $80,221, $66,524, and $67,099, respectively. These amounts are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Gift Cards
We
sell gift cards with no expiration dates. At the time gift cards are sold, no revenue is recognized and a liability is established for the value of the card. The liability is relieved and revenue is recognized when the gift cards are redeemed by the
customer for merchandise. The liability for unredeemed gift cards was $29,681, $28,933, and $29,651 as of October 27, 2012, January 28, 2012, and October 29, 2011, respectively and is included in accrued expenses on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 2: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
(ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 requires reporting entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components
of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB indefinitely deferred certain provisions of ASU
2011-05 related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Effective January 29, 2012, we adopted the applicable portions of ASU 2011-05. The adoption did not affect our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2011-04,
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs
(ASU 2011-04), which amends the existing fair value guidance to improve consistency in the application and
disclosure of fair value measurements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 provides certain clarifications to the existing guidance, changes certain fair value principles, and enhances disclosure requirements.
Effective January 29, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-04. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 resulted in additional disclosures but did not affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11,
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
(ASU 2011-11). ASU 2011-11 enhances disclosure requirements regarding financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU 2011-11
requires disclosure of both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities in order to enhance comparability between those entities that prepare their financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare
their financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption
of ASU 2011-11 will not affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
8
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3: INCOME TAXES
The effective income tax rates for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 27, 2012 were 28.2% and 34.7%, respectively, as compared to
37.4% and 35.7% for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 29, 2011, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended October 27, 2012 is primarily due to the release of a valuation allowance no
longer deemed necessary related to federal tax credits. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the nine months ended October 27, 2012 is primarily due to the release of a valuation allowance related to federal tax credits which was
partially offset by the write-off of a deferred tax asset associated with non-deductible compensation.
A reconciliation of our income
tax expense for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 and October 29, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
Expected federal income taxes at statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
11,012
|
|
|
$
|
9,941
|
|
|
$
|
22,746
|
|
|
$
|
20,586
|
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
Valuation allowance adjustment related to federal tax credits
|
|
|
(3,269)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,269)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance adjustment related to state net operating losses
|
|
|
(527)
|
|
|
|
(575)
|
|
|
|
(1,152)
|
|
|
|
(1,431)
|
|
Effect of settling tax examinations and other tax reserve adjustments
|
|
|
(698)
|
|
|
|
(842)
|
|
|
|
(1,981)
|
|
|
|
(2,470)
|
|
Non-deductible compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
8,859
|
|
|
$
|
10,633
|
|
|
$
|
22,538
|
|
|
$
|
21,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return as well as state tax returns in multiple state jurisdictions.
Examinations have been completed by the Internal Revenue Service or the statute of limitations has expired for taxable years through January 31, 2009. With respect to state and local jurisdictions, examinations have been completed in many
jurisdictions through the same period and beyond. Currently, examinations in several jurisdictions are in progress.
As of
October 27, 2012, gross deferred tax assets related to U.S. federal and state net operating loss, alternative minimum tax credit and other federal tax credit carryforwards were $91,502. The majority of the net operating loss carryforward is a
result of the net operating losses incurred during the fiscal years ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 principally due to difficult market and macroeconomic conditions. We have concluded, based on the weight of all available
positive and negative evidence, that all but $18,065 of these tax benefits relating to certain state losses are more likely than not to be realized in the future. Therefore, the valuation allowance as of October 27, 2012 was $18,065. We
evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance in the future. If future results are less than or more than projected or tax planning strategies are no longer
viable, then changes to valuation allowances may be required which could have a material impact on our results of operations in the period in which they are recorded.
9
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. For the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 and October 29, 2011, the computations of diluted EPS assume that our convertible notes would be settled in shares of common stock. Diluted EPS is
computed by adjusting: (i) the income available to common shareholders for the amount of interest expense recognized related to the convertible notes, and (ii) the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding to assume conversion
of our convertible notes and the issuance of all other potential common shares, if the effect is dilutive. The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 and
October 29, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2012
|
|
|
October 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
22,602
|
|
|
|
147,547
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
17,771
|
|
|
|
154,080
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
43,546
|
|
|
|
(0.01)
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
44,973
|
|
|
|
(0.01)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
26,848
|
|
|
|
191,093
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
21,838
|
|
|
|
199,053
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2012
|
|
|
October 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
|
|
151,152
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
37,811
|
|
|
|
155,739
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
|
|
154,025
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
37,811
|
|
|
|
159,851
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended October 27, 2012 and October 29, 2011, the computations of diluted EPS include
the effect of 40,889 shares that could be issued upon the conversion of our convertible notes and the related interest expense, net of tax, of $4,246 and $4,067, respectively, as the effect is dilutive. The following table presents potentially
dilutive securities excluded from the computations of diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
Stock options (1)
|
|
|
1,258
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,307
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,258
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,307
|
(2)
|
Contingently convertible securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,670
|
(3)
|
|
|
21,670
|
(3)
|
2.0% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,219
|
(3)
|
|
|
19,219
|
(3)
|
(1)
|
The amounts represent the number of instruments outstanding at the end of the period. Application of the treasury stock method would reduce this amount if
they had a dilutive effect and were included in the computation of diluted EPS.
|
(2)
|
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price of the options exceeded the average market price of
our common stock during the period.
|
(3)
|
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
|
10
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5: DEBT
A summary of our long-term debt and capital lease obligations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2012
|
|
|
January 28, 2012
|
|
|
October 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Notes 7.0%, maturing fiscal year 2013
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
2,226
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
Convertible notes 7.5%, maturing fiscal year 2013, net (1)
|
|
|
113,536
|
|
|
|
224,600
|
|
|
|
109,549
|
|
|
|
228,592
|
|
|
|
108,292
|
|
|
|
253,132
|
|
Convertible notes 2.0%, maturing fiscal year 2024, net (2)
|
|
|
217,323
|
|
|
|
239,485
|
|
|
|
210,840
|
|
|
|
234,894
|
|
|
|
208,745
|
|
|
|
237,843
|
|
Capital lease obligations (3)
|
|
|
52,711
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
52,920
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
53,663
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
385,695
|
|
|
|
466,311
|
|
|
|
375,434
|
|
|
|
465,669
|
|
|
|
372,825
|
|
|
|
493,185
|
|
Less current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (3)
|
|
|
(9,326)
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(7,472)
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(7,088)
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(9,326)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,472)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,088)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
376,369
|
|
|
$
|
466,311
|
|
|
$
|
367,962
|
|
|
$
|
465,669
|
|
|
$
|
365,737
|
|
|
$
|
493,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount represents the $120,000 convertible notes, net of the unamortized discount of $6,464, $10,451, and $11,708 as of October 27,
2012, January 28, 2012, and October 29, 2011, respectively.
|
(2)
|
Amount represents the $230,000 convertible notes, net of the unamortized discount of $12,677, $19,160, and $21,255 as of October 27,
2012, January 28, 2012, and October 29, 2011, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.
|
The fair values of our debt instruments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and were determined based on recently reported market transactions for the identical liability when traded as an
asset or pricing information obtained from a third-party financial institution. The inputs and assumptions used in the pricing models of the financial institution are primarily derived from market-observable sources.
Revolving Credit Facility
We have a
$500,000 revolving credit facility, subject to a borrowing base equal to a specified percentage of eligible inventory and certain credit card receivables. The availability is based primarily on current levels of inventory, less outstanding letters
of credit.
In March 2011, we entered into an amendment to our existing revolving credit agreement. The amendment extended the maturity
date of this facility from November 23, 2013 to March 29, 2016 and revised certain terms of the existing revolving credit facility. The maximum committed borrowing capacity of the amended facility remains at $500,000. Fees incurred
associated with the amendment to the revolving credit agreement were $2,961. As of October 27, 2012, we had no direct outstanding borrowings under the facility and had letters of credit outstanding of $6,136.
The obligations under the facility are guaranteed by certain of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries, and are secured by their merchandise
inventories and certain third party receivables. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at a per annum rate of either: (i) LIBOR plus a percentage ranging from 2.00% to 2.50%, or (ii) the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds
rate plus a percentage ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%. Letters of credit are charged a per annum fee equal to the then applicable LIBOR borrowing spread (for standby letters of credit) or the applicable LIBOR spread minus 0.50% (for documentary or
commercial letters of credit). We also pay an unused line fee ranging from 0.38% to 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused balance of the facility.
During periods in which availability under the agreement is $62,500 or more, we are not subject to financial covenants. If and when availability under the agreement decreases to less than $62,500, we will be
subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0. There are no debt-ratings-based provisions. As of October 27, 2012, we were not subject to the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit agreement contains default provisions
that are typical for this type of financing, including a provision that would trigger a default under the credit agreement if a default were to occur in another debt instrument resulting in the acceleration of more than $20,000 of principal under
that other instrument.
11
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
The revolving credit agreement permits additional debt in specific
categories including the following (each category being subject to limitations as described in the revolving credit agreement): (i) debt arising from permitted sale/leaseback transactions; (ii) debt to finance purchases of machinery,
equipment, real estate and other fixed assets; (iii) debt in connection with permitted acquisitions; and (iv) unsecured debt. The revolving credit agreement also permits other debt (including permitted sale/leaseback transactions) in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 at any time, including secured debt, so long as it is a permitted lien as defined by the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement also places certain restrictions on, among other things,
asset sales, the ability to make acquisitions and investments, and to pay dividends.
Senior Notes
As of October 27, 2012, we had $2,125 of unsecured senior notes outstanding that mature in December 2013 with an interest rate of 7.0%. The
senior notes are guaranteed by all of the subsidiaries that guarantee our revolving credit facility. The notes permit certain sale/leaseback transactions but place certain restrictions around the use of proceeds generated from a sale/leaseback
transaction. The terms of the senior notes require all principal to be repaid at maturity. There are no financial covenants associated with these notes, and there are no debt-ratings-based provisions.
During April 2011, we redeemed $1,911 of our 7.375% senior notes that were set to mature in 2019. The redemption of these notes resulted in a loss
on extinguishment of $539.
Convertible Notes
7.5% Convertible Notes
We issued $120,000
of 7.5% convertible notes in May 2009 (the 7.5% Convertible Notes). The 7.5% Convertible Notes mature in December 2013 and are convertible, at the option of the holders at any time, into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of
$5.54 per share of common stock (21,670 shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion). We can settle a conversion of the notes with shares, cash, or a combination thereof at our discretion.
Authoritative accounting literature requires the allocation of convertible debt proceeds between the liability component and the embedded
conversion option (i.e., the equity component). The liability component of the debt instrument is accreted to par value using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the debt. The accretion is reported as a component of interest
expense. The equity component is not subsequently revalued as long as it continues to qualify for equity treatment. Upon issuance, we estimated the fair value of the liability component of the 7.5% Convertible Notes, assuming a 13.0% non-convertible
borrowing rate, to be $97,994. The difference between the fair value and the principal amount of the 7.5% Convertible Notes was $22,006. This amount was recorded as a debt discount and as an increase to additional paid-in capital as of the issuance
date. The discount is being accreted to interest expense over the 4.5 year period to the maturity date of the notes in December 2013 resulting in an increase in non-cash interest expense.
2.0% Convertible Senior Notes
We issued $230,000 of 2.0% convertible senior notes in March
2004 (the 2.0% Convertible Notes). The 2.0% Convertible Notes mature in 2024 and, in certain circumstances, allow the holders to convert the notes to shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $11.97 per share of common stock
(19,219 shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion) subject to an anti-dilution adjustment. The holders may put the debt back to us in 2014 or 2019 and the debt became callable at our option on March 21, 2011. We can settle a
conversion of the notes with shares, cash or a combination thereof at our discretion. The holders may convert the notes at the following times, among others: (i) if our share price is greater than 120% of the applicable conversion price for a
certain trading period; (ii) if the credit ratings of the notes are below a certain threshold; or (iii) upon the occurrence of certain consolidations, mergers or share exchange transactions involving us. As of October 27, 2012, none
of the conversion criteria were met.
In connection with the issuance of the 2.0% Convertible Notes, we entered into a convertible note
hedge and written call options on our common stock to reduce our exposure to dilution from the conversion of the 2.0% Convertible Notes. These transactions were accounted for as a net reduction of shareholders equity of $25,000 in 2004. The
convertible note hedge and written call options expired during 2011.
12
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
We estimated the fair value of the liability component of the 2.0%
Convertible Notes at the date of issuance, assuming a 6.25% non-convertible borrowing rate, to be $158,148. The difference between the fair value and the principal amount of the 2.0% Convertible Notes was $71,852. This amount was recorded as a debt
discount and as an increase to additional paid-in capital as of the issuance date. In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance, the debt discount should be amortized over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have an
associated equity component (considering the effects of embedded features other than the conversion option). Since the holders of the notes have put options in 2014 and 2019, the debt instrument is accreted to par value using the effective interest
method from issuance until the first put date in 2014 resulting in an increase in non-cash interest expense.
Saks Incorporated is the
issuer of our outstanding notes, which include the 7.0% senior notes, the 7.5% convertible notes, and the 2.0% convertible senior notes. Substantially all of Saks Incorporateds subsidiaries guarantee our outstanding notes which are the same
subsidiaries that guarantee the revolving credit facility. Separate condensed consolidating financial information is not included because Saks Incorporated has no independent assets or operations, the subsidiary guarantees related to the notes are
full and unconditional and joint and several, and subsidiaries not guaranteeing the debt are minor. All subsidiaries of Saks Incorporated are 100% owned and there are no contractual restrictions on the ability of Saks Incorporated to obtain funds
from our subsidiaries.
NOTE 6: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We sponsor a funded defined-benefit cash balance pension plan (Pension Plan) and an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) principally benefiting our former employees.
Effective January 1, 2007, we amended the Pension Plan, suspending future benefit accruals for all participants, except certain participants who as of December 31, 2006 had attained age 55, completed 10 years of credited service, and who
were not considered to be highly compensated employees. Effective March 13, 2009, we amended the Pension Plan, suspending future benefit accruals for all remaining participants. We fund the Pension Plan in accordance with regulatory funding
requirements. The components of net periodic benefit cost related to the Pension Plan and SERP for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 and October 29, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
|
October 27,
2012
|
|
|
October 29,
2011
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
$
|
1,630
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
4,890
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,741)
|
|
|
|
(2,002)
|
|
|
|
(5,222)
|
|
|
|
(6,008)
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We contributed $906 and $2,762 to the Pension Plan during the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012,
respectively, and expect additional funding requirements of approximately $702 for the remainder of fiscal year 2012.
13
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7: SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
The following table summarizes the changes in shareholders equity for the nine months ended October 27, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
(1)
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 28, 2012
|
|
|
160,043
|
|
|
$
|
16,004
|
|
|
$
|
1,296,191
|
|
|
$
|
(50,706)
|
|
|
$
|
(54,705)
|
|
|
$
|
1,206,784
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,450
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Net activity under stock compensation plans
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
(203)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares withheld for employee taxes
|
|
|
(1,354)
|
|
|
|
(135)
|
|
|
|
(15,694)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,829)
|
|
Income tax effect of stock compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,053
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(7,987)
|
|
|
|
(799)
|
|
|
|
(78,289)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,088)
|
|
Deferred tax adjustment related to convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 27, 2012
|
|
|
152,766
|
|
|
$
|
15,277
|
|
|
$
|
1,224,948
|
|
|
$
|
(8,256)
|
|
|
$
|
(53,426)
|
|
|
$
|
1,178,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss is composed of net gains and losses associated with our defined benefit plans.
|
We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to repurchase up to 70,025 shares of our common stock. During the three months ended
October 27, 2012, we repurchased and retired an aggregate of 9 shares of our common stock at an average price of $10.01 and a total cost of $82. During the nine months ended October 27, 2012, we repurchased and retired an aggregate of
7,987 shares of our common stock at an average price of $9.90 and a total cost of $79,088. During the three- and nine-month periods ended October 29, 2011, we repurchased and retired an aggregate of 3,537 shares of our common stock at an
average price of $8.18 and a total cost of $28,932. As of October 27, 2012, there were 21,185 shares remaining available for repurchase under our share repurchase program.
NOTE 8: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We maintain an equity incentive plan, which allows for the
granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance share awards and other forms of equity awards to our employees, directors, and officers. Stock options generally vest over a four-year period from the grant date and
have a contractual term of seven to ten years from the grant date. Restricted stock and performance share awards generally vest over periods ranging from three to five years from the grant date, although the equity incentive plan permits accelerated
vesting in certain circumstances at the discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. We do not use cash to settle any of our stock-based awards and we issue new shares of common stock upon the exercise
of stock options and the granting of restricted stock and performance shares.
We recognize compensation expense for stock options with
graded-vesting on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Compensation expense for restricted stock and performance share awards that cliff-vest is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Restricted
stock awards with graded-vesting are treated as multiple awards based upon the vesting date. We recognize compensation expense for these awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the
award.
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended October 27, 2012 was $3,663 and $12,053,
respectively, and $3,733 and $11,885 for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively.
14
SAKS INCORPORATED & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal
On February 2, 2011, the
plaintiffs in
Dawn Till and Mary Josephs v. Saks Incorporated et al
, filed a complaint, with which we were served on March 10, 2011, in a purported class and collective action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs were improperly classified as exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the California Labor Code and that we failed to pay overtime,
provide itemized wage statements and provide meal and rest periods. On March 8, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding a claim for penalties under the California Private Attorneys General Act of 2004. The plaintiffs seek to
proceed collectively under the FLSA and as a class under the California statutes on behalf of individuals who have been employed by OFF 5TH as Selling and Service Managers, Merchandise Team Managers, or Department Managers and similar titles. On
February 8, 2012, the same plaintiffs counsel from the
Till
case filed a complaint, with which we were served on March 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging essentially the same
FLSA claim and related claims under New York state law (
Tate Small et al v. Saks Incorporated et al
). This case was subsequently transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. We believe that our
managers at OFF 5TH have been properly classified as exempt under both federal and state law and we intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously. It is not possible to predict whether the courts will permit these actions to proceed collectively or as
a class. We cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may arise from these matters.
In addition to
the litigation described in the preceding paragraph, we are involved in legal proceedings arising from our normal business activities and have accruals for losses where appropriate. Management believes that none of these legal proceedings will have
a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Taxes
We are routinely under examination by federal, state or local taxing authorities in the areas of income taxes and the remittance of sales and use
taxes. These examinations include questioning the timing and amount of deductions, the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions and compliance with federal, state and local tax laws. Based on annual evaluations of our tax filing
positions, we believe we have adequately accrued for our tax exposures. To the extent we are to prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of income tax reserves, our effective tax rate in a
given financial statement period may be materially impacted. As of October 27, 2012, certain state income and sales and use tax examinations were ongoing.
Other Matters
From time to time we have issued guarantees to landlords under leases of stores
operated by our subsidiaries. Certain of these stores were sold in connection with the Saks Department Store Group and the Northern Department Store Group transactions which occurred in July 2005 and March 2006, respectively. If the purchasers fail
to perform certain obligations under the leases we guaranteed, we could have obligations to landlords under such guarantees. Based on the information currently available, we do not believe that our potential obligations under these lease guarantees
would be material.
15