Federated Says SEC Reforms In Money-Fund Holdings Go Too Far
September 09 2009 - 5:34PM
Dow Jones News
Federated Investors Inc. (FII), the third-largest manager of
money-market funds, said regulators shouldn't prohibit such funds
from holding illiquid, or second-tier, securities.
The Pittsburgh-based asset manager also said that ending the
standard practice of offering money-market shares at a stable net
asset value would be "antithetical" to the goal of making the funds
more resilient to certain short-term market risks and safer for
investors.
Still, Federated said the funds should be prepared to process
transactions at a price less than the $1 when necessary.
Federated, which manages $312.8 billion in money-market fund
assets, made its comments in a letter to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which has proposed reforms to the $3.5
trillion money-market fund industry.
The SEC has proposed limiting money-market funds to investing in
only the highest-quality securities. Most funds are now permitted
to invest up to 5% in second-tier securities.
"Federated strongly believes that the commission should continue
to allow investment companies to hold second-tier securities,"
according to the 36-page letter signed by John McGonigle, executive
vice president and chief legal officer at Federated.
Money-market fund investments in second-tier securities reduce
concentration in the financial sector; provide greater credit
diversification of investments, particularly for tax-exempt funds;
and provide a more affordable means of financing issuers of
second-tier securities, the letter argued.
Debbie Cunningham, chief investment officer for taxable
money-market funds at Federated, noted in an interview that none of
these second-tier issuers have defaulted in the recent downturn.
"These issuers have held their own," she said.
Fidelity Investments has also opposed the elimination of
second-tier securities from money-market portfolios.
Federated also opposes the SEC's proposed ban on illiquid
securities.
"Federated believes that the proposed reforms go too far in
restricting 'illiquid' securities, both in terms of the definition
of a 'liquid' security and in prohibiting their acquisition,"
McGonigle wrote. "Given the current size of money funds, where 1%
of any type of money funds represents several billion dollars, the
SEC might reasonably conclude that the money funds can support
innovation with a limit below 10% for illiquid securities."
Federated recommended that the SEC not reduce the limit on
illiquid securities below 5%.
Said Cunningham, "Although it's not a huge slice of any
money-market portfolio, we do think that it offers a little bit of
innovation...that allows the marketplace to expand..."
Taxable money-market funds now use asset-backed commercial paper
as a liquid asset, and tax-free funds use tender option bonds, she
noted. Both asset classes started out as illiquid securities, but
have grown into sectors that are very prevalent and key in
money-market portfolios, Cunningham said.
Federated suggested changing the definition of a liquid security
from one "that can be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of
business within seven days at approximately the value ascribed to
it by the money-market fund" to one "that can be sold or disposed
of in the ordinary course of business within seven calendar days at
approximately its amortized cost."
Many in the industry say a floating net asset value - that is,
one that can "break the buck" and drop below the customary $1 per
share value - would threaten the viability of money-market funds.
Federated agreed that prohibiting money funds from offering shares
at a stable NAV would expose investors to market risks. But it
supported requiring a money fund to have the capacity to convert to
a fluctuating NAV if it can't maintain a stable NAV, provided there
is an extended transition period.
"As with the ability to suspend redemptions, it is critical that
a board have this alternative available to it in the event of a
crisis affecting a money fund's ability to maintain a stable NAV,"
the letter said.
Cunningham said that when Reserve Primary Fund's NAV fell,
problems were added because of the system's inability to operate
with a NAV of less than $1.
Federated has confirmed that the processing systems used by its
money funds can handle share transactions at a fluctuating NAV, but
said many intermediaries who process such transactions can't, and
that it will be expensive for them to reprogram their systems. As a
result, it encouraged the SEC to provide a long transition period -
at least a year - to comply with such a requirement.
The asset manager also said it analyzed the impact of the SEC's
proposed reforms on a prime money-market fund's seven-day yield,
and found that the proposals would subtract as much as 24 basis
points. With the changes Federated has proposed, the fund's yield
would be reduced by only 6 basis points, it said.
-By Daisy Maxey, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-2237;
daisy.maxey@dowjones.com