UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-11238
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
13-3534162
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
919 Third Avenue
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
10022
(Zip Code)
|
212 551-0600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at November 1, 2009
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share
|
|
8,442,488 shares
|
FORWARDLOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the Companys
operations, economic performance and financial condition, including, in particular, the
likelihood of the Companys success in developing and expanding its business. Any
forward-looking statements concerning the Companys operations, economic performance and
financial condition contained herein, including statements related to the outlook for the
Companys performance in 2009 and beyond, are made under the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon a
number of assumptions and estimates which inherently are subject to uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Some of these
assumptions may not materialize and unanticipated events may occur which could cause
actual results to differ materially from such statements. These include, but are not
limited to, the cyclical nature of the insurance and reinsurance industry, premium rates,
investment results, hedge fund results, the estimation of loss reserves and loss reserve
development, uncertainties associated with asbestos and environmental claims, including
difficulties with assessing latent injuries and the impact of litigation settlements,
bankruptcies and potential legislation, the uncertainty surrounding the losses related to
the attacks of September 11, 2001, and those associated with
catastrophic hurricanes, the occurrence and effects of wars and acts of terrorism, net loss
retention, the effect of competition, the ability to collect reinsurance receivables and
the timing of such collections, the availability and cost of reinsurance, the possibility
that the outcome of any litigation or arbitration proceeding is unfavorable, the ability
to pay dividends, regulatory changes, changes in the ratings assigned to the Company by
rating agencies, failure to retain key personnel, the possibility that our relationship
with Mariner Partners, Inc. could terminate or change, and the fact that ownership of our
common stock is concentrated among a few major stockholders and is subject to the voting
agreement, as well as assumptions underlying any of the foregoing and are generally
expressed with words such as intends, intend, intended, believes, estimates,
expects, anticipates, plans, projects, forecasts, goals, could have, may
have and similar expressions. These risks could cause actual results for the 2009 year
and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statements.
Item 1. Financial Statements
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity at amortized cost (fair value $62,131,620 and $42,329,432)
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
Available for sale at fair value (amortized cost $309,140,914 and
$149,402,001)
|
|
|
318,036,188
|
|
|
|
144,978,426
|
|
Trading at fair value (amortized cost $0 and $22,203,883)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,399,090
|
|
Equity securities trading at fair value (cost $0 and $15,159,200)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,822,620
|
|
Commercial loans at fair value (amortized cost $6,736,458 and $6,907,368)
|
|
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
Limited partnerships at equity (cost $111,648,817 and $98,101,553)
|
|
|
158,798,157
|
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
64,863,945
|
|
|
|
110,249,779
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
67,891,455
|
|
|
|
75,672,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
|
671,081,771
|
|
|
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
3,420,445
|
|
|
|
4,978,920
|
|
Premiums and other receivables, net
|
|
|
28,455,773
|
|
|
|
23,426,525
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed
|
|
|
1,571,664
|
|
|
|
25,415,261
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on unpaid losses, net
|
|
|
207,631,304
|
|
|
|
213,906,569
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on paid losses, net
|
|
|
21,456,640
|
|
|
|
28,429,945
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
17,088,852
|
|
|
|
14,663,710
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
23,087,406
|
|
|
|
19,225,185
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
30,481,581
|
|
|
|
35,514,597
|
|
Property, improvements and equipment, net
|
|
|
13,767,979
|
|
|
|
10,033,489
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,403,093
|
|
|
|
23,895,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,023,446,508
|
|
|
$
|
946,476,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
558,764,963
|
|
|
$
|
548,749,589
|
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
95,541,752
|
|
|
|
83,364,396
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
23,573,807
|
|
|
|
23,809,871
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
5,445,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
749,529
|
|
|
|
671,059
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
32,671,215
|
|
|
|
25,808,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
816,746,966
|
|
|
|
782,403,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
15,776,465
|
|
|
|
15,742,215
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
51,074,740
|
|
|
|
49,539,886
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(18,962,171
|
)
|
|
|
(2,875,317
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
246,847,099
|
|
|
|
189,702,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,736,133
|
|
|
|
252,109,353
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 7,333,977 shares
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
206,699,542
|
|
|
|
164,072,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,023,446,508
|
|
|
$
|
946,476,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
117,676,922
|
|
|
$
|
128,473,249
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
34,320,641
|
|
|
|
(47,539,914
|
)
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
(478,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(478,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
|
|
2,320,323
|
|
|
|
(46,313,522
|
)
|
Commission and other income
|
|
|
3,439,012
|
|
|
|
107,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
157,278,491
|
|
|
|
34,727,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
57,843,159
|
|
|
|
90,971,704
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
26,899,347
|
|
|
|
29,398,298
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
30,876,796
|
|
|
|
28,141,458
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,047,269
|
|
|
|
5,035,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
120,666,571
|
|
|
|
153,547,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
36,611,920
|
|
|
|
(118,819,715
|
)
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
4,712,535
|
|
|
|
(16,064,257
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(357,982
|
)
|
|
|
(18,187,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
4,354,553
|
|
|
|
(34,251,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
32,257,367
|
|
|
$
|
(84,567,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-basic
|
|
|
8,422,448
|
|
|
|
8,582,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
$
|
(9.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
8,624,267
|
|
|
|
8,582,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
$
|
(9.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
38,506,255
|
|
|
$
|
40,476,732
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
14,577,937
|
|
|
|
(39,434,923
|
)
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
|
|
545,780
|
|
|
|
(14,963,262
|
)
|
Commission and other income
|
|
|
3,311,542
|
|
|
|
(31,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
56,941,514
|
|
|
|
(13,953,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
19,831,468
|
|
|
|
28,080,754
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
9,072,957
|
|
|
|
10,053,153
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,398,637
|
|
|
|
9,703,807
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,683,238
|
|
|
|
1,679,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
40,986,300
|
|
|
|
49,517,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
15,955,214
|
|
|
|
(63,470,362
|
)
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
4,353,745
|
|
|
|
(14,631,113
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(2,973,658
|
)
|
|
|
1,234,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,380,087
|
|
|
|
(13,396,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
14,575,127
|
|
|
$
|
(50,073,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-basic
|
|
|
8,431,788
|
|
|
|
8,405,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
8,657,247
|
|
|
|
8,405,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.06
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
32,257,367
|
|
|
$
|
(84,567,868
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred taxes
|
|
|
(357,982
|
)
|
|
|
(18,187,590
|
)
|
Net realized investment (gain) loss
|
|
|
(2,320,323
|
)
|
|
|
46,313,522
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
478,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of limited partnerships
|
|
|
(20,492,356
|
)
|
|
|
13,963,661
|
|
Net amortization from bonds and commercial loans
|
|
|
821,888
|
|
|
|
148,383
|
|
Depreciation and other, net
|
|
|
1,024,857
|
|
|
|
873,335
|
|
Trading portfolio activities
|
|
|
29,217,972
|
|
|
|
59,832,465
|
|
Commercial loan activities
|
|
|
(1,615,100
|
)
|
|
|
1,206,886
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other receivables
|
|
|
(5,029,248
|
)
|
|
|
(21,387,908
|
)
|
Reinsurance receivables paid and unpaid, net
|
|
|
13,248,570
|
|
|
|
33,064,249
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
(236,064
|
)
|
|
|
(4,046,115
|
)
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
1,558,475
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(2,425,142
|
)
|
|
|
(1,403,807
|
)
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
(3,862,221
|
)
|
|
|
(976,777
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,492,809
|
|
|
|
(16,280,516
|
)
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
10,015,374
|
|
|
|
4,202,284
|
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
12,177,356
|
|
|
|
6,474,964
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,862,546
|
|
|
|
(6,183,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
57,559,818
|
|
|
|
97,665,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
89,817,185
|
|
|
|
13,097,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity fixed maturities matured, repaid and redeemed
|
|
|
6,712,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities acquired
|
|
|
(423,889,045
|
)
|
|
|
(159,465,754
|
)
|
Available for sale fixed maturities sold
|
|
|
264,735,655
|
|
|
|
56,849,498
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities matured, repaid and redeemed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,278,880
|
|
Capital contributed to limited partnerships
|
|
|
(27,235,000
|
)
|
|
|
(44,859,990
|
)
|
Distributions and redemptions from limited partnerships
|
|
|
11,856,894
|
|
|
|
60,092,204
|
|
Net sale of short-term investments
|
|
|
45,254,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed and not yet settled
|
|
|
23,843,597
|
|
|
|
6,876,900
|
|
Payable for securities not yet settled
|
|
|
5,445,700
|
|
|
|
4,903,438
|
|
Acquisition of property & equipment, net
|
|
|
(4,759,347
|
)
|
|
|
(5,019,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(98,033,864
|
)
|
|
|
(71,343,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issuance and other
|
|
|
1,569,104
|
|
|
|
1,787,914
|
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(1,133,072
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091,648
|
)
|
Net purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,653,602
|
)
|
Payable for treasury stock purchased and not yet settled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,911,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
436,032
|
|
|
|
(9,868,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash
|
|
|
(7,780,647
|
)
|
|
|
(68,114,951
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
75,672,102
|
|
|
|
204,913,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
67,891,455
|
|
|
$
|
136,798,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
6,501,388
|
|
|
$
|
6,500,055
|
|
Net federal income tax received
|
|
$
|
9,148,020
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
(1) Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are unaudited. In the opinion of
management, all material adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results have
been reflected for such periods. Adjustments to financial statements consist of normal
recurring items. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year. These financial statements and related notes
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
claims and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(ASC 105). ASC 105
identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP. ASC 105 establishes the
FASB Accounting Standards
Codification
(the Codification) as the single source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP. The Codification does not create new accounting and reporting
guidance; rather, it reorganizes U.S. GAAP pronouncements into approximately 90 topics
within a consistent structure. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an
equal level of authority. Relevant portions of authoritative content, issued by the SEC,
for SEC registrants, have been included in the Codification. After the effective date of
ASC 105, all nongrandfathered, literature not included in the Codification is
superseded and deemed nonauthoritative (other than Securities and Exchange guidance for
publicly-traded companies). ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105 has
had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Future adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets
. ASC 715 requires an employer to provide certain disclosures about
plan assets of its defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The
disclosures required include the investment policies and strategies of the plans, the
fair value of the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques
used to develop fair value measurements and a description of significant concentrations
of risk in plan assets. ASC 715 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2009. The adoption of ASC 715 will not have an impact on the Companys operations,
financial position or liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(SFAS 166). (This pronouncement has not been Codified as of the filing of this report,
therefore reference is made to the pre-Codified standard). SFAS 166 amends the
derecognition guidance in Statement 140 and eliminates the concept of qualifying
special-purpose entities (QSPEs). SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2009. Early adoption of SFAS 166 is prohibited. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 166 during the first quarter of 2010 and has not yet
determined the impact adoption will have on its results of operations, financial
position or liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46
(SFAS 167), which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest
entities (VIE). (This pronouncement has not been Codified as of the filing of this
report, therefore reference is made to the pre-Codified standard). An entity would
consolidate a VIE, as the primary beneficiary, when the entity has both of the following
characteristics: (a) The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (b) The obligation to absorb losses of the
entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Ongoing reassessment
of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is required. SFAS 167
amends interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required
for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This Statement is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt SFAS
No. 167 during the first quarter of 2010 and has not yet determined the impact adoption
will have on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
6
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05,
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
. ASU
2009-05 is an amendment of ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
. ASU 2009-05
applies to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value within the scope of ASC
820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
. ASU 2009-05 provides guidance on measuring
the fair value of liabilities under circumstances in which a quoted price in an active
market for the identical liability is not available. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the
first interim or annual reporting period beginning after August 28, 2009. The Company
will adopt ASU 2009-05 during the fourth quarter of 2009 and has determined ASU 2009-05
will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12,
Investments in Certain Entities That
Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
ASU 2009-12 provides guidance
on estimating the fair value of alternative investments when using the net asset value
per share provided by the investment entity. The effective date of ASU 2009-12 is for
interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2009-12 in the fourth quarter
of 2009 and has not yet determined the impact
adoption will have on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
7
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
(2) Investments:
A summary of the Companys investment portfolio components at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (amortized cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
54,877,110
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
154,230,914
|
|
|
|
22.98
|
%
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
16.54
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
108,928,164
|
|
|
|
16.23
|
%
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
318,036,188
|
|
|
|
47.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
144,978,426
|
|
|
|
26.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities trading
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
375,235,770
|
|
|
|
55.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
223,623,728
|
|
|
|
40.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
132,755,400
|
|
|
|
19.78
|
%
|
|
|
185,921,881
|
|
|
|
33.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash
and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
507,991,170
|
|
|
|
75.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
421,368,229
|
|
|
|
77.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
|
158,798,157
|
|
|
|
23.66
|
%
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
|
|
22.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
671,081,771
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, 94.5% of the carrying value of the Companys fixed income and
short-term investment portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P.
Short-term investments, which have maturity of one year or less from the date of
purchase, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company
considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. The Companys investment
in limited partnerships at equity include hedge fund interests in
limited partnerships and limited liability companies.
8
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
Details of the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of September 30, 2009,
including publicly available qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value %
|
|
|
Score
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Level
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Security description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
11,521,788
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,880
|
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
|
Caa1
|
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
7,291,385
|
|
|
|
7,433,475
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
|
Ba3
|
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
7,215,803
|
|
|
|
6,180,018
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
|
|
B2
|
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,227,789
|
|
|
|
7,854,855
|
|
|
|
81.5
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
A-
|
|
|
|
B1
|
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,222,054
|
|
|
|
7,482,223
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
|
A1
|
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
8,713,422
|
|
|
|
9,801,677
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
Ba1
|
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
9,007,341
|
|
|
|
11,732,492
|
|
|
|
76.1
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
AA-
|
|
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
$
|
62,131,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying
loans at October 25, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average original FICO of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at October 25, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60
days delinquent as of October 25, 2009. This includes loans that are in
foreclosure and real estate owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the
overall security structure at October 25, 2009.
|
The Company has investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) amounting
to $57.2 million at September 30, 2009. These securities are classified as held to
maturity after the Company transferred these holdings from the available for sale
portfolio effective October 1, 2008. Upon acquisition of the RMBS portfolio and prior to
October 1, 2008, the Company was uncertain as to the duration for which it would hold
the RMBS portfolio and appropriately classified such securities as available for sale.
As a result of the increasing market uncertainty surrounding the projected cash flows on
these securities, as well as the widely disparate estimated prices of such securities
among brokers depending on facts and assumptions utilized, we developed a process to
perform an extensive analysis of the underlying structure of each RMBS in order to
assure ourselves of its collectability. Accordingly, we constructed cash models to
estimate the potential for impairment to these securities based upon default rates,
severity rates and prepayment speeds consistent with reasonable expectations of their
underlying cash flows. These assumptions were further stressed to provide a range of
potential outcomes allowing us to assess any impairment. After reviewing the results of
the analytical evaluation of the RMBS portfolio, we concluded that the economic or
intrinsic value of these securities was not impaired. Additionally, we concluded, on the
basis of this analysis, that there were no other-than-temporary impairments to these
securities required to be recorded. Accordingly, the Company transferred such securities
to the held to maturity classification as we had the intent and the ability to hold such
securities to maturity. The Company had never previously transferred securities to held
to maturity, but considered this an unprecedented situation brought upon by the
financial crisis in the markets. The adjusted cost basis (amortized
cost) of these securities is based on
a determination of the fair value of these securities on the date they were transferred.
Prior to the transfer to the held to maturity classification, the Company incurred
cumulative write-downs from other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) declines in the
fair value of these securities, amounting to approximately $40.7 million in 2008. The
collection of principal repayments on these securities through September 30, 2009
resulted in approximately $545,000 in realized investment gains and $2.1 million in
reductions in unrealized losses.
The Companys cash flow analysis for each of these securities attempts to estimate the
likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe there are any
OTTI currently, future estimates may change depending upon the actual performance
statistics reported for each security to the Company. This may result in future charges
based upon revised estimates for delinquency rates, severity rates or prepayment
patterns. These changes in estimates may be material. These securities are
collateralized by pools of Alt-A mortgages, and receive priority payments from these
pools. The Companys securities rank senior to subordinated tranches of debt
collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has collected all
applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date. As of October
25, 2009, the levels of subordination ranged from 26% to 51% of the total debt
outstanding for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools ranged
from 29% to 51% of total amounts outstanding. For comparison purposes, in September
2008, delinquencies ranged from 11.3% to 33.1%, while subordination levels have
remained consistent. Delinquency rates are not the same as severity rates, or actual
loss, but are an indication of the potential for losses of some degree in future
periods.
9
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009
and 2008
Under ASC 320, effective April 1, 2009, the Company records any future principal
payments received on its RMBS in excess of its carrying amount as credits to other
comprehensive income instead of recording the excess in the Companys income statement.
Since April 1, 2009, the Company recorded $2.1 million of principal payments received on
its RMBS in excess of its carrying amount as a credit before income taxes to other
comprehensive income.
These RMBS investments, as of December 31, 2008 were rated AAA/Aaa by S&P/Moodys. As of
September 30, 2009, these securities are rated CCC to AAA by S&P and Caa1 to A1 by
Moodys.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is based on the framework established in ASC 820
(See Note 3). Fair value is determined by estimating the price at which an asset might
be sold on the measurement date. There has been a considerable amount of turmoil in the
U.S. housing market since 2007, which has led to market declines in the Companys RMBS
securities. Because the pricing of these investments is complex and has many variables
affecting price including, projected delinquency rates, projected severity rates,
estimated loan to value ratios, vintage year, subordination levels, projected prepayment
speeds and expected rates of return required by prospective purchasers, the estimated
price of such securities will differ among brokers depending on these facts and
assumptions. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, many other
inputs are unobservable and will vary depending upon the broker. During periods of
market dislocation, such as current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to
value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes
less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are
less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods
that are more complex. For example, assumptions regarding projected delinquency and
severity rates have become very pessimistic due to uncertainties associated with the
residential real estate markets. Additionally, there are only a limited number of
prospective purchasers of such securities and such purchasers generally demand high
expected returns in the current market. This has resulted in lower quotes from
securities dealers, who are, themselves, reluctant to position such securities because
of financing uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to establish fair value
may not be reflective of the expected future cash flows from a security and, therefore,
not reflective of its intrinsic value.
As of
September 30, 2009, there was substantial variance in RMBS
securities prices from
different pricing sources. Additionally, to managements
knowledge, there have been very few trades in securities within the Companys RMBS portfolio. This is
consistent with managements previously established view that the market is dislocated
and illiquid. Accordingly, the Company has elected to deviate from quoted prices using
a matrix pricing analysis.
The Company used a weighted pricing matrix to determine fair value. The pricing matrix
was based on risk profile, qualitative and quantitative data for similar vintage RMBS
securities that had recent prices. The securities were evaluated in each of the
following 9 categories: sector, collateral, current S&P rating, current credit support,
3 month CDR, 3 month VPR, 1 month loss severity, 60+ delinquencies, and FICO score. The
price for each RMBS was based upon the prices of those RMBS securities that had the most
similar underlying characteristics to the Companys RMBS portfolio.
There are government sponsored programs that may affect the performance of the Companys
RMBS and the Company is uncertain as to the impact, if any, these programs will have on
their fair value. The fair value of such securities at September 30, 2009 was
approximately $62 million.
As a result of the recent downgrades of such securities and in accordance with applicable
statutory accounting guidance under SSAP 43R, which became effective September 30, 2009, the
Company recorded decreases in the fair value of six of seven of the RMBS securities in its
portfolio, resulting in a decline of $29.6 million before applicable taxes, to the Companys
consolidated statutory surplus, which was approximately $187 million as of September 30, 2009.
10
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities held to maturity and available
for sale at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Cost after
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
In OCI (a)
|
|
|
OTTI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
95,267,425
|
|
|
$
|
(38,067,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
$
|
5,967,823
|
|
|
$
|
(1,035,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
62,131,620
|
|
U.S. Treasury
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
54,368,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,368,401
|
|
|
|
508,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,877,110
|
|
Municipal
obligations
available for sale
|
|
|
152,001,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,001,527
|
|
|
|
2,258,831
|
|
|
|
(29,444
|
)
|
|
|
154,230,914
|
|
Corporate
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
102,770,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,770,986
|
|
|
|
6,157,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,928,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
404,408,339
|
|
|
$
|
(38,067,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
366,340,496
|
|
|
$
|
14,892,541
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
380,167,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,916,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,329,432
|
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
U.S. Treasury
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
38,917,878
|
|
|
|
1,866,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
40,783,969
|
|
Municipal
obligations
available for sale
|
|
|
97,166,677
|
|
|
|
220,718
|
|
|
|
(6,903,934
|
)
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
Corporate
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
13,317,446
|
|
|
|
395,344
|
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
210,648,213
|
|
|
$
|
2,482,153
|
|
|
$
|
(25,822,508
|
)
|
|
$
|
187,307,858
|
|
|
$
|
206,224,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard
promulgated by the FASB (ASC 320), which applies to the Companys investment portfolio.
The Companys total stockholders equity was unchanged by adopting this new accounting
standard. However, retained earnings were increased by an after tax amount of $26.1
million and accumulated comprehensive income was reduced by the same amount. These
changes are attributable to a reclassification in the amount of $40.1 million of
non-credit investment impairment losses previously recognized on the Companys RMBS
holdings that are currently being held to maturity. These securities are categorized as
non-credit based on the Companys impairment analysis. The Company will accrete from OCI
to the amortized cost of the RMBS over their remaining life in a prospective manner on
the basis of the amount and timing of future cash flows. The amount of the accretion
since April 1, 2009 was $2.1 million.
11
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
Net investment income (loss) from each major category of investments for the periods
indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment (loss) income
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
(44.1
|
)
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
(38.2
|
)
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment (loss) income
|
|
$
|
34.3
|
|
|
$
|
(47.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
(39.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details related to investment income (loss) from commercial loans and trading activities
presented in the preceding table are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Interest and dividends earned
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(32.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income (loss) from
commercial loans and trading activities
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
(26.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize all fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss
position at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, disclosing the aggregate fair value
and gross unrealized loss for less than as well as more than 12 months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,180,018
|
|
|
$
|
(1,035,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,180,018
|
|
|
|
(1,035,785
|
)
|
Municipal
obligations
available for sale
|
|
|
13,659,485
|
|
|
|
(29,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,659,485
|
|
|
|
(29,444
|
)
|
Corporate
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily
impaired securities
|
|
$
|
13,659,485
|
|
|
$
|
(29,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,180,018
|
|
|
$
|
(1,035,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,839,503
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
42,329,432
|
|
|
$
|
(18,916,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,329,432
|
|
|
$
|
(18,916,780
|
)
|
Municipal
obligations
available for sale
|
|
|
79,343,141
|
|
|
|
(6,903,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,343,141
|
|
|
|
(6,903,934
|
)
|
Corporate
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
100,068
|
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,068
|
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily
impaired securities
|
|
$
|
121,772,641
|
|
|
$
|
(25,822,508
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,772,641
|
|
|
$
|
(25,822,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the Company was holding four fixed maturity securities that were
in an unrealized loss position. The Company believes these unrealized losses are
temporary, as they resulted from changes in market conditions, including interest rates
or sector spreads, and are not considered to be credit risk related. The Company does
not intend to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell the securities outlined
above.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities that are not included in the
Companys Commercial Loans portfolio at September 30, 2009 are shown below by
contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities,
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call
or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
10,766,782
|
|
|
$
|
10,781,045
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
166,505,980
|
|
|
|
171,247,456
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
112,101,385
|
|
|
|
115,771,088
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
19,766,767
|
|
|
|
20,236,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,140,914
|
|
|
|
318,036,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
|
62,131,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
366,340,496
|
|
|
$
|
380,167,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The components for net realized gains (losses) for the nine months and third quarter
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities gains
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Fixed maturities losses
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Fixed maturities impairments
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
(46.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemptions in investments held to maturity or disposals of investments
available for sale for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were
$271,448,477 and $66,128,378, respectively. Gross gains of $545,363 were realized on
repayments of held to maturity investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Gross gains of $4,284,970 and $85,452 and gross losses of $2,857,388 and $501,569 were
realized on sales, maturities, repayments and/or redemptions of available for sale
investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company recorded declines it considered OTTI in values of investments of $478,407
and $46,025,472 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
Company recorded declines it considered OTTI in values of investments of $0 and $13,629,036 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Under ASC 320 and ASC 958,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
impairment is
considered to be other than temporary if an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2)
more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its
amortized cost basis, or (3) does not expect to recover the securitys entire amortized
cost basis. The OTTI of $478,407 recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
resulted from the Companys intention to sell certain municipal securities under
circumstances in which those securities are not expected to recover their entire
amortized cost prior to sale. Credit impairment occurs under ASC 320 if the present
value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security is less than the
amortized cost basis of the security. There were no credit impairments recorded during
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Substantially all of the
other-than-temporary declines recorded during the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were from the Companys RMBS portfolio. The decision to write down
such securities was based upon the Companys uncertainty at September 30, 2008 that such
securities would be held until the fair value decline recovered.
The Company maintains a portfolio of municipal bonds that has an average S&P rating of
AA. The average S&P rating includes certain municipal bonds that carry the benefit of
insurance that provides credit enhancement. Excluding the benefit of this credit
enhancement, the portfolio of municipal bonds has an average underlying S&P rating of
AA-. The Company purchases municipal bonds with the intent to rely upon the underlying
credit rating of the security exclusive of the credit enhancement provided by any
financial guarantor.
14
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table lists the financial guarantors, as well as the average S&P ratings
and the average underlying S&P ratings, excluding the impact of credit enhancement, of
the guaranteed municipal bonds in our investment portfolio in which there are a total of
22 municipal securities with a fair value of $112.7 million containing credit
enhancements. The Company does not have any investments directly in the following
financial guarantors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
Underlying
|
Financial Guarantors
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
|
AMBAC ST GTD
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
AA-
|
|
AA-
|
FGIC
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AAA
|
FSA & FSA-CR Ambac
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AA
|
Natl-Re
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
AA-
|
|
AA-
|
Natl-Re FGIC
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
A+
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Fair Value Measurements:
The Companys estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are
based on the framework established in ASC 820. The framework is based on the inputs used
in valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and
requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure
of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the significant
inputs into the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in
which the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the
Companys significant market assumptions. The standard describes three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value and categorize the assets and liabilities within
the hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally
provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever
available. Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured
asset/liability: i) many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying
substantially among market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information
publicly available.
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, which are highly
liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level
1. The Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally recognized
pricing service. Prices are obtained from available sources for market transactions
involving identical assets. For the majority of Level 1 investments, the Company
receives quoted market prices from an independent pricing service. The Company validates
primary source prices by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing
services significant inputs are observable.
The Company also compares the prices received from the third party service to other
third party sources to validate the consistency of the prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2
inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding
quotes in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets and other market
observable inputs (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates
and loss severities).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations and corporate debt
securities.
15
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or
security dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining
non-binding broker quotes (when pricing service information is not available) in order
to determine an estimate of fair value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair
value for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant
would be willing to pay in an arms length transaction. Prices from pricing services are
validated by the Company through comparison to prices from corroborating sources and are
validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services
significant inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may conclude
the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not
reasonable or reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not
observable, in which case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information
or quotes received and apply internally developed values to the related assets or
liabilities. In such cases, those valuations would be generally classified as Level 3.
Generally, the Company utilizes an independent pricing service to price its municipal
debt obligations and corporate debt securities. Currently, these securities are
exhibiting low trade volume. The Company considers such investments to be in the Level 2
category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect
the Companys understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS (which are held to maturity) and
commercial loans, as they are illiquid and trade in inactive markets. These markets are
considered inactive as a result of the low level of trades of such investments.
All prices provided by primary pricing sources are reviewed for reasonableness, based on
the Companys understanding of the respective market. Prices may then be determined
using valuation methodologies such as discounted cash flow models, as well as matrix
pricing analyses performed on non-binding quotes from brokers or other market-makers. As
of September 30, 2009, the Company utilized cash flow models, matrix pricing and
non-binding broker quotes obtained from the primary pricing sources to determine the
fair value of its RMBS and commercial loan investments. Because pricing of these
investments is complex and has many variables affecting price including, delinquency
rate, severity rate, loan to value ratios, vintage year, discount rate, subordination
levels and prepayment speeds, the price of such securities will differ by broker
depending on the weight given to the various inputs. While many of the inputs utilized
in pricing are observable, some inputs are unobservable and the weight given these
unobservable inputs will vary depending upon the broker. During periods of market
dislocation, such as the current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to
value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes
less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are
less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods
that are more complex. For example, prepayment speeds, delinquency rates and severity
rates have become increasingly stressed by brokers due to market uncertainty connected
with these types of investments resulting in lower quoted prices. These inputs are used
in pricing models to assist the broker in determining a current price for these
investments. After considering all of the relevant information at September 30, 2009,
the Company adjusted the price received for two commercial loan investments. The Company
considers such investments to be in the Level 3 category because the establishment of
fair valuation is significantly reliant upon unobservable inputs.
The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis for the period ended September 30, 2009, using quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Total at
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
54,877,110
|
|
|
$
|
263,159,078
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
318,036,188
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,877,110
|
|
|
$
|
263,159,078
|
|
|
$
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
$
|
322,328,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments classified as Level 3 in the above table consist of commercial loans,
for which the Company has determined that quoted market prices of similar investments
are not determinative of fair value. Since the broker quotes do not reflect current
market information from actual transactions, the Company has elected to deviate from
quoted prices using a matrix pricing analysis. The following table presents a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for all investments measured at fair
value using Level 3 inputs during the nine months and three months ended September 30,
2009.
16
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
$
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
$
|
4,287,759
|
|
|
$
|
4,287,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains or losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in
net assets)
|
|
|
1,773,037
|
|
|
|
1,773,037
|
|
|
|
42,511
|
|
|
|
42,511
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, maturities, repayments,
redemptions and amortization
|
|
|
(170,910
|
)
|
|
|
(170,910
|
)
|
|
|
(37,826
|
)
|
|
|
(37,826
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
$
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
$
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
$
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no investments classified as Level 3 for the nine months and three month
periods ending September 30, 2008.
The Company elected the fair value option for approximately $8.3 million in commercial
loans upon its adoption of ASC 825 effective January 1, 2008. The ASC 825 adoption did
not have an impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or
liquidity. The Company utilized the fair value election under ASC 825 for all of its
$10.3 million of commercial loan purchases during the first three months of 2008.
Management believes that the use of the ASC 825 fair value option to record commercial
loan purchases was consistent with its trading objective for such investments.
Accordingly, the entire commercial loan portfolio of $4.3 million at September 30, 2009
was recorded at fair value. The amortized cost of the commercial loan portfolio at
September 30, 2009 was $6.7 million. All loans are current with respect to interest
payments. The Company did not utilize the fair value election under ASC 825 for any
investment purchases during the first nine months of 2009.
The changes in the fair value of these debt instruments were recorded in investment
income. Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 reflected no
realized gains or losses from sales and repayments, unrealized losses from fair value
changes of $1,773,037 and interest income earned of $277,865. Investment income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflected realized losses from repayments of
$52,039, unrealized losses from fair value changes of $1,604,201 and interest
income earned of $988,563.
(4) Income Taxes:
The Company files tax returns subject to the tax regulations of federal, state and local
tax authorities. A tax benefit taken in the tax return but not in the financial
statements is known as an unrecognized tax benefit. The Company had no unrecognized
tax benefits at either September 30, 2009 or September 30, 2008. The Companys policy is
to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits to income tax
expense. The Company did not incur any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits for each of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Company is subject to federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for
tax year 2006 and subsequent. The Company had federal, state and local deferred tax
assets amounting to potential future tax benefits of approximately $30.5 million and
$35.5 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As of September
30, 2009, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $11.6 million with respect
to the uncertainty in the realization of capital loss carryforwards. The Company
considered various tax planning strategies to support the recoverability of existing
deferred income taxes for capital loss carryforwards. This included an analysis of the
timing and availability of unrealized positions in the fixed income maturity portfolio.
The Company recorded tax benefits of $5.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 as a result of the partial reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowance
previously provided for capital losses. This resulted from realized and unrealized
capital gains in the investment portfolio during the first nine months of 2009.
Management believes the deferred tax asset, net of the recorded valuation allowance
account, as of September 30, 2009 will more-likely-than-not be fully realized.
17
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
(5) Comprehensive Income
The Companys comparative comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
$
|
(84,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income,
net of deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on
securities, net of deferred tax
expense (benefit) of $5,306,
$(18,175), $2,197 and $(9,183)
|
|
|
9,854
|
|
|
|
(33,753
|
)
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
(17,054
|
)
|
Noncredit component of other than
temporarily impaired securities (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity, net of
deferred tax (benefit) of
$(14,053), $0, $0 and $0
|
|
|
(26,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of noncredit
portion of impairment on
held-to-maturity, net of
deferred tax expense of
$729, $0, $376 and $0
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
: reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for gains (losses) realized in net
income, net of tax expense (benefit)
of 812, $(16,210), $191 and $(5,237)
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
(30,104
|
)
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
(9,726
|
)
|
Less
: reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for impairment (losses) recognized
in net income, net of tax (benefit)
of $(167), $0, $0 and $0
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(16,087
|
)
|
|
|
(3,649
|
)
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
|
|
(7,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
16,170
|
|
|
$
|
(88,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,997
|
|
|
$
|
(57,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
See Note 2 Investments for a discussion of the impact the adoption
of ASC 320 had on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.
|
6) Common Stock Repurchase Plan:
Under the Common Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to $75 million of
the Companys issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. During
the first nine months of 2008, there were 368,900 shares repurchased at a total cost of
approximately $7.7 million. There were no repurchases of the Companys common stock
during the first nine months of 2009.
18
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
(7) Earnings per share:
Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per
share (EPS) computations for each of the periods reported herein are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
8,422
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
$
|
(84,568
|
)
|
|
|
8,583
|
|
|
$
|
(9.85
|
)
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards and
purchased options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
$
|
(84,568
|
)
|
|
|
8,583
|
|
|
$
|
(9.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards and
purchased options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
8,657
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) Share Based Incentive Compensation Plans:
The Company maintains three share-based incentive compensation plans (the Plans) for
employees and directors. A presentation of awards granted under the Plans at September
30, 2009 follows:
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Restricted and Deferred Share Units
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
260,949
|
|
|
$
|
4,503,978
|
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of period
|
|
|
83,300
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,758
|
|
|
$
|
27.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately $2,004,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to restricted and deferred share units, which is expected to
be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1.7
years.
1991, 2002 and 2004 Stock Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
304,950
|
|
|
$
|
15.72
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
159,950
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately $350,000 of unrecognized compensation
cost related to stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1.7 years.
The total compensation cost recognized in results of operations for all share-based
incentive compensation awards was approximately $1,647,000 and $1,803,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The related tax benefit
recognized in results of operations was approximately $577,000 and $631,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Executive Compensation Agreements:
The Company entered into a new employment agreement with A. George Kallop, the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2009 through December 31,
2010 (the Kallop Employment Agreement). Under his new employment agreement, Mr. Kallop
is entitled to an annual base salary of $525,000 and a target annual incentive award of
$393,750. Mr. Kallop also received two grants of 8,000 restricted share units, which
will vest on December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, respectively, provided that he
continues to be employed by the Company on those dates; a long-term incentive award with
maximum, target and threshold awards of 12,000, 6,000 and 3,000 performance units,
respectively, in each of two one-year performance periods beginning on January 1, 2009
and January 1, 2010; and, a supplemental performance compensation award in the amount of
25,000 performance units. Under the long term incentive award, the number of performance
units eligible to be earned for each of these two one-year performance periods is based
on target increases in the market price of the Companys common stock in the applicable
performance period. The supplemental performance compensation award of 25,000 units is
earned if there is a change in control of the Company as defined in the employment
agreement. Mr. Kallops new employment agreement also includes provisions governing
termination for death, disability, cause, without cause and change of control, which
include a severance benefit of one year salary, pro rata annual incentive awards at
target, and accelerated vesting of stock and performance unit grants in the event of his
termination without cause prior to a change of control.
In connection with the Kallop Employment Agreement, the Company entered into a
Performance Share Award Agreement (the Kallop Award Agreement) with Mr. Kallop on the
same date. Under the terms of the Kallop Award Agreement, the aforementioned performance
share units will be earned for each of the two one-year performance periods based on
predetermined market price targets of the daily closing price of the Companys common
stock in each of the requisite performance periods. The performance share units award is
contingent upon the satisfaction of certain market conditions relating to the fair
market value of the Companys common stock. Depending on the performance of the
Companys common stock for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 an award
may be issued up to 12,000 performance share units
per year upon the achievement of certain predetermined share closing price requirements.
The fair value of the performance share award has been estimated as of the initial
grant-date using a Monte Carlo Simulation. The inputs for expected dividends, expected
volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rate used in the calculation of the
grant-date fair value of this award were 1.67%, 79.6%, 3 years and 0.37% for 2009
performance period and 1.67%, 63.4%, 4 years and 0.76% for 2010 performance
period, respectively. Pursuant to the completion of the 2009 and 2010 annual performance
periods, performance shares for each year, will vest on the second anniversary of the
last day of the applicable performance period, provided that the executive is employed
by the Company on that date.
20
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
(9) Nature of Business and Segment Information:
The Companys subsidiaries include three insurance companies and three insurance
agencies. These subsidiaries underwrite commercial insurance in three major lines of
business. The Company considers ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other liability as
appropriate segments for purposes of evaluating the Companys overall performance. A
final segment includes the runoff operations in the aircraft business. The Company
ceased writing any new policies covering common carrier aircraft risks subsequent to
March 31, 2002, although in October 2009 it began to write policies on small, non-common
carrier aircraft. The Company evaluates revenues and income or loss by the
aforementioned segments. Revenues include premiums earned and commission income. Income
or loss includes premiums earned and commission income less the sum of losses incurred
and policy acquisition costs.
The financial information by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
39,756
|
|
|
$
|
22,576
|
|
|
$
|
51,468
|
|
|
$
|
19,920
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
Other liability
|
|
|
74,055
|
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
|
|
72,432
|
|
|
|
(10,227
|
)
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
117,826
|
|
|
|
33,084
|
|
|
|
128,509
|
|
|
|
8,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
34,799
|
|
|
|
34,799
|
|
|
|
(47,540
|
)
|
|
|
(47,540
|
)
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
(46,314
|
)
|
|
|
(46,314
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,877
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,141
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,036
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,278
|
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
$
|
34,728
|
|
|
$
|
(84,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
12,367
|
|
|
$
|
8,684
|
|
|
$
|
15,291
|
|
|
$
|
4,286
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
Other liability
|
|
|
24,811
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
23,864
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
38,593
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
40,468
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
14,578
|
|
|
|
14,578
|
|
|
|
(39,435
|
)
|
|
|
(39,435
|
)
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
(14,963
|
)
|
|
|
(14,963
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,704
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,680
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
56,941
|
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
$
|
(13,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Related Party Transactions:
The Company entered into an investment management agreement with Mariner Partners, Inc.
(Mariner) effective October 1, 2002, which was amended and restated on December 6,
2002. Under the terms of this agreement, Mariner manages the Companys and its
subsidiaries, New York Marine And General Insurance Companys and Gotham Insurance
Companys investment portfolios. Fees to be paid to Mariner are based on a percentage of
the investment portfolios as follows: .20% of liquid assets, .30% of fixed maturity
investments and 1.25% of limited partnership (hedge fund) and equity security
investments. Another of the Companys subsidiaries, Southwest Marine and General
Insurance Company, entered into an investment management agreement, the substantive
terms of which are identical to those set forth above, with a subsidiary of Mariner,
Mariner Investment Group, Inc. (Mariner Group) effective March 1, 2007. William J.
Michaelcheck, a Director of the Company, is the Chairman and the beneficial owner of a
substantial number of shares of Mariner. George R. Trumbull, a Director of the Company,
A. George Kallop, a Director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and William D. Shaw, Jr., Vice Chairman and a Director of the Company, are also
associated with Mariner. Investment fees incurred under the agreements with Mariner were
$1,537,156 and $2,341,012 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
On April 4, 2008, the Company renewed its consulting agreement (the Shaw Consulting
Agreement), effective January 1, 2008, with William D. Shaw, Jr., a member of the
Companys Board of Directors and Vice Chairman, pursuant to which Mr. Shaw provided
certain consulting services to the Company relating to the Companys asset management
strategy including (i) participating in meetings with rating agencies; (ii)
participating in meetings with research analysts; and (iii) certain other investor
relations services. Mr. Shaws compensation under the Consulting Agreement was $100,000
per year, payable in four
equal quarterly payments of $25,000. From January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008, he
was paid $75,000 under the Shaw Consulting Agreement. The Shaw Consulting Agreement
terminated on December 31, 2008 and was not renewed for 2009.
On May 21, 2008, George R. Trumbull stepped down as Chairman of the Board of Directors.
Effective as of that date, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr.
Trumbull, pursuant to which the Trumbull Employment Agreement, which was previously
filed as Exhibit 10.59 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, was novated and the vesting of 5,000 restricted share units granted
to Mr. Trumbull on January 1, 2008, was accelerated to May 21, 2008.
22
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Trumbull, a member of the
Companys Board of Directors, on June 16, 2008 (the Trumbull Consulting Agreement),
which was made effective as of May 21, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement,
Mr. Trumbull performs consulting services in the form of providing assistance to the
Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors as requested in connection with Board
matters and to the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company as he requested
in connection with various issues arising in the Companys operating and risk bearing
subsidiaries. Mr. Trumbulls compensation under the Trumbull Consulting Agreement was
$100,000 per year, payable in four equal quarterly payments of $25,000 each, the first
of which was paid on August 21, 2008. From January 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009,
he was paid $25,000 under the Trumbull Consulting Agreement and is due an additional
$25,000. The Company is also obligated to reimburse Mr. Trumbull for all reasonable and
necessary expenses incurred in connection with the services he provides under the
Trumbull Consulting Agreement. The Trumbull Consulting Agreement is also subject to
termination by Mr. Trumbull or the Company on 30 days prior notice. The Company may
terminate the Trumbull Consulting Agreement at any time in the event Mr. Trumbull ceases
to be a member of the Companys Board of Directors. The agreement automatically
terminates immediately upon the merger or consolidation of the Company into another
corporation; the sale of all or substantially all of its assets; its dissolution and/or
liquidation; or, the death of Mr. Trumbull. On June 9, 2009 the Company renewed the
Trumbull Consulting Agreement for one year, with an effective date of May 21, 2009, but
in lieu of cash compensation for his consulting services, the Company awarded Mr.
Trumbull an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Companys common stock. The exercise
price of the shares subject to the option is $15; the option vests on May 21, 2010, and
expires on May 21, 2012.
On July 8, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year engagement agreement with Robert
G. Simses, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors (the Simses Engagement
Agreement), effective May 21, 2008 through May 21, 2011. Under the terms of the Simses
Engagement Agreement, Mr. Simses is entitled to an annual retainer, payable quarterly,
beginning on August 21, 2008, of not less than $150,000, subject to review for increase
at the discretion of the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors. From
January 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 Mr. Simses was paid $112,500 under the Simses
Engagement Agreement. Mr. Simses is also entitled to receive a grant of 30,000
restricted share units as of the effective date of the agreement. These shares vest
ratably over the term of the agreement, beginning on May 21, 2009. The Simses Engagement
Agreement also provides for reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in the
performance of Mr. Simses duties, and includes provisions governing termination for
death, disability, cause, without cause and change of control, which includes payment
through the end of the term of the agreement and accelerated vesting of stock unit
grants in the event of his termination without cause, for good cause or upon a change of
control. At the conclusion of the first year of the Simses Engagement Agreement the
Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company reviewed its
compensation component and determined not to modify its cash compensation component, but
recommend to the Board of Directors that it award Mr. Simses an option to purchase
10,000 shares of the Companys common stock, which it did effective May 21, 2009. The
exercise price of the shares subject to the option is $15; the option vests on May 21,
2010, and expires on May 21, 2012.
On
September 17, 2009, the Company entered into a Separation,
Release and Consultancy Agreement with Mark Blackman, a director and former
named executive officer who resigned from the Company on
August 11, 2009 (the Blackman Consulting Agreement) pursuant to which Mr. Blackman will
provide continuing services to the Company. The Blackman Consulting Agreement and provides that Mr. Blackmans resignation is
effective as of August 11, 2009. Mr. Blackman will also receive compensation of $50,000 in
2009 and $100,000 in 2010, with such fees to be paid bi-monthly. The Company will pay
Mr. Blackman an amount (expected to be approximately $22,000), equivalent to the
contribution the Company would have made on his behalf to the Companys Profit Sharing
Plan & Trust had Mr. Blackman been employed with the Company on December 31, 2009, pro
rated on the basis of his 2009 salary up to the time of his
resignation and Mr. Blackman
will not forfeit a then-pending award of $16,000 restricted share
units under the Companys Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
In 2003, the Company acquired a 100% interest in a limited partnership hedge fund,
Mariner Tiptree (CDO) Fund I, L.P. (Tiptree), subsequently known as Tricadia CDO Fund,
L.P. (Tricadia) and since June 2008 known as Altrion Capital, L.P. (Altrion).
Altrion was originally established to invest in collateralized debt obligation (CDO)
securities, commercial loan
obligation (CLO) securities, credit related structured (CRS) securities and other
structured products, as well as commercial loans, that are arranged, managed or advised
by a Mariner affiliated company. In 2003, the Company made an investment of $11.0
million in Altrion. Additional investments of $4.65 million, $2.7 million and $6.25
million were made in 2004, in 2005 and 2007, respectively. On August 18, 2006, the
Company entered into an Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, effective
August 1, 2006, with Tricadia Capital, LLC (Tricadia Capital), the general partner,
and the limited partners named therein (the Amended Agreement), to amend and restate
the existing Limited Partnership Agreement of Mariner Tiptree (CDO) Fund I, L.P. entered
into in 2003 (the Original Agreement).
23
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Company was previously committed to providing an additional $15.4 million, or a
total of approximately $40 million, in capital to Altrion by August 1, 2008. Altrion,
however, waived its right to require the Company to contribute its additional capital
commitment of $15.4 million and accordingly, the Companys obligation to make such
capital contribution has expired. In addition, the Company withdrew $10 million of its
capital from Altrion during July 2008. Withdrawals require one years prior written
notice to the hedge fund manager. The Company has submitted a redemption notice to
Altrion for the full value of its capital account, estimated at $41.6 million, which
will be effective December 31, 2009. The Company is uncertain as to whether cash and/or
securities will be received as payment of the redemption proceeds.
Under the provisions of both the Original Agreement and the Amended Agreement, the
Mariner affiliated company was entitled to 50% of the net profit realized upon the sale
of certain investments held by the Company.
Investment expenses incurred under the Amended Agreement for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $0 and $844,387, respectively. These amounts
were based upon the fair value of certain investments held as of September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, as well as certain investments sold during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The limited partnership agreements also
provide for other fees payable to the manager based upon the operations of the hedge
fund. There were no other fees incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Company is the only limited partner in Altrion and reports its
investment using the equity method of accounting. The amounts reported in the balance
sheet caption Limited partnerships related to Altrion at September 30, 2009 and 2008
were $41.6 million and $35.5 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company held approximately $93.0 million in limited
partnership and limited liability company interests in hedge funds, which are directly
or indirectly managed by Mariner.
(11) Subsequent Event:
The Company has evaluated events subsequent to September 30, 2009, and through the
consolidated financial statement issuance date of November 6, 2009 and has determined no
events require adjustment or disclosure.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Description of Business
NYMAGIC, INC., a New York corporation (the Company or NYMAGIC), is a holding
company which owns and operates insurance companies, risk bearing entities and
insurance underwriters and managers.
Insurance Companies:
New York Marine And General Insurance Company (New York Marine)
Gotham Insurance Company (Gotham)
Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest Marine)
Insurance Underwriters and Managers:
Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (MMO)
Pacific Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (PMMO)
Mutual Marine Office of the Midwest, Inc. (Midwest)
New York Marine and Gotham each currently holds a financial strength rating of A
(Excellent) and Southwest Marine currently holds a financial strength rating of A-
(Excellent) and an issuer credit rating of a- from A.M. Best Company. These are the
third and fourth highest of fifteen rating levels in A.M. Bests classification system.
The Companys insureds rely on ratings issued by rating agencies. Any adverse change in
the ratings assigned to New York Marine, Gotham or Southwest Marine may adversely
impact their ability to write premiums.
The Company specializes in underwriting ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other
liability insurance through insurance pools managed by the Companys insurance
underwriters and managers, MMO, PMMO and Midwest (collectively referred to as MMO).
The original members of the pools were insurance companies that were not affiliated
with the Company. Subsequently, New York Marine and Gotham joined the pools. Over the
years, New York Marine and Gotham steadily increased their participation in the pools,
while the unaffiliated insurance companies reduced their participation or withdrew from
the pools entirely. Since January 1, 1997, New York Marine and Gotham have been the
only members of the pools, and therefore we now write 100% of all of the business
produced by the pools.
In prior years, the Company issued policies covering aircraft insurance; however, the
Company ceased writing any new policies covering common carrier aircraft risks as of
March 31, 2002. The Company decided to exit the commercial common carrier aviation
insurance business, because it is highly competitive, generated underwriting losses
during the 1990s and is highly dependent on the purchase of substantial amounts of
reinsurance, which became increasingly expensive after the events of September 11,
2001. This decision has enabled the Company to concentrate on its core lines of
business, which include ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other liability. The
Company, however, in October 2009 began to write policies on small non-common carrier
aircraft.
In 2005, the Company formed Arizona Marine And General Insurance Company, which was
renamed Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest Marine) in July
2006, as a wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Arizona. Its application to the
State of Arizona Department of Insurance for authority to write commercial property and
casualty insurance in Arizona was approved in May 2006. Southwest Marine writes, among
other lines of insurance, excess and surplus lines in New York.
In 2008 the Company acquired a book of professional liability business oriented to
insurance brokers and agents and also formed MMO Agencies, which focuses on generating
additional premium growth through a network of general agents with binding authority
subject to underwriting criteria established and monitored by MMO.
Results of Operations
The Company reported net income for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $14.6
million, or $1.68 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $(50.1) million, or
$(5.96) per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2008. The increase in results of
operations for the third quarter of 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008 was
primarily attributable to stronger investment results from trading activities and
limited partnership income, lower other-than-temporary write-downs, a lower combined
ratio derived from lower catastrophe losses and deferred tax valuation allowance
decreases resulting from the utilization of capital loss carryforwards.
25
The Company reported net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $32.3
million, or $3.74 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $(84.6) million, or
$(9.85) per diluted share, for the same period in 2008.
The increase in results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 when
compared to the same period of 2008 was primarily attributable to stronger investment
results from trading activities and limited partnership income, lower
other-than-temporary write-downs, a lower combined ratio derived from lower catastrophe
losses and deferred tax valuation allowance decreases resulting from the utilization of
capital loss carryforwards.
Shareholders equity increased to $206.7 million as of September 30, 2009 from $164.1
million as of December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to net income
for the period and increases in unrealized appreciation of fixed maturities held for
sale.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in shareholders equity as of
September 30, 2009 decreased by $(16.1) million to $(19.0) million from $(2.9) million
as of December 31, 2008. This includes $(26.1) million attributable to the
reclassification from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) of non-credit investment impairment losses previously recognized in net income
on the Companys RMBS holdings as a result of the adoption of ASC 320 on April 1, 2009.
The adoption of ASC 320 had no impact on total shareholders equity. The change in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), offsetting the effect of adopting ASC
320, was primarily due to unrealized appreciation in corporate bonds and municipal
bonds held as available for sale.
The Companys gross premiums written, net premiums written and net premiums earned
decreased by 4%, 6% and 8%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
when compared to the same period of 2008.
Premiums for each segment were as follows:
NYMAGIC Gross Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
61,414
|
|
|
$
|
68,933
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
$
|
16,814
|
|
|
$
|
23,375
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
12,685
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
90,161
|
|
|
|
93,035
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
28,121
|
|
|
|
27,993
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
167,325
|
|
|
|
174,653
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
49,393
|
|
|
|
55,514
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
167,403
|
|
|
$
|
174,680
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
49,462
|
|
|
$
|
55,484
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
41,664
|
|
|
$
|
49,338
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
$
|
11,727
|
|
|
$
|
15,594
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
79,210
|
|
|
|
80,790
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
24,470
|
|
|
|
23,080
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
126,055
|
|
|
|
133,953
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
37,602
|
|
|
|
39,844
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
125,992
|
|
|
$
|
133,971
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
37,688
|
|
|
$
|
39,767
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Earned By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
39,689
|
|
|
$
|
51,433
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
$
|
12,264
|
|
|
$
|
15,300
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
73,973
|
|
|
|
72,431
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
24,827
|
|
|
|
23,864
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
117,740
|
|
|
|
128,454
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
38,420
|
|
|
|
40,554
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
117,677
|
|
|
$
|
128,473
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
38,506
|
|
|
$
|
40,477
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean marine gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by 11% and primarily reflected reduced volume in the cargo class. The first
nine months of 2008 included $7.6 million in gross cargo premiums arising from one of
the Companys program management agreements, which was terminated at the end of 2007.
This compared to $(0.3) million in gross cargo premiums recorded during the same period
of 2009. Increases were recorded in other ocean marine classes largely due to
additional production in the marine liability class and firmer rates in the energy
class that were partially offset by declining production in hull business.
Ocean marine net premiums written and net premiums earned for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 decreased by 16% and 23% respectively, when compared to the same
period of 2008. Net written and earned premiums for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 largely reflected the decline in gross cargo premiums written over the past year.
There were no reinsurance reinstatement costs arising from catastrophe losses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. This compares to reinsurance reinstatement costs
of $1.7 million resulting from hurricane Ike for the same period of 2008.
Ocean marine gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by 28%, primarily reflecting a decline in gross cargo premiums arising from
one of the Companys program management agreements which was terminated at the end of
2007. The third quarter of 2009 reflected $(0.1) million of such gross cargo premiums
as compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2008. Decreased production occurred
in the other marine classes largely as a result of declining rates and competitive
markets. Net written and earned premiums for three months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by 25% and 20%, respectively, largely reflected the decline in gross cargo
premiums written which, was partially offset by reinsurance reinstatement costs of $1.7
million resulting from hurricane Ike.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company maintained its $5 million per risk net loss
retention in the ocean marine line that was in existence during 2008. In addition, the
Companys net retention could be as low as $1 million for certain classes within ocean
marine. The 80% quota share reinsurance protection for energy business, which commenced
in 2006, also remains in effect for 2009 and the net retention from losses arising from
energy business is subject to inclusion within the ocean marine reinsurance program.
Inland marine/fire gross premiums written and net premiums written increased by 24% and
35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 when compared to the same period of
2008. Net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by
11%. Gross premiums written in the first nine months of 2009 reflected increases in
production largely relating to property risks written on a nationwide basis. Premiums
reflected mildly lower market rates when compared to the prior year. The decrease in
net premiums earned reflected lower premium production from the prior year.
Inland marine/fire gross premiums written and net premiums written increased by 8% and
20% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 when compared to the same period of
2008. Net premiums earned for the three months ended September 30, 2009 declined 4%
when compared to the same period in 2008. Gross premiums written for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 reflect increases in production largely relating
to surety risks. Partially offsetting this increase were declines in production in
inland marine business largely resulting from mild rate decreases. The increase in net
premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2009 resulted from a change
in gross premiums mix which resulted in lower premium cessions to reinsurers. Surety
premiums are written net of reinsurance. Net premiums earned reflected declines in
premium production from the prior year, which was offset mostly by current year
increases in production largely relating to property risks written on a nationwide
basis.
27
Other liability gross premiums written and net premiums written decreased 3% and 2%,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 when compared to the same
period in 2008. Net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
increased by 2% when compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in premiums
written is primarily due to declines in excess workers compensation, contractors
liability and commercial auto premiums that resulted from lower production largely as a
consequence of reduced construction and commercial activities. Partially offsetting the
decrease in gross premiums in 2009 were $7.8 million in premiums written from MMO
Agencies which was formed in 2008 to write premiums through a network of general agents
with binding authority subject to underwriting criteria established and monitored by
the Company.
Other liability gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2009
were flat when compared to the same period in 2008. Net premiums written and net
premiums earned increased 6% and 4%, respectively, for the three months ended September
30, 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in net premiums written
is largely attributable to premiums from MMO Agencies that were partially offset by
declines in premiums from contractors liability. Net premiums earned increased largely
as a result of a change in mix of gross premiums in the various classes within other
liability.
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned
(the loss ratio) was 51.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to
69.4% for the same period of 2008. The loss ratio was 49.2% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to 70.8% for the same period in 2008. The lower loss
ratios in 2009 were partly attributable to lower current accident year loss ratios in
the ocean marine and other liability lines of business and partly attributable to
larger amounts of favorable loss reserve development. The ocean marine loss ratio
benefited in part from lower catastrophe losses reported in 2009 as well as the
non-renewal of certain unprofitable hull business. Losses incurred from hurricanes
Gustav and Ike amounted to $7.2 million, and added 15.7% and 5.1% to the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 loss ratios, respectively. The lower other liability
loss ratio was due in part to lower loss estimates used for contractors liability
business. The inland marine/fire segment loss ratio was lower in the current year due
to lower reported catastrophe losses. The larger loss ratio in 2008 in the other
liability class was primarily attributable to the resolution of a dispute over
reinsurance receivables with a reinsurer as well as a reevaluation of the provision for
doubtful reinsurance receivables that resulted in additional losses of $12.4 million,
and added 9.6% to nine months ended 2008 overall loss ratio. The decision to resolve a
dispute regarding non-core reinsurance receivables and adjust our allowance for other
potentially uncollectable non-core reinsurance receivables was related to reinsurance
cessions made under a number of reinsurance contracts written from 1978 to 1986.
The Company reported favorable development of prior year loss reserves of $13.2 million
and $3.9 million during the first nine months and third quarter of 2009, respectively,
as a result of favorable reported loss trends arising from the ocean marine and other
liability lines of business in 2009, including the favorable resolution of large
severity claims and lower than expected emergence of claims. In addition, partially
contributing to the favorable loss development in 2009 was approximately $2.3 million
and $0.2 million in the nine months and third quarter ended September 30, respectively,
in favorable loss development in the aviation line.
The Company reported adverse development of prior year loss reserves of $7.2 million
and favorable development of prior year loss reserves of $1.9 million during the first
nine months and third quarter of 2008, respectively. The second quarter resolution of a
dispute over reinsurance receivables with a reinsurer and the reevaluation of the
reserve for doubtful reinsurance receivables in 2008 contributed $12.4 million of
adverse development in the first nine months of 2008. Partially offsetting this was
favorable development as a result of lower reported loss trends arising from the inland
marine and ocean marine lines of business. The aviation line of business contributed
$600,000 of adverse loss development in the first nine months of 2008.
Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums earned (the acquisition cost
ratio) for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 23.6% and 24.8%,
respectively. The acquisition cost ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 were 22.9% and 22.9%, respectively. The lower acquisition cost ratio for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 is due largely to the third quarter of 2008 ocean
marine acquisition cost ratio being adversely impacted by the reinstatement premium
charges from hurricane Ike. The acquisition cost ratio for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was flat with the same period of 2008. A change in premium mix in
the other liability segment whose underlying classes of business have higher
acquisition cost ratios than other lines of business was offset by a lower ocean marine
ratio which benefited from lower reinstatement premium charges in 2009.
General and administrative expenses increased by 9.7% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008. Larger expenses were
incurred in 2009 to service the expansion of the Companys business operations,
including increased staffing for MMO Agencies as well as computer system
implementation expenditures.
28
The Companys combined ratio (the loss ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and general
and administrative expenses divided by net premiums earned) was 102.1% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 118.2% for the same period in 2008. The
Companys combined ratio was 98.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to 115.6% for the same period in 2008.
Interest expense of $5.0 million and $1.7 million for the nine and three months ended
September 30, 2009 was comparable to the same periods of 2008.
Net investment income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $34.3
million as compared to $(47.5) million for the same period of 2008. Net investment
income in 2009 reflected increases in income from trading, limited partnerships and
commercial loan portfolios. Trading portfolio income of $4.5 million resulted primarily
from the fair value changes in municipal obligations. The net investment (loss) for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflected trading portfolio losses and losses from
limited partnerships. Trading portfolio losses of $(37.2) million resulted primarily
from the fair value changes in municipal obligations $(1.1) million, preferred stocks
$(28.3) million, economic hedged positions $(1.1) million and exchange traded funds
$(6.7) million. Income from commercial loans of $2.1 million resulted primarily from
the tightening of credit spreads in the market for these types of securities during
2009. Limited partnership income for the first nine months of 2009 increased from the
same period of the prior year as a result of higher returns amounting to 14.6% as
compared to (8.0)% for the same period of 2008. For the first nine months of 2009,
fixed income hedge fund returns were mainly derived from G-7 government arbitrage
strategies which reported higher returns than the prior years
comparable period. Included in limited partnership income was $7.7 million and $2.9 million for the first
nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, from our investment in Altrion.
Net investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $14.6 million
as compared to $(39.4) million for the same period of 2008. Net investment income in
2009 reflected increases in income from trading and limited partnerships portfolios.
Trading portfolio income of $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
resulted primarily from the fair value changes in municipal obligations. The net
investment loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008 reflected losses from
trading and limited partnerships portfolios. Trading portfolio losses of $(25.8)
million resulted primarily from the fair value changes in municipal obligations $(0.8)
million, preferred stocks $(23.8) million, economic hedged positions $0.6 million and
exchange traded funds $(1.8) million. Limited partnership income (loss) of $11.3
million in the third quarter of 2009 increased from $(14.6) million in the prior years
third quarter as a result of higher returns amounting to 7.0% as compared to (8.4)% for
the same period of 2008. For the third quarter of 2009, fixed income hedge fund returns
from G-7 government arbitrage strategies reported higher returns than the prior years
comparable period. Income from our investment in Altrion was $4.7 million and $0.3
million for the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Investment income (loss), net of investment fees, from each major category of
investments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment (loss) income
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
(44.1
|
)
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
(38.2
|
)
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment (loss) income
|
|
$
|
34.3
|
|
|
$
|
(47.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
(39.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, investments in limited partnerships amounted to
approximately $158.8 million and $159.1 million, respectively. The equity method of
accounting is used to account for the Companys limited partnership hedge fund
investments. Under the equity method, the Company records all changes in the underlying
value of the limited partnership hedge fund to results of operations.
As of September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 investments in the trading and
commercial loan portfolios collectively amounted to approximately $4.3 million and
$55.1 million, respectively. Net investment income (loss) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 reflected approximately $6.6 million and $(37.9) million,
respectively, derived from combined trading portfolio and commercial loan activities
before investment expenses. These activities primarily include the trading of
commercial loans, municipal obligations, preferred stocks and exchange traded funds.
The Companys trading and commercial loan portfolios are marked to market with the
change recognized in net investment income during the current period. Any realized
gains or losses resulting from the sales of trading and commercial loan investments are
also recognized in net investment income.
The Companys investment income results may be volatile depending upon the level of
limited partnerships, commercial loans and trading portfolio investments held. If the
Company continues to increase its percentage of its investment portfolio in limited
partnership hedge funds, and/or if the fair value of trading and/or commercial loan
investments held varies significantly during different periods, there may also be a
greater volatility associated with the Companys investment income.
Commission and other income increased to $3.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from $108,000 for the same period in the prior year. The increase
was attributable to the Companys receipt of $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2009
as beneficiary of a life insurance policy on a former director.
Net realized investment gains were $0.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 as compared to net realized investment losses of $(15.0) million for the same
period in the prior year. Net realized investment gains were $2.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to net realized investment losses of
$(46.3) million for the same period in the prior year. Net realized investment gains in
2009 primarily reflect gains from the sales of municipal bonds and U.S. Treasury
securities. Net realized investment losses for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 include OTTI in the fair value of securities amounting to $13.6
million and $46.0 million, respectively. The OTTI in 2008 was primarily attributable to
the decline in the fair value of the Companys RMBS portfolio. The decision to write
down such securities as of September 30, 2008 was based upon the possibility then that
we might not hold such securities until their fair value decline was recovered.
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings of $(0.5) million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 resulted from write-downs from OTTI in the fair value of securities.
The OTTI recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was attributable to
the Companys intention to sell certain municipal securities that were not expected to
recover their entire amortized cost prior to sale.
Total income tax expense (benefit) amounted to $1.4 million and $(13.4) million,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Total income tax expense or benefit as a percentage of income or (loss) before taxes
was 8.6% and (21.1%) for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Total income tax expense (benefit) amounted to $4.4 million and $(34.3)
million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Total income tax expense or benefit as a percentage of income or (loss)
before taxes was 11.9% and (28.8%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The lower percentages in 2009 were largely attributable to tax
benefits of $2.7 million and $5.9 million for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, as a result of the partial reversal of the deferred
tax valuation allowance previously provided for capital losses. Further contributing to
the lower percentage in 2009 was greater investment income from tax exempt municipal
bonds. For each of the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company reported deferred tax valuation allowance increases of $9.5 million for capital
loss carryforwards.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and total investments increased from $547.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $671.1
million at September 30, 2009, principally as a result of the fair value increases of
its investments and favorable cash flows from operations. The level of cash and
short-term investments of $132.8 million at September 30, 2009 reflected the Companys
high liquidity position.
30
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $89.8 million and $13.1 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Trading portfolio and
commercial loan activities of $27.6 million and $61.0 million favorably affected cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Trading
portfolio activities include the purchase and sale of preferred stocks, municipal bonds
and exchange traded
funds. Commercial loan activities include the fair value changes and purchase and sale
of middle market loans made by commercial companies. As the Companys trading and
commercial loan portfolio balances may fluctuate significantly from period to period,
cash flows from operating activities may also be significantly impacted by such
activities. Contributing to an increase in operating cash flows, other than trading and
commercial loan activities, during the first nine months of 2009 were the collection of
premiums and reinsurance recoverable balances and lower amounts of paid losses.
Contributing to a decrease in operating cash flows, other than trading and commercial
loan activities, for the first nine months of 2008 were the payment of both gross
losses in the ocean marine line of business and asbestos and environmental losses,
substantially all of which were reinsured.
Cash flows used in investing activities were $98.0 million and $71.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The cash flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 were adversely impacted by the net purchase of
fixed maturity available for sale investments. This resulted primarily from the sale of
selected municipal securities, U.S. Treasury securities and net sale of short-term
investments of $45.3 million undertaken to further reposition the Companys holdings
into corporate bonds. The cash flows for 2008 were adversely impacted by net purchases
of fixed maturity available for sale investments.
Cash flows provided by financing activities were $436,000 and cash flows used in
financing activities were $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. In 2009, cash inflows from the proceeds, including tax benefits, of
stock issuances were partially offset by cash dividends. In 2008, a substantial portion
of the use of cash flows was attributable to the repurchase of the Companys common
stock.
On September 17, 2009, the Company declared a dividend of six (6) cents per share to
shareholders of record on September 30, 2009, payable on October 6, 2009. On May 21,
2009, the Company declared a dividend of four (4) cents per share to shareholders of
record on June 30, 2009, payable on July 7, 2009. On March 6, 2009, the Company
declared a dividend to shareholders of four (4) cents per share payable on April 7,
2009 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2009. On September 9, 2008, the Company
declared a dividend of eight (8) cents per share to shareholders of record on September
30, 2008, payable on October 7, 2008. On May 21, 2008, the Company declared a dividend
of eight (8) cents per share to shareholders of record on June 30, 2008, payable on
July 8, 2008. On March 5, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of eight (8) cents per
share to shareholders of record on March 31, 2008, payable on April 3, 2008. The
reduction in dividend amount from prior quarters reflected the Companys cautious
economic outlook.
New York
Marine and Gotham declared $5.0 million and $2.2 million in ordinary dividends during the first nine months of 2009. New York Marine and Gotham did not declare any ordinary dividends to the Company during
the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Under the NYMAGIC, INC. Amended and Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
LTIP), the Company granted 8,000 restricted share units, and up to 49,000 performance
share units and 100,000 stock options to the President and Chief Executive Officer
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The market price per share and option
price per share on the grant date of the stock options were $9.88 and $15.00 per share,
respectively. The Company also granted 30,000 stock options to certain directors. The
market price per share equaled the option price per share on the grant date of the
stock options which ranged from $12.41 to $15.00 per share, respectively.
Under the LTIP, the Company granted 61,500 restricted share units (RSUs) to the
Chairman of the Board of Directors and other officers and employees of the Company with
an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $1,380,000 during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
Under the NYMAGIC, INC. non-qualified 2002 Stock Option Plan, 10,000 stock options were
awarded to a Director during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Under the Common Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to $75 million of
the Companys issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. During
the first nine months of 2008, there were 368,900 shares repurchased at a total cost of
approximately $7.7 million. There were no repurchases of the Companys common stock
during the first nine months of 2009.
Premiums and other receivables, net increased to $28.5 million as of September 30, 2009
from $23.4 million as of December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of excess workers
compensation gross writings, which are substantially written during the first half of
the calendar year.
31
Deferred income taxes at September 30, 2009 decreased to $30.5 million from $35.5
million at December 31, 2008, primarily due to reductions in deferred tax benefits
arising from the increase in the fair value of investments in addition to a reduction
of $5.9 million in the valuation allowance account. Management believes the Companys
total deferred tax asset, net of the recorded valuation allowance account, as of
September 30, 2009 will more-likely-than-not be fully realized.
Reserve for unearned premiums increased to $95.5 million as of September 30, 2009 from
$83.4 million as of December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of excess workers
compensation gross writings, which are substantially written during the first half of
the calendar year.
Reinsurance receivables on paid balances, net at September 30, 2009, decreased to $21.5
million from $28.4 million at December 31, 2008 largely as a result of the collection
of reinsurance balances on gross losses paid on prior year hurricane claims.
Property, improvements and equipment, net at September 30, 2009, increased to $13.8
million from $10.0 million at December 31, 2008 largely as a result of capitalized
expenditures relating to information technology infrastructure initiatives.
Other liabilities at September 30, 2009 increased to $32.7 million from $25.8 million
at December 31, 2008 primarily due to the amounts owed to the MMO insurance pools.
Other assets at September 30, 2009 decreased to $5.4 million from $23.9 million at
December 31, 2008 primarily due to cash received on federal income taxes recoverable
and the receipt as beneficiary of proceeds of a life insurance policy on a former
director.
32
Investments
A summary of the Companys investment portfolio components at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (amortized
cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
54,877,110
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
154,230,914
|
|
|
|
22.98
|
%
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
16.54
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
108,928,164
|
|
|
|
16.23
|
%
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
318,036,188
|
|
|
|
47.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
144,978,426
|
|
|
|
26.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities trading
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
375,235,770
|
|
|
|
55.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
223,623,728
|
|
|
|
40.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
132,755,400
|
|
|
|
19.78
|
%
|
|
|
185,921,881
|
|
|
|
33.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash
and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
507,991,170
|
|
|
|
75.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
421,368,229
|
|
|
|
77.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
|
4,292,444
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
|
158,798,157
|
|
|
|
23.66
|
%
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
|
|
22.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
671,081,771
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, 94.5% of the carrying value of the Companys fixed income and
short-term investment portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P.
33
Details of the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of September 30,
2009, including publicly available qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value %
|
|
|
Score
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Level
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
Moodys
|
Security description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
11,521,788
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,880
|
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
Caa1
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
7,291,385
|
|
|
|
7,433,475
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
Ba3
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
7,215,803
|
|
|
|
6,180,018
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
B2
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,227,789
|
|
|
|
7,854,855
|
|
|
|
81.5
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
A-
|
|
B1
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,222,054
|
|
|
|
7,482,223
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
A1
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
8,713,422
|
|
|
|
9,801,677
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
B
|
|
Ba1
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
9,007,341
|
|
|
|
11,732,492
|
|
|
|
76.1
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
AA-
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,199,582
|
|
|
$
|
62,131,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying loans at October 25, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average original FICO of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at October 25, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60 days delinquent as of October 25, 2009. This includes loans that are in foreclosure and real
estate owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the overall security structure at October 25, 2009.
|
The Company has investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)
amounting to $57.2 million at September 30, 2009. These securities are classified as
held to maturity after the Company transferred these holdings from the available for
sale portfolio effective October 1, 2008. Upon acquisition of the RMBS portfolio and
prior to October 1, 2008, the Company was uncertain as to the duration for which it
would hold the RMBS portfolio and appropriately classified such securities as available
for sale. As a result of the increasing market uncertainty surrounding the projected
cash flows on these securities, as well as the widely disparate estimated prices of
such securities among brokers depending on facts and assumptions utilized, we developed
a process to perform an extensive analysis of the underlying structure of each RMBS in
order to assure ourselves of its collectability. Accordingly, we constructed cash
models to estimate the potential for impairment to these securities based upon default
rates, severity rates and prepayment speeds consistent with reasonable expectations of
their underlying cash flows. These assumptions were further stressed to provide a range
of potential outcomes allowing us to assess any impairment. After reviewing the results
of the analytical evaluation of the RMBS portfolio, we concluded that the economic or
intrinsic value of these securities was not impaired. Additionally, we concluded, on
the basis of this analysis, that there were no other-than-temporary impairments to
these securities required to be recorded. Accordingly, the Company transferred such
securities to the held to maturity classification as we had the intent and the ability
to hold such securities to maturity. The Company had never previously transferred
securities to held to maturity, but considered this an unprecedented situation brought
upon by the financial crisis in the markets. The adjusted cost basis of these
securities is based on a determination of the fair value of these securities on the
date they were transferred.
Prior to the transfer to the held to maturity classification, the Company incurred
cumulative write-downs from other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) declines in the
fair value of these securities, amounting to approximately $40.7 million in 2008. The
collection of principal repayments on these securities through September 30, 2009
resulted in approximately $545,000 in realized investment gains and $2.1 million in
reductions in unrealized losses.
The Companys cash flow analysis for each of these securities attempts to estimate the
likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe there are any
OTTI currently, future estimates may change depending upon the actual performance
statistics reported for each security to the Company. This may result in future
charges based upon revised estimates for delinquency rates, severity rates or
prepayment patterns. These changes in estimates may be material. These securities are
collateralized by pools of Alt-A mortgages, and receive priority
payments from these pools. The Companys securities rank senior to subordinated
tranches of debt collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has
collected all applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date.
As of October 25, 2009, the levels of subordination ranged from 26% to 51% of the total
debt outstanding for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools
ranged from 29% to 51% of total amounts outstanding. For comparison purposes, in
September 2008, delinquencies ranged from 11.3% to 33.1%, while subordination
levels have remained consistent. Delinquency rates are not the same as severity rates,
or actual loss, but are an indication of the potential for losses of some degree in
future periods.
34
Under ASC 320, effective April 1, 2009, the Company will record any future principal
payments received on its RMBS in excess of its carrying amount as credits to other
comprehensive income instead of recording the excess in the Companys income statement.
Since April 1, 2009, the Company recorded $2.1 million of principal payments received
on its RMBS in excess of its carrying amount as a credit before income taxes to other
comprehensive income.
These RMBS investments, as of December 31, 2008 were rated AAA/Aaa by S&P/Moodys. As
of September 30, 2009, these securities are rated CCC to AAA by S&P and Caa1 to A1 by
Moodys.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is based on the framework established in ASC 820
(See Note 4). Fair value is determined by estimating the price at which an asset might
be sold on the measurement date. There has been a considerable amount of turmoil in
the U.S. housing market since 2007, which has led to market declines in the Companys
RMBS securities. Because the pricing of these investments is complex and has many
variables affecting price including, projected delinquency rates, projected severity
rates, estimated loan to value ratios, vintage year, subordination levels, projected
prepayment speeds and expected rates of return required by prospective purchasers, the
estimated price of such securities will differ among brokers depending on these facts
and assumptions. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, many
other inputs are unobservable and will vary depending upon the broker. During periods
of market dislocation, such as current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult
to value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data
becomes less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions
that are less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as
valuation methods that are more complex. For example, assumptions regarding projected
delinquency and severity rates have become very pessimistic due to uncertainties
associated with the residential real estate markets. Additionally, there are only a
limited number of prospective purchasers of such securities and such purchasers
generally demand high expected returns in the current market. This has resulted in
lower quotes from securities dealers, who are, themselves, reluctant to position such
securities because of financing uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to
establish fair value may not be reflective of the expected future cash flows from a
security and, therefore, not reflective of its intrinsic value.
As of
September 30, 2009, there was substantial variance in RMBS
Securities prices from
different pricing sources. Additionally, to managements
knowledge, there have been very few trades in securities within the Companys RMBS portfolio. This is
consistent with managements previously established view that the market is dislocated
and illiquid. Accordingly, the Company has elected to deviate from quoted prices using
a matrix pricing analysis.
The Company used a weighted pricing matrix to determine fair value. The pricing matrix
was based on risk profile, qualitative and quantitative data for similar vintage RMBS
securities that had recent prices. The securities were evaluated in each of the
following 9 categories: sector, collateral, current S&P rating, current credit support,
3 month CDR, 3 month VPR, 1 month loss severity, 60+ delinquencies, and FICO score.
The price for each RMBS was based upon the prices of those RMBS securities that had the
most similar underlying characteristics to the Companys RMBS portfolio.
There are government sponsored programs that may affect the performance of the
Companys RMBS and the Company is uncertain as to the impact, if
any, these programs
will have on their fair value. The fair value of such securities at
September 30, 2009 was approximately $62 million.
Fair value measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820, which establishes a consistent
framework for measuring fair value. The framework is based on the inputs used in
valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and
requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The
disclosure of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the
significant inputs into the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the
hierarchy in which the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs that reflect the Companys significant market assumptions. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value and categorize
the assets and liabilities within the hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally
provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever
available. Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured
asset/liability: i) many
transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among
market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available.
35
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities and preferred
stock, which are highly liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level
1. The Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally
recognized pricing service. Prices are obtained from available sources for market
transactions involving identical assets. For the majority of Level 1 investments, the
Company receives quoted market prices from an independent pricing service. The Company
validates primary source prices by back testing to trade data to confirm that the
pricing services significant inputs are observable. The Company also compares the
prices received from the third party service to other third party sources to validate
the consistency of the prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that
are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full
term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs
include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding quotes
in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets and other market
observable inputs (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates
and loss severities).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations and corporate debt
securities.
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or
security dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining
non-binding broker quotes (when pricing service information is not available) in order
to determine an estimate of fair value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair
value for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market
participant would be willing to pay in an arms length transaction. Prices from pricing
services are validated by the Company through comparison to prices from corroborating
sources and are validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing
services significant inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may
conclude the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers
are not reasonable or reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not
observable, in which case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing
information or quotes received and apply internally developed values to the related
assets or liabilities. In such cases, those valuations would be generally classified as
Level 3. Generally, the Company utilizes an independent pricing service to price its
municipal debt obligations and corporate debt securities. Currently, these securities
are exhibiting low trade volume. The Company considers such investments to be in the
Level 2 category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect
the Companys understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS and commercial loans, as they are
illiquid and trade in inactive markets. These markets are considered inactive as a
result of the low level of trades of such investments.
All prices provided by primary pricing sources are reviewed for reasonableness, based
on the Companys understanding of the respective market. Prices may then be determined
using valuation methodologies such as discounted cash flow models, as well as matrix
pricing analyses performed on non-binding quotes from brokers or other market-makers.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company utilized cash flow models, matrix pricing and
non-binding broker quotes obtained from the primary pricing sources to evaluate the
fair value of its RMBS and commercial loan investments. Because pricing of these
investments is complex and has many variables affecting price including, delinquency
rate, severity rate, loan to value ratios, vintage year, discount rate, subordination
levels and prepayment speeds, the price of such securities will differ by broker
depending on the weight given to the various inputs. While many of the inputs utilized
in pricing are observable, some inputs are unobservable and the weight given these
unobservable inputs will vary depending upon the broker. During periods of market
dislocation, such as the current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to
value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes
less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are
less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods
that are more complex. For example, prepayment speeds, delinquency rates and severity
rates have become increasingly stressed by brokers due to market uncertainty connected
with these types of investments resulting in lower quoted prices. These inputs are used
in pricing models to assist the broker in determining a current price for these
investments. After considering all of the relevant information at September 30, 2009,
the Company adjusted the price received for two of its commercial loan investments. The
Company considers such investments to be in the Level 3 category, because the
establishment of fair valuation is significantly reliant upon unobservable inputs.
The Company maintains cash and short-term investments of $132.8 million at September
30, 2009, which is more than adequate to meet its immediate liquidity requirements.
36
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for each segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
151,840
|
|
|
$
|
97,434
|
|
|
$
|
169,478
|
|
|
$
|
101,830
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
|
|
21,057
|
|
|
|
8,971
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
265,420
|
|
|
|
222,152
|
|
|
|
239,026
|
|
|
|
197,658
|
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
120,139
|
|
|
|
24,725
|
|
|
|
119,189
|
|
|
|
26,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
558,765
|
|
|
$
|
351,134
|
|
|
$
|
548,750
|
|
|
$
|
334,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our long tail business is primarily in ocean marine liability, aircraft and non-marine
liability insurance. These classes historically have extended periods of time between
the occurrence of an insurable event, reporting the claim to the Company and final
settlement. In such cases, we estimate reserves, with the possibility of making several
adjustments, because of emerging differences in actual versus expected loss
development, which may result from shock losses (large losses), changes in loss payout
patterns and material adjustments to case reserves due to adverse or favorable judicial
or arbitral results during this time period.
By contrast, other classes of insurance that we write, such as property, which includes
certain ocean marine classes (hull and cargo) and our inland marine/fire segment, and
claims-made non-marine liability, historically have had shorter periods of time between
the occurrence of an insurable event, reporting of the claim to the Company and final
settlement. The reserves for these classes are estimated as described above, but these
reserves are less likely to be readjusted, because it is not likely that they will have
significant differences resulting from expected loss development, shock or large
losses, changes in loss payout patterns and material adjustments to case reserves over
their short tails.
As the Company increases its production in its other liability lines of business, its
reported loss reserves from period to period may vary depending upon the long tail,
short tail and product mix within this segment. Our professional liability class, for
example, is written on a claims-made basis, but other sources of recent production, such
as excess workers compensation, are derived from liability classes written on an
occurrence basis. Therefore, the overall level of loss reserves reported by the Company
at the end of any reporting period may vary as a function of the level of writings
achieved in each of these classes.
The process of establishing reserves for claims involves uncertainties and requires the
use of informed estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments may be revised as
claims develop and as additional experience and other data become available and are
reviewed, as new or improved methodologies are developed or as current laws change. The
Company realized $13.2 million in favorable development for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as a result of favorable reported loss trends arising from the ocean
marine, inland marine/fire and other liability lines of business. In addition the
runoff aircraft class also reported $2.3 million of favorable development for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. The Company recorded losses in 2008 from its exposure
to offshore oil rigs, cargo interests and property as a result of hurricanes Gustav and
Ike. The ultimate gross and net losses resulting from these catastrophes, as well as
the reinsurance recoveries attributable to them and applicable reinstatement premium
costs, are based upon the Companys best estimate derived from an evaluation of claims
notices received and a review of historic loss development. The low frequency and high
severity of the risks we insure make it difficult to assess the adequacy of such loss
reserves. As such, the Companys ultimate liability may change from the amount provided
currently. If these reserves or reinstatement premium costs are insufficient to cover
our actual losses and loss adjustment expenses, we would have to augment our
liabilities and incur a charge to our earnings. These charges could be material. Other
than specifically disclosed herein, there were no significant changes in assumptions
made in the evaluation of loss reserves during 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
37
Critical Accounting Policies
Management considers certain accounting policies to be critical with respect to the
understanding of the Companys financial statements. Such policies require significant
management judgment and the resulting estimates have a material effect on reported
results and will vary to the extent that future events affect such estimates and cause
them to differ from the estimates provided currently. These critical accounting
policies include unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, allowance for doubtful
accounts, impairment of investments, limited partnerships and trading portfolios,
reinstatement reinsurance premiums and stock compensation.
The Company maintains reserves for the future payment of losses and loss adjustment
expenses with respect to both case (reported) and IBNR (incurred but not reported)
losses under insurance policies issued by the Company. IBNR losses are those losses,
based upon historical experience, industry loss data and underwriter expectations, that
the Company estimates will be reported under these policies. Case loss reserves are
determined by evaluating reported claims on the basis of the type of loss involved,
knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the claim and the policy provisions relating
to the type of loss. Case reserves can be difficult to estimate depending upon the
class of business, claim complexity, judicial interpretations and legislative changes
that affect the estimation process. Case reserves are reviewed and monitored on a
regular basis, which may result in changes (favorable or unfavorable) to the initial
estimate until the claim is ultimately paid and settled. Unpaid losses with respect to
asbestos/environmental risks are difficult for management to estimate and require
considerable judgment due to the uncertainty regarding the significant issues
surrounding such claims. Unpaid losses with respect to catastrophe losses, such as
hurricanes Katrina and Rita that occurred in 2005 and hurricanes Ike and Gustav in
2008, are also difficult to estimate due to the high severity of the risks we insure.
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses amounted to $558.8 million and $548.7
million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Unpaid losses and
loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance amounted to $351.1 million and $334.8
million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Management
continually reviews and updates the estimates for unpaid losses, and any changes
resulting therefrom are reflected in operating results currently. The potential for
future adverse or favorable loss development is highly uncertain and subject to a
variety of factors including, but not limited to, court decisions, legislative actions
and inflation.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on managements review of amounts due from
insolvent or financially impaired companies. Allowances are estimated for both premium
receivables and reinsurance receivables. Management continually reviews and updates
such estimates for any changes in the financial status of companies. The allowance for
doubtful accounts for both premiums and reinsurance receivables amounted to $18.1
million and $21.7 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The decrease in the allowance was primarily the result of the settlement of disputed
balances with reinsurers and the reevaluation of the remaining reserve for doubtful
accounts.
Impairment of investments, included in realized investment gains or losses, results
from declines in the fair value of investments which are considered by management to be
other-than-temporary. Management reviews investments for impairment based upon specific
criteria that include the duration and extent of declines in fair value of the security
below its cost or amortized cost. The Company performs a qualitative and quantitative
review of all securities in a loss position in order to determine if any impairment is
considered to be other-than-temporary. The Company also reviews all securities with any
rating agency declines during the reporting period. This review includes considering
the effect of rising interest rates, credit losses and the Companys intent to sell
impaired securities in the foreseeable future to recoup any losses. In addition to
subjecting its securities to the objective tests of percent declines in fair value and
downgrades by major rating agencies, when it determines whether declines in the fair
value of its securities are other-than-temporary, the Company also considers the facts
and circumstances that may have caused the declines in the value of such securities. As
to any specific security, it may consider general market conditions, changes in
interest rates, adverse changes in the regulatory environment of the issuer, the
duration for which the Company expects to hold the security and the length of any
forecasted recovery. Approximately $0.5 million and $32.4 million were charged to
results from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, resulting from fair value declines considered to be other-than-temporary.
Gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity investments available for sale
amounted to approximately $8.9 million and $0, respectively, at September 30, 2009.
Gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity investments available for sale
amounted to approximately $2.5 million and $(6.9) million, respectively, at December
31, 2008. The Company believes the unrealized losses are temporary and result from
changes in market conditions, including interest rates or sector spreads.
The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting to account for its limited
partnership hedge fund investments. Under the equity method, the Company records all
changes in the underlying value of the limited partnership to net investment income in
results of operations. Net investment income (loss) derived from investments in limited
partnerships amounted to $20.5 million and $(14.0) million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. See Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
with respect to market risks associated with investments in limited partnership hedge
funds.
38
The Company maintained commercial loan portfolio at September 30, 2009. As of December
31, 2008, the Company maintained both commercial loan and trading portfolios consisting
of municipal obligations and commercial loans. These investments are marked to market
with the change recognized in net investment income during the current period. Any
realized gains or losses resulting from the sales of such securities are also
recognized in net investment income. The Company recorded
$6.6 million and $(37.9)
million in combined net trading portfolio and commercial loan portfolio income (loss)
before expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
See Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk with respect to
market risks associated with investments in illiquid investments.
Reinsurance reinstatement premiums are recorded, as a result of losses incurred by the
Company, in accordance with the provisions of our reinsurance contracts. Upon the
occurrence of a large severity or catastrophe loss, the Company may be obligated to pay
additional reinstatement premiums under its excess of loss reinsurance treaties up to
the amount of the original premium paid under such treaties. Reinsurance reinstatement
premiums incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0 and
$2.1 million, respectively.
Total stock compensation cost recognized in earnings for all share-based incentive
compensation awards was approximately $1.6 million and $1.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820, which establishes a consistent
framework for measuring fair value. The framework is based on the inputs used in
valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and
requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The
disclosure of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the
significant inputs into the valuation are observable. For an updated discussion of the
application of estimates and assumptions around the valuation of investments, see Fair
value measurements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The investment portfolio has exposure to market risks, which include the effect on the
investment portfolio of adverse changes in interest rates, credit quality, hedge fund
values, and illiquid securities including commercial loans and residential
mortgage-backed securities. Interest rate risk includes the changes in the fair value
of fixed maturities based upon changes in interest rates. Credit quality risk includes
the risk of default by issuers of debt securities. Hedge fund risk includes the
potential loss from the diminution in the value of the underlying investment of the
hedge fund. Illiquid securities risk includes exposure to the private placement market
including its lack of liquidity and volatility in changes in market prices. The only
significant change to the Companys exposure to market risks during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to those disclosed in the Companys financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 related to the interest rate and credit
risk associated with an increase in the level of fixed income investments relating to
corporate and municipal bonds and an increase in the amount of limited partnerships.
The Company increased its investments in municipal obligations and corporate bonds from
$121.6 million as of December 31, 2008 to $263.2 million as of September 30, 2009. This
resulted primarily from the sale of selected longer duration municipal securities and
U.S. Treasury securities undertaken to further reposition the Companys holdings into
investment grade mid term duration corporate and municipal securities. The Company
seeks to mitigate interest risk of its investment portfolio by properly matching the
duration of its assets and liabilities. The Company also seeks to mitigate credit risk
associated with its portfolio by investing in a diversified portfolio of investment
grade securities.
Hedge fund investments are subject to various economic and market risks. The risks
associated with hedge fund investments may be substantially greater than the risks
associated with fixed income investments. Consequently, our hedge fund portfolio may be
more volatile, and the risk of loss greater, than that associated with fixed income
investments. In accordance with the investment policy for each of the Companys New
York insurance company subsidiaries, hedge fund investments are limited to the greater
of 30% of invested assets or 50% of policyholders surplus. The Companys Arizona
insurance subsidiary does not invest in hedge funds.
The Company also seeks to mitigate market risk associated with its investments in hedge
funds by maintaining a diversified portfolio of hedge fund investments. Diversification
is achieved through the use of many investment managers employing a variety of
different investment strategies in determining the underlying characteristics of their
hedge funds. The Company is dependent upon these managers to obtain market prices for
the underlying investments of the hedge funds. Some of these investments may be
difficult to value and actual values may differ from reported amounts. The hedge funds
in which we invest usually impose limitations on the timing of withdrawals from the
hedge funds (most are within 90 days), and may affect our liquidity.
39
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report was made
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this
evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported and (b)
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) that
occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We rely on our computer equipment, software and technical personnel to accumulate data
in order to quote new and existing business, record loss reserves, pay claims and
maintain historical statistical information. Any disruption of this process would
affect many aspects of our business. Computer risks include hardware failures,
software defects, incompatibility of related systems, improper inputs from technical
and operational personnel, and functional obsolescence due to the rapid advance of
technology and the expanding needs of our business to remain competitive. The
Companys previous date to implement a new computer system was during 2009. As a
result of system modifications, the Company intends to implement a new computer system
in 2010. In the event that such systems are not deemed to be adequate to conduct the
Companys business, the Company may incur substantial write off charges.
There were no other material changes in the risk factors disclosed in the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
41
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Charter of NYMAGIC, INC. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2003 (File No.
1-11238) and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. (Filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999 (Commission File No. 1-11238) and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Separation Release and Consultancy
Agreement, effective September 17, 2009, between Mark W. Blackman
and NYMAGIC, INC. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K (file No. 1-11238) filed on September 23,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of A. George Kallop, Chief Executive Officer, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief Financial Officer, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification of A. George Kallop, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief Financial Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009
|
/s/ A. George Kallop
|
|
|
A. George Kallop
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009
|
/s/ Thomas J. Iacopelli
|
|
|
Thomas J. Iacopelli
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
42
Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024