BigBadWolf
10 hours ago
imho this is why there has been no increase in the SS just recently, check the dates of both filing / last SS update
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/uyeda-statement-ghs-investments
Now w/ Conclusion
In enforcing the federal securities laws, the Commission has an obligation to express its views prospectively, ex ante, to provide fair notice to persons of the conduct that will run afoul of the law. The Commission has failed to do so in this action against GHS.
w/ this filing/statement GHS has NOW been properly Notified
GHS taking another highly discounted tranche after being properly notified would severely limit their chance of actually being granted Dealer status moving forward, which would have to be approved by the aforementioned agency(s) (thus ending their current business model)
Enjoy the read
BigBadWolf
5 days ago
Wondering if, the possible consequences of as some have already been shown to be less than.... When a client is not truthful with their attorneys, several consequences can arise, and these consequences can significantly impact both the legal representation and the overall outcome of the case. Here are some common outcomes:
Compromised Legal Strategy: Attorneys rely on accurate and complete information to develop effective legal strategies. If a client is dishonest, the attorney might make decisions based on false or incomplete information, which can lead to a poorly executed strategy and potentially unfavorable outcomes.
Legal Risks: Providing false information can increase legal risks. For instance, if a client lies under oath or provides misleading information in legal documents, they could face charges of perjury or other legal consequences.
Damaged Trust: The attorney-client relationship is based on trust. If an attorney discovers that a client has been dishonest, it can damage or destroy that trust. This can affect the attorney's ability to advocate effectively and could lead to a breakdown in communication.
Ethical Issues: Attorneys have ethical obligations to the court and to the legal system. If a client’s dishonesty comes to light, it can place the attorney in a difficult position, as they are bound by rules of professional conduct that require honesty and integrity. The attorney may be compelled to withdraw from the case or report the dishonesty, depending on the circumstances.
Adverse Outcomes: The lack of honesty can directly impact the outcome of a case. For example, if critical facts are withheld or misrepresented, it can weaken the client's position, lead to sanctions, or result in a less favorable judgment.
Withdrawal of Representation: If an attorney discovers that a client has been deceitful and it affects the representation, the attorney may seek to withdraw from the case. This can create additional delays and complications, as the client would need to find new legal representation.
In summary, honesty and transparency are crucial in the attorney-client relationship to ensure effective legal representation and to avoid negative consequences that can arise from deceit.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175066730&txt2find=MAGAnify
When a plaintiff files a frivolous lawsuit, which is a case that lacks any legal basis or is filed for the purpose of harassment or delay, the court has several options to address the situation. Here’s what a judge or court can do in response to a frivolous suit:
Dismiss the Lawsuit: The court can dismiss the lawsuit if it determines that the claims are entirely without merit. This is often done through a motion to dismiss, which may be filed by the defendant.
Sanctions: The court may impose sanctions on the plaintiff for bringing a frivolous suit. Sanctions can include financial penalties, such as requiring the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s legal fees and court costs. Sanctions are intended to discourage the filing of frivolous or abusive lawsuits.
Rule 11 Sanctions (Federal Court): In federal court, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the court to impose sanctions if a party submits pleadings, motions, or other papers that are not well-grounded in fact or law. Sanctions under Rule 11 can include fines or orders to pay the opposing party’s legal costs.
Contempt of Court: In extreme cases, if a plaintiff's behavior is particularly egregious or obstructive, the court might hold the plaintiff in contempt of court. This can result in additional penalties, including fines or other measures.
Referral to Disciplinary Authorities: If the frivolous suit is filed by an attorney, the court might refer the matter to the appropriate bar association or disciplinary authority for investigation and possible disciplinary action against the attorney.
Warning or Admonishment: The court may issue a warning or admonishment to the plaintiff or their attorney, cautioning them against filing such suits in the future. This can sometimes be part of the court’s order when dismissing a case or imposing sanctions.
Restrict Future Filings: In some cases, particularly where a plaintiff has a history of filing frivolous lawsuits, the court might impose restrictions on the plaintiff’s ability to file future lawsuits without permission. This is more common in cases involving vexatious litigants.
By taking these actions, the court aims to prevent misuse of the legal system and to ensure that legal resources are used efficiently and appropriately.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175107526
tractor4sale
5 days ago
Because I am not the one concerned about it! If you sent emails to TSOI twice requesting a conference call with shareholders, those emails would still be in your “sent” email history so feel free to post them here on this board showing the dates on them for our own reading purposes! Again, it should only take about 30 seconds! Why not do TSOI Facebook forum knowing you already stated you do Stockwits, Yahoo, and Ihub message boards? You seem very unhappy with everything that is going on with TSOI so adding some disgruntled posts to the TSOI Facebook page, it should help your cause for holding accountability to TSOI? Go sail away with that golden idea…
BigBadWolf
5 days ago
Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline
Appears that Dixon in the K has to tell the truth as to why the Ongoing pps decline.
T/A has been Verifying whose is personally responsible for said since the Ongoing was never Going On.
-28-
The elimination of monetary liability against our directors and officers under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Nevada law, and the existence of indemnification rights to our directors, officers and employees, may result in substantial expenditures by the Company.
Article 6 of our Articles of Incorporation exculpates our directors and officers from certain monetary liabilities. Article 7 of our Articles of Incorporation provides that we shall indemnify all directors (and all persons serving at our request as a director or officer of another corporation) to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.
Further pursuant to Article 7, the expenses of the indemnified person incurred in defending a civil suit or proceeding must be paid by us as incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit, or proceeding under receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the indemnified person to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by us.
The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in us incurring substantial expenditures, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage us from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.
ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, claims are made against us in the ordinary course of business, which could result in litigation. Claims and associated litigation are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable outcomes could occur, such as monetary damages, fines, penalties, or injunctions prohibiting us from selling one or more products or engaging in other activities. The occurrence of an unfavorable outcome in any specific period could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for that period or future periods.
-29-
However, as of the date of this report, management believes the outcome of currently identified potential claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Currently identified
Where?
Cost of goods sold decreased $42,672, from $79,440 to $36,768, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, respectively. This decrease was mainly due to lower net sales of the Company’s nutraceutical line of products in 2023 vs 2022.
When the truth comes out wink https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174258672
$TGD admits to yet the T/A has verified it for years as to who is & has been responsible for $TSOI's Ongoing pps decline
JohnSmith4
6 days ago
Question. Anyone who has this stock. Are you going to opt for divvy in Campell Neuroscience? Reason why I`m asking is when you apply they ask you " Note If you elect into the stock option of this event it will require the disclosure of your name, address, email address, phone number and tax ID number to the issuer and their transfer agent. Additionally, the new shares issued from this event cannot be held in your account.
I was wondering if they were using this as a tool to get your info so they can find out who said bad things about them on stocktwits, yahoo etc. I`ve had my doubts if it is legit, e.g. the lawsuit about posters speaking ill of company. What president or ceo would even care. Don`t they have regular work to do instead of trolling market boards? I also think company may be legit. e.g. who would go through all the trouble and science for a few dollars, and they could get sued themselves. Comments?
BigBadWolf
1 week ago
Wondering if, the possible consequences of as some have already been shown to be less than.... When a client is not truthful with their attorneys, several consequences can arise, and these consequences can significantly impact both the legal representation and the overall outcome of the case. Here are some common outcomes:
Compromised Legal Strategy: Attorneys rely on accurate and complete information to develop effective legal strategies. If a client is dishonest, the attorney might make decisions based on false or incomplete information, which can lead to a poorly executed strategy and potentially unfavorable outcomes.
Legal Risks: Providing false information can increase legal risks. For instance, if a client lies under oath or provides misleading information in legal documents, they could face charges of perjury or other legal consequences.
Damaged Trust: The attorney-client relationship is based on trust. If an attorney discovers that a client has been dishonest, it can damage or destroy that trust. This can affect the attorney's ability to advocate effectively and could lead to a breakdown in communication.
Ethical Issues: Attorneys have ethical obligations to the court and to the legal system. If a client’s dishonesty comes to light, it can place the attorney in a difficult position, as they are bound by rules of professional conduct that require honesty and integrity. The attorney may be compelled to withdraw from the case or report the dishonesty, depending on the circumstances.
Adverse Outcomes: The lack of honesty can directly impact the outcome of a case. For example, if critical facts are withheld or misrepresented, it can weaken the client's position, lead to sanctions, or result in a less favorable judgment.
Withdrawal of Representation: If an attorney discovers that a client has been deceitful and it affects the representation, the attorney may seek to withdraw from the case. This can create additional delays and complications, as the client would need to find new legal representation.
In summary, honesty and transparency are crucial in the attorney-client relationship to ensure effective legal representation and to avoid negative consequences that can arise from deceit.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175066730&txt2find=MAGAnify
When a plaintiff files a frivolous lawsuit, which is a case that lacks any legal basis or is filed for the purpose of harassment or delay, the court has several options to address the situation. Here’s what a judge or court can do in response to a frivolous suit:
Dismiss the Lawsuit: The court can dismiss the lawsuit if it determines that the claims are entirely without merit. This is often done through a motion to dismiss, which may be filed by the defendant.
Sanctions: The court may impose sanctions on the plaintiff for bringing a frivolous suit. Sanctions can include financial penalties, such as requiring the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s legal fees and court costs. Sanctions are intended to discourage the filing of frivolous or abusive lawsuits.
Rule 11 Sanctions (Federal Court): In federal court, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the court to impose sanctions if a party submits pleadings, motions, or other papers that are not well-grounded in fact or law. Sanctions under Rule 11 can include fines or orders to pay the opposing party’s legal costs.
Contempt of Court: In extreme cases, if a plaintiff's behavior is particularly egregious or obstructive, the court might hold the plaintiff in contempt of court. This can result in additional penalties, including fines or other measures.
Referral to Disciplinary Authorities: If the frivolous suit is filed by an attorney, the court might refer the matter to the appropriate bar association or disciplinary authority for investigation and possible disciplinary action against the attorney.
Warning or Admonishment: The court may issue a warning or admonishment to the plaintiff or their attorney, cautioning them against filing such suits in the future. This can sometimes be part of the court’s order when dismissing a case or imposing sanctions.
Restrict Future Filings: In some cases, particularly where a plaintiff has a history of filing frivolous lawsuits, the court might impose restrictions on the plaintiff’s ability to file future lawsuits without permission. This is more common in cases involving vexatious litigants.
By taking these actions, the court aims to prevent misuse of the legal system and to ensure that legal resources are used efficiently and appropriately.
News
Market Data
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
