UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________________________________________________________________
Form 10-Q
_________________________________________________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission file number 0-50854
________________________________________________________________________
Thomas Properties Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________________________________________________
Delaware
 
20-0852352
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
515 South Flower Street, Sixth Floor,
Los Angeles, CA
 
90071
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(213) 613-1900
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

____________________________________________________________



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    
Large accelerated filer   o
  
 
  
 
  
Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   o
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
Smaller reporting company  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   o     No   x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
    
Class
  
Outstanding at May 8, 2013
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
  
46,303,321




THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED March 31, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
Page No.
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
 
 
 
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
ITEM 5.
Other Information
ITEM 6.
 
 
 





PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
(unaudited)
 
(audited)
ASSETS
 
 
 
Investments in real estate:
 
 
 
Land and improvements
$
33,077

 
$
33,077

Land and improvements—development properties
6,298

 
6,403

Buildings and improvements
319,788

 
318,473

Tenant improvements
46,278

 
42,917

Total investments in real estate
405,441

 
400,870

Less accumulated depreciation
(128,790
)
 
(126,143
)
Investments in real estate, net
276,651

 
274,727

Condominium units held for sale
34,620

 
37,891

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
107,374

 
106,210

Cash and cash equivalents, unrestricted
86,873

 
76,689

Restricted cash
4,696

 
11,611

Rents and other receivables, net
2,024

 
1,825

Receivables from unconsolidated real estate entities
2,393

 
2,347

Deferred rents
19,394

 
18,994

Deferred leasing and loan costs, net
10,900

 
10,716

Other assets, net
15,386

 
10,222

Assets associated with land held for sale
47,651

 
59,760

Total assets
$
607,962

 
$
610,992

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
263,304

 
$
259,995

Accounts payable and other liabilities, net
31,433

 
28,346

Losses and distributions in excess of investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
10,878

 
10,084

Prepaid rent
2,651

 
1,784

Deferred revenue
11,194

 
10,566

Mortgage loans associated with land held for sale
14,500

 
21,380

Total liabilities
333,960

 
332,155

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)

 

Equity:
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as
    of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 225,000,000 shares authorized, 46,303,321 and 46,126,481
    shares issued and outstanding as March 31, 2013 of and December 31, 2012, respectively
463

 
461

Limited voting stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 12,313,331 shares issued
    and outstanding as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
123

 
123

Additional paid-in capital
259,415

 
258,780

Retained deficit and dividends
(93,535
)
 
(83,635
)
Total stockholders’ equity
166,466

 
175,729

Noncontrolling interests:
 
 
 
Unitholders in the Operating Partnership
41,658

 
44,154

Partners in consolidated real estate entities
65,878

 
58,954

Total noncontrolling interests
107,536

 
103,108

Total equity
274,002

 
278,837

Total liabilities and equity
$
607,962

 
$
610,992

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information.

3


THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
Rental
$
7,389

 
$
7,846

Tenant reimbursements
5,576

 
5,421

Parking and other
1,380

 
740

Investment advisory, management, leasing, and development services
892

 
931

Investment advisory, management, leasing, and development
   services—unconsolidated real estate entities
3,104

 
4,102

Reimbursement of property personnel costs
1,130

 
1,511

Condominium sales
4,398

 
919

Total revenues
23,869

 
21,470

Expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
6,618

 
6,264

Real estate and other taxes
1,995

 
1,920

Investment advisory, management, leasing, and development services
1,920

 
2,994

Reimbursable property personnel costs
1,130

 
1,511

Cost of condominium sales
3,638

 
672

Interest
3,941

 
4,238

Depreciation and amortization
4,192

 
3,510

General and administrative
7,927

 
4,239

Impairment loss
753

 

Total expenses
32,114

 
25,348

Interest income
23

 
5

Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities
(2,756
)
 
(22
)
Gain (loss) on sale of land
(700
)
 

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
(11,678
)
 
(3,895
)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
(22
)
 
(43
)
Net income (loss)
(11,700
)
 
(3,938
)
Noncontrolling interests’ share of net (income) loss:
 
 
 
Unitholders in the Operating Partnership
2,422

 
1,041

Partners in consolidated real estate entities
309

 
(223
)

2,731

 
818

TPGI's share of net income (loss)
$
(8,969
)
 
$
(3,120
)
Income (loss) per share-basic and diluted
$
(0.20
)
 
$
(0.09
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted
45,826,728

 
36,737,276

Dividends declared per share
$
0.02

 
$
0.015

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information.


4


THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(11,700
)
 
$
(3,938
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
Loss on sale of land
700

 

Gain on sale of condominiums
(760
)
 
(247
)
Equity in net (income) loss of unconsolidated real estate entities
2,756

 
22

Deferred rents
326

 
(267
)
Deferred taxes (and interest on unrecognized benefits)

 
26

Deferred interest

 
25

Depreciation and amortization expense
4,192

 
3,510

Allowance for doubtful accounts
44

 
86

Amortization of loan costs
162

 
160

Amortization of above and below market leases, net
41

 
8

Amortization of share-based compensation

953

 
648

Distributions from operations of unconsolidated real estate entities

 
250

Impairment loss
753

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Rents and other receivables
(255
)
 
(39
)
Receivables from unconsolidated real estate entities
(46
)
 
(1,139
)
Deferred leasing costs
(681
)
 
(1,040
)
Other assets
(5,272
)
 
(5,487
)
Accounts payable and other liabilities
2,304

 
(2,078
)
Prepaid rent and deferred revenue
868

 
580

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(5,615
)
 
(8,920
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Expenditures for improvements to real estate
(4,366
)
 
(2,686
)
Proceeds from sale of condominiums
4,033

 
759

Proceeds from sale of real estate
10,667

 
1,107

Return of capital from unconsolidated real estate entities
874

 
8,932

Contributions to unconsolidated real estate entities
(4,000
)
 
(902
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
7,208

 
7,210

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interest contributions
7,233

 

Payment of dividends to common stockholders and distributions to limited partners of the Operating
     Partnership
(1,177
)
 
(750
)
Principal payments of mortgage and other secured loans
(117,579
)
 
(924
)
Proceeds from mortgage and other secured loans
114,008

 
263

Payment of loan costs
(806
)
 

Change in restricted cash
6,912

 
4,081

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
8,591

 
2,670

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
10,184

 
960

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
76,689

 
79,320

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
86,873

 
$
80,280


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information.

5


THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FOR THE THREE MONTHS END MARCH 31, 2013
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1.     Organization and Description of Business

The terms “Thomas Properties”, “TPG”, “us”, “we”, “our” and "the Company" as used in this report refer to Thomas Properties Group, Inc. together with our Operating Partnership, Thomas Properties Group, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”).

We own, manage, lease, acquire and develop real estate, consisting primarily of office properties and related parking garages, located in Southern California; Sacramento, California; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Northern Virginia; Houston, Texas and Austin, Texas.

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 9, 2004. On October 13, 2004, we completed our initial public offering. Our operations are carried on through our Operating Partnership of which we are the sole general partner. The Operating Partnership holds our direct and indirect interests in real estate properties, and it carries on our investment advisory, property management, leasing and real estate development operations. As of March 31, 2013 , we held a 78.7% interest in the Operating Partnership which we consolidate, as we have control over the major decisions of the Operating Partnership.

As of March 31, 2013 , we were invested in the following real estate properties:
Property
 
Type
 
Location
Consolidated properties:
 
 
 
 
One Commerce Square
 
High-rise office
 
Philadelphia Central Business District, Pennsylvania (“PCBD”)
Two Commerce Square
 
High-rise office
 
PCBD
Murano
 
Residential condominiums held for sale
 
PCBD
Four Points Centre (1)
 
Suburban office; Undeveloped land; Office/Retail/Research and Development/Hotel/ Residential
 
Austin, Texas
Campus El Segundo (2)
 
Developable land; Site infrastructure complete; Office/Retail/ Research and Development/Hotel
 
El Segundo, California
Unconsolidated properties:
 
 
 
 
TPG/CalSTRS, LLC (“TPG/CalSTRS”):
 
 
City National Plaza
 
High-rise office
 
Los Angeles Central Business District, California
San Felipe Plaza
 
High-rise office
 
Houston, Texas
CityWestPlace
 
Suburban office and undeveloped land
 
Houston, Texas
Reflections I
 
Suburban office
 
Reston, Virginia
Reflections II
 
Suburban office
 
Reston, Virginia
Fair Oaks Plaza
 
Suburban office
 
Fairfax, Virginia
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC:
San Jacinto Center
 
High-rise office
 
Austin Central Business District, Texas, (“ACBD”)
Frost Bank Tower
 
High-rise office
 
ACBD
One Congress Plaza
 
High-rise office
 
ACBD
One American Center
 
High-rise office
 
ACBD
300 West 6th Street
 
High-rise office
 
ACBD
2121 Market Street (3)
 
Residential and retail

 
PCBD
  _______________
(1)
Certain undeveloped land parcels are being targeted for sale.
(2)
Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land including athletic facility naming rights and a building previously used as a marketing center. The Company has no further ownership interest in

6

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Campus El Segundo. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , Campus El Segundo is reflected in Assets associated with land held for sale on our
(3)
consolidated balance sheets.
(4)
The Company has a 1% limited partnership interest in 2121 Market Street. See Note 3. Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities for further details.

The City National Plaza property includes an off-site garage that provides parking for City National Plaza and other properties. The office properties typically include on-site parking, retail and storage space.

As of March 31, 2013 , we wholly own both Four Points Centre and Campus El Segundo.

In March 2013 , TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, completed the sale of Westech 360, Park Centre and Great Hills Plaza, in suburban Austin, Texas. The properties were unencumbered by debt. The sales price for the properties was $76.0 million , which after closing adjustments and prorations, resulted in net proceeds to TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC of $73.1 million . TPG’s share of the net proceeds of $24.4 million was received subsequent to March 31, 2013.

We have the responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the California Environmental Protection Agency (“CalEPA”) building, but have no ownership interest in the property. We provide investment advisory services for the California State Teachers' Retirement System (“CalSTRS”) with respect to two properties that are wholly owned by CalSTRS— 800 South Hope Street (Los Angeles, CA) and 1835 Market Street (Philadelphia, PA). In addition, we provide property management, leasing and development services to 800 South Hope Street and 1835 Market Street; and the properties owned by the TPG/CalSTRS and TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC joint ventures. Two properties that we previously managed, wholly owned by an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc., 816 Congress and Austin Centre, both in Austin, TX, were sold subsequent to March 31, 2013 .


2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Interim Financial Data

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP may have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make their presentation not misleading. The accompanying unaudited financial statements include, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information set forth therein. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2013 . The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 .

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are subjective and affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

We evaluate each entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity ("VIE"), and if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE based on whether the Company has both (i) the power to direct those matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements. When an entity is not deemed to be a VIE, the Company considers the provisions of the accounting standards to determine whether a general partner, or the general partners as a group, controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights. The Company consolidates (i) entities that are VIEs and of which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs and controlled by the Company and in which the limited partners neither have the ability to dissolve the entity or remove the Company without cause nor any substantive participating rights.


7

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

We continuously reassess our determination of whether an entity is a VIE and who the primary beneficiary is, and whether or not the limited partners in an entity have substantive rights, more particularly if certain events occur that are likely to cause a change in the original determinations. There have been no changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 in previous conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE.

The equity method of accounting is utilized to account for investments in real estate entities that are VIEs and of which the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary and entities that are non-VIEs which the Company does not control, but over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

The 25% preferred equity interests in One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square (beginning December 2010), owned by Brandywine Operating Partnership LP ("Brandywine") are reflected under the "Noncontrolling Interests" caption on our consolidated balance sheets. Our interest in these two partnerships is a variable interest, which we consolidate because we are considered to be the primary beneficiary.

We also consolidate our Murano residential condominium project which we control. Our unaffiliated partner's interest is reflected in our consolidated balance sheets under the "Noncontrolling Interests" caption. Our partner has a stated ownership interest of 27% . After full repayment of the Murano mortgage loan, which has a balance of $3.3 million at March 31, 2013 , net proceeds from the project will be distributed, to the extent available, based on an order of preferences described in the partnership agreement. The Company anticipates that we will receive distributions, if any, in excess of our stated 73% ownership interest according to these distribution preferences.

Refer to Note 3 for discussion of TPG/CalSTRS, TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, and the TPG-Austin Portfolio Syndication Partners JV LP ( Austin Joint Venture Predecessor"), which were determined to be variable interest entities for which we are not considered the primary beneficiary for the periods presented herein.

The 33.3% equity interest in TPG Austin Partner, LLC owned by Madison International Realty ("Madison") is reflected under the "Noncontrolling Interests" caption on our consolidated balance sheets. We consolidate this entity, which has a 50% interest in TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, and which is further discussed in Note 3, because we have control.
 
Included in total assets on TPG's consolidated balance sheets are the following assets for each listed investment in which a noncontrolling interest is held by an unaffiliated partner. The assets of each listed entity can only be used to settle the liabilities of that entity as follows (in thousands):

 
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
2013
 
2012
One Commerce Square
 
$
138,163

 
$
133,987

Two Commerce Square
 
149,763

 
142,436

Murano
 
34,624

 
37,687

TPG Austin Partner, LLC
 
107,191

 
106,031

 
 
$
429,741

 
$
420,141


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess whether there has been impairment in the value of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount to the future net cash flows, undiscounted and without interest, expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. We record the Murano condominium units at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value as the condominium units meet the held for sale criteria of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.”

8

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


We use the equity method of accounting to account for investments in real estate entities over which we have significant influence, but not control over major decisions. In these situations, the unit of account for measurement purposes is the equity investment and not the real estate. Accordingly, if our joint venture investments meet the other-than-temporary criteria of FASB ASC 323, “Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures”, we would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value of our investment.

We recorded an impairment of $0.8 million related to Campus El Segundo for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to reduce the book value of the property to estimated net sales proceeds. Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land including athletic facility naming rights and a building previously used as a marketing center. The Company has no further ownership interest in Campus El Segundo. We did not record an impairment for any real estate assets or equity investments during the three months ended March 31, 2012 .

Dispositions

In January and March 2013 , TPG completed the sale of certain land parcels totaling 17.5 acres and 27.9 acres, respectively, at Four Points Centre in Austin, Texas, for $4.9 million and $6.4 million , respectively. TPG received net proceeds from these two transactions of $1.1 million (after a $3.7 million paydown of the Four Points Centre mortgage debt) and $2.7 million (after a $3.1 million pay down of the loan), respectively.

In March 2013 , TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, an unconsolidated real estate entity in which TPG holds an effective ownership interest of 33.3% , completed the sale of Westech 360, Park Centre and Great Hills Plaza, in suburban Austin, Texas. The properties were unencumbered by debt. The sales price for the properties was $76.0 million , which after closing adjustments and prorations, resulted in net proceeds to TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC of $73.1 million . TPG’s share of the net proceeds of $24.4 million was received subsequent to March 31, 2013.

Development Activities

Costs associated with the development and construction of a real estate project are capitalized on our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, interest, loan fees, real estate taxes, and general and administrative expenses that are directly associated with and incremental to our development activities and other costs are capitalized during the period in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress, including the pre-development and lease-up phases. Once the development and construction of the building shell is completed, the costs capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to operating properties. Cumulative capitalized interest as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , is $5.7 million and $6.8 million , respectively. There was no interest capitalized for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 .

Revenue Recognition - Condominium Sales

We have one high-rise condominium project, Murano, for which we use the deposit method of accounting to recognize sales revenue and costs. Under the provisions of FASB ASC 360-20, “Property, Plant and Equipment” subsection “Real Estate and Sales”, revenue and costs for projects are recognized when all parties are bound by the terms of the contract, all consideration has been exchanged, any permanent financing for which the seller is responsible has been arranged and all conditions precedent to closing have been performed. This results in profit from the sale of condominium units recognized at the point of settlement as compared to the point of sale. Revenue is recognized on the contract price of individual units. Total estimated costs, net of impairment charges, are allocated to individual units which have closed on a relative value basis. Total estimated revenue and construction costs are reviewed periodically, and any change is applied to current and future periods.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The computation of basic income (loss) per share is based on net income (loss) and the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted income (loss) per share includes the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and the effect of the vesting of restricted stock and incentive units that have been granted to employees in connection with stock based compensation, all calculated using the treasury stock method. In accordance with FASB ASC 260-10-45, “Earnings Per Share”, the Company's unvested restricted stock and unvested incentive units are considered to be participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share to calculate a two class earnings per share. We only present the earnings per share attributable to the common shareholders. See Note 5 - Income (Loss) Per Share and Dividends Declared.

9

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are established by the FASB in the form of accounting standards updates (ASUs) to the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASUs. Newly issued ASUs not listed below are expected to have no impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, because either the ASU is not applicable or the impact is expected to be immaterial.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation for unconsolidated real estate entities and for activity associated with real estate held for disposition.


3.
Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

The unconsolidated real estate entities include our share of the entities that own 2121 Market Street, the TPG/CalSTRS properties, TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC properties and the Austin Portfolio Joint Venture Predecessor properties. TPG/CalSTRS owns the following properties as of March 31, 2013 :

City National Plaza (acquired January 2003)
Reflections I (acquired October 2004)
Reflections II (acquired October 2004)
San Felipe Plaza (acquired August 2005)
CityWestPlace land (acquired June 2006)
CityWestPlace (acquired June 2006)
Fair Oaks Plaza (acquired January 2007)

TPG Austin Partner, LLC, a limited liability company formed in September 2012 by TPG and Madison, owns a 50% interest in TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, which owns the following properties that were acquired from Austin Joint Venture Predecessor:

San Jacinto Center (acquired September 2012 )
Frost Bank Tower (acquired September 2012 )
One Congress Plaza (acquired September 2012 )
One American Center (acquired September 2012 )
300 West 6th Street (acquired September 2012 )
Park Centre (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)
Great Hills Plaza (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)
Westech 360 I-IV (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)

The following properties were sold by the Austin Joint Venture Predecessor in July 2012 prior to the transaction with TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC:

Research Park Plaza I & II (acquired June 2007, disposed of July 2012 )
Stonebridge Plaza II (acquired June 2007, disposed of July 2012 )

10

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    
Capital contributions, distributions, and profits and losses of the real estate entities are allocated in accordance with the terms of the applicable partnership and limited liability company agreements. Such allocations may differ from the stated ownership percentage interests in such entities as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in the partnership and limited liability company agreements. Following are the stated ownership percentages, prior to any preferred or special allocations, as of March 31, 2013 .

2121 Market Street
1.0%
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC (1)
50.0%
TPG/CalSTRS:
 
City National Plaza
7.9%
All properties, excluding City National Plaza
25.0%
        
(1) TPG Austin Partner, LLC, a limited liability company owned by TPG and Madison, a noncontrolling interest partner, owns 50% of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC. The effective ownership of TPG and Madison in the underlying five properties of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC is 33.3% and 16.7% , respectively.

We review the facts and circumstances of each distribution from unconsolidated entities to determine how to classify it on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Distributions received from unconsolidated entities that represent returns on the Company's investment are reported as cash flows from operating activities, consistent with ASC 230-10-45-16. Cash distributions from unconsolidated entities that represent returns of the Company's investment are reported as cash flows from investing activities, consistent with ASC 230-10-45-12.

Distributions are deemed to be returns on the Company's investment, and recorded as operating inflows, unless the cumulative distributions exceed the cumulative equity in earnings recognized by the Company. The excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing cash flows. Distributions received in excess of cumulative contributions are deemed a return on investment and classified as operating cash flows.

We evaluated unconsolidated investments with negative carrying amounts to determine if the equity method of accounting is still appropriate, consistent with ASC 323-10-35-19 through 26. The Company's investment in 2121 Market Street has a negative carrying amount of $0.3 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 . The Company reduced its investment balance below zero due to the receipt of distributions and recording of our share of investee losses in excess of our investment, because we have guaranteed up to a maximum of $14.0 million of 2121 Market Street's outstanding mortgage loan. In December 2012 , we redeemed a 49% interest in 2121 Market Street and retained a 1% limited partnership interest, which is accounted for on the cost method of accounting.

With respect to the Company's investment in TPG/CalSTRS, we had negative carrying amounts as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , of approximately $10.6 million and $9.8 million , respectively. The Company has committed to fund tenant improvements, other capital improvements, debt repayment or debt repurchase of properties owned by TPG/CalSTRS up to $10.9 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 . In addition, the Company has committed to fund temporary operating cash shortfalls, not more frequently than once a month, up to $1.25 million in the aggregate for all the TPG/CalSTRS properties.






[space intentionally left blank]


11

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
 
March 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
ASSETS:
 
 
 
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC
$
107,374

 
$
106,210

Total reflected in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
107,374

 
106,210

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
TPG/CalSTRS
(10,602
)
 
(9,808
)
2121 Market Street
(276
)
 
(276
)
Total reflected in losses and distributions in excess of investments in unconsolidated
    real estate entities
(10,878
)
 
(10,084
)
Net investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
$
96,496

 
$
96,126

    
The following is a summary of the net investments in unconsolidated real estate entities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
 
Net investment balance, December 31, 2012
$
96,126

Contributions
4,000

Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities
(2,756
)
Distributions
(874
)
Net investment balance, March 31, 2013
$
96,496

 
TPG/CalSTRS was formed to acquire office properties on a nationwide basis classified as moderate risk (core plus) and high risk (value add) properties. Core plus properties consist of under-performing properties that we believe can be brought to market potential through improved management. Value-add properties are characterized by unstable net operating income for an extended period of time, occupancy less than 90% and/or physical or management problems which we believe can be positively impacted by introduction of new capital and/or management.

The total capital commitment to TPG/CalSTRS was $511.7 million as of March 31, 2013 , of which approximately $2.9 million and $10.9 million was unfunded by CalSTRS and us, respectively.

A buy-sell provision may be exercised by either CalSTRS or us. Under this provision, the initiating party sets a price for its interest in TPG/CalSTRS, and the other party has a specified time to elect to either buy the initiating party's interest or to sell its own interest to the initiating party. Upon the occurrence of certain events, CalSTRS also has a buy-out option to purchase our interest in TPG/CalSTRS. The buyout price is based upon a 3% discount to the appraised fair market value.
    
In March 2013 , TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, completed the sale of Westech 360, Park Centre and Great Hills Plaza, in suburban Austin, Texas. The properties were unencumbered by debt. The sales price for the properties was $76.0 million , which after closing adjustments and prorations, resulted in net proceeds to TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC of $73.1 million . TPG’s share of the net proceeds was $24.4 million .

The TPG/CalSTRS joint venture is deemed to be a variable interest entity for which we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary. CalSTRS and TPG acting together are considered to have the power to direct the activities of the joint venture that most significantly impact the joint venture economic performance and therefore neither TPG nor CalSTRS is considered to be the primary beneficiary. We determined the key activities that drive the economic performance of the joint venture to be (1) the acquisition and development of real estate (including capital improvements), (2) financing, and (3) leasing. In connection with these key activities, the TPG/CalSTRS venture agreement requires unanimous approval by the two members.

In connection with TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, TPG Austin Partner, LLC is not considered to be the primary beneficiary due to the fact that the power to direct the activities of the limited liability company is shared with CalSTRS such that no one

12

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the limited liability company's economic performance. In connection with TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, we determined the key activities that drive the economic performance to be (1) the acquisition and development of real estate (including capital improvements), (2) financing, and (3) leasing. In connection with these key activities, TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC agreement requires either unanimous or majority approval of decisions by the respective partners.

As of March 31, 2013 , our total maximum exposure to loss to TPG/CalSTRS and the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC is:

(1)
Our net equity investment in the various properties controlled by TPG/CalSTRS and TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC as of March 31, 2013 , was $96.5 million , as presented earlier in this note.

(2)
The potential loss of future fee revenues which we earn in connection with the management and leasing agreements with the various properties controlled by the respective limited liability companies. We earn fee revenues in connection with those management and leasing agreements for services such as property management, leasing, asset management and property development. The management and leasing agreements with the various properties generally expire on an annual basis and are automatically renewed for successive periods of one year each, unless we elect not to renew the agreements. As of March 31, 2013 , we had total receivables of $1.0 million and $0.7 million related to TPG/CalSTRS and the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, respectively.

(3)
Unfunded capital commitments to the TPG/CalSTRS was $10.9 million as of March 31, 2013 .

(4)
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC owns the five Austin properties and TPG, together with Madison, have an unfunded capital commitment of approximately $10.4 million . Of that amount, TPG's unfunded capital commitment is approximately $6.9 million or 66.67% as of March 31, 2013 .









[space intentionally left blank]

13

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Following is the combined balance sheets of our unconsolidated real estate entities as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 .
Summarized Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities Balance Sheets
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Audited)
ASSETS
 
 
 
Investments in real estate, net
$
1,487,739

 
$
1,497,828

Receivables including deferred rents, net
68,314

 
66,491

Deferred leasing and loan costs, net
122,037

 
128,623

Other assets
118,301

 
51,329

Assets associated with discontinued operations
365

 
74,957

Total assets
$
1,796,756

 
$
1,819,228

LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
1,375,408

 
$
1,376,343

Acquired below market leases, net
29,912

 
32,075

Prepaid rent and deferred revenue
7,378

 
6,030

Accounts and interest payable and other liabilities
46,619

 
62,036

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations
506

 
4,735

Total liabilities
1,459,823

 
1,481,219

Owners’ equity:
 
 
 
Thomas Properties
100,978

 
100,451

Other owners
235,955

 
237,558

Total owners’ equity
336,933

 
338,009

Total liabilities and owners’ equity
$
1,796,756

 
$
1,819,228


Following is the combined statements of operations of our unconsolidated real estate entities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands) (unaudited):

Summarized Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities Statements of Operations
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues
$
65,717

 
$
65,034

Expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
24,232

 
25,603

Real estate and other taxes
8,470

 
7,972

Interest expense
20,323

 
25,242

Depreciation and amortization
23,398

 
21,845

Total expenses
76,423

 
80,662

Income (loss) from continuing operations
(10,706
)
 
(15,628
)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate
(6
)
 

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations before gains on
    disposition of real estate and gain on extinguishment on debt
    and impairment loss
392

 
733

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate
1,301

 
(38
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
1,693

 
695

Net income (loss)
$
(9,019
)
 
$
(14,933
)
Thomas Properties’ share of net income (loss)
$
(3,473
)
 
$
(1,218
)
Intercompany eliminations
717

 
1,196

TPGI's share of equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real
     estate entities
$
(2,756
)
 
$
(22
)

14

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Included in the preceding summarized balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , are the following balance sheets of TPG/CalSTRS, LLC (in thousands):

 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(unaudited)
 
(audited)
ASSETS
 
 
 
Investments in real estate, net
$
753,261

 
$
759,512

Receivables including deferred rents, net
63,545

 
63,881

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
638

 
659

Deferred leasing and loan costs, net
50,000

 
51,273

Other assets
30,194

 
28,347

Assets associated with real estate held for disposition
106

 
116

Total assets
$
897,744

 
$
903,788

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
746,842

 
$
747,610

Accounts and interest payable and other liabilities
30,241

 
32,182

Liabilities associated with real estate held for disposition
25

 
25

Total liabilities
777,108

 
779,817

Members’ equity:
 
 
 
Thomas Properties
(6,213
)
 
(5,580
)
CalSTRS
126,849

 
129,551

Total members’ equity
120,636

 
123,971

Total liabilities and members’ equity
$
897,744

 
$
903,788

 
Included in the preceding summarized balance sheet as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are the following balance sheet of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC (in thousands):
 
March 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
(unaudited)
 
(audited)
ASSETS
 
 
 
Investments in real estate, net
$
734,479

 
$
738,316

Real estate held for sale

 
74,182

Receivables including deferred rents, net
4,769

 
2,611

Deferred leasing costs, net
72,037

 
77,350

Other assets
85,405

 
20,361

Assets associated with discontinued operations
257

 
557

Total assets
$
896,947

 
$
913,377

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
628,567

 
$
628,733

Accounts and interest payable and other liabilities
27,293

 
39,869

Acquired below market leases, net
26,356

 
28,148

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations
348

 
4,566

Total liabilities
682,564

 
701,316

Members' equity
214,383

 
212,061

Total liabilities and members’ equity
$
896,947

 
$
913,377


15

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Following is summarized financial information by real estate entity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands) (unaudited):
 
Three months ended March 31, 2013
 
TPG/
CalSTRS,
LLC
 
TPG/ CalSTRS Austin, LLC
 
Austin Portfolio Joint Venture Predecessor
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Revenues
$
41,630

 
$
24,087

 
$

 
$

 
$
65,717

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
18,081

 
6,147

 
4

 

 
24,232

Real estate and other taxes
4,252

 
4,221

 
(3
)
 

 
8,470

Interest expense
11,025

 
9,298

 

 

 
20,323

Depreciation and amortization
11,597

 
11,801

 

 

 
23,398

Total expenses
44,955

 
31,467

 
1

 

 
76,423

Income (loss) from continuing operations
(3,325
)
 
(7,380
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(10,706
)
Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate
    entities
(2
)
 

 

 
2

 

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate
(6
)
 

 

 

 
(6
)
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations before gains
    on disposition of real estate and gain on extinguishment
    on debt and impairment loss
(2
)
 
401

 
(7
)
 

 
392

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate

 
1,301

 

 

 
1,301

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
(2
)
 
1,702

 
(7
)
 

 
1,693

Net income (loss)
$
(3,335
)
 
$
(5,678
)
 
$
(8
)
 
$
2

 
$
(9,019
)
Thomas Properties’ share of net income (loss)
$
(633
)
 
$
(2,839
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
$
(3,473
)
Intercompany eliminations
 
717

TPGI's share of equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities
 
$
(2,756
)

 
Three months ended March 31, 2012
 
2121 Market
Street
 
TPG/
CalSTRS,
LLC
 
Austin Portfolio Joint Venture Predecessor
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Revenues
$

 
$
41,331

 
$
23,703

 
$

 
$
65,034

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance

 
18,510

 
7,699

 
(606
)
 
25,603

Real estate and other taxes

 
3,950

 
4,022

 

 
7,972

Interest expense

 
11,424

 
14,519

 
(701
)
 
25,242

Depreciation and amortization

 
11,606

 
10,239

 

 
21,845

Total expenses

 
45,490

 
36,479

 
(1,307
)
 
80,662

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 
(4,159
)
 
(12,776
)
 
1,307

 
(15,628
)
Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate
    entities

 
(2,411
)
 

 
2,411

 

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations before gains
    on disposition of real estate and gain on extinguishment
    on debt and impairment loss
2

 
220

 
511

 

 
733

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate

 
(38
)
 

 

 
(38
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
2

 
182

 
511

 

 
695

Net income (loss)
$
2

 
$
(6,388
)
 
$
(12,265
)
 
$
3,718

 
$
(14,933
)
Thomas Properties’ share of net income (loss)
$
1

 
$
(452
)
 
$
(767
)
 
$

 
$
(1,218
)
Intercompany eliminations
 
1,196

TPGI's share of equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities
 
$
(22
)

16

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Following is a reconciliation of our share of owners’ equity of the unconsolidated real estate entities as shown above to amounts recorded by us as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 :
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Our share of owners’ equity recorded by unconsolidated real estate entities
$
100,978

 
$
100,451

Intercompany eliminations and other adjustments
(4,482
)
 
(4,325
)
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
$
96,496

 
$
96,126



4. Mortgage Loans

A summary of the outstanding mortgage loans as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands). None of these loans are recourse to us, except that we have guaranteed the Campus El Segundo mortgage loan (see footnote 3 below), partially guaranteed the Four Points Centre mortgage loan, under which our liability is currently limited to a maximum of $10.0 million , and provided a limited guaranty for the Murano mortgage loan. See footnote 5 to the table below for further details regarding the Murano limited guaranty. In connection with some of the loans listed in the table below, our operating partnership is subject to customary non-recourse carve out obligations.

 
 
 
 
Outstanding Debt
 
Maturity Date
 
Maturity Date
at End of
Extension
Options
Mortgage Loan
 
Interest Rate at March 31, 2013
 
As of March 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
One Commerce Square (1)
 
5.67%
 
$
126,409

 
$
126,869

 
1/6/2016
 
1/6/2016
Two Commerce Square (2)
 
3.96%
 
112,000

 
106,612

 
4/5/2023
 
4/5/2023
Campus El Segundo (3)
 
LIBOR +
3.75%
 
14,500

 
14,500

 
10/31/2013
 
10/31/2014
Four Points Centre (4)
 
LIBOR +
3.50%
 
21,581

 
26,453

 
7/31/2014
 
7/31/2015
Murano (5)
 
LIBOR +
3.75%
 
3,314

 
6,941

 
12/15/2013
 
12/15/2013
Total mortgage loans
 
$
277,804

 
$
281,375

 
 
 
 

The 30 day LIBOR rate for the loans above was 0.20% at March 31, 2013 .
______________________
(1)
The mortgage loan may be defeased, and is subject to yield maintenance payments for any prepayments prior to October 2015 .

(2)
On March 8, 2013 , we entered into a loan agreement with a lender for a new mortgage on Two Commerce Square in the amount of $112.0 million . The loan has a fixed interest rate of 3.96% for a ten year term. The expiring loan which had an outstanding balance of $106.5 million as of March 8, 2013 , was paid off at par. The new mortgage loan is subject to interest only payments through March 5, 2018 , and thereafter, principal and interest payments are due based on a thirty-year amortization schedule. The loan may be defeased, and is subject to yield maintenance payments for any prepayments prior to the maturity date.

(3)
The interest rate as of March 31, 2013 , was 4.00% per annum. We have guaranteed this loan. We agreed to certain financial covenants on this loan as the guarantor, which we were in compliance with as of March 31, 2013 . As of March 31, 2013 , the loan is shown as “obligations associated with land held for sale” on the consolidated balance sheets. The prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land and related assets, and paid off the mortgage loan balance in full.

(4)
The interest rate as of March 31, 2013 was 3.75%  per annum. As of March 31, 2013 , $2.2 million was available to be drawn to fund tenant improvement costs and certain other project costs related to two office buildings. The loan has a one -year extension option at our election subject to certain conditions. The option to extend is subject to (1) a loan-to-value ratio and a minimum appraised land ratio of 62.5% , and (2) the adjusted net operating income of the property and improvements as a percentage of the outstanding principal balance must be at least 10.0% . If the loan-to-value ratio or the minimum debt yield is not met, we can pay down the principal balance in an amount sufficient to satisfy the requirement.

17

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The debt yield is calculated by dividing the net operating income of the property by the outstanding principal balance of the loan.

Beginning in August 2014 , we are required to pay down the loan balance by $42,000 each month. As of March 31, 2013 , the property had a net operating loss. We have guaranteed completion of the tenant improvements and 46.5% of the outstanding principal balance and interest payable on the loan, which results in a maximum guarantee of $10.0 million as of March 31, 2013 . We have agreed to certain financial covenants on this loan as the guarantor, which we were in compliance with as of March 31, 2013 . We have also provided additional collateral of fully entitled unimproved land, which is immediately adjacent to the office buildings.

During the first quarter of 2013, we sold certain land parcels at Four Points Centre, resulting in paydowns of $6.9 million on the loan. The remaining collateral of fully entitled unimproved land adjacent to the office buildings is approximately 19.9 acres.

(5)
The interest rate as of March 31, 2013 was 4.00%  per annum and the loan matures on December 15, 2013 . Repayment of this loan is being made with proceeds from the sales of condominium units. TPG gave the lender a limited guaranty which (i) guarantees repayment of the loan in the event of certain bankruptcy events affecting the borrower, (ii) guarantees payment of the lender's damages from customary “bad boy” actions of the borrower or TPG (such as fraud, physical waste of the property, misappropriation of funds and similar bad acts); and (iii) guarantees payment of the amount, if any, by which the loan balance at the time exceeds 80.0% of the bulk sale value of the collateral upon an acceleration of the loan triggered by a borrower default. Based on two units that have settled subsequent to March 31, 2013 , and two additional units scheduled to settle in the second quarter of 2013 , we expect the loan will be reduced to approximately $1.4 million .

The loan agreements for One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square require that all receipts collected from these properties be deposited in lockbox accounts under the control of the lenders to fund reserves such as capital improvements, taxes, insurance, leasing commissions, debt service and operating expenditures. Included in restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , are lockbox, reserve funds and/or security deposits as follows (in thousands):

 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
One Commerce Square
$
2,720

 
$
5,245

Two Commerce Square
1,865

 
6,258

Murano
111

 
108

Restricted cash - consolidated properties
$
4,696

 
$
11,611


As of March 31, 2013 , subject to certain extension options exercisable by the Company, principal payments due for the secured outstanding debt are as follows (in thousands):

 
Amount Due at
Original Maturity
Date
 
Amount Due at
Maturity Date
After Exercise of
Extension Options
 
2013
$
19,134

(1)
$
4,634

 
2014
23,465

 
16,594

(1)
2015
1,996

 
23,367

 
2016
121,209

 
121,209

 
2017

 

 
Thereafter
112,000

 
112,000

 
 
$
277,804

 
$
277,804

 
        
(1) Subsequent to March 31, 2013, the Company sold the Campus El Segundo project, and paid off the mortgage loan balance of $14.5 million in full. The loan had an October 31, 2013 maturity date with the ability to extend twelve months to October 31, 2014 .



18

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


5.
Income (Loss) per Share and Dividends Declared

Under FASB ASC 260-10-45, "Earnings Per Share", the Company uses the two-class method to calculate earning per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated based on dividends declared on common shares and other participating securities (“distributed earnings”) and the rights of common shares and participating securities in any undistributed earnings, which represents net income remaining after deduction of dividends accrued during the respective period. Participating securities, which include restricted stock, incentive units and stock options, are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding common shares and participating securities based on the relative percentage of each security to the total number of outstanding securities. Basic earnings per common share and participating securities, including restricted stock, incentive units and stock options, represent the summation of the distributed and undistributed earnings per common share and participating security divided by the total weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the total weighted average number of participating securities outstanding during the respective periods. We only present the earnings per share attributable to the common shareholders.

Net losses, after deducting the dividends to participating securities, are allocated in full to the common shares since the participating security holders do not have an obligation to share in the losses, based on the contractual rights and obligations of the participating securities. Because we incurred losses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 , all potentially dilutive instruments are anti-dilutive and have been excluded from our computation of weighted average dilutive shares outstanding.

Our board of directors declared and paid a quarterly dividend to common stockholders in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 of $0.02 and $0.015 per common share.

The following is a summary of the elements used in calculating basic and diluted income (loss) per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands except share and per share amounts):
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Net income (loss) attributable to common shares
$
(8,969
)
 
$
(3,120
)
Dividends to participating securities
 
 
 
Unvested restricted stock

 

Unvested incentive units

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common shares, net of dividends to
   participating securities
$
(8,969
)
 
$
(3,120
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted (1)
45,826,728

 
36,737,276

Income (loss) per share—basic and diluted
$
(0.20
)
 
$
(0.09
)
Dividends declared per share
$
0.02

 
$
0.015

        
(1) Basic and diluted shares are calculated in accordance with GAAP, and include common shares plus dilutive equity instruments, as appropriate. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 , all potentially dilutive instruments have been excluded from the computation of weighted average dilutive shares outstanding because they were anti-dilutive.


6. Equity

Common Stock and Operating Partnership Units

The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of our common stock vote together as a single class with holders of our limited voting stock on those matters upon which the holders of limited voting stock are entitled to vote. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends when, if, and as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available for dividend payments. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of

19

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

liabilities and the liquidation preferences of any outstanding shares of preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, conversion, subscription or other rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. An Operating Partnership unit and a share of our common stock have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and distributions of the Operating Partnership. An Operating Partnership unit may be redeemed by the holder in exchange for cash or shares of common stock at our election, on a one-for-one basis. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , we held a 78.7% and 78.7% interest in the Operating Partnership respectively.

Limited Voting Stock

Each Operating Partnership unit issued in connection with the formation of our Operating Partnership at the time of our initial public offering in 2004 was paired with one share of limited voting stock. Operating Partnership units issued under other circumstances, including upon the conversion of incentive units granted under the Incentive Plan, are not paired with shares of limited voting stock. These shares of limited voting stock are not transferable separate from the limited partnership units they are paired with, and each Operating Partnership unit is redeemable together with one share of limited voting stock by its holder for cash, or, at our election, one share of our common stock. Each share of limited voting stock entitles its holder to one vote on the election of directors, certain extraordinary transactions, including a merger or sale of our Company, and amendments to our certificate of incorporation. Shares of limited voting stock are not entitled to any regular or special dividend payments or other distributions, including any dividends or other distributions declared or paid with respect to shares of our common stock or any other class or series of our stock, and are not entitled to receive any distributions in the event of liquidation or dissolution of our Company. Shares of limited voting stock have no class voting rights, except to the extent required by Delaware law. Any redemption of a unit in our Operating Partnership will be redeemed together with a share of limited voting stock in accordance with the redemption provisions of the Operating Partnership agreement, and the share of limited voting stock will be canceled and not subject to reissuance. As of March 31, 2013 , there were 12,313,331 limited voting stock outstanding.

Incentive Partnership Units

We have issued a total of 1,377,714 incentive units as of March 31, 2013 to certain executives. Incentive units represent a profits interest in the Operating Partnership and generally will be treated as regular Operating Partnership units in the Operating Partnership and rank pari passu with the Operating Partnership units as to payment of distributions, including distributions of assets upon liquidation. Incentive units are subject to vesting, forfeiture and additional restrictions on transfer as may be determined by us as general partner of the Operating Partnership. The holder of an incentive unit has the right to convert all or a part of his vested incentive units into Operating Partnership units, but only to the extent of the incentive units’ economic capital account balance. As general partner, we may also cause any number of vested incentive units to be converted into Operating Partnership units to the extent of the incentive units’ economic capital account balance. We had 46,303,321 shares of common stock and 12,313,331 Operating Partnership units outstanding as of March 31, 2013 , and 224,100 vested incentive units outstanding which were issued under our Incentive Plan. The share of the Company owned by the Operating Partnership unit holders is reflected as a separate component under the "Noncontrolling Interests" caption in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheets.


20

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Stock Compensation

We adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of Thomas Properties Group, Inc. as amended, (the “Incentive Plan”) effective upon the closing of our initial public offering and amended it in May 2007 and June 2008 to increase the shares reserved under the plan. The Incentive Plan provides incentives to our employees and is designed to attract, reward and retain personnel. We may issue up to 3,361,906 shares as either stock option awards, restricted stock awards or incentive unit awards of which 234,768 , remain available for grant as of March 31, 2013 (see table below for details). In addition, under our Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Plan (“the Non-Employee Directors Plan”) a total of 60,000 shares are reserved for grant, of which 29,065 remain available for grant.
 
March 31, 2013
Total awards authorized for issuance
3,361,906

Less:
 
Incentive unit grants
1,377,714

Restricted stock grants
1,345,107

Stock option awards, net of forfeitures
404,317

Awards available for grant
234,768


For more information on our stock incentive plan, please refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 11, 2013 , and our proxy statement, which was filed with the SEC on April 30, 2013 .

On January 27, 2013 and February 1, 2012 , we granted 176,840 and 199,999 restricted shares, respectively, of which fifty percent vest based on stock performance and had a total grant date fair market value of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million , respectively. The other fifty percent are discretionary vesting shares based on goals determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which are currently reserved and will be considered granted and fully expensed upon vesting.

During first quarter of 2013 , 37,189 incentive units and 207,801 restricted shares, subject to stock performance, vested. During February 2013 , 18,594 incentive units and 128,897 restricted shares, subject to discretionary vesting, were approved for vesting by the Compensation Committee.

Phantom Shares

During 2011, a Phantom Share Plan was approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors and adopted by the full board of directors. The purpose of the Plan is to reward and retain senior executive officers of the Company. This Plan is an incentive award plan that pays cash or, if the stockholders of the Company approve and authorize the issuance of additional shares, common stock. Generally, the recipient must still be employed with the Company to receive the cash or stock. Each phantom share award vests upon the earlier of (i) ratably, one-third on each anniversary of the grant date, subject to achievement of (x) with respect to 50% of each award, a Company stock appreciation target rate of up to 12% pro-rated, and (y) with respect to 50% of each award, other goals determined by the Compensation Committee, in each case only to the extent that at or after such time the Company's stockholders have approved the issuance of sufficient shares of common stock under the Company's 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, or any successor thereto, to settle awards under the Plan in common stock, and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the grant date, subject to such grantee's continued employment with the Company and achievement of the Company and other goals.


21

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following is a summary of the phantom shares outstanding as of March 31, 2013 :

Grant Date
Shares Granted
 
Grant Date Fair Value
(in thousands)
March 16, 2011
677,933

 
$
1,034

February 1, 2012
437,950

 
$
946

January 27, 2013
626,977

 
$
1,477

Total
1,742,860

 
 

We have determined these grants should be treated as liability awards rather than equity awards in accordance with ASC 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation", and as such, the obligation is reflected in the accounts payable and other liabilities caption on our consolidated balance sheet.

Compensation Expense

We recognized non-cash compensation expense and the related income tax benefit for the amortization of restricted stock and phantom stock grant expense as well as the remeasurement of the phantom stock awards at fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 as follows (in thousands).
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Restricted Stock :
 
 
 
Compensation expense
$
715

 
$
375

Income tax benefit
278

 
149

 
 
 
 
Phantom Shares:
 
 
 
Compensation expense
$
144

 
$
188

Income tax benefit
56

 
74


For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 , a full valuation allowance was recorded against the income tax benefit.

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets relate primarily to the partnership and incentive units in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company. In conjunction with the formation of the Company, certain persons and entities contributing interests in properties to the Operating Partnership received Operating Partnership units. In addition, certain employees of the Operating Partnership have received incentive units in connection with services rendered or to be rendered to the Operating Partnership. Limited partners who have been issued incentive units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their incentive units upon vesting of the incentive units, if applicable. The Company may elect to acquire those incentive units in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, issuance of stock rights, specified extraordinary distributions and similar events, or pay cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of redemption.

The redemption value of the 224,100 outstanding incentive units at March 31, 2013 was approximately $1.1 million based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $5.13 per share as of March 31, 2013 .

A charge is recorded each period to the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the noncontrolling interests' proportionate share of the Company's net income (loss).


22

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Equity is allocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests as follows (in thousands):
 
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2012
$
175,729

 
$
103,108

 
$
278,837

Net income (loss)
(8,969
)
 
(2,731
)
 
(11,700
)
Amortization of share-based compensation
637

 
172

 
809

Dividends
(931
)
 
(246
)
 
(1,177
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 
7,233

 
7,233

Balance, March 31, 2013
$
166,466

 
$
107,536

 
$
274,002


Noncontrolling Interests - Partners in Consolidated Real Estate Entities

Noncontrolling interest - Partners in Consolidated Real Estate Entities represents the proportionate share of equity in the partnerships and limited liability companies listed below held by non-affiliated partners. Capital contributions, distributions, and profits and losses of the real estate entities are allocated in accordance with the terms of the applicable partnership and limited liability company agreements. Such allocations may differ from the stated ownership percentage interests in such entities as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in the partnership and limited liability company agreements. Following are the stated ownership percentages of the unaffiliated partners in these consolidated entities, prior to any preferred or special allocations, as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 .
 
Non-Affiliated
 Partner Share
One Commerce Square
25.0%
Two Commerce Square
25.0%
Murano
27.0%
TPG Austin Partner, LLC
33.3%

7. Income Taxes

All operations are carried on through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership is not subject to income tax and all of the taxable income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits are passed through to its partners. However, the Operating Partnership and some of its subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in Texas. We are responsible for our share of the Operating Partnership's taxable income or loss allocated in accordance with the Operating Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership. As of March 31, 2013 , we held a 78.7% capital interest in the Operating Partnership. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 , we were allocated a weighted average of 78.7% of the income and losses from the Operating Partnership.

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was (0.19)% , compared to the federal statutory rate of 35% . The difference from the statutory rate is due primarily to income attributable to the non-controlling interests and the valuation allowance related to the Company's deferred tax assets for which no benefit could be provided due to their realization not meeting the "more-likely-than-not" threshold.

In 2007 , an ownership change pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”) occurred. The Company's federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in existence at that time were subject to a gross annual limitation of $9.9 million . Net operating loss carryforwards generated subsequent to the 2007 deemed ownership change were not subject to the Section 382 limitation. On June 12, 2012 , as a result of the acquisition of 8,695,653 shares of common stock by affiliates of Madison International Realty, the Company believes a second change in ownership pursuant to Section 382 occurred. Accordingly, as of June 12, 2012 , the Company’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and, potentially, certain post June 12, 2012 deductions and losses (to the extent such losses are considered recognized built-in losses and to the extent of the company’s net unrealized built-in loss (if any) under Section 382) are subject to an annual Section 382 limitation of approximately $5.7 million . As the new annual limitation is less than the previous $9.9 million annual limitation imposed on 2007 and prior net operating losses, the new annual limitation of $5.7 million is now applied against all federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in existence as of June 12, 2012 . Net operating losses generated after June 12, 2012 , are generally not subject to the Section 382 limitation. As of the year ended December 31, 2012 , the Company anticipates having net

23

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

operating loss carryforwards of $54.0 million for federal purposes and $48.0 million for state purposes. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are subject to varying expirations from 2020 through 2033 .

FASB ASC 740-10-30-17, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Future realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent on the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, carryback potential, tax-planning strategies and on us generating sufficient taxable income in future years. Due to uncertainty of future realization, the Company recorded a valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets in excess of its liability for unrecognized tax benefits, due to uncertainty of future realization. As such, a net deferred tax asset related solely to uncertain tax positions is included in "other assets" on the Company's balance sheet.

FASB ASC 740-10-25, "Accounting for Income Taxes" subsection "Recognition" clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of March 31, 2013 , there is no interest or penalty associated with unrecognized tax benefits. We do not anticipate any significant increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.


8. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our estimates of the fair value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2013 were determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methods. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. A fair value measurement is based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The hierarchy consists of three broad levels as follows:

1. Level 1 Inputs - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
2.
Level 2 Inputs - Significant other observable inputs (can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, such as discounts and borrowing rates with similar terms and maturities)
3.
Level 3 Inputs - Significant unobservable inputs (based on an entity's own assumptions, since there is little, if any, related market activity)

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rent and other receivables, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
 
The Company uses a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our mortgage loans. The inputs used in preparing the discounted cash flows include actual maturity dates and scheduled interest and principal payments as well as estimates for market loan-to-value ratios and discount rates. The discount rate, which is the most significant input, is estimated based on our knowledge of the market including discussions with market participants. As this input has more attributes of a Level 3 input than a Level 2 input, we classify it as such.

As of March 31, 2013 and December 2012 , the book and fair values of our mortgage loans were as follows (in thousands):

 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Book Value (1)
 
Fair Value
 
Book Value (1)
 
Fair Value
Mortgage loans
$
277,804

 
$
282,144

 
$
281,375

 
$
286,223

             
(1) Included in the book value of mortgage loans above is $14.5 million related to the Campus El Segundo loan that is shown as obligations associated with land held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to March 31, 2013, the Company sold the Campus El Segundo project, and paid off the mortgage loan balance of $14.5 million in full.


24

THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation
    
The Company has been in litigation with a former consultant regarding a claim by the consultant for approximately $5.1 million of incentive compensation pursuant to a consulting agreement, which the Company contested and did not pay. Effective April 10, 2013 , the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release with the consultant whereby the Company agreed to pay the consultant $3.25 million in total satisfaction of the consultant's claim, within thirty (30) days of the date of the agreement, at which time the parties mutually release all claims against the other and the litigation will be dismissed. This amount has been fully accrued as of March 31, 2013 .

General

We have been named as a defendant in a number of premises liability claims in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

A mortgage loan secured by a first trust deed on 2121 Market Street is guaranteed by our Operating Partnership, up to a maximum amount of $14.0 million expiring in December 2022 . 2121 Market Street is an unconsolidated real estate entity in which we have a 1.0% limited partnership interest. See Note 4 for disclosure of guarantees related to our consolidated debt.

Insurance

We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $200 million per occurrence and all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $1.25 billion per occurrence (except for a limit of $600 million per occurrence for one particular asset grouping), with terrorism limits of $1.15 billion per occurrence (except for a limit of $600 million per occurrence for one particular asset grouping), and flood insurance with a limit of $200 million per occurrence. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $200 million per occurrence, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property.

10. Subsequent Event

Subsequent to March 31, 2013, the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land in its Campus El Segundo project, located in the City of El Segundo in the County of Los Angeles, including athletic facility naming rights and a building previously used as a marketing center. The sales pri ce for the land and related assets was $48.5 million . After closing adjustments and prorations, and payment in full of a $14.5 million mortgage loan, the Company received net proceeds of $33.3 million .


25


ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this Form 10-Q entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.” Certain risk factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this report entitled “Risk Factors.”
When you read the financial statements and the information included in this report, you should be aware that our operations are significantly affected by both macro and micro economic forces. Our operations are directly affected by actual and perceived trends in various national and regional economic conditions that affect national and regional markets for commercial real estate services, including interest rates, the availability of credit to finance commercial real estate transactions, and the impact of tax laws affecting real estate. Periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates, tightening of the credit markets, declining demand for or increased supply of real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur can adversely affect our business. These conditions could result in a general decline in rents, which in turn would reduce revenue from property management fees and brokerage commissions derived from leases. In addition, these conditions could lead to a decline in property values as well as a decline in funds invested in commercial real estate and related assets, which in turn may reduce revenues from investment advisory, property management, leasing and development fees.
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Although information is based on our current estimates, forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information as we cannot guarantee that any future expectations and events described will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “should”, “seeks”, “approximately”, “intends”, “plans”, “pro forma”, “estimates” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.

Overview and Background

We are a full-service real estate operating partnership that owns, acquires, develops and manages primarily office, as well as mixed-use and residential properties on a nationwide basis. Our company’s primary areas of focus are the acquisition and ownership of interests in premier properties, property development and redevelopment, and investment and property management activities. We conduct our business through our Operating Partnership, of which we own 78.7% as of March 31, 2013 and have control over the major decisions of the Operating Partnership.
The properties we own interests in or manage on behalf of third parties are located in Southern California and Sacramento, California; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Northern Virginia; Houston, Texas; and Austin, Texas. As of March 31, 2013 , we own interests in and asset manage 14 operating properties with 9.8 million rentable square feet and provide leasing, asset and/or property management services on behalf of third parties for an additional five operating properties with 2.6 million rentable square feet. We also have direct and indirect ownership interests in developable land with various allowable uses, including office development, totaling approximately 2.7 million square feet. Additionally, we developed Murano, a 302 - unit high-rise residential condominium project in downtown Philadelphia, in which we have closed sales on 256 units as of March 31, 2013 .
Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations

The following is a summary of the more significant factors we believe may affect our results of operations. For a more detailed discussion regarding the factors that you should consider before making a decision to acquire shares of our common stock, see the information under the caption “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this report.

Rental income . The amount of net rental income generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space, to lease currently available space as well as space in newly developed or redeveloped properties and space available from unscheduled lease terminations. The amount of rental income we generate also depends on our ability to maintain or increase rental rates in the submarkets where our properties are located.


26


Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Austin, and Houston—Submarket Information . A significant portion of our income is derived from properties located in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Austin and Houston. The market conditions in these submarkets have a significant impact on our results of operations.

Development . We continually evaluate the size, timing and scope of our development initiatives to determine if we are able to lease committed development properties at expected rental rates or within projected time frames or complete projects on schedule or within budgeted amounts. The inability to achieve these outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As of March 31, 2013 , we have sole ownership interest in two development projects, Campus El Segundo and Four Points Centre. Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land in its Campus El Segundo project, which had a carrying value of $47.7 million . We have incurred $6.3 million of costs related to the Four Points Centre land acquisition, predevelopment and infrastructure improvements that are reflected in “Land improvements - development properties” on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2013 . We are targeting one or more parcels at Four Points Centre for potential sale. To the extent that we do not proceed with projects as planned or do not achieve sufficient proceeds from any contemplated disposition, development costs would need to be evaluated for impairment.

Results of Operations

The results of operations reflect the consolidation of the affiliates that own One Commerce Square, Two Commerce
Square, Murano, Four Points Centre, Campus El Segundo and our investment advisory, property management, leasing and real estate development operations. The following properties are accounted for using the equity method of accounting (the date of acquisition is listed for each):

City National Plaza (as of January 2003)
Reflections I (as of October 2004)
Reflections II (as of October 2004)
San Felipe Plaza (as of August 2005)
CityWestPlace (as of June 2006)
Fair Oaks Plaza (as of January 2007)

TPG Austin Partner, LLC, a limited liability company formed in September 2012 by TPG and Madison, owns a 50% interest in TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, which owns the following properties that were acquired from Austin Joint Venture Predecessor:

San Jacinto Center (acquired September 2012 )
Frost Bank Tower (acquired September 2012 )
One Congress Plaza (acquired September 2012 )
One American Center (acquired September 2012 )
300 West 6th Street (acquired September 2012 )
Park Centre (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)
Great Hills Plaza (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)
Westech 360 I-IV (acquired September 2012 , sold March 2013)

The following properties were disposed by TPG/CalSTRS, TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, or Austin Joint Venture Predecessor during 2013 and 2012 , and were accounted for using the equity method of accounting for the periods presented:
    
Brookhollow Central I, II and III (as of August 2005, disposed of January 2012)
Stonebridge Plaza II (as of June 2007, disposed of July, 2012)
Research Park Plaza I & II (as of June 2007, disposed of July 2012)
CityWestPlace land - certain land parcels (as of June 2006, disposed of November 2012)
Park Centre (as of June 2007, disposed of March 2013)
Great Hills Plaza (as of June 2007, disposed of March 2013)
Westech 360 I-IV (as of June 2007, disposed of March 2013)

This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report.


27


Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2013 to the three months ended March 31, 2012

Overview

The main drivers of our consolidated results of operations are (1) two high-rise office towers, commonly referred to as Commerce Square, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, (2) Four Points Centre, two office buildings located in Austin, Texas (3) Murano, a high-rise condominium project, also located in Philadelphia, and (4) our investment advisory, management, leasing and development services business. The table below reflects the change in leasing status of our three consolidated office properties from 2012 to 2013 .
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of March 31,
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
Location
 
Rentable Square Feet
 
Percent Leased
 
Percent Leased
Consolidated Operating Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One Commerce Square
 
Philadelphia, PA
 
942,866

 
93.5
%
 
95.7
%
Two Commerce Square
 
Philadelphia, PA
 
953,276

 
81.6

 
77.5

Four Points Centre
 
Austin, TX
 
193,862

 
72.5

 
31.5

 
 
 
 
2,090,004

 
 
 
 

We have sold 256 units at Murano as of March 31, 2013 . Revenue from unit settlements increased due to settlement of 2 units in the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to 7 units in the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The average revenue per unit sold in 2013 and 2012 was $0.6 million and $0.5 million , respectively. Fee revenue from our investment advisory, management, leasing and development services business decreased $1.0 million or 20.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the same period for 2012 . This decrease was primarily due to the increase in our ownership interest in our Austin portfolio.

Revenues

Total revenues increased by approximately $2.4 million , or 11.2% , to $23.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $21.5 million for the same period for 2012 . The increase in total revenues was primarily due to an increase of $3.5 million in condominium sales as 7 units settled in the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to 2 units settled in the three months ended March 31, 2012 . This increase is partially offset by a decrease in fee revenue from our investment advisory, management, leasing and development services business of $1.0 million due to our increased ownership interest in our Austin portfolio.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $6.8 million , or 26.9% , to $32.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 in comparison to $25.3 million in the same period in 2012 . The expense for impairment charges increased $0.8 million in 2013 compared to 2012 , related to our Campus El Segundo project. There was no charge in the comparable period in 2012. Our cost of condominium sales increased $2.9 million as 7 units were sold in 2013 , compared to 2 units during the same period in 2012 . Additionally, general and administrative expenses increased $3.7 million , primarily due to higher costs related to the settlement of a claim by a former consultant (see Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies for further details). Finally, depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.7 million , primarily due to new building and tenant improvement projects. These increases are offset by decreases of $0.3 million in interest expense due primarily to a lower interest rate after the refinancing of our loan on the Two Commerce Square project, as well as a declining balance on our loan on the Murano project. Additionally, there were decreases in reimbursable property personnel costs of $0.4 million and investment advisory expenses of $1.1 million primarily due to our increased ownership in our Austin portfolio.

Loss on sale of real estate

Loss on sale of real estate of $0.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was due to the sale of 45.4 acres in land parcels at our Four Points Centre project. There was no corresponding transaction during the comparable period in 2012 .


28


Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities

Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities decreased by $2.8 million , to a loss of $2.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 , compared to a nominal loss of less than $0.1 million in the prior year. This was primarily a result of our increased ownership interest in our Austin portfolio. The gain on disposition of real estate increased $1.3 million on the sale of the remaining three suburban properties in our Austin portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2013 .

Set forth below is a summary of the combined financial information for the unconsolidated real estate entities, our share of net income (loss) and our equity in net income (loss), after intercompany eliminations, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues
$
65,717

 
$
65,034

Expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
24,232

 
25,603

Real estate and other taxes
8,470

 
7,972

Interest expense
20,323

 
25,242

Depreciation and amortization
23,398

 
21,845

Total expenses
76,423

 
80,662

Income (loss) from continuing operations
(10,706
)
 
(15,628
)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate
(6
)
 

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations before gains on
    disposition of real estate and gain on extinguishment on debt
    and impairment loss
392

 
733

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate
1,301

 
(38
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
1,693

 
695

Net income (loss)
$
(9,019
)
 
$
(14,933
)
Thomas Properties’ share of net income (loss)
$
(3,473
)
 
$
(1,218
)
Intercompany eliminations
717

 
1,196

TPGI's share of equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated real
     estate entities
$
(2,756
)
 
$
(22
)


Aggregate revenues for the unconsolidated real estate entities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased approximately $0.7 million , or 1.1% , to $65.7 million compared to $65.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . The increase is primarily due to an increase in rental, reimbursement and parking revenue at our downtown Austin properties due to new and expanded leases. This increase is offset by a decrease in revenue related to the remaining three Austin suburban properties, which were sold during the current period, and have been reclassed to discontinued operations. The activity for these three properties has not been reclassed to discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2012 , due to the different ownership of the properties during that time.

Property operating and maintenance expenses for unconsolidated real estate entities decreased by $1.4 million , or 5.5% , to $24.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $25.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . The decrease was due primarily to the reclassification of the three suburban Austin properties to discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2013 , which were not during the comparable period during 2012 , as discussed above. Real estate and other taxes expense increased $0.5 million , or 6.3% , to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . This increase is primarily the result of increases in the assessed values of the Austin CBD properties and the Houston properties. Interest expense decreased by $4.9 million , or 19.4% , to $20.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to $25.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . The decrease was due primarily to a bank term loan and the a senior secured priority credit facility related to the Austin portfolio owned by the Austin Joint Venture Predecessor, both of which were paid off at par in September 2012 . Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.6 million , or 7.3% , to $23.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $21.8 million for the comparable period in 2012 . This is due to the Austin portfolio, which is incurring

29


greater amortization expense related to the in-place lease values resulting from the purchase price accounting for the September 2012 transaction.

Income associated with discontinued operations increased by approximately $1.0 million , or 142.9% , to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to income of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 , primarily due to a gain on the disposition of Park Centre, Great Hills Plaza and Westech 360 I-IV from our Austin portfolio during the current period, compared to a loss on the disposition of our Brookhollow Central project from the TPG/CalSTRS Joint Venture during the comparable period in 2012 . The loss on disposition of Brookhollow was offset by income from operations of Brookhollow for the period prior to the sale.

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

For each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 , there was a provision for income taxes of less than $0.1 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Analysis of liquidity and capital resources

As of March 31, 2013 , we have unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $86.9 million . We believe that we will have sufficient capital to satisfy our liquidity needs over the next 12 months through cash on hand, cash flows from operations and proceeds from condominium and property sales. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including debt service, property acquisitions and additional future development and redevelopment activity, through cash flow from operations, additional secured and unsecured long-term borrowings, proceeds from dispositions of non-strategic assets, and the potential issuance of additional debt, or common or preferred equity securities, including convertible securities.

We have $4.6 million of scheduled principal payments on consolidated debt in 2013 and $1.9 million in 2014 (assuming the extension option on the Four Points Centre loan is granted, otherwise the principal balance of $21.6 million is due on July 31, 2014). We believe that we will have sufficient capital to satisfy these obligations when due.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013 , we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per common share. The availability of funds to pay dividends is impacted by property-level restrictions on cash flows. With respect to our investments in properties, we do not solely control decision making with respect to these properties, and may not be able to obtain monies from these properties even if funds are available for distribution to us. In addition, we may enter future financing arrangements that contain restrictions on our use of cash generated from our properties. The payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our overall financial condition, and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

As of March 31, 2013 , we have unfunded capital commitments to TPG/CalSTRS of $10.9 million . We are obligated to fund tenant improvements and other capital improvements for properties that were acquired prior to June 1, 2007 . We estimate we will fund approximately $2.5 million in 2013 and $1.4 million between 2014 and 2017 to satisfy our share of contractual obligations existing at March 31, 2013 for capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

As of March 31, 2013 , we have unfunded capital commitments to TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC of $6.9 million . We estimate we will fund approximately $4.4 million in 2013 and $0.2 million between 2014 and 2017 to satisfy our share of contractual obligations existing at March 31, 2013 for capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

Development

As of March 31, 2013 , we own two development projects, Campus El Segundo and Four Points Centre, which are comprised of 23.9 acres and 19.9 acres, respectively. Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the 23.9 acres of land in the Campus El Segundo project, located in the City of El Segundo in the County of Los Angeles, including athletic facility naming rights and a building previously used as a marketing center. TPG/CalSTRS owns one development project, CityWestPlace, which is comprised of 9.9 acres. If we decide to develop any of the remaining land holdings, we anticipate seeking to mitigate our development risk by obtaining significant pre-leasing and guaranteed maximum cost construction contracts. The amount and timing of costs associated with our development projects is inherently uncertain due to market and economic conditions. We presently intend to fund development expenditures, if any, primarily through construction and permanent financing.

30



Leasing, Tenant Improvement and Capital Needs

In addition to our development projects, our One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square properties require capital expenditures as well as leasing commissions and tenant improvement costs. The level of these expenditures varies from year to year based on several factors, including lease expirations. There are commitments to incur expenditures of approximately $6.2 million in capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions for Commerce Square during 2013 . Additionally, we have spent and will continue to spend additional amounts in connection with a value-enhancement program at Commerce Square.

During November 2010 , subsidiaries of TPG and Brandywine entered into two partnership arrangements with respect to our One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square properties. Brandywine committed to contribute $25.0 million of preferred equity in return for a 25% limited partnership interest in each property and as of March 31, 2013 , this commitment has been fully funded and invested in the value-enhancement program designed to increase rental rates and occupancy at Commerce Square.

Annual capital expenditures may fluctuate in response to the nature, extent and timing of improvements required to maintain our properties. Tenant improvements and leasing costs may also fluctuate depending upon other factors, including the type of property involved, the existing tenant base, terms of leases, types of leases, the involvement of leasing agents and overall market conditions.

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our contractual obligations at March 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):  
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Regularly scheduled
   principal payments
$
4,634

 
$
1,884

 
$
1,996

 
$

 
$

 
$
10,764

 
$
19,278

Balloon payments due at
    maturity (1)(2)(3)(4)
14,500

 
21,581

 

 
121,209

 

 
101,236

 
258,526

Interest payments—fixed
    rate debt (5)
8,744

 
11,570

 
11,459

 
5,026

 
4,435

 
22,606

 
63,840

Interest payments—variable
    rate debt (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital commitments (6)
14,837

 
995

 
246

 
87

 
244

 
58

 
16,467

Operating lease (7)
253

 
122

 

 

 

 

 
375

Obligations associated with
     uncertain tax positions (8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
$
42,968

 
$
36,152

 
$
13,701

 
$
126,322

 
$
4,679

 
$
134,664

 
$
358,486

 __________________________________________________
(1)
Included within these balloon payments in the "Thereafter" column is $101.2 million due under the Two Commerce Square mortgage loan, which is scheduled to mature on April 5, 2023 . On March 8, 2013 , we entered into a loan agreement with a lender for a new mortgage on Two Commerce Square in the amount of $112.0 million . The loan has a fixed interest rate of 3.96% for a ten year term. The expiring loan which had an outstanding balance of $106.5 million as of March 8, 2013 , was paid off at par. The new mortgage loan is subject to interest only payments through March 5, 2018 , and thereafter, principal and interest payments are due based on a thirty-year amortization schedule. The loan may be defeased, and is subject to yield maintenance payments for any prepayments prior to the maturity date.

(2)
Included within these balloon payments in the "2014" column is $21.6 million due under the Four Points Centre mortgage loan. The loan is scheduled to mature on July 31, 2014 , with a one -year extension option subject to certain conditions. The option to extend is subject to (1) a loan-to-value ratio and a minimum appraised land ratio of 62.5% , and (2) the adjusted net operating income of the property and improvements as a percentage of the outstanding principal balance must be at least 10.0% . If these requirements are not met, we can pay down the principal balance in an amount sufficient to satisfy these requirements. The debt yield is calculated by dividing the net operating income of the property by the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Through March 31, 2013 , the property has been generating net operating losses. Beginning in August 2014 , we are required to pay down the loan balance by $42,000 each month. The loan has an unfunded balance of $2.2 million , which is available to fund any remaining project costs. The balance of the loan as of March 31, 2013 was $21.6 million . We have provided a guarantee for a portion of principal and interest payable. We have

31


also provided collateral of approximately 19.9 acres of fully entitled unimproved land, which is immediately adjacent to our Four Points Centre office buildings.

(3)
The Murano mortgage loan has a balance of $3.3 million as of March 31, 2013 . The loan is scheduled to mature on December 15, 2013 . The loan principal is being amortized with proceeds from the sale of condominium units. Based on two units that have settled subsequent to March 31, 2013 , and two additional units scheduled to settle in the second quarter of 2013 , we expect the loan will be reduced to approximately $1.4 million . TPG gave the lender a limited guaranty which (i) guarantees repayment of the loan in the event of certain bankruptcy events affecting the borrower, (ii) guarantees payment of the lender's damages from customary “bad boy” actions of the borrower or TPG (such as fraud, physical waste of the property, misappropriation of funds and similar bad acts); and (iii) guarantees payment of the amount, if any, by which the loan balance at the time exceeds 80.0% of the bulk sale value of the collateral upon an acceleration of the loan triggered by a borrower default.

(4)
As of March 31, 2013 , the Campus El Segundo mortgage loan has a balance of $14.5 million , and is shown as “obligations associated with land held for sale” on the consolidated balance sheets. Subsequent to March 31, 2013 , the Company sold the remaining 23.9 acres of land and related assets, and paid off the mortgage loan balance in full.

(5)
As of March 31, 2013 , 85.8% of our debt was at contractually fixed rates ranging from 3.96% to 5.67% . The information in the table above reflects our projected interest obligations for the fixed-rate payments based on the contractual interest rates and scheduled maturity dates. The remaining 14.2% of our debt bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a spread that ranges from 3.50% to 3.75% . The interest payments on the variable rate debt have not been reported in the table above because we cannot reasonably determine the future interest obligations on our variable rate debt as we cannot predict what LIBOR rates will be in the future. As of March 31, 2013 , one-month LIBOR was 0.20% .

(6)
Capital commitments of our Company and consolidated subsidiaries include approximately $6.2 million of tenant improvements and leasing commissions for certain tenants in One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square, of which $6.2 million is expected to be paid in 2013 . Additionally, our Company and consolidated subsidiaries have capital commitments of approximately $1.8 million of tenant improvements and leasing commissions for certain tenants in Four Points Centre of which the entire amount is expected to be funded by additional borrowings available under the loan and paid in 2013 . We have an unfunded capital commitment of $10.9 million to TPG/CalSTRS, of which we estimate we will fund $2.5 million in 2013 for contractual obligations existing as of March 31, 2013 . We are not obligated to fund our share for the acquisition of any new project, but we are obligated to fund tenant improvements and other capital improvements for projects that were acquired prior to June 1, 2007 . We have an unfunded capital commitment of $6.9 million to TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, of which we estimate we will fund $4.4 million in 2013 for contractual obligations existing as of March 31, 2013 .

(7)
Represents the future minimum lease payments on our operating lease for our corporate office at City National Plaza, which expires in May 2014 . The table does not reflect available extension options.

(8)
The obligations associated with uncertain tax positions in the table above should represent amounts related to temporary book-tax differences. However, reasonable estimates cannot be made about the amount and timing of payment, if any, for these obligations. As of March 31, 2013 , $8.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with FASB ASC 740, and we are uncertain as to if and when such amounts may be settled. Additionally, there is no interest or penalty associated with unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2013 .


32


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Indebtedness of Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

As of March 31, 2013 , our Company had investments in entities owning unconsolidated properties with stated ownership percentages ranging from 7.9% to 33.3% . We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting.

The table below summarizes the outstanding debt for these properties as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands). None of these loans are recourse to us. Some of the loans listed in the table below subject TPG/CalSTRS to customary non-recourse carve out obligations. There are no extension options on these loans as of March 31, 2013 .

 
Interest Rate at
March 31, 2013
 
Principal
Amount
 
Maturity
Date
TPG/CalSTRS:
 
 
 
 
 
City National Plaza
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan
5.90%
 
$
350,000

 
7/1/2020
Note payable to former partner
5.75%
 
500

 
1/4/2016
CityWestPlace
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan - Building I & II
6.16%
 
118,741

 
7/6/2016
Mortgage loan - Building III & IV
5.03%
 
94,428

 
3/5/2020
San Felipe Plaza
4.78%
 
110,000

 
12/1/2018
Fair Oaks Plaza
5.52%
 
44,300

 
2/9/2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC:
 
 
 
 
 
San Jacinto Center
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan-Note A (1)
6.05%
 
43,000

 
6/11/2017
Mortgage loan-Note B (2)
6.05%
 
58,000

 
6/11/2017
Frost Bank Tower
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan-Note A (1)
6.06%
 
61,300

 
6/11/2017
Mortgage loan-Note B (2)
6.06%
 
88,700

 
6/11/2017
One Congress Plaza
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan-Note A (1)
6.08%
 
57,000

 
6/11/2017
Mortgage loan-Note B (2)
6.08%
 
71,000

 
6/11/2017
One American Center
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loan-Note A (1)
6.03%
 
50,900

 
6/11/2017
Mortgage loan-Note B (2)
6.03%
 
69,100

 
6/11/2017
300 West 6th Street
6.01%
 
127,000

 
6/11/2017
 
 
 
1,343,969

 
 
Loans on properties subject to special servicer oversight (3):
 
 
 
 
Reflections I
5.23%
 
20,484

 
4/1/2015
Reflections II
5.22%
 
8,533

 
4/1/2015
 
 
 
29,017

 
 
Total outstanding debt of all unconsolidated properties
 
$
1,372,986

 
 

The 30 day LIBOR rate for the loans above was 0.20% at March 31, 2013 .
_______________________
(1) Balance represents senior mortgage indebtedness.

(2) Balance represents subordinate mortgage indebtedness.

(3) The borrower under mortgage loans secured by these properties has not made any debt service payments since February 2013 . The special servicer has issued notices of default, but has not taken any further action in response. The borrowers are

33


accruing interest on these loans at a default rate, which is 10.23% per annum for Reflections I and 10.22% per annum for Reflections II since March 2013. On a net basis, TPG's equity investment balance in these properties is not material.

34


Cash Flows

Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2013 to three months ended March 31, 2012

Cash and cash equivalents were $86.9 million and $80.3 million at March 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing an increase of $6.6 million . The increase was a result of the following changes in cash flows:

 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
Increase
(Decrease)
 
(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(5,615
)
 
$
(8,920
)
 
$
3,305

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
7,208

 
7,210

 
(2
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
8,591

 
2,670

 
5,921

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
10,184

 
960

 
9,224

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
76,689

 
79,320

 
(2,631
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
86,873

 
$
80,280

 
$
6,593


Our cash flows from operating activities are primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the rental rates achieved on our leases, the collectability of rent and recoveries from our tenants, revenues generated and collected from our investment advisory, management, leasing and development services and the level of operating expenses and other general and administrative costs. Net cash used in operating activities was $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 , which represented a decrease of $3.3 million from the net cash used by operations of $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . The decrease in cash used in operations was primarily due to a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities resulting from payment of most bonuses related to 2011 during the first quarter of 2012 , which was a $3.3 million use of cash, whereas the majority of 2012 bonus payments were paid during 2012 .

Our net cash generated by or used in investing activities is generally impacted by the sale of condominium units at Murano, contributions and distributions related to our investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, the funding of development and redevelopment projects and recurring and non-recurring capital expenditures. Net cash provided by investing activities of $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was consistent with the amount for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . During the three months ended March 31, 2013 , amongst other investing activities, we received cash proceeds of $10.7 million related to the sale of certain land parcels at Four Points Centre, and we made cash contributions of $4.0 million to our TPG/CalSTRS Austin joint venture to fund working capital needs.

Our net cash provided by or used in financing activities is generally impacted by our borrowings, and capital activities, net of dividends and distributions paid to common stockholders and non-controlling interests. Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $5.9 million to $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $2.7 million provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . This increase was primarily due to contributions by partners holding non-controlling interests in Commerce Square (Brandywine of $5.9 million ) and TPG Austin Partner (Madison of $1.3 million ) totaling $7.2 million during 2013 . There were no contributions from non-controlling interest holders in the corresponding period in 2012 . Additionally, we paid off the expiring mortgage loan at Two Commerce Square in the amount of $106.5 million with proceeds from a new loan of $112.0 million .

Inflation
Substantially all of our office leases provide for tenants to reimburse us for increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses related to the leased space at the applicable property. In addition, many of the leases provide for increases in fixed base rent. We believe that inflationary increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses may be partially offset by the contractual rent increases and expense reimbursements as described above.

35


Non-GAAP Supplemental Financial Measure: After Tax Cash Flow ("ATCF")

The Company's management considers ATCF to be a key performance indicator. We define ATCF as net income (loss) excluding the following items: i) deferred income tax expense (benefit); ii) noncontrolling interests; iii) non-cash charges for depreciation, amortization and asset impairment; iv) amortization of loan costs; v) non-cash compensation expense; vi) the adjustment to recognize rental revenues using the straight-line method; vii) the adjustments to rental revenue to reflect the fair market value of rent; and viii) gain from extinguishment of debt. Our management utilizes ATCF data in assessing performance of our business operations in period to period comparisons and for financial planning purposes. ATCF should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. ATCF should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs. ATCF also should not be used as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP).

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to ATCF:
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2013
 
 
 
Plus Unconsolidated Investments at TPGI's Share
 
Less Non-Controlling Interests Share
 
 
 
Consolidated
 
Continuing Operations
 
Discontinued Operations
 
Continuing Operations
 
Discontinued Operations
 
TPGI's Share
Net income (loss)
$
(8,969
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
(8,969
)
Income tax (benefit) provision
22

 

 

 

 

 
22

Noncontrolling interests - unitholders in the
   Operating Partnership
(2,422
)
 

 

 

 

 
(2,422
)
Depreciation and amortization
4,192

 
7,414

 
233

 
(1,967
)
 
(86
)
 
9,786

Amortization of loan costs
162

 
(55
)
 

 
28

 

 
135

Non-cash compensation expense
953

 

 

 

 

 
953

Straight-line rent adjustments
327

 
(692
)
 
(31
)
 
221

 
10

 
(165
)
Adjustments to reflect the fair market value of rent
41

 
(924
)
 
12

 
286

 
(4
)
 
(589
)
Impairment loss
753

 

 

 

 

 
753

Loss (gain) on sale of real estate
700

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
699

ATCF before income taxes
$
(4,241
)
 
$
5,742

 
$
214

 
$
(1,432
)
 
$
(80
)
 
$
203

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TPGI's share of ATCF before income taxes (1)
$
(3,337
)
 
$
4,518

 
$
168

 
$
(1,127
)
 
$
(62
)
 
$
160

TPGI's income tax benefit (expense) - current
(22
)
 

 

 

 

 
(22
)
TPGI's share of ATCF
$
(3,359
)
 
$
4,518

 
$
168

 
$
(1,127
)
 
$
(62
)
 
$
138

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ATCF per share - basic
 
$

ATCF per share - diluted
 
$

Dividends paid per share
 
$
0.02

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
45,826,728

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
46,091,417



36


 
For the three months ended March 31, 2012
 
 
 
Plus Unconsolidated
Investments at TPGI's Share
 
 
 
Consolidated
 
Continuing Operations
 
Discontinued Operations
 
TPGI's Share
Net income (loss)
$
(3,120
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(3,120
)
Income tax (benefit) provision
43

 

 

 
43

Noncontrolling interests - unitholders in the Operating
     Partnership
(1,041
)
 

 

 
(1,041
)
Depreciation and amortization
3,510

 
2,367

 
173

 
6,050

Amortization of loan costs
160

 
76

 
5

 
241

Non-cash compensation expense
648

 

 

 
648

Straight-line rent adjustments
(267
)
 
(13
)
 
(5
)
 
(285
)
Adjustments to reflect the fair market value of rent
8

 
(232
)
 
(16
)
 
(240
)
ATCF before income taxes
$
(59
)
 
$
2,198

 
$
157

 
$
2,296

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TPGI's share of ATCF before income taxes (1)
$
(44
)
 
$
1,642

 
$
118

 
$
1,716

TPGI's income tax benefit (expense) - current
(17
)
 

 

 
(17
)
TPGI's share of ATCF
$
(61
)
 
$
1,642

 
$
118

 
$
1,699

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ATCF per share - basic
 
$
0.05

ATCF per share - diluted
 
$
0.05

Dividends paid per share
 
$
0.015

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
36,737,276

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
37,076,840

                                   
(1) Based on an interest in our operating partnership of 78.69% and 74.72% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

TPGI's share of ATCF for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $0.1 million , or $0.00 per share, compared to ATCF of $1.7 million , or $0.05 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 . The decrease in ATCF per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily the result of the overall reduction in consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year, and the increased number of shares of our common stock outstanding resulting from the issuance of common stock in 2012.


ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

A primary market risk faced by our Company is interest rate risk. Our strategy is to match as closely as possible the expected holding periods and income streams of our assets with the terms of our debt. In general, we use floating rate debt on assets with higher growth prospects and less stability to their income streams. Correspondingly, with respect to stabilized assets with lower growth rates, we will generally use longer-term fixed-rate debt. As of March 31, 2013 , our Company had $39.4 million of outstanding consolidated floating rate debt, which is not subject to an interest rate cap.

Our fixed and variable rate consolidated long-term debt at March 31, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
        
Year of Maturity
 
Fixed Rate
 
Variable
Rate
 
Total
2013
 
$
1,320

 
$
17,814

 
$
19,134

2014
 
1,884

 
21,581

 
23,465

2015
 
1,996

 

 
1,996

2016
 
121,209

 

 
121,209

2017
 

 

 

Thereafter
 
112,000

 

 
112,000

Total
 
$
238,409

 
$
39,395

 
$
277,804

Weighted average interest rate
 
4.86%
 
3.86%
 
4.72%


37


We utilize sensitivity analyses to assess the potential effect on interest costs of our variable rate debt. At March 31, 2013 , our variable rate long-term debt represents 14.2% of our total long-term debt. If interest rates were to increase by 75 basis points, or by approximately 19.4% of the weighted average variable rate at March 31, 2013 , the net impact would be increased interest costs of $0.3 million per year.

Our estimates of the fair value of debt instruments at March 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, were determined by performing discounted cash flow analyses using an appropriate market discount rate. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

As of March 31, 2013 , the estimated fair value of our consolidated mortgage loans aggregate $282.1 million , compared to the aggregate carrying value of $277.8 million .


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have adopted and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b), promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Controls

Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.


38


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Properties
We generate a significant portion of our revenues from our joint venture and our separate account management agreements with CalSTRS, and if we were to lose these relationships, our financial results would be significantly negatively affected.
Our joint venture and separate account management agreement relationships with CalSTRS provide us with substantial fee revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 , approximately 14.3% of our revenue has been derived from fees earned from these relationships.
We cannot assure you that our joint venture and separate account management relationships with CalSTRS will continue, and, if they do not, we may not be able to replace these relationships with other strategic alliances that would provide comparable revenues. Our interest in TPG/CalSTRS is subject to a buy-sell provision, which permits CalSTRS to purchase our interest in TPG/CalSTRS at any time. Under the buy-sell provision either our Operating Partnership or CalSTRS can initiate a buy-out of the other's interest at any time by delivering a notice to the other specifying a purchase price for all the joint venture's assets; the other partner then has the option to sell its joint venture interest or purchase the interest of the initiating venture partner. The purchase price is based on what each partner would receive on liquidation if the joint venture's assets were sold for the specified price and the joint venture's liabilities were paid and the remaining assets distributed to the partners. In addition, TPG Austin Partner, LLC, the entity through which we own our interest in TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, is subject to a forced sale and right of first offer provision, starting on the earlier of the third anniversary of the date of the agreement, September 18, 2015 , or the date on which a management committee deadlock occurs after the first anniversary of the date of this agreement, September 18, 2013 , which permits either partner in TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC to initiate a sale of one or more of the properties and gives the other partner the right of first offer to purchase.
In addition, upon the occurrence of certain events of default by the Operating Partnership under the TPG/CalSTRS agreement or related management, development and leasing agreements, upon bankruptcy of our Operating Partnership, or upon the death or disability of either James A. Thomas, our Chairman, President and CEO, or John R. Sischo, our Co-Chief Operating Officer, or the failure of either of them to devote the necessary time to perform their duties (unless replaced by an individual approved by CalSTRS) (each, a “Buyout Default”), CalSTRS may elect to purchase our membership interest based on a three percent discount to the appraised fair market value at the time of the Buyout Default.
Upon the occurrence of certain events of default by TPG Austin Partner, LLC, under the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC agreement or by the Operating Partnership under related management, development and leasing agreements, upon bankruptcy of our Operating Partnership, or the Company's senior executive team's failure to devote the time required to perform the duties of the manager under the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC agreement (each, a “TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC Buyout Default”), CalSTRS may elect to purchase our membership interest based on a three percent discount to the appraised fair market value at the time of the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC Buyout Default.
The TPG/CalSTRS agreement also prohibits any transfer of securities of the Company or limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership that would result in Mr. Thomas, his immediate family and any entities controlled thereby beneficially owning less than 30.0% of our securities entitled to vote for the election of directors; provided, that in connection with the issuance of additional Company shares in one or more public offerings, Mr. Thomas, his immediate family and controlled entities may reduce their collective beneficial ownership interest to no less than 10% of the total common shares and Operating Partnership units and no less than 15.0 million shares and Operating Partnership units on a collective basis. There is no comparable requirement in the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC agreement. In May 2012 , the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement, a Stockholders Agreement and a Registration Rights Agreement with affiliates of Madison International Realty (“Madison Agreements”). We issued 8.7 million shares of our common stock to the Madison affiliates in a non-public transaction. Pursuant to the Madison Agreements, during a lock-up period that generally expires with respect to all of such shares in June 2015 , Mr. Thomas controls the voting of the shares issued to Madison's affiliates and, therefore, presently has beneficial ownership of more than 40% of our securities entitled to vote for the election of directors. If Mr. Thomas does not acquire beneficial ownership of additional shares of our common stock prior to expiration or earlier termination of such lock-up period or the TPG/CalSTRS agreement is not otherwise amended prior thereto, the termination of the voting control by Mr. Thomas of the shares of common stock issued pursuant to the Madison Agreements may result in a Buyout Default under the TPG/CalSTRS agreement at the final expiration of such lock-up period.

39


Most of our fee arrangements under our separate account relationship with CalSTRS are terminable on 30 days' notice. Termination of either our joint venture or separate account relationship with CalSTRS would adversely affect our revenue and profitability and our ability to achieve our business plan by reducing our fee income and access to co-investment capital to acquire additional properties. 
Our joint venture investments may be adversely affected by our lack of control or input on decisions or shared decision-making authority or disputes with our co-venturers.
Many of our operating properties are owned through a joint venture or partnership with other parties. As a result, we do not exercise sole decision-making authority regarding such joint venture properties, including with respect to cash distributions or the sale of such properties. Furthermore, we may co-invest in the future through other partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, acquiring non-controlling interests or sharing responsibility for managing the affairs of a property, partnership or joint venture. Investments in partnerships, joint ventures, funds or other entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks, including partners who may have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. These investments may also have the risk of impasses on significant decisions, because neither we nor our partner or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Future disputes between us and our partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their full time and effort on our business. In addition, under the principles of agency and partnership law, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers, such as if a partner or co-venturer became bankrupt and defaulted on its reimbursement and contribution obligations to us, subjecting the property owned by the partnership or joint venture to liabilities in excess of those contemplated by the partnership or joint venture agreement, or incurred debts or liabilities on behalf of the partnership or joint venture in excess of the authority granted by the partnership or joint venture agreement. In some joint ventures or other investments we make, if the entity in which we invest is a limited partnership, we have acquired and may acquire in the future all or a portion of our interest in such partnership as a general partner. In such event, we may be liable for all the liabilities of the partnership, although we attempt to limit such liability to our investment in such partnership by investing through a subsidiary.
Our joint venture partners have rights under our joint venture agreements that could adversely affect us.
As of March 31, 2013 , we held interests in six of our properties through TPG/CalSTRS, and five of our properties through TPG Austin Partner, LLC, in turn as a member of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC. TPG/CalSTRS requires a unanimous vote of its management committee on certain major decisions, including approval of annual business plans and budgets, financings and refinancings, and additional capital calls not in compliance with an approved annual plan. The management committee currently consists of two members appointed by CalSTRS and one member appointed by the Operating Partnership. All other decisions, including sales of properties, are made based upon a majority decision of the management committee. Thus CalSTRS has the ability to control certain decisions for TPG/CalSTRS that may result in an outcome contrary to our interests. The Operating Partnership has the responsibility and authority to carry out day to day management of TPG/CalSTRS and to implement the annual plans approved by the management committee. In addition to CalSTRS' ability to control certain decisions relating to TPG/CalSTRS, our agreement with CalSTRS includes provisions negotiated for the benefit of CalSTRS that could adversely affect us. Unless otherwise determined by the management committee of TPG/CalSTRS, we are required to use diligent efforts to sell each joint venture property generally within five years of that property reaching stabilization. The TPG/CalSTRS' subsidiaries owning Reflections I and Reflections II have not made the respective debt service payments due starting in February 2013 . The special servicer has issued notices of default, but has not taken further formal action. Therefore, the likelihood of these two properties reaching stabilization and their ultimate resolution is uncertain. We have a right of first offer to purchase a TPG/CalSTRS property upon a required sale at a price we propose, and if CalSTRS accepts our offer we must close within 90 days. If we do not exercise the right of first offer and we subsequently fail to effect a sale by the end of the specified holding period, CalSTRS has the right to assume control of the sale process. This may require us to sell one or more of our assets at an inopportune time, or for prices that are lower than could be achieved if we had more flexibility in the timing for effecting sales.
TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC requires a unanimous vote of its management committee on certain major decisions, including approval of the holding period, annual business plans and budgets, financings and refinancings, and additional capital calls not in compliance with an approved annual plan. The management committee currently consists of two members appointed by CalSTRS and two members appointed by the Operating Partnership. All other decisions are made based upon a majority decision of the management committee. Through its position as managing member of TPG Austin Partner, LLC, the Operating Partnership has the responsibility and authority to carry out day to day management of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC and to implement the annual plans approved by the management committee. In addition, our interest is subject to a forced sale and right of first offer provision, starting on the earlier of the third anniversary of the date of the agreement, September 18, 2015 , or the date on which a management committee deadlock occurs after the first anniversary of the date of the agreement,

40


September 18, 2013 , or on an event of default or if three or more of the Company's senior executives, at the same time, are unable to perform duties for two or more months due to death, disability or departure (unless a replacement is reasonably approved by CalSTRS) which permits either partner to initiate a sale of one or more of the properties, and gives the other partner the right of first offer to purchase. This may require us to sell one or more of the Austin assets at an inopportune time, or for prices that are lower than could be achieved if we had more flexibility in the timing for effecting sales.
TPG Austin Partner, LLC has two members, Madison and the Operating Partnership. The agreement permits Madison to require the sale of its direct interest in the limited liability company, subject to a right of first offer in favor of the Operating Partnership. In addition, Madison has a put right, on the earliest of (i) January 1, 2017 , (ii) a TPG Change of Control (as defined in the LLC agreement), (iii) the removal of TPG Austin Partner, LLC as manager of TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC, or (iv) the exercise by CalSTRS of any of its rights pursuant to the TPG/CalSTRS Austin, LLC agreement, to require the Operating Partnership to purchase all of Madison's ownership interest for a purchase price equal to the put price, which is based on fair market value.
In November 2010 , our subsidiaries entered into amended and restated partnership agreements and contribution agreements with Brandywine, with respect to our One Commerce Square and Two Commerce Square buildings in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Brandywine contributed capital, and committed to additional capital contributions to the existing owners of the buildings, in return for a 25% limited partnership interest in each building. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries are the general partners of the Commerce Square partnerships, with authority to manage and carry out the day to day business of the partnerships, subject only to approval by Brandywine of certain specified major decisions, including approval of certain capital budgets, leasing budgets and leasing guidelines, financing or refinancing of each building, and certain major leases. We retained sole approval over the operating budgets and other decisions that are not major decisions. Brandywine has the right to purchase all of the Company's interest in each of the buildings subject to the retention of a nominal interest by the Company with an allocation of mortgage debt for a minimum of five years, which right is exercisable between October 31, 2016 and April 30, 2017 . The exercise of such call right triggers certain rights and obligations of the Company, including the right to elect to market our interests in the buildings to third parties to achieve a price for our interests that we deem to be acceptable. If the Company deems a third party bid for our interests to be acceptable, then under certain conditions Brandywine will have a right of first refusal to purchase our interests for the same price and terms offered by the third party. If Brandywine does not exercise, or does not have, such right of first refusal, and if we elect to sell our interests in Commerce Square to a third party, Brandywine has a right to “piggyback” on such sale and sell its interests in Commerce Square to the third party on the same terms. We retain, as general partner, the right to sell the Commerce Square buildings at any time, but Brandywine has certain rights to acquire our interests in Commerce Square in lieu of such a sale of the buildings to a third party, as long as we receive the same amount we would have received on a sale to a third party. Finally, on or after the 10 th anniversary of the admission of Brandywine as a partner, either the Company or Brandywine may elect to cause the sale of the Commerce Square buildings and dissolve the partnerships, which will give the other party the right to trigger a buy-sell procedure for the purchase of the electing partner's interest in the partnerships.
We may not receive funding from our joint venture partners in connection with proposed acquisitions, which could adversely affect our growth.
We have entered into, and may enter into in the future, certain joint venture acquisition arrangements with third parties in which we identify potential acquisition properties on behalf of the joint venture, and a portion (in some cases, a substantial portion) of the capital required for each project would be funded by our joint venture partners. Although our joint venture partners generally commit to fund property acquisitions under these arrangements, such joint venture partners may decide not to fund a particular or any potential acquisition properties for any number of reasons, including such entities may not have the capital necessary to fund projects at the time of the proposed acquisition. Accordingly, if we identify potential acquisition opportunities in the future for these programs, we may not receive approval and/or funding from joint venture partners, notwithstanding any prior commitments for funding.
We depend on significant tenants, and their failure to pay rent could seriously harm our operating results and financial condition.
As of March 31, 2013 , the 20 largest tenants for properties in which we held an ownership interest collectively leased 40.1% of the rentable square feet of space, representing 45.4% of the total annualized rent generated by these properties.
Any of our tenants may experience a downturn in its business, which may weaken such tenant's financial condition. As a result, tenants may delay lease commencement, fail to make rental payments when due, decline to extend a lease upon its expiration, become insolvent, declare bankruptcy or default under their leases. Certain of our tenants also have termination rights under their leases with us, which they might choose to exercise if they experience a downturn in their business. In addition, current economic and market conditions increase the possibility that one or more of our tenants will become insolvent.

41


Any tenant bankruptcy or insolvency, leasing delay, failure to make rental payments when due, or default under a lease could result in the termination of the tenant's lease and material losses to our Company.
In particular, if a significant tenant becomes insolvent, suffers a downturn in its business and decides not to renew its lease or vacates a property, it may seriously harm our business. Failure on the part of a tenant to comply with the terms of a lease may give us the right to terminate the lease, repossess the applicable property and enforce the payment obligations under the lease. In those circumstances, we would be required to find another tenant. We cannot assure you that we would be able to find another tenant without incurring substantial costs, or at all, or that if another tenant were found, we would be able to enter into a new lease on favorable terms to us or at the same rental rates.
Bankruptcy filings by or relating to one of our tenants could bar us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or their property. A tenant bankruptcy would delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these amounts. If a lease is assumed by the tenant in bankruptcy, all pre-bankruptcy amounts due under the lease must be paid to us in full. However, if a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt entity may be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. We may recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claim in the event of the bankruptcy of a large tenant, which could adversely impact our financial condition.
Our operating results depend upon the regional economies in which our properties are located and the demand for office and other mixed-use space, and unique or disproportionate economic downturns or adverse regulatory or taxation policies in any of these regions could harm our operating results.
Our operating and development properties are located in three geographic regions of the United States: the West Coast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions. Historically, the largest part of our revenues has been derived from our ownership and management of properties consisting primarily of office buildings.
A decrease in the demand for office space in these geographic regions, and for Class A office space in particular, may have a greater adverse effect on our business and financial condition than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. We are also susceptible to disproportionate or unique adverse developments in these regions and in the national office market generally, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics, terrorist targeting of high-rise structures, infrastructure quality, increases in real estate and other taxes, costs of complying with government regulations or increased regulation, oversupply of or reduced demand for office space, and other factors. Some of the regional issues we face include the more highly regulated and taxed economy of Southern California and high local and municipal taxes for our Philadelphia properties. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in one or more of our regions, or any decrease in demand for office space resulting from the local regulatory environment, business climate or energy or fiscal problems, could adversely impact our revenue and profitability, thereby causing a significant decline in our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the trading price of our common stock and impairing our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
Our need for additional debt financing, our existing level of debt and the limitations imposed by our debt agreements could have significant adverse consequences on us.
We may seek to incur additional debt to finance future acquisition and development activities; however debt financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms under current market conditions. In addition, it is possible the required payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash to operate our properties profitably. Our need for debt financing, our existing level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following:
our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments or to pay dividends;
we may be unable to borrow additional funds as needed or on favorable terms;
we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;
we may be unable to distribute funds from a property to our Operating Partnership or apply such funds to cover expenses related to another property;
we could be required to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms and/or at disadvantageous times;

42


we could default on our obligations and the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure their loans and receive an assignment of rents and leases;
we could violate covenants in our loan documents or our joint venture agreements, including provisions that may limit our ability to further mortgage a property, make distributions, acquire additional properties, repay indebtedness prior to a set date without payment of a premium or other pre-payment penalties, all of which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations;
because we have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain certain debt levels to provide the ability for Mr. Thomas and entities controlled by him to guarantee debt of $210.0 million , we may not be able to refinance our debt when it would otherwise be advantageous to do so or to reduce our indebtedness when our board of directors determines it is prudent.
If any one or more of these events were to occur, our revenue and profitability could be adversely impacted, causing a significant downturn in our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the trading price of our common stock, and could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We may be unable to complete acquisitions necessary to grow our business, and even if consummated, we may fail to successfully operate these acquired properties.
Our planned growth strategy includes the acquisition of additional properties as opportunities arise with a focus in the southwest and western regions of the United States. We regularly evaluate approximately seven  major markets in the United States for strategic opportunities to acquire office, mixed-use and other properties. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully operate them is subject to the following significant risks:
we may be unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, or obtain the necessary debt or equity to consummate an acquisition or, if obtainable, such financing may not be on favorable terms;
we may need to spend more than budgeted amounts to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties;
we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other real estate investors with more available capital, including other real estate operating companies, real estate investment trusts and investment funds;
competition from other potential acquirers may significantly increase the purchase price, even if we are able to acquire a desired property;
agreements for the acquisition of office properties are typically subject to customary conditions to closing, including satisfactory completion of due diligence investigations, and we may spend significant time and money on a potential acquisition we eventually decide not to pursue;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations;
market conditions may result in higher than expected vacancy rates and lower than expected rental rates; and
we may acquire properties subject to liabilities without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, for unknown liabilities such as clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
If we cannot complete property acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, or operate acquired properties to meet our expectations, our revenue and profitability could be adversely impacted.
Any real estate acquisitions that we consummate may result in disruptions to our business as a result of the burden of integrating operations placed on our management.
Our business strategy includes acquisitions and investments in real estate on an ongoing basis as market conditions warrant. These acquisitions may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management's attention from our other day-to-day operations, which could impair our relationships with our current tenants and employees. If we acquire real estate by acquiring another entity, we may be unable to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired business. In

43


addition, we may be unable to train, retain and motivate any key personnel from the acquired business. If our management is unable to effectively implement our acquisition strategy, we may experience disruptions to our business, which could harm our results of operations.
We may be unable to successfully complete and operate properties under development, which would impair our financial condition and operating results.
Part of our business is devoted to the development of office, mixed-use and other properties, and the redevelopment of core plus and value-add properties. Our development and redevelopment activities involve the following significant risks:
we may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all;
if we finance projects through construction loans, we may be unable to obtain permanent financing at all or on advantageous terms;
we may not complete projects on schedule or within budgeted amounts;
we may underestimate the expected costs and time necessary to achieve the desired result with a redevelopment project;
we may discover structural, environmental or other feasibility issues with properties acquired as redevelopment projects following our acquisition, which may render the redevelopment as planned not possible;
we may encounter delays or refusals in obtaining all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
occupancy rates and rents may fluctuate depending on a number of factors, including market and economic conditions, and may result in our investment not being profitable;
adverse weather that damages the project or causes delays;
unanticipated changes to the plans or specifications;
unanticipated shortages of materials and skilled labor;
unanticipated increases in material and labor costs; and
fire, flooding and other natural disasters.
If we are not successful in our property development and redevelopment initiatives, it could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock.
We face significant competition, which may decrease or prevent increases of the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.
We face significant competition from other managers and owners of office and mixed-use real estate, many of which own or manage properties similar to ours in the same regional markets in which our properties are located. We also compete with other diversified real estate companies and companies focused solely on offering property investment management and brokerage services. A number of our competitors are larger and better able to take advantage of efficiencies created by size, have better financial resources, or increased access to capital at lower costs, and may be better known in regional markets in which we compete. Our smaller size as compared to some of our competition may increase our susceptibility to economic downturns and pressures on rents. Our failure to compete successfully in our industry would materially affect our business prospects and operating results.
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire resulting in increased vacancy rates, lower revenue and an adverse effect on our operating results.
As of March 31, 2013 , leases representing 3.7% and 11.2% of the rentable square feet of the office and retail space of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties will expire in 2013 and 2014 , respectively. Further, an additional 13.3% of the square feet of these properties was available for lease as of March 31, 2013 . Current economic conditions have resulted in depressed leasing activity recently in certain markets as a result of tenant unwillingness to make long term leasing commitments, and it is unclear how long this market condition may continue. If the rental rates for our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available space and space for which

44


leases will expire, our revenue and profitability could be adversely impacted, causing a significant downturn in our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the trading price of our common stock and impairing our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
Our growth depends on external sources of capital, some of which are outside of our control. If we are unable to access capital from external sources, we may not be able to implement our business strategy.
Our business strategy requires us to rely significantly on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain debt or equity on favorable terms or at all. Any additional debt we incur will increase our leverage and may impose operating restrictions on us. Any issuance of equity by our Company to fund our portion of equity capital requirements could be dilutive to our existing stockholders, and could have a negative impact on our stock price. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on:
our current debt levels, which were $277.8 million of consolidated debt and $1.4 billion of unconsolidated debt, of which our share was $335.6 million as of March 31, 2013 ;
our ability to generate consistent cash flow from operating activities, which used cash of $5.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 ;
our current and expected future earnings;
the market's perception of our growth potential;
the market price of our common stock;
the perception of the value of an investment in our common stock; and
general market conditions.
If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources when needed, we may not be able to acquire or develop properties when strategic opportunities exist, or to repay existing debt as it matures.
As a result of the limited time which we have to perform due diligence of many of our acquired properties, we may become subject to significant unexpected liabilities and our properties may not meet projections.
When we enter into an agreement to acquire a property or portfolio of properties, we often have limited time to complete our due diligence prior to acquiring the property. To the extent we underestimate or fail to investigate or identify risks and liabilities associated with the properties we acquire, we may incur unexpected liabilities or the properties may fail to perform as we expected. If we do not accurately assess the liabilities associated with properties prior to their acquisition, we may pay a purchase price that exceeds the current fair value of the net identifiable assets of the acquired property. As a result, intangible assets would be required to be recorded, which could result in significant accounting charges in future periods. These charges, in addition to the financial impact of significant liabilities that we may assume, and any failure of properties to perform as expected, could adversely impact our revenue and profitability, causing a significant downturn in our financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our common stock and impairing our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
As the current or previous owner or operator of real property, we could become subject to liability for environmental contamination, regardless of whether we caused such contamination.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances, a current or previous owner or operator (e.g., tenant or manager) of real property may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate contamination resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, wastes or petroleum products on, under, from or in such property. These costs could be substantial and liability under these laws may attach without regard to fault, or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the contamination. The liability may be joint and several for the full amount of the investigation, clean-up and monitoring costs incurred or to be incurred or actions to be undertaken, although a party held jointly and severally liable may obtain contributions from other identified, solvent, responsible parties of their fair share toward these costs to the extent such contributions are possible to obtain. In addition, the current or previous owner or operator of property may be subject to damage awards for personal injury or property damage resulting from contamination at or migrating from its property. Previous owners used some of our properties for industrial and retail purposes, so those properties may contain some level of environmental contamination. In addition, the presence of contamination, or the failure to properly remediate contamination on a property may limit the ability of the owner or operator to sell, develop or rent that property or to borrow using the property as collateral, and may cause our investment in that property to decline in value.

45


As the owner of real property, we could become subject to liability for asbestos-containing building materials in the buildings on our property.
Some of our properties may contain asbestos-containing materials. Environmental laws require that owners or operators of buildings with asbestos-containing building materials properly manage and maintain these materials, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators for failure to comply with these requirements. In addition, these laws may also allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing building materials.
Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold or suffer from other adverse conditions, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediation.
When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants above certain levels can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected property or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from our tenants, employees of our tenants and others if property damage or health concerns arise.
As the owner of real property, we could become subject to liability for failure to comply with environmental requirements regarding the handling and disposal of regulated substances and wastes or for non-compliance with health and safety requirements.
Environmental laws and regulations regarding the handling of regulated substances and wastes apply to our properties. The properties in our portfolio are also subject to various federal, state and local health and safety requirements, such as state and local fire requirements. If we or our tenants fail to comply with these various requirements, we might incur governmental fines or private damage awards. Moreover, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will materially adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, the per share trading price of our common stock and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations. Environmental noncompliance liability could also affect a tenant's ability to make rental payments to us.
Tax indemnification obligations that may arise in the event we or our Operating Partnership sell an interest in either of two of our properties could limit our operating flexibility.
We and our Operating Partnership agreed at the time of our initial public offering in 2004 to indemnify Mr. Thomas against adverse direct and indirect tax consequences in the event that our Operating Partnership or the underlying property owner directly or indirectly sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes (including by way of merger, sale of assets or otherwise) of any portion of its interests, in a taxable transaction, in either One Commerce Square or Two Commerce Square. These two assets represented 98.1% of annualized rent for our consolidated properties as of March 31, 2013 . The indemnification obligation currently expires October 13, 2013 , which may be further extended to October 13, 2016 provided Mr. Thomas and his controlled entities collectively retain at least 50% of the Operating Partnership units received by them in connection with our formation transactions at the time of our initial public offering.
We agreed at the time of the initial public offering to use commercially reasonable efforts to make an aggregate of approximately $210.0 million of debt available to be guaranteed by entities controlled by Mr. Thomas. We agreed to make this debt available for guarantee in order to assist Mr. Thomas in preserving his tax position after his contribution at the time of our initial public offering.
The current economic environment for real estate companies may significantly adversely impact our results of operations and business prospects.
The success of our business and profitability of our operations are dependent on continued investment in the real estate markets and access to capital and debt financing. A long term crisis of confidence in real estate investing and lack of available credit for acquisitions would be likely to constrain our business growth. As part of our business goals, we intend to grow our properties portfolio with strategic acquisitions of core properties at advantageous prices, and core plus and value added

46


properties where we believe we can bring necessary expertise to bear to increase property values. In order to pursue acquisitions, we need access to equity capital and also property-level debt financing. Conditions in the financial markets may adversely impact the availability and cost of credit in the near future. Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our obligations with respect to indebtedness depends on our operating and financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions.
Illiquidity of real estate investments and the susceptibility of the real estate industry to economic conditions could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.
Our ability to achieve desired and projected results for growth of our business depends on our ability to generate revenues in excess of expenses, and make scheduled principal payments on debt and fund capital expenditure requirements. Events and conditions generally applicable to owners and operators of real property that are beyond our control may adversely impact our results of operations and the value of our properties. These events include:
vacancies or our inability to rent space on favorable terms;
inability to collect rent from tenants;
difficulty in accessing credit in the present economic environment, in particular for larger mortgage loans;
inability to finance property development and acquisitions on favorable terms;
increased operating costs, including real estate taxes, insurance premiums and utilities;
local oversupply, increased competition or reduction in demand for office space;
fluctuating condominium prices and absorption rates;
costs of complying with changes in governmental regulations;
the relative illiquidity of real estate investments;
changing submarket demographics; and
the significant transaction costs related to property sales.
In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults under existing leases. If any of these events were to happen, our revenue and profitability could be impaired, causing a significant downturn in our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the trading price of our common stock, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be impaired.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make unintended expenditures that adversely impact our financial condition.
All of our commercial properties are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities,” but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we assess our properties and make alterations as appropriate. Compliance with the ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers.
If one or more of our properties is not in compliance with the ADA, we would be required to incur additional costs to bring the property or properties into compliance. In addition, non-compliance could result in imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. Typically, we are responsible for changes to a building structure that are required by the ADA, which can be costly. In addition, we are required to operate our properties in compliance with fire and safety regulations, building codes and other land use regulations. We may be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with these requirements thereby limiting the funds available to operate, develop and redevelop our properties and acquire additional properties. As a result, these expenditures could negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

47


Potential losses to our properties may not be covered by insurance and may result in our inability to repair damaged properties; as a result we could lose invested capital.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, flood, extended coverage, wind, earthquake, terrorism, pollution legal liability, business interruption and rental loss insurance under policies covering all of the properties in which we own an interest in or manage for third parties, including our development properties (although we carry only liability insurance for the California Environmental Protection Agency (“CalEPA”) headquarters building because the tenant has the right to provide all other forms of coverage it deems necessary, and it has elected to do so). We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.
We either own or manage two properties in Southern California, an area especially prone to earthquakes. We carry earthquake insurance on our properties located in these seismically active areas, wind insurance on our properties located in “tier 1” wind zones, which includes our Houston, Texas properties, and terrorism insurance on all of our properties. Our terrorism insurance is subject to exclusions for loss or damage caused by nuclear substances, pollutants, contaminants, and biological and chemical weapons as more specifically excluded under the actual terrorism policies. Some of our policies, like those covering losses due to earthquakes and terrorism, are subject to limitations involving deductibles and policy limits which may not be sufficient to cover potential losses.
Under their leases, our tenants are generally required to indemnify us against liabilities resulting from injury to persons, air, water, land or property, on or off the premises due to activities conducted by them on our properties. There is generally an exception for claims arising from the negligence or intentional misconduct by us or our agents. Additionally, tenants are generally required, with the exception of governmental entities and other entities that are self-insured, to obtain at their own expense and keep in force during the term of the lease both liability and property damage insurance policies issued by companies holding ratings at a minimum level at their own expense.
Although we have not experienced such a loss to date, if we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged property as well as the anticipated future cash flows from that property, including lost revenue from unpaid rent from tenants. In addition, if the damaged property is subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if the property was irreparably damaged. In the event of a significant loss at one or more of the properties covered by our policies, the remaining insurance under the policy, if any, could be insufficient to adequately insure our remaining properties. In this event, securing additional insurance, if possible, could be significantly more expensive than our current policy.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
Our senior management has existing conflicts of interest with us and our public stockholders that could result in decisions adverse to our Company.
In addition to the common stock owned by Mr. Thomas as of March 31, 2013 , he owned or controlled a significant interest in our Operating Partnership consisting of 12,313,331 units, or a 20.9% interest in the Operating Partnership as of such date. In addition, our senior executive officers, excluding Mr. Thomas, collectively held an interest in incentive units (vested and unvested) representing an aggregate 3.0% equity interest in the Operating Partnership.
Members of senior management could make decisions that could have different implications for our Operating Partnership and for us, our stockholders, and our senior executive officers. For example, dispositions of interests in One Commerce Square or Two Commerce Square could trigger our tax indemnification obligations with respect to Mr. Thomas.
We have a holding company structure and rely upon funds received from our Operating Partnership to pay liabilities.
We are a holding company. Our primary asset is our general partnership interest in our Operating Partnership. We have no independent means of generating revenues. To the extent we require funds to pay taxes or other liabilities incurred by us, to pay dividends or for any other purpose, we must rely on funds received from our Operating Partnership. If our Operating Partnership should become unable to distribute funds to us, we would be unable to continue operations after a short period. Most of the properties owned by our subsidiaries and joint ventures are encumbered by loans. These loans generally contain lockbox arrangements and reserve requirements that may affect the amount of cash available for distribution from the subsidiaries that own the properties to the Operating Partnership. Some of the loans include cash sweep and other restrictions and provisions that prior to an event of default may prevent the distribution of funds from the subsidiaries who own these properties to our Operating Partnership. In the event of a default under any of these loans, the defaulting subsidiary or joint venture would be prohibited from distributing cash to our Operating Partnership. As a result, our Operating Partnership may be unable to distribute funds to us and we may be unable to use funds from one property to support the operation of another property. As we acquire new properties and refinance our existing properties, we may finance these properties with new loans

48


that contain similar provisions. Some of the loans to our subsidiaries and joint ventures may contain provisions that restrict us from loaning funds to our other subsidiaries or joint ventures. If we are permitted to loan funds to our subsidiaries or joint ventures, our loans generally will be subordinated to the existing debt on our properties.
Mr. Thomas has a significant vote in certain matters as a result of his control of 100% of our limited voting stock.
Each entity that received Operating Partnership units in our formation transactions received shares of our limited voting stock that are paired with units in our Operating Partnership on a one-for-one basis. All of these entities are directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Thomas, and, as a result, Mr. Thomas controls 100% of our outstanding limited voting stock, and 42.2% of our outstanding voting stock (including outstanding shares of common stock owned by Mr. Thomas and his affiliates as well as 8,695,653 shares owned by Madison and subject to a lock-up period and voting agreement in favor of Mr. Thomas which generally expires with respect to all of such Madison shares in June 2015) as of March 31, 2013 . The limited voting shares are entitled to vote in the election of directors, for the approval of certain extraordinary transactions including any merger, sale or liquidation of the Company, amendments to our certificate of incorporation and any other matter required to be submitted to a separate class vote under Delaware law. Mr. Thomas may have interests that differ from that of our public stockholders, including by reason of his interests held in Operating Partnership units, and may accordingly vote as a stockholder in ways that may not be consistent with the interests of our public stockholders. This significant voting influence over certain matters may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our Company, or could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our Company. Pursuant to the stockholders' agreement with Madison, subject to certain exceptions, during the period from the sixth anniversary of the issuance of shares to Madison's affiliates until the ninth anniversary of such date, Mr. Thomas has agreed to vote (and to cause his affiliated entities to vote) all of his controlled group's shares of common stock and limited voting stock in a manner that is in direct proportion to the manner in which other holders of the common stock vote on a proposed company sale transaction. This vote neutralization provision will not apply, however, if Madison's affiliates no longer beneficially own at least 10.0% of the our total voting securities or if the volume-weighted average price of our common stock is at least $12.50 per share during the six month period prior to the sixth anniversary of the issuance of the shares to Madison's affiliates (or at least $10.00 per share if our common stock has met certain trading volume tests).
Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may deter takeover attempts, which may limit the opportunity of our stockholders to sell their shares at a favorable price.
Some of the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our stockholders by potentially providing them with the opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the then market price. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions which may deter takeover attempts, including the following:
vacancies on our board of directors may only be filled by the remaining directors;
only the board of directors can change the number of directors;
there is no provision for cumulative voting for directors;
directors may only be removed for cause; and
our stockholders are not permitted to act by written consent.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation authorizes the board of directors to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which will be determined at the time of issuance by our board of directors without further action by our stockholders. These terms may include voting rights, including the right to vote as a series on particular matters, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of any preferred stock could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and therefore could reduce the value of our common stock. In addition, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with, or sell assets to, a third party. The ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock could make it more difficult, delay, discourage, prevent or make it more costly to acquire or effect a change in control, thereby preserving the current stockholders' control of our Company.
Finally, we are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any "interested stockholder" for a period of three years following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder.

49


The provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, described above, as well as Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, could discourage potential acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change of control and prevent changes in our management, even if these events would be in the best interests of our stockholders.
We could authorize and issue stock without stockholder approval, which could cause our stock price to decline and which could dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our preferred stock and to set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or unclassified shares. Our board of directors could establish a series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of the series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
The payment of dividends on our common stock is at the discretion of our board of directors and subject to various restrictions and considerations and, consequently, may be changed or discontinued at any time.
Although we historically paid quarterly cash dividends on our common stock after our initial public offering until December 2009, and since December 2011 have resumed paying a quarterly cash dividend, the payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our overall financial condition, and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. There is no guarantee that dividend payments will continue. Without dividend payments, the only opportunity to achieve a positive return on an investment in our common stock is if the market price of our common stock appreciates.

ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.


ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

31.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8212, the following exhibits are being furnished, and are not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document, and are not being incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933.
32.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


50


The following Thomas Properties Group, Inc. financial information for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 , formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):

101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 
___________________




51


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May 9, 2013
 
 
T HOMAS  P ROPERTIES  G ROUP , I NC .
 
 
 
By:
/s/ James A. Thomas        
 
 
James A. Thomas
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Diana M. Laing
 
 
Diana M. Laing
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 



52
Thomas Properties Grp., Inc. (NYSE:TPGI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2024 to Oct 2024 Click Here for more Thomas Properties Grp., Inc. Charts.
Thomas Properties Grp., Inc. (NYSE:TPGI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2023 to Oct 2024 Click Here for more Thomas Properties Grp., Inc. Charts.