By Jonathan Cheng and Eun-Young Jeong in Seoul and Georgia Wells in San Francisco
Samsung Electronics Co.'s recall of one of its most advanced
smartphones descended further into confusion, as the technology
giant told consumers to stop using the Galaxy Note 7 and halted its
production and distribution, while investigators probed reports of
overheating batteries on devices that were supposed to be safe.
The company late on Monday U.S. time said it was asking all
telecom carriers and retailers that sell the Note 7 globally to
stop sales and exchanges of the device pending investigation into
the latest incidents. Major U.S. carriers already had made that
move on their own.
Consumers with either an original or a replacement Note 7 should
power down and stop using the device, said Samsung.
The Samsung announcement came after the company suspended
production of the Note 7, a decision that raised questions about
Samsung's initial diagnosis of the problem, which attributed
overheating batteries in some Note 7s to manufacturing issues at
one of its suppliers. Samsung said last month that it stopped using
batteries from that supplier.
The turn of events has shaken already-damaged confidence in the
global recall of 2.5 million Note 7s that began more than a month
ago, creating a headache for consumers, carriers and airlines
worried that the smartphone's faulty batteries could cause smoke or
fires in midflight.
Shares in Samsung Electronics fell by more than 7% in Seoul
Tuesday.
Verizon Communications Inc. Chief Executive Lowell McAdam on
Monday said the recall was "a major black eye" for Samsung. "This
is by far the biggest concern I have seen in cellphones during my
tenure," said the CEO--a veteran of the wireless business since the
1980s--at an industry conference in Menlo Park, Calif. "In my
however many years in the market I have not seen a recall like
this," Mr. McAdam said.
Samsung didn't immediately comment on Mr. McAdam's remarks. The
company's statement Monday said "We remain committed to working
diligently with appropriate regulatory authorities to take all
necessary steps to resolve the situation."
Samsung's move Monday came after recent incidents in which
owners reported problems with Note 7s that they said they had
received as replacements as part of the recall. The U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission was investigating a total of five such
incidents, two in Kentucky and one each in Minnesota, Virginia and
Texas. Authorities haven't confirmed that the incidents involve
replacement versions of the Note 7.
CPSC Chairman Elliot Kaye late Monday endorsed the decision by
Samsung and the U.S. carriers to halt distribution of the Note 7,
and urged existing owners to take advantage of remedies available,
including a full refund. "No one should have to be concerned their
phone will endanger them, their family or their property," he
said.
The muddled recall process has raised the prospect of lasting
damage to Samsung's brand, which is competing for global market
share with Apple Inc. and Huawei Technologies Co.
Matthew Quint, director of the Center on Global Brand Leadership
at Columbia Business School, said that consumers might have let the
initial glitch slide. "But a second time, you're definitely going
to see some long-term impact."
Mr. McAdam said Verizon has seen some customers shift to
competing products, but that he thinks Samsung will recover. "This
is certainly helping Apple, but people aren't flocking away from
Samsung," he said.
Samsung initially stumbled in the U.S. by not coordinating its
initial recall announcement with the CPSC, earning it a public
rebuke from the agency's leader last month.
The process seemed to have stabilized in recent weeks. Then on
Friday, after reports of new incidents surfaced, major carriers
said they had started to allow customers to get a second
replacement for their Note 7s. On Sunday, Verizon, AT&T Inc.
and T-Mobile US Inc. said they would stop issuing new Note 7s to
replace those turned in by customers. Sprint Corp. followed suit on
Monday.
Some U.S. airlines held internal meetings Monday on providing
additional guidance to passengers to prevent the use of their
phones, but decided to stay for now with existing guidance barring
passengers from using or charging Note 7s on flights. Carriers said
they would follow any new guidance from regulators.
If authorities determine that replacement Note 7s do indeed have
the same battery problems that originally prompted concern, it
would cast doubt on the entire recall so far.
"Trust factor is a very important one in recalls, and it is
undermined every time a mistake is made," said Pamela Gilbert, a
partner with Washington law firm Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca LLP and
a former executive director of the CPSC.
Samsung has attributed the battery problems to one of its
battery suppliers. It hasn't named the supplier, but people
familiar with the matter say it is Samsung SDI Co., an affiliate of
the smartphone maker. Samsung SDI has declined to comment.
Samsung said on Sept. 2 that it immediately would stop sourcing
its Note 7 batteries from the supplier, diverting orders to Amperex
Technology Ltd., a unit of Japanese electronic-parts maker TDK
Corp.
Samsung's short turnaround to produce replacement phones risked
straining the other battery supplier, said Cho Jae-phil, director
for the Future Batteries Research Center, which is overseen by
Samsung SDI and South Korea's Ulsan National Institute of Science
and Technology. "More quality issues can surface when you have a
supplier trying to mass produce batteries in a short amount of
time," Mr. Cho said.
Some battery experts and analysts said it is possible the Note
7's woes are the result of another component in the smartphone. In
complex devices such as smartphones, "You can do 499 things right
out of 500, but if you make that one error, that phone is going to
be problematic," said Daniel Kim, a Seoul-based analyst for
Macquarie.
Samsung declined to comment Monday on speculation about specific
technical problems with the Galaxy Note 7 replacements.
Trisha Thadani, John D. McKinnon and Doug Cameron contributed to
this article.
Write to Jonathan Cheng at jonathan.cheng@wsj.com and Georgia
Wells at Georgia.Wells@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 11, 2016 01:02 ET (05:02 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Samsung SDI (PK) (USOTC:SSDIY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2025 to Feb 2025
Samsung SDI (PK) (USOTC:SSDIY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Feb 2025