UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22437
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Amy J. Lee
227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 827-0100
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: June 1, 2020 – November 30, 2020
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
The registrant’s semi-annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), is as
follows:
GUGGENHEIMINVESTMENTS.COM/GBAB
... YOUR LINK TO THE LATEST, MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST
The shareholder report you are reading right now is just the beginning of the story.
Online at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab, you will find:
•
|
Daily, weekly and monthly data on share prices, net asset values, distributions and more
|
•
|
Monthly portfolio overviews and performance analyses
|
•
|
Announcements, press releases and special notices
|
•
|
Trust and adviser contact information
|
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC and Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC are continually updating and expanding shareholder information services on the Trust’s website in an
ongoing effort to provide you with the most current information about how your Trust’s assets are managed and the results of our efforts. It is just one more small way we are working to keep you better informed about your investment in the Trust.
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited)
|
November 30, 2020
|
We thank you for your investment in the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (formerly, Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Managed Duration Trust) (the “Trust”). In August
2020, the Board of Trustees of the Trust approved modifications to certain non-fundamental investment policies along with a corresponding name change. The modifications are primarily intended to provide the Trust with greater investment flexibility
while remaining consistent with the Trust’s overall investment objectives. The changes took effect on November 19, 2020, and are described in the Questions & Answers sections of the report. The Trust’s primary investment objective remains the
same, which is to provide current income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation.
This report covers the Trust’s performance for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020, which concluded on a cautious note. Even though markets performed well for most of the period, COVID-19
became the deadliest pandemic in a century. The U.S. Federal Reserve acted quickly to restore market functioning and cushion the economy, cutting rates to zero, engaging in large-scale asset purchases, and launching an array of lending facilities.
Congress also acted much faster than in previous downturns, with the budget deficit headed to the highest level since World War II.
The recovery since the spring has been faster than expected, thanks to massive fiscal support. Encouraging progress on the vaccine front bode well for vaccine take up rates and the time needed to
bring the pandemic under control. We expect a sizable growth acceleration in the middle of 2021 as multiple vaccines are broadly distributed in the U.S. However, the latest COVID wave is the largest yet, which has led to renewed lockdowns and a
setback in the recovery. Winter weather and holiday gatherings could cause things to get worse before they get better.
These events affected performance of the Trust for the period. To learn more about the Trust’s performance and investment strategy, we encourage you to read the Economic and Market Overview and the
Questions & Answers sections of this report, which begin on page 5. There, you will find information on Guggenheim’s investment philosophy, views on the economy and market environment, and detailed information about the factors that impacted the
Trust’s performance.
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value (“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the six-month period ended November 30, 2020, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 9.52% and a total return based on NAV of 8.00%. As of November 30, 2020, the Trust’s market price of $24.59 per share represented a premium of 6.63% to its NAV of $23.06 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time, and may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
The Trust paid a monthly distribution of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized rate of 6.14% based on the Trust’s closing market price of $24.59 on November 30,
2020. There is no guarantee of future distributions or that the current returns and distribution rate will be
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 3
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
maintained. The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change based on the performance of the Trust.
Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution Rate on page 25, and Note 2(f) on page 50 for more information on distributions for the period.
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC (“GFIA” or the “Adviser”) serves as the investment adviser to the Trust. Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM” or the “Sub-Adviser”) serves
as the Trust’s investment sub-adviser and is responsible for the management of the Trust’s portfolio of investments. Each of the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser is an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (“Guggenheim”), a global diversified financial
services firm.
We encourage shareholders to consider the opportunity to reinvest their distributions from the Trust through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”), which is described in detail on page 66 of this
report. When shares trade at a discount to NAV, the DRIP takes advantage of the discount by reinvesting the monthly distribution in common shares of the Trust purchased in the market at a price less than NAV. Conversely, when the market price of the
Trust’s common shares is at a premium above NAV, the DRIP reinvests participants’ distributions in newly-issued common shares at the greater of NAV per share or 95% of the market price per share. The DRIP provides a cost-effective means to accumulate
additional shares and enjoy the benefits of compounding returns over time. Since the Trust endeavors to maintain a steady monthly distribution rate, the DRIP effectively provides an income averaging technique, which causes shareholders to accumulate
a larger number of Trust shares when the share price is lower than when the price is higher.
We appreciate your investment and look forward to serving your investment needs in the future. For the most up-to-date information on your investment, please visit the Trust’s website at
guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Sincerely,
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
December 31, 2020
4 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
ECONOMIC AND MARKET OVERVIEW (Unaudited)
|
November 30, 2020
|
The period was marked by COVID-19, the deadliest pandemic in a century, which caused a steeper plunge in output and employment in two months than during the first two years of the Great Depression.
However, the recovery since May 2020 has been faster than expected, with consumer confidence holding up well as massive fiscal support drove positive personal income growth and a swift monetary policy response led to gains in household net worth.
Nonetheless, the U.S. economy slowed in the final weeks of 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic worsened, with the expected holiday season surge in cases leading to new restrictions and stay-at-home orders
in a number of states. The ramping up of vaccine distribution may help drive recovery by the second quarter of 2021, but the pace of vaccine rollout is likely not yet fast enough to stop the current wave, risking a further slowdown in the near term.
The slowing recovery was evident in falling small business optimism in November’s National Federation of Independent Business (“NFIB”) survey, which saw a sharp contraction in the number of businesses
expecting the economy to improve. One bright spot in the report was that a relatively high amount of businesses plan more hiring, consistent with the rebound in job openings data, which has bounced back much faster than in previous recessions. These
positive signals of elevated labor demand suggest that once the pandemic impediment to business activity starts to fade, we could see relatively rapid job growth in 2021, one of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) two policy mandates. The other,
inflation at 2%, remains a challenge. While the most recent reading of core Consumer Price Index was slightly stronger than expected at 1.6%, its more durable components, such as rental inflation, continue to soften, suggesting underlying inflation
remains weak.
Beyond the data, the market has been focused on the recently passed federal fiscal package, which adds more support for small businesses, new stimulus payments, reinstates federal unemployment
benefits, and provides some funding for state and local governments. This stimulus should be out the door relatively quickly, helping to cushion incomes in the first quarter even as the pandemic worsens. And with Democrats taking control of the
Senate after the period ended, more fiscal stimulus appears to be on the way, which should drive a strong recovery by the summer as vaccines are more widely distributed and consumers and businesses can draw on buffers built up during the crisis. With
a change in Senate control, there is some chance that Democratic proposals the markets had worried about under a Biden presidency, such as corporate and individual tax hikes and heavier regulations, could move forward. A Biden presidency may also
mean more predictable policymaking and a scaled back trade war.
We expect the Fed to remain ultra-accommodative, continuing its current pace of asset purchases “until substantial further progress has been made” in reaching its dual mandate goals. Given the amount
of labor market healing still ahead of us, and continued disinflationary headwinds, the Fed will likely continue to signal to the market it will be on hold even as we see strong economic growth rates in 2021.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 5
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited)
|
November 30, 2020
|
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”) is managed by a team of seasoned professionals at Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC
(“GPIM” or the “Sub-Adviser”). This team includes B. Scott Minerd, Chairman of Investments and Global Chief Investment Officer; Anne B. Walsh, CFA, JD, Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income; Steven H. Brown, CFA, Senior
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; and Adam J. Bloch, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager. In the following interview, the investment team discusses the market environment and the
Trust’s strategy and performance for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020.
Discuss the Trust’s changes to the non-fundamental investment policy and name.
In August 2020, the Board of Trustees of the Trust approved modifications to certain non-fundamental investment policies along with a name change to Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment
Grade Debt Trust. The modifications were primarily intended to provide the Trust with greater investment flexibility while remaining consistent with the Trust’s overall investment objectives. The changes took effect on November 19, 2020. The Trust
will continue to trade on the NYSE under its current ticker symbol, “GBAB”.
The Trust expanded its non-fundamental 80% investment policy to include, in addition to taxable municipal securities, other investment grade, income-generating debt securities, including debt
instruments issued by non-profit entities (such as entities related to healthcare, higher education and housing), municipal conduits, project finance corporations, and tax-exempt municipal securities. In addition to the 80% investment policy change,
the Trust (i) removed certain limitations on the composition of the other 20% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes (“Managed Assets”), (ii) removed the limitation on illiquid investments, (iii) added a policy to
invest at least 50% of its Managed Assets in taxable municipal securities and (iv) changed the level at which the Trust seeks to maintain its leverage-adjusted duration from generally less than 10 years to generally less than 15 years.
No other changes to the Trust’s other investment policies or the Trust’s portfolio management team are currently anticipated. No action was required by shareholders of the Trust in connection with
these investment policy modifications or the change in the Trust’s name.
What is the Trust’s investment objective and how is it pursued?
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing
primarily in a diversified portfolio of taxable municipal securities and other investment grade, income generating debt securities, including debt instruments issued by non-profit entities (such as entities related to healthcare, higher education and
housing), municipal conduits, project finance corporations, and tax-exempt municipal securities. Under normal market conditions, the Trust will invest at least 80% of its Managed Assets in taxable municipal securities, including Build America Bonds
(“BABs”), which qualify for federal subsidy payments under the American Recovery and
6 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Act”) and other investment grade, income generating debt securities, including debt instruments issued by non-profit entities (such as entities related to healthcare,
higher education and housing), municipal conduits, project finance corporations, and tax-exempt municipal securities. As outlined in the response to the question above, the 80% policy was expanded beyond taxable municipal securities in November to
include such investment-grade, income-generating securities and the policy regarding the other 20% of Managed Assets was modified in November to remove certain limitations on its composition. Three specific opportunities that the Trust seeks to
further pursue upon the investment policy changes are investments in (i) debt instruments issued by non-profit entities, such as entities related to healthcare, housing and higher education, (ii) “municipal conduits” (entities on whose behalf
municipalities issue bonds, but the conduit, not the municipality, is obligated to pay the interest and principal on the bonds), and (iii) project finance corporations. Guggenheim Investments believes these debt instruments are rapidly growing
components of the municipal securities and municipal-related markets. The Trust will also pursue investment opportunities in other investment-grade rated debt sectors.
Under normal market conditions, the Trust invests at least 80% of its Managed Assets in securities that, at the time of investment, are investment grade quality. The Trust may invest up to 20% of its
Managed Assets in securities that, at the time of investment, are below investment grade quality. Securities of below investment grade quality are regarded as having predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to capacity to pay interest
and repay principal. The Trust does not invest more than 25% of its Managed Assets in municipal securities in any one state of origin. As part of the non-fundamental investment policy changes, the Trust removed the limitation on illiquid investments.
Previously, the Trust could not invest more than 15% of its Managed Assets in municipal securities that, at the time of investment, were illiquid.
Why is the Trust focused on taxable municipals?
Most investors equate the municipal market with tax-exemption. But taxable municipals are a growing part of the market, in fact the fastest-growing segment in U.S. fixed income for 2020. Year-to-date,
taxable municipals have posted the best results in the municipal space, in part due to their longer durations and higher yields.
Issuance for the year is expected to total $170 billion, more than double the $85 billion sold in all of 2019. That represents about 30% of primary market volume, up from an average of about only 9%
from 2011 to 2018. Taxable municipals total about $700 billion of the $3.7 trillion municipal market.
Growth has surged because of low interest rates that reduced the cost of borrowing for many municipal market issuers and the refinancing of outstanding tax-exempt bonds by states and local governments
with taxable securities, which was required by a tax law change in 2017. Even though taxable advance refundings have been available for years, borrowing costs prevented issuers from using them. Taxable municipals are also popular for general purpose
funding for higher education and healthcare.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 7
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
The benefits of taxable municipals include their higher yields compared with similarly rated tax-exempt municipal and corporate debt with similarly low historical rates of default. The higher yields
stem from their absence of tax benefits, but also because the sector is small when compared with the total municipal market and perhaps not as well known. But like most municipal issues, the taxable market is generally high in credit quality. The
growing size of the taxable market means that investors have more to choose from, thus helping increase its potential to help portfolio diversification.
Generally, taxable municipals have longer average duration, which makes them more sensitive to changes in interest rates than tax exempts, suggesting that total returns for taxable municipals could
lag that of tax exempts if rates jump quickly. While issuance of taxable municipals occurs across the yield curve, the trend is toward longer maturities, including some 100-year issues in the higher education sector.
Issuers should continue to take advantage of refinancing opportunities through the taxable municipal market, and their share of the municipal market should be maintained, if not grow. Taxable
municipals have also drawn the interest of international investors, whose ownership has been steadily increasing along with the size of the market. Improved hedging costs have also attracted overseas buyers, continuing their preference for liquid,
“brand name” credits.
The trend is likely to continue, as taxable municipals are a compelling alternative to corporate bonds, offering typically higher yields and lower rates of default. The market has grown to $700
billion, but is still dwarfed by the $3.7 trillion that makes up the tax-exempt side of the market.
Most of the Trust’s assets are in Build America Bonds. Is that expected to continue?
It is not currently anticipated that there will be substantial portfolio turnover in conjunction with the non-fundamental investment policy changes in the immediate future. BABs remain an integral
part of the portfolio.
That said, the BABs market is not growing and the number of BABs available is limited. BABs were created following the 2008 financial crisis to support job-creating projects funded by the public
finance market. Although interest received on BABs is subject to U.S. federal income tax, issuers of these securities are eligible to receive a subsidy of up to 35% from the U.S. Treasury, which, under sequestration, has been cut by about 6% each
year since 2013. The provisions of the Act have not been extended, so no bonds issued after December 31, 2010, qualify as BABs.
Other parts of the taxable municipal market, however, have been booming. 2020 saw the highest issuance of taxable municipals since the BABs program expired. About 60% of taxable issuance was for
advance refunding of tax-exempt municipal debt with taxable debt.
How did the Trust perform for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020?
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value (“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the six-month period ended November 30, 2020, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 9.52% and a total return based on NAV of 8.00%. As
8 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
of November 30, 2020, the Trust’s market price of $24.59 per share represented a premium of 6.63% to its NAV of $23.06 per share. As of May 31, 2020, the Trust’s market price of $23.20 per share
represented a premium of 5.02% to its NAV of $22.09 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time, and may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
The Trust paid a monthly distribution of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized rate of 6.14% based on the Trust’s closing market price of $24.59 on November 30,
2020. There is no guarantee of future distributions or that the current returns and distribution rate will be maintained. The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees,
is subject to change based on the performance of the Trust.
Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution Rate on page 25, and Note 2(f) on page 50 for more information on distributions for the period.
How did other markets perform in this environment for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020?
Index
|
Total Return
|
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index
|
3.29%
|
Bloomberg Barclays Taxable Municipal Index
|
5.08%
|
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
|
1.79%
|
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index
|
10.36%
|
Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index
|
7.96%
|
ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index
|
7.53%
|
ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch Build America Bond Index
|
5.25%
|
S&P 500 Index
|
19.98%
|
What was notable in the municipal market for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020?
The municipal market, along with many other financial sectors, rebounded as the recovery since March was faster than expected, and was further boosted by positive vaccine news toward the end of the
period. The rally drove municipal/treasury ratios to contract to pre-COVID-19 levels. The potential for post-election stimulus added support to financial markets, including the municipal market.
Still, there are long-term scarring effects from small business failures, corporate bankruptcies, and higher debt burdens, which could drag on the recovery. Further clouding the outlook, states are
reporting significant budgetary deficits for Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021. At period end, Congress had not provided additional aid to struggling state and local governments, which face job and spending cuts without more support.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 9
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
The Fed acted quickly to restore market functioning and cushion the economy in the spring, cutting rates to zero, engaging in massive asset purchases, and launching an array of lending facilities.
These included the Fed’s commitment to buy short-term municipal bonds as part of the government’s $2 trillion stimulus bill, enacted in March and providing $150 billion directly to state governments and key funding to help hospitals cope with the
budgetary pressures of COVID-19. In April, the Fed said a municipal liquidity facility would offer up to $500 billion in lending to states and municipalities. However, in November, the U.S. Treasury said the municipal liquidity facility as well as
other Fed lending facilities would sunset on December 31, 2020, as scheduled.
Much of the market performance over the period stemmed from technical factors like fund flows and issuance. Annual supply rebounded from a five-year low in 2018 and should exceed $460 billion in 2020,
the fourth highest level since at least 2003. Net fund flows into municipal bonds have been positive since spring, when the pandemic prompted heavy outflows.
Technical factors began receding near period end, providing less incremental support for market performance. In addition, rating downgrades exceeded upgrades for the second and third quarters,
according to Moody’s. Given the challenges facing state and municipal budgets, downgrades could outpace upgrades for several quarters to come.
Discuss Trust asset allocation and respective performance for the six-month period ended November 30, 2020.
The percentage of the Trust’s long-term investments (excluding cash) that was invested in taxable municipal bond securities was approximately 73%. As noted, the Trust expanded its non-fundamental 80%
investment policy to include, in addition to taxable municipal securities, other investment grade, income-generating debt securities.
The balance of the Trust’s Managed Assets was invested in high yield corporate bonds, ABS, bank loans, and tax-exempt municipal bonds. The exposure to leveraged credit and ABS contributed to Trust
performance, as these sectors had positive returns over the period, but with low correlation to the Trust’s core holdings.
Performance was driven by favorable security selection, sector allocation and the use of leverage to enhance the Trust’s returns. As liquidity improved over the period, spreads in several sectors,
including airports, healthcare and hospitals, tightened despite their different underlying credit conditions, implying a technically driven market. We remain cautious in the face of technical factors, such as Fed initiatives and fund inflows, and
expect additional negative credit developments over the next 12 months, as tax revenues recover slowly while safety-net and entitlement spending increase. Our focus is on assessing individual credits to identify those equipped to survive in a
post-pandemic revenue environment. Rate positioning also added to returns as U.S. Treasury rates rallied.
Discuss the Trust’s duration.
The change in non-fundamental investment policy increased the level at which the Trust seeks to maintain its leverage-adjusted duration from generally less than 10 years to generally less than 15
years. At November 30, 2020, the Trust’s duration was approximately 10.6 years. (Duration is a
10 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
measure of a bond’s price sensitivity to changes in interest rates, expressed in years, and reflects the weighted average term to maturity of discounted bond cash flow.) The Sub-Adviser may seek to
manage the Trust’s duration in a flexible and opportunistic manner based primarily on then-current market conditions and interest rate levels.
Discuss the Trust’s use of leverage.
Since leverage adds to performance when the cost of leverage is less than the total return generated by investments, the use of financial leverage contributed to the Trust’s total return based on NAV
during the period.
The Trust utilizes financial leverage as part of its investment strategy to finance the purchase of additional securities that provide increased income and potentially greater appreciation potential
to common shareholders than could be achieved from a portfolio that is not leveraged. Leverage will not exceed 33.33% of the Trust’s Managed Assets.
As of November 30, 2020, the Trust’s leverage was approximately 21% of Managed Assets (including the proceeds of leverage), compared with about 18% at the beginning of the period. The Trust currently
employs financial leverage through reverse repurchase agreements with five counterparties and a credit facility with a major bank.
Although financial leverage may create an opportunity for increased return for shareholders, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the effect of any losses. There is no assurance that
the strategy will be successful. If income and gains earned on securities purchased with the financial leverage proceeds are greater than the cost of the financial leverage, common shareholders’ return will be greater than if financial leverage had
not been used. Conversely, if the income or gains from the securities purchased with the proceeds of financial leverage are less than the cost of the financial leverage, common shareholders’ return will be less than if financial leverage had not been
used.
The Trust may invest up to 20% of its Managed Assets in other investment companies, including U.S. registered investment companies and/or other U.S. or foreign pooled investment vehicles
(collectively, “Investment Funds”). Investments in Investment Funds involve operating expenses and fees that are in addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another
Investment Fund are borne indirectly by common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expense and fee layering. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for
such entities’ managers to employ financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk. A performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the
hope of earning a higher profit participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial leverage.
Index Definitions
Indices are unmanaged and reflect no expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 11
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is considered representative of the broad market for investment grade, tax-exempt municipal bonds with a maturity
of at least one year.
The Bloomberg Barclays Taxable Municipal Index tracks performance of investment-grade fixed income securities issued by state and local governments whose
income is not exempt from tax, issued generally to finance a project or activity that does not meet certain “public purpose/use” requirements.
The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate
taxable bond market, including U.S. Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities or “MBS” (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage, or “ARM”, pass-throughs), ABS, and commercial mortgage-backed
securities (“CMBS”) (agency and non-agency).
The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index measures the U.S. dollar-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are
classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB +/BB + or below.
The Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index is an index designed to mirror the investable universe of the U.S.-dollar-denominated leveraged loan market.
The ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index is a subset of the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Fixed Rate Asset Backed
Securities Index including all securities rated AA1 through BBB3, inclusive.
The ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch Build America Bond Index is designed to track the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated Build America Bonds publicly
issued by U.S. states and territories, and their political subdivisions, in the U.S. market.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure the performance of the broad economy,
representing all major industries and is considered a representation of U.S. stock market.
Risks and Other Considerations
The global ongoing crisis caused by the outbreak of COVID-19 is causing materially reduced consumer demand and economic output, disrupting supply chains, resulting in market closures, travel
restrictions and quarantines, and adversely impacting local and global economies. Investors should be aware that in light of the current uncertainty, volatility and distress in economies, financial markets, and labor and public health conditions all
over the world, the Trust’s investments and a shareholder’s investment in the Trust are subject to sudden and substantial losses, increased volatility and other adverse events. Firms through which investors invest with the Trust, the Trust, its
service providers, the markets in which it invests and market intermediaries are also impacted by quarantines and similar measures intended to contain the ongoing pandemic, which can obstruct their functioning and subject them to heightened
operational risks.
12 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio managers only through the report period as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time, based on market and
other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation of any kind. The material may also include forward looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass.
There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment objectives. The value of the Trust will fluctuate with the value of the underlying securities. Risk is inherent in all investing,
including the loss of your entire principal. Therefore, before investing you should consider the risks carefully.
The Trust is subject to various risk factors, including investment risk, which could result in the loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Certain of these risk factors are described
below. Please see the Trust’s Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab for a more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust. Shareholders may access the Trust’s Prospectus and SAI on
the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
The fact that a particular risk below is not specifically identified as being heightened under current conditions does not mean that the risk is not greater than under normal conditions.
Below Investment Grade Securities Risk. High yield, below investment grade and unrated high risk debt securities (which also may be known as “junk bonds”) may
present additional risks because these securities may be less liquid, and therefore more difficult to value accurately and sell at an advantageous price or time, and present more credit risk than investment grade bonds. The price of high yield
securities tends to be subject to greater volatility due to issuer-specific operating results and outlook and to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions. This exposure may be obtained through investments in other
investment companies. Generally, the risks associated with high yield securities are heightened during times of weakening economic conditions or rising interest rates and are therefore especially heightened under current conditions.
Corporate Bond Risk. Corporate bonds are debt obligations issued by corporations and other business entities. Corporate bonds may be either secured or
unsecured. Collateral used for secured debt includes real property, machinery, equipment, accounts receivable, stocks, bonds or notes. If a bond is unsecured, it is known as a debenture. Bondholders, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common
and preferred stockholders as to both income and assets of the corporation for the principal and interest due them and may have a prior claim over other creditors if liens or mortgages are involved. Interest on corporate bonds may be fixed or
floating, or the bonds may be zero coupons. Interest on corporate bonds is typically paid semi-annually and is fully taxable to the bondholder. Corporate bonds contain elements of both interest-rate risk and credit risk. The market value of a
corporate bond generally may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates and may also be affected by the credit rating of the corporation, the corporation’s performance and perceptions of the corporation in the marketplace. Corporate
bonds usually yield more than government or agency bonds due to the presence of credit risk. Depending on the nature of the seniority provisions, a senior corporate bond may be junior to other credit securities of the issuer. The market value of a
corporate
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 13
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
bond may be affected by factors directly related to the issuer, such as investors’ perceptions of the creditworthiness of the issuer, the issuer’s financial performance, perceptions of the issuer in
the market place, performance of management of the issuer, the issuer’s capital structure and use of financial leverage and demand for the issuer’s goods and services. There is a risk that the issuers of corporate bonds may not be able to meet their
obligations on interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument. Corporate bonds of below investment grade quality are often high risk and have speculative characteristics and may be particularly susceptible to adverse
issuer-specific developments.
Credit Risk. The Trust could lose money if the issuer or guarantor of a debt instrument or a counterparty to a derivatives transaction or other transaction is
unable or unwilling, or perceived to be unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal on time or defaults. Also, the issuer, guarantor or counterparty may suffer adverse changes in its financial condition or be adversely affected by
economic, political or social conditions that could lower the credit quality (or the market’s perception of the credit quality) of the issuer or instrument, leading to greater volatility in the price of the instrument and in shares of the Trust.
Although credit quality may not accurately reflect the true credit risk of an instrument, a change in the credit quality rating of an instrument or an issuer can have a rapid, adverse effect on the instrument’s liquidity and make it more difficult
for the Trust to sell at an advantageous price or time. The risk of the occurrence of these types of events is especially heightened under current conditions.
Current Fixed-Income and Debt Market Conditions. Fixed-income and debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to
dislocations. In response to the crisis initially caused by the outbreak of COVID-19, as with other serious economic disruptions, governmental authorities and regulators have enacted and are enacting significant fiscal and monetary policy changes,
including providing direct capital infusions into companies, creating new monetary programs and lowering interest rates considerably. These actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt instruments, and such risks could be even further
heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes. In light of these actions and current conditions, interest rates and bond yields in the United States and many other countries
are at or near historic lows, and in some cases, such rates and yields are negative. The current very low or negative interest rates are magnifying the Trust’s susceptibility to interest rate risk and diminishing yield and performance. In addition,
the current environment is exposing fixed-income and debt markets to significant volatility and reduced liquidity for Trust investments.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income and other debt instruments are subject to the possibility that interest rates could change (or are expected to change).
Changes in interest rates, including changes in reference rates used in fixed-income and other debt instruments (such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in these instruments, such as the value
or liquidity of, and income generated by, the investments. In addition, changes in interest rates, including rates that fall below zero, can have unpredictable effects on markets and can adversely affect the Trust’s yield, income and performance.
Generally, when interest rates increase, the values of
14 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
fixed-income and other debt instruments decline, and when interest rates decrease, the values of fixed-income and other debt instruments rise. In response to the crisis initially caused by the
outbreak of COVID-19, as with other serious economic disruptions, governmental authorities and regulators are enacting significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including providing direct capital infusions into companies, creating new monetary
programs and lowering interest rates considerably. These actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are ineffective
in achieving their desired outcomes. In light of these actions and current conditions, interest rates and bond yields in the United States and many other countries are at or near historic lows, and in some cases, such rates and yields are negative.
The current very low or negative interest rates are magnifying the Trust’s susceptibility to interest rate risk and diminishing yield and performance.
Leverage Risk. The Trust’s use of leverage, through borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, causes the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if it
had not been leveraged. Although the use of leverage by the Trust may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the effect of any losses. The effect of leverage in a declining market is likely to
cause a greater decline in the net asset value of the Trust than if the Trust were not leveraged, which may result in a greater decline in the market price of the Trust shares. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be implemented
or that it will be successful during any period during which it is employed. Recent economic and market events have contributed to severe market volatility and caused severe liquidity strains in the credit markets. If dislocations in the credit
markets continue, the Trust’s leverage costs may increase and there is a risk that the Trust may not be able to renew or replace existing leverage on favorable terms or at all. If the cost of leverage is no longer favorable, or if the Trust is
otherwise required to reduce its leverage, the Trust may not be able to maintain distributions at historical levels and common shareholders will bear any costs associated with selling portfolio securities. The Trust’s total leverage may vary
significantly over time. To the extent the Trust increases its amount of leverage outstanding, it will be more exposed to these risks.
Liquidity Risk. The Trust may invest in municipal securities that are, at the time of investment, illiquid. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be
disposed of within seven days in the ordinary course of business at approximately the value that the Trust values the securities. Illiquid securities may trade at a discount from comparable, more liquid securities and may be subject to wide
fluctuations in market value. The Trust may be subject to significant delays in disposing of illiquid securities. Accordingly, the Trust may be forced to sell these securities at less than fair market value or may not be able to sell them when the
Adviser believes it is desirable to do so. Illiquid securities also may entail registration expenses and other transaction costs that are higher than those for liquid securities. Dislocations in certain parts of markets are resulting in reduced
liquidity for certain investments. It is uncertain when financial markets will improve. Liquidity of financial markets may also be affected by government intervention.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 15
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
Management Risk. The Trust is actively managed, which means that investment decisions are made based on investment views. There is no guarantee that the
investment views will produce the desired results or expected returns, causing the Trust to fail to meet its investment objective or underperform its benchmark index or funds with similar investment objectives and strategies.
Market Risk. The value of, or income generated by, the investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation. The
value of certain investments (e.g., equity securities) tends to fluctuate more dramatically over the shorter term than do the value of other asset classes. These movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, or from broader
influences, including real or perceived changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in inflation or expectations about inflation, investor confidence or economic, political, social or financial market conditions, environmental disasters,
governmental actions, public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics) and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods. For example, the crisis initially caused by
the outbreak of COVID-19 is causing materially reduced consumer demand and economic output, disrupting supply chains, resulting in market closures, travel restrictions and quarantines, and adversely impacting local and global economies. As with other
serious economic disruptions, governmental authorities and regulators are responding to this crisis with significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, which could further increase volatility in securities and other financial markets, reduce market
liquidity, heighten investor uncertainty and adversely affect the value of the Trust’s investments and the performance of the Trust. Administrative changes, policy reform and/or changes in law or governmental regulations can result in expropriation
or nationalization of the investments of a company in which the Trust invests.
Municipal Securities Risk. The amount of public information available about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate equities or bonds.
The secondary market for municipal securities also tends to be less well-developed or liquid than many other securities markets, which may adversely affect the Trust’s ability to sell such securities at prices approximating those at which the Trust
may currently value them. In addition, many state and municipal governments that issue securities are under significant economic and financial stress and may not be able to satisfy their obligations. Issuers of municipal securities might seek
protection under bankruptcy laws. In the event of bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of municipal securities could experience delays in collecting principal and interest and such holders may not be able to collect all principal and interest to
which they are entitled. Legislative developments may result in changes to the laws relating to municipal bankruptcies. Each of the foregoing may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in municipal securities.
Build America Bonds (“BABs”) Risk. BABs are a form of municipal financing. The BABs market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities
market. In addition, because the relevant provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were not extended, bonds issued after December 31, 2010 cannot qualify as BABs. There is no indication that Congress will renew the program to
permit issuance of new Build America Bonds. As a result, the number of available BABs is limited, which may negatively affect the value of BABs. In addition, there can be no
16 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
assurance that BABs will continue to be actively traded. It is difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will continue, meaning that BABs may experience greater illiquidity than
other municipal obligations.
Special Risks Related to Certain Municipal Securities. The Trust may invest in municipal leases and certificates of participation in such leases, which involve
special risks not normally associated with general obligations or revenue bonds. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have
evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt issuance limitations are deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion
in many leases or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that relieve the governmental issuer of any obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose by the appropriate legislative body on
a yearly or other periodic basis. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to the temporary abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing the leased
equipment.
Taxable Municipal Securities Risk. While interest earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable
municipal securities is fully taxable at the federal level and may be subject to tax at the state level. Additionally, litigation, legislation or other political events, local business or economic conditions or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have
a significant effect on the ability of an issuer of municipal securities to make payments of principal and/or interest. Political changes and uncertainties in the municipal market related to taxation, legislative changes or the rights of municipal
security holders can significantly affect municipal securities. Because many securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect
the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market.
Debt Instruments Risk. The value of the Trust’s investments in debt instruments (including bonds issued by non-profit entities, municipal conduits and project
finance corporations) depends on the continuing ability of the debt issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal when due. The ability of debt issuers to make timely payments of interest and principal can be affected by
a variety of developments and changes in legal, political, economic and other conditions. Investments in debt instruments present certain risks, including credit, interest rate, liquidity and prepayment risks. Issuers that rely directly or indirectly
on government funding mechanisms or non-profit statutes, may be negatively affected by actions of the government, including reductions in government spending, increases in tax rates, and changes in fiscal policy. The value of a debt instrument may
decline for many reasons that directly relate to the issuer, such as a change in the demand for the issuer’s goods or services, or a decline in the issuer’s performance, earnings or assets. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an
individual issuer can affect the overall market for such instruments.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 17
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk. Municipal conduit bonds, also referred to as private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds, are bonds issued by state and
local governments or other entities for the purpose of financing the projects of certain private enterprises. Unlike municipal bonds, municipal conduit bonds are not backed by the full faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental
entity. Rather, issuances of municipal conduit bonds are backed solely by revenues of the private enterprise involved. Municipal conduit bonds are therefore subject to heightened credit risk, as the private enterprise involved can have a different
credit profile than the issuing governmental entity. Municipal conduit bonds may be negatively impacted by conditions affecting either the general credit of the private enterprise or the project itself. Factors such as competitive pricing,
construction delays, or lack of demand for the project could cause project revenues to fall short of projections, and defaults could occur. Municipal conduit bonds tend to have longer terms and thus are more susceptible to interest rate risk.
Project Finance Risk. Project finance is a type of financing commonly used for infrastructure, industry, and public service projects. In a project finance
arrangement, the cash flow generated by the project is used to repay lenders while the project’s assets, rights and interest are held as secondary collateral. Investors involved in project finance face heightened technology risk, operational risk,
and market risk because the cash flow generated by the project, rather than the revenues of the company behind the project, will repay investors. In addition, because of the project-specific nature of such arrangements, the Trust face the risk of
loss of investment if the company behind the project determines not to complete it.
Risks of Investing in Debt Issued by Non-Profit Institutions. Investing in debt issued by non-profit institutions, including foundations, museums, cultural
institutions, colleges, universities, hospitals and healthcare systems, involves different risks than investing in municipal bonds. Many non-profit entities are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and risk losing their
tax-exempt status if they do not comply with the requirements of that section. There is a risk that Congress or the IRS could pass new laws or regulations changing the requirements for tax-exempt status, which could result in a non-profit institution
losing such status. Additionally, non-profit institutions that receive federal and state appropriations face the risk of a decrease in or loss of such appropriations. Hospitals and healthcare systems are highly regulated at the federal and state
levels and face burdensome state licensing requirements. There is a risk that a state could refuse to renew a hospital’s license or that the passage of new laws or regulations, especially changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, could inhibit a
hospital from growing its revenues. Hospitals and healthcare systems also face risks related to increased competition from other health care providers; increased costs of inpatient and outpatient care; and increased pressures from managed care
organizations, insurers, and patients to cut the costs of medical care. There is a risk that non-profit institutions relying on philanthropy and donations to maintain their operations will receive less funding during economic downturns, such as the
economic crisis initially caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
18 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
Senior Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in senior secured floating rate loans made to corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers (“Senior
Loans”). Senior Loans typically hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the issuing entity, are typically secured with specific collateral and typically have a claim on the assets and/or stock of the borrower that is senior to that
held by subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrower. The Trust’s investments in Senior Loans are typically below investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. The risks associated with
Senior Loans of below investment grade quality are similar to the risks of other lower grade securities, although Senior Loans are typically senior and secured in contrast to subordinated and unsecured securities. Senior Loans’ higher standing has
historically resulted in generally higher recoveries in the event of a corporate reorganization. In addition, because their interest payments are adjusted for changes in short-term interest rates, investments in Senior Loans generally have less
interest rate risk than other lower grade securities, which may have fixed interest rates. The Trust invests in or is exposed to loans and other similar debt obligations that are sometimes referred to as “covenant-lite” loans or obligations, which
are generally subject to more risk than investments that contain traditional financial maintenance covenants and financial reporting requirements. The terms of many loans and other instruments are tied to LIBOR, which functions as a reference rate or
benchmark. It is anticipated that LIBOR will ultimately be discontinued, which may cause increased volatility and illiquidity in the markets for instruments with terms tied to LIBOR or other adverse consequences, such as decreased yields and
reduction in value, for these instruments. These events may adversely affect the Trust and its investments in such instruments.
Structured Finance Investments Risk. The Trust’s structured finance investments may consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial
mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) issued by governmental entities and private issuers, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured finance securities. Holders of structured finance
investments bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk. The Trust may have the right to receive payments only from the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights
against the issuer or the entity that sold the assets to be securitized. The Trust may invest in structured finance products collateralized by low grade or defaulted loans or securities. Investments in such structured finance products are subject to
the risks associated with below investment grade securities. Such securities are characterized by high risk. It is likely that an economic recession could severely disrupt the market for such securities and may have an adverse impact on the value of
such securities. Structured finance securities are typically privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in structured finance securities may be characterized by the Trust as illiquid
securities; however, an active dealer market may exist which would allow such securities to be considered liquid in some circumstances.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk. ABS may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. ABS involve certain risks in addition to those
presented by mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). ABS do not have the benefit of the same security interest in the underlying collateral as MBS and are more dependent on the borrower’s ability to pay and may provide the Trust with a less effective
security interest in the related collateral than do MBS. There is the possibility that recoveries on the underlying
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 19
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on these securities. The collateral underlying ABS may constitute assets related to a wide range of industries and sectors, such as
credit card and automobile receivables or other assets derived from consumer, commercial or corporate sectors. If the economy of the United States deteriorates, defaults on securities backed by credit card, automobile and other receivables may
increase, which may adversely affect the value of any ABS owned by the Trust. In addition, these securities may provide the Trust with a less effective security interest in the related collateral than do mortgage-related securities. Therefore, there
is the possibility that recoveries on the underlying collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on these securities. ABS collateralized by other types of assets are subject to risks associated with the underlying collateral.
These risks are elevated given the currently distressed economic, market, labor and public health conditions.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) represent an interest in a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities generally are
classified as either commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), each of which are subject to certain specific risks. The risks associated with mortgage-backed securities include: (1) credit risk
associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties and of the borrowers owning these properties; (2) adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, which are more likely to have an adverse impact on mortgage-backed
securities secured by loans on certain types of commercial properties than on those secured by loans on residential properties; (3) prepayment risk, which can lead to significant fluctuations in the value of the mortgage-backed security; (4) loss of
all or part of the premium, if any, paid; and (5) decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates, prepayments on the underlying mortgage collateral or perceptions of the credit risk associated with the
underlying mortgage collateral. The value of mortgage-backed securities may be substantially dependent on the servicing of the underlying pool of mortgages.
Collateralized Loan Obligation (“CLO”), Collateralized Debt Obligation (“CDO”) and Collateralized Bond Obligation (“CBO”) Risk. In addition to the general
risks associated with debt securities discussed herein, CLOs, CDOs, CBOs are subject to additional risks. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs are subject to risks associated with the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to
make interest or other payments; the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; and the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected
investment results. The credit quality of CLOs, CDOs and CBOs depends primarily upon the quality of the underlying assets and the level of credit support and/or enhancement provided. The underlying assets (e.g., debt obligations) of CLOs, CDOs and
CBOs are subject to prepayments, which shorten the weighted average maturity and may lower the return of the securities issued by the CLOs, CDOs and CBOs. If the credit support or enhancement is exhausted, losses or delays in payment may result if
the required payments of principal and interest are not made. The value of securities issued by CLOs, CDOs and CBOs also may change because of changes in market value; changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicing agent
for the pool, the originator of the pool, or the financial institution or fund providing the credit support or enhancement; loan performance and prices;
20 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
broader sentiment and standing in the economic cycle, including expectations regarding future loan defaults; liquidity conditions; and supply and demand at the various tranche levels. Finally, CLOs,
CDOs and CBOs are limited recourse and may not be paid in full and may be subject to up to 100% loss.
Investment Funds Risk. As an alternative to holding investments directly, the Trust may also obtain investment exposure to securities in which it may invest
directly by investing up to 20% of its Managed Assets in Investment Funds. Investments in Investment Funds present certain special considerations and risks not present in making direct investments in securities in which the Trust may invest.
Investments in Investment Funds involve operating expenses and fees that are in addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another Investment Fund are borne indirectly by
common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expense and fee layering. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for such entities’ managers to employ
financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk. A performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the hope of earning a higher profit
participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial leverage.
In addition to the foregoing risks, investors should note that the Trust reserves the right to merge or reorganize with another fund, liquidate or convert into an open-end fund, in each case subject
to applicable approvals by shareholders and the Trust’s Board of Trustees as required by law and the Trust’s governing documents.
This material is not intended as a recommendation or as investment advice of any kind, including in connection with rollovers, transfers, and distributions. Such
material is not provided in a fiduciary capacity, may not be relied upon for or in connection with the making of investment decisions, and does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. All content has been provided for
informational or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Always consult a financial, tax and/or legal professional regarding your specific situation.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 21
|
|
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited)
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
|
|
|
$24.59
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
|
|
|
$23.06
|
Premium to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
6.63%
|
Net Assets ($000)
|
|
|
|
|
$450,500
|
|
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS FOR
|
|
|
|
|
THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six month
|
|
|
|
|
|
(non-
|
One
|
Three
|
Five
|
Ten
|
|
annualized)
|
Year
|
Year
|
Year
|
Year
|
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade Debt Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
8.00%
|
8.82%
|
6.49%
|
7.20%
|
9.08%
|
Market
|
9.52%
|
11.76%
|
10.19%
|
9.52%
|
9.54%
|
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. All NAV returns include the
deduction of management fees, operating expenses and all other Trust expenses. The deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Trust distributions or the sale of Trust shares is not reflected in the total returns. For the most recent month-end
performance figures, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with changes in market conditions and other factors so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more
or less than their original cost.
Portfolio Breakdown
|
% of Net Assets
|
Municipal Bonds
|
88.6%
|
Closed-End Funds
|
17.1%
|
Corporate Bonds
|
11.3%
|
Senior Floating Rate Interests
|
6.4%
|
Asset-Backed Securities
|
2.3%
|
Common Stocks
|
1.3%
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
0.1%
|
Warrants
|
0.0%*
|
Total Investments
|
127.1%
|
Other Assets & Liabilities, net
|
(27.1)%
|
Net Assets
|
100.0%
|
Portfolio breakdown and holdings are subject to change daily. For more information, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The above summaries are provided for informational purposes only and
should not be viewed as recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee futures results.
*Less than 0.1%.
22 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
Ten Largest Holdings
|
% of Total Net Assets
|
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust
|
6.3%
|
State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds,
|
|
Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 2010, 7.65%
|
3.6%
|
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds, 7.10%
|
3.6%
|
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build
|
|
America Bonds, 8.57%
|
3.3%
|
Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel Revenue Bonds,
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.09%
|
3.0%
|
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A,
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds - (Federally Taxable - Direct Subsidy), 6.00%
|
2.9%
|
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, 5.45%
|
2.8%
|
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Federal Taxable
|
|
Build America Bonds, 7.10%
|
2.7%
|
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
|
2.7%
|
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General Obligation
|
Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction Bonds, Series 2012B, 6.88%
|
2.4%
|
Top Ten Total
|
33.3%
|
“Ten Largest Holdings” excludes any temporary cash or derivative investments.
|
|
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 23
|
|
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
Portfolio Composition by Quality Rating1
|
|
|
% of Total
|
Rating
|
Investments
|
Fixed Income Instruments
|
|
AAA
|
1.0%
|
AA
|
41.2%
|
A
|
22.7%
|
BBB
|
11.0%
|
BB
|
4.6%
|
B
|
4.1%
|
CCC
|
0.8%
|
NR2
|
0.2%
|
Other Instruments
|
|
Closed-End Funds
|
13.4%
|
Common Stocks
|
1.0%
|
Warrants
|
0.0%*
|
Total Investments
|
100.0%
|
1
|
Source: Factset. Credit quality ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). All rate securities have been rated by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), or Fitch, which are all a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). For purposes of this presentation, when ratings are available from more than one agency, the highest rating is used. Guggenheim Investments has converted Moody’s and Fitch ratings to the
equivalent S&P rating. Unrated securities do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. Security ratings are determined at the time of purchase and may change thereafter.
|
2
|
NR (not rated) securities do not necessarily indicate low credit quality.
|
*
|
Less than 0.1%.
|
24 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
All or a portion of the above distributions may be characterized as a return of capital. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2020, 89% of the distributions were characterized
as ordinary income, 9% of the distributions were characterized as long-term capital gains and 2% of the distributions were characterized as a return of capital. The final determination of the tax character of the distributions paid by the Trust in
2020 will be reported to shareholders in January 2021.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 25
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Value
|
|
COMMON STOCKS† – 1.3%
|
|
|
Financial – 1.3%
|
|
|
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. — Class A*
|
213,570
|
$ 5,554,956
|
|
Energy – 0.0%
|
|
|
SandRidge Energy, Inc.*
|
9,544
|
25,482
|
Summit Midstream Partners, LP*
|
1,140
|
17,146
|
Total Energy
|
|
42,628
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 0.0%
|
|
|
Targus Group International Equity, Inc.*,†††,1
|
17,838
|
36,581
|
|
Industrial – 0.0%
|
|
|
BP Holdco LLC*,†††,1
|
15,619
|
5,507
|
Vector Phoenix Holdings, LP*,†††
|
15,619
|
1,404
|
Total Industrial
|
|
6,911
|
Total Common Stocks
|
|
|
(Cost $4,270,282)
|
|
5,641,076
|
|
WARRANTS† – 0.0%
|
|
|
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
$23.00, 07/24/25*
|
23,730
|
228,994
|
Total Warrants
|
|
|
(Cost $134,763)
|
|
228,994
|
|
CLOSED-END FUNDS† – 17.1%
|
|
|
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust
|
1,058,939
|
28,379,565
|
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
|
530,189
|
12,072,404
|
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
441,210
|
6,516,672
|
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
383,883
|
5,769,761
|
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
|
311,829
|
5,117,114
|
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
|
292,274
|
3,685,575
|
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
|
250,383
|
3,239,956
|
Invesco Municipal Trust
|
238,904
|
3,034,081
|
BlackRock MuniVest Fund, Inc.
|
274,679
|
2,477,605
|
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
140,274
|
2,106,915
|
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II
|
173,837
|
1,948,626
|
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.
|
170,865
|
1,438,683
|
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
|
86,288
|
1,143,316
|
Total Closed-End Funds
|
|
|
(Cost $73,662,947)
|
|
76,930,273
|
See notes to financial statements.
26 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
Amount
|
Value
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 88.6%
|
|
|
California – 16.4%
|
|
|
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds,
|
|
|
Federal Taxable Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
7.10% due 08/01/40
|
$ 7,785,000
|
$ 12,353,160
|
6.80% due 08/01/30
|
2,245,000
|
3,227,434
|
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable
|
|
|
General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2012B
|
|
|
6.88% due 08/01/332
|
10,000,000
|
10,824,300
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power System Revenue Bonds,
|
|
|
Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
7.00% due 07/01/412
|
10,000,000
|
10,330,500
|
Long Beach Unified School District, California, Qualified School Construction Bonds,
|
|
|
Federally Taxable, Election of 2008, General Obligation Bonds
|
|
|
5.91% due 08/01/252
|
7,500,000
|
8,694,375
|
East Side Union High School District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
3.13% due 08/01/42
|
7,500,000
|
7,638,150
|
Palomar Community College District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
2.99% due 08/01/44
|
6,700,000
|
6,743,617
|
California Housing Finance Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
3.66% due 02/01/292
|
3,000,000
|
3,214,950
|
Marin Community College District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
4.03% due 08/01/382
|
2,000,000
|
2,254,380
|
San Bernardino City Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
2.72% due 08/01/37
|
1,000,000
|
1,016,350
|
2.73% due 08/01/37
|
700,000
|
712,040
|
San Jose Evergreen Community College District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
3.06% due 09/01/452
|
1,500,000
|
1,526,310
|
Monrovia Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, Election of 2006
|
|
|
General Obligation Bonds, Build America Bonds, Federally Taxable12
|
|
|
7.25% due 08/01/28
|
1,025,000
|
1,332,521
|
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (Orange County, California), General
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Federally Taxable Direct-Pay Qualified School Construction
|
|
|
Bonds, Election of 2008
|
|
|
5.40% due 02/01/262
|
1,000,000
|
1,221,750
|
Cypress School District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
6.65% due 08/01/25
|
660,000
|
781,546
|
6.05% due 08/01/21
|
120,000
|
124,422
|
Alhambra Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
6.70% due 02/01/262
|
500,000
|
596,360
|
California State University Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
3.90% due 11/01/472
|
500,000
|
595,160
|
Hillsborough City School District General Obligation Unlimited
|
|
|
due 09/01/363
|
500,000
|
315,965
|
due 09/01/403
|
500,000
|
264,920
|
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 27
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 88.6% (continued)
|
|
|
|
California – 16.4% (continued)
|
|
|
|
Riverside County Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation
|
|
|
|
3.88% due 10/01/37
|
$ 250,000
|
$ 269,690
|
Total California
|
|
|
74,037,900
|
|
Texas – 11.9%
|
|
|
|
Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel Revenue
|
|
|
|
Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
|
7.09% due 01/01/422
|
10,020,000
|
|
13,364,876
|
Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
3.34% due 11/15/37
|
8,900,000
|
|
9,298,364
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
3.29% due 01/01/422
|
5,250,000
|
|
5,172,772
|
2.84% due 01/01/34
|
2,300,000
|
|
2,264,833
|
2.74% due 01/01/33
|
850,000
|
|
837,599
|
City of San Antonio Texas Electric & Gas Systems Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
2.91% due 02/01/48
|
6,800,000
|
|
6,966,736
|
North Texas Tollway Authority Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
3.03% due 01/01/40
|
6,700,000
|
|
6,898,588
|
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
2.92% due 11/01/502
|
6,500,000
|
|
6,469,385
|
City of Dallas Texas Waterworks & Sewer System Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
2.82% due 10/01/422
|
2,100,000
|
|
2,159,577
|
Total Texas
|
|
|
53,432,730
|
|
Washington – 10.1%
|
|
|
|
Washington State University, Housing and Dining System Revenue Bonds,
|
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
|
7.40% due 04/01/412
|
6,675,000
|
|
10,633,141
|
7.10% due 04/01/32
|
3,325,000
|
|
4,622,781
|
Central Washington University Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
6.95% due 05/01/40
|
5,000,000
|
|
7,396,100
|
Central Washington University, System Revenue Bonds, 2010, Taxable
|
|
|
|
Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 05/01/30
|
5,000,000
|
|
6,470,800
|
Washington State Convention Center Public Facilities District, Lodging Tax Bonds,
|
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
|
6.79% due 07/01/402
|
5,000,000
|
|
6,450,800
|
City of Anacortes Washington Utility System Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
6.48% due 12/01/202
|
5,000,000
|
|
5,000,000
|
County of Pierce Washington Sewer Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
2.87% due 08/01/42
|
4,300,000
|
|
4,409,779
|
Port of Seattle Washington Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
|
3.76% due 05/01/36
|
300,000
|
|
317,142
|
Total Washington
|
|
|
45,300,543
|
See notes to financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
28 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
Amount
|
Value
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 88.6% (continued)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania – 5.1%
|
|
|
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A,
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds – (Federally Taxable – Direct Subsidy)
|
|
|
6.00% due 09/01/302
|
$ 10,330,000
|
$ 13,229,734
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds
|
|
|
6.85% due 09/01/292
|
6,895,000
|
9,508,481
|
Doylestown Hospital Authority Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
3.95% due 07/01/24
|
195,000
|
197,085
|
Altoona Water Authority Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
6.44% due 12/01/20
|
10,000
|
9,900
|
Total Pennsylvania
|
|
22,945,200
|
|
New York – 4.7%
|
|
|
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build
|
|
|
America Bonds12
|
|
|
8.57% due 11/01/402
|
10,010,000
|
14,701,887
|
Westchester County Local Development Corp. Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
3.85% due 11/01/50
|
4,250,000
|
4,344,945
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
2.73% due 03/01/342
|
2,250,000
|
2,251,170
|
Total New York
|
|
21,298,002
|
|
New Jersey – 4.4%
|
|
|
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds12
|
|
|
7.10% due 01/01/412
|
10,000,000
|
16,297,300
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
3.51% due 07/01/422
|
3,500,000
|
3,590,545
|
Total New Jersey
|
|
19,887,845
|
|
Ohio – 4.2%
|
|
|
County of Franklin Ohio Revenue Bonds
|
|
|
2.88% due 11/01/50
|
8,900,000
|
9,115,914
|
American Municipal Power, Inc., Combined Hydroelectric Projects Revenue Bonds,
|
|
|
New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds
|
|
|
7.33% due 02/15/282
|
5,000,000
|
6,338,850
|
Madison Local School District, Richland County, Ohio, School Improvement, Taxable
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds
|
|
|
6.65% due 12/01/292
|
2,500,000
|
2,509,725
|
Toronto City School District, Ohio, Qualified School Construction Bonds General
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds
|
|
|
7.00% due 12/01/28
|
1,085,000
|
1,087,832
|
Total Ohio
|
|
19,052,321
|
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 29