NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements of Aspen Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries have been prepared on the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements. We have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in our annual consolidated financial statements. Such interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 270,
Interim Reporting
, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2016
, which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented have been included and all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the subsequent quarter or for the full fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, our and us refer to Aspen Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
(a)
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aspen Technology, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(b)
Significant Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2016
. There were no material changes to our significant accounting policies during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
.
(c)
Revenue Recognition
We generate revenue from the following sources: (1) Subscription and software revenue; and (2) Services and other revenue. We sell our software products to end users primarily under fixed-term licenses. We license our software products primarily through a subscription offering which we refer to as our aspenONE licensing model, which includes software maintenance and support, known as our Premier Plus SMS offering, for the entire term. Our aspenONE products are organized into three suites: 1) engineering; 2) manufacturing and supply chain, or MSC; and 3) asset performance management, or APM. The aspenONE licensing model provides customers with access to all of the products within the aspenONE suite(s) they license. We refer to these arrangements as token arrangements. Tokens are fixed units of measure. The amount of software usage is limited by the number of tokens purchased by the customer.
We also license our software through point product term arrangements, which include our Premier Plus SMS offering for the entire term, as well as perpetual license arrangements.
Four basic criteria must be satisfied before software license revenue can be recognized: persuasive evidence of an arrangement between us and an end user; delivery of our product has occurred; the fee for the product is fixed or determinable; and collection of the fee is probable.
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement
—We use a signed contract as evidence of an arrangement for software licenses and SMS. For professional services we use a signed contract and a work proposal to evidence an arrangement. In cases where both a signed contract and a purchase order are required by the customer, we consider both taken together as evidence of the arrangement.
Delivery of our product
—Software and the corresponding access keys are generally delivered to customers via electronic delivery or via physical medium with standard shipping terms of Free Carrier, our warehouse (i.e., FCA, AspenTech). Our software license agreements do not contain conditions for acceptance.
Fee is fixed or determinable
—We assess whether a fee is fixed or determinable at the outset of the arrangement. Significant judgment is involved in making this assessment.
As a standard business practice, we offer fixed-term license arrangements, which are generally payable on an annual basis.
We cannot assert that the fees under our aspenONE licensing model and point product arrangements with Premier Plus SMS are fixed or determinable because of the rights provided to customers, economics of the arrangements, and because we do not have an established history of collecting under the terms of these contracts without providing concessions to customers. As a result, the amount of revenue recognized for these arrangements is limited by the amount of customer payments that become due.
Collection of fee is probable
—We assess the probability of collecting from each customer at the outset of the arrangement based on a number of factors, including the customer's payment history, its current creditworthiness, economic conditions in the customer's industry and geographic location, and general economic conditions. If in our judgment collection of a fee is not probable, revenue is recognized as cash is collected, provided all other conditions for revenue recognition have been met.
Vendor-Specific Objective Evidence of Fair Value (VSOE)
We have established VSOE for professional services and certain training offerings, but not for our software products or our SMS offerings. We assess VSOE for SMS, professional services, and training, based on an analysis of standalone sales of the offerings using the bell-shaped curve approach. We do not have a history of selling our Premier Plus SMS offering to customers on a standalone basis, and as a result are unable to establish VSOE for this deliverable.
Subscription and Software Revenue
Subscription and software revenue consists primarily of product and related revenue from our (i) aspenONE licensing model; (ii) point product arrangements with our Premier Plus SMS offering included for the contract term; and (iii) perpetual arrangements.
When a customer elects to license our products under our aspenONE licensing model, our Premier Plus SMS offering is included for the entire term of the arrangement and the customer receives, for the term of the arrangement, the right to any new unspecified future software products and updates that may be introduced into the licensed aspenONE software suite. Due to our obligation to provide unspecified future software products and updates and because we do not have VSOE for our Premier Plus SMS offering, we are required to recognize revenue ratably over the term of the arrangement, once the other revenue recognition criteria noted above have been met.
Our point product arrangements with Premier Plus SMS include SMS for the term of the arrangement. Since we do not have VSOE for our Premier Plus SMS offering, the SMS element of our point product arrangements is not separable. As a result, revenue associated with point product arrangements with Premier Plus SMS included for the contract term is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, once the other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Services and Other Revenue
Professional Services Revenue
Professional services are provided to customers on a time-and-materials (T&M) or fixed-price basis. We recognize professional services fees for our T&M contracts based upon hours worked and contractually agreed-upon hourly rates. Revenue from fixed-price engagements is recognized using the proportional performance method based on the ratio of costs incurred to the total estimated project costs. Project costs are typically expensed as incurred. The use of the proportional performance method is dependent upon our ability to reliably estimate the costs to complete a project. We use historical experience as a basis for future estimates to complete current projects. Additionally, we believe that costs are the best available measure of performance. Out-of-pocket expenses which are reimbursed by customers are recorded as revenue.
In certain circumstances, professional services revenue may be recognized over a longer time period than the period over which the services are performed. If the costs to complete a project are not estimable or the completion is uncertain, the revenue and related costs are recognized upon completion of the services. In circumstances in which professional services are sold as a single arrangement with, or in contemplation of, a new aspenONE license or point product arrangement with Premier Plus SMS, revenue is deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the longer of (i) the period the services are performed, or (ii) the license term. When we provide professional services considered essential to the functionality of the software, we recognize the combined revenue from the sale of the software and related services using the completed contract or percentage-of-completion method.
We have occasionally been required to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, which resulted in losses on those contracts. Provisions for estimated losses on contracts are made during the period in which such losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Training Revenue
We provide training services to our customers, including on-site, Internet-based, public and customized training. Revenue is recognized in the period in which the services are performed. In circumstances in which training services are sold as a single arrangement with, or in contemplation of, a new aspenONE license or point product arrangement with Premier Plus SMS, revenue is deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the longer of (i) the period the services are performed or (ii) the license term.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue includes amounts billed or collected in advance of revenue recognition, including arrangements under the aspenONE licensing model, point product arrangements with Premier Plus SMS, professional services, and training. Deferred revenue is recorded as each invoice becomes due.
Other Licensing Matters
Our standard licensing agreements include a product warranty provision. We have not experienced significant claims related to software warranties beyond the scope of SMS support, which we are already obligated to provide, and consequently, we have not established reserves for warranty obligations.
Our agreements with our customers generally require us to indemnify the customer against claims that our software infringes third-party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of industry-standard respects, including our right to replace an infringing product. As of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, we had not experienced any material losses related to these indemnification obligations and
no
claims with respect thereto were outstanding. We do not expect significant claims related to these indemnification obligations, and consequently, have not established any related reserves.
(d) Loss Contingencies
We accrue estimated liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation and other sources when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the claim, assessment or damages can be reasonably estimated. We believe that we have sufficient accruals to cover any obligations resulting from claims, assessments or litigation that have met these criteria. Please refer to Note 16 for discussion of these matters and related liability accruals.
(e)
Foreign Currency Transactions
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses generated from the settlement and remeasurement of transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries are recognized in our results of operations as incurred as a component of other income (expense), net. Net foreign currency gains (losses) were
$0.7 million
and
$1.3 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$(0.2) million
and
$0.7 million
during the three and six months ended and
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
(f) Research and Development Expense
We charge research and development expenditures to expense as the costs are incurred. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses related to the creation of new products, enhancements and engineering changes to existing products and costs of acquired technology prior to establishing technological feasibility.
We acquired technology for
$0.4 million
and
$0.3 million
during the six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, respectively. At the time we acquired the technology, the projects to develop commercially available products did not meet the accounting definition of having reached technological feasibility and therefore the cost of the acquired technology was expensed as a research and development expense.
(g)
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
. ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)
, and requires entities to recognize revenue when they transfer promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. As currently issued and amended, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, though early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We will adopt ASU No. 2014-09 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Based on our preliminary assessment, the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will impact the timing of a portion of the revenue recognized from our term contracts. We are continuing to evaluate the impact of ASU No. 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and implementing accounting system changes related to the adoption.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
. Under the amendment, lessees will be required to recognize virtually all of their leases on the balance sheet, by recording a right-of-use asset and lease liability. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. The amendment identifies several areas for simplification applicable to entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees, including income tax consequences, the option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized when they occur, and certain classifications on the statements of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326).
The amendment changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Entities will be required to use a model that will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses for trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than as reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
. The amendment updates the guidance as to how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be presented and classified, and is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,
Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
(Topic 740)
. The amendment changes accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory by requiring an entity to recognize the income tax consequences when a transfer occurs, instead of when
an asset is sold to an outside party. The amendment should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-18 on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Marketable Securities
The following table summarizes the fair value, the amortized cost and unrealized holding gains (losses) on our marketable securities as of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate bonds
|
$
|
72,939
|
|
|
$
|
72,965
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
Total short-term marketable securities
|
$
|
72,939
|
|
|
$
|
72,965
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate bonds
|
$
|
3,006
|
|
|
$
|
3,006
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total short-term marketable securities
|
$
|
3,006
|
|
|
$
|
3,006
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Our marketable securities were classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value on the unaudited consolidated balance sheets. Net unrealized gains (losses) were reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Realized gains (losses) on investments were recognized in earnings as incurred. Our investments consisted primarily of investment grade fixed income corporate debt securities with maturity dates ranging from January 2017 through May 2017 as of
December 31, 2016
and August 2016 as of
June 30, 2016
.
4. Fair Value
We determine fair value by utilizing a fair value hierarchy that ranks the quality and reliability of the information used in its determination. Fair values determined using “Level 1 inputs” utilize unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Fair values determined using “Level 2 inputs” utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves for similar assets and liabilities.
Cash equivalents of
$30.2 million
and
$286.2 million
as of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively, were reported at fair value utilizing quoted market prices in identical markets, or “Level 1 inputs.” Our cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months or less when purchased.
Marketable securities of
$72.9 million
and
$3.0 million
as of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, respectively, were reported at fair value calculated in accordance with the market approach, utilizing market consensus pricing models with quoted prices that were directly or indirectly observable, or “Level 2 inputs.”
Financial instruments not measured or recorded at fair value in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements consist of accounts receivable, installments receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value. The estimated fair value of the borrowings under the Credit Agreement (described below in Note 11, Credit Agreement) approximates its carrying value due to the floating interest rate.
5. Accounts Receivable
Our accounts receivable, net of the related allowance for doubtful accounts, were as follows as of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Net
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
19,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
17,927
|
|
|
$
|
19,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
17,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
22,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,604
|
|
|
$
|
20,476
|
|
|
$
|
22,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,604
|
|
|
$
|
20,476
|
|
As of
December 31, 2016
, we had
one
customer receivable balance that individually represented approximately
15%
of our total receivables.
6. Property and Equipment
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements - at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
$
|
9,668
|
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
Purchased software
|
23,725
|
|
|
23,705
|
|
Furniture & fixtures
|
6,862
|
|
|
6,712
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
11,763
|
|
|
12,523
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(37,026
|
)
|
|
(37,502
|
)
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements - net
|
$
|
14,992
|
|
|
$
|
15,825
|
|
During the six months ended
December 31, 2016
, we wrote off fully depreciated property, equipment and leasehold improvements that were no longer in use with gross book values of
$2.2 million
.
7. Acquisitions
Mtelligence Corporation
On October 26, 2016, we completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of Mtelligence Corporation (“Mtell”), a provider of predictive and prescriptive maintenance software and related services used to optimize asset performance, for total cash consideration of
$37.4 million
. The purchase price consisted of
$31.9 million
of cash paid at closing and an additional
$5.5 million
to be held back until April 2018 as security for certain representations, warranties, and obligations of the sellers. The holdback was recorded at its fair value as of the acquisition date of
$5.3 million
.
A preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows. The valuation of the net assets acquired and the deferred tax liabilities are considered preliminary as of
December 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Tangible assets acquired, net
|
$
|
779
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
Developed technology
|
11,385
|
|
Customer relationships
|
679
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
553
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
28,160
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net
|
(4,371
|
)
|
Total assets acquired
|
$
|
37,185
|
|
We used the income approach to determine the values of the identifiable intangible assets. The weighted-average discount rate (or rate of return) used to determine the value of the Mtell intangible assets was
19%
and the effective tax rate used was
34%
. The values of the developed technology, customer relationships and non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis, except technology which is being amortized on a proportional use basis, over their estimated useful lives of
12 years
,
6 years
and
3 years
, respectively.
The goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, reflects the value of the assembled workforce and the company-specific synergies we expect to realize by selling Mtell products and services to our existing customers. The results of operations of Mtell have been included prospectively in our results of operations since the date of acquisition.
Technology and Trademarks
In August 2016, we acquired certain technology and trademarks for total cash consideration of
$6.0 million
. The purchase price consisted of
$5.4 million
of cash paid at closing and up to an additional
$0.6 million
to be paid in August 2017. The acquisition met the definition of a business combination as it contained inputs and processes that are capable of being operated as a business. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price as of September 30, 2016 allocated
$4.0 million
to developed technology and
$2.0 million
to goodwill. The fair value of the developed technology of
$4.0 million
was determined using the replacement cost approach. The developed technology is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of
6 years
. The acquisition is treated as an asset purchase for tax purposes and accordingly, the goodwill resulting from the acquisition is expected to be deductible.
Fidelis Group, LLC
In June 2016, we completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of Fidelis Group, LLC ("Fidelis"), a provider of asset reliability software used to predict and optimize asset performance. The purchase price consisted of
$8.0 million
of cash paid at closing and up to an additional
$2.0 million
to be paid in December 2017.
A preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows, including adjustments identified subsequent to the acquisition date. The valuation of the net assets acquired and the deferred tax liabilities are considered preliminary as of
December 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Tangible assets acquired, net
|
$
|
65
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
Developed technology
|
1,272
|
|
Customer relationships
|
753
|
|
In-process research and development
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
6,706
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net
|
(1,893
|
)
|
Total assets acquired
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
8. Intangible Assets
We include in our amortizable intangible assets those intangible assets acquired in our business and asset acquisitions. We amortize acquired intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated economic lives, generally using the straight-line method. Each period, we evaluate the estimated remaining useful lives of acquired intangible assets to determine whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. Acquired intangibles are removed from the accounts when fully amortized and no longer in use.
Intangible assets consist of the following as of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and patents
|
$
|
19,150
|
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,490
|
|
In process research & development
|
3,200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Customer relationships
|
1,432
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
1,385
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
553
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
553
|
|
Total
|
$
|
24,335
|
|
|
$
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,628
|
|
June 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and patents
|
$
|
3,696
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
In process research & development
|
3,200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Customer relationships
|
700
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
700
|
|
Total
|
$
|
7,596
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Total amortization expense related to intangible assets is included in operating expenses and amounted to approximately
$0.1 million
for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, respectively. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately
$1.1 million
in fiscal
2017
,
$1.7 million
in fiscal
2018
,
$1.7 million
in fiscal
2019
,
$1.8 million
in fiscal
2020
,
$1.9 million
in fiscal
2021
, and
$13.4 million
thereafter.
9. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for our subscription and software reporting unit during the six months ended
December 31, 2016
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
Effect of currency translation
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net, at June 30, 2016
|
$
|
89,007
|
|
|
$
|
(65,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,438
|
|
Goodwill from Mtell acquisition
|
28,160
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28,160
|
|
Goodwill from technology acquisition
|
2,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Subsequent Fidelis goodwill adjustment
|
(78
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Goodwill, net, at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
119,089
|
|
|
$
|
(65,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(487
|
)
|
|
$
|
53,033
|
|
We test goodwill for impairment annually (or more often if impairment indicators arise), at the reporting unit level. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on this assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The first step requires us to determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount, including goodwill, of such reporting unit. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no impairment loss is recognized. However, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of the unit may be impaired. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based upon the implied fair value of goodwill at the valuation date.
Fair value of a reporting unit is determined using a combined weighted average of a market-based approach (utilizing fair value multiples of comparable publicly traded companies) and an income-based approach (utilizing discounted projected cash flows). In applying the income-based approach, we would be required to make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows would be based on our most recent long-term financial projections. The discount rate we would utilize would be determined using estimates of market participant risk-adjusted weighted-average costs of capital and reflect the risks associated with achieving future cash flows.
We have elected December 31st as the annual impairment assessment date and perform additional impairment tests if triggering events occur. We performed our annual impairment test for the subscription and software reporting unit as of
December 31, 2016
and, based upon the results of our qualitative assessment, determined that it was not likely that its fair value was less than its carrying amount. As such, we did
not
perform the two-step goodwill impairment test and did
not
recognize impairment losses as a result of our analysis. If an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value, goodwill will be evaluated for impairment between annual tests.
10. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Royalties and outside commissions
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
$
|
2,640
|
|
Payroll and payroll-related
|
12,351
|
|
|
17,809
|
|
Other
|
17,783
|
|
|
15,656
|
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$
|
33,028
|
|
|
$
|
36,105
|
|
Other non-current liabilities in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Deferred rent
|
$
|
6,627
|
|
|
$
|
6,361
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
20,704
|
|
|
23,535
|
|
Other
|
10,451
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
Total other non-current liabilities
|
$
|
37,782
|
|
|
$
|
32,591
|
|
11. Credit Agreement
On February 26, 2016, we entered into a
$250.0 million
Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Silicon Valley Bank, as syndication agent, and the lenders and other parties named therein (the “Lenders”). The indebtedness evidenced by the Credit Agreement matures on February 26, 2021. Prior to the maturity of the Credit Agreement, any amounts borrowed may be repaid and, subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, borrowed again in whole or in part without penalty. As of
December 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2016
, we had
$140.0 million
in outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Debt issuance costs related to the Credit Agreement were recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to either, at our option, the sum of (a) the highest of (1) the rate of interest publicly announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as its prime rate in effect, (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus
0.5%
, and (3) the one-month Adjusted LIBO Rate plus
1.0%
,
plus
(b) a margin initially of
0.5%
for the first full fiscal quarter ending after the date of the Credit Agreement and thereafter based on our Leverage Ratio; or the Adjusted LIBO Rate plus a margin initially of
1.5%
for the first full fiscal quarter ending after the date of the Credit Agreement and thereafter based on our Leverage Ratio. We must also pay, on a quarterly basis, an unused commitment fee at a rate of between
0.2%
and
0.3%
per annum, based on our Leverage Ratio. The interest rate as of
December 31, 2016
was
2.27%
.
All borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by liens on substantially all of our assets. The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for facilities of this type, including restrictions on: incurrence of additional debt; liens; fundamental changes; asset sales; restricted payments; and transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants regarding maintenance as of the end of each fiscal quarter, commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2016, of a maximum Leverage Ratio of
3.0
to
1.0
and a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio of
3.0
to
1.0
. As of
December 31, 2016
we were in compliance with these covenants.
12. Stock-Based Compensation
The weighted average estimated fair value of option awards granted was
$12.45
and
$12.96
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$12.39
and
$13.52
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
We utilized the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
4.6
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Expected volatility factor
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
The stock-based compensation expense and its classification in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Recorded as expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and other
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
743
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
1,010
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Research and development
|
1,495
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
General and administrative
|
1,792
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
4,364
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
$
|
4,671
|
|
|
$
|
3,512
|
|
|
$
|
9,630
|
|
|
$
|
7,935
|
|
A summary of stock option and RSU activity under all equity plans for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in 000’s)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
1,314,142
|
|
|
$
|
32.47
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
$
|
12,340
|
|
|
493,332
|
|
|
$
|
41.06
|
|
Granted
|
456,872
|
|
|
45.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509,156
|
|
|
45.93
|
|
Settled (RSUs)
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,970
|
)
|
|
41.72
|
|
Exercised
|
(191,085
|
)
|
|
25.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled / Forfeited
|
(42,702
|
)
|
|
39.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,987
|
)
|
|
42.28
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
1,537,227
|
|
|
$
|
36.97
|
|
|
7.72
|
|
$
|
27,219
|
|
|
802,531
|
|
|
$
|
43.96
|
|
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
806,266
|
|
|
$
|
30.97
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
$
|
19,113
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2016
|
1,460,949
|
|
|
$
|
36.60
|
|
|
7.65
|
|
$
|
26,416
|
|
|
719,043
|
|
|
$
|
43.87
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted was
$47.73
and
$45.93
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$38.04
and
$43.94
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested from RSU grants was
$4.2 million
and
$8.3 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$2.9 million
and
$6.3 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
At
December 31, 2016
, the total future unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was
$8.3 million
and is expected to be recorded over a weighted average period of
2.9
years. At
December 31, 2016
, the total future unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs was
$31.4 million
and is expected to be recorded over a weighted average period of
2.9
years.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was
$1.4 million
and
$4.1 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$1.4 million
and
$2.3 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively. We received cash proceeds from option exercises of
$4.8 million
and
$2.4 million
during the six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. We withheld withholding taxes on vested RSUs of
$2.8 million
and
$2.2 million
during the six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
At
December 31, 2016
, common stock reserved for future issuance or settlement under equity compensation plans was
5.0 million
shares.
13. Stockholders’ Deficit
Stock Repurchases
On January 28, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to
$450.0 million
worth of our common stock. On April 26, 2016, the Board of Directors approved a
$400.0 million
increase in the share repurchase plan. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased are based on market conditions and other factors. All shares of our common stock repurchased have been recorded as treasury stock under the cost method.
On August 29, 2016, as part of our common stock repurchase program, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase program (the "ASR Program") with a third-party financial institution. Pursuant to the terms of the ASR Program, we made an upfront payment of
$100.0 million
in exchange for an initial delivery of approximately
1.76 million
shares of our common stock, representing
80%
of the total shares ultimately expected to be delivered over the program's term. The initial shares received, which had an aggregate cost of
$80.0 million
based on the August 29, 2016 closing share price, were recorded as an increase to treasury stock. As of
September 30, 2016
,
$20.0 million
, representing the difference between the upfront
$100.0 million
payment and the
$80.0 million
cost of the initial share delivery, was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet.
Upon the final settlement of the ASR Program during the three months ended December 31, 2016, we received an additional delivery of
0.35 million
shares of our common stock. The total number of shares received under the ASR Program during the six months ended December 31, 2016 was
2.1 million
shares, which was determined based on the volume-weighted average price per share of our common stock over the term of the ASR Program, less an agreed-upon discount.
During the three months ended
December 31, 2016
we repurchased
987,237
and
348,854
shares of our common stock for
$50.0 million
and
$20.0 million
in the open market and as part of the ASR Program, respectively.
During the six months ended
December 31, 2016
we repurchased
2,126,095
and
2,106,709
shares of our common stock for
$100.0 million
and
$100.0 million
in the open market and as part of the ASR Program, respectively
As of
December 31, 2016
, the total remaining value under the share repurchase program approved on January 28, 2015 and amended on April 26, 2016 was approximately
$321.3 million
.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
As of
December 31, 2016
, accumulated other comprehensive income was comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments of less than
$0.1 million
and net unrealized losses on available for sale securities of less than
$0.1 million
. As of
December 31, 2015
, accumulated other comprehensive income was comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments of
$4.3 million
and net unrealized losses on available for sale securities of less than
$0.1 million
.
As of
June 30, 2016
, accumulated other comprehensive income was comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments of
$2.7 million
and net unrealized losses on available for sale securities of less than
$0.1 million
. As of
June 30, 2015
, accumulated other comprehensive income was comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments of
$6.5 million
and net unrealized losses on available for sale securities of less than
$0.1 million
.
14. Net Income Per Share
Basic income per share is determined by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is determined by dividing net income by diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted weighted average shares reflect the dilutive effect, if any, of potential common shares. To the extent their effect is dilutive, employee equity awards and other commitments to be settled in common stock are included in the calculation of diluted net income per share based on the treasury stock method.
The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share and basic and dilutive weighted average shares outstanding for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
|
Net income
|
$
|
37,010
|
|
|
$
|
36,683
|
|
|
$
|
72,011
|
|
|
$
|
73,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
76,905
|
|
|
83,315
|
|
|
77,977
|
|
|
83,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive impact from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment awards
|
413
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
439
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding
|
77,318
|
|
|
83,703
|
|
|
78,356
|
|
|
84,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Dilutive
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
For the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, certain employee equity awards were anti-dilutive based on the treasury stock method. Additionally, during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
, options to purchase
2,260
and
6,875
shares, respectively, of our common stock were not included in the computation of dilutive weighted average shares outstanding, because their exercise prices ranged from
$47.40
per share to
$54.22
per share and were greater than the average market price of our common stock during the periods then ended. These options were outstanding as of
December 31, 2016
and expire at various dates through December 14, 2026.
The following employee equity awards were excluded from the calculation of dilutive weighted average shares outstanding because their effect would be anti-dilutive as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(Shares in Thousands)
|
Employee equity awards
|
721
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
15. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the periods presented was primarily the result of income earned in the U.S., taxed at U.S. federal and state statutory income tax rates, income earned in foreign tax jurisdictions taxed at the applicable rates, as well as the impact of permanent differences between book and tax income.
Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
was
33.9%
and
35.0%
, respectively, as compared to
34.7%
and
34.8%
for the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year. Our effective tax rate changed slightly for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
compared to the same periods in
2015
due to discrete items. During the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, our income tax expense was driven primarily by pre-tax profitability
in our domestic and foreign operations and the impact of permanent items. The permanent items are predominantly a U.S. domestic production activity deduction being slightly offset by non-deductible stock-based compensation expense.
We use the “with and without” ordering approach to calculate our tax provision when necessary. This methodology requires us to utilize all other tax attributes before recognizing excess tax benefits. Excess tax benefits are generated when the deductible value of stock-based compensation for income tax purposes exceeds the value recognized for financial statement purposes. Excess tax benefits are not included as a component of deferred tax assets. When realized, excess tax benefits reduce income taxes payable and increase additional paid in capital. In our unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows, the excess tax benefits of
$1.0 million
and
$1.8 million
were reported as sources of cash flows from financing activities with offsetting reductions to cash flows from operating activities during the six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Deferred income taxes are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the statutory tax rates and laws expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided against net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and the timing of the temporary differences becoming deductible. Management considers, among other available information, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, limitations of availability of net operating loss carryforwards, and other matters in making this assessment.
We do not provide deferred taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries since we intend to indefinitely reinvest those earnings either currently or sometime in the foreseeable future. Unrecognized provisions for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which are considered indefinitely reinvested, are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
We lease certain facilities under non-cancellable operating leases with terms in excess of
one year
. Rental expense on leased facilities under operating leases was approximately
$2.1 million
and
$4.2 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
$2.1 million
and
$4.1 million
during the three and six months ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
Standby letters of credit for
$2.9 million
as of
December 31, 2016
secure our performance on professional services contracts, certain facility leases and potential liabilities. This is a decrease from
$3.5 million
as of
June 30, 2016
. The letters of credit expire at various dates through fiscal 2018.
Legal Matters
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings and threats of litigation. These matters include an April 2004 claim by a customer that certain of our software products and implementation services failed to meet the customer's expectations. In March 2014, a judgment was issued by the trial court against us in the amount of approximately
1.9 million
Euro (“€”) plus interest and a portion of legal fees. We subsequently filed an appeal of that judgment. As of
December 31, 2016
, the appellate court determined that we are liable for damages in the amount of approximately
€1.7 million
plus interest, with the possibility of additional damages to be determined in further proceedings by the appellate court.
While the outcome of the proceedings and claims referenced above cannot be predicted with certainty, there were
no
such matters, as of
December 31, 2016
that, in the opinion of management, are reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Liabilities, if applicable, related to the aforementioned matters discussed in this Note have been included in our accrued liabilities at
December 31, 2016
, and are not material to our financial position for the period then ended. As of
December 31, 2016
, we do not believe that there is a reasonable possibility of a material loss exceeding the amounts already accrued for the proceedings or matters discussed above. However, the results of litigation (including the above-referenced appeal) and claims cannot be predicted with certainty; unfavorable resolutions are possible and could materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. In addition, regardless of the outcome, litigation could have an adverse impact on us because of attorneys' fees and costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
17. Segment Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and to assess performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our President and Chief Executive Officer.
The subscription and software segment is engaged in the licensing of process optimization software solutions and associated support services. The services segment includes professional services and training. We do not track assets or capital expenditures by operating segments. Consequently, it is not practical to present assets, capital expenditures, depreciation or amortization by operating segments.
The following table presents a summary of our reportable segments’ profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
and software
|
|
Services
|
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
$
|
112,916
|
|
|
$
|
7,017
|
|
|
$
|
119,933
|
|
Segment expenses (1)
|
(45,602
|
)
|
|
(6,403
|
)
|
|
(52,005
|
)
|
Segment profit
|
$
|
67,314
|
|
|
$
|
614
|
|
|
$
|
67,928
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
$
|
110,126
|
|
|
$
|
9,025
|
|
|
$
|
119,151
|
|
Segment expenses (1)
|
(42,126
|
)
|
|
(6,921
|
)
|
|
(49,047
|
)
|
Segment profit
|
$
|
68,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
|
$
|
70,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
$
|
226,360
|
|
|
$
|
13,623
|
|
|
$
|
239,983
|
|
Segment expenses (1)
|
(91,328
|
)
|
|
(12,839
|
)
|
|
(104,167
|
)
|
Segment profit
|
$
|
135,032
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
135,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
$
|
221,985
|
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
|
$
|
239,447
|
|
Segment expenses (1)
|
(86,401
|
)
|
|
(14,651
|
)
|
|
(101,052
|
)
|
Segment profit
|
$
|
135,584
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
138,395
|
|
(1)
Our reportable segments’ operating expenses include expenses directly attributable to the segments. Segment expenses include selling and marketing, research and development, stock-based compensation and certain corporate expenses incurred in support of the segments. Segment expenses do not include allocations of general and administrative; interest income, net; and other income, net.
Reconciliation to Income before Income Taxes
The following table presents a reconciliation of total segment profit to income before income taxes for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit for reportable segments
|
$
|
67,928
|
|
|
$
|
70,104
|
|
|
$
|
135,816
|
|
|
$
|
138,395
|
|
General and administrative
|
(11,863
|
)
|
|
(13,805
|
)
|
|
(25,020
|
)
|
|
(26,667
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
697
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
739
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
(676
|
)
|
|
58
|
|
|
(1,274
|
)
|
|
139
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
56,086
|
|
|
$
|
56,200
|
|
|
$
|
110,866
|
|
|
$
|
112,606
|
|