NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Description of Company
PCM,
Inc. is a leading multi-vendor provider of technology solutions, including hardware products, software and services, offered through
our dedicated sales force and field service teams and direct marketing channels. Since our founding in 1987, we have served our
customers by offering products and services from vendors such as Apple, Cisco, Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, HP Inc., Ingram
Micro, Lenovo, Microsoft and Tech Data. We add additional value by incorporating products and services into comprehensive solutions.
Our sales and marketing efforts allow our vendor partners to reach multiple customer segments including small, medium and enterprise
businesses, state, local and federal governments and educational institutions.
We
currently operate in three reportable segments: Commercial, Public Sector and Canada. Our segments are primarily aligned based
upon their respective customer base. We include corporate related expenses such as legal, accounting, information technology,
product management and other administrative costs that are not otherwise included in our reportable operating segments in Corporate
& Other.
In
February 2016, we transitioned out nearly the entire management overhead of our MacMall business, thinned out its cost structure
and brought it under the management and supervision of our Commercial segment. All historical segment financial information provided
herein has been revised to reflect this revised operating segment.
Also,
in connection with our acquisitions of Acrodex and certain assets of Systemax’s North American Technology Group in the fourth
quarter of 2015 and our resulting entrance into selling technology solutions in the Canadian market, we formed a new operating
segment called Canada. This segment includes our operations related to these Canadian market activities, beginning as of the respective
dates of these acquisitions.
During
2014, we discontinued the operation of all four of our retail stores, located in Huntington Beach, Santa Monica and Torrance,
California and Chicago, Illinois, and our OnSale and eCost businesses. We reflected the results of these operations, which were
historically reported as a part of our MacMall segment at the time, as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein
in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We
sell primarily to customers in the United States and Canada, and maintain offices in the United States and Canada, as well as
in Manila, Philippines. In 2016, we generated approximately 77% of our revenue in our Commercial segment, 16% of our revenue in
our Public Sector segment and 7% of our revenue in our Canada segment.
Our
Commercial segment sells complex technology solutions to commercial businesses in the United States, using multiple sales channels,
including a field relationship-based selling model, an outbound phone based sales force, a field services organization and online
extranets.
Our
Public Sector segment consists of sales made primarily to federal, state and local governments, as well as educational institutions.
The Public Sector segment utilizes an outbound phone and field relationship-based selling model, as well as contract and bid business
development teams and an online extranet.
Our
Canada segment consists of sales made to customers in the Canadian market beginning as of the respective dates of our acquisition
of Acrodex and certain assets of Systemax in October and December 2015, respectively.
2.
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The
accompanying financial statements included herein are presented on a consolidated basis and include our accounts and the accounts
of all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
We
prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America, which requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported herein. Management
bases its estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
We
adhere to the guidelines and principles of revenue recognition described in ASC 605 —
Revenue Recognition
. Under
ASC 605, product sales are recognized when the title and risk of loss are passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence
of an arrangement for sale, delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable
and collectability is reasonably assured. Under these guidelines, the majority of our sales, including revenue from product sales
and gross outbound shipping and handling charges, are recognized upon receipt of the product by the customer. In accordance with
our revenue recognition policy, we perform an analysis to estimate the number of days products we have shipped are in transit
to our customers using data from our third party carriers and other factors. We record an adjustment to reverse the impact of
sale transactions based on the estimated value of products that have shipped, but have not yet been received by our customers,
and we recognize such amounts in the subsequent period when delivery has occurred. Changes in delivery patterns or unforeseen
shipping delays beyond our control could have a material impact on our revenue recognition for the current period.
For
all product sales shipped directly from suppliers to customers, we take title to the products sold upon shipment, bear credit
risk, and bear inventory risk for returned products that are not successfully returned to suppliers; therefore, these revenues
are recognized at gross sales amounts.
We
also sell certain products for which we act as an agent in accordance with ASC 605-45. Products in this category include the sale
of third-party services, warranties, software assurance (“SA”) or subscriptions. SA is an “insurance”
or “maintenance” product that allows customers to upgrade, at no additional cost, to the latest technology if new
applications are introduced during the period that the SA is in effect. These sales do not meet the criteria for gross sales recognition,
and thus are recognized on a net basis at the time of sale. Under net sales recognition, the cost paid to the vendor or third-party
service provider is recorded as a reduction to sales, resulting in net sales being equal to the gross profit on the transaction.
Some
of our larger customers are offered the opportunity by certain of our vendors to purchase software licenses and SA under enterprise
agreements (“EAs”). Under EAs, customers are considered to be compliant with applicable license requirements for the
ensuing year, regardless of changes to their employee base. Customers are charged an annual true-up fee for changes in the number
of users over the year. With most EAs, our vendors will transfer the license and invoice the customer directly, paying us an agency
fee or commission on these sales. We record these fees as a component of net sales as earned and there is no corresponding cost
of sales amount. In certain instances, we invoice the customer directly under an EA and accounts for the individual items sold
based on the nature of the item. Our vendors typically dictate how the EA will be sold to the customer.
When
a customer order contains multiple deliverables such as hardware, software and services which are delivered at varying times,
we determine whether the delivered items can be considered separate units of accounting as prescribed under ASC 605-25,
Revenue
Recognition, Multiple-Element Arrangement
. For arrangements with multiple units of accounting, arrangement consideration is
allocated among the units of accounting, where separable, based on their relative selling price. Relative selling price is determined
based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if it exists. Otherwise, third-party evidence of selling price is used, when it is
available, and in circumstances when neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence of selling price is available,
management’s best estimate of selling price is used.
Revenue
from professional services is either recognized as incurred for services billed at an hourly rate or recognized using the proportional
performance method for services provided at a fixed fee. Revenue for data center services, including internet connectivity, web
hosting, server co-location and managed services, is recognized over the period the service is performed.
Sales
are reported net of estimated returns and allowances, discounts, mail-in rebate redemptions and credit card chargebacks. If the
actual sales returns, allowances, discounts, mail-in rebate redemptions or credit card chargebacks are greater than estimated
by management, additional expense may be incurred.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Cost
of goods sold includes product costs, outbound and inbound shipping costs and costs of delivered services, offset by certain market
development funds, volume incentive rebates and other consideration from vendors.
We
receive consideration from our vendors in the form of cooperative marketing allowances, volume incentive rebates and other programs
to support our marketing of their products. Most of our vendor consideration is accrued, when performance required for recognition
is completed, as an offset to cost of sales in accordance with ASC 605-50,
Revenue Recognition — Customer Payments and
Incentives,
since such funds are not a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by us in selling
the vendors’ products. For costs that are considered to be a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs
incurred by us in selling the vendors’ products, we accrue the vendor consideration as an offset to such costs in selling,
general and administrative expenses. At the end of any given period, unbilled receivables related to our vendor consideration
are included in “Accounts receivable, net of allowances” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
All
highly liquid investments with initial maturities of three months or less and credit card receivables with settlement terms less
than 5 days are considered cash equivalents. Amounts due from credit card processors classified as cash totaled $4.6 million and
$3.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015. Checks issued but not presented for payment to the bank, net of available cash subject
to a right of offset, totaling $5.4 million and $18.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were included in “Accounts
payable” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our cash management programs result in utilizing available cash to pay down
our line of credit.
Accounts
Receivable
We
generate the majority of our accounts receivable through the sale of products and services to certain customers on account. In
addition, we record vendor receivables at such time as all conditions have been met that would entitle us to receive such vendor
funding, and is thereby considered fully earned.
The
following table presents the gross amounts of our accounts receivable (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
$
|
320,321
|
|
|
$
|
296,795
|
|
Vendor
receivables
|
|
|
35,482
|
|
|
|
40,530
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
3,978
|
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
Total
gross accounts receivable
|
|
|
359,781
|
|
|
|
341,576
|
|
Less:
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
(558
|
)
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
$
|
358,949
|
|
|
$
|
341,018
|
|
For
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, “Vendor receivables” presented above included $22.6 million and $19.1
million, respectively, of unbilled receivables relating to vendor consideration, which is described above under “Cost of
Goods Sold.”
Accounts
receivable potentially subject us to credit risk. We extend credit to our customers based upon an evaluation of each customer’s
financial condition and credit history, and generally do not require collateral. No customer accounted for more than 10% of trade
accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and 2015. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon estimates
of future collection. We regularly evaluate our customers’ financial condition and credit history in determining the adequacy
of our allowance for doubtful accounts. We have historically incurred credit losses within management’s expectations. We
also maintain an allowance for uncollectible vendor receivables, which arise from vendor rebate programs, price protections and
other promotions. We determine the sufficiency of the vendor receivable allowance based upon various factors, including payment
history. Amounts received from vendors may vary from amounts recorded because of potential non-compliance with certain elements
of vendor programs. If the estimated allowance for uncollectible accounts or vendor receivables subsequently proves to be insufficient,
additional allowance may be required.
Inventories
Inventories
consist primarily of finished goods, and are stated at the lower of cost (determined under the first-in, first-out method) or
market. As discussed under “Revenue Recognition” above, we do not record revenue and related cost of goods sold until
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed and determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured. As such, inventories include goods-in-transit to customers at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
A
substantial portion of our business is dependent on sales of Cisco, HP Inc., Microsoft and products purchased from other vendors
including Apple, Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ingram Micro, Lenovo, and Tech Data. Our top sales of products by manufacturer
as a percent of our gross billed sales were as follows for the periods presented:
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
$
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
HP
Inc.
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Cisco
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Advertising
Costs
Our
advertising expenditures are expensed in the period incurred. Total net advertising expenses, which were included in “Selling,
general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, were $4.2 million, $4.4 million and $4.3
million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets,
as noted below. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the remaining lease term. We also
capitalize computer software costs that meet both the definition of internal-use software and defined criteria for capitalization
in accordance with ASC 350-40,
Internal-Use Software
.
Autos
|
|
3
– 5 years
|
Computers,
software, machinery and equipment
|
|
1
– 7 years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
1
– 10 years
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
3
– 15 years
|
Building
and improvements
|
|
5
– 31 years
|
We
had $4.2 million and $4.8 million of remaining unamortized internally developed software at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Disclosures
About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our
line of credit borrowings and notes payable approximate their fair values based upon the current rates offered to us for obligations
of similar terms and remaining maturities.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible assets are carried at historical cost, subject to write-down, as needed, based upon an impairment
analysis that we perform annually, or sooner if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not result
in an impairment loss. We perform our annual impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October
1 of each year.
Goodwill
impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Events that may create
an impairment include, but are not limited to, significant and sustained decline in our stock price or market capitalization,
significant underperformance of operating units and significant changes in market conditions. Changes in estimates of future cash
flows or changes in market values could result in a write-down of our goodwill in a future period. If an impairment loss results
from any impairment analysis as described above, such loss will be recorded as a pre-tax charge to our operating income. Goodwill
is allocated to various reporting units, which are generally an operating segment or one level below the operating segment. At
October 1, 2016, our goodwill resided in our Abreon, Commercial Technology, Public Sector and Canada reporting units.
Goodwill
impairment testing is a two-step process. Step one involves comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their carrying
amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment and no further testing
is required. If the reporting unit’s carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed to
measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step two calculates the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of
all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, net of any assumed liabilities, of the reporting unit from the fair value
of the reporting unit as determined in step one. The implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the
carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss
is recognized equal to the difference.
We
performed our annual impairment analysis of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for possible impairment as of October
1, 2016. Our annual impairment analysis excluded goodwill associated with the Stratiform acquisition made during the fourth quarter
of 2016, as its purchase price allocation was completed subsequent to the analysis date, and no impairment triggering events have
occurred. Our management, with the assistance of an independent third-party valuation firm, determined the fair values of our
reporting units and their underlying assets, and compared them to their respective carrying values. Goodwill represents the excess
of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in each business combination.
The carrying value of goodwill was allocated to our reporting units pursuant to ASC 350. As a result of our annual impairment
analysis as of October 1, 2016, we have determined that no impairment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets
existed.
Fair
value was determined by using a weighted combination of a market-based approach and an income approach, as this combination was
deemed to be the most indicative of fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants. Under the market-based approach,
we utilized information regarding our company and publicly available comparable company and industry information to determine
cash flow multiples and revenue multiples that are used to value our reporting units. Under the income approach, we determined
fair value based on estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit, discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of capital,
which reflects the overall level of inherent risk of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor would expect
to earn.
In
addition, the fair value of our indefinite-lived trademark was determined using the relief from royalty method under the income
approach to value. This method applies a market based royalty rate to projected revenues that are associated with the trademarks.
Applying the royalty rate to projected revenues resulted in an indication of the pre-tax royalty savings associated with ownership
of the trademarks. Projected after-tax royalty savings were discounted to present value at the reporting unit’s weighted
average cost of capital, and a tax amortization benefit (calculated based on a 15-year life for tax purposes) was added.
In
conjunction with our annual assessment of goodwill, our valuation techniques did not indicate any impairment as of October 1,
2016. All reporting units with goodwill passed the first step of the goodwill evaluation, with the fair values of our Abreon,
Commercial Technology, Public Sector and Canada reporting units exceeding their respective carrying values by 80%,
79%, 130% and 168% and, accordingly, we were not required to perform the second step of the goodwill evaluation. We had $7.2
million, $62.5 million, $8.3 million and $5.3 million of goodwill as of October 1, 2016 residing in our Abreon, Commercial Technology,
Public Sector and Canada reporting units, respectively. In applying the market and income approaches to determining fair
value of our reporting units, we rely on a number of significant assumptions and estimates including revenue growth rates and
operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe
to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. Changes in one or more of these significant estimates
or assumptions could affect the results of these impairment reviews.
As
part of our annual review for impairment, we assessed the total fair values of the reporting units and compared total fair value
to our market capitalization at October 1, 2016, including the implied control premium, to determine if the fair values are reasonable
compared to external market indicators. When comparing our market capitalization to the discounted cash flow models for each reporting
unit summed together, the implied control premium was approximately 15% as of October 1, 2016. We believe several factors are
contributing to our low market capitalization, including the lack of trading volume in our stock and the recent significant investments
made in various parts of our business and their effects on analyst earnings models.
Given
continuing economic uncertainties and related risks to our business, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions
made for purposes of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment testing as of October 1, 2016 will prove to
be accurate predictions of the future. We may be required to record additional goodwill impairment charges in future periods,
whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing as of October 1, 2016 or prior to that, if any change constitutes
a triggering event outside of the quarter from when the annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test
is performed. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether
such charge would be material.
We
amortize other intangible assets with definite lives generally on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, or
in the case of customer relationships, based on a relative percentage of annual discounted cash flows expected to be delivered
by the asset over its estimated useful life.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets
We
review long-lived assets and certain intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the undiscounted future cash flow attributable to the asset is less than
the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the
fair value of the long-lived asset. Changes in estimates of future cash flows attributable to the long-lived assets could result
in a write-down of the asset in a future period.
Debt
Issuance Costs
We
defer costs incurred to obtain our credit facility and amortize these costs to interest expense using the straight-line method
over the term of the respective obligation.
Income
Taxes
We
account for income taxes under the assets and liability method as prescribed in accordance with ASC 740 —
Income Taxes
.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future
years to differences between the tax basis and financial reporting amounts of existing assets and liabilities. The effect of a
change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax provisions and benefits, in assessing the likelihood of recovering
our deferred tax assets and in evaluating our tax positions. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not
that all or some portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making such a determination, all available positive and
negative evidence is considered, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable
income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations.
We
account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with ASC 740, which prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold may
be recognized. We have elected to classify interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part
of “Interest expense, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Sales
Taxes
We
present sales tax we collect from our customers on a net basis (excluded from our revenues), a presentation which is prescribed
as one of two methods available under ASC 605-45-50-3 (Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities).
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 —
Compensation — Stock Compensation
. ASC 718
addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for
either equity instruments of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments
or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. We record compensation expense related to stock-based compensation
over the award’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
We
estimate the grant date fair value of each stock option grant awarded using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management
assumptions made regarding various factors, including expected volatility of our common stock, expected life of options granted
and estimated forfeiture rates, which require use of accounting judgment and financial estimates. We compute the expected term
based upon an analysis of historical exercises of stock options by our employees. We compute our expected volatility using historical
prices of our common stock for a period equal to the expected term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is determined using
the implied yield on U.S. Treasury issues with a remaining term within the contractual life of the award. We estimate an annual
forfeiture rate based on our historical forfeiture data, which rate will be revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Any material change in the estimates used in calculating the stock-based compensation
expense could result in a material impact on our results of operations.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
local currency of our foreign operations is their functional currency. The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830-30. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of our Canadian and Philippine
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet dates. Income and expense items
are translated at the average exchange rate for each month within the year. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded
in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” a separate component of stockholders’ equity on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. All transaction gains or losses are recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on
our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and recorded a gain of $0.2 million and losses of $0.7 million and $0.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles –
Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which simplified the testing of goodwill
for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measured a goodwill impairment loss by comparing
the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective
for public companies for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
We are currently evaluating the effects that the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a
Business,” which provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a
business. ASU 2017-01 provides a more narrow definition of what is referred to as outputs and align it with how outputs are
described in Topic 606 in order to narrow the broad interpretations of the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective
for public companies in their annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those
periods. We are currently evaluating the effects that the adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments,” which aims to eliminate the diversity in practice related to classification of eight types
of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim
periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the effects that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Employee
Share-Based Accounting,” which simplifies several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including
the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory state tax withholding requirements, as wells as classification in
statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December
15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We are currently evaluating
the effects that the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use
assets and lease liability, initially measured at present value of the lease payments, on its balance sheet for leases with terms
longer than 12 months and classified as either financing or operating leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition
approach for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period
presented in the financial statements, and provides certain practical expedients that companies may elect. ASU 2016-02 is effective
for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
We are currently evaluating the effects that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.
2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities,
and any related valuation allowance, to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet. The classification change for all deferred
taxes as non-current simplifies entities’ processes as it eliminates the need to separately identify the net current and
net non-current deferred tax asset or liability in each jurisdiction and allocate valuation allowances. ASU 2015-17 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, but may be adopted in earlier interim or annual financial statement reporting
periods. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. We will adopt ASU 2015-17 on a retrospective basis
during the first quarter of 2017. As a result of the adoption, current deferred tax assets of $4.7 million and current deferred
tax liabilities of $1.7 million included in our balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 will be reclassified to noncurrent. There
will be no impact on our results of operations or our cash flows as a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-17.
In
September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period
Adjustments,” which requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the
measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, including the cumulative effect of
the change in provisional amount as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement
for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recorded in a business combination to reflect new information about
the facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date and that, if known, would have affected measurement or recognition
of amounts initially recognized. The adjustments related to previous reporting periods since the acquisition date must be disclosed
by income statement line item either on the face of the income statement or in the notes. ASU 2015-16 is effective prospectively
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.
We adopted ASU 2015-16 during the year ended December 31, 2015. Accordingly, we applied the amendments in this update to the measurement
period adjustments made during the year ended December 31, 2015 with no material effect on previous-period or current-period earnings.
See Note 3 below for more information regarding adjustments to provisional amounts that occurred during 2015 since adoption of
ASU 2015-16.
In
August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) – Presentation
and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements,” which provides that the
SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the
deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding
borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We defer debt issuance costs related to our line-of-credit arrangement as an asset
and amortize the deferred costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement.
In
July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330) - Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which
requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable
value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal,
and transportation. ASU 2015-11 applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. ASU 2015-11
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted
as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We are evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated
financial statements and plan to adopt ASU 2015-11 during our quarterly period ending March 31, 2017.
In
February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation,” which amends the analysis that a reporting entity must
perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We adopted ASU 2015-02 effective January 1, 2016 and
it did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items,” with the objective
of simplifying income statement presentation requirements by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP, but retaining
current presentation and disclosure requirements for an event or transaction that is of an unusual nature or of a type that indicates
infrequency of occurrence. ASU 2015-01 is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2015. We adopted ASU 2015-01 effective January 1, 2016 and it did not have an effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which, along with amendments issued
in 2015 and 2016, will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and eliminate industry specific guidance.
The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods and services equal
to an amount it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods and services. The ASU, as amended, will be effective beginning
in the first quarter of 2018, and allows for early adoption in the first quarter of 2017. The new guidance permits two methods
of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively by recognizing
the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance to all contracts existing at the date of initial application (the modified
retrospective method). We are currently assessing all potential impacts of the standard on our contract portfolio by reviewing
the current accounting policies and practices utilized to identify potential differences that would result from applying the requirements
of the new standard to our various contracts. We will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2018 and will not early adopt. We currently
prefer to adopt the standard using the full retrospective method; however, our ability to do so is dependent on many factors,
including the completion of our analysis of information necessary to recast prior period financial statements. Based on these
and other factors, we may decide to use the cumulative catch-up transition method.
In
April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment
(Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which amended guidance
on the presentation of financial statements and reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of
an entity within property, plant and equipment. ASU 2014-08 amends the definition of a discontinued operation and requires entities
to disclose additional information about disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued-operations criteria. ASU 2014-08
is effective for disposals that occur in annual periods (and interim periods therein) beginning on or after December 15, 2014.
We had no disposals during the year ended December 31, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015 did not have
an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3.
Acquisitions
Stratiform
On
December 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Stratiform, Inc. for C$2.1 million in cash (or $1.6 million). Stratiform is
an industry-leading provider of cloud IT solutions that include consulting, professional and managed services to clients across
Canada. As part of the Stratiform acquisition, we agreed to pay certain contingent earn-out consideration related to years ending
December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (each year the “measurement period”), and payable 90 days in arrears following each
measurement period. As of December 31, 2016, we have estimated that the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid throughout
the earn-out periods to be approximately $0.7 million, of which we have included $0.3 million in each of “Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December
31, 2016.
Systemax
On
December 1, 2015, we completed the acquisition of certain Business to Business (B2B) assets of Systemax’s North American
Technology Group (NATG) for $14 million in cash. We acquired the right to hire approximately 400 B2B sales representatives located
across the United States and Canada, all rights to the NATG B2B customer list, certain B2B customer and vendor contracts, trademarks
and other intellectual property rights including the TigerDirect brand, and certain fixed assets and equipment. We did not acquire
cash, accounts receivable, inventory or assume trade payables in connection with the transaction. Also at closing, the parties
entered into a transition services agreement to facilitate an orderly transition of the purchased assets. We assumed certain leases
and entered into certain subleases for office space where the approximate 400 B2B sales representatives currently work.
In
January 2016, we exercised an option in our purchase agreement and paid $0.4 million related to our purchase of additional customer
list information, which was recorded as an increase to goodwill associated with the Systemax assets acquisition. As of December
31, 2016, we have finalized the fair value determination and purchase price allocation for the Systemax acquisition, and there
has been no other change to the preliminary accounting for the Systemax acquisition and the related purchase price allocation.
Based
on the final purchase price allocation, we recorded the following fair values of the certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed
at the date of the Systemax asset acquisition (in thousands):
Purchase
price paid
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
706
|
|
Intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationships(1)
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
Trademarks
and trade names(2)
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
Non-compete
agreements(3)
|
|
|
270
|
|
Total
intangible assets
|
|
|
6,990
|
|
Total
assets acquired
|
|
|
7,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
473
|
|
Capital
lease payables
|
|
|
507
|
|
Total
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill(4)
|
|
$
|
7,284
|
|
|
(1)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 20 years.
|
|
(2)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 3 years.
|
|
(3)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 5 years.
|
|
(4)
|
This
goodwill acquired as part of the Acrodex acquisition is recorded as part of our Canada segment, and it is not deductible for
tax purposes
|
Following
the completion of the acquisition on December 1, 2015, the results of our TigerDirect operations, which generated $12.5 million
of net sales and $0.7 million of operating profit since the date of acquisition, have been included in the results of our Commercial,
Public Sector and Canada operating segments for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Acrodex
On
October 26, 2015, PCM Sales Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PCM, Inc., completed the acquisition of all the outstanding
common stock of Acrodex, Inc. (“Acrodex”) for a total purchase price of approximately C$16.7 million (or $13.6 million,
net of cash acquired). Acrodex, headquartered in Edmonton, Alberta (Canada), provides full end-to-end infrastructure solutions
from initial plan and design, through procurement and installation, to full support and on-going management. Acrodex’s core
business areas include software value-added reseller services, software asset management and hardware sales and services, including
client device products, servers, storage, networks, printers and a full complement of accessories and devices. Services are a
significant component to Acrodex’s product mix and include managed services, cloud-based services, consulting, IT management
and other IT service areas.
The
accounting for the acquisition of Acrodex was finalized as of September 30, 2016. We have finalized the final fair value determination
and purchase price allocation for the Acrodex acquisition, and there has been no other change to the preliminary accounting for
the Acrodex acquisition and the related purchase price allocation. Based on the final purchase price allocation, we recorded the
following estimated fair values of the certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the Acrodex acquisition
(in thousands):
Purchase
price paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
13,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
14,330
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
224
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
Intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationships(1)
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
Trademarks
and trade names(2)
|
|
|
380
|
|
Non-compete
agreements(3)
|
|
|
236
|
|
Total
intangible assets
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
62
|
|
Total
assets acquired
|
|
|
20,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
9,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill(4)
|
|
$
|
2,575
|
|
|
(1)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 20 years.
|
|
(2)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 3 years.
|
|
(3)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 5 years.
|
|
(4)
|
This
goodwill acquired as part of the Acrodex acquisition is recorded as part of our Canada
segment, and it is not deductible for tax purposes.
|
In
March 2016 and June 2016, we paid an additional $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to adjustments to the net
asset value as defined in the agreement, which was recorded as an increase to goodwill resulting from the Acrodex acquisition.
Following
the completion of the Acrodex acquisition on October 26, 2015, the results of our Acrodex operations, which generated $16.7 million
of net sales and $0.6 million of operating profit since the date of acquisition, have been included in the results of our Canada
operating segment.
En
Pointe
On
April 1, 2015, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of En Pointe, one of the nation’s largest independent IT solutions
providers, headquartered in Southern California. En Pointe
is the largest acquisition by
PCM to date based on revenues, and is expected to significantly enhance PCM’s relationships with several key vendor partners,
provide incremental advanced technical certifications and operational expertise in key practice areas, and bring the consolidated
business significantly increased scale.
We acquired the assets of En Pointe’s IT solutions provider business, excluding
cash and other current tangible assets such as accounts receivable. The assets were acquired by an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary
of PCM, which subsidiary now operates under the En Pointe brand. Under the terms of the agreement, we paid an initial purchase
price of $15 million in cash and an additional $2.3 million for inventory. We agreed to pay certain contingent earn-out consideration,
including 22.5% of the future adjusted gross profit of the business and 10% of certain service revenues over the three years following
the closing of the acquisition. As of December 31, 2016, we have estimated that the fair value of contingent consideration to
be paid throughout the earn-out period ending March 31, 2018 to be approximately $38.6 million, representing no change from December
31, 2015. During 2016 and 2015, we made $13.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively, of earn-out payments to the sellers of En
Pointe. The fair value of this contingent consideration is determined and accrued based on a probability weighted average of possible
outcomes that would occur should certain financial metrics be reached. Because there is no market data available to use in valuing
the contingent consideration, the Company developed its own assumptions related to the future financial performance of the businesses
to determine the fair value of this liability. As such, the valuation of the contingent consideration is determined using Level
3 inputs. The significant inputs into the calculation of the contingent consideration as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 include
projected gross profit values of En Pointe and the weighted average cost of capital, which was determined to be 13%. The undiscounted
estimate of the range of outcomes for the earn-out liability is approximately $10.0 million to $76.9 million.
The
accounting for the acquisition of En Pointe was finalized as of December 31, 2015. The purchase price has been allocated to the
acquired assets and assumed liabilities, which include, but are not limited to, fixed assets, licenses, intangible assets and
professional liabilities, based on estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. Based on the final purchase price allocation,
we recorded the following estimated fair values of the certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the En Pointe
acquisition (in thousands):
Purchase
price paid
|
|
$
|
17,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
439
|
|
Intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationships(1)
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Trademarks
and trade names(2)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Non-compete
agreements(3)
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
Total
intangible assets
|
|
|
8,360
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
115
|
|
Total
assets acquired
|
|
|
14,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
Earn-out
liabilities
|
|
|
38,625
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
276
|
|
Total
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
42,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill(4)
|
|
$
|
45,326
|
|
|
(1)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 20 years.
|
|
(2)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 3 years.
|
|
(3)
|
Estimated
useful life of this asset is 4 years.
|
|
(4)
|
This
goodwill acquired as part of the En Pointe acquisition is recorded as part of our Commercial
and Public Sector segments.
|
|
|
The
goodwill resulting from the En Pointe acquisition is deductible for tax purposes.
|
As
of December 31, 2016, we had $13.3 million and $3.4 million of accrued earn-out liability included in “Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities,” respectively, on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. As of December 31, 2015, we had $13.2 million and $16.5 million of accrued earn-out liability included in “Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities,” respectively, on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. We recorded approximately $2.3 million and $1.0 million of amortization expense during the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to the $8.4 million of intangible assets acquired in the En Pointe transaction.
The
following table sets forth our results of operations on a pro forma basis as though the En Pointe acquisition had been completed
as of the beginning of the periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,779,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,767,963
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(24,531
|
)
|
|
|
22,484
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(17,415
|
)
|
|
|
10,369
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
(17,725
|
)
|
|
|
8,799
|
|
Basic
and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
12,251
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
|
12,881
|
|
Real
Estate Transactions
In
March 2015, we completed the purchase of real property in Irvine, California (the “Irvine Property”) for approximately
$5.8 million and financed $4.9 million with a long-term note. The real property includes approximately 60,000 square feet of office
and warehouse space and land. Certain of our subsidiaries were tenants of the building, which are continuing to use the office
and warehouse space. In September 2015, we listed the Irvine Property for sale. See Note 5 below for more information.
In
January 2015, we completed the purchase of certain real property in Lewis Center, Ohio for approximately $6.6 million. We paid
approximately $2.2 million in cash and financed $4.575 million with a long-term note. The $4.575 million term note provides for
a five-year term with a 25 year principal amortization period that began in February 2015, and bears interest at a variable rate
of LIBOR plus 2.25%. The real property includes approximately 12.4 acres of land together with a building for office and warehouse
space of approximately 144,000 square feet. Certain of our subsidiaries were tenants of the building, which are continuing to
use the office and warehouse space.
For
more information on the financing arrangements on the real estate transactions discussed above, see Note 8 below.
4.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based
Benefit Plan
PCM,
Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan
In
April 2012, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved and adopted our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012
Plan”). In June 2012, the Plan was approved by our stockholders at our 2012 annual stockholders meeting. Upon the adoption
of the 2012 Plan, our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1994 Plan”) was terminated, canceling the shares that remained
available for grant under the 1994 Plan. Outstanding awards granted under the 1994 Plan continue unaffected following the termination
of the 1994 Plan.
The
2012 Plan authorizes our Board and the Compensation Committee to grant equity-based compensation awards in the form of stock options,
SARs, restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares, performance units, and other awards for the purpose of providing our directors,
officers and other employees incentives and rewards for performance. The 2012 Plan does not contain an evergreen provision. The
2012 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee under delegated authority from the Board. The Board or Compensation Committee
may delegate its authority under the 2012 Plan to a subcommittee. The Compensation Committee or the subcommittee may delegate
to one or more of its members or to one or more of our officers, or to one or more agents or advisors, administrative duties,
and the Compensation Committee may also delegate powers to one or more of our officers to designate employees to receive awards
under the 2012 Plan and determine the size of any such awards (subject to certain limitations described in the 2012 Plan).
At
December 31, 2016, a total of 1,413,762 shares of authorized and unissued shares were available for future grants. All options
granted through December 31, 2016 have been Nonstatutory Stock Options. We satisfy stock option exercises and vesting of RSUs
with newly issued shares.
Stock-Based
Compensation
For
the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million, $1.6 million
and $1.5 million, respectively, in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations, and related deferred income tax benefits of $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Valuation
Assumptions
We
estimated the grant date fair value of each stock option grant awarded during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management assumptions made regarding various factors which require extensive
use of accounting judgment and financial estimates. We compute the expected term based upon an analysis of historical exercises
of stock options by our employees. We computed our expected volatility using historical prices of our common stock for a period
equal to the expected term of the options. The risk free interest rate was determined using the implied yield on U.S. Treasury
issues with a remaining term within the contractual life of the award. Each year, we estimated an annual forfeiture rate based
on our historical forfeiture data, which rate is revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.
The
following table presents the weighted average assumptions we used in each of the following years:
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
1.45
|
%
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Expected
term (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Stock-Based
Payment Award Activity
Stock
Options
The
following table summarizes our stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2016 and stock options outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2016 for the above plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
(in years)
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
1,872,855
|
|
|
$
|
7.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
372,750
|
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(375,255
|
)
|
|
|
6.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(44,025
|
)
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/cancelled
|
|
|
(26,600
|
)
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,799,925
|
|
|
|
8.41
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
$
|
25,352
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,242,475
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
18,533
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value is calculated for in-the-money options based on the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
awards and the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016, which was $22.50.
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Weighted
average grant-date fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
|
$
|
4.20
|
|
|
$
|
5.79
|
|
Total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the period (in thousands)
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
Total
fair value of shares vested during the period (in thousands)
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, there was $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested outstanding stock options.
We expect to recognize these costs over a weighted average period of 3.6 years.
Restricted
Stock Units
We
estimate the fair value of RSU awards based on the closing stock price of our common shares on the date of grant. The following
table summarizes our RSU activity during the year ended December 31, 2016 issued under the above plans:
|
|
Restricted
Stock
Units
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
391,600
|
|
|
$
|
9.30
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
109,000
|
|
|
|
10.05
|
|
Vested
and distributed
|
|
|
(99,000
|
)
|
|
|
9.37
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
379,600
|
|
|
|
9.56
|
|
The
weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted during the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $9.66 and $9.48, respectively.
As
of December 31, 2016, there was $2.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested outstanding RSUs. We expect
to recognize these costs over a weighted average period of 3.36 years.
5.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Computers,
software, machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
71,769
|
|
|
$
|
72,066
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
|
6,898
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
Building
and improvements
|
|
|
23,786
|
|
|
|
23,786
|
|
Land
|
|
|
12,852
|
|
|
|
12,852
|
|
Software
development and other equipment in progress
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
125,734
|
|
|
|
124,551
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(69,382
|
)
|
|
|
(67,777
|
)
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
56,352
|
|
|
$
|
56,774
|
|
We
capitalized interest costs of approximately $40,000 and $0.5 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to internally developed
software costs during development. Capitalized interest costs in 2015 were also related to the construction of our data center
in New Albany, Ohio. Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment, including fixed assets under capital leases,
for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 totaled $9.9 million, $10.9 million and $10.3 million.
In
September 2015, we listed our real property located in Irvine, California for sale. Under a broker agreement, the Irvine Property
is available for immediate sale in its present condition. The asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is
reasonable in relation to its current fair value and we believe the fair value exceeds the carrying value. We have classified
$5.8 million related to the Irvine Property, stated at lower of cost or fair value, as “Asset held for sale” at December
31, 2016 and 2015, and $4.6 million and $4.8 million related to the mortgage on the Irvine Property as “Note payable related
to asset held for sale” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Throughout
2016 and 2015, we entered into capital lease schedules with a bank totaling approximately $0.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
The capital leases are primarily related to the data center we constructed in New Albany, Ohio and various furniture and equipment
additions at our El Segundo, California corporate headquarters office. The capital lease schedules entered into in 2016 and 2015
have terms ranging from one to five years. See Note 10 below for information related to capital lease obligations. At December
31, 2016, we had a total of $2.0 million under our capital lease obligations, of which $1.3 million was included as part of “Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities” and $0.7 million was included as part of “Other long-term liabilities”
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We
have been in the process of upgrading our ERP systems due to the discontinued third party support of certain of our aged legacy
systems, our changing IT needs when considering the transitioning state of our business from our origins towards becoming a leading
IT solution provider and the ongoing desire to integrate multiple systems upon which we currently operate as a result of multiple
acquisitions. In this regard, we previously purchased licenses for Microsoft Dynamics AX and other related modules to provide
a complete, robust and integrated ERP solution and have expended time, effort and resources to implement this AX solution for
our legacy businesses. We believe the implementation and upgrade of our systems should help us to gain further efficiencies across
our organizations. Our newly acquired En Pointe business has operated for a number of years on an implemented and successfully
functioning SAP system. As a result of the En Pointe acquisition, we considered new issues related to the costs, risks and benefits
of either continuing the implementation of our AX solution and moving En Pointe to such AX solution or moving the legacy businesses
to the SAP solution. In response, we shifted certain of our IT development efforts towards assessing these respective costs, risks
and benefits. There are significant risks and uncertainties in adopting and implementing a new ERP system and as part of our assessment
of these alternatives, we considered the fact that En Pointe has been successfully functioning on its SAP system for many years
while none of our businesses have operated on the AX system. While we believe the AX solution has many valuable features and that
it has been essential that we have undertaken our AX development efforts to date, we have weighed these attributes and the transition
risk inherent with any such new solution against the fact that En Pointe, with similar business characteristics and system needs
to our legacy businesses, has been successfully operating on its SAP system for a number of years. As a result of the assessments
performed, our management concluded that the SAP solution is the best, most viable and cost effective option for our consolidated
business going forward. To that end, in late October 2015, our management determined, and our Board of Directors approved such
determination, to adopt the SAP platform across all of our business units and approved the non-cash write-off of the remaining
$22.1 million of work in process software previously capitalized for all major phases of the design, configuration and customization
of the AX solution to date. For the year ended December 31, 2015, a total of $25.4 million non-cash charge related to the ERP
and CRM write-offs was included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
6.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The
change in the carrying amounts of goodwill was as follows (in thousands) by segment:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Public
Sector
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
69,335
|
|
|
$
|
8,322
|
|
|
$
|
2,895
|
|
|
$
|
80,552
|
|
Additional
goodwill related to Acrodex acquisition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Additional
goodwill related to Systemax asset acquisition
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Goodwill
related to Stratiform acquisition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
Foreign
currency translation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
69,735
|
|
|
$
|
8,322
|
|
|
$
|
5,331
|
|
|
$
|
83,388
|
|
Intangible
Assets
The
following table sets forth the amounts recorded for intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
Weighted
Average
Estimated
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Useful
Lives
(years)
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amount
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Net
Amount
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amount
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Net
Amount
|
|
Patent,
trademarks, trade names & URLs
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
7,691
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
$
|
5,790
|
|
|
$
|
7,675
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
585
|
|
|
$
|
7,090
|
|
Customer
relationships
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13,369
|
|
|
|
5,480
|
|
|
|
7,889
|
|
|
|
13,299
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
11,712
|
|
Non-compete
agreements
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
Total
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,421
|
|
|
$
|
8,347
|
|
|
$
|
15,074
|
|
|
$
|
23,328
|
|
|
$
|
2,521
|
|
|
$
|
20,807
|
|
(1)
|
Included
in the total amount for “Patent, trademarks & URLs” at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are $2.9 million of trademarks
with indefinite useful lives that are not amortized.
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets was $5.8 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014, respectively.
Estimated
amortization expense for intangible assets in each of the next five years and thereafter, as applicable, as of December 31, 2016
is as follows: $4.1 million in 2017, $2.9 million in 2018, $1.8 million in 2019, $1.3 million in 2020 and $2.1 million thereafter.
7.
Discontinued Operations
During
2014, we discontinued the operation of all four of our retail stores, located in Huntington Beach, Santa Monica and Torrance,
California and Chicago, Illinois, and our OnSale and eCost businesses. We reflected the results of these operations, which were
historically reported as a part of our MacMall segment, as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. The revenues,
operating and non-operating results of the discontinued operations are reflected in a single line item entitled “Loss from
discontinued operations, net of taxes” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and the related liabilities are presented
in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in a line item entitled “Current liabilities of discontinued operations” for all
periods presented herein.
The
carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities that have been included in such balance sheet line items, as described
above, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
The
operating results of our discontinued operations reported in “Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes” in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(507
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,795
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,570
|
)
|
8.
Debt
The
following table sets forth our outstanding debt as of the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revolving
credit facility, LIBOR plus 1.50%, maturing in March 2019(1)
|
|
$
|
107,396
|
|
|
$
|
162,439
|
|
Note
payable, LIBOR plus 1.50%, maturing in March 2019(1)
|
|
|
8,293
|
|
|
|
9,848
|
|
Note
payable, LIBOR plus 1.50%, maturing in March 2019(1)
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
Note
payable, greater of 2% or LIBOR plus 2.15%, maturing in April 2022
|
|
|
4,601
|
(2)
|
|
|
4,799
|
(2)
|
Note
payable, LIBOR plus 2.25%, maturing in January 2022
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
Notes
payable, 4.12%, 4.33% and 4.60%, maturing in March 2017
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
2,569
|
|
Note
payable, LIBOR plus 2.25%, maturing in January 2020
|
|
|
7,107
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Note
payable, Prime plus 0.375% or LIBOR plus 2.375%, maturing in November 2017
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
8,515
|
|
Other
note payable, maturing in August 2018
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
141,915
|
|
|
|
201,604
|
|
Less:
Total current debt
|
|
|
123,165
|
|
|
|
180,150
|
|
Total
non-current debt
|
|
$
|
18,750
|
|
|
$
|
21,454
|
|
(1)
|
The
Second Amendment described below in Note 15 extended the maturity date to March 19, 2021.
|
(2)
|
This
note payable, related to the Irvine Property, has been presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Note payable
related to asset held for sale” and is included as current debt. See Note 5 above for more information regarding the
Irvine Property.
|
The
following table sets forth the maturities of our outstanding debt balance as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
15,769
|
|
|
$
|
2,529
|
|
|
$
|
8,534
|
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
34,519
|
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
|
|
107,396
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
107,396
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
123,165
|
|
|
$
|
2,529
|
|
|
$
|
8,534
|
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
141,915
|
|
Line
of Credit and Related Notes
We
maintain a credit facility, which functions as a working capital line of credit with a borrowing base of inventory and accounts
receivable, including certain credit card receivables, and a portion of the value of certain real estate. On January 19, 2016,
we entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Fourth Amended Loan Agreement”) with
certain lenders and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as administrative and collateral agent (the “Lenders”). On July
7, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to the Fourth Amended Loan Agreement (the “First Amendment”) with the Lenders.
The
terms of our credit facility provide for (i) a Maximum Credit, as defined in the credit facility, of $290,000,000; (ii) a sub-line
of up to C$40,000,000 as the Canadian Maximum Credit ((i) and (ii) collectively the “Revolving Line”); (iii) a Maturity
Date of March 19, 2019; (iv) interest on outstanding balance under the Canadian Maximum Credit based on the Canadian Base Rate
(calculated as the greater of CDOR plus one percentage point and the “prime rate” for Canadian Dollar commercial loans,
as further defined in the Fourth Amended Loan Agreement) or at the election of the Borrowers, based on the CDOR Rate, plus a margin,
depending on average excess availability under the Revolving Line, ranging from 1.50% to 1.75%; and (v) interest on outstanding
balance under the Maximum Credit based on the Eurodollar Rate
plus a margin, depending on average
excess availability under the revolving line, ranging from 1.50% to 1.75%.
The credit facility also includes a monthly
unused line fee of 0.25% per year on the amount, if any, by which the Maximum Credit, then in effect, exceeds the average daily
principal balance of outstanding borrowings during the immediately preceding month.
The
credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. In addition to the security interest required by the credit
facility, certain of our vendors have security interests in some of our assets related to their products. The credit facility
has as its single financial covenant a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (FCCR) requirement in the event an FCCR triggering
event has occurred. An FCCR triggering event is comprised of maintaining certain specified daily and average excess availability
thresholds. In the event the FCCR covenant applies, the fixed charge coverage ratio is 1.0 to 1.0 calculated on a trailing four-quarter
basis as of the end of the last quarter immediately preceding such FCCR triggering event date. At December 31, 2016, we were in
compliance with our financial covenant under the credit facility.
Loan
availability under the line of credit fluctuates daily and is affected by many factors, including eligible assets on-hand, opportunistic
purchases of inventory and availability and our utilization of early-pay discounts. At December 31, 2016, we had $130.2 million
available to borrow for working capital advances under the line of credit.
In
connection with, and as part of, our revolving credit facility, we maintain two sub-lines under our revolving credit facility
secured by the two parcels of real property we own in Santa Monica, California, each with a limit of $9.8 million and $1.7 million,
as provided by the Fourth Amended Loan Agreement. The $9.8 million sub-line has a monthly principal amortization of $129,583 and
the $1.7 million sub-line has a monthly principal amortization of $21,750, both bearing interest at the same rate as our revolving
credit facility.
Also
on July 7, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement with Castle Pines Capital LLC (“Castle Pines”), which provides
for a credit facility (“Channel Finance Facility”) to finance the purchase of inventory from a list of approved vendors.
The aggregate availability under the Channel Finance Facility is variable and discretionary, but has initially been set at $35
million. Each advance under the Channel Finance Facility will be made directly to an approved vendor and must be repaid on the
earlier of (i) the payment due date as set by Castle Pines or (ii) the date (if any) when the inventory is lost, stolen or damaged.
No interest accrues on advances paid on or prior to payment due date. The Channel Finance Facility is secured by a lien on certain
of our assets, subject to an intercreditor arrangement with the Lenders. The Channel Finance Facility has an initial term of one
year, but shall be automatically renewed for one year periods from year to year thereafter unless terminated earlier by either
party within reasonable notice periods.
Other
Notes Payable
In
March 2015, we completed the purchase of real property in Irvine, California for approximately $5.8 million and financed $4.9
million with a long-term note. The loan agreement provides for a seven-year term and a 25 year straight-line, monthly principal
repayment amortization period that began on May 1, 2015 with a balloon payment at maturity in April 2022. The loan is secured
by the real property and contains financial covenants substantially similar to those of our existing asset-based credit facility.
In September 2015, we listed the Irvine Property for sale. See Note 4 above for more information.
In
January 2015, we completed the purchase of certain real property in Lewis Center, Ohio for approximately $6.6 million and financed
$4.575 million with a long-term note. The $4.575 million term note provides for a seven-year term and a 25 year straight-line,
monthly principal repayment amortization period that began in February 2015 with a balloon payment at maturity in January 2022.
The loan is secured by the real property and contains financial covenants substantially similar to those of our existing asset-based
credit facility.
Throughout
2014, we entered into three financing arrangements with a bank to finance the costs of equipment, software and professional services
related to our ERP upgrade. The total amount financed was $5.6 million, with a quarterly repayment schedule maturing in March
2017.
In
December 2012, we completed the purchase of 7.9 acres of land for approximately $1.1 million and have incurred additional costs
of $12.2 million through December 31, 2014 towards the construction of a new cloud data center that we opened in June 2014. In
July 2013, we entered into a loan agreement for up to $7.725 million to finance the build out of the new data center. The loan
agreement provides for a five-year term and a 25 year straight-line, monthly principal repayment amortization period with a balloon
payment at maturity in January 2020. The loan is secured by the real property and contains financial covenants substantially similar
to those of our existing asset-based credit facility.
In
June 2011, we entered into a credit agreement to finance a total of $10.1 million of the acquisition and improvement costs for
the real property we purchased in March 2011 in El Segundo, California. The credit agreement provides for a five-year term and
a 25 year straight-line, monthly principal repayment amortization period with a balloon payment at maturity in September 2016.
In August 2016, we entered into an amendment with the lender extending the term of the loan to November 30, 2017. The loan is
secured by the real property and contains financial covenants substantially similar to those of our existing asset-based credit
facility.
At
December 31, 2016, the effective weighted average annual interest rate on our outstanding amounts under the credit facility, term
note and variable interest rate notes payable was 2.39%.
The
carrying amounts of our line of credit borrowings and notes payable approximate their fair value based upon the current rates
offered to us for obligations of similar terms and remaining maturities.
9.
Income Taxes
“Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations included the following
components for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
23,818
|
|
|
$
|
(30,402
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,533
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
28,708
|
|
|
$
|
(29,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,525
|
|
“Income
tax expense (benefit)” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations consisted of the following for the periods presented
(in thousands):
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
7,008
|
|
|
$
|
(2,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
State
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
Total
— Current
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
(1,816
|
)
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
(8,303
|
)
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
State
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
545
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
Total
— Deferred
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
(9,578
|
)
|
|
|
4,212
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
11,115
|
|
|
$
|
(11,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,490
|
|
We
recorded income tax benefits of $0.2 million and $1.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively,
related to our discontinued operations.
The
provision for income taxes differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to “Income (loss)
from continuing operations before income taxes” due to the effects of the following:
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Expected
taxes at federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State
income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Research
tax credits
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
Non-deductible
business expenses
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Foreign
rate differential
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
The
significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Deferred
tax assets :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Accrued
expenses and reserves
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
3,946
|
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
Tax
credits and loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Total
gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
9,155
|
|
|
|
11,543
|
|
Less:
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
|
|
10,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
(4,638
|
)
|
|
|
(5,102
|
)
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(2,196
|
)
|
|
|
(2,550
|
)
|
Foreign
employment tax subsidy
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(8,996
|
)
|
|
|
(9,912
|
)
|
Net
deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(552
|
)
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
The
table of deferred tax assets does not include certain deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2015 which arose from tax deductions
related to equity compensation which were greater than the compensation recognized for financial reporting. During the tax year
ended December 31, 2016, the deferred tax assets were realized and equity was increased by $0.2 million. We apply ASC 740 ordering
when determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.
The
valuation allowance relates to certain state net operating loss carryforwards and other state deferred tax assets generated by
subsidiaries in a cumulative loss position. The valuation allowance decreased by $0.2 million during the year ended December 31,
2016 primarily due to both utilization of state net operating losses and revaluing of state deferred tax assets.
Current
deferred tax liabilities relating primarily to foreign employment tax subsidy of $0.6 million and $0.6 million at December 31,
2016 and 2015, respectively, included in the table above, were included as part of “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities”
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
At
December 31, 2016, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $0.6 million, which begin to expire at the end of 2024,
and state net operating loss carryforwards of $23.9 million, of which $0.5 million expire between 2017 and 2019, and the remainder
expire between 2020 and 2031. Included in these amounts are $0.6 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and $3.4
million of state net operating loss carryforwards which relate to an acquired subsidiary and are subject to annual limitations
as to their use under IRC Section 382. As such, the extent to which these losses may offset future taxable income may be limited.
At December 31, 2016, we had state research tax credits of $0.7 million, which have no expiration date.
Cumulative
undistributed earnings of our Canadian subsidiaries for which no U.S. income taxes have been provided approximated $12.7 million
at December 31, 2016. Deferred U.S. income taxes on these earnings have not been provided as these amounts are considered to be
permanently reinvested. At the present time, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that may be payable if these
earnings were repatriated.
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
ASC
740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions by subscribing the recognition threshold a tax position is required
to meet before being measured and then recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We elected to classify interest and penalties
related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part of our “Interest expense, net” in our Consolidated Statements
of Operations rather than as a component of income tax expense.
There
were no unrecognized tax benefits during 2014. Activity relating to our unrecognized tax benefits were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Additions
to tax positions
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
Although
it is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease within the next twelve months due to
tax examination changes, settlement activities, expirations of statute of limitations, or the impact on recognition and measurement
considerations related to the results of published tax cases or other similar activities, we do not anticipate any significant
changes to unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, no interest or
penalties were required to be recognized relating to unrecognized tax benefits.
We
are subject to U.S. and foreign income tax examinations for years subsequent to 2012, and state income tax examinations for years
following 2011. However, to the extent allowable by law, the tax authorities may have a right to examine prior periods when net
operating losses or tax credits were generated and carried forward for subsequent utilization, and make adjustments up to the
amount of the net operating losses or credit carryforwards.
10.
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
We
lease office and warehouse space and equipment under various non-cancelable operating leases which provide for minimum annual
rentals and escalations based on increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses. We also have minimum commitments
under non-cancelable contracts for services relating to telecommunications, IT maintenance, financial services and employment
contracts with certain employees (which consist of severance arrangements that, if exercised, would become payable in less than
one year). In addition, we have obligations under capital leases for computers and related equipment, telecommunications equipment
and software.
As
of December 31, 2016, minimum payments over the terms of applicable contracts were payable as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,843
|
|
|
$
|
4,523
|
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
3,260
|
|
|
$
|
63,042
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
85,194
|
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
Other
commitments (1)(2)
|
|
|
13,044
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,905
|
|
Total
minimum payments
|
|
$
|
20,142
|
|
|
$
|
6,458
|
|
|
$
|
5,293
|
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
63,042
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
103,054
|
|
(1)
|
Other
commitments consist of minimum commitments under non-cancelable contracts for services relating to telecommunications, IT
maintenance, financial services and employment contracts with certain employees (which consist of severance arrangements that,
if exercised, would become payable in less than one year).
|
(2)
|
We
had $12.9 million of standby letters of credits (LOCs) under which there were no minimum payment requirements at December
31, 2016. LOCs are commitments issued to third party beneficiaries, underwritten by a third party bank, representing funding
responsibility in the event of third party demands or contingent events. The outstanding balance of our standby LOCs reduces
the amount available to us from our revolving credit facility. There were no claims made against any standby LOCs during the
year ended December 31, 2016.
|
For
the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, total rent expense, net of sublease income, totaled $5.8 million, $4.2 million
and $4.6 million, respectively. Some of the leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses, and require us to pay taxes,
insurance and maintenance costs.
Legal
Proceedings
From
time to time, we receive claims of and become subject to consumer protection, employment, intellectual property and other litigation
related to the conduct of our business. Any such litigation could result in a material amount of legal or related expenses and
be time consuming and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. In connection with any such
litigation, we may be subject to significant damages or equitable remedies relating to the operation of our business. Any such
litigation may materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
On
December 5, 2016, Collab9, Inc. (formerly, En Pointe Technologies Sales, Inc.) filed an action against PCM, Inc. and its subsidiary,
En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC, in the Superior Court of Delaware in New Castle County, Delaware. The action arises out of
a March 12, 2015 Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) pursuant to which the Company acquired assets of Collab9’s
information technology solutions business. Collab9’s complaint alleges that the Company breached the APA by failing to pay
Collab9 the full amount of the periodic “earn-out” payments to which Collab9 is entitled under the APA. The complaint
also alleges that the Company breached an obligation to cooperate with Collab9’s evaluation of its claim for breach of the
APA’s earn-out provisions. The complaint does not specify the amount of damages Collab9 is seeking, but asserts that the
amount of underpayment is “millions of dollars.” On February 8, 2017, the Company filed an answer to Collab9’s
complaint in which the Company denied that it breached the APA and asserted that there is no merit in Collab9’s claim. The
court has not yet established a schedule for pretrial proceedings or for trial on the merits of Collab9’s claim. The Company
believes the claims are speculative and wholly without merit, and intends to vigorously defend the claims. However, the outcome
of this matter is uncertain and, as a result, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss that could result
in the event of an unfavorable outcome. Accordingly, no amounts have been accrued for any liability that may result from the resolution
of this matter.
The
Company is currently assessing a number of counterclaims related to this lawsuit which include, without limitation, claims that
sellers in the transaction intentionally breached representations and warranties in the APA. The counterclaims being assessed
also include potential claims that sellers received, failed to disclose to the Company and retained after the closing certain
vendor payments which are the property of the Company under the APA. At this time, the outcome of this matter is uncertain.
On
January 13, 2017, Collab9 also filed an action against PCM, Inc. and its subsidiary, En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC, in the
Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The complaint alleges that, in connection with the Company’s
processing of transactions with certain customers whose contracts the Company purchased the rights to under the APA following
the closing of the APA, the Company, without authorization, accessed and altered electronically stored data of which Collab9 claims
to have retained ownership. It further alleges that, although Collab9 authorized the Company to access the data in question during
a post-closing transition period, the Company continued to access and alter the data Collab9 claims to own after an alleged termination
of such authorization, and, in so doing, violated California’s Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. The Company believes
the claims are wholly without merit, and intends to vigorously defend the claims. On February 21, 2017, the Company moved to dismiss
the case on the ground that the APA governs this dispute and contains a provision designating New Castle County, Delaware as the
exclusive forum in which claims arising out of or relating to the APA may be brought. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for
July 14, 2017. No other pretrial activities have been conducted or scheduled. However, the outcome of this matter is uncertain
and, as a result, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss that could result in the event of an unfavorable
outcome. Accordingly, no amounts have been accrued for any liability that may result from the resolution of this matter.
11.
Stockholders’ Equity
We
have a board approved discretionary stock repurchase program under which shares may be repurchased from time to time at prevailing
market prices, through open market or unsolicited negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions. Our Board of Directors
originally adopted the plan in October 2008 with an initial authorized maximum of $10 million. The plan was amended in September
2012 and increased to $20 million, and again amended in April 2015 and increased to a total of $30 million. Under the program,
the shares may be repurchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or unsolicited negotiated transactions,
depending on market conditions. We expect that the repurchase of our common stock under the program will be financed with existing
working capital and amounts available under our existing credit facility. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock. No
limit was placed on the duration of the repurchase program. There is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that we will
repurchase. Subject to applicable securities laws, repurchases may be made at such times and in such amounts as our management
deems appropriate. The program can also be discontinued at any time management feels additional purchases are not warranted.
We
repurchased a total of 405,698 shares of our common stock under this program during the year ended December 31, 2016 for a total
cost of approximately $3.5 million. From the inception of the program in October 2008 through December 31, 2016, we have repurchased
an aggregate of 4,081,687 shares of our common stock for a total cost of $25.9 million. At December 31, 2016, we had $4.1 million
available in stock repurchases under the program, subject to any limitations that may apply from time to time under our existing
credit facility.
We
have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and our credit facility prohibits us from paying any cash dividends on our
capital stock. Therefore, we do not currently anticipate paying dividends; we intend to retain any earnings to finance the growth
and development of our business.
12.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic
earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the reported periods. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur under the treasury
stock method if stock options and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised, except in loss periods where the effect
would be antidilutive. Potential common shares of approximately 279,000 and 562,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2014 have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. For the
year ended December 31, 2015, since we reported a loss from continuing operations, all potential shares totaling 553,000 were
excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as their inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the year ended December 31,
2015, had we reported income from continuing operations, approximately 466,000 common shares would have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted EPS because the effect of their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the basic and diluted EPS computation was as follows for income from continuing operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Income
From
Continuing
Operations
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Number of
Common Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
Share
Amounts
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
17,593
|
|
|
|
11,847
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
effect of stock-based awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
17,593
|
|
|
|
12,528
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(17,948
|
)
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
$
|
(1.49
|
)
|
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
effect of stock-based awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(17,948
|
)
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
|
$
|
(1.49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
12,251
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
effect of stock-based awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
12,881
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
13.
Employee & Non-Employee Benefits
401(k)
Savings Plan
We
maintain a 401(k) Savings Plan which covers substantially all full-time employees who meet the plan’s eligibility requirements.
Participants are allowed to make tax-deferred contributions up to limitations specified by the Internal Revenue Code. We make
25% matching contributions for amounts that do not exceed 4% of the participants’ compensation. The matched contributions
to the employees are subject to a five-year vesting provision, with credit given towards vesting for employment during prior years.
We made matching contributions to the plan totaling approximately $803,000, $661,900 and $545,000 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Stock
Options and Restricted Stock Units Issued to Non-Employees
On
May 20, 2016, our Compensation Committee approved and granted, under our 2012 Plan, the award of options to purchase 12,750 shares
of our common stock to each of our non-employee members of our board for a total of 38,250 shares. These options were issued at
an exercise price of $10.05 with a seven-year term and vest quarterly in equal amounts over a two-year term.
On
each of May 20, 2015 and 2014, our Compensation Committee approved and granted, under our 2012 Plan, the award of 6,000 shares
of restricted stock units to each of our three non-employee members of the board for a total award of 36,000 restricted stock
units. The restricted stock units each vest annually in equal amounts over a two-year period from the respective dates of grant.
See Note 4 for more information on our accounting for stock-based compensation.
14.
Segment Information
Our
three reportable operating segments - Commercial, Public Sector and Canada - are primarily aligned based upon their respective
customer base. We include corporate related expenses such as legal, accounting, information technology, product management and
certain other administrative costs that are not otherwise included in our reportable operating segments in Corporate & Other.
We allocate our resources to and evaluate the performance of our segments based on operating income. For more information on our
reportable operating segments, see Note 1 above.
Summarized
segment information for our continuing operations is as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Public
Sector
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Corporate
&
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,746,530
|
|
|
$
|
353,497
|
|
|
$
|
150,643
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,250,587
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
259,102
|
|
|
|
35,946
|
|
|
|
23,838
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
318,801
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense(1)
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
6,811
|
|
|
|
15,784
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
81,220
|
|
|
|
14,163
|
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
(64,586
|
)
|
|
|
34,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,365,384
|
|
|
$
|
279,603
|
|
|
$
|
16,987
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,661,948
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
194,214
|
|
|
|
26,914
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
224,327
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense(1)
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
12,217
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
58,479
|
|
|
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
(95,572
|
)
|
|
|
(25,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,141,661
|
|
|
$
|
214,723
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,356,362
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
170,988
|
|
|
|
21,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
192,067
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense(1)
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,070
|
|
|
|
10,647
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
59,319
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(51,963
|
)
|
|
|
15,705
|
|
(1)
|
Primary
fixed assets relating to network and servers are managed by the Corporate headquarters. As such, depreciation expense relating
to such assets is included as part of Corporate & Other.
|
As
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had total consolidated assets of $633.0 million and $600.2 million. Our management does not
have available to them and does not use total assets measured at the segment level in allocating resources. Therefore, such information
relating to segment assets is not provided herein.
Sales
of our products and services are made to customers primarily within the U.S and Canada and other foreign countries. During the
year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 6% of our gross billed sales were made to customers outside of the continental U.S.
During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, less than 1% of our gross billed sales were made to customers outside of the
continental U.S. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our gross billed sales in each of the years ended December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Our
property and equipment, net, were located in the following countries as of the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
Location:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
54,784
|
|
|
$
|
55,338
|
|
|
$
|
73,784
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
56,352
|
|
|
$
|
56,774
|
|
|
$
|
74,368
|
|
15.
Subsequent Event
On
February 24, 2017, we and certain of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “US Borrowers”) and
certain of our Canadian subsidiaries (collectively, the “Canadian Borrowers”) entered into a Second Amendment to Fourth
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) with certain lenders named therein (the
“Lenders”) and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as administrative and collateral agent for the Lenders.
The
Second Amendment provides for, among other things: (i) an increase in the Maximum Credit, as defined in the Fourth Amended Agreement,
from $290,000,000 to $345,000,000; (ii) the addition of a sub-limit for Eligible Illinois Real Estate, as defined in the agreement
for $2,205,000, reduced monthly beginning on March 1, 2017 by $26,250; (iii) the addition of a sub-limit for Eligible Santa Monica
Real Estate, as defined in the agreement, replacing the previously provided sub-limits for both the Eligible Real Estate and Eligible
Adjacent Real Estate, as defined in the agreement, for $12,523,000, reduced monthly beginning on March 1, 2017 by $149,083.33
and (iv) an extension of the Maturity Date from March 19, 2019 to March 19, 2021.
16.
Supplementary Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The
following tables summarize supplementary quarterly financial information (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
1
st
Quarter
|
|
|
2
nd
Quarter
|
|
|
3
rd
Quarter
|
|
|
4
th
Quarter
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
498,029
|
|
|
$
|
580,994
|
|
|
$
|
584,937
|
|
|
$
|
586,627
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
70,307
|
|
|
|
82,999
|
|
|
|
82,655
|
|
|
|
82,840
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
7,406
|
|
|
$
|
5,321
|
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
7,406
|
|
|
$
|
5,321
|
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
2015
(1)
|
|
|
|
1
st
Quarter (1)
|
|
|
2
nd
Quarter (1)
|
|
|
3
rd
Quarter (1)
|
|
|
4
th
Quarter
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
295,959
|
|
|
$
|
478,871
|
|
|
$
|
404,933
|
|
|
$
|
482,185
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
39,105
|
|
|
|
61,966
|
|
|
|
60,143
|
|
|
|
63,113
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(3,524
|
)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(483
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,116
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,555
|
)
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
(785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,167
|
)
|
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(1.21
|
)
|
(1)
|
All
amounts reported herein have been recast to present all four of our retail stores and our OnSale and eCost businesses as discontinued
operations.
|