ASV ASV Holdings Inc

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

(In thousands, except par value and per share data)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

Nature of Operations

ASV Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “ASV”) primarily designs, manufactures and markets compact track loaders and skid steer loaders as well as related parts for use primarily in the construction, landscaping, and agricultural industries. The Company’s headquarters and manufacturing facility is located in Grand Rapids, Minnesota. Products are marketed and sold in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Latin America.

Corporate Conversion and  Initial Public Offering

On May 11, 2017, pursuant to a Plan of Conversion adopted by the Members and Board of Managers of A.S.V., LLC as of April 25, 2017, the Company converted from a Minnesota limited liability company into a Delaware corporation and changed its name from A.S.V., LLC to ASV Holdings, Inc.  In conjunction with this corporate conversion, the Company filed a certificate of incorporation  (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the bylaws of the Company (the “Bylaws”) became effective. Both the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws were approved by the Board of Managers and Members of A.S.V., LLC prior to corporate conversion. Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue up to 50,000 shares of common stock $0.001 par value per share and 5,000 shares of preferred stock $0.001 par value per share.  All references in the unaudited interim condensed financial statements to the number of shares and per-share amounts of common stock have been retroactively restated to reflect the corporate conversion.

On May 17, 2017, the Company completed its underwritten initial public offering (“IPO”) of 3,800 shares of the Company’s common stock, including 1,800 shares sold by the Company and 2,000 shares sold by Manitex International, Inc. (“Manitex”), at a price to the public of $7.00 per share.  After underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company, the Company received net proceeds of $10,405 from the offering. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by Manitex.

On May 23, 2017, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option in full by purchasing an additional 570 shares of the Company’s common stock from A.S.V. Holding, LLC, a selling stockholder in the IPO and subsidiary of Terex Corporation (“Terex”), at the IPO price of $7.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by A.S.V. Holding, LLC.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited financial statements, included herein, have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Pursuant to these rules and regulations, the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and have been consistently applied. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our prospectus dated May 12, 2017 (the “Prospectus”), as filed with the SEC on May 15, 2017 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

The unaudited financial statements include all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position as of September 30, 2017 and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. Results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates  

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Company to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures and contingencies. The Company evaluates estimates used in preparation of the accompanying financial statements on a continual basis. There have been no significant changes to the critical accounting policies

4

described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , ” to the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 201 6 included in the Prospectus dated May 12, 2017.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 6, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements.” 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on individual customer review and current economic conditions. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts at least quarterly. Individual balances exceeding a threshold amount that are over 90 days past due are reviewed individually for collectability. All other balances are reviewed on a pooled basis by type of receivable. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when the Company determines it is probable the receivable will not be recovered.

The balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts was $85 and $63 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue and related costs are recorded when title and risk of loss passes to dealers and OEM customers. The Company’s typical terms are FOB shipping point and Ex-Works, which results in revenue being recognized and invoicing of dealers and OEM customers upon shipment from the Company’s facilities and when the Company’s products are picked up from the Company’s facilities, respectively.

The Company’s policy requires in all instances certain minimum criteria be met in order to recognize revenue, specifically:

In addition, the Company’s policies regarding discounts, returns, post shipment obligations, customer acceptance, credits, rebates and protection or similar privileges are as follows:

Accrued Warranties

The Company records accruals for potential warranty claims based on its claim experience. The Company’s products are typically sold with a standard warranty covering defects that arise during a fixed period.

5

A liability for estimated warranty claims is accrued at the time of sale. The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience for each product sold. Histor ical claim experience may be adjusted for known design improvements or for the impact of unusual product quality issues. Warranty reserves are reviewed quarterly to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may affect the potential warr anty liability.

Litigation Claims

In determining whether liabilities should be recorded for pending litigation claims, the Company must assess the allegations and the likelihood that it will successfully defend itself. When the Company believes it is probable that it will not prevail in a particular matter, it will then record an estimate of the amount of liability based, in part, on advice of outside legal counsel.

Defined Benefit Plan

The Company sponsors a nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for a former senior executive. The SERP is unfunded. The Company accounts for this plan pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 710, “Compensation – General.” This guidance requires balance sheet recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of the defined benefit plan. Actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs or credits, and any remaining transition assets or obligations that have not been recognized under previous accounting guidance must be recognized in the Statement of Operations. The defined benefit obligation for this plan as of September 30, 2017 is $795, of which, $64 and $731 is reflected in “Accrued Other” and “Other Long-Term Liabilities,” respectively, on the balance sheet.  The balance at December 31, 2016 was $837, of which, $64 and $773 was reflected in the “Accrued Other” and “Other Long-Term Liabilities,” respectively.  The Company expects to make annual benefit payments of $64 per year over the next five years.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Such costs are incurred in the development of new products or significant improvements to existing products.

Income Taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of federal and state taxes, as applicable, in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that it expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments as necessary.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $(372), which consists of a federal and state income tax provision of $575 offset by a discrete income tax benefit of $(947) related primarily to the recognition of a deferred tax asset related to a change in tax status with the conversion from a Minnesota limited liability company to a Delaware corporation on May 11, 2017. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $257, which consists of a federal and state income tax provision.

Prior to May 11, 2017, the Company was taxed as partnership.  As such, the Company was not a tax paying entity and not subject to federal and state income tax purposes.  The income or loss of the Company was passed through to its members and their share was reported on their respective tax returns.

At September 30, 2017, the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions.  The Company records interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes in the accompanying Statement of Income.

Concentrations of Business and Credit Risk

Caterpillar Inc., an OEM customer, and CEG Distributions PTY Ltd., the Company’s Australian master distributor, accounted for 37% and 43% of the Company’s Net Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as well as 63% of the Company’s Accounts Receivable at September 30, 2017. Caterpillar Inc. and CEG Distributions PTY Ltd. accounted for 32% and 34% of the Company’s Net Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as well as 64% of the Company’s Accounts Receivable at December 31, 2016.  

6

Sales by major customer consisted of the following for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 :

Any disruptions to these two customer relationships could have adverse effects on the Company’s financial results. The Company manages dealer and OEM concentration risk by evaluating in advance the financial condition and creditworthiness of its dealers and OEM customers. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, if needed, based upon expected collectability.  Any reserves established for doubtful accounts is determined on a case-by-case basis when it is believed the payment of specific amounts owed to us is unlikely to occur. Although the Company has encountered isolated credit concerns related to its dealer base, management is not aware of any significant credit risks related to the Company’s dealer base and generally does not require collateral or other security to support account receivables, other than UCC related sales. The Company has secured a credit insurance policy for certain accounts with a policy limit of liability of not more than $8,600.

Revenue by geographic area consisted of the following for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

Note 3. Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. The company records excess and obsolete inventory reserves.  The estimated reserve is based on specific identification of excess or obsolete inventories.

Inventory consisted of the following as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

7

Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include patented and unpatented technology, trade names, customer relationships and other specifically identifiable assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives, which range from ten to twenty-five years.  Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when facts and circumstances indicate a potential impairment has occurred.

There are three fundamental methods applied to value intangible assets outlined in FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement.” These methods include the Cost Approach, the Market Approach, and the Income Approach. Each of these valuation approaches were considered in the Company’s estimation of value.

Trade names and trademarks, patented and unpatented technology:  Valued using the Relief from Royalty method, a form of both the Market Approach and the Income Approach. Because the Company has established trade names and trademarks and has developed patented and unpatented technology, the Company estimated that the benefit of ownership as the relief from the royalty expense that would need to be incurred in absence of ownership.

Customer relationships: Because there is a specific earnings stream that can be associated with customer relationships, the Company determined the fair value of these relationships based on the excess earnings method, a form of the Income Approach.

Technology: The Company holds a number of U.S. patents covering its undercarriage technology. The key patent related to the Company’s Posi-Track undercarriage and suspension expires in 2023. The average estimated useful life for the Company’s patents is ten years, but useful life is determined in part by any legal, regulatory or contractual provisions that limit useful life. The Company has and will continue to dedicate technical resources toward the further development of our products and processes in order to maintain its competitive position.

Intangible assets, net comprised the following as of September 30, 2017:

8

Intangible assets, net comprised the following as of December 31, 2016:

Amortization of other intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1,910 and $1,910, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill, representing the difference between the total purchase price and the fair value of assets (tangible and intangible) and liabilities at the date of acquisition, is reviewed for impairment annually, and more frequently as circumstances warrant, and written down only in the period in which the recorded value of such assets exceed their fair value. The Company selected September 30 as the date for the required annual impairment test.

Note 5. Related Party Transactions

Effective December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Distribution and Cross Marketing Agreement with Terex and Manitex (the “Terex Cross Marketing Agreement”) that set forth the terms under which the Company would manufacture and sell ASV products, certain services Terex would provide in assisting in the sales and marketing of ASV products and the costs to be paid by the Company in exchange for such services. The Terex Cross Marketing Agreement defines dealers and customers to which, and territories for which, Terex would have the exclusive right on behalf of the Company to market and sell Terex-branded ASV products. The Terex Cross Marketing Agreement defines the compensation to Terex for its machine sales selling expense, part sales selling expense and general and administrative costs associated with such sales. In addition, for the provision of marketing services by Terex, the Company would pay an annual fee of $250, subject to annual escalation of 3% plus 0.2% of net incremental sales. Unless terminated, the term of the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement is five years, and the parties may agree to renew for additional one year terms. The Company expensed $296 and $170 for services for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $888 and $1,150 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, under the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement.

Effective December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Terex (the “Terex Services Agreement”) that set forth the terms under which Terex would provide certain services to the Company and the Company will retain access to certain services provided by Terex and the compensation related thereto. The scope of the Terex Services Agreement covers amongst other items, temporary transition services arising from the transfer of majority ownership to Manitex, third party logistics services for parts fulfillment, warranty and field service and information technology (“IT”) services for both transitional and ongoing services. Unless terminated, the term of the Terex Services Agreement is specific to each service provided, and the parties may agree to renew for additional one year terms. The Company expensed $320 and $311 for services provided for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $1,010 and $960 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, under the Terex Services Agreement.  

Effective March 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Winddown and Termination of Distribution and Cross Marketing Agreement and Services Agreement with Terex and Manitex (the “Winddown Agreement”). Pursuant to the Winddown Agreement, Terex will continue to provide certain services to the Company following the completion of the IPO under the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement and the Terex Services Agreement, including parts sales, shipment and purchases and parts planning, customer parts phone support, and administrative services, including IT support and accounting input information for parts cost and pricing. Pursuant to the Winddown Agreement, these services will continue on a transitional basis. Terex no longer markets ASV machines under the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement and the Company is responsible for marketing all ASV machines to all distribution channels, but Terex will continue to market ASV parts under the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement during transition period. Pursuant to the Winddown Agreement, the Company will be permitted to produce and sell Terex-branded ASV products to existing Terex dealers and continue to use applicable Terex trademarks during the transition period and for one year after termination of the Winddown Agreement. The Company has the right to terminate any service related to parts sales and distribution upon six months’ notice to Terex, and the Company also has the right to terminate all services upon six months’ notice to Terex. After one year from the date of the Winddown Agreement, Terex will also have the right to terminate services upon six months’ notice.  In no event will the services continue beyond

9

December 19, 2019.  The Winddown Agreement does not immediately terminate the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement or the Terex Services Agreement, each of which will remain in effect until terminated in accordance with the Windd own Agreement. By notice dated October 5, 2017, the Company provided notice to Terex and Manitex of the termination, effective as of April 5, 2018, of all services provided by Terex thereunder.  Such notice also indicated that, also effective as of April 5 , 2018, the Terex Cross Marketing Agreement and Terex Services Agreement shall also be deemed terminated.   

Included in the Company’s Condensed Statements of Income are sales to Terex of $50 and $200  for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $229 and $1,471 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Also included are sales to Manitex of $1 and $1 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $24 and $1,147 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.   The Company recorded purchases from Terex of $1,127 and $2,175 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 respectively, and $4,832 and $6,090 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company also recorded charges for insurance and employee benefit costs from Manitex of $567 and $616 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $2,153 and $2,326 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Receivables from affiliates include $44 due from Terex and $0 due from Manitex (total $44) at September 30, 2017, and $501 due from Terex and $912 due from Manitex (total $1,413) at December 31, 2016.  

Payables from affiliates includes $1,120 due to Terex and $3 due to Manitex (total $1,123) at September 30, 2017, and $2,275 due to Terex and $23 due to Manitex (total $2,298) at December 31, 2016.

Note 6. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, “Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to borrowings be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the borrowing, consistent with debt discounts. The ASU does not affect the amount or timing of expenses for debt issuance costs.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” (“ASU 2015-15”), which amends, ASC 835-30, “Interest – Imputation of Interest”.  ASU 2015-15 clarifies the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with lines of credit.  These costs may be presented as an asset and amortized ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 as of January 1, 2016 on a retrospective basis, by recasting all prior periods shown to reflect the effect of adoption. Unamortized costs related to securing our revolving line of credit will continue to be presented in Non-Current Assets on the accompanying Balance Sheets.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by using only the lower of cost or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, for emerging growth companies, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the period ended March 31, 2017 on a prospective basis.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results for the period ended September 30, 2017.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), which includes multiple amendments intended to simplify aspects of share-based payment accounting. Amendments to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, and forfeitures will be applied using a modified retrospective transition method through a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Amendments to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement will be applied retrospectively, and amendments requiring the recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement are to be applied prospectively. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, for emerging growth companies, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the guidance for the period ended March 31, 2017.  The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results for the period ended September 30, 2017.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

10

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASU 2014-09”).  ASU 2014-09 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue resulting from contracts with cust omers and will supersede virtually all of the current revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gros s versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. In April 2016, the FASB issued AS U No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”), which clarifies guidance related to identifying the performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance contain ed in the new revenue recognition standard. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”), which addresses narrow-scope improvements to the guidance on collectability, noncash consideration and completed contracts at transition as well as providing a practical expedient for contract modifications at transition and an accounting policy election related to the presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ ASU 2016-20 ”). ASU 2016-20 is intended to clarify and suggest i mprovements to the application of current standards under Topic 606 and other Topics amended by ASU 2014-09 . ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, for emerg ing growth companies, with early adoption permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this standard on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," (“ASU 2016-01”). The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things, require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, for emerging growth companies. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities associated with the rights and obligations created by those leases.  The guidance for lessors is largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP.  Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months.  Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, for emerging growth companies, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230): Statement of Cash Flows” (“ASU 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, for emerging growth companies. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have its financial statements.

In December 2016, the FASB issued No. ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires that amounts described as restricted cash or cash equivalents must be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 will be effective in fiscal year 2020, for emerging growth companies, and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement of performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Instead, impairment will be measured using the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the reporting unit. The amended guidance also eliminates the requirement for any reporting unit with a zero or a negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and will require disclosure of the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting

11

unit with a zero or a negative carrying amount of net assets. This standard will be effective beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2022, for emerging growth companies. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwi ll impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The standard is to be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

Except as noted above, the guidance issued by the FASB during the current period is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 7. Litigation and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including product liability, general liability, workers’ compensation liability, and employment litigation, which have arisen in the normal course of operations. The Company is insured for product liability, general liability, workers’ compensation, employer’s liability, property damage and other insurable risk required by law or contract, with retained liability or deductibles. The Company has recorded and maintains an estimated liability in the amount of management’s estimate of the Company’s aggregate exposure for such retained liabilities and deductibles. For such retained liabilities and deductibles, the Company determines its exposure based on probable loss estimations, which requires such losses to be both probable and the amount or range of probable loss to be estimable. The Company believes it has made appropriate and adequate reserves and accruals for its current contingencies. On May 11, 2017, the Company obtained insurance coverage for product liability exposures, certain exposures related to general, workers’ compensation and automobile liability, catastrophic losses as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract.  The Company’s workers’ compensation policies have a $250 per claim deductible with a $1,000 aggregate deductible.  The Company also maintains an occurrence based product liability policy with a $500 per claim self-insured retention.

The product liability case Knezek v. Terex Corp, et. al., went to trial and on November 10, 2016, the jury awarded the plaintiff damages payable by the Company in the amount of $109. The verdict was subject to appeal and on January 12, 2017 a settlement agreement of $225 was reached, which was paid in full during the period ended March 31, 2017.

The product liability case Jones v. Terex Corp, et. al., an agreement of $1,600 was reached in March 2017. The Company agreed to pay $200 within 14 days of full execution of settlement agreement, followed thereafter by monthly payments in the amount of $82 per month for 17 months. Settlement for $53 was reached with co-plaintiff, Kerch, in June 2017.    

Note 9. Debt

Loan Facilities

On December 23, 2016, the Company completed a new unitranche credit agreement with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC”), and White Oak Global Advisors, LLC (“White Oak”) to provide a $65,000, 5-year credit facility (the “Credit Agreement’). This new facility replaced the Company’s previous revolving credit and term loan facilities with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Garrison Loan Agency Services LLC. The new facility consists of a $35,000 revolving credit facility (which is subject to availability based primarily on eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory), a Term Loan A facility of $8,500 and a Term Loan B facility of $21,500.  A total of $46,700 was drawn by the Company at closing of the Credit Agreement.

12

Revolving Loan Facility with PNC

On December 23, 2016, the Company entered into a $35,000 revolving loan facility with PNC as the administrative agent, which loan facility includes two sub-facilities: (i) a $2,000 letter of credit sub-facility, and (ii) a $3,500 swing loan sub-facility, each of which is fully reserved against availability under the revolving loan facility. The facility matures on December 23, 2021.

The $35,000 revolving loan facility is a secured financing facility under which borrowing availability is limited to existing collateral as defined in the agreement.  The maximum amount available is limited to (i) the sum of (a) up to 85% of Eligible Receivables, plus (b) 90% of Eligible Insured Foreign Receivables, plus (c) the lesser of (I) 95% of Eligible CAT Receivables, or $8,600 plus (ii) the lesser of (A) the sum of (I) up to 65% of the value of the Eligible Inventory (other than Eligible Inventory consisting of finished goods machines and service parts that are current), plus (II) 80% of the value of Eligible inventory consisting of finished goods machines, plus (III) 75% of the value of Eligible Inventory consisting of service parts that are current) or, (B) up to 90% of the appraised net orderly liquidation value of Eligible Inventory. Inventory collateral is capped at $15,000 less outstanding letters of credit and any reasonable reserves as established by the bank.  At September 30, 2017, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was capped at $18,735.  

At September 30, 2017, the Company had drawn $7,439 under the $35,000 revolving loan facility. The Company can opt to pay interest on the revolving credit facility at either a domestic rate plus a spread, or a LIBOR rate plus a spread.  The spread for domestic rate will range from 1% to 1.5% and LIBOR spread from 2% to 2.5% depending on the average undrawn availability (as defined in the loan agreement).  Funds borrowed under the LIBOR options can be borrowed for periods of one, two, or three months. The weighted average interest rate for the period ending September 30, 2017 was 3.6%.  Additionally, the bank assesses a 0.375% unused line fee that is payable monthly.

Term Loan A with PNC

On December 23, 2016, the Company entered into an $8,500 term loan (“Term Loan A”) facility with PNC as the administrative agent.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had no outstanding balance. The Company was required to use 40% of the net proceeds from the IPO to pay down amounts outstanding under its term loans.  In addition to the amount required of $4,160, the Company repaid the remaining Term Loan A balance of $4,128 and recorded an $83 loss on debt extinguishment charge.

Term Loan B with White Oak

On December 23, 2016, the Company entered into a $21,500 term loan (“Term Loan B”) facility with White Oak as the administrative agent.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had an outstanding balance of $18,388, less $553 debt issuance costs, for net debt of $17,835. The interest rate is fixed at a LIBOR rate plus 10% until delivery of the same reporting documents referenced above. After delivery of the reporting documents, the Company will pay interest at the LIBOR rate plus a spread of either 9% or 10% depending on the leverage ratio, provided that at no time will the LIBOR rate be less than 1%. The interest rate for the period ending September 30, 2017 was 10.3%.

The Company is obligated to make quarterly principal payments of $538 commencing on March 31, 2017. If the term loan is prepaid in full or in part prior to the maturity date, the Company will be required to pay a prepayment penalty.  If paid prior to December 23, 2017 the prepayment penalty will be equal to 2.0% of the prepayment.  The prepayment penalty percentage reduces each year towards the loan maturity date.  Any unpaid principal is due on maturity, which is December 23, 2021.  Interest is payable monthly beginning on December 31, 2016.

Covenants

The Company’s indebtedness is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets. The facilities contain customary limitations including, but not limited to, limitations on additional indebtedness, acquisitions, and payment of dividends. The Company is also required to comply with certain financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility and the term loans require the Company to maintain a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of not less than 1.20 to 1.0.  Additionally, the term loans require the Company not exceed a Leverage Ratio of 5.00 to 1.00 which shall step down to 2.85 to 1.00 by March 31, 2021

13

and also limits capital expenditures to $1,300 in any fiscal year. The Company was in compliance with all covenants for the period ended September 30, 2017 .

Note 10. Equity

2017 Equity Incentive Plan

On May 11, 2017, the Company adopted the ASV Holdings, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2017 Plan is 1,250 shares. The total number of shares reserved for issuance however, can be adjusted to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in the Company’s capital structure. The Company’s employees and members of the board of directors who are not the Company’s employees or employees of the Company’s affliliates are eligible to participate in the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. The 2017 Plan provides that the committee has the authority to, among other things, select plan participants, determine the type and amount of rewards, determine the award terms, fix all other conditions of any awards, interpret the plan and any plan awards. Under the 2017 Plan, the committee can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. The 2017 Plan requires that the exercise price for stock options and stock appreciation rights be not less then fair market value of the Company’s common stock on date of grant.

The Company awarded a total of 104 restricted stock units to employees and directors under the 2017 Plan on June 2, 2017. The restricted stock units are subject to the same conditions as the restricted stock awards except the restricted stock units will not have voting rights and the common stock will not be issued until the vesting criteria are satisfied.  

The following table contains information regarding restricted stock units:

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 53 restricted stock units to employees pursuant to the 2017 Plan. Restricted stock units of 9, 24 and 20 vest in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted 51 restricted stock units to officers pursuant to the 2017 Plan. Restricted stock units of 17, 17 and 17 vest on June 2, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

The value of the restricted stock is being charged to compensation expense over the vesting period. Compensation expense includes expense related to restricted stock units of $96 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $231 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additional compensation expense related to restricted stock units will be $110, $285, $212 and $58 for the remainder of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.