NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Jersey Shore State Bank (“JSSB”), Luzerne Bank ("Luzerne" and collectively with JSSB , the "Banks"), Woods Real Estate Development Co., Inc., Woods Investment Company, Inc., The M Group Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”), a wholly owned subsidiary of JSSB and an
eighty
percent owned partnership, United Solutions, LLC, (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Nature of Business
The Banks engage in a full-service commercial banking business, making available to the community a wide range of financial services including, but not limited to, installment loans, credit cards, mortgage and home equity loans, lines of credit, construction financing, farm loans, community development loans, loans to non-profit entities and local government, and various types of demand and time deposits including, but not limited to, checking accounts, savings accounts, money market deposit accounts, certificates of deposit, and IRAs. Deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the extent provided by law.
The financial services are provided by the Banks to individuals, partnerships, non-profit organizations, and corporations through their
twenty-six
offices located in Clinton, Lycoming, Centre, Montour, Union, and Luzerne Counties, Pennsylvania.
Woods Real Estate Development Co., Inc. engages in real estate transactions on behalf of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and the Banks.
Woods Investment Company, Inc., a Delaware holding company, is engaged in investing activities.
The M Group engages in securities brokerage and financial planning services, which include the sale of life insurance products, annuities, and estate planning services.
United Insurance Solutions, LLC will be offering property and casualty and auto insurance products within the Company's market footprint beginning in 2018.
Operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporate-wide basis. Accordingly, all financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in
one
reportable operating segment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of net deferred tax assets, impairment of goodwill, other than temporary impairment of debt and equity securities, fair value of financial instruments, and the valuation of real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure on settlement of debt.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks and federal funds sold. Interest-earning deposits mature within 90 days and are carried at cost. Net cash flows are reported for loan, deposit, and short-term borrowing transactions.
Restrictions on Cash and Cash Equivalents
Based on deposit levels, the Banks must maintain cash and other reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia ("FRB").
Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on management’s intention and ability, as securities held to maturity, securities available for sale, or securities held for trading. Debt securities acquired with the intent and ability to hold to maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, which are computed using the interest method and recognized as adjustments of interest income. Certain other debt securities have been classified as available for sale to serve principally as a source of liquidity. Unrealized holding gains and losses for available for sale securities are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax, until realized. Unrealized holding gains and losses for equity securities held for trading are recognized as a separate component within the income statement. Realized security gains and losses are computed using the specific identification method for debt securities and the average cost method for marketable equity securities. Interest and dividends on investment securities are recognized as income when earned.
Securities are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment based upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition of the underlying issuer, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, the likelihood of the security’s ability to recover any decline in its fair value, whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in fair value, and a review of the Company’s capital adequacy, interest rate risk position, and liquidity. The assessment of a security’s ability to recover any decline in fair value, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, and management’s intent and ability requires considerable judgment. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Fair values of investment securities are based on observed market prices. Certain investment securities do not have observed bid prices and their fair value is based on instruments with similar risk elements. Since regulatory stock is redeemable at par, the Company carries it at cost.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff generally are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred fees and discounts, unamortized loan fees and costs, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is recognized as income when earned on the accrual method. The Company’s general policy has been to stop accruing interest on loans when it is determined a reasonable doubt exists as to the collectability of additional interest. Income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received provided the loan is not delinquent in payment and, in management’s judgment, the borrower has the ability and intent to make future principal payments. Otherwise, payments are applied to the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Loans are restored to accrual status if certain conditions are met, including but not limited to, the repayment of all unpaid interest and scheduled principal due, ongoing performance consistent with the contractual agreement, and the future expectation of continued, timely payments.
Loan origination and commitment fees as well as certain direct loan origination costs are being deferred and amortized as an adjustment to the related loan’s yield over the contractual lives of the related loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents the amount which management estimates is adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in its loan portfolio as of the Consolidated Balance Sheet date. The allowance method is used in providing for loan losses. Accordingly, all loan losses are charged to the allowance and all recoveries are credited to it. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Bank. Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.
The allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, and general economic conditions. In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to nonperforming loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.
Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at December 31, 2017, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy, rising unemployment, or negative performance trends in financial information from borrowers could be indicators of subsequent increased levels of nonperforming assets and possible charge-offs, which would normally require increased loan loss provisions. An integral part of the periodic regulatory examination process is the review of the adequacy of the Banks' loan loss allowance. The regulatory agencies could require the Banks, based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examination, to provide additional loan loss provisions to further supplement the allowance.
Impaired loans are commercial and commercial real estate loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Banks individually evaluate such loans for impairment and do not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “nonaccrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Banks may choose to place a loan on nonaccrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired if the loan is not a commercial or commercial real estate loan. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loans. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Loan Charge-off Policies
Loans are generally fully or partially charged down to the fair value of collateral securing the asset when:
|
|
•
|
management judges the asset to be uncollectible;
|
|
|
•
|
repayment is deemed to be protracted beyond reasonable time frames;
|
|
|
•
|
the asset has been classified as a loss by either the internal loan review process or external examiners;
|
|
|
•
|
the borrower has filed bankruptcy and the loss becomes evident due to a lack of assets; or
|
|
|
•
|
the loan is
180
days past due unless both well secured and in the process of collection.
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings
In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, management may grant a concession for other than an insignificant period of time to the borrower that would not otherwise be considered, the related loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"). Management strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance, and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where borrowers are granted new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, management measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans.
In addition to the allowance for the pooled portfolios, management has developed a separate allowance for loans that are identified as impaired through a TDR. These loans are excluded from pooled loss forecasts and a separate reserve is provided under the accounting guidance for loan impairment. Consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR are also individually analyzed for estimated impairment.
Loans Held for Sale
In general, fixed rate residential mortgage loans originated by the Banks are held for sale and are carried at cost due to their short holding period, which can range from less than two weeks to a maximum of thirty days. Sold loans are not serviced by the Banks. Proceeds from the sale of loans in excess of the carrying value are accounted for as a gain. Total gains on the sale of loans are shown as a component of non-interest income within the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Foreclosed Assets
Foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Prior to foreclosure, the value of the underlying loan is written down to the fair value of the real estate to be acquired by a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Any subsequent write-downs are charged against operating expenses. Net operating expenses and gains and losses realized from disposition are included in non-interest expense and income, respectively, within the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from
five
to
ten
years for furniture, fixtures, and equipment and
fifteen
to
forty
years for buildings and improvements. Costs incurred for routine maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Costs of major additions and improvements are capitalized.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain officers and directors. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at its cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. Increases in the cash surrender value are recognized as a component of non-interest income within the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Goodwill
The Company performs an annual impairment analysis of goodwill for its purchased subsidiaries, Luzerne and The M Group. Based on the fair value of these reporting units, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows,
no
impairment of goodwill was recognized in
2017
,
2016
, or
2015
.
Intangible Assets
At
December 31, 2017
, the Company had intangible assets of
$641,000
as a result of the acquisition of Luzerne National Bank Corporation, which is net of accumulated amortization of
$1,373,000
. These intangible assets will continue to be amortized using the sum-of-the-years digits method of amortization over
ten
years. The Company also had intangible assets of
$821,000
, which is net of accumulated amortization of
$192,000
, as a result of the purchase of
two
books of business related to investment product sales. The book of business intangible is being amortized using the straight-line method over a period of
ten
years.
Investments in Limited Partnerships
The Company is a limited partner in
three
partnerships at
December 31, 2017
that provide low income elderly housing in the Company’s geographic market area. The carrying value of the Company’s investments in limited partnerships was
$402,000
at
December 31, 2017
and
$586,000
at
December 31, 2016
. The investments are being amortized over the
ten
-year tax credit receipt period utilizing the straight-line method. The partnerships are amortized once the projects reach the level of occupancy needed to begin the ten year tax credit recognition period. Amortization of limited partnership investments amounted to
$184,000
,
$312,000
, and
$661,000
for 2017, 2016 and
2015
, respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into off-balance sheet financial instruments. Those instruments consist of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. When those instruments are funded or become payable, the Company reports the amounts in its financial statements.
Marketing Cost
Marketing costs are generally expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the
appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences in financial and income tax methods of accounting, and are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. The Company analyzed its deferred tax asset position and determined that there was not a need for a valuation allowance due to the Company’s ability to generate future ordinary and capital taxable income.
On December 22, 2017 the Tax Cut and Jobs Act was signed into law. ASC 740 (Income Taxes) requires the recognition of the effect of changes in tax laws or rates in the period in which the legislation is enacted. The changes in the deferred tax assets and liabilities remeasured at the new 21% federal tax rate are reflected in income tax expense for fiscal year 2017.
The Company when applicable recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax provision.
Earnings Per Share
The Company provides dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated utilizing net income as reported in the numerator and weighted average shares outstanding in the denominator. The computation of diluted earnings per share differs in that the dilutive effects of any stock options are adjusted in the denominator.
Employee Benefits
Pension and employee benefits include contributions, determined actuarially, to a defined benefit retirement plan covering the eligible employees of JSSB. The plan is funded on a current basis to the extent that it is deductible under existing federal tax regulations. Pension and other employee benefits also include contributions to a defined contribution Section 401(k) plan covering eligible employees. Contributions matching those made by eligible employees are funded throughout the year. In addition, an elective contribution may be made annually at the discretion of the board of directors for the employees of JSSB with no contributions made since 2015.
The M Group Products and Income Recognition
The M Group product line is comprised primarily of annuities, life insurance, and mutual funds. The revenues generated from life insurance sales are commission only, as The M Group does not underwrite the policies. Life insurance sales include permanent and term policies with the majority of the policies written being permanent. Term life insurance policies are written for
10
,
15
,
20
, and
30
year terms with the majority of the policies being written for
20
years. None of these products are offered as an integral part of lending activities.
Commissions from the sale of annuities are recognized at the time notice is received from the third party broker/dealer or an insurance company that the transaction has been accepted and approved, which is also the time when commission income is received.
Life insurance commissions are recognized at varying points based on the payment option chosen by the customer. Commissions from monthly and annual payment plans are recognized at the start of each annual period for the life insurance, while quarterly and semi-annual premium payments are recognized quarterly and semi-annually when the earnings process is complete. For example, semi-annual payments on the first of January and July would result in commission income recognition on the first of January and July, while payments on the first of January, April, July, and October would result in commission income recognition on those dates. The potential for chargebacks only exists for those policies on a monthly payment plan since income is recognized at the beginning of the annual coverage period versus at the time of each monthly payment. No liability is maintained for chargebacks as these are removed from income at the time of the occurrence.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company is required to present accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in a full set of general-purpose financial statements for all periods presented. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized holding gains
(losses) on the available for sale securities portfolio and the unrecognized components of net periodic benefit costs of the defined benefit pension plan.
Segment Reporting
The Company has determined that its only reportable segment is Community Banking.
Reclassification of Comparative Amounts
Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s reporting format. Such reclassifications did not affect net income or shareholders’ equity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(a new revenue recognition standard). The Update’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this Update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This Update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Since the guidance scopes out revenue associated with financial instruments, including loan receivables and investment securities, we do not expect the adoption of the new standard, or any of the amendments, to result in a material change from our current accounting for revenue because the majority of the Company's revenue is not within the scope of Topic 606. However, we do expect that the standard will result in new disclosure requirements, which are currently being evaluated.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(
Topic 606
). The amendments in this Update defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting Update.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
. This Update applies to all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities and is intended to provide more useful information on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other things, this Update (a) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (b) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (c) eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (d) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (e) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (f) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (g) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that are not public business entities may adopt the amendments in this Update earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for us on January 1, 2018 and will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
. The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A short-term lease is defined as one in which (a) the lease term is 12 months or less and (b) there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. For short-term leases, lessees may elect to recognize lease
payments over the lease term on a straight-line basis. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the practical expedients it may elect at adoption, but does not anticipate the amendments will have a significant impact on the financial statements. Based on the Company’s preliminary analysis of its current portfolio, the impact to the Company’s balance sheet is estimated to result in less than a 1 percent increase in assets and liabilities. The Company also anticipates additional disclosures to be provided at adoption.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04,
Liabilities
-
Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20).
The standard provides that liabilities related to the sale of prepaid stored-value products within the scope of this Update are financial liabilities. The amendments in the Update provide a narrow-scope exception to the guidance in Subtopic 405-20 to require that breakage for those liabilities be accounted for consistent with the breakage guidance in Topic 606. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
The amendments in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services (that are an output of the entity’s ordinary activities) in exchange for consideration.
The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606; they simply clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments in this Update are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),
which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of Update 2014-09. ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,
defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
The amendments in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services in exchange for consideration. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle for revenue recognition in Topic 606. Instead, the amendments provide (1) more detailed guidance in a few areas and (2) additional implementation guidance and examples based on feedback the FASB received from its stakeholders. The amendments are expected to reduce the degree of judgment necessary to comply with Topic 606, which the FASB expects will reduce the potential for diversity arising in practice and reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
:
Deferral of the Effective Date
, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, which among other things clarifies the objective of the collectability criterion in Topic 606, as well as certain narrow aspects of Topic 606. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date
, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
, which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. This Update is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The underlying premise of the Update is that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the
remaining life of a financial asset. The income statement will be effected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. With certain exceptions, transition to the new requirements will be through a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, but cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. Among these include recognizing cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment as cash outflows for financing activities; cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the related insurance coverage; and cash proceeds received from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as cash inflows from investing activities while the cash payments for premiums on bank-owned policies may be classified as cash outflows for investing activities, operating activities, or a combination of investing and operating activities. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The amendments in this Update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16,
Income Taxes (Topic 740)
, which requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. Consequently, the amendments in this Update eliminate the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. That is, earlier adoption should be in the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial statements. The amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
, which requires that a statement of cash flows explains the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in this Update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of cash flows.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20
, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
. This Update, among others things, clarifies that guarantee fees within the scope of Topic 460,
Guarantees
, (other than product or service warranties) are not within the scope of Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-20 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for the new revenue recognition guidance. For public entities with a calendar year-end, the new guidance is effective in the quarter and year beginning January 1, 2018. For all other entities with a calendar year-end, the new guidance is effective in the year ending December 31, 2019, and interim periods in 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business
, which provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. Public business entities should apply the amendments in this Update to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. All other entities should apply the amendments to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. A public business entity that is not an SEC filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. All other entities, including not-for-profit entities, that are adopting the amendments in this Update should do so for their annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05,
Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20).
The amendments in this Update clarify what constitutes a financial asset within the scope of Subtopic 610-20. The amendments also clarify that entities should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset that is promised to a counterparty and to derecognize each asset when the counterparty obtains control. There is also additional guidance provided for partial sales of a nonfinancial asset and when derecognition, and the related gain or loss, should be recognized. The amendments in this Update are effective at the same time as the amendments in Update 2014-09. Therefore, for public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-06
, Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), and Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965)
.
This Update relates primarily to the reporting by an employee benefit plan for its interest in a master trust, which is a trust for which a regulated financial institution serves as a trustee or custodian and in which assets of more than one plan sponsored by a single employer or by a group of employers under common control are held. For each master trust in which a plan holds an interest, the amendments in this Update require a plan's interest in that master trust and any change in that interest to be presented in separate line items in the statement of net assets available for benefits and in the statement of changes in net assets available for benefits, respectively. The amendments in this Update remove the requirement to disclose the percentage interest in the master trust for plans with divided interests and require that all plans disclose the dollar amount of their interest in each of those general types of investments, which supplements the existing requirement to disclose the master trusts balances in each general type of investments. There are also increased disclosure requirements for investments in master trusts. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted.
This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,
Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)
. The amendments in this Update require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost as defined in paragraphs 715-30-35-4 and 715-60-35-9 are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within those annual periods. For other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08,
Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20).
The amendments in this Update shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity should apply the amendments in this Update on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, in the period of adoption, an entity should provide disclosures about a change in accounting principle. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)
, which affects any entity that changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. This Update amends the definition of modification by qualifying that modification accounting does not apply to changes to outstanding share-based payment awards that do not affect the total fair value, vesting requirements, or equity/liability classification of the awards. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11,
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815)
. The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down-round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down-round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down-round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down-round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down- round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20,
Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options
), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Accounting Standards Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in Part I of this Update should be applied either retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the first fiscal year and interim period(s) in which the pending content that links to this paragraph is effective or retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature for each prior reporting period presented in accordance with the guidance on accounting changes in paragraphs 250-10-45-5 through 45-10. The amendments in Part II of this Update do not require any transition guidance because those amendments do not have an accounting effect. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 850)
, the objective of which is to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this Update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application and disclosure of the hedge accounting guidance in current general accepted accounting principles. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application is permitted in any period after issuance. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this Update. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01,
Leases (Topic 842)
, which provides an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under the current lease guidance in Topic 840. An entity that elects this practical expedient should evaluate new or modified land easements under Topic 842 beginning at the date the entity adopts Topic 842; otherwise,
an entity should evaluate all existing or expired land easements in connection with the adoption of the new lease requirements in Topic 842 to assess whether they meet the definition of a lease. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU 2016-02. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02,
Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,
which gave entities the option to reclassify tax effects stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a result of the recent tax reform, to retained earnings (accumulated deficit). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company has elected to early adopt this standard and has chosen to apply this adjustment in 2017. As a result, the Company reclassified
$809,000
and
$9,000
of tax liability from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings, the adjusted line items are defined benefit plan and net unrealized loss on available for sale securities, respectively, and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component shown, net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits to net income, as of
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2015
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain(Loss) on Available for Sale Securities
|
|
Defined
Benefit
Plan
|
|
Total
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available
for Sale Securities
*
|
|
Defined
Benefit
Plan
*
|
|
Total
*
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available
for Sale Securities
*
|
|
Defined
Benefit
Plan
*
|
|
Total
*
|
Beginning balance
*
|
|
$
|
(639
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
(4,057
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,930
|
|
|
$
|
(4,597
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
*
|
|
990
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
(962
|
)
|
|
435
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
*
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
115
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
101
|
|
|
(963
|
)
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
105
|
|
|
(1,605
|
)
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
*
|
|
594
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
(2,672
|
)
|
|
540
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
Reclassification of certain income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
(639
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
(4,057
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,799
|
)
|
* Amounts net of 34% tax rate
The preceding table includes current guidance issued related to
Income Statement- Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
("ASU 2018-02"). The Company has
elected to reclassify the portion in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) that would have been otherwise stranded. Amounts were reclassified for both components included in AOCI and their ending balance as of December 31, 2017 is net of tax at the 21% corporate tax rate.
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income shown, net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits to net income, as of
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
Affected Line Item
in the Consolidated
Statement of Income
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Net realized gain on available for sale securities
|
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
|
$
|
2,592
|
|
|
Securities gains, net
|
Income tax effect
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrecognized pension costs
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
Income tax effect
|
|
59
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
NOTE 3 - PER SHARE DATA
There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share; therefore, net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator. The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive per share computation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Weighted average common shares issued
|
|
5,008,073
|
|
|
5,005,971
|
|
|
5,003,691
|
|
Average treasury stock shares
|
|
(302,471
|
)
|
|
(270,514
|
)
|
|
(231,452
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
4,705,602
|
|
|
4,735,457
|
|
|
4,772,239
|
|
There were a total of
93,500
non-qualified employee stock options (Note 14) outstanding on
December 31, 2017
that had a weighted average strike price of
$43.59
. Options on
December 31, 2016
had an average strike price of
$42.03
with a total of
26,500
options outstanding. Grants outstanding at year-end
2015
totaled to
34,750
options with an average strike price of $
42.03
. These options were excluded, on a weighted average basis, in the computation of diluted earnings per share for all periods presented due to the average market price of common shares being less than the strike price of the options.
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost, gross gains and losses, and fair values of investment securities at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
Available for sale (AFS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
4,273
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
(111
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,213
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
56,295
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
56,508
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
48,807
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
47,907
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
109,375
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
108,628
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
13,868
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,596
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
1,251
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
15,168
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
15,847
|
|
Total investment securities AFS
|
|
$
|
124,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
|
$
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
124,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
Available for sale (AFS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
9,295
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
(164
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
109
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
109
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
60,777
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
60,934
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
53,046
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
|
51,118
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
123,227
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
121,474
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
9,566
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,535
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
1,483
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
11,233
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
12,018
|
|
Total investment securities AFS
|
|
$
|
134,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
$
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
133,492
|
|
The amortized cost and fair values of trading investment securities at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
Trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
192
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
170
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
Trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
56
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
Available for Sale (AFS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,276
|
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,257
|
|
|
$
|
(111
|
)
|
State and political securities
|
|
15,691
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
18,709
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Other debt securities
|
|
7,512
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
28,517
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
36,029
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
Total debt securities
|
|
24,184
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
33,811
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
|
57,995
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
Other equity securities
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Total equity securities
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Total Investment Securities AFS
|
|
$
|
25,435
|
|
|
$
|
(313
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,811
|
|
|
$
|
(1,125
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,246
|
|
|
$
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Losses
|
Available for Sale (AFS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
3,572
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,627
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,199
|
|
|
$
|
(164
|
)
|
State and political securities
|
|
26,113
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26,113
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
Other debt securities
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
(1,179
|
)
|
|
12,240
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
40,380
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
Total debt securities
|
|
57,825
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
15,867
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
73,692
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
Other equity securities
|
|
727
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
756
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Total equity securities
|
|
727
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
756
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Total Investment Securities AFS
|
|
$
|
58,552
|
|
|
$
|
(1,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,623
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,175
|
|
|
$
|
(2,922
|
)
|
At
December 31, 2017
there were
37
individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and
22
individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months.
The Company reviews its position quarterly and has asserted that at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe they will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. The Company has concluded that any impairment of its investment securities portfolio is not other than temporary but is the result of interest rate changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at
December 31, 2017
, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
4,696
|
|
|
$
|
4,684
|
|
Due after one year to five years
|
|
43,748
|
|
|
43,609
|
|
Due after five years to ten years
|
|
49,777
|
|
|
49,063
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
11,154
|
|
|
11,272
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
109,375
|
|
|
$
|
108,628
|
|
Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were
$25,528,000
,
$44,829,000
, and
$65,672,000
for
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, respectively. The following table represents gross realized gains and losses on those transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Gross realized gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
69
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
408
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
53
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
825
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
288
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
183
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
132
|
|
Total gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
818
|
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
|
$
|
2,711
|
|
Gross realized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
18
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
51
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
54
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
149
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
43
|
|
Total gross realized losses
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
There were
no
impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
.
Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately
$89,736,000
and
$95,199,000
at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law.
There is no concentration of investments that exceed ten percent of shareholders’ equity for any individual issuer, excluding those guaranteed by the U.S. Government.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
The Banks are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh and as such, are required to maintain a minimum investment in stock of the FHLB that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the FHLB. The stock is bought from and sold to the FHLB based upon its
$100
par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated for impairment as necessary. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (a) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted (b) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance (c) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB and (d) the liquidity position of the FHLB.
Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. Management considered that the FHLB maintains regulatory capital ratios in excess of all regulatory capital requirements, liquidity appears adequate, new shares of FHLB stock continue to change hands at the
$100
par value, and the payment of dividends.
NOTE 6 - LOAN CREDIT QUALITY AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Management segments the Banks' loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics. Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics. Categories include commercial, financial,
and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Real estate loans are further segmented into
three
categories: residential, commercial, and construction.
The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
Past Due
30 To 89
Days
|
|
Past Due 90
Days Or More
& Still Accruing
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
|
Total
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
178,022
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
178,885
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
588,278
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
597,077
|
|
Commercial
|
|
325,148
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
332,019
|
|
Construction
|
|
31,547
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31,683
|
|
Installment loans to individuals
|
|
106,335
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
106,678
|
|
|
|
1,229,330
|
|
|
$
|
9,744
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
6,759
|
|
|
1,246,342
|
|
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
(12,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,858
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,216,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,233,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
Past Due
30 To 89
Days
|
|
Past Due 90
Days Or More
& Still Accruing
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
|
Total
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
145,179
|
|
|
$
|
785
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
146,110
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
553,053
|
|
|
9,112
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
564,740
|
|
Commercial
|
|
296,537
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
8,591
|
|
|
306,182
|
|
Construction
|
|
33,879
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
34,650
|
|
Installment loans to individuals
|
|
43,008
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
43,256
|
|
|
|
1,071,656
|
|
|
$
|
11,656
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
10,756
|
|
|
1,094,938
|
|
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
(12,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,896
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,057,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,080,785
|
|
Purchased loans acquired are recorded at fair value on their purchase date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses.
Upon acquisition, the Company evaluated whether each acquired loan (regardless of size) was within the scope of ASC 310-30. Purchased credit-impaired loans are loans that have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. The fair value of purchased credit-impaired loans, on the acquisition date, was determined primarily based on the fair value of loan collateral.
The following table presents the interest income if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans as of
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Interest Income That Would Have Been Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
|
|
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
|
|
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
|
|
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
|
|
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
|
|
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
147
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
38
|
|
Commercial
|
|
390
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
54
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
Installment loans to individuals
|
|
5
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Banks individually evaluate such loans for impairment and do not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Banks may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than
$100,000
and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard or worse. Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than
$100,000
on a case by case basis.
Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively with the exception of loans identified as troubled debt restructurings. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as
90
days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent to the Banks' policy on non-accrual loans.
The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Recorded Investment
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance
|
|
Related Allowance
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
—
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
—
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
235
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
96
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
367
|
|
Commercial
|
|
7,981
|
|
|
8,031
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
96
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
|
367
|
|
Commercial
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,446
|
|
|
$
|
14,545
|
|
|
$
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Unpaid Principal
Balance
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
1,833
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
|
—
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
—
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
132
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
74
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
437
|
|
Commercial
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,450
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
241
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
74
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
3,477
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
|
437
|
|
Commercial
|
|
12,258
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,976
|
|
|
$
|
16,071
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
91
|
|
Commercial
|
|
11,551
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
233
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Installment loans to individuals
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,516
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
101
|
|
Commercial
|
|
12,887
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
110
|
|
Construction
|
|
138
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,896
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
|
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
47
|
|
Commercial
|
|
17,529
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
80
|
|
Construction
|
|
865
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,995
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
Currently there are no additional funds needed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
Modifications
The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR"), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally
six
months.
Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Real estate mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
6
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
397
|
|
Commercial
|
|
2
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Of the
eight
new troubled debt restructurings that were granted for the year ended December 31, 2017,
six
loans totaling $
1,061,000
were granted payment concessions,
one
loan totaling $
273,000
was granted a rate concession, and
one
loan totaling $
52,000
was granted a term concession.
The
four
new troubled debt restructurings granted for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaling $
797,000
were granted term concessions.
No loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings made during the twelve months previous to December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, have defaulted during the corresponding twelve month periods.
Internal Risk Ratings
Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first
six
categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than
90
days past due are evaluated for Substandard classification. Loans in the Doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the Substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced. Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt. Loans classified Loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.
To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Banks have a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. An external annual loan review of large commercial relationships is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. During 2017, the threshold for the annual loan review was commercial relationships
$1,600,000
or greater for JSSB and
$1,400,000
or greater for Luzerne. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
to Individuals
|
|
Totals
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
175,603
|
|
|
$
|
593,828
|
|
|
$
|
311,209
|
|
|
$
|
31,535
|
|
|
$
|
106,678
|
|
|
$
|
1,218,853
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
738
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
7,337
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,118
|
|
Substandard
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
13,473
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
178,885
|
|
|
$
|
597,077
|
|
|
$
|
332,019
|
|
|
$
|
31,683
|
|
|
$
|
106,678
|
|
|
$
|
1,246,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
to Individuals
|
|
Totals
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
140,497
|
|
|
$
|
561,440
|
|
|
$
|
277,916
|
|
|
$
|
34,493
|
|
|
$
|
43,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,057,602
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
11,143
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
Substandard
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
|
17,123
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22,510
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
146,110
|
|
|
$
|
564,740
|
|
|
$
|
306,182
|
|
|
$
|
34,650
|
|
|
$
|
43,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,094,938
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.
The Banks' methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance. The total of the
two
components represents the Banks' ALL.
Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into
two
classes for evaluation. A general allowance is determined for
“Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.
For the general allowances historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a
twelve
quarter moving average. However, management may adjust the moving average time frame by up to
four
quarters to adjust for variances in the economic cycle. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry, and/or geographic standpoint. There was a substantial increase in our indirect loan portfolio in 2017 which resulted in an increase of
20
basis points within this qualitative factor. Additionally, the tenure of our credit department allowed us to incur a slight adjustment within our experience factor. Due to an increase in foreclosures nationally, we adjusted our residential loans category accordingly.
Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors. Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.
Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.
Over the last three years, various quantitative and qualitative factors indicate changes in our provision for loan losses. The provision for commercial and agricultural loans decreased based on changes in the economic cycle and our historical loss factors within this loan type. The change in the provision for residential real estate loans vary based on our observations of industry trends during 2017 in national foreclosure rates. A decrease in the provision for commercial real estate loans is due to bank and industry historical analysis. Our portfolio of construction loans has remained steady in recent years. The provision for this loan type is adjusted by national indices as well as our historical losses. In 2016 and 2017, the substantial growth in our indirect loan portfolio has been the key driver for the increase in allocation of provision for the installment loans to individuals segment of the portfolio.
Activity in the allowance is presented for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Commercial and Agricultural
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans to Individual
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Totals
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
1,554
|
|
|
$
|
5,383
|
|
|
$
|
4,975
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
135
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
277
|
|
Provision
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
819
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
885
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
730
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
1,177
|
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
|
$
|
4,277
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
12,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Commercial and Agricultural
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans to Individuals
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Totals
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
$
|
5,116
|
|
|
$
|
4,217
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
776
|
|
|
$
|
12,044
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
62
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
186
|
|
Provision
|
|
127
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
1,196
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
1,554
|
|
|
$
|
5,383
|
|
|
$
|
4,975
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Commercial and Agricultural
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans to Individuals
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Totals
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
4,205
|
|
|
$
|
786
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
10,579
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,361
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
176
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
526
|
|
Provision
|
|
515
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
174
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
$
|
5,116
|
|
|
$
|
4,217
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
776
|
|
|
$
|
12,044
|
|
The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers throughout north-central and north-eastern Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.
The amount of foreclosed residential real estate held at
December 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, totaled
$422,000
and
$839,000
, respectively. Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process at
December 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, totaled
$378,000
and
$167,000
, respectively.
The Company has a concentration of loans at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Owners of residential rental properties
|
|
15.16
|
%
|
|
16.10
|
%
|
Owners of commercial rental properties
|
|
13.57
|
%
|
|
14.18
|
%
|
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Commercial
and Agricultural
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment
Loans to Individuals
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Totals
|
(In Thousands)
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
Allowance for Loan Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
1,721
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,184
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
10,674
|
|
Total ending allowance balance
|
|
$
|
1,177
|
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
|
$
|
4,277
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
12,858
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
$
|
3,732
|
|
|
$
|
9,446
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,446
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
177,617
|
|
|
593,345
|
|
|
322,573
|
|
|
31,683
|
|
|
106,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231,896
|
|
Total ending loans balance
|
|
$
|
178,885
|
|
|
$
|
597,077
|
|
|
$
|
332,019
|
|
|
$
|
31,683
|
|
|
$
|
106,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,246,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Commercial and Agricultural
|
|
Real Estate Mortgages
|
|
Installment Loans to
Individuals
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
Unallocated
|
Totals
|
Allowance for Loan Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
3,307
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
10,717
|
|
Total ending allowance balance
|
|
$
|
1,554
|
|
|
$
|
5,383
|
|
|
$
|
4,975
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
12,258
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,976
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
145,869
|
|
|
561,263
|
|
|
293,924
|
|
|
34,650
|
|
|
43,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078,962
|
|
Total ending loans balance
|
|
$
|
146,110
|
|
|
$
|
564,740
|
|
|
$
|
306,182
|
|
|
$
|
34,650
|
|
|
$
|
43,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,094,938
|
|
NOTE 7 - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Major classifications of premises and equipment are summarized as follows at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Land
|
|
$
|
7,107
|
|
|
$
|
6,400
|
|
Premises
|
|
20,808
|
|
|
18,568
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
Total
|
|
40,121
|
|
|
35,491
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
12,735
|
|
|
11,216
|
|
Net premises and equipment
|
|
$
|
27,386
|
|
|
$
|
24,275
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to premises and equipment for the years ended
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
was
$1,659,000
$1,578,000
, and
$1,564,000
, respectively.
NOTE 8 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, goodwill had a gross carrying value of
$17,380,000
and accumulated amortization of
$276,000
resulting in a net carrying amount of
$17,104,000
.
The gross carrying amount of goodwill is tested for impairment in the third quarter of each fiscal year. Based on the fair value of the reporting unit, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, there was
no
evidence of impairment of the carrying amount at
December 31, 2017
or
2016
.
Identifiable intangibles are amortized to their estimated residual values over the expected useful lives. Such lives are also periodically reassessed to determine if any amortization period adjustments are required. Since the acquisition, no such adjustments were recorded. The identifiable intangible assets consist of a core deposit intangible and a trade name intangible which are being amortized on an accelerated basis, and also book of business intangible that is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of such assets. The net carrying amount of the core deposit intangible, the trade name intangible, and the book of business intangible at
December 31, 2017
was
$598,000
,
$43,000
, and
$821,000
respectively, with
$1,283,000
,
$90,000
, and
$199,000
accumulated amortization as of that date.
As of
December 31, 2017
, the estimated future amortization expense for the core deposit and trade name intangible was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Core Deposit Intangible
|
|
Trade Name Intangible
|
|
Book of Business Intangible
|
2018
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
2019
|
|
151
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
102
|
|
2020
|
|
117
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
102
|
|
2021
|
|
83
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
102
|
|
2022
|
|
48
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
102
|
|
2023
|
|
14
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
102
|
|
2024
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
102
|
|
2025
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
102
|
|
2026
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
NOTE 9 - TIME DEPOSITS
Time deposits of $250,000 or more totaled approximately
$43,262,000
on
December 31, 2017
and
$32,167,000
on
December 31, 2016
. Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000 or more was approximately
$1,479,000
,
$1,305,000
, and
$1,112,000
, for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, respectively.
At
December 31, 2017
, the scheduled maturities on time deposits of $100,000 or more are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
22,164
|
|
Three months to six months
|
|
10,354
|
|
Six months to twelve months
|
|
32,660
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
60,889
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
126,067
|
|
Total time deposit maturities are as follows at
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
$
|
115,659
|
|
2019
|
|
62,572
|
|
2020
|
|
22,453
|
|
2021
|
|
25,810
|
|
2022
|
|
1,546
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
1,427
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
229,467
|
|
NOTE 10 - SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and primarily FHLB advances, which generally represent overnight or less than six month borrowings. In addition to the outstanding balances noted below, the Banks also have additional lines of credit totaling
$52,000,000
available from correspondent banks other than the FHLB. The outstanding balances and related information for short-term borrowings are summarized as follows at
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Repurchase Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at year end
|
|
$
|
7,878
|
|
|
$
|
13,241
|
|
|
$
|
18,334
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end
|
|
13,782
|
|
|
17,827
|
|
|
18,614
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
15,394
|
|
|
15,834
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
Paid during the year
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
Overnight:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at year end
|
|
$
|
92,870
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
28,304
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end
|
|
92,870
|
|
|
24,346
|
|
|
42,760
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
15,559
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
23,075
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
Paid during the year
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and to facilitate secured short-term funding needs. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. We monitor collateral levels on a continuous basis. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agents.
The remaining contractual maturity of repurchase agreements in the consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
is presented in the following tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Overnight and Continuous
|
|
Overnight and Continuous
|
Repurchase Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
6,684
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
109
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
6,894
|
|
|
5,241
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
8,662
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
Total carrying value of collateral pledged
|
|
$
|
17,454
|
|
|
$
|
20,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability recognized for repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
7,878
|
|
|
$
|
13,241
|
|
NOTE 11 - LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
The following represents outstanding long-term borrowings with the FHLB by contractual maturities at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Interest Rate
|
|
Stated Interest Rate Range
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
From
|
|
To
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Variable
|
|
2017
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
Variable
|
|
2018
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Total Variable
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
2017
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Fixed
|
|
2018
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Fixed
|
|
2019
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
17,292
|
|
|
7,292
|
|
Fixed
|
|
2020
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
28,333
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
Fixed
|
|
2022
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Total Fixed
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,625
|
|
|
55,625
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,625
|
|
|
$
|
85,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
2018
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
2019
|
|
17,292
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
2020
|
|
28,333
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
2022
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
70,625
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
The terms of the convertible borrowings allow the FHLB to convert the interest rate to an adjustable rate based on the
three month London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) at a predetermined anniversary date of the borrowing’s origination, ranging from
three
months to
five
years. If the FHLB converts the interest rate on one of the predetermined dates, the Bank has the ability to pay off the debt on the conversion date and quarterly thereafter without incurring the customary pre-payment penalty.
The Banks maintain a credit arrangement which includes a revolving line of credit with the FHLB. Under this credit arrangement, at
December 31, 2017
, JSSB has a remaining borrowing capacity of
$235,868,000
and Luzerne has a remaining capacity of
$157,292,000
, which are subject to annual renewal and typically incur no service charges. Under terms of a blanket agreement,
collateral for the FHLB borrowings must be secured by certain qualifying assets of each Bank which consist principally of first mortgage loans and state and political securities, along with other securities.
In December 2012, JSSB entered in to a capital lease on a piece of land in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. The carrying amount of the land as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
$827,000
. The present value of minimum lease payments at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
$345,000
and
$373,000
. The following is a schedule showing the future minimum lease payments under the capital lease by years and the present value of the minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2017. The interest rate related to the lease obligation is
2.75%
and the maturity date is October 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Lease Payment
|
|
Interest
|
|
Present Value of Minimum Lease Payment
|
2018
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
2019
|
|
38
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
29
|
|
2020
|
|
38
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
30
|
|
2021
|
|
38
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
31
|
|
2022
|
|
37
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
31
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
200
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
NOTE 12 - INCOME TAXES
Year-end deferred taxes are presented in the table below. As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (discussed below), deferred taxes as of December 31, 2017 are based on the newly enacted U.S. statutory federal income tax rate of 21%. Deferred taxes as of December 31, 2016 are based on the previously enacted U.S. statutory federal income tax rate of 34%.
The following temporary differences gave rise to the net deferred tax asset position at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
4,400
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Defined Pension
|
|
684
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Deferred Loan fees and discounts
|
|
211
|
|
|
320
|
|
Investment securities allowance
|
|
45
|
|
|
517
|
|
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities
|
|
14
|
|
|
329
|
|
Other
|
|
727
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
Total
|
|
5,630
|
|
|
10,249
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment security accretion
|
|
95
|
|
|
244
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
537
|
|
|
588
|
|
Amortization
|
|
610
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Total
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
8,397
|
|
No
valuation allowance was established at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, because of the Company’s ability to carry back capital losses to recover taxes paid in previous years and certain tax strategies, together with the anticipated future taxable income as evidenced by the Company’s earning potential. The Corporation is no longer subject to federal, state, and local examinations by tax authorities for years before 2014.
The provision or benefit for income taxes is comprised of the following for the year ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Currently payable
|
|
$
|
5,690
|
|
|
$
|
3,054
|
|
|
$
|
3,527
|
|
Deferred benefit
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
209
|
|
Change in corporate tax rate
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total provision
|
|
$
|
7,459
|
|
|
$
|
4,597
|
|
|
$
|
3,736
|
|
A reconciliation between the expected income tax or benefit and the effective income tax rate on income before income tax provision or benefit follows for the year ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
Provision at expected rate
|
|
$
|
5,859
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,804
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,996
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
(Decrease) increase in tax resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
(4.71
|
)
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
(6.40
|
)
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
(8.46
|
)
|
Tax credits
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
(4.17
|
)
|
Change in corporate tax rate
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
15.81
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other, net
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
197
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
Effective income tax provision and rate
|
|
$
|
7,459
|
|
|
43.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,597
|
|
|
26.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,736
|
|
|
21.19
|
%
|
NOTE 13 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) for all employees meeting certain age and length of service requirements that were hired prior to January 1, 2004, at which time entrance into the Plan was frozen. The benefit accrual for the Plan was subsequently frozen at December 31, 2014. Benefits are based primarily on years of service and the average annual compensation during the highest
five
consecutive years within the final
ten
years of employment, until December 31, 2014 when the benefit accrual was frozen.
The following table sets forth the obligation and funded status as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
19,289
|
|
|
$
|
18,947
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
756
|
|
|
775
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
159
|
|
|
139
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(782
|
)
|
|
(800
|
)
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other, change in actuarial assumptions
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
228
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
20,669
|
|
|
$
|
19,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
15,090
|
|
|
$
|
14,223
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
910
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
750
|
|
|
750
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(782
|
)
|
|
(797
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of plan assets
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
17,486
|
|
|
15,090
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts recognized on balance sheet as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
6,227
|
|
|
$
|
6,498
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Plan was
$20,669,000
and
$19,289,000
at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Components of Net Periodic Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (loss) as of
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
756
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
757
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(926
|
)
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
(983
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
174
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
159
|
|
Net periodic benefit (cost)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Discount rate
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost for years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Discount rate
|
3.98
|
%
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
3.83
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
The expected long-term rate of return was estimated using market benchmarks by which the plan assets would outperform the market value in the future, based on historical experience adjusted for changes in asset allocation and expectations for overall lower future returns on similar investments compared to past periods.
Plan Assets
The Plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Cash
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
11.42
|
%
|
|
9.15
|
%
|
Equity
|
|
66.90
|
%
|
|
64.79
|
%
|
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
Hedged Strategies
|
|
10.90
|
%
|
|
13.97
|
%
|
Total
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
The investment objective for the Plan is to maximize total return with tolerance for slightly above average risk, meaning the fund is able to tolerate short-term volatility to achieve above-average returns over the long term.
Asset allocation favors equities, with target allocation of approximately
62%
equity securities,
15.0%
fixed income securities,
10%
inflation hedges/real assets,
10%
hedged strategies, and
2.5%
cash. Due to volatility in the market, the target allocation is not always desirable and asset allocations will fluctuate between the acceptable ranges. The equity portfolio’s exposure is primarily in mid and large capitalization domestic equities with limited exposure to small capitalization and international stocks.
It is management’s intent to give the investment managers flexibility, within the overall guidelines, with respect to investment decisions and their timing. However, certain investments require specific review and approval by management. Management is also informed of anticipated, significant modifications of any previously approved investment, or anticipated use of derivatives to execute investment strategies.
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy detailed in Note 21 - Fair Value Measurements, the Plan’s assets at fair value as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
Mutual funds - taxable fixed income
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
Mutual funds - domestic equity
|
|
9,358
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,358
|
|
Mutual funds - international equity
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Hedged Strategies
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
17,486
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
Mutual funds - taxable fixed income
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
Mutual funds - domestic equity
|
|
8,944
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,944
|
|
Mutual funds - international equity
|
|
835
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
835
|
|
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets
|
|
838
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
838
|
|
Hedged Strategies
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
15,090
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,090
|
|
The following future benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2018
|
$
|
838
|
|
2019
|
874
|
|
2020
|
907
|
|
2021
|
898
|
|
2022
|
918
|
|
Thereafter
|
5,249
|
|
|
$
|
9,684
|
|
The company expects to contribute a minimum of
$500,000
to its Pension Plan in
2018
.
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company also offers a 401(k) savings plan in which eligible participating employees may elect to contribute up to a maximum percentage allowable not to exceed the limits of Code Sections 401(k), 404, and 415. The Company may make matching contributions equal to a discretionary percentage that is determined by the Board of Directors. Participants are at all times fully vested in their contributions and vest over a period of
five
years regarding the employer contribution. Contribution expense was approximately
$369,000
,
$215,000
, and
$230,000
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a deferred compensation plan whereby participating directors elect to forego directors’ fees paid in cash. Under this plan, the Company will make payments for a
ten
-year period beginning at the later of age
65
or ceasing to be a director in most cases or at death, if earlier, at which time payments would be made to their designated beneficiaries.
To fund benefits under the deferred compensation plan, the Company has acquired bank-owned life insurance policies on the lives of the participating directors for which insurance benefits are payable to the Company. The Company incurred expenses related to the plan of
$330,000
,
$303,000
, and
$252,000
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, respectively. Benefits paid under the plan were approximately
$79,000
,
$85,000
, and
$103,000
in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, respectively.
NOTE 14 - STOCK OPTIONS
In 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan designed to help the Company attract, retain, and motivate employees and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock may be granted as part of the plan.
On August 27, 2015, the Company issued
38,750
stock options with a strike price of
$42.03
to employees that have a
five
year vesting period and expire
ten
years from the grant date. On March 24, 2017, the Company issued
70,000
stock options with a strike price of
$44.21
to employees. The options granted in 2017 all expire ten years from the grant date; however, of the
70,000
grants awarded,
46,250
of the options have a
three
year vesting period while the remaining
23,750
options vest in
five
years.
A summary of stock option activity for the year ended
December 31, 2017
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
|
38,750
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
34,750
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
9.67
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
Granted
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
8.66
|
|
|
224,455
|
|
Granted
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
44.21
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
44.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
93,500
|
|
|
$
|
43.59
|
|
|
8.79
|
|
|
$
|
279,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2017
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
On
December 31, 2017
, a total of
93,500
options were outstanding. Outstanding options at December 31, 2017 and the related vesting schedules are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Granted
|
Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
Vesting Period
|
|
Expiration
|
March 24, 2017
|
|
46,250
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
43,250
|
|
|
$
|
44.21
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
10 years
|
March 24, 2017
|
|
23,750
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23,750
|
|
|
44.21
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
10 years
|
August 27, 2015
|
|
38,750
|
|
|
(12,250
|
)
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
42.03
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
10 years
|
The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following is a summary of the assumptions used in this model for the stock options granted during 2017 and 2015 (no options were issued during 2016):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2015
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
27.63
|
%
|
|
31.58
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Expected life
|
6.84 years
|
|
|
7.51 years
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per option
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straightline basis over the options’ vesting periods while ensuring that the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized at least equals the value of the vested portion of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury bond with a similar term to the expected life of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility was estimated based on the adjusted historic volatility of the Company’s shares. The expected life was estimated to equal the contractual life of the options. The dividend yield rate was based upon recent historical dividends paid on shares.
For the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, there was
$29,000
and
$19,000
in total share-based compensation expense, respectively. The compensation expense is recorded as part of the non-interest expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
As at
December 31, 2017
, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options was
$99,000
which is expected to be recognized over a period of
2.91
years.
NOTE 15 - EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company maintains a Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”). The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company. The Plan allows for up to
1,000,000
shares to be purchased by employees. The purchase price of the shares is
95%
of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of
15%
of base compensation or
$12,000
in market value annually. There were
2,230
and
2,125
shares issued under the plan for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
NOTE 16 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and the Banks, including their immediate families and companies in which they are principal owners (more than
ten
percent), are indebted to the Company. Such indebtedness was incurred in the ordinary course of business on the same terms and at those rates prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with others.
A summary of loan activity with executive officers, directors, principal shareholders, and associates of such persons is listed below for the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
New Loans
|
|
Repayments
|
|
Ending Balance
|
2016
|
|
$
|
9,258
|
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
|
$
|
(6,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,877
|
|
2017
|
|
8,877
|
|
|
13,147
|
|
|
(3,013
|
)
|
|
19,011
|
|
Deposits from related parties held by the Banks amounted to
$21,700,000
at
December 31, 2017
and
$13,052,000
at
December 31, 2016
.
NOTE 17 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The following schedule shows future minimum rental payments under operating leases with noncancellable terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2018
|
$
|
599
|
|
2019
|
480
|
|
2020
|
463
|
|
2021
|
369
|
|
2022
|
261
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,246
|
|
|
$
|
3,418
|
|
The Company’s operating lease obligations represent short and long-term lease and rental payments for facilities and equipment. Total rental expense for all operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
, and
2015
were
$584,000
,
$573,000
, and
$591,000
.
The Company is subject to lawsuits and claims arising out of its business. There are no such legal proceedings or claims currently pending or threatened other than those encountered during the normal course of business.
NOTE 18 - OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
264,982
|
|
|
$
|
263,487
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
10,406
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
Credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
6,341
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.
Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts. The coverage period for these instruments is typically a
one
year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management. Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period. For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.
NOTE 19 - CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Federal regulations require the Company and the Banks to maintain minimum amounts of capital. Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of Common Equity Tier 1, Total, and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average total assets.
In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”) established
five
capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” Should any institution fail to meet the requirements to be considered “adequately capitalized,” it would become subject to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions.
As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the FDIC categorized the Banks as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be classified as a well capitalized financial institution, common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risked-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least
6.5%
,
8%
,
10%
, and
5%
, respectively.
The Company’s and the Banks' actual capital ratios (using the definitions from the prompt corrective action rules) are presented in the following tables, which shows that the Company and both Banks met all regulatory capital requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
125,513
|
|
|
11.254
|
%
|
|
$
|
125,804
|
|
|
12.620
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
50,187
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
|
44,849
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
64,128
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
51,078
|
|
|
5.125
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
72,493
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
|
64,782
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
132,094
|
|
|
11.844
|
%
|
|
$
|
133,393
|
|
|
13.380
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
89,223
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
79,732
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
103,164
|
|
|
9.250
|
%
|
|
85,961
|
|
|
8.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
111,528
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
|
99,665
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
125,513
|
|
|
11.254
|
%
|
|
$
|
125,804
|
|
|
12.620
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
66,916
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
|
59,799
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
80,857
|
|
|
7.250
|
%
|
|
66,028
|
|
|
6.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
89,222
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
79,732
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
125,513
|
|
|
8.766
|
%
|
|
$
|
125,804
|
|
|
9.432
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
57,273
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
|
53,352
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
71,591
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
66,691
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jersey Shore State Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
88,289
|
|
|
10.120
|
%
|
|
$
|
86,397
|
|
|
11.136
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
39,259
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
|
34,914
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
50,164
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
39,763
|
|
|
5.125
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
56,707
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
|
50,431
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
93,145
|
|
|
10.677
|
%
|
|
$
|
90,992
|
|
|
11.728
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
69,791
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
62,069
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
80,696
|
|
|
9.250
|
%
|
|
66,918
|
|
|
8.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
87,239
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
|
77,587
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
88,289
|
|
|
10.120
|
%
|
|
$
|
86,397
|
|
|
11.136
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
52,345
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
|
46,552
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
63,251
|
|
|
7.250
|
%
|
|
51,401
|
|
|
6.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
69,794
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
62,069
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
88,289
|
|
|
8.235
|
%
|
|
$
|
86,397
|
|
|
8.894
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
42,885
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
|
38,856
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
53,606
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
48,570
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luzerne Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
31,116
|
|
|
9.731
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,102
|
|
|
10.165
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
14,389
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
|
13,769
|
|
|
4.500
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
18,386
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
15,682
|
|
|
5.125
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
20,785
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
|
19,889
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
32,533
|
|
|
10.174
|
%
|
|
$
|
33,589
|
|
|
10.977
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
25,581
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
24,479
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
29,578
|
|
|
9.250
|
%
|
|
26,391
|
|
|
8.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
31,977
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
|
30,599
|
|
|
10.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
31,116
|
|
|
9.731
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,102
|
|
|
10.165
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
19,186
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
|
18,359
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
23,183
|
|
|
7.250
|
%
|
|
20,272
|
|
|
6.625
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
25,581
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
24,479
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
$
|
31,116
|
|
|
8.384
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,102
|
|
|
8.535
|
%
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
14,845
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
|
14,576
|
|
|
4.000
|
%
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
18,557
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
18,220
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
NOTE 20 - REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS
The Pennsylvania Banking Code restricts the availability of capital funds for payment of dividends by all state-chartered banks. Accordingly, at
December 31, 2017
, the balance in the additional paid in capital account totaling
$11,657,000
for JSSB and
$42,214,000
for Luzerne Bank is unavailable for dividends.
The Banks are subject to regulatory restrictions, which limit the ability to loan funds to Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. At
December 31, 2017
, the regulatory lending limit amounted to approximately
$16,914,000
.
Cash and Due from Banks
Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank had
no
reserve requirements by the district Federal Reserve Bank at
December 31, 2017
or
2016
; however, if they did they would be reported with cash and due from banks. The required reserves are computed by applying prescribed ratios to the classes of average deposit balances. These are held in the form of cash on hand and a balance maintained directly with the Federal Reserve Bank.
NOTE 21 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing observations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Level I:
|
|
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
|
|
|
|
Level II:
|
|
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
|
|
|
|
Level III:
|
|
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities, available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,213
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,213
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
56,508
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56,508
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
47,907
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
47,907
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
14,596
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,596
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
Investment securities, trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
190
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
190
|
|
Total assets measured on a recurring basis
|
|
$
|
16,037
|
|
|
$
|
108,628
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
124,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities, available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
109
|
|
State and political securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
60,934
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
60,934
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
51,118
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51,118
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
10,535
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,535
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
Investment securities, trading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institution equity securities
|
|
58
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
Total assets measured on a recurring basis
|
|
$
|
12,076
|
|
|
$
|
121,474
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
133,550
|
|
The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,262
|
|
|
$
|
12,262
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,797
|
|
|
$
|
13,797
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
839
|
|
The following table provides a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items valued utilizing level III techniques as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Valuation Technique(s)
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Range
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,583
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
|
Temporary reduction in payment amount
|
|
3% to (70)%
|
|
(4)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probability of default
|
|
—%
|
|
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
|
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
|
|
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
|
|
0 to (20)%
|
|
(17)%
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
|
|
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
|
|
(20)%
|
|
(20)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Valuation Technique(s)
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Range
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
5,304
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
|
Temporary reduction in payment amount
|
|
0 to (70)%
|
|
(20)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probability of default
|
|
—%
|
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
|
|
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
|
|
0 to (20)%
|
|
(15)%
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
|
|
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
|
|
(20)%
|
|
(20)%
|
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default. Significant increases (decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements. The probability of default is
0%
for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
NOTE 22 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments. Fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These fair values do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair values are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair values.
Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.
As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, the fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.
The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level I)
|
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level II)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level III)
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
27,243
|
|
|
$
|
27,243
|
|
|
$
|
27,243
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
124,475
|
|
|
124,475
|
|
|
15,847
|
|
|
108,628
|
|
|
—
|
|
Trading
|
|
190
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
1,233,756
|
|
|
1,264,584
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,264,584
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
843,004
|
|
|
$
|
838,441
|
|
|
$
|
611,187
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
227,254
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
303,316
|
|
|
303,316
|
|
|
303,316
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
100,748
|
|
|
100,748
|
|
|
100,748
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
70,970
|
|
|
70,280
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
70,280
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
502
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level I)
|
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level II)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level III)
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
43,671
|
|
|
$
|
43,671
|
|
|
$
|
43,671
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
133,492
|
|
|
133,492
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
121,474
|
|
|
—
|
|
Trading
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
1,080,785
|
|
|
1,088,122
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,088,122
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
27,332
|
|
|
27,332
|
|
|
27,332
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
791,937
|
|
|
$
|
789,401
|
|
|
$
|
571,768
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
217,633
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
303,277
|
|
|
303,277
|
|
|
303,277
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
13,241
|
|
|
13,241
|
|
|
13,241
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
85,998
|
|
|
86,353
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
86,353
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
455
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Trading Securities, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings, and Accrued Interest Payable:
The fair value is equal to the carrying value.
Investment Securities:
The fair value of investment securities available for sale is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is determined by using the quoted market price for similar securities. Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal to the carrying value.
Loans:
Fair values are determined for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and other consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals. If appraisals are not available, estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance:
The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.
Deposits:
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
The fair values above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.
Long Term Borrowings:
The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:
There is no material difference between the notional amount and the fair value of off-balance sheet items at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 18.
NOTE 23 - PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed financial information for Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. follows:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
131,637
|
|
|
129,421
|
|
Non-bank
|
|
5,685
|
|
|
8,037
|
|
Other assets
|
|
889
|
|
|
373
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
138,343
|
|
|
$
|
138,409
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
138,194
|
|
|
138,249
|
|
Total liability and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
138,343
|
|
|
$
|
138,409
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
11,352
|
|
|
$
|
10,007
|
|
|
$
|
11,367
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
3,128
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
(636
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,773
|
|
|
$
|
12,475
|
|
|
$
|
13,898
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
10,545
|
|
|
$
|
11,346
|
|
|
$
|
11,766
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,773
|
|
|
$
|
12,475
|
|
|
$
|
13,898
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
908
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
(3,167
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
344
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
(8,837
|
)
|
|
(8,903
|
)
|
|
(8,967
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
116
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
116
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
(2,603
|
)
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
(10,602
|
)
|
|
(9,376
|
)
|
|
(11,454
|
)
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
315
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
578
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
CASH, END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
NOTE 24 - CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
2017
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
11,682
|
|
|
$
|
12,209
|
|
|
$
|
12,948
|
|
|
$
|
13,138
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
10,336
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
11,468
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
330
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
125
|
|
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
Securities gains (losses), net
|
|
199
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
298
|
|
|
107
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
8,985
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
9,566
|
|
|
9,248
|
|
Income before income tax provision
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
|
4,685
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
986
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
3,968
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
3,086
|
|
|
$
|
3,284
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share - basic
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
2016
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
11,669
|
|
|
$
|
11,660
|
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
10,374
|
|
|
10,288
|
|
|
10,247
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
350
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
330
|
|
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains
|
|
2,522
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
2,821
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
Securities gains, net
|
|
475
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
441
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
9,061
|
|
|
8,666
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
Income before income tax provision
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
4,238
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
882
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
3,059
|
|
|
$
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|