Amedica
Corporation
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Unaudited
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Product
revenue
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
3,208
|
|
|
$
|
4,330
|
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
7,462
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
|
(4,177
|
)
|
|
|
(3,526
|
)
|
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
Loss
on extinguishment of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,252
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Offering
costs
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
Other
income (loss), net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
Net loss before income
taxes
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,215
|
)
|
Deemed
dividend related to the beneficial conversion feature and accretion of a discount on series B preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,334
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,334
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(9,646
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,215
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
|
5,847,984
|
|
|
|
3,022,073
|
|
|
|
4,636,346
|
|
|
|
2,918,240
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Amedica
Corporation
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Unaudited
(in
thousands)
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Cash flow from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,215
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Amortization of
lease incentive for tenant improvements
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Non-cash interest
expense
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Loss on extinguishment
of debt
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Change in fair value
of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|
|
(2,183
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Loss on extinguishment
of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Provision for inventory
reserve
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,280
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(5,934
|
)
|
|
|
(3,430
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Purchase of intangible asset
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrant derivative
liabilities, net of issuance costs ($682)
|
|
|
7,577
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred
stock, net of issuance costs ($668)
|
|
|
6,754
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with the
exercise of warrants, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of debt
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,128
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
(3,324
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
14,387
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
(3,455
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
6,915
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
8,835
|
|
|
$
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing
and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt exchange
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Payment of debt with common stock
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Extinguishment of derivative liabilities
through exercise of warrants
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants issued in association with
debt
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash
flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
AMEDICA
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Amedica
Corporation was incorporated in the state of Delaware on December 10, 1996. Amedica Corporation is a materials company focused
on developing, manufacturing and selling silicon nitride ceramics that are used in medical implants and in a variety of industrial
devices. At present, Amedica Corporation commercializes silicon nitride in the spine implant market and believes that its silicon
nitride manufacturing expertise positions it favorably to introduce new and innovative products in the medical and non-medical
fields. Amedica Corporation also believes that it is the first and only company to commercialize silicon nitride medical implants.
Amedica Corporation acquired US Spine, Inc. (“US Spine”), a Delaware spinal products corporation with operations in
Florida, on September 20, 2010. Amedica Corporation and US Spine are collectively referred to as “Amedica” or “the
Company” in these condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s products are sold primarily in the United
States.
Basis
of Presentation
These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and include all assets and liabilities of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, US Spine. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. SEC rules and
regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, so long as the statements are not misleading.
In the opinion of management, these financial statements and accompanying notes contain all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented
herein. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial
statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,
filed with the SEC on March 29, 2018. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company’s significant accounting policies are set
forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.
GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the periods then ended. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates relate
to inventory, stock-based compensation, long-lived and intangible assets and the liability for preferred stock and common stock
warrants.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern,
which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business, and do not include
any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications
of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to its ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the
date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred net losses of $5.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and
used cash in operations of $5.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $226.3 million
and $220.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. To date, the Company’s operations have been
principally financed by proceeds received from the issuance of preferred and common stock, convertible debt and bank debt and,
to a lesser extent, cash generated from product sales. It is anticipated that the Company will continue to generate operating
losses and use cash in operating activities. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability
to increase sales, implement cost saving measures, maintain compliance with debt covenants and/or raise additional funds through
the capital markets. Whether and when the Company can attain profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities or
obtain additional financing is uncertain.
In
2016, the Company implemented certain cost saving measures, including workforce and office space reductions, and will continue
to evaluate additional cost savings alternatives during 2018. These additional cost savings measures may include additional workforce
and research and development reductions, as well as cuts to certain other operating expenses. In addition to these cost-saving
measures, the Company is taking measures to increase sales revenue. These efforts include actively generating additional
scientific and clinical data to have it published in leading industry publications. The unique features of the Company’s
silicon nitride material are not well known, and the Company believes that the publication of such data would help sales efforts
as the Company approaches new prospects. The Company is also making additional changes to the sales strategy, including a focus
on revenue growth of silicon nitride lateral lumbar implants, the recently developed pedicle screw system known as Taurus, a variation
of the Taurus system known as Taurus MIS and a newly developed interbody device known as C+CSC with Lumen.
The Company has common stock that is publicly
traded and has been able to successfully raise capital when needed since the date of the Company’s initial public offering.
The Company has engaged in discussions with investment and banking firms to examine financing alternatives, including options
to encourage the exercise of outstanding warrants and other lending alternatives. To this effect, in March 2018, the Company closed
on gross proceeds of $1.4 million, before payment of placement agent fees and costs on a warrant reprice and exercise transaction.
See discussion regarding Warrant Reprice March 2018 in Note 8 below. Additionally, on May 14, 2018, we closed on a public offering
of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million, which excludes underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company.
These uncertainties create substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Reverse
Stock Split
On
November 10, 2017, the Company effected a 1 for 12 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. The par value and
the authorized shares of the common and convertible preferred stock were not adjusted as a result of the reverse stock split.
All common stock share and per-share amounts for all periods presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements have
been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse stock split.
Significant
Accounting Policies
There
have been no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In
January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04
Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. The amendments in this guidance eliminate the requirement
to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill used to measure goodwill impairment charge (Step 2). As a result, an impairment
charge will equal the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the amount
of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting
unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. The
guidance is effective for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. Early adoption is permitted
for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The impact of this guidance for the Company will depend on the
outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests.
In
August 2016, the FASB updated accounting guidance on the following eight specific cash flow classification issues: (1) debt prepayment
or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates
that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; (3) contingent consideration payments made
after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned
life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions received from equity method investees;
(7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance
principle. Under existing U.S. GAAP, there is no specific guidance on the eight cash flow classification issues aforementioned.
These updates are effective for the Company for its annual period beginning January 1, 2019, and interim periods therein, with
early adoption permitted. The guidance in this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements
of the Company.
In
February 2016, the FASB updated the accounting guidance related to leases as part of a joint project with the International Accounting
Standards Board (“IASB”) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets
and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new guidance,
a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for capital and operating leases with lease terms of more than 12
months. Additionally, this update will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand
the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases, including qualitative and quantitative requirements. The
standard is effective for the Company for its annual period beginning January 1, 2020, and interim periods therein, with early
adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this new standard may have on its financial statements
but believes the most significant change will relate to building leases.
In
May 2014, in addition to several amendments issued during 2016, the FASB updated the accounting guidance related to revenue from
contracts with customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle
is that a company should recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. The standard defines a five-step process
to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process
than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for the Company for its annual period beginning January
1, 2019, and interim periods therein, and shall be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect
adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is in the preliminary stages of evaluating the impact that the new standard
will have on its financial statements.
The
Company has reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards, in order to determine their effects,
if any, on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Based on that review, the Company believes that no other
pronouncements will have a significant effect on its financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
In
March 2016, the FASB updated the accounting guidance related to stock compensation. This update simplifies the accounting for
employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding
requirements, as the well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for the Company for its
annual period beginning January 1, 2018. The guidance in this standard did not have a material impact on the financial statements
of the Company.
The Company early adopted
ASU 2017-11 -
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part
I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
with a Scope Exception.
This update changed the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or
embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities
or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is
indexed to an entity’s own stock. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion
option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round
feature. The adoption of this update did not change the accounting conclusions related to any instruments issued prior to the
adoption of this update as of January 1, 2018.
2.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Common Share
Basic
net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss
by the weighted-average number of common share equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method.
Dilutive common stock equivalents are primarily comprised of warrants for the purchase of common stock, Series B Convertible Preferred
stock and stock options. For all periods presented, there is no difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and
diluted shares outstanding because their effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the Company reporting a net loss. The Company
had potentially dilutive securities, shares of common stock, totaling approximately 21.2 million and 1.5 million as of June 30,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
3.
Inventories, net
Inventories
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
WIP
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,460
|
|
|
$
|
2,377
|
|
Finished goods included consigned inventory
totaling approximately $1.7 million and $0.5 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. As of June 30, 2018, inventories
totaling $1.2 million and $1.2 million were classified as current and long-term, respectively. Inventories classified as current
represent the carrying value of inventories as of June 30, 2018, that management estimates will be sold by June 30, 2019.
4.
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
$
|
4,685
|
|
|
$
|
4,685
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
Other patents and patent applications
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
Less: accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
(7,205
|
)
|
|
|
(6,936
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
2,432
|
|
|
$
|
2,651
|
|
Amortization
expense is expected to approximate $260,000 for the remainder of 2018, $536,000 per year through 2021, $369,000 in 2022 and total
$140,000 thereafter, until fully amortized.
5.
Fair Value Measurements
Financial
Instruments Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The
Company has issued certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock, which are considered derivative liabilities because they
have registration rights which could require a cash settlement and are re-measured to fair value at each reporting period in accordance
with accounting guidance. Fair value is based on the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, under a three-tier fair value hierarchy
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
Level
1 -
|
quoted
market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Level
2 -
|
observable
prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but corroborated by market data.
|
|
|
|
|
Level
3 -
|
unobservable
inputs reflecting management’s assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants.
These valuations require significant judgment.
|
The
Company classifies assets and liabilities measured at fair value in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to their fair value measurement. No financial assets were measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December
31, 2017. The following tables set forth the financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within
the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements as of June 30, 2018
|
|
Description
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock warrants
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,561
|
|
|
$
|
6,561
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements as of December 31, 2017
|
|
Description
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Derivative
liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock warrants
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,357
|
|
|
$
|
1,357
|
|
The
Company did not have any transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy
during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
Common
Stock
Warrants
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
(3,665
|
)
|
Issuances of warrants classified
as derivatives
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
Change
in fair value
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
(1,357
|
)
|
Issuances of warrants classified
as derivatives
|
|
|
(7,577
|
)
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
565
|
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Balance as of June 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
(6,561
|
)
|
Common
Stock Warrants
The
Company has issued certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock, which are considered derivative liabilities because they
have registration rights which could require a cash settlement and are re-measured to fair value at each reporting period in accordance
with accounting guidance. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of the
derivative liability was calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017, $6.1 million and $0.9 million of the derivative liability was calculated using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model.
The
assumptions used in estimating the common stock warrant liability using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model as of June 30,
2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
Weighted-average risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected volatility
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
107
|
%
|
The
assumptions used in estimating the common stock warrant liability using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model as of
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
Weighted-average risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Weighted average expected volatility
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
In
addition, if at any time after the second anniversary of the issuance of the warrant, both: (1) the 30-day volume weighted average
price of the Company’s stock exceeds $3.00; and (2) the average daily trading volume for such 30-day period exceeds $350,000,
the Company may call this warrant for $0.01 per share. Because of the call provisions, management believes the Monte Carlo Simulation
valuation model provides a better estimate of fair value for the warrants issued during July 2016 and January 2017 than the Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model.
6.
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued
liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
Payroll and related expense
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Final loan payment fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
Other
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
7.
Debt
L2
Capital Debt
On January 31, 2018, the Company signed a
promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of up to $0.84 million (the “L2 Note”) for an aggregate purchase
price of up to $0.75 million and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 68,257 shares of common stock of the Company
(the “Warrants”) at an exercise price of $3.31 per share. The maturity date is six months from date of funding. The
L2 Note bears interest at a rate of 8% per year and a default interest rate of 18% per year. The L2 Note may be converted by the
holder of the L2 Note at any time following an event of default. The conversion price of the L2 Note in the event of a default
is equal to the product of (i) 0.70 multiplied by (ii) the lowest volume weighted average price, or VWAP, of the Company’s
common stock during the 20-day trading period ending in the holder of the L2 note’s sole discretion on the last complete
trading day prior to conversion, or, the conversion date.
On May 14, 2018, the Company closed on an
underwritten public offering of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of $15.0
million. Part of the proceeds from this offering were used to pay off the outstanding debt with L2 Capital. The total payoff
amount totaled $1.1 million, with a net of $0.7 in principal and $0.4 in interest.
Hercules
and MEF I, LP/Anson Investments Debt Exchange
On
January 3, 2018, the Company entered into an Assignment Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) with MEF I, LP and
Anson Investments Master Fund (collectively the “Assignees” and each an “Assignee”), Hercules Technology
III, L.P. (“HT III”) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (“HC” and, together with HT III, “Hercules”),
pursuant to which Hercules assigned to the Assignees all amounts remaining due under the Loan and Security Agreement, dated June
30, 2014, as amended, between the Company and Hercules (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) and (2) the note (the “Hercules
Note”) between the Company and Hercules evidencing the amounts due under the Loan and Security Agreement. The total amount
assigned by Hercules to the Assignees in the aggregate was $2,264,623 and is secured by the same collateral underlying the Loan
and Security Agreement. Subsequently, the Company entered into an exchange agreement pursuant to which the Assignees agreed to
exchange the Hercules Term Loan obligation acquired by them for two senior secured convertible promissory notes issued by the
Company, each in the principal amount of $1.1 million for an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million, (the “Exchange
Notes”). The Exchange Notes will mature on February 3, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). The Exchange Notes bear interest
at a rate of 15% per annum. Prior to the Maturity Date, principal and interest accrued under the Exchange Notes is payable in
cash or, if certain conditions are met, payable in shares of common stock of the Company. All principal accrued under the Exchange
Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock (“Conversion Shares”) at the election of the
holders at any time at a fixed conversion price of $3.87 per share. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Assignees
are entitled to convert all or any part of their Exchange Notes at a conversion price (the “Alternate Conversion Price”)
equal to 70% of the lowest traded price of the Company’s common stock during the ten trading days prior to the conversion
date, provided that (i) in no event may the Alternate Conversion Price be less than $1.75 per share and (ii) the Assignees shall
not be entitled to receive more than 19.99% of the outstanding common stock. So long as these Exchange Notes remain outstanding
or the Assignees hold any Conversion Shares, the Company is prohibited from entering into any financing transaction pursuant to
which the Company sells its securities at a price lower than $1.75 per share. The Exchange Notes are secured by a first priority
security interest in substantially all assets, including intellectual property, of the Company and contains covenants restricting
payments to certain Company affiliates.
On
May 14, 2018, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants,
for gross proceeds of $15.0 million. Part of the proceeds from this offering were used to pay off the outstanding debt
with MEF I, L.P. and Anson Investments. The total payoff was $1.6 million, with $1.4 million in principal and $0.2
million in interest.
North
Stadium Term Loan – Related Party (Extension)
In July 2018, the Company entered into an
extension to the term loan with North Stadium Investments, LLC. The extension moved the due date of the loan from July 28, 2018
to October 28, 2018, at which time all principal and unpaid interest are due and payable. The monthly interest only payments
will continue through the payoff on October 28, 2018.
North
Stadium Term Loan – Related Party
On
July 28, 2017, the Company entered into a $2.5 million term loan (the “North Stadium Loan”) with North Stadium Investments,
LLC (“North Stadium”), a company owned and controlled by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board. The North Stadium Loan bears interest at 10% per annum and requires the Company to make monthly interest only payments
from September 5, 2017 through July 5, 2018. All principal and unpaid interest (if any) under the Loan are due and payable on
July 28, 2018. The North Stadium Loan is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets but is junior to the security
interest in assets encumbered by the Hercules Term Loan now held by MEF I and Anson Investments. In connection with the North
Stadium Loan, the Company also issued North Stadium a warrant to purchase up to 55,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
at a purchase price of $5.04 per share, subject to a 5-year term. The relative estimated value of the warrants on the date of
grant approximated $0.2 million, was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized as interest expense over the life of the
term loan.
Hercules
Term Loan
On
June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules which provided the Company with a $20.0 million
term loan. The Hercules Term Loan matured on January 1, 2018. The Hercules Term Loan included a $0.2 million closing fee, which
was paid to Hercules on the closing date of the loan. The closing fee was recorded as a debt discount and was amortized to interest
expense over the life of the loan. The Hercules Term Loan also included a non-refundable final payment fee of $1.7 million. The
final payment fee was accrued and recorded to interest expense over the life of the loan. On January 3, 2018, the Hercules Term
Loan and all amounts owing thereunder were assigned to MEF I and Anson Investments. See discussion above for a more detailed description
of that transaction.
See
discussion below with respect to the assignment of $3.0 million of the principal balance of the Hercules Term Loan to Riverside
Merchant Partners, LLC (“Riverside”) and the subsequent agreement between the Company and Riverside to exchange the
$3.0 million of the Hercules Term Loan held by Riverside for subordinated convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal
amount of $3.0 million.
Hercules
and Riverside Debt Exchange
On
April 4, 2016, the Company entered into an Assignment and Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “Assignment
Agreement”) with Riverside and Hercules, pursuant to which Hercules sold $1.0 million of the principal amount outstanding
under the Hercules Term Loan to Riverside. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, Riverside acquired
an option to purchase an additional $2.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the Hercules Term Loan from Hercules.
Riverside subsequently exercised its option in full and acquired the additional $2.0 million of the outstanding principal amount
of the Hercules Term Loan.
Long-term
debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June
30, 2018
|
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Principal
|
|
|
Unamortized
Discount
and Debt
Issuance
Costs
|
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
Principal
|
|
|
Unamortized
Discount
and Debt
Issuance
Costs
|
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Hercules Term Loan
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
North Stadium
Loan
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
3,105
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
Less: Current
portion
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(2,479
|
)
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(2,961
|
)
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
8.
Equity
May-June
2018 Preferred Stock Conversion
During
both May 2018 and June 2018, Series B Convertible Preferred shareholders of the Company converted 4,072 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock into 3,086,570 shares of common stock.
May
2018 Warrant Exercise
During
March 2018, the Company repriced 832,000 warrants dated July 8, 2016. During May 2018, an additional 145,834 of the repriced warrants
were exercised resulting in gross proceeds of $0.3 million.
May
2018 Unit Offering
On
May 14, 2018, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering of units (“the Units”), consisting of convertible
preferred stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million, which excludes underwriting discounts and commissions
and offering expenses payable by Amedica. The offering was priced at a public offering price of $1,000 per unit. Each unit consisted
of one share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, with a stated value of $1,100, and warrants to purchase up to 758 shares
of common stock (the “May 2018 Warrants”). The May 2018 Warrants are initially exercisable at an exercise price of
$1.60 per share and expire 5 years from the date of issuance. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of common
stock by dividing the stated value of $1,100 by: (i) for the first 40 trading days following the closing of this offering, $1.4512
(the “Conversion Price”), (ii) after 40 trading days but prior to the 81st trading day, the lesser of (a)
the Conversion Price and (b) 87.5% of the lowest volume weighted average price for our Common Stock as reported at the close of
trading on the market reporting trade prices for the Common Stock during the five trading days prior to the 41st trading day,
and (iii) after 80 trading days, the lesser of (a) the Conversion Price and (b) 87.5% of the lowest volume weighted average
price for our Common Stock as reported at the close of trading on the market reporting trade prices for the Common Stock during
the five trading days prior to the date of the notice of conversion. In the case of (ii)(b) and (iii)(b) above, the share price
shall not be less than $0.48 (the “Floor Price”). Each of the Conversion Price and Floor Price is subject to adjustment
in certain circumstances.
The Company raised $15.0 million associated
with the issuance of the Units, with $6.8 million, net of issuance costs of $0.6 million, allocated to the preferred
stock and $6.9 million, net of issuance costs of $0.7 million, allocated to the warrants. In association with the warrants
that were recorded as a derivative liability, the Company immediately expensed approximately $0.7 million of issuance costs. The
15,000 preferred shares were initially convertible into 11,369,900 shares of common stock and had an effective conversion rate
of $1.45 per share based on the proceeds that were allocated to them. The conversion price was adjusted to $0.6543, effective
July 12, 2018.
Warrant
Reprice March 2018
During
the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company entered into a warrant amendment agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”)
with certain holders of previously issued Series E Common Stock Purchase Warrants (collectively, “Investors”). In
connection with that certain Series E Common Stock Purchase Warrant between the Company and Investors dated July 8, 2016, the
Company issued to Investors warrants to purchase up to 832,000 shares of common stock (the “Warrant Shares”) at an
exercise price of $12.00 per share, (the “Investors Warrants”). Under the terms of the Amendment Agreement, in consideration
of Investors exercising 668,335 of the Investors Warrants (the “Warrant Exercise”), the exercise price per share of
the Investor Warrants was reduced to $2.125 per share. 668,335 of the Investors Warrants were exercised resulting in gross proceeds
to the Company of $1.4 million before payment of placement agent fees and costs. In addition, and as further consideration, the
Company issued to Investors new warrants to purchase up to the number of shares of common stock equal to 100% of the number of
Warrant Shares issued pursuant to the Warrant Exercise at an exercise price per share equal to $2.00 per share.
January
2017 Offering
During
2017, the Company completed a secondary offering in which the Company sold 741,667 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase
363,750 shares of common stock. The Company received approximately $3.9 million in proceeds from the offering, with $3.1 million,
net of issuance costs of $0.6 million, allocated to common stock and $0.8 million allocated to the warrants. In association with
the warrants that were recorded as a derivative liability, the Company immediately expensed $0.1 million of issuance costs. The
warrants became exercisable on the closing date, expire on the five-year anniversary of the closing date, and have an initial
exercise price per share equal to $6.60 subject to adjustments for events of recapitalization, stock dividends, stock splits,
stock combinations, reclassifications, reorganizations or similar events affecting the Company’s common stock.
July
2016 Offering
In
July 2016, the Company completed a secondary offering in which the Company sold 5,258,000 Class A Units, including 1,650,000 units
sold pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option, priced at $1.00 per unit, and 7,392 Class B
Units, priced at $1,000 per unit. Each Class A Unit consisted of 1/12th share of common stock and one warrant to purchase 1/12th
share of common stock. Each Class B Unit consisted of one share of preferred stock convertible into 83 shares of common stock
and warrants to purchase 83 shares of common stock. The securities comprising the units were immediately separable and were issued
separately. In total, the Company issued 438,167 shares of common stock, 7,392 shares of preferred stock convertible into 616,000
shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,054,167 shares of common stock at a fixed exercise price of $12.00 per share.
The Company received proceeds of approximately $11.4 million, net of underwriting and other offering costs.
The
Company raised $4.9 million associated with the Class A Units, with $2.5 million, net of issuance costs of $0.3 million, allocated
to the common stock and $2.4 million allocated to the warrants. The Company also raised $7.0 million associated with the Class
B Units with $3.6 million, net of issuance costs of $0.4 million, allocated to preferred stock and $3.4 million allocated to the
warrants. The $5.8 million allocated to warrants were recorded as a derivative liability. In association with the warrants that
were recorded as a derivative liability, the Company immediately expensed approximately $0.5 million of issuance costs. The 7,392
preferred shares were convertible into 616,000 shares of common stock and had an effective conversion rate of $6.48 per share
based on the proceeds that were allocated to them.
Subsequent
to the secondary offering, all 7,392 shares of convertible preferred stock have been converted into 616,000 shares of common stock.
Furthermore, the Company received $0.4 million and issued 37,208 shares of common stock upon the exercise of certain warrants
issued in the secondary offering.
9.
Stock-Based Compensation
A
summary of the Company’s outstanding stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is as follows:
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
$
|
264.26
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
As of June 30, 2018
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
$
|
264.26
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercisable as of June 30, 2018
|
|
|
10,161
|
|
|
$
|
272.59
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Expected to vest as of June 30, 2018
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
$
|
264.26
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
Company estimates the fair value of each stock option on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, which
requires several estimates including an estimate of the fair value of the underlying common stock on grant date. The expected
volatility was based on an average of the historical volatility of a peer group of similar companies. The expected term was calculated
utilizing the simplified method. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time
of grant for the expected term of the option.
Summary
of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Total
stock-based compensation expense included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Capitalized
into inventory
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
Unrecognized
stock-based compensation as of June 30, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Unrecognized
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Period
of
Recognition
(in
years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
10.
Commitments and Contingencies
From
time to time, the Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering matters that arise in the ordinary course
of its business activities. Management believes any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You
should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto, along with Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2017, filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking
statements based upon current beliefs, plans, expectations, intentions and projections that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and projections. Our actual results and the timing
of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors,
including those set forth under the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2017, and any updates to those risk factors filed from time to time in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We
are a materials company focused on developing, manufacturing and selling silicon nitride ceramics that are used in medical implants
and in a variety of industrial devices. At present, we commercialize silicon nitride in the spine implant market. We believe that
our silicon nitride manufacturing expertise positions us favorably to introduce new and innovative products in the medical and
non- medical fields. We also believe that we are the first and only company to commercialize silicon nitride medical implants.
We
have received 510(k) regulatory clearance in the United States, a CE mark in Europe, ANVISA approval in Brazil, and ARTG and Prostheses
approvals in Australia for a number of our devices that are designed for spinal fusion surgery. To date, more than 33,000 of our
silicon nitride devices have been implanted into patients, with a 10-year successful track record. In March 2018, we received
clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, to market a modified novel composite spinal fusion device
that combines porous and solid silicon nitride and is comparable to our commercially-available Valeo®C cervical implants.
We
believe that silicon nitride has a superb combination of properties that make it ideally suited for human implantation. Other
biomaterials are based on bone grafts, metal alloys, and polymers; all of which have practical limitations. In contrast, silicon
nitride has a legacy of success in the most demanding and extreme industrial environments. As a human implant material, silicon
nitride offers bone ingrowth, resistance to bacterial infection, resistance to corrosion, superior strength and fracture resistance,
and ease of diagnostic imaging, among other advantages.
We
market and sell our Valeo brand of silicon nitride implants to surgeons and hospitals in the United States and to selected markets
in Europe and South America through more than 50 independent sales distributors who are supported by an in-house sales and marketing
team. These implants are designed for use in cervical (neck) and thoracolumbar (lower back) spine surgery. In 2016, we entered
into a 10-year exclusive distribution agreement with Shandong Weigao Orthopaedic Device Company Limited (“Weigao”)
to sell Amedica-branded silicon nitride spinal fusion devices within the People’s Republic of China (“China”).
Weigao, a large orthopedic company, has expertise in acquiring Chinese Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) approval
of medical devices, and will assist us in obtaining regulatory approval. Weigao has committed to minimum purchase requirements
totaling 225,000 implants in the first six years following CFDA clearance. We are also working with other partners in Japan to
obtain regulatory approval for silicon nitride in that country. China and Japan are relevant because historically, ceramic implants
are more familiar to, and more readily accepted by surgeons outside the United States, i.e., in Asia and Europe.
In
addition to silicon nitride, we also sell metal-based products in the United States that provide surgeons and hospitals with a
complete package for spinal surgery. These metal products are designed to address spinal deformity and degenerative conditions.
Although metal products have accounted for approximately 61% and 51% of our product revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2018 and 2017, respectively, we remain focused on developing and promoting silicon nitride, and driving its adoption through a
scientifically-intense, data-driven strategy.
In
addition to direct sales, we have targeted original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and private label partnerships
in order to accelerate adoption of silicon nitride, both in the spinal space, and also in future markets such as hip and knee
replacements, dental, extremities, trauma, and sports medicine. Existing biomaterials, based on plastics, metals, and bone grafts
have well-recognized limitations that we believe are addressed by silicon nitride, and we are uniquely positioned to convert existing,
successful implant designs made by other companies into silicon nitride. We believe OEM and private label partnerships will allow
us to work with a variety of partners, accelerate the adoption of silicon nitride, and realize incremental revenue at improved
operating margins, when compared to the cost-intensive direct sales model.
We
believe that silicon nitride addresses many of the biomaterial-related limitations in fields such as hip and knee replacements,
dental implants, sports medicine, extremities, and trauma surgery. We further believe that the inherent material properties of
silicon nitride, and the ability to formulate the material in a variety of compositions, combined with precise control of the
surface properties of the material, opens up a number of commercial opportunities across orthopedic surgery, neurological surgery,
maxillofacial surgery, and other medical disciplines.
We
operate a 30,000 square foot manufacturing facility at our corporate headquarters in Salt Lake City, Utah, and we believe we are
the only vertically integrated silicon nitride medical device manufacturer in the world.
Components
of our Results of Operations
We
manage our business within one reportable segment, which is consistent with how our management reviews our business, makes investment
and resource allocation decisions and assesses operating performance.
Product
Revenue
We
derive our product revenue primarily from the sale of spinal fusion and fixation devices and related products used in the treatment
of spine disorders. Our product revenue is generated from sales to three types of customers: (1) surgeons and hospitals; (2) stocking
distributors; and (3) private label customers. Most of our products are sold on a consignment basis through a network of independent
sales distributors; however, we also sell our products to independent stocking distributors and private label customers. Product
revenue is recognized when all four of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2)
delivery of the products has occurred; (3) the selling price of the product is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. We generate the majority of our revenue from the sale of inventory that is consigned to independent sales
distributors that sell our products to surgeons and hospitals. For these products, we recognize revenue at the time we are notified
the product has been used or implanted and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. For all other transactions, we
recognize revenue when title and risk of loss transfer to the stocking distributor or private label customers, and all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. We generally recognize revenue from sales to stocking distributors and private label customers
at the time the product is shipped to the distributor. Stocking distributors and private label customers, who sell the products
to their customers, take title to the products and assume all risks of ownership at time of shipment. Our stocking distributors
and private label customers are obligated to pay within specified terms regardless of when, if ever, they sell the products. Our
policy is to classify shipping and handling costs billed to customers as an offset to total shipping expense in the statement
of operations, primarily within sales and marketing. In general, our customers do not have any rights of return or exchange.
Cost
of Revenue
The
expenses that are included in cost of revenue include all direct product costs if we obtained the product from third-party manufacturers
and our in-house manufacturing costs for the products we manufacture. We obtain our non-silicon nitride products, including our
metal products, from third-party manufacturers, while we currently manufacture our silicon-nitride products in-house.
Specific
provisions for excess or obsolete inventory are also included in cost of revenue. In addition, we pay royalties attributable to
the sale of specific products to some of our surgeon advisors that assisted us in the design, regulatory clearance or commercialization
of a particular product. These payments are recorded as cost of revenue.
Gross
Profit
Our
gross profit measures our product revenue relative to our cost of revenue. We expect our gross profit to decrease as we expand
the penetration of our silicon nitride technology platform through OEM and private label partnerships.
Research
and Development Expenses
Our
research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs consist of engineering, product development,
clinical trials, test-part manufacturing, testing, developing and validating the manufacturing process, manufacturing, facility
and regulatory-related costs. Research and development expenses also include employee compensation, employee and non-employee
stock-based compensation, supplies and materials, consultant services, and travel and facilities expenses related to research
activities. To the extent that certain research and development expenses are directly related to our manufactured products, such
expenses and related overhead costs are allocated to inventory.
As
we continue to develop new spinal fusion products, our product
candidates for total joint replacements, such as our total hip replacement product candidate, and dental applications, we expect
to increase our total research and development expenses.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
Sales
and marketing expenses consist of salaries, benefits and other related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel
employed in sales, marketing, medical education and training. In addition, our sales and marketing expenses include commissions
and bonuses, generally based on a percentage of sales, to our sales managers and independent sales distributors. We provide our
products in kits or banks that consist of a range of device sizes and separate instruments sets necessary to perform the surgical
procedure. We generally consign our instruments to our distributors or our hospital customers that purchase the device used in
spinal fusion surgery. Our sales and marketing expenses include depreciation of the surgical instruments.
We
expect our commissions to increase in absolute terms over time but remain approximately the same or decrease as a percentage of
product revenue.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and other related costs, including stock-based compensation
for certain members of our executive team and other personnel employed in finance, legal, compliance, administrative, information
technology, customer service, executive and human resource departments. General and administrative expenses also include other
expenses not part of the other cost categories mentioned above, including facility expenses and professional fees for accounting
and legal services.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
- Unaudited
The
following is a tabular presentation of our unaudited condensed consolidated operating results for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (
in thousands
):
|
|
Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
3,208
|
|
|
$
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,330
|
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
|
$
|
(1,507
|
)
|
|
|
-26
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
-28
|
%
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
-24
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
-39
|
%
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
-26
|
%
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
-2
|
%
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
-37
|
%
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
(1,104
|
)
|
|
|
-32
|
%
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
-16
|
%
|
|
|
7,462
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
-6
|
%
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
-18
|
%
|
|
|
(4,177
|
)
|
|
|
(3,526
|
)
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
-18
|
%
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
1429
|
%
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
(2,844
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
%
|
Net loss before taxes
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
(3,495
|
)
|
|
|
-158
|
%
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
$
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,495
|
)
|
|
|
-158
|
%
|
Product
Revenue - Unaudited
The
following table sets forth our product revenue from sales of the indicated product category for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Silicon
Nitride
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
-54
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,679
|
|
|
$
|
2,876
|
|
|
$
|
(1,197
|
)
|
|
|
-42
|
%
|
Non-Silicon
Nitride
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
-22
|
%
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
-10
|
%
|
Total
product revenue
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
3,208
|
|
|
$
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,330
|
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
|
$
|
(1,507
|
)
|
|
|
-26
|
%
|
For
the three months ended June 30, 2018, total product revenue was $2.0 million as compared to $3.2 million in the same period 2017,
a decrease of $1.2 million, or 36%. This decrease was due to the loss of surgeons and the renegotiation of pricing with some of
our hospital groups.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, total product revenue was $4.3 million as compared to $5.8 million in the same period 2017,
a decrease of $1.5 million, or 26%. This decrease was due to the loss of surgeons and the renegotiation of pricing with some of
our hospital groups.
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our unaudited product revenue by geographic area (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
2,022
|
|
|
$
|
3,179
|
|
|
$
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
|
|
$
|
(1,566
|
)
|
|
|
-27
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-41
|
%
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
Total
product revenue
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
3,208
|
|
|
$
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
-36
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,330
|
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
|
$
|
(1,507
|
)
|
|
|
-26
|
%
|
For
the three months ended June 30, 2018, domestic revenue decreased by $1.2 million, or 36%. This is attributable to the loss of
surgeons and the renegotiation of hospital pricing. International revenue decreased $12,000, or 41% as compared to the same period
in 2017. After our Australian distributor, new in 2018, made purchases during the first quarter of 2018, international sales have
followed the same pattern as our domestic sales.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, domestic revenue decreased by $1.5 million, or 27%. This is attributable to the loss of surgeons
and the renegotiation of hospital pricing. International revenue increased $0.06 million, or 88% as compared to the same
period in 2017. This is due to our Australian distributor, new in 2018, making purchases of instrumentation equipment and inventory.
Cost
of Revenue and Gross Profit
For the three months ended June 30, 2018,
our cost of revenue decreased $0.2 million, or 28%, as compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was due primarily to
a decline in sales. Gross profit decreased $0.9 million, also attributable to the decline in sales. Gross margin percentage decreased
3% to 74%, primarily due to negotiation of sales prices on select contracts.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, our
cost of revenue decreased $0.3 million, or 24%, as compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily due a decline
in sales. Gross profit decreased $1.2 million and was attributable to the corresponding decrease in revenue and cost of revenue.
Gross margin remained the same at 76%.
Research
and Development Expenses
For
the three months ended June 30, 2018, research and development expenses decreased $31,000, or 2%, as compared to the same period
in 2017. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in payroll related expenses of $78,000 offset by the increase
in various manufacturing expenses of $47,000.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, research and development expenses increased $0.2 million, or 8%, as compared to the same period
in 2017. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in clinical studies expense of $0.1 million, and consulting,
travel, product testing and fees expenses of $0.1 million.
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended June 30, 2018,
general and administrative expenses increased $32,000, or 3%, as compared to the same period in 2017. This increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in accounting and legal expenses of $78,000, related to capital raising activities, and tax
expense, offset by a decrease in payroll related expenses of $46,000.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 18%, as compared to the same
period in 2017. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in accounting and legal expenses of $0.2 million, related
to capital raising activities, and tax expense of $0.2 million related to the effectuating of the November 2017 1-12 stock split.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
For
the three months ended June 30, 2018, sales and marketing expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 37%, as compared to the same period
in 2017. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in commissions of $0.5 million due to the decrease in sales, and
a decrease in consulting, contracting, travel and marketing expense of $0.2 million.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 32%, as compared to the same period
in 2017. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in commissions of $0.8 million due to the decrease in sales, and
a decrease in consulting, contracting, travel and marketing expense of $0.3 million.
Other
Expense, Net
For
the three months ended June 30, 2018, other expense increased $0.3 million, or 1429%, as compared to the same period in
2017. This increase was primarily due to an increase in offering costs of $0.7 million related to the May 2018 public offering,
the increase in interest expense of $0.4 million related to the payoff of debt, offset by the change in the fair value of the
derivative liabilities in the amount of $0.8 million.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, other expense increased $2.8 million, or 217%, as compared to the same period in 2017. This
increase was primarily due to an increase in the loss on the extinguishment of derivative liabilities in the amount of $1.2 million,
the increase in offering costs of $0.6 million related to the issuance of warrant derivative liabilities, the increase in interest
expense of $0.5 million due to the extinguishment of debt, the increase in the loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million
and the increase in the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities in the amount of $0.2 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business, and do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications
of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to its ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the
date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we incurred net losses of $5.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and used cash
in operations of $5.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $226.3 million and $220.6 million
as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. To date, our operations have been principally financed by proceeds
received from the issuance of preferred and common stock, convertible debt and bank debt and, to a lesser extent, cash generated
from product sales. It is anticipated that we will continue to generate operating losses and use cash in operating activities.
Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to increase sales, implement cost saving measures, maintain
compliance with debt covenants and/or raise additional funds through the capital markets. Whether and when we can attain profitability
and positive cash flows from operating activities or obtain additional financing is uncertain.
In 2016, we implemented certain cost saving
measures, including workforce and office space reductions, and will continue to evaluate additional cost savings alternatives
during 2018. These additional cost savings measures may include additional workforce and research and development reductions,
as well as cuts to certain other operating expenses. In addition to these cost saving measures, the Company is taking measures
to increase sales revenue. These efforts include actively generating additional scientific and clinical data to have it published
in leading industry publications. The unique features of our silicon nitride material are not well known, and publication of such
data would help sales efforts as we approach new prospects. We are also making additional changes to the sales strategy, including
a focus on revenue growth of silicon nitride lateral lumbar implants and the recently developed pedicle screw system known as
Taurus, a variation of the Taurus system known as Taurus MIS and a newly developed interbody devise known as C+CSC with Lumen.
On May 14, 2018, we closed on a public offering
of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million, which excludes underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company.
These uncertainties create substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Cash Flows
- Unaudited
The
following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands)
– unaudited:
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(5,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,430
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Net cash provided
by financing activities
|
|
|
14,387
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Net increase/(decrease)
in cash used
|
|
$
|
8,296
|
|
|
$
|
(3,455
|
)
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Net
cash used in operating activities increased $2.5 million to $5.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared
to $3.4 million for the same period in 2017. Offset by the increase in the net loss and related non-cash add backs to the net
loss, the increase in cash used in operating activities during 2018 was primarily due to changes in the movement of working capital
items during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 as follows: a $0.8 million change in accounts
payable and accrued expenses, a $0.3 million change in inventories offset by a $0.4 million change in trade accounts receivable.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net
cash used in investing activities decreased $0.3 million to $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to
$0.5 million for the same period in 2017. The decrease in cash used in investing activities during 2018 was due to a net decrease
of $0.4 million in purchases of property and equipment offset by an increase of $0.1 million in purchase of intangible assets.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net
cash provided from financing activities was $14.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $0.5 million
during the same period in 2017. The $13.9 million increase in 2018 was primarily attributable to $6.9 million in proceeds received
from the issuance of warrant derivative liabilities, the $6.8 million in proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock, the $1.6
million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of warrants, the decrease of $1.0 million
is payments on debts and the $0.7 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt, offset by the decrease of $3.1 million in proceeds
from the issuance of common stock.
L2
Capital Debt
On
January 31, 2018, the Company signed a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of up to $840,000 (the “L2 Note”)
for an aggregate purchase price of up to $750,000 and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 68,257 shares of common stock
of the Company (the “Warrants”) at an exercise price of $3.31 per share. The maturity date is six months from date
of funding. The Note bears interest at a rate of 8% per year and a default interest rate of 18% per year. The Note may be converted
by the holder of the Note at any time following an event of default. The conversion price of the Note in the event of a default
is equal to the product of (i) 0.70 multiplied by (ii) the lowest volume weighted average price, or VWAP, of the Company’s
common stock during the 20-day trading period ending in the Holder’s sole discretion on the last complete trading day prior
to conversion, or, the conversion date.
On May 14, 2018, the Company closed on an
underwritten public offering of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million.
Part of the proceeds from this offering were used to pay off the outstanding debt with L2 Capital. The total payoff was $1.1
million, with $0.7 million in principal and $0.4 million in interest.
Hercules
and MEF I, LP/Anson Investments Debt Exchange
On
January 3, 2018, the Company entered into an Assignment Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) with MEF I, LP and
Anson Investments Master Fund (collectively the “Assignees” and each an “Assignee”), Hercules Technology
III, L.P. (“HT III”) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (“HC” and, together with HT III, “Hercules”),
pursuant to which Hercules assigned to the Assignees all amounts remaining due under the Loan and Security Agreement, dated June
30, 2014, as amended, between the Company and Hercules (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) and (2) the note (the “Hercules
Note”) between the Company and Hercules evidencing the amounts due under the Loan and Security Agreement. The total amount
assigned by Hercules to the Assignees in the aggregate was $2.3 million and is secured by the same collateral underlying the Loan
and Security Agreement. Subsequently, the Company entered into an exchange agreement pursuant to which the Assignees agreed to
exchange the Hercules Term Loan obligation acquired by them for two senior secured convertible promissory notes issued by the
Company, each in the principal amount of $1.1 million for an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million, (the “Exchange
Notes”). The Exchange Notes will mature on February 3, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). The Exchange Notes bear interest
at a rate of 15% per annum. Prior to the Maturity Date, principal and interest accrued under the Exchange Notes is payable in
cash or, if certain conditions are met, payable in shares of common stock of the Company. All principal accrued under the Exchange
Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock (“Conversion Shares”) at the election of the
holders at any time at a fixed conversion price of $3.87 per share. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Assignees
are entitled to convert all or any part of their Exchange Notes at a conversion price (the “Alternate Conversion Price”)
equal to 70% of the lowest traded price of the Company’s common stock during the ten trading days prior to the conversion
date, provided that (i) in no event may the Alternate Conversion Price be less than $1.75 per share and (ii) the Assignees shall
not be entitled to receive more than 19.99% of the outstanding Common Stock. So long as these Exchange Notes remain outstanding
or the Assignees hold any Conversion Shares, the Company is prohibited from entering into any financing transaction pursuant to
which the Company sells its securities at a price lower than $1.75 per share. The Exchange Notes are secured by a first priority
security interest in substantially all assets, including intellectual property, of the Company and contains covenants restricting
payments to certain Company affiliates.
On
May 14, 2018, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering of units, consisting of convertible preferred stock and warrants,
for gross proceeds of $15.0 million. Part of the proceeds from this offering were used to pay off the outstanding debt
with MEF I, L.P and Anson Investments. The total payoff was $1.6 million, with $1.4 million in principal and $0.2
million in interest.
North
Stadium Term Loan – Related Party (Extension)
In
July 2018, the Company entered into an extension to the term loan with North Stadium Investments, LLC. The extension moved the
due date of the loan from July 28, 2018 to October 28, 2018, at which time all principal and unpaid interest are due and
payable. The monthly interest only payments will continue through the payoff on October 28, 2018.
North
Stadium Term Loan – Related Party
On
July 28, 2017, we entered into a $2.5 million term loan (the “North Stadium Loan”) with North Stadium Investments,
LLC (“North Stadium”), a company owned and controlled by our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The
North Stadium Loan bears interest at 10% per annum and requires us to make monthly interest only payments from September 5, 2017
through July 5, 2018. All principal and unpaid interest (if any) under the Loan is due and payable on July 28, 2018. The North
Stadium Loan is secured by substantially all of our assets but is junior to security interest in assets encumbered by the Hercules
Term Loan. In connection with the North Stadium Loan, we also issued North Stadium a warrant to purchase up to 55,000 shares of
our common stock at a purchase price of $5.04 per share, subject to a 5-year term. The relative estimated value of the warrants
on the date of grant approximated $0.2 million, which was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized as interest expense
over the life of the term loan.
Hercules
Term Loan
On
June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules which provided the Company with a $20.0 million
term loan. The Hercules Term Loan matured on January 1, 2018. The Hercules Term Loan included a $0.2 million closing fee, which
was paid to Hercules on the closing date of the loan. The closing fee was recorded as a debt discount and was amortized to interest
expense over the life of the loan. The Hercules Term Loan also included a non-refundable final payment fee of $1.7 million. The
final payment fee was accrued and recorded to interest expense over the life of the loan. On January 3, 2018, the Hercules Term
Loan and all amounts owing thereunder was assigned to MEF I and Anson Investments. See discussion above for a more detailed description
of that transaction.
See
discussion below with respect to the assignment of $3.0 million of the principal balance of the Hercules Term Loan to Riverside
Merchant Partners, LLC (“Riverside”) and the subsequent agreement between the Company and Riverside to exchange the
$3.0 million of the Hercules Term Loan held by Riverside for subordinated convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal
amount of $3.0 million.
Hercules
and Riverside Debt Exchange
On
April 4, 2016, the Company entered into an Assignment and Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “Assignment
Agreement”) with Riverside and Hercules, pursuant to which Hercules sold $1.0 million of the principal amount outstanding
under the Hercules Term Loan to Riverside. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, Riverside acquired
an option to purchase an additional $2.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the Hercules Term Loan from Hercules.
Riverside subsequently exercised its option in full and acquired the additional $2.0 million of the outstanding principal amount
of the Hercules Term Loan.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
A
summary of our significant accounting policies and estimates is discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. There have been no material changes to those policies during the six months ended June
30, 2018. The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities.
Significant areas of uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for income taxes and
other contingencies as well as valuation of derivative liabilities, asset impairment and collectability of accounts receivable.
We use historical and other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However, actual
results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
See
discussion under Note 1,
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for information on new accounting pronouncements.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
This
Report includes the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
required by Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2. This
Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to in those certifications.
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the Quarterly report were effective,
and that the information require to be disclosed by us in the reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls
system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system will be met, and no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected.
Prior
to the period covered by the Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2018, our Chief Executive Officer had concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Prior to the period ended June 30, 2018, we hired advisors to
help us adopt new measures to improve upon our disclosure controls. Our process for evaluating controls and procedures is continuous
and encompasses constant improvement of the design and effectiveness of established controls and procedures and the remediation
of any deficiencies which may be identified during this process.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified
by the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are properly recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Commission’s rules and forms.
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of these disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of June 30, 2018. Based on this evaluation,
the Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2018, the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q due to the material weaknesses described below.
As
defined in SEC Regulation S-X, a material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31,
2017, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because of the material weaknesses described below.
The
design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that complex accounting matters are properly accounted
for and reviewed in a timely manner. As a result, we failed to accurately record a complex equity transaction which caused the
restatement of our third quarter 2016 financial results as set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter
filing 2016. In addition, we failed to properly evaluate and test certain long-lived assets for impairment, which ultimately resulted
in recognition of an impairment charge. These errors are a result of the following control deficiencies:
Control
Environment and Risk Assessment
–
We did not have an effective control environment with the structure necessary for
effective internal controls over financial reporting. Furthermore, we did not have an effective risk assessment to identify and
assess risks associated with changes to our structure and the resultant impact on internal controls. With the dismissal of our
CFO, we did not have qualified personnel necessary to meet our control objectives. We did not have personnel with an appropriate
level of knowledge and experience with U.S. GAAP to properly review and evaluate the work performed by other of our personnel
and experts related to complex accounting matters.
Control
Activities – We did not have control activities that were designed and operating effectively including management review
controls, controls related to monitoring and assessing the work of technical experts and consultants, and controls to verify the
completeness and adequacy of information. Specifically, we did not have procedures for competent personnel to review work performed
by technical experts and consultants in relation to complex debt and equity transactions and impairment evaluations.
Monitoring
Activities – We did not maintain effective monitoring controls related to the financial reporting process. We did not effectively
monitor the changes in internal control related to changes in the roles and responsibilities associated with the changes in personnel
and organizational structure. The failure to properly monitor impacted the timing, accuracy, and completion of the work related
to significant accounting matters.
Our
Chief Executive Officer is in the preliminary stage of a review of our controls relating to complex accounting matters. Although
our analysis is not complete, we will be adding additional resources with expertise in accounting for complex accounting matters
including timely review and evaluation of assets for potential impairment. We are also considering redesigning controls to add
additional layers of review and approval whenever entering into or subsequently converting, exercising, amending, repricing, exiting
or otherwise experiencing changes in or to complex financial instruments.
Notwithstanding
the identified material weaknesses, we believe the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly represent in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for
the periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other
than as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second
quarter of 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.