Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Organization and Operations
Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Ltd. (formerly
Nexgen Petroleum Corp.
,
Blackrock Petroleum Corp. or
DGT Corp.)
Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Ltd. (formerly Nexgen Petroleum Corp., Blackrock Petroleum Corp. or DGT Corp.) ("Hubei " or the “Company”) was incorporated on April 17, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada. Through various acquisitions and name changes, the Company engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing oil and gas properties.
On October 20, 2010, the Company changed to its current name, Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Ltd. to reflect its intended acquisition of HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited (“HBMK”), a BVI corporation.
The Company discontinued its oil and gas exploration business upon consummation of the share exchange agreement (“Share Exchange Agreement”) with HBMK and all of the shareholders of HBMK on September 21, 2011.
HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited and subsidiary
HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited
HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited was incorporated on June 29, 2010 under the laws of the Territory of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”). HBMK was formed by the stockholders of Sensori Holdings (S) Pte Ltd., the sole stockholder of Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the registered and contributed capital of Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Prior to October 12, 2010, the date of recapitalization, HBMK was inactive and had no assets or liabilities.
Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Minkang”) was incorporated on December 18, 2003 under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Minkang engages in the research, development, manufacturing and distribution of traditional Chinese medicine.
Merger of
Minkang
On October 12, 2010, HBMK acquired all of the registered and contributed capital of Minkang from Sensori Holdings (S) Pte Ltd., Minkang’s then sole stockholder in exchange for 3,620,000 shares of the HBMK’s common stock. The number of shares issued represented 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock immediately after the consummation of the Minkang acquisition.
As a result of the ownership interests of the former stockholder of Minkang, for financial statement reporting purposes, the merger between HBMK and Minkang has been treated as a reverse acquisition with Minkang deemed the accounting acquirer and HBMK deemed the accounting acquiree under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The reverse merger is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of Minkang (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to HBMK (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the acquisition. The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of HBMK and the assets and liabilities of Minkang which are recorded at historical cost. The equity of the combined entity is the historical equity of Minkang retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by HBMK in the transaction.
Acquisition of HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited and Subsidiary Recognized as a Reverse Acquisition
On July 8, 2011, Hubei entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with HBMK and all of the shareholders of HBMK and consummated the Share Exchange Agreement on September 21, 2011, with the HBMK stockholders representing 100% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of HBMK. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, Hubei acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of HBMK from HBMK’s then stockholders in exchange for 33,500,000 shares of the Hubei’s common stock. The number of shares issued represented approximately 77.8% of the issued and outstanding common stock immediately after the consummation of the Share Exchange.
As a result of the ownership interests of the former stockholders of HBMK, for financial statement reporting purposes, the merger between Hubei and HBMK has been treated as a reverse acquisition with HBMK deemed the accounting acquirer and Hubei deemed the accounting acquiree under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The reverse merger is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of HBMK (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to Hubei (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the combination. The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of Hubei and the assets and liabilities of HBMK which are recorded at historical cost. The equity of the combined entity is the historical equity of HBMK retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by Hubei in the transaction.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012.
Principles of Consolidation
The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810
“Consolidation”
of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and its entities as of the reporting period ending date(s) and for the reporting period(s) as follows:
Entity
|
|
Jurisdiction, Place of Incorporation
|
|
Attributable
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBMK Pharmaceutical Limited
|
|
The Territory of the British Virgin Islands
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; allowance for doubtful accounts, normal production capacity, inventory valuation and obsolescence; the carrying value, recoverability and impairment of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment, land use rights, and purchased formulae; interest rates; revenue and government grant realized or realizable and earned; sales returns and allowances; value added tax rate, income tax rate and related tax provision; foreign currency exchange rate and functional currency of foreign subsidiaries. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1
|
|
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
|
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, restricted cash – unearned government grants, banker’s acceptance notes receivable, accounts receivable, advance on purchases, prepayments and other current assets, accounts payable, customer deposits, taxes payable, deferred revenue from government grants, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company’s loans payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
It is not, however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders, if any, due to their related party nature.
Fair Value of Non-Financial Assets or Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
The Company identifies potentially excess and slow-moving inventories by evaluating turn rates, inventory levels and other factors. Excess quantities are identified through evaluation of inventory aging, review of inventory turns and historical sales experiences. The Company provides lower of cost or market reserves for such identified excess and slow-moving inventories. The Company establishes a reserve for inventory shrinkage, if any, based on the historical results of physical inventory cycle counts.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment, land use rights, and purchased formulae are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
The key assumptions used in management’s estimates of projected cash flow deal largely with forecasts of sales levels, gross margins, and operating costs of the manufacturing facilities. These forecasts are typically based on historical trends and take into account recent developments as well as management’s plans and intentions. Any difficulty in manufacturing or sourcing raw materials on a cost effective basis would significantly impact the projected future cash flows of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and potentially lead to an impairment charge for long-lived assets. Other factors, such as increased competition or a decrease in the desirability of the Company’s products, could lead to lower projected sales levels, which would adversely impact cash flows. A significant change in cash flows in the future could result in an impairment of long lived assets.
The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash, Unearned Government Grants
The Company follows paragraph 210-10-45-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for restricted cash, unearned government grants. Restricted cash, unearned government grants represents grants received from the City of Yichang government to be used in the Company’s environmental protection and improvement projects.
Banker’s Acceptance Notes Receivable
The Company accepts bankers’ acceptance notes in payment of accounts receivable with certain customers. These notes are usually of a short term nature, approximately three to nine months in length. They are non-interest bearing, are due on the date of maturity; are paid by the customers’ bank or credit worthy issuer upon presentation.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.
Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any. Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.
There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
Advance on Purchases
Advance on purchases primarily represents amounts paid to vendors for future delivery of products ranging from three (3) months to nine (9) months, all of which are fully or partially refundable depending upon the terms and conditions of the purchase agreements.
Inventories
Inventory Valuation
The Company values inventories, consisting of raw materials, packaging material and finished goods, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in and first-out (“FIFO”) method for raw materials and packaging materials and the weighted average cost method for finished goods. Cost of finished goods comprises direct labor, direct materials, direct production cost and an allocated portion of production overhead. The Company reduces inventories for the diminution of value, resulting from product obsolescence, damage or other issues affecting marketability, equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. Factors utilized in the determination of estimated market value include (i) current sales data and historical return rates, (ii) estimates of future demand, (iii) competitive pricing pressures, (iv) new product introductions, (v) product expiration dates, and (vi) component and packaging obsolescence.
Normal Capacity and Period Costs of Underutilized or Idle Capacity of the Production Facilities
The Company follows paragraph 330-10-30-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the allocation of production costs and charges to inventories. The Company allocates fixed production overhead to inventories based on the normal capacity of the production facilities expected to be achieved over a number of periods or seasons under normal circumstances, taking into account the loss of capacity resulting from planned maintenance. Judgment is required to determine when a production level is abnormally low (that is, outside the range of expected variation in production). Factors that might be anticipated to cause an abnormally low production level include significantly reduced demand, labor and materials shortages, and unplanned facility or equipment down time. The actual level of production may be used if it approximates normal capacity. In periods of abnormally high production, the amount of fixed overhead allocated to each unit of production is decreased so that inventories are not measured above cost. The amount of fixed overhead allocated to each unit of production is not increased as a consequence of abnormally low production or idle plant and unallocated overheads of underutilized or idle capacity of the production facilities are recognized as period costs in the period in which they are incurred rather than as a portion of the inventory cost.
Inventory Obsolescence and Markdowns
The Company evaluates its current level of inventories considering historical sales and other factors and, based on this evaluation, classify inventory markdowns in the income statement as a component of cost of goods sold pursuant to Paragraph 420-10-S99 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to adjust inventories to net realizable value. These markdowns are estimates, which could vary significantly from actual requirements if future economic conditions, customer demand or competition differ from expectations. Other significant estimates include the allocation of variable and fixed production overheads. While variable production overheads are allocated to each unit of production on the basis of actual use of production facilities, the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion is based on the normal capacity of the Company’s production facilities, and recognizes abnormal idle facility expenses as current period charges. Certain costs, including categories of indirect materials, indirect labor and other indirect manufacturing costs which are included in the overhead pools are estimated. The management of the Company determines its normal capacity based upon the amount of operating hours of the manufacturing machinery and equipment in a reporting period.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful lives ranging from five (5) years to twenty (20) years. Upon sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). Leasehold improvements, if any, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction or the acquisition cost of long-lived assets. Under
U.S. GAAP, all costs associated with construction of long-lived assets should be reflected as long-term as part of construction-in-progress. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to property, plant and equipment when substantially all of the activities necessary to prepare the long-lived assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is provided until the construction of the long-lived assets is complete and ready for their intended use.
Planned Major Maintenance Activities
The Company follows the guidance of paragraph 360-10-25-5 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 360-10-25-5”), which prohibits the use of the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities. Paragraph 360-10-25-5 also requires disclosures regarding the method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities and the effects of implementing the Paragraph 360-10-25-5. The guidance in Paragraph 360-10-25-5 affects the Company with regard to its manufacturing facility requiring periodic major maintenance to meet the Certification of Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMP”) requirement every five (5) years in connection with its pharmaceutical products manufacturing license as mandated by China State Food and Drug Administration (“SFDA”). As a result, the Company has retroactively applied the required change in accounting, electing the deferral method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities. The deferral method requires the capitalization of planned major maintenance costs at the point they occur and the depreciation and amortization of these costs over their estimated useful lives or the period until future maintenance activities of five (5) years are repeated, whichever is shorter.
Land Use Rights
Land use rights represent the cost to obtain the rights to use certain parcels of land in the City of Yichang, Hubei Province, PRC. Land use rights are carried at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the rights of fifty (50) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Purchased Formulae
The Company has adopted paragraph 350-30-25-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for purchased formulae. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the costs of purchased formulae over their estimated useful lives of ten (10) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Customer Deposits
Customer deposits primarily represent amounts received from customers for future delivery of products, all of which were fully or partially refundable depending upon the terms and conditions of the sales agreements.
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
The Company derives the majority of its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of goods. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from trucking or rail company and title transfers when the goods arrive at their destination, based on free on board (“FOB”) destination; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.
Net sales of products represent the invoiced value of goods, net of value added taxes (“VAT”). The Company is subject to VAT which is levied on all of the Company’s products at the rate of 17% on the invoiced value of sales. Sales or Output VAT is borne by customers in addition to the invoiced value of sales and Purchase or Input VAT is borne by the Company in addition to the invoiced value of purchases to the extent not refunded for export sales, if any.
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees in accordance with paragraphs 605-45-45-19 through 605-45-45-23 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. While amounts charged to customers for shipping products are included in revenues, the related costs are classified in cost of goods sold as incurred.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Research and Development
The Company follows paragraph 730-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2
“Accounting for Research and Development Costs”
) and paragraph 730-20-25-11 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 68
“Research and Development Arrangements”
) for research and development costs. Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development costs consist primarily of remuneration for research and development staff, depreciation and maintenance expenses of research and development equipment, material and testing costs for research and development as well as research and development arrangements with unrelated third party research and development institutions. The research and development arrangements usually involve specific research and development projects. Often times, the Company makes non-refundable advances upon signing of these research and development arrangements. The Company adopted paragraph 730-20-25-13 and 730-20-35-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 07-3
“Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to be Used in Future Research and Development Activities”
) for those non-refundable advances. Non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. Such amounts are recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. The management continues to evaluate whether the Company expect the goods to be delivered or services to be rendered. If the management does not expect the goods to be delivered or services to be rendered, the capitalized advance payment are charged to expense.
Government Grants
Receipts of government grants (i) to construct environmental protection and improvement projects and (ii) to encourage research and development and (iii) to subsidize energy conservation activities which are non-refundable are credited to unearned government grants upon receipt. The grants are used for purchases of assets, to subsidize the research and development and energy conservation expenses incurred, for compensation expenses already incurred or for good performance of the Company.
Grants applicable to the construction of the environmental protection and improvement projects are recorded as a credit to the total cost of pollution prevention projects upon completion of the pollution prevention projects. For research and development expenses, the Company matches and offsets the government grants with the expenses of the research and development activities as specified in the grant approval document in the corresponding period when such expenses are incurred and records related government grants as credit to research and development and pollution prevention project cost accordingly. For government grants received as compensation for expenses already incurred are recognized as income in the period they become recognizable.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-20-35”) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s reporting currency or Chinese Yuan or Renminbi, the Company’s functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss
that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date
or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.
Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions, if any, are included in the Company’s statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).
Income Tax Provision
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss) in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty (50) percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to the unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company follows Section 830-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-10-45”) for foreign currency translation to translate the financial statements of the foreign subsidiary from the functional currency, generally the local currency, into U.S. Dollars. Section 830-10-45 sets out the guidance relating to how a
reporting entity determines the
functional currency of a
foreign entity (including of a foreign entity in a highly inflationary economy), re-measures the books of record (if necessary), and characterizes transaction gains and losses. Pursuant to Section 830-10-45,
the assets, liabilities, and operations of a foreign entity shall be measured using the functional currency of that entity.
An entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates; normally, that is the currency of the environment, or local currency, in which an entity primarily generates and expends cash.
The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is determined based on management’s judgment and involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which the subsidiary transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency, but any dependency upon the parent and the nature of the subsidiary’s operations must also be considered. If a subsidiary’s functional currency is deemed to be the local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of that subsidiary’s financial statements is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. However, if the functional currency is deemed to be the U.S. Dollar, then any gain or loss associated with the re-measurement of these financial statements from the local currency to the functional currency would be included in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company disposes of foreign subsidiaries, then any cumulative translation gains or losses would be recorded into the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company determines that there has been a change in the functional currency of a subsidiary to the U.S. Dollar, any translation gains or losses arising after the date of change would be included within the statement of income and comprehensive income (loss).
Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant subsidiary’s local currency to be the functional currency for its foreign subsidiary.
The financial records of the Company are maintained in their local currency, the Renminbi (“RMB”), which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated from the local currency into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates for the period to approximate translation at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates those elements are recognized in the financial statements. Foreign currency
translation gain (loss) resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining accumulated other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders’ equity.
RMB is not a fully convertible currency. All foreign exchange transactions involving RMB must take place either through the People’s Bank of China (the “PBOC”) or other institutions authorized to buy and sell foreign exchange. The exchange rate adopted for the foreign exchange transactions are the rates of exchange quoted by the PBOC. Commencing July 21, 2005, China adopted a managed floating exchange rate regime based on market demand and supply with reference to a basket of currencies. The exchange rate of the US dollar against the RMB was adjusted from approximately RMB 8.28 per U.S. dollar to approximately RMB 8.11 per U.S. dollar on July 21, 2005. Since then, the PBOC administers and regulates the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the RMB taking into account demand and supply of RMB, as well as domestic and foreign economic and financial conditions.
Unless otherwise noted, the rate presented below per U.S. $1.00 was the midpoint of the interbank rate as quoted by OANDA Corporation (
www.oanda.com
) contained in its financial statements. Management believes that the difference between RMB vs. U.S. dollar exchange rate quoted by the PBOC and RMB vs. U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by OANDA Corporation were immaterial. Translations do not imply that the RMB amounts actually represent, or have been or could be converted into, equivalent amounts in U.S. dollars. Translation of amounts from RMB into U.S. dollars has been made at the following exchange rates for the respective periods:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheets
|
|
|
6.3265
|
|
|
|
6.3585
|
|
|
|
6.3952
|
|
|
|
6.6118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of income and comprehensive income
|
|
|
6.3180
|
|
|
|
6.4640
|
|
|
|
6.6558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company has applied section 220-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 220-10-45”) to present comprehensive income (loss). Section 220-10-45 establishes rules for the reporting of comprehensive income (loss) and its components. Comprehensive income (loss), for the Company, consists of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments and is presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss) and stockholders’ equity.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent share arrangements, stock options and warrants.
There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events.
The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08
In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:
Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 20112012-08”).
This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.
The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011.
Early adoption is permitted.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11
“Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”).
This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position.
The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.
The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02
In July 2012, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 “
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” (“ASU 2012-02”).
This Update is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment. This guidance builds upon the guidance in ASU 2011-08, entitled
Testing Goodwill for Impairment
. ASU 2011-08 was issued on September 15, 2011, and feedback from stakeholders during the exposure period related to the goodwill impairment testing guidance was that the guidance also would be helpful in impairment testing for intangible assets other than goodwill.
The revised standard allows an entity the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, thus necessitating that it perform the quantitative impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.
This Update is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Earlier implementation is permitted.
Other Recently Issued, but Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
Note 3 – Restricted Cash – Unearned Government Grant
Restricted cash – unearned government grant consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash – unearned government grant
|
|
$
|
445,233
|
|
|
$
|
468,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
445,233
|
|
|
$
|
468,009
|
|
Management has estimated that during the next twelve months the Company will complete certain environmental protection and improvement projects and earn the entire grant currently held in the restricted cash.
Note 4 – Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
479,192
|
|
|
$
|
508,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging materials
|
|
|
235,717
|
|
|
|
184,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,015,806
|
|
|
|
727,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,689,849
|
|
|
|
1,041,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,420,564
|
|
|
$
|
2,461,454
|
|
Slow-moving or Obsolescence Markdowns
There were no slow-moving or inventory obsolescence adjustments for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
Lower of Cost or Market Adjustments
There were no lower of cost or market adjustments for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
Note 5 – Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation consisted of the following:
|
|
Estimated Useful Life (Years)
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements (i)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
3,680,027
|
|
|
$
|
3,656,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress (ii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,051
|
|
|
|
180,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,871,172
|
|
|
|
1,564,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
175,856
|
|
|
|
174,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
5-8
|
|
|
|
120,720
|
|
|
|
113,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,968,826
|
|
|
|
5,690,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation (iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,227,207
|
)
|
|
|
(943,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,741,619
|
|
|
$
|
4,747,005
|
|
(i)
Capitalized Interest
For the interim period ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, Minkang did not capitalize any interest to fixed assets.
(ii)
Construction-in-progress
Minkang is in the process of constructing a pollution prevention station, which is recorded as construction in progress included in the consolidated balance sheets.
(iii)
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $279,910 and $236,931, respectively.
Note 6 – Land Use Rights
Minkang
In 2004 and 2008, Minkang entered into a series of agreements with the Chinese government, whereby the Company paid RMB 15,495,700 to acquire the rights to use 37,919.86 square meters of land in the aggregate for approximately 50 years and obtained the land use right certificates expiring from February 23, 2054 through November 5, 2058. The purchase price and related acquisition costs are being amortized over the term of the right of approximately fifty (50) years.
Land use rights, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land use rights
|
|
$
|
2,449,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,437,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(379,647
|
)
|
|
|
(341,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,069,685
|
|
|
$
|
2,095,825
|
|
Amortization Expense
Amortization expense for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $36,740 and $36,345, respectively.
Note 7 – Purchased Formulae
Purchased formulae, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased formulae
|
|
$
|
1,902,948
|
|
|
$
|
1,893,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,474,785
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
428,163
|
|
|
$
|
568,011
|
|
Amortization Expense
Amortization expense for the interim period e 31, 2012 and 2011 was $142,721 and $141,188, respectively.
Note 8 – Loans Payable
Loans payable consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB10,000,000 from Bank of Communications Limited, Yichang City Branch, collateralized by certain of Minkang’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 110% of the bank’s benchmark rate, payable monthly, with principal due May 5, 2012 which was repaid in full on May 7, 2012.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,572,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB5,000,000 to Hubei Bank Corporation Limited, collateralized by certain of the Company’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 110% of the bank’s benchmark payable monthly, with principal due and repaid in full on January 11, 2012.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
786,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB5,000,000 to Hubei Bank Corporation Limited, collateralized by certain of the Company’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 110% of the bank’s benchmark payable monthly, with principal due on January 11, 2013.
|
|
|
790,326
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB5,000,000 to Hubei Bank Corporation Limited, collateralized by certain of the Company’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 110% of the bank’s benchmark payable monthly, with principal due April 7, 2012 which was repaid in full on April 1, 2012.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
786,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB5,000,000 to Hubei Bank Corporation Limited, collateralized by certain of the Company’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 110% of the bank’s benchmark payable monthly, with principal due on April 5, 2013.
|
|
|
790,326
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable of RMB10,000,000 from Bank of Communications Limited, Yichang City Branch, collateralized by certain of Minkang’s buildings and land use rights, with interest at 120% of the bank’s benchmark rate, payable monthly, with principal due May 7, 2013.
|
|
|
1,580,654
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,161,306
|
|
|
$
|
3,145,396
|
|
Note 9 – Related Party Transactions
Related parties
Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:
Related Parties
|
|
Relationship
|
|
|
|
KOH, SOCK HUA
|
|
Stockholder of the Company
|
|
|
|
LEE, TONG TAI
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and stockholder of the Company
|
|
|
|
KOH, CHEOH NGUAN
|
|
Stockholder of the Company
|
|
|
|
Sensori Holdings (S) Pte Ltd.
|
|
An entity owned and controlled by significant stockholders of the Company
|
Advances from
Stockholders
From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
Advances from stockholders consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from stockholders
|
|
$
|
183,846
|
|
|
$
|
505,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,846
|
|
|
$
|
505,480
|
|
Note 10 – Working Capital Advances
On September 26, 2011, Minkang received non-interest bearing working capital advances of RMB5 million from an unrelated third party. On April 25, 2012, Minkang fully repaid the working capital advance in the amount of RMB 5,000,000 (approximately $791,189).
Note 11 – Unearned and Earned Government Grants
Unearned government grants and earned government grants were as follows:
|
Earned Government Grants
at
|
|
Unearned Government Grants
at
|
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution prevention projects
|
|
$
|
25,177
|
|
|
$
|
2,254
|
|
|
$
|
445,233
|
|
|
$
|
468,009
|
|
Note 12 – Stockholders’ Equity
Shares Authorized
Upon formation the aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is one hundred million (100,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock,” with all of such shares having a par value of $0.001 per share. The total number of shares of Common Stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is ninety million (90,000,000) shares. The total number of shares of Preferred Stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is ten million (10,000,000) shares.
On September 7, 2007, the Company filed a Certificate of Change to the Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to NRS 78.209 with the Secretary of State of Nevada, effective September 20, 2007, and changed its authorized capital from 90,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 to 1,350,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001.
On September 29, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Change to the Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to NRS 78.209 with the Secretary of State of Nevada, effective October 20, 2010, and changed its authorized capital from 1,350,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 to 168,750,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001.
Common Stock
Immediately prior to the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement on September 21, 2011, the Company had 9,547,169 common shares issued and outstanding.
Upon consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement on September 21, 2011, the Company issued 33,500,000 shares of its common stock for the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of HBMK.
On April 27, 2012, the Company completed a private placement financing involving the sale of 1,130,270 restricted shares of the common stock (each a “share”) of the Company to one individual at $0.70 per share for gross proceeds of $791,189.
Note 13 – Stamp Tax on Minkang’s Change of Ownership
Minkang was billed a one-time stamp tax of RMB2 million and RMB1,356,505.95 on August 31, 2011 and September 14, 2011, respectively, or RMB3,356,505.95 in aggregate in connection with its ownership change from Sensori Holdings (S) Pte Ltd. to HBMK.
Note 14 – Concentrations and Credit Risk
Customer and Credit Concentrations
Customer concentrations and credit concentrations are as follows:
|
|
Net Sales
for the Interim Period Ended
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
at
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer #0999
|
|
|
69.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer #0579
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer #1162
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer #1212
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Product Concentration
Product concentrations are as follows:
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product # 1
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product # 2
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.
Substantially all of the Company’s cash was held by major financial institutions located in the PRC, none of which are insured. However, the Company has not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts.
Note 15 - Foreign Operations
Operations
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are carried out and all of its assets are located in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC. The Company’s business may be influenced by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency fluctuation and remittances and methods of taxation, among other things.
Interest Rate
The tight monetary policy currently instituted by the PRC government and increases in interest rate would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. In particular, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates due to the fact that interest rates on all of Minkang’s borrowings were based on 110% of the banks’ benchmark rate, a 1% increase in average interest rates on the Company’s borrowings would increase future interest expense by approximately RMB200,000 (approximately $32,000) per year based on the outstanding balances of RMB20 million (approximately $3.2 million) of loans payable at September 30, 2012.
The Company is currently not using any interest rate collars or hedges to manage or reduce interest rate risk. As a result, any increase in interest rates on the variable rate borrowings would increase interest expense and reduce net income.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies for transactions denominated in currencies other than RMB, the Company’s PRC subsidiary’s functional currency.
The Company had no foreign currency hedges in place to reduce such exposure.
Note 16 – Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.