Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission File Number 001-31305
FOSTER WHEELER AG
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Switzerland   98-0607469
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
80 Rue de Lausanne    
CH 1202 Geneva, Switzerland   1202
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
41 22 741 8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 123,218,303 registered shares (CHF 3.00 par value) were outstanding as of October 22, 2010.
 
 

 


 

FOSTER WHEELER AG
INDEX
         
    3  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    31  
 
       
    50  
 
       
    50  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    51  
 
       
    52  
 
       
    53  
  EX-10.2
  EX-10.3
  EX-10.4
  EX-23.1
  EX-31.1
  EX-31.2
  EX-32.1
  EX-32.2
  EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
  EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
  EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
  EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
  EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
  EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Operating revenues
  $ 904,709     $ 1,216,379     $ 2,855,778     $ 3,789,703  
Cost of operating revenues
    764,789       1,022,542       2,395,916       3,213,155  
 
                       
Contract profit
    139,920       193,837       459,862       576,548  
 
                               
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    73,622       75,881       213,442       214,153  
Other income, net
    (16,197 )     (10,508 )     (35,948 )     (30,201 )
Other deductions, net
    7,394       6,722       27,131       19,707  
Interest income
    (2,835 )     (2,701 )     (7,924 )     (7,799 )
Interest expense
    4,330       4,648       12,925       10,117  
Net asbestos-related (gain)/provision
    (1,665 )     1,745       (68 )     5,251  
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    75,271       118,050       250,304       365,320  
Provision for income taxes
    18,693       22,061       55,712       67,625  
 
                       
Net income
    56,578       95,989       194,592       297,695  
 
                       
 
                               
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    4,858       5,991       11,954       12,630  
 
                       
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 51,720     $ 89,998     $ 182,638     $ 285,065  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per share (see Note 1):
                               
Basic
  $ 0.41     $ 0.71     $ 1.44     $ 2.26  
 
                       
Diluted
  $ 0.41     $ 0.71     $ 1.44     $ 2.24  
 
                       
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
ASSETS
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,040,153     $ 997,158  
Short-term investments
    268        
Accounts and notes receivable, net:
               
Trade
    493,213       526,525  
Other
    118,865       117,718  
Contracts in process
    197,748       219,774  
Prepaid, deferred and refundable income taxes
    51,384       46,478  
Other current assets
    37,199       33,902  
 
           
Total current assets
    1,938,830       1,941,555  
 
           
Land, buildings and equipment, net
    371,883       398,132  
Restricted cash
    32,866       34,905  
Notes and accounts receivable — long-term
    1,397       1,571  
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
    225,162       228,030  
Goodwill
    87,883       88,702  
Other intangible assets, net
    67,541       73,029  
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
    216,393       244,265  
Other assets
    85,668       87,781  
Deferred tax assets
    70,127       89,768  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 3,097,750     $ 3,187,738  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Current installments on long-term debt
  $ 35,627     $ 36,930  
Accounts payable
    262,694       303,436  
Accrued expenses
    225,504       280,861  
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
    633,050       600,725  
Income taxes payable
    33,227       60,052  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    1,190,102       1,282,004  
 
           
Long-term debt
    159,339       175,510  
Deferred tax liabilities
    68,013       62,956  
Pension, postretirement and other employee benefits
    234,215       270,269  
Asbestos-related liability
    317,191       352,537  
Other long-term liabilities
    176,433       171,405  
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES
    2,145,293       2,314,681  
 
           
Temporary Equity:
               
Non-vested share-based compensation awards subject to redemption
    10,291       2,570  
 
           
TOTAL TEMPORARY EQUITY
    10,291       2,570  
 
           
Equity:
               
Registered shares:
               
CHF 3.00 par value; authorized: 190,733,474 shares and 190,649,900 shares, respectively; conditionally authorized: 62,098,354 shares and 62,181,928 shares, respectively; issued: 127,525,517 shares and 127,441,943 shares, respectively; outstanding: 123,212,807 shares and 127,441,943 shares, respectively
    329,641       329,402  
Paid-in capital
    626,948       617,938  
Retained earnings
    504,819       322,181  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (463,941 )     (438,004 )
Treasury shares (outstanding: 4,312,710 shares)
    (99,182 )      
 
           
TOTAL FOSTER WHEELER AG SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    898,285       831,517  
 
           
Noncontrolling interests
    43,881       38,970  
 
           
TOTAL EQUITY
    942,166       870,487  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY
  $ 3,097,750     $ 3,187,738  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
                                                                                 
                                                            Total Foster              
                                    Retained Earnings/                     Wheeler AG              
    Preferred     Common     Registered     Paid-in     (Accumulated     Accumulated Other     Treasury     Shareholders’     Noncontrolling        
    Shares     Shares     Shares     Capital     Deficit)     Comprehensive Loss     Shares     Equity     Interests     Total Equity  
     
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009:
                                                                               
Balance at December 26, 2008
  $     $ 1,262     $     $ 914,063     $ (27,975 )   $ (494,788 )   $     $ 392,562     $ 28,718     $ 421,280  
Net income
                            285,065                   285,065       12,630       297,695  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                                                               
Foreign currency translation
                                  31,322             31,322       1,212       32,534  
Cash flow hedges
                                  (3,739 )           (3,739 )           (3,739 )
Pension and other postretirement benefits
                                  14,789             14,789       (6 )     14,783  
 
                                                                         
Comprehensive Income
                                                            327,437       13,836       341,273  
 
                                                                         
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of share purchase warrants
                      9                         9             9  
Issuance of common shares upon vesting of restricted awards
          1             (1 )                                    
Cancellation of common shares and issuance of registered shares
          (1,263 )     326,070       (324,807 )                                    
Repurchase and retirement of shares
                      (28 )                       (28 )           (28 )
Issuance of registered shares upon conversion of preferred shares
                361       (361 )                                    
Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of stock options
                33       244                         277             277  
Issuance of registered shares upon vesting of restricted awards
                9       (9 )                                    
Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of share purchase warrants
                1,518       955                         2,473             2,473  
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
                                                    (2,171 )     (2,171 )
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards
                      14,183                         14,183             14,183  
Excess tax shortfall related to share-based compensation
                      (9 )                       (9 )           (9 )
     
Balance at September 30, 2009
  $     $     $ 327,991     $ 604,239     $ 257,090     $ (452,416 )   $     $ 736,904     $ 40,383     $ 777,287  
     
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010:
                                                                               
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $     $     $ 329,402     $ 617,938     $ 322,181     $ (438,004 )   $     $ 831,517     $ 38,970     $ 870,487  
Net income
                            182,638                   182,638       11,954       194,592  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                                                               
Foreign currency translation
                                  (18,694 )           (18,694 )     994       (17,700 )
Cash flow hedges
                                  (5,333 )           (5,333 )           (5,333 )
Pension and other postretirement benefits
                                  (1,910 )           (1,910 )     (6 )     (1,916 )
                                                             
Comprehensive Income
                                                            156,701       12,942       169,643  
                                                             
Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of stock options
                235       1,481                         1,716             1,716  
Issuance of registered shares upon vesting of restricted awards
                4       (4 )                                    
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
                                                    (8,031 )     (8,031 )
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards
                      7,531                         7,531             7,531  
Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation
                      2                         2             2  
Repurchase of registered shares
                                        (99,182 )     (99,182 )           (99,182 )
     
Balance at September 30, 2010
  $     $     $ 329,641     $ 626,948     $ 504,819     $ (463,941 )   $ (99,182 )   $ 898,285     $ 43,881     $ 942,166  
     
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
                 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net income
  $ 194,592     $ 297,695  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    37,394       32,909  
Curtailment net gain on defined benefit pension plans
    (19,665 )      
Net asbestos-related provision
    10,286       5,251  
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards
    15,252       15,891  
Excess tax (benefit)/shortfall related to share-based compensation
    (2 )     9  
Deferred income tax provision
    16,526       9,477  
Loss on sale of assets
    252       565  
Equity in the net earnings of partially-owned affiliates, net of dividends
    (10,998 )     312  
Other noncash items
    34       5  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease in receivables
    12,662       81,590  
Net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
    53,994       (110,913 )
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (102,335 )     (116,574 )
Net change in other assets and liabilities
    (40,425 )     (5,298 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    167,567       210,919  
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Payments related to acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
    (1,971 )     (8,883 )
Change in restricted cash
    847       705  
Capital expenditures
    (14,826 )     (36,680 )
Proceeds from sale of assets
    187       903  
Return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates
    3,232        
Increase in short-term investments
    (240 )     (1,003 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (12,771 )     (44,958 )
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Repurchase of shares
    (99,182 )     (28 )
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    (8,031 )     (2,171 )
Proceeds from share purchase warrants exercised
          2,482  
Proceeds from stock options exercised
    2,681       277  
Excess tax benefit/(shortfall) related to share-based compensation
    2       (9 )
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt
    2,197       5,852  
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
          1,865  
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations
    (10,222 )     (11,963 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (112,555 )     (3,695 )
 
           
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    754       26,704  
 
           
 
               
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    42,995       188,970  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    997,158       773,163  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 1,040,153     $ 962,133  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
      Basis of Presentation — The fiscal year of Foster Wheeler AG ends on December 31 of each calendar year. Foster Wheeler AG’s fiscal quarters end on the last day of March, June and September.
     Foster Wheeler AG’s consolidated financial results for the fiscal quarter represent the period from July 1 through September 30 for both fiscal years 2010 and 2009 and the fiscal nine months represent the period from January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 and December 27, 2008 through September 30, 2009 in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Please refer to Note 1 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (“2009 Form 10-K”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2010, for further information on our fiscal year end and related change of country of domicile from Bermuda to Switzerland in February 2009. As part of our change of country of domicile, we cancelled our common shares and issued registered shares. In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland.
     The consolidated financial results include our U.S. operations, which have a fiscal year that is the 52- or 53- week annual accounting period ending the last Friday in December, and our non-U.S. operations, which have a fiscal year ending December 31.
     The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such adjustments only consisted of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
     The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in our 2009 Form 10-K. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the audited financial statements included in our 2009 Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual consolidated financial statements.
     Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
      Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Foster Wheeler AG and all significant U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries as well as certain entities in which we have a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
     Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, as well as adjustments for foreign currency translation, derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension and other postretirement benefits. Comprehensive income for Foster Wheeler AG, noncontrolling interests and total equity were as follows:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Comprehensive Income:
                               
Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 104,504     $ 105,615     $ 156,701     $ 327,437  
Noncontrolling interests
    5,919       6,810       12,942       13,836  
 
                       
Total
  $ 110,423     $ 112,425     $ 169,643     $ 341,273  
 
                       
     In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance to amend the manner in which entities evaluate whether consolidation is required for variable interest entities (“VIE”). The model for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary of a VIE has changed under the new guidance. Furthermore, the new guidance requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and also amends the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This revised guidance also requires enhanced disclosures about how a company’s involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and exposure to risks. This guidance, which became effective for us on January 1, 2010, did not result in any change to the entities previously included in our consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

      Variable Interest Entities — We sometimes form separate legal entities such as corporations, partnerships and limited liability companies in connection with the execution of a single contract or project. Upon formation of each separate legal entity, we perform an evaluation to determine whether the new entity is a VIE, and whether we are the primary beneficiary of the new entity, which would require us to consolidate the new entity in our financial results. We reassess our initial determination on whether the entity is a VIE and whether we are the primary beneficiary upon the occurrence of certain events as outlined in current accounting guidelines. If the entity is not a VIE, we determine the accounting for the entity under the voting interest accounting guidelines.
     An entity is determined to be a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not sufficient for the entity to finance its own activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (such as the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their obligations to absorb losses of the entity and/or their rights to receive benefits of the entity, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
     As of September 30, 2010, we participated in certain entities determined to be VIEs, including a gas-fired cogeneration facility in Martinez, California, a waste-to-energy facility in Camden, New Jersey and a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile. We consolidate the operations of both the Martinez and Camden projects while we record our participation in the Chile based project on the equity method of accounting.
     Please see Note 3 for further information on our participation in these projects.
      Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods in which they become known. Significant estimates are used in accounting for long-term contracts including estimates of total costs, progress toward completion and customer and vendor claims, employee benefit plan obligations and share-based compensation plans. In addition, we also use estimates when accounting for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes, asbestos liabilities and expected recoveries and when assessing goodwill for impairment, among others.
      Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts — Revenues and profits on long-term contracts are recorded under the percentage-of-completion method.
     Progress towards completion on fixed-price contracts is measured based on physical completion of individual tasks for all contracts with a value of $5,000 or greater. For contracts with a value less than $5,000, progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs (the cost-to-cost method).
     Progress towards completion on cost-reimbursable contracts is measured based on the ratio of quantities expended to total forecasted quantities, typically man-hours. Incentives are also recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis when the realization of an incentive is assessed as probable. We include flow-through costs consisting of materials, equipment or subcontractor services as both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues on cost-reimbursable contracts when we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for such costs. There is no contract profit impact of flow-through costs as they are included in both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues.
     Contracts in process are stated at cost, increased for profits recorded on the completed effort or decreased for estimated losses, less billings to the customer and progress payments on uncompleted contracts.

8


Table of Contents

     At any point, we have numerous contracts in progress, all of which are at various stages of completion. Accounting for revenues and profits on long-term contracts requires estimates of total estimated contract costs and estimates of progress toward completion to determine the extent of revenue and profit recognition. These estimates may be revised as additional information becomes available or as specific project circumstances change. We review all of our material contracts on a monthly basis and revise our estimates as appropriate for developments such as earning project incentive bonuses, incurring or expecting to incur contractual liquidated damages for performance or schedule issues, providing services and purchasing third-party materials and equipment at costs differing from those previously estimated and testing completed facilities, which, in turn, eliminates or confirms completion and warranty-related costs. Project incentives are recognized when it is probable they will be earned. Project incentives are frequently tied to cost, schedule and/or safety targets and, therefore, tend to be earned late in a project’s life cycle.
     Changes in estimated final contract revenues and costs can either increase or decrease the final estimated contract profit. In the period in which a change in estimate is recognized, the cumulative impact of that change is recorded based on progress achieved through the period of change. The following table summarizes the number of separate projects that experienced final estimated contract profit revisions with an impact on contract profit in excess of $1 million relating to the revaluation of work performed in prior periods:
                                     
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Number of separate projects
    14       10       35       28  
Increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit
  $ 11,800     $ 11,500     $ 44,600     $ 47,500  
     Please see Note 11 for further information related to changes in final estimated contract profit.
     Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the original contract price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in specifications and designs, contract terminations, disputed or unapproved change orders as to both scope and price or other causes of unanticipated additional costs. We record claims as additional contract revenue if it is probable that the claims will result in additional contract revenue and if the amount can be reliably estimated. These two requirements are satisfied by the existence of all of the following conditions: the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim; additional costs are caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and are not the result of deficiencies in our performance; costs associated with the claim are identifiable or otherwise determinable and are reasonable in view of the work performed; and the evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If such requirements are met, revenue from a claim may be recorded only to the extent that contract costs relating to the claim have been incurred. Costs attributable to claims are treated as costs of contract performance as incurred and are recorded in contracts in process. Our consolidated financial statements included the following regarding commercial claims:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Assumed recovery of commercial claims
  $ 17,100     $ 18,700  
Claims yet to be expended
  $ 1,700     $ 1,200  
     In certain circumstances, we may defer pre-contract costs when it is probable that these costs will be recovered under a future contract. Such deferred costs would then be included in contract costs upon execution of the anticipated contract.
     Certain special-purpose subsidiaries in our global power business group are reimbursed by customers for their costs, including amounts related to repayments of non-recourse project debt, for building and operating certain facilities over the lives of the corresponding service contracts.
      Fair Value Measurements — Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or FASB ASC, 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and provides guidance on required disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

9


Table of Contents

     Our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist primarily of the assets or liabilities arising from derivative financial instruments and defined benefit pension plan assets. We value our derivative financial instruments using broker quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets, resulting in fair value measurements using level 2 inputs as defined under the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8 for further information regarding our derivative financial instruments.
     The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value:
      Financial instruments valued independent of the fair value hierarchy:
    Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash — The carrying value of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value because of the demand nature of many of our deposits or short-term maturity of these instruments.
      Financial instruments valued within the fair value hierarchy:
    Short-term Investments — Short-term investments primarily consist of deposits with maturities in excess of three months but less than one year. Short-term investments are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
    Long-term Debt — We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt (including current installments) based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities using level 2 inputs.
    Foreign Currency Forward Contracts — We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts by obtaining quotes from financial institutions or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs.
    Interest Rate Swaps — We estimate the fair value of our interest rate swaps based on quotes obtained from financial institutions, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs.
    Defined Benefit Pension Plan Assets — We estimate the fair value of our defined benefit pension plan assets at each fiscal year end based on quotes obtained from financial institutions, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 1 and 2 inputs.
      Retirement of Shares under Share Repurchase Program — On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. Under Swiss law, the shares that we have repurchased under the program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 must be held as treasury shares until their cancellation is approved by shareholders and registered with the commercial register as described below. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through September 30, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $165,591 of our outstanding shares. Any repurchases will be made at our discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, share price and other factors. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The program has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
     All shares acquired under our share repurchase program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 are held as treasury shares and are carried at cost on the consolidated balance sheet until the cancellation of the shares has been approved by our shareholders and the cancellation is registered with the commercial register of the Canton of Zug in Switzerland. We expect to seek shareholder approval of the cancellation of all shares repurchased under the program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 at our 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders. Upon the effectiveness of the cancellation of the shares, the treasury share value, on the consolidated balance sheet, will be reduced for the cost of the cancelled shares, with an offsetting aggregate reduction to the registered share value, on the consolidated balance sheet, for the par value of the cancelled shares and paid-in capital, on the consolidated balance sheet, for the excess of the cost of the treasury shares above par value.
     Once repurchased, treasury shares are no longer considered outstanding, which results in a reduction to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period when calculating earnings per share, as described below.

10


Table of Contents

      Earnings per Share — Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding non-vested restricted shares. There were no non-vested restricted shares as of September 30, 2010 and 2009. Restricted shares and restricted share units (collectively, “restricted awards”) are included in the weighted-average number of shares outstanding when such restricted awards vest.
     Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG by the combination of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period and the impact of dilutive securities, if any, such as outstanding stock options, warrants to purchase shares and the non-vested portion of restricted awards to the extent such securities are dilutive.
     In profitable periods, outstanding stock options and warrants have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method when the average share price for the period exceeds the assumed proceeds from the exercise of the option or warrant. The assumed proceeds include the exercise price, compensation cost, if any, for future service that has not yet been recognized in the consolidated statement of operations, and any tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital when the option or warrant is exercised. Under the treasury stock method, the assumed proceeds are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. The dilutive impact of the non-vested portion of restricted awards is determined using the treasury stock method, but the proceeds include only the unrecognized compensation cost and tax benefits as assumed proceeds.
     The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
                                     
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 51,720     $ 89,998     $ 182,638     $ 285,065  
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
    125,459,735       126,459,865       126,810,748       126,355,686  
 
                       
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.41     $ 0.71     $ 1.44     $ 2.26  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 51,720     $ 89,998     $ 182,638     $ 285,065  
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
    125,459,735       126,459,865       126,810,748       126,355,686  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Options to purchase shares
    60,199       163,721       148,650       77,022  
Warrants to purchase shares
          440,826             465,028  
Non-vested portion of restricted awards
    191,298       335,442       203,651       171,917  
 
                       
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share
    125,711,232       127,399,854       127,163,049       127,069,653  
 
                       
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.41     $ 0.71     $ 1.44     $ 2.24  
 
                       
     The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes potentially dilutive securities when the assumed proceeds would be greater than the average share price for the period. The following table summarizes the share equivalent of potentially dilutive securities that have been excluded from the denominator used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to their antidilutive effect:
                                     
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Options not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
    3,049,055       2,146,939       2,855,367       2,441,968  
 
                       
      Recent Accounting Developments — In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This ASU requires specific disclosures related to the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. Financing receivable is defined in the ASU as a contractual right to receive money on demand or on fixed or determinable dates that is recognized as an asset in the entity’s statement of financial position. New disclosures are required for finance receivables and the related allowance for credit losses on a disaggregated basis, which the standard defines as portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. ASU No. 2010-20 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. We will amend our disclosures accordingly beginning with our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2010.

11


Table of Contents

2. Business Combinations
     In October 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Houston operations of Atlas Engineering, Inc., a privately held company, for a purchase price of approximately $21,000. The purchase price may be increased by an estimated $12,000 for contingent consideration depending on the acquired company’s EBITDA, as defined in the purchase agreement for this transaction, over the first three years after the closing date. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 was $6,625. The acquired company is active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
     In April 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the offshore engineering division of OPE Holdings Ltd., a Canadian company that is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and which we refer to as OPE, for a purchase price of approximately $8,900. The acquired company is active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
3. Investments
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
     We own a noncontrolling interest in two electric power generation projects, one waste-to-energy project and one wind farm project in Italy and in a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile. We also own a noncontrolling interest in a project based in Italy which generates earnings from royalty payments linked to the price of natural gas. Based on the outstanding equity interests of these entities, we own 42% of each of the two electric power generation projects in Italy, 39% of the waste-to-energy project and 50% of the wind farm project. We have a notional 85% equity interest in the project in Chile; however, we are not the primary beneficiary as a result of participating rights held by the minority shareholder. In determining that we are not the primary beneficiary, we considered the minority shareholder’s right to approve activities of the project that most significantly impact the project’s economic performance which include the right to approve or reject the annual financial (capital and operating) budget and the annual operating plan, the right to approve or reject the appointment of the general manager and senior management, and approval rights with respect to capital expenditures beyond those included in the annual budget.
     On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to our unconsolidated affiliate’s Chile based project. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities from that date. Subsequent to that date, our unconsolidated affiliate filed a claim with their insurance carrier. During the fiscal third quarter of 2010, a preliminary assessment of the extent of the damage was completed and an estimate of the required cost of repairs was developed. Based on the assessment and cost estimate, as well as correspondence received from the insurance carrier, we expect the property damage insurance recovery to be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing the facility. During the fiscal third quarter of 2010, the insurance carrier also provided a preliminary assessment of the business interruption insurance recovery due to the project, and an advance of insurance proceeds against this assessment. Based on this assessment, we expect the business interruption insurance recovery to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility has suspended operations. Normal operating activities are expected to resume by January 1, 2011.
     The summarized financial information presented below for the Chile based project includes an estimated recovery under a property damage insurance policy sufficient to repair the facility and an estimated recovery under a business interruption insurance policy for fixed costs along with an estimated recovery for lost profits for the period from the suspension of the facility’s operations on February 27, 2010 through September 30, 2010. The fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 includes approximately $19,700 for the estimated recovery under the business interruption insurance policy included within income before income taxes.

12


Table of Contents

     We account for these investments in Italy and Chile under the equity method. The following is summarized financial information for these entities (each as a whole) based on where the projects are located:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Italy     Chile     Italy     Chile  
Balance Sheet Data:
                               
Current assets
  $ 266,610     $ 56,746     $ 325,688     $ 46,311  
Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment)
    597,530       120,182       644,344       127,393  
Current liabilities
    118,259       44,021       173,593       40,444  
Other liabilities (primarily long-term debt)
    404,385       50,132       440,942       63,109  
Net assets
    341,496       82,775       355,497       70,151  
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    Italy     Chile     Italy     Chile     Italy     Chile     Italy     Chile  
Income Statement Data:
                                                               
Total revenues
  $ 76,839     $ 14,918     $ 84,074     $ 13,830     $ 275,112     $ 32,222     $ 283,232     $ 47,176  
Gross profit
    14,340       (1,257 )     28,574       7,813       54,919       2,032       67,823       27,713  
Income before income taxes
    11,138       16,183       23,640       6,752       42,210       20,577       56,239       23,121  
Net earnings
    6,579       13,432       11,918       5,605       24,528       17,079       32,972       19,191  
     Our investment in these unconsolidated affiliates is recorded within investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheet and our equity in the net earnings of these unconsolidated affiliates is recorded within other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations. Our consolidated financial statements reflect the following amounts related to these unconsolidated affiliates:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Equity in the net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
  $ 14,254     $ 8,664     $ 24,836     $ 25,555  
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
                  $ 17,251     $ 25,486  
                 
    September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliates
  $ 203,727     $ 215,280  
     Our equity earnings for our Chile based project in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $11,195 and $14,026, respectively, which include our equity interest of the after tax estimated recovery under our Chile based project’s business interruption insurance policy. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance on business interruption insurance, we were not able to record an estimated recovery for lost profits until substantially all contingencies related to the insurance claim had been resolved, which occurred during the fiscal third quarter of 2010. Accordingly, during the fiscal third quarter of 2010, we recorded an estimated recovery for lost profits for the period from February 27, 2010 through September 30, 2010.
     The two electric power generation projects in Italy, owned by the companies Centro Energia Ferrara (“CEF”) and Centro Energia Teverola (“CET”), in which we hold 41.65% of the shares, have long-term power off-take agreements in place with the Authority for the Energy, which is part of the Italian Economic Development Ministry (“the Ministry”). In September 2010, the Ministry announced an option for certain projects, including those of CEF and CET, to early terminate their long-term power off-take agreements in exchange for a lump-sum payment. The payment is determined by specific calculation under parameters established by the Ministry. The deadline for submitting an acceptance of the proposal was required by October 29, 2010. On October 29, 2010, CEF and CET submitted an application to early terminate their power off-take agreements. The application is subject to approval by the Ministry on or before November 30, 2010.
     In light of the potential early termination of the power off-take agreements, we and our partner in CEF and CET are re-assessing the continued economic viability of the projects. If our application is accepted by the Ministry, and depending on the outcome of our assessment, we and our partner may decide to make changes to the operations of the projects, including the potential shut down of one or both of the projects. At this time, we cannot determine what, if any, impact this will have on the carrying value of our investments in these projects.
     We have guaranteed certain performance obligations of the Chile based project. We do not expect that the earthquake will require us to contribute to this project under our guarantee of the project’s performance obligations.
     We have a contingent obligation, which is measured annually based on the operating results of the Chile based project for the preceding year and is shared equally with our minority interest partner. We did not have a current payment obligation under this guarantee as of December 31, 2009.

13


Table of Contents

     In addition, we have provided a $10,000 debt service reserve letter of credit to cover debt service payments in the event that the Chile based project does not generate sufficient cash flows to make such payments. We are required to maintain the debt service reserve letter of credit during the term of the Chile based project’s debt, which matures in 2014. As of September 30, 2010, no amounts have been drawn under this letter of credit and, based on our current assessment following the earthquake in Chile as described above, we do not anticipate any amounts being drawn under this letter of credit.
     We also have a wholly-owned subsidiary that provides operations and maintenance services to the Chile based project. We continue to provide our services to the project, which since the earthquake in Chile noted above, has been focused on assessing the damage caused by the earthquake and the related repair for the facility to resume normal operating activities. We record the fees for operations and maintenance services in operating revenues on our consolidated statement of operations and the corresponding receivable in trade accounts and notes receivable on our consolidated balance sheet. Our consolidated financial statements include the following balances related to our Chile based project:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Fees for operations and maintenance services
  $ 2,461     $ 2,116     $ 7,381     $ 6,348  
                 
    September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
Receivable from our unconsolidated affiliate in Chile
  $ 3,089     $ 4,916  
     We also have guaranteed the performance obligations of our wholly-owned subsidiary under the Chile based project’s operations and maintenance agreement. The guarantee is limited to $20,000 over the life of the operations and maintenance agreement, which extends through 2016. No amounts have ever been paid under the guarantee.
Other Investments
     We are the majority equity partner and general partner of a gas-fired cogeneration facility in Martinez, California, and we own 100% of the equity in a waste-to-energy facility in Camden, New Jersey (please see Note 12 for further information on the waste-to-energy facility). We have determined that these entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of these VIEs since we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s performance. These activities include the operations and maintenance of the facility. Accordingly, we consolidate these entities. The aggregate net assets of these entities are presented below.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Balance Sheet Data (excluding intercompany balances):
               
Current assets
  $ 22,958     $ 14,722  
Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment)
    100,866       104,552  
Current liabilities
    34,173       31,014  
Other liabilities
    785       876  
Net assets
    88,866       87,384  
4. Intangible Assets
     We have tracked accumulated goodwill impairments since December 29, 2001, the first day of fiscal year 2002 and our date of adoption of the accounting guidelines within FASB ASC 350-20. There were no accumulated goodwill impairment losses as of that date. The net carrying amount of goodwill by geographic region for our reporting units in our Global E&C Group and Global Power Group was as follows:
                                 
    Global E&C Group     Global Power Group  
    September 30,     December 31,     September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
U.S.
  $ 37,407     $ 35,436     $     $  
Asia
    1,048       1,012              
Europe
                49,428       52,254  
 
                       
Total
  $ 38,455     $ 36,448     $ 49,428     $ 52,254  
 
                       
     During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, we made contractual payments totaling approximately $2,000 related to prior acquisitions of businesses in our Global E&C Group’s U.S. operations.

14


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth amounts relating to our identifiable intangible assets:
                                                 
    September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Gross             Net     Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Patents
  $ 40,370     $ (27,035 )   $ 13,335     $ 39,304     $ (24,983 )   $ 14,321  
Trademarks
    63,393       (26,792 )     36,601       63,676       (24,487 )     39,189  
Customer relationships, pipeline and backlog
    22,004       (4,399 )     17,605       21,934       (2,415 )     19,519  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 125,767     $ (58,226 )   $ 67,541     $ 124,914     $ (51,885 )   $ 73,029  
 
                                   
     As of September 30, 2010, the net carrying amounts of our identifiable intangible assets were $49,800 for our Global Power Group and $17,741 for our Global E&C Group. Amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets is recorded within cost of operating revenues on the consolidated statement of operations. The following table details amounts relating to amortization expense:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Amortization expense
  $ 1,561     $ 1,214     $ 4,898     $ 3,728  
                                         
    Fiscal Years  
    2010     2011     2012     2013     2014  
Approximate full year amortization expense
  $ 6,700     $ 6,500     $ 6,300     $ 5,600     $ 5,300  
5. Long-term Debt
     The following table shows the components of our long-term debt:
                                                 
    September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Current     Long-term     Total     Current     Long-term     Total  
Capital Lease Obligations
  $ 2,227     $ 60,051     $ 62,278     $ 1,492     $ 65,327     $ 66,819  
Special-Purpose Limited Recourse Project Debt:
                                               
Camden County Energy Recovery Associates
    21,865             21,865       21,865             21,865  
FW Power S.r.l.
    7,274       86,785       94,059       7,428       95,661       103,089  
Energia Holdings, LLC
    2,019       11,220       13,239       3,187       13,239       16,426  
Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations:
                                               
1999C Bonds at 7.25% interest, due October 15, 2024
          1,283       1,283             1,283       1,283  
Term Loan in China at 4.78% interest, due February 25, 2011
    2,242             2,242                    
Term Loan in China at 4.374% interest, due January 8, 2010
                      2,930             2,930  
Other
                      28             28  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 35,627     $ 159,339     $ 194,966     $ 36,930     $ 175,510     $ 212,440  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Estimated fair value
                  $ 214,411                     $ 222,165  
      U.S. Senior Secured Credit Agreement — On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, which we entered into in October 2006. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000, and includes a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to $225,000 in total availability under the facility. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement permits us to issue up to $450,000 under the letter of credit facility. Letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement have performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit rating as reported by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and/or Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”). We received a corporate credit rating of BBB- as issued by S&P during the fiscal third quarter of 2010, which, under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement, reduces our pricing for letters of credit issued under the agreement. Based on the current ratings, letter of credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.000% and 2.000% per annum of the outstanding amount, respectively, excluding fronting fees. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the agreement, plus 2.000%, subject also to the performance pricing noted above.
     Unamortized fees and expenses in conjunction with the execution of our amended and restated U.S. senior credit agreement were approximately $4,300 and will be amortized to expense over the four-year term of the agreement, commencing in the fiscal third quarter of 2010. As a result of amending and restating our October 2006 U.S. senior secured credit agreement in July 2010 we incurred a charge in the third fiscal quarter of 2010 of $1,600 related to unamortized fees and expenses paid in conjunction with the October 2006 agreement.

15


Table of Contents

     The assets and/or stock of certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries collateralize our obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. Our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness or guarantees, create liens or other encumbrances on property, sell or transfer certain property and thereafter rent or lease such property for substantially the same purposes as the property sold or transferred, enter into a merger or similar transaction, make investments, declare dividends or make other restricted payments, enter into agreements with affiliates that are not on an arms’ length basis, enter into any agreement that limits our ability to create liens or the ability of a subsidiary to pay dividends, engage in new lines of business, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG, change Foster Wheeler AG’s fiscal year or, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd. and one of our holding company subsidiaries, directly acquire ownership of the operating assets used to conduct any business. In the event that our corporate credit rating as issued by Moody’s is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement will be automatically released and terminated.
     In addition, our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains financial covenants requiring us not to exceed a total leverage ratio, which compares total indebtedness to EBITDA, and to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, which compares EBITDA to interest expense. All such terms are defined in our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. We must be in compliance with the total leverage ratio at all times, while the interest coverage ratio is measured quarterly. We have been in compliance with all financial covenants and other provisions of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement prior and subsequent to our amendment and restatement of the agreement.
     We had approximately $262,700 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The letter of credit fees under the U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 ranged from 1.00% to 2.00% and 1.50% to 1.60%, respectively, of the outstanding amount, excluding fronting fees. There were no funded borrowings under this agreement as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
     During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, one of our subsidiaries based in China repaid its outstanding term loan at the scheduled maturity date. Also during the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, the same China based subsidiary entered into a new term loan, as noted in the table above.
6. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
     We have defined benefit pension plans in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada and Finland, and we have other postretirement benefit plans for health care and life insurance benefits in the United States and Canada.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans — Our defined benefit pension plans cover certain full-time employees. Under the plans, retirement benefits are primarily a function of both years of service and level of compensation.
     The U.S. pension plans, which are frozen to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and the Canadian, Finnish and French plans are non-contributory. The U.K. pension plan, which is closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, is contributory.
     During the fiscal first nine months of 2010, we capped pensionable salary growth in the U.K. plan to a maximum of 5% and, effective March 31, 2010, we closed the plan for future defined benefit accrual. As a result of the U.K. plan closure, we recognized a curtailment gain in our statement of operations for the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 of approximately £13,300 (approximately $20,086 at the exchange rate in effect at the time of the plan closure).
     Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2010, we are not required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans. The following table provides details on fiscal year 2010 contribution activity, including discretionary contributions made to our U.S. and U.K. pension plans:
         
Contributions made through fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010:
       
Mandatory
  $ 16,300  
Discretionary
    17,800  
 
     
Total
    34,100  
 
     
Remaining contributions expected for fiscal year 2010
    4,900  
 
     
Total contributions expected for fiscal year 2010
  $ 39,000  
 
     

16


Table of Contents

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans — Certain employees in the United States and Canada may become eligible for health care and life insurance benefits (“other postretirement benefits”) if they qualify for and commence normal or early retirement pension benefits as defined in the U.S. and Canadian pension plans while working for us. Additionally, one of our subsidiaries in the United States also has a benefit plan, referred to as the Survivor Income Plan (“SIP”), which provides coverage for an employee’s beneficiary upon the death of the employee. This plan has been closed to new entrants since 1988.
     The components of net periodic benefit cost/(credit) for our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows:
                                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010     Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009  
                                    Other                                     Other  
    Defined Benefit Pension Plans     Postre-     Defined Benefit Pension Plans     Postre-  
    United     United                     tirement     United     United                     tirement  
    States     Kingdom     Other     Total     Benefits     States     Kingdom     Other     Total     Benefits  
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit):
                                                                               
Service cost
  $     $ 183     $ 150     $ 333     $ 27     $     $ 1,442     $ 166     $ 1,608     $ 34  
Interest cost
    4,736       10,150       382       15,268       913       4,949       10,859       467       16,275       1,219  
Expected return on plan assets
    (5,129 )     (10,050 )     (341 )     (15,520 )           (4,280 )     (8,836 )     (313 )     (13,429 )      
Amortization of transition (asset)/obligation
          (39 )     26       (13 )     8             (14 )     22       8        
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)
          3       5       8       (1,002 )           2,049       5       2,054       (1,157 )
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    1,742       1,648       152       3,542       7       1,961       3,521       112       5,594       211  
(Curtailment gain)/
settlement charges
                                              100       100        
 
                                                           
Total net periodic benefit cost/(credit)
  $ 1,349     $ 1,895     $ 374     $ 3,618     $ (47 )   $ 2,630     $ 9,021     $ 559     $ 12,210     $ 307  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Changes recognized in comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Net actuarial loss
  $     $     $ 675     $ 675     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Amortization of transition asset/(obligation)
          39       (26 )     13       (8 )           14       (22 )     (8 )      
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
          (3 )     (5 )     (8 )     1,002             (2,049 )     (5 )     (2,054 )     1,157  
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    (1,742 )     (1,648 )     (152 )     (3,542 )     (7 )     (1,961 )     (3,521 )     (112 )     (5,594 )     (211 )
 
                                                           
Total recognized in comprehensive income
  $ (1,742 )   $ (1,612 )   $ 492     $ (2,862 )   $ 987     $ (1,961 )   $ (5,556 )   $ (139 )   $ (7,656 )   $ 946  
 
                                                           
 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009  
                                    Other                                     Other  
    Defined Benefit Pension Plans     Postre-     Defined Benefit Pension Plans     Postre-  
    United     United                     tirement     United     United                     tirement  
    States     Kingdom     Other     Total     Benefits     States     Kingdom     Other     Total     Benefits  
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit):
                                                                               
Service cost
  $     $ 2,069     $ 469     $ 2,538     $ 82     $     $ 4,050     $ 476     $ 4,526     $ 101  
Interest cost
    14,210       30,275       1,177       45,662       2,739       14,847       30,599       1,336       46,782       3,656  
Expected return on plan assets
    (15,386 )     (29,687 )     (1,016 )     (46,089 )           (12,839 )     (24,895 )     (879 )     (38,613 )      
Amortization of transition (asset)/obligation
          (39 )     74       35                   (37 )     63       26        
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)
          (423 )     15       (408 )     (2,987 )           5,775       13       5,788       (3,470 )
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    5,225       7,149       432       12,806       36       5,879       9,924       351       16,154       634  
(Curtailment gain)/
settlement charges*
          (20,086 )     422       (19,664 )                       291       291        
 
                                                           
Total net periodic benefit cost/(credit)
  $ 4,049     $ (10,742 )   $ 1,573     $ (5,120 )   $ (130 )   $ 7,887     $ 25,416     $ 1,651     $ 34,954     $ 921  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Changes recognized in
comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Net actuarial loss
  $     $ 21,130     $ 675     $ 21,805     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Prior service credit
          (9,054 )           (9,054 )                                    
Amortization of transition asset/(obligation)
          39       (74 )     (35 )                 37       (63 )     (26 )      
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
          423       (15 )     408       2,987             (5,775 )     (13 )     (5,788 )     3,470  
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    (5,225 )     (7,149 )     (432 )     (12,806 )     (36 )     (5,879 )     (9,924 )     (351 )     (16,154 )     (634 )
 
                                                           
Total recognized in comprehensive income
  $ (5,225 )   $ 5,389     $ 154     $ 318     $ 2,951     $ (5,879 )   $ (15,662 )   $ (427 )   $ (21,968 )   $ 2,836  
 
                                                           
 
*   During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, a curtailment gain resulted from the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual. During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, charges were incurred related to the settlement of pension obligations with former employees of the Canada pension plan.

17


Table of Contents

7. Guarantees and Warranties
     We have agreed to indemnify certain third parties relating to businesses and/or assets that we previously owned and sold to such third parties. Such indemnifications relate primarily to potential environmental and tax exposures for activities conducted by us prior to the sale of such businesses and/or assets. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar indemnifications due to the conditional nature of the obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular indemnification.
                         
    Maximum   Carrying Amount of Liability  
    Potential   September 30,     December 31,  
    Payment   2010     2009  
                     
Environmental indemnifications
  No limit   $ 8,600     $ 8,800  
Tax indemnifications
  No limit   $     $  
     We also maintain contingencies for warranty expenses on certain of our long-term contracts. Generally, warranty contingencies are accrued over the life of the contract so that a sufficient balance is maintained to cover our aggregate exposure at the conclusion of the project.
                 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
Warranty Liability:   2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 110,800     $ 99,400  
Accruals
    18,900       21,200  
Settlements
    (10,100 )     (2,000 )
Adjustments to provisions, including foreign currency translation
    (18,200 )     (6,200 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 101,400     $ 112,400  
 
           
     We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds, totaling $948,900 and $943,100 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, primarily for performance guarantees. These balances include the standby letters of credit issued under the U.S. senior credit agreement discussed in Note 5 and from other facilities worldwide. No material claims have been made against these guarantees, and based on our experience and current expectations, we do not anticipate any material claims.
     We have also guaranteed certain performance obligations in a refinery/electric power generation project based in Chile in which we hold a noncontrolling interest. See Note 3 for further information.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
     We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. The risks managed by using derivative financial instruments relate primarily to foreign currency exchange rate risk and, to a significantly lesser extent, interest rate risk. Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet.
                                         
    Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments
        Asset Derivatives       Liability Derivatives
    Balance Sheet   September 30,   December 31,   Balance Sheet   September 30,   December 31,
    Location   2010   2009   Location   2010   2009
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
                                       
Interest rate swap contracts
  Other assets   $     $     Other long-term liabilities   $ 10,673     $ 6,554  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
                                       
Foreign currency forward contracts
  Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts     8,054       1,174     Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts     2,122       4,934  
Foreign currency forward contracts
  Other accounts receivable     413       470     Accounts payable     13       246  
 
                                       
                                         
Total derivatives
      $ 8,467     $ 1,644         $ 12,808     $ 11,734  
 
                                       

18


Table of Contents

      Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
     We operate on a worldwide basis with substantial operations in Europe that subject us to U.S. dollar translation risk mainly relative to the Euro and British pound. Under our risk management policies we do not hedge translation risk exposure. All activities of our non-U.S. affiliates are recorded in their functional currency, which is typically the local currency in the country of domicile of the affiliate. In the ordinary course of business, our affiliates do enter into transactions in currencies other than their respective functional currencies. We seek to minimize the resulting foreign currency transaction risk by contracting for the procurement of goods and services in the same currency as the sales value of the related long-term contract. We further mitigate the risk through the use of foreign currency forward contracts.
     The notional amount provides one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of the balance sheet date. As of September 30, 2010, we had a total gross notional amount of $174,569 related to foreign currency forward contracts. Amounts ultimately realized upon final settlement of these financial instruments, along with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures within our long-term contracts, will depend on actual market exchange rates during the remaining life of the instruments. The contracts mature between fiscal years 2010 and 2013.
     We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties. These counterparties are commercial banks that are primarily rated “BBB+” or better by S&P (or the equivalent by other recognized credit rating agencies).
     Increases in the fair value of the currencies sold forward result in losses while increases in the fair value of the currencies bought forward result in gains. The gain or loss from the portion of the mark-to-market adjustment related to the completed portion of the underlying contract is included in cost of operating revenues at the same time as the underlying foreign currency exposure occurs. The gain or loss from the remaining portion of the mark-to-market adjustment, specifically the portion relating to the uncompleted portion of the underlying contract is reflected directly in cost of operating revenues in the period in which the mark-to-market adjustment occurs. The incremental gain or loss from the remaining uncompleted portion of our contracts was as follows:
                                         
    Location of Gain/(Loss)     Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives  
Derivatives Not Designated as   Recognized in Income on     Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
Hedging Instruments   Derivative     2010     2009     2010     2009  
Foreign currency forward contracts
  Cost of operating revenues   $ 3,526     $ 1,352     $ 1,519     $ 6,690  
Foreign currency forward contracts
  Other deductions, net     497       (76 )     122       201  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total
          $ 4,023     $ 1,276     $ 1,641     $ 6,891  
 
                               
     The mark-to-market adjustments on foreign currency forward contracts for these unrealized gains or losses are primarily recorded in either contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts on the consolidated balance sheet.
     During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we included net cash outflows on the settlement of derivatives of $5,839 and $6,972, respectively, within the “net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts,” a component of cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
      Interest Rate Risk
     We use interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk associated with some of our variable rate special-purpose limited recourse project debt. The aggregate notional amount of the receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swaps was $78,200 as of September 30, 2010.
     Upon entering into the swap contracts, we designate the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. We assess at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether the interest rate swaps are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the project debt. Consequently, we record the fair value of interest rate swap contracts in our consolidated balance sheet at each balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

19


Table of Contents

     The impact from interest rate swap contracts in cash flow hedging relationships was as follows:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Loss recognized in Other comprehensive income
  $ (2,370 )   $ (1,763 )   $ (4,175 )   $ (2,474 )
Gain/(loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss
                       
9. Share-Based Compensation Plans
     Our share-based compensation plans include both restricted awards and stock option awards. The following table summarizes our share-based compensation expense and related income tax benefit:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Share-based compensation
  $ 5,678     $ 5,036     $ 15,252     $ 15,891  
Related income tax benefit
    88       115       257       335  
     As of September 30, 2010, we had $15,933 and $17,834 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options and restricted awards, respectively. Those amounts are expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 25 months.
     Our share-based compensation plans include a “change in control” provision, which provides for cash redemption of equity awards issued thereunder in certain limited circumstances. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting Series Release No. 268, “Presentation in Financial Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stocks,” we present the redemption amount of these equity awards as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet as the equity award is amortized during the vesting period. The redemption amount represents the intrinsic value of the equity award on the grant date. In accordance with FASB ASC 480-10-S99-3A (formerly EITF Topic D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities”), we do not adjust the redemption amount each reporting period unless and until it becomes probable that the equity awards will become redeemable (upon a change in control event). Upon vesting of the equity awards, we reclassify the intrinsic value of the equity awards, as determined on the grant date, to permanent equity. A reconciliation of temporary equity for the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                 
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 2,570     $ 7,586  
Compensation cost during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date
    7,771       8,151  
Intrinsic value of equity awards vested during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date
    (50 )     (6,443 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 10,291     $ 9,294  
 
           
     Our articles of association provide for conditional capital of 63,207,957 registered shares for the issuance of shares under our share-based compensation plans, outstanding share purchase warrants and other convertible securities we may issue in the future. Conditional capital decreases upon issuance of shares in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or vesting of restricted stock units, with an offsetting increase to our issued share capital. As of September 30, 2010, our remaining available conditional capital was 62,098,354 shares.
10. Income Taxes
     The tax provision for each year-to-date period is calculated by multiplying pretax income by the estimated annual effective tax rate for such period. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate significantly from period to period and may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of income taxed in various non-U.S. jurisdictions with rates different from the U.S. statutory rate, as a result of our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses generated by certain unprofitable operations and as a result of the varying mix of income earned in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We have reduced our U.S. and certain non-U.S. tax benefits by a valuation allowance based on a consideration of all available evidence, which indicates that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance favorably impacts our effective tax rate. Conversely, in periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax losses, the corresponding increase in the valuation allowance has an unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate.

20


Table of Contents

      Fiscal Year 2010
     Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first nine months of 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
    Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which is expected to contribute to an approximate 17-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010.
 
    A valuation allowance increase because we are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which is expected to contribute an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010.
      Fiscal Year 2009
     Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first nine months of 2009 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the impact of the following:
    Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate.
 
    A valuation allowance increase because we were unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which contributed to an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate.
     These variances were partially offset by the change of valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions, including a valuation allowance reversal in one of our non-U.S. subsidiaries in fiscal year 2010, and other permanent differences.
     We evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions in which we currently maintain a valuation allowance. Such evaluation includes a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary.
     Our subsidiaries file income tax returns in numerous tax jurisdictions, including the United States, several U.S. states and numerous non-U.S. jurisdictions around the world. Tax returns are also filed in jurisdictions where our subsidiaries execute project-related work. The statute of limitations varies by jurisdiction. Because of the number of jurisdictions in which we file tax returns, in any given year the statute of limitations in a number of jurisdictions may expire within 12 months from the balance sheet date. As a result, we expect recurring changes in unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, none of which are expected to be individually significant. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. (including federal, state and local) or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal year 2005.
     A number of tax years are under audit by the relevant state and non-U.S. tax authorities. We anticipate that several of these audits may be concluded in the foreseeable future, including in the remainder of fiscal year 2010. Based on the status of these audits, it is reasonably possible that the conclusion of the audits may result in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. However, it is not possible to estimate the magnitude of any such reduction at this time. We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations.

21


Table of Contents

11. Business Segments
     We operate through two business groups: our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group .
Global E&C Group
     Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants, coal-to-liquids, coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering, procurement and construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power production facilities.
     Our Global E&C Group provides the following services:
    Design, engineering, project management, construction and construction management services, including the procurement of equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers and contractors.
 
    Environmental remediation services, together with related technical, engineering, design and regulatory services.
 
    Development, engineering, procurement, construction, ownership and operation of power generation facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and waste-to-energy facilities in Europe.
 
    Design and supply of direct-fired furnaces used in a wide range of refining, petrochemical, chemical, oil and gas processes, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery units. In addition, our Global E&C Group also designs and supplies the fired heaters which form an integral part of its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies.
Global Power Group
     Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and industrial facilities worldwide and owns and/or operates several cogeneration, independent power production and waste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries. Our Global Power Group generates revenues from engineering activities, equipment supply, construction contracts, operating and maintenance agreements, royalties from licensing its technology, and from returns on its investments in several power production facilities.
     Our Global Power Group’s steam generating equipment includes a full range of technologies, offering independent power producers, utilities, municipalities and industrial clients high-value technology solutions for converting a wide range of fuels, such as coal, lignite, petroleum coke, oil, gas, solar, biomass and municipal solid waste, into steam, which can be used for power generation, district heating or for industrial processes.
     Our Global Power Group offers several other products and services related to steam generators:
    Designs, manufactures and installs auxiliary and replacement equipment for utility power and industrial facilities, including surface condensers, feed water heaters, coal pulverizers, steam generator coils and panels, biomass gasifiers, and replacement parts for steam generators.
 
    Nitrogen-oxide (“NO x ”) reduction systems and components for pulverized coal steam generators such as selective catalytic reduction systems, low NO x combustion systems, low NO x burners, primary combustion and overfire air systems and components, fuel and combustion air measuring and control systems and components.
 
    A broad range of site services including construction and erection services, maintenance engineering, steam generator upgrading and life extension, and plant repowering.
 
    Research and development in the areas of combustion, fluid and gas dynamics, heat transfer, materials and solid mechanics.
 
    Technology licenses to other steam generator suppliers in select countries.
Corporate and Finance Group
     In addition to these two business groups, which also represent operating segments for financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group (“C&F Group”), which we also treat as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes.

22


Table of Contents

          EBITDA is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating decision maker. We define EBITDA as net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
          A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below:
                                 
            Global     Global     C&F  
    Total     E&C Group     Power Group     Group (1)  
Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010:
                               
Operating revenues (third-party)
  $ 904,709     $ 749,249     $ 155,460     $  
 
                       
EBITDA (2)
  $ 87,150     $ 69,339     $ 40,430     $ (22,619 )
 
                         
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    4,858                          
Less: Interest expense
    4,330                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    12,407                          
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    75,271                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    18,693                          
 
                             
Net income
    56,578                          
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    4,858                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 51,720                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
Operating revenues (third-party)
  $ 1,216,379     $ 1,009,352     $ 207,027     $  
 
                       
EBITDA (2)
  $ 128,170     $ 114,134     $ 39,589     $ (25,553 )
 
                         
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    5,991                          
Less: Interest expense
    4,648                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    11,463                          
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    118,050                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    22,061                          
 
                             
Net income
    95,989                          
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    5,991                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 89,998                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010:
                               
Operating revenues (third-party)
  $ 2,855,778     $ 2,371,394     $ 484,384     $  
 
                       
EBITDA (2)
  $ 288,669     $ 254,732     $ 96,709     $ (62,772 )
 
                         
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    11,954                          
Less: Interest expense
    12,925                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    37,394                          
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    250,304                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    55,712                          
 
                             
Net income
    194,592                          
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    11,954                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 182,638                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
Operating revenues (third-party)
  $ 3,789,703     $ 2,992,235     $ 797,468     $  
 
                       
EBITDA (2)
  $ 395,716     $ 326,044     $ 142,152     $ (72,480 )
 
                         
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    12,630                          
Less: Interest expense
    10,117                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    32,909                          
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    365,320                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    67,625                          
 
                             
Net income
    297,695                          
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    12,630                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 285,065                          
 
                             
 
(1)   Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest.
 
(2)   EBITDA includes the following:

23


Table of Contents

                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*:
                               
Global E&C
  $ 8,400     $ 11,200     $ 27,900     $ 44,000  
Global Power Group
    3,400       300       16,700       3,500  
 
                       
Total
    11,800       11,500       44,600       47,500  
 
                       
 
Net asbestos-related (gain)/provision in C&F Group**
    (1,665 )     1,745       (68 )     5,251  
 
Curtailment gain on the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual in our Global E&C Group
                20,086        
Settlement fee received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a prospective power project under development in Italy within our Global E&C Group
    10,900             9,800        
 
*   Please refer to “Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts” in Note 1 for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit.
 
**   Please refer to Note 12 for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset.
          The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they were third-party transactions—i.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that activity in the results of the C&F Group.
          Operating revenues by industry were as follows:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
Operating Revenues (Third-Party) by Industry:   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Power generation
  $ 131,057     $ 187,954     $ 432,019     $ 749,110  
Oil refining
    329,335       350,830       1,037,033       1,017,824  
Pharmaceutical
    13,441       15,482       37,932       50,086  
Oil and gas
    252,290       461,195       851,486       1,055,602  
Chemical/petrochemical
    124,611       165,638       375,381       819,320  
Power plant operation and maintenance
    43,564       30,006       94,743       81,915  
Environmental
    2,299       3,164       8,900       9,846  
Other, net of eliminations
    8,112       2,110       18,284       6,000  
 
                       
Total
  $ 904,709     $ 1,216,379     $ 2,855,778     $ 3,789,703  
 
                       
12. Litigation and Uncertainties
Asbestos
          Some of our U.S. and U.K. subsidiaries are defendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits and out-of-court informal claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom. Plaintiffs claim damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with work allegedly performed by our subsidiaries during the 1970s and earlier.
           United States
          A summary of our U.S. claim activity is as follows:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
Number of Claims by period:   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Open claims at beginning of year
    122,490       130,500       125,100       130,760  
New claims
    2,840       890       5,050       3,230  
Claims resolved
    (970 )     (2,090 )     (5,790 )     (4,690 )
 
                       
Open claims at end of period
    124,360       129,300       124,360       129,300  
 
                       
          We had the following U.S. asbestos-related assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of the dates set forth below. Total U.S. asbestos-related liabilities are estimated through the fiscal third quarter of 2025. Although it is likely that claims will continue to be filed after that date, the uncertainties inherent in any long-term forecast prevent us from making reliable estimates of the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after that date.

24


Table of Contents

                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Asbestos-related assets recorded within:
               
Accounts and notes receivable-other
  $ 54,500     $ 65,600  
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
    184,300       208,400  
 
           
Total asbestos-related assets
  $ 238,800     $ 274,000  
 
           
 
               
Asbestos-related liabilities recorded within:
               
Accrued expenses
  $ 56,200     $ 59,800  
Asbestos-related liability
    285,100       316,700  
 
           
Total asbestos-related liabilities
  $ 341,300     $ 376,500  
 
           
 
               
Liability balance by claim category:
               
Open claims
  $ 126,200     $ 141,600  
Future unasserted claims
    215,100       234,900  
 
           
Total asbestos-related liabilities
  $ 341,300     $ 376,500  
 
           
          Since fiscal year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation, or ARPC, nationally recognized consultants in the United States with respect to projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate the amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs at each fiscal year-end for the next 15 years. Since that time, we have recorded our estimated asbestos liability at a level consistent with ARPC’s reasonable best estimate. Our estimated asbestos liability decreased during the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of indemnity and defense cost payments totaling approximately $49,300, partially offset by an increase of $14,100 related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability, which includes adjustments for actual settlement experience different from our estimates and the accrual of our rolling 15-year asbestos-related liability estimate. The total asbestos-related liabilities are comprised of our estimates for our liability relating to open (outstanding) claims being valued and our liability for future unasserted claims through the fiscal third quarter of 2025.
          Our liability estimate is based upon the following information and/or assumptions: number of open claims, forecasted number of future claims, estimated average cost per claim by disease type – mesothelioma, lung cancer and non-malignancies – and the breakdown of known and future claims into disease type – mesothelioma, lung cancer or non-malignancies. The total estimated liability, which has not been discounted for the time value of money, includes both the estimate of forecasted indemnity amounts and forecasted defense costs. Total defense costs and indemnity liability payments are estimated to be incurred through the fiscal third quarter of 2025, during which period the incidence of new claims is forecasted to decrease each year. We believe that it is likely that there will be new claims filed after the fiscal third quarter of 2025, but in light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably estimate the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after the fiscal third quarter of 2025.
          Through September 30, 2010, total cumulative indemnity costs paid were approximately $723,100 and total cumulative defense costs paid were approximately $334,100. Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 31.6% of total defense and indemnity costs. The overall historic average combined indemnity and defense cost per resolved claim through September 30, 2010 has been approximately $2.9. The average cost per resolved claim is increasing and we believe it will continue to increase in the future.
          Over the last several years, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into settlement agreements calling for insurers to make lump-sum payments, as well as payments over time, for use by our subsidiaries to fund asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs and, in certain cases, for reimbursement for portions of out-of-pocket costs previously incurred. During the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, our subsidiaries reached agreements to settle their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with three additional insurers. As a result of these settlements, we increased our asbestos-related insurance asset and recorded gains of $7,000 and $14,000, respectively in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
          The asbestos-related asset recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other as of September 30, 2010 reflects amounts due in the next 12 months under executed settlement agreements with insurers. Such amounts have not been discounted for the time value of money. As of September 30, 2010, there were no unsettled asbestos insurance-related assets recorded. Our insurance recoveries may be limited by insolvencies among our insurers. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos insurance asset from any of our currently insolvent insurers. Other insurers may become insolvent in the future and our insurers may fail to reimburse amounts owed to us on a timely basis. Failure to realize the expected insurance recoveries, or delays in receiving material amounts from our insurers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our cash flows.

25


Table of Contents

          The following table summarizes our net asbestos-related provision:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Provision for revaluation
  $ 5,319     $ 1,745     $ 13,908     $ 5,251  
Gain on the settlement of coverage litigation
    (6,984 )           (13,976 )      
 
                       
Net asbestos-related (gain)/provision
  $ (1,665 )   $ 1,745     $ (68 )   $ 5,251  
 
                       
          Our net asbestos-related (gain)/provision is the result of our revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset resulting from adjustments for actual settlement experience different from our estimates and the accrual of our rolling 15-year asbestos liability estimate, partially offset by gains on settlements of coverage litigation with asbestos insurance carriers.
          The following table summarizes our asbestos-related payments and insurance proceeds:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Asbestos litigation, defense and case resolution payments
  $ 15,300     $ 14,200     $ 49,300     $ 48,200  
Insurance proceeds
    (22,000 )     (14,600 )     (49,400 )     (31,400 )
 
                       
Net asbestos-related payments/(receipts)
  $ (6,700 )   $ (400 )   $ (100 )   $ 16,800  
 
                       
          We expect to have net cash inflows of $10,500 as a result of insurance settlement proceeds in excess of the asbestos liability indemnity and defense payments for the full fiscal year 2010. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance companies and no elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our consolidated balance sheet will continue to decrease.
          The estimate of the liabilities and assets related to asbestos claims and recoveries is subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number and type of claims filed, the amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs to resolve those claims could cause us to increase further the estimates of the costs associated with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
          Based on the fiscal year-end 2009 liability estimate, an increase of 25% in the average per claim indemnity settlement amount would increase the liability by $57,500 and the impact on expense would be dependent upon available additional insurance recoveries. Assuming no change to the assumptions currently used to estimate our insurance asset, this increase would result in a charge in the statement of operations in the range of approximately 70% to 80% of the increase in the liability. Long-term cash flows would ultimately change by the same amount. Should there be an increase in excess of this 25%, the percentage of that increase that would be expected to be funded by additional insurance recoveries will decline.

26


Table of Contents

           United Kingdom
          Some of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have also received claims alleging personal injury arising from exposure to asbestos. To date, 955 claims have been brought against our U.K. subsidiaries of which 287 remained open as of September 30, 2010. None of the settled claims has resulted in material costs to us. The following table summarizes our asbestos-related liabilities and assets for our U.K. subsidiaries based on open (outstanding) claims and our estimate for future unasserted claims through the fiscal third quarter of 2025:
         
    September 30,  
    2010  
Asbestos-related assets:
       
Accounts and notes receivable-other
  $ 3,400  
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable
    32,100  
 
     
Total asbestos-related assets
  $ 35,500  
 
     
 
       
Asbestos-related liabilities:
       
Accrued expenses
  $ 3,400  
Asbestos-related liability
    32,100  
 
     
Total asbestos-related liabilities
  $ 35,500  
 
     
 
       
Liability balance by claim category:
       
Open claims
  $ 5,700  
Future unasserted claims
    29,800  
 
     
Total asbestos-related liabilities
  $ 35,500  
 
     
          The liability estimates are based on a U.K. House of Lords judgment that pleural plaque claims do not amount to a compensable injury and accordingly, we have reduced our liability assessment. If this ruling is reversed by legislation, the total asbestos liability and related asset recorded in the U.K. would be approximately $53,700.
Project Claims
          In the ordinary course of business, we are parties to litigation involving clients and subcontractors arising out of project contracts. Such litigation includes claims and counterclaims by and against us for canceled contracts, for additional costs incurred in excess of current contract provisions, as well as for back charges for alleged breaches of warranty and other contract commitments. If we were found to be liable for any of the claims/counterclaims against us, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent a reserve had not been established for the matter in our accounts or if the liability exceeds established reserves.
          Due to the inherent commercial, legal and technical uncertainties underlying the estimation of all of the project claims described herein, the amounts ultimately realized or paid by us could differ materially from the balances, if any, included in our financial statements, which could result in additional material charges against earnings, and which could also materially adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows.
           Power Plant Dispute — Ireland
          In 2006, a dispute arose with a client because of material corrosion that occurred at two power plants we designed and built in Ireland, which began operation in December 2005 and June 2006. There was also corrosion that occurred to subcontractor-provided emissions control equipment and induction fans at the back-end of the power plants which is due principally to the low set point temperature design of the emissions control equipment that was set by our subcontractor. We have identified technical solutions to resolve the boiler tube corrosion and emissions control equipment corrosion and during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2008 entered into a settlement with the client under which we are implementing the technical solutions in exchange for a full release of all claims related to the corrosion (including a release from the client’s right under the original contract to reject the plants under our availability guaranty) and the client’s agreement to share the cost of the ameliorative work related to the boiler tube corrosion. Accordingly, the client withdrew its notice of arbitration in January 2009, which was originally filed in May 2008.
          Between fiscal year 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2008, we recorded charges totaling $61,700 in relation to this project. The implementation of the technical solutions is anticipated to be completed in 2011.
           Power Plant Arbitration — North America
          In January 2010, we commenced arbitration against our client in connection with a power plant project in Louisiana seeking, among other relief, a declaration as to our rights under our purchase order with respect to $17,800 in retention monies and an $82,000 letter of credit held by the client. The purchase order was for the supply of two

27


Table of Contents

boilers and ancillary equipment for the project. The project was substantially completed and released for commercial operation in February 2010. Our client is the project’s engineering, procurement and construction contractor. Under the terms of the purchase order, significant reductions to the retention and letter of credit monies are to occur upon the project’s achievement of substantial completion, which has been delayed due to failures on our client’s part to properly manage and execute the project. The client has taken the position that we are responsible for the project’s delays and, subsequent to service of our arbitration demand, has served its own arbitration demand, seeking to assess us with all associated late substantial completion liquidated damages under our purchase order, together with liquidated damages for alleged late material and equipment deliveries, and back charges for corrective work and other damages arising out of allegedly defective materials and equipment delivered by us. The client contends it is owed in excess of $69,000 under our purchase order as a result of our alleged failures. There is a risk that the client will attempt to call all or part of the letter of credit during the pendency of the proceeding. We are of the opinion that any such call would be wrongful and entitle us to seek return of the funds and any other damages arising out of the call. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this dispute at this time.
           Camden County Waste-to-Energy Project
          One of our project subsidiaries, Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, LP (“CCERA”) owns and operates a waste-to-energy facility in Camden County, New Jersey (the “Project”). The Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County (“PCFA”) issued bonds to finance the construction of the Project and to acquire a landfill for Camden County’s use. Pursuant to a loan agreement between the PCFA and CCERA, proceeds from the bonds were loaned by the PCFA to CCERA and used by CCERA to finance the construction of the facility. Accordingly, the proceeds of this loan were recorded as debt on CCERA’s balance sheet and, therefore, are included in our consolidated balance sheet. CCERA’s obligation to service the debt incurred pursuant to the loan agreement is limited to depositing all tipping fees and electric revenues received with the trustee of the PCFA bonds. The trustee is required to pay CCERA its service fees prior to servicing the PCFA bonds. CCERA has no other debt repayment obligations under the loan agreement with the PCFA.
          In 1997, the United States Supreme Court effectively invalidated New Jersey’s long-standing municipal solid waste flow rules and regulations, eliminating the guaranteed supply of municipal solid waste to the Project with its corresponding tipping fee revenue. As a result, tipping fees have been reduced to market rate in order to provide a steady supply of fuel to the Project. Since the ruling, those market-based revenues have not been, and are not expected to be, sufficient to service the debt on outstanding bonds issued by the PCFA to finance the construction of the Project.
          In 1998, CCERA filed suit against the PCFA and other parties seeking, among other things, to void the applicable contracts and agreements governing the Project (Camden County Energy Recovery Assoc. v. N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County, L-268-98). Since 1999, the State of New Jersey has provided subsidies sufficient to ensure the payment of each of the PCFA’s debt service payments as they became due, but the State’s current appropriations act includes an appropriation that appears insufficient to make the full debt service payment due in December 2010. The bonds outstanding in connection with the Project were issued by the PCFA, not by us or CCERA, and the bonds are not guaranteed by either us or CCERA. In the litigation, the defendants have asserted, among other things, that an equitable portion of the outstanding debt on the Project should be allocated to CCERA even though CCERA did not guarantee the bonds.
          At this time, we cannot determine the ultimate outcome of the foregoing and the potential effects on CCERA and the Project. If the State of New Jersey were to fail to subsidize the debt service, and there were to be a default on a debt service payment, the bondholders might proceed to attempt to exercise their remedies, by among other things, seizing the collateral securing the bonds. We do not believe this collateral includes CCERA’s plant.

28


Table of Contents

Environmental Matters
           CERCLA and Other Remedial Matters
          Under U.S. federal statutes, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, and similar state laws, the current owner or operator of real property and the past owners or operators of real property (if disposal of toxic or hazardous substances took place during such past ownership or operation) may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of removal or remediation of toxic or hazardous substances on or under their property, regardless of whether such materials were released in violation of law or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such substances. Moreover, under CERCLA and similar state laws, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be jointly and severally liable for the costs of the removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment site, whether or not such site was owned or operated by such person, which we refer to as an off-site facility. Liability at such off-site facilities is typically allocated among all of the financially viable responsible parties based on such factors as the relative amount of waste contributed to a site, toxicity of such waste, relationship of the waste contributed by a party to the remedy chosen for the site and other factors.
          We currently own and operate industrial facilities and we have also transferred our interests in industrial facilities that we formerly owned or operated. It is likely that as a result of our current or former operations, hazardous substances have affected the facilities or the real property on which they are or were situated. We also have received and may continue to receive claims pursuant to indemnity obligations from the present owners of facilities we have transferred, which claims may require us to incur costs for investigation and/or remediation.
          We are currently engaged in the investigation and/or remediation under the supervision of the applicable regulatory authorities at two of our or our subsidiaries’ former facilities (including Mountain Top, which is described below). In addition, we sometimes engage in investigation and/or remediation without the supervision of a regulatory authority. Although we do not expect the environmental conditions at our present or former facilities to cause us to incur material costs in excess of those for which reserves have been established, it is possible that various events could cause us to incur costs materially in excess of our present reserves in order to fully resolve any issues surrounding those conditions. Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not discover additional environmental conditions at our currently or formerly owned or operated properties, or that additional claims will not be made with respect to formerly owned properties, requiring us to incur material expenditures to investigate and/or remediate such conditions.
          We have been notified that we are a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under CERCLA or similar state laws at three off-site facilities. At each of these sites, our liability should be substantially less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste attributable to us compared to that attributable to all other PRPs is low. We do not believe that our share of cleanup obligations at any of the off-site facilities as to which we have received a notice of potential liability will exceed $500 in the aggregate. We have also received and responded to a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) regarding a fourth off-site facility. We do not know what, if any, further actions USEPA may take regarding this fourth off-site facility.
           Mountain Top
          In February 1988, one of our subsidiaries, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (“FWEC”), entered into a Consent Agreement and Order with the USEPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“PADEP”) regarding its former manufacturing facility in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania. The order essentially required FWEC to investigate and remediate as necessary contaminants, including trichloroethylene (“TCE”), in the soil and groundwater at the facility. Pursuant to the order, in 1993 FWEC installed a “pump and treat” system to remove TCE from the groundwater. It is not possible at the present time to predict how long FWEC will be required to operate and maintain this system.
          In the fall of 2004, FWEC sampled the private domestic water supply wells of certain residences in Mountain Top and identified approximately 30 residences whose wells contained TCE at levels in excess of Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The subject residences are located approximately one mile to the southwest of where the TCE previously was discovered in the soils at the former FWEC facility. Since that time, FWEC, USEPA, and PADEP have cooperated in responding to the foregoing. Although FWEC believed the evidence available was not sufficient to support a determination that FWEC was responsible for the TCE in the residential wells, FWEC immediately provided the affected residences with bottled water, followed by water filters, and, pursuant to a

29


Table of Contents

settlement agreement with USEPA, it hooked them up to the public water system. Pursuant to an amendment of the settlement agreement, FWEC subsequently agreed with USEPA to arrange and pay for the hookup of approximately five additional residences, even though TCE has not been detected in the wells at those residences. FWEC is incurring costs related to public outreach and communications in the affected area, and it may be required to pay the agencies’ costs in overseeing and responding to the situation. FWEC is also incurring further costs in connection with a Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) that in March 2009 it agreed to conduct. In April 2009, USEPA proposed for listing on the National Priorities List (“NPL”) an area consisting of its former manufacturing facility and the affected residences, but it also stated that the proposed listing may not be finalized if FWEC complies with its agreement to conduct the RI/FS. FWEC submitted comments opposing the proposed listing. FWEC has accrued its best estimate of the cost of the foregoing and it reviews this estimate on a quarterly basis.
          Other costs to which FWEC could be exposed could include, among other things, FWEC’s counsel and consulting fees, further agency oversight and/or response costs, costs and/or exposure related to potential litigation, and other costs related to possible further investigation and/or remediation. At present, it is not possible to determine whether FWEC will be determined to be liable for some or all of the items described in this paragraph or to reliably estimate the potential liability associated with the items. If one or more third-parties are determined to be a source of the TCE, FWEC will evaluate its options regarding the potential recovery of the costs FWEC has incurred, which options could include seeking to recover those costs from those determined to be a source.
           Other Environmental Matters
          Our operations, especially our manufacturing and power plants, are subject to comprehensive laws adopted for the protection of the environment and to regulate land use. The laws of primary relevance to our operations regulate the discharge of emissions into the water and air, but can also include hazardous materials handling and disposal, waste disposal and other types of environmental regulation. These laws and regulations in many cases require a lengthy and complex process of obtaining licenses, permits and approvals from the applicable regulatory agencies. Noncompliance with these laws can result in the imposition of material civil or criminal fines or penalties. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws. However, no assurance can be provided that we will not become the subject of enforcement proceedings that could cause us to incur material expenditures. Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not need to incur material expenditures beyond our existing reserves to make capital improvements or operational changes necessary to allow us to comply with future environmental laws.
          With regard to the foregoing, the waste-to-energy facility operated by our CCERA project subsidiary is subject to certain revisions to New Jersey’s mercury air emission regulations. The revisions make CCERA’s mercury control requirements more stringent, especially when the last phase of the revisions becomes effective in 2012. CCERA’s management believes that the data generated during recent stack testing tends to indicate that the facility will be able to comply with even the most stringent of the regulatory revisions without installing additional control equipment. Even if the equipment had to be installed, CCERA could assert that the project’s sponsor would be responsible to pay for the equipment. However, the sponsor may not have sufficient funds to do so or may assert that it is not so responsible. Estimates of the cost of installing the additional control equipment are approximately $30,000 based on our last assessment.
          In June 2010, CCERA received an Administrative Order of Revocation and Notice of Civil Administrative Penalty Assessment from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”). The Administrative Order alleged that CCERA had violated its permit emission limit for total PM-10, particulate matter 10 micrometers or less, during its March 2010 annual stack testing (8.08 pounds per hour against a permit limit of 7.02 pounds per hour), and it provided for the revocation of the permit to operate CCERA’s Unit A, one of CCERA’s three units. CCERA re-tested Unit A on June 22, 2010, and the re-test results indicated that the PM-10 emissions were well below its permit limit. In response to CCERA’s subsequent request for a hearing and a stay of the revocation order, NJDEP, on September 16, 2010, rescinded its notice of revocation.

30


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
          The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated below. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which we refer to as our 2009 Form 10-K.
Safe Harbor Statement
          This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, other sections of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports and oral statements made by our representatives from time to time may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our assumptions, expectations and projections about Foster Wheeler AG and the various industries within which we operate. These include statements regarding our expectations about revenues (including as expressed by our backlog), our liquidity, the outcome of litigation and legal proceedings and recoveries from customers for claims and the costs of current and future asbestos claims and the amount and timing of related insurance recoveries. Such forward-looking statements by their nature involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. We caution that a variety of factors, including but not limited to the factors described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our 2009 Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on February 25, 2010, and the following, could cause business conditions and our results to differ materially from what is contained in forward-looking statements:
    benefits, effects or results of our redomestication or the relocation of our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland;
 
    the search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer;
 
    further deterioration in the economic conditions in the United States and other major international economies;
 
    changes in investment by the oil and gas, oil refining, chemical/petrochemical and power generation industries;
 
    changes in the financial condition of our customers;
 
    changes in regulatory environments;
 
    changes in project design or schedules;
 
    contract cancellations;
 
    changes in our estimates of costs to complete projects;
 
    changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies worldwide;
 
    compliance with laws and regulations relating to our global operations;
 
    currency fluctuations;
 
    war and/or terrorist attacks on facilities either owned by us or where equipment or services are or may be provided by us;
 
    interruptions to shipping lanes or other methods of transit;
 
    outcomes of pending and future litigation, including litigation regarding our liability for damages and insurance coverage for asbestos exposure;
 
    protection and validity of our patents and other intellectual property rights;
 
    increasing competition by non-U.S. and U.S. companies;
 
    compliance with our debt covenants;
 
    recoverability of claims against our customers and others by us and claims by third parties against us; and
 
    changes in estimates used in our critical accounting policies.
          Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the formation of these forward-looking statements and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized, as well as other factors, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made by us.

31


Table of Contents

          In addition, this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains several statements regarding current and future general global economic conditions. These statements are based on our compilation of economic data and analyses from a variety of external sources. While we believe these statements to be reasonably accurate, global economic conditions are difficult to analyze and predict and are subject to significant uncertainty and as a result, these statements may prove to be wrong. The challenges and drivers for each of our business segments are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “—Results of Operations-Business Segments,” within this Item 2.
          We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on Form 10-K and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Overview
          We operate through two business groups — the Global Engineering & Construction Group, which we refer to as our Global E&C Group, and our Global Power Group. In addition to these two business groups, we also report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group, which we refer to as the C&F Group.
          We have been exploring, and intend to continue to explore, acquisitions within the engineering and construction industry to strategically complement or expand on our technical capabilities or access to new market segments. We are also exploring acquisitions within the power generation industry to complement our Global Power Group product offering. However, there is no assurance that we will consummate any acquisitions in the future.
      Results for the Fiscal Third Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
          Our summary financial results for the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
                               
Operating revenues (1)
  $ 904,709     $ 1,216,379     $ 2,855,778     $ 3,789,703  
Contract profit (1)
    139,920       193,837       459,862       576,548  
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1)
    73,622       75,881       213,442       214,153  
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
    51,720       89,998       182,638       285,065  
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
    0.41       0.71       1.44       2.26  
Diluted
    0.41       0.71       1.44       2.24  
Net cash provided by operating activities (2)
                    167,567       210,919  
 
(1)   Please refer to the section entitled “—Results of Operations” within this Item 2 for further discussion.
 
(2)   Please refer to the section entitled “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” within this Item 2 for further discussion.
          Cash and cash equivalents totaled $1,040,153 and $997,200 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
          Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit and an increase in our effective tax rate.
          Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit and an increase in our effective tax rate.
          Please refer to the discussion within the section entitled “—Results of Operations” within this Item 2.

32


Table of Contents

           Challenges and Drivers
          Our primary operating focus continues to be booking quality new business and executing our contracts well. The global markets in which we operate are largely dependent on overall economic growth and the resultant demand for oil and gas, electric power, petrochemicals and refined products.
          In the engineering and construction industry, we expect long-term demand to be strong for the end products produced by our clients, and to continue to stimulate investment by our clients in new and expanded plants. The global economic downturn experienced in 2008 and 2009 caused many of our engineering and construction clients to reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to the kinds of energy, petrochemical and pharmaceutical projects that we execute, but as the global economic outlook continues to improve, we have noted signs of market improvement. We are seeing increasing numbers of our clients implementing their 2010 capital spending plans. A number of these clients are, however, releasing tranches of work on a piecemeal basis, conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments or reevaluating the size, timing or configuration of specific planned projects. We are also seeing clients re-activating planned projects that were placed on hold in 2009. The challenges and drivers for our Global E&C Group are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “—Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global E&C Group-Overview of Segment,” within this Item 2.
          In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected by several trends which began in fiscal year 2008 and have continued in fiscal year 2010. We believe, however, that demand for new solid-fuel steam generators has begun to improve in fiscal year 2010 in some markets, driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies around the world recover from the recent global economic downturn. The challenges and drivers for our Global Power Group are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “—Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global Power Group-Overview of Segment,” within this Item 2.
      New Orders and Backlog of Unfilled Orders
          The tables below summarize our new orders and backlog of unfilled orders by period:
                         
    Fiscal Quarter Ended  
    September 30,     June 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2010     2009  
New orders, measured in future revenues:
                       
Global E&C Group*
  $ 758,400     $ 770,800     $ 688,800  
Global Power Group
    154,100       164,800       212,100  
 
                 
Total*
  $ 912,500     $ 935,600     $ 900,900  
 
                 
 
* Balances include Global E&C Group flow-through revenues, as defined in the section entitled “—Results of Operations-Operating Revenues” within this Item 2.
  $ 286,600     $ 283,200     $ 333,400  
 
                       
    As of  
    September 30,     June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2010     2009  
Backlog of unfilled orders, measured in future revenues
  $ 3,972,000     $ 3,713,300     $ 4,112,800  
Backlog, measured in Foster Wheeler scope*
  $ 2,446,200     $ 2,229,800     $ 2,068,600  
E&C man-hours in backlog (in thousands)
    14,700       14,100       12,700  
 
*   As defined in the section entitled “—Backlog and New Orders” within this Item 2.
          Please refer to the section entitled “—Backlog and New Orders” within this Item 2 for further detail.
Results of Operations:
      Operating Revenues:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 904,709     $ 1,216,379     $ (311,670 )     (25.6 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 2,855,778     $ 3,789,703     $ (933,925 )     (24.6 )%
          We operate through two business groups: our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group. Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments,” within this Item 2, for a discussion of the products and services of our business segments.
          The composition of our operating revenues varies from period to period based on the portfolio of contracts in execution during any given period. Our operating revenues are therefore dependent on our portfolio of contracts, the strength of the various geographic markets and industries we serve and our ability to address those markets and industries.

33


Table of Contents

          The geographic dispersion of our consolidated operating revenues for the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, based upon where our projects are being executed, were as follows:
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Asia
  $ 159,325     $ 287,343     $ (128,018 )     (44.6 )%   $ 580,540     $ 1,118,225     $ (537,685 )     (48.1 )%
Australasia and other*
    288,379       425,442       (137,063 )     (32.2 )%     883,810       941,380       (57,570 )     (6.1 )%
Europe
    209,623       239,595       (29,972 )     (12.5 )%     632,972       817,455       (184,483 )     (22.6 )%
Middle East
    29,511       76,673       (47,162 )     (61.5 )%     154,949       294,679       (139,730 )     (47.4 )%
North America
    151,634       127,888       23,746       18.6 %     429,602       455,634       (26,032 )     (5.7 )%
South America
    66,237       59,438       6,799       11.4 %     173,905       162,330       11,575       7.1 %
 
                                               
Total
  $ 904,709     $ 1,216,379     $ (311,670 )     (25.6 )%   $ 2,855,778     $ 3,789,703     $ (933,925 )     (24.6 )%
 
                                               
 
*   Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.
          Our consolidated operating revenues declined in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. The declines in both periods were primarily the result of decreased flow-through revenues, as described below, and decreased operating revenues in both our operating groups, partially offset by a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received. Our consolidated operating revenues decreased approximately 19% and 21%, respectively, excluding the impact of the change in flow-through revenues, foreign currency fluctuations and the above noted settlement fee in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments-Global E&C Group,” within this Item 2, for further information regarding the settlement fee noted above.
          Flow-through revenues and costs result when we purchase materials, equipment or third-party services on behalf of our customer on a reimbursable basis with no profit on the materials, equipment or third-party services and where we have the overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for the materials, equipment or third-party services included in flow-through costs. Flow-through revenues and costs do not impact contract profit or net earnings.
          Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments,” within this Item 2, for further discussion related to operating revenues and our view of the market outlook for both of our operating groups.
      Contract Profit:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 139,920     $ 193,837     $ (53,917 )     (27.8 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 459,862     $ 576,548     $ (116,686 )     (20.2 )%
          Contract profit is computed as operating revenues less cost of operating revenues. “Flow-through” amounts are recorded both as operating revenues and cost of operating revenues with no contract profit. Contract profit margins are computed as contract profit divided by operating revenues. Flow-through revenues reduce the contract profit margin as they are included in operating revenues without any corresponding impact on contract profit. As a result, we analyze our contract profit margins excluding the impact of flow-through revenues as we believe that this is a more accurate measure of our operating performance.
          The decrease in our contract profit in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted from contract profit decreases in both our operating groups, partially offset by the favorable impact of a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received. Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments,” within this Item 2, for further information related to contract profit for both of our operating groups.
          Both of our operating groups experienced decreased contract profit in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, which was partially offset by a curtailment gain of approximately $20,100 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future defined benefit accrual and the favorable impact of a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received. Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments,” within this Item 2, for further information related to contract profit for both of our operating groups.
      Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 73,622     $ 75,881     $ (2,259 )     (3.0 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 213,442     $ 214,153     $ (711 )     (0.3 )%

34


Table of Contents

          SG&A expenses include the costs associated with general management, sales pursuit, including proposal expenses, and research and development costs.
          The decrease in SG&A expenses in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from a decrease in sales pursuit costs of $1,700, while general overhead costs and research and development costs were relatively unchanged.
          The decrease in SG&A expenses in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from a decrease in research and development costs of $1,000, while general overhead costs and sales pursuit costs were relatively unchanged.
      Other Income, net:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 16,197     $ 10,508     $ 5,689       54.1 %
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 35,948     $ 30,201     $ 5,747       19.0 %
          Other income, net during the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, consisted primarily of equity earnings of $14,300 and $25,600, respectively, generated from our investments, primarily from our ownership interests in build, own and operate projects in Italy and Chile.
          Other income, net increased in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily driven by an increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $7,500, partially offset by a decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy of $1,900.
          Other income, net increased in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This was the net result of an increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $2,500 and other activities including $3,200 of value-added tax refunds and other non-income tax credits, partially offset by a decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy of $3,200.
          Please refer to the section entitled “—Business Segments-Global Power Group,” within this Item 2, for further information related to the equity earnings of our Global Power Group’s project in Chile.
      Other Deductions, net:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 7,394     $ 6,722     $ 672       10.0 %
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 27,131     $ 19,707     $ 7,424       37.7 %
          Other deductions, net includes various items, such as legal fees, consulting fees, bank fees, net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits and the impact of net foreign exchange transactions within the period. Net foreign exchange transactions include the net amount of transaction losses and gains that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries.
          Other deductions, net in the fiscal third quarter of 2010 consisted primarily of $2,600 of legal fees, $1,300 of bank fees, $1,700 of consulting fees, a charge of $1,600 for unamortized fees and expenses related to the amendment and restatement of our October 2006 U.S. senior secured credit agreement in July 2010, net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $900 and a charge of $900 for the write-off of capitalized costs due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project, partially offset by a $2,400 net foreign exchange transaction gain. The increase in other deductions, net in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, was primarily the net result of the $1,600 charge related to the amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, the $900 capitalized costs write-off charge, an increase in consulting fees of $600 and an increase in net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $500, partially offset by a favorable impact of $2,700 related to the change in net foreign exchange transactions.

35


Table of Contents

          Other deductions, net in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 consisted primarily of $12,500 of legal fees, $4,100 of consulting fees, $3,300 of bank fees, $2,200 of net foreign exchange transaction losses, the $1,600 charge related to the amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement noted above, net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $800 and a charge of $900 for the write-off of capitalized costs due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project. The increase in other deductions, net in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, was primarily the result of an unfavorable impact of $3,400 related to the change in net foreign exchange transactions, an increase in legal fees of $2,300, the $1,600 charge related to amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement noted above, an increase in consulting fees of $900 and the $900 capitalized costs write-off charge.
          Net foreign exchange transactions in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 resulted in a net gain of $2,400 and a net loss of $2,200, respectively, and were primarily driven from exchange rate fluctuations on cash balances held by certain of our subsidiaries that were denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of those subsidiaries.
      Interest Income:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 2,835     $ 2,701     $ 134       5.0 %
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 7,924     $ 7,799     $ 125       1.6 %
          Interest income in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was relatively unchanged, compared to the same periods in 2009. The fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, was favorably impacted by higher interest rates and investment yields and higher average cash and cash equivalents balances, which was substantially all offset by an unfavorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations. Interest income in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, was favorably impacted by higher average cash and cash equivalents balances and a favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations, which was substantially all offset by an unfavorable impact from lower interest rates and investment yields.
      Interest Expense:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 4,330     $ 4,648     $ (318 )     (6.8 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 12,925     $ 10,117     $ 2,808       27.8 %
          Interest expense in the fiscal third quarter of 2010 was relatively unchanged, compared to the same period in 2009, which was the net result of a favorable impact from decreased average borrowings, partially offset by increased interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits. Interest expense in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased, compared to the same period in 2009, which primarily resulted from an increase in net interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits of $3,800, partially offset by decreased average borrowings. Accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits during the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are net of the reversal of previously accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits that was ultimately not assessed of $900 and $3,100, respectively. The reversals in both periods occurred prior to the fiscal third quarters.
      Net Asbestos-Related (Gain)/Provision:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ (1,665 )   $ 1,745     $ (3,410 )     (195.4 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ (68 )   $ 5,251     $ (5,319 )     (101.3 )%
          The change in the net asbestos-related (gain)/provision in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from a gain of $7,000 on the settlement of coverage litigation with asbestos insurance carriers, partially offset by an increase of $3,600 to our provision related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability.
          The change in the net asbestos-related (gain)/provision in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from a gain of $14,000 on the settlement of coverage litigation with asbestos insurance carriers, partially offset by an increase of $8,700 to our provision related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability.

36


Table of Contents

      Provision for Income Taxes:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 18,693     $ 22,061     $ (3,368 )     (15.3 )%
Effective Tax Rate
    24.8 %     18.7 %                            
 
                                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 55,712     $ 67,625     $ (11,913 )     (17.6 )%
Effective Tax Rate
    22.3 %     18.5 %                        
          The tax provision for each year-to-date period is calculated by multiplying pretax income by the estimated annual effective tax rate for such period. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate significantly from period to period and may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of income taxed in various non-U.S. jurisdictions with rates different from the U.S. statutory rate, as a result of our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses generated by certain unprofitable operations and as a result of the varying mix of income earned in the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, our deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of loss carryforwards (or other deferred tax assets) will not be realized in the future. In periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance favorably impacts our effective tax rate. Conversely, in periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax losses, the corresponding increase in the valuation allowance has an unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate.
           Fiscal Year 2010
          Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first nine months of 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
    Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which is expected to contribute to an approximate 17-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010.
 
    A valuation allowance increase because we are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which is expected to contribute an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010.
           Fiscal Year 2009
          Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first nine months of 2009 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
    Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate.
 
    A valuation allowance increase because we were unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which contributed to an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate.
          These variances were partially offset by the change of valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions, including a valuation allowance reversal in one of our non-U.S. subsidiaries in fiscal year 2010, and other permanent differences.
          We monitor the jurisdictions for which valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were established in previous years, and we evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions. Such evaluation includes a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary.
          For statutory purposes, the majority of the U.S. federal tax benefits, against which valuation allowances have been established, do not expire until fiscal year 2025 and beyond, based on current tax laws.
      Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 4,858     $ 5,991     $ (1,133 )     (18.9 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 11,954     $ 12,630     $ (676 )     (5.4 )%

37


Table of Contents

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents third-party ownership interests in the results of our Global Power Group’s Martinez, California gas-fired cogeneration subsidiary and our manufacturing subsidiaries in Poland and the People’s Republic of China as well as our Global E&C Group’s subsidiaries in Malaysia and South Africa. The change in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is based upon changes in the underlying earnings of these subsidiaries and/or changes in the noncontrolling interests’ ownership interest in the subsidiaries.
          The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from our operations in the People’s Republic of China, Martinez, California and Poland.
          The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from our operations in the People’s Republic of China, Malaysia and Poland, partially offset by our operations in Martinez, California and South Africa.
      EBITDA:
          EBITDA, as discussed and defined below, is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating decision maker.
          In addition to our two business groups, which also represent operating segments for financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group, or C&F Group, which we also treat as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     $ Change     % Change  
Fiscal Quarters Ended
  $ 87,150     $ 128,170     $ (41,020 )     (32.0 )%
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
  $ 288,669     $ 395,716     $ (107,047 )     (27.1 )%
          EBITDA decreased in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily driven by decreased contract profit in both of our business groups, partially offset by the favorable impact of a settlement fee we received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract. Please refer to the preceding discussion within this “—Results of Operations” section.
          EBITDA decreased in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily driven by decreased contract profit in both of our business groups, partially offset by a curtailment gain related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future defined benefit accrual and the favorable impact of a settlement fee we received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract. Please refer to the preceding discussion of each of these items within this “—Results of Operations” section.
          See the individual segment explanations below for additional details.
          EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure not defined in generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. We define EBITDA as income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We have presented EBITDA because we believe it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. Certain covenants under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement use an adjusted form of EBITDA such that in the covenant calculations the EBITDA as presented herein is adjusted for certain unusual and infrequent items specifically excluded in the terms of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement. We believe that the line item on the consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG” is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP financial measure. EBITDA, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information that is included in net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG, users of this financial information should consider the type of events and transactions that are excluded. Our non-GAAP performance measure, EBITDA, has certain material limitations as follows:
    It does not include interest expense. Because we have borrowed money to finance some of our operations, interest is a necessary and ongoing part of our costs and has assisted us in generating revenue. Therefore, any measure that excludes interest expense has material limitations;
 
    It does not include taxes. Because the payment of taxes is a necessary and ongoing part of our operations, any measure that excludes taxes has material limitations; and
 
    It does not include depreciation and amortization. Because we must utilize property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in order to generate revenues in our operations, depreciation and amortization are necessary and ongoing costs of our operations. Therefore, any measure that excludes depreciation and amortization has material limitations.

38


Table of Contents

          A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below.
                                 
            Global     Global     C&F  
    Total     E&C Group     Power Group     Group (1)  
Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010:
                               
EBITDA (2)
  $ 87,150     $ 69,339     $ 40,430     $ (22,619 )
 
                         
Less: Interest expense
    4,330                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    12,407                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    18,693                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 51,720                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
EBITDA (2)
  $ 128,170     $ 114,134     $ 39,589     $ (25,553 )
 
                         
Less: Interest expense
    4,648                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    11,463                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    22,061                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 89,998                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010:
                               
EBITDA (2)
  $ 288,669     $ 254,732     $ 96,709     $ (62,772 )
 
                         
Less: Interest expense
    12,925                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    37,394                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    55,712                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 182,638                          
 
                             
 
                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009:
                               
EBITDA (2)
  $ 395,716     $ 326,044     $ 142,152     $ (72,480 )
 
                         
Less: Interest expense
    10,117                          
Less: Depreciation and amortization
    32,909                          
Less: Provision for income taxes
    67,625                          
 
                             
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG
  $ 285,065                          
 
                             
 
(1)   Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest.
 
(2)   EBITDA includes the following:
                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*:
                               
Global E&C
  $ 8,400     $ 11,200     $ 27,900     $ 44,000  
Global Power Group
    3,400       300       16,700       3,500  
 
                       
Total
    11,800       11,500       44,600       47,500  
 
                       
 
                               
Net asbestos-related (gain)/provision in C&F Group**
    (1,700 )     1,800       (100 )     5,300  
 
                               
Curtailment gain on the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual in our Global E&C Group
                20,100        
Settlement fee received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a prospective power project under development in Italy within our Global E&C Group
    10,900             9,800        
 
*   Please refer to “Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit.
 
**   Please refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset.

39


Table of Contents

     The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they were third-party transactions—i.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that activity in the results of the C&F Group.
Business Segments
      Global E&C Group
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Operating revenues
  $ 749,249     $ 1,009,352     $ (260,103 )     (25.8 )%   $ 2,371,394     $ 2,992,235     $ (620,841 )     (20.7 )%
 
                                               
EBITDA
  $ 69,339     $ 114,134     $ (44,795 )     (39.2 )%   $ 254,732     $ 326,044     $ (71,312 )     (21.9 )%
 
                                               
      Results
          The geographic dispersion of our Global E&C Group’s operating revenues for the fiscal quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, based upon where our projects are being executed, were as follows:
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Asia
  $ 132,640     $ 264,121     $ (131,481 )     (49.8 )%   $ 492,048     $ 1,044,517     $ (552,469 )     (52.9 )%
Australasia and other*
    288,379       424,926       (136,547 )     (32.1 )%     883,775       937,327       (53,552 )     (5.7 )%
Europe
    148,131       144,926       3,205       2.2 %     454,893       450,964       3,929       0.9 %
Middle East
    24,544       76,596       (52,052 )     (68.0 )%     145,738       294,602       (148,864 )     (50.5 )%
North America
    108,340       60,821       47,519       78.1 %     262,201       179,170       83,031       46.3 %
South America
    47,215       37,962       9,253       24.4 %     132,739       85,655       47,084       55.0 %
 
                                               
Total
  $ 749,249     $ 1,009,352     $ (260,103 )     (25.8 )%   $ 2,371,394     $ 2,992,235     $ (620,841 )     (20.7 )%
 
                                               
 
*   Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.
          Our Global E&C Group experienced decreases in operating revenues of 26% and 21%, respectively, in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. The declines in both periods include the net impact of decreased flow-through revenues, partially offset by the favorable impact of a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received, as noted below. Excluding flow-through revenues, foreign currency fluctuations and the above noted settlement fee, our Global E&C Group’s operating revenues decreased 18% and 10% in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009. Please refer to the “—Overview of Segment” section below for a discussion of our Global E&C Group’s market outlook.
          The decrease in our Global E&C Group’s EBITDA in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
    Decreased contract profit of $53,900, excluding the favorable contract profit impact of the settlement fee noted below, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit margins and, to a lesser extent, decreased volume of operating revenues.
 
    A decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy of $1,900.
 
    A net favorable impact of approximately $10,900 for a settlement fee we received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract, as described below.
 
    Favorable impact of $3,200 related to the change in net foreign exchange transactions.
          The decrease in our Global E&C Group’s EBITDA in the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
    Decreased contract profit of $92,500, excluding the favorable contract profit impact of the settlement fee noted below, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit margins and, to a lesser extent, the volume decrease in operating revenues.
 
    Unfavorable impact of $4,400 related to the change in net foreign exchange transactions.
 
    A decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy of $3,200.
 
    The favorable impact of a curtailment gain of $20,100 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future defined benefit accrual, which was included in contract profit.
 
    A net favorable impact of approximately $9,800 for a settlement fee we received, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract, as described below.

40


Table of Contents

          During the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we received a settlement fee of $11,800, which was included in operating revenues, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract. As a result of the decision to not proceed with the project, we incurred a charge of approximately $900 in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 for the write-off of capitalized costs in our project company. Additionally, we incurred approximately $1,100 of development costs associated with this project during fiscal year 2010. The development costs are included in SG&A and were primarily incurred during the fiscal first and second quarters of 2010, with minimal activity in the fiscal third quarter of 2010. These items contributed to a net favorable impact to EBITDA of approximately $10,900 and $9,800 for the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
           Overview of Segment
          Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants, coal-to-liquids, coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering, procurement, construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power production facilities.
          Our Global E&C Group owns one of the leading technologies (SYDEC SM delayed coking) used in refinery residue upgrading, in addition to other refinery residue upgrading technologies (solvent deasphalting and visbreaking), and a hydrogen production process used in oil refineries and petrochemical plants. The Global E&C Group also designs and supplies direct-fired furnaces, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery generators, used in a range of refinery, chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas processes, including furnaces used in its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies. Additionally, our Global E&C Group has experience with, and is able to work with, a wide range of processes owned by others.
          Although the global economy is showing signs of recovery, several of our clients are continuing to reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to the kinds of energy, petrochemical and pharmaceutical projects that we execute. We have seen instances of postponement or cancellation of prospects; clients releasing us to proceed on projects in phases; clients conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments; clients resizing, reconfiguring or relocating prospective projects to make them more economically viable; and intensified competition among engineering and construction contractors which has resulted in pricing pressure. These factors may continue for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 and into 2011. However, we continue to see new projects being developed, projects moving forward and clients starting to re-examine previously postponed projects to review the business cases for proceeding with such projects. In addition, we believe world demand for energy and chemicals will continue to grow over the long term and that clients will continue to invest in new and upgraded capacity to meet that demand. As the global economic outlook continues to improve, we have noted signs of market improvement. Moreover, we have continued to be successful in booking contracts of varying types and sizes in our key end markets, including the award of a project management consultancy contract for the expansion of a terminal in Iraq, an engineering, procurement and construction management contract in Germany for a cogeneration plant, engineering, procurement and construction management contracts for gas compression facilities in Western Europe, and services for a potential refinery re-start project in the U.S. Our success in this regard is a reflection of our technical expertise, our long-term relationships with clients, and our selective approach in pursuit of new prospects where we believe we have significant differentiators.

41


Table of Contents

      Global Power Group
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Operating revenues
  $ 155,460     $ 207,027     $ (51,567 )     (24.9 )%   $ 484,384     $ 797,468     $ (313,084 )     (39.3 )%
 
                                               
 
EBITDA
  $ 40,430     $ 39,589     $ 841       2.1 %   $ 96,709     $ 142,152     $ (45,443 )     (32.0 )%
 
                                               
           Results
          The geographic dispersion of our Global Power Group’s operating revenues for the fiscal quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, based upon where our projects are being executed, were as follows:
                                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30,     Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Asia
  $ 26,685     $ 23,222     $ 3,463       14.9 %   $ 88,492     $ 73,708     $ 14,784       20.1 %
Australasia and other*
          516       (516 )     (100.0 )%     35       4,053       (4,018 )     (99.1 )%
Europe
    61,492       94,669       (33,177 )     (35.0 )%     178,079       366,491       (188,412 )     (51.4 )%
Middle East
    4,967       77       4,890       6350.6 %     9,211       77       9,134       11862.3 %
North America
    43,294       67,067       (23,773 )     (35.4 )%     167,401       276,464       (109,063 )     (39.4 )%
South America
    19,022       21,476       (2,454 )     (11.4 )%     41,166       76,675       (35,509 )     (46.3 )%
 
                                               
Total
  $ 155,460     $ 207,027     $ (51,567 )     (24.9 )%   $ 484,384     $ 797,468     $ (313,084 )     (39.3 )%
 
                                               
 
*   Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.
          Our Global Power Group experienced decreases in operating revenues excluding foreign currency fluctuations, in the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009, of 21% and 39%, respectively, which was the result of decreased volume of business in both periods. Please refer to the “—Overview of Segment” section below for a discussion of our Global Power Group’s market outlook.
          The increase in our Global Power Group’s EBITDA in the fiscal third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
    An increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $7,500, which was primarily due to the recognition of insurance recoveries in the fiscal third quarter of 2010 as described below.
 
    Decreased SG&A expenses of $5,100 primarily as a result of decreased sales pursuit costs of $2,500 and general overhead costs of $2,300.
 
    Decreased contract profit of $8,600, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, while contract profit margins were relatively unchanged.
          The decrease in our Global Power Group’s EBITDA in the fiscal first nine months of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
    Decreased contract profit of $52,200, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, partially offset by increased contract profit margins.
 
    Decreased SG&A expenses of $9,900 primarily as a result of decreased general overhead costs of $5,600 and sales pursuit costs of $3,300.
 
    An increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $2,500, which was primarily due to the recognition of insurance recoveries in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 as described below.
          On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to our Global Power Group’s project in Chile. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities from that date. Our Global Power Group’s equity earnings from the project in Chile during the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $11,200 and $14,000, respectively, which include our Global Power Group’s equity interest of the after-tax estimated recovery under the Chile based project’s business interruption insurance policy. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance on business interruption insurance, we were not able to record an estimated recovery for lost profits until substantially all contingencies related to the insurance claim had been resolved, which occurred during the fiscal third quarter of 2010. Accordingly, during the fiscal third quarter of 2010, we recorded an estimated recovery for lost profits for the period from February 27, 2010 through September 30, 2010.

42


Table of Contents

           Overview of Segment
          Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generators and auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and power plants and industrial facilities worldwide. Our competitive differentiation in serving these markets is the ability of our products to cleanly and efficiently burn a wide range of fuels, singularly or in combination. In particular, our CFB steam generators are able to burn coals of varying quality, as well as petroleum coke, lignite, municipal waste, waste wood, biomass and numerous other materials. Among these fuel sources, coal is the most widely used, and thus the market drivers and constraints associated with coal strongly affect the steam generator market and our Global Power Group’s business. Additionally, our Global Power Group owns and/or operates several cogeneration, independent power production and waste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries.
          In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected by several trends which began in fiscal year 2008 and which may continue in the future. Weakness in the global economy has reduced the near-term growth in demand for electricity and steam for industrial production processes. In addition, political and environmental sensitivity regarding coal-fired steam generators caused a number of our Global Power Group’s prospective projects to be postponed or cancelled as clients experienced difficulty in obtaining the required environmental permits or decided to wait for additional clarity regarding state and federal regulations. This environmental concern has been especially pronounced in the U.S. and Western Europe, and is linked to the view that solid-fuel-fired steam generators contribute to global warming through the discharge of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. In addition, the depressed level of natural gas pricing experienced in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, increased the attractiveness of that fuel, in relation to coal, for the generation of electricity. Finally, the constraints on the global credit market are impacting and may continue to impact some of our clients’ investment plans as these clients are affected by the availability and cost of financing, as well as their own financial strategies, which could include cash conservation. We believe that demand for new solid-fuel steam generators will continue to improve in some markets in the remainder of 2010 and into 2011, driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies around the world recover from the recent global economic downturn. We are now seeing increased demand for our products in Asia and Eastern Europe as evidenced by increased proposal activity. However, the significant reduction of new contract awards in fiscal year 2009 has and is likely to continue to impact our financial performance for the remainder of fiscal year 2010.
          Longer-term, we believe that world demand for electrical energy will continue to grow and that solid-fuel-fired steam generators will continue to fill a significant portion of the incremental growth in new generating capacity. In addition, we are seeing a growing need to repower older coal plants with new clean coal plants driven by the need to improve environmental, economical, and reliability performance of mature coal plant fleets in the U.S., Europe and Russia. The fuel-flexibility of our CFB steam generators enables them to burn a wide variety of fuels other than coal and to produce carbon-neutral electricity when fired by biomass. In addition, our utility steam generators can be designed to incorporate supercritical steam technology, which significantly improves power plant efficiency and reduces power plant emissions.
          We have recently received an award to carry out the detailed engineering and supply of a pilot-scale (approximately 30 MWth) CFB steam generator, which incorporates our carbon-capturing Flexi-Burn TM technology. Once operational, this pilot facility will be utilized to validate the design of a full-scale carbon-capturing CFB power plant. Further, we have recently signed, together with other parties, a grant agreement with the European Commission, or EC, to support the technology development of a commercial scale (approximately 300 MWe) Carbon Capture and Storage, or CCS, demonstration plant featuring our Flexi-Burn TM CFB technology. If the technology development work demonstrates that the project meets its specified technology and investment goals, construction of the commercial scale demonstration plant could begin in 2012 and the plant could be operational by 2015. This project is one of the six European based CCS projects selected for funding by the EC under the European Energy Program for Recovery and it is the only selected project utilizing CFB technology for CCS application.

43


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
           Fiscal First Nine Months of 2010 Activities
          Our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balances were:
                                 
    As of              
    September 30,
2010
    December 31,
2009
    $ Change     % Change  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,040,153     $ 997,158     $ 42,995       4.3 %
Short-term investments
    268             268       N/M  
Restricted cash
    32,866       34,905       (2,039 )     (5.8 )%
 
                       
Total
  $ 1,073,287     $ 1,032,063     $ 41,224       4.0 %
 
                       
 
    N/M — not meaningful.
          Total cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash held by our non-U.S. entities as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $956,400 and $806,800, respectively.
          During the fiscal first nine months of 2010, we experienced an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $43,000, primarily as a result of $167,600 of cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by $99,200 used to repurchase our shares under our share repurchase program and $14,800 of capital expenditures.
           Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
                                 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 167,567     $ 210,919     $ (43,352 )     (20.6 )%
          Net cash provided by operating activities in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 primarily resulted from cash provided by net income of $243,700, which excludes non-cash charges of $49,100, partially offset by cash used to fund working capital of $66,600 and mandatory and discretionary contributions to our pension plans of $34,100, which included discretionary contributions of $17,800.
          Net cash provided by operating activities in the first fiscal nine months of 2009 primarily resulted from cash provided by net income of $362,100, which excludes non-cash charges of $64,400, partially offset by cash used to fund working capital of $133,000, mandatory and discretionary contributions to our non-U.S. pension plans of $36,500 and net asbestos-related payments of $16,800.
          The decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $43,400 in the fiscal first nine months of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, resulted primarily from decreased cash provided by net income of $118,400, partially offset by a decrease in cash used to fund working capital of $66,400 and decreased net asbestos-related payments of $16,900.
          Cash used for working capital was $66,600 and $133,000 in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Working capital varies from period to period depending on the mix, stage of completion and commercial terms and conditions of our contracts and the timing of the related cash receipts. We experienced a decrease in cash used for working capital during the fiscal first nine months of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, as cash receipts from client billings increased relative to cash used for services rendered and purchases of materials and equipment. The decrease in cash used for working capital during the fiscal first nine months of 2010 was driven by the conversion of working capital to cash by our Global Power Group, partially offset by a use of cash to fund working capital by our Global E&C Group.
          As more fully described below in “—Outlook,” we believe our existing cash balances and forecasted net cash provided from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations throughout the next 12 months. Our ability to increase or maintain our cash flows from operating activities in future periods will depend in large part on the demand for our products and services and our operating performance in the future. Please refer to the sections entitled “—Global E&C Group-Overview of Segment” and “—Global Power Group-Overview of Segment” above for our view of the outlook for each of our business segments.
           Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
                                 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (12,771 )   $ (44,958 )   $ 32,187       (71.6 )%

44


Table of Contents

          The net cash used in investing activities in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 was attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $14,800 and contractual payments of $2,000 related to prior business acquisitions, partially offset by return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates of $3,200.
          The net cash used in investing activities in the fiscal first nine months of 2009 was attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $36,700, which included $17,100 of expenditures in FW Power S.r.l. for the construction of the electric power generating wind farm projects in Italy and the purchase price paid for substantially all of the assets of the offshore engineering division of OPE Holdings Ltd. of $8,900.
          The capital expenditures in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 and 2009 related primarily to project construction (including the fiscal year 2009 wind farm project expenditures in FW Power S.r.l., noted above), leasehold improvements, information technology equipment and office equipment. Our capital expenditures decreased $21,900 in the fiscal first nine months of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, as a result of decreased expenditures in both our Global E&C Group and Global Power Group.
           Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
                                 
    Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
Net cash used in financing activities
  $ (112,555 )   $ (3,695 )   $ (108,860 )     2946.1 %
          The net cash used in financing activities in the fiscal first nine months of 2010 was attributable primarily to the cash used to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program of $99,200. Other financing activities included the repayment of project debt and capital lease obligations of $10,200 and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $8,000, partially offset by cash provided from exercises of stock options of $2,700 and proceeds from the issuance of new short-term debt of $2,200.
          The net cash used in financing activities in the fiscal first nine months of 2009 was attributable primarily to the repayment of project debt and capital lease obligations of $12,000 and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $2,200, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of project debt of $7,700 and proceeds from the exercise of share purchase warrants of $2,500.
           Outlook
          Our liquidity forecasts cover, among other analyses, existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, cash repatriations from non-U.S. entities, changes in working capital activities, unused credit line availability and claim recoveries and proceeds from asset sales, if any. These forecasts extend over a rolling 12-month period. Based on these forecasts, we believe our existing cash balances and forecasted net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations throughout the next 12 months. Based on these forecasts, our primary cash needs will be working capital, capital expenditures, asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs and acquisitions. We may also use cash to repurchase additional shares under our share repurchase program, as described further below, under which we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $165,591 of our outstanding shares. The majority of our cash balances are invested in short-term interest bearing accounts with maturities of less than three months. We continue to consider investing some of our cash in longer-term investment opportunities, including the acquisition of other entities or operations in the engineering and construction industry or power industry and/or the reduction of certain liabilities such as unfunded pension liabilities. We may elect to make additional discretionary contributions to our U.S. and/or U.K. pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2010.
          It is customary in the industries in which we operate to provide standby letters of credit, bank guarantees or performance bonds in favor of clients to secure obligations under contracts. We believe that we will have sufficient letter of credit capacity from existing facilities throughout the next 12 months.
          Our U.S. operating entities do not generate sufficient cash flows to fund our obligations related to corporate overhead expenses and asbestos-related liabilities incurred in the U.S. Additionally, we are dependent on cash repatriations to cover essentially all payments and expenses of our Switzerland based corporate overhead expenses and to fund the acquisition of our shares under our share repurchase program described below. Consequently, we require cash repatriations to the U.S. and Switzerland from our entities located in other countries in the normal course of our operations to meet our Swiss and U.S. cash needs and have successfully repatriated cash for many years. We believe that we can repatriate the required amount of cash to the U.S. and Switzerland. Additionally, we continue to have access to the revolving credit portion of our U.S. senior secured credit facility, if needed.

45


Table of Contents

          During the fiscal first nine months of 2010, we had net cash inflows of approximately $100, resulting from insurance settlement proceeds in excess of asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs payments. We expect to have net cash inflows of approximately $10,500 as a result of insurance settlement proceeds in excess of the asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs for the full fiscal year 2010. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance companies or elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability or any future insurance settlements, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our balance sheet will continue to decrease.
          On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, which we entered into in October 2006. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000, and includes a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to $225,000 in total availability under the facility. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement permits us to issue up to $450,000 under the letter of credit facility. Letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement have performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit rating as reported by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and/or Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”). We received a corporate credit rating of BBB- as issued by S&P during the fiscal third quarter of 2010, which, under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement, reduces our pricing for letters of credit issued under the agreement. Based on the current ratings, the letter of credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.000% and 2.000% per annum of the outstanding amount, respectively, excluding fronting fees. This performance pricing is not expected to materially impact our liquidity or capital resources in fiscal year 2010. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the agreement, plus 2.000%, subject also to the performance pricing noted above.
          The assets and/or stock of certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries collateralize our obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. In the event that our corporate credit rating as issued by Moody’s is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement will be automatically released and terminated.
          We had approximately $262,700 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. There were no funded borrowings under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009. We do not intend to borrow under our U.S. senior secured credit facility during fiscal year 2010. Please refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding our debt obligations.
          On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to the refinery/electric power generation project in which we hold an 85% noncontrolling interest. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities from that date. Subsequent to that date, our unconsolidated affiliate filed a claim with their insurance carrier. During the fiscal third quarter of 2010, a preliminary assessment of the extent of the damage was completed and an estimate of the required cost of repairs was developed. Based on the assessment and cost estimate, as well as correspondence received from the insurance carrier, we expect the property damage insurance recovery to be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing the facility. During the fiscal third quarter of 2010, the insurance carrier also provided a preliminary assessment of the business interruption insurance recovery due to the project, and an advance of insurance proceeds against this assessment. Based on this assessment, we expect the business interruption insurance recovery to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility has suspended operations. Normal operating activities are expected to resume by January 1, 2011. Please refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information on our equity interest in this project.

46


Table of Contents

          We are not required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans in fiscal year 2010 based on the minimum statutory funding requirements. We made mandatory and discretionary contributions totaling approximately $34,100 to our pension plans, which included discretionary contributions totaling approximately $17,800 to our U.S. and U.K. pension plans, during the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2010. Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2010, we expect to make mandatory and discretionary contributions totaling approximately $39,000 to our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act were signed into law in the U.S. in March 2010. The law includes a significant number of health-related provisions, most of which will take effect beginning in 2011 or later. We do not expect that the law will have a significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
          On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. We expect to seek shareholder approval of the cancellation of all shares repurchased under the program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 at our 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders. Under Swiss law, the cancellation of the shares repurchased under the program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 must be approved by our shareholders and repurchased shares remain as treasury shares on our balance sheet until cancellation. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through September 30, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $165,591 of our outstanding shares. On November 4, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized additional share repurchases of up to approximately $335,227 and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. Under Swiss law, cancellation of repurchased shares in excess of 10% of a company’s share capital must be approved in advance by the company’s shareholders. Accordingly, share repurchases under the November 2010 authorization in excess of 12,744,194 shares must be approved in advance by our shareholders. We expect to seek shareholder approval of any such share repurchases at our next general meeting of shareholders.
           Any repurchases will be made at our discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, share price and other factors. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The program has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Any repurchases made pursuant to the share repurchase program will be funded using our cash on hand. Through September 30, 2010, we have repurchased 22,411,229 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $584,409. We have executed the repurchases in accordance with 10b5-1 repurchase plans as well as other privately negotiated transactions pursuant to our share repurchase program. The 10b5-1 repurchase plans allow us to purchase shares at times when we may not otherwise do so due to regulatory or internal restrictions. Purchases under the 10b5-1 repurchase plans are based on parameters set forth in the plans. For further information, please refer to Part II, Item II of this quarterly report.
          We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. Our U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains limitations on cash dividend payments as well as other restricted payments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
          We own several noncontrolling interests in power projects in Chile and Italy. Certain of the projects have third-party debt that is not consolidated in our balance sheet. We have also issued certain guarantees for the Chile based project. Please refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information related to these projects.
Backlog and New Orders
          New orders are recorded and added to the backlog of unfilled orders based on signed contracts as well as agreed letters of intent, which we have determined are legally binding and likely to proceed. Although backlog represents only business that is considered likely to be performed, cancellations or scope adjustments may and do occur. The elapsed time from the award of a contract to completion of performance may be up to approximately four years. The dollar amount of backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future earnings related to the performance of such work due to factors outside our control, such as changes in project schedules, scope adjustments or project cancellations. We cannot predict with certainty the portion of backlog to be performed in a given year. Backlog is adjusted quarterly to reflect new orders, project cancellations, deferrals, revised project scope and cost and sales of subsidiaries, if any.
          Backlog measured in Foster Wheeler scope reflects the dollar value of backlog excluding third-party costs incurred by us on a reimbursable basis as agent or principal, which we refer to as flow-through costs. Foster Wheeler scope measures the component of backlog with profit potential and corresponds to our services plus fees for reimbursable contracts and total selling price for fixed-price or lump-sum contracts.

47


Table of Contents

      New Orders, Measured in Terms of Future Revenues
                                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
    Global     Global             Global     Global        
    E&C Group     Power Group     Total     E&C Group     Power Group     Total  
By Project Location:
                                               
Fiscal Quarter Ended
                                               
North America
  $ 117,200     $ 56,300     $ 173,500     $ 30,500     $ 56,600     $ 87,100  
South America
    34,900       4,700       39,600       11,300       6,100       17,400  
Europe
    162,600       18,900       181,500       61,400       116,400       177,800  
Asia
    124,300       49,000       173,300       93,700       4,900       98,600  
Middle East
    131,300       25,200       156,500       156,400       27,800       184,200  
Australasia and other*
    188,100             188,100       335,500       300       335,800  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 758,400     $ 154,100     $ 912,500     $ 688,800     $ 212,100     $ 900,900  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
                                               
North America
  $ 407,700     $ 162,100     $ 569,800     $ 479,900     $ 139,900     $ 619,800  
South America
    87,700       12,700       100,400       61,600       13,600       75,200  
Europe
    389,900       435,100       825,000       311,100       188,300       499,400  
Asia
    374,200       145,600       519,800       782,800       24,500       807,300  
Middle East
    292,800       25,500       318,300       245,900       27,800       273,700  
Australasia and other*
    453,200       100       453,300       464,700       600       465,300  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 2,005,500     $ 781,100     $ 2,786,600     $ 2,346,000     $ 394,700     $ 2,740,700  
 
                                   
 
                                               
By Industry:
                                               
Fiscal Quarter Ended
                                               
Power generation
  $ 6,000     $ 119,500     $ 125,500     $ 6,500     $ 182,100     $ 188,600  
Oil refining
    369,700             369,700       151,800             151,800  
Pharmaceutical
    27,600             27,600       8,900             8,900  
Oil and gas
    264,900             264,900       409,400             409,400  
Chemical/petrochemical
    51,800       100       51,900       104,000             104,000  
Power plant operation and maintenance
    12,400       34,500       46,900             30,000       30,000  
Environmental
    1,400             1,400       8,100             8,100  
Other, net of eliminations
    24,600             24,600       100             100  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 758,400     $ 154,100     $ 912,500     $ 688,800     $ 212,100     $ 900,900  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Fiscal Nine Months Ended
                                               
Power generation
  $ 30,000     $ 695,300     $ 725,300     $ 24,000     $ 323,000     $ 347,000  
Oil refining
    1,078,000             1,078,000       1,199,900             1,199,900  
Pharmaceutical
    59,500             59,500       43,100             43,100  
Oil and gas
    441,200             441,200       651,300             651,300  
Chemical/petrochemical
    332,800       100       332,900       417,600             417,600  
Power plant operation and maintenance
    12,400       85,700       98,100             71,700       71,700  
Environmental
    10,900             10,900       12,800             12,800  
Other, net of eliminations
    40,700             40,700       (2,700 )           (2,700 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 2,005,500     $ 781,100     $ 2,786,600     $ 2,346,000     $ 394,700     $ 2,740,700  
 
                                   
 
*   Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.

48


Table of Contents

      Backlog, Measured in Terms of Future Revenues
                                                 
    As of September 30, 2010     As of December 31, 2009  
    Global     Global             Global     Global        
    E&C Group     Power Group     Total     E&C Group     Power Group     Total  
By Contract Type:
                                               
Lump-sum turnkey
  $     $ 355,200     $ 355,200     $ 100     $ 169,300     $ 169,400  
Other fixed-price
    520,000       451,600       971,600       215,800       306,300       522,100  
Reimbursable
    2,585,800       59,400       2,645,200       3,297,700       128,700       3,426,400  
Eliminations
                      (900 )     (4,200 )     (5,100 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 3,105,800     $ 866,200     $ 3,972,000     $ 3,512,700     $ 600,100     $ 4,112,800  
 
                                   
 
                                               
By Project Location:
                                               
North America
  $ 613,600     $ 187,200     $ 800,800     $ 472,700     $ 198,900     $ 671,600  
South America
    137,700       32,900       170,600       185,300       52,700       238,000  
Europe
    344,200       458,000       802,200       432,800       228,500       661,300  
Asia
    599,300       144,300       743,600       728,400       93,200       821,600  
Middle East
    310,300       43,700       354,000       226,000       27,800       253,800  
Australasia and other*
    1,100,700       100       1,100,800       1,467,500       (1,000 )     1,466,500  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 3,105,800     $ 866,200     $ 3,972,000     $ 3,512,700     $ 600,100     $ 4,112,800  
 
                                   
 
                                               
By Industry:
                                               
Power generation
  $ 16,800     $ 744,200     $ 761,000     $ 18,900     $ 482,100     $ 501,000  
Oil refining
    1,618,400             1,618,400       1,597,900             1,597,900  
Pharmaceutical
    39,800             39,800       21,300             21,300  
Oil and gas
    1,123,800             1,123,800       1,559,400             1,559,400  
Chemical/petrochemical
    268,300       300       268,600       299,800             299,800  
Power plant operation and maintenance
          121,700       121,700             118,000       118,000  
Environmental
    8,800             8,800       8,200             8,200  
Other, net of eliminations
    29,900             29,900       7,200             7,200  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 3,105,800     $ 866,200     $ 3,972,000     $ 3,512,700     $ 600,100     $ 4,112,800  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Backlog, measured in terms of Foster Wheeler Scope
                                               
Total
  $ 1,591,600     $ 854,600     $ 2,446,200     $ 1,480,100     $ 588,500     $ 2,068,600  
 
                                   
 
                                               
E & C Man-hours in Backlog (in thousands)
                                               
Total
    14,700               14,700       12,700               12,700  
 
                                       
 
*   Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.
     The foreign currency translation impact on backlog and Foster Wheeler scope backlog resulted in decreases of $74,100 and $59,700, respectively, as of September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009.
Inflation
     The effect of inflation on our financial results is minimal. Although a majority of our revenues are realized under long-term contracts, the selling prices of such contracts, established for deliveries in the future, generally reflect estimated costs to complete the projects in these future periods. In addition, many of our projects are reimbursable at actual cost plus a fee, while some of the fixed-price contracts provide for price adjustments through escalation clauses.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
     Our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approve the critical accounting policies. A full discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our 2009 Form 10-K. We did not have a significant change to the application of our critical accounting policies and estimates during the fiscal first nine months of 2010.

49


Table of Contents

Accounting Developments
     In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This ASU requires specific disclosures related to the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. Financing receivable is defined in the ASU as a contractual right to receive money on demand or on fixed or determinable dates that is recognized as an asset in the entity’s statement of financial position. New disclosures are required for finance receivables and the related allowance for credit losses on a disaggregated basis, which the standard defines as portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. ASU No. 2010-20 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. We will amend our disclosures accordingly beginning with our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2010.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     During the fiscal first nine months of 2010, there were no material changes in the market risks as described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
     As of the end of the period covered by this report, our interim chief executive officer and our chief financial officer carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, our interim chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded, at the reasonable assurance level, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     During the third quarter of 2010, we completed the implementation of a new worldwide consolidation system. The system change was made to improve the efficiency of the consolidation process and related financial reporting and was not the result of any identified deficiencies in the previous consolidation system. As part of the implementation, we modified internal controls where necessary due to the system change. There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the fiscal three months ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

50


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     Please refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of legal proceedings, which is incorporated by reference in this Part II.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
     Information regarding our risk factors appears in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which we filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010. There have been no material changes in those risk factors.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
     (c) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers (amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts).
     On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. Under Swiss law, the cancellation of the shares repurchased under the program since our redomestication to Switzerland in February 2009 must be approved by our shareholders and repurchased shares remain as treasury shares on our balance sheet until cancellation. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through September 30, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $165,591 of our outstanding shares. The following table provides information with respect to purchases under our share repurchase program during the fiscal third quarter of 2010.
                                 
                    Total Number     Approximate  
                    of Shares     Dollar Value  
                    Purchased as     of Shares that  
                    Part of     May Yet Be  
            Average     Publicly     Purchased  
    Total Number     Price     Announced     Under the  
    of Shares     Paid per     Plans     Plans or  
Fiscal Month   Purchased (1)     Share     or Programs     Programs  
July 1, 2010 through July 31, 2010
        $                
August 1, 2010 through August 31, 2010
    4,312,710       23.00       4,312,710          
September 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010
                         
 
                         
Total
    4,312,710     $ 23.00       4,312,710 (2)   $ 165,591  
 
                         
 
(1)   During the fiscal third quarter of 2010, we repurchased an aggregate of 4,312,710 shares in privately negotiated transactions pursuant to our share repurchase program. We are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $165,591 of our outstanding shares. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares other than through our publicly announced repurchase programs.
 
(2)   As of September 30, 2010, an aggregate of 22,411,229 shares were purchased for a total of $584,409 since the inception of the repurchase program announced on September 12, 2008.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
     None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
     None.

51


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit No.   Exhibits
3.1
  Articles of Association of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’s Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
3.2
  Organizational Regulations of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’s Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
4.0
  Foster Wheeler AG hereby agrees to furnish copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Foster Wheeler AG and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Commission upon request.
 
   
10.1*
  Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Lisa Z. Wood. (Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Foster Wheeler AG’s Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 and filed on August 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.2*
  Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Thierry Desmaris.
 
   
10.3*
  Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2010, between Foster Wheeler North America Corp. and Gary T. Nedelka.
 
   
10.4*
  Employment Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2010, among Foster Wheeler Inc., W. Troy Roder, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation and Foster Wheeler International Corp.
 
   
10.5
  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, among Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation, and Foster Wheeler Inc., as Borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, BNP Paribas as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, and Natixis as Syndication Agents. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Foster Wheeler AG’s Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 and filed on August 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
23.1
  Consent of Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation.
 
   
31.1
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Umberto della Sala.
 
   
31.2
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto.
 
   
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Umberto della Sala.
 
   
32.2
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto.
 
   
101.INS
  XBRL Instance Document
 
   
101.SCH
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
   
101.CAL
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
   
101.DEF
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
   
101.LAB
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
   
101.PRE
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
 
*   Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

52


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  FOSTER WHEELER AG
(Registrant)
 
 
Date: November 4, 2010  /s/ Umberto della Sala    
  Umberto della Sala    
  Interim Chief Executive Officer    
 
     
Date: November 4, 2010  /s/ Franco Baseotto    
  Franco Baseotto    
  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer    
 

53

Foster Wheeler (NASDAQ:FWLT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Foster Wheeler Charts.
Foster Wheeler (NASDAQ:FWLT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Foster Wheeler Charts.