- Report of Foreign Issuer (6-K)
June 29 2011 - 5:28PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
FORM 6-K
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-15148
BRF–BRASIL FOODS S.A.
(Exact Name as Specified in its Charter)
N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s Name)
760 Av. Escola Politecnica
Jaguare 05350-000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F ___X___ Form 40-F _______
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes _______ No ___X____
If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): Not applicable.
Union of forces that generates results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
2010
|
|
2009**
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Net sales
|
|
22,681
|
|
20,937
|
|
11,393
|
|
6,633
|
|
5,210
|
Domestic market
|
|
13,515
|
|
12,148
|
|
6,424
|
|
3,482
|
|
2,793
|
Exports
|
|
9,166
|
|
8,789
|
|
4,969
|
|
3,151
|
|
2,417
|
Gross profit
|
|
5,730
|
|
4,220
|
|
2,759
|
|
1,873
|
|
1,344
|
Gross margin (%)
|
|
25.3
|
|
20.2
|
|
24.2
|
|
28.2
|
|
25.8
|
Operating income
|
|
1,874
|
|
392
|
|
709
|
|
504
|
|
191
|
Operating margin (%)
|
|
8.3
|
|
1.9
|
|
6.2
|
|
7.6
|
|
3.7
|
EBITDA
|
|
2,635
|
|
1,166
|
|
1,159
|
|
803
|
|
456
|
EBITDA margin (%)
|
|
11.6
|
|
5.6
|
|
10.2
|
|
12.1
|
|
8.7
|
Net income
|
|
804
|
|
225
(1)
|
|
54
|
|
321
|
|
117
|
Net margin (%)
|
|
3.5
|
|
1.1
|
|
0.5
|
|
4.8
|
|
2.3
|
Market value
|
|
23,853
|
|
19,792
|
|
6,155
|
|
8,230
|
|
4,975
|
Total assets
|
|
27,752
|
|
28,384
|
|
11,219
|
|
6,543
|
|
4,829
|
Shareholder’s equity
|
|
13,637
|
|
12,996
|
|
4,111
|
|
3,226
|
|
2,105
|
Net debt
|
|
3,634
|
|
4,193
|
|
3,390
|
|
429
|
|
633
|
Net debt/EBITDA
|
|
1.38
|
|
3.60
|
|
2.92
|
|
0.53
|
|
1.39
|
Earnings per share - R$*
|
|
0.92
|
|
0.28
|
|
0.26
|
|
1.73
|
|
0.71
|
Number of shares
|
|
872,473,246
|
|
436,236,623
|
|
206,958,103
|
|
185,957,152
|
|
165,957,152
|
Treasury shares
|
|
781,172
|
|
1,226,090
|
|
430,485
|
|
430,485
|
|
430,485
|
* Consolidated excluding treasury shares.
|
** Proforma result, incorporating the data of Sadia since January 1 2009
|
(1) Net adjusted result – not considering the absorption of tax losses due to the incorporation of Perdigão Agroindustrial S.A., with respect to the results
for the first quarter 2009, total amount of R$ 132 million.
|
The changes commented in this report are comparisons of the years 2010 and 2009. Sadia’s results have been incorporated as from July 2009. For this reason, the accumulated results for the year encompass Sadia’s second half accounts. For a better understanding of the businesses, the changes are compared in numbers according to Brazilian corporate law (CL) and on a pro-forma basis, as specified.
|
|
Content
|
|
|
2
|
|
BRF
|
2
|
|
Profile
|
4
|
|
Message from the Management
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Strategy and management
|
6
|
|
Strategic management
|
8
|
|
Investments
|
9
|
|
Competitive advantages
|
10
|
|
Corporate governance
|
16
|
|
Ethical behavior
|
18
|
|
Risk management
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Economic performance
|
20
|
|
Sectoral scenario
|
23
|
|
Operational performance
|
32
|
|
Economic-financial performance
|
34
|
|
Shares as an investment
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Social performance
|
38
|
|
Management of people
|
42
|
|
Suppliers
|
43
|
|
Clients/Consumers
|
44
|
|
Society
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Environmental performance
|
46
|
|
Environmental management
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
About this Report
|
54
|
|
Social report/Ibase
|
56
|
|
Practices aligned with the UN Global Compact
|
57
|
|
GRI Reference Index
|
60
|
|
Corporate information
|
Profile
|
|
|
|
|
A company with global
and competitive scale,
based on commitment to
growth, efficiency, innovation,
modernity, governance
and sustainability.
|
|
The product portfolio is made up of more
than 3 thousand items, in the segments of
poultry, pork, beef, processed meats, milk, dairy
products, margarines, pastas, frozen dishes
and vegetables and other processed products.
The company’s principal brands are Perdigão,
Sadia, Qualy, Doriana, Becel, Rezende, Batavo,
Elegê, Wilson, Cotochés, Miss Daisy, Deline,
Avipal, Texas Burger, Speedy Pollo, Turma da
Mônica, Chester, Fribo and Freski.
|GRI 2.2|
The Company operates 60 plants through
out Brazil and three overseas (dairy products
in Argentina and units of Plusfood in the
United Kingdom and The Netherlands). With
a solid structure in the domestic market, BRF
is the only company with a chilled and frozen
product distribution network covering the
entire country. A modern and capillary distri
bution system allows it to make 500 thousand
monthly deliveries to 150 thousand clients
and serve 98% of the Brazilian population. The
Company operates 24 overseas commercial
offices and has a relationship with more than
|
|
5 thousand clients in 140 countries on the five
continents.
|GRI 2.3; 2,5; 2.7|
BRF’s workforce of 113 thousand makes it
one of the largest employers in Brazil, exercising
a major economic and social impact on the
regions where it operates. In 2010, it sold 5.7
million tons of product and reported net sales
of R$ 22.7 billion, 59.6% of this to the domestic
market and 40.4%, to export market.
|GRI 2.8|
As a publicly held company, in 2010, it
celebrated 30 years of listing of its shares on
the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBovespa-
BRFS3). It is listed on the Novo Mercado, a
segment of the stock market reserved for
companies adhering to the highest standards
of corporate governance. For the sixth
consecutive year, BRF was selected as a com
ponent of the Corporate Sustainability Stock
Index (ISE) - recognition of the company’s
commitment to sustainable growth. For ten
years now, the Company’s securities have
been traded as Level III ADRs on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE-BRFS).
|GRI 2.6|
|
A company on a global scale
BRF – Brasil Foods is one of the largest food
companies in the world by market capitaliza
tion, leader in the global production of pro
teins, with a 9% share of international trade for
the sector and the largest exporter of poultry
meat. In 2010, the Company was ranked the
third largest exporter in Brazil according to
Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign
Trade statistics, BRF is also one of the leading
milk collectors and processors in Brazil.
|GRI 2.1|
|
2
Commitment with growth
The current corporate denomination of Perdigão, BRF has as its wholly owned subsidiary Sadia S.A., a company with which it signed an association agreement, currently subject to the scrutiny of the Brazilian anti-trust authorities – the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE). The Transaction Reversibility Preservation Agreement (APRO), signed with the anti-trust organ in 2009, authorized the two companies to integrate the financial area in addition to the areas of risk policies, exports and in natura meat sales to the domestic market as well as the acquisition of some raw materials and services. The project involving the plan for integration and identification of synergies has been successfully concluded and will be implemented once CADE announces its decision.
Sadia’s results were consolidated in July 2009, the company becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of BRF.
|GRI 2.9|
The Company now emerging underscores the position of Brazil as an agribusiness power house with the creation of a company on a global and competitive scale based on commitment to growth, efficiency, innovation, modernity, governance and sustainability.
3
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Message from the Management
|GRI 1.1|
|
|
|
|
|
The performance of BRF Brasil Foods was
marked by consistent advances during 2010
and characterized by efficiency, scale gains
and profitability in both domestic and overseas
markets. As a consequence, we have been
able to report an unprecedented result for a
Brazilian food company: its ranking as the third
largest exporter in the country with overseas
sales of R$ 9.2 billion. This position shows that
we are making good on the commitments we
assumed at the time the association between
Perdigão and Sadia was announced in 2009 for
creating a company able to compete globally
and recognized for the value of its brands and
the quality of its products.
Our sales volume grew 7% to 5.7 million
tons. We posted net sales of R$ 22.7 billion,
8.3% up on 2009. Cash generation according
to the EBITDA concept reached R$ 2.6 billion
and net income, R$ 804 million, a year on year
improvement on a pro-forma basis of 126%
and 125%, respectively. EBITDA margin was
11.6%, restoring the Company’s historic levels
of profitability and this in spite of currency
appreciation and spiraling commodity prices
in the second half of 2010.
Despite the year being a period of transition
|
|
while we await authorization to conclude the
merger, we continued to invest, allocating
R$ 1.1 billion to the expansion and moderniza
tion of productive capacity and to efficiency
programs in all areas. Such a decision is indica
tive of the Company’s soundness, commit
ment to our stakeholders and to the execution
of our growth plans for both domestic and
international markets. Our net debt to EBITDA
ratio fell from 3.6 to 1.4 times given better
operating cash generation and substantial
optimization of investments. A successful
bond issue conducted during the year was
instrumental in raising R$ 750 million, at the
same time extending the debt maturity profile
from an average of two to three years.
An important part of our success is con
tingent on getting closer to our clients and
consumers and improving logistics systems,
distribution, development and product inno
vation. We monitor the dynamic of the mar
kets and adjust our portfolio of products and
services to the specific needs of each segment
of consumption or region of the country and
the world. To grow and continue to be market
leaders, we shall invest in customized solu
tions which add greater value and services,
|
|
provide support to our clients in their day to
day activities and maintain an open relation
ship channel. In this context, we have also
established the long-term internationalization
project focused on higher added value prod
ucts and distribution in the principal regions
where we operate.
The expansion of the operations strength
ens an important vocation and strategy of the
Company - the creation of jobs and income
in small and medium-size municipalities
throughout Brazil. In this context, the principal
inputs and raw materials we use – grains, hogs,
poultry, beef cattle and milk – are all acquired
from local producers. We ended the year with
more than 113 thousand employees, ranking
us among the five largest employers in Brazil.
We are also conscious that the impact of our
projects percolates down through the entire
community by encouraging the constitution
of new companies, services, projects for
infrastructure, healthcare and education.
Going forward, we face the challenge of
building a global culture, counting on a team
of talented and multifunctional people, alert
to the cultural plurality of our customers and
equipped to find solutions that meet their
|
4
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are at a unique and special moment,
one in which efforts are focused on the
consolidation of a company with a vocation
and culture for performing the role of global
leader in the food business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
particular needs. We are conscious that this
situation requires constant efforts in training,
upgrading of skills and attracting professionals
to help us expand our business.
We also want to be recognized for our
initiatives in protecting and preserving the
environment. Our Sustainable Hog Farming
System which supports and finances the
construction of biodigestors on the properties
of integrated outgrowers, received United
Nations certification allowing the Company to
trade carbon credits and has been recognized
as a successful example of sustainability in
rural production. On the same theme of sus
tainability, we also have a particular concern
with water. Vital to the food industry, it will
become an important competitive element
and key advantage going forward. Given the
seriousness of this theme, we dedicate con
stant vigilance in the preservation, economy
and reuse of this natural resource.
The combination of these initiatives makes
BRF one of the companies which inspires the
greatest confidence among investors and
shareholders - this translating into recognition
by the capital markets of the excellence of our
corporate governance practices. In a year when
|
|
the Ibovespa stock index rose 1%, we recorded
a growth of 21% in market capitalization. Over
the past ten years, we have provided an annual
average return of 31% to our shareholders, a
differential which makes the Company one of
the most attractive investment options.
In 2010, we took some important steps
towards the formation of one of the largest
companies in Brazil. We have been tireless in
the task of identifying best practices and in the
definition of a new command structure for the
Company, drawing equally on manpower from
Perdigão and Sadia as well as hiring from the
market. The knowledge which has been accu
mulated in this process has been invaluable in
allowing us to prepare a long-term plan which
will drive BRF’s growth through 2015, with a
focus on adding value to the business.
Our assumptions for 2011 contemplate
growth in our leading markets and the incor
poration of the synergies expected to follow
from the integration of the businesses with
Sadia in alignment to the 2011-2015 strategic
plan. Based on the macroeconomic outlook,
we are forecasting growth of between 10% to
12% in net revenues and investments between
R$ 1.2 and R$ 1.4 billion in Capex and R$ 400
|
|
million in replacement of breeder stock.
We shall need the approval of the Adminis
trative Council for Economic Defense - CADE if
we are to execute these plans and fully achieve
the growth objectives to which we committed
at the time of the association of the two com
panies. The Company has been doing its part
in supplying all the analyses and information
required of us by the anti-trust authorities and
we are hopeful that the organ will announce
its decision on the merger shortly.
We are conducting one of the largest merg
ers in the food industry anywhere in the world.
Although working under some operating
constraints, we can be proud of the progress
and the results that have been achieved in
2010. We are convinced that this merger is
pro-competition. The results attained up to
the present time show the relevance of the
Company to all our stakeholders – shareholders,
clients, consumers, employees, partners, com
munities, government and society.
We are at a unique and special moment,
one in which efforts are focused on the con
solidation of a company with a vocation and
culture for performing the role of global leader
in the food business.
|
|
Luiz Fernando Furlan
|
|
|
|
Nildemar Secches
|
Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
José Antonio do Prado Fay
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
5
Strategic management
|GRI 1.2|
|
|
|
|
|
BRF Brasil Foods aims to
move up the ranking of the
largest global food companies
based on the criteria of sales,
margins and markets.
|
|
for enhancing brand penetration; an increase
in the channels for direct distribution to the
client; initiatives for attracting and retaining
professional manpower committed to the
Company’s long-term projects; and reinforcing
the concept of sustainability in all areas of the
business. Strategic management has among
its objectives, the adoption and strengthen
ing of sustainable practices along the entire
production chain and in the relationship with
its principal stakeholders.
|GRI 1.2|
BRF adopts a long-term view permanently
focused on the efficiency of the entire pro
duction chain. This strategy contributes to
offsetting the impacts of factors affecting
the trading environment at any given time
(currency exchange rates for example) thus
helping to sustain the targets for market share
without sacrificing margins. ‘To do more with
less’ is the driving behind BRF’s entire busi
ness, this having a positive spinoff in terms
of return and competitiveness. In the context
of integrating processes, in 2010, BRF began
the development of a robust technological
platform capable of sustaining its growth
|
|
plans in Brazil as well as overseas with conclu
sion expected before the end of 2011.
Future vision
BRF wants to be the consumers’ first
choice in regions where it has a strong pres
ence whether in Brazil or overseas, offering
products suited to local habits and customs
and with the support of a global distribution
platform. The Company invests in the forma
tion of an international culture, alert to the
cultural diversity of its clients and consumers
to meet their needs and in line with their
consumption habits.
Estimates for the domestic market are that
36 million will migrate to the ABC classes
over the next five years, representing major
sales potential. In addition to an increase
in the number of consumers with greater
purchasing power, the change in habits tends
to favor the acquisition of ready-to-eat dishes
combining practicality, quality, healthiness
and price competitiveness. In just one year,
2.8 million homes have joined the consumer
category for ready-to-eat dishes while singles
|
|
The alignment of all areas of the Company
with this long-term objective is a priority in
the strategic plan for the new corporate con
figuration once CADE authorization has been
received for the merger between Perdigão
and Sadia. The Company plans to double its
sales by 2015 and is preparing to begin a fresh
cycle of investments in order to sustain new
projects which will support this expansion.
The long-term internationalization project
for the overseas market has been structured to
focus on higher value-added products and on
distribution to the Company’s prime markets.
BRF’s principal strategic initiatives center
around: investments in innovation and in
products with health related attributes; actions
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘To do more with less’
is the driving behind BRF’s
entire business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and couples with no children already account
for 27% of total consumption in Brazil.
Sustainability
Sustainability at BRF is a strategic element of
the Company. It means more than preserving
the environment or creating jobs. Rather it is to
operate in a unique manner in the market place,
managing the daily activities and the attitudes
of the organization on the basis of a series of
guidelines, practices and actions designed
to achieve positive results simultaneously on
economic, environmental and social fronts.
BRF believes that to contribute to the
development of society is compatible with
its own corporate progress. If it is successful
in disseminating this sustainability-related
culture, then this will bring gains in efficiency
for the business with opportunities for as
sociating these improvements in corporate
management as a competitive differential of
the BRF brand. As a result of this vision, the
Company has selected six key pillars to per
meate its business strategy, contributing to
the target of building a global food company.
|
|
Total commitment to sustainability
–
To build sustainability criteria into the organiza
tion’s investment decisions and new projects/
products; to link senior management’s variable
compensation/bonus to meeting sustainabil
ity targets; to ensure management conformity
with the principal sustainability standards and
certifications; to undertake continual auditing
of the Company’s operations
and those of
its suppliers; to promote the
maintenance/
entry of the Company as a component of the
principal sustainability indices.
Increase the focus of sustainability in
the value chain
– To consolidate the Com
pany’s position as a catalyst for sustainability
in Brazilian agriculture; to identify and reduce
the principal social and environmental risks in
the value chain (from farm gate to the dining
room table); to develop new opportunities
along the value chain.
Engagement with stakeholders
– To
involve stakeholders in making decisions; to
improve accountability in matters involving
sustainability, prioritizing transparency and
key stakeholders.
|
|
Promote sustainable consumption
–
To make significant investment to ensure that
the Company’s products increasingly match
health criteria (reducing salt, sugar, trans and
saturated fats); to view social inclusion in the
consumer market as a business opportunity
for the Company.
Focus on human capital
– To train and
enhance the importance of local labor; to im
prove management practices for increasing
the levels of employee satisfaction; to include
education for sustainability in the strategy
for organizational development; to provide
guidance to the employees to act as agents
for sustainability.
Adaptation to climate change
– To
control and reduce environmental impacts
(consumption and emissions) of the Com
pany’s operations, transforming BRF into
an organization which makes a positive
contribution to combating climate change; to
participate in sector movements and public
commitments for offsetting climate change.
|
7
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
BRF invested R$ 1.1 billion
in 2010 in the expansion
of production capacity,
operating improvements,
productivity and the new
industrial units in Lucas do
Rio Verde (MT), Vitória de
Santo Antão (PE) and Bom
Conselho (PE).
|
|
demand using the potential in existing plants
or in those about to go into operation. The
larger part of the investment made in 2010
was allocated to programs for improvements,
productivity and new projects.
In early March 2011, a fire affected part
of the installations of the Nova Mutum (MT)
unit. This event was of minor proportions,
the unit’s production being temporarily
absorbed by other BRF plants in order not to
compromise supplies to clients and consum
ers. The Company has fire insurance. The Nova
Mutum unit slaughters 230 thousand head of
chicken/day and its output (whole chicken
and chicken cuts)
supplies both domestic
and export markets.
Coopercampos
– On April 29 2010, the
Company signed a services agreement with
Cooperativa Coopercampos, state of Santa
Catarina, which includes the use of future
industrial capacity of the plant currently
under construction
in the municipality of
Campos Novos for
hog slaughtering. The
unit is to be equipped for selling its produc
tion to the leading world markets. The unit’s
slaughtering capacity will be seven thousand
head/day, enabling it to meet the needs of a
demanding export market. The cooperative
estimates total investments in the project at
R$ 145 million. Slaughtering operations are
expected to begin in the first half of 2011.
|
|
Information Technology
– During the
year, an integrated systems platform was set
up to support the merger between Perdigão
and Sadia for capturing identified synergies,
these contingent on a unified system once
the merger is finalized. The project, which will
take approximately 18 months to conclude,
involves about 200 people in 4 stages: 1)
upgrading of the SAP system to increase
processing capacity; 2) construction of the
initial platform; 3) development of the Human
Resources SAP system; and 4) the roll-out of
SAP APO – Advance Planning Optimization.
All stages are integrated and critical to the
creation of a complete platform to support
the Company’s expected international expan
sion as well as to ensure lower operating and
maintenance costs.
Internationalization Project
– To
sustain its domestic and international
expansion plans, the Company is planning a
further investment cycle in 2012 for meeting
market demands as from 2013. BRF is to as
sess the best opportunities for executing this
expansion, either through the construction of
greenfield units or the acquisition of overseas
companies. In addition, the company is
maintaining its plans for modernization and
improved productivity at all the production
units. Funding for these investments will
come principally from BRF’s own cash flow.
|
|
Of this total, 348.9 million was appropriated
for the acquisition of poultry and hog breeder
stock. In the past five years, investments
amounted to R$ 6,058 million, an annual
average of R$ 1,211 million in Capex.
The reduction in investments when
compared to previous years is due to the stra
tegic option of optimizing installed capacity
through standardization and improvements,
resulting in more efficient production and
gradual maturation of investments in new
industrial units and in the expansion of pro
cessing capacity.
Both Perdigão as well as Sadia are emerg
ing from an intense round of investments
which have enabled BRF to meet market
|
8
BRF Brasil Foods
Competitive advantages
|
|
|
|
|
BRF has advantages which are difficult to
replicate either in the domestic or interna
tional market. In centralizing its production
platform in Brazil, the Company is able to
source an abundant supply of raw materials
for the food industry, the most important
of these being the product of agriculture or
cattle ranching. However, there are other fac
tors at play which are company-specific and
allow BRF to stand out from its competitors.
|
|
the executive level, courses and training are
held to continually provide updating in man
agement tools and involving participation in
forums with the presence of world renowned
consultants. BRF also maintains a leadership
development program which fosters the
exchange of experiences among the leaders
of various Company units. (More information
on Management of people on page 38.)
Innovation and technology
The Company is continually investing in
innovation and improvement in manage
ment processes and information technology
to sustain the corporate growth plan. On the
product front, the focus is to develop new
items and improve the quality of specialty
products and industrial processes with a
view to reducing the cost of production, use
of materials and natural resources. BRF is the
first company to invest in animal wellbeing in
Brazil in compliance with the most rigorous
international standards.
The development of a more robust plat
form with the capacity to sustain the joint
Perdigão and Sadia operation will permit BRF
to benefit from the greater agility accruing
from the synergies and best practices already
identified, the capture however of which is
contingent on a unified system. In 2011, the
project for unification of IT operations will
be concluded. The area will be restructured
to ensure the demands of the company are
met more efficiently, with particular focus on
the support and development of business.
The project includes the international stan
dardization of all the platforms for increasing
efficiency in both costs and maintenance.
Logistics
BRF has one of the most complex and
capillarized logistics structures in the country.
The Company operates a fleet of 9 thousand
trucks – the largest in Brazil – and employs 15
thousand to meet supply chain requirements
– involving more than three thousand items.
The system is responsible for the delivery of
animal feed to the producers’ poultry farms
for feeding 6.5 million head of poultry/day
and also 40 thousand hogs/day as well as
transporting animals to the slaughtering units,
supplying raw materials to the plants and dis
tributing the portfolio of products to BRF’s 150
|
|
thousand clients. The Company is the only one
in the country with a nationwide distribution
network for chilled and frozen products.
The Company works on the basis of con
tingency plans in all areas to ensure absolute
safety in the functioning of the system. The
product profile demands a continuous opera
tion with rigid timeframes, standardized tem
peratures and handling methods. All stages in
the process are carefully planned and moni
tored by a specialized team and supported by
IT systems which are permanently updated
using the best available solutions anywhere
in the world.
Simulations are made to determine what
is the most cost- and safety-effective way
to pack a cargo or container, the number of
people needed for each one of the stages of
the work, and the means of transportation
chosen for a given product. In 2009, BRF
launched an optimization program for the
transportation chain, increasing the Standard
Load Unit (pallet) from 1.7 meter to 2.1
meters with a resulting reduction in costs
and better use of truck capacity. The aim is
to operate with all that is best and achieve
excellence in the way services are rendered
with a corresponding improvement in quality
and reduction in costs besides contributing
to lower fuel consumption and green house
gas emissions.
In 2010, BRF identified best practices in logis
tics at Perdigão and Sadia and begun to capture
synergies between the two for the areas where
CADE authorizes joint operations – namely, the
acquisition of raw materials and services in ad
dition to the international sales operation.
Management
BRF operates an integrated management
system anchored in three international
standards: ISO 14001 (environment), OHSAS
18000 (health and safety) and ISO 9000
(quality). The system has been extended to
all operating units in order to standardize
processes, improve performance and con
tribute to the reduction in risks. Nine of the
Company’s units carry ISO 14001 certification
and seven, OHSAS 18000. Six of these are
Integrated Management System certified
(SGI – environment, safety and quality).
|
|
Brands
BRF’s brands are one of the
pillars to corporate growth
strategy thanks to consumer
recognition and reputation
for reliability in both domestic
and international markets.
|
|
The portfolio is made up of brands which
together cover the full spectrum of consumer
profiles – children, adolescents
and adults
– and product categories, ranging from the
popular to the premium and in line with the
evolution in the consumer market.
The companies leading brands are Per
digão and Sadia, rated as the most valuable
in the Brazilian food sector according to a
BrandAnalytics/Millward
Brown
study in
partnership with
IstoÉ
Dinheiro
magazine.
The survey was based on financial data and
information raised from the capital markets
in addition to a market survey
by BrandZ
which annually publishes the world’s most
valuable brands. Announced in 2010, the
ranking reveals that the value of Perdigão and
Sadia brands together increased from R$ 1.87
billion in 2008 to R$ 3.6 billion 2009.
Human capital
BRF’s objective is to build an organizational
culture characterized by the commitment of
employees to the long-term plan. During the
course of 2010, progress was made in this
direction through Training and Development
activities. A large part of the investment
in this direction was dedicated to the Oc
cupational Safety, Health and Environment
program (SSMA) which enjoys the commit
ment at all levels of senior management. At
|
9
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Corporate governance
|
|
|
|
|
A widely held company,
BRF Brasil Foods shares
are traded on the São
Paulo Stock Exchange’s
(BM&FBovespa-BRFS3) Novo
Mercado, a listing segment
of the exchange consisting
of companies committed
to the highest standards of
transparency, full disclosure
and equality of treatment
to shareholders.
|
|
These commitments cover the issue of
common shares exclusively, prohibition on
shareholders and executives obtaining unfair
advantage due to access to information not
yet in the public domain, a trading policy for
securities and disclosure of material facts, and
the use of arbitration as a more agile and spe
cific manner with which to resolve conflicts
of interests. In addition, BRF has adopted a
defense mechanism for avoiding sharehold
ing concentration: if a shareholder or group
of shareholders obtains control of more than
20% of the total stock, it is obliged to make a
public offering of shares (POS). In this event,
each acquired share will give its owner the
right to an additional remuneration of 35%
on the average value of the quotation for the
30 days prior to the holding of the offering.
The offering price may also be based on the
|
|
economic value recorded in the valuation
report or again, 135% of the issue price of the
shares of capital increases over the previous
24 months, whichever the highest.
|GRI 4.6|
Since the Company’s securities in the form
of Level III ADRs-BRFS trade in the United
States
capital markets, the financial state
ments
adopt the procedures and internal
controls required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s
(SOX) Internal Controls System over Financial
Reporting (SCIRF).
The Board of Directors and the Board of
Executive
Officers are responsible for
the
periodic
evaluation of the Company.
On
a quarterly basis, the Board examines
the
results, which are published according to
generally
accepted accounting practices
(IFRS). The Board of Executive Officers meets
monthly to monitor general performance
using economic, social and environmental
indicators proposed by Brazilian and interna
tional institutions, such as the Social Report
of the Brazilian Social and Economic Analyses
Institute (Ibase) and the Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI).
The Company has a Governance, Sustain
ability and Strategy Committee providing
advisory support to the Board of Directors; an
Executive Sustainability Committee, consist
ing of the executive vice presidents and of
ficers; and a Working Group for sustainability,
comprising managers with the purpose of
evaluating and monitoring performance
in addition to risks and opportunities in
sustainability.
|GRI 4.9|
|
10
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency
|
|
Rating
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
BBB
-
|
|
Stable
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
BB+
|
|
Positive
|
Moody’s
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Positive
|
|
|
|
In 2010, for the third consecutive year, BRF
was ranked as the Best Company in Corporate
Governance in the consumer goods sector
and Top 5 in Latin America by IR Global
Rankings Awards. The Company also received
Transparency in Sustainability in the Ibovespa
Companies, a recognition awarded by Man
agement & Excellence (M&E),
Razão Contábil
magazine and the Brazilian Investor Relations
Institute (IBRI). The Company was also rated
as the Best Company in Latin America in a
perception study conducted by the United
States magazine
Institutional Investor
, Food
& Beverages sector (
The 2010 Latin America
Investor Relations Perception Study
), as well as
recognition in the awards for Best CEO, Best
CFO, Best IR Program and Best IR Team.
Governance bodies include the General
Shareholders Meeting, Board of Directors, Fis
cal Council which performs the functions of
an Audit Committee, advisory committees
to the Board of Directors and the Board of
Executive Officers.
|GRI 4.1|
Shareholders’ meeting
The meetings are the principal channel
for shareholders recommendations to the
|
|
Company’s management. They are held with
quorums in excess of 70% of shareholders.
Participation is encouraged by a direct ap
proach to the investors and by the dispatch
of the reference manual in which the reasons
for the meeting are listed, the importance of
shareholder participation as well as general
guidance on the process. The shareholders’
meetings approve
financial statements,
incorporations and other matters, elect the
Board of Directors and the Fiscal Council, set
management compensation, among other
issues.
|GRI 4.4|
Novo Mercado
BRF listed on
BM&FBovespa’s Novo
Mercado on April 12 2006, being bound to
settle disputesthrough the Arbitration Panel
in accordance with the commitment clause in
its bylaws and in the regulations.
|
|
11
Annual and sustainability report 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Currently made up of 11
members with a two-year
term of office, seven
of them independent.
|
|
in the internet, on which all the information
necessary for taking a decision is made avail
able. In 2010, the Board met 16 times. The
members of the Board of Directors have a
fixed compensation contingent on members’
participation in the meetings.
|GRI 4.5|
The qualifications to be a member of
the Board of Directors is laid down in the
Company’s Bylaws and includes such aspects
as: an exemplary reputation and not to hold
posts on the boards of competitors or those
representing conflicts of interests. The Board
of Directors is evaluated by a tailor-made
process designed and implemented by a
specialized and independent consultancy.
However, there is no tool for evaluating indi
vidual performance of members of the Board
or the committees. The Board of Executive
Officers is evaluated by an internal process
validated by management.
|GRI 4.7, 4.10|
|
|
1. Luiz Fernando Furlan
Co-chairman
2. Nildemar Secches
Co-chairman
3. Francisco Ferreira Alexandre
Vice Chairman
4. Carlos Alberto Cardoso Moreira
Member
5. Décio da Silva
Member
6. João Vinicius Prianti
Member
7. Luis Carlos Fernandes Afonso
Member
8. Manoel Cordeiro Silva Filho
Member
9. Rami Naum Goldfajn
Member
10. Roberto Faldini
Member
11. Walter Fontana Filho
Member
|
In line with the best governance practices,
the co-chairmen on the Board do not sit on
the Board of Executive Officers. The Bylaws
require that the Board of Directors is made up
of 9 to 11 members.
|GRI 4.3, 4.2|
The organ is responsible for defining busi
ness strategy, approving investments and
appraising the performance of the Company
and the actions of the executives. Meetings
are held once a month or whenever neces
sary. The directors have access to information
on the Company through an exclusive portal
|
See the short résumé of each member in www.brasilfoods.com/ri
12
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
Committees
BRF adopts a governance
model which prioritizes
management efficiency
and the professionalism
of its managers.
|
|
Governance, Sustainability and Strat
egies Committee
– This has an advisory role
in relation to: Company practices of corporate
governance; strategies of the Company;
strategic guidelines and planning; annual and
multi-annual investment budgets; opportuni
ties for investments and/or divestments into/
out of new businesses; mergers, spinoffs and
acquisitions; management system; institu
tional and socio-environmental responsibility
policies and activities; monitoring of the work
of the Audit Committee and the Sarbanes
Oxley-mandated Internal Controls System
over Financial Reporting Committee pursuant
to US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)
requirements.
Finance and Policy and Risks Commit
tee
– Accountable for advising on: corporate
and financial risk policies; funding policies; the
Company’s processes for internal financial and
accounting systems; investor remuneration;
and a suitable capital structure for the Company.
|
|
Management Compensation
and
Executive Development
– With
the
advisory function for monitoring: execution
on the Company’s human resources policy;
criteria for compensating the Board of Execu
tive Officers, including short- and long-term
incentive plans; targets and criteria for evalu
ating performance of the Board of Executive
Officers; monitoring of the Board of Executive
Officers’succession plan.
The Senior Advisory Board
Members of this board are ex-members
of the Board of Executive Officers. They are
professionals that provide specialized advice
to the Company reporting directly to the
CEO. The compensation of the members of
the Senior Advisory Board is provided for and
regulated in the internal organizational ruling
and is equal to 20% of the monthly fixed
income received when the executives were
active in the Company.
|
The committees play a fundamental role in
this structure, integrating the Board of Direc
tors with the Board of Executive Officers.
The Company maintains three advisory
committees made up of members of the Board
of Directors and the Board of Executive Offi
cers: Governance, Sustainability and Strategies;
Finance and Policy and Risks; Management
Compensation and Executive Development.
In addition, the Company has a Disclosure
committee as called for by the Sarbanes Oxley
regulations, and the Senior Advisory Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fiscal Council is made
up of three independent
members, one of them
holding the position of
financial specialist, meeting on
a monthly basis and whenever
necessary, deliberating jointly
with the Board of Directors.
|
|
Pursuant with United States legislation, the
Fiscal Council also exercises the functions of
an Audit Committee. Members of the Fiscal
Council receive a fixed compensation in line
with their participation in the meetings, this
amounting to R$ 0.34 million in 2010.
|GRI 4.5|
|
|
1. Attilio Guaspari
Chairman and financial specialist
2. Jorge Kalache Filho
Member
3. Osvaldo Roberto Nieto
Member
|
See the short résumé of each councilor in www.brasilfoods.com/ri
13
Annual and sustainability report 2010
|
|
|
|
|
BRF’s Board of Executive
Officers is made up of 11
members, elected by the
Board of Directors, with
two-year mandates, members
being eligible for reelection.
|
|
The Board is responsible for the manage
ment of the day to day operations of the Com
pany and for short-, medium- and long-term
strategies in line with the guidelines relative to
the management of the business, supported
and guided by the Board of Directors.
In 2010, the Board’s total compensation
amounted to R$ 18.4 million, including both
fixed and variable portions, linked to targets
and performance indicators to be reached
during the fiscal year. An executive officer’s
variable compensation is a reflection of per
formance measured against individual and
collective targets in line with the Company’s
strategic plan and budget. The targets are
earmarked against general productivity
indicators for BRF and/or the respective area
of operations in addition to indicators for
|
|
resource maximization and personnel man
agement. The monitoring of these indicators
is carried out during the entire fiscal year by
the Financial Controller’s office and Human
Resources area and then formally validated by
the Board of Directors following the finaliza
tion of the annual results.
|GRI 4.5|
In March 2010, the shareholders approved
a long-term stock option plan for executive
officers supported by recently issued shares
or those held as treasury stock. The Executive
Compensation and Development Committee,
which supports the Board of Directors in its
decisions, analyzes the strategy for fixed and
variable compensation to be adopted, issuing
recommendations and policy changes for
subsequent submission for the appreciation,
deliberation and approval of the Board.
|
14
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
1. José Antonio do Prado Fay
Chief Executive Officer
2. Antonio Augusto de Toni
Vice President of Export Markets
3. Ely Mizrahi
Vice President of Food Services
(1)
4. Fabio Medeiros Martins da Silva
Vice President of Dairy Products
5. Gilberto Antonio Orsato
Vice President of Human Resources
|
|
6. José Eduardo Cabral Mauro
Vice President of Domestic Market
(1)
7. Leopoldo Saboya
Vice President of Finance,
Administration and
Investor Relations
8. Luiz Henrique Lissoni
Vice President of Supply Chain
9. Nelson Vas Hacklauer
Vice President of Strategy,
Projects and New Businesses
|
|
10. Nilvo Mittank
Vice President of Operations and
Technology
11. Wilson Newton de Mello Neto
Vice President of Corporate Affairs
(1)
The Vice Presidencies for Food Service and the
Domestic Market will be filled in the event of and
contingent upon the terms of the final approval
of the Concentration Act currently subject to
examination by the Administrative Council for
Economic Defense – CADE, as well as eventual
approval of the Company’s Board of Directors.
|
See the short résumé for each officer in www.brasilfoods.com/ri
15
Annual and sustainability report 2010
|
|
Investor relations
Brasil Foods has an Investor Relations area
responsible for providing a personalized
service to investors and analysts through
the offer of comprehensive information on
the Company’s businesses and performance.
Through the IR site (www.brasilfoods.com/
ri) such interested parties have access to
information which is being constantly
updated, and through in depth contact via
|
|
other mediums such as one-on-one meet
ings, conference calls and video conferences,
public meetings – with the Association of
Capital Markets Analysts and Investment Pro
fessionals (Apimec) and financial institutions
–, road shows and onsite meetings.
In 2010, the number of attendances grew
an average of 76%. Various conferences were
held in Brazil and overseas including the BRF
Day in São Paulo and New York.
|
|
|
Ethical behavior
|GRI 4.8|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust is the first principle
and value adopted by BRF
for operating ethically and
transparently in its activities as
they relate to all stakeholders.
|
|
The internal auditing area is responsible for
investigating complaints of any nature such
as misappropriation, fraud, moral or sexual
harassment. The result is presented and dis
cussed with the Chief Executive Officer and
with the vice presidents from the areas in
volved. Should any infringement of the Code
of Ethics and Conduct be identified, the pen
alty may be the rescission of work or service
contracts. The penalties are decided by a mul
tidisciplinary team with representatives from
Human Resources, Legal and Auditing areas
together with the vice president of the area.
In 2010, the work contracts of 47 employees
were rescinded and the credentials of three
suppliers cancelled. The Company recorded
no legal case of corruption.
|GRI SO4|
Human rights policies and procedures are
set forth in the Code of Ethics and delivered
to all those employees joining the Company
and taking part in the New Employees Induc
tion Program. In 2010, this translated into 12
thousand hours of training for 40 thousand
new hires (35% of the payroll). A further 164
employees (0.2% of the total) took part in 48
hours of training with the focus on basic labor
legislation, disciplinary measures, moral and
sexual harassment and managerial responsi
bility (civil, criminal and labor).
|GRI HR3, SO3|
The Company also has a Material Informa
tion Disclosure and Share Trading Policy
which is disseminated to all stakeholders.
During the course of 2010, BRF was
sentenced to pay fines amounting to R$ 1.6
million for infringing laws and regulations.
Through a Conduct Adjustment Agreement
(TAC), which lays down periods for compli
ance
|
|
The Code of Ethics and Conduct under
scores this behavior by establishing guide
lines and orientating decisions and attitudes
of the employees in their relations with
clients, suppliers, co-workers and other stake
holders. The Code can be found by accessing
the Company’s internet page, through the
internet and in the Employee Manual.
Internal audits are conducted at the units
– plants, corporate offices, sales branches,
milk catchment points, etc. – for evaluating
the suitability of the internal controls and
detecting complaints as well as procedures
or practices contrary to the Code of Ethics
and Conduct. The frequency and coverage
of the audits depend on the track record of
problems, relevance/materiality or degree
of risk represented for each one of the units.
Some are audited every year although with
others frequency may involve intervals of
more than a year. Notwithstanding, all units
should be audited on a remote basis every
year. The Company maintains various chan
nels available for registering complaints or
infringements of conduct such as The Audit
Department (11-2322-5060/5059 or 49-
8816-0780) and Dial Integrity (DIS –0800 702
7014).
|GRI SO2|
|
16
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
with certain legally enforceable rulings,
the Company allocated R$ 160 thousand on
canalization work between the decanting
lake of the Rio Verde (GO) plant and Saneago’s
(the water and sanitation utility for the state
of Goiás) water catchment lake responsible
for the supply of water to the municipality.
In the same municipality, R$ 167 thousand
was invested in the construction of a paved
area and fencing around the entire perimeter
of the source of Rio da Barrinha in addition
to R$ 450 thousand in the restoration of the
sources of the Ribeirão da Abóbora.
|GRI SO8|
External commitments
|GRI 4.12|
BRF participates in initiatives which sup
port its commitment to sustainability based
on the principles of respect for people and
the environment. Among these, of special
importance are:
Global Compact
– BRF is a signatory to
the Global Compact which encourages the
business sector to adopt practices of corporate
responsibility for promoting a more inclusive
and sustainable economy. The Pact is an initia
tive of the ex-general secretary of the United
Nations Organization, Kofi Annan, in partner
ship with UN agencies as well as social entities.
It has more than 5.2 thousand signatories
around the world. It sets out ten principles to
be respected in the areas of Human Rights,
Labor Rights, Environmental Protection and
Anti-corruption. Adherence to the initiative
was initially through the medium of Sadia and
is being reconfirmed in 2011 by BRF.
Eight
Millennium
Development
Goals
– Aligned to the Global Compact, this
UNO initiative is a list of challenges to be met
through concrete actions by governments
and society by 2015. The declaration was
subscribed by 191 countries, among them
Brazil, during the Millennium Summit held in
2000 in New York. The goals are: eradication
of hunger and poverty; quality education for
all; non-discrimination; reduction in infant
mortality; improved maternal health; com
bating disease; quality of life and respect for
the environment; and establishing a global
partnership for development.
The Business Pact for Integrity and
against Corruption
– A voluntary com
mitment for ethical behavior in businesses,
the pact defines standards for corporate
relationships with government and broaches
such themes as tax evasion, corruption of
civil servants, organized crime and money
laundering. The initiative is organized by the
|
|
Ethos Institute in partnership with the United
Nations Development Program (PNUD), the
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC) and the Brazilian Committee of the
Global Compact, among other entities. Sadia
has been a party to this initiative since 2007
and BRF signed up to the commitment in
March 2011.
The National Pact for the Eradication
of Slave Labor in Brazil
– The fight against
slave labor is expressed in the Human Re
sources Policy of the Endesa companies and
is the criterion for engaging suppliers and ser
vice providers. Since 2006, Ampla and Coelce
have been a party to this initiative of the Ethos
Institute jointly with the International Labor
Organization (ILO) and the NGO, Repórter
Brasil. Commitment is voluntary and signato
ries are companies committed to the dignity,
formalization, modernization and eradication
of degrading work. Sadia has been a signatory
since 2007 and Perdigão since 2008 and at the
recommendation of the Pact Committee, BRF
will become a signatory in 2011.
Choices International Foundation
–
Headquartered in Brussels, the foundation
was responsible for introducing the My Choice
seal. It allows consumers to identify products
aligned to the criteria adopted by the dietary
recommendations of the World Health
Organization (WHO). The products that bear
the seal are those which match the criteria
defined by the program as to the quantity of
salt, sugar, saturated and trans fats, which if
consumed in excess, cause chronic disease.
BRF signed up to this initiative in 2009.
The Brazilian GHG Protocol Program
– provides an incentive to the voluntary
management of atmospheric emissions with
publication of GNG emission inventories. BRF
has been a participant since 2010 and Sadia
since 2008. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol
is the tool most used by companies and
governments to quantify and manage atmo
spheric emissions.
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)
– The
project involves international investors and
is today the largest GHG emissions database
in the world. Through a questionnaire to
which 2.5 thousand companies replied on
a voluntary basis, the initiative analyzes the
positions of major corporations in relation to
climate change. BRF has been a signatory to
this project since 2006 and Sadia since 2007.
Cattle ranching pact / Sustainable
connections
– Commitment assumed
by Sadia in 2008 for financing, production,
|
|
distribution and sustainable consumption of
beef cattle products from the Amazon Basin
region and destined for the city of São Paulo.
BRF adhered in April 2011.
Sustainable Pro-Food Initiative (Ipas)
– This is a multi-stakeholder initiative, created
in March 2007 by Sadia and invited institu
tions. Its objective is to be an agent for pro-
sustainability in Brazil by developing projects
for food chain innovation from production to
consumption. Focus: activities involve mem
bers (sharing knowledge and projects) and
the market (seeking sustainability in consumer
preference, establishing good pro-competitive
practices and engagement in government
policies directed towards fostering sustain
ability in agribusiness systems).
|GRI 4.13|
Right Direction Program
– A WCF Brasil
(World Childhood Foundation) initiative for
more effectively combating sexual exploita
tion of children and adolescents on Brazilian
highways. Sadia has been a signatory since
2007 and BRF joined in February 2011.
Companies for Climate
– In early 2011,
BRF signed up to the Companies for Climate
program, led by the Getúlio Vargas Founda
tion with the purpose of involving companies
disposed to operate in a low carbon economy.
|
|
17
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Awards and recognition
|GRI 2.10|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards and highlights
|
|
Reason
|
|
Institution
|
Best CEO; Best CFO; Best IR
Program and Best IR Team
|
|
Best Companies in Latin America in the perception study of
Institutional
Investor
magazine for the Food & Beverages sector (
The 2010 Latin America
Investor Relations Perception Study
) - buy side ranking and the 2nd best in all
categories – sell side ranking.
|
|
Institutional Investor
magazine
|
Company of the Year in the 500
Best Ranking
|
|
Elected Company of the Year among The Best of Dinheiro 2010. The ranking
contemplates 500 among the best companies that operate in 25 sectors.
BRF was also ranked first in the food sector.
|
|
Istoé Dinheiro
magazine
|
The most valuable brands in the
country in the food sector
|
|
BRF Brasil Foods’Perdigão and Sadia brands are the most valuable in Brazil
in the food sector. The study was conducted on the basis of financial and
capital markets data for 2009 in addition to a BrandZTM survey.
|
|
IstoÉ Dinheiro
magazine
BrandAnalytics
/Millward Brown
|
Best Company in Corporate
Governance
|
|
IR Global Rankings Awards, as The Best Corporate Governance in
the Consumer Goods Industry and Top 5 Corporate Governance
in Latin America, the Company being considered a bellwether in
transparency, disclosure, relationship and equality of treatment to its
investors, promoting structured operations which permit the effective
aggregation of value.
|
|
MZ Consult
Technical Commission:
Arnold & Porter, Barbosa,
Müssnich & Aragão
Advogados, Demarest e
Almeida and KPMG.
|
2011 – BCG Global Challengers
|
|
BRF is of the top Companies in Brazil with potential do worldwide trade
|
|
BCG-Boston Consulting
Group
|
Leader in the ranking of Brazilian
companies –Transparency in
Sustainability in the Companies of
the Ibovespa 2010.
|
|
M&E’s study evaluated the companies on the basis of 123 criteria of
transparency based on actions in Corporate Governance, Sustainability and
Social Responsibility.
|
|
Management & Excellence
(M&E) in partnership
with the
Razão Contábil
magazine
|
Industry Trophy 2010
|
|
For the investments made by the Company in the state of Paraná as well as
development of projects/social responsibility.
|
|
Federation of Industries
of Paraná(FIEP)
|
The 500 Largest in the South
|
|
Leader in the ranking of the largest companies in the state of Santa
Catarina.
|
|
Amanhã
magazine
|
Expomoney 2010
|
|
Respect for the individual investor.
|
|
ExpoMoney 2010
|
The most recalled brand
in the state of Paraná
|
|
Sadia: Confidence and credibility together with the consumer.
|
|
Amanhã
magazine
|
Most admired in agribusiness
|
|
Sadia: 9
th
place in the ranking of the companies- state of Santa Catarina
|
|
Amanhã
magazine
|
Top of mind
|
|
Award-Winning Brand: Qualy / Sadia
|
|
Folha de São Paulo
Newspaper
|
Risk management
|GRI 1.2|
|
|
|
|
|
BRF has reinforced its
structure and improved
risk management controls
and mechanisms in
parallel with the process
of integrating Sadia.
|
|
Directors at Board level and employees are
involved in a series of controls and have well
defined functions:
Board of Directors
– Sets out the
strategic guidelines for risk management;
assesses and approves the policy for financial
|
|
risk management; establishes
and amends
selected hedge instruments;
approves risk
factor limits; approves all and any modifica
tion in risk policy.
|
18
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy and Finance Committee
–
Performs an advisory role in relation to risk
policy and to the strategic guidelines for
management of financial risk and maintains
permanent monitoring of the activities of the
Financial Risk Management Committee.
Board of Executive Officers
– Estab
lishes the Company’s position for each identi
fied risk according to Board guidelines, action
plans and risk monitoring.
Financial Risk Management Com
mittee
– Proposes improvements to the
financial risk management policy; supervises
risk management; evaluates and approves
hedging alternatives in line with Board of
Directors policy; evaluates stress scenarios to
be applied in operations.
Supporting its governance standards, the
risk policy is integral to the Company’s regular
publications as for example in the case of the
reference form, including the detailing of risk
positions, available for consultation on the
internet (
www.brasilfoods.com/ir
).
Financial Risks
The financial risks policy clearly establishes
guidelines, situations, limits for authorization
and responsibility, with operators’ limits
for the Risk Committee and the Board of
Executive Officers. Any eventual irregularity
is quickly identified and reported with the
immediate adoption of corrective measures.
Financial markets and the Company’s posi
tions are monitored on a daily basis with the
support of management tools.
In 2009, BRF set up an area specifically
dedicated to control and risk management
subordinated to the Vice President for Fi
nance, Administration and Investor Relations.
Currency
– BRF enjoys natural protection
from currency fluctuations thanks to the rev
enue flow from export business in volumes
proportional to its currency-denominated
financial liabilities. Risk management policy
allows for the contracting of currency hedg
ing instruments albeit with no financial gain
in mind.
Credit
– A Credit Committee establishes
a credit ceiling each branch can extend to
clients. Positions are tracked in real time with
the support of a management system. In
addition the diffused client base restricts the
impact of eventual delinquencies.
Operating risks
BRF now has an area dedicated exclu
sively to the management of operating risks
|
|
thus ensuring even greater security to its
operations. During 2010, risks were charted
and defined according to different levels of
severity. The Company identified risk-related
processes requiring adaptation and imple
mented as a question of priority at all units,
irrespective of the latter being new, old or
acquired. The plan is to adjust all operational
risk management processes over four years.
Additionally, a contingency plan for the
logistics area is in place to ensure continuity
of operations along the entire product supply
and distribution chain to the end client.
In its activities, the Company considers the
Precautionary Principle, established at the
Rio de Janeiro Eco92 Conference, according
to which the absence of scientific consensus
should not be used as justification for not
taking action when there is a threat of seri
ous or irreversible environmental damage to
the environment or to human health. This
principle is implicit at all phases of product
development, conception, manufacture and
distribution.
Nutritional safety
– The Company is
equipped to trace all items produced at
its units from breeder stock to the product
delivered to the final consumer including
the control of feed and medications admin
istered to livestock. All Company suppliers are
subject to contractual clauses guaranteeing
nutritional safety of all items manufactured at
any industrial unit.
Sanitary control
– A continuous process
of improvements allows the company to
eliminate or minimize risks of this nature. This
also includes the monitoring of integrated
outgrowers practices. Strategically distributed
in different regions of Brazil, the slaughter
ing units are geographically dispersed to
minimize the impact on performance of the
businesses in the event of trade bans due to
sanitary issues on products from a specific
region of the country.
Commodities
– Inventory and hedging
policies are established to guarantee the sup
ply of inputs and ameliorate the risk of major
grain price volatility. Markets are permanently
monitored in order to anticipate movements
which can have a positive or negative impact
on the costs of the operations. The Company
has upgraded mechanisms for acquisition of
raw materials which are now conducted on a
competitive bidding basis. Among the factors
determining the geographical location of its
units is the supply of grain and the infrastruc
ture for delivering production.
|
|
Insurance
– Property insurance protects
all industrial units, product warehousing and
distribution centers with coverage for mate
rial damage, loss of profits and civil liability.
Environmental risks
BRF propagates a culture of respect for the
environment at all levels of the Company
in addition to complying with all environ
mental legislation. The Occupational Health,
Safety and Environment program is one of
the principal mediums for disseminating and
strengthening environmental awareness in all
company activities.
Technological risks
Through continual monitoring of all sys
tems and the industrial complex as a whole,
BRF exercises a policy of risk management
based on the security of its production
and on increased productivity with the use
of equipment and processes aligned to
the most modern international standards.
Investments in innovation allows for ongoing
portfolio renovation reflecting demands and
tendencies of the different consumer profiles.
Risks of image and reputation
The dissemination of the Code of Ethics and
Conduct is core to BRF’s efforts to propagate
good corporate governance practice and to
contribute to maintaining the Company’s
principles and values on the basis of confi
dence, ethics and transparency. These prac
tices emphasize respect for the human being,
repudiation of any form of discrimination, and
responsibility in relation to society and the
environment. The Vice President’s office for
Corporate Affairs is responsible for monitoring
these aspects and for action plans.
|
|
19
Sectoral scenario
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic consumption
is likely to remain strong
throughout the period,
especially in the case of
non-durables.
|
|
While the labor market failed to record
any significant improvement in developed
countries during the period, consumption
indicators such as retail sales and consumer
confidence reported an improvement in
relation to the third quarter.
Brazilian exports
– In 2010, the exports
of chicken reported an increase of 6.4%
against 2009. Main importing countries were
Saudi Arabia, Japan, Hong Kong, The Nether
lands and South Africa. Worthy of note is the
export performance to South Africa, China
and Egypt - markets traditionally with a low
percentage share of total overseas sales but
which in 2010, expanded significantly.
The exports of pork in 2010 were 11%
weaker with an across-the-board decline in
all leading markets (Russia, Hong Kong and
|
|
the Ukraine). This negative performance in
sales value was partially offset by an average
price increase of 22.9% compared with 2009.
Domestic Consumption
– The unem
ployment rate reported by the Government
Statistics Office (IBGE) fell to 5.3% of the
Economically Active Population in December,
the lowest rate ever recorded for the historical
series and boosting consumer confidence
levels to the highest ever according to the
ACSP (the São Paulo Commercial Associa
tion). This positive trading environment saw
retail sales in the principal metropolitan
regions grow at an average year on year rate
of 9.6% as against an historical average rate of
4.3% between 2000 and 2009.
Raw Materials
– Between October and
December 2010 average corn prices in the
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
domestic market rose 34% compared with
3Q10, but during the year posted a decline
of 1.2%. The spike in the final quarter of 2010
was in line with the trend in the international
price which was pushed up due to an in
crease in the demand for animal feed and the
production of biofuels and not accompanied
proportionally by supply. The result was
a decline in world inventory, leading to a
relatively low inventory/consumption ratio.
Low productivity levels due to unfavorable
climatic conditions affected supplies from
exporting countries such as Argentina,
preventing the replenishment of inventory in
2011 and maintaining high level prices.
Meanwhile, average soybean prices in
4Q10 rose 15.8% against 3Q10, albeit 13.5%
down on a year on year basis
|
|
Perspectives
– Social tensions affecting
the countries of North Africa and the Middle
East have led to an increase in international
oil prices although not to the point of threat
ening global growth. However, in developed
countries, macroeconomic indicators are
positive especially those for the United States.
In Brazil, the basic Selic rate of interest is
expected to increase from 10.75% p.a. in
December 2010 to 12.25% p.a. by December
2011, with a consequent deceleration in
inflation rates. This hike in interest rates is
unlikely to choke off demand as consumer
confidence should remain very positive. An
Applied Economic Research Institute - IPEA
survey conducted in January 2011 shows that
64% of families polled expect the economic
situation in Brazil to improve over the next 12
months, indicating that domestic consump
tion is likely to remain strong throughout the
period, especially in the case of non-durables.
|
|
21
Annual and sustainability report 2010
22
BRF Brasil Foods
Operational performance
|
|
|
|
|
Production
Production volumes at BRF Brasil Foods
have recovered to levels prior to the
2008/2009 crisis with growth of 6 % against
the preceding year. A total of 1.6 billion head
of poultry and 10.5 million head of hogs/beef
cattle were slaughtered, a growth of 3.9% and
2.8%, respectively. Other processed products
reported growth of 57.4% on a pro-forma
basis, most notably in margarines, pastas and
pizzas as well as appetizers following their
launch by the Company.
Activities at
the Cavalhada unit in the
Greater Porto
Alegre (RS) region, were
transferred to the Lajeado(RS) unit. This
move reflects the ease of integrating the
processes of the two plants, in so doing
adding value to the product mix as well as
optimizing processes, industrial lines and
production costs. In addition, investments
were recently made at the Lajeado plant
in expanding capacity and modernization
of the installations. The unit’s slaughtering
capacity has been increased from 320 to 470
thousand head of chicken per day, while hog
slaughtering capacity has been raised from 2
to 4.8 thousand head/day.
|
|
Domestic market
BRF has successfully
maintained its market
share for the principal
product categories thanks
to innovative initiatives,
product launches and brand
sustainability campaigns in
addition to the continual
hands on management of
prices and costs.
In all segments, including dairy products,
BRF has prioritized commercialization margin
(value share) over its market share.
Sales to the domestic market totaled
R$ 13.5 billion, a growth of 11.3% against the
preceding year. The Company sold 3.8 million
tons of products, 4.9% higher than 2009 on
a pro-forma basis. Thanks to these results,
margins were restored to pre-crisis levels.
A buoyant domestic market and full
employment together with the inclusion of
emerging consumer classes, all stimulated
demand and sales of products to all segments,
more especially lines specific to the year-end
holiday period.
|
|
Meats
- The segment posted an increase
of 10.5% in sales and 6.6% in volume. The
recovery in in natura meat exports helped
to bring back supply and demand for the
product to equilibrium in the domestic
market, sustaining prices and the sale of items
with greater added value. As a result, average
prices remained 3.6% above those registered
for 2009 on a pro-forma basis while processed
products registered an improvement of 6.9
percentage points for the year.
Dairy Products
– Net sales for the dairy
product segment in 2010 recovered to 2008
levels, ending the period totaling R$ 2.3 bil
lion. Margins were squeezed by high prices
paid to milk producers. Average prices were
stable in relation to 2009. The year was not
characterized by the usual on- and off-season
movements, a fact that rendered manage
ment of
costs and inventory even more
difficult.
Since these problems prevented
margins returning to historical levels, BRF
pursued a policy of preserving profitability in
the segment which translated into a reduced
market share for chilled items and UHT milks.
Other processed products
- Highlights
for the year in this segment were Meu Menu,
a line of ready-to-eat, frozen and individual
dishes for consumers that live alone, and
Escondidinho, inspired by traditional recipes
of Brazilian cuisine and directed towards the
family market. The Company ran campaigns
designed to consolidate the brands, taking
|
Pro-forma production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Ch. %
|
Poultry slaughter (million head)
|
|
1,623
|
|
1,562
|
|
4%
|
Hog/beef cattle slaughter (thousand head)
|
|
10,563
|
|
10,277
|
|
3%
|
Production (thousand tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meat
|
|
3,992
|
|
3,767
|
|
6%
|
Dairy Products
|
|
1,110
|
|
1,044
|
|
6%
|
Other Processed Products
|
|
469
|
|
298
|
|
57%
|
Feed and Concentrates (thousand tons)
|
|
10,723
|
|
10,328
|
|
4%
|
23
Annual and sustainability report 2010
|
|
|
|
|
full advantage of events with major popular
appeal such as the World Soccer Tournament.
Overall, market share remained stable – with
the exception of margarines where there
was growth. Total sales for the segment were
R$ 2.0 billion, a growth of 25.7% while
volume reached 454.9 thousand tons, a rise
of 13.1% and 79%, respectively on a pro-form
and Corporate Law (CL) basis.
Food Service
– This segment is a strategic
one in BRF’s growth plans with the food service
market benefiting from a change in the habits
of the Brazilian population, growth in incomes
and a recovery in employment. According to
the IBGE’s Family Budgets Survey, the percent
age of personal expenditure on food away
from home rose from 24.1% (2002/2003) to
31.1% (2008/2009). Thanks to this trend and
BRF’s investments in products and services,
the segment posted a year on year increase of
13.1% in sales and 15% in volume.
BRF is the leading player in the Brazilian
food service business, supplying the largest
food service chains and franchises in the
country and developing customized solu
tions for enhancing its services and proximity
to the customer. This segment is present in all
the major urban centers, BRF using a propri
etary and dedicated fleet of delivery trucks
in addition to maintaining high standards of
quality and reliability.
|
|
Exports
In accordance with
instructions from the anti-
trust authority CADE, the
merging of international sales
has allowed the Company to
achieve gains in synergies and
scale with better price and
portfolio management.
The Company has repositioned its brands,
benefiting from the segmentation of the
markets. Sadia has become a premium brand
focused on higher added value and innova
tion. Perdix is positioned as a mainstream high
brand, dedicated to the commercialization of
large volumes and products catering for local
tastes. Borella, Halal, Fazenda and others have
been maintained as brands which compete
with indigenous food product industries.
BRF’s international division, Plusfood, with
units in The Netherlands and the United
Kingdom, is reinforcing its strategy with the
manufacture of items destined for the Euro
pean market. Examples are Perfect Portions, a
standardized line of items for the food service
business as well as specific products geared
to satisfying European consumer demand.
|
|
In 2010, export revenue increased 4.3%
to R$ 9.2 billion on volumes of 2.3 million
tons (5.9% greater) – pro-forma basis and
a growth of 40.2% in sales revenue on a
Corporate Law basis.
Meats
– During the first half, high invento
ries in world markets depressed prices. In the
light of this scenario, the Company adjusted
its portfolio accordingly and by the second
half with supply and demand back in balance,
conditions had improved. The devaluation of
the US Dollar during the year reflected in a
reduction in sales revenue in Reals although
without sacrificing returns.
Meat exports amounted to R$ 9.0 billion,
5% higher with volumes 6.1% up for the year.
The average prices in US Dollars FOB were
14% up against 2009.The average foreign ex
change rate impact resulted in price decline
in terms of Reals and an overall reduction in
export revenues in local currency terms.
Dairy Products
- The scenario of weaker
international demand restricted sales volume
on the overseas market with shipments
recording a year on year decline of 28%. The
Company is shortly to expand its unit in Ar
gentina – a cheese manufacturer – to make it
self-sustainable and to source of value-added
exports. Argentina offers a stable supply of
quality and competitively priced raw materials
in addition to enjoying sanitary agreements
with European countries making exports to
these markets a feasible proposition
|
24
Annual and sustainability report 2010
26
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
Market tendencies:
Europa
– The crises in some countries
– Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain – weak
ened the domestic economy in the area and
causing considerable instability throughout
the year. Operations benefited from the pres
sure on international quotations for the prin
cipal grains (corn and soybeans), permitting
an increase in prices to the European market.
Expansion at Plusfood was instrumental in
BRF enhancing its penetration in the region.
Capacity at the Dutch unit is expected to be
doubled by mid- 2011. Production will be
sold to such countries as Spain, Germany,
Austria and Poland.
Middle East
– These markets were severely
pressured in the first half of last year due to high
product inventory. Importers remained cau
tious, but resumed business in the second half.
The Middle East continues to be BRF’s principal
overseas market. Among the countries where
there is major potential are Iraq, Jordan and
Iran. In 2010, 15 new products under the Sadia
brand were launched in the region, a trend
which is expected to increase in 2011.
Far East
– The Japanese market reported
an improvement in prices for imported prod
ucts with consumption remaining steady. In
China, demand for BRF’s products continued
|
|
strong especially following the opening of the
Company’s commercial office in the financial
hub of Shanghai. BRF plans to leverage its
business on the back of the major growth
potential presented by the Chinese market.
Eurasia
– Demand from countries in the
region remained strong both for poultry meat
and pork products resulting in an improve
ment in prices and volumes.
Africa, Americas and other countries
– There was an increase in the African market,
especially for processed products with an
improvement in volumes and prices. The
region presents major growth potential for
BRF’s products, more notably in countries
such as Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt and Morocco,
Mozambique, South Africa and Namibia as
well as Angola.
With a proprietary distribution system in
Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Peru, sales to
the region have been particularly strong for a
new line in hams to Argentina and Uruguay,
and Qualy light margarine in Chile.
Internationalization Project
- BRF is
structuring its Long-Term Internationalization
Project focused on its international footprint
for products with higher added value and
distribution in its main operating regions.
|
|
|
27
Annual and sustainability report 2010
28
BRF Brasil Foods
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousand tons
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
|
Domestic market
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
Meats
|
|
1,837
|
|
1,722
|
|
7
|
|
8,668
|
|
7,844
|
|
10
|
In natura
|
|
400
|
|
340
|
|
17
|
|
1,930
|
|
1,306
|
|
48
|
Poultry
|
|
255
|
|
216
|
|
18
|
|
1,039
|
|
760
|
|
37
|
Pork/beef
|
|
145
|
|
124
|
|
16
|
|
891
|
|
546
|
|
63
|
Elaborated/processed (meats)
|
|
1,437
|
|
1,382
|
|
4
|
|
6,738
|
|
6,538
|
|
3
|
Dairy products
|
|
1,075
|
|
1,001
|
|
7
|
|
2,292
|
|
2,139
|
|
7
|
Milk
|
|
873
|
|
793
|
|
10
|
|
1,585
|
|
1,437
|
|
10
|
Dairy products/ juice/ others
|
|
202
|
|
208
|
|
(3)
|
|
707
|
|
702
|
|
1
|
Other processed
|
|
455
|
|
402
|
|
13
|
|
2,026
|
|
1,612
|
|
26
|
Soybean products/ others
|
|
389
|
|
454
|
|
(14)
|
|
529
|
|
551
|
|
(4)
|
Total
|
|
3,756
|
|
3,580
|
|
5
|
|
13,515
|
|
12,148
|
|
11
|
|
Processed
|
|
2,094
|
|
1,993
|
|
5
|
|
9,472
|
|
8,853
|
|
7
|
% Total sales
|
|
62
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousand tons
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
|
Exports
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
Meats
|
|
2,278
|
|
2,147
|
|
6
|
|
9,051
|
|
8,618
|
|
5
|
In natura
|
|
1,922
|
|
1,818
|
|
6
|
|
7,361
|
|
6,923
|
|
6
|
Poultry
|
|
1,640
|
|
1,529
|
|
7
|
|
5,847
|
|
5,532
|
|
6
|
Pork/beef
|
|
282
|
|
289
|
|
(2)
|
|
1,515
|
|
1,391
|
|
9
|
Elaborated/processed (meats)
|
|
357
|
|
329
|
|
8
|
|
1,690
|
|
1,695
|
|
-
|
Dairy products
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
(28)
|
|
20
|
|
22
|
|
(10)
|
Milk
|
|
-
|
|
2
|
|
(92)
|
|
1
|
|
12
|
|
(92)
|
Dairy products/ juice/ others
|
|
3
|
|
2
|
|
45
|
|
19
|
|
10
|
|
96
|
Other processed
|
|
18
|
|
18
|
|
4
|
|
91
|
|
120
|
|
(24)
|
Soybean products/ others
|
|
6
|
|
8
|
|
(30)
|
|
4
|
|
29
|
|
(85)
|
Total
|
|
2,306
|
|
2,177
|
|
6
|
|
9,166
|
|
8,789
|
|
4
|
|
Processed
|
|
378
|
|
348
|
|
8
|
|
1,799
|
|
1,825
|
|
(1)
|
% Total sales
|
|
38
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousand tons
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
Meats
|
|
4,115
|
|
3,869
|
|
6
|
|
17,719
|
|
16,463
|
|
8
|
In natura
|
|
2,322
|
|
2,158
|
|
8
|
|
9,291
|
|
8,229
|
|
13
|
Poultry
|
|
1,895
|
|
1,745
|
|
9
|
|
6,886
|
|
6,292
|
|
9
|
Pork/beef
|
|
427
|
|
413
|
|
3
|
|
2,406
|
|
1,937
|
|
24
|
Elaborated/processed (meats)
|
|
1,793
|
|
1,711
|
|
5
|
|
8,428
|
|
8,234
|
|
2
|
Dairy products
|
|
1,078
|
|
1,005
|
|
7
|
|
2,311
|
|
2,161
|
|
7
|
Milk
|
|
873
|
|
795
|
|
10
|
|
1,585
|
|
1,450
|
|
9
|
Dairy products/ juice/ others
|
|
205
|
|
210
|
|
(3)
|
|
726
|
|
711
|
|
2
|
Other processed
|
|
473
|
|
420
|
|
13
|
|
2,117
|
|
1,732
|
|
22
|
Soybean products/ others
|
|
395
|
|
462
|
|
(15)
|
|
533
|
|
580
|
|
(8)
|
Total
|
|
6,062
|
|
5,757
|
|
5
|
|
22,681
|
|
20,937
|
|
8
|
|
Processed
|
|
2,472
|
|
2,341
|
|
6
|
|
11,271
|
|
10,677
|
|
6
|
% Total sales
|
|
41
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
51
|
|
|
29
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Brand and products line
|GRI 2.2; 2.5|
30
BRF Brasil Foods
31
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Economic-financial performance
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
– During the
year, net sales
totaled R$ 22.7 billion, 8.3% up in terms of the
result on a pro-forma basis and 42.6% in CL
terms considering the incorporation of results
for Sadia as from July 2009.
Cost of Sales
- Costs
of sales
were
11.9% higher in 4Q10, the
increase
being
proportionally less than sales revenue. This
permitted a gain in gross margin despite cost
pressures from the principal
raw materials
(corn and soybeans) due to the highly volatile
scenario for these commodities.
For the year as a whole, costs of sales were
1.4% higher on a comparative pro-forma ba
sis and 33.2% up on a CL basis, although also
permitting margin gains in the light of even
stronger proportional growth in net sales.
Gross Profit and Gross Margin
– For fis
cal year 2010, gross profits amounted to R$ 5.7
billion – 35.8% higher on a pro-forma basis and
80.4% higher on a CL basis, reflecting a gradual
and consistent recovery in performance.
|
|
Operating expenses
– In 2010, operat
ing expenses amounted to R$ 3.9 billion,
11.2% higher on a pro-forma basis and 37.7%
according to CL criteria, considering improve
ments to the IT system and disbursements
with respect to consultancy work on the
integration process and new executive hires.
Operating Income and Margin
– Op
erating profit before other results, equity
income and financial expenses was R$ 1.8
billion, 396.3% up in CL terms and a growth of
378.1% on a pro-forma basis. There was a 6.4
percentage point gain in operating margin
(pro-forma) reflecting the gradual post-crisis
recovery from the adverse situation afflicting
global markets in the preceding year.
Financial Results
– BRF reported a reduc
tion in the average cost of debt as well as a
longer average debt maturity profile thanks
to the financial discipline adopted in the debt
restructuring plan. The use of non-derivative
instruments (currency debt) for foreign ex
change protection in accordance with hedge
|
|
accounting principles has allowed significant
reductions in net currency exposure. As result
substantial benefits have accrued from the
synchronization of currency liability flows with
export shipments in addition to a reduction in
the monthly volatility of financial expenses
Net debt for December 31 2010 was 13.3%
less than reported in 2009, supported by
operating results despite disbursements for
investments in assets (Capex), marketing and
for synergy projects.
Net debt/EBITDA ratio fell from 3.6x to 1.4x
due to the improvement in cash generation
posted in the year and the equilibrium be
tween the Company’s net debt in relation to
operations. Consolidated currency exposure
was US$ 76 million (asset position), contem
plating the implemented hedge accounting
policy, against US$ 1.1 billion (liability posi
tion) for the preceding year.
On a pro-forma basis for the year, there was
a net financial expense of R$ 483.1 million
against a net financial income of R$ 617.3
million in 2009. Meanwhile on a C L basis,
financial income was R$ 262.5 million in 2009
due to the incorporation of Sadia’s results in
July 2009.
The restructuring of the Sadia subsidiary’s
debt was secured with the funds raised from
the primary share issue totaling R$ 5.3 billion
in July 2009. Of this amount, a total of R$ 3.5
billion was transferred to Sadia in 2009 via an
Advance for Future Capital Increases (AFAC)
and an intercompany loan, for anticipating
payments, and thus reducing short term
bank borrowings. A further R$1.2 billion was
transferred during 2010.
On January 21 2010, with a view to extend
ing the debt profile and reducing costs, BRF
issued ten-year bonds totaling US$750 mil
lion maturing January 28 2020 on a coupon
of 7.250% per annum yield to maturity of
7.375%, which shall fall due and be payable in
semi-annual installments as from July 28 2010.
The offering allowed the Company to increase
its average debt maturity by one year.
Other Operating Results
–In 2010 the
operating results totaled R$ 393.9 million
for the year, 41.2% higher on a pro-forma
|
|
|
* Includes UHT, pasteurized and powdered milk
32
BRF Brasil Foods
Debt profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 12.31.10
|
|
As of 12.31.09
|
|
|
Debt - R$ million
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-current
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
% Ch.
|
Local Currency
|
|
1,536
|
|
1,680
|
|
3,216
|
|
4,570
|
|
(30)
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
675
|
|
3,296
|
|
3,970
|
|
4,544
|
|
(13)
|
Gross Debt
|
|
2,211
|
|
4,975
|
|
7,187
|
|
9,114
|
|
(21)
|
Cash Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Currency
|
|
955
|
|
104
|
|
1,059
|
|
2,787
|
|
(62)
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
2,219
|
|
274
|
|
2,493
|
|
2,134
|
|
17
|
Total Cash Investments
|
|
3,174
|
|
378
|
|
3,552
|
|
4,920
|
|
(28)
|
Net Accounting Debt
|
|
(963)
|
|
4,598
|
|
3,634
|
|
4,913
|
|
(26)
|
Exchange rate exposure
US$ million
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
(1,066)
|
|
|
Breakdown of EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Ch.
|
Net Income
|
|
804
|
|
123
|
|
554
|
Non-Controlling Shareholders
|
|
1
|
|
(4)
|
|
-
|
Income Tax and Social Contribution
|
|
196
|
|
221
|
|
(11)
|
Net Financial Income
|
|
483
|
|
(262)
|
|
|
Equity Income/Other Operating Results
|
|
311
|
|
249
|
|
25
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
|
|
840
|
|
545
|
|
54
|
= EBITDA*
|
|
2,635
|
|
871
|
|
203
|
* Reclassification in the calculation of EBITDA between depreciation and other results with the objective of demonstratin
g the effect of depreciation, depletion and amortization as shown in the cash
flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
basis and 30.1% up on a CL basis. This item
largely reflects the costs of idle capacity – due
to the pre-operational phase of the new
industrial units in: Bom Conselho (PE), Lucas
do Rio Verde (MT), Vitória de Santo Antão (PE),
Mineiros (GO) and Três de Maio (RS).
Net Income and Net Margin
– BRF post
ed a net income of R$ 804.1 million, a 125%
increase on a pro-forma basis and 215.3% up
on a CL basis based on the adjusted result of
R$ 255 million reported for 2009 (including
an additional R$ 132 million, reflecting the
incorporation of Perdigão Agroindustrial in
the first half of 2009).
EBITDA
– Operating cash generation for
2010asmeasuredbyEBITDA(operatingincome
before expenses, taxes and depreciation) was
R$ 2.6 billion, a year on year growth of 126.1%
|
|
on a pro-forma basis and 202.6% on a C L ba
sis. Principal factors driving this increase were:
the larger volume of processed products sold
in the domestic market, a gradual recovery
seen in some important export markets, the
reduction in production costs and commercial
expenses and the synergies from the merging
of those processes already authorized by CADE
such as in export business and the domestic
market for in natura meat and the acquisition
of some raw materials and services.
Shareholders’ Equity
– Shareholders’
Equity as of December 31 2010 stood at
R$ 13.6 billion against R$ 13 billion on
December 31 2009, 5% higher with a return
on equity of 6.2% when calculated on the net
accumulated result for the year in relation to
initial shareholders’equity.
|
|
Combination of the Businesses
– The
goodwill arising from the combination of
businesses with Sadia has been allocated to
the assets and liabilities in line with prevailing
accounting practices (IFRS). The remaining
balance of goodwill will be subject to annual
evaluation using the impairment test (non-
recoverability).
IFRS
– BRF has adapted its procedures in
full for evaluation of balance sheet items,
changes in requirements for disclosure of
information, and analysis of the economic
essence of the migration to IFRS rules in accor
dance with the accounting pronouncements
- CPCs. As a result, quarterly earnings reported
during 2010 are being republished with the
incorporation of the new procedures as well
as the comparison with fiscal year 2009.
|
33
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
804
|
|
123
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income Cash Provide By
|
|
1,332
|
|
195
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
318
|
Variation
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts Payable, Net
|
|
-402
|
|
119
|
Inventories
|
|
168
|
|
245
|
Suppliers
|
|
155
|
|
-29
|
Other Assets and Liabilities
|
|
1,175
|
|
-1,647
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
-994
|
Cash Flow from Investments Activities
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Investments
|
|
-
|
|
252
|
Investments in Fixed Assets
|
|
38
|
|
66
|
Business Acquisition
|
|
-1,139
|
|
-367
|
|
|
-1,101
|
|
-49
|
Cash Flow from Financial Activities
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and Financing
|
|
-1,429
|
|
-3.319
|
Capital Increase
|
|
-
|
|
5,290
|
Dividends and Interest Over Capital Paid
|
|
-153
|
|
-25
|
Others
|
|
-2
|
|
-91
|
|
|
-1,584
|
|
1,855
|
Exchange variation effect on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
-135
|
|
-147
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
412
|
|
665
|
Shares as an investment
|
|
|
|
|
In 2010, the Company held BRF Day
for the twin purpose of intensifying the
relationship with the capital markets as well
as commemorating its listing on the stock
exchanges - 30 years on BM&FBovespa
and 10 years on the NYSE – New York Stock
Exchange. In São Paulo the event began with
an Apimec National meeting followed by the
opening of the trading day at the invitation of
BM&FBovespa. This was repeated on Novem
ber 23 at the NYSE also with presentations
to investors and followed by management
ringing the Opening Bell. Both events were
attended by investors and sell- and buy-side
investment analysts.
The Company’s shares and ADRs have
outperformed the leading stock indices and
market players. The average daily financial
volume traded on the Bovespa and the NYSE
– New York Stock Exchange amounted to
US$ 46.6 million, 18.1% higher than in 2009.
Stock Split
– The Annual General Meeting
and Extraordinary General Meeting of March
31 2010 approved a stock split at a ratio of
100% with the issue of 1 new for each exist
ing share. The change in the ratio for the ADR
|
|
(American Depositary Receipt) program was
also approved, equating the ADRs similarly
such that each share corresponds currently
to one ADR.
Shareholder Remuneration
– The Board
of Directors approved the distribution of
R$ 262.5 million to shareholders, correspond
ing to R$ 0.30124415 per share
– payout
|
|
effected on August 27 2010 (R$ 0.061136430
per share) and on February 24 2011
(R$ 0.24010772), in the form of interest on
shareholders’equity, with income tax withheld
at source pursuant to the current legislation.
The amount distributed to the shareholders
with respect to fiscal year 2010 represented
32.6% of net earnings in the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance on the BM&FBovespa
|
|
Performance on the NYSE
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
Share price (R$)*
|
|
22.69
|
|
27.34
|
|
Share price - US$*
|
|
13.09
|
|
16.88
|
Traded shares (volume) - million
|
|
637.5
|
|
558.7
|
|
Traded ADR (volume) - million
|
|
275.4
|
|
286.9
|
BRFS3 Performance
|
|
52.6%
|
|
20.5%
|
|
BRFS Performance
|
|
98.5%
|
|
28.9%
|
Bovespa Index
|
|
82.7%
|
|
1.0%
|
|
Dow Jones Index
|
|
18.8%
|
|
11.0%
|
IGC (Brazilian Corporate Governance Index)
|
|
83.4%
|
|
12.5%
|
|
* Closing Price
|
ISE (Corporate Sustainability Index)
|
|
66.4%
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
* Closing Price
|
|
35
Management of people
|
|
|
|
|
The aim of BRF is to build an
organizational culture in which
the employees are committed
to the long-term plan.
In 2010, progress was made in this direc
tion through training and career develop
ment initiatives and quality of life at work
programs. At the end of 2010, the Company
had a workforce of 113 thousand employees.
The Company has elected as priorities the
development of the BRF culture, and the
formation of leaders in order to grow the
Company and instill managers with a global
vision, together with the consolidation of the
culture of Safety, Health and Environment
(SSMA). One of the results of this initiative in
2010 has been a reduction from 7.1 to 4.6 in
|
|
the Accident Frequency Rate with time off
work - a 35% decline. Additionally, BRF seeks
to maintain competitive salaries and benefits
as well as a working environment conducive
to the engagement of its in-house stakehold
ers. In this way it is able to attract and retain
the professionals which will help it meet its
growth plans.
In order to ensure the necessary labor for
its operations at all levels, BRF has adopted
such initiatives as the Operational Attraction
and Retention Plan which awards employees
for assiduity and productivity.
BRF has launched its ‘I Recommend’
program for stimulating existing employees
to indicate others interested in working in the
Company and thus maintaining its work force
at appropriate levels. At some units, about
25% of manpower has been hired in this way.
Similarly, the Itinerant Recruiting project is
a scheme whereby attraction and selection
|
|
teams travel to different locations where
the Company has job vacancies in order to
improve hiring processes and at the same
time, promoting diversity.
The first trainee program was launched
in 2010 - the BRF Generation 2011. Approxi
mately, 15 thousand candidates enrolled for
30 places. Thanks to this initiative, BRF was
able to tap the market for the best potential
of the new generation. The trainee develop
ment plan involves exposure to all sectors
of the Company on a rotational basis for ten
months to be followed by a further 24-month
formation spell in his/her area of interest.
During this period, the trainee is constantly
assessed, participating in workshops and
discussions with executives and the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company as well as
being required to design a strategic plan.
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total workforce
|GRI LA1|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Employment Contract
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Own Employees
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeterminated period
|
|
113,912
|
|
113,614
|
|
Fixed period
|
|
147
|
|
96
|
|
Apprentices (Specific period)
|
|
300
(2)
|
|
551
|
|
Outsourced
(3)
|
|
15,147
|
|
13,267
|
|
Interns
|
|
298
|
|
454
|
|
Total
|
|
129,804
|
|
127,982
|
|
(1) Data adjusted, since in 2009 the apprentices had not been included
|
|
(2) Out-sourced hirings are restricted to work-specific activities such as cleaning, janitorial and
industrial restaurant services
|
|
Turnover – monthly average
|GRI LA2|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turnover
|
|
Total number of labor contract terminations
|
|
Male
|
|
Female
|
|
Less than 30
|
|
Between 30 and 50
|
|
Over 50
|
2.33%
|
|
33,996
|
|
1.45%
|
|
0.88%
|
|
1.54%
|
|
0.75%
|
|
0.04%
|
39
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Diversity indicators
(1)
|GRI LA13|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function
|
|
Number
|
|
Male
|
|
Female
|
|
Up to 30 years
of age
|
|
From 30 to 50
|
|
Over 50
|
Officers
|
|
55
|
|
46
|
|
9
|
|
0
|
|
38
|
|
17
|
Managers
|
|
381
|
|
323
|
|
58
|
|
8
|
|
329
|
|
44
|
Assistants
|
|
11
|
|
11
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
9
|
|
2
|
Supervisors/
Coordinators
|
|
1,698
|
|
1,434
|
|
264
|
|
239
|
|
1,373
|
|
86
|
Administrative
|
|
21,389
|
|
14,041
|
|
7,348
|
|
9,029
|
|
11,712
|
|
648
|
Operational
|
|
89,621
|
|
53,160
|
|
36,461
|
|
43,086
|
|
42,619
|
|
3,916
|
Apprentices
|
|
551
|
|
314
|
|
237
|
|
551
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
113,706
|
|
69,329
|
|
44,377
|
|
52,913
|
|
56,080
|
|
4,713
|
%
|
|
100%
|
|
61%
|
|
39%
|
|
46.3%
|
|
49.6%
|
|
4%
|
(1) Data for employees in Brazil only, excluding the 555 employees located overseas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation and Distribution of Value
|GRI EC1|
|
|
|
|
Health and safety
More than 90% of the employees are
represented on formal safety committees,
assisting in the monitoring and advising of
occupational safety and health programs.
These committees encompass: the General
Committee with the participation of senior
management, Regional Occupational Safety,
Health and Environment Committees (SSMA);
SSMA Corporate Operational Committees;
SSMA Unit Committees; the Internal Accident
Prevention Commission (CIPA); and the Ergo
nomics Commission.
|GRI LA6|
The SSMA plays a fundamental role in the
reduction and elimination of accidents and
work-related illnesses through the dissemina
tion of information and the monitoring of the
implementation of its norms and principles.
Introduced in 2006, the SSMA is strategic and
represents a critical process in establishing
a culture of prevention in health and safety
questions at a fresh enhanced level.
Thanks to this work, in 2010 there was an
average reduction of 40% in the Accident
Frequency Rate with time off work, including
accidents on the way to and from work: rates
fell to 5.01 compared with 7.05 in 2009 and
8.61 in 2008. The goal is to achieve an annual
reduction in excess of 10%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ million
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Human Resources
|
|
3,164
|
|
2,180
|
Taxes
|
|
3,530
|
|
2,637
|
Interest
|
|
1,535
|
|
1,386
|
Interest of Shareholder’s Equity
|
|
263
|
|
100
|
Retention
|
|
542
|
|
23
|
Minority Interests
|
|
1
|
|
-4
|
Total
|
|
9,034
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safety indicators
|GRI LA7|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicators
|
|
BRF consolidated
|
Accident Frequency Rate – with time off work
(1)
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
Frequency Rate – occupational illnesses
(1)
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
Severity Rate
(1)
|
|
|
|
473
|
Absenteeism percentage
(2)
|
|
|
|
3.38%
|
Fatalities (absolute numbers)
(3)
|
|
|
|
4
|
Accidents with time off work
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
Accidents without time off work
|
|
|
|
2,693
|
(1) Frequency and severity rates relate to each 1,000,000 (one million) man/hours worked in accordance with the NBR 14.280.
(2) The absenteeism rate relates to absences of employees be it as a result of misdemeanor or delay due to some
intervening motive.
(3) 2 on the way to or from work and 2 typical.
|
40
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matters relating to occupational health and safety are central to the majority of labor union agreements. Among them are the supply of and guidance on the importance of the use of individual protection equipment (IPE), the operations and the composition of the internal accident prevention commissions (CIPA), training and educational processes with a focus on occupational safety and health, participation of worker representatives – labor union officials and members of CIPA – in safety and health inspections, audits and accident investigations.
|GRI LA9|
The right to refuse unsafe work, while not a part of the collective agreements, is respected by the Company and is integral to the SSMA policy.
The focus of the area is on the implementation of SSMA Management, with stimulus for adopting safe behavior and correction of certain situations and workplace risks, with a high degree of operational discipline for achieving the excellence required of world class companies. During the year, 7,087 people (20,245 in 2009) took part in health, safety and environmental (SSMA) training - an investment of R$ R$ 3.4 million (R$ 5.5 million in 2009).
Various programs are run for ensuring optimum conditions of health and safety. Examples are prevention of and education on chemical dependence, professional rehabilitation, participative ergonomics, health and safety dialogs, in addition to legal mandatory requirements with respect to such aspects as medical controls and occupational health. In addition, the Quality of Life at Work Program (PQVT) seeks to make the working environment more agreeable through activities such as workplace gymnastics, physical fitness centers and professional rehabilitation.
|GRI LA8|
|
|
Training
In 2010, the Company focused on execut
ing the annual training plan whereby all the
activities at the non-managerial levels of BRF
are organized using an educational approach,
both technical and behavioral. At the executive
level, attention is on modern management
practices and concepts. The trainees program
was revised - indicative of the importance with
which the Company views the formation of its
future leaders.
|GRI LA11|
During 2011, customized solutions will
be developed on the basis of relationships
and partnerships. Emphasis will be given to
individual career development plans cover
ing all levels of company hierarchy. The
alignment and standardization of actions for
training and development will be crucial to
BRF as well as the focus on the designing and
implementation of new policies, processes
and programs to provide the support for
future corporate growth.
BRF periodically undertakes appraisals
of performance and career development
reviews of its executives in order to dem
onstrate method and transparency in the
succession process at senior levels of the
Company. The analysis is carried out using
tools and structured data which permit the
visualization of the career curve and iden
tification of potential. In 2010, 2,636 leaders
were involved in this process, 2.33% of total
headcount.
|GRI LA12|
|
|
Relations with the Company
Due to the nature of the business, the
majority of the employees are represented
by the labor union of their category, either
the meat packing or food industry work
ers. The Company’s full recognition of the
legally constituted union entities provides
the grounds for dialog and conciliation - with
due compliance with the current legislation
– involving ethical principles and respect be
tween capital and labor. Collective bargaining
covers 99.4% of the workforce, this based on
respect,
responsibility and transparency,
reconciling interests in an authentic manner
with autonomy and freedom.
|GRI LA4|
In its desire to continually improve its rela
tions with labor, and based on the principles
of labor union/company harmony, BRF sees
the right to free association as fundamental
and vehemently repudiates anti-union
practices
or conversely,
union-inspired
discriminatory ideology. It also demands that
100% of its suppliers fully comply with the
labor legislation and the right of employees
to exercise freedom of association.
|GRI HR5|
|
|
|
Hours of training
|GRI LA10|
|
|
Função
|
|
BRF
|
|
Sadia
|
|
Consolidated
|
Managerial
|
|
5.15
|
|
6.72
|
|
5.93
|
Supervisory/Coordination
|
|
4.81
|
|
15.71
|
|
10.26
|
Administrative
|
|
4.97
|
|
1.42
|
|
3.19
|
Operational
|
|
4.02
|
|
5.78
|
|
4.9
|
Commercial
(1)
|
|
-
|
|
12.00
|
|
12.00
|
(1) In 2010, Sadia controlled the average hour/training of the commercial team separately (branch regional managers,
supervisors/coordinators, sellers and promoters). From 2011, the information will be consolidated based on a single
criterion.
|
41
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Suppliers
|
|
|
|
|
BRF has launched its World
Class Supply Chain program
based upon five pillars –
people, processes, innovation,
environment and information
technology.
The project seeks to identify and adopt the
best global supply chain practices for excel
lence in execution at the point of sale and in
the purchase of raw materials and supplies to
assure leadership in the management of client
costs and services.
This approach implies the migration of the
supply chain area from a formal model of trans
actional negotiations (purchases) to a concept
of procurement - that is the development of
businesses and suppliers. The latter involves
negotiators becoming business managers by
seeking to understand raw material trends
as well as the indigenous and international
economy and the needs of domestic and over
seas clients, thus becoming direct participants
in the development of the overall business.
Routines for analysis of data on performance
of equipment, products and processes, and
the monitoring of the competition thereby
become key to purchasing decisions.
The Company selects its suppliers on the
basis of commercial viability, cost competitive
ness, technical capacity, economic-financial
status and alignment to social policies and
guidelines. In spite of not having a set policy
as to preference for locally-based suppliers, in
practice in certain segments – those of services
and investments involving smaller values for
instance – priority is given to this category as
|
|
long as the requisites of the Company are met.
In 2010,39.4%oftheamountspentonsuppli
ers took place in regions close to the Company’s
principal industrial units. This compares with
44% in 2009. The ratio is 100% in the case of the
integrated outgrowers (poultry and hog breed
ers), beef cattle ranchers and milk producers. In
relation to grain supply, other factors affect deci
sions, negotiations depending on harvests, level
of demand, prices, etc. The Supply Chain area
has structures in place to facilitate acquisition
from locally-based suppliers.
|GRI EC6|
Monitoring of the supply
chain
|GRI 1.2|
Supplier Chain Monitoring Program is a set
of Company policies, practices and procedures
for operations designed to enhance sustain
ability along the value chain. The program is
currently at the implementation stage and has
the objective of consolidating BRF’s position as
a catalyst for sustainability in Brazilian agricul
ture by providing incentives to sustainable and
certified suppliers, identification of the main
social and environmental risks and reduction
in environmental impacts.
Measures have already been taken to
improve control and auditing to avoid disre
spect for human rights, forced labor or labor
analogous to slavery and child exploitation.
In this context, the Company has charted and
identified the supply chain, meal, oil, grains,
beef cattle, dairy products and logistics as areas
representing significant risk.
In order to eliminate the possibility of oc
currences, action has been taken to reinforce
initiatives for the control of suppliers and the
raw materials production chain through the
adoption of more rigid contractual clauses. BRF
supports its work in this direction with the use
|
|
of public information, notably the Slave Labor
Black List published in the internet (www.re
porterbrasil.org.br), and the list of embargoed
areas published by the Federal Environmental
Protection Agency (IBAMA, in siscom.ibama.
gov.br/geo_sicafi).
|GRI HR7|
Another Company initiative is the Two Ways
Program, a chemical dependence prevention
project for raising awareness among truck driv
ers transporting BRF’s products as to the risk
of these substances. The aims are to provide a
better quality of life, establishing a safe and re
sponsible means of transportation, minimizing
the risks and preserving the company image as
well as the lives of other highway users.
In 2010, the In the Right Direction Program
was intensified to increase the awareness of
truckers and their assistants as to the sexual
exploitation of children so making them agents
for protection and co-responsible for the elimi
nation of the problem.The Program was notified
to all BRF logistics suppliers which have been in
structed to report any occurrences. Each regional
office has groups which organize meetings with
truckers to discuss the matter. During the year, a
total of 3,214 In the Right Direction primers were
handed out to trained drivers.The project is to be
expanded during 2011.
|GRI HR6|
BRF also requires that all employees of
companies providing janitorial services undergo
training certified by the National Security Per
sonnel License (CNV). Prepared by the Federal
Police, the Program includes a section on Hu
man Rights. Additionally, all outsourced workers
beginning their activities with BRF receive two
hours of training covering the Code of Ethics,
Occupational Safety, Best Practice Standards
(GMP – Good Manufacturing Practices), the 5S
Program, among others.
|GRI HR8|
|
Participation of locally-based suppliers
|GRI EC6|
|
|
|
State
|
|
% of amount
|
São Paulo
|
|
60.5
|
Rio Grande do Sul
|
|
50.8
|
Santa Catarina
|
|
48.1
|
Mato Grosso
|
|
41.7
|
Minas Gerais
|
|
38.8
|
Paraná
|
|
34.0
|
Goiás
|
|
25.0
|
Rio de Janeiro
|
|
24.3
|
42
BRF Brasil Foods
Suppliers contracts screened for human rights
|GRI HR2|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nr. of suppliers
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Self-appraisal
|
|
Auditing/technical
visit
|
|
Relationship
guidelines
|
Grains
|
|
2,000
|
|
100%
|
|
45%
|
|
30%
|
|
70%
|
Integrated products
|
|
20,000
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
Não Aplicável
|
Meal and oil
|
|
10 account for 90% of
the volume
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
100%
|
Supplies
|
|
1,525
|
|
29%
|
|
6%
(1)
|
|
32%
(1)
|
|
57%
|
Transportation
|
|
995
|
|
100%
|
|
-
|
|
60%
|
|
50%
|
(1) New suppliers of direct materials (inputs and packaging etc.)
|
Clients/Consumers
|
|
|
|
|
All BRF’s products are subject
to evaluation of health and
safety impacts during the
various phases of their life
cycle from the conceptual
stage to the phase of research
and development of the
product and the packaging,
manufacture, production,
warehousing, distribution
and supply.
In the case of dairy products, the analysis
also includes the stages of certification, mar
keting and promotion. Tracking is conducted
through a specific checklist for monitoring
each one of these items.
|GRI PR1|
Satisfaction
As part of its policy of getting closer to the
consumer, BRF has run satisfaction surveys
focused on the Perdigão and Batavo brands,
polling a total of 31,176 people. Out of this total,
28,224 were questioned on Perdigão, 99.81%
responding that they were satisfied or that
|
|
their expectations had been exceeded. Batavo
reported a similar result, 99.86%.
|GRI PR5|
BRF received 373,682 consumer mani
festations in 2010, 125,084 with respect to
Perdigão, 132,978, Sadia and 115,620 related
to dairy products. The majority of contacts
with the Company was made by telephone
(70%), followed by internet (28%) and letter
(2%). Inquiries were responsible for 46% of
consumer contacts followed by requests for
recipes (34%) and sundry themes (11%).
Complaints about products and criticisms
accounted for only 6% of the total.The rest was
divided between allegations and suggestions
(1% each) and compliments and thanks, 1%.
Labeling
The labeling on all BRF’s products carries
standardized information on packaging and
services, content – especially items which can
have environmental and social impacts – safe
use of the product as well as instructions as
to post-consumption disposal and eventual
impacts.
|GRI PR3|
The Company adheres strictly to the legisla
tion and anticipates solutions which enrich con
sumer information.The carton-paper packaging
is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC) testifying that the paper is produced from
forests planted in a sustainable manner.
|
|
Communication
In line with the Company’s ethical prin
ciples, BRF practices a communication and
marketing policy in accordance with the
National Advertising Self-Regulation Council
(CONAR) and the Consumer Protection Code
(CDC). BRF uses publicity campaigns and
marketing initiatives to highlight values such
as diversity and adopts rigid guidelines in
relation to messages to its infant audience.
|GRI PR6|
Since 2009, the Company made a public and
voluntary commitment with the Brazilian Food
Industry Association (ABIA) and the Brazilian
Advertisers Association (ABA) to establish rigid
criteria in communicating with children.
|
43
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Society
|GRI SO1|
|
|
|
|
|
BRF’s community initiatives
are aligned to the principle
of playing an important
role as an agent for
social development in
the locations where it
operates its businesses.
In so doing, it assumes
responsibility for introducing
preventive, mitigating and
compensatory solutions
for its negative impacts
as well as maximizing and
managing its positive impacts,
assuming co-responsibility
for the development of the
municipalities in which
it is located.
|
|
The Company’s social investment is
directed towards projects in the public inter
est, priority being given to educational and
environmental themes. In 2010, it allocated
R$ 1.4 million to projects of this nature.
Socio-environmental projects
Socio-environmental projects involve the
local development of the municipalities where
the Company has a presence on the ground.
Projects are prepared and/or chosen on the
basis of needs and local potential as well as
their degree of alignment to the Company’s
social investment criteria.
Public call
– 32 socio-environmental proj
ects were chosen from among an enrollment
of 160, 24 of which already concluded. The
work is focused on initiatives for improving
infant/adolescent and adult education, the
social inclusion of people with special needs,
environmental awareness and preservation
and the fostering of socio-environmental
business, among others. A total of 27
thousand people benefited either directly or
indirectly, representing 70% of the planned
targets. Project monitoring is the responsibil
ity of the social investment committees while
community relations are in the hands of vol
unteer employees of the Company acting on
an integrated basis with the corporate area in
the planning and installation of initiatives.
Time to act
– An association between BRF
(Sadia Institute), Camargo Corrêa Institute,
Sebrae and local partners, the project develops
initiatives contributing to the sustainable
development of the Lucas do Rio Verde, Nova
Mutum and Tapurah regions in the state of
Mato Grosso. The project is divided along two
axes, operating in urban and rural areas. The To
Do Works Out was launched in Lucas do Rio
Verde, training 150 adolescents in sustainable
entrepreneurship. In the rural area of Nova
Mutum and Tapurah, the project involves
investments in diversified agricultural produc
tion
|
|
for supplying nearby cities and income
enhancement. The program’s aim is to increase
agribusiness activities in these communities
in addition to establishing two nurseries for
the cultivation of native, forest and fruit tree
seedlings for use in restoring the region’s biodi
versity and as a source of additional income for
rural producers and their families.
Digital Concórdia
– Seeks to introduce
information technology into the classroom
in an innovative way, helping students and
professors to build up their wealth of knowl
edge. The project is the result of a partnership
between BRF (Sadia Institute), the Municipal
Government of Concórdia (Education Secre
tary) and the Jaborandi Institute and entered
its final phase in 2010, denominated Profes
sors on Line. A total of 12 municipal schools
participated in the pilot project. However, the
plan is to transform the program into public
policy under the municipality’s Education
Secretary, the computer being used as a tool
in the formation of citizens able to assess
their own attitudes and choices as well as the
world in which they live.
Digital Station
– Also focusing on digital
inclusion, developed in Bom Conselho (PE)
and training 120 students monthly in partner
ship with the Universidade de Pernambuco.
Since its inception in 2008, it has qualified 642
adolescents and adults to join the labor market.
Educational Center for People with
Special Needs
– The course includes classes
in Braille (a form of writing to allow the visu
ally handicapped to read) and Libras (Brazilian
Sign Language for those with hearing handi
caps) in addition to elementary teaching.
In 2010, 59 students (against 47 in 2009) in
Videira (SC) were trained in elementary teach
ing (literacy, 2nd to 5th grade and 6th to 9th
grade), high school teaching, art workshop,
digital education through the Learn to Click
course and skills training to enter the job mar
ket. In Marau (RS), 49 students were trained
|
44
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
(57 in 2009) in elementary teaching (literacy
and 2nd to 5th grade), Libras, Braille, digital
education and art workshop.
Actions with trash scavengers
– The
Company participated in the constitution of
the Trash and Citizenship Institute involving
trash scavenger entities from all over the state
of Paraná. The activity began in April 2010 with
duration of a year, also operating in alignment
with the State Solid Waste Policy. The project
supports the setting up of new scavenger
cooperatives dedicated to collecting post-con
sumption packaging (PET bottles, glass bottles,
carton packaging, etc.). Once processed, the
material collected is sold to the recyclers.
Social Action
– The project is designed to
facilitate access to health services (medical and
dental attendances), citizenship (receipt and/or
regularization of documents, legal advice, etc.)
and education in addition to activities involving
culture, leisure and sport. This initiative is aimed
at improving the quality of life of the population
living in the communities residing close to the
Company’s industrial units. BRF, in partnership
with institutions and local companies, works
as an agent for local change by putting into
practice the project’s elected activities. Since its
creation in 2003, the program has been responsible for more than 300 thousand attendances,
68,377 of these in 2010 alone.
|
|
Sport
The Company sees sport
as an instrument for
promoting the quality of life,
development of values and
social inclusion.
Consequently, it invests in actions such as
5 km Perdigão, a program launched in 2007
to increase employee and community aware
ness of the importance of practicing physical
exercise for achieving quality of life. In 2010, 6
thousand registered for the event, 50% more
than in 2009. The event was held at Videira
(SC), Carambeí (PR), Rio Verde (GO), Marau
(RS) and Lajeado (RS).
BRF also invests in the development of
children, adolescents and young people by
supporting programs for stimulating sport on
three fronts
|
|
1. Athlete for the Future
– Partnerships
with SESI (Social Service for Industry) in seven
municipalities which have industrial units
with a focus on “to work sport beyond sport”,
developing complementary concepts such as
health and education. This initiative currently
attends about 7,100 children.
2. Launch Yourself into the Future
–
Support to the Launch yourself into the
Future project attending annually about 600
children, adolescents and young people in
athletics. Begun in 2010, this sponsorship
includes a specific training program for ado
lescents and young people with potential to
be top class athletics.
3. GR Program
– Partnership with SESI and
Toledo City Government (PR), has as its core
interest the development of children, adoles
cents and young people through rhythmic
gymnastics, including top class athletes in the
sport. In 2010, approximately 1.2 thousand
children benefited from the program. The
project currently includes 29 athletes in the
high performance team.
|
45
Environmental management
|
|
|
|
|
BRF is continually investing in
environmental management
as part of its commitment
to sustainability.
|
|
Investments in 2010 amounted to R$ 144.1
million, a year on year increase of 29%. The
majority of resources (51.3%) were applied in
disposal, treatment of waste and mitigation
of impacts and reforestation (31.8%). Refores
tation areas consist of pinus and eucalyptus,
the wood from which is used to generate
steam at the industrial units in substitution
for fossil fuels, a strategy which diminishes
the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on
the environment.
|
|
The Company adopts measures for the
preservation of natural resources - especially
water -, the reduction of greenhouse gases,
energy, biodiversity, recycling and environ
mental education. These actions permeate
the entire operation and the communities
where the production units are sited. In this
way, BRF contributes towards consolidating
a culture alert to sustainable development in
relation to all segments of its activities and all
stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental investments - Consolidated BRF (R$)
|GRI EN30|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
Prevention and Management
|
|
21,130,781
|
|
24,325,726
|
Disposal, Treatment and Mitigation of Impacts
|
|
66,487,836
|
|
74,013,278
|
Investments in Forest Plantations
|
|
24,222,354
|
|
45,796,104
|
Total
|
|
111,840,971
|
|
144,135,104
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
Water consumption
BRF treats the rational use of water as an
absolute priority for the investments it makes
in technologies and environmental manage
ment processes. Water is an essential input for
the food industry and vital to the production
of its raw material and rural operations as
well as the processing and finalization of the
products. The industry’s expansion is a direct
function of this input and water shortage is
one of the constraining factors on sector
growth. This issue is a concern that goes be
yond the frontiers of the Company itself and
finds support in global awareness campaigns
and initiatives for preserving natural resources
and the planet as a whole.
Despite an increase in production, BRF’s
water
usage remained unchanged from
2009
thanks to initiatives and projects for
improving excellence in usage. The Company
invests in processes for the reuse of water
at its operations and as a result reuse ratios
have been growing year after year. In 2010,
the reuse ratio stood at 20.4%, apparently
|
|
stable in relation to 2009 (20.2%). However,
during the year there was an increase of 6%
in production, implying a greater level of
efficiency in the use of water for activities in
which there is no contact with the production
process – for example, the cleaning of floors,
bathrooms and in the irrigation of green
areas. In industrial units such as Capinzal (SC),
the reuse ratio was as high as 47% in 2010.
Among the actions planned for 2011, the
use of recycled water will continue to increase.
The installation of a reused water treatment
plant in Serafina Correa (RS) will permit a
reduction of 300 thousand cubic meters of
water withdrawn from the public supply
system, a volume equivalent to the supply
of a city of 5.5 thousand inhabitants. The
plant at Teutônia (RS) created a hydro-team,
a multidisciplinary team which evaluates and
proposes improvements in processes for the
rational use of water, contributing to a saving
of 14% of the total used at the unit, equivalent
to 113.5 thousand cubic meters.
|
|
The priority given to capturing surface wa
ter is another important measure contribut
ing to rational use and reducing the impact of
the industrial operation on the environment.
This helps the Company avoid using ground
water sources and the public utility system in
competition with the local population. As a
result of this strategy, there was a reduction
of 582,574 cubic meters in water withdrawn
from the public utility system. This decline
reflects both a reduction in consumption
and the discontinuation of BRF’s Porto Alegre
plant. The target in 2011 is to reduce water
capture from public sources by 300 thousand
cubic meters.
|GRI EN8|
In 2012, the Company plans a water
resource study to measure the affect of
water withdrawal on the regions where it has
operations. The objective is to evaluate the
impact of water capture and whether there
are conflicts or possible emergency situations
which could compromise future supplies.
|GRI EN9|
|
47
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Water consumption (m
3
/year) – BRF Consolidated
|GRI EN8, EN10|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
% of total
|
|
Ch.
|
Total
|
|
61,226,432
|
|
61,202,360
|
|
100.0
|
|
- 0.04%
|
Surface
|
|
41,693,856
|
|
41,139,557
|
|
68.3%
|
|
- 1.33%
|
Underground
|
|
17,350,531
|
|
17,486,230
|
|
29.0%
|
|
0.78%
|
Public utility supply
|
|
2,136,939
|
|
1,554,365
|
|
2.6%
|
|
- 27.26%
|
Rainwater
|
|
45,105
|
|
32,154
|
|
0.1%
|
|
- 28.71%
|
Total of reuse
|
|
15,506,752
|
|
15,701,346
|
|
-
|
|
1.3%
|
% of reuse
|
|
20.2%
|
|
20.4%
|
|
-
|
|
0.2 pp
|
Disposal of effluent
|GRI EN21|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
Superficial
|
|
52,758,568
|
|
52,233,375
|
Soil
|
|
1,050,429
|
|
862,317
|
Total
|
|
53,808,997
|
|
53,095,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effluents
All BRF’s industrial units have Effluent
Treatment Plants (ETPs). Water is returned to
the environment according to parameters
required by the legislation and in conditions
where it can be reused and absorbed without
causing damage to nature – an additional
company commitment to the environment.
All effluent is treated through flotation pro
cesses, discharged into anaerobic or aerated/
aerobic lakes or activated sludge. Effluent
volume fell year on year by 1.3%.
|GRI EN21|
|
|
Energy consumption
Three working parties with members
drawn from the various manufacturing areas
were set up to study the consumption of elec
tricity, the use and consumption of steam and
increasing the efficiency of reforestation to
obtain greater productivity from wood used
as a source of power. The teams’ diagnosis re
vealed opportunities for increasing energy ef
ficiency of both equipment and processes to
ensure better natural resource management.
Based on the studies, plans were prepared
for each industrial unit and reflected in 420
actions of either an operational or investment
nature. Action plans not requiring investment
were immediately put into practice and for
those requiring investments, allocation of
resources was approved with execution to be
concluded by April 2011.
As a result of this work, BRF was able to
record a saving of 341,496 GJ of electric
ity in 2010 compared with the preceding
year, a reduction of 4.78% in total indirect
energy consumption. Hence, in addition
to reducing the environmental impacts
|
|
caused by the extraction and processing of
energy, these initiatives have allowed BRF to
cut costs in product processing and increase
competitiveness. Examples of improvements
during the year were: updating of technol
ogy, improving the efficiency of refrigeration
systems; standardization and training of
operators, with operational improvements
in chilling and freezing processes, increased
efficiency in steam generation and a reduc
tion in losses from steam distribution. In 2011
the Company’s target is to save a further 250
thousand GJ of electric energy.
|GRI EN5|
Direct Energy
– BRF’s use of direct energy
increased 3.8% in 2010 although this was
concentrated in energy from renewable
sources (a further 4.6%), while a decrease of
8.6% was recorded in energy generated from
fossil fuels. During the year, 94.89% of all en
ergy consumed by the Company came from
renewable sources. However, the variation
in consumption came in at below produc
tion increases for the year, an indication of
reduced demand for energy as a result of
improvements in efficiency of systems.
|
|
|
|
48
BRF Brasil Foods
Consumption of direct energy (GJ)
|GRI EN3|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Ch. (%)
|
Renewable energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol
|
|
1,358.93
|
|
735.24
|
|
-45.9%
|
Rice Briquettes
|
|
-
|
|
9,635.33
|
|
|
Wood chips
|
|
5,374,267.59
|
|
11,441,207.14
|
|
112.9%
|
Fire wood
|
|
9,952,549.27
|
|
4,978,860.14
|
|
-50.0%
|
Vegetable oil
|
|
260,727.81
|
|
404,915.22
|
|
55.3%
|
Off cuts
|
|
460,016.81
|
|
-
|
|
|
Sawdust
|
|
2,202,912.66
|
|
2,247,976.38
|
|
2.0%
|
Subtotal
|
|
18,251,833.07
|
|
19,083,329.47
|
|
4.6%
|
Non renewable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPF
|
|
476,228.56
|
|
478,347.06
|
|
0.4%
|
Diesel
|
|
110,671.97
|
|
77,472.64
|
|
-30.0%
|
Gasoline
|
|
1,943.96
|
|
2,571.67
|
|
32.3%
|
LPG
|
|
271,794.62
|
|
266,035.74
|
|
-2.1%
|
Kerosene
|
|
212.97
|
|
334.28
|
|
57.0%
|
Shale
|
|
117,002.54
|
|
102,018.39
|
|
-12.8%
|
Natural gas
|
|
147,244.79
|
|
101,287.13
|
|
-31.2%
|
Subtotal
|
|
1,125,099.42
|
|
1,028,066.91
|
|
-8.6%
|
Total
|
|
19,376,932.48
|
|
20,111,396.38
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The larger part of direct energy was used
for steam generation in the boilers from
biomass in the form of wood chips, firewood
from tree trunks or timber offcuts (sawmill
waste). Due to the importance of this resource
in its energy matrix, BRF’s target is to increase
productivity from its reforestation projects
by 25%. This will be done by using more
advanced technologies which reduce the re
quired area under forests. In processes where
the use of biomass is technically unfeasible,
the Company employs BFP oil, shale, natural
gas or LPG. Diesel oil is consumed to operate
generators during National Interconnected
System (SIN) peak hours.
The target for 2011 is to increase the
consumption of direct energy to 95% from
renewable energy sources with consequent
gains in efficiency.
|
|
Calculation of direct energy consumption
is based on all the industrial meat and dairy
product processing
plants (95% of direct
energy consumed).
Neither the agricultural
units (feed, incubators, poultry farms, etc.) nor
the logistics installations were included except
when physically part of the industrial units.
Indirect energy
– Electricity is the only
indirect energy source used by BRF. Wher
ever possible, the Company buys energy from
small hydroelectric plants due to the latter’s
lesser environmental impact. In 2010, there
was an increase of 1.1% in the use of indirect
energy, 89.8% of it from renewable sources
and matching the national energy matrix
(National Electrical System Operator– ONS
data). The Company’s 2011 target to use 2%
more renewable energy than the national
average includes the contracting of a larger
quantity of energy from renewable sources to
supply the industrial complex.
|GRI EN4|
|
|
|
49
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Indirect energy consumption (GJ)
|GRI EN4|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Ch. (%)
|
Renewable source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidroelectricity
|
|
6,182,550.41
|
|
6,287,132.78
|
|
1.7%
|
Biomass
|
|
331,941.30
|
|
107,271.12
|
|
-67.7%
|
Wind power
|
|
-
|
|
21,623.09
|
|
|
Photovoltaic
|
|
2.08
|
|
1.97
|
|
-5.3%
|
Subtotal
|
|
6,514,494.79
|
|
6,416,029.96
|
|
-1.5%
|
Fonte não renovável
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
262,467.94
|
|
374,717.01
|
|
42.8%
|
Oil
|
|
119,654.50
|
|
137,861.90
|
|
15.2%
|
Nuclear
|
|
108,075.03
|
|
213,204.85
|
|
97.3%
|
Coal
|
|
62,620.69
|
|
-
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
552,818.16
|
|
725,784.76
|
|
31.3%
|
Total
|
|
7,067,312.95
|
|
7,141,813.71
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste
In 2010, only 3.86% of all BRF’s waste was
discharged into landfills. The Company’s goal
is to further reduce this percentage through
reuse and recycling. Only a small part of the
waste is processed internally in accordance
with current legislation. The rest is sent for
recycling or external processing through third
parties licensed by environmental protection
agencies to exercise this activity. In addi
tion to complying with this determination,
BRF adopts a rigorous selection process of
licensed third parties, controls the licenses
which have been granted and undertakes au
dits for monitoring conformity of processes.
|
|
After segregation and classification, waste
generated from industrial processing is stored
at purpose-built locations to be subsequently
collected and transported for final disposal.
All stages are covered by federal state and
municipal legislation and by the Brazilian
Association of Technical Standards (ABNT).
Waste is classified according to NBR 10.004
and controlled at the corporate level. Nearly
all (99.8%) pertains to Class II (not dangerous)
and basically originates from the productive
process, an example being organic waste.
The remainder is Class I (dangerous), such as
lamps, flashlight batteries, vehicle batteries
and waste produced from existing first aid
medical posts at the units.
|GRI EN22|
|
|
Collection of packaging
|GRI EN27|
In October 2010, BRF signed a partnership
agreement with TerraCycle, a global leader in
the collection and reuse of post-consumption
waste, with the objective of engaging con
sumers in a campaign to reuse frozen food
product cartridges and margarine tubs. This is
one more step in the Company’s commitment
to contribute towards avoiding uncontrolled
disposal. The partnership’s target is to reach
400 waste collection brigades.
To take part in the campaign, consumers
must register through the website (http://www.
terracycle.com.br) and the Perdigão Brigade
will collect the material, subsequently sending
it to TerraCycle for being transformed into
ecofriendly products. The company has a catalog of recycled items – lunch boxes, watches, bags etc. – for retail commercialization.
|
50
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
The Brigade is already active in 20 states with 238 signatures, 37% from schools and 30% from families, and has collected 1,947 packages in three months. The initiative complies with the National Solid Waste Policy approved in 2010.
Atmospheric Emissions
During 2011, the Company is to draw up its emissions inventory for 2010 in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative (GHG). The inventory will give BRF a more detailed picture of its emissions allowing it to diagnose existing processes and systems and establish a long-term GGE management strategy.
Reflecting the results of its policies for reducing emissions, BRF was included in BM&FBovespa’s Carbon Efficient Stock Index (ICO2), established in 2010, to encourage companies to migrate to a low carbon production system. Trucost international consultancy was engaged by BM&FBovespa to assist in the structuring of the ICO2 and to estimate total emissions in the first year of the index. On the basis of 2009 figures, (BRF’s) emissions were estimated at 410,507 tonnes of CO
2
eq as scope 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (direct emissions) and 53,858 tonnes of CO
2
eq as scope 2 (indirect emissions).
In addition to continuously monitoring the status of its delivery fleet, BRF endeavors to build its distribution centers close to areas of consumption and supply, thus ensuring that its trucks are always operating with full loads and eliminating waste and reducing the impact on the environment. In 2010, the Company was recognized by the Depollution Project, the government of the state of Santa Catarina’s Environmental Program for Transportation designed by the National Transportation Confederation (CNT-SC). Inspections of the Company’s fleet showed that 87% of all vehicles was operating in accordance with the legislation and standards of quality.
|
|
Sustainable Hog Farming
System
|GRI EN18|
This is one of the Company’s most em
blematic sustainability projects, combining
social, economic and environmental projects.
BRF is developing a structured program for
reducing greenhouse gas emissions - to be
expanded to the entire hog supply chain – by
supporting the construction of biodigestors
on the properties of the integrated outgrow
ers. As a result of this project, the latter are
adopting the Clean Development Mecha
nisms (CDM), reducing the impact of manure
from hog farming activities.
This project is a voluntary one aligned to
Kyoto Protocol guidelines and operated by
the Perdigão Institute for Sustainability and
the Sadia Sustainability Institute in partner
ship with the integrated outgrowers and
AgCert. It was the first project for a food com
pany anywhere in the world to obtain United
Nations Organization registration, adopting
the Programme of Activities methodology for
the trading of carbon credits.
|
|
The measure contributes to the goal of re
ducing carbon dioxide emissions (CO
2
) along
the entire production, supply and distribution
chain. Based on the projects already imple
mented and UNO methodology, the potential
is for an annual reduction of 591,418 tonnes
of CO
2
eq. In 2010, the reduction amounted
to 137,870 tonnes of CO
2
eq. The process for
verification of the emissions will be conducted
throughout 2011 and following substantiation
of the reduction by the Designated Operating
Entity (DOE), a request will be made to issue
the ERC (Emissions Reduction Certificate)
by the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change).
The project is one of a list of 50 private
sector global initiatives for reducing poverty
and improving living conditions included in
the United Nations Development Program’s
(UNDP) report‘Creating values for all – Strate
gies for doing business with the poor’.
|
|
|
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (t)
|GRI EN16, EN17|
|
|
|
|
2009
(1)
|
Scope 1 (direct)
|
|
410,507
|
Scope 2 (indirect)
|
|
53,858
|
(1) Estimated emissions
|
|
51
Annual and sustainability report 2010
About this report
|
|
|
|
|
This is the third year that BRF
Brasil Foods is publishing its
performance according to
Global Reporting Initiative
(GRI) guidelines.
|
|
This report consolidates the economic-
financial,
social and
environmental
information with respect to the period from
January 1 to December 31 2010. Prepared
annually, the last document was published in
March 2010.
|GRI 3.1; 3.2; 3.3|
The financial indicators cover all the
operating units and subsidiaries in Brazil, Argentina, the United Kingdom and The
Netherlands, while the information of a social
and environmental nature is restricted to
the operations in Brazil and, in large part,
consolidatetheindicatorsforBRFandSadia.The
financial statements are shown in accordance
with Brazilian accounting standards and the
International Financial Reporting Standards
– IFRS as determined by CVM (the Brazilian
Securities and Exchange Commission)
instructions 457/07 and 485/10, and audited
|
|
by KPMG Auditores Independentes. Socio-
environmental information was based on
corporate standards and verified internally. BSD
Consulting has verified the level of application
of GRI Guidelines (version 3) and has declared
full conformity with Level B.
|GRI 3.6; 3.7; 3.8;
3.9; 3.13|
Engagement
|GRI 3.5, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16|
Content definition was based on a process
of stakeholder engagement consisting of two
workshops in which 40 people took part, 21
representing external stakeholders (academia,
sectoral associations, shareholders, suppliers,
employees, civil society organizations) and 19
internal stakeholders (managers). In parallel,
a further 20 individuals were consulted by
e-mail from among representatives of the
internal and external stakeholders, including
|
|
|
52
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
board directors, vice presidents, executive
officers, clients and consumers. The partici
pants evaluated the relevance of 49 themes,
indicating what should be highlighted in the
report content and with greatest relevance to
the Company’s strategy and management.
The panels were chaired by BSD Consulting
which was responsible for guiding partici
pants on the process of evaluating materiality
in the context of the GRI, the importance of
the process of engagement as well as present
ing the methodology for evaluation of sus
tainability issues. Subsequently, doubts and
questions were clarified and the questionnaire
completed individually with the classification
of each theme according to importance. The
participants also assessed the application of
the GRI principles in the 2009 report, and were given the opportunity to suggest improve
ments to be included in the 2010 version.
In addition to enhancing the participation
of the strategic group in the validation of
matters previously identified as well as the
inclusion of new issues for the 2010 report,
the panels represented an opportunity for
stakeholder dialog and involvement in the
management of sustainability and in the
preparation of BRF for the way it approaches
the treatment and disclosure of its perfor
mance with respect to these themes.
While not obligatory at the level of Ap
plication B, in undertaking this activity, BRF
increases the transparency and the seriousness
with which sustainability is handled by corpo
rate management. In adopting this initiative,
the Company takes one more step towards a
higher application level in forthcoming reports.
The process was initiated on the basis
of a survey of BRF’s key stakeholders, the
criterion being their representativeness and
relationship with the main issues relating
to the sustainability of the organization. In
addition, matters were raised for inclusion in
the report, having as their base the process of
engagement undertaken for the 2009 report,
sectoral surveys of sustainability issues and
|
|
identification of the themes covered in the
GRI’s sectoral food supplement. This list of
topics was authorized by BRF’s Sustainability
Committee prior to conducting the stake
holder consultation process.
The matters raised formed the basis for
the preparation of a materiality matrix, this
graphically illustrating those issues deemed
of greatest importance in the consultation
process. The matrix is comprised of two axes:
one which represents relevant topics from
the internal point of view (Company) and the
other which consists of those issues raised by
the external stakeholders. In the graph, those
|
|
issues situated above and close to the red line
(from 1 to 5) are considered as having the
highest degree of relevance.
Eventual reformulations of information in
previous documents are shown and justified
throughout this publication. There have
been no significant changes compared with
preceding years with respect to scope, limit
or methods of measurement applied in the
Report.
|GRI 3.10; 3.11|
Doubts or requests for additional information
may be sent to e-mail acoes@brasilfoods.com
or alternatively by contacting telephones – (55)
11 2322-5061/5048/5051.
|GRI 3.4|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal concerns
|GRI 4.17|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Themes deemed of critical importance by stakeholders
|
|
1. Nutritional safety, quality of the products and packaging
|
|
2. Suitable working conditions and human rights
|
|
3. Compliance with environmental legislation
|
|
4. Compliance with the social and environmental legislation on the part
of integrated outgrowers and suppliers
|
|
5. Relations of a long-term, transparent and ethical nature with mutual respect
|
|
6. Ethics and mechanisms for combating corruption
|
|
7. Management of effluent, emissions and waste
|
|
8. Cleaner operational production, efficiency pollution prevention, reduction of negative impacts,
|
|
9. Occupational health and safety
|
|
10. Company performance and the generation of value
|
|
11. Sustainability policy
|
|
12. Environmental protection in the areas surrounding the plants
|
|
13. Traceability along the supply chain
|
|
14. Policies and criteria for selecting and evaluating suppliers
|
|
15. Relationship with integrated outgrowers
|
|
16. Enhancing the importance of human capital
|
|
17. Health, nutrition and healthy food
|
|
18. Rational and efficient use of water, materials and energy
|
|
19. Responsible communication, labeling and information on products
|
53
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Social Report/IBASE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Basis of calculation
|
2010 (amount in R$ thousand)
|
2009 (amount in R$ thousand)
|
Net sales (NS)
|
|
|
22.681
|
|
|
20.937
|
Operating results (OR)
|
|
|
1.001
|
|
|
733
|
Gross payroll (GP)
|
|
|
3.525
|
|
|
3.155
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
2. Internal social indicators
|
thousand)
|
% of GP
|
% of NS
|
thousand)
|
% of GP
|
% of NS
|
Food
|
128.10
|
3.63%
|
0.56%
|
156.95
|
4.97%
|
0.75%
|
Mandatory payroll taxes and benefits
|
836.30
|
23.72%
|
3.69%
|
629.97
|
20.00%
|
3.01%
|
Private pension plan
|
11.53
|
0.33%
|
0.05%
|
11.21
|
0.36%
|
0.05%
|
Health
|
85.41
|
2.42%
|
0.38%
|
100.16
|
3.18%
|
0.48%
|
Workplace health and safety
|
14.29
|
0.41%
|
0.06%
|
21.63
|
0.69%
|
0.10%
|
Education, Training and Professional
development
|
3.66
|
0.10%
|
0.02%
|
6.08
|
0.19%
|
0.03%
|
Transportation
|
90.99
|
2.58%
|
0.40%
|
32.67
|
1.04%
|
0.16%
|
Culture
|
0.00
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
14.4
|
0.46%
|
0.07%
|
Day care or allowance for day care
|
1.28
|
0.04%
|
0.01%
|
1.15
|
0.04%
|
0.01%
|
Profit sharing
|
23.13
|
0.66%
|
0.10%
|
26.76
|
0.85%
|
0.13%
|
Other
|
26,50
|
0.75%
|
0.12%
|
47.41
|
1.51%
|
0.23%
|
Total - Internal social indicators
|
1,221.19
|
35%
|
5%
|
1,048.38
|
33.32%
|
5.01%
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
3. External social indicators
|
thousand)
|
% of OR
|
% of NS
|
thousand)
|
% of OR
|
% of NS
|
Education
|
0.85
|
0.08%
|
0.00%
|
1.34
|
0.18%
|
0.01%
|
Culture
|
0
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.01
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Health and sanitation
|
0.03
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.00
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Sports
|
1.20
|
0.11%
|
0.01%
|
0.59
|
0.08%
|
0.00%
|
Hunger relief and food security
|
0.01
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.07
|
0.02%
|
0.00%
|
Other
|
0.14
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.00
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Total contributions to society
|
2.23
|
0.22%
|
0.01%
|
2.00
|
0.27%
|
0.01%
|
Taxes (excluding payroll taxes)
|
2,966.58
|
196%
|
13.08%
|
3,019.85
|
312%
|
14.42%
|
Total – External social indicators
|
2,968.81
|
197%
|
13.09%
|
3,021.85
|
312.26%
|
14.43%
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
Amount (R$
|
|
|
4. Environmental indicators
|
thousand)
|
% of OR
|
% of NS
|
thousand)
|
% of OR
|
% of NS
|
Related to company operations
|
144.14
|
14.40%
|
0.64%
|
111.46
|
15.21%
|
0.53%
|
External projects
|
-
|
-
|
0.00%
|
0.38
|
0.05%
|
0.00%
|
Total invested in environment
|
144.14
|
14.40%
|
0.64%
|
111.84
|
15.26%
|
0.53%
|
Regarding the establishment of
|
( ) does not establish targets
|
( ) does not establish targets
|
annual targets to minimize waste and
|
( ) attains 0 to 50% targets
|
( ) attains 0 to 50% targets
|
consumption during production/
|
( ) attains 51 to 75% targets
|
( ) attains 51 to 75% targets
|
operation and to improve the use of
|
(X) attains 76 to 100% targets
|
(X) attains 76 to 100% targets
|
natural resources, the Company:
|
|
|
54
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
5. Employee composition indicators
|
2010
|
2009
|
# of employees at the end of the period
|
113,710
|
114,059
|
# of hires during period
|
37,099
|
31,025
|
# of apprentices
|
551
|
300
|
# of outsourced employees
|
13,267
|
15,147
|
# of interns
|
454
|
298
|
# of employees over 45
|
11,206
|
11,680
|
# of women working at the Company
|
44,134
|
42,467
|
% of management positions occupied by women
|
15,55%
|
16.21%
|
# of Afro-Brazilian employees working at the Company
|
18,491
|
17,012
|
% of management positions occupied by Afro-Brazilians
|
4.73%
|
4.35%
|
# of employees with disabilities or special needs
|
1,154
|
1,044
|
6. Information relating to the exercise
of corporate citizenship
|
2010
|
2009
|
Ratio of highest to lowest compensation at the Company
|
49.8 times
|
ND
|
Total # of accidents at the Company
|
1,078
|
949 (-12%)
|
Social and environmental projects developed by the Company
were selected by:
|
( ) top level executives
(x) top
level executives and mid-level
management
( ) all employees
|
( ) top level executives
(x) top
level executives and mid-level
management
( ) all employees
|
The Company’s standards for safety and cleanliness in the
workplace were set by:
|
( ) top level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees + CIPA
|
( ) top level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees + CIPA
|
Concerning freedom of association, the right to collective
bargaining and employee representation in unions, the
Company:
|
( ) is not involved
( ) follows ILO
standards
(x) encourages and
follows ILO
|
( ) will not become involved
( )
will follow ILO standards
(x) will
encourage and follow ILO
|
The Company pension plan covers:
|
( ) top level executives
( ) top
level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees
|
( ) top level executives
( ) top
level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees
|
The profit-sharing program covers:
|
( ) top level executives
( ) top
level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees
|
( ) top level executives
( ) top
level executives and mid-level
management
(x) all employees
|
In the selection of suppliers, the same ethical standards and
standards of socio-environmental responsibility adopted by
the Company:
|
( ) are not considered
( ) are suggested
(x) are required
|
( ) will not be considered
( ) will be suggested
(x) will be required
|
On the participation of employees in volunteer work, the
Company:
|
( ) is not involved
( ) supports it
(x) organizes and encourages it
|
( ) will not be involved
( ) will support
it
(x) will organize and encourage it
|
Total number of consumer complaints and criticisms:
|
to the Company: not informed
to Procon: 52
to the Law Courts: 77
|
Not informed
|
% of complaints and criticisms answered or solved:
|
by the Company: 100%
through Procon: 10%
through the Law Courts: 11%
|
by the Company: 100%
through Procon: not informed
through the Law Courts: not informed
|
Total added value to be distributed (in R$ million)
|
In 2010: R$ 9,035
|
In 2009: R$ 6,323
|
Distribution of Added Value (DAV)
|
39.1% government / 35.0%
employees / 17.0% third parties/
2.9% shareholders/ 6.0% retained
|
41.7% government / 34.5%
employees / 21.9% third parties /
1.5% shareholders / 0.4% retained
|
7. Other information
|
|
|
• IBASE data – BRF and Sadia pro-forma figures
|
• Item “6 – Relevant information on the exercising of corporate citizenship”relates to BRF only since data between companies is still not
consolidated due to some CADE - and management-related restrictions.
|
• Economic sector: Food industry – Registered Offices: Santa Catarina
|
• This Company does not employ child labor, degrading or analogous to slave labor, is not involved with prostitution or sexual exploitation of
children or adolescents and is not involved with corruption. The Company values and respects diversity both internally and externally.
|
55
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Practices aligned with the UN Global Compac
|
|
|
|
UN Global
Compact Principles
|
Millennium
Development Goals
|
|
Actions
|
Human Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Code of Ethics and Conduct
-
Mission, Vision and Values
-
Clauses incorporating human rights issues in goods and services
supplier contracts
-
Monitoring of the supply chain
-
Investment of R$ 1.4 million in social projects
-
Local development projects (Community Development Committees)
-
Income generation projects (Time to Act, Trash and Citizenship Institute)
-
Education and social inclusion programs (Digital Concórdia, Digital Station)
-
Social action with 68,377 attendances in 2010
-
Membership of the National Pact for the Eradication of Slave Labor in Brazil
-
Membership of the Right Direction Program (fighting the sexual
exploitation of children)
-
Participation in the Choices International Foundation (products made
according to the World Health Organization’s nutritional recommendations)
-
Signatory of the Cattle Ranching Pact / Sustainable Connections
|
|
Labor Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Code of Ethics and Conduct
-
Mission, Vision and Values
-
Professional training and development Programs
-
Confidential channels for making complaints of irregularities
-
Human Resources health, safety and quality of life projects
-
Health, Safety and Environment System (SSMA)
-
OHSAS 18000 certification
-
Labor union relations
-
Retirement preparation program
|
|
Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Code of Ethics and Conduct
-
Mission, Vision and Values
-
ISO 14001 certification
-
Clauses incorporating human rights issues in goods
and services supplier contracts
-
Health, Safety and Environment System (SSMA)
-
Membership of the Brazilian GHG Protocol Program
-
Participation in the Carbon Disclosure Project
|
|
Anti-Corruption
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Code of Ethics and Conduct
-
Mission, Vision and Values
-
Corporate Governance
-
Governance, Sustainability and Strategy Committee
-
External audit for validation of economic and financial data
-
Internal audit
-
Adherence to the Corporate Pact for Integrity and Against Corruption
|
56
BRF Brasil Foods
GRI Reference Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
Compact
Principle
|
Page / Comment
|
|
Strategy and analysis
|
|
|
1.1
|
Statement on the significance of sustainability
|
|
4, 5
|
1.2
|
Description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities
|
|
6, 7, 42
|
|
Organizational profile
|
|
|
2.1
|
Name of the organization
|
|
2
|
2.2
|
Primary brands, products, and/or services
|
|
2, 30, 31
|
2.3
|
Operational structure
|
|
2
|
2.4
|
Location of organization’s headquarters
|
|
60
|
2.5
|
Countries and regions where the organization operates
|
|
2, 30, 31
|
2.6
|
Nature of ownership and legal form
|
|
2
|
2.7
|
Markets served (regions, sectors and types of clients/ beneficiaries)
|
|
2, 36, 37
|
2.8
|
Scale of the reporting organization
|
|
2
|
2.9
|
Significant changes during the reporting period in relation to size, structure, or shareholding
|
|
3
|
2.10
|
Awards received in the reporting period
|
|
18
|
|
Report parameters
|
|
|
3.1
|
Reporting period for information provided
|
|
52
|
3.2
|
Date of most recent previous report (if any)
|
|
52
|
3.3
|
Reporting cycle
|
|
52
|
3.4
|
Contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents
|
|
53, 60
|
|
Scope and limit of the Report
|
|
|
3.5
|
Process for defining report content
|
|
52
|
3.6
|
Boundary of the report (countries, divisions, subsidiaries, suppliers)
|
|
52
|
3.7
|
State any specific limitations on the scope or boundary of the report
|
|
52
|
3.8
|
Data measurement techniques and the bases of calculations
|
|
52
|
3.9
|
Explanation of the effect of any re-statements of information provided in earlier reports
|
|
52
|
3.10
|
Significant changes from previous reporting periods
|
|
53
|
3.11
|
Table identifying the location of the Standard Disclosures in the report
|
|
53
|
3.12
|
Data measurement techniques and the bases of calculations
|
|
57, 58, 59
|
|
Assurance
|
|
|
3.13
|
Policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report
|
|
53
|
|
Governance, commitments and engagement
|
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
4.1
|
Governance structure of the organization
|
1 to 10
|
11
|
4.2
|
Statement on whether the Chair of the highest governance body is also an executive officer
|
1 to 10
|
12
|
4.3
|
Independent or non-executive members of the highest governance body
|
1 to 10
|
12
|
4.4
|
Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations to the highest governance body
|
1 to 10
|
11
|
4.5
|
Linkage between compensation and performance
|
1 to 10
|
12, 13, 14
|
4.6
|
Processes in place to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided
|
1 to 10
|
10
|
4.7
|
Processes for determining the qualifications and knowledge of the members of the highest governance body
|
1 to 10
|
12
|
4.8
|
Statements of mission and values, codes of internal conduct and principles relevant to economic, environmental
and social performance, as well as the status of their implementation
|
1 to 10
|
Cover
|
4.9
|
Procedures of the highest governance body for overseeing the organization’s identification and management
of economic, environmental and social performance, including significant risks and opportunities, as well as
compliance or conformity with internationally agreed norms, codes of conduct and principles
|
1 to 10
|
10, 13
|
4.10
|
Processes for evaluating the highest governance body’s own performance including economic, environmental
and social performance
|
1 to 10
|
12
|
|
Commitments to external initiatives
|
|
|
4.11
|
Precautionary approach or principle
|
7
|
19
|
4.12
|
Externally developed charters, principles or other initiatives subscribed or endorsed
|
|
17
|
4.13
|
Membership of associations and/or national/international organizations
|
|
17
|
|
Engagement of stakeholders
|
|
|
4.14
|
List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization
|
|
52
|
4.15
|
Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage
|
|
52
|
4.16
|
Approaches to stakeholder engagement
|
|
52
|
4.17
|
Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Confirmation of the Application Level for the
GRI-G3 Guidelines
Annual and Sustainability Report, 2010
BRF Brasil Foods
BSD Consulting has verified the application level of the guidelines for the
Sustainability Reports of the Global Reporting Initiative - GRI (version
G3) in this edition of BRF’s Annual and Sustainability Report, 2010. Based
on verification of content provided, we can confirm that the application B
level of the GRI-G3 was successfully reached in this version.
|
|
BRF ‘s Annual and Sustainability Report, 2010 has shown a highly com
prehensive coverage in the list of indicators required by the GRI for Level
B reports.
It was not within BSD’s remit to verify the content and veracity of the
replies given to the indicators.
São Paulo, April 14 2011
BSD Consulting
Marcelo Aversa, Partner, BSD Consulting
Joyce Fernandes, Projects Manager, BSD Consulting
|
57
Annual and sustainability report 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Indicators
|
|
Global
Compact
Principle
|
|
Page / Comment
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Performance Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management approach
|
|
1, 4, 6, 7
|
|
6, 7, 42
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Performance
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EC1
|
|
Direct economic value generated and distributed
|
|
|
|
40 e IBASE
|
ES
|
|
EC2
|
|
Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization’s activities due to climate change
|
|
7
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EC3
|
|
Coverage of the organization’s defined benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
BRF has defined benefit plan obligations.
|
ES
|
|
EC4
|
|
Significant financial assistance received from government
|
|
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Market presence
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
EC5
|
|
Ratio of lowest wage to highest wage
|
|
1 e 6
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EC6
|
|
Policy, practices and proportion of spending on locally-based suppliers
|
|
|
|
42
|
ES
|
|
EC7
|
|
Procedures for local hiring
|
|
6
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect economic impacts
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EC8
|
|
Infrastructure investments and services provided for public benefit
|
|
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EC9
|
|
Significant indirect economic impacts
|
|
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental performance indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management approach
|
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
46 - 51
|
|
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN1
|
|
Materials used by weight or volume
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EN2
|
|
Percentage of materials used that are recycled input materials
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN3
|
|
Direct energy consumption by primary energy source
|
|
8
|
|
49
|
ES
|
|
EN4
|
|
Indirect energy consumption by primary source
|
|
8
|
|
49, 50
|
AD
|
|
EN5
|
|
Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements
|
|
8, 9
|
|
48
|
AD
|
|
EN6
|
|
Initiatives to provide energy-efficient products and services
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN7
|
|
Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and reductions achieved
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN8
|
|
Total water withdrawal by source
|
|
8
|
|
47, 48
|
AD
|
|
EN9
|
|
Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water
|
|
8
|
|
47, 48
|
AD
|
|
EN10
|
|
Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused
|
|
8, 9
|
|
47, 48
|
|
|
|
|
Biodiversity
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN11
|
|
Location and size of land owned by the organization in protected or high biodiversity areas
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EN12
|
|
Description of significant impacts on biodiversity
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN13
|
|
Habitats protected or restored
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN14
|
|
Strategies for managing impacts on biodiversity
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN15
|
|
Number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions, discharges and waste
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN16
|
|
Total direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight
|
|
8
|
|
51
|
ES
|
|
EN17
|
|
Other relevant indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight
|
|
8
|
|
51
|
ES
|
|
EN18
|
|
Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reductions achieved
|
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
51
|
ES
|
|
EN19
|
|
Emissions of ozone-depleting substances by weight
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EN20
|
|
NOx, SOx, and other significant air emissions by type and weight
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EN21
|
|
Total water discharge by quality and destination
|
|
8
|
|
48
|
ES
|
|
EN22
|
|
Total weight of waste by type and disposal method
|
|
8
|
|
50
|
ES
|
|
EN23
|
|
Total number and volume of significant spills
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN24
|
|
Weight of transported, imported, exported and disposed waste deemed hazardous
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
EN25
|
|
Identity, size, protected status, and biodiversity value of water bodies and related habitats affected by water
disposal and drainage
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Products and services
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN26
|
|
Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services
|
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
EN27
|
|
Percentage of products and packaging materials that are reclaimed
|
|
8, 9
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Conformity
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
EN28
|
|
Monetary value of fines and total number of sanctions for noncompliance with environmental laws and
regulations
|
|
8
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Transport
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
EN29
|
|
Environmental impacts of transporting products, goods, materials and members of the workforce
|
|
8, 9
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
EN30
|
|
Total environmental protection expenditures and investments by type
|
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
Labor practices and decent work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
1, 3, 6
|
|
38 - 41
|
|
|
|
|
Total workforce by employment type, employment contract, and region
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
LA1
|
|
Total number and rate of employee turnover by age group, gender, and region
|
|
|
|
39
|
ES
|
|
LA2
|
|
Benefits provided that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees
|
|
6
|
|
39
|
AD
|
|
LA3
|
|
Relations between the workforce and governance
|
|
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
LA4
|
|
Minimum prior notice period for disclosure of operational changes
|
|
1, 3
|
|
41
|
ES
|
|
LA5
|
|
Workplace health and safety
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total workforce represented in formal health and safety committees
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
LA6
|
|
Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, absenteeism and death
|
|
1
|
|
40
|
58
BRF Brasil Foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Indicators
|
|
Global
Compact
Principle
|
|
Page / Comment
|
ES
|
|
LA7
|
|
Education, training, counseling, prevention, and risk-control programs
|
|
1
|
|
40
|
ES
|
|
LA8
|
|
Programas de educação, treinamento, aconselhamento, prevenção e controle de risco
|
|
1
|
|
41
|
AD
|
|
LA9
|
|
Health and safety topics covered in formal agreements with trade unions
|
|
1
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Training and development
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
LA10
|
|
Average hours of training per year, per employee, by employee category
|
|
6
|
|
41
|
AD
|
|
LA11
|
|
Programs for skills management, lifelong learning and career ending
|
|
|
|
41
|
AD
|
|
LA12
|
|
Percentage of employees receiving regular performance reviews
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity and equal opportunities
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
LA13
|
|
Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees by gender, age group and ethnic origin
|
|
1, 6
|
|
39
|
ES
|
|
LA14
|
|
Ratio of basic salary of men to women by employee category
|
|
1, 6
|
|
There is no discrimination according to
gender, race, etc. Any differences are due
to aspects such as experience in the role,
qualifications, ability and performance.
|
|
|
|
|
Human rights performance indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management approach
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and purchase process practices
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HR1
|
|
Description of policies and clauses incorporating human rights concerns in investment contracts
|
|
1 a 6
|
|
ND
|
ES
|
|
HR2
|
|
Suppliers that have undergone screening on human rights
|
|
1 a 6
|
|
43
|
AD
|
|
HR3
|
|
Employee training on human rights issues
|
|
1 a 6
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Nondiscrimination
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HR4
|
|
Total number of incidents of discrimination and actions taken
|
|
1, 2, 6
|
|
None registered
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom of association and collective negotiation
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HR5
|
|
Operations identified in which the right to exercise freedom of association may be at risk
|
|
1, 2, 3
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Child labor
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HR6
|
|
Operations identified as having significant risk for incidents of child labor
|
|
1, 2, 5
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Forced or analogous to slave labor
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HR7
|
|
Operations identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or analogous to slave labor
|
|
1, 2, 4
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Security practices
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
HR8
|
|
Security personnel trained in aspects concerning human rights
|
|
1, 2
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Indigenous rights
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
HR9
|
|
Total number of incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous people
|
|
1, 2
|
|
No violations were registered
|
|
|
|
|
Society performance indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management approach
|
|
10
|
|
16, 44
|
|
|
|
|
Local community
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
SO1
|
|
Programs and practices that assess and manage the impacts of operations on local communities
|
|
1
|
|
44, 45
|
|
|
|
|
Corruption
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
SO2
|
|
Total number of business units analyzed for risks related to corruption
|
|
10
|
|
16
|
ES
|
|
SO3
|
|
Percentage of employees trained in the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures
|
|
10
|
|
16
|
ES
|
|
SO4
|
|
Actions taken in response to incidents of corruption
|
|
10
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Public policies
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
SO5
|
|
Public policy positions and participation in public policy development and lobbying
|
|
1 a 10
|
|
ND
|
AD
|
|
SO6
|
|
Financial contributions to political parties, politicians, and related institutions
|
|
10
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-competitive behavior
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
SO7
|
|
Number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
SO8
|
|
Description of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non- compliance with laws and
regulations
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Product responsibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Approach
|
|
1, 8
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
Customer health and safety
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
PR1
|
|
Life cycle stages in which health and safety impacts of products and services are assessed
|
|
1
|
|
43
|
AD
|
|
PR2
|
|
Compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning health and safety
|
|
1
|
|
88 incidents relating to product quality
were registered by the Legal Department,
but no case impacted on consumer
health.
|
|
|
|
|
Product and Service Labeling
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
PR3
|
|
Type of product and service information required by labeling procedures
|
|
8
|
|
43
|
AD
|
|
PR4
|
|
Description of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning information and labeling
|
|
8
|
|
22 incidents were registered, but no
decision was reached in any of the cases.
|
AD
|
|
PR5
|
|
Practices related to customer satisfaction, including results of surveys
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Communications
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
PR6
|
|
Programs for adherence to laws, standards, and voluntary codes related to marketing communications
|
|
|
|
43
|
AD
|
|
PR7
|
|
Total number of incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications
|
|
|
|
3 incidents were registered, with
2 relating to promotional campaigns and
1 for supposedly incorrect information on
butter labeling.
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Privacy
|
|
|
|
|
AD
|
|
PR8
|
|
Substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data
|
|
1
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
PR9
|
|
Fines for non-compliance in the provision and use of products and services
|
|
|
|
ND
|
59
Annual and sustainability report 2010
Corporate information
|
|
|
Head Office
|GRI 2.4|
|
|
Stock Exchange Ticker Symbols
|
Rua Jorge Tzachel, 475
|
|
BM&FBOVESPA
|
88301-600 Itajaí – SC – Brazil
|
|
BRFS3 – Common Shares – New Market
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange – NYSE
|
Corporate headquarters
|
|
BRFS –Level III ADRs
|
Rua Hungria, 1400 – 5
th
floor
|
|
|
01455-000 São Paulo – SP – Brazil
|
|
Official Newspapers
|
Phone: (55 11) 2322-5000
|
|
Diário Oficial do Estado de Santa Catarina
|
Fax: (55 11) 2322-5747
|
|
Diário Catarinense
|
www.brasilfoods.com
|
|
Valor Econômico
|
|
Investor Relations
|GRI 3.4|
|
|
Independent Auditors
|
Leopoldo Viriato Saboya
– Vice
|
|
KPMG Auditores Independentes
|
President of Finance, Administration
|
|
|
and Investor Relations
|
|
|
Elcio Ito
– Director of Finance
|
|
|
and Investor Relations
|
|
|
Edina Biava
– IR Manager
|
|
|
Rua Hungria, 1400 – 5
th
floor
|
|
|
01455-000 São Paulo – SP – Brazil
|
|
|
Phone: (55 11) 2322-5052/ 5061 / 5048
|
|
|
Fax: (55 11) 2322-5747
|
|
|
E-mail: acoes@brasilfoods.com
|
|
|
www.brasilfoods.com/ir
|
|
|
|
Depositary Banks
|
|
|
|
In Brazil
|
|
|
Banco Itaú S/A
|
|
|
Av. Engenheiro Armando de Arruda Pereira,
|
|
|
707 – 9
th
floor
|
|
|
04344-902 São Paulo – SP – Brazil
|
|
|
Tel: (55 11) 5029-1908
|
|
|
Fax: (55 11) 5029-1917
|
|
|
|
In the USA
|
|
|
The Bank of New York Mellon
|
|
|
Investor Services
|
|
|
P.O. Box 11258
|
|
|
Church Street Station
|
|
|
New York NY 10286-1258 USA
|
|
|
Phone: 1-888-269-2377
|
|
|
E-mail: shareowners@bankofny.com
|
|
|
www.bankofny.com
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Coordination
Financial, Administration and Investor
Relations Department
Collaboration
Domestic Market, Export Market, Food
Services, Dairy, Operations, Corporate
Affairs, Human Resources, Supply Chain,
Strategy and New Business and Technol
ogy.
Design
A10
Text
Editora Contadino
BRF Team
Paul Steele (translation)
GRI Consulting
BSD Consulting
Images
BRF collection
Printing
Leograf
We would like to thank all who have
worked in the preparation of this report:
|
|
The results for 2010 consolidate the Compa
nies BRF - Brasil Foods S.A. and Sadia S.A.
(wholly owned subsidiary). Sadia’s results have
been fully consolidated since July 2009
pursuant to the Association Agreement and
Shareholder Meetings for the merger of shares
which took place in July and August 2009.
The merger between BRF and Sadia is
currently under analysis by the Brazilian System
for Protection of Competition and its
implementation depends on the approval of
the Administrative Council for Economic
Defense - CADE. On July 7 2009, an Agreement
was signed with CADE (APRO – Transaction
Reversibility Preservation Agreement) which
ensures the reversibility of the operation,
authorizes the preparation of synergetic
studies and the adoption of joint management
initiatives with respect to treasury activities.
The statements contained in this report with
respect to the outlook for the Company’s
businesses, to the forecasts and results and the
potential for the Company’s growth, constitute
mere projections and were based on
management’s expectations in relation to the
Company’s future. These expectations are
extremely dependent on changes in the
market, on the general economic performance
of the country, the sector and the international
markets, being subject to changes.
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: June 29, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Leopoldo Viriato Saboya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Leopoldo Viriato Saboya
|
|
|
Title:
|
Financial and Investor Relations Director
|
BRF (NYSE:BRFS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
BRF (NYSE:BRFS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024