UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 1-33402
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
72-1252405
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
10001 Woodloch Forest Drive, Suite 610
|
|
|
The Woodlands, Texas
|
|
77380
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 203-5700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer
o
|
|
Accelerated Filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not Check if a Smaller Reporting Company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes
þ
No
o
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, $0.01 par value per share, issued and
outstanding at May 5, 2010 was 19,538,017.
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.
REPORT FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,965
|
|
|
$
|
52,981
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
87,573
|
|
|
|
98,600
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
|
|
18,761
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
13,917
|
|
|
|
15,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
154,954
|
|
|
|
189,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine vessels
|
|
|
476,355
|
|
|
|
522,169
|
|
Subsea equipment
|
|
|
176,242
|
|
|
|
182,576
|
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
178,012
|
|
|
|
168,879
|
|
Transportation and other
|
|
|
8,585
|
|
|
|
6,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839,194
|
|
|
|
880,273
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(141,453
|
)
|
|
|
(152,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment, net
|
|
|
697,741
|
|
|
|
728,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash, noncurrent
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
110,868
|
|
|
|
116,471
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
46,245
|
|
|
|
38,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,013,628
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
|
$
|
52,585
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
41,360
|
|
|
|
45,961
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
77,844
|
|
|
|
88,990
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
27,429
|
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
|
|
9,182
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
218,619
|
|
|
|
214,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
675,393
|
|
|
|
681,312
|
|
Long-term derivative
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,886
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
80,681
|
|
|
|
19,219
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
11,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
985,940
|
|
|
|
963,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized and
20,108,224
shares issued at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
342,947
|
|
|
|
340,803
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(198,618
|
)
|
|
|
(120,069
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(146,881
|
)
|
|
|
(153,301
|
)
|
Phantom stock
|
|
|
47,643
|
|
|
|
47,643
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 570,207 shares
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
|
(17,604
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trico Marine Services, Inc. equity
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
99,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
112,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,013,628
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
95,714
|
|
|
$
|
121,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
79,154
|
|
|
|
98,488
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
18,057
|
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,813
|
|
|
|
18,072
|
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
114,160
|
|
|
|
137,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(18,446
|
)
|
|
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net loss of investee
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(22,354
|
)
|
|
|
(10,914
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded
derivative
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
(19,455
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(55,689
|
)
|
|
|
(15,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
22,860
|
|
|
|
(15,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,691
|
|
|
|
16,711
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,691
|
|
|
|
16,711
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(
Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,813
|
|
|
|
18,072
|
|
Amortization of non-cash deferred revenues
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Noncash benefit related to change in Norwegian tax law
|
|
|
21,242
|
|
|
|
(18,568
|
)
|
Accretion of debt discount
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,131
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
(5,281
|
)
|
|
|
(939
|
)
|
Gain on conversions of 6.5% Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,779
|
)
|
Cash paid for make-whole premium related to conversions of
6.5% Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,574
|
)
|
Foreign currency (gains)/losses, net
|
|
|
11,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Provision on doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
19,225
|
|
|
|
(4,155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,025
|
)
|
|
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(14,852
|
)
|
|
|
(19,557
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Dividend
from unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(5,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,913
|
)
|
|
|
(18,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and (repayments) of revolving credit facilities, net
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
Contribution from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
Dividend to noncontrolling partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21,016
|
)
|
|
|
(34,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
52,981
|
|
|
|
94,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
31,965
|
|
|
$
|
60,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Trico Marine Services,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company). The consolidated financial statements of
the Company include the accounts of those subsidiaries where the Company directly or indirectly has
more than 50% of the ownership rights and for which the right to participate in significant
management decisions is not shared with other shareholders. Beginning January 1, 2010, in accordance with new
guidelines for consolidation of variable interest entities, the Company deconsolidated Eastern
Marine Services Limited (EMSL). See Note 13. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. For comparative purposes, certain amounts in 2009 have been adjusted
to conform to the current periods presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required for complete financial
statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring items considered
necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. The results of operations for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts as well as certain disclosures. The Companys financial statements include amounts
that are based on managements best estimates and judgments. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, since certain information
and disclosures normally included in the notes to the financial statements have been condensed or
omitted for interim periods as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
2. Risks, Uncertainties and Going Concern
As discussed below, the Companys forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not
expected to be sufficient to meet its commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and
the Company does not expect that it will be able to remain in compliance with its debt covenants.
At March 31, 2010, we had available cash of $32 million. There can be no assurance that we will
have sufficient funds to permit us to make the 8.125% Payment of approximately $8 million on or
before May 15, 2010. Further, we have no availability under either our U.S.
$50 million revolving
credit facility (the U.S. Credit Facility) or Trico Shippings $33 million working capital
facility (the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility). We will be unable to satisfy our
obligations under the 8.125% Debentures, the 3% Debentures, the Senior Secured Notes, the U.S.
Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility if such indebtedness is
accelerated.
The uncertainties associated with the Companys ability to meet its commitments as they come
due, comply with its debt covenants or repay its outstanding debt raises substantial doubt about
the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the uncertainty associated with
the Companys ability to meet its obligations as they come due.
The Companys forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient
to meet its commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and the Company does not
expect that it will be able to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. In particular, the
Company may need to, or may choose to, avail itself of the 30-day grace period with respect to the
approximately $8 million interest payment due on May 15, 2010 (the 8.125% Payment) on its 8.125%
secured convertible debentures due 2013 (the 8.125% Debentures), and there is no assurance that
the Company will be able to make the 8.125% Payment before the end of that grace period, in which
case an event of default will occur with respect to the 8.125% Debentures, which in turn would
constitute an event of default under all of its outstanding debt agreements, and all of the
Companys outstanding debt could become callable by its creditors and would be reclassified as a
current liability on its balance sheet. The Companys use of the
grace period would not constitute an event of default under the
indenture governing the 8.125% Debentures.
The Company has engaged a financial
advisor and is pursuing measures to improve liquidity and its capital structure and is in
active discussions with various parties regarding potential transactions, including replacing its
current U.S. Credit Facility and modifying the existing 8.125%
Debentures to, among other things, defer amortization payments.
Under the indenture governing the 8.125% Debentures, if we do not
make the 8.125% Payment by June 15, 2010, the trustee under such indenture, or the holders of at
least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 8.125% Debentures, by notice to us, may declare
the outstanding principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all the 8.125% Debentures to be due
and payable immediately. In addition, if the 8.125% Payment is not made on June 15, 2010
(irrespective of whether the amounts owing under the 8.125% Debentures are accelerated), then the
administrative agents under the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital
Facility may, upon written request by all the non-defaulting lenders thereto, declare the
outstanding principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding loans under such
agreements to be due and payable. Following acceleration under the 8.125% Debentures, (i) the
trustee under the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes, or holders of at least 25% in
principal amount of the outstanding Senior Secured Notes, may, by notice to Trico Shipping, declare
the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on the Senior Secured Notes to be due and payable
immediately and (ii) the trustee under the indenture governing our 3% senior convertible
debentures due 2027 (the 3% Debentures), or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the
outstanding 3% Debentures, may provide us with a notice of default under the 3% Debentures and, if
we fail to make the 8.125% Payment within 30 calendar days of such notice, such trustee or such
holders of the 3% Debentures may, by notice to us, declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid
interest on the 3% Debentures to be due and payable immediately. See Note 5.
In the Companys 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company indicated that the
forecasted cash and available credit capacity were not expected to be sufficient to meet its
commitments as they came due over the subsequent twelve months and that it would not be able to
remain in compliance with its debt covenants without completing certain actions to increase its
level of liquidity. These actions included (i) selling additional assets, (ii) accessing cash in
certain of its subsidiaries, (iii) minimizing capital
6
expenditures, (iv) obtaining waivers or amendments from its lenders, (v) managing working
capital and (vi) improving cash flows from operations. Since December 31, 2009, the Company has
made progress toward completing certain of these actions. These actions include receiving
approximately $2.8 million in net proceeds from asset sales,
with an additional $15.6 million received after March 31, 2010, receiving a dividend of $1.0 million
from its EMSL subsidiary, receiving a $9.3 million tax refund at its subsidiary, Trico Shipping AS
(Trico Shipping), and obtaining a waiver from its lender for the debt to consolidated leverage
ratio for the period ending March 31, 2010. However, additional liquidity will need to be generated from some or all of the previously mentioned actions
in order for the Company to have sufficient liquidity to meet its commitments as they come due.
There can be no assurance that sufficient liquidity can be raised from one or more of these
transactions and / or that these transactions can be consummated within the period needed to meet
certain obligations. Additionally, the Company expects that it will need additional amendments or
waivers from its lenders for at least each of the next four quarters. The Companys interest payment
obligations are concentrated in the months of May and November with approximately $24 million of
interest due on Trico Shippings 11 7/8% senior secured notes due 2014 (the Senior Secured Notes)
on each of May 1 and November 1, in addition to the 8.125% Payments due on each of May 15 and
November 15. The May 1, 2010 interest payment on the Senior Secured Notes was paid as scheduled.
Additionally, the terms of the Companys credit agreements require that some or all of the proceeds
from certain asset sales be used to permanently reduce outstanding debt which could substantially
reduce the amount of proceeds it retains. The Company is currently restricted by the terms of each
of the 8.125% Debentures and the Senior Secured Notes from incurring additional indebtedness due to
its leverage ratio exceeding the limit at which additional indebtedness could be incurred. In
conjunction with the waiver of the requirement that the Company receive an unqualified opinion in
relation to going concern for the period ending December 31, 2009, additional
draws under the
U.S. Credit Facility and Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility
were prohibited and no additional amounts are currently available under those facilities.
Additionally, the Companys ability to refinance any of its existing indebtedness on commercially
reasonable terms may be materially and adversely impacted by the Companys financial condition and
the current credit market conditions. If the Company is unable to complete the above mentioned
actions, it will be in default under its credit agreements, which in turn, could potentially
constitute an event of default under all of its outstanding debt agreements. If this were to occur,
all of its outstanding debt could become callable by its creditors and would be reclassified as a
current liability on its balance sheet.
Due to the Companys expected liquidity position and limitations in the U.S. Credit Facility,
it expects to make the amortization payments of approximately $10 million due on the 8.125%
Debentures on each of August 1, 2010, November 1, 2010 and February 1, 2011 in common stock. The
number of shares issued will be determined by the stock price at the time of each of the
amortization payments and may lead to significantly more shares being issued than if the debentures
were converted at the stated conversion rate which is equivalent to $14 per share; however, the
number of shares that the Company can issue in compliance with Nasdaq rules is limited to
approximately 9.3 million as of March 31, 2010.
At the March 31, 2010 closing market price of $2.32 per share, the Company has enough shares to
fund the $10 million amortization payments due August 1 and November 1, 2010 but not enough shares to
fully fund the interest due February 1, 2011 which would be an event of default.
There can be no assurance that the number of shares required to make
these amortization payments will not exceed this limit, in which case the Company will require an
amendment to the U.S. Credit Facility to permit the amortization payments to be made in cash, and
will require the cash to make such payments, or will require a shareholder vote to permit the
issuance of additional shares. There can be no assurance that all or any of these events will
occur, in which case the Company may default on either the 8.125% Debentures or the U.S. Credit
Facility, which would provide the lenders the opportunity to accelerate the remaining amounts
outstanding under these facilities. In addition, the Company will need to obtain a waiver or
amendment to its consolidated leverage ratio debt covenant in the U.S. Credit Facility that it does
not expect to be in compliance with beginning with the quarter ending
June 30, 2010 and for at least the
three subsequent quarters. There can be no assurance that the lenders will agree to these
amendments / waivers and / or additional amendments/ waivers on
acceptable terms, or at all, and a failure to
do so would provide the lenders the opportunity to accelerate the remaining amounts outstanding
under these facilities.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had available cash of $32 million. (This amount and other
amounts in this section reflecting U.S. Dollar equivalents for foreign denominated debt amounts are
translated at currency rates in effect at March 31, 2010.) As of March 31, 2010, payments due on
the Companys contractual obligations during the next twelve months were approximately $284
million. This includes $62 million of principal payments of debt as of March 31, 2010, $29 million
of which can be paid in cash or stock at the Companys option, $119 million of time charter
obligations, $31 million of vessel construction obligations, $69 million of estimated interest
expense, and approximately $3 million of other operating expenses such as operating leases and
pension obligations. The Company expects it will need to complete
additional actions to have
sufficient liquidity to satisfy these obligations. The Company holds the option to cancel
construction by Tebma of the four new build MPSVs after July 15, 2010, which would reduce its
committed future capital expenditures to approximately $33 million on the three remaining MPSVs, of
which it expects to take delivery of by the second and fourth quarters of 2010 and the first
quarter of 2011.
7
The Company is highly leveraged and its debt imposes significant restrictions on it and
increases its vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes, the Companys business has been
effectively split into two groups: (i) Trico Supply, where substantially all of its subsea services
business and all of its subsea protection business resides along with its North Sea towing and
supply business and (ii) Trico Other, whose business is comprised primarily of its non North Sea
towing and supply businesses. Trico Other has the obligation, among other things, to pay the debt
service related to the 8.125% Debentures,
the Companys 3% senior convertible debentures due 2027 (the 3%
Debentures), the U.S. Credit Facility, and the Companys 6.11% notes due 2014 (the 6.11%Notes)
and to pay the majority of corporate related expenses while Trico Supply has the obligation to make
debt service payments related to the Senior Secured Notes and the Trico Shipping Working Capital
Facility. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes, the ability of Trico Supply to provide
funding on an ongoing basis to Trico Other is limited by restrictions on Trico Supplys ability to
pay dividends and principal and interest on intercompany debt unless certain financial measures are
met. Other than an annual reimbursement of up to $5 million related to the reimbursement of
corporate expenses, a one-time $5 million restricted payment basket, and certain carve outs related
to the sale of one vessel and the proceeds from refund guarantees associated with four construction
vessel contracts that are expected to be cancelled, the Company does not expect Trico Supply to be
able to transfer additional funds to Trico Other in the foreseeable future. During the first
quarter of 2010, a total of $3.5 million was transferred from Trico Supply to Trico Other under the
one-time $5 million restricted payment basket and approximately $1.1 million was transferred
related to the $5 million annual reimbursement for corporate expenses. The refund guarantees
related to the final four construction vessel contracts have expiration dates and need to be
periodically renewed. Some or all of the $21 million in refund guarantees for the final four
vessels may expire prior to when the Company can make a claim under them. To date, the Company has
been able to obtain renewals of these refund guarantees except for one $1.3 million refund
guarantee, which has not yet been renewed. The Company has withheld $1.3 million in payments for
the recently completed vessel until this refund guarantee is renewed. However, there can be no
assurance that the current refund guarantees will be renewed by the existing financial institutions
or, if not renewed, replacement refund guarantees can be obtained. Additionally, in lieu of
obtaining proceeds from certain of the refund guarantees, the Company may instead realize the
proceeds from the sale of equipment previously purchased for the last four vessels. The proceeds
from the sale of this equipment may not be equal to the value of the refund guarantees associated
with the equipment, the value of which equals the purchase price paid by the Company for the
equipment. Should the proceeds of the sale of this equipment not be equal to the value of the refund
guarantees associated therewith, the Company would record an impairment charge for the difference
in value.
In addition to the previously mentioned actions being taken to increase its liquidity, the
ability of each of Trico Supply, Trico Other, and the Company overall to obtain minimum levels of
operating cash flows and liquidity to fund their operations, meet their debt service requirements,
and remain in compliance with their debt covenants, is dependent on its ability to accomplish the
following: (i) secure profitable contracts through a balance of spot exposure and term contracts,
(ii) achieve certain levels of vessel and service spread utilization, (iii) deploy its vessels to
the most profitable markets, and (iv) invest in technologically advanced subsea fleet. The
forecasted cash flows and liquidity for each of Trico Supply, Trico Other, and the Company are
dependent on each meeting certain assumptions regarding fleet utilization, average day rates,
operating and general and administrative expenses, and in the case of Trico Supply, new vessel
deliveries, which could prove to be inaccurate. Within certain constraints, the Company can
conserve capital by reducing or delaying capital expenditures, deferring non-regulatory maintenance
expenditures and further reducing operating and administrative costs through various measures.
The Companys inability to satisfy any of the obligations under its debt agreements would
constitute an event of default. Under cross default provisions in several agreements governing its
indebtedness, a default or acceleration of one debt agreement will result in the default and
acceleration of its other debt agreements and under its Master Charter lease agreement. A default,
whether by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, could result in all or a portion of its
outstanding debt becoming immediately due and payable and would provide certain other remedies to
the counterparty to the Master Charter which would result in the
Companys debt being reclassified to a current liability.
These events could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to satisfy
obligations under its debt agreements (Also see Note 5).
The Companys revenues are primarily generated from entities operating in the oil and gas
industry in the North Sea, the Asia Pacific Region, West Africa, Brazil and the Mexican Gulf of
Mexico (Mexico). The Companys international operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010
account currently for 100% of revenues and are subject to a number of risks inherent to
international operations including exchange rate fluctuations, unanticipated assessments from tax
or regulatory authorities, and changes in laws or regulations. In addition, because of the
Companys corporate structure, it may not be able to repatriate funds from its Norwegian
subsidiaries without adverse tax or debt compliance consequences. These factors could have a
material adverse affect on the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Because the Companys revenues are generated primarily from customers who have similar
economic interests, its operations are also susceptible to market volatility resulting from
economic, cyclical, weather or other factors related to the energy industry. Changes
8
in the level of operating and capital spending in the industry, decreases in oil and gas
prices, or industry perceptions about future oil and gas prices could materially decrease the
demand for the Companys services, adversely affecting its financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
The Companys operations, particularly in the North Sea, the Asia Pacific Region, West Africa,
Mexico, and Brazil, depend on the continuing business of a limited number of key customers and some
of its long-term contracts contain early termination options in favor of its customers. If any of
these customers terminate their contracts with the Company, fail to renew an existing contract,
refuse to award new contracts to it or choose to exercise their termination rights, the Companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
The Companys certificate of incorporation effectively requires that it remain eligible under
the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, as amended, or the Jones Act, and together with the Shipping Act,
1916, the Shipping Acts. The Shipping Acts require that vessels engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade
and other services generally be owned by U.S. citizens and built in the U.S. For a corporation
engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade to be deemed a U.S. citizen: (i) the corporation must be
organized under the laws of the U.S. or of a state, territory or possession thereof, (ii) each of
the president or other chief executive officer and the chairman of the board of directors of such
corporation must be a U.S. citizen, (iii) no more than 25% of the directors of such corporation
necessary to the transaction of business can be non-U.S. citizens and (iv) at least 75% of the
interest in such corporation must be owned by U.S. citizens (as defined in the Shipping Acts).
The Jones Act also treats as a prohibited controlling interest any (i) contract or understanding
by which more than 25% of the voting power in the corporation may be exercised, directly or
indirectly, on behalf of a non-U.S. citizen and (ii) the existence of any other means by which
control of more than 25% of any interest in the corporation is given to or permitted to be
exercised by a non-U.S. citizen. The Company expects decommissioning and deep water projects in the
Gulf of Mexico to comprise an important part of its subsea strategy, which may require continued
compliance with the Jones Act. Any action that risks its status under the Jones Act could have a
material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The holders of the Companys 3% Debentures and the 8.125% Debentures have the right to require
the Company to repurchase the debentures upon the occurrence of a Fundamental Change in its
business. The holders of the Senior Secured Notes have the ability to require the Company to
repurchase the Notes at 101% of par value in the event of a Change of Control. See Note 5 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for more information.
3. Asset Sales
Asset Sales
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold three offshore supply vessels (OSVs) and
one subsea platform supply vessel (SPSV) for net proceeds of $2.8 million and a gain of $0.9
million. The sale of these vessels did not require a debt prepayment.
Assets Held for Sale
Marine vessels held for sale at March 31, 2010 included one anchor handling, towing and supply
vessel (AHTS) and one OSV. The vessels are included in the Companys towing and supply segment.
The vessels were sold in April 2010 for $15.6 million in
net proceeds and did require a partial debt
repayment.
4. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of trade names and customer relationships. The Company did not incur
costs to renew or extend the term of acquired intangible assets during the period ending March 31,
2010. The Company classified trade names as indefinite lived
intangible assets. Under authoritative guidance
for goodwill and other intangibles, indefinite lived assets are not amortized but instead are
reviewed for impairment annually and more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the
asset may be impaired. At December 31, 2009, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its
trade name assets utilizing a form of the income approach known as the relief-from-royalty method.
The Company did not recognize an impairment in 2009.
The following table provides information relating to the Companys intangible assets as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
118,057
|
|
|
$
|
(14,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,608
|
|
|
$
|
118,057
|
|
|
$
|
(12,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
118,057
|
|
|
$
|
(14,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,608
|
|
|
$
|
118,057
|
|
|
$
|
(12,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
$
|
40,881
|
|
|
$
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,260
|
|
|
$
|
40,881
|
|
|
$
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,881
|
|
|
$
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,260
|
|
|
$
|
40,881
|
|
|
$
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $1.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The estimated amortization expense for the
remainder of 2010 is estimated to be $5.8 million and $7.8 million per year for 2011, 2012, 2013
and 2014.
5. Debt
Unless otherwise specified, amounts in these footnotes disclosing U.S. Dollar equivalents for
foreign denominated debt amounts are translated at currency rates in effect at March 31, 2010. The
Companys debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$50 million U.S. Revolving Credit Facility Agreement
(1)
,
maturing in December 2011
|
|
$
|
11,298
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,298
(2)
,
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
11,347
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,347
|
(2),(3)
|
$202.8 million face amount, 8.125% Convertible Debentures, net of
unamortized
discount of $11.2 million and $12.3 million as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009,
respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears, maturing on
February 1, 2013
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
162,726
|
|
|
|
191,652
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
|
|
170,696
|
|
|
|
190,470
|
|
$150.0 million face amount, 3% Senior Convertible Debentures, net of
unamortized
discount of $28.5 million and $30.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009,
respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears, maturing on
January 15, 2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,535
|
|
|
|
121,535
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,992
|
|
|
|
119,992
|
(4)
|
$400.0 million face amount, 11.875% Senior Secured Notes, net of
unamortized
discount of $13.5 million and $14.1 million as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009,
respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears, maturing
on November 1, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,460
|
|
|
|
386,460
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,925
|
|
|
|
385,925
|
(5)
|
$33 million Working Capital Facility
(1)
, maturing December 2011
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
6.11% Notes, principal and interest due in 30 semi-annual installments,
maturing April 2014
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
Insurance note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Motor vehicle leases
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Fresh-start debt premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
|
$
|
675,393
|
|
|
$
|
736,936
|
|
|
$
|
52,585
|
|
|
$
|
681,312
|
|
|
$
|
733,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Interest on such credit facilities is at the London inter-bank offered rate
(LIBOR) plus 5.00%. There is an additional utilization fee of 3.00% per annum for each day the
amount drawn, including amounts related to letters of credit, exceeds 50% of the total amount
available. The three month LIBOR rate was 0.3% for the periods ending March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In December 2009, the Company entered into an amendment that excluded the
impact on the minimum net worth covenant of the impairment charge related to four construction
vessels. The Company was in compliance with this covenant as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Company was in compliance with its maximum consolidated leverage ratio
covenant as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. In August 2009, the Company entered into an
amendment whereby the maximum consolidated leverage was increased from 4.5:1 to 5.0:1 for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009. The Company was not in compliance with this
consolidated leverage ratio covenant at September 30, 2009 due to the negative impact on
calculated EBITDA of the increase in value of the embedded derivative associated with the
8.125% Debentures which was primarily the result of an increase in the Companys stock price.
The Company received an amendment retroactive to September 30, 2009 that amended the
calculation retroactively and prospectively to exclude the effects of the change in the value
of this embedded derivative. With this amendment, the Company was in compliance with this
covenant as of September 30, 2009. This amendment also increased the consolidated leverage
ratio to 8.50:1 for each of the quarters ending between December 31, 2009 through September
30, 2010. The ratio decreases to 8.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, and
subsequently decreases to 7.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, 6.00:1 for the
fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2011, and to 5.00:1 for any fiscal quarters ending thereafter.
In December 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to increase the consolidated leverage
ratio to 11.0:1 for the quarters ending December 31, 2009,
March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 and to 10.0:1 for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 while leaving the ratio
levels for December 31, 2010 and beyond unchanged. In conjunction with this amendment, the
current availability under the facility was reduced to approximately $14.8 million with the
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
reduced availability being restored when the Company is below the consolidated ratio levels that
were in effect prior to this amendment. The Company was in compliance with this covenant as of
December 31, 2009. On March 31, 2010, the Company received a waiver to the maximum consolidated
leverage ratio as of March 31, 2010. Absent this waiver, the Company would not have been in
compliance with this covenant as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Holders of the Companys 3% Debentures have the right to require the Company to
repurchase the debentures in cash at par on each of January 15, 2014, January 15, 2017 and
January 15, 2022.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc. is a guarantor of the Senior Secured Notes and
the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility. This guarantee is subordinated to any obligations
under the U.S. Credit Facility.
|
Maturities of debt during the next five years and thereafter, based on debt amounts
outstanding as of March 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Due in one year
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
Due in two years
|
|
|
46,960
|
|
Due in three years
|
|
|
129,477
|
|
Due in four years
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Due in five years
|
|
|
400,625
|
|
Due in over five years
|
|
|
150,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-start debt premium
|
|
|
238
|
|
Unamortized discounts on Senior Secured Notes, 3% Debentures and 8.125% Debentures
|
|
|
(53,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
736,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the $150.0 million of 3% Debentures that may be converted earlier but
have stated maturity terms in excess of five years.
|
$50 million U.S. Credit Facility.
In January 2008, the Company entered into a $50 million
three-year credit facility (as amended and restated, the U.S. Credit Facility) secured by an
equity interest in direct material domestic subsidiaries, first preferred mortgage on vessels owned
by Trico Marine Assets, Inc. and a pledge on the intercompany note due from Trico Supply AS to
Trico Marine Operators, Inc. A voluntary prepayment of $15 million was made on January 14, 2009
which reduced the commitment to $35 million. In October 2009, $10 million of the proceeds from the
sale of the
Northern Challenger
were used to permanently reduce the commitment under the facility
to $25 million. The remaining commitment is reduced by $3.5 million for each quarter beginning
September 1, 2010 with the debt having a final maturity on December 31, 2011. Interest is payable
on the unpaid principal amount outstanding at the Eurodollar rate designated by the British Bankers
Association plus 5.0% and is subject to an additional utilization fee of 3.0% paid quarterly in
arrears if the facility is more than 50% drawn.
In August 2009 the Company received an amendment to the U.S. Credit Facility whereby the
maximum consolidated leverage ratio, net debt to EBITDA, was increased from 4.5:1 to 5.0:1 for the
fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009. The consolidated leverage ratios for the remaining
periods were subsequently amended in October 2009 to increase the consolidated leverage ratio to
8:50:1:00 for the fiscal quarters ending starting December 31, 2009 and ending September 30, 2010.
The ratio decreases to 8.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, and subsequently
decreases to 7.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, 6.00:1 for the fiscal quarter
ending June 30, 2011, and to 5.00:1 for any fiscal quarters ending thereafter.
In October 2009, the definition of EBITDA used to calculate the Consolidated Leverage Ratio
was amended to exclude any gains or losses related to the embedded derivative associated with the
8.125% Debentures. The change to this definition was made retroactive to September 30, 2009.
Additionally in October 2009, the facility was amended to change the definition of Free Liquidity
to exclude cash and cash equivalents held by Trico Supply and its subsidiaries, and added a
collateral coverage requirement. The amendment also added certain limitations on our ability to pay
amortization payments in cash on the 8.125% Debentures, the first payment of which is due August 1,
2010 such that the company cannot pay the amortizations in cash unless the amount of Free Liquidity
(which includes any amounts available under this facility) was at least $25 million prior to the
amortization payment.
11
In December 2009, the Company entered into an amendment that excluded the impact on the
minimum net worth covenant of the impairment charge related to four construction vessels. This
amendment also increased the consolidated leverage ratio to 11.0:1 for the quarters ending December
31, 2009, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 and to 10.0:1 for the quarter ending September 30, 2010
while leaving the ratio levels for December 31, 2010 and beyond unchanged. In conjunction with this
amendment, the current availability under the facility was reduced to $15 million with the reduced
availability being restored when the Company is below the consolidated ratio levels that were in
effect prior to this amendment.
On January 15, 2010, the U.S. Credit Facility was amended to change the definition of Free
Liquidity such that any amounts that were committed under the facility, whether available to be
drawn or not, would be included for the purposes of calculating the free liquidity covenant. In
March 2010, the Company received waivers related to the requirement that an unqualified auditors
opinion without an explanatory paragraph in relation to going concern accompany its annual
financial statements. Separate waivers were received for each of the U.S. Credit Facility and the
Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility. The Company also amended the Trico Shipping Working
Capital Facility to provide that the aggregate amount of loans thereunder shall not exceed $26.0
million.
In April 2010, the U.S. Credit Facility was amended which (i) enabled the Company to re-borrow
certain amounts used to cash collateralize letters of credit, (ii) provided that specified asset
sales will not require a reduction in the Total Commitment (as defined in the U.S. Credit
Facility), (iii) allowed the Company and its subsidiaries to make cash capital contributions and/or
loans to joint ventures and other subsidiaries of the Company with the written consent of Nordea
Bank Finland plc, New York Branch, provided that no written consent is necessary if the ultimate
recipient of the proceeds is a credit party under and as defined in the Trico Shipping Working
Capital Facility and (iv) updated a financial condition representation.
For the period ending March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants with
the exception of the consolidated leverage ratio covenant for which the Company received a waiver.
Without this waiver, the Company would not have been in compliance with this covenant. Due to the
recent amendments and waivers and the expectation that the Company, absent a waiver or amendment,
does not expect to be in compliance with the consolidated leverage ratio at June 30, 2010, the full
amount outstanding is classified as current as of March 31, 2010.
The availability under the facility can also be used for the issuance of up to $5 million in
letters of credit. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under the
U.S. Credit Facility totaling $3.5 million with various expiration dates through December 2010 for
(1) securing certain payment under vessel operating leases and for (2) payment of certain taxes in
Trinidad and Tobago. Due to recent waivers which limited additional draws under the facility, no
amounts were available under the facility at March 31, 2010.
The U.S. Credit Facility subjects the Companys subsidiaries that are parties to the credit
agreement to certain financial and other covenants including, but not limited to, affirmative and
negative covenants with respect to indebtedness, minimum liquidity, liens, declaration or payment
of dividends, sales of assets, investments, consolidated leverage ratio, consolidated net worth and
collateral coverage. Payment under the U.S. Credit Facility may be accelerated following certain
events of default including, but not limited to, failure to make payments when due, noncompliance
with covenants, breaches of representations and warranties, commencement of insolvency proceedings,
entry of judgment in excess of $5 million, defaults by any of the credit parties under the credit
agreement or certain other indebtedness in excess of $10 million and occurrence of certain changes
of control.
8.125% Debentures.
On May 11, 2009, the Company entered into exchange agreements (the
Exchange Agreements) with existing holders of its 6.5% senior convertible debentures due 2028
(the 6.5% Debentures) party thereto as investors (the Investors). In accordance with the
exchange (the Exchange) contemplated by the Exchange Agreements, on May 14, 2009 the Company
exchanged $253.5 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Debentures (representing all of
the outstanding 6.5% Debentures) for, in the aggregate, approximately $12.7 million in cash,
3,042,180 shares of the Companys common stock (or warrants exercisable for $0.01 per share in lieu
thereof) and $202.8 million in aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Debentures.
This
Exchange was accounted for under modification accounting which
required the Company to
defer and amortize any change in value exchanged. The amount deferred was approximately $10 million
and was reflected as a discount to the 8.125% Debentures, which being amortized under the effective
interest method over the life of the 8.125% Debentures. This discount
represented the fair value of
the warrants and common shares of stock that were tendered in the Exchange. The warrants issued in
the Exchange were required to be recorded as a liability due to the net-cash settlement terms
included in the Exchange document and were revalued each reporting period based upon the Companys
stock price each period they were outstanding. All warrants were exercised by December 2009.
Additionally, the debt issue costs previously recorded for the 6.5% Debentures continue to be
amortized over the life of the 8.125% Debentures and the new debt
issue costs were expensed.
12
The Company pays interest on the unpaid principal amount of the 8.125% Debentures at a rate of
8.125 percent per annum. The Company will pay interest semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of
each year. Interest on the 8.125% Debentures will accrue from the most recent date to which
interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from May 15, 2009.
The 8.125% Debentures are subject to quarterly principal amortizing payments beginning August
1, 2010 of 5% of the aggregate principal amount per quarter, increasing to 14% of the aggregate
principal amount per quarter beginning February 1, 2012 until the final payment on February 1, 2013
(the Maturity Date). The Company has the right to elect at each payment date whether to pay
principal installments in common stock, subject to certain limitations, or cash. Separate from and
prior to the Companys election, a majority of the holders of the 8.125% Debentures can elect to
have the payment of all or any portion of an installment of principal deferred until the Maturity
Date. The 8.125% Debentures are also subject to mandatory prepayments, applied on a pro-rata basis,
related to net cash proceeds of asset sales. Asset sales of greater than $5 million require a
prepayment equal to 50% of net cash proceeds. Net cash proceeds exclude among other items, required
repayment of debt. Asset sales between $0.5 million and $5 million do not require a prepayment of
the 8.125% Debentures unless total gross proceeds of all asset sales between $0.5 million and $5
million exceed $10 million in any given year based on issuance date of the 8.125% Debentures. If
the total gross proceeds of asset sales between $0.5 million and $5 million during any given year
exceed $10 million, a prepayment of 50% of net cash proceeds is required for all completed asset
sales. After each twelve month period, the cumulative amount of total gross proceeds is reduced by
$5 million for calculation purposes. The Company has the option to redeem the 8.125% Debentures at
par plus accrued interest on or after May 1, 2011, if the trading price of the common stock exceeds
135% of the conversion price (currently $14.00 per share), subject to adjustment, for 20
consecutive tracking days.
The holders of the 8.125% Debentures have the option at any time to convert the 8.125%
Debentures into the requisite number of shares of common stock at any time. Holders who convert
after May 1, 2011 are entitled to receive, in addition to the shares due upon conversion, a cash
payment equal to the present value of remaining interest payments until final maturity. Holders of
the 8.125% Debentures are entitled to require the Company to repurchase the debentures at par plus
accrued interest in the event of certain fundamental change transactions. For more information
regarding the conversion, redemption, and repurchase options of the 8.125% Debentures, see Note 5
of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The conversion feature associated with the 8.125% Debentures is considered an embedded
derivative as defined in the derivative instrument and hedging activities authoritative guidance.
Under this guidance, the Company is required to bifurcate the conversion option as its fair value
is not clearly and closely related to the debt host as the make-whole interest is based on the
treasury bond rate. This embedded derivative is recorded at fair value on the date of issuance. The
estimated fair value of the derivative on the date of issuance was $4.7 million, which was recorded
as a non-current derivative liability on the balance sheet with the offset recorded as a discount
on the 8.125% Debentures. The derivative liability must be marked-to-market each reporting period
with changes to its fair value recorded in the consolidated statement of income as other income
(expense) and the discount being accreted through an additional non-cash charge to interest expense
over the term of the debt. See Note 6 for further discussion on the derivative liability.
The 8.125% Debentures and the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the
8.125% Debentures have not been registered because the Company sold the 8.125% Debentures to the
investors in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
The 8.125% Debentures are senior secured obligations of the Company, rank senior to all other
indebtedness of the Company with respect to the collateral (other than indebtedness secured by
permitted liens on the collateral), rank on parity in right of payment with all other senior
indebtedness of the Company, and rank senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness
of the Company. The 8.125% Debentures shall rank senior to all future indebtedness of the Company
to the extent the future indebtedness is expressly subordinated to the 8.125% Debentures. The
8.125% Debentures are secured by a perfected security interest in certain assets of the Company and
its subsidiaries. These assets include, as of May 7, 2010, three SPSVs and nine OSVs and, among
other assets, one of three intercompany notes between Trico Supply and Trico Other. The note that
is pledged as security has an approximate principal amount of $163.1 million as of March 31, 2010
and is between Trico Supply AS (borrower) and Trico Marine Operators (lender). The two notes which
are not pledged to the 8.125% Debentures are between Trico Shipping AS (borrower) and Trico Marine
Services, Inc. (lender) with a principal amount of approximately $335.5 million as of March 31,
2010 and between Trico Supply AS (borrower) and Trico Marine Cayman LP (lender) with a principal
amount of approximately $33.5 million as of March 31, 2010. These three intercompany notes do not
include any subordination provisions among themselves but are each subordinated to the Senior
Secured Notes.
3% Debentures.
In February 2007, the Company issued $150.0 million of its 3% Debentures. The
Company received net proceeds of approximately $145.2 million after deducting commissions and
offering costs of approximately $4.8 million. Net proceeds of the offering were for the acquisition
of Active Subsea ASA, financing of the Companys fleet renewal program and for general corporate
13
purposes. Interest on the 3% Debentures is payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and
July 15 of each year. The 3% Debentures will mature on January 15, 2027, unless earlier converted,
redeemed or repurchased. Effective January 1, 2009, the 3% Debentures were subject to new
authoritative guidance.
The 3% Debentures are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally in right of
payment to all of the Companys other existing and future senior indebtedness. The 3% Debentures
are effectively subordinated to all of the Companys existing and future secured indebtedness to
the extent of the value of its assets collateralizing such indebtedness and any liabilities of its
subsidiaries. The 3% Debentures and shares of the common stock issuable upon the conversion of the
debentures have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The 3% Debentures are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of the Companys common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, based on an initial conversion rate of 23.0216 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 3% Debentures (which is equal to an initial conversion
price of approximately $43.44 per share), subject to adjustment and certain limitations. Should the
holders of such debentures convert, the Company would pay the holders $1,000 in cash for each
$1,000 in principal plus the number of shares of stock equal to the value of the conversion option
in excess of $43.44 per share. For more information regarding the conversion and redemption options
of the 3% Debentures, see Note 5 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
The amount of interest cost recognized for the three months ending March 31, 2010 relating to
both the contractual interest coupon and amortization of the discount on the liability component is
$2.7 million compared to $2.5 million for the three months ending March 31, 2009. The coupon and
the amortization of the discount on the debt will yield an effective interest rate of approximately
8.9% on these convertible notes.
Senior Secured Notes
. On October 30, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary Trico Shipping, issued
$400.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes. These notes have a final
bullet maturity of November 1, 2014 with no scheduled amortization payments. Interest is payable on
May 1 and November 1 and accrues at a rate of 11.875%. The Senior Secured Notes are not callable
for three years and are subject to a declining prepayment premium until November 2013 after which
they can be repaid at par. The Senior Secured Notes are secured by the assets and earnings of Trico
Supply AS, and its subsidiaries, including Trico Shipping, DeepOcean AS and CTC Marine Projects,
Ltd. (the Trico Supply Group) and the proceeds from the sale of these assets. The Senior Secured
Notes are guaranteed by the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Trico Supply AS, and by Trico
Supplys direct and indirect subsidiaries (other than Trico Shipping) and Trico Marine Services,
Inc., Trico Marine Cayman L.P. and Trico Holdco LLC (the Guarantors) The Notes are
pari passu
in
right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of Trico Shipping and the Guarantors
(excluding Trico Marine Services) and senior to all existing and future subordinated debt of the
Issuer and Guarantors (excluding Trico Marine Services), including any Intercompany Debt; except
that debt under the U.S. Credit Facility will be senior in right of payment to the Companys
guarantee of the Senior Secured Notes. The Notes are subject to certain prepayment provisions
related to sale of assets if the proceeds from these sales are not reinvested within six months.
The Notes may be put to the company at 101% of face value in the event of a Change of Control as
defined in the Indenture.
The Senior Secured Notes restrict Trico Supply and its direct and indirect subsidiaries from
incurring additional indebtedness or paying dividends to the parent of Trico Supply unless the
consolidated leverage ratio, which includes certain intercompany indebtedness, is less than 3.0:1
subsequent to the incurrence of the additional indebtedness. The Notes also limit the ability of
Trico Supply and its subsidiaries from paying interest on existing intercompany debt agreements to
Trico Marine Services and certain of its subsidiaries unless the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is
less than 2.5:1. However, payments of up to $5 million by year to Trico Marine Services may be made
for payment of general corporate, overhead and other expenses. As of March 31, 2010, payments in
the amount of $1.1 million have been made by Trico Supply under this provision. These provisions do
not prohibit the payment of any dividend or distribution to Trico Marine Services in an amount
equal to any guarantee refunds received by the Company for the last four VS470 vessels currently
under construction and the net cash proceeds received from the sale of the
Northern Challenger
, the
Northern Clipper
or the
Northern Corona
. The
Northern Challenger
and
Northern Clipper
were sold in
the fourth quarter of 2009 and the
Northern Corona
was sold subsequent to March 31, 2010.
The indenture provides that each of the following is an Event of Default: default for 30 days
in the payment when due of interest; default in the payment when due (at maturity, upon redemption
or otherwise) of the principal of, or premium, if any, on, the Senior Secured Notes; failure for 60
days after notice to the borrower by the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes then outstanding voting as a single class to comply
with any of the other agreements in the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes or any
security document or the occurrence of any event of default under any mortgage, equipment pledge or
other security document; default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which there may
be issued or by which there may be secured or evidenced any indebtedness, if that default: (i) is
caused by a failure to make any payment when
14
due at the final maturity of such indebtedness; or (ii) results in the acceleration of such
indebtedness prior to its express maturity, and, in each case, the principal (or face) amount of
any such indebtedness, together with the principal (or face) amount of any other indebtedness with
respect to which an event described herein has occurred, aggregates $20.0 million or more; a
default under the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility which is caused by a failure to make any
payment when due at maturity or results in the acceleration of such indebtedness prior to its
express maturity; if certain significant subsidiaries within the meaning of the bankruptcy law
commences a voluntary case, consents in writing to the entry of an order for relief against it in
an involuntary case, consents in writing to the appointment of a Custodian of it or for all or
substantially all of its property, makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or
admits in writing it generally is not paying its debts as they become due; or any entity that is
organized under the laws of Norway will have failed to duly file its audited financial statements
for the fiscal year 2008 in accordance with the laws of the Kingdom of Norway prior to January 15,
2010. (All of these reports were filed prior to January 15, 2010.)
If any Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee, by notice to the Company, or
the Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Senior Secured Notes, by
notice to the Company and the Trustee, may declare all the Senior Secured Notes to be due and
payable immediately.
Within 210 days of the issuance date of the Senior Secured Notes (October 30, 2009), the
Company is to file a registration statement with the SEC to effect the exchange of the issued notes
for replacement notes covered by the registration statement and not subject to restrictions on
transfer. If the registration statement is not effective within 270 days of the original issuance
date of the Senior Secured Notes, which may be extended in certain circumstances, the Company will
be required to pay additional interest on the Senior Secured Notes of 0.25% per annum initially up
to a maximum of 0.50% per annum.
Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility.
In conjunction with the issuance of the Senior
Secured Notes, the Company entered into the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility with Trico
Shipping as the borrower. This facility will expire on December 31, 2011. In conjunction with the
amendment executed in March 2010, the total commitment was reduced to $26.0 million with quarterly
amortizations of $3.3 million beginning July 1, 2010. Interest is payable on the outstanding
principal amount at the Eurodollar rate designated by the British Bankers Association plus 5.0% and
is subject to an additional utilization fee of 3.0%, payable quarterly in arrears, if the facility
is more than 50% drawn. Up to $10 million of the facility may be used for letters of credit and
replaced existing letter of credit facilities currently used by CTC and Deep Ocean. This facility
shares in the collateral with the Senior Secured Notes and does not have financial covenants. This
facility cross-defaults to both the Senior Secured Notes and the U.S. Credit Facility.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under the Trico Shipping
Working Capital Facility of $5.7 million with various expiration dates through October 2010 for
securing performance under certain subsea services contracts.
The Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility subjects the Companys subsidiaries that are
parties to the agreement to certain customary non-financial covenants including, but not limited
to, affirmative and negative covenants. Payments under the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility
may be accelerated following certain events of default, including, but not limited to, failure to
make payments when due, noncompliance with covenants, breaches of representations and warranties,
commencement of insolvency proceedings, occurrence of certain changes of control, and defaults
under other debt agreements which permit the holders to declare the indebtedness due and payable
prior to stated maturity provided the aggregate amount of indebtedness affected is at least $10
million. The Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility also cross defaults to the U.S. Credit
Facility. In March 2010, the Company received a waiver of the requirement that its annual financial
statements contain an unqualified auditors opinion without an explanatory paragraph in regards to
going concern. The waiver limited the aggregate amount of loans to the amount then outstanding and
there are currently no funds available to be drawn under the facility. The amount of availability
under the facility decreases by $3.3 million per quarter beginning July 1, 2010.
6.11% Notes.
In 1999, Trico Marine International issued $18.9 million of notes due 2014 to
finance construction of two supply vessels, of which $5.7 million is outstanding at March 31, 2010.
The notes are guaranteed by the Company and the U.S. Maritime Administration and secured by first
preferred mortgages on two vessels. Failure to maintain the Companys status as a Jones Act company
would constitute an event of default under such notes.
The Companys capitalized interest totaled $3.2 million for the three month period ended March
31, 2010 and $4.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2009.
15
6. Derivative Instruments
As discussed in Note 5, the Companys 8.125% Debentures provide the holder with a conversion
option, which if exercised after May 15, 2011, entitles the holder to a make-whole interest payment
that is indexed to the U.S. Treasury Rate. Because the terms of this embedded option are not
clearly and closely related to the debt instrument, it represents an embedded derivative that must
be accounted for separately. Under authoritative guidance for derivative instruments and hedging
activities, the Company is required to bifurcate the embedded derivative from the host debt
instrument and record it at fair value on the date of issuance, with subsequent changes in its fair
value recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. The conversion option in the Companys
3% Debentures is settled in cash and potentially stock and therefore is not required to be
separately accounted for as a derivative as the value of the consideration is determined solely by
the price of the stock. The warrants issued in the Exchange were also derivative instruments and
required to be recorded as a liability due to the net-cash settlement terms included in the
Exchange document. Changes in fair value were re-measured in each subsequent period based upon the
Companys stock price each quarter the warrants were outstanding. All of the warrants were
exercised in 2009 and are no longer outstanding.
For the debentures, the estimate of fair value was determined through the use of a Monte Carlo
simulation lattice option-pricing model that included various assumptions (see Note 7 for further
discussion). The 6.5% Debentures were exchanged for the 8.125% Debentures in May 2009. The coupon
and the amortization of the discount on the debt will yield an effective interest rate of
approximately 11.1% on the 8.125% Debentures and yielded approximately 11.2% on the 6.5%
Debentures. The reduction in the Companys stock price as well as the passage of time are the
primary factors influencing the change in value of the derivatives and their impact on the
Companys net income (loss). Any increase in the Companys stock price will result in non-cash
unrealized losses being recognized in future periods for the debentures and such amounts could be
material.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard regarding
disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new standard requires entities
that use derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and
strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. It also requires entities to disclose additional information
about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements, how the
provisions of derivative instruments and hedging activities have been applied, and the impact that
hedges have on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The tables
below reflect (i) Fair Values of Derivative Instruments in the Balance Sheets and (ii) the Effect
of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivative
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Instruments under Accounting Guidance
|
|
Location
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Other contract - 8.125% Debentures
|
|
Long-term derivative
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
Long-term derivative
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as Hedging
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivative
|
|
Instruments under
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Accounting Guidance
|
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Other contract
|
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative - 6.5% Debentures
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contract
|
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative - 8.125% Debentures
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,281
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
7. Fair Value Measurements
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard for fair value
measurements of all non-financial assets and liabilities. We had no required fair value
measurements for non-financial assets and liabilities in 2010 and no required additional
disclosures upon adoption.
The accounting standard for fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair
value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as
the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a
liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. The accounting standard established a fair value hierarchy
which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following
summarizes the three levels of inputs required as well as the assets and liabilities that the
Company values using those levels of inputs.
|
|
|
Level 1 Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions.
|
Financial liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
at March 31, 2010 Using Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative (8.125% Debentures)
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
at December 31, 2009 Using Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative (8.125% Debentures)
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by the Company
using available market information and valuation methodologies described below. However,
considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair
value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein may not be indicative of the amounts that the
Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions or
valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable.
The carrying amounts
approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Debt.
The fair value of the Companys fixed rate debt is based partially on quoted market
prices as well as prices for similar debt based on recent market transactions.
The carrying amounts and fair values of debt were as follows (in thousands):
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
736,936
|
|
|
$
|
733,897
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
636,818
|
|
|
|
687,401
|
|
As discussed in Note 6, the Companys conversion feature contained in its 8.125%
Debentures and the prior 6.5% Debentures is required to be accounted for separately and recorded as
a derivative financial instrument measured at fair value. The estimate of fair value was determined
through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation lattice option-pricing model. The assumptions used in
the valuation model for the 8.125% Debentures as of March 31, 2010 include the Companys stock
closing price of $2.32 on such date, expected volatility of 60%, a discount rate of 30.0% and a
United States Treasury Bond Rate of 1.40% for the time value of options. Assumptions used in the
valuation model for the 6.5% Debentures as of March 31, 2009 included the Companys stock closing
price of $2.10, expected volatility of 60%, a discount rate of 25.0% and a United States Treasury
Bond Rate of 1.45% for the time value of options. As of December 31, 2009, there were no
assumptions used in the valuation model for the 6.5% Debentures as they were exchanged for the
8.125% Debentures in May 2009. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the
fair value of the Companys derivative liability as classified as Level 3 in the fair value
hierarchy (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.125%
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss for 2009
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
Final valuation of 6.5% Debentures due to exchange for 8.125% Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
Issuance of long-term derivative (8.125% Debentures)
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unrealized gain for 2010
|
|
|
(5,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
722
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings (loss) per common share was computed based on the following (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,691
|
|
|
|
16,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,691
|
|
|
|
16,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,691
|
|
|
|
16,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
In May 2009, the existing holders of the 6.5% Debentures entered into the Exchange
Agreements exchanging their 6.5% Debentures for 8.125% Debentures. See Note 5 for more information.
Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the if-converted method for the 8.125%
Debentures and using the treasury stock method for the 3% Debentures and the 6.5% Debentures. The
scheduled principal amortizations for the 8.125% Debentures can be paid either in stock or cash
based upon the Companys election. However, if the 8.125% Debentures are converted at the option of
the holders prior to maturity, the bondholders will be paid in stock.
The Companys 3% Debentures and 6.5% Debentures (through May 2009 only) were not dilutive as
the average price of the Companys common stock was less than the conversion price for each series
of the debentures during the presented periods they were outstanding. As the principal amount for
the 3% Debentures can only be settled in cash, they are not considered in the diluted earnings per
share. Although the Company had the option of settling the principal amount of 6.5% Debentures in
either cash, stock or a combination of both, managements
intention at that time was to settle the amounts when
converted with available cash on hand, through borrowings under the Companys existing lines of
credit or other refinancing as necessary.
9. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of total comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trico Marine
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Services, Inc.
|
|
Interests
|
|
Total
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
|
|
13,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,090
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(72,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,440
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
13,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has stock-based compensation plans, which are described in more detail in Note 14
to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 included $0.4 million, of stock-based
compensation costs compared to $0.7 million for the same three month period of 2009. The Company
records all of its stock based compensation costs as general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2010, there was $1.4
million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock-based compensation that
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.8 years. The Company expects that
its total fixed stock-based compensation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2010 will total approximately $1.5 million.
As SARs provide the participant the right to receive a cash payment only when the SARs are
exercised, they will be classified as liabilities and the fair value will be measured in each
subsequent reporting period with changes in fair value reflected as a component of stock-based
compensation costs in the Statements of Operations. See below for the updated assumptions as of
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
|
Vested Ratably
|
|
|
Cliff Vested
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Term
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
Expected Dividend Distributions
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
19
11. Taxes
The Companys income tax expense/(benefit) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $22.9
million compared to $(15.0) million for the comparable prior year period. The income tax
expense/(benefit) for each period is primarily associated with the Companys U.S. federal, state
and foreign taxes. The Companys tax expense/(benefit) for the three month period ending March 31,
2010 differs from that under the statutory rate primarily due to nondeductible interest expense in
the United States as a result of the 6.5% Debenture exchange described in Note 5, the one-time
expense related to the Norwegian Supreme Court ruling on February 12, 2010 (described below) and
state and foreign taxes. The Companys effective tax rate is subject to wide variations given its
structure and operations. The Company operates in many different taxing jurisdictions with
differing rates and tax structures. Therefore, a change in the Companys overall plan could have a
significant impact on the estimated rate. At March 31, 2009, the Companys tax benefit differed
from that under the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits associated with the Norwegian
Tonnage Tax Regime and a change in law enacted on March 31, 2009 (described below), the Companys
permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings and state and foreign taxes.
Since the Company currently has no U.S. operations, the history of negative earnings from
these operations and the emphasis to expand the Companys presence in growing international markets
constitutes significant negative evidence substantiating the need for a full valuation allowance
against the U.S. net deferred tax assets, including the current deferred tax assets, as of March
31, 2010. The Company will use cumulative profitability and future income projections as key
indicators to substantiate subsequent release of the valuation allowance. This will result in an
increase in additional paid-in-capital at the time the valuation allowance is reduced. If the
Companys future U.S. operations are profitable, it is possible the Company will release the
valuation allowance at some future date.
The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, one or more of its subsidiaries files
income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In
the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities
worldwide, including such major jurisdictions as Norway, Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria, Angola, Hong
Kong, China, United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. With few exceptions, the Company is
no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years before 2003.
The accounting for income taxes prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company recognized $2.4 million in uncertain tax positions and $2.0 million in penalties and
interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recognized $0.2 million in
uncertain tax positions, penalties and interest. The entire balance of unrecognized tax benefits,
if recognized, would affect the Companys effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and
penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Norwegian Tonnage Tax legislation was enacted as part of the 2008 Norwegian budgetary process.
This new tonnage tax regime was applied retroactively to January 1, 2007 and is similar to other
European Union tonnage tax regimes. As a result, all shipping and certain related income, but not
financial income, is exempt from ordinary corporate income tax and subjected to a tonnage-based
tax. Unlike the previous regime, where the taxation was only due upon a distribution of profits or
an outright exit from the regime, the new regime provides for a tax exemption on profits earned
after January 1, 2007.
As part of the legislation, the previous tonnage tax regime covering the period from 1996
through 2006 was repealed. Companies that are in the current regime, and enter into the new regime,
will be subject to tax at 28% for all accumulated untaxed shipping profits generated between 1996
through December 31, 2006 in the tonnage tax company. Under the original provisions, two-thirds of
the liability (NOK 251 million, $42.0 million at March 31, 2010) was payable in equal installments
over 10 years. The remaining one-third of the tax liability (NOK 126 million, $21.1 million at
March 31, 2010) can be met through qualified environmental expenditures.
Under the initial legislation enacted, any remaining portion of the environmental part of the
liability not expended at the end of ten years would be payable to the Norwegian tax authorities at
that time. In 2008, the ten year limitation was extended to fifteen years. On March 31, 2009, the
need to invest in environmental measures within fifteen years was abolished. As a result, the
Company recognized a one-time tax benefit in the first quarter of 2009 earnings of $18.6 million
related to the change. Although qualifying expenditures are still required, there is no time
constraint to make these expenditures before it would become payable to the Norwegian tax
authorities.
On February 12, 2010, the Norwegian Supreme Court ruled that the transitional rules, whereby
the untaxed profits under the old regime became taxable upon entrance into the new regime, were
unconstitutional. As a result, the Company received $9.3 million in cash refunds related to tax
payments made in 2008 and 2009 pursuant to the transitional regime that was ruled unconstitutional.
This refund and related interest was received by the Company in March 2010.
20
As a result of the unconstitutionality ruling and lack of new tax regulations, the
distribution tax regime in place prior to the 2008 Tonnage Tax
Legislation is presumed to apply again. Consequently, the Company recorded a deferred tax
liability of approximately $64.3 million as of March 31, 2010 related to the calculated gains under
the transition rules. These taxes are not due until earnings are distributed from one of our
Norwegian tonnage tax entities.
12. Employee Benefit Plans
The annual costs and liabilities under the Norwegian defined benefit pension plans are
determined each year based on actuarial assumptions. The components of net periodic benefit costs
related to the Companys Norwegian defined benefit pension plans were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
Social security contributions
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,339
|
|
|
$
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys contributions to the Norwegian defined benefit plans totaled $0.9 million
for the three month period ended March 31, 2010. The Companys contributions for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 totaled $0.7 million.
The Companys United Kingdom employees are covered by a non-contributory multi-employer
defined benefit plan. Contributions to this plan were $0.2 million and $0.1 million for each of the
three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
13.
Investment in Eastern Marine Services Limited
Beginning January 1, 2010, in accordance with new authoritative guidance for variable interest
entities, the Company no longer consolidates its investment in Eastern Marine Services Limited
(EMSL). Because the Company holds a 49% ownership interest, EMSL is now accounted for under the
equity method. There was no gain or loss recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of
EMSL. As of March 31, 2010, EMSL currently has total assets of $24.9 million and equity of $23.9
million. EMSL generated revenues of $2.3 million and a net loss of $3.7 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010.
21
14. Commitments and Contingencies
General.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in certain personal
injury, pollution and property damage claims and related threatened or pending legal proceedings.
The Company does not believe that any of these proceedings, if adversely determined, would have a
material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Additionally, the Companys insurance policies may reimburse all or a portion of certain of these
claims. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company accrued for liabilities in the amount
of approximately $3.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively, based upon the gross amount that
management believes it may be responsible for paying in connection with these matters.
Additionally, from time to time, the Company is involved as both a plaintiff and a defendant in
other civil litigation, including contractual disputes. The Company does not believe that any of
these proceedings, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. The amounts the Company will ultimately be
responsible for paying in connection with these matters could differ materially from amounts
accrued.
Saipem.
Prior to their acquisition by the Company, CTC Marine entered into a sub-contract (the Contract) dated March 30, 2007 with
Saipem S.p.A (Saipem), an Italian-registered company. Saipem had previously been contracted by
oil and gas operator Terminale GNL Adriatico Srl (ALNG) to lay, trench and backfill an offshore
pipeline in the northern Adriatic Sea. The Contract between Saipem and CTC Marine related to the
trenching and backfilling work. Work on location commenced on February 13, 2008 and was completed
on May 5, 2008. The project took longer than originally anticipated and the target depth of cover
for the pipeline was not met for the whole of the route due to CTC Marine encountering
significantly different soils on the seabed to those which had been identified in the geotechnical
survey documentation. In conjunction with the acquisition of CTC in
May of 2008, the Company recorded an asset in purchase accounting
related to the estimated fair value of this claim as of the
acquisition date. In the summer of 2008, CTC Marine submitted a contractual claim to Saipem in
relation to the different soils. Saipem in turn made submissions to ALNG. ALNG rejected Saipems
submission and Saipem has, in turn, refused to pay CTC Marine the additional sums. The Contract is
governed by English law and specifies that disputes that are incapable of resolution must be
referred to Arbitration before three Arbitrators under the International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) rules. Arbitration is a commercial rather than a court remedy. The decision of the Arbitral
Tribunal is enforceable in the courts of all major nations.
CTC Marine submitted a Claim to Arbitration on April 9, 2009 based upon the Contract for
payment of 7.7 million Sterling plus interest and costs. Saipem sought an extension to the time for
their answer and provided this on June 4, 2009, together with a Counterclaim for Liquidated Damages
in terms of the Contract. CTC submitted its reply to the Counterclaim as well as amendments to the
request. The Arbitration Tribunal of three, comprising one nomination from each side and an
independent chairman has been convened and parties have agreed that the forum for the Arbitration
be set in London. The Tribunal issued their schedule of the hearing to follow in August 2009 and both parties agreed. The timetable has been set with
arbitration in June or July 2010. The amount due to the Company is reflected in Prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
22
sheets. While there can be no
assurances of full recovery in arbitration, the Company intends to vigorously defend its claim for
payment for services rendered and believes its position to be favorable at this time.
Brazilian Tax Assessments.
On March 22, 2002, the Companys Brazilian subsidiary received a
non-income tax assessment from a Brazilian state tax authority for approximately 52.0 million Reais
($29.0 million at March 31, 2010). The tax assessment is based on the premise that certain services
provided in Brazilian federal waters are considered taxable by certain Brazilian states as
transportation services. The Company filed a timely defense at the time of the assessment. In
September 2003, an administrative court upheld the assessment. In response, the Company filed an
administrative appeal in the Rio de Janeiro administrative tax court in October 2003. In November
2005, the Companys appeal was submitted to the Brazilian state attorneys for their response. On
December 8, 2008, the final hearing took place and the Higher Administrative Tax Court ruled in
favor of the Company. On April 13, 2009, the State Attorneys Office filed its appeal with the
Special Court of the Higher Administrative Tax Court. The Company filed its response on June 9,
2009. The Company is under no obligation to pay the assessment unless and until such time as all
appropriate appeals are exhausted. The Company intends to vigorously challenge the imposition of
this tax. Many of our competitors in the marine industry have also received similar non-income tax
assessments. Broader industry actions have been taken against the tax in the form of a suit filed
at the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court seeking a declaration that the state statute attempting to
tax the industrys activities is unconstitutional. This assessment is not income tax based and is
therefore not accounted for under authoritative accounting guidance for income taxes that
prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. The Company has not accrued any amounts for the assessment
of the liability.
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company received a separate non-income tax assessment
from the same Brazilian state tax authority for approximately 4.8 million Reais ($2.7 million at
March 31, 2010). This tax assessment is based on the same premise as noted above. The Company filed
a timely defense in October 2004. In January 2005, an administrative court upheld the assessment.
In response, the Company filed an administrative appeal in the Rio de Janeiro administrative tax
court in February 2006. On January 22, 2009, the Company filed a petition requesting for the
connection of the two cases, and asking for the remittance of the case to the other Administrative
Section that ruled favorable to the Company in the other case mentioned above. The President of the
Higher Administrative Tax Court is analyzing this request. This assessment is not income tax based
and is therefore not accounted for under authoritative accounting guidance for income taxes that
prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. The Company has not accrued any amounts for the assessment
of the liability.
If the Companys challenges to the imposition of these taxes (which may include litigation at
the Rio de Janeiro state court) prove unsuccessful, current contract provisions and other factors
could potentially mitigate the Companys tax exposure. Nonetheless, an unfavorable outcome with
respect to some or all of the Companys Brazilian state tax assessments could have a material
adverse affect on the Companys financial position and results of operations if the potentially
mitigating factors also prove unsuccessful.
15. Segment Information
We operate through three business segments: (i) subsea services (ii) subsea trenching and
protection and (iii) towing and supply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trenching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Towing and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Protection
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
$
|
55,630
|
|
|
$
|
21,795
|
|
|
$
|
18,289
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,714
|
|
Intersegment Revenues
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
Operating Loss
|
|
|
(7,843
|
)
|
|
|
(1,989
|
)
|
|
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
|
(7,106
|
)
|
|
|
(18,446
|
)
|
Loss Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(11,937
|
)
|
|
|
(3,322
|
)
|
|
|
(33,157
|
)
|
|
|
(7,273
|
)
|
|
|
(55,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
$
|
58,647
|
|
|
$
|
26,050
|
|
|
$
|
37,122
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,819
|
|
Intersegment Revenues
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Operating Loss
|
|
|
(5,478
|
)
|
|
|
(3,236
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(6,998
|
)
|
|
|
(16,171
|
)
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes and Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
(7,509
|
)
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
(15,025
|
)
|
23
16. Recent Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment to the
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The update requires entities to disclose the
amounts of and reasons for significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, the reasons for any
transfers into or out of Level 3, and information about recurring Level 3 measurements of
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The update also clarifies that
entities must provide (i) fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and
liabilities and (ii) information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating
Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. Except for the requirement to disclose information
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3
measurements on a gross basis, the update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. The requirement to separately disclose purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements of recurring Level 3 measurements is effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The Companys adoption did not have a material effect on the disclosures
contained in its notes to the consolidated financial statements.
17. Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
On October 30, 2009, Trico Shipping issued the Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes
are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by Trico Supply AS and each of the other direct
and indirect parent companies of Trico Shipping (other than the Company) and by each direct and
indirect subsidiary of Trico Supply AS other than Trico Shipping (collectively, the Subsidiary
Guarantors). The Senior Secured Notes are also unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated
basis by the Company. The guarantees are full and unconditional, joint and several guarantees of
the Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes and the guarantees rank equally in right of
payment with all of Trico Shippings and the Subsidiary Guarantors existing and future
indebtedness and rank senior to all of Trico Shippings and the Subsidiary Guarantors existing and
future subordinated indebtedness. The Companys guarantee ranks junior in right of payment to up to
$50 million principal amount of indebtedness under the Companys U.S. Credit Facility. All other
subsidiaries of the Company, either direct or indirect, have not guaranteed the Senior Secured
Notes (collectively, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Trico Shipping and the Subsidiary
Guarantors and their consolidated subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company.
Under the terms of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes and the Trico Shippings
Working Capital Facility, Trico Supply AS is restricted from paying dividends to its parent, and
Trico Supply AS and its restricted subsidiaries (including Trico Shipping) are restricted from
making intercompany loans to the Company and its subsidiaries (other than Trico Supply AS and its
restricted subsidiaries).
The following tables present the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, and the condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidating statements of cash flows for the periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 of (i) the Company (ii) Trico Shipping, (iii) the Subsidiary
Guarantors, (iv) the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and (v) consolidating entries and eliminations
representing adjustments to (a) eliminate intercompany transactions, (b) eliminate the investments
in our subsidiaries and (c) record consolidating entries.
The additional tables represent consolidating information for the Trico Supply Group as
follows: the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
the condensed consolidating statements of operations and of cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 of (i) Trico Shipping, (ii) the Subsidiary Guarantors, excluding the parent
companies of Trico Supply AS, and (iii) consolidating entries and eliminations representing
adjustments to (a) eliminate intercompany transactions, (b) eliminate the investments in our
subsidiaries and (c) record consolidating entries. The purpose of these tables is to provide the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the group of entities which own
substantially all of the collateral securing the Senior Secured Notes and are subject to the
restrictions of the indenture. For purposes if this presentation, investments in consolidated
subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method.
Prior periods have been prepared to conform to the Companys current organizational structure.
24
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
(Trico
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,994
|
|
|
$
|
16,765
|
|
|
$
|
4,206
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,965
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,983
|
|
|
|
46,638
|
|
|
|
26,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,573
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
18,282
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,917
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
38,627
|
|
|
|
83,247
|
|
|
|
32,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,829
|
|
|
|
555,928
|
|
|
|
61,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables (debt and other payables)
|
|
|
338,486
|
|
|
|
(143,822
|
)
|
|
|
(307,514
|
)
|
|
|
112,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,868
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
21,754
|
|
|
|
6,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,008
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
17,161
|
|
|
|
180,785
|
|
|
|
(333,699
|
)
|
|
|
13,058
|
|
|
|
135,752
|
|
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
360,657
|
|
|
$
|
159,033
|
|
|
$
|
130,584
|
|
|
$
|
227,602
|
|
|
$
|
135,752
|
|
|
$
|
1,013,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
40,224
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
31,872
|
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,360
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
|
55,933
|
|
|
|
19,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,844
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,429
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,967
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
47,948
|
|
|
|
42,775
|
|
|
|
96,833
|
|
|
|
31,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
284,261
|
|
|
|
386,460
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,393
|
|
Long-term derivative
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,098
|
|
|
|
17,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,681
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
332,969
|
|
|
|
492,729
|
|
|
|
123,429
|
|
|
|
36,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
(333,696
|
)
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
190,789
|
|
|
|
135,752
|
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
360,657
|
|
|
$
|
159,033
|
|
|
$
|
130,584
|
|
|
$
|
227,602
|
|
|
$
|
135,752
|
|
|
$
|
1,013,628
|
|
|
|
|
25
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Adjustments
(3)
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
10,994
|
|
|
$
|
16,765
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,759
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
13,983
|
|
|
|
46,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,621
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
18,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,708
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
13,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,224
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
38,627
|
|
|
|
83,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment, net
|
|
|
79,829
|
|
|
|
555,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables (debt and other payables)
|
|
|
(143,822
|
)
|
|
|
(307,514
|
)
|
|
|
(34,133
|
)
|
|
|
(485,469
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,868
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
21,754
|
|
|
|
6,884
|
|
|
|
32,252
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
180,785
|
|
|
|
(333,699
|
)
|
|
|
152,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
159,033
|
|
|
$
|
130,584
|
|
|
$
|
125,665
|
|
|
$
|
415,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,061
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
31,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,119
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
|
55,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,353
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,967
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
42,775
|
|
|
|
96,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
386,460
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,495
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
63,098
|
|
|
|
17,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,681
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,374
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
492,729
|
|
|
|
123,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
(333,696
|
)
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
125,665
|
|
|
|
(200,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
159,033
|
|
|
$
|
130,584
|
|
|
$
|
125,665
|
|
|
$
|
415,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Parent that are providing guarantees including Trico Holding LLC and Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS, and
all subsidiaries below Trico Supply AS and Issuer.
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Parent that are not providing guarantees including Trico Marine Assets, Inc., Trico Marine Operators, Inc., Trico Servicios
Maritimos Ltda., Servicios de Apoyo Maritimo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Adjustments include Trico Marine Cayman L.P. and Trico Holding LLC that are not part of the Credit Group and investment in subsidiary
balances between Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
26
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,617
|
|
|
$
|
37,573
|
|
|
$
|
12,791
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,981
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
|
64,294
|
|
|
|
27,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,600
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,006
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,761
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,223
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
22,746
|
|
|
|
122,726
|
|
|
|
43,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,524
|
|
|
|
567,449
|
|
|
|
79,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728,157
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables (debt and other payables)
|
|
|
339,476
|
|
|
|
(138,531
|
)
|
|
|
(317,794
|
)
|
|
|
116,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,471
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
20,688
|
|
|
|
9,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,436
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
86,748
|
|
|
|
169,285
|
|
|
|
(312,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
432,231
|
|
|
$
|
141,753
|
|
|
$
|
197,055
|
|
|
$
|
248,768
|
|
|
$
|
56,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
31,240
|
|
|
$
|
20,087
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,585
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
32,834
|
|
|
|
10,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,961
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
68,886
|
|
|
|
16,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,990
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
8,442
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,182
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
37,789
|
|
|
|
110,185
|
|
|
|
30,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
290,688
|
|
|
|
385,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681,312
|
|
Long-term derivative
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,376
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,886
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
19,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,219
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
9,314
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,357
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
332,918
|
|
|
|
454,238
|
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
36,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
963,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
99,313
|
|
|
|
(312,485
|
)
|
|
|
56,452
|
|
|
|
212,596
|
|
|
|
56,452
|
|
|
|
112,328
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
432,231
|
|
|
$
|
141,753
|
|
|
$
|
197,055
|
|
|
$
|
248,768
|
|
|
$
|
56,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,259
|
|
|
|
|
27
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Adjustments
(3)
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,617
|
|
|
$
|
37,573
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,190
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
|
64,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,478
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,006
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
22,746
|
|
|
|
122,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment, net
|
|
|
81,524
|
|
|
|
567,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany receivables (debt and other payables)
|
|
|
(138,531
|
)
|
|
|
(317,794
|
)
|
|
|
(34,133
|
)
|
|
|
(490,458
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,471
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
20,688
|
|
|
|
9,542
|
|
|
|
36,959
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
169,285
|
|
|
|
(312,485
|
)
|
|
|
143,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
141,753
|
|
|
$
|
197,055
|
|
|
$
|
118,609
|
|
|
$
|
457,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
20,087
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,087
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
32,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,993
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
68,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
8,442
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
37,789
|
|
|
|
110,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
385,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,972
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
30,376
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,886
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
19,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,219
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
9,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,790
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
454,238
|
|
|
|
140,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
(312,485
|
)
|
|
|
56,452
|
|
|
|
118,609
|
|
|
|
(137,424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
141,753
|
|
|
$
|
197,055
|
|
|
$
|
118,609
|
|
|
$
|
457,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Parent that are providing guarantees including Trico Holdco LLC and Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS, and
all subsidiaries below Trico Supply AS and Issuer.
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Parent that are not providing guarantees including Trico Marine Assets, Inc., Trico Marine Operators, Inc., Trico Servicios
Maritimos Ltda., Servicios de Apoyo Maritimo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Adjustments include Trico Marine Cayman L.P. and Trico Holding LLC that are not part of the Credit Group and investment in subsidiary
balances between Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
28
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,332
|
|
|
$
|
73,309
|
|
|
$
|
13,628
|
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
$
|
95,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
62,849
|
|
|
|
10,530
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
79,154
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,057
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,813
|
|
(Gain) loss on sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,019
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
84,657
|
|
|
|
19,806
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
114,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(11,348
|
)
|
|
|
(6,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(8,828
|
)
|
|
|
(16,196
|
)
|
|
|
(3,436
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
6,280
|
|
|
|
(22,354
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
(6,280
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
Unrealized
gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
Other income
(expense), net
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,313
|
)
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,099
|
)
|
Equity income (loss) in investees, net of tax
|
|
|
(75,894
|
)
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(47,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
|
(28,623
|
)
|
|
|
(67,833
|
)
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
125,733
|
|
|
|
(55,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,216
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the respective entity
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
125,733
|
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Adjustments
(4)
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
9,332
|
|
|
$
|
73,309
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
62,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,179
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,818
|
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
84,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(11,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(16,196
|
)
|
|
|
(3,436
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(19,938
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(13,313
|
)
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,530
|
)
|
Equity income (loss) in investees, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(47,800
|
)
|
|
|
49,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(28,623
|
)
|
|
|
(67,833
|
)
|
|
|
49,533
|
|
|
|
(46,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense (benefit)
|
|
|
21,216
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,171
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(49,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,533
|
|
|
$
|
(67,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are providing guarantees, including Trico
Holdco, LLC, Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS and all subsidiaries of Trico Supply AS
(other than Trico Shipping).
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are not providing guarantees.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries include an equity method investment in Eastern Marine
Service Limited (EMSL).
|
|
(4)
|
|
Adjustments include Trico Marine Cayman L.P. and Trico Holdco, LLC that are
not part of the Trico Supply Group and equity income (loss) balances between Trico Shipping
and Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
29
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,580
|
|
|
$
|
77,220
|
|
|
$
|
33,039
|
|
|
$
|
(9,020
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,699
|
|
|
|
69,407
|
|
|
|
26,402
|
|
|
|
(9,020
|
)
|
|
|
98,488
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
8,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
11,314
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,072
|
|
(Gain) loss on sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
14,561
|
|
|
|
91,826
|
|
|
|
39,473
|
|
|
|
(9,020
|
)
|
|
|
137,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
6,019
|
|
|
|
(14,606
|
)
|
|
|
(6,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(9,103
|
)
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
7,668
|
|
|
|
(10,914
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,307
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
(7,668
|
)
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
Equity income (loss) in investees, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,120
|
)
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
18,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
(3,733
|
)
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
(5,238
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(15,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
(18,743
|
)
|
|
|
(8,710
|
)
|
|
|
9,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
15,010
|
|
|
|
12,897
|
|
|
|
(14,264
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the respective entity
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,010
|
|
|
$
|
12,897
|
|
|
$
|
(15,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Adjustments
(4)
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
20,580
|
|
|
$
|
77,220
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
11,699
|
|
|
|
69,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,106
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
11,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,940
|
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
14,561
|
|
|
|
91,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
6,019
|
|
|
|
(14,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(8,909
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Equity income (loss) in investees, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
18,646
|
|
|
|
(15,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,733
|
)
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
(15,461
|
)
|
|
|
(15,007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(18,743
|
)
|
|
|
(8,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
15,010
|
|
|
$
|
12,897
|
|
|
$
|
(15,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are providing guarantees, including Trico
Holdco, LLC, Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS and all subsidiaries of Trico Supply AS
(other than Trico Shipping).
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are not providing guarantees.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries include a noncontrolling interest in EMSL.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Adjustments include Trico Marine Cayman L.P. and Trico Holdco, LLC that are
not part of the Trico Supply Group and equity income (loss) balances between Trico Shipping
and Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
30
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
(15,684
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,272
|
|
|
$
|
(3,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(14,591
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,852
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
Return on equity investment in investee
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
from unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated affilates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,839
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13,343
|
)
|
|
|
(2,556
|
)
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
(15,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Borrowings (repayments) on debt between subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
(3,745
|
)
|
|
|
16,316
|
|
|
|
(12,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
|
|
24,316
|
|
|
|
(22,109
|
)
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,377
|
|
|
|
(20,808
|
)
|
|
|
(8,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
37,573
|
|
|
|
12,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,981
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,994
|
|
|
$
|
16,765
|
|
|
$
|
4,206
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Credit Group
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(15,684
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,272
|
|
|
$
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(14,591
|
)
|
|
|
(14,602
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13,343
|
)
|
|
|
(13,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments
of revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Borrowings (repayments) on debt between subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
16,316
|
|
|
|
(12,571
|
)
|
|
|
3,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
24,316
|
|
|
|
(22,109
|
)
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8,377
|
|
|
|
(20,808
|
)
|
|
|
(12,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
37,573
|
|
|
|
40,190
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
10,994
|
|
|
$
|
16,765
|
|
|
$
|
27,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are providing guarantees, including Trico
Holdco, LLC, Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS and all subsidiaries of Trico Supply AS
(other than Trico Shipping).
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are not providing guarantees.
|
31
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
|
(Trico Marine
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
Services, Inc.)
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
(2)
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Subsidiaries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
5,412
|
|
|
$
|
11,994
|
|
|
$
|
(18,851
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
(17,105
|
)
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,557
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Return on equity investment in investee
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
(16,053
|
)
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
(18,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
(repayments) of revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(14,950
|
)
|
|
|
(12,457
|
)
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
Dividend to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution
(dividend) from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(14,950
|
)
|
|
|
(12,457
|
)
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,319
|
)
|
|
|
(16,665
|
)
|
|
|
(16,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
48,133
|
|
|
|
30,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,613
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,036
|
|
|
$
|
31,468
|
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Trico Shipping AS)
|
|
|
Guarantors
(1)
|
|
|
Credit Group
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
11,994
|
|
|
$
|
(18,851
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
(17,105
|
)
|
|
|
(18,301
|
)
|
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,196
|
)
|
|
|
(16,053
|
)
|
|
|
(17,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
(repayments) of revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(12,457
|
)
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
Contribution
from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(12,457
|
)
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,319
|
)
|
|
|
(16,665
|
)
|
|
|
(17,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
48,133
|
|
|
|
64,488
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
15,036
|
|
|
$
|
31,468
|
|
|
$
|
46,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are providing guarantees, including Trico
Holdco, LLC, Trico Marine Cayman L.P., Trico Supply AS and all subsidiaries of Trico Supply AS
(other than Trico Shipping).
|
|
(2)
|
|
All subsidiaries of the Company that are not providing guarantees.
|
18. Subsequent Events
Asset Sales.
In April 2010, an additional OSV and AHTS were sold for $15.6 million in net
proceeds, a portion of which were used to repay indebtedness. These vessels were included in assets
held for sale in the Balance Sheet at March 31, 2010.
Amendments to U.S. Credit Facility.
In April 2010, the Company entered into amendments to the
U.S. Credit Facility which (i) enabled the Company to re-borrow certain amounts used to cash
collateralize letters of credit, (ii) provided that specified asset sales will not require a
reduction in the Total Commitment (as defined in the U.S. Credit Facility), (iii) allowed the
Company and its subsidiaries to make cash capital contributions and/or loans to joint ventures and
other subsidiaries of the Company with the written consent of Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York
Branch, provided that no written consent is necessary if the ultimate recipient of the proceeds is
a credit party under and as defined in the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility and (iv) updated
a financial condition representation.
32
Delivery of Trico Star.
In April 2010, the Company took delivery of the second VS-470 vessel
built by Tebma shipyard.
Interest Payment on Senior Secured Notes.
The May 1, 2010 interest payment on the Senior
Secured Notes of $24 million was paid as scheduled.
33
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the 2009 Form 10-K). Unless otherwise indicated, any reference to (i) Notes refers to the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein, (ii) Gulf of Mexico
refers to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and (iii) Mexico refers to the Mexican Gulf of Mexico.
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts
are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Such forward-looking statements may include statements that relate to:
|
|
our ability to continue as a going concern
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to make payments when due, and to comply with our obligations, under
our credit facilities and our other indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
our objectives, business plans or strategies, and projected or anticipated benefits or other
consequences of such plans or strategies;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms;
|
|
|
|
projections involving revenues, operating results or cash provided from operations, or our
anticipated capital expenditures or other capital projects;
|
|
|
|
overall demand for and pricing of our vessels;
|
|
|
|
changes in the level of oil and natural gas exploration and development;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully or timely complete our various vessel construction projects;
|
|
|
|
further reductions in capital spending budgets by customers;
|
|
|
|
further declines in oil and natural gas prices;
|
|
|
|
projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
increases in operating costs;
|
|
|
|
the inability to accurately predict vessel utilization levels and day rates;
|
|
|
|
variations in global business and economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
the results, timing, outcome or effect of pending or potential litigation and our intentions
or expectations with respect thereto and the availability of insurance coverage in connection
therewith; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to repatriate cash from foreign operations if and when needed.
|
You can generally identify forward-looking statements by such terminology as may, will,
expect, believe, anticipate, project, estimate, will be, will continue or similar
phrases or expressions. We caution you that such statements are only predictions and not guarantees
of future performance or events. All phases of our operations are subject to a number of
uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our ability to control or
predict. Any one of such influences, or a combination, could materially affect the results of our
operations and the accuracy of forward-looking statements made by us. Actual results may vary
materially from anticipated results for a number of reasons, including those stated under Item 1A.
Risk Factors included in our 2009 Form 10-K and below in
Part II, our reports and registration statements filed from
time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other announcements we make from time
to time.
34
All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by
the cautionary statements above. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this
report. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Immediate Risks and Uncertainties
Our forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient
to meet our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months
and we do not
expect that we will be able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants. At March 31, 2010, we
had available cash of $32 million. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to
permit us to make the 8.125% Payment of approximately $8 million on or before May 15, 2010.
Further, we have no availability under either our U.S. $50 million revolving credit
facility (the
U.S. Credit Facility) or Trico Shippings $33 million working capital facility (the Trico
Shipping Working Capital Facility).
We
are pursuing measures to improve liquidity and our capital structure
and are now in active
discussions with various parties regarding potential transactions,
including replacing our current
U.S. Credit Facility and modifying the existing 8.125% Debenture to,
among other things, defer amortization payments. We may need to, or as a result of those
discussions, may choose to, avail ourselves of the 30-day grace period with respect to the
approximately $8 million interest payment due on May 15,
2010 on our 8.125% Debentures. Our use of
the grace period would not constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 8.125%
Debentures. Under the indenture governing the 8.125% Debentures, if we do not make the 8.125%
Payment by June 15, 2010, the trustee under such indenture, or the holders of at least 25% in
principal amount of the outstanding 8.125% Debentures, by notice to us, may declare the outstanding
principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all the 8.125% Debentures to be due and payable
immediately. In addition, if the 8.125% Payment is not made on June 15, 2010 (irrespective of
whether the amounts owing under the 8.125% Debentures are accelerated), then the administrative
agents under the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility may, upon
written request by all the non-defaulting lenders thereto, declare the outstanding principal of and
accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding loans under such agreements to be due and payable.
Following acceleration under the 8.125% Debentures, (i) the trustee under the indenture governing
the Senior Secured Notes, or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Senior
Secured Notes, may, by notice to Trico Shipping, declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid
interest on the Senior Secured Notes to be due and payable immediately and (ii) the trustee under
the indenture governing our 3% senior convertible debentures due 2027 (the 3% Debentures), or
holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 3% Debentures, may provide us with a
notice of default under the 3% Debentures and, if we fail to make the 8.125% Payment within 30
calendar days of such notice, such trustee or such holders of the 3% Debentures may, by notice to
us, declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on the 3% Debentures to be due and
payable immediately. See Note 5.
We will be unable to satisfy our obligations under the 8.125% Debentures, the 3% Debentures,
the Senior Secured Notes, the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility
if such indebtedness is accelerated. Please see Risk
Factors in our 2009 Form 10-K and below in Part II,
Item 1A and
Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
Overview
We are an integrated provider of subsea services, subsea trenching and protection services and
offshore supply vessels (OSVs) to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies that
operate in major offshore producing regions around the world. Our subsea operations, including
technologically advanced and often proprietary services performed in demanding subsea environments,
represented approximately 81% of our revenues for the first quarter of 2010. The remainder of our
revenue is attributable to our legacy towing and supply business. We operate through three business
segments: (i) subsea services (ii) subsea trenching and protection and (iii) towing and supply.
The revenues and costs for our subsea services segment primarily are determined by the scope
of individual projects and in certain cases by multi-year contracts. Subsea services projects may
utilize any combination of vessels, both owned and leased, and components of our non-fleet
equipment consisting of remotely-operated vehicles (ROVs), installation handling equipment, and
survey equipment. The scope of work, complexity, and area of operation for our projects will
determine what assets will be deployed to service each respective project. Rates for our subsea
services typically include a composite day rate for the utilization of a vessel and/or the
appropriate equipment for the project, as well as the crew. These day rates can be fixed or
variable and are primarily influenced by the specific technical requirements of the project, the
availability of the required vessels and equipment and the projects geographic location and
competition. Occasionally, projects are based on unit-rate contracts (based on units of work
performed, such as miles of pipeline inspected per day) and occasionally through lump-sum
contractual arrangements. In addition, we generate revenues for onshore engineering work, post
processing of survey data, and associated reporting. The operating costs for the subsea
35
services segment primarily reflect the rental or ownership costs for our leased vessels and
equipment, crew compensation costs, supplies and marine insurance. Our customers are typically
responsible for mobilization expenses and fuel costs. Variables that may affect our subsea services
segment include the scope and complexity of each project, weather or environmental downtime, and
water depth. Delays or acceleration of projects will result in fluctuations of when revenues are
earned and costs are incurred but generally they will not materially affect the total amount of
costs.
The revenues and costs for our subsea trenching and protection segment are also primarily
determined by the scope of individual projects. Based on the overall scale of the respective
projects, we may utilize any combination of engineering services, assets and personnel, consisting
of a vessel that deploys a subsea trenching asset, ROV and survey equipment, and supporting
offshore crew and management. Our asset and personnel deployment is also dependent on various other
factors such as subsea soil conditions, the type and size of our customers product and water
depth. Revenues for our subsea trenching and protection segment include a composite daily rate for
the utilization of vessels and assets plus fees for engineering services, project management
services and equipment mobilization. These daily rates will vary in accordance with the complexity
of the project, existing framework agreements with clients, competition and geographic location.
The operating costs for this segment predominately reflect the rental of its leased vessels, the
hiring of third party equipment (principally ROVs and survey equipment which we sometimes hire from
our subsea services segment), engineering personnel, crew compensation and depreciation on subsea
assets. The delay or acceleration of the commencement of customer offshore projects will result in
fluctuations in the timing of recognition of revenues and related costs, but generally will not
materially affect total project revenues and costs.
The revenues for our towing and supply segment are impacted primarily by fleet size and
capabilities, day rates and vessel utilization. Day rates and vessel utilization are primarily
driven by demand for our vessels, supply of new vessels, our vessel availability, customer
requirements, competition and weather conditions. The operating costs for the towing and supply
segment are primarily a function of the active fleet size. The most significant of our normal
direct operating costs include crew compensation, maintenance and repairs, marine inspection costs,
supplies and marine insurance. We are typically responsible for normal operating expenses, while
our contracts provide that customers are typically responsible for mobilization expenses and fuel
costs.
Our Outlook
Our results of operations are highly dependent on the level of operating and capital spending
for exploration and development by the energy industry, among other things. The energy industrys
level of operating and capital spending is substantially related to the demand for natural
resources, the prevailing commodity price of natural gas and crude oil, and expectations for such
prices. During periods of low commodity prices, our customers may reduce their capital spending
budgets which could result in reduced demand for our services. Other factors that influence the
level of capital spending by our customers which are beyond our control include: worldwide demand
for crude oil and natural gas and the cost of exploring for and producing oil and natural gas which
can be affected by environmental regulations, significant weather conditions, maintenance
requirements and technological advances that affect energy and its usage.
For the remainder of 2010, we will continue to focus on the following key areas:
Reduce our debt level and carefully manage liquidity and cash flow
.
Our substantial amount of
indebtedness requires us to manage our cash flow to maintain compliance under our debt covenants
and to meet our capital expenditure and debt service requirements.
In order to meet our immediate debt service obligations requiring cash payments of
approximately $8 million on May 15, 2010 and $32 million in November 2010, we are taking the
following steps:
|
|
|
We have engaged a financial advisor and are pursuing measures to improve liquidity and our
capital structure and are in active discussions with various parties regarding potential
transactions, including replacing our current U.S. Credit Facility and modifying
the existing 8.125% Debentures to, among other things, defer amortization
payments. We may need to, or as a result of those discussions, may choose to, avail ourselves
of the 30-day grace period with respect to the approximately $8 million interest payment due
on May 15, 2010 on our 8.125% Debentures. Our use of the grace period would not
constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 8.125% debentures. Please see Risk Factors
in our 2009 Form 10-K and below in Part II, Item 1A.
|
|
|
|
|
We are conserving cash by minimizing capital expenditures and managing working capital.
|
|
|
|
|
We are pursuing the sale of additional vessels and other assets.
|
36
Beyond managing our short-term liquidity needs, we will also work towards deleveraging our
balance sheet as we manage cash flow and liquidity throughout the year.
In addition, we have a centralized and disciplined approach to marketing and contracting our
vessels and equipment to achieve less spot market exposure in favor of long-term contracts. The
expansion of our subsea services activities is intended to have a stabilizing influence on our cash
flow.
Maximize our vessel utilization and our service spreads.
We continue to increase our combined
subsea services and subsea trenching and protection fleet primarily through chartering of
third-party vessels. We offer our customers a variety of subsea installation, construction,
trenching and protection services using combinations of our equipment and personnel to maximize the
earnings per vessel and to increase the opportunity to offer a differentiated technology service
package.
Reduce exposure to a declining offshore towing and supply vessel business.
Over time, we
believe transitioning away from a low growth, commoditized towing and supply business toward
specialized subsea services will result in improved operating results. As part of this transition,
we are divesting non-core or underperforming towing and supply assets. In 2009, we sold eight OSVs,
two PSVs, and one AHTS for aggregate proceeds of approximately $73 million. During the first
quarter of 2010, we completed four vessel sales for aggregate
consideration of $2.8 million. In
April 2010, we sold two additional vessels, including one AHTS, for net proceeds of approximately
$15.6 million. We will continue to look for opportunities to divest non-core or underperforming
towing and supply assets. We will also continue to position our towing and supply vessels in
markets where we believe we have a competitive advantage or that have positive fundamentals.
Expand our presence in additional subsea services markets.
In contrast to the overall market
served by our traditional towing and supply business, we believe the subsea market is growing and
will provide a higher rate of return on our services. We have increased our marketing efforts to
expand our subsea services business in West Africa, the Asia Pacific Region, Brazil, the Middle
East, the United States and Mexico. For the first quarter of 2010, our aggregate revenues in these
markets represented 39% of our revenue in subsea operations. Through our legacy towing and supply
business, we have strong relationships with important customers, such as a contractor of Pemex,
Statoil and CNOOC, and an in-depth understanding of their bidding procedures, technical
requirements and needs. We are leveraging this infrastructure to expand our subsea services and
subsea trenching and protection businesses around the world.
Invest in growth of our subsea fleet.
We continually aim to improve our fleets capabilities
in the subsea services area by focusing on more sophisticated next generation subsea vessels that
will be attractive to a broad range of customers and can be deployed worldwide. We have contracted
for the building of three new MPSVs (the
Trico Star
,
Trico Service
and
Trico Sea
), which are
expected to be delivered in the second and fourth quarters of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011,
respectively. Our remaining committed capital expenditures related to these vessels are
approximately $33 million. We also lease many of the vessels used in our subsea services and subsea
trenching and protection businesses. This gives us the opportunity to expand our business without
large incremental capital expenditures, to match vessel capabilities with project requirements, and
to benefit from periods of oversupply of vessels. We believe having an up-to-date and
technologically advanced fleet is critical to our being competitive within the subsea services and
subsea trenching and protection businesses. Finally, we invest in ROVs and subsea trenching and
protection equipment such as the RT-1, the largest rock trencher in the world, and the UT-1, the
most powerful jetting trencher in the world, further enhancing our capabilities. We view our future
expenditures for such assets as discretionary in nature, and we will only undertake them to the
extent we believe they are economically justified.
37
Market Outlook
Demand for our Vessels and Services
Each of our operating segments experiences different impacts from the current overall economic
slowdown, crisis in the credit markets, and decline in oil prices. In all segments, however, we
have seen increased exploration and production spending in Brazil, Mexico and the Asia Pacific
Region and will continue to focus our efforts on increasing our market presence in those regions
for the remainder of 2010. For 2010, we expect in general no significant change from 2009 in
exploration and production spending, offshore drilling worldwide, and construction spending, but we
anticipate overall subsea spending to increase based on unit growth in new subsea installation and
a large base of installed units.
Subsea Services.
Although some projects were postponed as a result of volatile commodity
prices, we did not have any contracts canceled in 2009. Some of these postponed projects will take
place in 2010 and 2011. Given that a majority of our subsea services work includes inspection,
maintenance and repair required to maintain existing pipelines, and such services are covered by
operating expenditures rather than capital expenditures, we believe that the outlook for our subsea
services will remain consistent with the levels of subsea spending occurring in 2009 as we have
seen no material decline in pricing for subsea services contracts.
Subsea Protection and Trenching.
For the remainder of 2010, we expect demand for our subsea
protection and trenching services to be similarly driven by the increase in overall spending on
subsea services. However, we believe that certain markets may be softer due to seasonality in this
area and therefore are mitigating such seasonality by mobilizing our assets to regions less
susceptible to seasonality. We generally expect a weak market in the North Sea, but we believe
there is an opportunity to develop a meaningful presence in emerging growth areas for this segment
including the Asia Pacific Region, Australia, the Middle East, the Mediterranean and Brazil. In
addition, this segment participates in the renewable energy industry which we expect as a result of
worldwide green initiatives to grow in 2010 and beyond.
Towing and Supply.
During 2009, we experienced significant declines in utilization and day
rates in the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea driven by reduced exploration and production spending as
a result of low commodity prices coupled with an increased supply of newly built vessels. We have
taken appropriate measures to reduce our cost structure as well as significantly reduce our
presence in this segment. Our current view of the worldwide OSV market is that the combination of
reduced customer spending on offshore drilling coupled with the likely level of newly built vessels
to be delivered in the remainder of 2010 and in 2011 will cause prices and utilization in most
markets, including the North Sea, Asia and Mexico, to remain very weak. We no longer have a
presence in the OSV segment in the Gulf of Mexico.
Other Items
Asset Sales.
During the first quarter of 2010, we sold three OSVs and one SPSV for net
proceeds of $2.8 million. The sale of these vessels did not require a debt prepayment. In April
2010, an additional OSV and AHTS were sold for $15.6 million in
net proceeds which were partially used to
repay or service indebtedness. These vessels were included in assets held for sale in the Balance
Sheet at March 31, 2010.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
A non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined by the SEC as one that purports to measure
historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows, but excludes or
includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable GAAP measures. We measure
operating performance based on adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, which is calculated
as operating income or loss before depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation,
gain/loss on sale of assets and provision for doubtful accounts in respect of revenues earned in
prior periods. Our measure of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures presented by other companies. Other companies may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently
than we do, which may limit its usefulness as a comparative measure.
We believe that the GAAP financial measure that adjusted EBITDA most directly compares to is
operating income or loss. Because adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance
calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
operating income or loss, net income or loss, cash flows provided by operating, investing and
financing activities, or other income or cash flows statement data prepared in accordance with
GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA is a financial metric used by management (i) to monitor and evaluate the
performance of our business operations, (ii) to facilitate managements internal comparison of our
historical operating performance of our business operations, (iii) to facilitate managements
external comparisons of the results of our overall business to the historical operating performance
of our competitors, (iv) to analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions
regarding future operating investments and
38
acquisitions, which may be more easily evaluated in terms of adjusted EBITDA, (v) as a key
metric in the calculation of awards under the Incentive Bonus Plan and (vi) to plan and evaluate
future operating budgets and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(1,086
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,109
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(17,813
|
)
|
|
|
(18,072
|
)
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
Gain on Sale of Assets
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Loss
|
|
$
|
(18,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three month
period ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
$
|
55,630
|
|
|
$
|
58,647
|
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
21,795
|
|
|
|
26,050
|
|
|
|
(4,255
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
Towing & supply
|
|
|
18,289
|
|
|
|
37,122
|
|
|
|
(18,833
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
95,714
|
|
|
|
121,819
|
|
|
|
(26,105
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
|
(7,843
|
)
|
|
|
(5,478
|
)
|
|
|
(2,365
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
(1,989
|
)
|
|
|
(3,236
|
)
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)%
|
Towing & supply
|
|
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(1,049
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(7,106
|
)
|
|
|
(6,998
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating loss
|
|
|
(18,446
|
)
|
|
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
|
(2,275
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Equity in net loss of investee
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(22,354
|
)
|
|
|
(10,914
|
)
|
|
|
(11,440
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
%
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
462
|
%
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
|
|
(10,779
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
(19,455
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(19,062
|
)
|
|
|
4,850
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(55,689
|
)
|
|
|
(15,025
|
)
|
|
|
(40,664
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
%
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
22,860
|
|
|
|
(15,028
|
)
|
|
|
37,888
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(78,552
|
)
|
|
|
(2,618,400
|
)%
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(78,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77,802
|
)
|
|
|
10,415
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
The following information on day rates, utilization and average number of vessels is
relevant to our revenues and are the primary drivers of our revenue fluctuations. Our consolidated
fleets average day rates, utilization, and average number of vessels by vessel class, is as
follows (only includes actively marketed vessels):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Average Day Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Sea Class
(1)
|
|
$
|
14,298
|
|
|
$
|
19,206
|
|
OSVs
(2)
|
|
|
8,966
|
|
|
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSVs
(3)
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
SPSVs/MPSVs
(4)
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Sea Class
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
OSVs
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSVs
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
SPSVs/MPSVs
(5)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Sea Class
(5)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
OSVs
(5)
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply vessels and platform supply vessels
|
|
(2)
|
|
Offshore supply vessels
|
|
(3)
|
|
Multi-purpose vessels
|
|
(4)
|
|
Subsea platform supply vessels/Multi-purpose platform supply vessels
|
|
(5)
|
|
As a result of the EMSL deconsolidation, the number of vessels decreased. Including
the EMSL vessels, our average number of vessels would have been 7.0, 9.0 and 24.5 for
SPSVs/MPSVs, the North Sea Class and OSVs, respectively.
|
Overall Results
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we reported net loss attributable to Trico Marine
Services, Inc. of $78.5 million on revenues of $95.7 million compared to net loss attributable to
Trico Marine Services, Inc. of $0.7 million on revenues of $121.8 million for the same period in
2009. The 2010 revenues decreased $26.1 million and operating loss results increased $2.3 million
in comparison to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of the towing supply segment as we
exited the Gulf of Mexico region and sold eleven vessels in 2009 as well as deconsolidated EMSL in
2010. Non-operating items included increased costs for interest expense of $11.4 million and
foreign exchange loss of $19.1 million related primarily to the Senior Secured Notes. Foreign
exchange loss was also affected by certain intercompany notes. The increased costs were partially
offset by higher gains of $4.3 million
40
associated with our embedded derivative on the 8.125% Debentures. Additionally, in the first
quarter of 2009, we recognized a $10.8 million gain on conversions of debt.
Segment Results
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
55,630
|
|
|
$
|
58,647
|
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
49,098
|
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
(2,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,744
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,755
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
63,473
|
|
|
|
64,125
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(7,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,365
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased by $3.0 million and operating loss increased $2.4 million for the
three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The
decreases in revenues and direct operating expenses are related to decreased utilization in MSVs
from 73% in 2009 to 71% in 2010 and SPSVs/MPSVs from 68% in 2009 to 59% in 2010. Average vessel
count also decreased in MSVs from 9.1 in 2009 to 8.0 in 2010 and in SPSVs/MPSVs from 7.0 in 2009 to
6.0 in 2010. Increased costs were also a result of repairs associated with the
Deep Endeavour
.
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
21,795
|
|
|
$
|
26,050
|
|
|
$
|
(4,255
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
|
20,436
|
|
|
|
(4,082
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
%)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
|
|
4,194
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
23,784
|
|
|
|
29,286
|
|
|
|
(5,502
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(1,989
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
(39
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased $4.3 million and operating loss decreased $1.2 million for the three
month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same prior year period. Decreases in revenues and
operating expenses are primarily due to a lower utilization rate of 51% in 2010 as compared to 90%
in 2009. Additionally, general and administrative expenses were further reduced in 2010 as a result
of cost reduction efforts.
41
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
18,289
|
|
|
$
|
37,122
|
|
|
$
|
(18,833
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
26,812
|
|
|
|
(13,110
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
%)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
%)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
5,249
|
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
%)
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
36,900
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
19,797
|
|
|
|
37,581
|
|
|
|
(17,784
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
$
|
(459
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,049
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues significantly decreased by $18.8 million for the three month period ended March
31, 2010 and operating loss increased by $1.0 million for the same period as compared to the prior
year period. The decreases in revenues and expenses are related to exiting the Gulf of Mexico
region during 2009 and the deconsolidation of EMSL in 2010. There were also fewer vessels operating
in 2010 as we sold eleven vessels in 2009 of which one was in EMSL. In the first quarter of 2010,
we sold an additional three offshore supply vessels for a gain of approximately $0.7 million.
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
6,807
|
|
|
$
|
6,919
|
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
278
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,106
|
|
|
|
6,998
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(7,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses were $7.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 which is
comparable to $7.0 million for the same prior year period.
Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
Equity in net loss of investee
|
|
$
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
%)
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(22,354
|
)
|
|
|
(10,914
|
)
|
|
|
(11,440
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
%
|
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
462
|
%
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
|
|
(10,779
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
(19,455
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(19,062
|
)
|
|
|
4,850
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
(153
|
%)
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
22,860
|
|
|
|
(15,028
|
)
|
|
|
37,888
|
|
|
|
(252
|
%)
|
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Equity in net loss of investee.
As a result of the deconsolidation of EMSL, the
income/loss related to our equity interest is now included in Equity in net loss of investee in
2010. The amount attributable to China Oilfield Services Limited (COSL) was included under Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2009 as EMSL was previously consolidated.
The EMSL
42
changes from the first quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 are due to weakening market
conditions in Southeast Asia for our towing and supply vessels.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized.
Interest expense increased $11.4 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in interest
expense for the three month period is due to higher interest rates primarily as a result of the
Senior Secured Notes which have a rate of 11.875% and a reduction in
our construction in progress. We capitalize interest related to vessels
currently under construction. Capitalized interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010
totaled $3.2 million and $4.8 million for the same period in 2009.
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of embedded derivative.
The authoritative guidance for
derivative instruments and hedging activities requires valuations for our embedded derivatives
within our previous 6.5% Debentures and our new 8.125% Debentures. The estimated fair value of the
embedded derivatives will fluctuate based upon various factors that include our common stock
closing price, volatility, United States Treasury bond rates and the time value of options. The
fair value for the 8.125% Debentures will also fluctuate due to the passage of time. The
calculation of the fair value of the derivatives requires the use of a Monte Carlo simulation
lattice option-pricing model. On March 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of the 8.125% Debenture
derivative was $0.7 million resulting in a $5.3 million non-cash unrealized gain for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. On March 31, 2009, the embedded derivative on our previous 6.5%
Debentures was $0.2 million and the unrealized gain for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was
$0.9 million. Any increase in our stock price will result in non-cash unrealized losses being
recognized in future periods and such amounts could be material.
Gain on conversions of debt.
During the first three months of 2009, various holders of our
previous 6.5% Debentures converted $23.3 million principal amount of the debentures, collectively,
for a combination of $6.6 million in cash related to the interest make-whole provision and 576,071
shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 24.74023 shares of common stock
per $1,000 principal amount of debentures. We recognized gains on conversions of $10.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Foreign exchange loss.
Foreign exchange loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$19.5 million, an increase of $19.1 million compared to the same period in 2009 due primarily to
the $400 million Senior Secured Notes that are U.S. Dollar denominated on NOK functional currency
books and intercompany notes between DeepOcean ASA, CTC Marine Projects Ltd, Trico Shipping and
Trico Supply. Please see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Market Risk contained in the 2009
Form 10-K for further discussion on our foreign currency exposure.
Income tax (benefit) expense.
Our income tax expense/(benefit) for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was $22.9 million compared to $(15.0) million for the comparable prior year period.
The income tax expense/(benefit) for each period is primarily associated with the Companys U.S.
federal, state and foreign taxes. The Companys tax expense/(benefit) for the three month period
ending March 31, 2010 differs from that under the statutory rate primarily due to nondeductible
interest expense in the United States as a result of the 6.5% Debenture exchange described in Note
5, the one-time expense related to the Norwegian Supreme Court ruling on February 12, 2010 and
state and foreign taxes. The Companys effective tax rate is subject to wide variations given its
structure and operations. The Company operates in many different taxing jurisdictions with
differing rates and tax structures. Therefore, a change in the Companys overall plan could have a
significant impact on the estimated rate. At March 31, 2009, the Companys tax benefit differed
from that under the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits associated with the Norwegian
Tonnage Tax Regime and a change in law enacted on March 31, 2009, the Companys permanent
reinvestment of foreign earnings and state and foreign taxes.
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest.
See Equity in net loss of investee
above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis at March 31, 2010, which
contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in
the normal course of business. The content below, in Note 2 Risks, Uncertainties, and Going
Concern in our accompanying consolidated financial statements and in Immediate Risks and
Uncertainties above addresses important factors affecting our financial condition, liquidity and
capital resources and debt covenant compliance. Amounts in this section reflecting U.S. Dollar equivalents for foreign denominated
debt amounts are translated at currency rates in effect at March 31, 2010.
43
At March 31, 2010, we had available cash of $32 million. As of March 31, 2010, payments due on
our contractual obligations during the next twelve months were approximately $284 million. Included
in these amounts for the next twelve months are $69 million in interest payments which includes
payments of approximately $24 million on each of May 1 and November 1 related to the Senior Secured
Notes and payments of approximately $8 million on each of May 15 and November 15 related to the
8.125% Debentures. There is also $62 million of debt that is repayable during 2010 of which $31
million is related to the reclassification as current of the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico
Shipping Working Capital Facility due to forecasted non-compliance with debt covenants at June 30,
2010 that will require future waivers and approximately $30 million is related to amortization
payments of approximately $10 million on each of August 1, 2010, November 1, 2010, and February 1, 2011 for the
8.125% Debentures. These amortization payments for the 8.125% Debentures may be paid in either cash
or stock at the election of the company. Due to our liquidity position, we expect to make the
amortization payment due on August 1, 2010 in common stock. Depending on the price of the Companys
common stock at the time of these amortization payments and whether we obtain the necessary
approvals or other relief described under Risks, Uncertainties, and Going Concern in Note 2, we
will likely be unable to pay in common stock in full amortization payments due either November 1,
2010 or February 1, 2011 and thereafter without violating certain of our debt covenants or Nasdaq
rules, or at all. The remaining amount of payments due in the next twelve months for our
contractual obligations are related to $119 million of time charter obligations, $31 million of
vessel construction obligations and approximately $3 million of other operating expenses such as
operating leases and pension obligations. In April 2010, an additional OSV and AHTS were sold for
$15.6 million in net proceeds. These vessels were included in assets held for sale in our Balance
Sheet at March 31, 2010.
Our working capital and cash flows from operations are directly related to fleet utilization
and vessel day rates. We require continued access to capital to fund on-going operations, vessel
construction, discretionary capital expenditures and debt service. Please see Note 2. Our ability
to generate or access cash is subject to events beyond our control, such as, expenditures for
exploration, development and production activity, global consumption of refined petroleum products,
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors. In light of
the current financial turmoil, we may be exposed to credit risk relating to certain of our
customers. Depending on the market demand for our vessels and other growth opportunities that may
arise, we may require additional debt or equity financing. The ability to raise additional
indebtedness is restricted by the terms of each of the 8.125% Debentures and the Senior Secured
Notes, which restrictions include a prohibition on incurring certain types of indebtedness if our
leverage exceeds a certain maximum level, which it currently does.
The credit markets have been volatile and are experiencing a shortage in overall liquidity. We
have assessed the potential impact on various aspects of our operations, including, but not limited
to, the continued availability and general creditworthiness of our debt and financial instrument
counterparties, the impact of market developments on customers and insurers, and the general
recoverability and realizability of certain financial assets, including customer receivables. To
date, we have not suffered material losses due to nonperformance by our counterparties. We cannot
assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations through
liquidity initiatives or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facilities
in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Liquidity Sufficiency
Our forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient to meet
our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and we do not expect that we will be
able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants. In particular, we may need to, or may choose
to, avail ourselves of the 30-day grace period with respect to the 8.125% Payment due on May 15,
2010, and there is no assurance that we will be able to make the 8.125% Payment before the end of
that grace period, in which case an event of default will occur with respect to the 8.125%
Debentures, which in turn would constitute an event of default under all of our outstanding debt
agreements, and all of our outstanding debt could become callable by our creditors and would be
reclassified as a current liability on our balance sheet.
In our 2009 Form 10-K, we indicated that our forecasted cash and available credit capacity
were not expected to be sufficient to meet our commitments as they came due over the subsequent
twelve months and that we would not be able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants without
completing certain actions to increase our level of liquidity. These actions included selling
additional assets, accessing cash in certain of our subsidiaries, minimizing capital expenditures,
obtaining waivers or amendments from our lenders, managing working capital and improving cash flows
from operations. We are currently restricted by the terms of each of the 8.125% Debentures and the
Senior Secured Notes from incurring additional indebtedness due to our leverage ratio exceeding the
level that would allow us to incur additional indebtedness. In conjunction with the waiver of the
requirement that we receive an unqualified opinion in relation to the going concern qualification for the period ended December 31, 2009,
additional draws under the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility
were prohibited and no material additional amounts are currently available under those facilities.
Additionally, our ability to refinance any of our existing indebtedness on commercially reasonably
terms may be
44
materially and adversely impacted by our financial condition and the current credit
market conditions. If we are unable to meet our commitments as they come due because we cannot
complete some or all of the above actions, we will be in default under our credit agreements, which
in turn, could potentially constitute an event of default under all of our outstanding debt
agreements. If this were to occur, all of our outstanding debt could become callable by our
creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on our balance sheet. The uncertainty
associated with our ability to meet our commitments as they come due or to repay our outstanding
debt raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying
financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and
classification of recorded assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might
result from the uncertainty associated with our ability to meet our obligations as they come due.
We are currently pursuing a number of actions including (i) active discussions with various
parties regarding potential transactions, including replacing the current U.S. Credit Facility;
(ii) active discussions regarding modifications to the existing
8.125% Debentures, to, among other things, defer amortization payments (iii) selling additional assets, (iv) accessing
cash in certain of our subsidiaries, (v) minimizing our capital expenditures, (vi) obtaining
waivers or amendments from our lenders, (vii) effectively managing our working capital and (viii)
improving our cash flows from operations in order to increase our liquidity to levels sufficient to
meet our commitments. Since December 31, 2009, we have made progress toward completing certain of
these actions. These actions include receiving approximately $18 million in net proceeds from asset
sales, receiving a dividend of $1.0 million from our EMSL subsidiary, receiving a $9.3 million tax
refund at our Trico Shipping subsidiary, and obtaining a waiver from our lender for the debt to
consolidated leverage ratio related to the U.S. Credit Facility for the period ending March 31,
2010. While these actions have increased liquidity, additional liquidity will need to be generated
from some or all of the previously mentioned actions in order for us to have sufficient liquidity
to meet our commitments as they come due. There can be no assurance that sufficient liquidity can
be raised from one or more of these actions and / or that these actions can be completed within the
period needed to meet certain obligations. Additionally, the Company expects that it will need
additional amendments or waivers from its lenders for at least each of the next four quarters. Furthermore,
meeting our obligations and commitments, including making the 8.125% Payment, may leave us with
little or no liquidity to operate our business. See Risk Factors in our 2009 Form 10-K and below
in Part II, Item 1A.
Our interest payment obligations are concentrated in the months of May and November with
approximately $24 million of interest due on the Senior Secured Notes on each of May 1 and November
1 and approximately $8 million of interest due on the 8.125% Debentures on each of May 15 and
November 15. The May 1, 2010 interest payment on the Senior Secured Notes was paid as scheduled.
Additionally, the terms of our credit agreements and the 8.125% Debentures require that some or all
of the proceeds from certain asset sales, including proceeds from certain prior asset sales, be
used to permanently reduce outstanding debt which could substantially reduce the amount of proceeds
we retain and, if we must use proceeds from prior asset sales to reduce outstanding debt, reduce
our available cash. Due to our expected liquidity position and limitations in the U.S. Credit
Facility, we expect to make the amortization payments of approximately $10 million due on the
8.125% Debentures on each of August 1, 2010, November 1,
2010 and February 1, 2011 in common stock.
The number of shares issued will be determined by the stock price at the time of each of the
amortization payments and may lead to significantly more shares being issued then if the debentures
were converted at the stated conversion rate of 71.43 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
debentures; however, the number of shares that we can issue in compliance with Nasdaq rules
is limited to approximately 9.3 million as of March 31, 2010. There can
be no assurance that the number of shares required to make these amortization payments will not
exceed this limit, in which case we will require an amendment to the
U.S. Credit Facility to permit
the amortization payments to be made in cash, and will require the cash to make such payments, or
will require a shareholder vote to permit the issuance of additional shares. There can be no
assurance that all or any of these events will occur, in which case we may default on either the
8.125% Debentures or the U.S. Credit Facility, which would provide the lenders the opportunity to
accelerate the remaining amounts outstanding under these facilities. In addition, we will need to
negotiate a waiver or amendment to our consolidated leverage ratio debt covenant on the U.S. Credit
Facility with which we do not expect to be in compliance beginning with the quarter ending June 30,
2010 and for the three subsequent quarters. There can be no assurance that the lenders will agree
to these amendments / waivers and / or additional amendments / waivers on acceptable terms and a
failure to do so would provide the lenders the opportunity to accelerate the remaining amounts
outstanding under these facilities. We are pursuing measures to improve liquidity and its capital
structure and is now in active discussions with various parties regarding potential transactions,
including replacing its current U.S. Credit Facility and modifying the existing
8.125% Debentures to, among other things, defer amortization payments. We may need to,
or as a result of those discussions, may choose to, avail itself of the 30-day grace period with
respect to the approximately $8 million interest payment due on May 15, 2010 on its 8.125%
Debentures. Our use of the grace period would not constitute an event of default under the
indenture governing the 8.125% Debentures. See Risk
Factors in our 2009 Form 10-K and below in Part II,
Item 1A.
45
Other Liquidity Items
Our debt as of the dates indicated below was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$50 million U.S. Revolving Credit Facility Agreement,
maturing in December 2011
|
|
$
|
11,298
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,298
|
|
|
$
|
11,347
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,347
|
|
$202.8 million face amount, 8.125% Convertible Debentures,
net of unamortized discount of $11.2 million and $12.3 million as of March,
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears,
maturing on February 1, 2013
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
162,726
|
|
|
|
191,652
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
|
|
170,696
|
|
|
|
190,470
|
|
$150.0 million face amount, 3% Senior Convertible
Debentures, net of unamortized discount of $28.5 million and
$30.0 million as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears,
maturing on January 15, 2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,535
|
|
|
|
121,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,992
|
|
|
|
119,992
|
|
$400.0 million face amount, 11.875% Senior Secured Notes,
net of unamortized discount of $13.5 million and $14.1 million as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, interest payable semi-annually in arrears,
maturing on November 1, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,460
|
|
|
|
386,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,925
|
|
|
|
385,925
|
|
$33 million Working Capital Facility, maturing December 2011
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
6.11% Notes, principal and interest due in 30 semi-annual
installments, maturing April 2014
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
Insurance note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Motor vehicle leases
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Fresh-start debt premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
|
$
|
675,393
|
|
|
$
|
736,936
|
|
|
$
|
52,585
|
|
|
$
|
681,312
|
|
|
$
|
733,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the financial covenants under our debt facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Lender(s)
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
Financial Covenants
|
8.125% Debentures
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance
covenants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% Debentures
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance
covenants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.11% Notes
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine
International, Inc.
|
|
Trico Marine
Services, Inc. and
U.S. Maritime
Administration
|
|
No maintenance
covenants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Shipping AS
|
|
Trico Supply and
subsidiaries, Trico
Marine Services
|
|
No maintenance
covenants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trico Shipping
Working Capital
Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland
PLC / Bayerische
Hypo Und
Vereinsbank AG
(HVB)
|
|
Trico Shipping AS
|
|
Trico Supply and
subsidiaries, Trico
Marine Services
|
|
No maintenance
covenants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland
PLC / Bayerische
Hypo
Und Vereinsbank AG
(HVB)
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
Trico Marine
Assets, Inc., Trico
Marine Operators,
Inc.
|
|
(1), (2), (3), (4), (5)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consolidated Net Worth minimum net worth of Borrower. Consolidated Net Worth excludes (i)
impairment charges incurred in connection with the cancellation by Trico Subsea AS of the
contracts of construction and sale of four vessels in the fiscal quarter ending on December
31, 2009 and (ii) write-downs of goodwill and/or non-amortizing intangible assets.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Free Liquidity unrestricted cash and or unutilized loan commitments at Borrower must be at
least $5.0 million (excluding certain indirect and direct subsidiaries)
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio: Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA* less than or equal to
11.0:1 for the quarters ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, 10.0:1 for the quarter ending
September 30, 2010, 8.00:1 for the quarter ending December 31, 2010 and 7.00:1, 6.00:1,
5.00:1, for the quarters ending March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011 and
thereafter, respectively. Calculated at the Borrower level
|
|
(4)
|
|
Maintenance Capital Expenditures limits the amount of maintenance capital expenditures in
any given fiscal year
|
|
(5)
|
|
Collateral coverage appraised value of collateral (vessels) must exceed 120% of amount
outstanding and amount available
|
|
*
|
|
EBITDA is defined in (3) above as Consolidated Net Income attributable to Trico Marine
Services, Inc. before deducting there from: (i) interest expense, (ii) provisions for taxes
based on income included in Consolidated Net Income attributable to Trico Marine Services,
Inc., (iii) any and all non-cash gains or losses in connection with embedded derivatives
related to the
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
8.125% Debentures, and (iv) amortization and depreciation without giving any
effect to (x) any extraordinary gains or extraordinary non-cash losses and (y) any gains or
losses from sales of assets other than the sale of inventory in the ordinary course of
business. Prior to December 31, 2009, pro-forma adjustments shall be made for any vessels
delivered during the period as if such vessels were acquired or delivered on the first day of
the relevant 12 month test period. Calculated at the Borrowers level.
|
Note:
|
|
Other covenant related definitions are defined in the respective credit agreements as
previously filed with the SEC.
|
Our most restrictive covenants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
Requirement as
|
|
|
|
Requirement to be met
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
of March 31,
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
on June 30,
|
Facility
|
|
Covenant
|
|
2010
|
|
Results
|
|
2010
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
|
|
Net Debt to 12
month rolling
EBITDA less than or
equal to 11.0:1
|
|
13.6:1
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month
rolling EBITDA less
than or equal to
11.0:1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
Consolidated Net Worth
|
|
Net Worth must
exceed $311.1
million (equal to
80% of net worth on
commencement date)
plus 100% of the
face amount of any
equity interests
issued by the
Borrower after the
Original Effective
Date (equal to
$100.6 million)
|
|
$420.9 million
|
|
Net Worth must
exceed $311.1
million (equal to
80% of net worth on
commencement date)
plus 100% of the
face amount of any
equity interests
issued by the
Borrower after the
Original Effective
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
Free Liquidity
|
|
$5.0 million
|
|
$9.9 million
|
|
$5.0 million
|
In December 2009, we entered into an amendment to the U.S. Credit Facility that excluded
the impact on the minimum net worth covenant of the impairment charge related to four construction
vessels and increased the consolidated leverage ratio to 11.0:1 for the quarters ending December
31, 2009, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 and to 10.0:1 for the quarter ending September 30,
2010. The ratio levels for subsequent periods were left unchanged at 8.00:1 for the fiscal quarter
ending December 31, 2010, 7.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, 6.00:1 for the
fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2011, and 5.00:1 for any fiscal quarters ending thereafter. In
conjunction with this amendment, the current availability under the U.S. Credit Facility was
reduced to $15 million from $25 million with the reduced availability being restored when we are
below the consolidated ratio levels that were in effect prior to this amendment. In March 2010, we
received a waiver to the requirement that our annual financial statements include an unqualified
auditors opinion. In conjunction with this waiver, the total available commitment was reduced to
approximately $14.8 million. We were in compliance with our debt covenants at March 31, 2010, after
giving consideration to the waiver received for the consolidated leverage ratio covenant which
exceeded 11.0 to 1.0. Please see Item 1A Risk
Factors located in our 2009 Form 10-K and below in
Part II, Item 1A for more
details about potential risks involving these facilities.
In addition to the covenants described above, our 8.125% Debentures limit our ability to incur
additional indebtedness if the consolidated leverage ratio applicable to the 8.125% Debentures
exceeds 4 to 1 at the time of incurrence of such indebtedness. The Senior Secured Notes restrict
Trico Supply and its direct and indirect subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness unless
the consolidated leverage ratio, which includes certain intercompany indebtedness, is less than
3.0:1 subsequent to the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The Senior Secured Notes also limit
the ability of Trico Supply and its subsidiaries to pay interest on existing intercompany debt
agreements to Trico Marine Services and certain of its subsidiaries unless the Fixed Charge
Coverage ratio is less than 2.5:1.
For a more detailed discussion of the risks outlined above, please see Risk Factors in our
2009 Form 10-K and below in Part II, Item 1A, as
well as Note 2 in our condensed consolidated financial statements for Risks, Uncertainties, and
Going Concern.
Cross
Default and Cross Acceleration Provisions.
Our debt agreements contain significant cross default and / or cross
acceleration provisions pursuant to which a default under one agreement can cause events of default
under the other agreements and enable the lenders or debenture holders (or a trustee or agent
acting on their behalf) under the other agreements to accelerate repayment of our obligations under
these agreement. These cross default/cross acceleration provisions include, but are not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
The 8.125% Debentures and the 3% Debentures contain provisions where the debt holders may
declare an event of default and require immediate repayment if repayment of certain other
indebtedness in a principal amount in excess of $30 million or its foreign currency
equivalent has been accelerated and not remedied within 30 days after notice thereof.
|
47
|
|
|
The U.S. Credit Facility allows the lenders to accelerate such indebtedness and require
immediate repayment if we or any of our subsidiaries were to be in default on more than $10
million in other indebtedness, the effect of which is to cause or permit the holders of such
indebtedness to cause (without regard to any notice) any such indebtedness to become due
prior to its stated maturity or if there is an event of default under the Trico Shipping
Working Capital Facility or the Senior Secured Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
The Senior Secured Notes allow the lenders to accelerate such indebtedness if there is a
default on other indebtedness and that default: (i) is caused by a failure to make any
payment when due at the final maturity of such indebtedness; or (ii) results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to its express maturity, and, in each case, the
principal (or face) amount of any such indebtedness, together with the principal (or face)
amount of any other indebtedness with respect to which an event described herein has
occurred, aggregates $20.0 million or more. The lenders may also accelerate such
indebtedness if there is a default under the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility which
is caused by a failure to make any payment when due at final maturity or results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to its express maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
The Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility allows the lenders to accelerate such
indebtedness and require immediate repayment if there is an event of default under the U.S.
Credit Facility that is continuing or if we or any of our subsidiaries were to be in default
on more than $10 million in other indebtedness, including the Senior Secured Notes, the
effect of which is to cause or permit the holders of such indebtedness (or trustee or agent
on their behalf) to cause (without regard to any notice) any such indebtedness to become due
prior to its stated maturity.
|
Recent Amendments and Waivers
|
|
In April 2010, the U.S. Credit Facility was amended which (i) enabled us to re-borrow certain
amounts used to cash collateralize letters of credit, (ii) specified asset sales will not
require a reduction in the Total Commitment (as defined in the U.S. Credit Facility), (iii)
allow us and our subsidiaries to make cash capital contributions and/or loans to joint
ventures and other of our subsidiaries with the written consent of Nordea Bank Finland plc,
New York Branch, provided that no written consent is necessary if the ultimate recipient of
the proceeds is a credit party under and as defined in the Trico Shipping Working Capital
Facility and (iv) a financial condition representation is updated.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we received a waiver related to the consolidated leverage ratio of the U.S.
Credit Facility for the period ending March 31, 2010. Absent this waiver, the company would
not have been in compliance with this covenant.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we received waivers related to the requirement that an unqualified auditors
opinion without an explanatory paragraph in relation to going concern accompany our annual
financial statements. Separate waivers were received for each of the U.S. Credit Facility and
the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility. In conjunction with the amendment to the U.S.
Credit Facility, the total available commitment was reduced to approximately $14.8 million. In
conjunction with the amendment to the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility, the amount
available under the facility was reduced from $29.7 million to the amount then outstanding,
approximately $26.0 million.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, we entered into an amendment to the U.S. Credit Facility to change the
definition of Free Liquidity such that any amounts that were committed under the facility,
whether available to be drawn or not, would be included for the purposes of calculating the
free liquidity covenant.
|
|
|
|
In December 2009, we entered into an amendment that excluded the impact on the minimum net
worth covenant of the impairment charge related to four construction vessels under our U.S.
Credit Facility. This amendment also increased the consolidated leverage ratio to 11.0:1 for
the quarters ending December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 and to 10.0:1 for the
quarter ending September 30, 2010 while leaving the ratio levels for December 31, 2010 and
beyond unchanged. In conjunction with this amendment, the current availability under the
facility was reduced to $15 million from $25 million with the reduced availability being
restored when we are below the consolidated ratio levels that were in effect prior to this
amendment.
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, we received an amendment retroactive to September 30, 2009 that amended the
consolidated leverage ratio covenant under our U.S. Credit Facility to exclude the effects of
the change in the value of the embedded derivative associated with the 8.125% Debentures in
the EBITDA calculation. With this amendment, we were in compliance with this covenant as of
September 30, 2009. This amendment also increased the consolidated leverage ratio to 8.50:1
for each of the quarters ending between December 31, 2009 through September 30, 2010. The
ratio decreases to 8.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, and subsequently
decreases to 7.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, 6.00:1 for the fiscal
quarter ending June 30, 2011, and to 5.00:1 for any fiscal quarters ending thereafter.
|
48
|
|
In August 2009, we entered into an amendment to our U.S. Credit Facility whereby the maximum
consolidated leverage ratio, net debt to EBITDA, was increased from 4.5:1 to 5.0:1 for the
fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009. The consolidated leverage ratios for the remaining
periods were not amended and remain at 4.5:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009
and 4.0:1.0 for any fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2009. In connection with this
amendment, the margin was increased from 3.25% to 5.0%. The total commitment under this
facility has also been permanently reduced to $35 million.
|
Our Capital Requirements
Our on-going capital requirements arise primarily from our need to improve and enhance our
current service offerings, invest in upgrades of existing vessels, acquire new assets and provide
working capital to support our operating activities and service debt. Generally, we provide working
capital to our operating locations through two primary business locations: the North Sea and the
U.S. The North Sea and the U.S. business operations have been capitalized and are financed on a
stand-alone basis. Debt covenants and U.S. and Norwegian tax laws make it difficult for us to
efficiently transfer the financial resources from one of these locations for the benefit of the
other.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our material contractual commitments at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt obligations (1) (2) (3)
|
|
$
|
789,863
|
|
|
$
|
61,543
|
|
|
$
|
176,437
|
|
|
$
|
401,883
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Interest on fixed rate debt (4)
|
|
|
329,176
|
|
|
|
67,771
|
|
|
|
124,083
|
|
|
|
84,272
|
|
|
|
53,050
|
|
Interest on variable rate debt (5)
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel construction obligations (6)
|
|
|
33,064
|
|
|
|
31,564
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter and equipment leases
|
|
|
276,921
|
|
|
|
118,790
|
|
|
|
88,719
|
|
|
|
50,486
|
|
|
|
18,926
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
8,560
|
|
|
|
2,821
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,443,401
|
|
|
$
|
284,448
|
|
|
$
|
394,543
|
|
|
$
|
539,316
|
|
|
$
|
225,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Excludes fresh-start debt premium of $0.2 million and unamortized discounts on
the Senior Secured Notes, 3% Debentures and 8.125% Debentures of $13.5 million, $28.5 million
and $11.2 million, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Does not assume any early conversions or redemptions of the 8.125%
Debentures and 3% Debentures as each is assumed to reach its originally stated maturity date
or be repaid based on its amortization schedule. Holders of our 3% Debentures have the right
to require us to repurchase the debentures on each of January 15, 2014, January 15, 2017 and
January 15, 2022. Please see Note 2 in our condensed consolidated financial statements for
Risks, Uncertainties, and Going Concern. We have the option to make amortization payments on
the 8.125% Debentures in either cash or stock. Due to our expected liquidity position and
limitations in the U.S. Credit Facility, we expect to make the amortization
payments of approximately $10 million due on the 8.125% Debentures on each of August 1, 2010,
November 1, 2010, and February 1, 2011, respectively, in common stock.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Primarily includes the semi-annual interest payments on Senior Secured
Notes, the 8.125% Debentures and the 3% Debentures to their maturities of 2014, 2013 and 2027,
respectively, and interest payments on the 6.11% Notes maturing 2014.
|
|
(4)
|
|
For the purpose of this calculation, amounts assume interest rates on
floating rate obligations remain unchanged from levels at March 31, 2010, throughout the life
of the obligation.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects committed expenditures and does not reflect the future capital
expenditures budgeted for periods presented which are discretionary. In 2009, we completed
negotiations with Tebma to suspend construction of the remaining four new build MPSVs (the
Trico Surge
,
Trico Sovereign
,
Trico Seeker
and
Trico Searcher
). We hold the option to cancel
construction of the four new build MPSVs after July 15, 2010. If we did not exercise this
option after the first twelve months, our total committed future capital expenditures would be
increased approximately $87 million in the above table for the last four vessels. In the first
quarter of 2010, we sold three offshore supply vessels (OSVs) and one subsea platform
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
supply vessel (SPSV) for net proceeds of $2.8 million. In April 2010, we sold an additional OSV as
well as an anchor, handling, towing and supply vessel for net proceeds of $15.6 million.
|
At March 31, 2010, we have estimated capital expenditures during the next twelve months
of $32 million, which includes the construction of the three new vessels reflected above under
vessel construction obligations, one of which was received in April 2010, plus discretionary
improvements to our existing aging vessels and general non-marine capital expenditures.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth the cash flows for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Cash flow used in operations
|
|
$
|
(4,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,418
|
)
|
Cash flow used in investing
|
|
|
(15,913
|
)
|
|
|
(18,743
|
)
|
Cash flow used in financing
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
Our primary sources of cash flow during the three months ended March 31, 2010 are due to
net proceeds from asset sales of $2.8 million, a dividend from our EMSL subsidiary of $1.0 million
and a tax refund at our Trico Shipping subsidiary of $9.3 million. The primary uses of cash were
for the purchases of new build vessels and maintenance of other property and equipment. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, our cash balance decreased $21.0 million to $32.0 million from
$53.0 million at December 31, 2009.
Net
cash used in operating activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was $4.0 million, a decrease of $11.4 million from the same period in 2009. Significant components of cash
used in operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 included a net loss of
$78.5 million partially offset by $55.3 million of non-cash
items and $19.2 million of changes in
working capital and other asset and liability balances resulting in an increase of cash. We expect
to fund our future routine operating needs through operating cash flows and draws on our various
credit facilities.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $15.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to $18.7 million for the same period in 2009. Our investing cash flows in 2010
primarily reflect $14.9 million of additions to property and equipment and $5.8 million related to
the investment in unconsolidated affiliates as a result of the deconsolidation of EMSL partially
offset by $2.8 million of net proceeds from asset sales of four vessels in 2010. Our investing cash
flows in 2009 primarily reflect $19.6 million of additions to property and equipment as well as a
$0.7 million decrease in restricted cash released under Norwegian statutory rules to pay tax
withholdings.
Net cash used in financing activities was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to cash used of $1.3 million for the same period in 2009. Our 2010 amount primarily
includes net repayments of debt of approximately $0.2 million. The 2009 amount primarily includes a
dividend payment of $6.1 million to EMSLs non-controlling partner partially offset by net proceeds
from debt of approximately $2.5 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with GAAP in the
United States. The preparation of these statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these
estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we consider reasonable under the
circumstances; however, reported results could differ from the current estimates under different
assumptions and/or conditions. We have disclosed the areas requiring the use of managements
estimates in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Standards
See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for a listing of recent accounting
standards.
50
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Market Risk Disclosures
There have been no material changes in the Companys exposure to market risk during the first
three months of 2010. See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Market Risk contained in the 2009
Form 10-K for further discussion.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act, as amended) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is also accumulated
and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter reported on herein. Based on that evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2010 because of the material weaknesses discussed
below.
We did not maintain an effective control environment. A control environment sets the tone of
an organization, influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the foundation of all
other components of internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, we did not maintain a
sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience
and training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Also, we did not maintain a
sufficient complement of personnel to provide for the proper preparation and review over period end
financial reporting process controls as discussed below. Accordingly, management has concluded that
this control deficiency constituted a material weakness. This control environment material weakness
contributed to the material weaknesses discussed below and also could contribute to additional
control deficiencies arising.
We did not maintain effective controls over the period-end financial reporting process.
Specifically, the following material weaknesses existed: (a) our controls over the preparation and
review of account reconciliations were ineffective to provide reasonable assurance that account
balances were complete and accurate and agreed to appropriate supporting detail and (b) our
controls over journal entries, including consolidation, top-side and intercompany elimination
entries, did not operate effectively to provide reasonable assurance that they were appropriately
recorded and prepared with sufficient support and documentation or that they were properly reviewed
and approved for validity, accuracy and completeness. These control deficiencies resulted in audit
adjustments to cash and cash equivalents, property and equipment, accumulated depreciation and
amortization, accounts payable, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative, and
interest expense accounts in the 2009 consolidated financial statements and if not remediated,
could result in a misstatement to substantially all accounts and disclosures that would result in a
material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be
prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has concluded that these control deficiencies
constituted material weaknesses. The period-end financial reporting process material weaknesses
contributed to the severity of the information technology general control deficiencies discussed
below.
We did not maintain effective controls over our information technology general controls.
Specifically, access to critical financial application programs and data was not reviewed on a
regular basis to ensure that key personnel had appropriate access commensurate with their assigned
roles and responsibilities. Also, appropriate policies and procedures were not in place with
respect to program changes and system security. These control deficiencies could result in a
misstatement to substantially all accounts and disclosures that would result in a material
misstatement to our interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented
or detected. Accordingly, management has concluded that these control deficiencies constituted a
material weakness.
We did not maintain an effective control over the remeasurement and/or translation of our
intercompany notes. Specifically, effective controls were not in place to ensure that foreign
exchange gains and losses and/or cumulative translation adjustment were appropriately calculated
and recorded in the respective accounts. This control deficiency resulted in an audit adjustment to
the 2009 consolidated financial statements and could result in a material misstatement to the
aforementioned accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our interim
or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly,
management has concluded that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness.
51
In light of the material weaknesses described above, we performed additional procedures that
were designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of (i) our financial
reporting; and (ii) the preparation of the consolidated financial statements contained in this
Quarterly Report. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report fairly present, in all material respects, our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As previously reported under Item 9A Controls and Procedures in the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and as discussed above, management concluded
that the internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the material
weaknesses identified. Management has continued to work on remediation efforts since the filing of
that report. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there were no changes in internal control
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Managements Remediation Plans
Management has been addressing the material weaknesses described above in our internal control
over financial reporting and its impact over disclosure controls and procedures and is committed to
effectively remediating these deficiencies as expeditiously as possible. We have devoted
significant time and resources to the remediation efforts.
In order to remediate the material weaknesses described above, we are undertaking the
following activities. We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and
procedures on an ongoing basis and will take further action as appropriate.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we hired a Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate
Accounting Manager. Along with other members of management, these individuals will direct the
necessary remedial changes to the overall design and implementation of internal controls over
financial reporting to address the material weaknesses identified. Specifically, we have begun
efforts to enhance and strengthen our written accounting and reporting policies and began
initiatives to provide increased training to our accounting department employees with respect to
its aforementioned policies.
We have enhanced our period-end financial reporting by further automating our consolidation
process. Integral to these automated processes are system controls that reduce the number of manual
procedures associated with the consolidation process. We also reduced the number of corporate-level
journal entries and recorded such entries at the appropriate entity level, thereby increasing the
level of local entity level review and supervision associated with recordation of the entries. In
addition, documentation related to the appropriate controls and procedures for the consolidation
process has been modified and enhanced.
As related to information technology general controls, specifically the documentation of the
procedures related to change management and segregation of duties, we revised our documentation
over program changes and began implementation of a software tool to assist in better identifying
system changes. The policy for segregation of duties access review has been updated to include
better documentation of analysis and procedures performed during the review. Applicable policies
and procedures are in place with respect to program changes and system security as well as access
review.
As part of our improvements to our period-end financial reporting, we are expanding controls
over our processes for accounting for foreign currency gains and losses and cumulative translation
adjustment, including the performance of an entity-wide analysis to test the reasonableness and
accuracy of manual and system generated entries.
We are committed to completing the implementation of our remediation action plan and
implementing the necessary enhancements to our resources, policies and procedures to fully
remediate the material weaknesses discussed above. These material weaknesses will not be considered
remediated until (i) new resources are fully engaged and new processes are fully implemented, (ii)
new processes are implemented for a sufficient period of time and (iii) we are confident that the
new processes are operating effectively.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Please see Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies in our accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements for a description of our material legal proceedings. In addition, we are a
party to routine litigation incidental to our business, which primarily involves employment matters
or claims for damages to vessels or equipment. Many of the other lawsuits to which we are a party
are covered by insurance. We have established accruals for these other matters, and it is
managements opinion that the resolution of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial position. However, a substantial settlement payment or judgment in
excess of our cash accruals could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The updated liquidity and debt risk factors described below, should be read in conjunction
with our risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Our forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient (i) to
meet our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and (ii) to remain in compliance
with our debt covenants over the next twelve months.
In depressed markets, our ability to pay debt service and other contractual obligations
depends upon us improving our cash flow generation, which in turn is affected by prevailing
economic and industry conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control. If we are unable to provide for debt service in May 2010, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, reducing or
delaying non-regulatory maintenance expenditures and other operating and administrative costs,
selling assets, refinancing or reorganizing our debt or other obligations and seeking additional
equity capital, or any combination of the above. Reducing or delaying capital expenditures or
selling assets will delay or reduce future cash flows. We may not be able to undertake any of these
actions on satisfactory terms, or at all.
Our forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient to meet
our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and we do not expect that we will be
able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants.
Our forecasted cash and available credit capacity are not expected to be sufficient to meet
our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and we do not expect that we will be
able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants. In particular, we may need to, or may choose
to, avail ourselves of the 30-day grace period with respect to the 8.125% Payment due on May 15,
2010, and there is no assurance that we will be able to make the 8.125% Payment before the end of
that grace period.
In our 2009 Form 10-K, we indicated that our forecasted cash and available credit capacity
were not expected to be sufficient to meet our commitments as they came due over the subsequent
twelve months and that we would not be able to remain in compliance with our debt covenants unless
we are able to successfully sell additional assets, access cash in certain of our subsidiaries,
minimize our capital expenditures, obtain waivers or amendments from our lenders, effectively
manage our working capital and improve our cash flows from operations. Additional liquidity will
need to be generated from some or all of the previously mentioned actions in order for us to have
sufficient liquidity to meet our commitments as they come due. There can be no assurance that
sufficient liquidity can be raised from one or more of these transactions and/or that these
transactions can be consummated within the period needed to meet certain obligations. Additionally,
we expect that we will need additional amendments or waivers from our lenders during the remaining
quarters in 2010. Furthermore, meeting our obligations and commitments, including making the 8.125%
Payment, may leave us with little or no liquidity to operate our business.
If
we do not make the 8.125% Payment due on May 15, 2010 prior to
the expiration of the grace period on June 15, 2010 or if we are unable to meet our other
commitments as they come due because we cannot complete some or all of the above actions, we will
be in an event of default under our credit agreements, which in turn, could potentially constitute an event of
default under all of our outstanding debt agreements. If this were to occur, all of our outstanding
debt could become callable by our creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on our
balance sheet. Our inability to make the 8.125% Payment and the uncertainty associated with our
ability to meet our other commitments as they come due or to repay our outstanding debt raises
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We may not be able to obtain funding or obtain funding on acceptable terms because of the
deterioration of the credit and capital markets. This may hinder or prevent us from meeting our
future capital needs.
53
Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and
volatile. The debt and equity capital markets have been exceedingly distressed. The re-pricing of
credit risk and the current weak economic conditions have made, and will likely continue to make,
it difficult to obtain funding on acceptable terms, if at all. In particular, the cost of raising
money in the debt and equity capital markets has increased substantially while the availability of
funds from those markets has diminished significantly. Also, as a result of concerns about the
stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost
of obtaining money from the credit markets has increased as many lenders and institutional
investors have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to refinance
existing debt at maturity at all or on terms similar to our current debt and reduced and, in some
cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers.
Our business is not generating sufficient cash flow from operations to enable us to pay our
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, and we have no availability under both our U.S.
Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility. We cannot assure you that future
borrowings will be available to us under our credit facilities in sufficient amounts, either
because our lending counterparties may be unwilling or unable to meet their funding obligations or
because our borrowing base may decrease as a result of lower asset valuations, operating
difficulties, lending requirements or regulations, or for any other reason. Moreover, even if
lenders and institutional investors are willing and able to provide adequate funding, interest
rates may rise in the future and therefore increase the cost of borrowing we incur on any of our
floating rate debt. Finally, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or
before maturity, sell assets, reduce or delay capital expenditures, seek additional equity
financing or seek third-party financing to satisfy such obligations. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. There
can be no assurance that our business, liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations
will not be materially and adversely impacted in the future as a result of the existing or future
credit market conditions.
Our holding company structure and the terms of the Senior Secured Notes may adversely affect
our ability to meet our obligations.
Substantially all of our consolidated assets are held by our subsidiaries and a majority of
our profits are generated by Trico Supply and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, our ability to meet
our obligations depends on the results of operations of our subsidiaries and upon the ability of
such subsidiaries to provide us with cash, whether in the form of management fees, dividends, loans
or otherwise, and to pay amounts due on our obligations. Dividends, loans and other distributions
to us from such subsidiaries may be subject to contractual and other restrictions. For example,
under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes, our business has been effectively split into two
groups: (i) Trico Supply, where substantially all of our subsea services business and all of our
subsea protection business resides along with our North Sea towing and supply business and (ii)
Trico Other, whose business is comprised primarily of our non North Sea towing and supply
businesses. Trico Other has the obligation, among other things, to pay the debt service related to
the 8.125% Debentures and the 3% Debentures and to pay the majority of corporate related expenses
while Trico Supply has the obligation to make debt service payments related to the Senior Secured
Notes. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes, the ability of Trico Supply to provide cash and
other funding on an ongoing basis to Trico Other is limited by restrictions on Trico Supplys
ability to pay dividends and interest on intercompany debt unless certain financial measures are
met. Because of these restrictions, our ability to meet our obligations at each of Trico Supply and
Trico Other depends on the results of operations of our businesses included within these groups.
Each of Trico Supply, Trico Other, and the Company overall will be unable to obtain minimum
levels of operating cash flows and liquidity to fund their operations, meet their debt service
requirements, and remain in compliance with their debt covenants over the next twelve months.
Subsequent compliance with their obligations is dependent on its ability to accomplish the
following: (i) secure profitable contracts through a balance of spot exposure and term contracts,
(ii) achieve certain levels of vessel and service spread utilization, (iii) deploy its vessels to
the most profitable markets, and (iv) invest in a technologically advanced subsea fleet. The
forecasted cash flows and liquidity for each of Trico Supply, Trico Other, and the Company are
dependent on each meeting certain assumptions regarding fleet utilization, average day rates,
operating and general and administrative expenses, and in the case of Trico Supply, new vessel
deliveries, which could prove to be inaccurate. A material deviation from one or more of these
estimates or assumptions by either Trico Supply or Trico Other could result in a violation of one
or more of our contractual covenants which could result in all or a portion of our outstanding debt
becoming immediately due and payable.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which is adversely affecting our cash flow and
our ability to operate our business, to comply with debt covenants and to make payments on our
indebtedness.
We are highly leveraged. As of March 31, 2010, our total indebtedness was $736.9 million,
which represents approximately 96.4% of our capitalization. Our interest expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 was $22.4 million. Our substantial level of
54
indebtedness is adversely affecting our flexibility in responding to adverse changes in
economic, business or market conditions, which will have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations.
The substantial level of our indebtedness has important consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
making it more difficult to pay interest and satisfy debt obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
requiring dedication of a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to required
payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash for working capital,
capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
limiting flexibility in planning for, or responding to, adverse changes in the business
and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
|
increasing vulnerability to general economic downturns and adverse developments in
business;
|
|
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any less leveraged competitors; and
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to raise additional financing on satisfactory terms or at all.
|
In addition, substantially all of the material assets of the Trico Supply Group secure the
Senior Secured Notes, the guarantees and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility, which may
limit the ability of the Trico Supply Group to generate liquidity by selling assets.
At March 31, 2010, we had available cash of $32 million. There can be no assurance that we
will have sufficient funds to permit us to make the 8.125% Payment of approximately $8 million on
or before May 15, 2010. Further, we have no availability under either our
U.S. Credit Facility or the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility.
We
are pursuing measures to improve liquidity and our capital structure
and are in active
discussions with various parties regarding potential transactions,
including replacing our current
U.S. Credit Facility and modifying the existing 8.125% Debentures
to, among other things, defer amortization payments. We may need to, or as a result of those
discussions, may choose to, avail ourselves of the 30-day grace period with respect to the
approximately $8 million interest payment due on May 15,
2010 on our 8.125% Debentures. Our use of
the grace period would not constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 8.125%
Debentures. Under the indenture governing the 8.125% Debentures, if we do not make the 8.125%
Payment by June 15, 2010, the trustee under such indenture, or the holders of at least 25% in
principal amount of the outstanding 8.125% Debentures, by notice to us, may declare the outstanding
principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all the 8.125% Debentures to be due and payable
immediately. In addition, if the 8.125% Payment is not made on June 15, 2010 (irrespective of
whether the amounts owing under the 8.125% Debentures are accelerated), then the administrative
agents under the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility may, upon
written request by all the non-defaulting lenders thereto, declare the outstanding principal of and
accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding loans under such agreements to be due and payable.
Following acceleration under the 8.125% Debentures, (i) the trustee under the indenture governing
the Senior Secured Notes, or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Senior
Secured Notes, may, by notice to Trico Shipping, declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid
interest on the Senior Secured Notes to be due and payable immediately and (iii) the trustee under
the indenture governing our 3% senior convertible debentures due 2027 (the 3% Debentures), or
holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 3% Debentures, may provide us with a
notice of default under the 3% Debentures and, if we fail to make the 8.125% Payment within 30
calendar days of such notice, such trustee or such holders of the 3% Debentures may, by notice to
us, declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on the 3% Debentures to be due and
payable immediately.
We will be unable to satisfy our obligations under the 8.125% Debentures, the 3% Debentures,
the Senior Secured Notes, the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility
if such indebtedness is accelerated.
In the past several months, we have amended our credit facilities and received waivers prior to the
completion of some of the amendments on many occasions in order to comply with the covenants
contained in our credit facilities. In January 2010, we entered into an amendment to the U.S.
Credit Facility to change the definition of Free Liquidity such that any amounts that were
committed under the facility, whether available to be drawn or not, would be included for the
purposes of calculating the free liquidity covenant. In March 2010, we received waivers related to
the requirement that an unqualified auditors opinion without an explanatory paragraph in relation
to going concern accompany our annual financial statements. Separate waivers were received for each
of the U.S. Credit Facility and the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility. In conjunction with
the amendment to the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility, the amount available under the
facility was reduced from $29.7 million to the amount then outstanding, approximately $26.0
million. Also in March 2010, we received a waiver related to the consolidated leverage ratio of the
U.S. Credit Facility for the period ending March 31, 2010. Absent this waiver, we would not have
been in compliance with this covenant. In April 2010, we entered into
55
three amendments to the U.S. Credit Facility which (i) enabled us to re-borrow approximately $3.2
million that had been used to cash collateralize letters of credit subsequent to the sale of the
Northern Corona, (ii) specified asset sales will not require a reduction in the Total Commitment
(as defined in the U.S. Credit Facility), (iii) allowed us and our subsidiaries to make cash
capital contributions and/or loans to joint ventures and other of our subsidiaries with the written
consent of Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York Branch, provided that no written consent is necessary
if the ultimate recipient of the proceeds is a credit party under and as defined in the Trico
Shipping Working Capital Facility and (iv) updated a financial condition representation.
Failure to obtain the necessary waivers or amendments would result in all or a portion of our
debt becoming immediately due and payable. Currently, we do not expect to be in compliance with the
consolidated leverage ratio covenant beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2010 in the U.S.
Credit Facility which will require us to obtain waivers or amendments from our lender. There can be
no assurance that these additional waivers or amendments can be obtained or that additional
amendments and waivers will not be required. Due to this expectation that we will need further
amendments and / or waivers and the fact that we have required previous amendments to remain in
compliance with certain debt covenants, the U.S. Credit Facility and the Working Capital Facility,
because of the cross default provision, have been classified as current.
Holders of our 8.125% Debentures have the right to convert their debentures into our common
stock. Additionally, if they convert after May 1, 2011, they have the right to receive a make-whole
interest payment. As of the date hereof, there are approximately $202.8 million principal amount of
the 8.125% Debentures outstanding. Should the remaining holders of such debentures convert after
May 1, 2011, we would be required to pay approximately $23.3 million in cash related to the
interest make-whole provision and issue approximately 11.6 million shares of our common stock based
on the initial conversion rate of 71.43 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of
debentures. At that time, such conversions could significantly impact our liquidity and we may not
have sufficient funds to make the required cash payments.
Our failure to convert or pay the make-whole interest payment under the terms of the
debentures or to pay amounts outstanding under our debt agreements when due would constitute events
of default under the terms of the debt, which in turn, could constitute an event of default under
all of our outstanding debt agreements.
Our business is cyclical in nature due to dependency on the levels of offshore oil and gas
drilling and subsea construction activity, and our ability to generate cash depends on many factors
beyond our control. Our ability to make scheduled payments on and/or to refinance indebtedness
depends on our ability to generate cash in the future, which will be affected by, among other
things, general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many
of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our businesses will generate sufficient
cash flows from operations, such that currently anticipated business opportunities will be realized
on schedule or at all or that future borrowings will be available in amounts sufficient to enable
us to service our indebtedness. If we cannot service our debt, we will have to take actions such as
reducing or delaying capital investments, reducing or delaying non-regulatory maintenance
expenditures and other operating and administrative costs, selling assets, restructuring or
refinancing debt or seeking additional equity capital, or any combination of the foregoing. We
cannot assure you that any of these remedies could, if necessary, be effected on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. Reducing or delaying capital expenditures or selling assets would
delay or reduce future cash flows. In addition, the indenture for the Senior Secured Notes and the
credit agreement governing the Trico Shipping Working Capital Facility, as well as credit
agreements governing various debt incurred by us may restrict us from adopting some or all of these
alternatives. Similarly, the indentures and credit agreements governing various debt incurred by us
may restrict us and our subsidiaries from adopting some or all of these alternatives. Because of
these and other factors beyond our control, we may be unable to pay the principal, premium, if any,
interest or other amounts due on our indebtedness. Our inability to repay our outstanding debt
would have a material adverse effect on us. We do not expect that our forecasted cash flows and
available credit capacity will be sufficient to meet our commitments and remain in compliance with
our debt covenants.
For a complete description of our indebtedness, please read Note 5 to our consolidated
financial statements included herein.
Our indentures and credit agreements impose significant restrictions that limit our operating and
financial flexibility.
The indentures and credit agreements governing our indebtedness contain a number of
significant restrictions and covenants that limit our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain types of equity or equity
linked securities;
|
|
|
|
|
pay distributions on, purchase or redeem capital stock or purchase or redeem
subordinated indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
make loans and investments;
|
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
56
|
|
|
sell or lease assets, including vessels and other collateral;
|
|
|
|
|
engage in sale leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
consolidate or merge with or into other companies or sell all or substantially all of
their assets;
|
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
reflag vessels outside of certain jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
|
engage in certain business activities not related to or incidental to the provision of
subsea and marine support services, subsea trenching and protection services or towing and
supply services;
|
|
|
|
|
materially impair any security interest with respect to the collateral; and
|
|
|
|
|
restrict distributions or other payments to us or other subsidiaries.
|
These restrictions could limit our ability to repay existing indebtedness, finance future
operations or capital needs, make acquisitions or pursue available business opportunities. In
addition, the U.S. Credit Facility requires maintenance of specified financial ratios and
satisfaction of certain financial covenants. We will need to negotiate a waiver or amendment to our
consolidated leverage ratio debt covenant on this facility as we do not expect to be in compliance
with it beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2010. There can be no assurance that the lenders
will agree to this amendment / waiver and / or, if required, other amendments / waivers on
acceptable terms. A failure to do so would provide the lenders the opportunity to declare the
associated debt, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable
and proceed against the collateral securing that debt. If the debt is declared due and payable,
this would result in a default under other debt agreements, and we may be unable to pay amounts due
on our debt. We cannot assure you that we will meet these financial ratios or satisfy these
covenants and events beyond our control, including changes in the economic and business conditions
in the markets in which we operate, may ultimately affect our ability to do so. Additionally, we
may be required to take action to reduce debt or to act in a manner contrary to business objectives
to maintain compliance with these covenants or to obtain required amendments or waivers.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization of the Company, Trico Marine Assets, Inc. and Trico Marine Operators,
Inc. under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12, 2004).
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Plan Support Agreement, as amended, dated September 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2004).
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2005).
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Annex A to our Schedule 14A filed July 2, 2008).
|
57
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Trico Marine Services, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2007).
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Elimination of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Trico Marine Services, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 29, 2008).
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Ninth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2009).
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture of Trico Marine Services, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, dated February
7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 2, 2007).
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2009, between Trico Marine Services, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2009).
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture dated as of October 30, 2009, by and among Trico Shipping AS, the guarantors party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 5,
2009)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed March 16, 2005).
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Warrant Agreement, dated March 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2005).
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Form of Series A Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed March 21, 2005).
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2009).
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Phantom Stock Units Agreement, dated May 22, 2008, between Trico Marine Services, Inc. and West Supply IV AS
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2008).
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Form of Phantom Stock Units Agreement, dated May 15, 2008, by and between Trico Marine Services, Inc. and
certain members of management (and their controlled entities) of DeepOcean (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 16, 2008).
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement by and between Trico Marine Services, Inc. and the Participants, dated as of
March 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 17,
2009).
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 15, 2010, among Trico Marine Services, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Nordea Bank Finland plc, New York Branch as
administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January
22, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Ninth Amendment and Waiver to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2010, to the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second Waiver to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, to the Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2010, to the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2010, to the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
First Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2010, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16,
2010).
|
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Trico 2010 Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated February 25, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Schedule of Director Compensation Arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Trico Marine Services, Inc., together with a schedule identifying
other substantially identical agreements between the Company and each of its non-employee directors identified
on the schedule and identifying the material differences between each of those agreements and the filed
Indemnification Agreement
|
58
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2010).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Officers certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Management Contract or Compensation Plan or Arrangement.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
59
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Geoff Jones
|
|
|
|
Geoff Jones
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Authorized Signatory and
Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2010
|
60
Trico Marine Services (NASDAQ:TRMA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Trico Marine Services (NASDAQ:TRMA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024