CANTON, Mass., Sept. 10, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- NEI
(Nasdaq: NEI), a leading provider of server-based
application platforms, deployment solutions and lifecycle support
services for software technology developers and OEMs worldwide,
announced today that it has signed a memorandum of understanding to
settle the previously disclosed class action lawsuit captioned
In re Network Engines, Inc. Shareholder Litigation,
C.A. No. 7650-CS pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery and the lawsuit in
the Suffolk County Superior Court in the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts entitled Shiva v.
Network Engines, Inc. et al., No. C.A. No. 12-2392-BLS
and the newly-filed action in the United States District Court for
the District of Massachusetts
entitled Strum v. Network Engines, Inc. et al., No.
12-cv-11533-RGS (collectively, the "Merger Litigation").
The Merger Litigation relates to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of June 18, 2012, by and
among UNICOM Systems, Inc. ("UNICOM"), UNICOM Sub
Two, Inc. and NEI.
NEI agreed to the settlement solely to avoid the costs, risks
and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any
liability or wrongdoing. NEI denies all liability with respect to
the facts and claims alleged in the Merger Litigation and
specifically denies that any breach of fiduciary duty occurred, or
that any further disclosure is required to supplement the Proxy
Statement under any applicable rule, statute, regulation or law.
The settlement provides, among other things, that the parties will
seek to enter into a stipulation of settlement which provides for
the conditional certification of the Merger Litigation as a non
opt-out class action pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 23 on
behalf of a class consisting of all record and beneficial owners of
NEI common stock during the period beginning on June 19, 2012, through the date of the
consummation of the proposed merger, including any and all of their
respective successors in interest, predecessors, representatives,
and the release of all asserted claims. The asserted claims will
not be released until such stipulation of settlement is approved by
the court. There can be no assurance that the parties will
ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement or that the court
will approve such settlement even if the parties were to enter into
such stipulation. The settlement will not affect the merger
consideration to be received by NEI stockholders or the timing of
the special meeting of NEI stockholders scheduled for September 18, 2012.
Additionally, as part of the settlement, NEI has agreed to make
certain additional disclosures related to the proposed merger,
which are set forth below. The additional disclosures supplement
the disclosure contained in the proxy statement filed by NEI with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on August 9, 2012 (the "Proxy Statement"), and
should be read in conjunction with the disclosures contained in the
Proxy Statement, which in turn should be read in its entirety.
Nothing in this press release or any stipulation of settlement
shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality
of any of the disclosures set forth herein. Capitalized terms used
herein, but not otherwise defined, shall have the meanings ascribed
to such terms in the Proxy Statement.
The following disclosure replaces the first two sentences
following the caption "Interests of Executive Officers
with respect to UNICOM" on page 10 of the Proxy Statement:
Following the merger, each of our officers will continue as the
officers of the surviving corporation. Our officers have not been
specifically informed by UNICOM that they will retain their
employment, but since January 18,
2012, UNICOM has indicated that NEI will operate as a
division of UNICOM and it does not intend to make any
changes. None of our officers have negotiated or entered into
an employment arrangement with UNICOM or Merger Sub.
The following disclosure replaces the ninth paragraph on page 20
of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On November 21, 2011, Mr. Bryant
met with representatives of Needham & Company, LLC ("Needham"),
a firm we formally engaged on February 16,
2012 as our exclusive financial advisor in connection with
our board of directors' evaluation of strategic and financial
alternatives, including a possible sale of Network Engines, at our
headquarters in Canton,
Massachusetts to discuss, among other things, a potential
review of strategic alternatives. NEI has a longstanding business
relationship with Needham, including work in 2002 and 2007, and did
not interview other financial advisors.
The following disclosure replaces the eighth paragraph on page
21 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
Between January 30, 2012 and February 3, 2012, there
were several telephonic discussions between Mr. Shortell and
Mr. Hong to discuss a potential letter of intent from UNICOM
to purchase Network Engines. During these telephonic meetings,
Mr. Hong expressed an interest in an acquisition of Network
Engines at a price per share of $1.70. In response to Mr. Hong's proposal,
Mr. Shortell indicated that he anticipated an offer price of
$1.70 would not represent an
acceptable premium to our board of directors and that the price
would need to be raised for our board of directors to consider a
sale of Network Engines.
The following disclosure replaces the fourth full paragraph on
page 22 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On February 20, 2012, our board of
directors held a telephonic meeting in consultation with
representatives of Latham and Needham. During the meeting, Needham
reviewed a presentation that included a review of stock price
trading, a summary of valuation analysis, a list of potential
interested parties and certain process considerations. Needham also
provided a summary of a February 17,
2012 telephone conversation they had with Mr. Hong regarding
the form of a transaction, timing, due diligence team, source of
funds and certain requests made by Mr. Hong. Mr. Shortell provided
a summary of strategic considerations, including a discussion of
our current business model. He discussed certain barriers to our
being able to access new markets and our position as a low margin
supplier with high customer concentrations of revenue. These
barriers include NEI's low margin business, pricing pressure from
larger customers, the uncertainty regarding the sustainability of
smaller customers, NEI's lack of substantial intellectual property,
the consolidation of markets, and NEI's lack of an international
presence. Our board of directors considered such factors
in our evaluation of UNICOM's indication of interest. After some
discussion, it was agreed that we should not sign the non-binding
indication of interest from UNICOM. Our board of directors
requested that Needham obtain further information from UNICOM,
including information concerning its ability to finance the
proposed transaction, and work with UNICOM to provide it with
further information concerning Network Engines. The board of
directors also discussed the sale process as it related to the
fiduciary duties of the members of the board of directors. The
board of directors also discussed the appointment of a committee of
the board of directors to assist with the process of soliciting and
analyzing acquisition proposals from other potentially interested
parties (the "Transaction Committee") and appointed directors
John A. Blaeser, Gary E. Haroian and Robert M. Wadsworth (until Mr. Wadsworth's term
expired on March 15, 2012) to serve
as members of the Transaction Committee. The Transaction
Committee did not have direct contact with UNICOM, but Messrs.
Shortell and Bryant and individuals at Needham and Latham
maintained an interface with Mr. Hong.
The following disclosure replaces the second paragraph on page
23 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On February 24, 2012, our
Transaction Committee held a telephonic meeting with
representatives from Needham and Latham and Messrs. Shortell and
Bryant. Needham updated the Transaction Committee on its recent
conversations with UNICOM. Representatives from Needham noted that
UNICOM had been made aware of Network Engines' intent to contact
other potential acquirers and to conduct a market check of parties
that might have an interest in acquiring Network Engines.
Management reviewed, and the Transaction Committee approved, the
list of 21 parties, including UNICOM, that Needham planned to begin
contacting on February 27, 2012. The
list of parties to be contacted by Needham included Firm A, along
with 16 other potential strategic buyers and 4 potential financial
buyers. Our management also reviewed a top-side financial
forecast for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 that our management had
prepared and reviewed with Needham and that would be included in
the information provided to interested parties after they signed a
non-disclosure agreement.
The following disclosure replaces the third paragraph on page 23
of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
Between February 21, 2012 and
April 12, 2012, representatives of
Needham contacted 21 parties, including UNICOM, to assess these
parties' interest in a potential transaction with Network Engines.
Of these 21 parties, 10 executed non-disclosure agreements,
including Firm A which signed an NDA on March 2, 2012 and the company later referred to
as Firm B, which executed an NDA on February
28, 2012. Only UNICOM submitted a preliminary,
non-binding indication of interest on or before April 6, 2012.
The following disclosure replaces the first full paragraph on
page 24 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On March 26, 2012, our Transaction
Committee held a telephonic meeting in consultation with Latham,
Needham and Messrs. Shortell and Bryant. Needham updated the
Transaction Committee on conversations with UNICOM after their
on-site due diligence visits at each of Network Engines' facilities
during the prior week. Needham also updated the Transaction
Committee on the 11 other parties that expressed interest in
acquiring Network Engines as a result of Needham's outreach
initiative and market check. Those 11 other parties were part
of the initial 21 parties contacted by Needham. The
Transaction Committee discussed the plan of expected activities for
this week and asked questions of Needham and Latham. The
Transaction Committee also discussed with Needham the plan and
timing of asking the other parties to submit formal bids to acquire
Network Engines.
The following disclosure replaces the fifth full paragraph on
page 24 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On April 10, 2012, Mr. Hong and
representatives of UNICOM notified representatives of Needham that
in light of the findings of its due diligence performed in February
and March, UNICOM was revising its proposed purchase price to
$1.70 per share of common stock of
Network Engines due in part to concerns regarding Network Engines'
concentration of customers and the accompanying impact on
revenue.
The following disclosure replaces the first full paragraph on
page 27 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
On June 15, 2012, Messrs. Shortell
and Bryant had a telephonic meeting with representatives from
Needham, Latham and the Transaction Committee. Mr. Bryant reviewed
the adjustments being made to the 2013 financial forecast model
with the latest market and customer inputs. Mr. Bryant noted a
decrease in revenue with respect to a particular major customer, as
well as a renewal for another year of certain services provided by
NEI to another major customer, were likely to occur. The
Committee discussed the potential impact of these anticipated
events and determined that the net effect thereof on the
Corporation's 2013 financial forecast would be minimal. The
parties discussed the remaining open items in the merger agreement
as well as the schedule for a meeting of our board of directors.
Following the telephonic meeting, the 2013 financial forecast was
provided to Mr. Hong and UNICOM.
The following disclosure replaces the third full paragraph on
page 27 of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
Between June 19, 2012 and
July 18, 2012, representatives of
Needham contacted 45 potential strategic and financial buyers to
gauge their interest in pursuing a possible transaction with
Network Engines, including the 20 parties initially contacted by
Needham between February 21, 2012 and
April 12, 2012 as part of our market
check. The only party that expressed an interest in the company was
Talden Capital, which was provided with diligence information and
given the opportunity to ask questions of management and Needham.
No offer was received. Additionally, following the announcement of
our transaction with UNICOM on June 19,
2012, our management and board of directors authorized
Needham to contact an additional 25 potential buyers who were not
contacted in the market check. Of these potential buyers, 36
were considered strategic buyers and 9 were considered financial
buyers. None of the 45 parties so contacted submitted an
acquisition proposal.
The following disclosure should be inserted as the first
paragraph on page 34 of the Proxy Statement under the caption
"Background":
Breakdown of the market capitalizations (in thousands) and
calculated multiples of the Selected Companies
|
|
|
Enterprise Value /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
Price / Non-GAAP EPS
|
|
Company
|
Value
|
|
LTM
|
|
CY'12E
|
|
CY'13E
|
|
LTM
|
|
CY'12E
|
|
CY'13E
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
CY'1E
|
|
|
CY'13E
|
|
Arrow
Electronics, Inc.
|
$3,764,435
|
|
0.25x
|
|
0.25x
|
|
0.24x
|
|
5.0x
|
|
5.3x
|
|
4.8x
|
|
6.2x
|
|
7.0x
|
|
6.3x
|
|
Avnet,
Inc.
|
$4,599,679
|
|
0.22x
|
|
0.22x
|
|
0.21x
|
|
5.2x
|
|
5.2x
|
|
4.9x
|
|
6.9x
|
|
7.2x
|
|
6.5x
|
|
Benchmark
Electronics, Inc.
|
$813,524
|
|
0.23x
|
|
0.21x
|
|
0.20x
|
|
5.8x
|
|
4.3x
|
|
3.7x
|
|
12.2x
|
|
11.7x
|
|
9.7x
|
|
DataTec
Ltd.
|
$1,053,395
|
|
0.23x
|
|
0.21x
|
|
0.19x
|
|
6.0x
|
|
5.2x
|
|
4.6x
|
|
11.7x
|
|
NA
|
|
8.8x
|
|
Dot Hill
Systems Corp.
|
$72,959
|
|
0.17x
|
|
0.15x
|
|
0.15x
|
|
NM
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
NM
|
|
25.0x
|
|
9.6x
|
|
Flextronics International Ltd.
|
$4,370,720
|
|
0.17x
|
|
0.20x
|
|
0.18x
|
|
4.3x
|
|
4.1x
|
|
3.6x
|
|
7.2x
|
|
6.2x
|
|
5.6x
|
|
Ingram
Micro, Inc.
|
$2,641,110
|
|
0.05x
|
|
0.05x
|
|
0.05x
|
|
3.5x
|
|
3.5x
|
|
3.1x
|
|
8.6x
|
|
8.8x
|
|
7.7x
|
|
Jabil
Circuit Inc.
|
$3,928,877
|
|
0.27x
|
|
0.26x
|
|
0.24x
|
|
4.4x
|
|
4.2x
|
|
3.8x
|
|
7.8x
|
|
7.1x
|
|
6.1x
|
|
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
|
$602,280
|
|
0.19x
|
|
0.20x
|
|
0.19x
|
|
3.6x
|
|
4.4x
|
|
4.4x
|
|
5.2x
|
|
5.7x
|
|
5.0x
|
|
ScanSource
Inc.
|
$871,457
|
|
0.30x
|
|
0.28x
|
|
NA
|
|
6.7x
|
|
6.6x
|
|
NA
|
|
10.4x
|
|
11.7x
|
|
NA
|
|
Super
Micro Computer Inc.
|
$675,566
|
|
0.62x
|
|
0.54x
|
|
0.49x
|
|
9.1x
|
|
7.5x
|
|
5.7x
|
|
15.6x
|
|
13.3x
|
|
10.1x
|
|
SYNNEX
Corp.
|
$1,265,751
|
|
0.14x
|
|
0.14x
|
|
0.13x
|
|
4.9x
|
|
4.9x
|
|
4.5x
|
|
7.3x
|
|
8.0x
|
|
7.3x
|
|
Tech Data
Corp.
|
$1,903,254
|
|
0.06x
|
|
0.06x
|
|
0.06x
|
|
3.7x
|
|
3.7x
|
|
3.6x
|
|
7.8x
|
|
8.3x
|
|
8.0x
|
|
Xyratex
Ltd.
|
$314,801
|
|
0.11x
|
|
0.12x
|
|
0.12x
|
|
2.2x
|
|
2.0x
|
|
NA
|
|
7.8x
|
|
7.1x
|
|
7.0x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following disclosure should be inserted as the fourth
paragraph on page 35 of the Proxy Statement under the caption
"Background":
Breakdown of the date, size (in millions), and calculated
multiples of the Selected Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
Close
Date
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
Equity
Value
|
Enterprise Value
|
LTM
Revenue
|
NTM
Revenue
|
LTM
Adjusted EBITDA
|
NTM
Adjusted EBITDA
|
05/31/12
|
|
Viasystems
Group, Inc.
|
|
DDi
Corp.
|
$279.3
|
$265.2
|
1.00x
|
0.95x
|
7.2x
|
6.5x
|
03/30/12
|
|
Salient
Federal Solutions, Inc.
|
|
ATS
Corporation
|
$74.1
|
74.6
|
0.82x
|
0.73x
|
6.9x
|
5.3x
|
03/01/12
|
|
Bertelsmann AG (arvato Systems GmbH)
|
|
Perdata
|
$24.0
|
24.0
|
0.66x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
01/30/12
|
|
Avnet,
Inc.
|
|
Pinnacle
Data Systems, Inc.
|
$20.5
|
19.0
|
0.72x
|
0.59x
|
11.2x
|
NA
|
12/31/11
|
|
WidePoint
Corporation
|
|
Avalon
Global Solutions, Inc.
|
$11.5
|
11.6
|
1.36x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
12/30/11
|
|
Presidio,
Inc.
|
|
INX
Inc.
|
$96.4
|
148.2
|
0.40x
|
0.36x
|
24.4x
|
11.0x
|
10/03/11
|
|
Datalink
Corp.
|
|
Midwave
Corporation
|
$19.0
|
21.2
|
0.30x
|
NA
|
7.3x
|
NA
|
09/20/11
|
|
Arrow
Electronics, Inc.
|
|
Chip One
Stop
|
$92.3
|
69.4
|
1.68x
|
NA
|
13.4x
|
NA
|
08/01/11
|
|
OnX
Enterprise Solutions
|
|
Agilysys,
Inc. (Technology Solutions Group)
|
$64.0
|
64.0
|
0.14x
|
0.12x
|
7.4x
|
NA
|
07/05/11
|
|
Dynamics
Research Corporation
|
|
High
Performance Technologies, Inc.
|
$143.0
|
141.9
|
1.37x
|
NA
|
9.7x
|
NA
|
07/04/11
|
|
Datatec
Limited
|
|
Netarx
LLC
|
$34.0
|
34.0
|
0.57x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
07/01/11
|
|
Telephone
and Data Systems, Inc.
|
|
OneNeck IT
Services Corporation
|
$95.9
|
95.9
|
2.59x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
06/01/11
|
|
URS
Corporation
|
|
Apptis
Holdings, Inc.
|
$260.0
|
260.0
|
0.90x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
04/15/11
|
|
ScanSource, Inc.
|
|
CDC Brasil
S.A.
|
$65.7
|
66.9
|
0.43x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
04/04/11
|
|
Epiq
Systems, Inc.
|
|
Encore
Discovery Solutions
|
$104.3
|
99.4
|
2.42x
|
2.84x
|
9.2x
|
11.6x
|
04/01/11
|
|
Computacenter plc
|
|
Top Info
SAS
|
$55.1
|
28.5
|
0.14x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
03/17/11
|
|
PC
Connection, Inc.
|
|
ValCom
Technology
|
$11.5
|
6.7
|
0.17x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
03/01/11
|
|
Arrow
Electronics, Inc.
|
|
Richardson
Electronics, Ltd. (RF, Wireless and Power Division)
|
$236.0
|
236.0
|
0.63x
|
0.63x
|
NA
|
10.6x
|
01/21/11
|
|
API
Technologies Corp.
|
|
SenDEC
Corporation
|
$91.3
|
58.9
|
0.53x
|
0.55x
|
6.8x
|
5.4x
|
01/12/11
|
|
CSE Global
Limited
|
|
ASTIB
Group Pty Ltd
|
$49.0
|
47.5
|
1.42x
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
01/03/11
|
|
Arrow
Electronics, Inc.
|
|
Nu
Horizons Electronics Corp.
|
$135.9
|
148.8
|
0.21x
|
0.22x
|
10.7x
|
13.5x
|
The following disclosure should be inserted as the fourth
paragraph on page 36 of the Proxy Statement under the caption
"Background":
Breakdown of the date and calculated premiums of the
transactions underlying the Stock Price Premium Analysis:
Close
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums Paid
|
Date
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
1
Day
|
5
Days
|
30
Days
|
03/30/12
|
|
Salient
Federal Solutions, Inc.
|
ATS
Corporation
|
(1.5%)
|
(1.5%)
|
0.3%
|
12/30/11
|
|
Presidio,
Inc.
|
|
INX
Inc.
|
15.9%
|
11.2%
|
23.1%
|
11/21/11
|
|
ARRIS
Group, Inc.
|
|
BigBand
Networks, Inc.
|
76.4%
|
80.6%
|
56.6%
|
06/16/11
|
|
Vector
Capital
|
|
RAE
Systems Inc.
|
116.3%
|
120.6%
|
196.1%
|
05/31/11
|
|
PAETEC
Holding Corporation
|
XETA
Technologies, Inc.
|
43.2%
|
56.3%
|
87.1%
|
05/10/11
|
|
Golden
Gate Capital
|
|
Tollgrade
Communications, Inc.
|
0.2%
|
2.0%
|
7.4%
|
04/19/11
|
|
Golden
Gate Capital
|
|
Conexant
Systems, Inc.
|
27.0%
|
47.2%
|
71.4%
|
04/14/11
|
|
Summit
Partners
|
|
Answers
Corporation
|
18.0%
|
22.1%
|
33.1%
|
01/28/11
|
|
ASSA ABLOY
AB
|
|
LaserCard
Corporation
|
40.4%
|
38.0%
|
34.1%
|
12/13/10
|
|
Stefanini
International Holdings Ltd
|
TechTeam
Global, Inc.
|
16.8%
|
18.4%
|
30.4%
|
11/30/10
|
|
Zoran
Corporation
|
|
Microtune,
Inc.
|
18.2%
|
28.1%
|
24.8%
|
11/23/10
|
|
Marlin
Equity Partners
|
|
Phoenix
Technologies Ltd.
|
39.1%
|
34.6%
|
46.9%
|
10/01/10
|
|
Kenexa
Corporation
|
|
Salary.com, Inc.
|
42.3%
|
40.8%
|
50.2%
|
07/21/10
|
|
NTT DATA
Corporation
|
|
Intelligroup, Inc.
|
27.7%
|
27.4%
|
17.7%
|
05/25/10
|
|
Thoma
Bravo LLC
|
|
PLATO
Learning, Inc.
|
14.1%
|
16.7%
|
35.3%
|
04/30/10
|
|
Microsemi
Corporation
|
|
White
Electronic Designs Corporation
|
28.2%
|
29.4%
|
37.8%
|
04/22/10
|
|
Pegasystems, Inc.
|
|
Chordiant
Software, Inc.
|
31.2%
|
37.7%
|
35.1%
|
03/18/10
|
|
Francisco
Partners
|
|
QuadraMed
Corporation
|
32.6%
|
32.4%
|
14.7%
|
02/18/10
|
|
IXYS
Corporation
|
|
ZiLOG,
Inc.
|
21.1%
|
18.7%
|
32.8%
|
01/27/10
|
|
ON
Semiconductor Corporation
|
|
California
Micro Devices Corporation
|
54.1%
|
52.6%
|
57.2%
|
The following disclosure replaces the first paragraph on page 37
of the Proxy Statement under the caption "Background":
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Needham performed illustrative
discounted cash flow analyses to determine indicators of
illustrative implied equity values for the Company and illustrative
implied equity values per share of our common stock based on our
management's forecasts. Needham did not treat stock-based
compensation as a cash expense for the purpose of this
analysis. Needham calculated ranges of estimated present
value of free cash flows determined by the Company for the periods
between the fiscal fourth quarter of 2012 until fiscal year 2017,
using a range of discount rates of 20.0% to 23.0%. In this
context, "free cash flows" is defined as the sum of cash flow from
operations and cash flow from investing activities. The range
of discount rates was derived by utilizing a weighted average cost
of capital analysis based on certain financial metrics, including
betas for the Company, the U.S. twenty-year treasury rate as of
June 18, 2012, and the equity market
risk premium and micro cap size premium as published by Ibbotson at
the time Needham conducted its analysis. The discount rates ranging
from 20.0% to 23.0% were based upon Needham's judgment of an
illustrative range based upon the above analysis. Needham then
calculated ranges of estimated present values of terminal value by
multiplying fiscal year 2017 estimated adjusted EBITDA of
approximately $12.2 million by
selected multiples ranging from 2.5x to 5.0x, and using a range of
discount rates of 20.0% to 23.0%. The range of selected multiples
was based upon Needham's judgment of an illustrative range based
upon the Enterprise value to LTM adjusted EBITDA multiples for us
and the selected companies, as set forth above in the "Selected
Companies Analysis" section of this proxy statement. Needham then
added these ranges of estimated present value of free cash flows to
the ranges of estimated present values of terminal value to arrive
at ranges of estimated implied enterprise value. Needham then added
to these ranges of estimated implied enterprise value the Company's
estimated cash balance as of June 30th,
2012, based on management estimates, to arrive at estimates
of implied equity values. Needham then divided these estimates of
implied equity values by the Company's fully-diluted common shares
outstanding to arrive at estimates of implied equity values per
share of our common stock. No implied perpetuity growth rates
were observed by Needham.
The following disclosure replaces the figure for 2016 EBITDAs in
the table on page 73 of the Proxy Statement under the caption
"Projected Financial Information":
NEI's projected EBITDAs for 2016 is $11,916.
About NEI
NEI is a leading provider of server-based application platforms
and lifecycle support services for software developers and OEMs
worldwide. Through its expertise and comprehensive suite of
solution design, system integration, application management, global
logistics, support, and maintenance services, NEI is redefining
application deployment solutions to provide customers with a
sustainable competitive advantage. More than a decade of appliance
innovation with the ability to provide physical, virtual and
cloud-ready solutions makes NEI one of the most trusted software
deployment partners in the industry. Founded in 1997, NEI is
headquartered in Canton,
Massachusetts, with facilities in Plano, Texas and Galway, Ireland, and
trades on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol NEI. For more
information, visit www.nei.com.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this press release regarding the Company's future
performance, including statements regarding the proposed sale of
NEI and any other statements about the future expectations,
beliefs, goals, plans or prospects of the Company or the Company's
management, constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The accuracy of these statements cannot be guaranteed as they are
subject to a variety of risks, including but not limited to the
inability to obtain stockholder approval for the transaction, the
inability to satisfy closing conditions to the transaction, the
loss of any key customer or customer product lines, the loss of key
suppliers, our ability to retain key personnel and those other
factors contained in the Company's most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 and the
most recent Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012
under the sections entitled "Risk Factors" in such reports as well
as other documents that may be filed by the Company from time to
time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking
statements include statements regarding the Company's expectations,
beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and can be
identified by forward-looking words such as "anticipate,"
"believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may,"
"should," "will," and "would" or similar words. The Company assumes
no obligations to update the information included in this press
release.
Contact:
Hayden IR
Peter Seltzberg
646-415-8972
peter@haydenir.com
ir@nei.com
SOURCE NEI