Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
A. Description of Business
CDK Global, Inc. (the "Company" or "CDK") is a leading global provider of integrated information technology and digital marketing solutions to the automotive retail and adjacent industries. The Company’s solutions automate and integrate all parts of the buying process from targeted digital advertising and marketing campaigns to the sale, financing, insuring, parts supply, repair, and maintenance of vehicles.
Effective July 1, 2016, the Company executed a comprehensive reorganization to streamline its organization that will enable it to deliver an improved customer experience, create significant efficiencies, and better align it to implement the ongoing business transformation plan discussed further in Note 3. The Company reorganized into two main operating groups. In connection with this reorganization, our operating segments have changed. The Company's first operating group is CDK North America which is comprised of two reportable segments, Retail Solutions North America, and Advertising North America. The second operating group, which is also a reportable segment, is CDK International. In addition, the Company has an Other segment, the primary components of which are corporate allocations and other expenses not recorded in the segment results. Refer to Note 13 for further information.
B. Basis of Preparation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses that are reported in the accompanying financial statements and footnotes thereto. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of financial results for a full year. The financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2016
.
C. Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
. The Company recognizes software revenues in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985-605, “Software - Revenue Recognition,” and non-software related revenue, including Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”), in accordance with ASC 605, "Revenue Recognition" ("ASC 605").
The Company generates revenues from four categories: subscription, digital advertising, transactional services, and other. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis; that is, such taxes are excluded from revenues.
Subscription
.
In the Retail Solutions North America (“RSNA”) and CDK International (“CDKI”) segments, CDK provides software and technology solutions for automotive retailers and OEMs, which includes:
|
|
•
|
Dealer Management Systems (“DMSs”) and layered applications, where the software may be installed onsite at the customer’s location, or hosted and provided on a SaaS basis, including ongoing maintenance and support;
|
|
|
•
|
Interrelated services such as installation, initial training, and data updates;
|
|
|
•
|
Websites, search marketing, and reputation management services (RSNA only); and
|
|
|
•
|
Hardware on a service basis, meaning no specific assets are identified or a substantive right of substitution exists.
|
Revenues for term licenses are recognized ratably over the software license term, as vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair values of the individual elements in the sales arrangement does not exist. Revenue recognition commences at the installation dates, when customer acceptance has occurred, and collectability of a determinable amount is probable. In the case of hosted applications, the customer does not have the contractual right to take possession of the software and the items delivered at the outset of the contract (e.g., installation, training, etc.) do not have value to the customer without the software license and ongoing support and maintenance. Any upfront fees charged in the case of hosted arrangements are recognized
ratably over the expected benefit period of the arrangement, typically five years. The unrecognized portion of these revenue elements is recorded as deferred revenue.
Advertising services.
In the Advertising North America (“ANA”) segment, the Company receives revenues from the placement of internet advertising for automotive retailers and OEMs. Advertising revenues are recognized when the services are rendered.
Transaction revenues
. In the RSNA segment, the Company receives fees per transaction for providing auto retailers interfaces with third parties to process credit reports, vehicle registrations, and automotive equity mining. Revenue is recognized at the time the services are rendered. Transaction revenues are recorded in revenues gross of costs incurred for credit report processing, vehicle registrations, and automotive equity mining as the Company is contractually responsible for providing the service, software, and/or connectivity to the customers, and therefore, the Company is the primary obligor under ASC 605.
Other
. The Company provides consulting and professional services and sells hardware such as laser printers, networking and telephony equipment, and related items. These revenues are recognized upon their delivery or service completion.
Deferred Costs.
Costs to deliver services are expensed to cost of revenues as incurred with the exception of specific costs directly related to transition or installation activities, including payroll-related costs for the Company's implementation and training teams, as well as commission costs for the sale. These costs are deferred and expensed proportionately over the same period that the deferred revenues are recognized as revenues. Deferred amounts are monitored regularly to ensure appropriate asset and expense recognition. Current deferred costs classified within other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets were
$102.2 million
and
$104.0 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively. Long-term deferred costs classified within other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets were
$132.1 million
and
$135.5 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively.
Goodwill.
The Company tests for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or a component of an operating segment. In July 2016, the Company revised its reportable segments and reporting units because of the changes to the way in which the chief operating decision maker regularly reviews information for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Due to the change in organization structure, the Company expanded its reporting units from three to five.
The Company tests impairment by first comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the carrying value for a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company then compares the implied fair value of the Company's goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.
The Company estimates the fair value of the Company's reporting units by weighting the results from the income approach, which is the present value of expected cash flows discounted at a risk-adjusted weighted-average cost of capital, and the market approach, which uses market multiples of companies in similar lines of business. These valuation approaches require significant judgment and consider a number of factors including assumptions about the future growth and profitability of the Company's reporting units, the determination of appropriate comparable publicly traded companies in the Company's industry, discount rates, and terminal growth rates.
Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.
The Company's policy provides for the capitalization of certain costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. The Company's policy provides for the capitalization of all software production costs upon reaching technological feasibility for a specific product. Technological feasibility is attained when software products have a completed working model whose consistency with the overall product design has been confirmed by testing. Costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are expensed as incurred. The establishment of technological feasibility requires judgment by management and in many instances is only attained a short time prior to the general release of the software. Maintenance-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Pursuant to this policy, the Company recognized expenses of
$38.7 million
and
$39.5 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. These expenses were classified within cost of revenues on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation.
Certain of the Company's employees (a) have been granted stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and (b) have been granted restricted stock or restricted stock units under which shares of the Company's common stock vest based on the passage of time or achievement of performance and market conditions.
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in net earnings based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant. The Company determines the fair value of stock options issued using a binomial option-pricing model. The binomial option-pricing model considers a range of assumptions related to volatility, dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the binomial option pricing model are based on a combination of implied market volatilities and historical volatilities of peer companies. Similarly, the dividend yield is based on historical experience and expected future dividend payments. The risk-free rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The binomial option pricing model also incorporates exercise based on an analysis of historical data. The expected life of a stock option grant is derived from the output of the binomial model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
The grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units that vest upon achievement of service conditions is based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company also grants performance-based awards that vest over a performance period. Certain performance-based awards are further subject to adjustment (increase or decrease) based on a market condition defined as total shareholder return of the Company’s common stock compared to a peer group of companies. The fair value of performance-based awards subject to a market condition is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The principal variable assumptions utilized in determining the grant date fair value of performance-based awards subject to a market condition include the risk-free rate, stock volatility, dividend yield, and correlations between the Company's stock price and the stock prices of the peer group of companies.
Upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" the Company no longer estimates its forfeiture rate in order to record stock compensation expense. The Company now records the impact of forfeitures on stock compensation expense in the period the forfeitures occur.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with accounting standards pertaining to fair value measurements. Such standards define fair value and establish a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP. Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, and other current liabilities are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company's term loan facilities (as described in Note 6), including accrued interest, approximates fair value based on the Company's current estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of arrangements. The approximate aggregate fair value of the Company's senior notes as of
September 30, 2016
was
$754.9 million
based on quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments and the carrying value was
$750.0 million
. The term loan facilities and senior notes are considered Level 2 fair value measurements in the fair value hierarchy.
D. Spin-off
On
April 9, 2014
, the board of directors of Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (“ADP”) approved the spin-off of the Dealer Services business of ADP. On
September 30, 2014
, the spin-off became effective and ADP distributed
100%
of the Company's common stock to the holders of record of ADP's common stock as of
September 24, 2014
(the "spin-off").
Concurrent with the spin-off, the Company and ADP entered into several agreements providing for transition services and governing relationships between the Company and ADP. Refer to Notes 8 and 12 for further information.
E. Spin-off Common Stock Issued
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company became aware that
1.0 million
shares of common stock were inadvertently issued and distributed to ADP at the spin-off with respect to certain unvested ADP equity awards. The Company previously reported that
160.6 million
shares were issued in connection with the spin-off, which was overstated by
1.0 million
shares. In addition, dividends paid to stockholders in
fiscal 2016
were overstated by
$0.4 million
. The Company assessed the materiality and concluded that the impact was not material to previously reported results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company and ADP took corrective action to cancel the
1.0 million
shares of common stock effective as of September 30, 2014 and the Company recovered the
$0.4 million
of cumulative dividends paid on such shares, thereby increasing the Company's retained earnings. The effects of these adjustments were reflected in the accompanying financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2015.
Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting." ASU 2016-09 includes provisions to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, accounting for forfeitures, classification of awards as either equity or liability, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 includes a requirement that the tax effect related to the settlement of share-based awards be recorded within income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The simplification of income tax accounting for share-based payment transactions also impacts the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to adopt ASU 2016-09 during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and the impact of the adoption resulted in the following:
|
|
•
|
The Company elected to account for forfeitures of stock-based compensation awards when they occur. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
|
|
|
•
|
The Company recorded a tax benefit of
$5.7 million
within provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2016, related to excess tax benefits on stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. Prior to adoption, the tax effect of share-based awards would have been recognized in additional paid-in capital. This change will result in increased volatility in the Company's effective tax rate.
|
|
|
•
|
In addition, ASU 2016-09 modifies the classification of certain share-based payment activities within the statements of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-09, excess tax benefits from share-based arrangements are classified within cash flow from operations, rather than as cash flow from financing activities. The Company applied this provision on a prospective basis and the prior period statement of cash flows was not adjusted.
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)." ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted ASU 2014-12 during the three months ended September 30, 2016. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230).” ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues where there is diversity in practice in how these certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 will not have a material impact on the Company's statement of consolidated cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." ASU 2016-02 requires that lessees recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for any lease classified as either a finance or operating lease that is not considered short-term. The accounting applied by lessors is largely consistent with the existing lease standard. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has obligations under lease agreements for facilities and equipment, which are classified as operating leases under the existing lease standard. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on the consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, the Company's financial statements will reflect an increase in both assets and liabilities due to the requirement to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets for its facility and equipment leases.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue depicting the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will also result in enhanced revenue related
disclosures. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). In July 2015, the FASB decided to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and subsequently issued ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date." As a result, this standard, and subsequent amendments thereto, will be effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. While the Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, the Company has concluded that it will adopt this standard on a modified retrospective basis, which results in a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings when the standard is adopted on July 1, 2018.
Note 3. Restructuring
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company initiated a
three
-year business transformation plan intended to increase operating efficiency and improve the Company's cost structure within its global operations. The business transformation plan is expected to produce significant benefits in the Company’s long-term business performance.
Restructuring expenses associated with the business transformation plan included employee-related costs, which represent severance and other termination-related benefits calculated based on long-standing benefit practices and local statutory requirements, and contract termination costs. The Company currently estimates total restructuring expenses under the business transformation plan of approximately
$55.0 million
through fiscal 2018. The Company will continue to evaluate its estimate of total restructuring expenses as it executes the business transformation plan. The Company recognized
$1.1 million
and
$1.9 million
of restructuring expenses for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Since the inception of the business transformation plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company has recognized cumulative restructuring expenses of
$23.7 million
. Restructuring expenses are presented separately on the consolidated statements of operations. Restructuring expenses are recorded in the Other segment, as these initiatives are predominantly centrally directed and are not included in internal measures of segment operating performance.
Accruals for restructuring expenses were included within accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
. The following table summarizes the activity for the restructuring accrual for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee-Related Costs
|
|
Contract Termination Costs
|
|
Total Costs
|
Balance as of June 30, 2016
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
Charges
|
1.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Cash payments
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Balance as of September 30, 2016
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
Note 4. Earnings per Share
The numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings attributable to CDK. The denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted-average number of shares of the Company's common stock outstanding during the reporting periods. Diluted earnings per share also reflects the dilutive effect of unexercised in-the-money stock options and unvested restricted stock.
Holders of certain stock-based compensation awards are eligible to receive dividends as described in Note 7. Net earnings allocated to participating securities were not significant for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
.
The following table summarizes the components of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net earnings attributable to CDK
|
$
|
76.9
|
|
|
$
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
150.2
|
|
|
159.2
|
|
Effect of employee stock options
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Effect of employee restricted stock
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Diluted
|
151.7
|
|
|
160.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings attributable to CDK per share
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Diluted earnings attributable to CDK per share
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
The weighted-average number of shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share does not include the effect of the following anti-dilutive securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Stock-based awards
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Note 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
In July 2016, the Company revised its reportable segments and reporting units because of the changes to the way in which the chief operating decision maker regularly reviews information for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Due to the change in organization structure, the Company expanded its reporting units from three to five. As a result, goodwill was reallocated to the new reporting units using a relative fair value approach. The indicated fair values substantially exceeded the carrying values of all reporting units. Goodwill has been restated to reflect the reallocation of goodwill based on the current reportable segments. Refer to Note 13 for further information.
Changes in goodwill for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions North America
|
|
Advertising North America
|
|
CDK International
|
|
Total
|
Balance as of June 30, 2016
|
$
|
604.7
|
|
|
$
|
214.3
|
|
|
$
|
363.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,182.7
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Balance as of September 30, 2016
|
$
|
604.3
|
|
|
$
|
214.3
|
|
|
$
|
360.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,179.3
|
|
Components of intangible assets, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
Original Cost
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
|
Original Cost
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
Customer lists
|
$
|
175.5
|
|
|
$
|
(120.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
54.7
|
|
|
$
|
175.5
|
|
|
$
|
(117.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
58.0
|
|
Software
|
144.5
|
|
|
(100.4
|
)
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
141.0
|
|
|
(96.1
|
)
|
|
44.9
|
|
Trademarks
|
25.0
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
|
1.5
|
|
Other intangibles
|
6.5
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
351.5
|
|
|
$
|
(247.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
103.8
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
$
|
(239.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
107.8
|
|
Other intangibles consist primarily of purchased rights, covenants, and patents (acquired directly or through acquisitions). All of the intangible assets have finite lives and, as such, are subject to amortization. The weighted-average remaining useful life of intangible assets is
6 years
(
7 years
for customer lists,
4 years
for software and software licenses, and
3 years
for trademarks). Amortization of intangible assets was
$7.7 million
and
$6.5 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Estimated amortization expenses of the Company's existing intangible assets as of
September 30, 2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
Nine months ending June 30, 2017
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30, 2018
|
25.6
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30, 2019
|
15.5
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30, 2020
|
9.9
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30, 2021
|
9.7
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30, 2022
|
7.5
|
|
Thereafter
|
12.7
|
|
|
$
|
103.8
|
|
Note 6. Debt
Debt was comprised of the following as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
Revolving credit facility
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2019 term loan facility
|
225.0
|
|
|
228.1
|
|
2020 term loan facility
|
240.6
|
|
|
243.8
|
|
3.30% senior notes, due 2019
|
250.0
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
4.50% senior notes, due 2024
|
500.0
|
|
|
500.0
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
3.2
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Unamortized debt financing costs
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
1,210.9
|
|
|
1,217.1
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
26.8
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
$
|
1,184.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,190.3
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a
five
-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which was undrawn as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
.
The revolving credit facility provides up to
$300.0 million
of borrowing capacity and includes a sub-limit of up to
$100.0 million
for loans in Euro and Sterling. In addition, the revolving credit facility contains an accordion feature that allows for an increase in the available borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility of up to
$100.0 million
, subject to the agreement of lenders under the revolving credit facility or other financial institutions that become lenders to extend commitments as part of the increased revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are available for general corporate purposes. The revolving credit facility will mature on
September 30, 2019
, subject to no more than
two
one
-year extensions if lenders holding a majority of the revolving commitments approve such extensions.
The revolving credit facility is unsecured and loans thereunder bear interest, at the Company's option, at (a) the rate at which deposits in the applicable currency are offered in the London interbank market (or, in the case of borrowings in Euro, the European interbank market) plus margins varying from
1.125%
to
2.000%
per annum based on the Company's senior, unsecured non-credit-enhanced, long-term debt ratings from Standard & Poor's Ratings Group and Moody's Investors Services Inc. (the "Ratings") or (b) solely in the case of U.S. dollar loans, (i) the highest of (A) the
prime rate
of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (B) a rate equal to the average of the overnight
federal funds rate
with a maturity of one day plus a margin of
0.500%
per annum and (C) the rate at which dollar deposits are offered in the London interbank market for a one-month interest period plus
1.000%
plus (ii) margins varying from
0.125%
to
1.000%
per annum based on the Ratings. The unused portion of the revolving credit facility is subject to commitment fees ranging from
0.125%
to
0.350%
per annum based on the Ratings.
Term Loan Facilities
The Company has
two
five
-year
$250.0 million
senior unsecured term loan facilities that mature on
September 16, 2019
(the "2019 term loan facility") and
December 14, 2020
(the "2020 term loan facility"), respectively. Borrowings under the 2020 term loan facility were used for general corporate purposes, which included the repurchase of shares of the Company's common stock in the open market and pursuant to the accelerated share repurchase agreement ("December 2015 ASR") discussed further in Note 11. The 2019 term loan facility and 2020 term loan facility are together referred to as the "term loan facilities." The term loan facilities are both subject to amortization in equal quarterly installments of
1.25%
of the aggregate principal amount of the term loans made on the respective closing dates, with any unpaid principal amount to be due and payable on the maturity date.
The term loan facilities bear interest at the same calculations as are applicable to dollar loans under the revolving credit facility. The interest rate per annum on the term loan facilities was
2.03%
as of
September 30, 2016
and
1.97%
as of
June 30, 2016
.
Restrictive Covenants and Other Matters
The revolving credit facility and the term loan facilities are together referred to as the "credit facilities." The credit facilities contain various covenants and restrictive provisions that limit the Company's subsidiaries' ability to incur additional indebtedness; the Company's ability to consolidate or merge with other entities; and the Company's subsidiaries' ability to incur liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and enter into agreements restricting the ability of the Company's subsidiaries to pay dividends. If the Company fails to perform the obligations under these and other covenants, the credit facilities could be terminated and any outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest, under the credit facilities could be declared immediately due and payable. The credit facilities also have, in addition to customary events of default, an event of default triggered by the acceleration of the maturity of any other indebtedness the Company may have in an aggregate principal amount in excess of
$75.0 million
.
The credit facilities also contain financial covenants that provide that (i) the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA shall not exceed
3.50
to
1.00
and (ii) the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense shall be a minimum of
3.00
to
1.00
.
Senior Notes
On
October 14, 2014
, the Company completed an offering of
3.30%
senior notes with a
$250.0 million
aggregate principal amount due in 2019 (the "2019 notes") and
4.50%
senior notes with a
$500.0 million
aggregate principal amount due in 2024 (the "2024 notes" and together with the 2019 notes, the "senior notes"). The issuance price of the senior notes was equal to the stated value. Interest is payable semi-annually on
April 15
and
October 15
of each year, and payment commenced on
April 15, 2015
. The interest rate payable on each applicable series of senior notes is subject to adjustment from time to time
if the credit ratings assigned to any series of senior notes by the rating agencies is downgraded (or subsequently upgraded). The 2019 notes will mature on
October 15, 2019
, and the 2024 notes will mature on
October 15, 2024
. The senior notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company and are not guaranteed by any of the Company's subsidiaries.
The senior notes rank equally in right of payment with the Company's existing and future unsecured unsubordinated obligations, including the credit facilities. The senior notes contain covenants restricting the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness secured by liens, engage in sale/leaseback transactions, and merge, consolidate, or transfer all or substantially all of the Company's assets.
The senior notes are redeemable at the Company's option prior to September 15, 2019 for the 2019 notes and prior to July 15, 2024 for the 2024 notes at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i)
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes to be redeemed, and (ii) the sum of the present value of the remaining scheduled payments (as defined in the agreement), plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon. Subsequent to September 15, 2019 and July 15, 2024, the redemption price for the 2019 notes and the 2024 notes, respectively, will equal
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The senior notes are also subject to a change of control provision whereby each holder of the senior notes has the right to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of such holder's senior notes at a purchase price equal to
101%
of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest upon the occurrence of both a change of control and a decline in the rating of the senior notes.
Capital Lease Obligations
The Company has lease agreements for equipment, which are classified as capital lease obligations. The Company recognized the capital lease obligations and related leased equipment assets based on the present value of the minimum lease payments at lease inception.
Unamortized Debt Financing Costs
As of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, gross debt issuance costs related to debt instruments were
$11.1 million
for both periods presented. Accumulated amortization was
$3.2 million
and
$2.7 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively. Debt financing costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments to interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company's aggregate scheduled maturities of the long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of
September 30, 2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
Twelve months ending September 30, 2017
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
Twelve months ending September 30, 2018
|
26.4
|
|
Twelve months ending September 30, 2019
|
212.5
|
|
Twelve months ending September 30, 2020
|
262.5
|
|
Twelve months ending September 30, 2021
|
190.6
|
|
Thereafter
|
500.0
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
1,218.8
|
|
Unamortized debt financing costs
|
(7.9
|
)
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations, net of unamortized deferred financing costs
|
$
|
1,210.9
|
|
Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation
Incentive Equity Awards Granted by the Company
The 2014 Omnibus Award Plan ("2014 Plan") provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards, and performance compensation awards to employees, directors, officers, consultants, and advisors, and those of the Company's affiliates. The 2014 Plan provides for an aggregate of
12.0 million
shares of the Company's common stock to be reserved for issuance and is
effective for a period of
ten years
. In fiscal 2016, the Company began reissuing treasury stock to satisfy issuances of common stock upon option exercise or vesting.
Prior to the spin-off, all employee equity awards (stock options and restricted stock) were granted by ADP. All subsequent awards, including all incentive equity awards converted from ADP awards, were granted under the 2014 Plan. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense associated with employee equity awards in net earnings based on the fair value of the awards on the date of grant. Effective July 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09. Upon adoption, the Company made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than apply an estimated forfeiture rate. See Note 2 for additional details regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-09. Stock-based compensation primarily consisted of the following for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
:
Stock Options.
Stock options are granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Stock options are issued under a graded vesting schedule and generally have a term of
ten years
. Compensation expense is measured based on the fair value of the stock option on the grant date and recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the stock option award.
Time-Based Restricted Stock and Time-Based Restricted Stock Units.
Time-based restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest over a
two
to
five
-year period.
Time-based restricted stock cannot be transferred during the vesting period. Compensation expense related to the issuance of time-based restricted stock is measured based on the fair value of the award on the grant date and recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Employees are eligible to receive dividends on the CDK shares awarded under the time-based restricted stock program.
Time-based restricted stock units are primarily settled in cash, but may also be settled in stock. Compensation expense related to the issuance of time-based restricted stock units is recorded over the vesting period and is initially based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. Cash-settled, time-based restricted stock units are subsequently remeasured at each reporting date during the vesting period to the current stock value. No dividend equivalents are paid on units awarded under the time-based restricted stock unit program during the restricted period.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units.
Performance-based restricted stock units generally vest over a
three
-year performance period. In the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, an additional one-time grant of performance restricted stock was made which will vest at the end of fiscal year June 30, 2020. Under these programs, the Company communicates "target awards" at the beginning of the performance period with possible payouts at the end of the performance period ranging from
0%
to
250%
of the "target awards" plus any dividend equivalents, as described below. Certain performance-based restricted stock units are further subject to adjustment (increase or decrease) based on a market condition defined as the total shareholder return of the Company's common stock compared to a peer group of companies.
Performance-based restricted stock units are settled in either cash or stock, depending on the employee’s home country, and cannot be transferred during the vesting period. Compensation expense related to the issuance of performance-based restricted stock units settled in cash is recorded over the vesting period, is initially based on the fair value of the award on the grant date, and is subsequently remeasured at each reporting date to the current stock value during the performance period, based upon the probability that the performance target will be met. Compensation expense related to the issuance of performance-based restricted stock units settled in stock is recorded over the vesting period based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. Prior to settlement, dividend equivalents are earned on "target awards" under the performance-based restricted stock unit program.
The following table represents stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefits for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Cost of revenues
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
8.5
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
consisted of
$8.2 million
of expense related to equity classified awards and
$1.6 million
of expense related to liability classified awards. As of
September 30, 2016
, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock awards was
$5.9 million
,
$46.5 million
, and
$22.2 million
, respectively, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service periods of
2.5 years
,
2.2 years
, and
1.9 years
, respectively.
The activity related to the Company's incentive equity awards from
June 30, 2016
to
September 30, 2016
consisted of the following:
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Options
(in thousands)
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
(in dollars)
|
Options outstanding as of June 30, 2016
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
27.64
|
|
Options granted
|
397
|
|
|
58.75
|
|
Options exercised
|
(53
|
)
|
|
22.29
|
|
Options canceled
|
(4
|
)
|
|
31.96
|
|
Options outstanding as of September 30, 2016
|
1,934
|
|
|
$
|
34.17
|
|
Time-Based Restricted Stock and Time-Based Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
(in thousands)
|
|
Number of Units
(in thousands)
|
Non-vested restricted units/shares as of June 30, 2016
|
616
|
|
|
271
|
|
Restricted shares/units granted
|
284
|
|
|
70
|
|
Restricted shares/units vested
|
(370
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Restricted shares/units forfeited
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Non-vested restricted units/shares as of September 30, 2016
|
512
|
|
|
242
|
|
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units
(in thousands)
|
Non-vested restricted units as of June 30, 2016
|
476
|
|
Restricted units granted
|
392
|
|
Dividend equivalents
|
2
|
|
Restricted units forfeited
|
(6
|
)
|
Non-vested restricted units as of September 30, 2016
|
864
|
|
In the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, two grants of performance-based stock units were made which will vest at the end of fiscal years June 30, 2019 and 2020. The Monte Carlo simulation model was used to determine the grant date fair value of each grant based on an average historical stock price volatility for the Company and the peer companies of
32.2%
and
31.9%
and a risk-free interest rate of
0.9%
and
1.0%
for the grants vesting at the end of fiscal years June 30, 2019 and 2020, respectively. Because these awards earn dividend equivalents, the model did not assume an expected dividend yield.
The following table presents the assumptions used in the binomial model to determine the fair value of stock options granted during the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.4
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.9
|
%
|
Weighted-average volatility factor
|
24.5
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
|
6.3
|
|
Weighted-average fair value (in dollars)
|
$
|
13.90
|
|
Note 8. Income Taxes
Tax Matters Agreement
The Company and ADP entered into a tax matters agreement as part of the spin-off that governs the rights and obligations of both parties after the spin-off with respect to taxes for both pre and post spin-off periods. Under this agreement, ADP is generally required to indemnify the Company for any income taxes attributable to ADP's operations or the Company's operations and for any non-income taxes attributable to ADP's operations, in each case for all pre spin-off periods as well as any taxes arising from transactions effected to consummate the spin-off, and the Company generally is required to indemnify ADP for any non-income taxes attributable to the Company's operations for all pre spin-off periods and for any income taxes attributable to the Company's operations for post spin-off periods.
The Company is generally required to indemnify ADP against any tax resulting from the spin-off (and against any claims made against ADP in respect of any tax imposed on its stockholders), in each case if that tax results from (i) an issuance of a significant amount of the Company's equity securities, a redemption of a significant amount of the Company's equity securities or the Company's involvement in other significant acquisitions of the Company's equity securities (excluding the spin-off), (ii) other actions or failures to act by the Company, or (iii) any of the Company's representations or undertakings referred to in the tax matters agreement being incorrect or violated. ADP will generally be required to indemnify the Company for any tax resulting from the spin-off if that tax results from (a) ADP's issuance of its equity securities, redemption of its equity securities or involvement in other acquisitions of its equity securities, (b) other actions or failures to act by ADP, or (c) any of ADP's representations or undertakings referred to in the tax matters agreement being incorrect or violated.
The Company recognized receivables from ADP of
$1.0 million
and
$1.1 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively, and payables to ADP of
$1.5 million
and
$1.6 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively, under the tax matters agreement.
Valuation Allowance
The Company had valuation allowances of
$34.9 million
and
$34.3 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will expire unutilized. At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the realizability of its deferred tax assets. During the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, the valuation allowance balance was adjusted for current year deferred tax movements and currency exchange fluctuations.
Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits
As of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, the Company had unrecognized income tax benefits of
$4.9 million
and
$4.7 million
, respectively, of which
$3.8 million
and
$3.6 million
, respectively, would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. During the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, the Company increased its unrecognized income tax benefits related to current tax positions by
$0.2 million
based on information that indicates the extent to which certain tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
was
29.2%
and
36.1%
, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
was favorably impacted by
$5.7 million
of excess tax benefits associated with adopting ASU 2016-09 effective July 1, 2016 as described in Note 2 and a tax benefit associated with the domestic production activities deduction.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various claims and litigation in the normal course of business. When a loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable, the Company records a liability in the amount of its best estimate for the ultimate loss. There can be no assurance that these matters will be resolved in a manner that is not adverse to the Company.
In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts in which it makes representations and warranties that relate to the performance of the Company’s services and products. The Company does not expect any material losses related to such representations and warranties.
Note 10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI")
Comprehensive income is a measure of income that includes both net earnings and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) results from items deferred on the consolidated balance sheets in CDK stockholders' equity. The Company's other comprehensive income (loss) for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
and AOCI balances as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
were comprised solely of currency translation adjustments. Other comprehensive income (loss) was
$(4.1) million
and
$(16.8) million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. The accumulated balances reported in AOCI on the consolidated balance sheets for currency translation adjustments were
$1.7 million
and
$5.8 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively.
Note 11. Share Repurchase Transactions
In December 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to
$1.0 billion
of its common stock as part of its
$1.0 billion
return of capital plan. Under the authorization, the Company may purchase its common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements. The actual timing, number, and price of any shares to be repurchased will be determined at management's discretion and will depend on a number of factors, which may include the market price of the shares, general market and economic conditions, and other potential uses for free cash flow.
In December 2015, the Company entered into the December 2015 ASR to purchase
$250.0 million
of the Company's common stock. Under the terms of the December 2015 ASR, the Company made a
$250.0 million
payment in December 2015 and received an initial delivery of approximately
4.3 million
shares of the Company's common stock. In June 2016, the
Company received an additional
1.0 million
shares of common stock in final settlement of the December 2015 ASR, for a total of
5.3 million
shares.
In June, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement ("June 2016 ASR" and together with the December 2015 ASR, the "ASRs") to purchase
$300.0 million
of the Company's common stock. Under the terms of the June 2016 ASR, the Company made a
$300.0 million
payment in June 2016 and received an initial delivery of approximately
4.3 million
of the Company's common stock. In September 2016, the Company received an additional
1.0 million
shares of common stock in final settlement of the June 2016 ASR, for a total of
5.3 million
shares. The value reflected in treasury stock upon completion of the June 2016 ASR represents the value of the shares received based on the closing price of the Company's stock on the respective settlement dates, which is less than the
$300.0 million
cash paid by
$3.1 million
.
Note 12. Transactions with ADP
Prior to the spin-off, the Company entered into a transition services agreement with ADP to provide for an orderly transition to being an independent company. Among the principal services to be provided by ADP to the Company were operational and administrative infrastructure-related services, such as use of the e-mail domain “adp.com,” facilities sharing, procurement support, tax, human resources administrative services and services related to back office support, and software development in ADP's Indian facilities. Among the principal services to be provided by the Company to ADP were operational and administrative infrastructure-related services, such as facilities sharing, and human resources administrative services. The agreement expired
one year
after the spin-off date.
The Company entered into a data services agreement with ADP prior to the spin-off under which ADP provided the Company with certain data center sharing services relating to the provision of information technology, platform support, hosting, and network services. The term of the agreement expired
two years
after the spin-off date.
For the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, the Company recorded
$1.3 million
of expenses related to the data services agreement in the accompanying financial statements. For the
three months ended
September 30, 2015
, the Company recorded
$0.9 million
of expense related to the transition services agreement and
$2.2 million
of expense related to the data services agreement in the accompanying financial statements related to these agreements. As of
June 30, 2016
, the Company had amounts payable to ADP under the transition services and data services agreements of
$0.1 million
and the Company had
no
amounts payable to ADP at
September 30, 2016
.
Note 13. Interim Financial Data by Segment
Effective July 1, 2016, the Company executed a comprehensive reorganization to streamline its organization that will enable it to deliver an improved customer experience, create significant efficiencies, and better align it to implement the business transformation plan. The organizational changes included integrating product management, combining the Digital Marketing and Automotive Retail North America operations into a single organization, creating a single North America sales organization, and forming a global research and development organization. In connection with this reorganization, information that the Company's chief operating decision maker regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance changed resulting in a reassessment of operating segments.
The Company reorganized into two main operating groups. In connection with this reorganization, our operating segments have changed. The Company's first operating group is CDK North America which is comprised of two reportable segments, Retail Solutions North America, and Advertising North America. The second operating group, which is also a reportable segment, is CDK International. Segment information for the
three months ended September 30, 2015
has been updated to conform to the new presentation.
The primary components of the Other segment are corporate allocations and other expenses not recorded in the segment results, such as stock-based compensation expense, corporate costs, interest expense, costs attributable to the business transformation plan, results of our captive insurance company and certain unallocated expenses. Certain expenses are charged to the reportable segments at a standard rate for management reasons. Other costs are recorded based on management responsibility.
Revenue by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
CDK North America:
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions North America
|
$
|
395.4
|
|
|
$
|
373.2
|
|
Advertising North America
|
77.5
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
CDK International
|
77.8
|
|
|
78.2
|
|
Total
|
$
|
550.7
|
|
|
$
|
514.6
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of revenue by type was as follows:
Retail Solutions North America:
Subscription
:
for software and technology solutions provided to automotive retailers and OEMs, which includes:
|
|
•
|
Dealer Management Systems (“DMSs”) and layered applications, which may be installed onsite at the customer’s location, or hosted and provided on a Software-as-a-Service ("SaaS") basis, including ongoing maintenance and support;
|
|
|
•
|
Interrelated services such as installation, initial training, and data updates;
|
|
|
•
|
Websites, search marketing, and reputation management services; and
|
|
|
•
|
Hardware on a service basis, meaning no specific assets are identified or a substantive right of substitution exists.
|
Transaction
: fees per transaction to process credit reports, vehicle registrations, and automotive equity mining.
Other
: consulting and professional services, sales of hardware, and other miscellaneous revenues.
Advertising North America revenues are primarily earned for placing internet advertisements for OEMS and automotive retailers.
CDK International revenues are generated primarily from Subscription revenue as described above, aside from the absence of website offerings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
CDK North America:
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions North America:
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenue
|
$
|
316.3
|
|
|
$
|
294.6
|
|
Transaction revenue
|
46.9
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
Other revenue
|
32.2
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
Total Retail Solutions North America
|
$
|
395.4
|
|
|
$
|
373.2
|
|
Advertising North America revenue
|
77.5
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
CDK International revenue
|
77.8
|
|
|
78.2
|
|
Total
|
$
|
550.7
|
|
|
$
|
514.6
|
|
Earnings before Income Taxes by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before Income Taxes
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
CDK North America:
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions North America
|
$
|
145.5
|
|
|
$
|
109.1
|
|
Advertising North America
|
11.5
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
CDK International
|
16.9
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Other
|
(62.0
|
)
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
111.9
|
|
|
$
|
95.8
|
|
Assets by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
CDK North America:
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions North America
|
$
|
1,240.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,240.9
|
|
Advertising North America
|
307.9
|
|
|
307.9
|
|
CDK International
|
532.2
|
|
|
539.4
|
|
Other
|
298.6
|
|
|
276.8
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,379.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,365.0
|
|