On January 31, 2022, GCP Applied Technologies Inc. (“GCP” or the “Company”) filed a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 5, 2021 (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Cyclades Parent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Cyclades Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), GCP, and solely for the purpose of Section 8.13 thereof, Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A., a société anonyme organized under the laws of France (“Saint-Gobain”). Parent and Merger Sub are each subsidiaries of Saint-Gobain. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into GCP and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, with GCP continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. The special meeting of GCP stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) will be held virtually on March 8, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time, to act on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, as disclosed in the Definitive Proxy Statement.
GCP is making the supplement to the Definitive Proxy Statement set forth below in connection with the solicitation for use at the special meeting of GCP stockholders to be held on March 8, 2022. The purpose of this supplement is to correct the amount of GCP common stock owned by the named executive officers as of January 14, 2022 in the Definitive Proxy Statement.
In addition, between January 18 and January 29, 2022, four lawsuits were filed against GCP and its directors: Le v. GCP Applied Technologies Inc., et al., 1:22-cv-00750 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Newman v. GCP Applied Technologies Inc. et al., 1:22-cv-00545 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; Stein v. GCP Applied Technologies Inc. et al., 1:22-cv-00436 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and Waterman v. GCP Applied Technologies Inc., et al., 1:22-cv-00583 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The complaints each allege that the Preliminary Proxy Statement filed on January 18, 2022 omitted material information that rendered it false and misleading. As a result of the alleged omissions, the lawsuits seek to hold GCP and its directors liable for violating Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, and additionally seek to hold GCP’s directors liable as control persons pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Each complaint seeks, among other relief, an injunction preventing the closing of the merger, rescission of the merger agreement or any of its terms to the extent already implemented or awarding of rescissory damages, damages, and an award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
GCP believes that the lawsuits are without merit and that no supplemental disclosures are required under applicable law. However, in order to avoid nuisance, potential expense and delay from the lawsuits and to provide additional information to the stockholders of GCP and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, GCP has determined to voluntarily supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement with the disclosures set forth herein in the section entitled Updated Disclosures Relating to Litigation Related to Transactions. Nothing in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable law of any of the disclosures set forth herein. GCP specifically takes the position that no further disclosure of any kind is required to supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement under applicable law.
* * *
Supplement to Proxy Statement
The following supplemental disclosures should be reviewed in conjunction with the disclosures in the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be carefully read in its entirety. To the extent information set forth herein differs from or updates information contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement, the information contained herein supersedes the information contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement. Any defined terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement. Paragraph and page references used herein refer to the Definitive Proxy Statement before any additions or deletions resulting from the supplemental disclosures.
Updated Disclosures Relating to the Amount of GCP Common Stock Owned by the Named Executive Officers
Each instance of the number 419,806 shares of GCP common stock on pages 3, 25 and 114 of the Definitive Proxy Statement is replaced with the number 299,811.
Each instance of the percentage 0.6% on pages 3 and 25 of the Definitive Proxy Statement is replaced with the number 0.4%.
In the table on page 114 of the Definitive Proxy Statement concerning “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” (1) the numbers in the “Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership” column for Simon Bates, Craig Merrill, David Campos, Sherry Mennenga and Michael W. Valente are updated to be 88,181, 33,325, 4,170, 1,458 and 6,089, and (2) in the line item for Craig Merrill, a footnote is added as follows: “Includes 22,427 shares of GCP common stock issuable upon exercise of options within 60 days”. No other information presented in this section, including the number of shares beneficially owned by each holder and the outstanding shares of GCP, is being corrected or updated hereby.