U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
Mark One
☑
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the period ended March 31 2011
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ______ to _______
Commission File No. 333-138332
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
20-0936313
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
545 Eighth Avenue, Suite 401, New York, New
York 10019
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
(212) 560-5195
(Issuer’s telephone number)
|
(Previous address if changed from last report)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☑
|
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐
No
☑
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s
classes of common stock, as of the most practicable date:
Class
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2011
|
Common Stock, $0.001
|
620,774
|
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Form 10-Q/A
|
|
Page
|
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010
|
|
3
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
4
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
5-6
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
7-15
|
Forward Looking Statement
|
|
18
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
18-20
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
21
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
|
22
|
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
|
|
23
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors
|
|
23
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
|
|
23
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
|
|
23
|
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information
|
|
23
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
23
|
Signatures
|
|
23
|
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
March 31
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
$ 11,450
|
Prepaid expenses (Note 6)
|
-
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
-
|
|
11,450
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
Bond issue costs, net - related party (Note 4C)
|
32,618
|
|
45,605
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
-
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ 32,618
|
|
$ 57,055
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$ 245,735
|
|
$ 250,612
|
Convertible notes payable-related party, current (Note 4A)
|
565,000
|
|
665,000
|
Accrued interest, convertible notes payable-related party (Note 4A)
|
88,398
|
|
89,098
|
Bonds payable, convertible and secured-related party net of debt discount (Note 4C)
|
1,610,407
|
|
1,610,407
|
Accrued interest, convertible bonds payable-related party (Note 4C)
|
215,262
|
|
149,379
|
Short-term notes payable-related party (Note 4B)
|
32,495
|
|
32,495
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
2,757,297
|
|
2,796,991
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
12,700,504
|
|
12,005,649
|
Total Long-term Liabilities
|
12,700,504
|
|
12,005,649
|
Total Liabilities
|
15,457,801
|
|
14,802,640
|
|
|
|
|
TEMPORARY EQUITY (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.001, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
12,563,500 and 10,200,000 issued and outstanding
|
3,757,786
|
|
3,231,121
|
|
|
|
|
PERMANENT EQUITY
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.001, 1,000,000,000
|
|
|
|
shares authorized, 643,771 & 310,439 issued, and 620,771 &
|
|
|
|
287,438 outstanding respectively
|
643
|
|
310
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,667,908
|
|
972,426
|
Accumulated deficit during the pre-exploration stage
|
(3,321,292)
|
|
(3,321,292)
|
Deficit accumulated
|
(7,330,228)
|
|
(5,428,150.00)
|
Total Stockholder's equity (deficit) (before treasury stock)
|
(8,982,969)
|
|
(7,776,706)
|
Treasury Stock (23,000 shares @ $443 per share) (Note 5)
|
(10,200,000)
|
|
(10,200,000)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' (Deficit)
|
(19,182,969)
|
|
(17,976,706)
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ 32,618
|
|
$ 57,055
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
6,573
|
|
64,565
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
6,573
|
|
64,565
|
Net Loss from Operations
|
(6,573)
|
|
(64,565)
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
-
|
|
-
|
Loss on Settlement of Debt
|
(583,333.00)
|
|
|
(Loss)/ gain in change in fair value
|
|
|
|
of derivative liability
|
(694,855)
|
|
(1,401,688)
|
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature
|
(526,665)
|
|
(604,777)
|
Interest expense
|
(90,652)
|
|
(107,737)
|
Total Other Income (Expense)
|
(1,895,505)
|
|
(2,114,202)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Applicaple to Common Shares
|
(1,902,078)
|
|
(2,178,767)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
-
|
|
-
|
NET LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED
|
|
|
|
OPERATIONS
|
-
|
|
(140,839)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain (Loss) Applicable to Common Shares
|
$ (1,902,078)
|
|
$ (2,319,606)
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, continuing operations
|
$ (3.53)
|
|
$ (7.02)
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
|
|
|
|
Outstanding ( Basic and Diluted)
|
539,292
|
|
310,438
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
|
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
Three Months ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(restated -
|
|
|
|
Note 8)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
($1,902,078)
|
|
($2,178,767)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
-
|
|
|
Amortization of bond issue costs - related party
|
12,987
|
|
12,987
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
526,665
|
|
604,777
|
Change in Fair value of derivative liability
|
694,855
|
|
1,401,688
|
Loss on Settlement of Debt
|
583,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
17,790
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,220
|
Accounts payable
|
(4,877)
|
|
44,555
|
Accrued interest, convertible bonds payable - related party
|
(11,782)
|
|
13,300
|
Accrued interest, convertible notes payable - related party
|
65,883
|
|
81,450
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used In) Operating Activities
|
(11,450)
|
|
-
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
-
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited) (continued)
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from convertible bonds payable - related party
|
(100,000)
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
112,482
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
|
(12,482)
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
(11,450)
|
|
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
11,450
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF PERIOD
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 10,200,000 shares of preferred stock in exchange
|
|
|
|
for 19,667 shares of treasury stock
|
$ -
|
|
|
Net assets acquired in acquisition of MuluncayGoldCorp
|
$ -
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for stock subscriptions
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
$ -
|
|
|
1,667 shares of common stock issued for deposit
|
|
|
|
on a business acquisition
|
$ -
|
|
|
Issuance of Preferred Stock In sttelemt of Debt and alcoved interest
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
6
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Trilliant Exploration Corporation, (the “Company”)
was incorporated as Project Development Pacific, Inc. on December 29, 2003, under the laws of the State of Nevada. The business
purpose of the Company was originally to assist Canadian citizens to access health care services from private providers. On November
26, 2007, the Company changed its name to Trilliant Exploration Corporation, with a purpose to acquire and develop mineral properties.
The Company has elected a fiscal year end of December 31.
On March 30, 2009 (Date of Acquisition), Trilliant
Exploration Corporation (the Parent) acquired a 100% interest in MuluncayGoldCorp (a Subsidiary) (Muluncay). The transaction was
accounted for as a purchase pursuant to ASC Topic No. 805.
On June 29, 2009 (Date of Formation), the Company
established a wholly-owned Trilliant Diamonds Limited (a Subsidiary) (Trilliant Diamonds), a private limited England and Wales
Company, to facilitate the Company’s diamond exploration. Trilliant Diamonds Limited was sold on August 26, 2010 and has
not been a subsidiary since this time.
On July 1, 2009 the Company acquired 799 of
800 shares of AyapampaGold S.A (AYA) (a Subsidiary) at $1 per share for a purchase price of $799. AYA was formed in mid-2007 as
a shell and has been inactive since inception.
On February 11, 2010, Minera Del Pacifico (the
seller of MuluncayGoldCorp) exercised its rights retroactive to December 31, 2009 to terminate the purchase of MuluncayGoldCorp.
The activity of MuluncayGoldCorp from the Date of Acquisition through December 31, 2009 is reported as discontinued operations
pursuant to ASC Topic 205.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements include the operations of the Subsidiaries’ activity from the dates of Acquisition and Formation through
this quarter end. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The Parent and Subsidiaries are collectively
referred to as “the Company.”
The unaudited interim financial statements
of Trilliant Exploration Corporation were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) and reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management,
are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. These statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Company’s most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Pre-Exploration Stage Company
The Company is considered to be in the pre-exploration
stage as defined in ASC 915 “
Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises
” as interpreted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission for mining companies in Industry Guide 7. The Company is devoting substantially all of its efforts
to the execution of its business plan.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Significant estimates that may change in the near future include value of goodwill, impairment of long-lived
assets acquired, and value of investments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consists principally
of currency on hand, demand deposits at commercial banks, and liquid investment funds having a maturity of three months or less
at the time of purchase. The Company had $11,606 and $0 in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
7
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT’D)
Revenue Recognition
The Company will follow the guidance of ASC
Topic 605, formerly, SAB 104 for revenue recognition. In general, the Company will record revenue when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is
reasonably assured. Revenues from services are recognized when the services are performed, evidence of an arrangement exists, the
fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. In circumstances when these criteria are not met, revenue recognition
is deferred until resolution occurs.
Mineral Acquisition and Exploration Costs
Mineral property interests include optioned
and acquired mineral development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral property interest
represents its fair value at the time it was optioned or acquired, either as an individual asset or as a part of a business combination.
The value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained in such
properties. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and development costs are capitalized if proven and probable reserves exist
and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand
the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs
incurred to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations
upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mineral interests costs and related
property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent
impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant
and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of the assets. All property,
plant, and equipment were disposed of and any gains and losses on the disposal are included in discontinued operations as disclosed
in Note 10. As of September 30, 2010, the Company held no property, plant or equipment.
Net Income or (Loss) Per Share of Common
Stock
Basic and diluted loss per common share is
based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period computed under the provisions of Accounting
Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260-10”). All primary dilutive common shares have
been excluded since the inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Such shares consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
3/31/2010
|
Common shares outstanding (Basic)
|
620,771
|
|
287,438
|
Conversion of convertible debt
|
62,015
|
|
30,505
|
Conversion of convertible notes
|
675,154
|
|
219,688
|
Conversion of convertible preferred shares
|
10,204,272
|
|
2,830,503
|
Conversion of warrants
|
31,477,
|
|
15,010
|
Common shares outstanding (Diluted)
|
11,593,689,
|
|
3,383,144
|
8
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT’D)
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
As of March 31, 2011, the Company held no Goodwill. The Company
possesses no other intangible assets.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet
effective accounting standards, if adopted, will have a material effect on our financial statements
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset
and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating
loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period enacted. A valuation allowance is
provided when it is more likely than not that a portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities during
the period in which related temporary differences become deductible. The benefit of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in the Company’s income tax returns are recognized in the consolidated financial statements if such positions are more likely
than not of being sustained.
In accordance with 740-10, the Company recognizes
the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than
not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting this standard, the amount recognized in the financial statements
is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant
tax authority.
Derivative Liabilities
The Company accounts for its embedded conversion
features in its convertible debentures in accordance ASC 815-10, "Derivatives and Hedging", which requires a periodic
valuation of their fair value and a corresponding recognition of liabilities associated with such derivatives, and ASC 815-40,
“Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity”. The recognition of derivative liabilities related to the issuance of convertible
debt is applied first to the proceeds of such issuance as a debt discount, at the date of issuance, and the excess of derivative
liabilities over the proceeds is recognized as “Loss on Valuation of Derivative” in other expense in the accompanying
financial statements. Any subsequent increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities is recognized as “Other
expense” or “Other income”, respectively.
Accounting
Standards Codification subtopic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging; Contracts in Entity
’
s
own Equity (
“
ASC 815-40
”
)
became effective for the Company. The Company
’
s Convertible
Preferred Stock and Convertible debt has certain provisions that require the Company to change conversion price of the Convertible
debt and Convertible Preferred Stock based on the discounted market value. Upon the effective date, the provisions of ASC 815-40
required a reclassification to liability based on the reset feature of the agreements. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 815-40,
the Company determined the fair value of the initial reset provision on preferred stock and convertible debt using the Black-Scholes
formula assuming no dividends, a risk-free interest rate of 0.68%-0.85%, expected volatility of 155.49%-214.23%, and expected life
of 1 and 5 years. The net value of the reset provision at the date of adoption of ASC 815-40 was recorded as a derivative liability
on the balance sheet and a reduction to convertible redeemable preferred stock and convertible debt. Changes in fair value are
recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date.
The fair value of the preferred stock and convertible
debt at September 31, 2010 was determined using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:
Dividend yield: 0%
Volatility 254.30%
Risk free rate: 0.70%
The change in fair value of the convertible
preferred stock and convertible debt derivative liability resulted in a current year non-operating loss to operations of $694,855.
Fair Value of Instruments
Accounting Standards Codification subtopic
825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”) requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and short-term borrowings, as reflected
in the balance sheets, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. All other significant financial
assets, financial liabilities and equity instruments of the Company are either recognized or disclosed in the financial statements
together with other information relevant for making a reasonable assessment of future cash flows, interest rate risk and credit
risk. Where practicable the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities have been determined and disclosed; otherwise
only available information pertinent to fair value has been disclosed.
The company follows Accounting Standards Codification
subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”) and Accounting Standards Codification subtopic
825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to
conform the prior period data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported net loss.
Currency Risk and Foreign Currency Translations
The functional currency of the Company is the
United States Dollar (USD). In accordance with ASC Topic No. 830, realized gains or losses on expenses incurred in denominations
other than USD are recognized in earnings on the transaction date. At such time as there are any foreign denominated assets or
liabilities, the Company will report changes in valuation in a Statement of Other Comprehensive Income or (Loss) due to the changes
in cumulative adjustments from foreign currency translation.
9
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
NOTE 3 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes the tax effects of transactions
in the year in which such transactions enter into the determination of net income regardless of when reported for tax purposes.
Deferred taxes provided for under ASC Topic No. 740 give effect to the temporary differences which may arise from differences in
the bases of fixed assets, depreciation methods, and allowances based on the income taxes expected to be payable in future years.
Deferred tax assets arising as a result of net operating loss carry-forwards and other temporary differences have been offset completely
by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of their utilization in future periods. Operating loss carry-forwards of $10,651,520,
generated since inception through March 31 31, 2011, will begin to expire in 2031. Accordingly, deferred tax assets of approximately
$3,151,400 were completely offset by the valuation allowance, which increased by $665,727and $762,568 during the three months endingMarch
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, based on the U.S. Statutory rate of 35%.
NOTE 4- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A – Convertible Notes Payable
The Company has entered into multiple convertible
notes payable agreements with an investment firm that is also a minority stockholder of the Company. Each note carries a separately
dated promissory note that bears interest of 8% and is payable on or before August 31, 2010, with each funding due one year from
original date of receipt. Principal and interest are convertible at the option of the note-holder into shares of the Company’s
common stock at the rate of 80% of the average of the five daily volume weighted average price preceding the conversion date. Several
Notes are in default and status of default is indicated in the following table. The Notes carry no penalty or change in interest
rate for default. Accrued interest and interest expense on the convertible notes payable as of and for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 totaled $75,251 and $39,354, respectively, and accrued interest at December 31, 2009 totaled $35,897. Due to the contingent
nature of the conversion price, the company accounted for beneficial conversion feature and derivative liability on the note. The
convertible promissory notes with the investment firm totaled $665,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and are summarized
as follows:
Convertible Notes
|
|
|
Interest expense
Nine month
|
|
|
Issue date
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Date of Default
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
(A)
|
12/31/2008
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
$90,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
9,020
|
|
(A)
|
1/16/2009
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
|
|
9,649
|
|
(A)
|
1/23/2009
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
4,748
|
|
(A)
|
2/2/2009
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
1479
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
(A)
|
3/9/2009
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
(B)
|
4/8/2009
|
|
4/8/2010
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
(C)
|
4/27/2009
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
(D)
|
4/27/2009
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6/23/2009
|
|
6/23/2010
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
6/23/2010
|
|
|
|
1479
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
7/1/2009
|
|
7/1/2010
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
7/2/2010
|
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
7/6/2009
|
|
7/6/2010
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
7/7/2010
|
|
|
|
1183
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
8/26/2009
|
|
8/31/2010
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,539
|
|
|
|
8,951
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
$665,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$39,354
|
|
|
|
$48,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A), Amounts borrowed were part
of a master note agreement totaling $195,000
,(B) The company borrowed, 50,000 on
April 8, 2010.
(C) and (D), The Company borrowed $75,000 on April 27, 2009,
and subsequently repaid this note on May 29, 2009
10
January 5, 2009 Note:
From January 5, 2009 to March 9, 2009, the
Company issued $275,000 Convertible Notes that matured on January 5, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% and is convertible
into the Company’s common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 80% of the average rate
of five preceding the closing date prior to notice of conversion.
The Company identified embedded derivatives
related to the Convertible Note entered into on March 9, 2009 (completion of funding as per agreement). These embedded
derivatives included certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires
that the Company record the fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Note and to adjust the fair
value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Note, the Company determined a fair
value of $218,585 of the embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black
Scholes Model based on the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
181.03
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded debt
derivative of $125,165 was allocated as a debt discount with the remainder ($93,420) charged to current period operations as interest
expense.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company
amortized $2,072 and $84,963 to current period operations as amortization of beneficial conversion feature.
The fair value of
the described embedded derivative of $137,304 and $70,253 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively was determined
using the
Black Scholes Model
with the following assumptions:
2010 2009
Dividend yield:
|
-0-%
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
166.87%
|
|
129.95
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
0.48%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
loss of $67,051 and a gain of $102,276, respectively.
April 8, 2009 Note
:
From April 8, 2009, the Company issued a $50,000
Convertible Note that matured on April 8, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 80% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion.
The Company identified embedded derivatives
related to the Convertible Note entered into on April 8, 2009. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion
features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance
sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Note, the Company determined a fair value of $42,239 of the embedded
derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black Scholes Model based on the following
assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
181.03
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded debt
derivative of $20,261 was allocated as a debt discount with the remainder ($21,978) charged to that period of operations as interest
expense.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company
amortized $2,348 and $11,741 to current period operations as amortization of beneficial conversion feature.
The fair value of
the described embedded derivative of $24,964 and $21,911 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively was determined
using the
Black Scholes Model
with the following assumptions:
2010 2009
Dividend yield:
|
-0-%
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
166.87%
|
|
129.95
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
0.48%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
loss (gain) of $3,053 and $(16,024), respectively.
June 23, 2009 Note
:
From June 23, 2009, the Company issued a $25,000
Convertible Note that matured on June 23, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 80% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion.
The Company identified embedded derivatives
related to the Convertible Note entered into on June 23, 2009. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion
features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance
sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Note, the Company determined a fair value of $19,148 of the embedded
derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black Scholes Model based on the following
assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
155.49
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded debt
derivative of $12,102 was allocated as a debt discount with the remainder ($7,046) charged to that period of operations as interest
expense.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company
amortized $4,449 and $3,967 to current period operations as amortization of beneficial conversion feature.
The fair value of
the described embedded derivative of $12,482 and $13,186 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively was determined
using the
Black Scholes Model
with the following assumptions:
2010 2009
Dividend yield:
|
-0-%
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
166.87%
|
|
129.95
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
0.48%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
gain of $705 and $4,458, respectively.
July 2009 and August 2009 Note
:
From July 2009 to August, 2009, the Company
issued a three note totaling to $315,000 Convertible Note that matured on July 1, 2010, July 6, 2010 and August 31, 2010. The note
bears interest at a rate of 8% and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at any time at the holder’s option,
at the conversion rate of 80% of the average rate of five preceding the closing date prior to notice of conversion.
The Company identified embedded derivatives
related to the Convertible Note entered into on date of Note. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion
features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance
sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Note, the Company determined a fair value of $241,266 of the embedded
derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black Scholes Model based on the following
assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
155.49
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded debt
derivative of $152,484 was allocated as a debt discount with the remainder ($88,782) charged to that period of operations as interest
expense.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company
amortized $88,360 and $17,642 to current period operations as amortization of beneficial conversion feature.
On January 22, 2011, the $100,000 Convertible
Note was assigned to Williams at the $0.001 of conversion price. The Company recorded $582,973 as loss on change in term of note.
On the same date the Company issued 333,333 no of Common stock against settlement of this Note of $100,000 and accrued interest
of $12,482.
The fair value of
the described embedded derivative of $157,276 and $184,765 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively was determined
using the
Black Scholes Model
with the following assumptions:
2010 2009
Dividend yield:
|
-0-%
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
166.87%
|
|
129.95
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
0.48%
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
gain of $27,490 and $41,942, respectively.
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months and Nine months Ended September
30, 2010
NOTE 4- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(CONT’D)
B – Short-Term Notes Payable
The Company has borrowed funds from stockholders for working capital
purposes from time to time. The loans are non-interest bearing, payable on demand and, consequently, reported as current liabilities.
The Company has received $39,514 in advances since inception and made repayments of $7,019 in cash, resulting in a payable balance
of $32,495 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The Company also has related party payables of $77,942 and $24,589 as
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, for reimbursable expenses incurred in the normal course of business.
C – Bonds Payable, Convertible & Secured
The Company has entered into multiple convertible bond agreements
with an investment firm that is also a minority stockholder of the Company.:
The convertible bonds were listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue date
|
Maturity
|
Principal
|
Interest rate
|
Default rate
|
Date of Default
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
10/15/2008
|
10/15/2010
|
$1,058,407*
|
9.00%
|
18.00%
|
1/15/2010
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
|
4/30/2009
|
10/31/2010
|
300,000
|
9.00%
|
18.00%
|
1/15/2010
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
10/12/2009
|
1/12/2010
|
252,000
|
9.00%
|
9.00%
|
1/13/2010
|
|
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
11/3/2009
|
2/3/2010
|
-*
|
9.00%
|
9.00%
|
2/3/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$1,610,407
|
|
|
|
Less: Debt Discount 7,703
Convertible Bond- Current $1,602,704
*On August 23, 2010, the Company repaid $241,593 in principal on
(A) and $210,000 in principal on (D).
11
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
October 2008 Bond
:
In October 15, 2008, the Company issued a $1,300,000
of Convertible Bond that matured on October 15, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 9% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 85% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion,
provided that Holder shall not receive more than 9.99% of
the issued and outstanding Common Stock. The debenture was recorded net of a beneficial conversion feature of $229,412,
based on the relative fair value of the conversion feature.
The beneficial conversion
feature is being amortized over the term of the debenture. During the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
the Company recorded amortization of the beneficial conversion feature related to this bond of $85,794 and $85,794, respectively.
April 2009 Bond
:
In April 30, 2009, the Company issued a $300,000
of Convertible Bond that matured on October 31, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 9% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 85% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion,
provided that Holder shall not receive more than 9.99% of
the issued and outstanding Common Stock. The debenture was recorded net of a beneficial conversion feature of $52,941,
based on the relative fair value of the conversion feature.
The beneficial conversion
feature is being amortized over the term of the debenture. During the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company
recorded amortization of the beneficial conversion feature related to this bond of $0 and $29,315, respectively.
October 2009 Bond
:
In October 12, 2009, the Company issued a $252,000
of Convertible Bond that matured on January 12, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 9% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 85% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion,
provided that Holder shall not receive more than 9.99% of
the issued and outstanding Common Stock. The debenture was recorded net of a beneficial conversion feature of $44,471,
based on the relative fair value of the conversion feature.
The beneficial conversion
feature is being amortized over the term of the debenture. During the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
the Company recorded amortization of the beneficial conversion feature related to this bond of $5,801 and $0, respectively.
November 2009 Bond
:
In November 3, 2009, the Company issued a $252,000
of Convertible Bond that matured on February 03, 2010. The note bears interest at a rate of 9% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at any time at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 85% of the average rate of five preceding the
closing date prior to notice of conversion,
provided that Holder shall not receive more than 9.99% of
the issued and outstanding Common Stock. The debenture was recorded net of a beneficial conversion feature of $37,059,
based on the relative fair value of the conversion feature.
The beneficial conversion feature is being
amortized over the term of the debenture. During the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded
amortization of the beneficial conversion feature related to this bond of $13,695 and $0, respectively
On August 23, 2010, the Company issued 2,363,500 shares
of Preferred stock with Trafalgar as part of a transaction that paid off $193,599 in interest and $451,593 in principal on the
Company’s convertible bonds for total consideration of $645,192.
The Company incurred bond issuance expenses which are
being amortized over the period of bond. The amortization of issuance expenses were $12,986 and $12,986 for the nine month ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest expenses for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 on this Convertible Bond were $65,883 and $81,450, respectively.
NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Stock Splits
On November 9, 2007, the Company affected a
2-for-1 forward split on its common stock. On November 14, 2008, the Company affected another 2-for-1 forward stock split. Par
value remained at $.001, and both splits have been retroactively applied to the earliest period presented in the accompanying financial
statements.
On January 26, 2011, the Board of Directors
of Trilliant Exploration Corporation, a Nevada corporation pursuant to unanimous written consent resolutions authorized and approved
a reverse stock split of one for every three hundred (1:300) of our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock was effectuated
on April 8, 2011. All references in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been retroactively
restated to reflect the above change in the ordinary share structure.
Preferred Stock and Treasury Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000
shares of convertible Preferred stock of the Company.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the Company had 12,563,500 and 10,200,000 preferred shares issued and outstanding, respectively.
Preferred stockholders do not receive interest
or dividends separately from common stock shareholders. Preferred Stock holder shall participate in dividends when and if declared
in the same proportion as common stock shareholders. Preferred stock is convertible into common shares at the lowest volume weighted
average price of the common shares in the five days preceding conversion.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
subtopic 470-20, Debt, Debt with Conversions and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”), the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in the Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company allocated a portion of the value of share cancelled
to Preferred stock. The fair value of the imbedded beneficial conversion feature was determined using the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model which approximates the fair value measured using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: Dividend
yield: $-0-; Volatility: 214.38% and risk free rate: 0.85%.
The FASB finalized ACS 815, “Determining
Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock.” Under ASC 815, instruments which
do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. In accordance with ASC 470-20, the
Company has classified the Preferred Stock outside of permanent equity. The Company has determined that it needs to account for these
imbedded beneficial conversion features, issued to holder in 2009 for its Convertible Preferred Stock, as derivative liabilities,
and apply the provisions of ASC 815. The instruments have a ratchet provision (that adjusts the exercise price according
to market rate ie at 85% of the market rate). As a result, the ratchet provision has been accounted for as derivative
liabilities, in accordance with ASC 815. ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”
(“ASC 815”) requires that the fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with
the change in fair value reported in the consolidated statement of operations
For 10,200,000 Preferred Stock issuance
On December 31, 2009, the Company issued to
Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund FIS (“Trafalgar”) (a significant stockholder of the Company), 10,200,000
shares of Preferred Stock (par value $.001), in exchange for 23,000 shares of the Company’s own common stock previously held
by Trafalgar. The 19,667 common stock were acquired in the year 2009 and 3,333 common stock in the year 2010 at $443 per share
and the preferred stock was issued at $1.00 per share. The transaction was recorded using the Cost Method, resulting in treasury
stock of $10,200,000 and an increase to Preferred Stock value of $10,200,000.
The fair value of the embedded conversion features
were measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the date of issuance and as of September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imbedded Beneficial Conversion Feature:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
Annual rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
166.87
|
%
|
|
|
129.95
|
%
|
|
|
214.23
|
%
|
Weighted Average life (years)
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
$
|
9,127,313
|
|
|
$
|
8,518,105
|
|
|
$
|
10,034,407
|
|
The risk-free interest rate was based
on rates established by the Federal Reserve. The Company based expected volatility on the historical volatility for
its common stock. The expected life of the embedded beneficial conversion features was based on their full term. The
expected dividend yield was based upon the fact that the Company has not historically paid dividends, and does not expect to pay
dividends in the future.
The net value of the reset provision at the
date of issuance was recorded as a derivative liability in the amount of $10,034,407 and debited to beneficial conversion feature
which was deducted from the face value of the preferred stock, since the preferred stock is a classified as temporary equity. The
company is amortizing beneficial conversion feature over the period of 5 years as a charge to operation. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, $1,006,190 and $505,844 was charged to operation, respectively.
As of the date of the financial statements,
the Company believes an event under the contract that would create an obligation to settle in cash or other current assets is remote
and has classified the obligation as a long term liability.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the reset derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
loss of $609,208 and gain of $1,627,910, respectively.
For 2,363,500 Preferred Stock
On August 23, 2010, the Company issued 2,363,500
shares of preferred stock with Trafalgar as part of a transaction that paid off $193,599 in interest and $451,593 in principal
on the Company’s convertible bonds for total consideration of $645,192.
The fair value of the embedded conversion features
were measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the date of issuance and as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imbedded Beneficial Conversion Feature:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
Annual rate of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166.87
|
%
|
|
|
180.22
|
%
|
Weighted Average life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,212,157
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,584
|
|
The risk-free interest rate was based
on rates established by the Federal Reserve. The Company based expected volatility on the historical volatility for
its common stock. The expected life of the embedded beneficial conversion features was based on their full term. The
expected dividend yield was based upon the fact that the Company has not historically paid dividends, and does not expect to pay
dividends in the future.
The net value of the reset provision at the
date of issuance was recorded as a derivative liability in the amount of $645,192 (maximum limit to value of preferred stock) and
debited to beneficial conversion feature which was deducted from the face value of the preferred stock, since the preferred stock
is a classified as temporary equity. The company is amortizing beneficial conversion feature over the period of 5 years as a charge
to operation. During the nine month ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, $13,434 and $0 was charged to operation, respectively.
As of the date of the financial statements,
the Company believes an event under the contract that would create an obligation to settle in cash or other current assets is remote
and has classified the obligation as a long term liability.
For the nine month ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the reset derivative liability to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating
loss of $1,566,965 and $0, respectively.
Common Stock
The Company’s common stock is thinly traded with a limited
market (amounts are adjusted by the reverse stock split):
|
Common shares issued
|
Common shares outstanding
|
March 31, 2011
|
643,771
|
620,771
|
December 31, 2010
|
310,438
|
287,438
|
12
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months March 31, 2011
NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(CONT’D)
13
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(CONT’D)
On August 23, 2010, the company cancelled 3,333
shares of common stock as part of issuance of 10,200,000 preferred stock, refer above preferred stock.
NOTE 6 - OTHER MATERIAL CONTRACTS
In June 2009, the Company acquired a one year
insurance policy with total premium of $20,760. As of March 31, 2011, total payments of $20,760 were made and $20,760 of the total
premium has been amortized, resulting in a balance of $-0- as of March 31, 2011.
In September 2009, the company entered into
a marketing contract for total expense of $25,200 for a nine month period. The company amortized $12,600 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
.
NOTE 7- GOING CONCERN
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has accumulated an operating deficit since its inception
of $10,651,520 as of March 31, 2011 . Additionally, current economic conditions in the United States and globally create significant
problems attaining sufficient funding. Accordingly, management has encountered significant difficulties in obtaining financing.
These items raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In view of these matters,
realization of the assets of the Company is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financial requirements through
equity financing, borrowing, and the success of future operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
NOTE 8 – CORRECTION OF PRIOR YEAR ACCOUNTING
ERROR
The Company’s consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2009, contained the following errors: (1) overstatement of debt in the amount of $2,389,200; overstatement
of a related investment in the amount of $2,389,200, and overstatement of accrued interest payable in the amount of $149,112. As
of December 31, 2009, the investment and debt (along with minimal foreign currency translation adjustments) were eliminated, and
accumulated deficit was increased by $149,112 to correct the aggregate effect of the errors. The error is a result of the Company
recording a transaction, known as Global Diamond Resources, which did not materialize wherein the Company was borrowing funds under
a convertible loan agreement to purchase, through a subsidiary, stock of a privately held company. The lenders were unable to complete
the transaction and neither funds nor equities changed hands. The Board of Directors issued a resolution to void the transaction.
The Company also made the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Paid in
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Stock
|
Stock Amount
|
Capital
|
During Pre Exploraiton
|
Equity (Deficit)
|
Balance December 31, 2009(Prior k)
|
$
|
10,200
|
$93,132
|
$10,706,521
|
$(3,557,556)
|
$(7252297)
|
Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
(92,822)
|
92,822
|
|
|
Reversal of interest Payable
|
|
|
|
|
149,112
|
149,112
|
Beneficial Converson feature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
-(10,034,40)7
|
|
|
|
(10,034,407)
|
Re-class
|
|
10,189,800
|
|
(10,189,800)
|
|
|
Amortization of Beneficial Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feature on Preferred Stock
|
|
1,011,688
|
|
|
|
1,011,688
|
Amortization of Beneficial Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Convertible Debt
|
|
|
|
363,883
|
|
363,883
|
Change in Value of Derivative Liability
|
|
|
|
|
1,747,423
|
1,747,423
|
Change in Interest Expense
|
$
|
|
|
|
(1,660,261)
|
(1,660,261)
|
Balance December 31, 2009(restated)
|
|
1,177,281
|
310
|
973,426
|
3,321,292
|
(1,170,265)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removed Preferred Stock from Equity
|
|
(1,177,281)
|
|
|
|
(1,177,281)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,347556)
|
14
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Three Months and March 31, 2011
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Charms Investments entered into that certain
debt assignment agreement dated January 22, 2011 regarding a $100,000 note issued July 1, 2009, with William Lieberman, the President/Chief
Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Therefore, the Board of Directors acknowledged the Debt
and the Loan Agreement and ratified and approved the issuance of 333,333 shares of restricted common stock to William Lieberman
in satisfaction of the Debt. In accordance with the issuance of the common shares to William Lieberman, there was a change in control.
On January 26, 2011, the Board of Directors
of Trilliant Exploration Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”) pursuant to unanimous written consent
resolutions authorized and approved a reverse stock split of one for every three hundred (1:300) of our total issued and outstanding
shares of common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Reverse Stock Split was effectuated on April 8, 2011 following
the filing of the appropriate documentation with FINRA.
The Company has evaluated events from the date
of this report, through the date whereupon the financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no additional
items to disclose.
NOTE 10 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2009, the Company was in
default on credit arrangements for the purchase of MuluncayGoldCorp. The Company received a letter on February 11, 2010 in which
Minera Del Pacifico informed the Company of the intent to enforce its rights under the agreements, and terminated all contractual
agreements between the two companies effective December 31, 2009. Management, in the interest of the Company and lacking financial
means to further pursue contractual agreements, acknowledged the letter from Minera Del Pacifico and released all claims on mining
assets and rights attached to previous agreements.
Effective December 31, 2009, the Company disposed
of its Muluncay Subsidiary and recognized a Net Loss from Discontinued Operations of $1,964,636, consisting of a $1,773,141 loss
on disposal and $191,495 loss from operations for the period of March 30, 2009 through December 31, 2009. The Company was released
from all obligations and released all claims on assets primarily because it has incurred significant operating losses since acquisition
and the Company could not attract operating capital to meet contractual obligations since the acquisition of MuluncayGoldCorp.
The assets lost consisted primarily of accounts receivable, inventories, property and equipment, and other assets. Minera Del Pacifico
also assumed certain accounts payable and accrued liabilities. As of December 31, 2009 the company disposed of its Ayapama subsidiary.
15
The following is a summary of the significant net assets lost and
discharge of liabilities as determined at December 31, 2009:
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Checking/Savings
|
|
$
|
4,501
|
|
Accounts payable - trade
|
|
$
|
57,940
|
|
Accounts receivable trade
|
|
|
86,788
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
Employee loans
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
Loan payable - related party
|
|
|
644,985
|
|
Accounts receivable - rel. party
|
|
|
472,598
|
|
Unearned income
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Accounts Receivable - Other
|
|
|
186,920
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
Foreign taxes payable
|
|
|
120,736
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
91,949
|
|
Payroll liabilities
|
|
|
91,975
|
|
Fixed Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage liabilities, net
|
|
|
403,620
|
|
Land
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,348,079
|
|
Plant
|
|
|
1,915,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
105,213
|
|
Net assets/loss on disposal
|
|
$
|
1,773,141
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
614
|
|
Operating loss, 3/30-12/31/09
|
|
|
191,495
|
|
Electrical equipment
|
|
|
10,476
|
|
Net loss, discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1,964,636
|
|
Tools
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(206,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral rights
|
|
|
412,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,121,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price
that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded
at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions
that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk
of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level
1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation
methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
To the extent that valuation is based on models
or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain
cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure
purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The debt derivative, comprised of our bifurcated convertible
debt features on our convertible notes, is measured at fair value using quoted market prices and estimated volatility factors based
on historical prices for the Company’s common stock and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The
following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 using:
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
332,028
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
332,028
|
|
Preferred stock derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
11,339,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,339,470
|
|
The following table provides a summary of changes
in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
Derivative
Liability
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
8,808,222
|
|
Preferred stock issued
|
|
|
645,192
|
|
Mark-to-market at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
- Embedded debt derivatives
|
|
|
41,911
|
|
- Reset provisions relating to preferred stock
|
|
|
2,176,173
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
11,671,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period included in earnings relating to the liabilities held at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,218,084
|
|
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for statements of historical fact, certain
information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are usually identified by our use of certain terminology, including “will,”
“believes,” “may,” “expects,” “should,” “seeks,” “anticipates,”
or “intends,” or by discussions of strategy or intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results or achievements to be materially different from any future
results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, our history
of operating losses and uncertainty of future profitability; our lack of working capital and uncertainty regarding our ability
to continue as a going concern; uncertainty of access to additional capital; risks inherent in mineral exploration; environmental
liability claims and insurance; dependence on consultants and third parties as well as those factors discussed in the sections
entitled “
Risk Factors
,” “
Business
,”
and “
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
.”
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materializes, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may
vary materially from those expected, estimated, or projected. Forward-looking statements in this document are not a prediction
of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. Given these uncertainties, users of
the information included herein, including investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission
permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically
and legally extract or produce. The Company is an exploration stage company and its properties have no known body of ore. U.S.
investors are cautioned not to assume that the Company has any mineralization that is economically or legally mineable.
All references in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-K to the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “TTXP,” and the “Company”
refer to Trilliant Exploration Corporation.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Trilliant Exploration Corporation was incorporated
under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 29, 2003 under the name Project Development Pacific Inc. We were previously engaged
in the business of assisting Canadian citizens to access health care services from private providers. On November 26, 2007, we
changed our name to Trilliant Exploration Corporation with a business purpose to acquire and develop mineral properties. During
2007, we began acquiring interests in mining properties.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Pre-Exploration Stage Company
The Company is considered to be in the pre-exploration
stage as defined in ASC 915 “
Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises
” as interpreted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission for mining companies in Industry Guide 7. The Company is devoting substantially all of its efforts
to the execution of its business plan.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Significant estimates that may change in the near future include value of goodwill, impairment of long-lived
assets acquired, and value of investments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consists principally
of currency on hand, demand deposits at commercial banks, and liquid investment funds having a maturity of three months or less
at the time of purchase. The Company had $0 and $11,450 in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
Revenue Recognition
The Company will follow the guidance of ASC
Topic 605, formerly, SAB 104 for revenue recognition. In general, the Company will record revenue when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is
reasonably assured. Revenues from services are recognized when the services are performed, evidence of an arrangement exists, the
fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. In circumstances when these criteria are not met, revenue recognition
is deferred until resolution occurs.
Mineral Acquisition and Exploration Costs
Mineral property interests include optioned
and acquired mineral development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral property interest
represents its fair value at the time it was optioned or acquired, either as an individual asset or as a part of a business combination.
The value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained in such
properties. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and development costs are capitalized if proven and probable reserves exist
and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand
the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs
incurred to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations
upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mineral interests costs and related
property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent
impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant
and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of the assets. All property,
plant, and equipment were disposed of and any gains and losses on the disposal are included in discontinued operations as disclosed
in Note 10. As of March 31, 2011, the Company held no property, plant or equipment.
Net Income or (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock
Basic and diluted loss per common share is
based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period computed under the provisions of Accounting
Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260-10”). All primary dilutive common shares have
been excluded since the inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Such shares consist of the following:
|
3/31/2011
|
|
3/31/2010
|
Common shares outstanding (Basic)
|
620,771
|
|
287,438
|
Conversion of convertible debt
|
62,015
|
|
30,505
|
Conversion of convertible notes
|
675,154
|
|
219,688
|
Conversion of convertible preferred shares
|
10,204,272
|
|
2,830,503
|
Conversion of warrants
|
31,477
|
|
15,010
|
Common shares outstanding (Diluted)
|
11,593,689
|
|
3,383,144
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
As of March 31, 2011, the Company held no Goodwill. The Company
possesses no other intangible assets.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet
effective accounting standards, if adopted, will have a material effect on our financial statements
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset
and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating
loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period enacted. A valuation allowance is
provided when it is more likely than not that a portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities during
the period in which related temporary differences become deductible. The benefit of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in the Company’s income tax returns are recognized in the consolidated financial statements if such positions are more likely
than not of being sustained.
In accordance with 740-10, the Company recognizes
the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than
not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting this standard, the amount recognized in the financial statements
is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant
tax authority.
Derivative Liabilities
The Company accounts for its embedded conversion
features in its convertible debentures in accordance ASC 815-10, "Derivatives and Hedging", which requires a periodic
valuation of their fair value and a corresponding recognition of liabilities associated with such derivatives, and ASC 815-40,
“Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity”. The recognition of derivative liabilities related to the issuance of convertible
debt is applied first to the proceeds of such issuance as a debt discount, at the date of issuance, and the excess of derivative
liabilities over the proceeds is recognized as “Loss on Valuation of Derivative” in other expense in the accompanying
financial statements. Any subsequent increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities is recognized as “Other
expense” or “Other income”, respectively.
Accounting
Standards Codification subtopic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging; Contracts in Entity
’
s
own Equity (
“
ASC 815-40
”
)
became effective for the Company. The Company
’
s Convertible
Preferred Stock and Convertible debt has certain provisions that require the Company to change conversion price of the Convertible
debt and Convertible Preferred Stock based on the discounted market value. Upon the effective date, the provisions of ASC 815-40
required a reclassification to liability based on the reset feature of the agreements. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 815-40,
the Company determined the fair value of the initial reset provision on preferred stock and convertible debt using the Black-Scholes
formula assuming no dividends, a risk-free interest rate of 0.68%-0.85%, expected volatility of 155.49%-214.23%, and expected life
of 1 and 5 years. The net value of the reset provision at the date of adoption of ASC 815-40 was recorded as a derivative liability
on the balance sheet and a reduction to convertible redeemable preferred stock and convertible debt. Changes in fair value are
recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date.
The fair value of the preferred stock and convertible
debt at March 31, 2011 was determined using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:
Dividend yield: 0%
Volatility 254.30%
Risk free rate: 0.70%
The change in fair value of the convertible
preferred stock and convertible debt derivative liability resulted in a current period non-operating loss to operations of $694,855.
Fair Value of Instruments
Accounting Standards Codification subtopic
825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”) requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and short-term borrowings, as reflected
in the balance sheets, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. All other significant financial
assets, financial liabilities and equity instruments of the Company are either recognized or disclosed in the financial statements
together with other information relevant for making a reasonable assessment of future cash flows, interest rate risk and credit
risk. Where practicable the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities have been determined and disclosed; otherwise
only available information pertinent to fair value has been disclosed.
The company follows Accounting Standards Codification
subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”) and Accounting Standards Codification subtopic
825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to
conform the prior period data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported net loss.
Currency Risk and Foreign Currency Translations
The functional currency of the Company is the
United States Dollar (USD). In accordance with ASC Topic No. 830, realized gains or losses on expenses incurred in denominations
other than USD are recognized in earnings on the transaction date. At such time as there are any foreign denominated assets or
liabilities, the Company will report changes in valuation in a Statement of Other Comprehensive Income or (Loss) due to the changes
in cumulative adjustments from foreign currency translation.
CURRENT BUSINESS OPERATIONS
We are engaged in the evaluation, acquisition,
exploration and advancement of mining projects. Although we were considered to have exited the pre-exploration stage with the Muluncay
acquisition, the disposal of Muluncay necessitates that we re-enter the pre-exploration stage effective December 31, 2009. As of
the date of this Quarterly Report, we are devoting substantially all of our efforts to the execution of our business operations.
To date, funding to acquire and explore gold properties and for operational purposes was acquired through private financings.
Fairfield Gold S.A. de C.V. Letter of Intent
Effective June 3, 2010, our Board of Directors
authorized the execution of a letter of intent (the “Letter of Intent”) with Fairfield Gold S.A. de C.V. (“Fairfield
Gold”), regarding the acquisition of the assets of Fairfield Gold for payment of consideration in the amount of $160,000.
The Letter of Intent provides that execution of a definitive agreement is subject to completion of satisfactory due diligence by
both parties. As of August 3, 2010, we have received an audit report from Baker Tilly Mexico, S.C., regarding Fairfield, including
balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash
flows for the period from January 1, 201 to June 30, 2010 and for the period from July 9, 2009 (incorporation) to December 31,
2009. In the event due diligence is satisfactorily completed by us and Fairfield Gold, we intend to execute a definitive share
purchase agreement or other similar documentation pertaining to consummation of the transaction. After additional due diligence
the firm decided not to pursue the investment during the fourth quarter of 2010.
16
Muluncay Project
On October 15, 2008, we entered into an asset
purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Compania Minera Del Pacifico S.A., an Ecuadorian corporation
(“Del Pacifico”) for the purchase of the Muluncay Project. Subsequently, on March 30, 2009, we entered into a share
transfer agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”) with Del Pacifico and its wholly owned subsidiary, Compania Muluncaygold
Corp. S.A. (“Muluncay”). The Share Transfer Agreement superseded in its entirety the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement.
In further accordance with the terms and provisions
of the Share Transfer Agreement, we also agreed to transfer to Muluncay an aggregate of $1,800,000 as follows: (i) an initial payment
of $800,000 within ninety day of March 30, 2009; and (ii) the balance of $1,000,000 within 180 days of March 30, 2009.
As of December 11, 2009, we were in default
for the purchase of Muluncay. We received a letter on February 11, 2010 in which Del Pacifico informed us of its intent to enforce
its rights under the Share Transfer Agreement and terminated all contractual agreements between us and Del Pacifico effective December
31, 2009. In the interest of our shareholders and lacking financial funds to further pursue contractual agreements with Del Pacifico,
we acknowledged the letter from Del Pacifico and released all claims on the Controlling Assets and rights under the terms of the
Share Purchase Agreement.
Effective December 31, 2009, Del Pacifico terminated
the agreement due to our inability to provide the $1,800,000 investment pursuant to the contract terms. Thus, we determined to
discontinue operations through our Muluncay subsidiary. We were released from all obligations and released all claims on the Controlling
Assets primarily because we had incurred significant operating losses since acquisition and we could not attract operating capital
to meet contractual obligations since the acquisition of Muluncay. On December 31, 2009, we completed the loss recognition for
a total loss of $1,964,636.
RESULTS OF OPERATION
Three Month Period Ended March
31, 2011 Compared to Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2010.
Our net loss for the three months period ended
March 31, 2011 was $1,902,078 compared to a net loss of $2,178,767 during the three month period ended March 31, 2010, a change
of $276,689. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not generate any revenue from continuing operations.
During the three month period ended March 31,
2011, we incurred operating expenses of $6,573 compared to $64,565 incurred during the three month period ended March 31, 2010,
a decrease of $57,992. These expenses incurred during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 consisted of: (i) professional
fees of $5,000 (2010: $41,700); (ii) insurance of $-0- (2010: $5,190); and (iii) other general and administrative expenses of $1,573
(2010: $17,675). The decrease in operating expenses incurred during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 from the three
month period ended March 31, 2010 was primarily attributable to the following items: (i) a decrease in professional fees of $36,700;
and (ii) and a decrease in other general and administrative expenses of $16,102. Operating expenses decreased due to the decreased
scope and scale of our business operations.
Other income (expense) was incurred during
the three month period ended March 31, 2011 of ($1,895,505) (2010: ($2,114,202). Other income (expense) during the nine month period
ended March 31, 2011 consisted of: (i) interest expense (including amortization of beneficial conversion feature) of ($617,317)
compared to ($712,514) during the three month period ended March 31, 2010; and (ii) change in derivative liability of ($694,855)
((2010: ($1,401,688)). We determined to discontinue operations with our Muluncay subsidiary, a mining operation in Ecuador, effective
December 31, 2009.
Therefore, this resulted in a net loss applicable
to common shares during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 of $1,902,078 compared to a net loss applicable to common shares
during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 of $2,178,767.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2011
As at March 31, 2011, our current assets were
$-0- and other assets of $32,618 representing bond issue costs – related party – for total assets of $32,618. Our current
liabilities were $2,757,297, which resulted in a working capital deficit of $2,724,679. As of March 31, 2011, liabilities were
primarily comprised of: (i) $245,735 in accounts payable; (ii) $565,000 in convertible notes payable, current; (iii) $1,610,407
of convertible bonds payable, and (iv) $336,155 of accrued interest and short term payable. The decrease in total assets during
the three month period ended March 31, 2011 from fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was primarily due to the payment of Company
expenses. The increase in liabilities during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 from fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
was primarily due to the Company issuing common stock to retire a convertible note payable along with applicable accrued interest,
and the change in the value of the derivative liability.
Stockholders’ deficit increased from
$17,976,706 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 to $19,182,969 for the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
We have not generated positive cash flows from
operating activities. For the three month period ended March 31, 2011, net cash flows used in operating activities was $11,450
consisting primarily of a net loss of $1,902,078 as adjusted by $526,665 in amortization of debt discounts, $694,855 change in
derivative liability, and $583,333 in a loss on settlement of debt.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
We did not engage in any investing activities
during the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
We did not engage in any financing activities
during the three month period ended March 31, 2011. For the three month period ended March 31, 2011, net cash flows provided from
financing activities was $nil compared to $0 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010.
PLAN OF OPERATION AND FUNDING
A substantial portion of quarter ended December
31, 2010 was dedicated to the Muluncay mining project and financing. As at March 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents were $0.
For the three month period ended March 31, 2011, we incurred a net loss of $1,902,078. Net cash provided by financing activities
for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 was $Nil. The accumulated deficit is due to losses incurred on the disposal of
Muluncay and general & administrative costs, change in the derivative liability, salaries and wages, note and bond interest,
and professional fees. The orchestration and execution of our business acquisitions resulted in increased professional fees and
the need for funding.
We will need additional further advances and
issuance of debt instruments to fund our operations over the next three months. In connection with our future business plan, management
anticipates additional increases in operating expenses and capital expenditures relating to acquisition of further interests in
gold mining concessions. We would finance these expenses with further issuances of securities and debt issuances. We expect we
would need to raise additional capital and generate revenues to meet long-term operating requirements. Additional issuances of
equity or convertible debt securities would result in dilution to our current shareholders. Further, such securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all.
17
MATERIAL COMMITMENTS
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have the following material
commitments as described as described in Footnote 4 of our financial statements (all of which are in default).
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
|
1 – 3 Years
|
|
|
3 – 5 Years
|
|
|
More than 5 Years
|
|
Convertible Bonds
|
|
$
|
1,610,407
|
|
|
$
|
1,610,407
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,175,407
|
|
|
$
|
2,175,407
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we do not have any off-balance
sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are
material to investors.
20
GOING CONCERN
The independent auditors' report accompanying our December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern,"
which contemplates that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.
ITEM3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse change in foreign currency and interest rates.
Exchange Rate
Our reporting currency is United States Dollars (“USD”).
In the event we acquire any properties outside of the United States, the fluctuation of exchange rates may have positive or negative
impacts on our results of operations. However, since all of our properties are currently located within the United States, any
potential revenue and expenses will be denominated in U.S. Dollars, and the net income effect of appreciation and devaluation of
the currency against the U.S. Dollar would be limited to our costs of acquisition of property.
Interest Rate
Interest rates in the United States are generally controlled. Any
potential future loans will relate mainly to acquisition of properties and will be mainly short-term. However our debt may be likely
to rise in connection with expansion and if interest rates were to rise at the same time, this could become a significant impact
on our operating and financing activities. We have not entered into derivative contracts either to hedge existing risks for speculative
purposes.
ITEM4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as
such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision
and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”),
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”)
as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO
and CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer has concluded that as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective. A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. To address the material weaknesses,
management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present,
in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Changes in Internal Controls
We have also evaluated our internal controls for financial reporting,
and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls
subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple
error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management or board override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving
its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective
control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
21
CEO and CFO Certifications
Appearing immediately following the Signatures section of this report
there are Certifications of the CEO and the CFO. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the information concerning
the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section
302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
We have a separately-designated audit committee of the board. Audit
committee functions are performed by our board of directors. Our director is not deemed independent. All directors also hold positions
as our officers. Our audit committee is responsible for: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2) establishing
procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, and auditing matters;
(3) establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting and auditing
matters; (4) engaging outside advisors; and, (5) funding for the outside auditory and any outside advisors engagement by the audit
committee. .
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
None of our directors or officers has the qualifications or experience
to be considered a financial expert. We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further,
because of our limited operations, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
No report required.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
No report required.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
No report required.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
No report required.
ITEM 4. Removed and Reserved
22
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR PRINCIPAL OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS;
APPOINTMENT OF PRINCIPAL OFFICERS
Effective on August 11, 2010, our Board of Directors accepted the
resignation of Jeffrey Sternberg as our President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and a member
of the Board of Directors. Effective on August 12, 2010, our Board of Directors accepted the consent of William Lieberman to act
as our President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Board of Directors.
Therefore, as of the date of this Quarterly Report, our Board of Directors is comprised of William Lieberman.
Biography
William Lieberman.
Mr. Lieberman is a Chartered Financial
Analyst Candidate, Level one at the CFA Institute in New York, and earned a Masters in Business Administration from Hult International
Business School in Boston, MA, in 2007. He has an extensive track record in international mining, metal, plastic and advertising
sales. Mr. Lieberman was vice president of sales and development for Zapoint, Inc. in Boston Massachusetts, where he was highly
involved in all stages of financing and development for the solicitation and close of $1,250,000 of venture capital and angel investment.
From 2005 through 2006, Mr. Lieberman was vice president of sales and development for Resource Polymers, Inc. in Toronto, Canada.
During his tenure at Resource Polymers, Mr. Lieberman networked throughout Canada and internationally in global scrap markets,
and provided arbitrage services to secondary metal and plastics markets. Mr. Lieberman is also the president/chief executive officer
and treasurer/chief financial officer and a member of the board of directors of Fox Petroleum Inc., a publicly traded company on
the Bulletin Board.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) Exhibits
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification of President pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification of President pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
* Filed herewith
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
TRILLIANT EXPLORATION CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 24, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ WILLIAM LIEBERMAN
|
|
|
William Lieberman, President/Chief
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 24, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ WILLIAM LIEBERMAN
|
|
|
William Lieberman, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
23
Trilliant Exploration (CE) (USOTC:TTXP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Trilliant Exploration (CE) (USOTC:TTXP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024