Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1
– Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
– The consolidated financial statements include Porter Bancorp, Inc. (Company) and its subsidiary, PBI Bank (Bank). The Company owns a 100% interest in the Bank. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q an
d Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. A description of other significant accounting policies is presented in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
– To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ.
Reclassifications
– Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The reclassifications did not impact net income or stockholders’ equity.
New Accounting Standards
–
In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU is an update to ASU 2014-09, and delays the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The ASU provides guidance on revenue recognition for entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enter into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures are required to provide quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company’s revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and liabilities, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of this guidance, and non-interest income. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s non-interest income revenue streams, adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued an update ASU No.
2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in this update impact public business entities as follows: 1) Require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. 2) Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value. 3) Eliminate the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. 4) Require entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. 5) Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. 6) Require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. 7) Clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements is not expected to have a material impact. The Company currently does not have any equity investments.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an update ASU N
o. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases, with the exception of short-term leases, at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting in largely unchanged. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements will not have a material impact
.
In J
une 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The final standard will change estimates for credit losses related to financial assets measured at amortized cost such as loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, and certain other contracts. For estimating credit losses, the FASB is replacing the incurred loss model with an expected loss model, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model. Under the CECL model, certain financial assets that are carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, are required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The change could materially affect how the allowance for loan losses is determined
. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We are currently gathering loan level data, and assessing our data and system needs. The impact of CECL model implementation is being evaluated, but it is expected that a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses will be recognized in retained earnings on the consolidated balance sheet as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, as is consistent with regulatory expectations set forth in interagency guidance. The magnitude of any adjustment or the overall impact of the new standard on financial condition or results of operation cannot yet be determined.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08,
Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization of Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The final standard will shorten the amortization period for premiums on callable debt securities by requiring that premiums be amortized to the first (or earliest) call date instead of as an adjustment to the yield over the contractual life. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
Note
2
– Securities
Securities are classified into available
for sale (AFS) and held to maturity (HTM) categories. AFS securities are those that may be sold if needed for liquidity, asset liability management, or other reasons. AFS securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax. HTM securities are those that we have the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.
The
amortized cost and fair value of securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
|
|
$
|
29,954
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,708
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed: residential
|
|
|
91,546
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
91,735
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations
|
|
|
23,444
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,526
|
|
State a
nd municipal
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
149,671
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
$
|
(971
|
)
|
|
$
|
149,797
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unre
cognized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross Unre
cognized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
$
|
41,424
|
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
43,397
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
$
|
41,424
|
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
43,397
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unre
alized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unre
alized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Decembe
r 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
|
|
$
|
34,757
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,099
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed: residential
|
|
|
103,390
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
|
102,353
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
154,447
|
|
|
$
|
554
|
|
|
$
|
(2,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
152,790
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross Unre
cognized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross Unre
cognized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
$
|
41,818
|
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,072
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
$
|
41,818
|
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,072
|
|
Sales and calls of securities were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,555
|
|
|
$
|
2,047
|
|
|
$
|
6,276
|
|
Gross gains
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Gross losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of the debt investment securities portfolio are shown by contrac
tual maturity.
Contractual maturities may differ from actual maturities if issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities not due at a single maturity date are detailed separately.
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
7,340
|
|
|
$
|
7,432
|
|
One to five years
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
|
15,102
|
|
Five to ten years
|
|
|
32,715
|
|
|
|
32,464
|
|
Beyond ten years
|
|
|
3,051
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed: residential
|
|
|
91,546
|
|
|
|
91,735
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
149,671
|
|
|
$
|
149,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
One to five years
|
|
|
27,619
|
|
|
|
28,729
|
|
Five to ten years
|
|
|
13,159
|
|
|
|
14,022
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,424
|
|
|
$
|
43,397
|
|
Securities pledged at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 had carrying values of approximately $85.3 million and $61.2 million, respectively, and were pledged to secure public deposits.
At
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we held securities issued by the Commonwealth of Kentucky or Kentucky municipalities having a book value of $15.8 million and $16.4 million, respectively. Additionally, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we held securities issued by the State of Texas or Texas municipalities having a book value of $4.3 million at each period end. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no other holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.
The Company evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment (OTTI) on a quarterly basis
, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition, credit quality, and near-term prospects of the issuer and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, the sector or industry trends and cycles affecting the issuer, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. As of September 30, 2017, management does not believe securities in our portfolio with unrealized losses should be classified as other than temporarily impaired.
Securities with unrealized losses at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Description of Securities
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal
Agency
|
|
$
|
19,543
|
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,668
|
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
Agency mortgage-backed:
residential
|
|
|
29,928
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
7,261
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
37,189
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
Total temporarily impaired
|
|
$
|
49,471
|
|
|
$
|
(813
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,386
|
|
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,857
|
|
|
$
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal
agency
|
|
$
|
27,738
|
|
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
27,738
|
|
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
Agency mortgage-backed:
residential
|
|
|
63,460
|
|
|
|
(1,449
|
)
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
66,205
|
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Total temporarily impaired
|
|
$
|
91,663
|
|
|
$
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,311
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
95,974
|
|
|
$
|
(2,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
There were
no held to maturity securities in an unrecognized loss position at September 30, 2017.
Note 3
– Loans
Loans net of unearned income, deferred loan origination costs, and net premiums on acquired loans by class were as follows:
|
|
September
30
,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
107,616
|
|
|
$
|
97,761
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
44,956
|
|
|
|
36,330
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
88,370
|
|
|
|
71,507
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
157,956
|
|
|
|
149,546
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
55,684
|
|
|
|
48,197
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
173,213
|
|
|
|
188,092
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
|
|
9,818
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
45,675
|
|
|
|
37,508
|
|
Other
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
682,511
|
|
|
|
639,236
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,977
|
)
|
|
|
(8,967
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
673,534
|
|
|
$
|
630,269
|
|
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
4,223
|
|
|
$
|
3,317
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
8,885
|
|
Provision (negative provision)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30
, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
5,429
|
|
|
$
|
3,778
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
10,104
|
|
Provision (negative provision)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
5,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
9,489
|
|
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by p
ortfolio segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
4,894
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8,967
|
|
P
rovision (negative provision)
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
818
|
|
|
$
|
6,993
|
|
|
$
|
3,984
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
12,041
|
|
Provision
(negative provision)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1,900
|
)
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
5,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
9,489
|
|
Th
e following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of September 30, 2017:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8,552
|
|
Total ending allowance balance
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
2,749
|
|
|
$
|
4,092
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
7,509
|
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
107,008
|
|
|
|
288,533
|
|
|
|
224,805
|
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
|
|
45,615
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
675,002
|
|
Total ending loans balance
|
|
$
|
107,616
|
|
|
$
|
291,282
|
|
|
$
|
228,897
|
|
|
$
|
8,474
|
|
|
$
|
45,675
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
682,511
|
|
The following t
able presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8,568
|
|
Total ending allowance balance
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
4,894
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
5,854
|
|
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
15,131
|
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
97,166
|
|
|
|
251,529
|
|
|
|
227,668
|
|
|
|
9,817
|
|
|
|
37,448
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
624,105
|
|
Total ending loans balance
|
|
$
|
97,761
|
|
|
$
|
257,383
|
|
|
$
|
236,289
|
|
|
$
|
9,818
|
|
|
$
|
37,508
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
639,236
|
|
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans include restructured loans
and loans on nonaccrual or classified as doubtful, whereby collection of the total amount is improbable, or loss, whereby all or a portion of the loan has been written off or a specific allowance for loss has been provided.
The following table
s present information related to loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September
30, 2017
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
For Loan
Losses
Allocated
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
3,858
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
5,494
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
With A
Related
Allowance
Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,852
|
|
|
$
|
7,509
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
7,891
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
10,202
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September
30, 2016
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
For Loan
Losses
Allocated
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
659
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,023
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5,569
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,254
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
6,159
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
19,579
|
|
|
|
12,467
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,065
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
19,381
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
With A
Related
Allowance
Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
5,559
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,350
|
|
|
$
|
15,131
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
20,874
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
24,940
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
Cash basis income recognized for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $24,000 and $309,000, respectively, compared to $87,000 and $377,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructuring
A troubled debt restructuring (TDR)
occurs when the Bank has agreed to a loan modification in the form of a concession for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty. The Bank’s TDRs typically involve a reduction in interest rate, a deferral of principal for a stated period of time, or an interest only period. All TDRs are considered impaired and the Bank allocates reserves for these loans to reflect the present value of the concessionary terms granted to the borrower.
The following table presents the types of TDR loan modifications by port
folio segment outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
|
TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
|
|
|
TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified
Terms
|
|
|
Total
TDRs
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Principal deferral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal deferral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
Total TDRs
|
|
$
|
1,226
|
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
$
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
TDRs
Performing to
Modified
Terms
|
|
|
TDRs Not
Performing to
Modified Terms
|
|
|
Total
TDRs
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Principal deferral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal deferral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Principal deferral
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate reduction
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Total TDRs
|
|
$
|
5,350
|
|
|
$
|
3,374
|
|
|
$
|
8,724
|
|
At
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 39% and 61%, respectively, of the Company’s TDRs were performing according to their modified terms. The Company allocated $141,000 and $197,000 in reserves to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company has committed to lend no additional amounts as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 to borrowers with outstanding loans classified as TDRs.
Management periodically reviews renewals and modifications of previously identified TDRs, for which there was no principal forgiveness, to consider if it is appropriate to remove the TDR classification. If the borrower is no longer experiencing financial
difficulty and the renewal/modification did not contain a concessionary interest rate or other concessionary terms, management considers the potential removal of the TDR classification. If deemed appropriate based upon current underwriting, the TDR classification is removed as the borrower has complied with the terms of the loan at the date of renewal/modification and there was a reasonable expectation that the borrower will continue to comply with the terms of the loan after the date of the renewal/modification. Additionally, TDR classification can be removed in circumstances in which the Company performs a non-concessionary re-modification of the loan at terms considered to be at market for loans with comparable risk and management expects the borrower will continue to perform under the re-modified terms based on the borrower’s past history of performance. In March 2017, the TDR classification was removed from two loans that met the requirements as discussed above. These loans totaled $4.1 million at December 31, 2016. These loans are no longer evaluated individually for impairment.
No TDR loan modification
s occurred during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 or September 30, 2016. During the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, no TDRs defaulted on their restructured loan within the twelve-month period following the loan modification. A default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual.
Non
-
performing Loans
Non
-performing loans include impaired loans and smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential mortgage and consumer loans, that are collectively evaluated for impairment. The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due 90 days and still on accrual by class of loan as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016:
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Loans Past
Due 90 Days
And Over Still
Accruing
|
|
|
|
September
30
,
201
7
|
|
|
December 31,
201
6
|
|
|
September
30
,
201
7
|
|
|
December 31,
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in t
housands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,769
|
|
|
$
|
9,216
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
|
30
– 59
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
60
– 89
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
90 Days
And Over
Past Due
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
And
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Resid
ential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
872
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,769
|
|
|
$
|
7,253
|
|
|
|
30
– 59
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
60
– 89
Days
Past Due
|
|
|
90 Days
And Over
Past Due
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
And
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,302
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,216
|
|
|
$
|
11,833
|
|
Credit Quality Indicators
We categorize
all loans into risk categories at origination based upon original underwriting. Thereafter, we categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends. Loans are also analyzed through our internal and external loan review processes. Borrower relationships in excess of $500,000 are routinely analyzed through our credit administration processes which classify the loans as to credit risk. The following definitions are used for risk ratings:
Wa
tch –
Loans
classified as watch are those loans which have or may experience a potentially adverse development which necessitates increased monitoring.
Special Mention
–
Loans classified as special mention do not have all of the characteristics of substandard or doubtful loans. They have one or more deficiencies which warrant special attention and which corrective action, such as accelerated collection practices, may remedy.
Substandard
–
Loans classified as substandard are those loans with clear and defined weaknesses such as a highly leveraged position, unfavorable financial ratios, uncertain repayment sources or poor financial condition which may jeopardize the repayment of the debt as contractually agreed. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some losses if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful
– Loans classified as doubtful are those loans which have characteristics similar to substandard loans but with an increased risk that collection or liquidation in full is highly questionable and improbable.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are consi
dered to be “Pass” rated loans. As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
106,645
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
743
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
107,616
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
44,956
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,956
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
78,156
|
|
|
|
5,935
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88,370
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
153,026
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
157,956
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
46,100
|
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55,684
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
162,476
|
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
173,213
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
33,215
|
|
|
|
11,676
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,675
|
|
Other
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
633,203
|
|
|
$
|
35,167
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
13,543
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
682,511
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
96,402
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
97,761
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
35,823
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36,330
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
63,323
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,663
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
71,507
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
142,222
|
|
|
|
5,217
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
149,546
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
38,281
|
|
|
|
6,080
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48,197
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
173,565
|
|
|
|
6,909
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
7,566
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
188,092
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
9,397
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,818
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
26,940
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,508
|
|
Other
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
586,430
|
|
|
$
|
30,431
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
21,878
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
639,236
|
|
Note 4
– Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (OREO) is real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure. It is classified as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. When property is acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in li
eu of foreclosure, it is recorded at its fair market value less expected cost to sell. Any write-down of the property at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses.
Fair value of OREO is determined on an individual property basis
. When foreclosed properties are acquired, we obtain a new appraisal of the subject property or have staff from our special assets group evaluate the latest in-file appraisal in connection with the transfer to OREO. We typically obtain updated appraisals within five quarters of the anniversary date of ownership unless a sale is imminent. Subsequent reductions in fair value are recorded as non-interest expense when a new appraisal indicates a decline in value or in cases where a listing price is lowered below the appraised amount.
The following table presents the major categories of OREO at the period-ends indicated:
|
|
September
30
,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development, and other land
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
6,571
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,330
|
|
|
$
|
6,821
|
|
R
esidential loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties in the process of foreclosure totaled $643,000 and $932,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Activity relating to OREO during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
|
|
For the
Nine
Months Ended
September
3
0
,
|
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
OREO Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO as of January 1
|
|
$
|
6,821
|
|
|
$
|
19,214
|
|
Real estate acquired
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
Valuation adjustment write-downs
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
Net gain
on sales
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Proceeds from sales of properties
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
(12,610
|
)
|
OREO as of
September 30
|
|
$
|
6,330
|
|
|
$
|
7,098
|
|
We recognized
no OREO rental income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $46,000 and $451,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
Expenses related to other real estate owned include:
|
|
Three Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net gain on sales
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
Valuation adjustment write-downs
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Operating expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
1,284
|
|
Note 5
– Deposits
The following table shows
ending deposit balances by category as of:
|
|
September
30
,
201
7
|
|
|
December 31,
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$
|
133,896
|
|
|
$
|
124,395
|
|
Interest
checking
|
|
|
94,523
|
|
|
|
103,876
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
156,905
|
|
|
|
142,497
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
35,946
|
|
|
|
34,518
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
445,577
|
|
|
|
444,639
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
866,847
|
|
|
$
|
849,925
|
|
Time deposits of $
250,000 or more were $33.1 million and $29.1 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Scheduled maturities of all
time deposits at September 30, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
Year 1
|
|
$
|
221,600
|
|
Year 2
|
|
|
174,906
|
|
Year 3
|
|
|
35,418
|
|
Year 4
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
Year 5
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
|
|
$
|
445,577
|
|
Note 6
– Advance
s
from the Federal Home Loan Bank
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
(FHLB) were as follows:
|
|
September
30
,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
A
dvances with fixed rates from 0.00% to 5.24% and maturities ranging
from 2
017 through 2033, averaging 1.24% at September 30, 2017 and 0.85% at December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
16,847
|
|
|
$
|
22,458
|
|
Scheduled principal payments on
FHLB advances during the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):
|
|
Advances
|
|
Year 1
|
|
$
|
15,203
|
|
Year 2
|
|
|
182
|
|
Year 3
|
|
|
492
|
|
Year 4
|
|
|
739
|
|
Year 5
|
|
|
108
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,847
|
|
Each advance is payable
based upon the terms of agreement, with a prepayment penalty. No prepayment penalties were incurred during 2017 or 2016. The advances are collateralized by first mortgage residential loans. In September 2017, the FHLB notified the Bank of an upgrade to its collateral reporting status from physical delivery status to blanket summary status whereby the FHLB determines borrowing capacity from the eligible book value of qualifying residential loans pledged rather than the discounted market value of loans delivered to physical custody. At September 30, 2017, our additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $74.8 million.
Note 7
– Senior Debt
On June 30, 2017, the Company entered into a $10.0 million senior secured loan agreement with a commercial bank. The loan matures on June 3
0, 2022. Interest is payable quarterly at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points through June 30, 2020, at which time quarterly principal payments of $250,000 plus interest will commence. The loan is secured by a first priority pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Bank. The Company may prepay any amount due under the promissory note at any time without premium or penalty.
The Company contributed $9.0 million
of the borrowing proceeds to the Bank as common equity Tier 1 capital. The remaining $1.0 million of the borrowing proceeds were retained by the lender in escrow to service quarterly interest payments. At September 30, 2017, the escrow account had a balance of $903,000.
The loan agreement contains customary representation
s, warranties, covenants and events of default, including the following financial covenants: (i) the Company must maintain minimum cash on hand of not less than $750,000 through June 30, 2018, and not less than $2,500,000 thereafter, (ii) the Company must maintain a total risk based capital ratio at least equal to 9% of risk-weighted assets to June 30, 2018, and 10% thereafter, (iii) the Bank must maintain a total risk based capital ratio at least equal to 10% of risk-weighted assets to June 30, 2018, and 11% thereafter, and (iv) non-performing assets of the Bank may not exceed 2.5% of the Bank’s total assets. Both the Company and Bank were in compliance with the covenants as of September 30, 2017.
Note
8
– Fair Values Measurement
Fair value is the excha
nge price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We use various valuation techniques to determine fair value, including market, income and cost approaches. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that an entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date, or observable inputs.
Level 2:
Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:
Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different leve
ls of the fair value hierarchy. When that occurs, we classify the fair value hierarchy on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. We used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value.
Securities:
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, if available. This valuation method is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated on market prices of similar securities, or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Matrix pricing relies on the securities’ relationship to similarly traded securities, benchmark curves, and the benchmarking of like securities. Matrix pricing utilizes observable market inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. In instances where broker quotes are used, these quotes are obtained from market makers or broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. This valuation method is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators.
This valuation method is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Discounted cash flows are calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit spread and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model.
Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.
Impaired Loans:
An impaired loan is evaluated at the time the loan is identified as impaired and is recorded at fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loan and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is determined using several methods. Generally, the fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.
Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These routine adjustments are made to adjust the value of a specific property rel
ative to comparable properties for variations in qualities such as location, size, and income production capacity relative to the subject property of the appraisal. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
We routinely apply an internal discount to the value of appraisals used in the fair value evaluation of our impaired loans. The deductions to the appraisal take into account changing business factors and market conditions,
as well as potential value impairment in cases where our appraisal date predates a likely change in market conditions. These deductions range from 10% for routine real estate collateral to 25% for real estate that is determined (1) to have a thin trading market or (2) to be specialized collateral. This is in addition to estimated discounts for cost to sell of six to ten percent.
We also apply discounts to the expected fair value of collateral for impaired loans where the likely resolution involves litigati
on or foreclosure. Resolution of this nature generally results in receiving lower values for real estate collateral in a more aggressive sales environment. We have utilized discounts ranging from 10% to 33% in our impairment evaluations when applicable.
Im
paired loans are evaluated quarterly for additional impairment. We obtain updated appraisals on properties securing our loans when circumstances are warranted such as at the time of renewal or when market conditions have significantly changed. This determination is made on a property-by-property basis in light of circumstances in the broader economic climate and our assessment of deterioration of real estate values in the market in which the property is located. The first stage of our assessment involves management’s inspection of the property in question. Management also engages in conversations with local real estate professionals and market participants to determine the likely marketing time and value range for the property. The second stage involves an assessment of current trends in the regional market. After thorough consideration of these factors, management will either internally evaluate fair value or order a new appraisal.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
: OREO is evaluated at the time of acquisition and recorded at fair value as determined by independent appraisal or internal evaluation less cost to sell. Our quarterly evaluations of OREO for impairment are driven by property type. For smaller dollar single family homes, we consult with staff from our special assets group as well as external realtors and appraisers. Based on these consultations, we determine asking prices for OREO properties we are marketing for sale. If the internally evaluated fair value or asking price is below our recorded investment in the property, appropriate write-downs are taken.
For larger dollar commercial real estate properties, we obtain a new appraisal of the subject property or have staff in our special assets group evaluate the latest in-file appraisal in connection wit
h the transfer to other real estate owned. We generally obtain updated appraisals within five quarters of the anniversary date of ownership unless a sale is imminent. When an asking price is lowered below the most recent appraised value, appropriate write-downs are taken.
We routinely apply an internal discount to the value of appraisals used in the fair value evaluation of our OREO. The deductions to the appraisal take into account changing business factors and market conditions, as well as potential value
impairment in cases where our appraisal date predates a likely change in market conditions. These deductions range from 10% for routine real estate collateral to 25% for real estate that is determined (1) to have a thin trading market or (2) to be specialized collateral. This is in addition to estimated discounts for cost to sell of six to ten percent.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
September
30
, 201
7
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observa
ble Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Availab
le
for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
|
|
$
|
29,708
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29,708
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed: residential
|
|
|
91,735
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
91,735
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations
|
|
|
23,526
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,526
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
149,797
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
149,797
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 201
6
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Description
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Availabl
e for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
|
|
$
|
34,099
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
34,099
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed: residential
|
|
|
102,353
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
102,353
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
152,790
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
152,790
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
There were
no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2017 or 2016.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
September
30
, 201
7
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other real estate owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
, land development, and other land
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 201
6
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices In
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other real estate owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
, land development, and other land
|
|
|
6,571
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,571
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonfarm nonresidential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Impaired loans,
which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $1.7 million at September 30, 2017 with a valuation allowance of $399,000, resulting in $171,000 and $29,000 in additional provision for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $2.5 million with a valuation allowance of $309,000, resulting in $220,000 and no additional provision for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. At December 31, 2016, impaired loans had a carrying amount of $2.4 million, with a valuation allowance of $370,000.
OREO
, which is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $6.3 million as of September 30, 2017, compared with $6.8 million at December 31, 2016. Write-downs of $98,000 were recorded on OREO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to write-downs of $761,000 and $1.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
The followi
ng table presents qualitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2017:
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Valuation
Technique(s)
|
|
Unobservable Input(s)
|
|
Range (W
eighted
Average)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
– Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
1,236
|
|
Sales comparison approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
|
|
0%
|
-
|
34%
|
(11%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
– Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
Sales comparison approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
|
|
0%
|
-
|
11%
|
(5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income approach
|
|
Discount or capitalization rate
|
|
|
18%
|
|
(18%)
|
|
The follow
ing table presents qualitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2016:
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Valuation
Technique(s)
|
|
Unobservable Input(s)
|
|
Range (Weighted
Average)
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
– Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
1,261
|
|
Sales comparison approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
|
|
0%
|
-
|
22%
|
(9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
– Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
6,571
|
|
Sales comparison approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
|
|
0%
|
-
|
20%
|
(9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income approach
|
|
Discount or capitalization rate
|
|
18%
|
-
|
20%
|
(19%)
|
|
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
September
30
, 201
7
Using
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
47,369
|
|
|
$
|
27,815
|
|
|
$
|
19,554
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
47,369
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
149,797
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
149,797
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
149,797
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
41,424
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,397
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,397
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
673,534
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
673,616
|
|
|
|
673,616
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
866,847
|
|
|
$
|
133,896
|
|
|
$
|
719,827
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
853,723
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
16,847
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,865
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,865
|
|
Subordinated capital note
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,087
|
|
|
|
19,087
|
|
Senior debt
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 201
6
Using
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
66,316
|
|
|
$
|
31,091
|
|
|
$
|
35,225
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
66,316
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
152,790
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
152,790
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
152,790
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
41,818
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,072
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,072
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
630,269
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
632,528
|
|
|
|
632,528
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
849,925
|
|
|
$
|
124,395
|
|
|
$
|
712,458
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
836,853
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
22,458
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,475
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,475
|
|
Subordinated capital note
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,263
|
|
|
|
13,263
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair values are described as follows:
(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amou
nts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2. Non-interest bearing deposits are Level 1 whereas interest bearing due from bank accounts and fed funds sold are Level 2.
(b) FHLB Stock
It is
not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
(c) Loans, Net
Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for
sale, are estimated as follows: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as described previously. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.
(
d
) Deposits
The fair values disclosed for non-interest bearing deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date resulting in a Level 1 classification. The carrying amounts of variable rat
e interest bearing deposits approximate their fair values at the reporting date resulting in a Level 2 classification. Fair values for fixed rate interest bearing deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flows calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.
(
e
) Other Borrowings
The fair values of the Company
’s FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates resulting in a Level 2 classification.
The fair values of the Company
’s subordinated capital notes, junior subordinated debentures, and senior debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 3 classification.
(
f
) Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value resulting in a Level 2 or Level 3 c
lassification based on the level of the asset or liability with which the accrual is associated.
Note
9
– Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities were due to the following as of:
|
|
September
30
,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forward
|
|
$
|
43,515
|
|
|
$
|
42,094
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
Other real estate owned write-down
|
|
|
3,401
|
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
Alternative minimum tax
credit carry-forward
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
Net assets from acquisitions
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
New market tax credit carry-forward
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Nonaccrual loan interest
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Accrued e
xpenses
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
Other
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
53,311
|
|
|
|
56,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB stock dividends
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Deferred
loan costs
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Other
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
51,902
|
|
|
|
54,049
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(51,902
|
)
|
|
|
(54,049
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Our es
timate of our ability to realize the deferred tax asset depends on our estimate of projected future levels of taxable income. In analyzing future taxable income levels, we considered all evidence currently available, both positive and negative. Based on our analysis, we established a valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2011. The valuation allowance remains in effect as of September 30, 2017.
The Company does not have any beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits. The Co
mpany does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months. There were no interest and penalties recorded in the income statement or accrued for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 or September 30, 2016 related to unrecognized tax benefits.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (“
Section 382”), the Company’s its net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) and other deferred tax assets can generally be used to offset future taxable income and therefore reduce federal income tax obligations. However, the Company's ability to use its NOLs would be limited if there was an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382. This would occur if shareholders owning (or deemed to own under the tax rules) 5% or more of the Company's voting and non-voting common shares increase their aggregate ownership of the Company by more than 50 percentage points over a defined period of time.
In 2015, the Company took
two measures to preserve the value of its NOLs. First, we adopted a tax benefits preservation plan designed to reduce the likelihood of an “ownership change” occurring as a result of purchases and sales of the Company's common shares. Upon adoption of plan, the Company declared a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right for each common share outstanding as of the close of business on July 10, 2015. Any shareholder or group that acquires beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the Company (an “acquiring person”) could be subject to significant dilution in its holdings if the Company's Board of Directors does not approve such acquisition. Existing shareholders holding 5% or more of the Company will not be considered acquiring persons unless they acquire additional shares, subject to certain exceptions described in the plan. In addition, the Board of Directors has the discretion to exempt certain transactions and certain persons whose acquisition of securities is determined by the Board not to jeopardize the Company's deferred tax assets. The rights will expire upon the earlier of (i) June 29, 2018, (ii) the beginning of a taxable year with respect to which the Board of Directors determines that no tax benefits may be carried forward, (iii) the repeal or amendment of Section 382 or any successor statute, if the Board of Directors determines that the plan is no longer needed to preserve the tax benefits, and (iv) certain other events as described in the plan.
On September 23, 2015,
our shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to further help protect the long-term value of the Company’s NOLs. The amendment provides a means to block transfers of our common shares that could result in an ownership change under Section 382. The transfer restrictions will expire on the earlier of (i) September 23, 2018, (ii) the beginning of a taxable year with respect to which the Board of Directors determines that no tax benefit may be carried forward, (iii) the repeal of Section 382 or any successor statute if our Board determines that the transfer restrictions are no longer needed to preserve the tax benefits of our NOLs, or (iv) such date as the Board otherwise determines that the transfer restrictions are no longer necessary.
The Company and its subsidi
aries are subject to U.S. federal income tax and the Company is subject to income tax in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2014
.
Note
10
– Stock Plans and Stock Based Compensation
S
hares available for issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (“2016 Plan”) total 25,000. Shares issued to employees under the plan vest annually on the anniversary date of the grant generally over three to four years.
The Company
also maintains the Porter Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan (“2006 Director Plan”) pursuant to which 2
,834 shares remain available for issuance as annual awards of restricted stock to the Company’s non-employee directors. Shares issued annually to non-employee directors have a fair market value of $25,000 and vest on December 31 in the year of grant.
The fair value of t
he 2017 unvested shares issued was $365,000, or $9.64 per weighted-average share. The Company recorded $129,000 and $271
,000 of stock-based compensation to salaries and employee benefits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $148,000 and $315,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. We expect substantially all of the unvested shares outstanding at the end of the period to vest according to the vesting schedule. No deferred tax benefit was recognized related to this expense for either period.
The following table summarizes unvested shar
e activity as of and for the periods indicated for the Stock Incentive Plan:
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30
, 201
7
|
|
|
December 31, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstandin
g, beginning
|
|
|
179,513
|
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
184,482
|
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
37,865
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
|
|
|
35,465
|
|
|
|
9.10
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(58,650
|
)
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
(38,462
|
)
|
|
|
8.32
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
(1,972
|
)
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
Outstanding, ending
|
|
|
157,412
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
179,513
|
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
Unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to unvested shares for the remainder of 201
7 and beyond is estimated as follows (in thousands):
October
2017 – December 2017
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
201
8
|
|
|
258
|
|
201
9
|
|
|
99
|
|
20
20 & thereafter
|
|
|
25
|
|
Note 1
1
– Earnings per Share
The factors used in the basic and diluted earnings
per share computations follow:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30
,
|
|
|
September
30
,
|
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,794
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
5,183
|
|
|
$
|
3,885
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings allocated to unvested shares
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Net inc
ome available to common shareholders,
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
1,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
5,050
|
|
|
$
|
3,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares including unvested common shares outstanding
|
|
|
6,259,864
|
|
|
|
6,223,045
|
|
|
|
6,245,418
|
|
|
|
5,897,617
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average unvested common shares
|
|
|
157,412
|
|
|
|
206,829
|
|
|
|
160,825
|
|
|
|
195,412
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
6,102,452
|
|
|
|
6,016,216
|
|
|
|
6,084,593
|
|
|
|
5,702,205
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of common stock warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted average common shares and potential common shares
|
|
|
6,102,452
|
|
|
|
6,016,216
|
|
|
|
6,084,593
|
|
|
|
5,702,205
|
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
The Company had no outstanding stock options at
September 30, 2017 or 2016. A warrant for the purchase of 66,113 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $79.41 was outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 2016, but was not included in the diluted EPS computation as inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 1
2
– Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Retained Earnings
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by
federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action.
The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
’s capital guidelines for U.S. Banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Company and Bank on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule through January 1, 2019. The final rules allowed banks and their holding companies with less than $250 billion in assets a one-time opportunity to opt-out of a requirement to include unrealized gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income in their capital calculation. The Company and the Bank opted out of this requirement. The rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the regulatory minimum risk-based capital ratios. Once the capital conservation buffer is fully phased in, the minimum ratios are a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5%. The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement began in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets with increases to 1.25% in 2017, 1.875% in 2018, and 2.5% in 2019. An institution is subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary bonuses if capital levels fall below minimum levels plus the buffer amounts. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
The Bank is no longer subject to a consent order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions. We were notified that the Bank
’s prior consent order was terminated, effective October 31, 2017.
On September 21, 2011, we entered into a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. In the Agreement, we made formal commitments to use our financial and management resources to serve as a source of strength for the Bank, to assist the
Bank in addressing weaknesses identified in a consent order with the FDIC and KDFI (which has since been terminated), to pay no dividends without prior written approval, to pay no interest or principal on trust preferred securities without prior written approval, and to submit an acceptable plan to maintain sufficient capital.
The following tables show the ratios and amounts of common equity Tier 1, Tier 1 capital, and total capital to risk-adjusted assets and the leverage ratios for
the Company and the Bank at the dates indicated. Regulatory minimums for capital adequacy purposes are prompt corrective action standards. Dollars are in thousands:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Requirement for Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Minimum Requirement to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
As of September 30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
76,402
|
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,833
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
84,299
|
|
|
|
11.10
|
|
|
|
60,761
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
75,951
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Total common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
41,719
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
34,219
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
73,387
|
|
|
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
34,178
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
49,368
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
55,613
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
73,387
|
|
|
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
45,571
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
60,761
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
55,613
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
|
|
|
38,056
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
73,387
|
|
|
|
7.73
|
|
|
|
37,986
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
47,482
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Requirement for Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Minimum Requirement to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
As of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
71,109
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,714
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
68,773
|
|
|
|
9.88
|
|
|
|
55,663
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
69,579
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Total common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
36,199
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
31,339
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
57,642
|
|
|
|
8.28
|
|
|
|
31,311
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
45,226
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
48,713
|
|
|
|
6.99
|
|
|
|
41,786
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
57,642
|
|
|
|
8.28
|
|
|
|
41,747
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
55,663
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
48,713
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
36,975
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
57,642
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
|
36,949
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
46,186
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
N/A: Not applicable. Regulatory framework does not define well capitalized for holding companies.
Kentucky banking laws limit the dividends that may be paid to a holding company by its subsidiary banks without prior approval. The amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year to current year
’s net income, as defined in the laws, combined with the retained net income of the preceding two years, less any dividends declared during those periods. In addition, a bank must have positive retained earnings.
Note 1
3
–
Off Balance Sheet Risks, Commitments, and Contingent Liabilities
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to financial instrumen
ts with off balance sheet risk. The financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the potential future obligations of the Company pursuant to those financial instruments. Creditworthiness for all instruments is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Company’s credit policies. Collateral from the client may be required based on the Company’s credit evaluation of the client and may include business assets of commercial clients, as well as personal property and real estate of individual clients or guarantors.
An approved but unfunded loan commitment represents a potential credit risk and a liquidity risk, since the Company
’s client(s) may demand immediate cash that would require funding. In addition, unfunded loan commitments represent interest rate risk as market interest rates may rise above the rate committed to the Company’s client. Since a portion of these loan commitments normally expire unused, the total amount of outstanding commitments at any point in time may not require future funding. Commitments to make loans are generally made for periods of one year or less.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. The terms an
d risk of loss involved in issuing standby letters of credit are similar to those involved in issuing loan commitments and extending credit. In addition to credit risk, the Company also has liquidity risk associated with standby letters of credit because funding for these obligations could be required immediately. The Company does not deem this risk to be material. No liability is currently established for standby letters of credit.
The following table presents the contractual amounts of financial instrume
nts with off-balance sheet risk for each period ended:
|
|
September
30
,
201
7
|
|
|
December 31,
201
6
|
|
|
|
Fixed
Rate
|
|
|
Variable
Rate
|
|
|
Fixed
Rate
|
|
|
Variable
Rate
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Commitments to make loans
|
|
$
|
32,645
|
|
|
$
|
30,764
|
|
|
$
|
19,445
|
|
|
$
|
18,347
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
7,252
|
|
|
|
58,107
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
51,407
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
In connection with the purchase of t
hree loan participations, the Bank entered into three risk participation agreements, which had notional amounts totaling $19.8 million at September 30, 2017 and $14.6 million at December 31, 2016.
The Company is
subject to claims and lawsuits that arise primarily in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. The Company records contingent liabilities resulting from claims against it when a loss is assessed to be probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Accruals are not made in cases where liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Assessing probability of loss and estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including in some cases judgments about the potential actions of third party claimants and courts. Recorded contingent liabilities are based on the best information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. Based upon current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, the Company believes pending legal proceedings or claims should not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. However, in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to the financial position or results of operations for a particular reporting period in the future.
On October 17, 2014, the United State
s Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) notified the Bank that it was the subject of an investigation into possible violations of federal laws, including, among other things, possible violations related to false bank entries, bank fraud and securities fraud. The investigation concerns allegations that Bank personnel engaged in practices intended to delay or avoid disclosure of the Bank’s asset quality at the time of and following the United States Treasury’s purchase of preferred shares from the Company in November 2008. The Bank has cooperated with all requests for information from the DOJ. At this time, the DOJ has not indicated whether it intends to pursue any action in the matter.