false
0001495825
N-CSRS
0001495825
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:RisksAndOtherConsiderationsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:BelowInvestmentGradeSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CorporateBondRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ShortSalesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
us-gaap:CreditRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CurrentFixedIncomeAndDebtMarketConditionsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
us-gaap:InterestRateRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:LeverageRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:LiquidityRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ManagementRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MarketRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MunicipalSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:BuildAmericaBondsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:SpecialRisksRelatedToCertainMunicipalSecuritiesMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:TaxableMinicipalSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:DebtInstumentsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MunicipalConduitBondRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ProjectFinanceRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:RisksOfInvestingInDebtIssuedByNonProfitInstitutionsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:SeniorLoansRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:StructuredFinanceInvestmentsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:AssetBackedSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MortgageBackedSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CLOCDOAndCBORiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:InvestmentFundsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
xbrli:pure
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22437
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investment Grade Debt Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
227 West Monroe, Chicago, IL, 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Amy J. Lee
227 West Monroe, Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area
code: (312) 827-0100
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: June 1, 2023 –
November 30, 2023
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
The registrant's annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant
to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), is as follows:
Guggenheim Funds Semiannual Report
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt
Trust
|
|
GuggenheimInvestments.com |
CEF-GBAB-SAR-1123 |
GUGGENHEIMINVESTMENTS.COM/GBAB
... YOUR LINK TO THE LATEST, MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ABOUT
THE GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST
The shareholder report you are reading right now is just the beginning
of the story.
Online at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab, you will find:
• Daily, weekly and monthly data on share prices, net asset
values, distributions and more
• Monthly portfolio overviews and performance analyses
• Announcements, press releases and special notices
• Trust and adviser contact information
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC and Guggenheim Funds
Investment Advisors, LLC are continually updating and expanding shareholder information services on the Trust’s website in an ongoing
effort to provide you with the most current information about how your Trust’s assets are managed and the results of our efforts.
It is just one more small way we are working to keep you better informed about your investment in the Trust.
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
We thank you for your investment in the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). This report covers the Trust’s performance for the six-month period
ended November 30, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”).
To learn more about the Trust’s performance and investment
strategy, we encourage you to read the Economic and Market Overview and the Management’s Discussion of Trust Performance, which
begin on page 5.There you will find information on Guggenheim’s investment philosophy, views on the economy and market environment,
and information about the factors that impacted the Trust’s performance during the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current
income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation.
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value
(“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 0.74% and a total return based on NAV of -0.08%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s
market price of $15.65 per share represented a premium of 2.76% to its NAV of $15.23 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV
returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time, and it may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution
of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.64% based on the Trust’s closing
market price of $15.65 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount
of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change. There is no guarantee of any future distribution
or that the current returns and distribution rate will be maintained. Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution
Rate table on page 25, and Note 2(g) on page 62 for more information on distributions for the period.
We encourage shareholders to consider the opportunity to
reinvest their distributions from the Trust through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”), which is described on page
86 of this report. When shares trade at a discount to NAV, the DRIP takes advantage of the discount by reinvesting the monthly
dividend distribution in common shares of the Trust purchased in the market at a price less than NAV. Conversely, when the market
price of the Trust’s common shares is at a premium above NAV, the DRIP reinvests participants’ dividends in newly issued
common shares at the greater of NAV per share or 95% of the market price per share. The DRIP provides a cost-effective means to
accumulate additional shares and enjoy the benefits of compounding returns over time. The DRIP effectively provides an income
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 3
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
averaging technique for shareholders to accumulate a larger number
of Trust shares when the market price is depressed than when the price is higher.
We appreciate your investment and look forward to serving your
investment needs in the future. For the most up-to-date information on your investment, please visit the Trust’s website at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Sincerely,
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt
Trust
December 31, 2023
4 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
ECONOMIC AND MARKET OVERVIEW (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
With an influx of softer data on economic activity and
inflation coupled with worsening survey results and anecdotal reports, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) has
continued to shift in a dovish direction as it becomes more cautious about downside risk to the economy than the upside risk to
inflation. The Fed held rates steady at its December 2023 meeting, and in their Summary of Economic Projections, Fed officials
signaled the possibility for 75 basis points of rate cuts in 2024, up from their prior estimate of 50 basis points of cuts. More
importantly, Chair Powell acknowledged that discussion on when to cut rates was beginning, opening the possibility for rate cuts in
as soon as the next few months.
The Fed’s pivot to a dovish stance is unequivocally market
friendly in our view and led rates lower, equity markets to new highs, and credit spreads to their tightest levels since before the hiking
cycle began. The decline in U.S. Treasury yields across the board is fueling a bit of an unexpected improvement in markets, spanning both
risk and government-backed assets. Spreads continued to tighten in asset-backed securities as well, and November 2023 was the best month
for Agency mortgage-backed securities since the 1980s.
Looking forward, we believe investment-grade corporate bond spread
tightening could slow somewhat. Meanwhile, we continue to keep an eye on areas where fundamental trends fail to corroborate the broad
risk-on sentiment, like in the office real estate sector which is struggling from structural demand shifts and the financing environment.
In short, the unexpected improvement, while good news for investors after a challenging year, is predicated on the Fed cutting rates just
in time to reverse the pressure that tightening is actively putting on the most sensitive sectors and consumers. To get more cuts projected
from here, we believe that we will need to see more evidence that the economy is going to slow further.
The opinions and forecasts expressed may not actually come
to pass. This information is subject to change at any time, based on market and other conditions, and should not be construed as a recommendation
of any specific security or strategy.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 5
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
MANAGEMENT TEAM
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC serves as the investment
adviser to Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust is managed by a team
of seasoned professionals at Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM”).
This team includes Anne B. Walsh, CFA, JD, Managing Partner,
Chief Investment Officer of GPIM and Portfolio Manager; Steven H. Brown, CFA, Chief Investment Officer - Fixed Income, Senior
Managing
Director, and Portfolio Manager; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director
and Portfolio Manager; Adam J. Bloch, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; and Evan L. Serdensky, Managing Director and Portfolio
Manager.
Discuss the Trust’s return and return of comparative Indices
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value
(“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 0.74% and a total return based on NAV of -0.08%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s
market price of $15.65 per share represented a premium of 2.76% to its NAV of $15.23 per share. At the beginning of the Reporting Period,
the Trust’s market price of $16.32 per share represented a premium of 1.94% to its NAV of $16.01 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV
returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time and maybe higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
Please refer to the graphs and tables included within the Trust
Summary, beginning on page 22 for additional information about the Trust’s performance.
The returns for the Reporting Period of indices tracking performance
of the asset classes to which the Trust allocates the largest of its investments were:
Index* |
Total Return |
|
Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
2.29 |
% |
Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index |
-1.21 |
% |
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
-0.80 |
% |
Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index |
5.52 |
% |
Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index |
6.98 |
% |
ICE Bank of America Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index |
2.19 |
% |
ICE Bank of America Build America Bond Index |
-1.49 |
% |
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index |
10.17 |
% |
*See page 10 for Index definitions |
|
|
6 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Discuss the Trust’s distributions
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution
of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.64% based on the Trust’s closing
market price of $15.65 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The distributions paid consisted of (i) investment company taxable
income taxed as ordinary income, which includes, among other things, short-term capital gain and income from certain hedging and interest
rate transactions, and (ii) return of capital.
There is no guarantee of any future distribution or that the current
returns and distribution rate will be maintained. The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions,
when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change.
Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution
Rate table on page 25, and Note 2(g) on page 62 for more information on distributions for the period.
Payable Date |
|
Amount |
June 30, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
July 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
August 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
September 29, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
October 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
November 30, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
Total |
$ |
0.75438 |
What factors contributed or detracted from the Trust’s
Performance during the Reporting Period?
The Reporting Period was marked by a move tighter in spreads
and a bear steepening of the U.S. Treasury curve. Earned income was the largest contributor to performance. Also, credit spreads
positively contributed as the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Bond Index and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond
Index spreads tightened by 34 basis points and 89 basis points, respectively. Duration detracted from performance as the yield curve
bear steepened, meaning yields at the long end of the curve rose more than those at the front end, with yields on 2-year and 30-year
Treasurys finishing 28 basis points and 63 basis points higher, respectively, at the end of the Reporting Period.
Discuss the Trust’s Use of Leverage
At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s leverage
was approximately 28% of Managed Assets, compared with about 26% at the beginning of the Reporting Period. The increase in leverage is
largely due to the increased income opportunity that presented itself as rates rose to cycle-highs.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The Trust currently employs financial leverage through reverse
repurchase agreements with five counterparties.
One purpose of leverage is to fund the purchase of additional securities
that may provide increased income and potentially greater appreciation to common shareholders than could be achieved from an unlevered
portfolio. Leverage may result in greater NAV volatility and entails more downside risk than an unleveraged portfolio.
Given negative total returns over the Reporting Period, leverage
detracted from performance.
Investments in Investment Funds (as defined below in the
Risks and Other Considerations section which begins on page 11) frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial
leverage and the associated risks, such as the magnified effect of any losses.
How did the Trust use derivatives during the Reporting Period?
The Trust had minimal exposure to derivatives during the Reporting
Period. The Trust held foreign currency forwards to hedge non-USD denominated bond holdings, which detracted a negligible amount as the
dollar marginally depreciated against the Canadian dollar, the euro, and the pound. The Trust utilized credit default swaps to hedge broader
credit risks, though this position was nearly unchanged and only modestly detracted during the period. Lastly, the Trust employed curve
caps to hedge against moves in the yield curve; the performance from these positions over the Reporting Period was negligible.
How was the Trust positioned at the end of the Reporting Period?
As we near the end of 2023, we have come through a period of
unprecedented volatility that has left a wide range of possible outcomes going forward. We are coming off multiple years of poor
returns across fixed income, particularly for longer-duration, high-quality investments. But the past may not resemble the future,
and the worst drawdown for an asset class can prove to be a very attractive entry point for prudent investors as the end of the
Fed’s aggressive rate hiking cycle may provide respite.
We believe the next major policy moves are likely to provide
strong tailwinds for fixed income. We continue to expect elevated volatility in the economy and markets, as well as a policy
response to these conditions. This argues for the importance of diversification in asset allocation and within portfolios. The
heightened probability of a recession over the next 6-12 months as indicated by our models continues to guide our more defensive and
conservative positioning within the Trust, prioritizing quality (which takes multiple forms, including focusing on industry market
leaders, more conservatively positioned balance sheets, stronger credit stipulations, and more creditor-friendly structures) and
industries that may be more resilient to economic downturns.
8 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Though the recent decrease in interest rates and tightening
of credit spreads have likely pulled forward some of the expected future total return potential of parts of fixed income, we still
view the go-forward valuation proposition of fixed income as attractive at current levels and sourceable income levels in high
quality credit as historically high relative to recent history. Our portfolio strategy has remained consistent throughout 2023. This
means continuing to upgrade the credit profile of our portfolios and to seek strong income generation and the potential for capital
appreciation. We have grown our exposure in high quality sectors, particularly in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
(“RMBS”) and in structured credit investments such as non-Agency RMBS, senior tranches of collateralized loan
obligations, and commercial asset-backed securities.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 9
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Index Definitions
Indices are unmanaged and reflect no expenses. It is not possible
to invest directly in an index.
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is considered representative
of the broad market for investment grade, tax-exempt municipal bonds with a maturity of at least one year.
The Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index tracks performance
of investment-grade fixed income securities issued by state and local governments whose income is not exempt from tax, issued generally
to finance a project or activity that does not meet certain “public purpose/use” requirements.
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based
flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including U.S. Treasuries,
government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities or “MBS” (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage, or “ARM”, pass-throughs), asset-backed securities (“ABS”), and commercial mortgage-backed securities
(“CMBS”) (agency and non-agency).
The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index measures
the U.S. dollar-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating
of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB +/BB + or below.
The Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index is an index designed
to mirror the investable universe of the U.S.-dollar-denominated leveraged loan market.
The ICE Bank of America Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA
Index is a subset of the ICE Bank of America U.S. Fixed Rate Asset Backed Securities Index including all securities rated AA1 through
BBB3, inclusive.
The ICE Bank of America Build America Bond Index is designed
to track the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated Build America Bonds publicly issued by U.S. states and territories, and their political
subdivisions, in the U.S. market.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”)
Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure the performance of the broad economy, representing all
major industries and is considered a representation of U.S. stock market.
10 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Risks and Other Considerations
Investors should be aware that in light of the current uncertainty,
volatility and state of economies, financial markets, geopolitical tensions, and labor and public health conditions around the world,
the risks below are heightened significantly compared to normal conditions and therefore subject the Trust’s investments and a
shareholder’s investment in the Trust to reduced yield and/or income and sudden and substantial losses.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio
managers only through the report period as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time, based on market and other
conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation of any kind. The material may also include forward looking statements that
involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass.
There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its
investment objectives. The net asset and market values of the Trust’s shares will fluctuate, sometimes independently, based on
market and other factors affecting the Trust and its investments. The market value of Trust shares will either be above (premium) or
below (discount) their net asset value. Although the net asset value of Trust shares is often considered in determining whether to
purchase or sell Trust shares, whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Trust shares will depend upon whether
the market price of Trust shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price. Market value movements
of Trust shares are thus material to investors and may result in losses, even when net asset value has increased. The Trust is
designed for long-term investors; investors should not view the Trust as a vehicle for trading purposes.
Risk is inherent in all investing, including the loss of your entire
principal. Therefore, before investing you should consider the risks carefully. The Trust is subject to various risk factors, including
investment risk, which could result in the loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Certain of these risk factors are described
below. Please see the Trust’s Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information (SAI), most recent annual report and guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab
for a more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust. Shareholders may access the Trust’s Prospectus, SAI and
most recent annual report on the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
The fact that a particular risk below is not specifically identified
as being heightened under current conditions does not mean that the risk is not greater than under normal conditions.
Below Investment Grade Securities Risk. High yield,
below investment grade and unrated high risk debt securities (which also may be known as “junk bonds”) may present
additional risks because these securities may be less liquid, and therefore more difficult to value accurately and sell at an
advantageous price or time, and present more credit risk than investment grade bonds. The price of high yield securities tends to be
subject to greater volatility due to issuer-specific operating results
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
and outlook and to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive
industry conditions. This exposure may be obtained through investments in other investment companies. Generally, the risks associated
with high yield securities are heightened during times of weakening economic conditions or rising interest rates.
Corporate Bond Risk. Corporate bonds are debt
obligations issued by corporations and other business entities. Corporate bonds may be either secured or unsecured. Collateral used
for secured debt includes real property, machinery, equipment, accounts receivable, stocks, bonds or notes. If a bond is unsecured,
it is known as a debenture. Bondholders, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common and preferred stockholders as to both
income and assets of the corporation for the principal and interest due them and may have a prior claim over other creditors if
liens or mortgages are involved. Interest on corporate bonds may be fixed or floating, or the bonds may be zero coupons. Interest on
corporate bonds is typically paid semi-annually and is fully taxable to the bondholder. Corporate bonds contain elements of both
interest-rate risk and credit risk and are subject to the risks associated with other debt securities, among other risks. The market
value of a corporate bond generally may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates and may also be affected by the
credit rating of the corporation, the corporation’s performance and perceptions of the corporation in the marketplace.
Depending on the nature of the seniority provisions, a senior corporate bond may be junior to other credit securities of the issuer.
The market value of a corporate bond may be affected by factors directly related to the issuer, such as investors’ perceptions
of the creditworthiness of the issuer, the issuer’s financial performance, perceptions of the issuer in the marketplace,
performance of management of the issuer, the issuer’s capital structure and use of financial leverage and demand for the
issuer’s goods and services. There is a risk that the issuers of corporate bonds may not be able to meet their obligations on
interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument. Corporate bonds of below investment grade quality are often
high risk and have speculative characteristics and may be particularly susceptible to adverse issuer-specific developments.
Short Sales Risk. The Trust may make short sales of securities.
A short sale is a transaction in which the Trust sells a borrowed security. If the price of the security sold short increases between
the time of the short sale and the time the Trust replaces the borrowed security, the Trust will incur a loss. Although the Trust’s
gain is limited to the price at which it sold the security short, its potential loss is theoretically unlimited.
Credit Risk. The Trust could lose money if the issuer or
guarantor of a debt instrument or a counterparty to a derivatives transaction or other transaction is unable or unwilling, or perceived
to be unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal on time or defaults. This risk is heightened in market environments where
interest rates are changing. The risk that such issuer, guarantor or counterparty is less willing or able to do so is heightened in market
environments where interest rates are rising. Also, the issuer, guarantor or counterparty may suffer adverse changes in its financial
condition or be adversely affected by economic, political or social conditions that could lower the credit quality (or the market’s
perception of the credit quality) of the issuer or instrument, leading to
12 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
greater volatility in the price of the instrument and in
shares of the Trust. Although credit quality may not accurately reflect the true credit risk of an instrument, a change in the
credit quality rating of an instrument or an issuer can have a rapid, adverse effect on the instrument’s value and liquidity
and make it more difficult for the Trust to sell at an advantageous price or time. The risk of the occurrence of these types of
events is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing.
Current Fixed-Income and Debt Market Conditions. Fixed-income
and debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to dislocations. In response to the inflation
rates in recent periods, governmental authorities have implemented significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including increasing
interest rates and implementation of quantitative tightening. These actions present heightened risks, particularly to fixed-income and
debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes
or reversed. It is difficult to accurately predict changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (“Federal Reserve”) monetary
policies and the effect of any such changes or policies. Certain economic conditions and market environments will expose fixed-income
and debt instruments to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity, which can impact the Trust’s investments and may negatively
impact the Trust’s characteristics, which in turn would impact performance.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income and other debt
instruments are subject to the possibility that interest rates could change (or are expected to change). Changes in interest rates
(or the expectation of such changes) may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in these instruments, such as the value or
liquidity of, and income generated by, the investments or increase risks associated with such investments, such as credit or default
risks. In addition, changes in interest rates, including rates that fall below zero, can have unpredictable effects on markets and
can adversely affect the Trust’s yield, income and performance. Generally, when interest rates increase, the values of
fixed-income and other debt instruments decline, and when interest rates decrease, the values of fixed-income and other debt
instruments rise. Changes in interest rates also adversely affect the yield generated by certain fixed income and other debt
securities (“Income Securities”) or result in the issuance of lower yielding Income Securities. The Federal Reserve has
increased interest rates at significant levels over recent periods. These actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt
instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are
ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes. It is difficult to accurately predict how long, and whether, the Federal
Reserve’s current stance on interest rates will persist and the impact these actions will have on the economy and the
Trust’s investments and the markets where they trade. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is subject to change at any
time and potentially frequently based on a variety of market and economic conditions.
Leverage Risk. The Trust’s use of leverage, through
borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, causes the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if it had not been leveraged. Although
the use of leverage by the Trust may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the
effect of any losses. The effect of leverage in a declining market is likely to
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 13
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
cause a greater decline in the net asset value of the Trust
than if the Trust were not leveraged, which may result in a greater decline in the market price of the Trust shares. There can be no
assurance that a leveraging strategy will be implemented or that it will be successful during any period during which it is
employed. When the cost of leverage is no longer favorable, or when the Trust is otherwise required to reduce its leverage, the
Trust may not be able to maintain distributions at historical levels and common shareholders will bear any costs associated with
selling portfolio securities. The Trust’s total leverage may vary significantly over time. To the extent the Trust increases
its amount of leverage outstanding, it will be more exposed to these risks.
Liquidity Risk. The Trust may invest in municipal securities
that are, at the time of investment, illiquid. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the
ordinary course of business at approximately the value that the Trust values the securities. Illiquid securities may trade at a discount
from comparable, more liquid securities and may be subject to wide fluctuations in market value. The Trust may be subject to significant
delays in disposing of illiquid securities. Accordingly, the Trust may be forced to sell these securities at less than fair market value
or may not be able to sell them when the Adviser believes it is desirable to do so. Illiquid securities also may entail registration expenses
and other transaction costs that are higher than those for liquid securities. Dislocations in certain parts of markets are resulting in
reduced liquidity for certain investments. It is uncertain when financial markets will improve. Liquidity of financial markets may also
be affected by government intervention, such as the legal restrictions on certain financial instruments’ resale.
Management Risk. The Trust is actively managed, which means
that investment decisions are made based on investment views. There is no guarantee that the investment views will produce the desired
results or expected returns, causing the Trust to fail to meet its investment objective or underperform its benchmark index or funds with
similar investment objectives and strategies.
Market Risk. The value of, or income generated by, the
investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation. The value of certain
investments (e.g., equity securities) tends to fluctuate more dramatically over the shorter term than do the value of other asset
classes. These movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, or from broader influences, including real or
perceived changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in inflation or expectations about inflation, investor confidence or
economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, tariffs and trade disruptions, recession,
changes in currency rates, natural/environmental disasters, cyber attacks, terrorism, governmental or quasigovernmental actions,
public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics), debt crises, actual or threatened
war or other armed conflicts (such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and its risk of expansion or collateral economic and other
effects) or ratings downgrade, and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods. Many economies
and markets have experienced high inflation rates in recent periods. In response to such inflation, government authorities have
implemented significant fiscal and monetary policies such as increasing interest rates and quantitative tightening (reduction of
money available in the
14 l GBAB l
GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
market) which may adversely affect financial markets and the
broader economy, as well as the Trust’s performance. Administrative changes, policy reform and/or changes in law or
governmental regulations can result in expropriation or nationalization of the investments of a company in which the Trust invests.
In addition, adverse changes in one sector or industry or with respect to a particular company could negatively impact companies in
other sectors or industries or increase market volatility as a result of the interconnected nature of economies and markets and thus
negatively affect the Trust’s performance. For example, developments in the banking or financial services sectors (one or more
companies operating in these sectors) could adversely impact a wide range of companies and issuers. These types of adverse
developments could negatively affect the Trust’s performance or operations.
Municipal Securities Risk. The Trust’s holdings
of municipal securities could be significantly affected by events that affect the municipal bond market, which could include
unfavorable legislative or political developments, adverse changes in the financial conditions of issuers of municipal securities,
or other actual or perceived changes in economic, social, or public health conditions. The amount of public information available
about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate equities or bonds. The secondary market for municipal
securities also tends to be less well-developed or liquid than many other securities markets, which may adversely affect the
Trust’s ability to sell such securities at prices approximating those at which the Trust may currently value them. In
addition, many state and municipal governments that issue securities are under significant economic and financial stress and may not
be able to satisfy their obligations. Issuers of municipal securities might seek protection under bankruptcy laws. In the event of
bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of municipal securities could experience delays in collecting principal and interest and such
holders may not be able to collect all principal and interest to which they are entitled. Legislative developments may result in
changes to the laws relating to municipal bankruptcies. The income, value and/or risk of municipal securities is often correlated to
specific project or other revenue sources, which can be negatively affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or
changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining rents resulting from legal, cultural, technological, global or
local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties, revenues or goods. Municipalities and municipal projects that
rely directly or indirectly on federal funding mechanisms may be negatively affected by constraints of the federal government
budget. Each of the foregoing may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in municipal securities.
Build America Bonds (“BABs”) Risk. BABs
are a form of municipal financing. The BABs market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities market. In
addition, because the relevant provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were not extended, bonds issued
after December 31, 2010 cannot qualify as BABs. It is uncertain whether Congress will renew the program to permit issuance of new
Build America Bonds. As a result, the number of available BABs is limited, which may negatively affect the value of BABs. In
addition, there can be no assurance
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 15
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
that BABs will continue to be actively traded. It is
difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will continue, meaning that BABs may experience greater illiquidity
than other municipal obligations.
Special Risks Related to Certain Municipal Securities. The
Trust may invest in municipal leases and certificates of participation in such leases, which involve special risks not normally associated
with general obligations or revenue bonds. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title
to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property
and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt issuance limitations are
deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that relieve
the governmental issuer of any obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose
by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to the temporary
abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing
the leased equipment.
Taxable Municipal Securities Risk. While interest
earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable municipal securities is fully
taxable at the federal level and may be subject to tax at the state level. Additionally, litigation, legislation or other political
events, local business or economic conditions or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have a significant effect on the ability of an
issuer of municipal securities to make payments of principal and/or interest. Political changes and uncertainties in the municipal
market related to taxation, legislative changes or the rights of municipal security holders can significantly affect municipal
securities. Because many securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care,
transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the
financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market.
Debt Instruments Risk. The value of the Trust’s
investments in debt instruments (including bonds issued by non-profit entities, municipal conduits and project finance corporations)
depends on the continuing ability of the debt issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal when due.
The ability of debt issuers to make timely payments of interest and principal can be affected by a variety of developments and
changes in legal, political, economic and other conditions. Investments in debt instruments present certain risks, including credit,
interest rate, liquidity and prepayment risks. Issuers that rely directly or indirectly on government funding mechanisms or
non-profit statutes, may be negatively affected by actions of the government, including reductions in government spending, increases
in tax rates, and changes in fiscal policy. The value of a debt instrument may decline for many reasons that directly relate to the
issuer, such as a change in the demand for the issuer’s goods or services, or a decline in the issuer’s performance,
16 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
earnings or assets. In addition, changes in the financial condition
of an individual issuer can affect the overall market for such instruments. The risk of the occurrence of these types of unfavorable events
is heightened in market environments where interest rates are rising.
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk. Municipal conduit bonds, also
referred to as private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds, are bonds issued by state and local governments or other entities for
the purpose of financing the projects of certain private enterprises. Unlike municipal bonds, municipal conduit bonds are not backed by
the full faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. Rather, issuances of municipal conduit bonds are backed
solely by revenues of the private enterprise involved. Municipal conduit bonds are therefore subject to heightened credit risk, as the
private enterprise involved can have a different credit profile than the issuing governmental entity. Municipal conduit bonds may be negatively
impacted by conditions affecting either the general credit of the private enterprise or the project itself. Factors such as competitive
pricing, construction delays, or lack of demand for the project could cause project revenues to fall short of projections, and defaults
could occur. Municipal conduit bonds tend to have longer terms and thus are more susceptible to interest rate risk.
Project Finance Risk. Project finance is a type of
financing commonly used for infrastructure, industry, and public service projects. In a project finance arrangement, the cash flow
generated by the project is used to repay lenders while the project’s assets, rights and interest are held as secondary
collateral. Investors involved in project finance face heightened technology risk, operational risk, and market risk because the
cash flow generated by the project, rather than the revenues of the company behind the project, will repay investors. In addition,
because of the project-specific nature of such arrangements, the Trust face the risk of loss of investment if the company behind the
project determines not to complete it.
Risks of Investing in Debt Issued by Non-Profit Institutions.
Investing in debt issued by non-profit institutions, including foundations, museums, cultural institutions, colleges, universities,
hospitals and healthcare systems, involves different risks than investing in municipal bonds. Many non-profit entities are tax-exempt
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and risk losing their tax-exempt status if they do not comply with the requirements
of that section. There is a risk that Congress or the IRS could pass new laws or regulations changing the requirements for tax-exempt
status, which could result in a non-profit institution losing such status. Additionally, non-profit institutions that receive federal
and state appropriations face the risk of a decrease in or loss of such appropriations. Hospitals and healthcare systems are highly regulated
at the federal and state levels and face burdensome state licensing requirements. There is a risk that a state could refuse to renew a
hospital’s license or that the passage of new laws or regulations, especially changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, could
inhibit a hospital from growing its revenues. Hospitals and healthcare systems also face risks related to increased competition from other
health care providers; increased costs of inpatient and outpatient care; and increased pressures from managed
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 17
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
care organizations, insurers, and patients to cut the costs of
medical care. There is a risk that nonprofit institutions relying on philanthropy and donations to maintain their operations will receive
less funding during economic downturns.
Senior Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in senior
secured floating rate loans made to corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers (“Senior Loans”).
Senior Loans typically hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the issuing entity, are typically secured with
specific collateral and typically have a claim on the assets and/or stock of the borrower that is senior to that held by
subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrower. The Trust’s investments in Senior Loans are typically below
investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. The risks associated with Senior Loans
of below investment grade quality are similar to the risks of other lower grade securities, although Senior Loans are typically
senior in payment priority and secured on a senior priority basis in contrast to subordinated and unsecured securities. Senior
Loans’ higher priority has historically resulted in generally higher recoveries in the event of a corporate reorganization. In
addition, because their interest payments are typically adjusted for changes in short-term interest rates, investments in Senior
Loans generally have less interest rate risk than certain other lower grade securities, which may have fixed interest rates. Loans
and other debt instruments are also subject to the risk of price declines due to increases in prevailing interest rates, although
floating-rate debt instruments are substantially less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments. Interest rate changes
may also increase prepayments of debt obligations and require the Trust to invest assets at lower yields. During periods of
deteriorating economic conditions, such as recessions or periods of rising unemployment, or changing interest rates (notably
increases), delinquencies and losses generally increase, sometimes dramatically, with respect to obligations under such loans. An
economic downturn or individual corporate developments could adversely affect the market for these instruments and reduce the
Trust’s ability to sell these instruments at an advantageous time or price. An economic downturn would generally lead to a
higher non-payment rate and, a Senior Loan may lose significant market value before a default occurs. The Trust invests in or is
exposed to loans and other similar debt obligations that are sometimes referred to as “covenant-lite” loans or
obligations, which are generally subject to more risk than investments that contain traditional financial maintenance covenants and
financial reporting requirements.
Structured Finance Investments Risk. The Trust’s
structured finance investments may consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial
mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) issued by governmental entities and private issuers, asset-backed securities
(“ABS”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured finance securities. Holders of structured
finance investments bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk.
The Trust may have the right to receive payments only from the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against
the issuer or the entity that sold the assets to be securitized. The Trust may invest in structured finance products collateralized
by low grade or defaulted loans or securities. Investments in such structured finance products are subject to
18 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
the risks associated with below investment grade securities.
Such securities are characterized by high risk. It is likely that an economic recession could severely disrupt the market for such
securities and may have an adverse impact on the value of such securities. Moreover, other types of events, domestic or
international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets, such as pandemics, armed conflicts, energy supply or
price disruptions, natural disasters and man-made disasters, which may have a significant effect on the underlying assets.
Structured finance securities are typically privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a
result, investments in structured finance securities may be characterized by the Trust as illiquid securities; however, an active
dealer market may exist which would allow such securities to be considered liquid in some circumstances.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk. While traditional
fixed-income securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount is due, an ABS
represents an interest in a pool of assets, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, unsecured consumer loans or student
loans, that has been securitized and provides for monthly payments of interest, at a fixed or floating rate, and principal from the
cash flow of these assets. This pool of assets (and any related assets of the issuing entity) is the only source of payment for the
ABS. The ability of an ABS issuer to make payments on the ABS, and the timing of such payments, is therefore dependent on
collections on these underlying assets. The recoveries on the underlying collateral may not, in some cases, be sufficient to support
payments on these securities, or may be unavailable in the event of a default and enforcing rights with respect to these assets or
collateral may be difficult and costly, which may result in losses to investors in an ABS. The collateral underlying ABS may
constitute assets related to a wide range of industries such as credit card and automobile receivables or other assets derived from
consumer, commercial or corporate sectors, and these underlying assets may be secured or unsecured. ABS are particularly subject to
interest rate risk and credit risk. Compared to other fixed income investments with similar maturity and credit, ABS generally
increase in value to a lesser extent when interest rates decline and generally decline in value to a similar or greater extent when
interest rates rise.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS”) represent an interest in a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities generally are classified as
either commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”),
each of which are subject to certain specific risks. The risks associated with mortgage-backed securities include: (1) credit risk
associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties and of the borrowers owning these properties; (2) risks
associated with their structure and execution (including the collateral, the process by which principal and interest payments are
allocated and distributed to investors and how credit losses affect the return to investors in such MBS); (3) risks associated with
the servicer of the underlying mortgages; (4) adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, which are more likely to
have an adverse impact on mortgage-backed securities secured by loans on certain types of commercial properties than on those
secured by loans
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 19
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
on residential properties; (5) prepayment risk and extension risks,
which can lead to significant fluctuations in the value of the mortgage-backed security; (6) loss of all or part of the premium, if any,
paid; and (7) decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates, prepayments on the underlying
mortgage collateral or perceptions of the credit risk associated with the underlying mortgage collateral. The value of mortgage-backed
securities may be substantially dependent on the servicing of the underlying pool of mortgages. Income from and values of MBS also may
be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining
rents resulting from legal, cultural technological, global or local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties.
In addition, the general effects of inflation on the U.S.
economy can be wide-ranging, as evidenced by rising interest rates, wages and costs of consumer goods and necessities. The long-term
effects of inflation on the general economy and on any individual mortgagor are unclear, and in certain cases, rising inflation may
affect a mortgagor’s ability to repay its related mortgage loan, thereby reducing the amount received by the holders of MBS
with respect to such mortgage loan. Additionally, increased rates of inflation may negatively affect the value of certain MBS in the
secondary market. MBS are also subject to risks similar to those associated with investing in real estate, such as the possible
decline in the value of (or income generated by) the real estate, variations in rental income, fluctuations in occupancy levels and
demand for properties or real estate-related services, changes in interest rates and changes in the availability or terms of
mortgages and other financing that may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or unattractive.
CLO, CDO and CBO Risk. In addition to the general
risks associated with debt securities discussed herein, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized debt
obligations (“CDOs”), and collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”) are subject to additional risks due to
their complex structure and highly leveraged nature, such as higher risk of volatility and magnified financial losses. CLOs, CDOs
and CBOs are subject to risks associated with the possibility that distributions from collateral securities may not be adequate to
make interest or other payments. The value of securities issued by CLOs, CDOs and CBOs also may decrease because of, among other
developments, changes in market value; changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicer of the
assets, the originator of an asset in the pool, or the financial institution or fund providing the credit support or enhancement;
loan performance and prices; broader market sentiment, including expectations regarding future loan defaults; liquidity conditions;
and supply and demand for structured products. Additionally, the indirect investment structure of CLOs, CDOs and CBOs presents
certain risks to the Trust such as less liquidity compared with holding the underlying assets directly. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs normally
charge management fees and administrative expenses, which would be borne by the Trust. The terms of many structured finance
investments, including CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, are tied to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other reference
rates based on SOFR. These
20 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
relatively new and developing rates may not match the
reference rate applicable to the underlying assets related to these investments. These events may adversely affect the Trust and its
investments in CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, including their value, volatility and liquidity.
Investment Funds Risk. As an alternative to holding
investments directly, the Trust may also obtain investment exposure to securities in which it may invest directly by investing up to
20% of its Managed Assets in other investment companies, including U.S. registered investment companies and/or other U.S. or foreign
pooled investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”). Investments in Investment Funds present certain special
considerations and risks not present in making direct investments in securities in which the Trust may invest. Investments in
Investment Funds subject the Trust to the risks affecting such Investment Funds and involve operating expenses and fees that are in
addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another
Investment Fund are borne indirectly by common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expense and fees at
both levels. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for such
entities’ managers to employ financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk. A
performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the hope of
earning a higher profit participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of
financial leverage and, thus, increase the Trust’s exposure to leverage risk and costs. From time to time, the Trust may
invest a significant portion of its assets in Investment Funds that employ leverage. The use of leverage by these Investment Funds
may cause these Funds’ market price of common shares and/or NAV to be more volatile and can magnify the effect of any
losses.
In addition to the foregoing risks, investors should note that
the Trust reserves the right to merge or reorganize with another fund, liquidate or convert into an open-end fund, in each case subject
to applicable approvals by shareholders and the Trust’s Board of Trustees as required by law and the Trust’s governing documents.
This material is not intended as a recommendation or as
investment advice of any kind, including in connection with rollovers, transfers, and distributions. Such material is not provided
in a fiduciary capacity, may not be relied upon for or in connection with the making of investment decisions, and does not
constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. All content has been provided for informational or educational
purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Always consult a
financial, tax and/or legal professional regarding your specific situation.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 21
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
Trust Statistics |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$15.65 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$15.23 |
|
Premium to NAV |
|
2.76 |
% |
Net Assets ($000) |
|
$358,076 |
|
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six month |
|
One |
|
Three |
|
Five |
|
Ten |
|
|
|
(non-annualized) |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade Debt Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV |
(0.08 |
%) |
2.85 |
% |
(5.61 |
%) |
0.09 |
% |
3.66 |
% |
Market |
0.74 |
% |
2.17 |
% |
(6.77 |
%) |
1.40 |
% |
5.45 |
% |
Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index |
(1.21 |
%) |
3.24 |
% |
(4.67 |
%) |
1.48 |
% |
3.31 |
% |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. All NAV returns include the
deduction of management fees, operating expenses and all other Trust expenses. The deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay
on Trust distributions or the sale of Trust shares is not reflected in the total returns. For the most recent month-end performance
figures, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with
changes in market conditions and other factors so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
The referenced index is an unmanaged index and not available for
direct investment. Index performance does not reflect transaction costs, fees or expenses.
Portfolio Breakdown |
% of Net Assets |
|
Municipal Bonds |
68.8 |
% |
Corporate Bonds |
31.5 |
% |
Asset-Backed Securities |
11.4 |
% |
Closed-End Mutual Funds |
11.0 |
% |
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
9.3 |
% |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
3.4 |
% |
Preferred Stocks |
2.1 |
% |
Money Market Funds |
1.3 |
% |
Foreign Government Debt |
0.2 |
% |
Options Purchased |
0.0 |
%* |
Common Stocks |
0.0 |
%* |
Warrants |
0.0 |
%* |
Total Investments |
139.0 |
% |
Other Assets & Liabilities, net |
(39.0 |
%) |
Net Assets |
100.0 |
% |
|
*Less than 0.1%. |
|
|
22 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
Ten Largest Holdings |
% of Net Assets |
State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 2010, 7.65% |
|
3.3 |
% |
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust |
|
3.2 |
% |
Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel Revenue |
|
|
|
Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.09% |
|
3.1 |
% |
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, |
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds - (Federally Taxable - Direct Subsidy), 6.00% |
|
2.9 |
% |
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General |
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction Bonds, |
|
|
|
Series 2012B, 6.88% |
|
2.8 |
% |
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds, 8.57% |
2.7 |
% |
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, 5.45% |
|
2.7 |
% |
Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds, 6.50% |
|
2.5 |
% |
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Federal |
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.10% |
|
2.5 |
% |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds, 6.85% |
2.1 |
% |
Top Ten Total |
|
27.8 |
% |
“Ten Largest Holdings” excludes any temporary cash
or derivative investments.
Portfolio breakdown and holdings are subject to change daily.
For more information, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The above summaries are provided for informational purposes only and
should not be viewed as recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 23
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
Portfolio Composition by Quality Rating1 |
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
Rating |
Investments |
|
Fixed Income Instruments |
|
|
AAA |
1.5 |
% |
AA |
28.9 |
% |
A |
22.7 |
% |
BBB |
17.6 |
% |
BB |
7.2 |
% |
B |
6.5 |
% |
CCC |
0.7 |
% |
CC |
0.0 |
%* |
NR2 |
4.6 |
% |
Other Instruments |
10.3 |
% |
Total Investments |
100.0 |
% |
1 | | Source: BlackRock Solutions. Credit quality ratings are measured on a scale that generally
ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). All securities except for those labeled “NR” have been rated by Moody’s, Standard
& Poor’s (“S&P”), or Fitch, each of which is a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”).
For purposes of this presentation, when ratings are available from more than one agency, the highest rating is used. Guggenheim Investments
has converted Moody’s and Fitch ratings to the equivalent S&P rating. Security ratings are determined at the time of purchase
and may change thereafter. |
2 | | NR (not rated) securities do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. |
24 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
All or a portion of the above distributions may be characterized
as a return of capital. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2023, 57% of the distributions were characterized as ordinary income,
and 43% of the distributions were characterized as return of capital. The final determination of the tax character of the distributions
paid by the Trust in 2023 will be reported to shareholders in January 2024.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 25
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Value |
COMMON STOCKS† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figs, Inc. — Class A* |
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
$27,254 |
Vacasa, Inc. — Class A* |
|
511 |
|
|
4,068 |
Total Communications |
|
31,322 |
Industrial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Holdco LLC*,†††,1 |
|
15,619 |
|
|
18,932 |
Vector Phoenix Holdings, LP*,††† |
|
15,619 |
|
|
960 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
526 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
526 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
428 |
Targus , Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
195 |
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
5,183 |
|
|
52 |
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
4,791 |
|
|
48 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
2 |
Total Industrial |
|
21,669 |
Financial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tensor Ltd.*,††† |
|
81,175 |
|
|
8 |
Total Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $194,583) |
|
52,999 |
PREFERRED STOCKS†† – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitable Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.30% |
|
140,000 |
|
|
2,241,400 |
W R Berkley Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13% due 03/30/61 |
|
95,975 |
|
|
1,753,463 |
Kuvare US Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 02/17/51*,2 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
1,511,250 |
PartnerRe Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% |
|
46,000 |
|
|
825,700 |
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13% due 10/15/52 |
|
23,225 |
|
|
607,798 |
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60% |
|
20,000 |
|
|
348,600 |
First Republic Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%††† |
|
17,750 |
|
|
2 |
4.25%††† |
|
31,650 |
|
|
– |
Total Financial |
|
7,288,213 |
Industrial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
284,756 |
|
|
79,077 |
Total Preferred Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $11,562,726) |
|
7,367,290 |
See notes to financial statements.
26 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Value |
WARRANTS† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 09/16/26* |
9,372 |
|
|
|
$842 |
Acropolis Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 03/31/26*,5 |
|
12,600 |
|
|
151 |
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 07/24/25*,†††,5 |
23,730 |
|
|
2 |
Total Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $32,105) |
|
995 |
CLOSED-END MUTUAL FUNDS† – 11.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust |
738,712 |
|
|
11,568,230 |
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund |
471,344 |
|
|
7,159,715 |
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund |
482,736 |
|
|
5,117,002 |
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust |
450,245 |
|
|
4,124,244 |
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals |
382,286 |
|
|
3,616,426 |
Invesco Municipal Trust |
309,052 |
|
|
2,849,459 |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund, Inc. |
394,750 |
|
|
2,676,405 |
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II |
287,297 |
|
|
2,341,471 |
Total Closed-End Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $56,469,081) |
|
39,452,952 |
MONEY MARKET FUNDS† – 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 5.27%6 |
4,102,624 |
|
|
4,102,624 |
Dreyfus Treasury Obligations Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 5.24%6 |
647,931 |
|
|
647,931 |
Total Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $4,750,555) |
|
4,750,555 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
|
|
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California – 13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% due 08/01/40 |
7,785,000 |
|
|
8,810,659 |
6.80% due 08/01/30 |
2,245,000 |
|
|
2,447,460 |
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2012B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 08/01/33 |
10,000,000 |
|
|
10,055,538 |
East Side Union High School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13% due 08/01/427 |
7,500,000 |
|
|
5,530,377 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.14% due 08/15/477 |
3,450,000 |
|
|
3,633,492 |
California Public Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27% due 10/15/43 |
4,800,000 |
|
|
3,101,104 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 27
SCHEDULE
OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November
30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount~
|
|
|
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL
BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
California
– 13.0% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oakland
Unified School District/Alameda County General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.12%
due 08/01/407 |
2,450,000 |
|
|
|
$1,790,621 |
Marin
Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
4.03%
due 08/01/387 |
2,000,000 |
|
|
1,732,395 |
Moreno
Valley Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.82%
due 08/01/447 |
2,000,000 |
|
|
1,551,347 |
Hillsborough
City School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
due
09/01/388 |
1,600,000 |
|
|
689,832 |
due
09/01/378 |
1,120,000 |
|
|
514,992 |
due
09/01/408 |
500,000 |
|
|
189,244 |
San
Jose Evergreen Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.06%
due 09/01/457 |
1,500,000 |
|
|
1,036,369 |
Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District (Orange County, California), General |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation
Bonds, Federally Taxable Direct-Pay Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds,
Election of 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.40%
due 02/01/26 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,007,483 |
Manteca
Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.21%
due 10/01/42 |
1,400,000 |
|
|
1,003,451 |
Monrovia
Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, Election of 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligation Bonds, Build America Bonds, Federally Taxable15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%
due 08/01/28 |
805,000 |
|
|
857,901 |
Norman
Y Mineta San Jose International Airport SJC Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.91%
due 03/01/357 |
500,000 |
|
|
392,794 |
3.27%
due 03/01/40 |
250,000 |
|
|
184,480 |
3.29%
due 03/01/417 |
70,000 |
|
|
50,766 |
Alhambra
Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
6.70%
due 02/01/26 |
500,000 |
|
|
511,781 |
California
State University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.90%
due 11/01/477 |
500,000 |
|
|
399,056 |
Cypress
School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
6.65%
due 08/01/25 |
350,000 |
|
|
355,095 |
Fremont
Unified School District/Alameda County California General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
2.75%
due 08/01/417 |
400,000 |
|
|
279,335 |
Riverside
County Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.88%
due 10/01/37 |
250,000 |
|
|
211,744 |
Coast
Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
2.98%
due 08/01/397 |
250,000 |
|
|
184,659 |
Total
California |
|
|
|
|
46,521,975 |
Texas
– 11.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas,
Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel
Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.09%
due 01/01/427 |
10,020,000 |
|
|
10,904,483 |
Harris
County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.34%
due 11/15/377 |
8,900,000 |
|
|
7,014,204 |
See notes to financial statements.
28 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas – 11.2% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.42% due 09/01/507 |
8,000,000 |
|
$5,208,942 |
City of San Antonio Texas Electric & Gas Systems Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.91% due 02/01/487 |
6,800,000 |
|
4,669,917 |
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.29% due 01/01/427 |
5,250,000 |
|
3,850,115 |
3.27% due 01/01/457 |
1,150,000 |
|
779,421 |
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.92% due 11/01/507 |
6,500,000 |
|
4,419,810 |
City of Garland Texas Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.15% due 03/01/51 |
2,400,000 |
|
1,590,554 |
City of Austin Texas Rental Car Special Facility Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.86% due 11/15/427 |
2,200,000 |
|
1,533,615 |
Total Texas |
|
39,971,061 |
Washington – 6.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Central Washington University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
6.95% due 05/01/40 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,417,525 |
Central Washington University, System Revenue Bonds, 2010, Taxable |
|
|
|
|
|
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 05/01/30 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,215,294 |
Washington State Convention Center Public Facilities District, Lodging |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.79% due 07/01/40 |
4,600,000 |
|
4,826,979 |
Washington State University, Housing and Dining System Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% due 04/01/32 |
3,325,000 |
|
3,582,230 |
County of Pierce Washington Sewer Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.87% due 08/01/42 |
4,300,000 |
|
3,065,181 |
King County Public Hospital District No. 2 General Obligation Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.11% due 12/01/447 |
1,100,000 |
|
745,169 |
Total Washington |
|
22,852,378 |
Pennsylvania – 5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, |
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds – (Federally Taxable – Direct Subsidy) |
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% due 09/01/30 |
10,330,000 |
|
10,543,303 |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
6.85% due 09/01/29 |
6,895,000 |
|
7,486,435 |
Doylestown Hospital Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.95% due 07/01/24 |
175,000 |
|
172,017 |
Total Pennsylvania |
|
18,201,755 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 29
SCHEDULE
OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November
30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~
|
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL
BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
New
York – 4.2% |
|
|
|
|
Westchester
County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
8.57%
due 11/01/40 |
|
10,010,000
|
|
$9,766,365 |
Port
Authority of New York & New Jersey Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.14%
due 02/15/51 |
5,000,000 |
|
3,476,728 |
New
York City Industrial Development Agency Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.73%
due 03/01/347 |
2,250,000 |
|
1,779,754 |
Total
New York |
|
15,022,847 |
Illinois
– 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
Chicago,
Illinois, Second Lien Wastewater Transmission Revenue Project Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
6.90%
due 01/01/407 |
5,100,000 |
|
5,633,130 |
Illinois,
General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
7.35%
due 07/01/35 |
4,258,242 |
|
4,486,125 |
Chicago,
Illinois, Second Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
6.74%
due 11/01/407 |
2,990,000 |
|
3,274,798 |
State
of Illinois General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.63%
due 02/01/35 |
858,462 |
|
874,370 |
6.73%
due 04/01/357 |
184,615 |
|
188,852 |
Chicago
Board of Education General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.14%
due 12/01/39 |
195,000 |
|
176,048 |
Total
Illinois |
|
14,633,323 |
Ohio
– 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
County
of Franklin Ohio Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.88%
due 11/01/507 |
8,900,000 |
|
5,615,779 |
American
Municipal Power, Inc., Combined Hydroelectric Projects Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
New
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds |
|
|
|
|
7.33%
due 02/15/287 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,252,061 |
Madison
Local School District, Richland County, Ohio, School Improvement, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.65%
due 12/01/29 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,502,677 |
Toronto
City School District, Ohio, Qualified School Construction Bonds General |
|
|
|
|
Obligation
Bonds |
|
|
|
|
7.00%
due 12/01/28 |
780,000 |
|
780,988 |
Total
Ohio |
|
14,151,505 |
Oklahoma
– 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma
Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
5.45%
due 08/15/28 |
10,950,000 |
|
9,617,846 |
Tulsa
Airports Improvement Trust Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.10%
due 06/01/45 |
3,700,000 |
|
2,541,989 |
Oklahoma
State University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
4.13%
due 08/01/48 |
150,000 |
|
120,014 |
Total
Oklahoma |
|
12,279,849 |
See notes to financial statements.
30 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
West Virginia – 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 201015 |
|
|
|
|
7.65% due 04/01/407 |
10,000,000 |
|
$11,777,377 |
Indiana – 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 01/15/307 |
8,690,000 |
|
8,918,278 |
County of Knox Indiana Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
5.90% due 04/01/34 |
2,920,000 |
|
2,759,451 |
Total Indiana |
|
11,677,729 |
Michigan – 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
Detroit City School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
7.75% due 05/01/397 |
2,505,000 |
|
2,856,513 |
Detroit, Michigan, School District, School Building and Site Bonds, Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
Tax General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.65% due 05/01/297 |
2,640,000 |
|
2,806,018 |
Fraser Public School District, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Federally |
|
|
|
|
Taxable School Construction Bonds, 2011 School Building and Site Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.05% due 05/01/26 |
1,510,000 |
|
1,510,871 |
Oakridge, Michigan, Public Schools, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.75% due 05/01/26 |
1,000,000 |
|
1,001,119 |
Comstock Park Public Schools General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.30% due 05/01/26 |
415,000 |
|
415,315 |
Total Michigan |
|
8,589,836 |
South Carolina – 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
County of Horry South Carolina Airport Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
7.33% due 07/01/40 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,625,588 |
New Jersey – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.51% due 07/01/427 |
3,500,000 |
|
2,648,070 |
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.78% due 01/01/407 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,770,274 |
Total New Jersey |
|
4,418,344 |
Massachusetts – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.72% due 07/01/427 |
3,400,000 |
|
2,390,592 |
2.87% due 07/01/51 |
750,000 |
|
481,450 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
3.52% due 10/01/46 |
2,250,000 |
|
1,500,104 |
Total Massachusetts |
|
4,372,146 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 31
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama – 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.68% due 06/01/507 |
6,500,000 |
|
$3,941,168 |
Colorado – 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado, Building Excellent Schools Today, Certificates of Participation, Taxable |
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
6.82% due 03/15/28 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,660,062 |
University of Colorado Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.81% due 06/01/487 |
920,000 |
|
603,546 |
Total Colorado |
|
3,263,608 |
Mississippi – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Center Educational Building Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.92% due 06/01/417 |
4,500,000 |
|
3,187,279 |
New Hampshire – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.27% due 05/01/517 |
4,800,000 |
|
3,174,812 |
Louisiana – 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
State of Louisiana Gasoline & Fuels Tax Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.05% due 05/01/387 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,950,741 |
Minnesota – 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
City of State Paul Minnesota Sales & Use Tax Revenue Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.89% due 11/01/35 |
250,000 |
|
215,634 |
Arkansas – 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
University of Arkansas Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.10% due 12/01/417 |
250,000 |
|
186,480 |
District of Columbia – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Convention & Sports Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
4.31% due 10/01/407 |
100,000 |
|
87,338 |
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $277,355,413) |
246,102,773 |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Central Storage Safety Project Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
4.82% due 02/01/389 |
6,956,064 |
|
5,880,317 |
Wilton RE Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% †††,2,3,10 |
3,800,000 |
|
3,356,710 |
Intact Financial Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.46% due 09/22/322,7 |
1,900,000 |
|
1,844,801 |
Blue Owl Finance LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
4.38% due 02/15/322,7 |
2,150,000 |
|
1,791,256 |
See notes to financial statements.
32 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America |
|
|
|
|
|
8.50% due 08/01/322 |
1,750,000 |
|
$1,727,157 |
Ares Finance Company IV LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
3.65% due 02/01/522,7 |
2,650,000 |
|
1,720,698 |
Maple Grove Funding Trust I |
|
|
|
|
|
4.16% due 08/15/512,7 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,637,183 |
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% due 10/01/312 |
2,100,000 |
|
1,571,430 |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.30% due 02/01/612 |
2,700,000 |
|
1,545,783 |
Jefferies Finance LLC / JFIN Company-Issuer Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 08/15/282 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,282,380 |
Global Atlantic Finance Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.70% due 10/15/512,3 |
1,450,000 |
|
1,202,647 |
National Life Insurance Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.50% due 09/15/392 |
900,000 |
|
1,103,230 |
United Wholesale Mortgage LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 11/15/252 |
1,100,000 |
|
1,069,391 |
Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 03/01/523 |
1,200,000 |
|
1,066,030 |
FS KKR Capital Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% due 07/15/277 |
1,150,000 |
|
1,013,903 |
Stewart Information Services Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.60% due 11/15/317 |
1,350,000 |
|
1,005,410 |
NFP Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 08/15/282,7 |
1,100,000 |
|
979,391 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.72% due 09/14/333 |
950,000 |
|
946,564 |
Horace Mann Educators Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% due 09/15/287 |
900,000 |
|
936,775 |
Macquarie Bank Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.05% due 03/03/362,3 |
1,200,000 |
|
920,972 |
Credit Suisse AG NY |
|
|
|
|
|
7.95% due 01/09/257 |
900,000 |
|
917,487 |
NatWest Group plc |
|
|
|
|
|
7.47% due 11/10/263,7 |
850,000 |
|
871,216 |
Kennedy-Wilson, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 03/01/317 |
1,150,000 |
|
863,011 |
Standard Chartered plc |
|
|
|
|
|
7.78% due 11/16/252,3,7 |
750,000 |
|
762,411 |
Keenan Fort Detrick Energy LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
4.17% due 11/15/482 |
1,000,000 |
|
757,012 |
Toronto-Dominion Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
8.13% due 10/31/823 |
750,000 |
|
754,146 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 33
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Owl Capital GP LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
7.21% due 08/22/43††† |
750,000 |
|
$736,218 |
Corebridge Financial, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 12/15/523 |
700,000 |
|
672,221 |
QBE Insurance Group Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.88% 2,3,10 |
650,000 |
|
625,179 |
Bank of Nova Scotia |
|
|
|
|
|
8.63% due 10/27/823 |
550,000 |
|
552,675 |
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 02/01/262,7 |
560,000 |
|
533,941 |
HUB International Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.63% due 12/01/292,7 |
550,000 |
|
498,721 |
Belvoir Land LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.60% due 12/15/352 |
500,000 |
|
464,406 |
OneMain Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.00% due 01/15/297 |
350,000 |
|
360,969 |
Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 07/15/322,7 |
300,000 |
|
260,547 |
Total Financial |
42,232,188 |
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 4.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
JBS USA LUX S.A. / JBS USA Food Company / JBS USA Finance, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 04/01/337 |
1,050,000 |
|
991,545 |
4.38% due 02/02/527 |
1,200,000 |
|
823,089 |
Tufts Medical Center, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 01/01/38 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,495,979 |
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.08% due 07/01/517 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,485,170 |
Post Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 09/15/312 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,131,812 |
Universal Health Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.65% due 01/15/327 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,023,065 |
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.70% due 02/04/517 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,000,643 |
Reynolds American, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.70% due 08/15/357 |
1,050,000 |
|
985,413 |
HCA, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 03/15/527 |
1,200,000 |
|
950,329 |
Amgen, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.40% due 02/22/62 |
1,200,000 |
|
943,656 |
Sotheby’s |
|
|
|
|
|
7.38% due 10/15/272,7 |
1,000,000 |
|
917,056 |
BAT Capital Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.08% due 08/02/437 |
800,000 |
|
814,231 |
See notes to financial statements.
34 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 4.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
BCP V Modular Services Finance II plc |
|
|
|
|
|
6.13% due 10/30/282 |
GBP 750,000 |
|
$807,118 |
CPI CG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.63% due 03/15/262 |
601,000 |
|
570,987 |
Baylor College of Medicine |
|
|
|
|
|
5.26% due 11/15/46 |
600,000 |
|
556,616 |
Medline Borrower, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
5.25% due 10/01/292 |
450,000 |
|
407,234 |
Kronos Acquisition Holdings, Inc. / KIK Custom Products, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 12/31/272,7 |
260,000 |
|
240,716 |
Upbound Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.38% due 02/15/292,7 |
250,000 |
|
227,648 |
Performance Food Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 05/01/252,7 |
225,000 |
|
225,118 |
Endo Luxembourg Finance Company I SARL / Endo US, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.13% due 04/01/292,11 |
350,000 |
|
224,875 |
OhioHealth Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.83% due 11/15/41 |
300,000 |
|
204,444 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
16,026,744 |
Consumer, Cyclical – 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 05/01/252,7 |
4,019,000 |
|
4,061,294 |
United Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 04/15/292 |
2,200,000 |
|
1,963,961 |
Warnermedia Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.14% due 03/15/527 |
1,150,000 |
|
919,150 |
6.41% due 03/15/267 |
900,000 |
|
900,816 |
Hyatt Hotels Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 04/23/307 |
1,100,000 |
|
1,107,734 |
LKQ Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% due 06/15/337 |
950,000 |
|
950,710 |
Air Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 08/15/292 |
CAD 1,050,000 |
|
699,082 |
Evergreen Acqco 1 Limited Partnership / TVI, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% due 04/26/282 |
539,000 |
|
559,213 |
PetSmart, Inc. / PetSmart Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.75% due 02/15/282,7 |
600,000 |
|
548,704 |
Polaris, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.95% due 03/15/29 |
450,000 |
|
463,124 |
Wabash National Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 10/15/282,7 |
500,000 |
|
427,486 |
Hanesbrands, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.00% due 02/15/312,7 |
400,000 |
|
377,081 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 35
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Cyclical – 3.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Propane Partners Limited Partnership/Suburban Energy Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 06/01/312,7 |
300,000 |
|
$265,500 |
Superior Plus Limited Partnership / Superior General Partner, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/15/292,7 |
250,000 |
|
220,149 |
Station Casinos LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 12/01/312 |
200,000 |
|
169,936 |
Total Consumer, Cyclical |
|
13,633,940 |
Industrial – 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.81% due 05/01/50 |
4,000,000 |
|
3,901,251 |
IP Lending V Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 04/02/26†††,2 |
1,200,000 |
|
1,142,640 |
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/25/527 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,017,084 |
Artera Services LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.03% due 12/04/252,7 |
1,050,000 |
|
958,918 |
LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.80% due 12/31/572 |
1,500,000 |
|
930,870 |
IP Lending X Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.75% due 07/02/29†††,2 |
900,000 |
|
905,440 |
Cellnex Finance Company S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.88% due 07/07/412,7 |
1,250,000 |
|
904,000 |
GrafTech Global Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.88% due 12/15/282 |
1,000,000 |
|
785,000 |
Dyal Capital Partners IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65% due 02/22/41††† |
1,000,000 |
|
768,409 |
Summit Materials LLC / Summit Materials Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 03/15/272,7 |
600,000 |
|
595,500 |
New Enterprise Stone & Lime Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% due 07/15/282,7 |
575,000 |
|
573,679 |
Deuce FinCo plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 06/15/272 |
GBP 500,000 |
|
568,861 |
Ardagh Metal Packaging Finance USA LLC / Ardagh Metal Packaging Finance plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 09/01/292,7 |
400,000 |
|
317,865 |
Level 3 Financing, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.00% due 11/15/29††† |
634,257 |
|
1 |
Total Industrial |
|
13,369,518 |
Communications – 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
British Telecommunications plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 11/23/812,3 |
1,700,000 |
|
1,403,356 |
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88% due 02/15/317 |
1,362,000 |
|
1,154,063 |
McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00% due 08/01/292,7 |
850,000 |
|
766,063 |
5.75% due 08/01/282 |
300,000 |
|
273,750 |
See notes to financial statements.
36 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications – 2.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
LCPR Senior Secured Financing DAC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 07/15/292,7 |
1,150,000 |
|
$965,351 |
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
5.25% due 04/01/537 |
1,200,000 |
|
960,990 |
Corning, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.38% due 11/15/577 |
1,200,000 |
|
950,048 |
Rogers Communications, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/15/42 |
1,150,000 |
|
947,127 |
Altice France S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 10/15/292,7 |
900,000 |
|
649,375 |
5.13% due 07/15/292,7 |
350,000 |
|
250,323 |
Vodafone Group plc |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 06/04/813 |
1,100,000 |
|
753,165 |
UPC Broadband Finco BV |
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 07/15/312,7 |
700,000 |
|
590,625 |
CSC Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
11.25% due 05/15/282,7 |
250,000 |
|
249,561 |
5.25% due 06/01/24 |
100,000 |
|
95,260 |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg Notes SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/28 |
200,000 |
|
182,500 |
Total Communications |
|
10,191,557 |
Energy – 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 11/15/27 |
2,000,000 |
|
2,047,320 |
Valero Energy Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 06/01/527 |
2,450,000 |
|
1,782,204 |
ITT Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 08/01/292 |
1,250,000 |
|
1,090,625 |
NuStar Logistics, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
6.38% due 10/01/307 |
1,000,000 |
|
975,000 |
Targa Resources Partners Limited Partnership / Targa Resources Partners Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 02/01/317 |
1,000,000 |
|
925,732 |
Venture Global LNG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.88% due 02/01/322 |
750,000 |
|
768,631 |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.20% due 06/01/337 |
400,000 |
|
383,015 |
Parkland Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 05/01/302,7 |
300,000 |
|
267,750 |
Buckeye Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
4.35% due 10/15/247 |
250,000 |
|
244,415 |
Viper Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.38% due 11/01/312,7 |
200,000 |
|
202,400 |
Greensaif Pipelines Bidco SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
6.51% due 02/23/422 |
200,000 |
|
200,268 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 37
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy – 2.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
CVR Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 02/15/282 |
125,000 |
|
$115,589 |
Total Energy |
|
9,002,949 |
Basic Materials – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Alcoa Nederland Holding BV |
|
|
|
|
|
4.13% due 03/31/292,7 |
1,100,000 |
|
981,096 |
ArcelorMittal S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.55% due 11/29/27 |
900,000 |
|
929,363 |
SK Invictus Intermediate II SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 10/30/292,7 |
700,000 |
|
568,844 |
SCIL IV LLC / SCIL USA Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.38% due 11/01/262,7 |
600,000 |
|
563,237 |
Mirabela Nickel Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
due 06/24/19†††,9,11 |
96,316 |
|
482 |
Total Basic Materials |
|
3,043,022 |
Technology – 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcom, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.19% due 11/15/362,7 |
1,300,000 |
|
993,297 |
Oracle Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.95% due 03/25/517 |
1,100,000 |
|
813,880 |
CDW LLC / CDW Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.57% due 12/01/317 |
800,000 |
|
688,896 |
Central Parent LLC / CDK Global II LLC / CDK Financing Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.00% due 06/15/292 |
200,000 |
|
205,158 |
Total Technology |
|
2,701,231 |
Utilities – 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Edison Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 01/15/332,7 |
950,000 |
|
925,344 |
Alexander Funding Trust II |
|
|
|
|
|
7.47% due 07/31/282,7 |
900,000 |
|
922,105 |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 03/15/332 |
450,000 |
|
454,972 |
Black Hills Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.95% due 03/15/287 |
200,000 |
|
202,461 |
Total Utilities |
|
2,504,882 |
Total Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $129,172,712) |
112,706,031 |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Thunderbird A |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/37††† |
3,925,948 |
|
3,606,610 |
See notes to financial statements.
38 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 3.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightning A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/37††† |
3,867,386 |
|
$3,552,812 |
HV Eight LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% (3 Month EURIBOR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 12/31/27◊,††† |
EUR 1,607,232 |
|
1,749,785 |
KKR Core Holding Company LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 08/12/31††† |
1,561,248 |
|
1,371,792 |
Project Onyx I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67% due 01/26/27††† |
1,350,000 |
|
1,349,277 |
Ceamer Finance LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.92% due 11/15/37††† |
966,635 |
|
923,670 |
LVNV Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.80% due 11/05/28††† |
650,000 |
|
650,000 |
Project Onyx II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67% due 01/26/27††† |
450,000 |
|
449,732 |
Total Financial |
|
13,653,678 |
Transport-Aircraft – 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAIA Aviation Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1, 3.97% due 12/15/442,4 |
2,382,172 |
|
2,142,001 |
Navigator Aircraft ABS Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1, 2.77% due 11/15/462 |
1,075,149 |
|
917,156 |
Sprite Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1, 3.75% due 11/15/462 |
954,136 |
|
874,437 |
JOL Air Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1, 3.97% due 04/15/442 |
862,383 |
|
777,378 |
Start Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-1, 4.09% due 05/15/432 |
829,979 |
|
740,880 |
Castlelake Aircraft Structured Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A, 6.66% due 01/15/462 |
725,290 |
|
596,955 |
Labrador Aviation Finance Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-1A, 4.30% due 01/15/422 |
573,173 |
|
483,035 |
AASET Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-2A, 2.80% due 01/15/472 |
407,951 |
|
349,288 |
Total Transport-Aircraft |
|
6,881,130 |
Collateralized Loan Obligations – 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABPCI Direct Lending Fund IX LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-9A BR, 8.15% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.76%, Rate Floor: 2.50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 11/18/31◊,2 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,405,639 |
Cerberus Loan Funding XLII LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-3A C, 9.58% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.15%, Rate Floor: 4.15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 09/13/35◊,2 |
1,250,000 |
|
1,249,705 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 39
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Loan Obligations – 1.9% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
ABPCI Direct Lending Fund CLO II LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A CR, 8.83% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.41%, Rate Floor: 3.15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 04/20/32◊,2 |
1,000,000 |
|
$963,631 |
Cerberus Loan Funding XL LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A C, 9.79% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.40%, Rate Floor: 4.40%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 03/22/35◊,2 |
750,000 |
|
751,087 |
KREF Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-FL2 AS, 6.74% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.41%, Rate Floor: 1.30%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 02/15/39◊,2 |
650,000 |
|
601,857 |
WhiteHorse X Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10A E, 10.96% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.56%, Rate Floor: 5.30%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 04/17/27◊,2 |
371,135 |
|
371,077 |
WhiteHorse VIII Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2014-1A E, 10.19% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.81%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 05/01/26◊,2 |
196,225 |
|
165,429 |
BNPP IP CLO Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2014-2A E, 10.90% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.51%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 10/30/25◊,2 |
287,756 |
|
71,737 |
Total Collateralized Loan Obligations |
|
6,580,162 |
Infrastructure – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
VB-S1 Issuer LLC - VBTEL |
|
|
|
|
|
2022-1A, 4.29% due 02/15/522 |
5,000,000 |
|
4,431,825 |
Hotwire Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 8.84% due 05/20/532 |
1,900,000 |
|
1,750,238 |
Total Infrastructure |
|
6,182,063 |
Whole Business – 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Applebee’s Funding LLC / IHOP Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1A, 4.72% due 06/05/492 |
990,000 |
|
930,192 |
SERVPRO Master Issuer LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1A, 3.88% due 10/25/492 |
960,000 |
|
886,363 |
2021-1A, 2.39% due 04/25/512 |
48,750 |
|
40,742 |
Sonic Capital LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A, 2.64% due 08/20/512 |
1,174,000 |
|
893,526 |
Total Whole Business |
|
2,750,823 |
Net Lease – 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
CARS-DB7, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 6.50% due 09/15/532 |
997,917 |
|
984,265 |
SVC ABS LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 5.55% due 02/20/532 |
998,125 |
|
921,977 |
CARS-DB4, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
2020-1A, 4.95% due 02/15/502 |
500,000 |
|
407,320 |
Total Net Lease |
|
2,313,562 |
40 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED
SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single
Family Residence – 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FirstKey
Homes Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-SFR3,
4.50% due 07/17/382 |
1,000,000 |
|
$950,488 |
2020-SFR2,
4.50% due 10/19/372 |
400,000 |
|
368,203 |
2020-SFR2,
4.00% due 10/19/372 |
400,000 |
|
367,018 |
2020-SFR2,
3.37% due 10/19/372 |
250,000 |
|
227,635 |
Total
Single Family Residence |
|
1,913,344 |
|
Insurance
– 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%
due 03/15/43††† |
500,000 |
|
488,142 |
Total
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost
$42,664,855) |
|
40,762,904 |
|
SENIOR
FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer,
Cyclical – 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MB2
Dental Solutions LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.45%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 7.00%) due 01/29/27††† |
|
1,492,679 |
|
1,476,415 |
FR
Refuel LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 11/08/28 |
|
|
|
1,286,353 |
|
1,244,546 |
Zephyr
Bidco Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.19%
(1 Month GBP SONIA + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 07/31/28 |
|
|
|
GBP
900,000 |
|
1,107,728 |
First
Brands Group LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.88%
(6 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 03/30/27 |
|
|
|
1,121,250 |
|
1,101,348 |
Alexander
Mann |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.42%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.10%, Rate Floor: 6.10%) due 06/29/27 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
971,670 |
Pacific
Bells LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 11/10/28 |
752,210 |
|
742,100 |
Accuride
Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.22%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 6.25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in-kind
rate was 1.62%) due 05/18/2612 |
698,946 |
|
597,599 |
The
Facilities Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.24%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 11/30/27††† |
496,343 |
|
486,417 |
NFM
& J LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.23%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 11/30/27††† |
488,427 |
|
478,658 |
Camin
Cargo Control, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.96%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.50%, Rate Floor: 6.50%) due 06/04/26††† |
471,801 |
|
452,929 |
Flutter
Financing B.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.90%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 3.25%, Rate Floor: 3.25%) due 07/24/28 |
415,521 |
|
415,662 |
ImageFIRST
Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47%
((3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
Floor: 4.75%) due 04/27/28 |
419,459 |
|
415,265 |
Total
Consumer, Cyclical |
|
9,490,337 |
|
Consumer,
Non-cyclical – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mission
Veterinary Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.46%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 04/27/28 |
|
|
|
1,225,000 |
|
1,207,899 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 41
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 2.1% (continued) |
|
|
|
PetIQ LLC |
|
|
|
10.17% (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 04/13/28 |
1,054,192 |
$ |
1,038,380 |
Quirch Foods Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
10.45% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 10/27/27 |
953,880 |
|
947,327 |
Women’s Care Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.05% (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 01/17/28 |
1,057,805 |
|
934,180 |
Blue Ribbon LLC |
|
|
|
11.43% (1 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 05/08/28 |
1,035,000 |
|
882,337 |
LaserAway Intermediate Holdings II LLC |
|
|
|
11.41% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 10/14/27 |
781,187 |
|
766,540 |
Gibson Brands, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.66% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 08/11/28 |
491,250 |
|
437,213 |
Southern Veterinary Partners LLC |
|
|
|
9.46% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 10/05/27 |
424,753 |
|
422,204 |
Endo Luxembourg Finance Company I SARL |
|
|
|
14.50% (Commercial Prime Lending Rate + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 03/27/28 |
592,500 |
|
380,681 |
Florida Food Products LLC |
|
|
|
10.46% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 10/18/28 |
439,356 |
|
375,649 |
HAH Group Holding Co. LLC |
|
|
|
10.45% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 10/29/27 |
255,153 |
|
251,752 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
|
7,644,162 |
Technology – 1.7% |
|
|
|
Polaris Newco LLC |
|
|
|
8.95% ((1 Month Term SOFR + 3.50%) and (Commercial Prime Lending |
|
|
|
Rate + 2.50%), Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 06/04/26††† |
2,021,000 |
|
1,894,134 |
Sitecore Holding III A/S |
|
|
|
10.98% ((6 Month EURIBOR + 7.75%) and (12 Month EURIBOR + 7.00%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 03/12/26††† |
EUR 727,995 |
|
789,269 |
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/12/26††† |
584,919 |
|
582,520 |
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/09/26††† |
111,648 |
|
111,191 |
Aston FinCo SARL |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month GBP SONIA + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 10/09/26 |
GBP 780,080 |
|
829,642 |
RLDatix |
|
|
|
13.19% (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 04/27/26††† |
700,000 |
|
685,650 |
24-7 Intouch, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.20% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 08/25/25 |
382,938 |
|
377,512 |
Datix Bidco Ltd. |
|
|
|
12.94% (6 Month GBP SONIA + 7.75%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 04/27/26††† |
GBP 300,000 |
|
370,943 |
Sitecore USA, Inc. |
|
|
|
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/12/26††† |
286,383 |
|
285,209 |
42 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Technology – 1.7% (continued) |
|
|
|
Atlas CC Acquisition Corp. |
|
|
|
9.90% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 05/25/28 |
191,431 |
$ |
177,100 |
Total Technology |
|
|
6,103,170 |
Industrial – 1.7% |
|
|
|
Dispatch Terra Acquisition LLC |
|
|
|
9.79% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 03/27/28 |
1,124,125 |
|
1,053,867 |
Arcline FM Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
10.40% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 06/23/28 |
959,038 |
|
942,974 |
Level 3 Financing, Inc. |
|
|
|
7.21% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.75%, Rate Floor: 1.75%) due 03/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
|
940,000 |
CapStone Acquisition Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.20% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 11/12/27††† |
931,966 |
|
926,725 |
Aegion Corp. |
|
|
|
10.39% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 05/17/28 |
588,174 |
|
580,828 |
Merlin Buyer, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.35% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 12/14/28 |
575,189 |
|
565,123 |
Merlin Buyer, Inc. |
|
|
|
due 12/14/28††† |
300,000 |
|
294,000 |
TK Elevator Midco GmbH |
|
|
|
6.85% (1 Month EURIBOR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.00%) due 01/29/27††† |
EUR 274,012 |
|
282,195 |
Integrated Power Services Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 11/22/28††† |
196,669 |
|
195,270 |
ILPEA Parent, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 06/22/28††† |
127,173 |
|
124,629 |
Total Industrial |
|
|
5,905,611 |
Communications – 0.6% |
|
|
|
FirstDigital Communications LLC |
|
|
|
9.71% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 12/17/26††† |
1,250,000 |
|
1,214,685 |
Syndigo LLC |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 12/15/27††† |
929,590 |
|
897,055 |
Total Communications |
|
|
2,111,740 |
Financial – 0.6% |
|
|
|
Citadel Securities, LP |
|
|
|
7.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.50%, Rate Floor: 2.50%) due 07/29/30 |
987,399 |
|
986,865 |
Eisner Advisory Group |
|
|
|
10.71% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 07/28/28 |
711,669 |
|
710,339 |
HighTower Holding LLC |
|
|
|
9.64% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 04/21/28 |
348,128 |
|
346,099 |
Total Financial |
|
|
2,043,303 |
Utilities – 0.0% |
|
|
|
Oregon Clean Energy LLC |
|
|
|
9.24% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.75%, Rate Floor: 3.75%) due 03/01/26 |
79,386 |
|
78,096 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 43
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Total Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
|
|
(Cost $34,481,531) |
|
$ |
33,376,419 |
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS†† – 3.4% |
|
|
|
Government Agency – 2.4% |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
|
3.00% due 08/01/527 |
2,930,298 |
|
2,490,280 |
3.00% due 06/01/527 |
2,913,706 |
|
2,471,939 |
Uniform MBS 30 Year |
|
|
|
due 09/14/5314 |
4,411,764 |
|
3,719,346 |
Total Government Agency |
|
|
8,681,565 |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities – 0.9% |
|
|
|
Imperial Fund Mortgage Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM2, 4.20% (WAC) due 03/25/67◊,2 |
1,972,124 |
|
1,719,893 |
GCAT Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM5, 5.71% due 08/25/672,4 |
537,125 |
|
521,485 |
OBX Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM8, 6.10% due 09/25/622,4 |
434,755 |
|
425,096 |
CFMT LLC |
|
|
|
2022-HB9, 3.25% (WAC) due 09/25/37◊,9 |
500,000 |
|
418,803 |
Total Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
|
3,085,277 |
Military Housing – 0.1% |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Military Housing Bonds Resecuritization Trust Certificates |
|
|
|
2015-R1, 0.70% (WAC) due 11/25/55◊,2,13 |
6,787,122 |
|
427,407 |
2015-R1, 5.94% (WAC) due 11/25/52◊,9 |
84,762 |
|
73,758 |
Total Military Housing |
|
|
501,165 |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
|
|
|
(Cost $12,486,511) |
|
|
12,268,007 |
FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DEBT†† – 0.2% |
|
|
|
Panama Government International Bond |
|
|
|
4.50% due 01/19/63 |
1,250,000 |
|
767,983 |
Total Foreign Government Debt |
|
|
|
(Cost $1,242,317) |
|
|
767,983 |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
OTC OPTIONS PURCHASED†† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
Call Options on: |
|
|
|
Interest Rate Options |
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs International |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,800,000 |
|
19,296 |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,400,000 |
|
18,581 |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,300,000 |
|
18,403 |
44 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Value |
Value |
OTC OPTIONS PURCHASED†† – 0.0% (continued) |
|
|
|
Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 5,200,000 |
$9,291 |
Goldman Sachs International |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 10,800,000 |
396 |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,400,000 |
381 |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 10,400,000 |
381 |
Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 5,100,000 |
187 |
Total OTC Options Purchased |
|
|
|
(Cost $313,757) |
|
66,916 |
Total Investments – 139.0% |
|
|
|
(Cost $570,726,146) |
$ 497,675,824 |
Other Assets & Liabilities, net – (39.0)% |
(139,600,114) |
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
$ 358,075,710 |
Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swap Agreements Protection Purchased††
|
|
|
Protection
|
|
|
|
|
Upfront |
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
Payment
|
Maturity
|
Notional
|
|
Premiums
|
Unrealized |
Counterparty
|
Exchange
|
Index
|
Rate
|
Frequency |
Date
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Received
|
Depreciation** |
J.P.
Morgan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
LLC |
ICE
|
ITRAXX.EUR.38.V1
|
1.00% |
Quarterly
|
12/20/27 |
EUR
4,400,000 |
$(81,663)
|
$(33,072) |
$(48,591) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts†† |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Contract |
Settlement |
|
Appreciation |
|
Counterparty |
Currency |
Type |
Quantity |
|
Amount |
Date |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
Barclays Bank plc |
EUR |
Sell |
32,000 |
|
35,060 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
|
$200 |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
EUR |
Sell |
2,510,000 |
|
2,733,285 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
Bank of America, N.A. |
CAD |
Sell |
935,000 |
|
682,963 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
GBP |
Sell |
2,952,000 |
|
3,690,692 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(36,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$(43,626 |
) |
~ | | The face amount is denominated in U.S. dollars unless
otherwise indicated. |
* | | Non-income producing security. |
** | | Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation).
Variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
† | | Value determined based on Level 1 inputs,
unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
†† | | Value determined based on Level 2
inputs, unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
††† | | Value determined based on
Level 3 inputs — See Note 6. |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 45
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
◊ | | Variable
rate security. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November 30, 2023. In some instances,
the effective rate is limited by a minimum rate floor or a maximum rate cap established by
the issuer. The settlement status of a position may also impact the effective rate indicated.
In some cases, a position may be unsettled at period end and may not have a stated effective
rate. In instances where multiple underlying reference rates and spread amounts are shown,
the effective rate is based on a weighted average. |
2 | | Security
is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be liquid
under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value of 144A or
Section 4(a) (2) securities is $92,016,924 (cost $102,353,536), or 25.7% of total net assets. |
3 | | Security
has a fixed rate coupon which will convert to a floating or variable rate coupon on a future
date. |
4 | | Security
is a step up/down bond. The coupon increases or decreases at regular intervals until the
bond reaches full maturity. Rate indicated is the rate at November 30, 2023. See table below
for additional step information for each security. |
5 | | Special
Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC). |
6 | | Rate indicated
is the 7-day yield as of November 30, 2023. |
7 | | All or
a portion of these securities have been physically segregated in connection with borrowings,
unfunded loan commitments, and reverse repurchase agreements. As of November 30, 2023, the
total value of securities segregated was $152,359,198. |
8 | | Zero coupon
rate security. |
9 | | Security
is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be illiquid
and restricted under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value
of 144A or Section 4(a)(2) illiquid and restricted securities is $6,373,360 (cost $7,701,346),
or 1.8% of total net assets — See Note 12. |
11 | | Security
is in default of interest and/or principal obligations. |
12 | | Payment-in-kind
security. |
13 | | Security
is an interest-only strip. |
14 | | Security
is unsettled at period end and does not have a stated effective rate. |
15 | | Taxable
municipal bond issued as part of the Build America Bond program. |
CAD — Canadian Dollar
CMS — Constant Maturity Swap
EUR — Euro
EURIBOR — European Interbank Offered Rate
GBP — British Pound
ICE — Intercontinental Exchange
ITRAXX.EUR.38.V1 — iTraxx Euro