FORM
10-Q
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
-OR-
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _________________ to
_________________
Commission
file number 001-32997
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
(Name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
86-0879278
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
777
Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 910, Houston, Texas 77056
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(832)
369-6986
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding
twelve months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act):
Large
accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
Smaller
reporting company
x
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
As of
September 30, 2008 there were 36,748,172 shares of the registrant’s common stock
($.01 par value) outstanding.
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
1
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
2
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2008
|
3
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
4
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|
|
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
|
|
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
22
|
|
|
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
|
23
|
|
|
Part
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
25
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,015,859
|
|
|
$
|
15,399,547
|
|
Accounts
receivable and accrued revenue
|
|
|
1,613,339
|
|
|
|
924,607
|
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
139,497
|
|
|
|
25,519
|
|
Deferred
financing costs, net of amortization of $0 and $1,513,586
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,378,492
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
6,768,695
|
|
|
|
18,728,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and natural gas properties, successful efforts accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
30,288,892
|
|
|
|
24,676,434
|
|
Proved
properties, net
|
|
|
23,434,119
|
|
|
|
18,936,428
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures, net
|
|
|
113,302
|
|
|
|
118,354
|
|
Total
property and equipment
|
|
|
53,836,313
|
|
|
|
43,731,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in partnership
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,892,944
|
|
Deposit
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
Deferred
financing costs, net of amortization of $23,735 and $0
|
|
|
1,288,864
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Market
value of derivative asset
|
|
|
822,953
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
other assets
|
|
|
2,122,074
|
|
|
|
3,903,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
62,727,082
|
|
|
$
|
66,362,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
3,057,987
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,474
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
102,954
|
|
|
|
244,419
|
|
Payable
on sale of partnership
|
|
|
754,255
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Short-term
debt, net of discount of $0 and $2,956,206
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,344,136
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
58,384
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
3,973,580
|
|
|
|
13,114,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
value of derivatives
|
|
|
1,440,517
|
|
|
|
1,832,316
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation
|
|
|
1,567,504
|
|
|
|
1,434,114
|
|
Revolving
credit borrowings
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Term
loan
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
23,481,601
|
|
|
|
16,380,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
2,353,079
|
|
|
|
3,025,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $3 stated value, issued
0
shares as of September 30, 2008 and 2,410,776 shares as of December 31,
2007;
cummulative,
dividend rate 15% per annum (2007 - 10%) with liquidation
preferences
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,232,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized,
0 and
2,410,776 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (reported above) issued and
outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
36,748,172
and 36,599,372 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 respectively
|
|
|
367,482
|
|
|
|
365,994
|
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
50,942,579
|
|
|
|
49,723,515
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(14,417,659
|
)
|
|
|
(10,365,090
|
)
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
|
|
36,892,402
|
|
|
|
39,724,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
62,727,082
|
|
|
$
|
66,362,582
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these financial statements.
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas sales
|
|
$
|
4,782,933
|
|
|
$
|
1,972,866
|
|
|
$
|
12,209,376
|
|
|
$
|
4,347,303
|
|
Gain
on sale of assets
|
|
|
1,181,963
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,181,963
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
5,964,896
|
|
|
|
1,972,866
|
|
|
|
13,491,339
|
|
|
|
4,447,303
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,492,163
|
|
|
|
890,140
|
|
|
|
4,061,269
|
|
|
|
2,352,411
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
2,179,388
|
|
|
|
344,722
|
|
|
|
2,789,552
|
|
|
|
518,311
|
|
Impairment
of oil & gas properties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
Depreciation,
depletion and accretion
|
|
|
718,513
|
|
|
|
178,483
|
|
|
|
1,855,706
|
|
|
|
488,866
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
817,811
|
|
|
|
612,321
|
|
|
|
3,005,583
|
|
|
|
2,031,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
5,207,875
|
|
|
|
2,025,666
|
|
|
|
11,712,110
|
|
|
|
5,406,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
757,021
|
|
|
|
(52,800
|
)
|
|
|
1,779,229
|
|
|
|
(959,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income and (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
179,643
|
|
|
|
91,843
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,066,477
|
)
|
|
|
(182,679
|
)
|
|
|
(2,172,257
|
)
|
|
|
(479,087
|
)
|
Loss
on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
(2,790,829
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,790,829
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain
(loss) on derivative contracts
|
|
|
2,477,405
|
|
|
|
(365,731
|
)
|
|
|
(986,245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before minority interest
|
|
|
(582,239
|
)
|
|
|
(583,706
|
)
|
|
|
(3,990,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,439,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
322,306
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
672,296
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(259,933
|
)
|
|
|
(583,706
|
)
|
|
|
(3,318,163
|
)
|
|
|
(2,439,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
on Series A Convertible Preferred
|
|
|
(275,605
|
)
|
|
|
(172,095
|
)
|
|
|
(734,406
|
)
|
|
|
(334,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attibutable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(535,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(755,801
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,052,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,773,838
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
|
36,738,145
|
|
|
|
21,273,172
|
|
|
|
36,703,179
|
|
|
|
21,253,995
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Shareholders'
|
|
|
|
of
Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
36,599,372
|
|
|
$
|
365,994
|
|
|
$
|
49,723,515
|
|
|
$
|
(10,365,090
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,724,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(734,406
|
)
|
|
|
(734,406
|
)
|
Restricted
stock issued to employees and consultants
|
|
|
148,800
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
300,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,657
|
|
Stock
options issued to employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918,895
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,318,163
|
)
|
|
|
(3,318,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
36,748,172
|
|
|
$
|
367,482
|
|
|
$
|
50,942,579
|
|
|
$
|
(14,417,659
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,892,402
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(3,318,163
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,439,308
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
(672,296
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depletion,
depreciation, and accretion
|
|
|
1,855,706
|
|
|
|
488,866
|
|
Amortization
included in interest expense
|
|
|
1,562,989
|
|
|
|
320,432
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
Dry
hole costs
|
|
|
2,600,817
|
|
|
|
479,949
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and stock options for services
|
|
|
1,220,552
|
|
|
|
876,286
|
|
Gain
on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,181,963
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,790,829
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized
loss on derivative contracts
|
|
|
(851,577
|
)
|
|
|
900,215
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable and accrued revenue
|
|
|
(688,732
|
)
|
|
|
(628,366
|
)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(113,978
|
)
|
|
|
(52,195
|
)
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
350,482
|
|
|
|
354,091
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
54,218
|
|
|
|
30,669
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,608,884
|
|
|
|
346,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(12,292,702
|
)
|
|
|
(9,140,133
|
)
|
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
7,828,962
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchase
of floor
|
|
|
(363,175
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Acquisition
of Williston Basin
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,397,855
|
)
|
Investment
in partnership
|
|
|
(1,999,800
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599,840
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(6,826,715
|
)
|
|
|
(25,137,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
costs
|
|
|
(1,312,599
|
)
|
|
|
(2,982,154
|
)
|
Payments
for debt refinancing
|
|
|
(144,565
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Cost
to issue preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,705
|
)
|
Redemption
of prefered stock
|
|
|
(7,966,735
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from revolving credit borrowings
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from term loan
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from loan
|
|
|
4,225,348
|
|
|
|
26,018,108
|
|
Principal
payment on loan
|
|
|
(18,467,306
|
)
|
|
|
(1,360,985
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(7,165,857
|
)
|
|
|
23,660,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(10,383,688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,131,213
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
15,399,547
|
|
|
|
4,285,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
5,015,859
|
|
|
$
|
3,153,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,177,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,181,501
|
|
Cash
paid for federal income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued in acquisition of Williston Basin properties
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,723,274
|
|
Royalty
interest issued in connection with debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,118,971
|
|
Preferred
stock dividend paid in preferred shares
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
334,530
|
|
Cancellation
of common stock in exchange for preferred stock
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,250,578
|
|
Capitalized
interest in oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
1,149,181
|
|
|
$
|
1,227,695
|
|
Property
and equipment included in accounts payable
|
|
$
|
986,347
|
|
|
$
|
803,135
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note
1—Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Petro Resources
Corporation (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in Petro Resource’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the
SEC on March 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial
position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have
been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to
the consolidated financial statements which would substantially duplicate the
disclosure contained in the audited consolidated financial statements as
reported in the 2007 annual report on Form 10-K have been omitted.
Certain
prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
New
accounting pronouncements
In March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities –an amendment of SFAS 133. SFAS 161 seeks to
improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures regarding the impact on financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. To achieve this increased transparency,
SFAS 161 requires: (1) the disclosure of the fair value of derivative
instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format; (2) the disclosure of
derivative features that are credit risk-related; and (3) cross-referencing
within the footnotes. SFAS 161 is effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are in
the process of evaluating the new disclosure requirements under SFAS
161.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, as amended in
February 2008 by FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FSP
FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
liabilities, except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an
annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. As such, we
partially adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008. The
partial adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our
financial statements. We expect to adopt the remaining provisions of SFAS 157
beginning in 2009. We do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities–including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This
standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are
elective; however the amendment to SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with available-for-sale
securities. The fair value option established by SFAS 159 permits all entities
to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A
business entity will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. The fair value option: (a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a
few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity
method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and (c) is
applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. We have
adopted this statement as of January 1, 2008. The adoption created no impact to
our consolidated financial statements.
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R
continues to require the purchase method of accounting to be applied to all
business combinations, but it significantly changes the accounting for certain
aspects of business combinations. Under SFAS 141R, an acquiring entity will be
required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS
141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition
related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred;
(2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and
(3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS
141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS
141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS 141R will have
an impact on our accounting for future business combinations once adopted but
the effect is dependent upon the acquisitions that are made in the
future.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary (minority interest) is an ownership interest in the consolidated
entity that should be reported as equity in the Consolidated Financial Statement
and separate from the parent company’s equity. Among other requirements, this
statement requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that
include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling
interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the Consolidated Statement
of Operations, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This statement is effective for us on
January 1, 2009. We are still in the process of evaluating the impact that SFAS
160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Note
2 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value measurements, for all financial instruments. SFAS 157 establishes a
three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of
an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined
as follows:
●
|
Level
1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in
active markets
|
|
|
●
|
Level
2 — Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets
that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or
significant value drivers are observable
|
|
|
●
|
Level
3 — Significant inputs to the valuation model are
unobservable
|
The
following describes the valuation methodologies we use to measure financial
instruments at fair value.
Derivative
Instruments
At
September 30, 2008, we had commodity derivative financial instruments in place
that do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. Therefore, the changes
in fair value subsequent to the initial measurement are recorded in income.
Although our derivative instruments are valued using public indexes, the
instruments themselves are traded with third-party counterparties and are not
openly traded on an exchange. As such, our derivative liabilities have been
classified as Level 2.
The
follow table provides a summary of the fair value of our derivative liabilities
measured on a recurring basis under SFAS 157:
|
|
Fair
value measurements on a recurring basis
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
822,953
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,440,517
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note
3 —Derivative Financial Instruments
We
entered into commodity derivative financial instruments intended to hedge our
exposure to market fluctuations of oil prices. As of September 30, 2008, we had
commodity swaps for the following oil volumes:
|
|
Barrels
per
quarter
|
|
|
Barrels
per
day
|
|
|
Price
per
barrel
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
20,600
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
87.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
9,725
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
71.76
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
8,325
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
72.62
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
72.55
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
72.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
14,825
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
93.50
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
105.45
|
|
As of
September 30, 2008, the fair value of the above commodity swaps amounted to a
liability of $1,325,846
.
On June
5, 2008, the Company purchased a floor at $110 per barrel for 100 bbls per day
for the calendar year 2009 for a price of $363,175. As of September
30, 2008 the fair value of the floor was $708,282.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred a loss of $986,245 related
to derivative contracts. Included in this loss was $1,837,822 of realized losses
related to settled contracts, $345,107 of gains related to the floor and
$506,470 of unrealized gains related to unsettled swap contracts. Unrealized
gain and losses are based on the changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments covering positions beyond September 30, 2008.
Note
4 —Asset Retirement Obligations
We
recorded the following activity related to the ARO liability for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008:
Liability
for asset retirement obligation as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,434,114
|
|
Liabilities
settled and divested
|
|
|
(3,328
|
)
|
Additions-Drilling
|
|
|
33,072
|
|
Accretion
expense
|
|
|
103,646
|
|
Liability
for asset retirement obligation as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,567,504
|
|
Note
5 – Minority Interest
In
connection with the Williston Basin acquisition, we entered into equity
participation agreements with the lenders pursuant to which we agreed to pay to
the lenders an aggregate of 12.5% of all distributions paid to the owners of PRC
Williston, which at this time is 100% owned by Petro Resources. The equity
participation agreements were valued at $3,401,655 and accounted for as a
minority interest in PRC Williston.
|
|
Minority
Interest
|
|
Minority
interest at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,025,375
|
|
Loss
to minority interest
|
|
|
(672,296
|
)
|
Minority
interest at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,353,079
|
|
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note
6 — Series A Preferred Stock
On
September 26, 2008, the Company redeemed 2,563,712 shares of the Company's
outstanding Series A Preferred Stock at an aggregate redemption price of
$7,966,735. The shares were held by investment funds managed by Touradji Capital
Management. Pursuant to the terms of the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, the
Company was required to redeem all Series A Preferred Stock no later than
October 2, 2008. After giving effect to the redemption, there are no shares of
Series A Preferred Stock outstanding at September 30, 2008.
Note
7 —Share Based Compensation
On
January 9, 2008 we granted 200,000 stock options to our President. The options
have an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Fifty thousand options vested on
January 9, 2008 and the remaining 150,000 options vest annually on January 10,
2009, 2010 and 2011. The stock options have a 5 year term expiring on January
10, 2013. The options were valued using the Black-Sholes model with the
following assumption: $2.15 quoted stock price; $2.00 exercise price; 104.83%
volatility; 3.25 year estimated life; zero dividend; 2.69% discount rate. The
fair value of these options was $293,364.
Also, on
January 9, 2008 we granted 10,000 stock options to our Director of Information
Services. The options have an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Twenty five
hundred options vested on January 10, 2008 and the remaining 7,500 options will
vest annually on January 10, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The stock options have a 5
year term expiring on January 10, 2013. The options were valued using the
Black-Sholes model with the following assumption: $2.15 quoted stock price;
$2.00 exercise price; 104.83% volatility; 3.25 year estimated life; zero
dividend; 2.69% discount rate. The fair value of these options was
$14,668.
On March
1, 2008 we granted 100,000 stock options to our new Chief Operating Officer. The
options have an exercise price of $1.70 per share. Twenty five thousand options
vested on March 1, 2008 and the remaining 75,000 options will be issued and will
vest annually on March 1, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The stock options have a 5 year
term expiring on March 1, 2013. The options were valued using the Black-Sholes
model with the following assumption: $1.70 quoted stock price; $1.70 exercise
price; 104% volatility; 3.25 year estimated life; zero dividend; 1.87% discount
rate. The fair value of these options was $112,381.
On March
1, 2008 we also granted 130,000 shares of restricted common stock to our new
Chief Operating Officer. These common shares vest at 40,000 immediately and the
remaining shares vest annually at 30,000 shares annually on March 1,
2009, 2010 and 2011. These shares were valued at $1.70 per share, based on the
quoted market value on the date of grant, and $106,250 of expense was recognized
as of September 30, 2008. The remaining $114,750 will be recognized over the
remaining service term.
On
January 9, 2008, we granted 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to our
President. These common shares vest at 25,000 immediately and 25,000 each on
January 10, 2009, 2010 and 2011. These shares were valued at $2.15 per share,
based on the quoted market value on the date of grant, and $94,063 of expense
was recognized as of September 30, 2008. The remaining $120,938 will be
recognized over the remaining service term.
Petro
Resources recognized stock compensation expense of $1,220,552 and $876,286 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A summary
of option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented
below:
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
Granted
|
310,000
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
Exercised,
forfeited, or expired
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
1,435,000
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2007
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
902,500
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
A summary
of Petro Resources non-vested options as of September 30, 2008 is presented
below.
Non-vested
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
310,000
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(352,500
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-vested
at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
532,500
|
|
Total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options granted under the
Plan was $850,355 and $1,566,192 as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
The cost at September 30, 2008 is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.3 years. The aggregate intrinsic value for options
was $0; and the weighted average remaining contract life was 2.93
years.
As
allowed by SFAS 123(R), the Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to measure the fair value of stock options and stock settled stock
appreciation rights.
The
assumptions used in the fair value method calculation for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are disclosed in the following
table:
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average value per option granted during the period
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
Assumptions
(3)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price volatility
|
|
|
104-105%
|
|
|
|
108%
|
|
Risk
free rate of return
|
|
|
1.87-2.69%
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
term
|
|
|
3.25 years
|
|
|
|
3.0 years
|
|
(1)
|
Our
estimated future forfeiture rate is zero.
|
(2)
|
Calculated
using the Black-Scholes fair value based method.
|
(3)
|
We
do not pay dividends on our common stock.
|
|
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A summary
of warrant activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented
below:
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
6,838,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Granted
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised,
forfeited, or expired
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
6,838,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2007
|
6,838,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
6,838,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value for warrants was $0; and the weighted average
remaining contract life was 2.16 years.
Note
8 – Note Payable
On
September 9, 2008, the Company entered into (1) a $50 million Credit Agreement
(the "Credit Agreement") with certain lenders named in the agreement and CIT
Capital USA Inc., as administrative agent for the lenders and (2) a $15 million
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement (the "Second Lien Term Loan Agreement") with
certain lenders named in the agreement and CIT Capital USA Inc., as
administrative agent for the lenders.
The
Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million first lien revolving credit
facility, with an initial borrowing base availability of $17
million. The first lien facility may be used for loans and, subject
to a $500,000 sublimit, letters of credit. Borrowings under the
Credit Agreement may be used to provide working capital for exploration and
production purposes, to refinance existing debt, and for general corporate
purposes. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is September 9,
2011.
Borrowings
under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company's option, at either a
fluctuating base rate or a rate equal to LIBOR plus, in each case, a margin
determined based on the Company's utilization of the borrowing
base. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders
may increase the interest rate then in effect by an additional 2% per
annum. The Credit Agreement contains covenants that, among others
things, restrict the ability of the Company to, with certain exceptions: (1)
incur indebtedness; (2) grant liens; (3) acquire other companies or assets; (4)
dispose of all or substantially all of its assets or enter into mergers,
consolidations or similar transactions; (5) make restricted payments; (6) enter
into transactions with affiliates; and (7) make capital
expenditures. The Credit Agreement also requires the Company to
satisfy certain financial covenants, including maintaining (1) a ratio of
EBITDAX to Interest Expense (as each term is defined in the Credit Agreement) of
not less than 2.5:1.0; (2) a ratio of Net Debt (as such term is defined in the
Credit Agreement) to EBITDAX of not more than (a) 4.5:1.0 for the fiscal
quarters ending December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and September
30, 2009, and (b) 3.5:1.0 for each fiscal quarter ending thereafter; and (3) a
ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current liabilities of not
less than 1.0:1.0. The Company is also required to enter into certain
swap agreements pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement.
PRC
Williston LLC, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary ("PRC Williston"), has
guaranteed the performance of all of the Company's obligations under the Credit
Agreement and related agreements pursuant to a Guaranty and Collateral Agreement
dated as of September 9, 2008 (the "Guaranty and Collateral
Agreement"). Subject to certain permitted liens, the Company's
obligations have been secured by the grant of a first priority lien on no less
than 80% of the value of the Company's and PRC Williston's existing and
to-be-acquired oil and gas properties and the grant of a first priority security
interest in related personal property of the Company and PRC
Williston. The Company has also granted a first priority security
interest in its ownership interest in PRC Williston, subject only to certain
permitted liens.
The
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement provides for a $15 million second lien term loan
facility. All term loans available under the second lien term loan
facility were advanced to the Company on September 9, 2008 and were used to
refinance existing debt. The maturity date of the Second Lien Term
Loan Agreement is September 9, 2012. Under certain circumstances, the
Company is permitted to repay the term loans prior to the maturity date;
however, any payments made on or prior to September 9, 2009 are subject to a
prepayment penalty equal to 2% of the amount prepaid, and any payments made
after September 9, 2009 but on or before September 9, 2010 are subject to a
prepayment penalty equal to 1% of the amount prepaid.
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Borrowings
under the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement bear interest, at the Company's
option, at either a fluctuating base rate plus 6.50% per annum or a rate equal
to LIBOR plus 7.50% per annum. If an event of default occurs and is
continuing, the lenders may increase the interest rate then in effect by an
additional 2% per annum. The Second Lien Term Loan Agreement contains
covenants that, among others things, restrict the ability of the Company to,
with certain exceptions: (1) incur indebtedness; (2) grant liens; (3) acquire
other companies or assets; (4) dispose of all or substantially all of its assets
or enter into mergers, consolidations or similar transactions; (5) make
restricted payments; (6) enter into transactions with affiliates; and (7) make
capital expenditures. The Second Lien Term Loan Agreement also
requires the Company to satisfy certain financial covenants, including
maintaining (1) a ratio of Total Reserve Value to Debt (as each term is defined
in the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement) of not less than 1.75:1.0; and (2) a
ratio of Net Debt to EBITDAX (as each term is defined in the Second Lien Term
Loan Agreement) of not more than (a) 4.5:1.0 for the fiscal quarters ending
December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009, and (b)
4.0:1.0 for each fiscal quarter ending thereafter.
PRC
Williston LLC has guaranteed the performance of all of the Company's obligations
under the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement and related agreements pursuant to a
Second Lien Guaranty and Collateral Agreement dated as of September 9, 2008 (the
" Second Lien Guaranty and Collateral Agreement"). Subject to certain
permitted liens (including, without limitation, the liens and security interests
granted in connection with the Credit Agreement referenced above), the Company's
obligations under the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement have been secured by the
grant of a first priority lien on no less than 80% of the value of the Company's
and PRC Williston's existing and to-be-acquired oil and gas properties and the
grant of a first priority security interest in related personal property of the
Company and PRC Williston. The Company has also granted a first
priority security interest in its ownership interest in PRC Williston, subject
only to certain permitted liens (including, without limitation, the security
interest granted in connection with the Credit Agreement).
The
Company incurred approximately $1.3 million of deferred financing cost on the
above notes and on September 9
th
, the
Company borrowed $16.5 million by drawing down $15 million on its Second Lien
Term Loan Agreement and $1.5 million on its Credit Agreement. The Company then
paid off the Petrobridge note of $16.2 million and also incurred $2.8 million of
debt extinguishment costs. The debt extinguishment costs consisted principally
of the write off of the note discount and deferred financing costs related to
the Petrobridge note.
Note
9 – Investment in partnership
On
September 26, 2008, the Company sold its 5.33% limited partner interest in
Hall-Houston Exploration II, L. P. pursuant to a Partnership Interest Purchase
Agreement dated September 26, 2008, as amended on September 29, 2008. The
interest was purchased by a non-affiliated partnership for a cash consideration
of $8.0 million and the purchaser’s assumption of the first $1,353,000 of
capital calls on the limited partnership interest sold subsequent to September
26, 2008. The Company agreed to reimburse the purchaser for up to
$754,255 of capital calls on the limited partnership interest sold in excess of
the first $1,353,000 of capital calls subsequent to September 26, 2008. The
Company’s net gain on the sale of the asset of is subject to future
upward adjustment to the extent that some or all of the $754,255 is not
called. As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company reported a net gain on the sale of the above interest amounting to
$1,098,000 and recognized the liability for the capital calls. The
proceeds of the sale of the limited partnership were used to redeem the
Company’s outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
Note
10 – Subsequent events
During
October 2008, we purchased put options for natural gas at a price of $7.75 per
mcf for 658 mcf per day of production during 2009. The cost of the natural gas
put options were $200,400.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Industry
terms used in this report are defined in the Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas
Terms located at the end of this Item
In this
report we make, and from time to time we otherwise make, written and oral
statements regarding our business and prospects, such as projections of future
performance, statements of management’s plans and objectives, forecasts of
market trends, and other matters that are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements containing the words or
phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is
anticipated,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,”
“intends,” “target,” “goal,” “plans,” “objective,” “should” or similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements, which may appear in documents,
reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, news releases,
written or oral presentations made by our officers or other representatives to
analysts, stockholders, investors, news organizations and others, and
discussions with management and other of our representatives. For such
statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.
Our
future results, including results related to forward-looking statements, involve
a number of risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be given that the results
reflected in any forward-looking statements will be achieved. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is
made. Our forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions that are
sometimes based upon estimates, data, communications and other information from
operators, government agencies and other sources that may be subject to
revision. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to
update or keep current either (i) any forward-looking statement to reflect
events or circumstances arising after the date of such statement, or
(ii) the important factors that could cause our future results to differ
materially from historical results or trends, results anticipated or planned by
us, or which are reflected from time to time in any forward-looking
statement.
There are
several important factors that could cause our future results to differ
materially from historical results or trends, results anticipated or planned by
us, or results that are reflected from time to time in any forward-looking
statement. Some of these important factors, but not necessarily all important
factors, are included in our filings with the SEC, including the risk factors
set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for our 2007 fiscal year filed with
the SEC on March 31, 2008 and our subsequently filed reports.
General
Petro
Resources Corporation and subsidiaries (“we,” “our” or “the Company”) is an
independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition of
exploratory leases and producing properties, secondary enhanced oil recovery
projects, exploratory drilling, and production of oil and natural gas in the
United States.
Our
business strategy is designed to create and maximize shareholder value by
combining and leveraging the knowledge and expertise of our management team with
that of our industry partners to grow our diversified portfolio of oil and
natural gas producing projects and prospects. Since our inception in
2005, we have established a balanced portfolio which includes producing
properties, secondary enhanced oil recovery projects, and exploration prospects
both onshore and offshore. We believe our current portfolio has
provided a solid base of production with multiple opportunities for organic
growth in both production and reserves for years into the future. We
target low to medium risk projects that are expected to provide meaningful
reserve, production and cash flow growth. We have focused our
acquisition and exploration pursuits on oil and natural gas properties
principally located in North Dakota, Texas, Louisiana, and New
Mexico.
In July
2005, we acquired our initial interest in drilling prospects and commenced
drilling activities in November 2005. In the first quarter of 2007,
we acquired oil and gas producing assets in the Williston Basin area of North
Dakota. As of September 30, 2008, we held interests in approximately
200
producing
wells in Texas, Louisiana and North Dakota. We also have exploratory
drilling prospects located in Texas, North Dakota, Louisiana, New Mexico, and
Kentucky. In December 2005, we commenced production operations from
our first oil and gas prospects and received our first revenues from oil and gas
production in February 2006. During 2007, we produced more than
120,000 boe and exited the year with a daily production exit rate of
approximately 400 boe per day. During the first nine months of 2008
we have produced approximatel
y 148,188
boe.
We
recognize the value of entering into derivative and physical contracts for the
sale of hydrocarbons to stabilize cash flow from production. During
the second and third quarters of 2008, we entered into three separate hedging
agreements. During June 2008, we purchased put options for crude oil
at a price of $110 per bbl for 100 bbls per day of production during
2009. The cost of the crude oil put options was
$363,175. During September 2008, we entered into swap agreements
covering 207,400 barrels of crude oil at a price of $105 per bbl for varying
amounts of production from October 2008 to December 2011. We incurred
no cost in entering these swap agreements. During October 2008, we
purchased put options for natural gas at a price of $7.75 per mcf for 658 mcf
per day of production during 2009. The cost of the natural gas put
options was $200,400.
As of
December 31, 2007, our estimated net total proved reserves had grown to
approximately 2,716,602 boe (net of production) of which approximately 2,369,600
boe were crude oil reserves and 347,002 boe were natural gas
reserves. The increase in net total proved reserves is a result of
our Williston Basin acquisition that closed on February 16, 2007, positive
results from enhanced oil recovery operations in North Dakota, successful
exploratory drilling success in the Williston Basin and in our Cinco Terry Field
in Crockett County, Texas.
Our
executive offices are located at 777 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 910, Houston, TX
77056, and our telephone number is (832) 369-6986. Our web site is
www.petroresourcescorp.com
. Additional
information which may be obtained through our web site does not constitute part
of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. A copy of this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of
the SEC’s Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our
filings at
www.sec.gov
.
CIT
Credit Facility
On
September 9, 2008, we entered into a $50 million Credit Agreement (the "Credit
Agreement") with certain lenders named in the agreement and CIT Capital USA
Inc., as administrative agent for the lenders, and a $15 million Second Lien
Term Loan Agreement (the "Second Lien Term Loan Agreement") with certain lenders
named in the agreement and CIT Capital USA Inc., as administrative agent for the
lenders. All term loans available under the Second Lien Term Loan
facility were advanced to us on September 9, 2008 and were used to retire our
previously existing credit facility arranged by Petrobridge Investment
Management, LLC.
The
Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million first lien revolving credit
facility, with an initial borrowing base availability of $17
million. The first lien facility may be used for loans and, subject
to a $500,000 sublimit, letters of credit. Borrowings under the
Credit Agreement may be used to provide working capital for exploration and
production purposes, to refinance existing debt, and for general corporate
purposes. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is September 9,
2011.
Borrowings
under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either a fluctuating
base rate or a rate equal to LIBOR plus, in each case, a margin determined based
on our utilization of the borrowing base. The Credit Agreement also
requires us to satisfy certain financial covenants, including maintaining (A) a
ratio of EBITDAX to Interest Expense (as each term is defined in the Credit
Agreement) of not less than 2.5:1.0; (B) a ratio of Net Debt (as such term is
defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDAX of not more than (y) 4.5:1.0 for the
fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, and (z) 3.5:1.0 for each fiscal quarter ending thereafter;
and (C) a ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current
liabilities of not less than 1.0:1.0. We are also required to enter
into certain swap agreements pursuant to the terms of the Credit
Agreement.
The
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement provides for a $15 million second lien term loan
facility. As noted above, all term loans available under the second
lien term loan facility were advanced to the us on September 9, 2008 and were
used to retire our previously existing credit facility arranged
by Petrobridge Investment Management, LLC. The maturity date of
the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement is September 9, 2012. Under
certain circumstances, we are permitted to repay the term loans prior to the
maturity date; however, any payments made on or prior to September 9, 2009 are
subject to a prepayment penalty equal to 2% of the amount prepaid, and any
payments made after September 9, 2009 but on or before September 9, 2010 are
subject to a prepayment penalty equal to 1% of the amount prepaid.
Borrowings
under the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement bear interest, at our option, at
either a fluctuating base rate plus 6.50% per annum or a rate equal to LIBOR
plus 7.50% per annum. The Second Lien Term Loan Agreement also
requires us to satisfy certain financial covenants, including maintaining (1) a
ratio of Total Reserve Value to Debt (as each term is defined in the Second Lien
Term Loan Agreement) of not less than 1.75:1.0; and (2) a ratio of Net Debt to
EBITDAX (as each term is defined in the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement) of not
more than (a) 4.5:1.0 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2008, March
31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009, and (b) 4.0:1.0 for each fiscal
quarter ending thereafter.
If an
event of default occurs and is continuing under either the Credit Agreement or
the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, the lenders may increase the interest rate
then in effect by an additional 2% per annum. The Credit Agreement
and the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement contain covenants that, among others
things, restrict our ability to, with certain exceptions: (i) incur
indebtedness; (ii) grant liens; (iii) acquire other companies or assets; (iv)
dispose of all or substantially all of our assets or enter into mergers,
consolidations or similar transactions; (v) make restricted payments; (vi) enter
into transactions with affiliates; and (vii) make capital
expenditures.
PRC
Williston LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, has guaranteed the performance of
all of our obligations under the Credit Agreement, the Second Lien Term Loan
Agreement and related agreements pursuant to a Guaranty and Collateral Agreement
and a Second Lien Guaranty and Collateral Agreement each dated as of September
9, 2008. Subject to certain permitted liens, our obligations have
been secured by the grant of a first priority lien on no less than 80% of the
value of our and PRC Williston's existing and to-be-acquired oil and gas
properties and the grant of a first priority security interest in related
personal property of ours and PRC Williston. We also granted a first
priority security interest in our ownership interest in PRC Williston, subject
only to certain permitted liens.
As of
November 12, 2008, we have drawn $21.5 million, of which $15.0 million was drawn
on the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement and $6.5 million was drawn on the Credit
Agreement. We are permitted to use the remaining available funds under the
Credit Agreement to finance our capital program and fund general corporate
purposes.
Series
A Preferred Stock Redemption
On September 26, 2008, we redeemed
2,563,712 shares of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock at an aggregate
redemption price of $7,946,735. The shares were held by investment funds managed
by Touradji Capital Management. Pursuant to the terms of the Series A Preferred
Stock, we were required to redeem all Series A Preferred Stock no later than
October 2, 2008. After giving effect to the redemption, there are no
shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.
Sale
of Hall-Houston Exploration II, L.P. Partnership Interest
On
September 26, 2008, we sold our 5.33% limited partner interest in Hall-Houston
Exploration II, L. P. pursuant to a Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement
dated September 26, 2008, as amended on September 29, 2008. The interest was
purchased by a non-affiliated partnership for a cash consideration of $8.0
million and the purchaser’s assumption of the first $1,353,000 of capital calls
on the limited partnership interest sold subsequent to September 26,
2008. We have agreed to reimburse the purchaser for up to $754,255 of
capital calls on the limited partnership interest sold in excess of the first
$1,353,000 of capital calls subsequent to September 26, 2008. We will
realize a net gain on the sale of the asset of not less than approximately $1.10
million for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, subject to future upward
adjustment to the extent that some or all of the $754,255 is not
called. The proceeds of the sale of the limited partnership were used
to redeem the Company’s outstanding shares of Series A Preferred
Stock.
Results
of Operations
For
the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007
Our net
production for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 included 35,012 barrels of
oil, 105,239 mcf of natural gas, and 4,801 barrels of natural gas
liquids for a barrel-equivalent total of 57,353 boe compared to 27,760 barrels
of oil, 35,720 mcf of natural gas, and 262 barrels of natural gas liquids for a
barrel-equivalent total of 33,975 boe for the quarter ended September 30,
2007.
For the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, the average daily production was approximately
623 boe per day compared to average daily production of 370 boe per day for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007.
We realized average prices for oil and
gas during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of $106.33 per barrel of oil,
$7.34 per mcf of natural gas, and $59.82 per barrel of natural gas liquids
compared to $66.75 per barrel of oil, $3.08 per mcf of natural gas, and $37.62
per barrel of natural gas liquids during the prior year period.
Revenue
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 totaled $5,964,895, compared to revenue
of $1,972,866 for the prior year period. Revenue for the quarter ended September
30, 2008 consisted of $4,782,933 of oil and gas sales compared to oil and gas
sales of $1,972,866 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. The
increase in revenue from oil and gas sales was due primarily to increased
production as the result of our successful drilling efforts in Crockett County,
Texas as well as the increase in oil and gas prices over the same period last
year. In addition, during the three months ended September 30, 2008,
we realized $1,181,963 of revenue from the gain on the sale of our 5.33% limited
partner interest in Hall-Houston Exploration II, L. P.
Lease
operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 totaled $1,492,163
compared to lease operating expenses of $890,140 for the prior year period. The
increase in lease operating expenses was due primarily to increased operational
costs in the Williston Basin properties and an increase in the number of
producing wells in our Cinco Terry Field in Crockett County,
Texas.
Exploration
costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 were $2,179,388 compared to
$344,722 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. Exploration costs
represent our drilling costs associated with dry holes and the carrying costs of
properties. The increase in exploration costs is the result of four
unsuccessful exploratory wells drilled in the Williston Basin during the third
quarter of 2008.
We
incurred no expenses related to the impairment of oil and gas properties in the
quarters ended September 30, 2008 or 2007. Impairment expenses represent the
write-down of previously capitalized expenses for productive wells. We take an
impairment charge for a productive well when there is an indication that we may
not receive production payments equal to the net capitalized costs. No wells
needed to be written down in either quarter.
Our
expenses for depreciation, depletion, and accretion (“DD&A”) for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 totaled $718,513 compared to $178,483 for the same
period in the prior year. DD&A expenses are a function of
production and depletion rates. The increase over the same period
last year is the result of our increased production in the Williston Basin and
the Cinco Terry Field as well as an increase in our depletion
rates.
General
and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 totaled
$817,811 compared to general and administrative expenses of $612,321 for the
prior year period. General and administrative expenses for the quarters ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 included expenses of $329,235 and
$241,550, respectively, for outstanding common stock shares and common stock
options granted under our Stock Incentive Plan. Without giving effect to
expenses for common shares and stock options, our general and administrative
expenses for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 were
$488,576 and $370,771, respectively. General and administrative
expenses increased over the same period last year due primarily to an increase
in the number of employees and the related expenses.
We
incurred income from operations of $757,021 for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 compared to a loss from operations of $52,800 during the same period in the
prior year. The increase in net income occurred due to increased
production revenues and the sale of our 5.33% limited partner interest in
Hall-Houston Exploration II, L. P.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, interest expense totaled $1,066,477
compared to $182,769 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. This
increase in interest expense was due primarily to a reduction in the interest
capitalized due to the decreased development activity in North
Dakota.
During
this quarter, we recognized debt extinguishment losses amounting to $2,790,828
related to the payoff of our Petrobridge credit facility. The majority of this
loss was related to the write off of the unamortized note discount and the write
off of the deferred financing cost related to this credit facility.
Beginning
in March 2007, we have entered into commodity derivative financial instruments
for purposes of hedging our exposure to market fluctuations of oil and natural
gas prices. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
incurred a gain on derivative contracts of $2,477,405 compared to a loss of
$365,731 for the comparable period in 2007. The gain of $2,477,405 included
$625,568 of realized losses related to settled contracts, $448,682 of unrealized
gains related to “floors,” which are put options we purchased to sell oil at
$110 per barrel, and $2,654,291 of unrealized gains related to unsettled swap
contracts. Unrealized gains and losses are based on the changes in
the fair value of derivative instruments covering positions beyond September 30,
2008.
We
incurred a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $535,538 ($0.01 per
share) during the quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared to a net loss of
$755,801 ($0.04 per share) for the same period in 2007. The decrease
in net loss was primarily the result of increased revenues and the sale of our
5.33% limited partner interest in Hall-Houston Exploration II, L. during the
third quarter of 2008, offset by the write off of $2,790,829 of debt
extinguishment losses associated with the early repayment of the Petrobridge
credit facility.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007
Our net
production for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included 95,869 barrels
of oil, 227,762 mcf of natural gas, and 14,358 barrels of natural gas liquids
for a barrel-equivalent total of 148,188 boe compared to 65,027 barrels of oil,
107,434 mcf of natural gas, and 915 barrels of natural gas liquids for a
barrel-equivalent total of 83,848 boe for the nine months ended September 30,
2007.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the average daily production was
approximately 543 boe per day compared to average daily production of 307 boe
per day for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
We realized average prices for oil and
gas during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $102.23 per barrel of
oil, $7.21 per mcf of natural gas, and $53.49 per barrel of natural gas liquids
compared to $60.61 per barrel of oil, $3.48 per mcf of natural gas, and $34.44
per barrel of natural gas liquids for the comparable prior year
period.
Revenues
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $13,491,339 compared to
revenues of $4,447,303 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Revenue for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 consisted of $12,209,376 of oil and gas
sales compared to oil and gas sales of $4,347,303 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in revenue from oil and gas sales of
$7,862,073 consisted of a $3,335,926 increase due to increased oil and gas
production as a result of our successful drilling efforts in Crockett County,
Texas and a $4,526,147 increase due to increased oil and gas prices over the
same period last year. In addition, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we realized $1,181,963 of revenue from the gain on the sale
of our 5.33% limited partner interest in Hall-Houston Exploration II, L.
P.
Lease
operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled
$4,061,269 compared to lease operating expenses of $2,352,411 for the prior year
period. The increase in lease operating expenses was due primarily to
the increased number of producing wells in our Cinco Terry Field in
Crockett County, Texas and higher costs in the Williston Basin.
Exploration
costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $2,789,552 compared to
$518,311 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Exploration costs
represent our drilling costs associated with dry holes and the carrying costs of
properties. The increase in exploration costs is the result of the
write off of four exploratory wells in North Dakota.
We
incurred no expenses related to the impairment of oil and gas properties in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $15,712 during the prior year
comparable period. Impairment expenses represent the write-down of previously
capitalized expenses for productive wells. We take an impairment charge for a
productive well when there is an indication that we may not receive production
payments equal to the net capitalized costs. The decline in expenses for
impairment of oil and gas properties is the result of no wells needing to be
written down to net cost.
Our
expenses for depreciation, depletion, and accretion, or DD&A, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $1,855,706, compared to $488,866
for the same period in the prior year. The increase in DD&A expenses was due
to our increased production from the Cinco Terry Field and the Williston
Basin as well as an increase in the depletion rates.
General
and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled
$3,005,583 compared to general and administrative expenses of $2,031,635 for the
prior year period. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 included expenses of $1,220,552 and
$876,286, respectively, for outstanding common stock shares and common stock
options granted under our Stock Incentive Plan. Without giving effect
to expenses for common shares and stock options, our general and administrative
expenses for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 were $1,785,031 and $1,155,349,
respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses (other than
expenses for options and common shares) between reporting periods was due to
increased number of employees, additional office space, professional fees,
travel and other related expenses.
We
incurred income from operations of $1,779,229 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to a loss from operations of $959,632 during the
same period in the prior year. The increase in income is due
primarily to increased revenues and the sale of our 5.33% limited partner
interest in Hall-Houston Exploration II, L. P.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, interest expense totaled $2,172,257,
compared to $479,087 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. This increase in interest expense was due primarily to a
reduction in the interest capitalized due to the decreased development activity
in North Dakota.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized debt extinguishment
losses in the
amount
of $2,790,828 related to the payoff of our Petrobridge credit
facility. The majority of this loss was related to the write-off of
the unamortized note discount and the write-off of the deferred financing cost
related to the credit facility.
Beginning in March 2007,
we entered into commodity derivative financial instruments intended to hedge our
exposure to market fluctuations of oil prices. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we incurred a loss of $986,245 compared to a loss of
$1,092,432 for the comparable period in 2007. The loss of $986,245 included
$1,837,822 of realized losses related to settled contracts, $345,107 of gains
related “floors”, which are put options we purchased to sell oil at $110 per
barrel, and $506,470 of unrealized gains related to unsettled swap contracts.
Unrealized gains and losses are based on the changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments covering positions beyond September 30,
2008.
We incurred a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $4,052,569 ($0.11 per share) during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to a net loss of $2,773,838
($0.13 per share) for the same period in 2007. The increase in net
loss was primarily the result of an increase in
our cost to extinguish
debt, interest expense and dividends, offset by an increase in our income from
operations.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash flow provided by operations
totaled $3,608,884 which represents an increase of $3,262,533 from the same
period in 2007. The increase in cash flow was primarily due to
increased revenues driven by increased production and higher commodity prices
realized over the same period last year.
Plan of
Operations
Our plan
of operations for the next 12 months is to pursue further exploration and
development of the oil and natural gas prospects that we currently own, along
with obtaining the working capital required to fund such exploration and
development and the acquisition of additional domestic oil and natural gas
interests. We intend to pursue prospects in partnership with other
companies with exploration, development and production expertise.
The
business of oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration and development is
capital intensive and the level of operations attainable by an oil and gas
company is directly linked to and limited by the amount of available capital.
Therefore, a principal part of our plan of operations is to raise the additional
capital required to finance the exploration and development of our current oil
and natural gas prospects and the acquisition of additional
properties. We may seek additional working capital through our bank
lines of credit, project financing or through the sale of our securities.
However, as described further below, based on our present working capital,
available borrowings under the credit facility and current rate of cash flow
from operations, we believe we have available to us sufficient working capital
to fund our operations and expected commitments for exploration and development
through, at least, December 31, 2009.
We intend
to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform
various professional services, including reservoir engineering, land, legal,
financial audit, environmental, and investor relations. We believe
that by limiting our management and employee costs, we may be able to better
control total costs and retain flexibility in terms of project
management.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
We
estimate our revised capital budget for the following 12 months to be
approximately $17.3 million, including:
|
Up
to $3.3 million of capital for secondary enhanced oil recovery operations
in the Williston Basin.
|
|
Up
to $7.4 million to be deployed in connection with our interest in
prospects operated by Approach Resources, Inc. including our highly
successful Cinco Terry field.
|
●
|
Up
to $3.6 million for exploratory and developmental drilling in the Surprise
Prospect located in Nacogdoches County,
Texas.
|
●
|
Up
to $2.0 million to be used for exploratory and developmental drilling in
the East Chalkley Prospect located in Cameron Parish,
Louisiana.
|
●
|
Up
to $1.0 million for exploratory drilling in the Leblanc Prospect located
in Allen Parish, Louisiana.
|
As of
September 30, 2008, we had total assets of $
63.0
million and
working capital of $
2.8
million. In addition, we have available to us a new $65.0
million credit facility, of which $21.5 million is outstanding as of November
12, 2008. Based on our present working capital, available borrowings
under the credit facility and current rate of cash flow from operations, we
believe we have available to us sufficient working capital to fund our
operations and expected commitments for exploration and development through, at
least, December 31, 2009. However, in the event we receive calls for
capital greater than we expect or generate cash flow from operations less than
we expect, we may require additional working capital to fund our operations and
expected commitments for exploration and development. We will seek to obtain
additional working capital through the sale of our securities and, subject to
the successful deployment of our cash on hand, we will endeavor to obtain
additional capital through bank lines of credit and project
financing. However, other than our new $65.0 million credit facility
with CIT Capital USA Inc., we have no agreements or understandings with any
third parties at this time for our receipt of additional working
capital. There can be no assurance we will be able to obtain
continued access to capital as and when needed or, if so, that the terms of any
available financing will be subject to commercially reasonable
terms. If we are unable to access additional capital in significant
amounts as needed, we may not be able to develop our current prospects and
properties, may have to forfeit our interest in certain prospects and may not
otherwise be able to develop our business. In such an event, our stock price
will be materially adversely affected.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
Glossary
of Oil and Natural Gas Terms
The
following is a description of the meanings of some of the oil and natural gas
industry terms used in this report.
bbl
. Barrel, 42 U.S. gallons
of liquid volume, used in reference to crude oil or other liquid
hydrocarbons.
bcf
. Billion cubic feet of
natural gas.
boe.
Barrels of crude oil
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six mcf of natural gas to one bbl of
crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
boe/d
. boe per
day.
Btu.
British thermal unit, a
measurement of energy equivalent to the heat needed to raise one pound of water
one degree Fahrenheit.
Completion
. The process of
treating a drilled well followed by the installation of permanent equipment for
the production of natural gas or oil, or in the case of a dry hole, the
reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
Development well
. A well
drilled within the proved area of a natural gas or oil reservoir to the depth of
a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Drilling locations
. Total
gross locations specifically quantified by management to be included in the
Company’s multi-year drilling activities on existing acreage. The Company’s
actual drilling activities may change depending on the availability of capital,
regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs,
drilling results and other factors.
Dry hole
. A well found to be
incapable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify
completion as an oil or gas well.
Exploratory well
. A well
drilled to find and produce natural gas or oil reserves not classified as
proved, to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of
natural gas or oil in another reservoir or to extend a known
reservoir.
Field
. An area consisting of
either a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs, all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic
condition.
Formation
. An identifiable
layer of rock named after its geographical location and dominant rock
type.
Lease
. A legal contract that
specifies the terms of the business relationship between an energy company and a
landowner or mineral rights holder on a particular tract of land.
Leasehold
. Mineral rights
leased in a certain area to form a project area.
mbbls
. Thousand barrels of
crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
mboe.
Thousand barrels of
crude oil equivalent, determined using the ratio of six mcf of natural gas to
one bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids
mcf.
Thousand cubic feet of
natural gas.
mcfe
. Thousand cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six mcf of natural gas to one bbl of
crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
mmbbls
. Million barrels of
crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
mmboe.
Million barrels of
crude oil equivalent, determined using the ratio of six mcf of natural gas to
one bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
mmbtu
. Million British
Thermal Units.
mmcf
. Million cubic feet of
natural gas.
Net acres, net wells, or net
reserves
. The sum of the fractional working interest owned in gross
acres, gross wells, or gross reserves, as the case may be.
Overriding royalty interest
.
Is similar to a basic royalty interest except that it is created out of the
working interest. For example, an operator possesses a standard lease providing
for a basic royalty to the lessor or mineral rights owner of 1/8 of 8/8. This
then entitles the operator to retain 7/8 of the total oil and natural gas
produced. The 7/8 in this case is the 100% working interest the operator owns.
This operator may assign his working interest to another operator subject to a
retained 1/8 overriding royalty of the 8/8. This would then result in a basic
royalty of 1/8, an overriding royalty of 1/8 and a working interest of 3/4.
Overriding royalty interest owners have no obligation or responsibility for
developing and operating the property. The only expenses borne by the overriding
royalty owner are a share of the production or severance taxes and sometimes
costs incurred to make the oil or gas salable.
Plugging and abandonment
.
Refers to the sealing off of fluids in the strata penetrated by a well so that
the fluids from one stratum will not escape into another or to the surface.
Regulations of all states require plugging of abandoned wells.
Present value of future net revenues
(PV-10
). The present value of estimated future revenues to be generated
from the production of proved reserves, before income taxes, of proved reserves
calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board guidelines,
net of estimated production and future development costs, using prices and costs
as of the date of estimation without future escalation, without giving effect to
hedging activities, non-property related expenses such a general and
administrative expenses, debt service and depreciation, depletion and
amortization, and discounted using an annual discount rate of 10%.
PV-10
. Pre–tax present value
of estimated future net revenues discounted at 10%.
Production
. Natural
resources, such as oil or gas, taken out of the ground.
Productive well
. A well that
is found to be capable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities
to justify completion as an oil or gas well.
Project
. A targeted
development area where it is probable that commercial oil or gas can be produced
from new wells.
Prospect
. A specific
geographic area which, based on supporting geological, geophysical or other data
and also preliminary economic analysis using reasonably anticipated prices and
costs, is deemed to have potential for the discovery of commercial
hydrocarbons.
Proved developed producing
reserves
. Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
Proved reserves
. The
estimated quantities of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
commercially recoverable from known reservoirs under current economic and
operating conditions, operating methods, and government
regulations.
Proved undeveloped reserves
.
Proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage or from existing wells where a relatively large expenditure
is required for recompletion.
Recompletion
. The process of
re-entering an existing well bore that is either producing or not producing and
completing new reservoirs in an attempt to establish or increase existing
production.
Reserves
. Oil, natural gas
and gas liquids thought to be accumulated in known
reservoirs.
Reservoir
. A porous and
permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible
nature gas and/or oil that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and
is separate from other reservoirs.
Royalty
interest
. A share of production or the value or proceeds of
production, free of the costs of production, when and if there is
production. A royalty interest is usually expressed as a fraction
such as 1/8.
Secondary recovery
. A
recovery process that uses mechanisms other than the natural pressure of the
reservoir, such as gas injection, water injection, or water flooding, to produce
residual oil and natural gas remaining after the primary recovery
phase.
Shut-in
. A well that has been
capped (having the valves locked shut) for an undetermined amount of time. This
could be for additional testing, could be to wait for pipeline or processing
facility, or a number of other reasons.
Standardized measure
. The
present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved oil and natural gas
reserves, less future development, abandonment, production and income tax
expenses, discounted at 10% per annum to reflect timing of future cash flows and
using the same pricing assumptions as were used to calculate PV-10. Standardized
measure differs from PV-10 because standardized measure includes the effect of
future income taxes.
Successful
. A well is
determined to be successful if it is producing oil or natural gas, or awaiting
hookup, but not abandoned or plugged.
Undeveloped acreage
. Lease
acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would
permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and natural gas regardless
of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Water flood
. A method of
secondary recovery in which water is injected into the reservoir formation to
displace residual oil and enhance hydrocarbon recovery.
Water re-pressurization
. A
method of secondary recovery in which water is injected into the reservoir
formation to increase reservoir pressure and enhance hydrocarbon
recovery.
Working interest
. The
operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct
operating activities on the property and receive a share of production and
requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production
operations.
ITEM
3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
.
Not
applicable.
ITEM 4(T). CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer have reviewed and continue to
evaluate the effectiveness of our controls and procedures over financial
reporting and disclosure (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(“Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report. The term “disclosure controls and procedures”
is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. This term
refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it
files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures. In designing and evaluating our controls and procedures over
financial reporting and disclosure, our management recognized that any controls
and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and our
management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
An
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30,
2008.
Changes in Internal Control
.
We made no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Method
of Filing
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
Credit
Agreement dated as of September 9, 2008 among Petro Resources Corporation,
CIT Capital USA Inc., as administrative agent, and the lenders party
thereto
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9,
2008
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
Second
Lien Term Loan Agreement dated as of September 9, 2008 among Petro
Resources Corporation, CIT Capital USA Inc., as administrative agent, and
the lenders party thereto
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9,
2008
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
Guaranty
and Collateral Agreement dated as of September 9, 2008 among Petro
Resources Corporation, PRC Williston LLC, and CIT Capital USA Inc., as
administrative agent
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9,
2008
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
Second
Lien Guaranty and Collateral Agreement dated as of September 9, 2008 Petro
Resources Corporation, PRC Williston LLC, CIT Capital USA Inc., as
administrative agent
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9,
2008
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
Partnership
Interest Purchase Agreement dated September 26, 2008, as amended on
September 29, 2008, between Petro Resources Corporation and PRC HHEP II,
LP
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Filed
herewith
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly
authorized.
|
|
PETRO
RESOURCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 13, 2008
|
|
/
s/ Wayne P.
Hall
|
|
|
Wayne
P. Hall,
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Harry
Lee Stout
|
|
|
Harry
Lee Stout,
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
25