Rambler Metals and Mining plc (TSX VENTURE:RAB)(AIM:RMM) ('Rambler'
or the 'Company') is pleased to report that it has completed a
preliminary economic assessment ('PEA') to include the Lower
Footwall Zone ('LFZ') mineralization in its mine plan at the Ming
Copper-Gold Mine, in Newfoundland, Canada. This assessment has
evaluated the potential for an expansion program to first optimize
then transition the Ming Mine into a bulk tonnage operation.
The results show positive economics, good internal rate of
return and significant cash flow in addition to numerous areas of
opportunities which can only further improve the findings in future
studies.
SUMMARY
-- The PEA is based on an optimization of the current high grade operation
at the Ming Mine and Nugget Pond milling facility followed by a
transition into a 20+ year bulk tonnage mine based on the anticipated
ramp-up schedule:
-- Current Production: 630 mtpd (year one)
-- Years two and three: 1,000 mtpd (optimization of existing
infrastructure)
-- Years four to end of mine: up to 3,500 mtpd (bulk tonnage operation)
-- Also in year four and five the Nugget Pond hydrometallurgical
facility will process all remaining gold ore from the 1806 zone
within the Ming Mine
-- Numerous opportunities exist to improve the business case. It is these
areas that future optimization and engineering studies will focus on to
ensure that if or when the decision is made to proceed with the
expansion, the project will benefit from the upside of the existing
operation. These opportunities include:
-- A reduction of upfront capital requirements by advancing synergies
with current operations;
-- Additional resource growth through ongoing exploration; and
-- Further utilization of the Nugget Pond facility with new feed
sources from other regional copper and gold plays
-- Project before tax net present value ('NPV') of $251M with an internal
rate of return ('IRR') of 18% based on trending copper and gold prices
(see Note 1 below)
-- Pre-tax cash flow from operations of $861M undiscounted
-- Initial CAPEX requirement of $231M estimated for the entire ramp-up of
the project. Includes a significant expansion to the mining fleet, a
newly built 3,500 mtpd copper concentrator, new production hoist, a
backfill plant and fresh air intake/ exhaust raises
-- During the life of mine, after milling and recovery, approximately 980k
tonnes of copper concentrate (616M lbs of copper) will be produced with
193k ounces of gold and 851k ounces of silver
-- Average annual cash operating cost of $1.94 per equivalent pound copper
George Ogilvie, President and CEO of Rambler, commented:
"We are pleased with the results of the PEA that has confirmed
our belief that the Lower Footwall Zone can provide a profitable
mine life in excess of 20 years. The study now shows the expansion
of the Ming Mine over a three to four year period, however more
importantly the work has also uncovered some of the projects
opportunities and challenges. It is these areas that we must now
focus on over the coming months in various optimization studies so
that the external risk factors can be minimized allowing the Lower
Footwall Zone to remain profitable over varying degrees of price
commodity conditions.
We have steadily moved this mine towards production over the
last five years and we believe that we have built a core asset that
will ensure the company's growth regardless of whether we are in a
booming market or working out of a recession. We intend to maximize
the return on investment for our shareholders by first delivering
on our existing mine plan through mining the known high grade
massive sulphides. The eventual expansion into the footwall zone
has great potential and it is important to continue with the
engineering work now so that when long term market conditions are
favorable, our Company is ready for the transition."
The PEA will see the underground mining of all available
material within the Ming Mine, including the Lower Footwall Zone,
and represents the first time the entire deposit has been
considered and evaluated as a potential mining target. The prior
feasibility study released in August 26, 2010 considered the mining
of the massive sulphide zones only. With the current operation
constructed on this basis any possible expansion into the Lower
Footwall Zone is preliminary in nature.
The PEA has been developed through three independent
consultants; the Stantec office out of Sudbury and New Brunswick
were responsible for the mining, environmental and project
economics; Thibault and Associates Inc. out of New Brunswick were
responsible for all processing aspects of the project; while James
Weick, a professional geologist based out of Newfoundland, has
reviewed the procedures used for the resource estimation and found
them consistent with CIM best practices and in compliance with
NI43-101 guidelines. Much of the operational input gained from the
ongoing mining and milling at the Ming Mine was made available for
review and inclusion in the report.
A National Instrument 43-101 ("NI43-101") technical report for
the PEA will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com before the end of
April 2012.
As part of the economic assessment a new geological resource and
reserve has been estimated for the project. Tables 1 and 2 below
outline the results of this updated estimate which will also be
detailed in the technical report filed with SEDAR at April end.
This PEA includes some inferred mineralization, approximately 7% of
the reserve estimate, which are considered speculative geologically
and there is no certainty that the preliminary economic assessment
for these resources will be realized and eventually moved into any
reserve category.
Table 1: Resource Estimate for all Zones within the Ming Copper-Gold
Mine
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Resource
Classification Cutoff Quantity Grades
-------------------------------------------
Copper Gold Silver Zinc
--------------------------------
(000't) % g/t g/t %
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 1.00 % Cu 1,016 2.46 1.99 8.88 0.56
1.25 g/t
MMS (Gold) Au 267 0.56 4.31 32.15 1.31
Total Massive Sulphides 1,283 2.07 2.47 13.72 0.71
Total Stringer 1.00 % Cu -- -- -- -- --
Combined Total 1,283 2.07 2.47 13.72 0.71
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 1.00 % Cu 1,088 1.99 2.00 8.74 0.48
1.25 g/t
MMS (Gold) Au 83 0.74 2.83 13.86 0.70
Total Massive Sulphides 1,171 1.90 2.06 9.14 0.50
Total Stringer 1.00 % Cu 18,306 1.43 0.09 1.35 0.01
Combined Total 19,477 1.46 0.21 1.77 0.04
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined Measured and Indicated
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 1.00 % Cu 2,105 2.22 2.00 8.29 0.49
1.25 g/t
MMS (Gold) Au 349 0.60 3.96 27.82 1.16
Total Massive Sulphides 2,454 1.99 2.28 11.07 0.59
Total Stringer 1.00 % Cu 18,306 1.43 0.09 1.35 0.01
Combined Total 20,760 1.49 0.35 2.51 0.08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 1.00 % Cu 1,711 2.01 1.81 8.87 0.66
1.25 g/t
MMS (Gold) Au 136 0.73 1.97 8.29 0.60
Total Massive Sulphides 1,847 1.91 1.83 8.82 0.66
Total Stringer 1.00 % Cu 17 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.01
Combined Total 1,863 1.91 1.81 8.74 0.65
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1: Resource Estimate for all Zones within the Ming
Copper-Gold Mine
----------------------------------------------------------
Resource
Classification Contained Metal
-----------------------------------------
Copper Gold Silver Zinc
-----------------------------------------
tonnes oz oz tonnes
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Measured
----------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 25,029 65,155 290,192 5,642
MMS (Gold) 1,494 36,919 275,644 3,489
Total Massive
Sulphides 26,524 102,074 565,836 9,131
Total Stringer -- -- -- --
Combined Total 26,524 102,074 565,836 9,131
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Indicated
----------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 21,656 70,151 270,713 4,672
MMS (Gold) 616 7,545 36,881 580
Total Massive
Sulphides 22,271 77,695 307,594 5,252
Total Stringer 261,258 52,015 794,102 2,603
Combined Total 283,530 129,710 1,101,697 7,854
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Combined Measured
and Indicated
----------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 46,685 135,306 560,904 10,314
MMS (Gold) 2,110 44,464 312,526 4,068
Total Massive
Sulphides 48,795 179,770 873,430 14,383
Total Stringer 261,258 52,015 794,102 2,603
Combined Total 310,053 231,784 1,667,533 16,985
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Inferred
----------------------------------------------------------
MMS (Copper) 34,362 99,832 409,823 9,499
MMS (Gold) 993 8,589 36,138 814
Total Massive
Sulphides 35,355 108,421 445,961 10,313
Total Stringer 196 50 531 2
Combined Total 35,552 108,471 446,491 10,314
----------------------------------------------------------
(i) Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and have
not demonstrated economic viability. All figures are
rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate. Cut-off
grades of 1.0 per cent copper for the massive sulphides,
1.25 grams per tonne gold for the 1806 zone, 1.00 per
cent copper for the stringer sulphides have been used in
the estimate. Cut-offs are based on an NSR model and long
term metal prices of US$3.45/lb copper and US$1200/oz
gold, and US$21.96/oz silver. Zinc does not contribute to
the revenues.
Table 2: Minable Reserve Estimate for the Ming Copper-Gold Mine
------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification Quantity Grades
------------------------------------------------
Copper Gold Silver Zinc
------------------------------------
(000't) % g/t g/t %
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Proven Reserve 17,206 1.33 0.22 1.96 0.06
Probable Reserve 2,899 1.34 0.67 3.44 0.16
Combined Total 20,105 1.33 0.28 2.17 0.07
Estimated Minable
Resource (after
dilution/recovery)
(i) 1,553 1.40 1.43 7.65 0.59
------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2: Minable Reserve Estimate for the Ming Copper-Gold Mine
---------------------------------------------------------------
Classification Contained Metal
---------------------------------------------
Copper Gold Silver Zinc
---------------------------------------------
tonnes oz oz tonnes
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Proven Reserve 229,449 122,364 1,083,343 9,967
Probable Reserve 38,752 62,711 320,778 4,746
Combined Total 268,201 185,075 1,404,121 14,713
Estimated Minable
Resource (after
dilution/recovery)
(i) 21,672 71,514 381,884 9,213
---------------------------------------------------------------
(i) A portion of the mine plan utilizes inferred mineralization
which cannot be characterized into any reserve classification.
The 1.6M tonnes of minable inferred mineralization, which
represents 7% of the total reserve estimate, is classified as
an "Estimated Minable Resource" and cannot be carried into a
NI43-101 technical report".
This PEA does not include any of the exploration potential at
the Ming Mine and has only used the drill defined resources
and reserves.
HIGHLIGHTS AND ASSUMPTIONS OF THE PEA
-- As with all mining and exploration projects this expansion carries with
it some risk but significant upside potential under the right
conditions. The table below summarizes the sensitivities associated with
head grade, commodity pricing, currency rate, project OPEX and CAPEX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable -15% Base NPV 15% Range
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grade to mill $ 53.21 $ 251.49 $ 449.78 $ 396.57
Metal Price $ 37.38 $ 251.49 $ 465.61 $ 428.23
Currency $ 85.16 $ 251.49 $ 417.85 $ 332.70
OPEX $ 133.93 $ 251.49 $ 369.06 $ 235.14
CAPEX $ 209.56 $ 251.49 $ 293.42 $ 83.86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Discounted NPV before-tax (millions of dollars)
-- Basic assumptions used for the compilation of this economic assessment:
-- Average copper price of $3.53 per pound, gold price of $1,320 per
ounce and silver of $24.16 per ounce (see Note 2)
-- US to Canada exchange rate of 1 : 0.97
-- Project discount rate of 5%
-- Mill recoveries for year one are based on current operations at
Nugget Pond; then expansion and optimizing of the Nugget Pond copper
and gold circuits during years two and three; finally for years four
to twenty a new copper concentrating facility constructed at the
Ming Mine site, optimized for the lower footwall material with an
overall recovery of 97%
OPPORTUNITIES
-- The project capital is $231M excluding contingency and sustaining
capital which envisions a significant expansion to the mining fleet, a
newly built 3,500 mtpd copper concentrator, new production hoist, a
backfill plant and fresh air intake/ exhaust raises; all required in the
first three years of the project. Besides focusing on ways to reduce
these expenditures, with an operating mine and mill already in place,
Rambler possess the ability to fund some of the expansion through its
current operations over a three to five year period. This of course
would mean that new resources and reserves would be required to replace
those mined during that period.
-- The construction of a backfill plant will allow some of the historical
pillars left over from mining operations in 1982 to be mined. This
mineralization has been verified and included in two separate resource
categories. The first in developed but unmined areas with an indicated
resource of 125k tonnes grading 2.43% copper and 1.99 g/t gold; the
second under an inferred category of 274k tonnes grading 3.94% copper
and 2.00 g/t gold. Further engineering work may allow these resources to
be converted and included in the reserve statement.
-- The Nugget Pond milling complex (500 mtpd gold hydromet and 1000 mtpd
copper concentrator) is not being utilized beyond year five of the
project after the remaining resources from the 1806 gold zone have been
processed. With any expansion of Rambler's gold resources or
participation in another copper or gold play near to the Nugget Pond
property, this facility could take advantage of any deposit outside the
Ming Mine area and operate independently.
-- The Ming Mine ore bodies remain open in all directions and have been
proven to return significant copper and gold intersections with ongoing
diamond drill delineation and exploration programs. By expanding on
these programs the company is confident that new resources and reserves
maybe added.
The PEA envisions that massive sulphide ore will be trucked from
the mine to the Nugget Pond copper concentrator, 40 km's away, over
the first three years whereupon the 1806 zone (gold zone) will be
treated at the facility from years four through five. Beyond year
five additional 1806 zone material could be supplied if the
company's exploration program is successful or from an external
satellite deposit. In the interim a new 3,500 mtpd mill would be
constructed next to the existing Ming Mine shaft to be available
from year four to end of mine. This concept allows the Company to
realize revenue streams from both copper and gold
simultaneously.
There will be production increases from the existing 630 mtpd,
to 1,000 mtpd (years 2 and 3) and 3,500 mtpd from year 4 to year
20. Once in steady state production approximately 90% of the
planned tonnage will come from a longhole bulk mining method which
can reduce the operating unit costs from current levels of $115 per
tonne to $60 per tonne. Hydraulic backfill augmented with waste
rock from underground development will be the primary filling
mechanism with access to each of the zones made possible through
extensions of the existing ramps and raises. Due to the significant
increase in production a supplemental ventilation and power system
will have to be installed.
The capital requirement for the mine over the first six years is
estimated to be $172M; mill $45M over the first three years and
tailings $14M over the life of mine giving a total requirement of
$231M excluding contingency and sustaining capital. Production,
mine development and construction activities have been identified
for the entire 20 years of operation and have been linked through
schedules based on current performance parameters.
ABOUT RAMBLER METALS AND MINING
Rambler Metals and Mining plc is a Junior Mining Company that
has 100% ownership of the Ming Copper-Gold Mine in Baie Verte,
Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. As a producing gold and copper
miner, our objective is to become a mid-tier mining company by
continuing the development of the Ming Mine, discovering new
deposits and through mergers and acquisitions.
The initial six years of the Ming Mine project is based on the
underground mining of massive sulphides with a mineable reserve
estimate of 1.498 million ore tonnes grading 1.62% copper, 2.40 g/t
gold and 10.90 g/t silver (24,252 tonnes of copper, 115,549 ounces
of gold and 525,139 ounces of silver of contained metal). All
massive sulphide zones remain open both up and down plunge with the
current exploration program focused on extending the known
mineralization for inclusion in the resource/ reserve estimate.
In addition to the outlined reserve estimate there is a sizeable
footwall deposit, beneath the massive sulphide horizon, that has
been outlined with an indicated resource grade of 18,306k tonnes
grading 1.43% copper (261,258 tonnes of contained copper at a 1.00%
copper cut-off grade). This zone forms the basis of the preliminary
economic assessment, currently being compiled by the Company, which
envisions the Ming Mine transitioning itself into a bulk tonnage
mining operation. For further information on the Ming Mine project,
please refer to the Company's NI 43-101 compliant technical
reports, available under the Company's profile on SEDAR
(www.sedar.com).
Over the coming months and years, as the Company seeks to
optimize the Ming Mine project into cash positive position, it is
expected that future expansion into the footwall zone will be
formalized with the goal of maximizing returns for shareholders and
increasing the life of mine.
Note 1: Unless otherwise noted all figures are quoted in $US
Note 2: Commodity pricing for years 1 and 2 are reflective of Macquarie's
published forecast report, November 2011. Long term pricing
beyond year 5 trending to $3.45 per pound copper, $1,200 per
ounce gold and $21.96 per ounce silver. For the life of mine the
average copper price is $3.53 per pound, gold price is $1,320 per
ounce and silver price is $24.16 per ounce
Larry Pilgrim, P.Geo., is the Qualified Person responsible for
the technical content of this release and has reviewed and approved
it accordingly. Mr. Pilgrim is an independent consultant contracted
by Rambler Metals and Mining plc.
All tonnes reported are dry metric tonnes unless otherwise
indicated.
The NI43-101 technical report has been complied by a number of independent,
third party, consultants. Including:
George Darling, P.Eng., Stantec: Reserve estimate, mining methodology and
project economics;
James Weick, P.Geo.: Resource estimate and regional geology;
Dean Thibault, P.Eng., Thibault and Associates Inc: Metallurgical
processing;
Peter Pheeney, P.Eng., Stantec: Environmental.
Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements:
Certain information included in this press release, including
information relating to future financial or operating performance
and other statements that express the expectations of management or
estimates of future performance constitute "forward-looking
statements". Such forward-looking statements include, without
limitation, statements regarding the financial strength of the
Company, estimates regarding timing of future development and
production and statements concerning possible expansion
opportunities for the Company. Where the Company expresses or
implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results,
such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed
to have a reasonable basis. However, forward-looking statements are
subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could
cause actual results to differ materially from future results
expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Such risks include, but are not limited to, interpretation and
implications of drilling and geophysical results; estimates
regarding timing of future capital expenditures and costs towards
profitable commercial operations. Other factors that could cause
actual results, developments or events to differ materially from
those anticipated include, among others, increases/decreases in
production; volatility in metals prices and demand; currency
fluctuations; cash operating margins; cash operating cost per pound
sold; costs per ton of ore; variances in ore grade or recovery
rates from those assumed in mining plans; reserves and/or
resources; the ability to successfully integrate acquired assets;
operational risks inherent in mining or development activities and
legislative factors relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land use,
title and permits, importing and exporting of minerals and
environmental protection. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be
placed on forward-looking statements and the forward-looking
statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified
in their entirety by this cautionary statement. The forward-looking
statements contained herein are made as at the date hereof and the
Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or
revise any such forward-looking statements or any forward-looking
statements contained in any other documents whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
under applicable securities law.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider
(as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
Contacts: Rambler Metals & Mining Plc George Ogilvie, P.Eng.
President and CEO 709-800-1929 709-800-1921 Rambler Metals &
Mining Plc Corporate Office +44 (0) 20 8652-2700 +44 (0) 20
8652-2719 (FAX) www.ramblermines.com Seymour Pierce Limited Nandita
Sahgal / Jeremy Stephenson +44 (0) 20-7107-8000 Pelham Bell
Pottinger Charles Vivian / Philippe Polman +44 (0) 20 7861 3921
Ocean Equities Limited Guy Wilkes +44 (0) 20-7786-4370