PHK Pimco High Income Fund

PROXY STATEMENT

May 18, 2021

FOR THE JOINT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 28, 2021

INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Boards of Trustees/Directors¹ (each a “Board”) of the shareholders of each of NRGX, RCS, PGP, PHK, PDI, PFL and PFN (each, a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”) of proxies to be voted at the Joint Annual Meeting of Shareholders of each Fund and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. The term “Meeting” is used throughout this joint Proxy Statement to refer to the Annual

1

Meeting of Shareholders of each Fund, as dictated by the context. The Meeting will be held at the offices of Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (“PIMCO” or the “Manager”), at 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660, on Monday, June 28, 2021, at 9:00 A.M. Pacific Time. The principal executive offices of the Funds are located at 1633 Broadway, between West 50^th and West 51^st Streets, 42^nd Floor, New York, New York 10019.

The Notice of Joint Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Notice”), this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy cards are first being sent to Shareholders on or about May 24, 2021.

The Meeting is scheduled as a joint meeting of the holders of all shares of the Funds, which consist of holders of common shares of each Fund (the “Common Shareholders”) and holders of common shares and preferred shares of PFL, PFN and PHK (the “Preferred Shareholders” and, together with the Common Shareholders, the “Shareholders”). The Shareholders of each Fund are expected to consider and vote on similar matters. The Shareholders of each Fund will vote on the applicable proposal set forth herein (the “Proposal”) and on any other matters that may properly be presented for vote by the Shareholders of that Fund. The outcome of voting by the Shareholders of one Fund does not affect the outcome for the other Funds.

The Board of each Fund has fixed the close of business on April 29, 2021 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of Shareholders of each Fund entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. The Shareholders of each Fund on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote per share on each matter to which they are entitled to vote and that is to be voted on by Shareholders of the Fund, and a fractional vote with respect to fractional shares, with no cumulative voting rights in the election of Trustees. The following table sets forth the number of common shares (“Common Shares”) and preferred shares (“Preferred Shares” and, together with the Common Shares, the “Shares”) issued and outstanding of each Fund at the close of business on the Record Date:

2

The classes of Shares listed for each Fund in the table above are the only classes of Shares currently issued by that Fund.

The following table sets forth the number of record holders of each class of shares of the Funds on the Record Date:

On each proposal to be brought before the Meeting (including the election of the nominees other than the Preferred Shares Trustees (as defined below) by all Shareholders), the Preferred Shareholders, if any, will have equal voting rights (i.e., one vote per Share) with the applicable Fund’s Common Shareholders and will vote together with Common Shareholders as a single class, except that the re-election of one Trustee (Alan Rappaport)of each of PFL and PFN will be voted on exclusively by the Preferred Shareholders of that Fund voting as a separate class (the “Preferred Shares Trustee”). As summarized in the table below:

NRGX:

The Common Shareholders of NRGX, voting as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Deborah A. DeCotis, David N. Fisher and Hans W. Kertess as Trustees of NRGX.

RCS:

The Common Shareholders of RCS, voting as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Deborah A. DeCotis, David N. Fisher and Alan Rappaport as Directors of RCS.

PGP:

The Common Shareholders of PGP, voting as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of David N. Fisher, Hans W. Kertess and William B. Ogden as Trustees of PGP.

3

PFL:

The Common and Preferred Shareholders of PFL, voting together as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of John C. Maney as Trustee of PFL; and the Preferred Shareholders of PFL, voting as a separate class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Alan Rappaport as a Trustee of PFL.³

PFN:

The Common and Preferred Shareholders of PFN, voting together as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of David N. Fisher and William B. Ogden as Trustees of PFN; and the Preferred Shareholders of PFN, voting as a separate class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Alan Rappaport as a Trustee of PFN.⁴

PHK:

The Common and Preferred Shareholders of PHK, voting together as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Deborah A. DeCotis, Hans W. Kertess and Joseph B. Kittredge, Jr. as Trustees of PHK.

PDI:

The Common Shareholders of PDI, voting as a single class, have the right to vote on the re-election of Sarah E. Cogan, Deborah A. DeCotis and Hans W. Kertess as Trustees of PDI.

4

5

You may vote by mail by returning a properly executed proxy card, by internet by going to the website listed on the proxy card, by telephone using the toll-free number listed on the proxy card, or in person by attending the Meeting. Shares represented by duly executed and timely delivered proxies will be voted as instructed on the proxy. If you execute and mail the enclosed proxy and no choice is indicated for the re-election of Trustees listed in the attached Notice, your proxy will be voted in favor of the re-election of all nominees. At any time before it has been voted, your proxy may be revoked in one of the following ways: (i) by timely delivering a signed, written letter of revocation to the Secretary of the applicable Fund at 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, (ii) by properly executing and timely submitting a later-dated proxy vote, or (iii) by attending the Meeting and voting in person. If you are planning to attend the Meeting in-person, please call (866) 416-0559 in advance. You may also call this phone number for information on how to obtain directions to be able to attend the Meeting and vote in person or for information or assistance regarding how to vote by telephone, mail or by internet. Please note that any shareholder wishing to attend the Meeting in-person is required to comply with any health regulations adopted by federal, state and local governments and PIMCO. If any proposal, other than the Proposal set forth herein, properly comes before the Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote in their sole discretion.

The principal executive offices of the Funds are located at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. PIMCO serves as the investment manager of each Fund. Additional information regarding the Manager may be found under “Additional Information — Investment Manager” below.

The solicitation will be primarily by mail and by telephone and the cost of soliciting proxies for each Fund will be borne by PIMCO. Certain officers of the

6

Funds and certain officers and employees of the Manager or its affiliates (none of whom will receive additional compensation therefor) may solicit proxies by telephone, mail, e-mail and personal interviews. Any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation will be borne by PIMCO.

Unless a Fund receives contrary instructions, only one copy of this Proxy Statement will be mailed to a given address where two or more Shareholders share that address and share the same surname. Additional copies of the Proxy Statement will be delivered promptly upon request. Requests may be sent to the Secretary of the Fund c/o Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660, or by calling (866) 416-0559 on any business day.

As of the Record Date, the Trustees, nominees and the officers of each Fund as a group and individually beneficially owned less than one percent (1%) of each Fund’s outstanding Shares. As of the Record Date, to the knowledge of the Funds, other than as set forth below, no person beneficially owned more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of a Fund:

7

8

9

10

PROPOSAL: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

In accordance with NRGX’s, PGP’s, PHK’s, PDI’s, PFL’s and PFN’s Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust (each, a “Declaration”) and RCS’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”), the Trustees have been divided into the following three classes (each, a “Class”): Class I, Class II and Class III. The expiration dates of the classes are described below, and each Trustee will remain in office until the end of his or her term and when his or her successor is elected and qualified. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of each applicable Fund have recommended the nominees listed herein for re-election as Trustees by the Shareholders of the applicable Funds.

NRGX. With respect to NRGX, the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022); and the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023). Currently, Deborah A. DeCotis, David N. Fisher and Hans W. Kertess are Class II Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Ms. DeCotis and Mr. Kertess be nominated for

11

re-election by the Common Shareholders as Class II Trustees and that Mr. Fisher be nominated for re-election by the Common Shareholders as a Class III Trustee at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Ms. DeCotis and Mr. Kertess will serve terms consistent with the Class II Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024), and Mr. Fisher will serve a term consistent with the Class III Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022).

RCS. With respect to RCS, the term of office of the Class III Directors will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class I Directors will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022); and the term of office of the Class II Directors will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023). Currently, Deborah A. DeCotis, David N. Fisher and Alan Rappaport are Class III Directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Fisher and Rappaport be nominated for re-election by the Common Shareholders as Class III Directors at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Articles, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Directors to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Fisher and Rappaport will serve terms consistent with the Class III Directors, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024).

PGP. With respect to PGP, the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022); and the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023). Currently, David N. Fisher, Hans Kertess and William B. Ogden are Class I Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Messrs. Fisher, Kertess and Ogden be nominated

12

for re-election by the Common Shareholders as Class I Trustees at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Messrs. Fisher, Kertess and Ogden will serve terms consistent with the Class I Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024).

PFL. With respect to PFL, the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022); and the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023). Currently, John C. Maney and Alan Rappaport are Class II Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Mr. Maney be nominated for re-election as a Class II Trustee by the Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders, voting as a single class, and that Mr. Rappaport be nominated for re-election as a Class II Trustee by the Preferred Shareholders, voting as a separate class, at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Messrs. Maney and Rappaport will serve terms consistent with the Class II Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024).

PFN. With respect to PFN, the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022); and the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023). Currently, David N. Fisher, William B. Ogden and Alan Rappaport are Class I Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that that Messrs. Fisher and Ogden be nominated for re-election as Class I Trustees by the Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders, voting as a single class, and that Mr. Rappaport be nominated for re-election as a Class I Trustee by the Preferred Shareholders, voting as a

13

separate class, at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Messrs. Fisher, Ogden and Rappaport will serve terms consistent with the Class I Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024).

PHK. With respect to PHK, the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022); and the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023). Currently, Deborah A. DeCotis, Hans W. Kertess and Joseph B. Kittredge, Jr. are Class III Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Kertess and Kittredge be nominated for re-election as Class III Trustees by the Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders, voting as a single class, at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Kertess and Kittredge will serve terms consistent with the Class III Trustees, which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024).

PDI. With respect to PDI, the term of office of the Class III Trustees will expire at the Meeting; the term of office of the Class I Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2021-2022 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022); and the term of office of the Class II Trustees will expire at the annual meeting of Shareholders held during the 2022-2023 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023). Currently, Sarah E. Cogan, Deborah A. DeCotis and Hans W. Kertess are Class III Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that Mses. Cogan and DeCotis and Mr. Kertess be nominated for re-election as Class III Trustees by the Common Shareholders at the Meeting. Consistent with the Fund’s Declaration, if re-elected, the nominees shall hold office for terms coinciding with the Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated. Therefore, if re-elected at the Meeting, Mses. Cogan and DeCotis and Mr. Kertess will serve terms consistent with the Class III Trustees,

14

which will expire at the Fund’s annual meeting of Shareholders for the 2023-2024 fiscal year (i.e., the annual meeting held during the fiscal year running from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024).

All members of the Board of each of NRGX, PGP, PFL, PFN, PHK and PDI are and will remain, if re-elected, “Continuing Trustees,” as such term is defined in the Declaration of the applicable Fund, having either served as Trustee since the inception of the Fund or for thirty-six months, or having been nominated by at least a majority of the Continuing Trustees then members of the Board.

All members of the Board of RCS are and will remain, if re-elected, “Continuing Directors,” as such term is defined in the Articles of Incorporation, either having served as Director for a period of at least 12 months or having been a successor to a Continuing Director and been recommended to succeed a Continuing Director by a majority of the Continuing Directors then members of the Board.

At any annual meeting of Shareholders, any Trustee elected to fill a vacancy that has arisen since the preceding annual meeting of Shareholders (whether or not such vacancy has been filled by election of a new Trustee by the Board) shall hold office for a term that coincides with the term (or any remaining term) of the Class of Trustees to which such office was previously assigned, if such vacancy arose other than by an increase in the number of Trustees and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify. In the event such vacancy arose due to an increase in the number of Trustees, any Trustee so elected to fill such vacancy at an annual meeting shall hold office for a term which coincides with that of the Class of Trustee to which such office has been apportioned and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify.

The following table summarizes the nominees who will stand for re-election at the Meeting, the respective Classes of Trustees to which they have been designated and the expiration of their respective terms if re-elected:

15

16

Under this classified Board structure, generally only those Trustees in a single Class may be replaced in any one year, and it would require a minimum of two years to change a majority of the Board under normal circumstances. This structure may make it more difficult for a Fund’s Shareholders to change the majority of Trustees of the Fund and, thus, promotes the continuity of management and limits the ability of other entities or persons to acquire control of the Fund by delaying the replacement of a majority of the Board.

Unless authority is withheld, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy for a Fund to vote each proxy for the persons listed above for that Fund. Each of the nominees has indicated he or she will serve if re-elected, but if he or she should be unable to serve for a Fund, the proxy holders may vote in favor of such substitute nominee as the Board may designate (or, alternatively, the Board may determine to save a vacancy).

Trustees and Officers

The business of each Fund is managed under the direction of the Fund’s Board. Subject to the provisions of each Fund’s Declaration or Articles, its Bylaws and applicable state law, the Trustees have all powers necessary and convenient to carry out their responsibilities, including the election and removal of the Fund’s officers.

Board Leadership Structure — Currently, and assuming the nominees are re-elected as proposed, the Board of Trustees of each Fund consists and will consist of eight Trustees, six of whom are and are anticipated to continue to be Independent Trustees. An Independent Trustee serves as Chair of the Board and is selected by a vote of the majority of the Independent Trustees. The Chair of the Board presides at meetings of the Board, acts as a liaison with service providers, officers, attorneys and other Trustees generally between meetings and performs such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time.

The Board of each Fund regularly meets four times each year to discuss and consider matters concerning the Funds and holds special meetings to address matters arising between regular meetings. The Independent Trustees regularly meet outside the presence of management and are advised by independent legal counsel.

17

The Board of each Fund has established five standing Committees to facilitate the Trustees’ oversight of the management of the Funds: the Audit Oversight Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Valuation Oversight Committee, the Contracts Committee and the Performance Committee. The functions and role of each Committee are described below under “Board Committees and Meetings.” The membership of each Committee (other than the Performance Committee) consists of only the Independent Trustees. The Performance Committee consists of all the Trustees. The Independent Trustees believe that participation on each Committee allows them to participate in the full range of the Board’s oversight duties.

The Board reviews its leadership structure periodically and has determined that this leadership structure, including an Independent Chair, a supermajority of Independent Trustees and Committee membership limited to Independent Trustees (with the exception of the Performance Committee), is appropriate in light of the characteristics and circumstances of each Fund. In reaching this conclusion, the Board considered, among other things, the predominant role of the Manager in the day-to-day management of Fund affairs, the extent to which the work of the Board is conducted through the Committees, the number of funds in the fund complex overseen by members that, the variety of asset classes those funds include, the assets of each Fund and the other funds in the fund complex and the management and other service arrangements of each Fund and such other portfolios. The Board also believes that its structure, including the presence of two Trustees who are or have been executives with the Manager or Manager-affiliated entities, facilitates an efficient flow of information concerning the management of each Fund to the Independent Trustees.

Risk Oversight — Each of the Funds has retained the Manager to provide investment advisory services and administrative services. Accordingly, the Manager is immediately responsible for the management of risks that may arise from Fund investments and operations. Some employees of the Manager serve as the Funds’ officers, including the Funds’ principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, chief compliance officer and chief legal officer. The Manager and the Funds’ other service providers have adopted policies, processes and procedures to identify, assess and manage different types of risks associated with each Fund’s activities. The Board oversees the performance of these functions by the Manager and the Funds’ other service providers, both directly and through the Committee structure it has established. The Board receives from the Manager a wide range of reports, both on a regular and as-needed basis, relating to the Funds’ activities and to the actual and potential risks of the Funds. These include reports on investment and market risks, custody and valuation of Fund assets, compliance with applicable laws and the Funds’ financial accounting and reporting. In addition, the Board meets periodically

18

with the individual portfolio managers of the Funds or their delegates to receive reports regarding the portfolio management of the Funds and their performance, including their investment risks. In the course of these meetings and discussions with the Manager, the Board has emphasized the importance of the Manager maintaining vigorous risk-management programs and procedures with respect to the Funds.

In addition, the Board has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”). The CCO oversees the development of compliance policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to minimize the risk of violations of the federal securities laws (“Compliance Policies”). The CCO reports directly to the Independent Trustees, interacts with individuals within the Manager’s organization and provides presentations to the Board at its quarterly meetings and an annual report on the application of the Compliance Policies. The Board periodically discusses relevant risks affecting the Funds with the CCO at these meetings. The Board has approved the Compliance Policies and reviews the CCO’s reports. Further, the Board annually reviews the sufficiency of the Compliance Policies, as well as the appointment and compensation of the CCO.

The Board recognizes that the reports it receives concerning risk management matters are, by their nature, typically summaries of the relevant information. Moreover, the Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect the Funds can be identified in advance; that it may not be practical or cost-effective to eliminate or mitigate certain risks; that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) in seeking to achieve the Funds’ investment objectives; and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in their effectiveness.

The Trustees and officers of the Funds, their years of birth, the positions they hold with the Funds, their terms of office and length of time served, a description of their principal occupations during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the fund complex that the Trustees oversee and any other public company directorships held by the Trustees are listed in the two tables immediately following. Except as shown, each Trustee’s and officer’s principal occupation and business experience for the last five years have been with the employer(s) indicated, although in some cases the Trustee may have held different positions with such employer(s).

19

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

The following table states the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned as of the Record Date by each Trustee and nominee of each Fund and, on an aggregate basis, of any registered investment companies overseen by the Trustees in the “family of investment companies,” including the Funds.

28

To the knowledge of the Funds, as of the Record Date, Trustees and nominees who are Independent Trustees or Independent Nominees and their immediate family members did not own securities of an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Funds or a person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Funds.

Mr. Ogden owns a less than 1% limited liability company interest in PIMCO Global Credit Opportunity Onshore Fund LLC, a PIMCO-sponsored private investment vehicle.

Compensation. Each of the Independent Trustees serves as a trustee of PIMCO Municipal Income Fund, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund, PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund, PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO Municipal Income Fund III, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III, PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund III, PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund, PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund, PIMCO Income Opportunity Fund, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund, PIMCO High Income Fund, PIMCO Income Strategy Fund, PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II, PIMCO Global StocksPLUS^®& Income Fund, PIMCO Energy and Tactical Credit Opportunities Fund, PCM Fund, Inc., PIMCO Strategic Income Fund, Inc., PIMCO Dynamic Credit and Mortgage Income Fund, and PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund, each a closed-end fund for which the Manager serves as investment manager (together with the Funds, the “PIMCO Closed-End Funds”), as well as PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund and PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund, each a closed-end management investment company that is operated as an “interval fund” for which the Manager serves as investment manager (the “PIMCO Interval Funds”) and PIMCO Managed Accounts Trust (“PMAT”), an open-end management investment company with multiple series for which the Manager serves as

29

investment adviser and administrator (together with the PIMCO Closed-End Funds and the PIMCO Interval Funds, the “PIMCO-Managed Funds”).

Each Independent Trustee currently receives annual compensation of $225,000 for his or her service on the Boards of the PIMCO-Managed Funds, payable quarterly. The Independent Chair of the Boards receives an additional $75,000 per year, payable quarterly. The Audit Oversight Committee Chair receives an additional $50,000 annually, payable quarterly. Trustees are also reimbursed for meeting-related expenses.

Each Trustee’s compensation for his or her service as a Trustee on the Boards of the PIMCO-Managed Funds and other costs in connection with meetings of such Funds are allocated among the PIMCO-Managed Funds, as applicable, on the basis of fixed percentages as among PMAT, the PIMCO Interval Funds and the PIMCO Closed-End Funds. Trustee compensation and other costs are then further allocated pro rata among the individual funds within each grouping based on each such fund’s relative net assets.

The Funds have no employees. The Funds’ officers and Interested Trustees (Mr. Fisher and Mr. Maney) are compensated by the Manager or its affiliates, as applicable.

The Trustees do not currently receive any pension or retirement benefits from the Funds or the Fund Complex (see below).

The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid to the Trustees and nominees for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2020 for PFL, PFN and PHK and the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 for NRGX, RCS, PGP and PDI. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2020, the Trustees received the compensation set forth in the table below for serving as Trustees of the Funds and other funds in the same Fund Complex as the Funds. Each officer and each Trustee who is a director, officer, partner, member or employee of the Manager, or of any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Manager, including any Interested Trustee, serves without any compensation from the Funds.

30

31

Trustee Qualifications — The Board has determined that each Trustee is qualified to serve as such based on several factors (none of which alone is decisive). Each Trustee, with the exception of Mr. Kittredge, has served in such role for several years. Mr. Kittredge formerly served as a Partner and General Counsel, at the investment management firm of Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC and President, CEO, and Trustee of the GMO Trust and the GMO Series Trust. Accordingly, each Trustee is knowledgeable about the Funds’ business and service provider arrangements and, with the exception of Mr. Kittredge, has also served for several years as trustee or director to a number of other investment companies advised by the Manager and/or its affiliates with similar arrangements to that of the Funds. Among the factors the Board considered when concluding that an individual is qualified to serve on the Board were the following: (i) the individual’s business and professional experience and accomplishments; (ii) the individual’s ability to work effectively with other members of the Board; (iii) the individual’s prior experience, if any, serving on the boards of public companies (including, where relevant, other investment companies) and other complex enterprises and organizations; and (iv) how the individual’s skills, experiences and attributes would contribute to an appropriate mix of relevant skills and experience on the Board.

In respect of each current Trustee, the individual’s substantial professional accomplishments and prior experience, including, in some cases, in fields related to the operations of the Funds, were a significant factor in the determination by the Board that the individual is qualified to serve as a Trustee of the Funds. The following is a summary of various qualifications, experiences and skills of each Trustee (in addition to business experience during the past five years set forth in the table above) that contributed to the Board’s conclusion that an individual is qualified to serve on the Board. References to qualifications, experiences and skills are not intended to hold out the Board or individual Trustees as having any

32

special expertise or experience and shall not impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board by reason thereof.

Sarah E. Cogan — Ms. Cogan has substantial legal experience in the investment management industry, having served as a partner at a large international law firm in the corporate department for over 25 years and as former head of the registered funds practice. She has extensive experience in oversight of investment company boards through her experience as counsel to the Independent Trustees of certain PIMCO-Managed Funds and as counsel to other independent trustees, investment companies and asset management firms.

Deborah A. DeCotis — Ms. DeCotis has substantial senior executive experience in the investment banking industry, having served as a Managing Director for Morgan Stanley. She has extensive board experience and experience in oversight of investment management functions through her experience as a former Director of the Helena Rubenstein Foundation, Stanford Graduate School of Business and Armor Holdings.

David N. Fisher — Mr. Fisher has substantial executive experience in the investment management industry. Mr. Fisher is a Managing Director and Co-Head of U.S. Global Wealth Management Strategic Accounts at PIMCO. In this role, he oversees PIMCO’s major Global Wealth Management client partnerships. Prior to taking on this position, Mr. Fisher was Head of Traditional Product Strategies at PIMCO, where he oversaw teams of product strategists covering core and non-core fixed income strategies as well as the firm’s suite of equity strategies, was a Global Bond Strategist at PIMCO, and has managed PIMCO’s Total Return Strategy since 2014. Because of his familiarity with PIMCO and its affiliates, Mr. Fisher serves as an important information resource for the Independent Trustees and as a facilitator of communication with PIMCO.

Hans W. Kertess — Mr. Kertess has substantial executive experience in the investment management industry. He is the president of a financial advisory company, H. Kertess & Co. and a Senior Adviser of Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets, and formerly served as a Managing Director of Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets. He has significant experience in the investment banking industry.

Joseph B. Kittredge, Jr. — Mr. Kittredge has substantial experience in the investment management industry, having served for thirteen years as General Counsel to Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC, the adviser to the GMO mutual fund complex, and as a Trustee and senior officer for Funds in the GMO complex. Previously, he was a partner at a large international law firm. Mr. Kittredge has extensive experience in asset management regulation and has

33

provided legal advice to investment company boards, registered funds and their sponsors with respect to a broad range of financial, legal, tax, regulatory and other issues. He also serves as the Audit Oversight Committee’s Chair and has been determined by the Board to be an “audit committee financial expert.”

John C. Maney — Mr. Maney has substantial executive and board experience in the investment management industry. Prior to January 2020, he served in a variety of senior-level positions with investment advisory firms affiliated with the Manager, including Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. (the Manager’s U.S. parent company). In addition, Mr. Maney currently provides various services to the Manager as a consultant. Because of his familiarity with the Manager and affiliated entities, he serves as an important information resource for the Independent Trustees and as a facilitator of communication with the Manager and its affiliates.

William B. Ogden, IV — Mr. Ogden has substantial senior executive experience in the investment banking industry. He served as Managing Director at Citigroup, where he established and led the firm’s efforts to raise capital for, and provide mergers and acquisition advisory services to, asset managers and investment advisers. He also has significant experience with fund products through his senior-level responsibility for originating and underwriting a broad variety of such products.

Alan Rappaport — Mr. Rappaport has substantial senior executive experience in the financial services industry. He formerly served as Chairman and President of the Private Bank of Bank of America and as Vice Chairman of U.S. Trust and as an Advisory Director of an investment firm.

Board Committees and Meetings.

Audit Oversight Committee. The Board of each Fund has established an Audit Oversight Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee currently consists of Mses. Cogan and DeCotis and Messrs. Kertess, Kittredge, Ogden and Rappaport, each of whom is an Independent Trustee. Mr. Kittredge is the current Chair of each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee.

Each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee provides oversight with respect to the internal and external accounting and auditing procedures of the Fund and, among other things, determines the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund and considers the scope of the audit, approves all audit and permitted non-audit services proposed to be performed by those auditors on behalf of the Fund and approves non-audit services to be performed

34

by the auditors for certain affiliates, including the Manager and entities in a control relationship with the Manager that provide services to the Fund where the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Audit Oversight Committee considers the possible effect of those services on the independence of the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm. Each member of each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee is “independent,” as independence for audit committee members is defined in the currently applicable listing standards of the NYSE, on which the Common Shares of each Fund are listed.

The Board of each Fund has adopted a written charter for its Audit Oversight Committee. A copy of the written charter for each Fund, as amended through January 1, 2020, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. A report of the Audit Oversight Committee of NRGX, RCS, PGP and PDI, dated August 24, 2020, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit C-1. A report of the Audit Oversight Committee of PFL, PFN and PHK, dated September 17, 2020, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit C-2.

Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board of each Fund has established a Governance and Nominating Committee composed solely of Independent Trustees, currently consisting of Messrs. Kertess, Kittredge, Ogden, Rappaport and Mses. Cogan and DeCotis. Ms. DeCotis is the current Chair of each Fund’s Governance and Nominating Committee. The primary purposes and responsibilities of each Fund’s Governance and Nominating Committee are: (i) advising and making recommendations to the Board on matters concerning Board governance and related Trustee practices, and (ii) the screening and nomination of candidates for election to the Board as Independent Trustees.⁵

The responsibilities of each Fund’s Governance and Nominating Committee include considering and making recommendations to the Fund’s Board regarding: (1) governance, retirement and other policies, procedures and practices relating to the Board and the Trustees; (2) in consultation with the Chair of the Board, matters concerning the functions and duties of the Trustees and committees of the Board; (3) the size of the Board and, in consultation with the Chair of the Board, the Board’s committees and their composition; and (4) Board and committee meeting procedures. The Committee will also periodically review and recommend for approval by the Board the structure and levels of compensation and any related benefits to be paid or provided by each Fund to the Independent Trustees for their services on the Board and any committees on the Board.

35

The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending qualified candidates to the Board in the event that a position is vacated or created or when Trustees are to be re-elected. The Governance and Nominating Committee of each Fund has adopted a charter, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit B.

Each member of each Fund’s Governance and Nominating Committee is “independent,” as independence for nominating committee members is defined in the currently applicable listing standards of the NYSE, on which the Common Shares of each Fund are listed.

Qualifications, Evaluation and Identification of Trustees/Nominees. The Governance and Nominating Committee of each Fund requires that Trustee candidates have a college degree or equivalent business experience. When evaluating candidates, each Fund’s Governance and Nominating Committee may take into account a wide variety of factors including, but not limited to: (i) availability and commitment of a candidate to attend meetings and perform his or her responsibilities on the Board, (ii) relevant industry and related experience, (iii) educational background, (iv) ability, judgment and expertise and (v) overall diversity of the Board’s composition.

The process of identifying nominees involves the consideration of candidates recommended by one or more of the following sources: (i) the Fund’s current Trustees, (ii) the Fund’s officers, (iii) the Fund’s investment adviser, (iv) the Fund’s shareholders and (v) any other source the Committee deems to be appropriate. The Governance and Nominating Committee of each Fund may, but is not required to, retain a third-party search firm at a Fund’s expense to identify potential candidates.

Consideration of Candidates Recommended by Shareholders. The Governance and Nominating Committee of each Fund will review and consider nominees recommended by Shareholders to serve as Trustees, provided that the recommending Shareholder follows the “Procedures for Shareholders to Submit Nominee Candidates for the PIMCO Sponsored Closed-End Funds,” which are set forth as Appendix B to the Funds’ Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit B. Among other requirements, these procedures provide that the recommending Shareholder must submit any recommendation in writing to the Fund, to the attention of the Fund’s Secretary, at the address of the principal executive offices of the Fund and that such submission must be received at such offices not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to the date of the Board or shareholder meeting at which the nominee would be elected. Any recommendation must include certain biographical and other information regarding the candidate and the

36

recommending Shareholder and must include a written and signed consent of the candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a Trustee if elected. The foregoing description of the requirements is only a summary. Please refer to Appendix B to the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter for each Fund, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit B for details.

The Governance and Nominating Committee has full discretion to reject nominees recommended by Shareholders, and there is no assurance that any such person properly recommended and considered by the Committee will be nominated for election to the Board of each Fund.

Diversity. The Governance and Nominating Committee takes diversity of a particular nominee and overall diversity of the Board into account when considering and evaluating nominees for Trustee. While the Committee has not adopted a particular definition of diversity, when considering a nominee’s and the Board’s diversity, the Committee generally considers the manner in which each nominee’s professional experience, education, expertise in matters that are relevant to the oversight of the Funds (e.g., investment management, distribution, accounting, trading, compliance, legal), general leadership experience and life experience are complementary and, as a whole, contribute to the ability of the Board to oversee the Funds.

Valuation Oversight Committee. The Board of each Fund has established a Valuation Oversight Committee currently consisting of Messrs. Kertess, Kittredge, Ogden and Rappaport and Mses. Cogan and DeCotis. Mr. Ogden is the current Chair of each Fund’s Valuation Oversight Committee. The Valuation Oversight Committee has been delegated responsibility by the Board for overseeing determination of the fair value of each Fund’s portfolio securities and other assets on behalf of the Board in accordance with the Funds’ valuation procedures. The Valuation Oversight Committee of each Fund reviews and approves procedures for the fair valuation of the Fund’s portfolio securities and periodically reviews information from the Manager regarding fair value determinations made pursuant to Board-approved procedures and makes related recommendations to the full Board and assists the full Board in resolving particular fair valuation and other valuation matters. In certain circumstances as specified in the Funds’ valuation policies, the Valuation Oversight Committee may also determine the fair value of portfolio holdings after consideration of all relevant factors, which determinations shall be reported to the full Board.

Contracts Committee. The Board of each Fund has established a Contracts Committee currently consisting of Messrs. Kertess, Kittredge, Ogden, Rappaport and Mses. Cogan and DeCotis. Ms. Cogan is the current Chair of each Fund’s Contracts Committee. The Contracts Committee meets as the Board deems

37

necessary to review the performance of, and the reasonableness of the fees paid to, as applicable, the Funds’ investment adviser(s) and any sub-adviser(s), administrators(s) and principal underwriters(s) and to make recommendations to the Board regarding the approval and continuance of each Fund’s contractual arrangements for investment advisory, sub-advisory, administrative and distribution services, as applicable.

Performance Committee. The Board has established a Performance Committee, currently consisting of Messrs. Kertess, Kittredge, Ogden, Rappaport, Maney and Fisher and Mses. Cogan and DeCotis. Mr. Rappaport is the current Chair of each Fund’s Performance Committee. The Performance Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing the performance of the Funds and any changes in investment philosophy, approach and personnel of the Manager.

Meetings. With respect to NRGX, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings and one special meeting. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least 75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for NRGX that were held during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.

With respect to RCS, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings and one special meeting. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Director attended in person or via teleconference at least 75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Director served for RCS that were held during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.

With respect to PGP, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings and one special meeting. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least

38

75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for PGP that were held during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.

With respect to PFL, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least 75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for PFL that were held during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020.

With respect to PFN, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least 75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for PFN that were held during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020.

With respect to PHK, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings and one special meeting. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least 75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for PHK that were held during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020.

With respect to PDI, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board held four regular meetings and one special meeting. The Audit Oversight Committee met in separate session six times, the Governance and Nominating Committee met in separate session four times, the Valuation Oversight Committee met in separate session four times, the Contracts Committee met in separate session five times and the Performance Committee met in separate session four times. Each Trustee attended in person or via teleconference at least

39

75% of the regular meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on and during which such Trustee served for PDI that were held during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.

The Trustees generally do not attend the annual shareholder meetings.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees of each Fund has adopted procedures by which Shareholders may send communications to the Board. Shareholders may mail written communications to the Board to the attention of the Board of Trustees, [name of Fund], c/o Fund Administration, Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. Shareholder communications must (i) be in writing and be signed by the Shareholder and (ii) identify the class and number of Shares held by the Shareholder. The Secretary of each Fund or her designee is responsible for reviewing properly submitted shareholder communications. The Secretary shall either (i) provide a copy of each properly submitted shareholder communication to the Board at its next regularly scheduled Board meeting or (ii) if the Secretary determines that the communication requires more immediate attention, forward the communication to the Trustees promptly after receipt. The Secretary may, in good faith, determine that a shareholder communication should not be provided to the Board because it does not reasonably relate to a Fund or its operations, management, activities, policies, service providers, Board, officers, shareholders or other matters relating to an investment in a Fund or is otherwise routine or ministerial in nature. These procedures do not apply to (i) any communication from an officer or Trustee of a Fund or (ii) any communication from an employee or agent of a Fund, unless such communication is made solely in such employee’s or agent’s capacity as a shareholder, but they shall apply to any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act or any communication made in connection with such a proposal. A Fund’s Trustees are not required to attend the Fund’s annual shareholder meetings or to otherwise make themselves available to shareholders for communications, other than by the aforementioned procedures.

Section 16(a) Reports. Each Fund’s Trustees and certain officers, investment adviser, certain affiliated persons of the investment adviser and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of outstanding securities of a Fund (i.e., a Fund’s Common Shares or Preferred Shares) are required to file forms reporting their affiliation with the Fund and reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the Fund’s securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the NYSE. Based solely on a review of these forms filed electronically with the SEC and any written representation from reporting persons during the most recently concluded fiscal year, each Fund believes that each of the Trustees and officers, investment adviser and relevant

40

affiliated persons of the investment adviser and the persons who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of outstanding securities of the Fund has complied with all applicable filing requirements during each Fund’s respective fiscal year.

Required Vote. The re-election of Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Kertess and Fisher to the Board of Trustees of NRGX will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of the Common Shareholders of the Fund cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Fisher and Rappaport to the Board of Directors of RCS will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of the Common Shareholders of the Fund cast in the election of Directors at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Messrs. Fisher, Kertess and Ogden to the Board of Trustees of PGP will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of the Common Shareholders of the Fund cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Mr. Maney to the Board of Trustees of PFL will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders of the Fund (voting together as a single class) cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Mr. Rappaport to Board of Trustees of PFL will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of Preferred Shareholders of the Fund (voting as a separate class) cast in the election of the Preferred Shares Trustee at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election Messrs. Fisher and Ogden to the Board of Trustees of PFN will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders of the Fund (voting together as a single class) cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Mr. Rappaport to Board of Trustees of PFN will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of Preferred Shareholders of the Fund (voting as a separate class) cast in the election of the Preferred Shares Trustee at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Ms. DeCotis and Messrs. Kertess and Kittredge to the Board of Trustees of PHK will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of Common Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders of the Fund (voting together as a single class) cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy. The re-election of Mses. Cogan and DeCotis and Mr. Kertess to Board of Trustees of PDI will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes of the Common Shareholders of the Fund cast in the election of Trustees at the Meeting, in person or by proxy.

41

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EACH FUND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH FUND.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Executive and Other Officers of the Funds. The table below provides certain information concerning the executive officers of the Funds and certain other officers who perform similar duties. Officers of NRGX, PGP, PFL, PFN, PHK and PDI hold office at the pleasure of the relevant Board and until their successors are chosen and qualified, or in each case until he or she sooner dies, resigns, is removed with or without cause or becomes disqualified. Officers of RCS shall be elected or appointed by the Board of Directors each year at its first meeting held after the annual meeting of Shareholders, or at any other time. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board. Each such officer shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected or appointed and qualified, or until his or her death, or until he or she shall have resigned or have been removed. Officers and employees of the Funds who are principals, officers, members or employees of the Manager are not compensated by the Funds.

42

43

44

45

Each of the Funds’ executive officers is an “interested person” of the Fund (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) as a result of his or her position(s) set forth in the table above.

Investment Manager. The Manager serves as the investment manager of each of the Funds. Subject to the supervision of the Board of each Fund, the Manager is responsible for managing the investment activities of the Funds and the Funds’ business affairs and other administrative matters. The Manager is located at 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. The Manager is a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Allianz SE, a publicly traded European insurance and financial services company.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Oversight Committee of each Fund’s Board and the full Board of each Fund unanimously selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2021 for NRGX, RCS, PGP and PDI and July 31, 2021 for PFL, PFN and PHK. PwC served as the independent registered public accounting firm of each Fund for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 for NRGX, RCS, PGP and PDI and July 31, 2020 for PFL, PFN and PHK and serves as the independent registered public accounting firm of various other investment companies for which the Manager serves as investment adviser. PwC is located at 300 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017. None of the Funds knows of any direct financial or material indirect financial interest of PwC in the Funds. A representative of PwC, if requested by any Shareholder, will be present at the Meeting via telephone to respond to appropriate questions from Shareholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she chooses to do so.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures. Each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee has adopted written policies relating to the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policies, on at least an annual basis, a Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee reviews and pre-approves proposed audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm on behalf of the Fund.

In addition, each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee pre-approves at least annually any permitted non-audit services (including audit-related services) to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Manager and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Manager that provides ongoing services to the Fund (together, the “Service Affiliates”), provided, in each case, that the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. Although the Audit Oversight Committee does not pre-approve all services provided by the independent

46

registered public accounting firm to Service Affiliates (for instance, if the engagement does not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund), the Committee receives an annual report from the independent registered public accounting firm showing the aggregate fees paid by Service Affiliates for such services.

Each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee may also from time to time pre-approve individual non-audit services to be provided to the Fund or a Service Affiliate that were not pre-approved as part of the annual process described above. A member of the Audit Oversight Committee to whom this responsibility has been delegated (a “Designated Member”) may also pre-approve these individual non-audit services, provided that the fee for such services does not exceed a pre-determined dollar threshold. Any such pre-approval by the Designated Member is reported to the full Audit Oversight Committee for ratification at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

The pre-approval policies provide for waivers of the requirement that the Audit Oversight Committee pre-approve permitted non-audit services provided to the Funds or their Service Affiliates pursuant to de minimis exceptions described in Section 10A of the Exchange Act and applicable regulations (referred to herein as the “de minimis exception”).

Audit Fees. Audit Fees are fees related to the audit and review of the financial statements included in annual reports and registration statements, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. For each Fund’s last two fiscal years as reflected below, the Audit Fees billed by PwC to the Fund or to PIMCO with respect to the Fund are shown in the table below:

47

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-Related Fees are fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements, but not reported under “Audit Fees” above, and that include accounting consultations, attestation reports, comfort letters, and agreed-upon procedure reports (inclusive of annual review of basic maintenance testing associated with the Preferred Shares for the Funds), if applicable. The table below shows, for each Fund’s last two fiscal years as reflected below, the Audit-Related Fees billed by PwC to the Fund or to PIMCO with respect to the Fund. During those fiscal years, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed by PwC to the Funds’ Service Affiliates for audit-related services related directly to the operation and financial reporting of the Funds.

Tax Fees. Tax Fees are fees associated with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews, and tax distribution and analysis reviews. The table below shows, for each Fund’s last two fiscal years as reflected below, the aggregate Tax Fees billed by PwC to the Fund or to PIMCO with respect to the Fund. During those fiscal years, there were no Tax Fees billed by PwC to the Funds’ Service Affiliates for tax-related services related directly to the operation and financial reporting of the Funds.

48

All Other Fees. All Other Fees are fees related to services other than those reported above under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees.” For each Fund’s last two fiscal years, no such fees were billed by PwC to the Fund or the Fund’s Service Affiliates.

During the periods indicated in the tables above, no services described under “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” or “All Other Fees” were approved pursuant to the de minimis exception.

Aggregate Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by PwC, during each Fund’s last two fiscal years as reflected below, for services rendered to each Fund and the Fund’s Service Affiliates are shown in the table below.

49

The table below shows a breakdown of the fees billed by PwC to each Fund, or to PIMCO with respect to each Fund, for the most recently completed fiscal year attributable the following categories: 1) Audit Fees, 2) Audit-Related Fees, 3) Tax Compliance/Preparation fees and 4) All Other Fees, as well as the percentage of the total fees billed attributable to the “All Other Fees” category.

Each Fund’s Audit Oversight Committee has determined that the provision by PwC of non-audit services to the Fund’s Service Affiliates that were not pre-approved by the Committee was compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC as the Fund’s principal auditors.

Other Business. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each Fund’s officers and the Manager know of no business to come before the Meeting other than as set forth in the Notice. If any other business is properly brought before the Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote in their sole discretion.

Quorum, Adjournments, Meeting Logistics and Methods of Tabulation. A quorum for each of PGP, PFL, PFN, PHK and PDI at the Meeting will consist of the presence in person or by proxy of thirty percent (30%) of the total Shares of the Fund entitled to vote at such Meeting, except that, where the Preferred Shares or Common Shares will vote as separate classes, then 30% of the shares of each class entitled to vote will be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business by that class. A quorum for NRGX at the Meeting will consist of the presence in person or by proxy of thirty percent and one-third (33¹⁄₃%) of the total Shares of the Fund entitled to vote at such Meeting. For RCS, the presence at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, of Shareholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum. If the quorum required for a Proposal has not been met, the persons named as proxies may propose adjournment of the Meeting with respect to such Proposal and, if adjournment is proposed, will vote all Shares that they are entitled to vote in favor of such adjournment. Any adjournments with

50

respect to the Proposal for a Fund will require, with respect to NRGX, PGP, PFL, PFN, PHK and PDI, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast upon the question for the relevant Fund, and, with respect to RCS, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares of RCS entitled to vote thereon and present in person or represented by proxy at the session of the Meeting to be adjourned. However, where the Preferred Shares or Common Shares will vote as separate classes, the affirmative vote of a plurality of shares of the applicable class present in person or by proxy at the session of the Meeting to be adjourned will be necessary to adjourn the Meeting with respect to that class. The costs of any additional solicitation and of any adjourned session will be borne by PIMCO under its investment management agreement with the Funds. Any proposal properly brought before the Meeting for which sufficient favorable votes have been received by the time of the Meeting will be acted upon and such action will be final regardless of whether the Meeting is adjourned to permit additional solicitation with respect to any other proposal with respect to which a quorum has not been reached. In certain circumstances in which a Fund has received sufficient votes to approve a matter being recommended for approval by the Fund’s Board, the Fund may request that brokers and nominee entities, in their discretion, withhold or withdraw submission of broker non-votes in order to avoid the need for solicitation of additional votes in favor of the proposal.

Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Meeting will be counted by persons appointed by NRGX, PGP, PFL, PFN, PHK and PDI as tellers and by RCS as inspectors (collectively, the “Tellers/Inspectors”) for the Meeting. For purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for each Fund, the Tellers/Inspectors will include the total number of Shares present at the Meeting in person or by proxy, including Shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or the persons entitled to vote and the broker or nominee does not have the discretionary voting power on a particular matter). For a proposal requiring approval of a plurality of votes cast, such as the election of Trustees, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted towards the achievement of a plurality of votes cast for a nominee and will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

PIMCO is sensitive to the health and travel concerns of the Funds’ shareholders and the evolving recommendations from public health officials. Due to the difficulties arising from the coronavirus known as COVID-19, the date, time, location or means of conducting the Meeting may change. In the event of such a change, the Funds will issue a press release announcing the change and file the announcement on the SEC’s EDGAR system, among other steps, but may not deliver additional soliciting materials to shareholders or otherwise amend the Funds’ proxy materials. The Funds may consider imposing

51

additional procedures or limitations on Meeting attendees or conducting the Meeting as a “virtual” shareholder meeting through the internet or other electronic means in lieu of an in-person meeting, subject to any restrictions imposed by applicable law. If the Meeting will be held virtually in whole or in part, a Fund will notify its shareholders of such plans in a timely manner and disclose clear directions as to the logistical details of the “virtual” meeting, including how shareholders can remotely access, participate in and vote at such meeting. The Funds plan to announce these changes, if any, at pimco.com/closedendfunds, and encourage you to check this website prior to the Meeting if you plan to attend. Please note that any shareholder wishing to attend the Meeting in-person is required to comply with any health regulations adopted by federal, state and local governments and PIMCO.

Reports to Shareholders. Below are the dates on or about which the Annual Reports to Shareholders for the most recently completed fiscal year of each Fund were mailed: