U.
S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from __________ to ____________
Synergy
Strips Corp.
Nevada |
|
000-55098 |
|
99-0379440 |
(State
or other jurisdiction |
|
(Commission |
|
(IRS
Employer |
of
Incorporation) |
|
File
Number) |
|
Identification
Number) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865
Spring Street |
|
|
|
|
Westbrook,
Maine 04092 |
|
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(615)
939-9004 |
|
|
|
|
(Issuer’s
Telephone Number) |
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every, Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec.232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ]
No [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ] |
|
Accelerated
filer [ ] |
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
(Do not check if smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller
reporting company [X] |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X]
No
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As
of May 15, 2015, 67,095,187 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.
SYNERGY
STRIPS CORP.
(FORMERLY
ORO CAPITAL CORPORATION)
INDEX
Table
of Contents
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Synergy
Strips Corp.
(formerly
ORO Capital Corporation)
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| |
March
31, 2015 | | |
December
31, 2014 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
| |
Assets | |
| | |
| |
Current Assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 1,716,045 | | |
$ | 338 | |
Accounts Receivable | |
| 1,947,693 | | |
| 2,898 | |
Receivable from related party | |
| 4,893 | | |
| 16,077 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 54,140 | | |
| 10,000 | |
Inventory | |
| 133,450 | | |
| 26,064 | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 3,856,221 | | |
| 55,376 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Fixes assets, net | |
| 1,579 | | |
| - | |
Goodwill | |
| 1,798,047 | | |
| - | |
Intangible assets, net | |
| 2,963,862 | | |
| - | |
Debt issuance cost, net | |
| 261,725 | | |
| - | |
Total Assets | |
$ | 8,881,433 | | |
$ | 55,376 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
$ | 1,722,897 | | |
$ | 74,642 | |
Notes payable, related party | |
| - | | |
| 100,000 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | |
| 751,600 | | |
| 6,400 | |
Total Current Liabilities | |
| 2,474,497 | | |
| 181,042 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Long-term Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable, net of debt discount | |
| 5,423,491 | | |
| - | |
Total Long-term Liabilities | |
| 5,423,491 | | |
| - | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 7,897,988 | | |
| 181,042 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and contingencies | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 67,095,187
and 62,100,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | |
| 671 | | |
| 621 | |
Common stock to be issued | |
| 52,000 | | |
| 40,000 | |
Additional paid in capital | |
| 4,382,469 | | |
| 867,004 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (3,451,695 | ) | |
| (1,033,291 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | |
| 983,445 | | |
| (125,666 | ) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit) | |
$ | 8,881,433 | | |
$ | 55,376 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
Synergy
Strips Corp.
(formerly
ORO Capital Corporation)
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
| |
For the three months
ended | |
| |
March
31, 2015 | | |
March
31, 2014 | |
Revenue | |
$ | 1,600,249 | | |
$ | - | |
Cost of sales | |
| 605,282 | | |
| - | |
Gross profit | |
| 994,967 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses | |
| | | |
| | |
Selling and marketing | |
| 733,589 | | |
| - | |
General and administrative | |
| 314,820 | | |
| 2,070 | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 77,242 | | |
| - | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 1,125,651 | | |
| 2,070 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (130,684 | ) | |
| (2,070 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other expenses | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| 171,393 | | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| 2,089,005 | | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 27,321 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total other expenses | |
| 2,287,719 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Loss | |
$ | (2,418,404 | ) | |
$ | (2,070 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss per share – basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.04 | ) | |
$ | (0.00 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average common shares – basic and diluted | |
| 65,883,030 | | |
| 180,000,000 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
Synergy
Strips Corp.
(formerly
ORO Capital Corporation)
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| |
For the three months
ended | |
| |
March
31, 2015 | | |
March
31, 2014 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (2,418,404 | ) | |
$ | (2,070 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 77,242 | | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 27,321 | | |
| - | |
Stock based compensation expense | |
| 12,000 | | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| 2,089,005 | | |
| - | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 981,574 | | |
| - | |
Inventory | |
| (48,940 | ) | |
| - | |
Prepaid expense | |
| (40,272 | ) | |
| - | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
| (184,304 | ) | |
| 1,500 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | |
| 495,221 | | |
| (570 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Payments for acquisition of fixed assets | |
| (1,654 | ) | |
| - | |
Payments for acquisition of Factor Nutrition Labs | |
| (4,500,000 | ) | |
| - | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (4,501,654 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from notes payable | |
| 6,000,000 | | |
| - | |
Payment of debt issuance cost | |
| (289,045 | ) | |
| | |
(Repayments to) advances from related party notes | |
| 11,184 | | |
| - | |
Warrant exercise | |
| 1 | | |
| - | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 5,722,140 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | |
| 1,715,707 | | |
| (570 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period | |
| 338 | | |
| 3,230 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period | |
$ | 1,716,045 | | |
$ | 2,660 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid during the period for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Income taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for settlement of debt | |
$ | 100,000 | | |
$ | - | |
Beneficial conversion feature on warrants issued concurrent with debt | |
$ | 3,415,514 | | |
$ | - | |
Assumption of assets and liabilities as part of acquisition transaction | |
$ | 9,332,559 | | |
$ | - | |
Note issued as part of asset purchase agreement | |
$ | 1,500,000
| | |
$ | - | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
SYNERGY
STRIPS CORP.
(FORMERLY
ORO CAPITAL CORPORATION)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1 – Nature of the Business
Synergy
Strips Corp. (“Synergy”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) (formerly
ORO Capital Corporation) was incorporated on December 29, 2010 in Nevada under the name “Oro Capital Corporation.”
On April 21, 2014, the Company changed its fiscal year end from July 31 to December 31. On April 28, 2014, the Company changed
its name to “Synergy Strips Corp.”.
The
Company is in the business of marketing and distributing best in class consumer branded products through various distribution
channels primarily in the health and wellness industry. The Company’s strategy is to grow both organically and by future
acquisitions.
Loan
and Warrants
On
January 22, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) with Knight Therapeutics
(Barbados) Inc. (“Knight”), pursuant to which Knight agreed to loan the Company $6.0 million (the “Loan”),
and which amount was borrowed at closing (the “Financing”) for the purpose of acquiring the Focus Factor Business
(defined below). At closing, the Company paid Knight an origination fee of $120,000 and a work fee of $60,000 and also paid $40,000
of Knight’s expenses associated with the Loan. The Loan bears interest at a rate of 15% per year; provided, however, that
upon the occurrence of an equity or convertible equity offering by the Company of at least $1.0 million, the interest rate will
drop to 13% per year. Interest accrues quarterly and is payable in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31
in each year, beginning on March 31, 2015.
All
outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest is due on the earliest to occur of either January 20, 2017 (the “Maturity
Date”), or the date that Knight, in its discretion, accelerates the Company’s obligations due to an event of default.
The Company may extend the Maturity Date for two successive additional 12-month periods if at March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017,
respectively, the Company’s revenues exceed $13.0 million and its EBITDA exceeds $2.0 million for the respective 12-month
period then ending. Principal payments under the Loan Agreement commence on June 30, 2015 and continue quarterly as set forth
on the Repayment Schedule to the Loan Agreement.
Subject
to certain restrictions, the Company may prepay the outstanding principal of the Loan (in whole but not in part) at any time if
the Company pays a concurrent prepayment fee equal to the greater of (i) the total unpaid annual interest that would have been
payable during the year in which the prepayment is made if the prepayment is made prior to the first anniversary of the closing,
and (ii) $300,000. The Company’s obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a first priority security interest
in all present and future assets of the Company. The Company also agreed to not pledge or otherwise encumber its intellectual
property assets, subject to certain customary exceptions.
The
Loan Agreement includes customary representations, warranties, and affirmative and restrictive covenants, including covenants
to attain and maintain certain financial metrics, and to not merge or dispose of assets, acquire other businesses (except for
businesses substantially similar or complementary to the Company’s business and the aggregate consideration to be paid does
not exceed $100,000) or make capital expenditures in excess of $100,000 over the Company’s annual business plan in any year.
The Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of covenants, change of control
and material adverse effect default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default and during the continuation thereof, the principal
amount of the Loan will bear a default interest rate of an additional 5%.
In
connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company issued to Knight a warrant (the “ST Warrant”) that entitled Knight
to purchase 4,595,187 shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”). The aggregate exercise price of the
Common Stock under the ST Warrant was $1.00. Knight exercised the ST Warrant on January 22, 2015. Also in connection with the
Loan Agreement, the Company issued to Knight a warrant to purchase 3,584,759 shares of Common Stock on or prior to the close of
business of January 22, 2025 (the “LT Warrant”). The exercise price per share of the Common Stock under the LT Warrant
is $0.34. The LT Warrant provides for cashless exercise. The LT Warrant also provides that in the event the closing price of the
Common Stock remains above $1.00 for six consecutive months, Knight will forfeit the difference between the number of shares acquired
under the LT Warrant prior to 90 days after such six-month period, and 25% of the shares purchasable under the LT Warrant.
Asset
Purchase Agreement
On
January 22, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)
with Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), Vita Partners, LLC, RPR Partners,
LLC, and Thor Associates, Inc. (each a “Principal Owner”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased
all of the assets of the Seller’s line of business and products called FOCUS Factor (the product plus the business related
to the product is collectively referred to as the “Focus Factor Business”) and assumed the accounts payable and contractual
obligations of the Focus Factor Business for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million, with $4.5 million paid on the Closing
Date, and $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2016 and an additional $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2017.
The
Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and covenants by each party. The Purchase Agreement contains
customary indemnification provisions in favor of the Company, including, subject to certain limitations, provisions whereby the
Seller and each of the Principal Owners agree to indemnify the Company and its affiliates for any losses arising out of any breach
of their representations or warranties and any breach or failure to perform their covenants under the Purchase Agreement.
The
Purchase Agreement also provides that during the period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the
Closing Date (the “Restricted Period”), the Seller, the Principal Owners (other than Thor Associates, Inc.), and their
respective affiliates agree to not, among other things, (i) compete against the Focus Factor Business, (ii) solicit any employee
or consultant providing services in connection with the Focus Factor Business (a “Covered Employee”), (iii) hire any
former Covered Employee who left employment or retention by the Company within one year of such departure, or (iv) solicit any
customer or supplier of the Company who was a customer or supplier within the two years prior to the solicitation to the extent
such business is similar to the business conducted by such customer or supplier with the Company.
Distribution
Agreement
On
January 22, 2015, the Company and Knight entered into a Distribution, License and Supply Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Company granted to Knight an exclusive license to commercialize FOCUSFactor, FOCUSFactor Kids and Synergy
Strip and all improvements thereto (together the “Licensed Products”) and appointed Knight as the exclusive distributor
to offer to sell and sell the Licensed Products in Canada, and, at Knight’s election, one or more of Israel, Russia, and
Sub-Saharan Africa (the “Territory”). The Distribution Agreement provides that Knight may sublicense its rights or
use sub-distributors under the Distribution Agreement on terms consistent with the terms of the Distribution Agreement. During
the term of the Distribution Agreement, Knight agrees to obtain from the Company all its requirements for the Licensed Products
and the Company agrees to supply the Licensed Products at its adjusted production cost plus a designated percentage and any applicable
taxes.
Pursuant
to the Distribution Agreement, Knight agrees to not (i) knowingly solicit or accept orders of Licensed Products from any customer
outside the Territory, (ii) knowingly distribute Licensed Products for sale or use outside the Territory, or (iii) supply any
third party distributor with Licensed Products after Knight has actual knowledge that such third party has distributed or offered
to distribute Licensed Products outside the Territory. Similarly, under the terms of the Distribution Agreement, the Company agrees
that it will not (i) knowingly solicit or accept orders of Licensed Products from a customer in the Territory, (ii) knowingly
distribute Licensed Products for sale or use in the Territory, or (iii) supply any third party distributor with Licensed Products
after the Company has actual knowledge that such third party has distributed or offered to distribute Licensed Products in the
Territory.
The
Distribution Agreement includes customary representations and warranties and covenants by the parties, each of which also agrees
to customary indemnification provisions. In the event of a long term inability by the Company to supply Knight with the Licensed
Products, Knight is entitled to require, among other remedies, the Company to grant a Knight-designated third party a non-exclusive
license to use all relevant intellectual property to manufacture and supply Knight with the Licensed Products for commercialization
in the Territory. The term of the Distribution Agreement runs until 15 years from the date of the first commercial sale of a Licensed
Product in Canada, and the Distribution Agreement will automatically renew for successive 15-year periods unless either party
provides the other with written notice of its intention not to renew (a “Non-Renewal Notice”). The Company agrees
that in the event it issues a Non-Renewal Notice, the Company will pay to Knight a non-renewal fee equal to the net sales of the
Licensed Products achieved by Knight in the Territory during the eight calendar quarters preceding the date of such notice, plus
all applicable taxes.
Distribution
Option Agreement
In
connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company entered into a Product Distribution Option Agreement, dated January 22, 2015 (the
“Option Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted Knight the exclusive right to negotiate the exclusive distribution
rights of any one or more of the Company’s products, including products from the Focus Factor Business, for the Territory
(the “Option”), pursuant to designated parameters. The Option Agreement is effective upon the date of the Option Agreement,
will run until January 31, 2045, and will automatically renew thereafter for successive five-year periods unless either party
provides a notice of termination prior to the Option Agreement’s expiration. If Knight does not exercise the Option then
the Company is free to contract for distribution with other parties, but only on terms no less favorable than those offered by
Knight pursuant to the Option Agreement.
The
foregoing is a summary of the terms of the Loan Agreement, the ST Warrant, the LT Warrant, the Purchase Agreement, the Distribution
Agreement and the Option Agreement (collectively, the “Transaction Documents”), and does not purport to be complete.
The descriptions of the Transaction Documents are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the Loan Agreement,
the LT Warrant, the ST Warrant, the Purchase Agreement, the Distribution Agreement and the Option Agreement, copies of which were
filed as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Note
2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2015 and 2014 are unaudited. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and
are presented in accordance with the requirements of Rule S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015, are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. The unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2014 and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all cash on hand and in banks, including accounts in book overdraft positions, certificates of deposit and other
highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents. As of March
31, 2015, the Company had no cash equivalents.
Capitalization
of Fixed Assets
The
Company capitalizes expenditures related to property and equipment, subject to a minimum rule, that have a useful life greater
than one year for: (1) assets purchased; (2) existing assets that are replaced, improved or the useful lives have been extended;
or (3) all land, regardless of cost. Acquisitions of new assets, additions, replacements and improvements (other than land) costing
less than the minimum rule in addition to maintenance and repair costs, including any planned major maintenance activities, are
expensed as incurred.
Intangible
assets
We
evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets periodically and take into account events or circumstances that warrant revised
estimates of useful lives or that indicate that impairment exists. All of our intangible assets are subject to amortization. Intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives.
Long-lived
Assets
Long-lived
assets include equipment and intangible assets other than those with indefinite lives. We assess the carrying value of our long-lived
asset groups when indicators of impairment exist and recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
is not recoverable when compared to undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Indicators
of impairment include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes
in our use of the assets or in our business strategy, loss of or changes in customer relationships and significant negative industry
or economic trends. When indications of impairment arise for a particular asset or group of assets, we assess the future recoverability
of the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis. If carrying value exceeds projected,
net, undiscounted cash flows, an additional analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the asset (or asset group), typically
a discounted cash flow analysis, and an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of carrying value over fair value.
Goodwill
Asset
Purchase is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under that method, assets and liabilities of the business acquired
are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition, with any excess of the cost of the acquisition
over the estimated fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
as revised by SAB No. 104. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Ownership and title of our products pass to customers
upon delivery of the products to customers. Certain of our distributors may also perform a separate function as a co-packer on
our behalf. In such cases, ownership of and title to our products that are co-packed on our behalf by those co-packers who are
also distributors, passes to such distributors when we are notified by them that they have taken transfer or possession of the
relevant portion of our finished goods.
Revenue
is presented net of estimated returns and allowances, discounts, sales incentives and promotions including, price reductions,
coupons, rebate offers and placement/slotting fees.
Accounts
receivable
Accounts
receivable are generally unsecured. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the age of
outstanding invoices and management’s evaluation of collectability. Accounts are written off after all reasonable collection
efforts have been exhausted and management concludes that likelihood of collection is remote. Any future recoveries are applied
against the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Advertising
Expense
The
Company expenses marketing, promotions and advertising costs as incurred. Such costs are included in general and administrative
expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Research
and development
Costs
incurred in connection with the development of new products and processing methods are charged to general and administrative expenses
as incurred.
Income
Taxes
The
Company utilizes Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
740, “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial
reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected
to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax
asset will not be realized.
The
Company generated a deferred tax asset through net operating loss carry-forward. However, a valuation allowance of 100% has been
established due to the uncertainty of the Company’s realization of the net operating loss carry forward prior to its expiration.
Net
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
The
Company computes earnings per share under ASC subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed
by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to the common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding (the denominator) during the reporting periods. Diluted loss per share is computed by increasing the
denominator by the weighted average number of additional shares that could have been outstanding from securities convertible into
common stock (using the “treasury stock” method), unless their effect on net loss per share is anti-dilutive. As of
March 31, 2015, an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 3,584,759 shares of common stock
were outstanding.
Going
Concern
The
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern,
which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had
accumulated deficit at March 31, 2015 of $3,451,695. The Company has working capital of $1,381,724 as of March 31, 2015. The Company
has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a
going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital
to fund operating losses until it establishes a revenue stream and becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate
capital it could be forced to cease operations.
In
order to continue as a going concern and to develop a reliable source of revenues, and achieve a profitable level of operations
the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern
include raising additional capital through borrowing and sales of common stock. However, management cannot provide any assurances
that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described
in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is
unable to continue as a going concern.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
Company measures and discloses the fair value of assets and liabilities required to be carried at fair value in accordance with
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
and enhances fair value measurement disclosure.
ASC
825 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities
required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it
would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent
risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825 establishes
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level
1 - Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets to which we have access at the measurement date.
Level
2 - Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The
determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
As
of March 31, 2015, the Company has determined that there were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of components and finished goods. The Company’s inventory is stated at the lower of cost (FIFO cost basis) or market.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC 718. We estimate the fair value of stock options using a binomial model, consistent with
the provisions of ASC 718 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment. Option-pricing models require the input
of highly subjective assumptions, including the price volatility of the underlying stock. We determined that the use of implied
volatility is expected to be more reflective of market conditions and, therefore, could reasonably be expected to be a better
indicator of our expected volatility than historical volatility. The expected term assumption used in calculating the estimated
fair value of our stock-based compensation awards using the binomial model is based on detailed historical data about employees’
exercise behavior, vesting schedules, and death and disability probabilities. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected
forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical
experience of our stock-based awards that are granted, exercised and cancelled. We believe the resulting binomial calculation
provides a more refined estimate of the fair value of our employee stock options.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
ASU
2015-03
In
April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments
in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct
deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance
for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments are effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments are
to be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the
period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a material effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2015-02
In
February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which is
intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability
corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed
security transactions). The ASU focuses on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate
whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to
two, the new standard simplifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and improves current U.S. GAAP by placing more emphasis
on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest, reducing the frequency of the application of related-party
guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and changing consolidation
conclusions for companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs. The ASU will be effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted,
including adoption in an interim period. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 to have a material effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2015-01
In
January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying
Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the
concept of extraordinary items. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-01
to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2014-17
In
November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-17, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting.” This ASU
provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of
an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown
accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual
change-in-control event, that election is irrevocable. ASU 2014-17 was effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-17
did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2014-16
In
November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” ASU 2014-16 addresses whether the
host contract in a hybrid financial instrument issued in the form of a share should be accounted for as debt or equity. ASU 2014-16
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We do not currently
have issued, nor are we investors in, hybrid financial instruments. Accordingly, we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-16
to have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2014-15
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)”.
ASU 2014-15 provides guidance related to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about
an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosure. ASU 2014-15 is effective
for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for interim and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
ASU
2014-12
In
June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based
Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.”
This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period
be treated as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2015. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
ASU
2014-09
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 affects
any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts
for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts
or lease contracts). ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2016. We are still evaluating the effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. On April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to propose
to defer the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year.
ASU
2014-08
In
April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and
Equipment (Topic 360) and Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU
2014-08 amends the definition for what types of asset disposals are to be considered discontinued operations, as well as amending
the required disclosures for discontinued operations and assets held for sale. ASU 2014-08 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have any
effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
There
were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application
to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s condensed financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Change
in Fiscal Year End
As
reported in the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2014, on April 21, 2014, the Company’s board
of directors approved a change to the Company’s fiscal year end from July 31 to December 31 of each year.
Note
3 – Asset Purchase
On
January 22, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)
with Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), Vita Partners, LLC, RPR Partners,
LLC, and Thor Associates, Inc. (each a “Principal Owner”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased
all of the assets of the Seller’s line of business and products called FOCUS Factor (the product plus the business related
to the product is collectively referred to as the “Focus Factor Business”) and assumed the accounts payable and contractual
obligations of the Focus Factor Business for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million, with $4.5 million paid on the Closing
Date, and $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2016 and an additional $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2017.
The
Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and covenants by each party. The Purchase Agreement contains
customary indemnification provisions in favor of the Company, including, subject to certain limitations, whereby the Seller and
each of the Principal Owners agree to indemnify the Company and its affiliates for any losses arising out of any breach of their
representations or warranties and any breach or failure to perform of their covenants under the Purchase Agreement, among others.
The
Purchase Agreement also provides that during the period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the
Closing Date (the “Restricted Period”), the Seller, the Principal Owners (other than Thor Associates, Inc.), and their
respective affiliates agree to not, among other things, (i) compete against the Focus Factor Business, (ii) solicit any employee
or consultant providing services in connection with the Focus Factor Business (a “Covered Employee”), (iii) hire any
former Covered Employee who left employment or retention by the Company within one year of such departure, or (iv) solicit any
customer or supplier of the Company who was a customer or supplier within the two years prior to the solicitation to the extent
such business is similar to the business conducted by such customer or supplier with the Company.
The Company has
accounted for this transaction under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total
acquisition consideration price is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated
fair values. The Company expects the purchase price allocations for the acquisition of FOCUS Factor Business to be completed by
September 30, 2015. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the
estimated fair values is as follows:
Assets | |
| | |
Accounts Receivable | |
$ | 2,926,369 | |
Inventory | |
| 67,113 | |
Intellectual Property | |
| 1,000,000 | |
Non-compete provision | |
| 50,000 | |
Non-solicitation provision | |
| 50,000 | |
Intangible assets-Customer relationships | |
| 1,941,030 | |
Goodwill | |
| 1,798,047 | |
Liabilities | |
| | |
Accounts Payable | |
| (891,113 | ) |
Accrued Expenses | |
| (941,446 | ) |
| |
$ | 6,000,000 | |
The
Customer relationships, the non-compete and the non-solicitation provisions will be amortized over their estimated useful lives
of 5 years.
Pro forma Results of Operations. The historical
operating results of FOCUS Factor Business prior to its acquisition date
have not been included in the Company's historical consolidated operating results. Pro forma results of operations data (unaudited)
for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013, are as follows:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Revenue | |
$ | 12,695,295 | | |
$ | 10,629,171 | |
Net income (loss) | |
| (183,471 | ) | |
| 932,209 | |
Pro forma revenue amount above does not include
adjustment/reductions relating to certain discounts, coupons and placement fees and is presented gross.
The amounts of revenue and earnings of FOCUS
Factor Business since the acquisition date included in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2015 are approximately $1,599,132 and $(2,418,752), respectively.
Note
4 – Inventory
Inventory
consists of components and finished goods. The Company’s inventory is stated at the lower of cost (FIFO cost basis) or market.
The
carrying value of inventory consisted of the following:
| |
March 31, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Energy product
| |
$ | 25,418 | | |
$ | 26,064 | |
Components
| |
| 28,124 | | |
| - | |
Finished goods | |
| 79,908 | | |
| - | |
Total inventory | |
$ | 133,450 | | |
$ | 26,064 | |
As
of January 22, 2015, inventory was pledged to Knight Therapeutics under the Loan Agreement (see note 1).
Note
5 – Fixed Assets and Intangible Assets
As
of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, fixed assets and intangible assets consisted of the following:
| |
March 31, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Property and equipment | |
$ | 1,654 | | |
$ | - | |
Less accumulated depreciation | |
| (75 | ) | |
| - | |
Fixed assets, net | |
$ | 1,579 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
March 31, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Intangible assets | |
| 3,041,030 | | |
| - | |
Less accumulated depreciation | |
| (77,167 | ) | |
| - | |
Intangible assets,
net | |
$ | 2,963,862 | | |
$ | - | |
Depreciation
and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $77,242 and $0, respectively. Annual amortization
expense will be $408,206 per year through 2020.
Note
6 – Related Party Transactions
On
April 2, 2014, the Company granted an option to purchase1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at approximately
$282,000, to a company owned by Mr. Jack Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
On
October 31, 2014, the Company borrowed $100,000 through a promissory note bearing interest at 10% with a maturity date of October
31, 2015 from a company owned by Mr. Jack Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As of March 31, 2015, the Company’s
obligations pursuant to the promissory note were converted into 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The
Company accrued consulting fees of $15,000 per month to a company owned by Mr. Jack Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
As of March 31, 2015, total outstanding balance of $45,000 was paid.
At
March 31, 2015, $4,893 was due from the Company owned by Mr. Jack Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in the form of
a note receivable.
Note
7 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
As
of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, accounts payable and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
| |
March 31, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Accrued payroll | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 10,867 | |
Accrued legal fees | |
| 30,065 | | |
| 47,916 | |
Manufacturers | |
| 674,646 | | |
| - | |
Promotions | |
| 885,054 | | |
| - | |
Other | |
| 133,132 | | |
| 15,859 | |
Total | |
$ | 1,722,897 | | |
$ | 74,642 | |
Note
8 – Notes Payable
On
January 22, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, pursuant to which Knight Therapeutics (Barbados) Inc.
(“Knight”) agreed to loan the Company $6.0 million (the “Loan”), and which amount was borrowed at closing
for the purpose of acquiring the Focus Factor Business (see note 1). The Loan bears interest at a rate of 15% per year; provided,
however, that upon the occurrence of an equity or convertible equity offering by the Company of at least $1.0 million, the interest
rate will drop to 13% per year. Interest accrues quarterly and is payable in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December
31 in each year, beginning on March 31, 2015. All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest is due on the earliest
to occur of either January 20, 2017, or the date that Knight, in its discretion, accelerates the Company’s obligations due
to an event of default.
In
connection with the Loan, the Company issued warrants that were recorded as a debt discount at an initial aggregate value of $3,415,514
(see note 1). The value of these warrants was amortized during the three months ended March 31, 2015, resulting in a final debt
discount balance of $1,326,508 as of March 31, 2015.
On
January 22, 2015, the Company issued a 0% promissory note in a principal amount of $1,500,000 in connection with an Asset Purchase
Agreement (see note 1). The note has a maturity date of January 20, 2017, with $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2016
and an additional $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2017.
Note
9 – Stockholders’ Deficit
The
total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Company is authorized to issue is 75,000,000 shares of common
stock with $0.00001 par value. On July 30, 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved an increase of the Company’s
authorized common stock from 75,000,000 to 300,000,000 shares. Such increase shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s
shareholders prior to its implementation.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued 4,595,187 shares of its common stock upon exercise of the ST Warrant
at an aggregate exercise price of $1.00 in connection with the Loan Agreement (see note1).
During
the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued 400,000 shares of its common stock to a note holder in a note conversion
at $0.25 per share. At the time of conversion, the note was valued at $100,000 for outstanding principal.
As
of March 31, 2015, there are 67,095,187 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding.
Note
10 – Commitments & Contingencies
From
time to time the Company may become a party to litigation in the normal course of business. Management believes that there are
no current legal matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Note
11 – Stock Options
On
July 30, 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and the reservation
of 15,525,000 shares of common stock for issuance under such plan. Such plan shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s
shareholders prior to its implementation.
On
April 2, 2014, the Company granted an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise
price of $0.25 per share.
The
following table summarizes the changes in options outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common
stock issued to employees and consultants at March 31, 2015:
| | |
Options
Outstanding | |
Options
Exercisable |
Exercise
Prices ($) | | |
Number
Outstanding | |
Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual Life
(Years) | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price ($) | | |
Number
Exercisable | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | |
$ | 0.25 | | |
1,000,000 | |
| 4.00 | | |
$ | 0.25 | | |
1,000,000 | |
$ | 0.25 | |
The
stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is as follows:
| |
Options
Outstanding | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | |
| 1,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.25 | |
Granted | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Exercised | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Expired or canceled | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2015 | |
$ | 1,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.25 | |
Note
12 – Stock Warrants
The
following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common
stock at March 31, 2015:
| | |
Warrants
Outstanding | |
Warrants Exercisable |
Exercise
Price ($) | | |
Number
Outstanding | |
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (Years) | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($) | | |
Number
Exercisable | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | |
$ | 0.34 | | |
3,584,759 | |
9.82 | |
$ | 0.34 | | |
| 3,584,759 | | |
$ | 0.34 | |
The warrant
activity for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is as follows:
| |
Options
Outstanding | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | |
| — | | |
$ | — | |
Granted | |
| 8,179,946 | | |
| 0.71 | |
Exercised | |
| (4,595,187 | ) | |
| 1.00 | |
Expired or canceled | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2015 | |
$ | 3,584,759 | | |
$ | 0.34 | |
Note
13 – Subsequent Events
Management
evaluated all activities of the Company through the issuance date of the Company’s interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require adjustments or disclosure into the
interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of Synergy for the three months ended March
31, 2015 and 2014, should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of Synergy, and the notes to those financial statements
that are included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations
that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing
of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those set forth under the Risk Factors, Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Business sections
in our Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2015. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,”
“project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,”
“may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking
statements.
Overview
The
Company is in the business of marketing and distributing best-in-class consumer-branded products through various distribution
channels primarily in the health and wellness industry. The Company’s strategy is to grow both organically and by future
acquisitions.
On
April 7, 2014, an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) was entered into by and among the Company,
Synergy Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company formed for the purpose of the
transactions under the Merger Agreement (“Merger Sub”), and Synergy Strips Corp., a Delaware corporation incorporated
on January 24, 2012 (“SSC”). The Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Merger Sub with and into SSC (the “Merger”),
with SSC surviving the merger as the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was consummated on April 21, 2014.
On
April 21, 2014, the Company changed its fiscal year end from July 31 to December 31.
On
April 28, 2014, the Company changed its name from “Oro Capital Corporation” to “Synergy Strips Corp.”
in connection with the Merger.
On
January 22, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)
with Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), Vita Partners, LLC, RPR Partners,
LLC, and Thor Associates, Inc. (each a “Principal Owner”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased
all of the assets of the Seller’s line of business and products called FOCUS Factor (the product plus the business related
to the product is collectively referred to as the “Focus Factor Business”) and assumed the accounts payable and contractual
obligations of the Focus Factor Business for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million, with $4.5 million paid on the Closing
Date, and $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2016 and an additional $750,000 to be paid on or before January 20, 2017.
Our
management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are only based on Synergy’s
current business. Our previous shell company’s results of operations are immaterial and will not be included in the discussion
below. Key factors affecting our results of operations include revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses and income and taxation.
Results
of Operations for the Three months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
Revenue
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, we had revenues of $1,600,249 from sales of our products, as compared to revenue of $0
for the same period in 2014. The increase was due to the purchase of the assets of Factor Nutrition Labs (FOCUSfactor).
Cost
of Revenue
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, our cost of revenue was $605,282. Our cost of revenue for the three months ended March
31, 2014, was $0.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit was $994,967 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to gross profit of $0 for the same period in 2014.
Operating
Expenses
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, our operating expenses were $1,125,651. Selling and marketing expenses were $733,589, and
included primarily retail promotions of $461,827, in-store demonstrations of $177,308, and marketing costs of $94,454. General
and administrative expenses were $314,820, which included professional fees of $86,600 and wages of $62,662. Amortization and
depreciation expense was $77,242 during the three months ended March 31, 2015. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, our
operating expenses were $2,070.
Other
Expenses
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, we incurred interest expense of $171,393 related to interest on notes payable, amortization
of debt issuance cost of $27,321 and amortization of debt discount of $2,089,005 in connection with our Loan from Knight.
Net
Loss
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, our net loss was $2,418,404, as compared to $2,070 for the same period in 2014.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
As
of March 31, 2015, we had $1,716,045 cash on hand and $1,381,724 working capital.
Going
Concern
The
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and
liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had accumulated deficit at March 31, 2015 of $3,451,695.
The Company has working capital of $1,381,724 as of March 31, 2015. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues
sufficient to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern is dependent on whether the Company can obtain adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes
a revenue stream and becomes profitable, if at all. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital it could be forced to
cease operations.
In
order to continue as a going concern and to develop a reliable source of revenues, and achieve a profitable level of operations
the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern
include raising additional capital through borrowing and sales of common stock. However, management cannot provide any assurances
that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described
in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is
unable to continue as a going concern.
Three
months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, we used net cash of $495,221 in operating activities. Non-cash adjustments included $77,242
related to depreciation and amortization, $27,321 related to amortization of debt issuance cost, $12,000 for stock based compensation,
$2,089,005 related to amortization of debt discount, and net changes in operating assets and liabilities of $708,058. During the
three months ended March 31, 2014, we used $570 of cash in operating activities.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
For
the three months ended March 31, 2015, we used net cash of $4,501,654 in investing activities, as compared to $0 used in investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to the purchase of the assets of
Factor Nutrition Labs (FOCUSfactor).
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Financing
activities provided $5,722,140 to us during the three months ended March 31, 2015. We received $7,500,000 in proceeds from notes
payable, $1 in proceeds from warrant conversion, and $11,184 if advances from related party notes offset with payment of debt
issuance cost of $289,045. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, financing activities provided $0.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual
Obligations
None.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
None.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance
with U.S. GAAP.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include, but are not limited to, the collectability
of accounts receivable and the estimates used when evaluating long-lived assets for impairment. Estimates are used for, but are
not limited to, determining the following: allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory valuation reserves, recoverability of
long-lived assets, and useful lives used in depreciation and amortization.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
At March 31, 2015, the Company had no cash equivalents.
Capitalization of
Fixed Assets
The Company capitalizes
expenditures related to property and equipment, subject to a minimum rule, that have a useful life greater than one year for:
(1) assets purchased; (2) existing assets that are replaced, improved or the useful lives have been extended; or (3) all land,
regardless of cost. Acquisitions of new assets, additions, replacements and improvements (other than land) costing less than the
minimum rule in addition to maintenance and repair costs, including any planned major maintenance activities, are expensed as
incurred.
Intangible
assets
We
evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets periodically and take into account events or circumstances that warrant revised
estimates of useful lives or that indicate that impairment exists. All of our intangible assets are subject to amortization. Intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives.
Long-lived
Assets
Long-lived
assets include equipment and intangible assets other than those with indefinite lives. We assess the carrying value of our long-lived
asset groups when indicators of impairment exist and recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
is not recoverable when compared to undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Indicators
of impairment include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes
in our use of the assets or in our business strategy, loss of or changes in customer relationships and significant negative industry
or economic trends. When indications of impairment arise for a particular asset or group of assets, we assess the future recoverability
of the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis. If carrying value exceeds projected,
net, undiscounted cash flows, an additional analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the asset (or asset group), typically
a discounted cash flow analysis, and an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of carrying value over fair value.
Goodwill
Asset
Purchase is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under that method, assets and liabilities of the business acquired
are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition, with any excess of the cost of the acquisition
over the estimated fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill.
Advertising
Expense
The
Company expenses marketing, promotions and advertising costs as incurred. Such costs are included in general and administrative
expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Research
and development
Costs
incurred in connection with the development of new products and processing methods are charged to general and administrative expenses
as incurred.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
as revised by SAB No. 104. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Ownership and title of our products pass to customers
upon delivery of the products to customers. Certain of our distributors may also perform a separate function as a co-packer on
our behalf. In such cases, ownership of and title to our products that are co-packed on our behalf by those co-packers who are
also distributors, passes to such distributors when we are notified by them that they have taken transfer or possession of the
relevant portion of our finished goods.
Revenue is presented
net of estimated returns and allowances, discounts, sales incentives and promotions including, price reductions, coupons, rebate
offers and placement/slotting fees.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are
generally unsecured. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the age of outstanding invoices
and management’s evaluation of collectability. Accounts are written off after all reasonable collection efforts have been
exhausted and management concludes that likelihood of collection is remote. Any future recoveries are applied against the allowance
for doubtful accounts.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification Topic 740-10-25
(“ASC 740-10-25”) Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25,
the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
We
may hold certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).
ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level
1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account payable
and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the instrument.
The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:
|
|
Level
1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability
to access. We believe our carrying value of level 1 instruments approximate their fair value at March 31, 2015 due to their
short term nature. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level
2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level
3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset retirement obligations and net profit interest liability
to be Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price
quotations and contract terms. |
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
Net
earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) less preferred dividends for the period by the weighted average
number of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss)
less preferred dividends for the period by the weighted average number of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially
dilutive securities outstanding during each period.
Inventory
Inventory consists of
components and finished goods. The Company’s inventory is stated at the lower of cost (FIFO cost basis) or market.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted the
provisions of ASC 718. We estimate the fair value of stock options using a binomial model, consistent with the provisions of ASC
718 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment. Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including the price volatility of the underlying stock. We determined that the use of implied volatility is expected
to be more reflective of market conditions and, therefore, could reasonably be expected to be a better indicator of our expected
volatility than historical volatility. The expected term assumption used in calculating the estimated fair value of our stock-based
compensation awards using the binomial model is based on detailed historical data about employees’ exercise behavior, vesting
schedules, and death and disability probabilities. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only
recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience of our stock-based
awards that are granted, exercised and cancelled. We believe the resulting binomial calculation provides a more refined estimate
of the fair value of our employee stock options. For our employee stock purchase plan, we decided to continue to use the Black-Scholes
model to calculate the estimated fair value.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
ASU 2015-03
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest
(Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance
costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount
of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not
affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments are to be applied on a retrospective basis,
wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the
new guidance. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
ASU 2015-02
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.
2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation
guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized
debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). The ASU focuses on the consolidation
evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In
addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the new standard simplifies the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and improves current U.S. GAAP by placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial
interest, reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest
in a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and changing consolidation conclusions for companies in several industries
that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We
do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2015-01
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01,
“Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating
the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. ASU 2015-01
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity
may apply the amendments prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-01 to have a material effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-17
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-17, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting.” This ASU provides an acquired entity with an option
to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control
of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which
the change-in-control event occurs. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual change-in-control event, that election
is irrevocable. ASU 2014-17 was effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-17 did not have any effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-16
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16,
“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” ASU 2014-16 addresses whether the host contract in a hybrid financial instrument
issued in the form of a share should be accounted for as debt or equity. ASU 2014-16 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We do not currently have issued, nor are we investors in,
hybrid financial instruments. Accordingly, we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-16 to have any effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-15
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,
"Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)". ASU 2014-15 provides guidance related to management's
responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to
provide related footnote disclosure. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for interim
and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material
effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-12
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide
That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” This ASU requires that a performance target
that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. ASU
2014-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We do
not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-09
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters
into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless
those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). ASU 2014-09 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. We are still evaluating the
effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. On April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to propose to defer the effective date of the new revenue
recognition standard by one year.
ASU 2014-08
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08,
"Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360) and Reporting Discontinued
Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity." ASU 2014-08 amends the definition for what types of
asset disposals are to be considered discontinued operations, as well as amending the required disclosures for discontinued operations
and assets held for sale. ASU 2014-08 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
on or after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections
to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s
condensed financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Fiscal
Year
The
Company has adopted December 31, as its fiscal year end.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As
a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information
required by this item.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) reviewed the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report and concluded that as of March 31,
2015, (i) the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that material information relating
to the Company is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and (ii) the Company’s controls and procedures have not
been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including
its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based
on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation of these controls
as of the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
The
Company’s management does not expect that its disclosure controls or its internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements
due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people, or management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to
risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From
time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business.
However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time
to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
As
a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information
required by this Item.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
other than those previously reported in a current report on Form 8-K during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
ITEM
3. DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
Applicable.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
Incorporated
by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
(Unless
Otherwise Indicated) |
Number |
|
Exhibit
Title |
|
Form |
|
File |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated April 7, 2014, by and among Oro Capital Corporation, Synergy Merger Sub, Inc. and Synergy Strips
Corp. |
|
8-K |
|
000-55098 |
|
2.1 |
|
4/9/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated April 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2014)
|
|
8-K |
|
000-55098 |
|
2.1 |
|
5/7/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated January 22, 2015, by and among Synergy Strips Corp.; Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC; Vita Partners,
LLC, RPR Partners, LLC, and Thor Associates, Inc. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
2.3 |
|
3/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Articles
of Incorporation |
|
S-1 |
|
333-185103 |
|
3.1 |
|
11/21/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation |
|
8-K |
|
000-55098 |
|
3.1(b) |
|
5/7/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
By-Laws |
|
S-1 |
|
333-185103 |
|
3.2 |
|
11/21/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Synergy
Strips Corp. Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 22, 2015. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
4.2 |
|
3/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Synergy
Strips Corp. Common Stock Purchase Warrant (10-Year Warrant), dated January 22, 2015. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
4.3 |
|
3/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Loan
Agreement, dated January 22, 2015, between Knight Therapeutics (Barbados) Inc. and Synergy Strips Corp. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
10.5 |
|
3/31/2015 |
10.6 |
|
Product
Distribution Option Agreement, dated January 22, 2015, between Knight Therapeutics (Barbados) Inc. and Synergy Strips Corp. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
10.6 |
|
3/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Distribution,
License and Supply Agreement, dated January 22, 2015, by and between Synergy Strips Corp. and Knight Therapeutics (Barbados)
Inc. |
|
10-K |
|
333-185103 |
|
10.7 |
|
3/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Filed
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Filed
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Filed
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Filed
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS* |
|
XBRL
Instance Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH* |
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL* |
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF* |
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB* |
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE* |
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Furnished
herewith |
|
* |
Pursuant
to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 hereto shall not be deemed “filed”
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability of that Section,
and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Jack Ross |
|
Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) |
|
May 15, 2015 |
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer) |
|
|
Exhibit
31.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jack
Ross, certify that:
1. |
I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synergy Strips Corp.; |
|
|
2. |
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
b. |
Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
c. |
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
d. |
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and |
5. |
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a. |
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
|
|
b. |
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2015 |
By: |
/s/
Jack Ross |
|
|
Jack Ross |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit
31.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jack
Ross, certify that:
1. |
I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synergy Strips Corp.; |
|
|
2. |
Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
b. |
Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
c. |
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
d. |
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and |
5. |
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a. |
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
|
|
b. |
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal controls over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2015 |
By: |
/s/
Jack Ross |
|
|
Jack Ross |
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit
32.1
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with the quarterly report of Synergy Strips Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack
Ross, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes
of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
Date: May 15, 2015 |
By: |
/s/
Jack Ross |
|
|
Jack Ross |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit
32.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with the quarterly report of Synergy Strips Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack
Ross, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
Date: May 15, 2015 |
By: |
/s/
Jack Ross |
|
|
Jack Ross |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
Synergy CHC (CE) (USOTC:SNYR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Synergy CHC (CE) (USOTC:SNYR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024