UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section
14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. __)
Filed
by the Registrant
x
Filed by a party other than the Registrant
¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
¨
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
x
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
¨
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
¨
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240. 14a-12
|
INTERCLOUD
SYSTEMS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No. :
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
INTERCLOUD
SYSTEMS, INC.
1030 Broad
Street, Suite 102
Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Monday, August 29, 2016
TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
OF INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
InterCloud Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held on
Monday, August 29, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight
Time
, at Spring Lake Golf Club, 901 Warren Avenue, Spring Lake, New Jersey 07762, for the following purposes as more fully
described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:
|
1.
|
To elect as Class III directors the nominees named in this proxy statement to serve until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders
or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
To authorize our board of directors to effect, at any time prior to the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, a reverse
stock split of the outstanding shares of our common stock at an exchange ratio of up to one-for-four shares;
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
To ratify the appointment of WithumSmith + Brown, PC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year
ending December 31, 2016; and
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
Our board of directors has fixed the
close of business on July 15, 2016 as the record date for the meeting. Only stockholders of record of our common stock on
July 15, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the
matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement.
We have enclosed our proxy statement,
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, a form of proxy and a postage-paid reply envelope. Please
read the accompanying proxy statement and other documents delivered to you carefully for information about the matters you are
being asked to consider and vote upon.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
. Whether
or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person, our board of directors urges you to promptly vote your
proxy as soon as possible by mail using the enclosed postage-paid reply envelope or by telephone or the Internet in the manner
set forth in the enclosed proxy statement. If you decide to attend the meeting and vote in person, you will, of course, have that
opportunity.
We appreciate your continued support of
our company and look forward to either greeting you personally at the meeting or receiving your proxy.
|
By order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
Mark Munro
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Shrewsbury, New Jersey
|
|
July 21, 2016
|
INTERCLOUD
SYSTEMS, INC.
1030 Broad Street, Suite 102
Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
to be held on Monday, August 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time
This proxy statement and the
enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the
annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Monday, August 29, 2016 and any postponements,
adjournments or continuations thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held at Spring Lake Golf Club located at 901 Warren Avenue,
Spring Lake, New Jersey 07762, on August 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. The notice of meeting, this proxy
statement and the form of proxy enclosed are first being sent to stockholders on or about July 21, 2016.
The
information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary
of the information contained in this proxy statement. You should read this entire proxy statement carefully.
Why am I receiving these materials?
Our board of directors is providing
these proxy materials to you in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of our company, to be held on
Monday, August 29, 2016. As a stockholder of record of our common stock on July 15, 2016, you are invited to
attend the Annual Meeting and are entitled to and requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.
What matters am I voting on?
You will be voting on:
|
●
|
the election as Class III directors of the nominees named in this
proxy statement to hold office until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
|
|
●
|
a proposal to authorize our board of directors to effect, at any time
prior to the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of our common stock at
an exchange ratio of up to one-for-four shares;
|
|
●
|
a proposal to ratify the appointment of WithumSmith + Brown, PC
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2016; and
|
|
·
|
any other business that may properly come before the meeting.
|
How does the board of directors recommend I vote on these
proposals?
The board of directors recommends a vote:
|
●
|
FOR the nominees named in this proxy statement for election as Class
III directors;
|
|
●
|
FOR the authorization of our board of directors to effect a reverse
stock split of our common stock as described herein; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of WithumSmith + Brown,
PC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.
|
Who is entitled to vote?
Holders of our common stock as of
the close of business on July 15, 2016, the record date, may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, we had
33,548,411 shares of common stock outstanding. In deciding all matters at the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on the record date. We do not have cumulative voting rights for the
election of directors.
Registered Stockholders
. If your
shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect
to those shares, and the Notice was provided to you directly by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your
voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
Street Name Stockholders
. If your
shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held
in street name, and the notice of meeting and this proxy statement was forwarded to you by your broker or nominee, who is considered
the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee
how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since a beneficial owner is
not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you follow your broker’s
procedures for obtaining a legal proxy.
How do I vote?
There are four ways to vote:
|
●
|
by Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven
days a week, until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on August 28, 2016 (have your proxy card in hand when you visit the
website);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
by toll-free telephone at 1-800-690-6903 (have your proxy card
in hand when you call), until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on August 28, 2016;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
by written ballot at the Annual Meeting.
|
Can I change my vote?
Yes. You can change your vote or revoke
your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting by:
|
●
|
entering a new vote by Internet or by telephone;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
returning a later-dated proxy card;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
notifying our Corporate Secretary, in writing, at the address listed
on the front page of this proxy statement; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
completing a written ballot at the Annual Meeting.
|
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf
of our board of directors. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxies by our board of directors. When proxies
are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance
with the instruction of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance
with the recommendations of our board of directors as described above. If any matters not described in the Proxy Statement are
properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If
the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have properly
revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.
What is a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares
required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. The presence,
in person or by proxy, of a majority of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting will
constitute a quorum at the meeting. A proxy submitted by a stockholder may indicate that all or a portion of the shares represented
by the proxy are not being voted (“stockholder withholding”) with respect to a particular matter. Similarly, a broker
may not be permitted to vote stock (“broker non-vote”) held in street name on a particular matter in the absence of
instructions from the beneficial owner of the stock. See “How may my brokerage firm or other intermediary vote my shares
if I fail to provide timely directions?” The shares subject to a proxy that are not being voted on a particular matter because
of either stockholder withholding or broker non-vote will count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions
are also counted in the determination of a quorum.
How many votes are needed for approval of each matter?
|
●
|
Proposal No. 1: The election of directors requires a plurality vote
of the shares of common stock voted at the meeting. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest
number of votes cast “for” are elected as directors. As a result, any shares not voted “for” a particular
nominee (whether as a result of a stockholder abstention or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor
and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Proposal No. 2: The authorization of our board of directors to
effect the proposed reverse stock split of our common stock must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock to
be approved.
Abstentions and
broker non-votes will be considered votes cast and thus, will have
the same
effect as a vote “against” the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Proposal No. 3: The ratification of the appointment of
WithumSmith + Brown, PC must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the
meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved.
Abstentions are considered votes cast and thus, will have the same effect as a vote
“against” the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
|
How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting?
The board of directors is soliciting proxies
for use at the Annual Meeting. All expenses associated with this solicitation will be borne by us. We will reimburse brokers or
other nominees for reasonable expenses that they incur in sending these proxy materials to you if a broker or other nominee holds
your shares.
How may my brokerage firm or other intermediary vote my
shares if I fail to provide timely directions?
Brokerage firms and other
intermediaries holding shares of common stock in street name for customers are generally required to vote such shares in the
manner directed by their customers. In the absence of timely directions, your broker will have discretion to vote your shares
on our sole “routine” matter - the proposal to ratify the appointment of WithumSmith + Brown, PC. Absent
direction from you, your broker will not have discretion to vote on the election of directors or on our proposals to
authorize our board of directors to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock.
Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting
tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not
be disclosed either within our company or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow
for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
Who are the proxies?
Our board of directors has appointed Mark
Munro and Timothy A. Larkin to serve as proxies at the Annual Meeting. When you fill out your proxy card and return it, or if you
vote electronically, you will be giving the proxies your instruction on how to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.
Who will count the votes?
We have retained Broadridge Financial
Solutions, Inc. to receive and tabulate the proxy cards, ballots and voting instruction forms.
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We will announce preliminary voting results
at the Annual Meeting. We will also disclose voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are
not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to publish preliminary
results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
I share an address with another stockholder, and we received
only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?
We have adopted a procedure called “house
holding,” which the SEC has approved. Under this procedure, we deliver a single copy of the notice of meeting and the proxy
materials to multiple stockholders who share the same address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the
stockholders. This procedure reduces our printing costs, mailing costs, and fees. Stockholders who participate in house holding
will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, we will deliver promptly a separate
copy of the notice of meeting and the proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy
of any of these documents. To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a
single copy, of the notice of meeting and the proxy materials, stockholders may contact us as follows:
InterCloud Systems, Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
1030 Broad Street, Suite 102
Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702
Stockholders who hold shares in street
name may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization to request information about householding.
What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration
at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
Stockholder Proposals
Stockholders may present proper proposals
for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals
in writing to our Corporate Secretary in a timely manner. Stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy
materials. Proposals should be addressed to:
InterCloud Systems, Inc.
Attention: Corporate Secretary
1030 Broad Street, Suite 102
Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702
Our bylaws establish an advance notice
procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws provide that the
only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect
to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors, or (iii)
properly brought before the meeting by a stockholder of record both at the time of giving notice of the proposal and at the time
of the meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Corporate Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified
in our bylaws. To be timely for our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written notice
at our principal executive offices:
|
●
|
not earlier than May 1, 2017; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
not later than the close of business on May 31, 2017.
|
In the event that we hold our 2017 annual
meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary date of the 2016 annual meeting,
then notice of a stockholder proposal must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120
th
day before
such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:
|
●
|
the
90
th
day prior to such annual meeting; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
10
th
day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such
meeting is first made.
|
If, after complying with the provisions
above, a stockholder, or such stockholder’s qualified representative, does not appear at the annual meeting to present the
stockholder’s proposal, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such meeting.
Nomination of Director Candidates
You may propose director candidates for
consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s
name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address
set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of
Directors and Corporate Governance - Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors.”
In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders
to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the
information required by our bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance
with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary within the time period described
above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals.
Availability of Bylaws
A copy of our bylaws may be obtained by
accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov
. You may also contact our Corporate Secretary at our principal
executive offices for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating
director candidates.
Whom should I call if I have questions regarding the Annual
Meeting?
If you have questions regarding the Annual
Meeting, please contact our Chief Accounting Officer, Daniel Sullivan, at (732) 898-6304.
Attending the Annual Meeting
Our Annual Meeting will be held on
Monday, August 29, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, at Spring Lake Golf Club, 901 Warren Avenue, Spring Lake, New
Jersey 07762.
All stockholders should be prepared to
present photo identification for admission to the Annual Meeting. Admission will be on a first-come, first-served basis. If you
are a beneficial stockholder and hold your shares in “street name,” you will be asked to present proof of ownership
of your shares as of the record date. Examples of acceptable evidence of ownership include your most recent brokerage statement
showing ownership of shares prior to the record date or a photocopy of your voting instruction form. Persons acting as proxies
must bring a valid proxy from a stockholder of record as of the record date. Your late arrival or failure to comply with these
procedures could affect your ability to participate in the Annual Meeting.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our business affairs are managed under
the direction of our board of directors, which is currently composed of four members. Three of our directors are “independent”
under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards. Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At
each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose
term is then expiring.
Each director’s term continues until
his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her death, resignation or removal. Any increase or decrease
in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist
of one-third of the directors. This classification of our board of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes
in control of our company.
The following table sets forth the
name and certain other information as of May 31, 2016 for the nominee for election as a director and for each of the
continuing members of the board of directors.
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
Current
Term
Expires
|
|
|
Expiration
of Term
For Which
Nominated
|
|
Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Munro
|
|
|
III
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Charles K. Miller
(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
III
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Durfee
(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Neal L. Oristano
(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
II
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Roger M. Ponder
|
|
|
II
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
____________
(1)
|
Member of the audit committee
|
(2)
|
Member of the compensation committee
|
(3)
|
Member of the governance and nominating committee
|
Nominees for Director
In accordance with the implementation
of our classified board of directors, the term of our Class III directors (Mark Munro and Charles K. Miller) expire at the Annual
Meeting, with Class I and Class II directors continuing in office for terms expiring in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our board
of directors has nominated Mark Munro and Charles K. Miller for re-election as Class III directors at the forthcoming Annual Meeting,
to hold office until our annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following such election (that is, our annual meeting
of stockholders to be held in 2019) and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
Mark Munro
has served as our Chief
Executive Officer and as the Chairman of our Board since December 2011. Mr. Munro is also the Founder and has been President of
Munro Capital Inc., a private equity investment firm, since 2005. Mr. Munro has been the Chief Executive Officer and owner of 1112
Third Ave Corp., a real estate holding company, since October 2000. He has also been an investor in private companies for the last
eight years. Prior to forming Munro Capital, Mr. Munro founded, built and sold Eastern Telcom Inc., a telecommunication company,
from 1990 to 1996. Mr. Munro has been directly involved in over $150 million of private and public transactions as both an investor
and entrepreneur. Mr. Munro received his B.A. in economics from Connecticut College. Mr. Munro brings extensive business experience,
including years as a successful entrepreneur and investor, to our board of directors and executive management team.
Charles K. Miller
has been a member
of our board of directors since November 2012. He has been the Chief Financial Officer of Tekmark Global Solutions, LLC, a provider
of information technology, communications and consulting services, since September 1997. Mr. Miller received his B.S. in accounting
and his M.B.A. from Rider University and is a Certified Public Accountant in New Jersey. Mr. Miller brings over 30 years of financial
experience to our board of directors.
Proxy Voting for Directors
Shares represented by proxies that are
returned properly signed will be voted for our board’s nominees unless the stockholder indicates on the proxy that authority
to vote the shares is withheld for one or more of the nominees listed. Should a nominee become unable to serve as a director (which
is not anticipated at this time), the proxy will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee who shall be designated by
our board of directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
Vote Required
Our Class III directors will be elected
by a plurality of the votes of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting, entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting and voting on the election of directors. Cumulative voting is not permitted in connection with the election of our directors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Continuing Directors
Director Continuing in Office Until the 2017 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
Mark F. Durfee
has been a member
of our board of directors since December 2012. Mr. Durfee has been a principal at Auerbach Acquisition Associates II, Inc., a private
equity fund, since August 2007. Mr. Durfee also worked for Kinderhook Capital Management, LLC, an investment manager, as a partner
from January 1999 to December 2004, at which he was responsible for investing in over 40 middle market companies. He has been a
director of Home Sweet Home Holdings, Inc., a wholesaler of home furnishings, since January 2012. Mr. Durfee received his B.S.
in finance from the University of Wyoming. Mr. Durfee brings over 25 years of experience as a private equity investor to our board
of directors.
Director Continuing in Office Until the 2018 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
Neal L. Oristano
has been a member
of our board of directors since December 2012. Mr. Oristano has been the Vice President - Service Provider Sales Segment at Cisco
Systems Inc., an internet protocol-based networking and products company, since August 2011. From July 2004 to July 2011, he was
the Senior Vice President - Service Provider Sales at Juniper Networks, Inc., a networking software and systems company. Mr. Oristano
received his B.S. in marketing from St. Johns University. Mr. Oristano brings 35 years of technology experience, including enterprise
and service provider leadership, to our board of directors.
Roger M. Ponder
has been a member
of our board of directors since November 2015. Mr. Ponder served as our Chief Operating Officer from November 2012 to March
2015. Mr. Ponder has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Summit Broadband LLC, a provider of consulting services
to private equity and institutional banking entities in the telecommunications, cable and media/internet sectors, since August
2009. From January 2005 to August 2009, he was the President - Midwest/Kansas City Division of Time Warner Cable. Mr. Ponder was
a member of the United Way Board of Trustees - Kansas City from January 2006 to January 2011. Mr. Ponder received his B.S. from
Rollins College in Business Administration and Economics. Mr. Ponder brings extensive business development, strategic planning
and operational experience to our board of directors.
Director Independence
Our board of directors has undertaken
a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of current directors and considered whether
any such director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying
out his responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each current director concerning his background,
employment and affiliations, including family relationships, the board of directors has determined that none of Messrs. Durfee,
Oristano or Miller representing three of our four current directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise
of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is an “independent
director” as defined under the rules of The NASDAQ Capital Market. Our board of directors also determined that each of such
directors, who comprise the members of our audit committee, our compensation committee and our governance and nominating committee,
satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by applicable SEC rules and the rules of The NASDAQ Capital
Market.
Board Meetings and Committees
During the year ended December
31, 2015, our board of directors held two meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and no director
attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the board of directors and the committees of which he was a
member. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, our board of directors acted by unanimous written consent on 18
occasions.
Although we do not have a formal policy
regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require,
directors to attend.
Our board of directors has an audit committee,
a compensation committee and a governance and nominating committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described
below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors.
Audit Committee.
Our audit
committee is comprised of Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller and Neal L. Oristano. Mr. Miller is the chairperson of the committee.
Our board of directors has determined that each member of the audit committee is “independent” for audit committee
purposes as that term is defined in the applicable rules of the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our board of directors has designated
Charles K. Miller as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC. The audit
committee’s responsibilities include:
|
●
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence
of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pre-approving auditing and permissible non-audit services, and the
terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing annually a report by the independent registered public accounting
firm regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s internal quality control procedures and various issues
relating thereto;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
coordinating the oversight and reviewing the adequacy of our internal
control over financial reporting with both management and the independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
●
|
establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention
of accounting related complaints and concerns, including a confidential, anonymous mechanism for the submission of concerns by
employees;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
periodically reviewing legal compliance matters, including any securities
trading policies, periodically reviewing significant accounting and other financial risks or exposures to our company, reviewing
and, if appropriate, approving all transactions between our company or its subsidiaries and any related party (as described in
Item 404 of Regulation S-K);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
establishing policies for the hiring of employees and former employees
of the independent registered public accounting firm; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing the audit committee report required by SEC rules to be included
in our annual proxy statement.
|
The audit committee also has the power
to investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties. It also has the authority to retain counsel
and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties.
The audit committee had four meetings
in 2015. The audit committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our board of directors and satisfies the applicable
rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on our
website at
http://www.ntercloudsys. com/governance-documents
.
Compensation Committee.
Our
compensation committee is comprised of Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller and Neal L. Oristano. Mr. Oristano is the chairperson
of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the compensation committee is an independent director
for compensation committee purposes as that term is defined in the applicable rules of NASDAQ, is a “non-employee director”
within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(d)(3) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
and is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The compensation
committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:
|
●
|
annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant
to the compensation of our chief executive officer;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
annually evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer
in light of such corporate goals and objectives and approving the compensation of our chief executive officer;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
annually reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive
officers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
annually reviewing our compensation, welfare, benefit and pension
plans, and similar plans;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors with
respect to director compensation; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reviewing for inclusion in our proxy statement the report of the compensation
committee required by the SEC.
|
The compensation committee also has the
power to investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties. It also has the authority to retain counsel
and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties.
Our compensation committee had one meeting
in 2015. The compensation committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our board of directors and satisfies the
applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter
is available on our website at
http://www.intercloudsys.com/governance-documents
. Pursuant to its charter, the compensation
committee may form subcommittees and delegate to such subcommittees any power and authority the compensation committee deems appropriate,
excluding any power or authority required by law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the compensation committee
as a whole.
Governance and Nominating Committee
.
Our governance and nominating committee, or nominating committee, is comprised of Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller and Neal L.
Oristano. Mr. Durfee is the chairperson of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that each of the committee members
is an independent director for nominating committee purposes as that term is defined in the applicable rules of the NASDAQ Stock
Market. The nominating committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:
|
●
|
developing and recommending to the board of directors criteria for
board of directors and committee membership;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
identifying individuals qualified to become board of directors members;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
recommending to the board of directors the persons to be nominated
for election as directors and to each of the board of directors’ committees;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
annually reviewing our corporate governance guidelines; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
monitoring and evaluating the performance of the board of directors
and leading the board in an annual self-assessment of its practices and effectiveness.
|
The governance and nominating committee
also has the power to investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties. It also has the authority
to retain counsel and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties.
During 2015, our governance and nominating
committee did not meet. The governance and nominating committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our board
of directors and satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. A copy of the
Governance and Nominating Committee Charter is available on our website at
http://www.intercloudsys.com/governance-documents
.
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
The governance and nominating committee
uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. In its evaluation of director candidates, the governance
and nominating committee will consider the current size and composition of the board of directors and the needs of the board of
directors and the respective committees of the board of directors. Some of the qualifications that the governance and nominating
committee considers include, without limitation, issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity, age, independence, skills,
education, expertise, business acumen, business experience, length of service, understanding of our business, other commitments
and the like. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees.
Although the board of directors does not
maintain a specific policy with respect to board diversity, the board of directors believes that the board should be a diverse
body, and the governance and nominating committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences. In making determinations
regarding nominations of directors, the governance and nominating committee may take into account the benefits of diverse viewpoints.
The governance and nominating committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual board of director and
committee evaluations.
Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board
of Directors
The governance and nominating committee
will consider candidates for directors recommended by stockholders so long as such recommendations comply with the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of our company and applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those promulgated by the SEC.
The committee will evaluate such recommendations in accordance with its charter, our bylaws and the regular nominee criteria described
above. This process is designed to ensure that the board of directors includes members with diverse backgrounds, skills and experience,
including appropriate financial and other expertise relevant to our business. Eligible stockholders wishing to recommend a candidate
for nomination should contact our Corporate Secretary in writing. Such recommendations must include information about the candidate,
a statement of support by the recommending stockholder, evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of our stock
and a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve on our board of directors. The committee has discretion
to decide which individuals to recommend for nomination as directors.
A stockholder of record can nominate
a candidate directly for election to the board of directors by complying with the procedures in Section 3.8 of our bylaws.
Any eligible stockholder who wishes to submit a nomination should review the requirements in our bylaws on nominations by
stockholders. Any nomination should be sent in writing to InterCloud Systems, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1030
Broad Street, Suite 102, Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702. Notice must be received by us no earlier than May 1, 2017, and no
later than May 31, 2017. The notice must state the information required by Section 3.8 of our bylaws and otherwise must
comply with applicable federal and state law.
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders wishing to communicate with
a non-management member of the board of directors may do so by writing to such director, and mailing the correspondence to: InterCloud
Systems, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1030 Broad Street, Suite 102, Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702. All such stockholder
communications will be forwarded to the appropriate committee of our board of directors or non-management director.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. We will provide a copy of our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, without charge, to any person desiring a copy, by written request to our company at 1030 Broad Street, Suite 102, Shrewsbury,
New Jersey 07702, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Risk Management
Our board of directors has an active role,
as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing the management of our risks. Our board of directors is responsible for
general oversight of risks and regular review of information regarding our risks, including credit risks, liquidity risks and operational
risks. The compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation
plans and arrangements. The audit committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to accounting matters
and financial reporting. The governance and nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated
with the independence of the board of directors and potential conflicts of interest. While each committee is responsible for evaluating
certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire board of directors is regularly informed through discussions
from committee members about such risks. The board of directors believes its administration of its risk oversight function has
not affected the board of directors’ leadership structure.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
Our board of directors has approved a
compensation policy for members of the board who are not employed by us or any of our subsidiaries (“non-employee directors”).
Under the policy, each non-employee director continuing to serve in such capacity after an annual meeting of our stockholders will
receive an award of restricted stock units, with the number of units to be determined by dividing $30,000 by the per-share closing
price of our common stock on the grant date. A non-employee director who is appointed to the board other than in connection with
an annual meeting and who has not been employed by us or one of our subsidiaries in the preceding six months will receive a grant
of restricted stock units, with the number of units to be determined by dividing $30,000 by the per-share closing price of our
common stock on the grant date and prorating that number based on the period of time that has elapsed since the last annual meeting.
Each of these grants will vest on a quarterly basis through the date of the next annual meeting (or, if earlier, the first anniversary
of the date of grant).
In addition, our director compensation
policy provides that a non-employee director who serves as Chairman of the Board will receive an annual cash retainer of $35,000.
A non-employee director who serves on our audit committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $20,000, a non-employee director
who serves on our compensation committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000, and a non-employee director who serves
on our governance and nominating committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000. Non-employee directors also are entitled
to receive a fee of $1,500 for each meeting of the board or a board committee that they attend in person (with the director being
entitled to one meeting fee if meetings of the board and a board committee are held on the same day). We also reimburse our non-employee
directors for their reasonable travel expenses incident to attending meetings of our board or board committees.
The following table sets forth information
about the compensation of the non-employee members of our board of directors who served as a director during the year ended December
31, 2015. Other than as set forth in the table and described more fully below, during the year ended December 31, 2015, we did
not pay any fees, make any equity awards or non-equity awards or pay any other compensation to the non-employee members of our
board of directors. Mr. Munro, our Chief Executive Officer, receives no compensation for his service as a director, and is not
included in the table below.
Name
|
|
Fees
earned
or paid
in cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Option
awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
|
|
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Mark F. Durfee
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
26,995
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
38,995
|
|
Charles K. Miller
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
Neal L. Oristano
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
Roger M. Ponder
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,269
|
(3)
|
|
|
43,269
|
|
____________
(1)
|
The amounts shown reflect the grant date fair value of each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,
Compensation-Stock
Compensation.
The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are described under the caption “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - Stock-Based
Compensation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in Note 2 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included in such report.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents health insurance premiums paid on behalf of Mr. Durfee.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Represents salary payments to Mr. Ponder as an employee prior joining our board of directors.
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OF
OUR COMMON STOCK
General
On July 15, 2016, our board of directors
unanimously authorized and approved, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amendment”)
to effect a reverse stock split of all outstanding shares of our common stock at an exchange ratio of up to one-for-four (1:4)
shares (the “Reverse Split”). Pursuant to the Reverse Split, depending on the exchange ratio determined by our board
of directors, up to every four shares of our outstanding common stock will automatically be combined into one share of common
stock. No fractional shares will be issued in connection with the foregoing combination; all shares of common stock that are held
by a stockholder will be aggregated and each stockholder will be entitled to receive the number of whole shares resulting from
the combination of the shares so aggregated. Any fractions resulting from the Reverse Split computation will be rounded up to
the next whole share.
Depending on the ratio for the Reverse
Split determined by our board of directors, a number of shares of our existing common stock, as determined by the board of directors,
will be combined into one share of common stock. The number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding will therefore be
reduced in an amount that will depend upon the Reverse Split ratio determined by our board of directors. The Amendment that is
filed to effect the Reverse Split, if any, will include only the Reverse Split ratio determined by our board of directors to be
in the best interests of our stockholders and all of the other proposed amendments at different ratios will be abandoned. The proposed
amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Split, as more fully described below, will effect the Reverse
Split but will not change the number of our authorized shares of common stock or preferred stock, or the par value of our common
stock or any issued or undesignated preferred stock. The par value of our common stock and preferred stock will remain $0.001 per
share.
Our board of directors has not yet determined
whether to implement the Reverse Split. If this proposal is approved by our stockholders, our board of directors will have the
authority to effect the Reverse Split by filing the Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State at any time prior to the one-year
anniversary of the Annual Meeting. Our board of directors may also abandon the Reverse Split. The form of the Amendment is attached
hereto as Appendix A. The following description of the Amendment is intended to be a summary only and is qualified in its entirety
by the terms of the Amendment.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REVERSE SPLIT WILL
NOT CHANGE YOUR PROPORTIONATE EQUITY INTERESTS IN OUR COMPANY, EXCEPT AS MAY RESULT FROM THE ISSUANCE OF WHOLE SHARES IN EXCHANGE
FOR ANY FRACTIONAL SHARES RESULTING FROM THE REVERSE SPLIT.
Purpose and Material Effects of the Reverse Split
Our shares of common stock are listed
on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ICLD.” In order to maintain the listing of our shares of our common
stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, we must satisfy various listing standards established by the exchange, including minimum sale
price requirements. One of the requirements for continued listing on the NASDAQ is maintenance of a minimum closing bid price of
$1.00 per share. As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2016, on February
18, 2016, we were notified by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC that we were not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the
“Minimum Bid Price Rule”) because the bid price for our common stock had failed to satisfy the minimum bid price requirement
set forth in that rule. While the NASDAQ notification had no immediate effect on the NASDAQ listing or trading of our common
stock, we were provided 180 calendar days, or until August 16, 2016, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement.
If, at any time before August 16, 2016, the bid price of our common stock closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10
consecutive business days, NASDAQ will notify us that we have achieved compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule.
We intend to take appropriate steps to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule, which may include effecting the Reverse
Split if this proposal is approved.
In an attempt to ensure that we can meet
the continuing listing standards of The NASDAQ Capital Market, our board of directors may consider it necessary to effect a reverse
stock split of our common stock to reduce the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. We also believe that if we are
successful in maintaining a higher stock price for our common stock, our stock will generate greater interest among professional
investors and institutions. If we are successful in generating interest among such entities, we anticipate that our common stock
would have greater liquidity and a stronger investor base. After consulting with investment bankers and advisors, our board of
directors approved the Reverse Split at an exchange ratio of up to one-for-four (1:4) shares.
While our board of directors unanimously
approved the Reverse Split on July 15, 2016, our board has not yet determined whether to implement the Reverse Split. If this
proposal is approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting, our board of directors will have the authority to effect the Reverse
Split by filing the Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State at any time prior to the one-year anniversary of the date of
the Annual Meeting. We believe that granting our board such discretion, including the discretion to determine the exchange ratio
of the Reverse Split at any exchange ratio of up to one-for-four (1:4) shares, provides our board of directors with maximum flexibility
to react to prevailing market conditions, and our board will implement the Reverse Split only upon its determination that the
Reverse Split is then in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.
We anticipate that the Reverse Split may
have the effect of increasing, proportionately, the per share trading price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market. The
decrease in the number of shares of common stock outstanding as a consequence of the proposed Reverse Split should increase the
per share price of our common stock, which may encourage greater interest in our common stock and possibly promote greater liquidity
for our stockholders. However, the increase in the per share price of our common stock as a consequence of the proposed Reverse
Split, if any, may be proportionately less than the decrease in the number of shares outstanding, and any increased liquidity due
to any increased per share price could be partially or entirely offset by the reduced number of shares outstanding after the proposed
Reverse Split. In general, there can be no assurance that the favorable effects described above will occur, or that any increase
in per share price of our common stock resulting from the Reverse Split will be maintained for any period of time.
The Reverse Split is not intended as,
and will not have the effect of, a “going private transaction” covered by Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act. We will
continue to be subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
Effect on Holders of
Common Stock.
The principal effect of the Reverse Split will be that the number of shares of common stock issued and
outstanding will be reduced. For example, assuming our board of directors implements the Reverse Split at the maximum
exchange ratio of one-for-3 (1:3) shares, the 33,548,411 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on July 15, 2016,
the record date for the Annual Meeting, will be reduced to approximately 8,387,103 shares, with the actual number of shares
dependent on the number of whole shares issued in exchange for any fractional shares. Any fractional shares resulting
from the Reverse Split will be rounded up to the nearest whole share, as described below under
“Fractional Shares.” Appropriate adjustments will also be made to the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and stock purchase warrants and upon conversion of our outstanding convertible
debt securities, with corresponding reductions in the applicable exercise or conversion prices of such securities.
The Reverse Split will not affect the
number of authorized shares of common stock. The Reverse Split will also not affect the par value of our common stock. As a result,
on the effective date of the Reverse Split, the stated capital on our balance sheet attributable to our common stock will be reduced
to less than the present amount, and the additional paid-in capital account shall be credited with the amount by which the stated
capital is reduced. The per share net income or loss and net book value of our common stock will be increased because there will
be fewer shares of our common stock outstanding.
The Reverse Split will not change the
proportionate equity interests of our stockholders, nor will the respective voting rights and other rights of stockholders be altered,
except for possible immaterial changes as a result of the “rounding up” of fractional shares. Our common stock issued
pursuant to the Reverse Split will remain fully paid and non-assessable.
Stockholders should recognize that they
will own a fewer number of shares than they presently own (a number equal to the number of shares owned immediately prior to the
effective date of the Reverse Split divided by up to four, depending on the exchange ratio selected by our board). While we expect
that the Reverse Split will result in an increase in the potential market price of our common stock, there can be no assurance
that the reverse split will increase the potential market price of our common stock by a multiple equal to the exchange number
or result in the permanent increase in any potential market price (which is dependent upon many factors, including our performance
and prospects). Also, should the market price of our common stock decline, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as
a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would pertain in the absence of a reverse split. Furthermore,
the possibility exists that potential liquidity in the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected by the reduced
number of shares that would be outstanding after the Reverse Split. In addition, the Reverse Split will increase the number of
our stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares). Stockholders who hold odd lots typically will experience an increase
in the cost of selling their shares, as well as possible greater difficulty in effecting such sales. Consequently, there can be
no assurance that the Reverse Split will achieve the desired results that have been outlined above.
Fractional Shares
We will not issue fractional certificates
for post-reverse split shares in connection with the Reverse Split. In order to avoid the expense and inconvenience of issuing
and transferring fractional shares of common stock to stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractional shares
of common stock following the Reverse Split, all shares of common stock that are held by a stockholder will be aggregated and each
stockholder shall be entitled to receive the number of whole shares resulting from the combination of the shares so aggregated.
Any fractions resulting from the Reverse Split computation shall be rounded up to the next whole share.
Procedure For Exchange of Stock Certificates
We anticipate that the Reverse Split will
become effective, if at all, on a date as determined by our board of directors prior to the one-year anniversary of the Annual
Meeting. Beginning on the effective date, each certificate representing pre-reverse split shares will be deemed for all corporate
purposes to evidence ownership of post-reverse split shares.
Our transfer agent, Corporate Stock Transfer
& Trust Co., will act as exchange agent for purposes of implementing the exchange of stock certificates. We refer to such person
as the “exchange agent.” Holders of pre-reverse split shares are asked to surrender to the exchange agent certificates
representing pre-reverse split shares in exchange for certificates representing post-reverse split shares in accordance with the
procedures set forth in a letter of transmittal that will be furnished to our stockholders in connection with the Reverse Split.
No new certificates will be issued to a stockholder until that stockholder has surrendered the stockholder’s outstanding
certificate(s) together with the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal.
Our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal
rights under the DGCL in connection with the Reverse Split.
STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD NOT DESTROY ANY STOCK
CERTIFICATE AND SHOULD NOT SUBMIT ANY CERTIFICATES WITHOUT THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
Anti-Takeover Effects of the Reverse Split
THE OVERALL EFFECT OF THE REVERSE SPLIT
MAY BE TO RENDER MORE DIFFICULT THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF MERGERS OR THE ASSUMPTION OF CONTROL BY A PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDER, AND THUS
INCREASE THE DIFFICULTY OF REMOVING MANAGEMENT.
The effective increase in our unissued
shares could potentially be used by management to thwart a take-over attempt. The over-all effects of the Reverse Split might be
to render it more difficult to consummate or otherwise discourage a merger, tender offer or proxy contest, or the assumption of
control by a holder of a large block of our securities and the removal of incumbent management. The Reverse Split could make the
accomplishment of a merger or similar transaction more difficult, even if it is beneficial to stockholders. Management might use
the additional authorized but unissued shares resulting from the Reverse Split to resist or frustrate a third-party transaction,
favored by a majority of the independent stockholders, that would provide an above market premium, by issuing additional shares
to frustrate the take-over effort.
The approval of the Reverse Split proposal
was not the result of management’s knowledge of an effort to accumulate the issuer’s securities or to obtain control
of the issuer by means of a merger, tender offer, solicitation or otherwise.
As discussed above, the Reverse Split
proposal was approved by the Board. There are no rules or practices on any stock exchange that permit such exchange to reserve
the right to refuse to list or to de-list any stock that completes a reverse stock split.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion is a summary
of certain federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Split to us and the holders of our common stock. This discussion is based
on laws, regulations, rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive
effect) and to differing interpretations. This discussion only applies to stockholders that are U.S. persons as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to a stockholder
in light of his particular circumstances or to stockholders subject to special rules (such as dealers in securities, financial
institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, foreign individuals and entities, and persons who acquired their common
stock as compensation). In addition, this summary is limited to stockholders that hold their common stock as capital assets. This
discussion also does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction or alternative
minimum tax consequences. The tax treatment of each stockholder may vary depending upon the particular facts and circumstances
of such stockholder.
WE URGE ALL STOCKHOLDERS TO CONSULT THEIR
OWN TAX ADVISERS TO DETERMINE THE PARTICULAR FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES TO EACH OF THEM OF THE PROPOSED
REVERSE SPLIT.
We have not sought and will not seek an
opinion of counsel or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding the federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Split.
We believe, however, that because the Reverse Split is not part of a plan to periodically increase or decrease any stockholder’s
proportionate interest in the assets or earnings and profits of our company, the Reverse Split should have the federal income tax
effects described below:
|
●
|
The exchange of pre-split shares for post-split shares should not
result in recognition of gain or loss for federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the post-split shares
would equal that stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the pre-split shares.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The stockholder’s holding period for the post-split shares will
include such stockholder’s holding period for the pre-split shares.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Provided that a stockholder held the pre-split shares as a capital
asset, the post-split shares received in exchange therefor would also be held as a capital asset.
|
Our company should not recognize gain
or loss as a result of the Reverse Split.
Effective Date of Proposed Reverse Split
If this proposal is approved at the Annual
Meeting, our board of directors will effect the Reverse Split, if at all, by filing the Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of
State. Our board of directors will have the authority to effect the Reverse Split at any time prior to the one-year anniversary
of the Annual Meeting. Our board may also abandon the Reverse Split.
Summary of Reverse Split
Below is a brief summary of the Reverse
Split:
|
●
|
Assuming our board of directors effects the Reverse Split at the
maximum exchange ratio of one-for-four (1:4) shares, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock shall be reduced on
the basis of one post-stock split share of our common stock for every four pre-stock split shares of common stock
outstanding (a ratio of 1:4). Our board of directors may implement the Reverse Split at a lesser exchange ratio. The
consolidation shall not affect any rights, privileges or obligations with respect to the shares of common stock existing
prior to the consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Assuming our board of directors effects the Reverse Split at
the maximum exchange ratio of one-for-four (1:4) shares,
as a result of the reduction of our common stock, the
pre-split total
of issued and outstanding shares of 33,548,411 at July 15, 2016, the record date for the Annual Meeting, shall be
consolidated to a
total of approximately
8,387,103 issued
and outstanding
shares (depending on the number of
fractional shares rounded up to whole
shares).
If the Reverse Split is effected by our
board of directors, the actual reduction in the number of our issued and outstanding shares of
common stock
will depend on
the exchange ratio that is approved by our board
of directors and the number of issued and outstanding shares
of our common stock on the effective date of the Reverse Split.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The par value of our common stock will not change.
|
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock is required to approve Proposal No. 2.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL
OF THE AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The audit committee of the board of
directors has appointed WithumSmith + Brown, PC (“WithumSmith”), independent registered public accountants, to audit
our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, WithumSmith served
as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Notwithstanding its selection and even
if our stockholders ratify the selection, our audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public
accounting firm at any time during the year if the audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of
our company and its stockholders. At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of WithumSmith
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016. Our audit committee is submitting the
selection of WithumSmith to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public
accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of WithumSmith will be present at the Annual Meeting,
and they will have an opportunity to make statements and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
If the stockholders do not ratify the
appointment of WithumSmith, the board of directors may reconsider the appointment.
On September 25, 2015, we dismissed
BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) as our principal independent accountants, effective as of such date. The dismissal of BDO was
approved by our board of directors.
BDO’s report on our financial
statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer
of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. In addition, during our fiscal
years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the subsequent interim period through September 25, 2015, we had no disagreements with
BDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreements in connection with its report. None of the reportable events set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K under
the Securities Act occurred during the period in which BDO served as our principal independent accountants.
Following our dismissal
of BDO in September 2015, we engaged Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as our principal independent accountants.
However, on May 3, 2016, we dismissed Grant Thornton as our principal independent accountants, effective as of such date, with
the approval of our board of directors.
During our fiscal year
ended December 31, 2015 and the subsequent interim period through May 3, 2016, there were no disagreements with Grant Thornton
on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements,
if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements
in connection with the report it would have prepared on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. None of
the reportable events set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurred during the period in which Grant Thornton served
as our principal independent accountants, except as follows:
(1) Item 304(a)(1)(v)(A).
The identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described in Item 4 of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015; and
(2) Item 304(a)(1)(v)(C).
The identification of certain errors in our accounting that, if further investigated, may have materially impacted the fairness
or reliability of previously issued financial statements or the financial statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal
period(s) subsequent to the date of the most recent financial statements covered by an audit report. Grant Thornton advised us
that, at the time of its dismissal, Grant Thornton had not had an opportunity to investigate the impact of those errors further.
The audit committee
of our board of directors discussed the subject matter of each of the foregoing events with Grant Thornton and authorized Grant
Thornton to respond fully to the inquiries of our successor auditor, WithumSmith.
On May 3, 2016, we
engaged WithumSmith as our new principal independent accountants to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2015. The engagement of WithumSmith was approved by our board of directors.
During our fiscal years
ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the subsequent interim period through May 3, 2016, we had not consulted with WithumSmith
regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and WithumSmith did not provide either a written report or oral
advice to our company that was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or
financial reporting issue; or (ii) the subject of any disagreement, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the
related instructions, or a reportable event within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
The following table sets forth information
regarding the aggregate fees billed by WithumSmith for the year ended December 31, 2015 and by our prior independent registered
accounting firm, BDO, for the year ended December 31, 2014.
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WithumSmith+Brown, PC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
487,500
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
287,500
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BDO USA, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
697,500
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Included in audit fees billed
by BDO USA, LLP are those fees in connection with our registration statement efforts on Form S-1 and S-3, respectively, filed on
various dates during 2014 totaling $175,000.
All Other Fees
Other than as reported
above, we did not engage our principal accountants to render any other services to us during the last two fiscal years.
Auditor Independence
In 2015, there were no other professional
services provided by WithumSmith that would have required the audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining
the independence of WithumSmith.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to approve Proposal No. 3.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF WITHUMSMITH + BROWN, PC.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors is currently comprised of three independent directors and operates under a written charter originally adopted by the
Board of Directors in December 2012, which charter is reviewed on an annual basis and amended as necessary by the Board of Directors
upon recommendation by the Audit Committee.
The members of the Audit Committee
are currently Charles K. Miller (chairman), Mark F. Durfee and Neal L. Oristano. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is
an “independent director” as currently defined in Rules 5605(c)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the NASDAQ listing standards and
Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Miller is an “audit
committee financial expert” as described in applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”).
The Audit Committee appoints an accounting
firm as our independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for
performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing
a report thereon. Management is responsible for our internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee
is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes.
The Audit Committee
held four meetings during 2015. The meetings were designed to provide information to the Audit Committee necessary for it to
conduct its oversight function of the external financial reporting activities and audit process of our company, and to
facilitate and encourage communication between the Audit Committee, management and our independent registered public
accounting firm, WithumSmith + Brown, PC. Management represented to the Audit Committee that our financial statements
were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the
audited financial statements for fiscal year 2015 with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The
Audit Committee also instructed the independent registered public accounting firm that the Audit Committee expects to be
advised if there are any subjects that require special attention.
The Audit Committee discussed with
the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications
with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).
The Audit Committee has also received
the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm, WithumSmith + Brown, PC, required by
applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the
Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with WithumSmith + Brown, PC that firm’s independence.
Based on its review of the audited
financial statements and the various discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for filing
with the SEC.
The Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of InterCloud Systems, Inc.:
Charles K. Miller (Chairman)
Mark F. Durfee
Neal L. Oristano
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table identifies
certain information about each of our executive officers as of May 31, 2016. Officers are elected by the board of directors
to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive
officers.
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
Mark
Munro
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
54
|
Frank
Jadevaia
|
|
President
|
|
56
|
Timothy
A. Larkin
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
53
|
The following is information about
the experience and attributes of our executive officers.
Mark Munro
. See “Proposal
No. 1. Election of Directors – Nominees For Director” for Mr. Munro’s biographical information.
Frank Jadevaia
has served as
our President since January 2014. From January 2007 to January 2014, prior to our acquisition of Integration Partners-NY Corporation,
Mr. Jadevaia was a Managing Partner at that company. From November 2001 to November 2006, he was a Vice President of Sales of Nortel
Networks Corporation, a telecommunications equipment manufacturer. Mr. Jadevaia received his B.S. from Bloomfield College in business.
Mr. Jadevaia brings extensive enterprise and service provider management experience to our executive management team.
Timothy A. Larkin
has served
as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2014. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Larkin was employed for more than 19 years
by Warren Resources, Inc., a publicly-traded oil and gas drilling company, most recently as Chief Financial Officer from January
1995 to July 2013 and Executive Vice President from March 2004 to January 2014. Mr. Larkin has a B.S. in accounting from Villanova
University. Mr. Larkin brings extensive experience in finance for both publicly-traded and private companies to our executive management
team.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Processes and Procedures for Compensation
Decisions
Our compensation committee is responsible
for the executive compensation programs for our executive officers and reports to our board of directors on its discussions, decisions
and other actions. Typically, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to our compensation committee, often attends committee
meetings and is involved in the determination of compensation for the respective executive officers that report to him, except
that our Chief Executive Officer does not make recommendations as to his own compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations
to our compensation committee regarding short- and long-term compensation for all executive officers (other than himself) based
on our results, an individual executive officer’s contribution toward these results and performance toward individual goal
achievement. Our compensation committee then reviews the recommendations and other data and makes decisions as to total compensation
for each executive officer, including the Chief Executive Officer, as well as each individual compensation component.
Summary Compensation Table
The following summary compensation
table sets forth the compensation paid to the following persons for the last two completed fiscal years:
|
(a)
|
our principal executive officer;
|
|
(b)
|
each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 who had total compensation exceeding $100,000; and
|
|
(c)
|
up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as one of our executive officers at the end of the most recently completed financial year.
|
These individuals are referred to as
the “named executive officers” in this proxy statement. The following table provides a summary of compensation paid
for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 to the named executive officers:
Summary Compensation
Table
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal
Year
|
|
Base
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Mark
Munro
|
|
2015
|
|
|
402,596
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
602,596
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
|
383,042
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
383,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank
Jadevaia
|
|
2015
|
|
|
415,385
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
615,385
|
|
President
|
|
2014
|
|
|
397,864
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
397,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy
A. Larkin
(2)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
285,577
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
292,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
577,577
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
|
46,538
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
474,310
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
520,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel
J. Sullivan
|
|
2015
|
|
|
233,654
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
233,654
|
|
Chief
Accounting Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
|
192,693
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
477,411
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
670,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott
Davis
Senior Vice President of Sales
|
|
2015
|
|
|
233,654
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
288,460
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
522,114
|
|
and Marketing
|
|
2014
|
|
|
192,017
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
395,250
|
|
|
|
61,921
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
649,188
|
|
____________
(1)
|
The amounts shown reflect the grant date fair value of each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation.
The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are described under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Stock-Based Compensation” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report and in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.
|
(2)
|
Mr. Larkin joined our company as Chief Financial Officer in October 2014.
|
Employment and Severance Agreements
In February 2014, we entered into three-year
employment agreements with our President, Frank Jadevaia, and our Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Scott Davis, and in October
2014, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with our Chief Financial Officer, Timothy A. Larkin. Pursuant to such employment
agreements, such officers are entitled to the following compensation:
Executive
|
|
Title
|
|
Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
Annual Targeted Bonus
|
Frank Jadevaia
|
|
President
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
Up to 75% of base salary
|
Timothy A. Larkin
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
|
Up to 60% of base salary
|
Scott Davis
|
|
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
Up to 100% of base salary
|
Each employment agreement is for a
term of three-years, provided that such agreements will be automatically extended for additional one-year terms unless either party
gives written notice of termination not less than sixty (60) days prior to the termination of the then-current term. Each executive
is entitled to the annual compensation described above, and is eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus as determined by our
board of directors of a percentage of such executive’s base salary as described above. During the term of employment, each
executive is entitled to participate all employee pension and welfare benefit plans and programs, and fringe benefit plans and
programs, made available to our employees generally, subject to the eligibility and participations restrictions of each such plan
or program. Each executive also is entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable business expenses incurred by such executive in
connection with carrying out such executive’s duties.
Each employment agreement is terminable
by us for at any time, (i) for Cause (as defined in such employment agreements), (ii) without Cause upon at least thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the executive, (iii) in the event of the executive’s death, or (iv) in the event of the executive’s
disability, as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Each executive may terminate the agreement at any time upon
not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice; provided, however, that each executive may terminate the agreement immediately
for Good Reason (as defined in such employment agreements) if we have not remedied the circumstances giving rise to the basis of
such termination for Good Reason within the applicable cure period. If the executive’s employment is terminated without Cause
or by the executive for Good Reason, in addition to payment of any accrued obligations, such executive will be entitled to certain
severance benefits based on such executive’s base salary and targeted incentive bonus amount then in effect, and such executive
shall also be entitled to incentive bonuses with respect to the current year that would otherwise have been payable to such executive
had such executive’s employment not been terminated.
Pursuant to such employment agreements,
each executive also is subject to customary confidentiality restrictions and work-product provisions, and each executive also is
subject to customary non-competition covenants and non-solicitation covenants with respect to our employees, consultants and customers.
We do not maintain any retirement plans,
tax-qualified or nonqualified, for our executives or other employees.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
The following table itemizes outstanding
equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Option
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock(#) That Have Not Vested
(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Award Grant Date
|
|
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock ($) That Have Not Vested
|
|
Mark Munro
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
9/21/2015
|
|
|
$
|
1,005,000
|
(3)
|
Mark Munro
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
12/4/2013
|
|
|
|
479,500
|
(5)
|
Frank Jadevaia
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
9/21/2015
|
|
|
|
502,500
|
(3)
|
Daniel Sullivan
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
8/28/2014
|
|
|
|
259,500
|
(7)
|
Daniel Sullivan
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
12/4/2013
|
|
|
|
239,750
|
(5)
|
Daniel Sullivan
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
42,644
|
(8)
|
|
|
5/23/2014
|
|
|
|
217,911
|
(9)
|
Timothy Larkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
6/23/2015
|
|
|
|
292,000
|
(11)
|
Timothy Larkin
|
|
|
10/14/2014
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
10/14/2024
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Scott Davis
|
|
|
10/14/2014
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
10/14/2024
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Scott Davis
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(12)
|
|
|
7/29/2014
|
|
|
|
135,750
|
(13)
|
Scott Davis
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(14)
|
|
|
8/28/2014
|
|
|
|
259,500
|
(7)
|
____________
(1)
|
Unvested shares of restricted stock are generally forfeited if the named executive officer’s employment terminates, except to the extent otherwise provided in an employment agreement or award agreement.
|
(2)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on June 2, 2017.
|
(3)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $2.01, which
was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on September 21, 2015.
|
(4)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on December 4, 2016.
|
(5)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $9.59, which
was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on December 4, 2013.
|
(6)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on August 28, 2017.
|
(7)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $5.19, which was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on August 28, 2014.
|
(8)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on May 23, 2017.
|
(9)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $3.21, which
was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on May 23, 2015.
|
(10)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on June 27, 2018.
|
(11)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $3.15, which
was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on June 23, 2015.
|
(12)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on July 29, 2017.
|
(13)
|
The market value of this stock award is computed by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock granted by $5.43, which
was the closing market price of one share of our common stock on July 29, 2015.
|
(14)
|
This restricted stock award vests in full on August 28, 2017.
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation
None of the members of
our compensation committee is or has at any time during the past year been an officer or employee of ours. None of our executive
officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any
entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board or compensation committee.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 31, 2016
by:
|
●
|
each person known by us to be a beneficial
owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
●
|
each
of our named executive officers; and
|
|
●
|
all directors and executive officers
as a group.
|
The
amounts and pe
rcentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares
“voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment
power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed
to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days
after, May 31, 2016. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a
person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest. Except as indicated by
footnote, to our knowledge, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
In the table
below, the percentage of beneficial ownership of our common stock is based on 32,580,187 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of May 31, 2016. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of the persons listed on the table is c/o
InterCloud Systems, Inc., 1030 Broad Street, Suite 102, Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702.
Name
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
Executive Officers
and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark
Munro
(1)
|
|
|
1,601,118
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Mark
F. Durfee
(2)
|
|
|
1,265,228
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Frank
Jadevaia
(3)
|
|
|
1,055,358
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Charles K. Miller
|
|
|
59,225
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Neal Oristano
|
|
|
91,137
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Roger M. Ponder
|
|
|
67,644
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Timothy
A. Larkin
(4)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group (six persons)
|
|
|
4,384,941
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
____________
(1)
|
Includes
(i) 1,157,724 shares of common stock held by Mr. Munro, (ii) 277,147 shares of common stock held by Mark Munro IRA, (iii)
161,478 shares held by 1112 Third Avenue Corp., and (iv) 4,769 shares held by MMD Genesis LLC. Mr. Munro has sole voting and
investment power over the shares held by 1112 Third Avenue Corp. Mr. Munro, Mr. Mark Durfee and Mr. Douglas Shooker share
voting and investment power over the shares held by MMD Genesis LLC.
|
(2)
|
Includes
(i) 40,011 shares held by Mr. Durfee, (ii) 1,225,217 shares held by Pascack Road LLC, and (iii) 4,769 shares held by MMD
Genesis LLC. Mr. Durfee has sole voting and investment power over the shares held by Pascack Road LLC. Mr. Durfee, Mr. Mark
Munro and Mr. Douglas Shooker share voting and investment power over the shares held by MMD Genesis LLC.
|
(3)
|
Includes
(i) 716,636 shares of common stock, and (ii) 338,722 shares of common issuable upon conversion of a convertible promissory
note (based on the principal amount of such note at May 31, 2016).
|
(4)
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
RELATED PERSON
TRANSACTIONS
Procedures for Approval of Related
Party Transactions
A “related party transaction”
is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we or any of our subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, and which
involves an amount exceeding $120,000, and in which any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
A “related party” includes
|
●
|
any person who is, or at any time during the applicable period was, one of our executive officers or one of our directors;
|
|
●
|
any person who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock;
|
|
●
|
any immediate family member of any of the foregoing; or
|
|
●
|
any entity in which any of the foregoing is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.
|
In March 2014, our board of directors
adopted a written related party transactions policy. Pursuant to this policy, the audit committee of our board of directors will
review all material facts of all related-party transactions and either approve or disapprove entry into the related-party transaction,
subject to certain limited exceptions. In determining whether to approve or disapprove entry into a related-party transaction,
our audit committee shall take into account, among other factors, the following: (i) whether the related-party transaction is on
terms no less favorable to us than terms generally available from an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances,
(ii) the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction and (iii) whether the transaction would impair the independence
of a non-employee director.
Related Party Transactions
Loan Transactions.
On February
25, 2015, we restructured the terms of certain promissory notes issued by us to each of Mark Munro, our Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, Cama Plan FBO Mark Munro IRA, 1112 Third Ave. Corp. and the Mark Munro 1996 Charitable Remainder Trust,
each of which is affiliated with Mr. Munro, and Pascack Road, LLC, a company controlled by Mark Durfee, one of our directors, to
extend the maturity dates thereof and to reduce the interest rate accruing thereon. The following notes were restructured as follows:
|
●
|
notes issued to Mark Munro in the aggregate principal amount of $1,337,000 had the interest rates reduced from 12% and 18% to 3% per annum and the maturity dates extended from March 31, 2016 to January 1, 2018;
|
|
●
|
notes issued to CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA in the aggregate principal amount of $596,904 had the interest rates reduced from 12% and 18% to 3% per annum and the maturity dates extended from March 31, 2016 to January 1, 2018;
|
|
●
|
a note issued to 1112 Third Avenue Corp., a company controlled by Mark Munro, in the principal amount of $375,000 had the interest rate reduced from 12% to 3% per annum and the maturity date extended from March 31, 2016 to January 1, 2018;
|
|
●
|
notes issued to Mark Munro 1996 Charitable Remainder UniTrust in the aggregate principal amount of $575,000 had the interest rates reduced from 12% and 18% to 3% per annum and the maturity dates extended from March 31, 2016 to January 1, 2018; and
|
|
●
|
notes issued to Pascack Road, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $2,650,000 had the interest rate reduced from 12% and 18% to 3% per annum and the maturity dates extended from March 31, 2016 to January 1, 2018.
|
In consideration for such restructuring,
we issued to Mark Munro 159,300 shares of unregistered common stock, the CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA 81,290 shares of unregistered
common stock, 1112 Third Avenue Corp. 87,500 shares of unregistered common stock, the Mark Munro 1996 Charitable Remainder UniTrust
89,900 shares of unregistered common stock and Pascack Road, LLC 381,100 shares of unregistered common stock.
On March 4, 2015, we restructured the
terms of certain promissory notes issued by us to Forward Investments, LLC, the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common
stock, to extend the maturity dates thereof, reduce the seniority and reduce the interest rate accruing thereon. The following
notes were restructured as follows:
|
●
|
notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $3,650,000 that bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum, had the maturity date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016;
|
|
●
|
notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the principal amount of $2,825,000 that bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, had the maturity date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016; and
|
|
●
|
notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $2,645,000 were converted from senior notes to junior notes, had the interest rate reduced from 18% to 3% per annum, had the maturity dates extended by approximately three years to January 1, 2018, and were made convertible into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price of $6.36 per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth therein.
|
In addition, on March 4, 2015, Forward
Investments, LLC agreed to lend to us an amount substantially similar to the accrued interest that we then owed to Forward Investments,
LLC on such notes. In consideration for such restructuring and additional payments made by Forward Investments, LLC to us, we issued
to Forward Investments, LLC an additional convertible note in the principal amount of $1,730,000 that bears interest at the rate
of 3% per annum, has a maturity date of January 1, 2018, and has an initial conversion price of $6.36 per share, subject to further
adjustment as set forth therein.
In connection with the transactions
effected with Forward Investments LLC on March 4, 2015, we also entered into a put option agreement with Forward Investments, LLC
pursuant to which we sold to Forward Investments, LLC, in consideration of a payment to us of $30,000, an option to lend to us
up to an additional $8.0 million, in increments of $1.0 million, at any time prior to March 3, 2020. Any such loans will be evidenced
by promissory notes that bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum, mature 30 months from the date of issuance, with the option
for Forward Investments, LLC to extend the maturity date to any date that is on or prior to the date that is 48 months from the
date of issuance, and are convertible into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price equal to the lower of (i)
$6.36 per share until the Convertible Debentures are repaid in full and thereafter $2.35 per share, and (ii) the lowest sale price
at which we sell or issue shares of common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable to purchase shares of common stock,
while such note is outstanding, subject in either case to adjustment as set forth therein.
Each of the promissory notes issued
to Forward Investments, LLC contains a restriction prohibiting the conversion thereof into our common stock without the approval
of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock if such conversion will increase the beneficial ownership
of Forward Investments, LLC above 19.99% of our outstanding common stock.
On July 31, 2015, we entered into a
letter agreement with Forward Investments, LLC pursuant to which Forward Investments, LLC further restricted its ability to convert
$9,120,000 aggregate principal amount of our convertible promissory notes into common stock, except upon (a) the mutual agreement
of Forward Investments, LLC and us, (b) at least 61 days prior notice by Forward Investments, LLC to us of the intention of Forward
Investments, LLC to convert all or a portion of such promissory notes or (c) the occurrence of a Fundamental Transaction, as defined
in such promissory notes.
OTHER MATTERS
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered
class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the SEC and NASDAQ. Such
directors, executive officers, and ten percent stockholders are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
that they file.
SEC regulations
require us to identify in this proxy statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent year. Based on
a review of the copies of such reports and the written representations of such reporting persons, we believe that all Section
16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were complied with during
2015, with the exception of a Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 4 for our chairman of the
board and chief executive officer, Mark Munro, filed on November 24, 2015; a Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of
Securities on Form 4 for our director, Mark F. Durfee, filed on November 19, 2015; a Statement of Changes in Beneficial
Ownership on Form 4 for Mr. Jadevaia, which has not yet been filed; and an Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of
Securities on Form 3 for our chief financial officer, Timothy A. Larkin, which has not yet been filed.
2015 Annual Report and SEC Filings
Our financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2015 are included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, a copy of which has
been sent to you with this proxy statement. Our annual report and this proxy statement also are posted on our website at
www.InterCloudSys.com
and are available from the SEC at its website at
www.sec.gov
.
You may also obtain an additional copy of our annual report
without charge by sending a written request to Corporate Secretary, Investor Relations, InterCloud Systems, Inc., 1030 Broad Street,
Suite 102, Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702.
* * *
Our board of directors does not know
of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any additional matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting,
the persons named in the enclosed proxy card will have discretion to vote shares they represent in accordance with their own judgment
on such matters.
It is important that your
shares be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to vote
by telephone or by using the Internet as instructed on the enclosed proxy card or execute and return, at your earliest convenience,
the enclosed proxy card in the envelope that has also been provided.
|
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
Shrewsbury,
New Jersey
|
|
July
21, 2016
|
APPENDIX A
FORM OF
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.
InterCloud Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”),
a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does
hereby certify as follows:
FIRST:
The name
of this corporation is InterCloud Systems, Inc.
SECOND:
The date of filing
of the Corporation’s original certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was November
24, 1999 (as i-RealtyAuction.com, Inc.) and which has been amended from time to time (as amended to date, the “Certificate
of Incorporation”).
THIRD:
The Board of Directors
of the Corporation, acting in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL, adopted resolutions to amend the Certificate
of Incorporation as follows:
Article Fourth of the Certificate of
Incorporation is hereby amended to provide that:
Effective as of the filing
of this Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, a one (1) for _______ (__) reverse split
of the outstanding Common Stock of the Corporation shall occur pursuant to which (i) every ______ (__) shares of outstanding Common
Stock of the Corporation shall be converted into one (1) share of Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”). The Reverse Split
shall not affect the number of authorized shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Corporation or the par value per share
of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock, such that immediately after the Reverse Split the total number of shares of all classes
of capital stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue will be 550,000,000, of which 500,000,000 shall be Common Stock having
a par value per share of $0.0001 and of which 50,000,000 shall be Preferred Stock having a par value per share of $0.0001. No fractional
share shall be issued in connection with the foregoing combination; all shares of Common Stock that are held by a stockholder will
be aggregated and each stockholder shall be entitled to receive the number of whole shares resulting from the combination of the
shares so aggregated. Any fractions resulting from the Reverse Split computation shall be rounded up to the next whole share. Except
as set forth above in this paragraph, Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation remains in full force and effect.
FOURTH:
This Certificate
of Amendment has been duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors.
FIFTH:
This
Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with sections 245 and 242 of the DGCL.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
,
InterCloud Systems, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer on ______ ___, 201_.
|
INTERCLOUD
SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Mark
Munro
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
InterCloud Systems (CE) (USOTC:ICLD)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2025 to Feb 2025
InterCloud Systems (CE) (USOTC:ICLD)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Feb 2025