We may not be able to
successfully compete
The
market for information and network security solutions is intensely competitive and we
expect that competition will continue to increase in the future. Our principal competitors
include Cisco Systems, Inc., Fortinet Inc. and Juniper Networks, Inc. We also compete with
several other companies, including McAfee, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, SonicWall Inc. and
Symantec Corporation with respect to specific products that we offer, including data
security products.
Some
of our current and potential competitors have various advantages over us, including longer
operating histories; access to larger customer bases; significantly greater financial,
technical and marketing resources; a broader portfolio of products, applications and
services; and larger patent and intellectual property portfolios. As a result, they may be
able to adapt better than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements, or to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products.
Furthermore, some of our competitors with more diversified product portfolios may be
better able to withstand a reduction in spending on information and network security
solutions. In addition, some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we
do, and they have offered, and in the future may offer, their products at lower prices
than we do, which may cause us to lose sales or to reduce our prices in response to
competition.
In
addition, consolidation in the markets in which we compete may affect our competitive
position. We may not be able to continue competing successfully against our current and
future competitors. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross
margins, and loss of market share, any of which will materially adversely affect our
business, operating results, and financial condition.
The
markets in which we compete also include many niche competitors, generally smaller
companies at a relatively early stage of operations, which are focused on specific
Internet and data security needs. These companies specialized focus may enable them
to adapt better than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements in their specific areas of focus. In addition, some of these companies can
invest relatively large resources on very specific technologies or customer segments. The
effect of these companies activities in the market may result in price reductions,
reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which will materially adversely
affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Further,
vendors of operating system software or networking hardware may enhance their products to
include functionality that is currently provided by our products. The widespread inclusion
of similar functionality to that which is offered by our solutions, as standard features
of operating system software or networking hardware, could significantly reduce the
marketability of our products, particularly if the quality of such functionality were
comparable to that of our products. Furthermore, even if the network or application
security functionality, provided as standard features by operating systems software or
networking hardware, is more limited than that of our solutions, a significant number of
customers may elect to accept more limited functionality in lieu of purchasing additional
products.
If
any of the events described above occur, our business, operating results and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected. Additional details are provided in
Item 4 Information on Check Point.
If we fail to enhance our existing
products, develop or acquire new and more technologically advanced products, or fail to
successfully commercialize these products, our business and results of operations will
suffer
The
information and network security industry is characterized by rapid technological
advances, changes in customer requirements, frequent new product introductions and
enhancements, and evolving industry standards in computer hardware and software
technology. In particular, the markets for data security, Internet, and intranet
applications are rapidly evolving. As a result, we must continually change and improve our
products in response to changes in operating systems, application software, computer and
communications hardware, networking software, programming tools, and computer language
technology. Further, we must continuously improve our products to protect our
customers data and networks from evolving security threats.
8
Our
future operating results will depend upon our ability to enhance our current products and
to develop and introduce new products on a timely basis; to address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of our customers; and to keep pace with technological developments,
new competitive product offerings, and emerging industry standards. Our competitors
introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry
standards may render our existing products obsolete or unmarketable. While we have been
successful in developing, acquiring, and marketing new products and product enhancements
that respond to technological change and evolving industry standards, we may not be able
to continue to do so. In addition, we may experience difficulties that could delay or
prevent the successful development, introduction, and marketing of these products, as well
as the integration of acquired products. Furthermore, our new products or product
enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace or achieve market
acceptance. In some cases, a new product or product enhancements may negatively affect
sales of our existing products. If we do not respond adequately to the need to develop and
introduce new products or enhancements of existing products in a timely manner in response
to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our business, operating results
and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Additional details are
provided in Item 4 Information on Check Point and under the caption
We may not be able to successfully compete in this Item 3 Key
Information Risk Factors.
Product defects may increase our
costs and impair the market acceptance of our products and technology
Our
products are complex and must meet stringent quality requirements. They may contain
undetected hardware or software errors or defects, especially when new or acquired
products are introduced or when new versions are released. In particular, the personal
computer hardware environment is characterized by a wide variety of non-standard
configurations that make pre-release testing for programming or compatibility errors very
difficult and time-consuming. We may need to divert the attention of our engineering
personnel from our research and development efforts to address instances of errors or
defects. In addition, we may in the future incur costs associated with warranty claims.
Our
products are used to deploy and manage Internet security and protect information, which
may be critical to organizations. As a result, the sale and support of our products
entails the risk of product liability and related claims. We do not know whether, in the
future, we will be subject to liability claims or litigation for damages related to
product errors, or will experience delays as a result of these errors. Our sales
agreements and product licenses typically contain provisions designed to limit our
exposure to potential product liability or related claims. In selling our products, we
rely primarily on shrink wrap licenses that are not signed by the end user,
and for this and other reasons, these licenses may be unenforceable under the laws of some
jurisdictions. As a result, the limitation of liability provisions contained in these
licenses may not be effective. Although we maintain product liability insurance for most
of our products, the coverage limits of these policies may not provide sufficient
protection against an asserted claim. If litigation were to arise, it could, regardless of
its outcome, result in substantial expense to us, significantly divert the efforts of our
technical and management personnel, and disrupt or otherwise severely impact our
relationships with current and potential customers. In addition, if any of our products
fail to meet specifications or have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our
reputation could be damaged significantly and customers might be reluctant to buy our
products, which could result in a decline in revenues, a loss of existing customers, and
difficulty attracting new customers.
9
We are subject to risks
relating to acquisitions
We
have made acquisitions in the past and we may make additional acquisitions in the future.
The pursuit of acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur
various expenses in identifying, investigating, and pursuing suitable acquisitions,
whether or not they are consummated.
Competition
within our industry for acquisitions of businesses, technologies, assets and product lines
has been, and may in the future continue to be, intense. As such, even if we are able to
identify an acquisition that we would like to consummate, we may not be able to complete
the acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or because the target is acquired by
another company. Furthermore, in the event that we are able to identify and consummate any
future acquisitions, we could:
|
n
|
Issue
equity securities which would dilute current shareholders' percentage ownership;
|
|
n
|
Incur
substantial debt;
|
|
n
|
Assume
contingent liabilities; or
|
|
n
|
Expend
significant cash.
|
These
financing activities or expenditures could harm our business, operating results and
financial condition or the price of our ordinary shares. Alternatively, due to
difficulties in the capital and credit markets, we may be unable to secure capital on
acceptable terms, or at all, to complete acquisitions.
In
addition, if we acquire additional businesses, we may not be able to integrate the
acquired personnel, operations, and technologies successfully or effectively manage the
combined business following the completion of the acquisition. We may also not achieve the
anticipated benefits from the acquired business due to a number of factors, including:
|
n
|
Unanticipated
costs or liabilities associated with the acquisition.
|
|
n
|
Incurrence
of acquisition-related costs.
|
|
n
|
Diversion
of managements attention from other business concerns.
|
|
n
|
Harm
to our existing business relationships with manufacturers, distributors and customers as
a result of the acquisition.
|
|
n
|
The
potential loss of key employees.
|
|
n
|
Use
of resources that are needed in other parts of our business.
|
|
n
|
Use
of substantial portions of our available cash to consummate the acquisition.
|
|
n
|
Unrealistic
goals or projections for the acquisition.
|
Moreover,
even if we do obtain benefits from acquisitions in the form of increased sales and
earnings, there may be a delay between the time when the expenses associated with an
acquisition are incurred and the time when we recognize such benefits.
In
December 2006, we completed the acquisition of NFR Security, Inc., a U.S. privately held
company. In January 2007, we completed the acquisition of Protect Data AB (Protect
Data), which was a public company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, and
completed the integration of Protect Data into Check Points business. Protect Data
is the owner of 100% of Pointsec Mobile Technologies AB (Pointsec), a leading
provider of data security products, and other subsidiaries, as listed below in Item
4 Information on Check Point under the caption Organizational
structure. Pointsec provides products that are different in nature than our core
technologies, including encryption software that helps companies secure data that may be
stored on employee laptops, personal computers, smartphones, and personal digital
assistants (PDAs).
10
On
December 22, 2008, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Nokia, Inc.
(Nokia) to acquire Nokias security appliance business. The pending
acquisition is expected to close in the first or second quarter of 2009 and is subject to
regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. If and when we close this pending
acquisition, we expect to expand our security appliance line of business. However, we
cannot assure you that we will complete the acquisition or successfully integrate the
acquired personnel, operations and technologies or that we will be able to effectively
manage the combined business following the completion of the acquisition.
If
we are unable to successfully address any of the risks related to acquisitions, our
business, financial condition or operating results could be harmed.
Our operating margins may
decline
We
may experience future fluctuations or declines in operating margins from historical levels
due to many factors, including:
|
n
|
Increased
competition that results in pressure on us to reduce prices.
|
|
n
|
Additional
investments in the continuing development and expansion of our sales and marketing
organization, including the expansion and further reinforcement of our worldwide field
organization.
|
|
n
|
Integration
of an acquired business that at the time of acquisition has operating margins lower than
ours.
|
|
n
|
Additional
expansion of our research and development organization.
|
|
n
|
Expected
growth in the percentage of revenues that we derive from products incorporating hardware,
which have lower operating margins than software products.
|
|
n
|
Global
economic conditions that results in changes in customer capital spending budget.
|
Our
operating margins are likely to fluctuate based on the amount and timing of these and
other developments. In addition, if our revenue levels are below expectations, this will
likely have an adverse effect on our operating margins, since most of our expenses are not
variable in the short term.
Our quarterly operating results
are likely to fluctuate which could cause us to miss expectations about these results and
cause the trading price of our ordinary shares to decline
Our
revenues from our sales are not consistent from quarter to quarter and we experience some
degree of seasonality in our sales. In addition, a majority of our sales typically occur
in the last month of each quarter. Factors that could cause our revenues and operating
results to fluctuate from period to period include:
|
n
|
Changes
in customer capital spending budgets and allocations throughout the year.
|
|
n
|
General
economic conditions in the markets in which our customers operate.
|
|
n
|
Seasonal
trends in customer purchasing.
|
|
n
|
Competitive
market conditions, including the pricing actions of our competitors.
|
|
n
|
The
occurrence of an infrastructure failure resulting in delay of quarter-end purchases of
products.
|
11
|
n
|
The
occurrence of Internet security breaches or threats.
|
|
n
|
The
timing and success of new products and new technologies introduced by us or our
competitors.
|
|
n
|
Regional
or global economic and political conditions.
|
|
n
|
Changes
in our operating expenses and extraordinary expenses.
|
|
n
|
Impairment
of goodwill and intangibles.
|
|
n
|
Our
relationships with, and sales through, our channel partners.
|
|
n
|
Our
ability to integrate the technology and operations of acquired businesses with our own
business.
|
|
n
|
Fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates.
|
Unfavorable
changes in the factors listed above, many of which are outside of our control, could
materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Historically,
our revenues have reflected seasonal fluctuations. Typically, we experience a slowdown in
sales of our products in the third quarter and an increase in sales in the fourth quarter.
We believe that we will continue to encounter quarter-to-quarter fluctuations.
We
operate with minimal backlog of products. Therefore, the timing and volume of orders
within a given period and our ability to fulfill these orders, determine the amount of our
product revenues within the period.
We
derive our sales primarily through indirect channels, making it difficult for us to
predict revenues because we depend partially on estimates of future sales provided by
third parties. In addition, changes in our arrangements with our network of channel
partners or in the products they offer, such as our recent introduction of new support
programs and products for our customers, which combine support from our channel partners
with back-end support from us, could affect the timing and volume of orders. Furthermore,
our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations as to future revenues. If our
revenue levels are below expectations, our operating results are likely to be adversely
affected, since most of our expenses are not variable in the short term.
As
a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are
not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future
performance. Due to the factors described above, it is possible that in some future
quarter, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and
investors. In this event, the price of our ordinary shares would likely decline.
Continuing unfavorable national
and global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition
The
recent crisis in the financial and credit markets in the United States, Europe and Asia
has led to a global economic slowdown, with the economies of the United States and Europe
showing significant signs of weakness. If the economies in any part of the world continue
to be weak or weaken further, our customers may reduce or postpone their spending
significantly. This could result in reductions in sales of our products or services and
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition.
In addition, weakness in the end-user market could negatively affect the cash flow of our
distributors and resellers who could, in turn, delay paying their obligations to us. This
would increase our credit risk exposure and cause delays in our recognition of revenues on
future sales to these customers. Specific economic trends, such as declines in the demand
for PCs, servers, and other computing devices, or weakness in corporate information
technology spending, could have a more direct impact on our business. Any of these events
would likely harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If global
economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in the United States or other key
markets do not improve, or continue to deteriorate, it may have a material adverse effect
on our business, operating results and financial condition.
12
We may fail to maintain effective
internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes certain duties on us and our executives and directors.
Our efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404, which started in connection
with our 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F, have resulted in increased general and
administrative expense and a diversion of management time and attention, and we expect
these efforts to require the continued commitment of resources. Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires (i) managements annual review and evaluation of our
internal control over financial reporting and (ii) an attestation report by our
independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F
for each fiscal year. We have documented and tested our internal control systems and
procedures and have made improvements in order for us to comply with the requirements of
Section 404. While our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting
resulted in our conclusion that as of December 31, 2008, our internal control over
financial reporting was effective, and our independent registered public accounting firm
has issued an unqualified attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods.
If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure
that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over
financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial
reporting could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results, investor confidence in our
reported financial information, and the market price of our ordinary shares.
We depend on our key personnel,
including our executive officers, and the failure to attract and retain key personnel
could adversely affect our business
Our
future performance depends in large part on the continued service of our key technical,
sales and management personnel. None of our key personnel is bound by an employment
agreement requiring service for any defined period of time. If we are unable to retain
members of our management and key employees, we must successfully manage transition and
replacement issues that may result from such departures.
Our
future performance also depends on our ability to attract skilled personnel in the future.
Competition for personnel is intense. In order to retain our employees, we provide many of
them with cash and stock-based awards that can be realized over time to increase
longer-term commitments. However, we cannot be assured that we can retain our key
personnel in the future.
The
loss of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to retain and attract
qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, could make it
difficult for us to meet key objectives, such as product deliveries, sales and customer
results and meeting managerial and financial milestones, and could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under current U.S., Swedish, and
Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete and, therefore, we may
be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our
former employees
Under
current U.S., Swedish, and Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce, in whole or in
part, agreements that prohibit some of our employees from competing with us or working for
our competitors after they cease working for us. It may be difficult for us to restrict
our competitors from gaining the expertise our former employees gained while working for
us. Competitors and others have in the past and may in the future attempt to recruit our
employees. While our employees are required to sign standard agreements concerning
confidentiality and ownership of inventions, we may not be able to prevent them from
working with our competitors and providing their expertise to such companies, which could
potentially harm our business.
13
We are dependent on a
small number of distributors
We
derive our sales primarily through indirect channels. During 2008, we derived
approximately 50% of our sales from our 10 largest distributors, with the largest
distributor accounting for approximately 16% of our sales, and the second largest
distributor accounting for approximately 14% of our sales. During 2007, these two
distributors accounted for approximately 30% of our sales.
We
expect that a small number of distributors will continue to generate a significant portion
of our sales. Furthermore, there has been an industry trend toward consolidation among our
distributors, and we expect this trend to continue in the near future which could further
increase our reliance on a small number of distributors for a significant portion of our
sales. If these distributors reduce the amount of their purchases from us, our business,
operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our
future success is highly dependent upon our ability to establish and maintain successful
relationships with our distributors. In addition, we rely on these entities to provide
many of the training and support services for our products and equipment. Accordingly, our
success depends in large part on the effective performance of these distributors.
Recruiting and retaining qualified distributors and training them in our technology and
products requires significant time and resources. Further, we have no long-term contracts
or minimum purchase commitments with any of our distributors, and our contracts with these
distributors do not prohibit them from offering products or services that compete with
ours. Our competitors may be effective in providing incentives to existing and potential
distributors to favor their products or to prevent or reduce sales of our products. Our
distributors may choose not to offer our products exclusively or at all. Our failure to
establish and maintain successful relationships with distributors would likely materially
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We purchase several key components
and finished products from sole or limited sources, and we are increasingly dependent on
contract manufacturers
Many
components, subassemblies and modules necessary for the manufacture or integration of our
products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance
on sole or limited suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our reliance on
subcontractors involves several risks, including a potential inability to obtain an
adequate supply of required components, subassemblies or modules and reduced control over
pricing, quality and timely delivery of components, subassemblies or modules. While we
expend resources to qualify additional component sources, consolidation of suppliers in
the industry and the small number of viable alternatives, have limited the results of
these efforts.
Managing
our supplier and contractor relationships is particularly difficult during time periods in
which we introduce new products and during time periods in which demand for our products
is increasing, especially if demand increases more quickly than we expect.
Difficulties
in managing relationships with current contract manufacturers could impede our ability to
meet the demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results.
14
We are dependent on a
limited number of product families
Currently,
we derive most of our revenues from sales of Internet security products primarily under
our VPN-1, UTM-1, Power-1 and related brands, as well as related revenues from software
updates, maintenance and other services. We expect this to continue to be the case in the
foreseeable future. Following the acquisition of Protect Data, we also began to generate
revenue from data security products and associated software updates, maintenance and
support services. Our future growth depends heavily on our ability to effectively develop
and sell new and acquired products as well as add new features to existing products. For
more details, see Item 4 Information on Check Point and Item 5
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
We incorporate third party
technology in our products, which may make us dependent on the providers of these
technologies and expose us to potential intellectual property claims.
Our
products contain certain technology that others license to us. Third party developers or
owners of technologies may not be willing to enter into, or renew, license agreements with
us regarding technologies that we may wish to incorporate in our products, either on
acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot obtain licenses to these technologies, we may be
at a disadvantage compared with our competitors who are able to license these
technologies. In addition, when we do obtain licenses to third party technologies that we
did not develop, we may have little or no ability to determine in advance whether the
technology infringes the intellectual property rights of others. Our suppliers and
licensors may not be required or may not be able to indemnify us in the event that a claim
of infringement is asserted against us, or they may be required to indemnify us only up to
a maximum amount, above which we would be responsible for any further costs or damages.
We incorporate open source
technology in our products which may expose us to liability and have a material impact on
our product development and sales
Some
of our products utilize open source technologies. These technologies are licensed to us on
varying license structures, including the General Public License. This license and others
like it pose a potential risk to products in the event they are inappropriately
integrated. In the event that we have not, or do not in the future, properly integrate
software that is subject to such licenses into our products, we may be required to
disclose our own source code to the public, which could enable our competitors to
eliminate any technological advantage that our products may have over theirs. Any such
requirement to disclose our source code or other confidential information related to our
products could materially adversely affect our competitive position and impact our
business results of operations and financial condition.
We are the defendants in various
lawsuits and are also subject to certain tax disputes and governmental proceedings, which
could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition
We
operate our business in various countries, and accordingly attempt to utilize an efficient
operating model to optimize our tax payments based on the laws in the countries in which
we operate. This can cause disputes between us and various tax authorities in different
parts of the world.
15
In
particular, following audits of our 2002 and 2003 corporate tax
returns, the Israeli Tax Authority (the ITA) issued
orders challenging our positions on several issues, including matters such as
the usage of funds earned by our approved enterprise for investments outside of
Israel, deductibility of employee stock options expenses, percentage of foreign
ownership of our shares, taxation of interest earned outside of Israel and deductibility
of research and development expenses. The largest amount in dispute relates to the
treatment of investment income on cash that is held and managed by our wholly-owned
Singapore subsidiary, which the ITA is seeking to tax in Israel. In an additional
challenge to this amount, the ITA reclassified the transfer of funds from Check Point
to our subsidiary in Singapore as a dividend for purposes of the Law for the Encouragement
of Capital Investments, which would result in tax on the funds
transferred. The ITA orders also contest our positions on various other
issues. The ITA, therefore, demanded the payment of additional taxes in the aggregate
amount of NIS 963 million with respect to 2002 (assessment received on December 27,
2007) and NIS 151 million with respect to 2003 (assessment received on May 29,
2008), in each case including interest as of the assessment date. We have
appealed the orders relating to both years with the Tel-Aviv District Court, and these
appeals are pending. See also Item 8 Financial Information under the
caption Legal Proceedings. There can be no assurance that the ITA will accept
our positions on these matters or others and, in such an event, we may record additional
tax expenses if these matters are settled for amounts in excess of our current provisions.
We
have also been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Information Protection and
Authentication of Texas, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas on
December 30, 2008. The plaintiffs original complaint in the lawsuit
alleges infringement by us of U.S. patents nos. 5,311,591 and 5,412,717
and seeks an injunction and an unspecified amount of damages. We currently
intend to vigorously defend against plaintiffs claims, but cannot assure you of the
outcome of this litigation.
We
are currently engaged in various legal disputes with two minority shareholders of our
subsidiary SofaWare Technologies Ltd. One of these shareholders is alleging we are
oppressing him as a minority shareholder, and he is seeking to compel us to purchase his
shares. He is currently valuing his shares at NIS 16 million, subject to change. The other
minority shareholder claims that he and other minority shareholders are entitled to
exercise veto rights with respect to certain actions of SofaWare. The same shareholder
also filed a derivative claim against us on behalf of SofaWare. On February 14, 2008, the
court partially accepted the derivative claim and ordered that we pay SofaWare NIS 13
million plus interest. Both parties have appealed this ruling. We are also engaged in
additional litigation with these two minority shareholders. We believe that the claims
filed by these two minority shareholders are without merit and intend to contest these
claims vigorously.
Further,
we are the defendants in various lawsuits, including employment-related litigation claims,
lease termination claims, patent infringement and other legal proceedings in the normal
course of our business. Litigation and governmental proceedings can be expensive, lengthy
and disruptive to normal business operations, and can require extensive management
attention and resources, regardless of their merit. While we intend to defend the
aforementioned matters vigorously, we cannot predict the results of complex legal
proceedings, and an unfavorable resolution of a lawsuit or proceeding could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Class action litigation due to
stock price volatility or other factors could cause us to incur substantial costs and
divert our managements attention and resources
In
the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a public companys
securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that
company. Companies such as ours in the software industry, and other technology industries,
are particularly vulnerable to this kind of litigation as a result of the volatility of
their stock prices. We have been named in the past as a defendant in this type of
litigation in the past. Any litigation of this sort could result in substantial costs and
a diversion of managements attention and resources.
16
We may not be able to
successfully protect our intellectual property rights
We
seek to protect our proprietary technology by relying on a combination of statutory as
well as common law copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
procedures, and contractual provisions as indicated below in the section entitled
Proprietary Rights in Item 4 Information on Check Point. We
have certain patents in the United States and in some other countries, as well as pending
patent applications. We cannot guarantee that pending patent applications will be issued,
either at all or within the scope of the patent claims that we have submitted. In
addition, someone else may challenge our patents and these patents may be found invalid.
Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar to or better than ours, or
may work around any patents issued to us. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary
rights, others may copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that we
consider proprietary. Although we do not know the extent to which there is piracy of our
software products, software piracy is a persistent problem. We try to police this type of
activity, but it is difficult to do so effectively. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the
United States, Israel or Sweden. Our efforts to protect our proprietary rights may not be
adequate and our competitors may independently develop technology that is similar to our
technology. If we are unable to secure, protect, and enforce our intellectual property
rights, such failure could harm our brand and adversely impact our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
If a third-party asserts that we
are infringing its intellectual property, whether successful or not, it could subject us
to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses, which could harm our
business
There
is considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in our
industry. Our success depends, in part, upon our ability not to infringe upon the
intellectual property rights of others. Our competitors, as well as a number of other
entities and individuals, own or claim to own intellectual property relating to our
industry. From time to time, third parties may claim that we are infringing upon their
intellectual property rights, and we may be found to be infringing upon such rights. As
noted above, we have been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Information
Protection and Authentication of Texas, LLC in the Eastern District
of Texas on December 30, 2008. The plaintiffs original complaint in
the lawsuit alleges infringement by us of U.S. patents nos. 5,311,591 and 5,412,717
and seeks an injunction and an unspecified amount of damages. In addition,
third-parties have in the past sent us correspondence regarding their intellectual
property and in the future we may receive claims that our products infringe or violate
their intellectual property rights. Furthermore, we may be unaware of the intellectual
property rights of others that may cover some or all of our technology or products. Any
claims or litigation could cause us to incur significant expenses and, if successfully
asserted against us, could require that we pay substantial damages or royalty payments,
prevent us from selling our products, or require that we comply with other unfavorable
terms. In addition, we may decide to pay substantial settlement costs and/or licensing
fees in connection with any claim or litigation, whether or not successfully asserted
against us. Even if we were to prevail, any litigation regarding our intellectual property
could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and key
personnel from our business operations. As such, third-party claims with respect to
intellectual property may increase our cost of goods sold or reduce the sales of our
products, and may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
We are exposed to various legal,
business, political and economic risks associated with international operations; these
risks could increase our costs, reduce future growth opportunities and affect our results
of operations
We
sell our products worldwide, and we book a significant portion of our revenue outside the
United States. We intend to continue to expand our international operations, which will
require significant management attention and financial resources. In order to continue to
expand worldwide, we will need to establish additional operations, hire additional
personnel and recruit additional channel partners, internationally. To the extent that we
are unable to do so effectively, our growth is likely to be limited and our business,
operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
17
Our
international revenues and operations subject us to many potential risks inherent in
international business activities, including, but not limited to:
|
n
|
Technology
import and export license requirements.
|
|
n
|
Costs
of localizing our products for foreign countries, and the lack of acceptance of localized
products in foreign countries.
|
|
n
|
Imposition
of or increases in tariffs or other payments on our revenues in these markets.
|
|
n
|
Changes
in regulatory requirements.
|
|
n
|
Greater
difficulty in protecting intellectual property.
|
|
n
|
Difficulties
in managing our overseas subsidiaries and our international operations.
|
|
n
|
Declines
in general economic conditions.
|
|
n
|
Political
instability and civil unrest which could discourage investment and complicate our
dealings with governments.
|
|
n
|
Variety
of foreign laws and legal standards.
|
|
n
|
Expropriation
and confiscation of assets and facilities.
|
|
n
|
Difficulties
in collecting receivables from foreign entities or delayed revenue recognition.
|
|
n
|
Differing
labor standards.
|
|
n
|
Potentially
adverse tax consequences, including taxation of a portion of our revenues at higher rates
than the tax rate that applies to us in Israel.
|
|
n
|
Fluctuations
in currency exchange rates and the impact of such fluctuations on our results of
operations and financial position.
|
|
n
|
The
introduction of exchange controls and other restrictions by foreign governments.
|
These
difficulties could cause our revenues to decline, increase our costs or both. This is also
specifically tied to currency exchange rates which has an impact on our financial
statements based on currency rate fluctuations.
We are controlled by a small
number of shareholders who may make decisions with which you or others may disagree
As
of December 31, 2008, our directors and executive officers owned approximately 20.7% of
the voting power of our outstanding ordinary shares, or 25.4% of our outstanding ordinary
shares if the percentage includes options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days of December 31, 2008 (the exercise price of some of these options is greater than our
current share market price). The interests of these shareholders may differ from your
interests and present a conflict. If these shareholders act together, they could exercise
significant influence over our operations and business strategy. For example, although
these shareholders hold considerably less than a majority of our outstanding ordinary
shares, they may have sufficient voting power to influence matters requiring approval by
our shareholders, including the election and removal of directors and the approval or
rejection of mergers or other business combination transactions. In addition, this
concentration of ownership may delay, prevent or deter a change in control, or deprive a
shareholder of a possible premium for its ordinary shares as part of a sale of our
company.
18
We may be required to indemnify
our directors and officers in certain circumstances
We
have entered into agreements with each of our directors and senior officers to insure,
indemnify and exculpate them against some types of claims, subject to dollar limits and
other limitations. Subject to Israeli law, these agreements provide that we will indemnify
each of these directors and senior officers for any of the following liabilities or
expenses that they may incur due to an act performed or failure to act in their capacity
as our director or senior officer:
|
n
|
Monetary
liability imposed on the director or senior officer in favor of a third party in a
judgment, including a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed by a court.
|
|
n
|
Reasonable
legal costs, including attorneys fees, expended by a director or senior officer as
a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against the director or senior
officer by a competent authority; provided, however, that such investigation or
proceeding concludes without the filing of an indictment against the director or senior
officer and either:
|
|
|
No
financial liability was imposed on the director or senior officer in lieu of criminal
proceedings, or
|
|
|
Financial
liability was imposed on the director or senior officer in lieu of criminal proceedings,
but the alleged criminal offense does not require proof of criminal intent.
|
|
n
|
Reasonable
legal costs, including attorneys fees, expended by the director or senior officer
or for which the director or senior officer is charged by a court:
|
|
|
In
an action brought against the director or senior officer by us, on our behalf or on
behalf of a third party,
|
|
|
In
a criminal action in which the director or senior officer is found innocent, or
|
|
|
In
a criminal action in which the director or senior officer is convicted, but in which
proof of criminal intent is not required.
|
We Face the Risk of a
Decrease in Our Cash Balances and Losses in Our Investment Portfolio
Investment
income is an important component of our net income. The ability to achieve our investment
objectives is affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control. We rely on
third-party money managers to manage the majority of our investment portfolio in a
risk-controlled framework. Our cash throughout the world is invested in fixed-income
securities and is affected by changes in interest rates. Interest rates are highly
sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and
international economic and political conditions.
The
outlook for our investment income is dependent on the future direction of interest rates,
the amount of any share repurchases or acquisitions that we effect and the amount of cash
flows from operations that are available for investment. Any significant decline in our
investment income or the value of our investments as a result of falling interest rates,
deterioration in the credit of the securities in which we have invested, or general market
conditions, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
19
The current global credit crisis
may significantly decrease the value of our investment assets
The performance of the capital markets affects the values of funds that are held in
marketable securities. These assets are subject to market fluctuations and will yield
uncertain returns, which may fall below our projected return rates. Due to recent market
developments, including a series of rating agency downgrades, the fair value of these
investments may decline. During 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of
marketable securities in the amount of $11.2 million in accordance with SFAS 115. Check
Point expects that market conditions will continue to fluctuate and that the fair value of
our investments may be impacted accordingly.
Our
cash, cash equivalents, short-term deposit and marketable securities totaled
$1,443.8 million as of December 31, 2008. Our investment portfolio policy is buy and
hold, while minimizing credit risk by setting maximum concentration limit per issuer and
credit rating. Our investments consist primarily of government and corporate debentures.
Although we believe that we generally adhere to conservative investment guidelines, the
continuing turmoil in the financial markets may result in impairments of the carrying
value of our investment assets. We classify our investments as available-for-sale. Changes
in the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are not recognized to
income during the period, but rather are recognized as a separate component of equity
until realized. Realized losses in our investments portfolio may adversely affect our
financial position and results. Had we reported all the changes in the fair values of our
investments into income, our reported net income for the year ended December 31,
2008, would have decreased by $5.9 million.
One
of our primary market risk exposures is changes in interest rates, which relates primarily
to our investments in marketable securities. A decline in market interest rates, such as
the significant global decline in recent months, has had an adverse effect on our
investment income. In a declining interest rate environment, borrowers may seek to
refinance their borrowings at lower rates and, accordingly, prepay or redeem securities we
hold more quickly than we initially expected. This action may cause us to reinvest the
redeemed proceeds in lower yielding investments. An increase in market interest rates
could also have an adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio, for example,
by decreasing the fair values of the fixed income securities that comprise a substantial
majority of our investment portfolio.
Our business and operations are
subject to the risks of earthquakes and other natural catastrophic events
Our
headquarters in the United States, as well as certain of our research and development
operations, are located in the Silicon Valley area of Northern California, a region known
for seismic activity. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, could damage
our operations and properties, and adversely affect our business, operating results, and
financial condition.
Risks Related to Our
Operations in Israel
Potential political, economic and
military instability in Israel, where our principal executive offices and our principal
research and development facilities are located, may adversely affect our results of
operations
We
are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, and our principal executive
offices and principal research and development facilities are located in Israel.
Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in and surrounding Israel may
directly affect our business. Since the State of Israel was established in 1948, a number
of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Any hostilities
involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its
present trading partners, or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition
of Israel, could materially adversely affect our operations. Since October 2000, terrorist
violence in Israel has increased significantly. In recent years, there has been an
escalation in violence among Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestinian Authority and other
groups, including the recent extensive hostilities along Israels border with Gaza in
December 2008 and January 2009. Ongoing and revived hostilities or other Israeli political
or economic factors could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
20
The tax benefits available to us
require us to meet several conditions, and may be terminated or reduced in the future,
which would increase our taxes.
For
the year ended December 31, 2008, our effective tax rate was 16%. There can be no
assurance that our effective tax rate will not change over time as a result of changes in
corporate income tax rates, changes in the tax laws of the various countries in which we
operate and fluctuations in the growth rate of our business. We have benefited or
currently benefit from a variety of government programs and tax benefits that generally
carry conditions that we must meet in order to be eligible to obtain any benefit.
If
we fail to meet the conditions upon which certain favorable tax treatment is based, we
would not be able to claim future tax benefits and could be required to refund tax
benefits already received. Additionally, some of these programs and the related tax
benefits are available to us for a limited number of years, and these benefits expire from
time to time.
Any
of the following could have a material effect on our overall effective tax rate:
|
n
|
Some
programs may be discontinued,
|
|
n
|
We
may be unable to meet the requirements for continuing to qualify for some programs,
|
|
n
|
These
programs and tax benefits may be unavailable at their current levels,
|
|
n
|
Upon
expiration of a particular benefit, we may not be eligible to participate in a new
program or qualify for a new tax benefit that would offset the loss of the expiring tax
benefit, or
|
|
n
|
We
may be required to refund previously recognized tax benefits if we are found to be in
violation of the stipulated conditions.
|
Additional
details are provided in Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and
Products under the caption Taxes on income, in Item 10
Additional Information under the caption Israeli taxation, foreign exchange
regulation and investment programs, and in notes 10b and 11 to our consolidated
financial statements.
Our operations may be disrupted by
the obligations of our personnel to perform military service
Many
of our officers and employees in Israel are obligated to perform military reserve duty
until they reach age 45 and, in the event of a military conflict, could be called to
active duty. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of
our employees related to military service or the absence for extended periods of military
service of one or more of our key employees. Military service requirements for our
employees could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Provisions of Israeli law and our
articles of association may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of us, prevent
a change of control, and negatively impact our share price
Israeli
corporate law regulates acquisitions of shares through tender offers and mergers, requires
special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant
shareholders, and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of
transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential acquisition
transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders. For example, Israeli tax
law may subject a shareholder who exchanges his or her ordinary shares for shares in a
foreign corporation, to taxation before disposition of the investment in the foreign
corporation. These provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an
acquisition of our company, which could prevent a change of control and, therefore,
depress the price of our shares.
21
In
addition, our articles of association contain certain provisions that may make it more
difficult to acquire us, such as the provision which provides that our board of directors
may issue preferred shares. These provisions may have the effect of delaying or deterring
a change in control of us, thereby limiting the opportunity for shareholders to receive a
premium for their shares and possibly affecting the price that some investors are willing
to pay for our securities.
Additional
details are provided in Item 10 Additional Information under the
caption Articles of association and Israeli Companies Law Anti-takeover
measures.
Our operations expose us to risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that could adversely
affect our business
Although
we have operations throughout the world, the majority of our revenue and approximately 56%
of our operating costs in 2008 were denominated in, or linked to, the U.S. dollar.
Accordingly, we consider the U.S. dollar to be our functional currency. However,
approximately 44% of our operating costs in 2008 were incurred in other currencies,
particularly in Israeli Shekels, Euros, Swedish Krona and British Pounds. During 2007 and
2008, the Israel shekel appreciated against the U.S. dollar, which resulted in a
significant increase in the U.S. dollar cost of our operations in Israel. As a result of
this differential, from time to time we may experience increases in the costs of our
operations outside the United States, as expressed in dollars, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The
imposition of exchange or price controls or other restrictions on the conversion of
foreign currencies could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
ITEM 4.
|
|
INFORMATION ON CHECK POINT
|
We
develop, market and support a wide range of software and combined hardware and software
products and services for information technology (IT) security and offer our customers an
extensive portfolio of network and gateway security solutions, data and endpoint security
solutions and management solutions. Our solutions operate under a unified security
architecture that enables end-to-end security with a single line of unified security
gateways and allow a single agent for all endpoint security that can be managed by a
single unified management console. This unified management allows for ease of deployment
and centralized control and is supported and enforced with real-time security updates. Our
products and services are sold to enterprises, service providers, small and medium sized
businesses and consumers. Our Open Platform for Security (OPSEC) framework allows
customers to extend the capabilities of our products and services with third-party
hardware and security software applications. Our products are sold, integrated and
serviced by a network of partners worldwide.
In
January 2007, we completed the acquisition of Protect Data AB (Protect Data),
which was a public company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, and completed the
integration of Protect Data into Check Points business. Protect Data operates its
business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pointsec Mobile Technologies AB, a worldwide
provider of mobile data protection. Pointsec delivers solutions for automatic data
encryption that keeps sensitive information stored on mobile computing devices, such as
laptops, PDAs, smartphones and removable media (e.g., USB devices), confidential and
secure. With the acquisition of Protect Data, Check Point entered into the data security
market.
22
On
December 22, 2008, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Nokia to acquire its
security appliance business. The pending acquisition is expected to close in the first or
second quarter of 2009 and is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing
conditions. Check Point has collaborated with Nokias security appliance business
over the past decade to deliver industry-leading enterprise security solutions. Upon
completion of the acquisition, Check Point intends to build on this collaboration to
provide an extended security appliance portfolio developed, manufactured and supported by
Check Point. Additional details regarding the important events in the development of our
business since the beginning of 2008 are provided in Item 5 Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects under the caption Overview.
We
were incorporated as a company under the laws of the State of Israel in 1993 under the
name of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Our registered office and
principal place of business is located at 5 HaSolelim Street, Tel Aviv 67897 Israel.
The telephone number of our registered office is 972-3-753-4555. Our companys Web
site is
www.checkpoint.com
. The contents of our Web site are not incorporated by
reference into this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
This
Annual Report on Form 20-F is available on our Web site. If you would like to receive a
printed copy via mail, please contact our Investor Relations department at 800 Bridge
Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065, U.S.A., tel: 650-628-2050, email:
ir@us.checkpoint.com
.
Our
agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation System, 818 West
Seventh Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017 U.S.A., tel: 213-627-8252.
Industry Background
The
ability to access and distribute information is a key strategic asset in todays
competitive business environment. The resulting need to effectively use and communicate
information as well as work more collaboratively has led to the extensive deployment of
network-based communication systems delivering connectivity. Increased connectivity has in
turn expanded the need for technology to safeguard and manage the access to information
available over these networks and to secure information contained on these connected
systems.
Increase
in connectivity
Over
the past decade, global connectivity has continued to increase rapidly. The emergence of
increased reliance on the Internet for business communications and transactions increases
the need for secured access to information and applications and raises challenges
associated with providing it. Companies of all sizes in most industries are embracing and
supporting increased connectivity for mobile and remote employees. This includes
connectivity to corporate data and application resources, as well as general Internet
access. Remote users are increasingly able to access private corporate networks and
information from a growing spectrum of mobile devices, including laptops, PDAs,
smartphones, portable media players, and removable media storage devices. The expansion of
network access to mobile workers and the increase in information contained on mobile
devices is driving demand to secure all devices with access to corporate information.
23
These
developments and the need for secure and managed communications have led to nearly
universal adoption of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). VPNs enable a secured exchange of
private information over networks, including the Internet. Sharing information and
utilizing services are now widely available, both within the enterprise, and with business
partners and customers. As a result, businesses are able to share internal information and
to run enterprise applications across geographically dispersed facilities, as well as
enable customers, suppliers and other business partners to link into their enterprise
information systems. These connectivity services include access to Web information,
messaging applications, such as email, database access, transaction-processing services,
voice-over-IP services and video teleconferencing services.
The
need for network and gateway security
The
use of networks within organizations and the use of the Internet by organizations of all
sizes have increased the risk that information technology resources can be attacked.
Organizations have recognized this risk and are deploying security solutions in an effort
to protect their information and infrastructure from damage and unauthorized access.
The
primary means of controlling access to organizational networks and protecting against
attacks is the deployment of Internet firewalls. Firewalls are typically deployed at the
demarcation of an organizations Local Area Network (LAN) and the Internet or within
an organization between different segments and are used to strictly control traffic into
and out of the organizational network or between segments. Firewall technology is
constantly evolving to detect and defeat highly sophisticated network and
application-level attacks that are increasingly prevalent on the Internet today.
Organizations are also deploying an additional layer of security by applying security
software to networked endpoint devices, such as personal computers. Endpoint security
includes personal firewall, security and policy enforcement features that have been
specifically designed for internal and remote personal computing devices. In addition to
protecting their IT assets from attack, organizations have taken steps to guard their
sensitive information traversing untrusted networks, such as the Internet. Securing
organizational information on the Internet is critical as organizations utilize the
Internet as their corporate network backbone to link company offices and employees.
Transmitting information over the Internet without adequate security exposes this
information to unauthorized interception, manipulation or replication. To mitigate this
risk, organizations have deployed VPNs to encrypt and authenticate their Internet traffic.
Firewalls
and VPNs are usually integrated as a single product. Unified Threat Management (UTM)
solutions integrate firewalls and VPNs with additional security features, such as network
intrusion prevention and virus scanning in a single, centrally managed security solution.
Integrating multiple security functionalities delivers greater security for all network
traffic and facilitates efficient management and enforcement of an organizations
security policies.
IT
security administrators within organizations have primarily focused on securing the
network perimeter. However, organizations are realizing the importance of also securing
their internal networks and Web-based business applications. Many of todays security
threats and attacks emerge within organizations. Internal security breaches can be in the
form of worm outbreaks and other attacks that are introduced through mobile and wireless
devices, internal hacking and misuse of business applications by users within an
organization. In addition, due to the rapid development of Web-based technologies and the
increased reliance on the Web to connect remote users, Web-based applications and
protocols are highly vulnerable to attacks. This presents many security challenges for
businesses because internal networks and Web-based communications contain unique
complexities, such as programming code embedded in the network traffic and communications
protocols that are used in these environments. Security solutions, for both internal and
Web security, need to incorporate an understanding of the applications and protocols that
are common in these environments.
24
The
need for data and endpoint security increases as workers continue to move away from
centralized corporate environments. While network security offers effective solutions for
data in motion, sensitive data can still be lost or accessed improperly. Organizations are
deploying an additional layer of security by applying security software to endpoint
devices, such as personal computers. Endpoint security includes personal-firewall, Network
Access Control (NAC), program control, antivirus, anti-spyware, data security, URL
filtering, anti-spam and remote access features that have been specifically designed for
remote personal computing devices.
Lost
or stolen computers can end up in the wrong hands, intentionally or unintentionally.
Companies of all sizes and government agencies face the consequences of losing sensitive
data from lost laptop computers, removable media or plug-and-play storage devices. This
drives the need for a complete data protection solution that secures data on all common
platforms, deploys easily, scales to any size organization and meets strict compliance
requirements related to privacy laws and regulations. For example, a number of publicized
cases involving large corporations losing unencrypted laptops and exposing millions of
customers and employees to potential identity theft have prompted a surge in data
protection legislation and regulatory compliance laws worldwide. The relative ease with
which data may be lost makes data security a major concern for organizations. To mitigate
this risk, organizations are looking to extend security beyond the network infrastructure,
to the data itself.
The
primary means of protecting data that resides on endpoints are as follows: full-disk
encryption of the hard drive with access control (rendering the data useless to
unauthorized parties); media encryption and port protection (to prevent unauthorized
copying of sensitive data to USB flash drives, writable CDs and DVDs, etc.); and mobile
device and memory card data encryption (to prevent sensitive data from being accessed on
lost or stolen PDAs and smartphones).
Products and Services
Our
products, services and technologies provide the following protection:
1. Network security
gateway
Our
wide range of network security gateways allows our customers to implement their security
policies on network traffic between internal networks and the Internet as well as between
internal networks and private networks used with partners. These gateways are available as
either appliances or software solutions providing customers with a broad range of
deployment options, including the ability to customize the configuration to best meet
their security needs. Our security gateways include the following technologies to secure
traffic and optimize performance:
n
|
Firewall
Inspects traffic as it passes through security gateways, classifying it based on
various criteria such as source and destination of connection, protocol, services and
application used. This provides a means to allow, block and log each connection based on
the organizations security policy. Our firewall technology is based on several key
differentiated technologies, including:
|
|
|
Patented
Stateful Inspection technology that allows flexible and programmable classification of
network traffic.
|
|
|
Application
Intelligence technology that contains various means to detect the correct use of
application protocols and can block attacks that attempt to utilize such exploits in
specific applications.
|
25
|
|
Network
Address Translation Allows hiding of internal addresses so internal users are not
exposed to external threats, as well as connecting private networks that use generic addresses
using publicly defined external addresses.
|
|
|
Specific
technologies to prevent denial-of-service (DoS) attacks on networks. These attacks
include various ways of overloading applications and networks in multiple requests that
try to slow and stop their response.
|
n
|
Intrusion
Prevention Technologies Monitors the network for malicious or unwanted traffic and
has the ability to detect and block known attacks on the network or system
based on usage patterns as well as unknown attacks based on out of
bounds usage of certain services and protocols. Intrusion prevention technology is
supported by online security update services that provide the latest defense mechanisms
including signatures for the most recent attacks. Intrusion prevention is
available as technology integrated into the firewall or as a dedicated IPS system.
|
n
|
Virtual
Private Networks (VPNs) Provide the means to enable private communication over a
network by encrypting traffic between various sub-networks (site-to-site) or individual
computers (such as mobile computers) and the corporate network. This prevents exposing
sensitive traffic and attempts to modify such communication and replicate certain
transactions.
|
n
|
Content
Screening Enables screening of specific application protocols such as Web traffic
to allow/block access to specific Web addresses based on their content. There is also
screening for viruses (antivirus) to detect downloads of malicious applications.
|
n
|
Messaging
Security Prevents the use of the messaging infrastructure (such as email) to
attack the organization. Six dimensions of messaging security technologies are available
in our products, including prevention of emailed spam and the use of messaging protocols
for various attacks, as well as enabling the scanning of email traffic for malware and
viruses embedded in email.
|
n
|
Web-Based
Communications Allow remote and mobile employees to securely connect to their
organizations networks via a Web browser (via Secure Sockets Layer VPN technology)
and defend against attacks that target our customers Web-based business
applications.
|
n
|
Security
Acceleration Patented security acceleration technologies speed up security
inspection to ensure a high service level for business applications. These technologies
improve overall throughput and reduce latency through several different techniques, such
as load balancing and load sharing between physical gateways, balancing security traffic
loads between multiple cores on multi-core processors, and offloading repetitive
decisions from the general-purpose processor to specialized hardware and software.
|
n
|
Virtualization
Certain Check Point gateways are available on a virtual security operations
platform that enables organizations to consolidate multiple security gateways in a single
hardware system and to secure virtual server environments.
|
26
2. Data and endpoint
security
Our
data and endpoint security technologies provide multiple technologies that run on
individual computers (endpoints) connecting to the network, such as desktop computers,
mobile computers and communications devices. These technologies include:
n
|
Personal
Firewall Prevents network attacks on individual computers by blocking internal
attacks and the proliferation of network worms within the corporate network,
as well as attacks on home and mobile computers that are connected to public networks.
Our personal firewall technologies include proprietary technologies such as:
|
|
|
Inbound
and Outbound Firewalls Prevent malware and Trojan horses not only from attacking
individual computers but also from sending data out through unauthorized applications.
|
|
|
Program
Advisor and Operating System Firewall Using a real-time network service, we can
detect malicious and/or unauthorized applications running on individual computers and
block their activities.
|
|
|
Network
Access Control Provides the network with information on the compliance of
individual computers to the organizations security policy and allows selective
connectivity of devices to the network based on their compliance.
|
n
|
Data
Protection Data stored on individual endpoint devices can be exposed to
unauthorized parties by copying it to external devices, or even more commonly, if devices
fall into the wrong hands. Lost and stolen computers provide unauthorized parties the
chance to access all the information stored on these computer hard drives. We protect
against these risks to data through:
|
|
|
Full-Disk
Encryption All the data stored on an individual PC can be fully encrypted, so that
unauthorized parties cannot read this data even if they get physical access to the disk
drive.
|
|
|
Port
Control Allows an organization to prevent or control the transfer of information
from individual computers to external devices such as USB memory devices and external
hard drives.
|
|
|
Media
Encryption Enables encryption of data stored on mobile devices, such as CDs and
DVDs and other external removable media.
|
n
|
Remote
Access VPNs Enable mobile devices to securely access an organizations
network by encrypting all traffic between mobile devices and the corporate network and
ensure mobile devices and users are properly authenticated.
|
n
|
Anti-Malware
Antivirus, anti-spyware and other technologies detect viruses and other malware
that try to run on any device and/or circumvent its operation. Our anti-malware
technology uses some of the industrys best engines and operates on-demand when
a new application is stored or retrieved from the device or the network and by scanning
computers against this type of attack.
|
27
The
four technologies above are consolidated into a single endpoint security agent managed by
a single administrative console. This is the industrys first and only such solution.
It provides total security at the endpoint and eliminates the need to deploy and manage
multiple agents, reducing complexity, conflicts between various security components,
procurement and management costs and the total cost of ownership.
3. Security management
A
key element in implementing the above security technologies is the ability to effectively
manage the deployment while ensuring consistent operations in accordance with organization
policy. Our strategy is to provide a single console for security management. This single
console reduces the need for multiple, sometimes conflicting, management systems that
require a high degree of specialization and training. The key aspects include:
|
n
|
Centralized
Policy Management Tools that allow the definition of various aspects of the
security policy, such as network access rights, application controls, etc.
|
|
n
|
Provisioning
Tools Allow the daily deployment and removal of individual entities, such as new
gateways, users and devices.
|
|
n
|
Monitoring
Tools Show the status of each controlled device and allow the immediate detection
and remediation of various situations.
|
|
n
|
Auditing
Tools Consistent tools to log and monitor every change made to the security
infrastructure and to ensure that all changes are accounted for and can be traced and
tracked by company policies.
|
|
n
|
Security
Information and Event Management Todays complex, multi-layered security
architecture consists of many devices to ensure servers, hosts and network applications
are protected from harmful activity. These devices all generate voluminous logs that are
difficult and time consuming to interpret. Our solutions automatically prioritize
security events for decisive, intelligent action. Clear, graphical reports help inform
decisions related to resource allocation, security optimization and regulatory
compliance.
|
We
package and market our products and services under different names and at a variety of
prices. Each package addresses security tasks for different network environments and has
corresponding support offerings.
Our
management and gateway software products run in a variety of deployment environments and
on platforms that include standard workstations, servers and dedicated appliances. Check
Point has both software and dedicated appliance solutions for both gateway and management
products. Additional appliance solutions are also available from our partners such as
Nokia Corporation, Crossbeam Systems Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation
(IBM). Different client products run on different client Operating Systems (OS), such as
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Microsoft Windows Mobile, Symbian, Linux and PalmOS.
28
Moving Forward
In
February 2009, Check Point introduced a new architecture aimed at changing the way
customers deploy their IT security infrastructure: the Software Blade
architecture. Security environments of large, medium and small companies are becoming
more complex as they attempt to address continually evolving threats with new protections.
Each new protection requires a new product, hardware platform, management console and set
of daily events to monitor. Corporations security has become increasingly complex
and incurs increased operational expenses in order to implement and support these
incremental additions to the existing security infrastructure.
As
described above in our product and service offerings, in response to rising IT operational
expenses, organizations began to seek consolidated security devices that
incorporated several functions into a single device, such as unified threat management
(UTM) appliance. UTM devices consolidate firewall, VPN, intrusion prevention,
antivirus and other functions in a single, turnkey solution and have been successful in
helping companies reduce capital and operational expenditures. Although clearly a
good solution to date, it cannot keep up with the rapidly evolving threat environment
which requires that UTM functionality be extended.
In
an effort to simultaneously address the need for scalable security solutions and the
retention of initial investments, Check Point introduced the Software Blade architecture,
which provides customers with the ability to tailor their security gateways based on their
specific needs at any time. Check Point Software Blade architecture offers businesses a
common platform to deploy independent, modular and interoperable security applications or
software blades, such as firewall, virtual private network (VPN), intrusion
prevention system (IPS), anti-virus, policy management or security reporting blades. The
new architecture allows customers to select the exact security software blades they need
and to combine them into a single, centrally managed solution. With the new Software Blade
architecture customers will be able to move functionality from one system to another,
consolidate or split functionalities between systems and assure performance for each
software blade by setting usage thresholds. All of these capabilities are intended to
enable customers to scale their security needs while simultaneously optimizing their
security costs.
Check
Points Software Blade architecture
Check
Points Software Blade architecture delivers extensible, flexible and manageable
security solutions to companies of all sizes. The Software Blade architecture provides
customers with the flexibility to custom configure Check Point security gateways and
security management systems to meet their specific needs. Customers can deploy any
combination of security functions by either purchasing pre-defined systems or
building a fully customized solution by choosing a Software Blade container and selecting
from a library of over 20 software blades. Each blade runs a separate security function.
Therefore, customers can easily extend their security solutions by adding new blades
without the necessity of purchasing separate systems. Check Points Software Blade
architecture enables organizations to deploy security dynamically, as needed, with lower
total cost of ownership, full integration of the various security functions and with
central management of the security system.
Technologies
We
have developed and acquired a variety of technologies that secure networks and
information. Our products and services implement these technologies to protect our
customers networks and private information, enabling their IT administrators to
define and enforce their security policies across the network. These technologies also
collect and bring together related information, monitor security and traffic flow, and
analyze and update configurations to reflect changes in the security policy.
29
Stateful
Inspection technology
Our
patented Stateful Inspection technology is a de facto standard in network security
technology. In order to provide accurate and highly efficient traffic inspection, Stateful
Inspection extracts and maintains extensive state information, i.e., data that
provides context for future screening decisions, from all relevant communication layers.
Stateful
Inspection runs on a network gateway or an endpoint, such as a personal computer, and
enables the screening of all data attempting to pass from one network to another. By
tracking each connection, the system ensures that data passing through the gateway
complies with a defined security and traffic policy, traffic is managed according to
priority, and security decisions are made in an intelligent and timely manner.
Stateful
Inspection enables our products to inspect network traffic at high speed. This means that
as network traffic increases, our products respond efficiently to the larger volumes of
data. Our Stateful Inspection technology can be adapted to new protocols, software
applications, and security threats. It can be upgraded and can be run on a wide range of
operating systems.
Application
Intelligence
Our
Application Intelligence technology provides a set of advanced capabilities that prevents
the exploitation of vulnerabilities in business applications, including vulnerabilities in
the application code, communication protocols, and the underlying operating system.
Application Intelligence provides security for these applications by running multiple
security checks, including validation of compliance to standards, validation of expected
use of protocols, inspection for known malicious content and control of application layer
operations. The result is the ability to proactively shield applications from attack
without relying on specific attack signatures. We have integrated our Application
Intelligence technology into our Power-1, UTM-1, UTM-1 Edge, VPN-1 Power, UTM,
Safe@Office, IPS-1, Connectra, and VPN-1 Power VSX products.
Security
Management Architecture (SMART)
Security
Management Architecture (SMART), a core component of our unified security architecture,
enables our customers to configure and manage security policies from a central
administrative point. SMART enables the definition and ongoing management of security
policies for businesses of all sizes. This object-oriented architecture maps real-world
entities, such as networks and users, to graphical representations that can be manipulated
in a database. Integrated monitoring and reporting tools improve the manageability of the
system by providing administrators with real-time information on the state of network and
security systems. These tools also provide longer term trending information that is useful
for periodic security management tasks, such as security audits.
Security
and network traffic enforcement technologies (based on Stateful Inspection)
Based
on our Stateful Inspection technology, the INSPECT engine scans all incoming and outgoing
traffic at security enforcement points. These are typically located at the network
perimeter as security gateways, on critical servers or inside the network dividing the
network into separate segments.
The
INSPECT engine can perform a variety of functions on inspected network traffic as listed
below:
|
n
|
Drop
it when the security policy has been violated.
|
30
|
n
|
Encrypt
it to create a secured VPN that enables the transfer of private data over public
networks, such as the Internet.
|
|
n
|
Prioritize
it for Quality of Service (QoS), which is the ability of a network to provide better
service for selected traffic.
|
|
n
|
Send
it for further processing, such as authentication, content inspection or the filtering of
malicious or unwanted traffic.
|
We
have developed a broad range of technologies that can be implemented by our INSPECT
engine. In addition, third party technologies can be implemented through our Open Platform
for Security (OPSEC) framework, which is described below.
SecurePlatform
SecurePlatform
bundles the Check Point security solutions together with a prehardened operating system
(OS), in a single package that is easy to deploy. It optimizes the performance of security
and OSes and includes a set of tools that ease setup and network configuration, thus
reducing the total cost of ownership for security gateways and security management
servers. SecurePlatform runs on a variety of open systems, i.e., systems whose key
interfaces are based on widely supported standards.
ClusterXL
Our
ClusterXL technology provides high availability and load sharing to keep businesses
running. It distributes traffic between clusters of redundant gateways so that the
computing capacity of multiple machines may be combined to increase total throughput. If
an individual gateway becomes unreachable, all connections are redirected to a designated
backup without interruption. Integration with our management and enforcement points
enables simple deployment.
CoreXL
CoreXL
is a technology for intelligently balancing security traffic loads between multiple cores
on multi-core processors. It results in a higher level of performance for integrated
intrusion prevention. CoreXL, a Check Point security gateway running on a multi-core
platform, can be configured to have a large number of active intrusion prevention
settings, such as those that would be found protecting sensitive information or networks,
while maintaining high performance levels.
SecureXL
SecureXL
is a framework of software and hardware technologies, including third-party technologies,
designed to increase performance. By using SecureXL, hardware vendors can accelerate the
performance of appliances on which our software is installed. With SecureXL, our products
can be integrated into high-performance networks typically found in large enterprises and
service providers.
TrueVector
technology
Our
TrueVector technology is a patented, flexible and efficient software technology for
enabling high-performance, scalable and robust Internet security for personal computers.
31
TrueVector
stops attempts to send confidential data to unauthorized parties by malicious software,
such as keystroke loggers and Trojan horses. It monitors all applications running on
protected computers, allowing trusted applications to engage in network communications,
while blocking network connections by untrusted applications. TrueVector enforces security
policies that are centrally created and managed, stand alone or any combination of these.
In addition, TrueVector may be configured to make protected computers invisible to
external attackers. The technology is used in the Check Point Endpoint Security and
ZoneAlarm lines of endpoint security products, as described above under
Products.
Pointsec
Secure Pre-Boot Environment
Pointsec
Secure Pre-Boot Environment (PPBE) is a secure, proprietary operating program. PPBE, along
with Pointsecs access control and authentication architecture, the Multi-Factor
Authentication Engine (MFAE), encrypts all information stored on a PCs hard disk,
i.e., full-disk encryption. It provides a user-friendly graphical user interface for the
Pre-Boot Authentication process and allows for the use of all common second factor
authentication methods, such as smartcards or tokens. The full-disk encryption technology
protects every sector of the computers hard drive, including the operating system
files. This prevents successful attacks on the OS and attacks to gain access to sensitive
data on the drive. The graphical user interface is designed like a common login screen to
ensure straightforward operation by the end user.
Hybrid
Detection Engine (HDE)
At
the heart of the IPS-1 Sensor (described above under Products), the HDE
utilizes multiple detection and analysis techniques to detect hostile or suspicious
traffic. These techniques include the following: signature-based methods to detect known
patterns of attacks targeted at the network and at vulnerabilities within the network;
protocol analysis to validate that the traffic construct meets the expected standards;
anomaly detection to identify instances where network traffic exhibits abnormal
characteristics; OS fingerprinting to determine the OS type of the traffic destination,
which ensures proper receipt and processing; multi-element correlation to detect
widespread illicit activity launched from the same source address; dynamic worm mitigation
whereby rapidly proliferating worms are detected and automatically blocked from spreading
within the network; as well as other techniques to deliver comprehensive network
protection.
Intrusion
Prevention with Confidence Indexing
Based
on several analysis data points for every network traffic flow, the IPS-1 Sensor
determines a level of confidence that a certain traffic flow is an attack. An exact match
to an exploit signature would derive a confidence level at or near 100 percent, whereas
purely anomalous traffic would derive a confidence level possibly in the range of 70
percent. This function reduces the occurrence of false positives by enabling a more
granular prevention policy, such as block everything with a confidence greater than
90 percent, which allows exploits to be blocked, without the concern of blocking
critical business traffic.
Open
Platform for Security (OPSEC)
Our
OPSEC framework provides a single platform that enables the integration and
interoperability of multi-vendor information security products and technologies. The OPSEC
framework allows certified third-party security applications to plug into our solutions
through our published application programming interfaces. Products that carry the OPSEC
Certified seal have been tested and certified for integration and interoperability within
the OPSEC framework.
32
Precision
Virtualization technology
Virtualizing
or emulating a limited set of processes creates a secure sandbox without the overhead of a
full OS virtual machine. This allows powerful but lightweight security just for a targeted
area that might otherwise be vulnerable to attacks. ZoneAlarm ForceField utilizes this to
provide powerful security for Web-browsing activities.
Revenues by category of
activity
The
following table presents our revenues for the last three fiscal years by category of
activity:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category of Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
241,961
|
|
$
|
309,785
|
|
$
|
338,317
|
|
Software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
333,180
|
|
|
421,092
|
|
|
470,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
$
|
575,141
|
|
$
|
730,877
|
|
$
|
808,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
revenues for the last three fiscal years by geographic area are set out in Item 5
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects under the caption
Overview.
Sales and Marketing
We
sell through a wide net work of channel partners, including distributors, resellers,
value-added resellers, system integrators and managed services providers. Our agreements
with these channel partners are non-exclusive. Almost all of our enterprise sales are to
our channel partners and not directly to our end users. Most of our sales to the consumer
market are either direct, via our Web sites, or through retail stores.
We
use various marketing tools to increase awareness and knowledge of our products and to
promote sales. These include our corporate Web sites, seminars and tradeshows that we
organize and participate in, print media and online advertising, online search
optimization and telemarketing campaigns. In addition, in order to try our products, we
provide current and prospective customers with limited in time software evaluation
licenses. We have strategic relationships with various hardware partners, including
vendors providing server, workstation, appliance and networking products. These include
Crossbeam Systems Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM, Nokia Corporation, Microsoft
Corporation, Nortel Networks Corp., Siemens AG and Sun Microsystems Inc.
As
of December 31, 2008, we had 701 employees dedicated to sales and marketing.
Customer Service and
Support
We
operate a worldwide technical services organization which provides a wide range of
services including the following: (i) technical customer support programs and plans, such
as Enterprise Based Support (EBS) and Collaborative Enterprise Support
(CES), which provides support for a customers entire Check Point product
install base; (ii) certification and educational training on Check Point products; and
(iii) professional services in implementing, upgrading, and optimizing Check Point
products, such as design planning, security implementation, and project management.
33
Our
technical assistance centers in the United States, Israel, and Japan offer worldwide
24-hour service, seven days per week. There are employees in additional locations
supporting our call centers, as well as call centers operated by third parties (for
consumers support only). As of December 31, 2008, we had 222 employees dedicated to
customer service and support.
Our
channel partners generally provide their customers with installation, training,
maintenance and support, while we provide our high-level technical support to our channel
partners. Alternatively, our customers may elect to receive support directly from us. As
part of our pre-sale support to our channel partners, we employ technical consultants and
systems engineers who work closely with our channel partners to assist them with pre-sale
configuration, use and application support.
We
offer comprehensive programs that cover all of our products in a customers installed
base. In 2006, we introduced a new support program for our customers, combining first-line
support from our partners, with full back-end support from Check Point. This program
provides added value to customers and partners by improving the support our customers
receive. The majority of our software updates, maintenance and support contracts are based
on these new programs.
Research and Product
Development
We
believe that our future success will depend upon our ability to enhance our existing
products, develop, acquire and introduce new products to address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of our customers. We work closely with existing and potential
customers, distribution channels, and major resellers, who provide significant feedback
for product development and innovation. Our product development efforts are focused on
providing a unified security architecture that functions throughout all layers of the
network and devices that carry data. This includes enhancements to our current family of
products and the continued development of new products to address network and data
security covering perimeter, internal, Web and endpoint security needs, as well as the
integrated management of these solutions. We expect to develop most of our new products
internally and also expect to leverage the products and technologies recently acquired in
our acquisitions of Protect Data AB and NFR Security, Inc., as well as the products and
solutions that we expect to acquire upon the closing of the proposed acquisition of
Nokias security appliance business. We may decide, based upon timing and cost
considerations that it would be more efficient to acquire or license certain technologies
or products from third parties, or to make acquisitions of other businesses. Research and
development expenses were $62.2 million in 2006, $81.0 million in 2007 and $91.6 million
in 2008. These amounts include stock-based compensation in the amount of $9.4 million in
2006, $4.3 million in 2007 and $5.0 million in 2008. As of December 31, 2008, we had 678
employees dedicated to research and development activities and quality assurance.
Competition
Information
concerning competition is provided in Item 3 Key Information under the
caption Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business and Our Market We
may not be able to successfully compete.
34
Proprietary Rights
We
use a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
procedures, and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We rely on trade
secret and copyright laws to protect our software, documentation, and other written
materials. These laws provide only limited protection. Further, we generally enter into
confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants, customers and potential customers,
and limit access and distribution of materials and information that we consider
proprietary.
We
have six U.S. patents, over 25 U.S. patents pending, and additional patents issued and
patent applications pending worldwide. Our efforts to protect our proprietary rights may
not be adequate and/or our competitors may independently develop technology that is
similar but is based on our technology. Additional details are provided in Item 3
Key Information under the caption Risk Factors Risks Relating to
Our Business and Our Market We may not be able to successfully protect our
intellectual property rights.
Effect of Government
Regulation on our Business
Information
concerning regulation is provided in Item 5 Operating and Financial Review
and Products under the caption Taxes on income and in Item 10
Additional Information under the caption Israeli taxation, foreign
exchange regulation and investment programs.
Organizational Structure
We
are organized under the laws of the State of Israel. We wholly own the subsidiaries listed
below, directly or through other subsidiaries, unless otherwise specified in the footnotes
below:
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
|
COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
|
United States of America (Delaware)
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Canada) Inc.
|
Canada
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Japan) Ltd.
|
Japan
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Singapore) PTE Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.
|
Netherlands
|
Check Point Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
Check Point Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd. - US Branch (1)
|
United States of America (New York)
|
Check Point Software Technologies Cayman Islands
|
Cayman Islands
|
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. China (2)
|
China
|
Protect Data AB
|
Sweden
|
SofaWare Technologies Ltd. (3)
|
Israel
|
(1)
|
Branch
of Check Point Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd.
|
(2)
|
Branch
of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
|
(3)
|
We
own 63% of the outstanding equity of SofaWare (62% on a fully diluted basis) as
of December 31, 2008.
|
35
Check
Point Software Technologies (Netherlands) B.V. acts as a holding company. It wholly owns
the principal operating subsidiaries listed below, unless otherwise indicated in the
footnotes below:
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
|
COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check Point Software Technologies S.A.
|
Argentina
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Australia) PTY Ltd.
|
Australia
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Austria) GmbH
|
Austria
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Belarus) LLC
|
Belarus
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Belgium) S.A.
|
Belgium
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Brazil) LTDA
|
Brazil
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd. (Guangzhou office) (1)
|
China
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd. (Shanghai office) (1)
|
China
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Czech Republic) s.r.o.
|
Czech Republic
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Denmark) ApS
|
Denmark
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Finland) Oy
|
Finland
|
Check Point Software Technologies SARL
|
France
|
Check Point Software Technologies GmbH
|
Germany
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Hungary) Ltd.
|
Hungary
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
Check Point Software Technologies (India) Private Limited
|
India
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Italia) Srl (2)
|
Italy
|
Check Point Software Technologies Mexico S.A. de C.V.
|
Mexico
|
Check Point Software Technologies B.V.
|
Netherlands
|
Check Point Software Technologies Norway A.S.
|
Norway
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Poland) Sp.z.o.o.
|
Poland
|
CPST (Portugal), Sociedade Unipessoal Lda.
|
Portugal
|
Check Point Software Technologies (RMN) SRL.
|
Romania
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Russia) OOO
|
Russia
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Korea) Ltd.
|
S. Korea
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Spain) S.A.
|
Spain
|
C.P.S.T. Sweden A.B.
|
Sweden
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Switzerland) A.G.
|
Switzerland
|
Check Point Software Technologies (Taiwan) Ltd.
|
Taiwan
|
Check Point Yazilim Teknolojileri Pazarlama A.S. (3)
|
Turkey
|
Check Point Software Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
United Kingdom
|
(1)
|
Representative
office of Check Point Software Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.
|
(2)
|
97%
owned by Check Point Software Technologies (Netherlands) B.V. and 3% owned
by Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
|
(3)
|
96%
owned by Check Point Software Technologies (Netherlands) B.V., 1% owned by
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., and 3% owned in trust by the
directors of Check Point Yazilim Teknolojileri Pazarlama A.S. on
behalf of Check Point Software Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.
|
36
Protect
Data AB wholly owns the subsidiaries listed below, directly or through other subsidiaries:
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
|
COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protect Data Internet Solutions AB
|
Sweden
|
Pointsec Sweden AB
|
Sweden
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies AB
|
Sweden
|
Pointsec Norway AS
|
Norway
|
Oy Pointsec Finland AB
|
Finland
|
Pointsec Wireless Solutions AB
|
Sweden
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies, Inc.
|
United States of America (California)
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies Ltd.
|
United Kingdom
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies Pty Ltd.
|
Australia
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies Limited
|
Hong Kong
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies B.V.
|
Holland
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies Pte Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
Reflex Software Ltd. (Jersey)
|
United Kingdom
|
Reflex Magnetics Ltd.
|
United Kingdom
|
Reflex Software Luxembourg SARL
|
Luxembourg
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Inc. wholly owns the subsidiaries listed below:
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
|
COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pointsec Mobile Technologies, LLC.
|
United States of America (California)
|
NFR Security, Inc.
|
United States of America (Delaware)
|
Zone Labs, L.L.C.
|
United States of America (California)
|
Zone Labs Pte Ltd. (1)
|
Singapore
|
(1)
|
Subsidiary
of Zone Labs LLC. The company filed an application for striking off
with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority in Singapore.
|
37
Property, Plants and
Equipment
Our
international headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel. We own the headquarters
pursuant to a lease with the City of Tel Aviv Jaffa, which expires in August 2059.
We are not required to make any additional payments under the lease.
Our
international headquarters building contains approximately 170,000 square feet of office
space. Our international headquarters building is used for administration of our business
including sales and research and development.
We
also acquired the rights to construct an additional building with approximately 130,000
square feet.
In
addition, we lease offices in various locations around the world. Our principal offices
locations are as follows:
|
Location
|
Primary Usage
|
Space (square feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood City, California
|
U.S. Headquarters
|
48,384
|
|
Irving, Texas
|
Technical support, education and professional services
|
26,725
|
|
Stockholm, Sweden
|
Research and development
|
15,123
|
In
addition to the above, we lease the following office spaces:
|
Location
|
Primary Usage
|
Space (square feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
Sales, research and development
|
61,170
|
|
Americas
|
Sales
|
27,484
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
Sales
|
13,514
|
Principal Capital
Expenditures and Divestitures
For
more information regarding our principal capital expenditures currently in progress, see
Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects under the caption
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
ITEM 4A.
|
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
ITEM 5.
|
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
The
following discussion and analysis is based on our consolidated financial statements
including the related notes, and should be read in conjunction with them. Our consolidated
financial statements are provided in Item 18 Financial Statements.
38
Overview
We
develop, market and support a wide range of software and combined hardware and software
products and services for IT security and offer our customers an extensive portfolio of
network and gateway security solutions, data and endpoint security solutions and
management solutions. Our solutions operate under a unified security architecture that
enables end-to-end security with a single line of unified security gateways and allow a
single agent for all endpoint security. We also provide unified management which allows
for ease of deployment and centralized control and is supported and enforced with
real-time security updates. Our products and services are sold to enterprises, service
providers, small and medium sized businesses and consumers. Our Open Platform for Security
(OPSEC) framework allows customers to extend the capabilities of our products and services
with third-party hardware and security software applications. Our products are sold,
integrated and serviced by a network of partners worldwide.
In
January 2007, we completed the acquisition of Protect Data AB (Protect Data),
which at the time was a public company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Protect
Data operates its business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pointsec Mobile
Technologies AB, a worldwide provider of mobile data protection. Pointsec delivers
solutions for automatic data encryption that keeps the sensitive information stored on
mobile computing devices, such as laptops, PDAs, smartphones, and removable media (e.g.,
USB devices), confidential and secure. With the acquisition of Protect Data, Check Point
entered the data security market.
On
December 22, 2008, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Nokia to acquire its
security appliance business. The pending acquisition is expected to close in the first or
second quarter of 2009 and is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing
conditions. Check Point has collaborated with Nokias security appliance business
over the past decade to deliver industry-leading enterprise security solutions. Upon
completion of the acquisition, Check Point intends to build on this collaboration to
provide an extended security appliance portfolio developed, manufactured and supported by
Check Point. We anticipate that as a result of this acquisition, our expenses in several
categories will increase commensurate with the operational costs of operating and
integrating the acquired business. This will be primarily attributable to increases in
personnel and payroll and related costs correlating to increases in cost of revenues,
research and development, selling and marketing and general and administrative expenses.
Our
business is subject to the effects of general global economic conditions and, in
particular, market conditions in the IT, Internet security, and data security industries.
If general economic and industry conditions fail to improve, or if they deteriorate,
demand for our products could be adversely affected.
We
derive most of our revenues from sales of Internet security products primarily under our
VPN-1 and related brands, as well as related revenues from software updates, maintenance
and other services. We expect this to continue to be the case in the foreseeable future.
We
derive our sales primarily through indirect channels. During 2008, we derived
approximately 50% of our sales from our ten largest distributors, compared to 49% in 2007.
In both 2007 and 2008, the largest distributor accounted for approximately 16% of our
sales, and the second largest distributor accounted for approximately 14% of our sales.
39
The
following table presents the percentage of total consolidated revenues that we derive from
sales in each of the regions shown:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Region:
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas, principally U.S.
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
12
|
%
|
For
information on the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, please refer to Item 11
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Foreign Currency
Risk.
Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). These accounting principles require us to make certain
estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and
assumptions upon which we rely, are reasonable based upon information available to us at
the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates,
judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences
between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial
statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant
estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in
fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, include the following:
|
n
|
Realizability
of long-lived assets
|
|
n
|
Accounting
for income taxes
|
|
n
|
Equity-based
compensation expense
|
|
n
|
Allowances
for doubtful accounts
|
|
n
|
Valuation
of financial instruments
|
|
n
|
Valuation
of investments
|
In
many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated
by GAAP and does not require managements judgment in its application. There are also
areas in which managements judgment in selecting among available alternatives would
not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed these
critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board
of Directors. You can see a summary of all of our significant accounting policies in Note
2 to our consolidated financial statements.
40
Revenue
recognition
We
generally derive our revenues from two primary sources:
|
n
|
Software
products and combined hardware and software products; and
|
|
n
|
Software
updates, maintenance and services.
|
We
recognize product and licenses revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No.
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9,
Modification of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect
to Certain Transactions (collectively, SOP 97-2). We recognize product
and license revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has
been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, there are no
significant future performance obligations, the license fees are fixed or determinable,
and collection of the license fee is considered probable. Amounts received in advance of
meeting these criteria are deferred. Fees for arrangements with payment terms extending
beyond customary payment terms are considered not to be fixed or determinable, in which
case revenue is deferred and recognized when payments become due from the customer or are
actually collected, providing that all other revenue recognition criteria have been
met.
As required by SOP 97-2, we determine the value of the
product component of our multiple-element arrangements using the residual method when
vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for the undelivered
elements of the support and maintenance agreements. VSOE is based on the price charged
when an element is sold separately or renewed. Under the residual method, the fair value
of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee
is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue.
Our
software updates and maintenance provides customers with rights to unspecified software
product upgrades released during the term of the agreement. Our support services grant our
customers telephone access to technical support personnel during the term of the service.
We recognize revenues from software updates, maintenance and services ratably over the
term of the agreement.
We
follow very specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue, the most significant of
which are discussed above. We determine the fair value of each type of undelivered element
as follows:
For
enterprise products, we determine the fair value based on the renewal prices charged for
our software updates, maintenance and support services. We offer several levels of
services, classified by services offered, response time and availability. We have defined
classes of customers, based on the total gross value of licensed software products the
customer purchased from us. We price renewals for each service level and each class of
customer as a fixed percentage of the total gross value of software products the customer
licensed from us.
For
our consumer products, we determine the fair value based on the renewal prices of our
software updates, maintenance and support services for the different products offered. The
renewal prices are based on our price list.
41
Business
combinations
In
accordance with business combination accounting, we allocate the purchase price of
acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
as well as to in-process research and development based on their estimated fair values. We
engage third-party appraisal firms to assist management in determining the fair values of
certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Such valuations require management to
make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
Management
makes estimates of fair value based upon assumptions it believes to be reasonable. These
estimates are based on historical experience and information obtained from the management
of the acquired companies and are, inherently, uncertain. Critical estimates made in
valuing certain of the intangible assets include, but are not limited to, the following:
(i) future expected cash flows from license sales, maintenance agreements, customer
contracts and acquired developed technologies and patents; (ii) expected costs to develop
the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated
cash flows from the projects when completed; (iii) the acquired companys brand and
market position as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will
continue to be used in the combined companys product portfolio; and (iv) discount
rates. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or
validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. Changes to these estimates,
relating to circumstances that existed at the acquisition date, are recorded as an
adjustment to goodwill during the purchase price allocation period (generally within one
year of the acquisition date) and as operating expenses, if otherwise.
In
connection with purchase price allocations, we estimate the fair value of the support
obligations assumed in connection with acquisitions. The estimated fair value of the
support obligations is determined utilizing a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up
approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the
obligations plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit
approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to
assume the support obligation. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for
additional information on accounting for our recent acquisitions.
Goodwill
We
review goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate its carrying value may not be
recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting
unit exceeds its fair value. If the carrying value of a reporting units goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss equal to the
difference.
We
operate in one operating segment, and this segment comprises our only reporting unit. In
calculating the implied fair value of the reporting unit, we use a discounted cash flow
methodology, market multiples and market capitalization. Significant estimates that we use
in these fair value methodologies include estimates of future cash flows, future
short-term and long-term growth rates, weighted average cost of capital and estimates of
market multiples of the reporting unit. Other factors we consider are the brand awareness
and the market position of the reporting unit and assumptions about the period of time we
will continue to use the brand in our product portfolio. If these estimates or their
related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges
for our goodwill. Our most recent annual goodwill impairment analysis, which was performed
during the fourth quarter of 2008, did not result in an impairment charge.
42
Realizability
of long-lived assets
We
are required to assess the impairment of tangible and intangible long-lived assets, other
than goodwill, under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, on a periodic basis, when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include any
significant changes in the manner of our use of the assets or the strategy of our overall
business, significant negative industry or economic trends and significant decline in our
share price for a sustained period.
Upon
determination that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based
upon a comparison of aggregate undiscounted projected future cash flows from the use of
the asset or asset group to the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment charge is
recorded for the excess of carrying amount over the fair value. We measure fair value
using discounted projected future cash flows. We base our fair value estimates on
assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently
uncertain. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be
required to record impairment charges for our tangible and intangible long-lived assets.
No impairment charges were recognized during 2006, 2007 and 2008.
Accounting
for income tax
We
are subject to income taxes in Israel, the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining
our provision for income taxes in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to
recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with (SFAS)
No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109). The first step is to evaluate
the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit,
including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being
realized upon settlement.
Although
we believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, no assurance can
be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different. We adjust
these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax
audit, the refinement of an estimate or changes in tax laws. To the extent that the final
tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will
impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.
The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to
reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related interest and penalty.
43
Accounting
for tax positions requires judgments, including estimating reserves for potential
uncertainties. We also assess our ability to utilize tax attributes, including those in
the form of carry forwards for which the benefits have already been reflected in the
financial statements. We do not record valuation allowances for deferred tax assets that
we believe are more likely than not to be realized in future periods. While we believe the
resulting tax balances as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are appropriately accounted
for in accordance with FIN 48 and SFAS No. 109 as applicable, the ultimate outcome of
such matters could result in favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our consolidated
financial statements and such adjustments could be material. See Note 11 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding income taxes. We have
filed or are in the process of filing local and foreign tax returns that are subject to
audit by the respective tax authorities. The amount of income tax we pay is subject to
ongoing audits by the tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. We
believe that we adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to tax
audits and settlement. However, our future results may include favorable or unfavorable
adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or
resolved, audits are closed or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments
expire.
Equity-based
compensation expense
We
account for equity-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this
statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair
value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods.
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires the exercise
of judgment, including the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited.
If actual forfeitures differ from our estimates, equity-based compensation expense and our
results of operations would be impacted.
We estimate the fair value of employee stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model. The fair value of an award is affected by our stock price on the date of
grant as well as other assumptions, including the estimated volatility of our stock price
over the expected term of the awards, and the estimated period of time that we expect
employees to hold their stock options. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based
upon United States treasury interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the
awards. We use the historical volatility of our publicly traded stock options in order to
estimate future stock price trends. In order to determine the estimated period of time
that we expect employees to hold their stock options, we use historical behavioral
patterns rates of employee groups by job classification. Our expected dividend rate is
zero since we do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for losses that may result from the failure of
our channel partners to make required payments. We estimate this allowance based on our
judgment as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables. We form this judgment based
on an analysis of significant outstanding invoices, the age of the receivables, our
historical collection experience and current economic trends. If the financial condition
of our channel partners were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make
payments, we would need to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Valuation
of financial instruments
Effective
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, and effective
October 10, 2008, adopted FSP No. SFAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, except as it applies
to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP 157-2. SFAS 157
clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined
based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a
liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier
value hierarchy, as set forth below, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation
methodologies in measuring fair value:
44
|
|
Level 1
Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
Level 2
Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the
marketplace.
|
|
|
Level 3
Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
|
The
fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The
actual value at which such securities could actually be sold or settled with a willing
buyer or seller may differ from such estimated fair values depending on a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, current and future economic conditions, the
quantity sold or settled, the presence of an active market and the availability of a
willing buyer or seller.
Valuation
of investments
Based
on our intention with respect to a particular investment at the time of investment, we are
generally required to classify our investments into one of three investment categories
under GAAP: trading, held-tomaturity, or available-for-sale. The classification of
the investment may affect our reported results. For investments classified as trading, we
are required to recognize changes in the fair values into income for the period reported.
For investments classified as held-to-maturity, we are required to carry the investment at
amortized cost, with only the amortization occurring during the period recognized into
income. Changes in the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are not
recognized to income during the period, but rather are recognized as a separate component
of equity until realized. We classify our investments as available-for-sale.
We
periodically review our marketable securities for impairment. If we conclude that any of
these investments are impaired, we determine whether such impairment is
other-than-temporary as defined under FSP 115-1. Factors we consider to
make such a determination include our intent and ability to hold the investment for a
period of time sufficient for any anticipated recovery in market value, the length of time
and extent to which the fair value has been less than its cost basis, the credit ratings
of the securities, the nature of underlying collateral as applicable and the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. If any impairment is considered
other-than-temporary, we will write down the asset to its fair value and take
a corresponding charge to our Consolidated Statement of Income.
During
2008, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment on our marketable securities in the
amount of $11.2 million pre-tax.
45
Results of operations
The
following table presents information concerning our results of operations in 2006, 2007
and 2008:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
241,961
|
|
$
|
309,785
|
|
$
|
338,317
|
|
Software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
333,180
|
|
|
421,092
|
|
|
470,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
575,141
|
|
|
730,877
|
|
|
808,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses*:
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
|
13,378
|
|
|
30,276
|
|
|
40,842
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
17,639
|
|
|
24,301
|
|
|
27,213
|
|
Amortization of technology
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
27,724
|
|
|
24,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
36,431
|
|
|
82,301
|
|
|
92,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
62,210
|
|
|
80,982
|
|
|
91,629
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
157,114
|
|
|
217,491
|
|
|
214,439
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
43,503
|
|
|
53,527
|
|
|
53,313
|
|
Acquired in-process R&D
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
300,318
|
|
|
451,301
|
|
|
451,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
274,823
|
|
|
279,576
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
63,647
|
|
|
49,725
|
|
|
40,876
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities**
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(11,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
338,470
|
|
|
329,301
|
|
|
386,155
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
|
60,443
|
|
|
48,237
|
|
|
62,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$
|
278,027
|
|
$
|
281,064
|
|
$
|
323,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including pre-tax charges for
amortization of intangible assets, acquisition related expenses and stock-based
compensation in the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets and acquisition related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
$
|
12,260
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
1,531
|
|
$
|
12,260
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
684
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
7,997
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
|
20,230
|
|
|
19,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
36,392
|
|
$
|
34,052
|
|
$
|
32,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Year ended December 31, 2008,
includes non-cash write down of $11.2 million (pre-tax) of marketable securities in
accordance with SFAS 115.
46
The
following table presents information concerning our results of operations as a percentage
of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
42
|
%
|
Software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amortization of technology
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
27
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7
|
|
Acquired in-process R&D
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
44
|
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
48
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
We
derive our revenues mainly from the sale of products and licenses, and related software
updates, maintenance and other services. Our revenues were $575.1 million in 2006, $730.9
million in 2007 and $808.5 million in 2008.
47
Total
revenues in 2008 grew by 11% compared to 2007. Product and license revenues increased by
$28.5 million, or 9%, from $309.8 million in 2007 to $338.3 million in 2008, which is
attributed mostly to growth in sales of integrated appliances. Over the last three years,
product and license revenues as a percentage of revenues remained flat at 42% of revenues.
Software updates, maintenance and services revenues increased by $49.1 million, or 12%,
from $421.1 million in 2007 to $470.2 million in 2008, primarily as a result of renewals
and new sales of maintenance contracts and increasing sales of SmartDefense security
services.
Total
revenues in 2007 grew by 27% compared to 2006. Of that increase, 13% was attributed to
Check Points traditional business and the remainder was due to the inclusion of
Protect Data in our results for 2007. Protect Data contributed $82.8 million to our
revenues in 2007. The increase of 28% in product and licenses revenues is mainly
attributed to the inclusion of Protect Data in our results of operations for 2007.
Software updates, maintenance and other services revenues grew by 26% compared to 2006,
again, primarily as a result of renewals and new sales of maintenance contracts and
increasing in sales of SmartDefense security services.
Cost of Revenues
Total
cost of revenues was $36.4 million in 2006, $82.3 million in 2007, and $92.6 million in
2008. Cost of revenues includes cost of product and licenses, cost of software updates,
maintenance and services and amortization of technology. Our cost of products and licenses
is comprised of the cost of software and hardware production, manuals, packaging and
license fees paid to third parties. Cost of products and licenses was $13.4 million in
2006, $30.3 million in 2007 and $40.8 million in 2008, and represented 2% of revenues in
2006, 4% in 2007 and 5% in 2008. In 2007, the increase was mainly due to increased volume
of hardware-based products and an increase in licensing expenses which accounted for
approximately $13.3 million, and the inclusion of Protect Data in our financial results
which accounted for approximately $2.8 million. In 2008, the increase was mainly due to
increased sales of hardware-based products and an increase in licensing expenses which
accounted for approximately $9.8 million.
Our
cost of software updates, maintenance and services includes the cost of post-sale customer
support, training and consulting. The cost of software updates, maintenance and services
was $17.6 million in 2006, $24.3 million in 2007, and $27.2 million in 2008, and
represented 3% of revenues in each of 2006, 2007 and 2008. In 2007, we experienced an
increase in cost of software updates, maintenance and services, primarily related to an
increase in headcount in our technical services organization, both from organic growth and
the inclusion of Protect Data. At the end of 2007, we had 225 employees, of which 18 were
added as a result of the Protect Data acquisition, compared to 163 at the beginning of
2007. The increase in the number of employees resulted in an additional compensation
expense of approximately $4.8 million in 2007. In 2008, we experienced an increase in the
cost of software updates, maintenance and service primarily related to an increase in
compensation and payroll related expenses, as the average headcount throughout 2008 was
higher, in comparison to 2007, and as a result of the effect of exchange rate fluctuations
on compensation expenses.
48
Amortization
of technology related to the acquisition of Zone Labs was $5.4 million in 2006. In 2007,
amortization of technology increased to $27.7 million, with the inclusion of Protect Data
and NFR. The intangible assets added in connection with the acquisitions are amortized
over their useful lives on a straight-line basis, which represents the expected pattern of
usage. In 2008, amortization of technology decreased to $24.6 million. The decrease
resulted primarily from Zone Labs intangible assets being fully amortized at the
beginning of 2008.
Research
and Development
Research
and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related expenses for
personnel, as well as the cost of facilities and depreciation of capital equipment.
Research and development expenses were $62.2 million in 2006, $81.0 million in 2007 and
$91.6 million in 2008, and represented 11% of revenues in each of 2006, 2007 and 2008. In
2007, the increase in research and development expenses was mainly due to growth in
headcount, from 573 at the end of 2006 to 673 at the end of 2007, including 68 employees
that were added in connection with the Protect Data acquisition. The cumulative additional
compensation expense was approximately $15.5 million. In 2008, approximately $4.2 million
of the increase in research and development expenses was primarily related to an increase
in the average number of research and development employees, and approximately $4.5
million of the increase resulted from the appreciation of the Israeli Shekel, the Euro,
and the Swedish Krona compared to the U.S dollar (compared to $1.8 million for 2007 in
currency fluctuations). The majority of our developers are located in Israel, where
compensation related expenses are paid in Israeli Shekels, and in Sweden, where
compensation related expenses are paid in Swedish Krona, while our research and
development expenses are reported in U.S. dollars. Therefore, changes to the exchange rate
between the Israeli Shekel, the Swedish Krona and the U.S. dollar, have affected and may
in the future affect our expense level.
Selling
and Marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising, trade
shows, seminars, public relations, travel and other related expenses. Selling and
marketing expenses were $157.1 million in 2006, $217.5 million in 2007 and $214.4 million
in 2008, and represented 27% of revenues in 2006, 30% of revenues in 2007 and 27% of
revenues in 2008. In 2007, the increase in selling and marketing expenses was primarily
due to an increase in our sales and marketing headcount, from 580 at the end of 2006 to
717 at the end of 2007, and the associated increase in travel, entertainment and
facilities expenses. Of the increase in employees, 134 employees arrived from Protect
Data, resulting in an increase in expenses of approximately $27.9 million. In 2008, the
decrease in selling and marketing expenses was primarily due to a decrease in our sales
and marketing headcount, from 717 at the end of 2007 to 701 at the end of 2008.
In
addition, the strengthening of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar contributed
approximately $2.2 million to the 2007 compensation expenses and $0.3 million to the 2008
compensation expenses. Our expenses in Europe, which primarily relate to compensation,
travel, facilities and marketing, are paid in local currencies, while being reported in
U.S. dollars. Therefore, changes to the exchange rates between the Euro and the U.S.
dollar have affected, and may in the future affect, our expense level.
49
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and headcount related expenses,
professional fees, insurance costs and other expenses. General and administrative expenses
were $43.5 million in 2006, $53.5 million in 2007 and $53.3 million in 2008, and
represented 8% of revenues in each of 2006 and 2007, and 7% of revenues in 2008. The
increase in general and administrative expenses in 2007, as compared to 2006, is mainly
due to Protect Data acquisition, resulting in an increase in expenses of approximately $5
million. In 2008, the expense level remained flat relative to 2007.
In-Process
Research and Development
Upon
the acquisition of Protect Data in January 2007, we recorded a $17 million charge for
acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D). This expense was attributable to
projects which have as not yet reached technological feasibility and with no alternative
future use. The value of IPR&D was determined using discounted cash flow approach.
Upon
the acquisition of NFR in December 2006, we recorded a $1.1 million charge for acquired
IPR&D. This expense was attributable to projects which qualified as not yet having
reached technological feasibility and with no alternative future use. The value of
IPR&D was determined using the discounted cash flow approach.
Operating
Margin
We
had operating margins of 48% in 2006, 38% in 2007 and 44% in 2008. The decrease of 10% in
operating margin between 2006 and 2007 is attributable primarily to the acquisition of
Protect Data and the inclusion of its operations in our financial results. Of that
decrease, 5% of the decline in margin was attributable to acquisition-related expenses and
the amortization of technology, and 5% of the decline in margins was attributable to the
increased level of operating expenses as a result of the acquisition.
The
increase of 6% in operating margin between 2007 and 2008 (or the increase of 3% with the
exclusion of Acquired in-process research and development in 2007) is attributable
primarily to the revenue growth and the full integration of Protect Datas operations
into our business. We may experience future fluctuations or declines in operating margins
from historical levels due to several factors, as described above in Item 3
Key Information under the caption Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our
Business and Our Market Our operating margins may decline.
Financial
Income, Net
Net
financial income consists primarily of interest earned on cash equivalents and marketable
securities. Net financial income was $63.6 million in 2006, $49.7 million in 2007 and
$40.9 million in 2008. As we customarily hold debentures until maturity, our current
portfolios yield is derived primarily from market interest rates and the yield of
securities on the date of the investment. As most of our investments are in U.S. dollars,
our financial income is heavily dependent on prevailing U.S. interest rates. The decrease
in net financial income in 2007 was primarily due to the decrease in our portfolio size
resulting from the approximately $614 million in cash we used to acquire Protect Data, as
well as declining interest rates. The decrease in net financial income in 2008 was
primarily due to the decrease in U.S. interest rates.
50
We
review various factors in determining whether we should recognize an impairment charge for
our marketable securities, including our intent and ability to hold the investment for a
period of time sufficient for any anticipated recovery in market value, the length of time
and extent to which the fair value has been less than its cost basis, the credit ratings
of the securities, the nature of underlying collateral as applicable and the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Based on our consideration of these
factors, we recognized in 2008 an other-than-temporary impairment on marketable securities
in a total amount of $11.2 million, pretax, out of which $6.3 million, pretax, is related
to Auction Rate Securities. The remaining impairment of $4.9 million related to corporate
obligations of U.S Companies with the original principal amounting to $8.0 million. In
evaluating when declines in fair value are other-than-temporary, we considered all
available evidence, including market declines subsequent to the end of the period. We may
recognize additional losses in the future should the market prospects of the issuers of
these securities continue to deteriorate.
As
interest rates in the U.S have continued to decrease in the beginning of 2009 and are
expected to remain low during 2009, we believe that this trend will result in a lower
portfolio yield. See also Item 3, Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business
and Our Market We Face the Risk of a Decrease in Our Cash Balances and Losses in
Our Investment Portfolio and The current global credit crisis may
significantly decrease the value of our investment assets.
Taxes
on Income
Our
effective tax rate was 18% in 2006, 15% in 2007 and 16% in 2008. These relatively low tax
rates were mainly achieved as a result of the Approved Enterprise and Privileged
Enterprise status granted to our production facilities in Israel (as described in Item 10,
Additional Information under the caption Israeli taxation, foreign
exchange regulation and investment programs). Our effective tax rate decreased in
2007, as a result of the acquisition of Protect Data and an increase in the tax-exempt
income deriving from our Privileged Enterprise status. Our effective tax rate increased in
2008, despite the decrease in the statutory tax rate in Israel from 29% to 27%, as a
result of an increase in taxable income at our foreign subsidiary, the changes in the
SEK/dollar exchange rate and a decrease in tax-exempt income deriving from our Privileged
Enterprise status. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further
information regarding income taxes.
Additional
details are provided in Item 10 Additional Information under the
caption Israeli taxation, foreign exchange regulation and investment programs
and Item 3 Key Information under the caption The tax benefits
available to us under Israeli law require us to meet several conditions, and may be
terminated or reduced in the future, which would increase our taxes.
51
Quarterly Results of
Operations
The
following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of income
data from the reports on Form 6-K that we furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, as well as the percentage of our revenues represented by each item. We prepare
our unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements on the same basis as our audited
annual consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of such
information. You should read this information in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements, including the related notes, appearing in Item 18
Financial Statements.
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
66,048
|
|
$
|
73,318
|
|
$
|
76,890
|
|
$
|
93,529
|
|
$
|
77,379
|
|
$
|
84,973
|
|
$
|
81,925
|
|
$
|
94,040
|
|
Software updates, maintenance
|
|
|
and services
|
|
|
|
97,921
|
|
|
102,874
|
|
|
107,122
|
|
|
113,175
|
|
|
114,218
|
|
|
114,633
|
|
|
117,795
|
|
|
123,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
163,969
|
|
|
176,192
|
|
|
184,012
|
|
|
206,704
|
|
|
191,597
|
|
|
199,606
|
|
|
199,720
|
|
|
217,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
6,747
|
|
|
8,511
|
|
|
9,778
|
|
|
8,993
|
|
|
9,693
|
|
|
10,267
|
|
|
11,889
|
|
Cost of software updates,
|
|
|
maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
6,695
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
6,941
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
Amortization of technology
|
|
|
|
6,262
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
16,960
|
|
|
19,800
|
|
|
21,914
|
|
|
23,627
|
|
|
22,897
|
|
|
22,594
|
|
|
23,008
|
|
|
24,110
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
18,868
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
19,885
|
|
|
21,454
|
|
|
22,745
|
|
|
23,824
|
|
|
23,193
|
|
|
21,867
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
52,162
|
|
|
55,176
|
|
|
52,515
|
|
|
57,638
|
|
|
53,660
|
|
|
56,588
|
|
|
50,796
|
|
|
53,395
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
14,100
|
|
|
11,621
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
15,768
|
|
|
13,566
|
|
|
13,005
|
|
|
12,294
|
|
|
14,448
|
|
Acquired in-process R&D
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses (*)
|
|
|
|
119,090
|
|
|
107,372
|
|
|
106,352
|
|
|
118,487
|
|
|
112,868
|
|
|
116,011
|
|
|
109,291
|
|
|
113,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
44,879
|
|
|
68,820
|
|
|
77,660
|
|
|
88,217
|
|
|
78,729
|
|
|
83,595
|
|
|
90,429
|
|
|
103,747
|
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
13,068
|
|
|
11,645
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
13,443
|
|
|
12,363
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
10,039
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of
|
|
|
marketable securities (**)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,288
|
)
|
|
(8,933
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
57,947
|
|
|
80,465
|
|
|
89,229
|
|
|
101,660
|
|
|
91,092
|
|
|
91,544
|
|
|
98,180
|
|
|
105,339
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
|
10,999
|
|
|
11,004
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
13,743
|
|
|
12,834
|
|
|
12,371
|
|
|
18,119
|
|
|
18,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
$
|
46,948
|
|
$
|
69,461
|
|
$
|
76,738
|
|
$
|
87,917
|
|
$
|
78,258
|
|
$
|
79,173
|
|
$
|
80,061
|
|
$
|
86,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Shares used in computing basic
|
|
|
earnings per share
|
|
|
|
224,917
|
|
|
223,291
|
|
|
221,893
|
|
|
220,132
|
|
|
217,065
|
|
|
215,030
|
|
|
213,728
|
|
|
211,731
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted
|
|
|
earnings per share
|
|
|
|
227,691
|
|
|
226,151
|
|
|
224,974
|
|
|
222,993
|
|
|
219,393
|
|
|
217,951
|
|
|
216,567
|
|
|
212,874
|
|
* Including pre-tax charges for
amortization of intangible assets related to the acquisition of Zone Labs, NFR and Protect
Data and stock-based compensation in the following items:
52
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
$
|
2,708
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
$
|
3,149
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
3,149
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Cost of software updates,
|
|
|
maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
174
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
993
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
5,479
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
4,427
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
5,539
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
3,649
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
8,338
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
$
|
8,299
|
|
$
|
8,827
|
|
$
|
9,071
|
|
$
|
8,385
|
|
$
|
6,857
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Including non-cash write down of
$2.3 million pre-tax in the third quarter of 2008 and $8.9 pre-tax million in the fourth
quarter of 2008 of marketable securities in accordance with SFAS 115.
53
As
a percentage of revenues:
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
43
|
%
|
Software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amortization of technology
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
10
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
24
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
Acquired in-process R&D
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
48
|
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities
|
|
|
impairment
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
49
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
future revenues and operating results are uncertain and may fluctuate from quarter to
quarter and from year to year due to several factors, as described above in Item 3
Key Information under the caption Risk Factors Risks Relating to
Our Business and Our Market Our quarterly operating results are likely to
fluctuate, which could cause us to miss expectations about these results and cause the
trading price of our ordinary shares to decline.
Historically,
our revenues have reflected seasonal fluctuations related to the slowdown in spending
activities for the third quarter, and the increased activity related to the year-end
purchasing cycles of many users of our products. We believe that we will continue to
encounter quarter-to-quarter seasonality.
Our
expense levels are based, in part, on expectations as to future revenues. If our revenue
levels are below expectations, our operating results are likely to be adversely affected,
since most of our expenses are not variable. As a result, we believe that period-to-period
comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be
relied upon as indications of future performance. Due to the above, it is likely that in
some future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market
analysts and investors. In this event, the price of our ordinary shares would likely
decline significantly.
54
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements, the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The impact of SFAS 141R on
our consolidated results of operations and financial condition will depend on the nature
and size of acquisitions, if any, subsequent to the effective date.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51". SFAS
No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that (i) the
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly
identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position
within equity, but separate from the parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income; and (iii)
changes in a parents ownership interest, while the parent retains its controlling
financial interest in its subsidiary, be accounted for consistently. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of
the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated financial statement.
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets
. EITF 08-7 clarifies the accounting
for certain separately identifiable intangible assets which an acquirer does not intend to
actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to them.
EITF 08-7 requires an acquirer in a business combination to account for a defensive
intangible asset as a separate unit of accounting which should be amortized to expense
over the period the asset diminishes in value. EITF 08-7 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of EITF 08-7 on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3
, Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FAS 142-3 on
our consolidated financial statement.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1,
Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement
under Statement 13
and FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 157
. Collectively, the Staff Positions defer the effective
date of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis at least annually, and amend the scope of
Statement 157. We adopted Statement 157 and the related FASB staff positions except for
those items specifically deferred under FSP No. FAS 157-2, effective January 1,
2008.
55
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
2007
and 2008, we have financed our operations through cash generated from operations. Our
total cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits short-term investments, and long-term
interest bearing investments, were $1,241.5 million as of December 31, 2007, and $1,443.8
million as of December 31, 2008. Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
were $842 million as of December 31, 2007, and $914.4 million as of December 31, 2008. Our
long-term interest bearing investments were $399.5 million as of December 31, 2007, and
$529.4 million as of December 31, 2008. At the end of 2002, we established a wholly owned
subsidiary in Singapore that serves as a vehicle for our international investments and
manages our financial assets.
We
generated net cash from operations of $367.5 million in 2006, $375.0 million in 2007 and
$434.0 million in 2008. Net cash from operations for 2006 consisted primarily of net
income adjusted for non-cash activity, including stock-based compensation expenses, plus
an increase in deferred revenue, offset by an increase in trade receivables, net. Net cash
from operations for 2007 consisted primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash activity,
including in-process research and development, stock-based compensation expenses,
amortization of intangible assets, and an increase in deferred income taxes, net plus an
increase in deferred revenue, offset by a decrease in accrued expenses and other
liabilities and trade payables and an increase in trade receivables, net. Net cash from
operations for 2008 consisted primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash activity,
including other-than-temporary impairment on marketable securities, stock-based
compensation expenses, depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and deferred income
taxes benefit plus an increase in deferred revenue and accrued expenses and other
liabilities, partially offset by an increase in trade receivables, net.
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $236.5 million in 2006, $(206.5)
million in 2007 and $(209.0) million in 2008. In 2006, net cash provided by investing
activities consisted primarily of proceeds from marketable securities, partially offset by
investments in marketable securities, the purchase of an office building in Israel, and
net cash paid in conjunction with the acquisition of NFR. In 2007, net cash used in
investing activities consisted primarily of net cash paid in conjunction with the
acquisition of Protect Data, investments in marketable securities and renovations to our
office building in Israel offset by proceeds from sales and maturity of marketable
securities. In 2008, net cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of
investments in marketable securities and short term deposits offset by proceeds from sale
and maturities of marketable securities. Our capital expenditures amounted to $44.9
million in 2006, $16.7 million in 2007 and $8.3 million in 2008. Our capital expenditures
in 2006 consisted primarily of computer equipment and software for our research and
development and technical services organizations efforts, as well as increasing
infrastructure to enable operation expansion. In addition, in 2006, we purchased an office
building in Israel that was occupied in May 2007 for a total amount of $35.25 million.
Additional payments in 2006 for taxes related to the purchase and for the building
renovation totaled $3.58 million. In 2007, our capital expenditures consisted primarily of
renovation of our office building in Israel for total of $7.04 million, computer equipment
and software for our research and development and technical services organizations
efforts, as well as an increasing infrastructure to enable operation expansions. In 2008,
our capital expenditures consisted primarily of renovation of our office building in
Israel for total of $2.6 million, computer equipment and software for our research and
development and technical services organizations efforts, as well as an increased
infrastructure to enable operation expansions.
56
We
funded the acquisition of NFR in December 2006 from our operating cash flow.
We funded
the acquisition of Protect Data in 2007 for approximately $614 million from our cash and
cash equivalents balances, as well as our marketable securities portfolio. We funded
roughly 62% of the acquisition price with our money market funds balances, and the
remainder was funded by selling a small portion of our marketable securities portfolio. We
plan to fund the acquisition of Nokia from our cash and cash equivalents balances.
Net
cash used in financing activities was approximately $383.1 million in 2006, $178.3 million
in 2007 and $191.5 million in 2008. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, net cash used in financing
activities was attributed primarily to the purchase of treasury shares. Our board of
directors approved $1.6 billion in the form of five programs to repurchase ordinary
shares. Each of the first three programs authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million,
the fourth program authorized the repurchase of up to $600 million, and the fifth program
authorized the repurchased of up to $400 million. The first program was announced on
October 28, 2003, and ended on August 24, 2004. The second program was announced on
October 28, 2004, and ended on May 31, 2005. The third program was announced on July 25,
2005, and ended on May 18, 2006. The fourth program was announced on May 22, 2006, and
ended on March 5, 2008. The fifth program was announced on March 26, 2008, and is still in
effect. Under the repurchase programs we may purchase our ordinary shares from time to
time, depending on market conditions, share price, trading volume, and other factors. We
fund the share purchases from available working capital. The current repurchase program
has no time limit and may be suspended from time to time or discontinued. In 2006, we
purchased a total of 23.2 million shares at a total cost of $435.5 million, at an average
price of $18.7 per share. In 2007, we purchased a total of 9.0 million shares at a total
cost of $209.8 million, at an average price of $23.3 per share. In 2008, we purchased a
total of 10.9 million shares at a total cost of $239.5 million, at an average price of
$21.9 per share. Since the first repurchase program was implemented, through the end of
2008, we purchased a total of 65.8 million shares for a total cost of $1,366.3 million, at
an average price of $20.8 per share. From time to time we re-issue the repurchased shares
to settle exercises of options and awards of restricted share units to our employees and
directors. Proceeds from such activities were $51.9 million, $24.6 million and $35 million
in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Our
securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried
at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other
comprehensive income. Amortization of premium, discount and interest is recorded in our
statements of income.
Our
liquidity could be negatively affected by a decrease in demand for our products and
services, including the impact of changes in customer buying that may result from the
current general economic downturn. Also, if the financial system or the credit markets
continue to deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be impacted and
the values and liquidity of our investments could be adversely affected.
57
Our
principal sources of liquidity consist of our cash and cash equivalents, short-term
deposits and marketable securities (which aggregated $1.443.8 million as of December 31,
2008), our cash flow from operations, and our net financial income. We believe that these
sources of liquidity will be sufficient to satisfy our capital requirements for the
foreseeable future.
Research and
Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Additional
details are provided in this Item 5, under the caption Results of operations.
Trend Information
Additional details
are provided in this Item 5, under the caption Results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We
are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements. In addition, we have no
unconsolidated special purpose financing or partnership entities that are likely to create
contingent obligations.
Tabular Disclosure of
Contractual Obligations
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008:
|
Payments due by period
|
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
More than 5
years
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
$
|
11,655
|
|
$
|
4,640
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain income tax position*
|
|
|
$
|
101,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance pay**
|
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
123,828
|
|
$
|
4,640
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Uncertain
income tax position under FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48) are due upon settlement and we
are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement. See Note
11a of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Companys
liability under FIN 48.
|
|
**
|
Severance
pay obligations to our Israeli employees, as required under Israeli labor law, are
payable only upon termination, retirement or death of the respective employee and there
is no obligation for benefits accrued prior to 2007, if the employee voluntarily resigns.
Of this amount, $5.1 million is unfunded.
|
58
ITEM 6.
|
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
Directors and Senior
Management
Our
directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2008, were as follows:
Name
|
Position
|
Independent
Director (1)
|
Outside
Director (2)
|
Member of
Audit
Committee
|
Member of
Compensation
Committee
|
Member of
Nominating
Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gil Shwed
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Chairman of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marius Nacht
|
Vice Chairman of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Ungerman
|
Vice Chairman of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tal Payne
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yoav Chelouche (3)
|
Director
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
|
Irwin Federman (3)
|
Director
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
Guy Gecht
|
Director
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
Dan Propper
|
Director
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Rothrock
|
Director
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
David Rubner
|
Director
|
P
|
|
P
|
|
P
|
Tal Shavit
|
Director
|
P
|
|
|
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Independent
Director under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the NASDAQ Global Select Market regulations (see
explanation below).
|
(2)
|
Outside
Director as required by the Israeli Companies Law (see explanation
below).
|
(3)
|
Financial
expert as required by the Israeli Companies Law and NASDAQ
requirements with respect to membership on the Audit Committee (see Item
16A Audit Committee Financial Expert).
|
Gil
Shwed, one of our founders, is the Chairman of our board of directors, a position he has
held since 1998. He is also our Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors, both
positions he has held since we were incorporated in 1993. Mr. Shwed also served as our
President from our incorporation until 2001. Mr. Shwed has received numerous prestigious
accolades for his individual achievements and industry contributions, including an
honorary Doctor of Science from the Technion Israel Institute of Technology, the
World Economic Forums Global Leader for Tomorrow for his commitment to public
affairs and leadership in areas beyond immediate professional interests, and the Academy
of Achievements Golden Plate Award for his innovative contribution to business and
technology. Mr. Shwed is a member of the Board of Trustees of Tel Aviv University and the
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Youth University of Tel Aviv University.
Marius
Nacht, one of our founders, has served as Vice Chairman of our board of directors since
2001. Mr. Nacht has served as one of our directors since we were incorporated in 1993.
From 1999 through 2005, Mr. Nacht served as our Senior Vice President. Mr. Nacht earned a
B.S. cum laude in Physics and Mathematics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1983,
and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Communication Systems from Tel Aviv University
in 1987.
Jerry
Ungerman was appointed Vice Chairman of our board of directors in 2005, and he is
responsible for leading our partner and customer relations. From 2001 until 2005, Mr.
Ungerman served as our President and before that, from 1998 until 2000, he served as our
Executive Vice President. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ungerman accumulated more than 30 years
of high-tech sales, marketing and management experience at Hitachi Data Systems (HDS). He
began his career with IBM after earning a B.A. in Business Administration from the
University of Minnesota.
59
Tal
Payne has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2008. Prior to joining us in
2008, Ms. Payne was chief financial officer at Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd., a leading
provider of products and services for satellite-based communications networks. During her
tenure at Gilat, Ms. Payne was fully responsible for the strategic planning, developments
and leadership of the entire corporate finance organization, and held the role of vice
president of finance for over five years. Ms. Payne led the companys public
offerings, capital restructurings and other transactions. Before joining Gilat, she was
previously employed at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Payne holds a B.A. in Economics and
Accounting and an Executive M.B.A., both from Tel-Aviv University. She is also a Certified
Public Accountant.
Yoav
Chelouche has served on our board of directors since 2006. Mr. Chelouche has also served
as one of our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law since 2006. Mr. Chelouche
has been Managing Partner of Aviv Venture Capital since August 2000. Prior to joining Aviv
Venture Capital, Mr. Chelouche served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Scitex
Corp., a world leader in digital imaging and printing systems (NASDAQ: SCIX), from
December 1994 until July 2000. From August 1979 until December 1994, Mr. Chelouche
held various managerial positions with Scitex, including VP Strategy and Business
Development, VP Marketing and VP Finance for Europe. Mr. Chelouche is the Chairman of the
Board of Dmatek Ltd., Chairman of the Board of Rosetta Genomics Ltd., and a member of the
board of directors of a number of private companies. He is also Chairman of Taasiyeda, an
Israeli nonprofit organization that promotes the development of leadership and technology
skills in children. Mr. Chelouche earned a B.A. in Economics and Statistics from Tel Aviv
University, and an M.B.A. from INSEAD University in Fontainebleau, France.
Irwin
Federman has served on our board of directors since 1995. Mr. Federman has also served as
one of our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law since 2000. Mr. Federman has
been a General Partner of U.S. Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, since 1990. Mr.
Federman serves as director of SanDisk Corp., Mellanox Technologies Ltd. and a number of
private companies. Mr. Federman received a B.S. in Economics from Brooklyn College.
Guy
Gecht has served on our board of directors since 2006. Mr. Gecht has also served as one of
our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law since 2006. Mr. Gecht is the Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (EFI), a
leader in digital imaging and print management solutions for commercial and enterprise
printing. Mr. Gecht has served in this position since January 2000. From October 1995
until January 2000, Mr. Gecht held various positions with EFI, including President of the
company. Prior to joining EFI, Mr. Gecht held various software engineering positions with
technology companies. Mr. Gecht holds a B.S. in Computer Science and Mathematics from
Ben-Gurion University in Israel.
Dan
Propper has served as one of our directors since 2006. Mr. Propper is the Chairman of the
Board of the Osem group, a leading Israeli manufacturer of food products. Mr. Propper
served as the CEO of Osem for 25 years until April 2006. In addition to his role at Osem,
from 1993 until 1999, Mr. Propper served as President of the Manufacturers
Association of Israel, an independent umbrella organization representing industrial
enterprises in Israel, and as Chairman of the Federation of Economic Organizations in
Israel, which unites economic and business organizations that represents all business
sectors in Israel. Mr. Propper has received prestigious accolades for his contributions to
the Israeli industry and economy, including an honorary Doctorate from the Technion
Israel Institute of Technology in 1999. Mr. Propper serves as a member of the boards of
the First International Bank of Israel, Delta Galil Industries Ltd., Osem Investments
Ltd., and a number of private companies, including Tivall Ltd. and Sabra Salads Ltd.,
subsidiaries of Osem. Mr. Propper is also a member of the board of the Technion, the
Weizmann Institute of Science and Ben-Gurion University in Israel, and of the executive
committee of Tel Aviv University. Mr. Propper earned a B.Sc.
summa cum laude
in
Chemical Engineering and Food Technology from the Technion.
60
Ray
Rothrock has served on our board of directors since 1995. Mr. Rothrock has also served as
one of our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law since 2000. Mr. Rothrock is
Managing General Partner of Venrock Associates, a venture capital firm, where he has been
a member since 1988 and a general partner since 1995. Mr. Rothrock is also a director of a
number of private companies. Mr. Rothrock received a B.S. in Engineering from Texas
A&M University, an M.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and an M.B.A.
from the Harvard Business School.
David
Rubner has served on our board of directors since 1999. Mr. Rubner is Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Rubner Technology Ventures Ltd., a venture capital firm, and is a
general partner in Hyperion Israel Advisors Ltd., a venture capital fund. Prior to
starting Rubner Technology Ventures, Mr. Rubner served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of ECI Telecommunications Ltd. Prior to this appointment, he held various
management positions in ECI Telecom. Mr. Rubner serves on the boards of directors of Elbit
Imaging Ltd., Messaging International Ltd., and a number of private companies. Mr. Rubner
is also a member of the Board of Trustees of Bar-Ilan University and Shaare Zedek
Hospital, and chairman of the Petach-Tikva Foundation. Mr. Rubner holds a B.S. in
engineering from Queen Mary College, University of London and an M.S. in Electrical
Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, and he was a recipient of the Industry Prize
in 1995.
Dr.
Tal Shavit has served on our board of directors since 2000. Dr. Shavit is an
organizational consultant specializing in international collaboration between
Israeli and American companies, consulting in the management of cultural
differences in order to forge effective collaboration. Her work with leading
management teams includes a defining of organizational culture as the engine of
the companys activities. She consults to companies undergoing structural
change with emphasis on organizational growth through effective mergers and
acquisitions and a redefining of management roles in order to meet market
changes.
Of
the individuals mentioned above, only Gil Shwed and Marius Nacht owned more than one
percent of our outstanding shares as of December 31, 2008. Additional details are provided
in this Item 6, under the caption Share ownership and in Item 7
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
Some
of our directors are board members of multiple companies, some of which may be technology
companies. The board of directors has determined that there are no current conflicts of
interest with respect to any of our directors.
The
term of each director, other than our outside directors (as described below), will expire
at our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders. The terms of our outside directors will expire
in 2009 and 2011, as described below.
Compensation
of directors and officers
The
total direct cash compensation that we accrued for our directors and executive officers as
a group was approximately $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately
$2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, and approximately $1.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. This does not include amounts accrued for expenses related
to business travel, professional and business association dues, and other business
expenses reimbursed to officers. We do not have any agreements with our directors who are
also officers that provide for benefits upon termination of employment, except for
severance payments mandated by Israeli law for all employees employed in Israel. In
addition, only directors who are not officers receive compensation for serving as
directors.
61
From
time to time we grant options and awards under our stock option and equity incentive plans
(described below) to our executive officers and directors. Option grants to directors who
are not officers are made pursuant to the automatic option grant program under these
plans, while option and award grants to directors who are officers are made only with
audit committee, board of directors and shareholder approval.
Our
non-employee directors receive an automatic option grant under the 2005 U.S. Plan or the
2005 Israel Plan (but not both), and are also eligible for discretionary awards under the
plans. Currently, automatic grants under the 2005 U.S. Plan is made primarily to
non-employee directors who are citizens or residents of the United States or other
countries other than Israel, and automatic grants under the 2005 Israel Plan is made
primarily to non-employee directors who are citizens or residents of Israel.
Each
non-employee director who is first elected or appointed to the board of directors is
granted an option to purchase 50,000 ordinary shares on the date of the initial election
or appointment, vesting in equal annual installments over a four-year period. On the date
of each annual general meeting of shareholders, each non-employee director who is to
continue to serve as a non-employee director after the annual meeting is granted an option
to purchase an additional 25,000 ordinary shares, of which 50% vest six months after the
grant date, 25% vest nine months after the grant date, and another 25% vest a year after
the grant date, provided that the director has served as a non-employee director for at
least six months prior to the date of the annual meeting. The directors in office
immediately prior to the date of initial appointment or election, or of the annual
meeting, as applicable, may determine to reduce the initial or annual grant to all
non-employee directors or specific non-employee directors.
All
options to directors are granted at an exercise price equal to 100% of the closing price
of the ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant.
As
of December 31, 2008, our executive officers and directors held options to purchase an
aggregate of approximately 19.0 million shares and held 34,261 restricted stock units
under our stock option and equity incentive plans. The exercise prices of these options
range between $13.00 and $79.79, and their expiration dates range between June 2009 and
September 2015. During 2008, we granted our executive officers and directors options to
purchase an aggregate of approximately 1.3 million shares and 34,261 restricted stock
units under our stock option and equity incentive plans. The exercise prices of these
options range between $23.35 and $24.01, and their expiration dates range between July 22,
2015, and September 3, 2015. Other than as specified in the share ownership table under
the caption Share ownership below, none of our directors and officers holds
more than 1% of our outstanding shares.
Board Practices
Our
board of directors currently consists of ten members. Under our articles of association,
the board is to consist of between six and twelve members. Each director (other than an
outside director as described below) is elected to serve until the next annual general
meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected. Each officer is
elected by the board of directors and serves at the discretion of the board. All of our
officers and directors, other than non-employee directors, devote substantially all of
their working time to our business. There are no family relationships among any of our
directors, officers, or key employees.
62
Our
articles of association provide that any director may, by written notice to us, appoint
another person to serve as an alternate director or may cancel the appointment of an
alternate director. Any person eligible to serve as a director, other than a person who is
already a director or an alternate director, may act as an alternate director. The term of
appointment of an alternate director may be for one meeting of the board, for a specified
period of time, a specified meeting or action of the board or until notice is given of the
cancellation of the appointment. No director has appointed, and, to our knowledge, no
director intends to appoint, any other person as an alternate director.
Outside
and independent directors
Outside
directors
. In accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and the relevant regulations,
we must have at least two outside directors who meet the Israeli statutory requirements of
independence. At least one of the outside directors is required to have financial
and accounting expertise and the other outside director or directors are required to
have professional expertise, all as defined under the Companies Law. Our board
of directors has determined that Yoav Chelouche and Irwin Federman have financial
and accounting expertise, and Guy Gecht and Ray Rothrock have professional
expertise.
An
outside director serves for a term of three years, which may be extended for additional
three-year terms. An outside director can be removed from office only under very limited
circumstances. All of the outside directors must serve on the companys audit
committee, and at least one outside director must serve on each committee of the board of
directors. As of December 31, 2008, Yoav Chelouche, Irwin Federman, Guy Gecht and Ray
Rothrock are our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law. Yoav Chelouches
and Guy Gechts term of office will expire in 2009. Irwin Federmans and Ray
Rothrocks term of office will expire in 2011.
Independent
directors
. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules subsequently
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
requires issuers to comply with various corporate governance practices. Under the rules
applicable to us as a foreign private issuer, we are required to have a majority of
independent directors within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ regulations. Our board
of directors complies with these requirements by including a majority of members who are
independent directors within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ regulations. As of
December 31, 2008, Yoav Chelouche, Irwin Federman, Guy Gecht, Dan Propper, Ray Rothrock,
David Rubner and Tal Shavit are our independent directors under the applicable NASDAQ
regulations. Our independent directors have regularly held meetings at which only
independent directors are present.
Pursuant
to a recent amendment to the Israeli Companies Law, an Israeli company, whose shares are
publicly traded, may elect to adopt a provision in its articles of association pursuant to
which a majority of its board of directors will constitute individuals complying with
certain independence criteria prescribed by the Companies Law. We have not included such a
provision in our articles of association because our board of directors already complies
with the independence requirements under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, as
described above.
63
Committees
of the board of directors
Our
articles of association provide that the board of directors may delegate all of its powers
to committees of the board as it deems appropriate, subject to the provisions of Israeli
law. Our board of directors has established an audit committee, compensation committee and
nominating committee.
Audit
committee
. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of any public
company must establish an audit committee. The audit committee must consist of at least
three directors and must include all of the outside directors. The audit committee may not
include the chairman of the board, any director whom we employ or who provides services to
us on a regular basis, a controlling shareholder, or certain relatives of a controlling
shareholder. In addition, the NASDAQ regulations also require us to maintain an audit
committee consisting of at least three directors, all of whom must be independent under
the NASDAQ regulations. Irwin Federman is the chairman of the audit committee. Yoav
Chelouche, Guy Gecht, Ray Rothrock and David Rubner serve as the other members of our
audit committee. The audit committee has adopted an audit committee charter as required by
the NASDAQ regulations.
The
audit committees duties include providing assistance to the board of directors in
fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting,
auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions. In this
respect the audit committee approves the services performed by our independent accountants
and reviews their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal
accounting controls. The audit committee also oversees the audits conducted by our
independent accountants and takes those actions, as it deems necessary to satisfy itself
that the accountants are independent of management. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the
audit committee also is required to monitor whether there are any deficiencies in the
administration of our company, including by consulting with the internal auditor, and to
review and approve related party transactions.
Compensation
committee
. Our compensation committee consists of Irwin Federman, Guy Gecht, and Ray
Rothrock. The compensation committees duties include making recommendations to the
board of directors regarding the issuance of employee equity incentives under our equity
incentive plans, and determining salaries and bonuses for some of our executive officers
and incentives for our other employees. The compensation committee has adopted a
compensation committee charter.
Nominating
committee
. The nominating committee identifies prospective board candidates,
recommends nominees for election to our board of directors, develops and recommends board
member selection criteria, considers committee member qualification, supervises the
selection and composition of committees of our board of directors, and provides oversight
in the evaluation of our board of directors and each committee. Our nominating committee
consists of Irwin Federman, Ray Rothrock, David Rubner, and Tal Shavit. The nominating
committee has adopted a nominating committee charter.
64
Employees
As
of December 31, 2008, we had 1,884 employees.
Over
the past three years, the number of our employees by function was as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and quality assurance
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
Marketing, sales and business development
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
Customer support
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
Information systems, administration, finance and operations
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
time to time, we also engage a limited number of consultants, subcontractors, and
temporary help. As of December 31, 2008, we had 82 people of this nature, as shown below:
Over
the past three years, the number of our employees by geographic area was as follows:
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
Rest of the World
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
are subject to Israeli labor laws and regulations with respect to our Israeli employees.
The Israeli labor laws differ materially from U.S. labor laws and, in some cases, impose
material obligations on us (such as severance pay and mandatory cost of living increases).
We are also subject to the labor laws and regulations of other jurisdictions in the world
where we have employees.
65
Share Ownership
The
following table shows information regarding beneficial ownership by our directors and
executive officers as of December 31, 2008. Beneficial ownership is determined in
accordance with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
All
information with respect to the beneficial ownership of any principal shareholder has been
furnished by such shareholder and, unless otherwise indicated below, we believe that
persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all
of the shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community property laws, where
applicable. The shares beneficially owned by the directors include the shares owned by
their family members to which such directors disclaim beneficial ownership.
The
share numbers and percentages listed below are based on 210,042,282 shares outstanding as
of December 31, 2008.
Name
|
Number of
shares
beneficially
owned (1)
|
% of
class of
shares (2)
|
Title of
securities
covered by the
options
|
Number of
options (3)
|
Exercise price
|
Date of expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gil Shwed
|
|
|
|
34,314,442
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
9,352,150
|
|
$13.00 - $26.99
|
|
|
06/25/2009-09/03/2014
|
|
|
Marius Nacht (4)
|
|
|
|
20,253,945
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
1,752,149
|
|
$13.00 - $26.99
|
|
|
06/25/2009-09/26/2012
|
|
|
All directors and officers
|
|
|
as a group (11 persons
|
|
|
including Messrs. Shwed and
|
|
|
Nacht) (5)
|
|
|
|
56,652,791
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
13,092,049
|
|
$13.00 - $79.79
|
|
|
06/25/2009-09/03/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
number of ordinary shares shown includes shares that each shareholder has
the right to acquire pursuant to stock options that are exercisable
within 60 days after December 31, 2008 (as determined in accordance
with footnote (3)).
|
(2)
|
If
a shareholder has the right to acquire shares by exercising stock options (as
determined in accordance with footnote (3)), these shares are deemed
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage owned by the
specific shareholder (that is, they are included in both the
numerator and the denominator), but they are disregarded for the
purpose of computing the percentage owned by any other shareholder.
|
(3)
|
Number
of options immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days from
December 31, 2008. The exercise price of some of these options is
greater than our current share market price.
|
(4)
|
In
addition to the amount above for which Mr. Nacht claims beneficial ownership,
Mr. Nacht is the beneficiary of a trust that holds 2,000,000 shares.
The trust, which was initially established in May 2005, is
irrevocable and is currently scheduled to expire in May 2009. Mr.
Nacht does not control the trust and has limited access to
information concerning activities and holdings of the trust. Mr.
Nacht disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in the trust.
|
(5)
|
Each
of Messrs. Ungerman, Payne, Chelouche, Federman, Gecht, Propper, Rothrock,
Rubner and Dr. Shavit beneficially owns less than one percent of our
outstanding ordinary shares.
|
66
Equity Incentive Plans
The
following table summarizes our equity incentive plans as of December 31, 2008:
Plan
|
Share
reserved
|
Option and
RSUs grants
net *
|
Outstanding
options and RSUs
|
Options
outstanding
exercise price
|
Date of expiration
|
Options and
RSUs exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
26,000,000
|
|
|
1,615,920
|
|
|
1,405,063
|
|
$
|
16.80-$24.01
|
|
|
09/26/2012-09/03/2015
|
|
|
596,206
|
|
2005 Israel Equity
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
39,000,000
|
|
|
7,523,216
|
|
|
7,162,988
|
|
$
|
16.80-$24.01
|
|
|
09/26/2012-09/03/2015
|
|
|
2,259,207
|
|
1996 United States
|
|
|
Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
41,131,261
|
|
|
41,131,261
|
|
|
1,834,321
|
|
$
|
13.02-$79.79
|
|
|
01/14/2009-07/24/2012
|
|
|
1,791,303
|
|
1996 Israel Stock
|
|
|
Option Plan
|
|
|
|
37,067,781
|
|
|
37,067,781
|
|
|
12,301,329
|
|
$
|
13.00-$44.42
|
|
|
01/13/2009-09/26/2012
|
|
|
9,735,240
|
|
Zone Labs 1998 Stock
|
|
|
Option Plan
|
|
|
|
2,461,943
|
|
|
2,461,943
|
|
|
72,408
|
|
$
|
1.66-$6.08
|
|
|
08/29/2009-02/16/2014
|
|
|
72,408
|
|
Employee Stock
|
|
|
Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
2,982,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pointsec Stock Option
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
496,265
|
|
|
496,265
|
|
|
203,622
|
|
$
|
5.91-$19.45
|
|
|
05/13/2011-02/28/2012
|
|
|
174,152
|
|
* Grants net is
calculated by subtracting options expired or forfeited.
In
2005, we adopted the following two new equity incentive plans: our 2005 United States
Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2005 U.S. Plan; and our 2005 Israel Equity
Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2005 Israel Plan. Both of these plans are in
effect until 2015. Following ratification of the new plans by our shareholders in
September 2005, we stopped issuing options under our 1996 United States Stock Option Plan
and 1996 Israel Stock Option Plan.
Number
of ordinary shares reserved for future grants under 2005 plans
We
initially reserved a total of 50,000,000 ordinary shares for future grants under the 2005
U.S. plan and the 2005 Israel plan (specifically, 20,000,000 ordinary shares under the
2005 U.S. Plan, and 30,000,000 ordinary shares under the 2005 Israel Plan). These are in
addition to the shares issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding under our 1996
United States Stock Option Plan, our 1996 Israel Stock Option Plan, the Zone Labs 1998
Stock Option Plan, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and Pointsec Mobile Technologies
2003, 2005 and 2006 Stock Option Plans, which are described in greater detail below. Since
January 2006, this number increases automatically by an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares a
year for both plans combined, of which 2,000,000 ordinary shares are added each January
1
st
to the number of shares reserved under the 2005 U.S. Plan, and 3,000,000
ordinary shares are added each January 1
st
to the number of shares reserved
under the 2005 Israel Plan.
Any
ordinary shares subject to awards under our 2005 U.S. Plan or 2005 Israel Plan are
deducted from the number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under that plan. If any
ordinary shares are issued as Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), or
Performance Shares under our 2005 U.S. Plan or 2005 Israel Plan, and they have a per share
or unit purchase price lower than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant,
twice this number of ordinary shares is deducted from the number of ordinary shares
reserved for issuance under that plan. Shares that are issued pursuant to any award under
our 2005 U.S. Plan or 2005 Israel Plan are not returned to the plan. However, if an award
under our 2005 U.S. Plan or 2005 Israel Plan expires or becomes unexercisable without
having been exercised in full, or is forfeited, or repurchased by us at its original price
due to the failure to vest, the shares which were subject to the award, become available
for future grant or sale under that plan.
67
As
of December 31, 2008, we had granted options to purchase an aggregate of 8,568,690
ordinary shares under the 2005 U.S. Plan and the 2005 Israel Plan combined, of which
options to purchase 7,169,999 ordinary shares were outstanding on that date. The option
exercise prices range between $16.80 and $24.01 per share. As of December 31, 2008, we had
granted an aggregate of 2,306,227 RSUs under the 2005 U.S. Plan and the 2005 Israel Plan
combined, of which 1,398,052 RSUs were outstanding on that date.
Administration
Both
the 2005 U.S. Plan and the 2005 Israel Plan are administered by our board of directors or
a committee of our board. The compensation committee of our board of directors currently
operates as the administrator of the plans. The administrator has full power to determine
the persons to whom awards shall be granted and the other terms of the awards granted,
including (a) the number of shares subject to each award, (b) the duration of the related
award agreement, (c) the time, manner and form of payment upon the exercise of an award,
and (d) other terms and provisions governing the awards. The administrator also
establishes the vesting schedule of awards that are granted.
2005
United States Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
. The
2005 U.S. Plan provides for the following kinds of awards, which we refer to
generically as awards: (i) Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), (ii) Non-statutory
Stock Options (NSOs), (iii) Restricted Stock, (iv) Restricted Stock Units
(RSUs), (v) Performance Shares, (vi) Performance Units, and (vii) Deferred
Stock Units. All of these awards can vest based on time or performance
milestones.
Granting
of options, price and duration
.
Our 2005 U.S. Plan provides that each option
will expire on the date stated in the notice of grant, which will not be more than seven
years from its date of grant (or five years, in the case of an ISO granted to a person who
on the date of grant owns 10% or more of our voting power). The exercise price of an
option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant
(or 110% of the fair market value, in the case of an ISO granted to a person who on the
date of grant owns 10% or more of our voting power). The administrator will fix the period
within which the award can be exercised and the exercise price. No award can vest until at
least six months after the grant date.
Granting
of awards other than options and price
.
The administrator can determine the
conditions that must be satisfied, which typically will be based principally or solely on
the recipients continuing to provide services to us, but conditions may also include
a performance-based component. We can issue ordinary shares under grants of Restricted
Stock, RSUs, Performance Shares and Performance Units upon payment of their nominal value.
No award can vest until at least one year after the grant date. Deferred Stock Units
consist of Restricted Stock, RSUs, Performance Shares or Performance Units that the
administrator permits to be paid out in installments or on a deferred basis.
68
2005
Israel Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
. The
2005 Israel Plan provides for the following kinds of awards, which we refer to
generically as awards: (i) Approved 102 Options/Shares, which are
grants to employees and officers that are eligible for favorable tax treatment
in Israel and which must be held by a trustee for a minimum period; (ii) Non-approved
102 Options/Shares, which are grants of options or shares that are not
eligible for favorable tax treatment in Israel and which may be held, directly
by the participants; (iii) Restricted Stock; (iv) RSUs; (v) Performance Shares;
(vi) Performance Units; and (vii) Deferred Stock Units. All of these awards can
vest based on time or performance milestones, or through other subsidiaries.
Trustee
.
A trustee designated by our board of directors and approved by the Israel Tax
Authority must hold any shares allocated or issued upon exercise of Approved
102 Options or other shares subsequently received following any realization of
rights, including bonus shares (stock dividends), for at least the period of
time specified by Section 102 of Israels Income Tax Ordinance.
Granting
of options, price and duration
.
Our 2005 Israel Plan provides that each option
will expire on the date stated in the option agreement, which will not be more than seven
years from its date of grant. The exercise price of an option cannot be less than 100% of
the fair market value per share on the date of grant. The administrator will fix the
period within which the award can be exercised and the exercise price. No option can vest
until at least six months after the grant date.
Granting
of awards, other than options, and price
.
The administrator can determine the
conditions that must be satisfied, which typically will be based principally or solely on
the recipients continuing to provide services to us, but conditions may also include
a performance-based component. We can issue ordinary shares under grants of Restricted
Stock, RSUs, Performance Shares and Performance Units upon payment of their nominal value.
No award can vest until at least one year after the grant date. Deferred Stock Units
consist of Restricted Stock, RSUs, Performance Shares, or Performance Units that the
administrator permits to be paid out in installments or on a deferred basis.
Change
of control arrangements
. Upon a change of control of us, if the successor entity
refuses to assume or provide substitute awards, then the administrator of the plans, which
is currently the compensation committee of our board of directors, can either terminate
all unvested awards or accelerate the vesting period of any award under our 2005 U.S. Plan
and our 2005 Israel Plan. The administrator also has the authority to accelerate the
vesting of the ordinary shares subject to outstanding awards held by our directors,
officers, and employees in connection with the subsequent termination of some
officers employment following a change of control event.
1996
United States Stock Option Plan and 1996 Israel Stock Option Plan
As
of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding options to acquire an aggregate of 14,135,650
ordinary shares under our 1996 United States Stock Option Plan and 1996 Israel Stock
Option Plan combined. The option exercise prices range between $13.00 and $79.79
per share. We do not issue any more stock options under our 1996 United States Stock
Option Plan and 1996 Israel Stock Option Plan.
69
Zone
Labs 1998 Stock Option Plan
In
connection with our acquisition of Zone Labs in March 2004, we assumed all of the
outstanding Zone Labs stock options under the Zone Labs 1998 Stock Option Plan, which were
converted into options to purchase approximately 2.8 million of our ordinary shares. As of
December 31, 2008, 2,389,535 ordinary shares had been issued under the Zone Labs 1998
Stock Option Plan, and options to purchase 72,408 ordinary shares were outstanding on that
date. The stock options generally have terms of between five and ten years and generally
vest over a four-year period. The option exercise prices range between $1.66 and $6.08 per
share. No further stock options can be granted under the Zone Labs 1998 Stock Option Plan.
Protect
Data Stock Option Plans
In
connection with our acquisition of Protect Data in 2007, we assumed all of the outstanding
options to purchase shares of Protect Data issued under the Pointsec Mobile Technologies
2003, 2005 and 2006 Stock Option Plans, which were converted into options to purchase
751,769 of our ordinary shares. As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding options to
acquire an aggregate of 203,622 ordinary shares under these plans combined.
The
options generally have terms of between five and six years and they generally vest over a
three-year period. The option exercise prices range between $5.91 and $19.45 per share. No
further stock options can be granted under these plans.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In
1996, we adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which we refer to as the
ESPP. The ESPP permits our full-time employees (and full-time employees of
some of our subsidiaries) to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions. Under
the ESPP, 6,000,000 ordinary shares were authorized for issuance. As of January 30, 2009,
3,218,322 ordinary shares had been issued under the ESPP. The ESPP has six-month offering
periods, with purchases occurring in January and July. The compensation committee of our
board of directors administers the ESPP. According to our shareholders resolution at
our annual meeting of shareholders, held in September 2005, the ESPP will terminate on the
earliest of (i) the last business day in January 2016, (ii) when no more shares are
available for issuance under the ESPP, or (iii) when all purchase rights under the ESPP
are granted or exercised in connection with a Corporate Transaction as defined
in the ESPP.
An
eligible employee can purchase ordinary shares at a price of 85% of the fair market value
of the ordinary shares at the beginning of the six-month offering period (or 85% of the
fair market value of the ordinary shares on the semi-annual purchase date, if that is
lower). Each eligible employee can elect to purchase ordinary shares under the ESPP in an
amount of up to 15% of the employees compensation, but not more than 1,250 shares
per participant on any purchase date. Employees may terminate their participation in the
ESPP at any time during the offering period, and participation ends automatically on
termination of employment with us. Each outstanding purchase right will be exercised
immediately prior to our merger or consolidation with another company. Our board of
directors may amend or terminate the ESPP immediately after the close of any purchase
date. The board may not, unless shareholders approve, materially increase the number of
ordinary shares available for issuance, reduce the purchase price payable for ordinary
shares, or materially modify the eligibility requirements for participation or the
benefits available to participants.
70
ITEM 7.
|
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The
following table shows information as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, for each person
who, to the best of our knowledge, beneficially owned more than 5% of our outstanding
ordinary shares as of December 31, 2008:
Name of Five Percent Shareholders
|
No. of shares
beneficially
held (1)
|
% of class of
shares (2)
|
No. of shares
beneficially
held (1)
|
% of class
of shares
(2)
|
No. of shares
beneficially
held (1)
|
% of class
of shares (2)
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
December 31, 2007
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gil Shwed
|
|
|
|
31,707,476
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
33,309,822
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
34,314,442
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Franklin Resources, Inc. (3)
|
|
|
|
34,688,010
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
34,573,925
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
23,253,624
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Marius Nacht (4)
|
|
|
|
20,851,795
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
20,851,795
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
20,253,945
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,049,274
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Friess Associates LLC (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,965,600
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
amount includes ordinary shares owned by each of the individuals, directly
or indirectly, and options immediately exercisable or that are
exercisable within 60 days from December 31
st
, of each of
the years shown in this table. The exercise price of some of these
options is greater than our current share market price.
|
(2)
|
If
a shareholder has the right to acquire shares by exercising stock options
exercisable within 60 days from December 31
st
, of each of
the years shown in this table, these shares are deemed outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage owned by the specific
shareholder (that is, they are included in both the numerator and the
denominator), but they are disregarded for the purpose of computing
the percentage owned by any other shareholder.
|
(3)
|
As
of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, based on information contained in a
Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 5, 2007, Franklin Resources,
Inc., Charles B. Johnson, Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., Templeton Global
Advisors Limited, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC, Franklin
Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Management
Limited, Franklin Templeton Portfolio Advisors, Inc., Templeton Asset
Management, Ltd., Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited,
Franklin Templeton Investments Australia Limited, Franklin Templeton
Investments Japan Limited and Franklin Templeton Alternative
Strategies, Inc. disclaim any pecuniary interest in any of the
securities. In the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 7, 2008, Franklin
Resources, Inc., Charles B. Johnson, Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.,
Templeton Global Advisors Limited, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC,
Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Portfolio
Advisors, Inc., Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited,
Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited, Franklin Advisors,
Inc., Franklin Templeton Investments Australia Limited, Templeton
Asset Management, Ltd. and Franklin Templeton Investments Japan
Limited disclaim any pecuniary interest in any of the securities. In
the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 6, 2009, Franklin Resources,
Inc., Charles B. Johnson, Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., Templeton
Investment Counsel, LLC, Templeton Global Advisors Limited, Franklin
Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Portfolio Advisors,
Inc., Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited, Franklin
Templeton Investment Management Limited, Franklin Templeton
Investments Australia Limited, Franklin Advisors, Inc., Templeton
Asset Management, Ltd. and Fiduciary Trust Company International
disclaim any pecuniary interest in any of the securities. The address
for Franklin Resources, Inc. is One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo,
California 94403.
|
(4)
|
In
addition to the amount above for which Mr. Nacht claims beneficial ownership,
Mr. Nacht is the beneficiary of a trust that holds 2,000,000 shares.
The trust, which was initially established in May 2005, is
irrevocable and is currently scheduled to expire in May 2009. Mr.
Nacht does not control the trust and has limited access to
information concerning activities and holdings of the trust. Mr.
Nacht disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in the trust.
|
(5)
|
As
of December 31, 2008, based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed
jointly by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and RiverSource Investments,
LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2009.
Based on information available to us, as of December 31, 2006 and
2007, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. did not beneficially own more than
5% of our outstanding ordinary shares. The address for the parties is
c/o Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 145 Ameriprise Financial Center,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474.
|
(6)
|
As
of December 31, 2008, based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2009.
Based on information available to us, as of December 31, 2006 and
2007, Friess Associates LLC did not beneficially own more than 5% of
our outstanding ordinary shares. The address for Friess Associates
LLC is 115 E. Snow King, Jackson, Wyoming 83001.
|
71
Our
major shareholders do not have different voting rights from other shareholders with
respect to our ordinary shares.
According
to our transfer agent, as of December 31, 2008, there were 219 holders of record of our
ordinary shares in the United States, representing approximately 64% of our outstanding
shares. The number of record holders in the United States is not representative of
the number of beneficial holders nor is it representative of where such beneficial holders
are resident since many of these ordinary shares were held by brokers or other nominees.
We
are not controlled by another corporation or by any foreign government, directly or
through any other entity. Each of our outstanding ordinary shares has identical rights in
all respects.
As
of December 31, 2006, we had employee and payroll accrual for related parties, for the
years 1999 through 2006, in a total amount of $8.9 million. As of December 31, 2007, this
accrual decreased to a total of $7.9 million, for the years 1999 through 2007. As of
December 31, 2008, this accrual decreased to a total of $5.6 million, for the years 2001
through 2007.
ITEM 8.
|
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Consolidated Financial
Statements
You
can find our financial statements in Item 18 Financial Statements.
Dividend
policy
. Out of our retained earnings of $2,622 million as of December 31, 2008,
approximately $1,054 million are from tax-exempt income because they are attributable to
our facilities status as Approved Enterprises and Privileged Enterprises under the
Investment Law. Our board of directors has currently resolved not to distribute any
dividend from our undistributed tax-exempt income. The undistributed tax-exempt income is
currently expected to be essentially permanent by reinvesting.
Legal Proceedings
We
operate our business in various countries, and accordingly attempt to utilize an efficient
operating model to optimize our tax payments based on the laws in the countries in which
we operate. This can cause disputes between us and various tax authorities in different
parts of the world.
72
In
particular, following audits of our 2002 and 2003 corporate tax
returns, the Israeli Tax Authority (the ITA) issued
orders challenging our positions on several issues, including matters such as
the usage of funds earned by our approved enterprise for investments outside of
Israel, deductibility of employee stock options expenses, percentage of foreign
ownership of our shares, taxation of interest earned outside of Israel and deductibility
of research and development expenses. The largest amount in dispute relates to the
treatment of investment income on cash that is held and managed by our wholly-owned
Singapore subsidiary, which the ITA is seeking to tax in Israel. In an
additional challenge to this amount, the ITA reclassified the transfer of funds from
Check Point to our subsidiary in Singapore as a dividend for purposes of the Law for the
Encouragement of Capital Investments, which would result in tax on the funds
transferred. The ITA orders also contest our positions on various other
issues. The ITA, therefore, demanded the payment of additional taxes in the aggregate
amount of NIS 963 million with respect to 2002 (assessment received on December 27,
2007) and NIS 151 million with respect to 2003 (assessment received on May 29,
2008), in each case including interest as of the assessment date. We have
appealed the orders relating to both years with the Tel-Aviv District Court, and these
appeals are pending. There can be no assurance that the ITA will accept our positions on
these matters or others and, in such an event, we may record additional tax expenses if
these matters are settled for amounts in excess of our current provisions.
Further,
we have also been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Information Protection and
Authentication of Texas, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas on
December 30, 2008. The plaintiffs original complaint in the lawsuit alleges
infringement by us of U.S. patents nos. 5,311,591 and 5,412,717 and seeks an
injunction and an unspecified amount of damages. We currently intend to
vigorously defend against plaintiffs claims, but cannot assure you of the outcome of
this litigation.
In
addition, we are currently engaged in various legal disputes with two minority
shareholders of our subsidiary SofaWare Technologies Ltd. One of these shareholders is
alleging we are oppressing him as a minority shareholder, and he is seeking to compel us
to purchase his shares. He is valuing his shares at NIS 16 million, subject to change. The
other minority shareholder claims that he and other minority shareholders are entitled to
exercise veto rights with respect to certain actions of SofaWare. The same shareholder
also filed a derivative claim against us on behalf of SofaWare. On February 14, 2008, the
court partially accepted the derivative claim and ordered that we pay SofaWare NIS 13
million plus interest. Both parties have appealed this ruling. We are also engaged in
additional litigation with these two minority shareholders. We believe that the claims
filed by these two minority shareholders are without merit and intend to contest these
claims vigorously.
73
ITEM 9.
|
|
THE OFFER AND LISTING
|
Our
ordinary shares are traded publicly on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
CHKP.
The
following table lists the high and low prices of the ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market for the periods indicated:
|
High
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
27.16
|
|
$
|
16.46
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
|
|
19.57
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
|
16.27
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
26.79
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
25.81
|
|
|
16.80
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
|
25.03
|
|
|
21.17
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
|
24.90
|
|
|
21.34
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
|
25.99
|
|
|
21.78
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
|
26.79
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
|
24.25
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
|
25.81
|
|
|
20.84
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
|
25.74
|
|
|
21.32
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
16.80
|
|
|
|
|
Most recent six months
|
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
|
25.29
|
|
|
21.32
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
16.80
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
|
20.90
|
|
|
18.03
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
|
20.20
|
|
|
17.74
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
|
23.35
|
|
|
18.94
|
|
February 2009
|
|
|
|
23.55
|
|
|
21.36
|
|
March 2009 (through March 2, 2009)
|
|
|
|
22.14
|
|
|
21.20
|
|
|
|
|
On
March 2, 2009, the last reported sale price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market was $21.36 per share.
ITEM 10.
|
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
We
were incorporated in Israel in July 1993, and we are registered with the Israeli Registrar
of Companies as public company number 52-004282-1.
The
objectives and purposes stated in our memorandum of association are to engage in any
lawful activity. We develop market and support a wide range of software and combined
hardware and software products and services for IT security, and offer our customers an
extensive portfolio of network security, endpoint security, data security and management,
Firewall and VPN solutions. A broad range of our network security solutions operate under
a unified security architecture, with central management and enforcement of security
policy, and with centralized real-time security updates. Our products and services are
sold to enterprises, service providers, small and medium-sized businesses and consumers.
74
Articles of Association
and Israeli Companies Law
The
following is a summary of the material provisions of our articles of association and
related provisions of Israeli corporate law. For the complete text of our articles of
association, see Item 19 Exhibits.
Description
of shares
Our
authorized share capital consists of the following: (i) 500,000,000 ordinary shares, NIS
0.01 nominal value; (ii) 5,000,000 preferred shares, NIS 0.01 nominal value; and (iii) 10
deferred shares, NIS 1 nominal value. On December 31, 2008, we had 210,042,282 ordinary
shares outstanding, and on January 1, 2008, we had 218,553,498 ordinary shares
outstanding. During 2008, we issued 2,402,792 ordinary shares from our treasury account,
all pursuant to equity incentive plans. On December 31, 2008, we held 51,181,688 ordinary
shares in our treasury. No preferred shares are outstanding. We have 1 deferred share
issued and outstanding, which is not entitled to any rights other than the right to
receive its nominal value upon our liquidation.
Description
of ordinary shares
All
of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares are validly issued, fully paid, and
non-assessable. The ordinary shares do not have pre-emptive rights. Our memorandum of
association, our articles of association, and Israeli law do not restrict in any way the
ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel, except with respect
to citizens of countries that are in a state of war with Israel.
Dividend
and liquidation rights
. The holders of our ordinary shares will be entitled to their
proportionate share of any cash dividend, share dividend, or dividend in kind distributed
with respect to our ordinary shares. This right may be changed if shares with special
dividend rights are authorized in the future. Under the Israeli Companies Law, we may
declare dividends out of the higher of retained earnings and earnings generated over the
two most recent years (the profits test), in either case, provided that our board of
directors reasonably believes that the dividend will not render us unable to meet our
current or foreseeable obligations when due (the solvency test). Even if we do not comply
with the profits test, a court may allow us to distribute a dividend as long as the court
is convinced that the solvency test is fulfilled.
Our
articles of association provide that the board of directors may declare and distribute
interim dividends without the approval of the shareholders. Shareholder approval is
required for the payment of a final dividend proposed by the board of directors, but
shareholders cannot approve a final dividend that is greater than the boards
proposal. In addition, once an interim dividend has been declared and paid, it cannot be
affected by any subsequent resolution of the shareholders or the shareholders
failure to approve a final dividend.
In
the event of our liquidation, holders of our ordinary shares have the equal right to
participate in the distribution of assets remaining after payment of liabilities. This
right may be changed if shares with special liquidation or dividend rights are issued in
the future.
Voting,
shareholder meetings and resolutions
. Holders of ordinary shares have one vote for
each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. This right
may be changed if shares with special voting rights are issued in the future.
75
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, we must hold an annual meeting of our shareholders once every
calendar year and not more than 15 months from the date of the previous annual
shareholders meeting. The board of directors determines the location of the meeting,
which can be in Israel or elsewhere. In addition, our board of directors may, in its
discretion, convene additional meetings as special shareholders
meetings. The board of directors is also required to convene a special
shareholders meeting upon the demand of any of the following: (i) two directors;
(ii) one quarter of the directors in office; (iii) the holder or holders of 5% of our
outstanding share capital and 1% of our voting power; or (iv) the holder or holders of 5%
of our voting power. Our articles of association provide that each shareholder of record
is entitled to receive prior notice of any shareholders meeting in accordance with
the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law. The law currently provides for at least 21
days notice, with certain specified matters requiring at least 35 days notice.
For purposes of determining the shareholders entitled to notice and to vote at such
meeting, the board of directors may fix a record date, which shall be between 4 and 40
days prior to the date of the meeting.
The
quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders
present in person or by proxy and holding more than 50% of the voting power. The chairman
of the board of directors presides at each of our shareholders meetings. The
chairman of the meeting does not have an additional or casting vote. A meeting adjourned
for lack of a quorum will be adjourned to the same day in the following week, at the same
time and place, or to the day, time and place that the chairman determines, with the
consent of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and
voting on the question of adjournment. At the reconvened meeting, the required quorum
consists of any two shareholders, regardless of the number of shares they hold or
represent.
The
Israeli Companies Law requires that shareholders approve certain transactions, actions and
arrangements, as described below under the caption Approval of certain transactions;
obligations of directors, officers and shareholders.
Shareholders
resolutions will be deemed adopted if approved by the holders of a majority of the voting
power voting at a shareholders meeting, except for the following decisions which
require a different majority:
|
(1)
|
A
special or extraordinary resolution (such as a resolution amending our
memorandum of association or articles of association). A majority of at
least 75% of the shares voting on the matter is needed.
|
|
(2)
|
A
voluntary liquidation process or a merger. A majority of at least 75% of the
shares voting on the matter is needed.
|
|
(3)
|
A
compromise or arrangement between us and our creditors or shareholders,
reorganization, stock split or reverse split. This has to be approved by a
majority in the number of the persons participating in the vote (except
for those abstaining) who together hold at least 75% of the value
represented at the vote. In addition, court approval is needed.
|
|
(4)
|
The
nomination and dismissal of outside directors. Outside directors may be
elected or removed by a majority vote at a shareholders meeting, as
long as either:
|
|
(i)
|
The
majority of shares includes at least one-third of the shares of
non-controlling shareholders voted at the meeting, or
|
|
(ii)
|
The
total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders voted against the
proposal does not exceed 1% of our aggregate voting rights.
|
76
|
(5)
|
Extraordinary
transactions with a controlling shareholder (i.e., any shareholder that
has the ability to direct our actions, including any shareholder who holds
25% or more of our voting rights if no other shareholder owns more than
50% of our voting rights), with another person in which the controlling
shareholder has a personal interest; or a transaction with a controlling
shareholder (or a relative of such controlling shareholder) concerning
terms of compensation for service as an office holder. Following audit
committee and board of directors approval, these transactions must be
approved by a majority vote at a shareholders meeting, as long as
either:
|
|
(i)
|
The
majority of shares includes at least one-third of the shares of the voting
shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction, or
|
|
(ii)
|
The total
shareholdings of those who have no personal interest in the transaction and who vote
against the transaction does not exceed 1% of our aggregate voting rights.
|
Transfer
of shares
. Fully paid ordinary shares are issued in registered form and, subject to
applicable securities laws, may be transferred freely.
Election
of directors
. Our ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election
of directors. Therefore, the holders of shares representing more than 50% of the voting
rights at the shareholders meeting, voting in person or by proxy, have the power to
elect any or all of the directors whose positions are being filled at that meeting,
subject to the special approval requirements for outside directors described above.
Transfer
agent and registrar
. The transfer agent and registrar for our ordinary shares is
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, NY
10038 U.S.A., tel: 718-921-8124.
Description
of preferred shares
We
have 5,000,000 preferred shares authorized. Our articles of association provide that the
board of directors has the authority to issue the preferred shares in one or more series
and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred shares,
including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of
redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares
constituting any series, without further vote or action by the shareholders. If this
provision withstands judicial scrutiny under the Israeli Companies Law, the issuance of
preferred shares may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control of us without further action by the shareholders. For example, the board of
directors could issue preferred shares with voting and conversion rights that may
adversely affect the voting power of the holders of ordinary shares, including the loss of
voting control to others. We currently have no plans to issue any preferred shares.
Anti-takeover
measures
Some
of the provisions of our articles of association and Israeli law could, together or
separately:
|
n
|
Discourage
potential acquisition proposals,
|
|
n
|
Delay
or prevent a change in control,
|
|
n
|
Limit
the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for our ordinary shares.
|
77
Israeli
corporate law regulates acquisitions of shares through tender offers and mergers; requires
special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant
shareholders; and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of
transactions.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, in the case of a merger, the shareholders and board of
directors of each of the merging companies generally need to approve the merger. Shares
held in one of the merging companies by the other merging company (or certain of its
affiliates) are not counted toward the required approval. If a merging company has
different classes of shares, the approval of each class may be required. Under the Israeli
Companies Law, a merger of our company requires the approval of a supermajority of at
least 75% of our shares that are voted on the merger. A merger cannot be completed until
30 days have passed after shareholder approval of each of the merging companies, all
approvals have been submitted to the Israeli Registrar of Companies and 50 days have
passed from the time that a proposal for approval of the merger is filed with the
Registrar of Companies. In addition, a creditor can seek to block a merger on the ground
that the surviving company will not be able to meet its obligations.
The
Israeli Companies Law also provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company,
such as our company, must be made by means of a tender offer, if as a result of the
acquisition, the purchaser would become a 25% shareholder of the company (unless there is
another 25% shareholder of the company, or the shares are acquired from another 25%
shareholder). Similarly, the Israeli Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares
in a public company, such as our company, must be made by means of a tender offer, if as a
result of the acquisition the purchaser would hold more than 45% of the shares of the
company (unless there is another holder of more than 45% of the shares of the company, or
the shares are acquired from another holder of more than 45% of the shares of the
company). These rules do not apply if the acquisition takes the form of a merger.
Regulations
promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law provide that these tender offer requirements
do not apply to companies whose shares are listed for trading outside of Israel if,
according to the law in the country in which the shares are traded or the rules and
regulations of the stock exchange on which the shares are traded:
|
n
|
There
is a limitation on acquisition of any level of control of the company, or
|
|
n
|
The
acquisition of any level of control requires the purchaser to make a tender offer to the
public.
|
The
Israeli Companies Law provides specific rules and procedures for the acquisition of shares
held by minority shareholders if the majority shareholder holds more than 90% of the
outstanding shares. Israeli tax law treats specified acquisitions, including a
stock-for-stock swap between an Israeli company and a foreign company, less favorably than
does U.S. tax law.
In
addition, our articles of association contain certain provisions that may make it more
difficult to acquire us, such as the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred
shares, as described above under the caption Description of preferred shares.
Our
articles of association provide that we may not engage in any business combination with an
interested shareholder for a period of three years after the date that the shareholder
became an interested shareholder, unless:
|
n
|
Prior
to that date, the board of directors approved either the business combination or the
transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder; or
|
78
|
n
|
Upon
consummation of the transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested
shareholder, the interested shareholder owned at least 75% of our voting shares
outstanding at the time the transaction commenced.
|
A
business combination includes:
|
n
|
Any
merger or consolidation between the interested shareholder and us;
|
|
n
|
Any
sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of our assets in a transaction
involving the interested shareholder;
|
|
n
|
Subject
to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in our issuance or transfer of any of
our shares to the interested shareholder;
|
|
n
|
Any
transaction in which we are involved that has an effect of increasing the proportionate
share of our shares, of any class or series, beneficially owned by the interested
shareholder; or
|
|
n
|
The
receipt by the interested shareholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees,
pledges, or other financial benefits provided by or through us.
|
In
general, the articles of association define an interested shareholder as any entity or
person that beneficially owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting shares and any entity
or person affiliated with, controlling or controlled by such entity or person.
In
addition, our shareholders are not able to cumulate votes at a meeting, which may require
the acquirer to hold more shares to gain representation on the board of directors than if
cumulative voting were permitted.
Approval
of certain transactions; obligations of directors, officers and shareholders
Officers
and directors
. The Israeli Companies Law codifies the fiduciary duties that office
holders, which under the law, includes our directors and executive officers, owe to a
company.
Fiduciary
duties
. An office holders fiduciary duties consist of a duty of loyalty and a
duty of care. The duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and for
the benefit of the company, including to avoid any conflict of interest between the office
holders position in the company and personal affairs, and proscribes any competition
with the company or the exploitation of any business opportunity of the company in order
to receive personal advantage for himself or herself or for others. This duty also
requires an office holder to reveal to the company any information or documents relating
to the companys affairs that the office holder has received due to his or her
position as an office holder. A company may approve any of the acts mentioned above;
provided, however, that all the following conditions apply: the office holder acted in
good faith; neither the act nor the approval of the act prejudices the good of the
company; and the office holder disclosed the essence of his or her personal interest in
the act, including any substantial fact or document, in a reasonable time before the date
for discussion of the approval. The duty of care requires an office holder to act with a
level of care that a reasonable office holder in the same position would employ under the
same circumstances. This includes the duty to use reasonable means to obtain information
regarding the advisability of a given action submitted for his or her approval or
performed by virtue of his or her position and all other relevant information material to
these actions.
Compensation
.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the compensation arrangements for officers who
are not directors require the approval of the board of directors, unless the
articles of association provide otherwise. Arrangements regarding the
compensation of directors require the approval of the audit committee, the
board, and the shareholders, in that order.
79
Disclosure
of personal interest
. The Israeli Companies Law requires that an office holder
promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have and all
related material information or documents known to him or her, in connection with any
existing or proposed transaction by the company. Personal interest, as defined
by the Israeli Companies Law, includes a personal interest of any person in an act or
transaction of the company, including a personal interest of his relative or of a
corporation (i) in which that person or a relative of that person is a 5% or greater
shareholder, a holder of 5% or more of the voting rights, or a director or general
manager, or (ii) in which he or she has the right to appoint at least one director or the
general manager. Personal interest does not apply to a personal interest
stemming merely from holding shares in the company.
The
office holder must immediately make the disclosure of his or her personal interest and no
later than the first meeting of the companys board of directors that discusses the
particular transaction. This duty does not apply to the personal interest of a relative of
the office holder in a transaction unless it is an extraordinary transaction.
The Israeli Companies Law defines an extraordinary transaction as a
transaction that is not in the ordinary course of business of a company, or that is not on
market terms, or which is likely to have a material impact on the companys
profitability, assets or liabilities. The Israeli Companies Law defines a
relative as a spouse, sibling, parent, grandparent, descendent, spouses
descendant, and the spouse of any of the foregoing.
Approvals
.
The Israeli Companies Law provides that a transaction with an office holder or
a transaction in which an office holder has a personal interest requires board
approval, unless the transaction is an extraordinary transaction or the
articles of association provide otherwise. The transaction may not be approved
if it is adverse to the companys interest. If the transaction is an
extraordinary transaction, or if it concerns exculpation, indemnification or
insurance of an office holder, then the approval of the companys audit
committee and the board of directors is required. Exculpation, indemnification,
insurance or compensation of a director also requires shareholder approval. A
director who has a personal interest in a matter that is considered at a
meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee generally may not
attend that meeting or vote on that matter, unless a majority of the board of
directors or the audit committee also has a personal interest in the matter. If
a majority of the board of directors has a personal interest in the
transaction, all directors may attend that meeting and vote, and a shareholder
approval also would be required.
Shareholders
.
The Israeli Companies Law imposes the same disclosure requirements described
above on a controlling shareholder of a public company that it imposes on an
office holder. For this purpose, a controlling shareholder is any
shareholder who has the ability to direct the companys actions, including
any shareholder holding 25% or more of the voting rights, if no other
shareholder owns more than 50% of the voting rights in the company. Two or more
shareholders with a personal interest in the approval of the same transaction
are deemed to be one shareholder.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to act in good faith toward the
company and other shareholders and refrain from abusing his or her power in the company,
including, among other things, voting in the general meeting of shareholders on the
following matters:
|
n
|
Any
amendment to the articles of association,
|
|
n
|
An
increase of the company's authorized share capital,
|
|
n
|
Approval
of interested party transactions that require shareholder approval.
|
80
In
addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who can determine the outcome of a
shareholder vote, and any shareholder who under the companys articles of association
can appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder, is under a duty to act with
fairness towards the company. The Israeli Companies Law provides that a breach of the duty
of fairness will be governed by the laws governing breach of contract. The Israeli
Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty.
Indemnification
and insurance of directors and officers; limitations on liability
Our
articles of association allow us to indemnify, exculpate and insure our office holders to
the fullest extent permitted under the Israeli Companies Law, provided that procuring this
insurance or providing this indemnification or exculpation is approved by the audit
committee and the board of directors, as well as by the shareholders if the office holder
is a director.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, we may indemnify an office holder for any of the
following liabilities or expenses that they may incur due to an act performed or failure
to act in his or her capacity as our office holder:
|
n
|
Monetary
liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party in a judgment, including
a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed by a court.
|
|
n
|
Reasonable
legal costs, including attorneys fees, expended by an office holder as a result of
an investigation or proceeding instituted against the office holder by a competent
authority, provided that such investigation or proceeding concludes without the filing of
an indictment against the office holder, and either:
|
|
|
No
financial liability was imposed on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings, or
|
|
|
Financial
liability was imposed on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings, but the
alleged criminal offense does not require proof of criminal intent.
|
|
n
|
Reasonable
legal costs, including attorneys fees, expended by the office holder or for which
the office holder is charged by a court:
|
|
|
In
an action brought against the office holder by us, on our behalf or on behalf of a third
party,
|
|
|
In
a criminal action in which the office holder is found innocent, or
|
|
|
In
a criminal action in which the office holder is convicted, but in which proof of criminal
intent is not required.
|
A
company may indemnify an office holder in respect of these liabilities either in advance
of an event or following an event. If a company undertakes to indemnify an office holder
in advance of an event, the indemnification, other than litigation expenses, must be
limited to foreseeable events in light of the companys actual activities when the
company undertook such indemnification, and reasonable amounts or standards, as determined
by the board of directors.
A
company may obtain insurance for an office holder against liabilities incurred in his or
her capacity as an office holder. These liabilities include a breach of duty of care to
the company or a third party including a breach arising out of negligent conduct of the
office holder, a breach of duty of loyalty and any monetary liability imposed on the
office holder in favor of a third party. A company may also exculpate an office holder
from a breach of duty of care in advance of that breach. Our articles of association
provide for exculpation both in advance or retroactively, to the extent permitted under
Israeli law. A company may not exculpate an office holder from a breach of duty of loyalty
towards the company or from a breach of duty of care concerning dividend distribution or a
purchase of the companys shares by the company or other entities controlled by the
company.
81
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, a company may indemnify or insure an office holder against a
breach of duty of loyalty only to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith
and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not prejudice the company. In
addition, a company may not indemnify, insure or exculpate an office holder against a
breach of duty of care if committed intentionally or recklessly (excluding mere
negligence), or committed with the intent to derive an unlawful personal gain, or for a
fine or forfeit levied against the office holder in connection with a criminal offense.
Our
audit committee, board of directors and shareholders have resolved to indemnify our
directors and officers, to the extent permitted by law and by our articles of association,
for liabilities not covered by insurance, that are of certain enumerated types of events,
and subject to limitations as to amount.
We
have also entered into indemnification, insurance, and exculpation agreements with our
directors and officers undertaking to indemnify, insure, and exculpate them to the full
extent permitted by the Israeli Companies Law. The entry into such agreements received the
prior approval of our audit committee, board of directors and shareholders.
Borrowing
power: amendment of rights of ordinary shares
Our
articles of association grant broad powers to the board of directors to have us borrow,
repay borrowings, make guarantees, and grant security interests in borrowings. The rights
and provisions of the ordinary shares may be cancelled, added to, restricted, amended, or
otherwise altered with a vote of the holders of at least 75% of the outstanding ordinary
shares voting at a duly convened shareholders meeting.
Availability
of Annual Report on Form 20-F
In
accordance with our articles of association, we post our Annual Report on Form 20-F on our
Web site
(www.checkpoint.com
), rather than mail it to shareholders as required by
the NASDAQ rules.
NASDAQ Global Select
Market corporate governance rules
NASDAQ
Rule 4350(f) requires that an issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market should have
a quorum requirement that in no case be less than 33 1/3% of the outstanding shares of the
companys common voting stock. However, our articles of association, consistent with
the Israeli Companies Law, provide that the quorum requirements for an adjourned meeting
are the presence of a minimum of two shareholders present in person. Our quorum
requirements for an adjourned meeting do not comply with the requirements of Rule 4350(f)
and we instead follow our home country practice.
Material Contracts
In
March 2006, we purchased a building in Tel Aviv, Israel, for a total amount of $35.25
million. Additional payments in 2006, 2007 and 2008 for taxes related to the purchase and
for the building renovation totaled $3.58 million, $7.04 million and $2.61 million,
respectively. In May 2007, we relocated to our new international headquarters to the
building. For more information, please see Item 3 Information on Check Point
Property, plants and equipment. A translation of the agreement was filed as
Exhibit 4.11 to our 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F.
82
Israeli Taxation,
Foreign Exchange Regulation and Investment Programs
The
following is a summary of the principal Israeli tax laws applicable to us, the Israeli
Government programs from which we benefit, and Israeli foreign exchange regulations. This
section also contains a discussion of material Israeli tax consequences to our
shareholders who are not residents or citizens of Israel. This summary does not discuss
all aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of
his or her personal investment circumstances, or to some types of investors subject to
special treatment under Israeli law. Examples of investors subject to special treatment
under Israeli law include residents of Israel, traders in securities, or persons who own,
directly or indirectly, 10% or more of our outstanding voting capital, all of whom are
subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Some parts of this
discussion are based on new tax legislation that has not been subject to judicial or
administrative interpretation. The discussion should not be construed as legal or
professional tax advice and does not cover all possible tax consequences.
You
are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the Israeli and other tax consequences of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, including, in particular,
the effect of any non-Israeli, state or local taxes.
General
corporate tax structure in Israel
Israeli
companies were subject to corporate tax at the rate of 27% in 2008. Pursuant to tax reform
legislation that came into effect in 2005, the corporate tax rate is to undergo further
staged reductions to 25% by the year 2010. In order to implement these reductions, the
corporate tax rate is scheduled to decline to 26% in 2009 and 25% in 2010.
However,
as discussed below, the rate is effectively reduced for income derived from our Approved
Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise plans.
Law
for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959
Our
facilities in Israel have been granted Approved Enterprise status under the Law for the
Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959, commonly referred to as the Investment
Law. The Investment Law provides that capital investments in a production facility
(or other eligible assets) may be designated as an Approved Enterprise. Until 2005, the
designation required advance approval from the Investment Center of the Israel Ministry of
Industry, Trade and Labor. Each certificate of approval for an Approved Enterprise relates
to a specific investment program, delineated both by the financial scope of the investment
and by the physical characteristics of the facility or the asset.
Under
the Approved Enterprise programs, a company is eligible for governmental grants, but may
elect to receive an alternative package comprised of tax benefits (Alternative Track).
Under the alternative package, a companys undistributed income derived from an
Approved Enterprise is exempt from corporate tax for an initial period (two to ten years,
depending on the geographic location of the Approved Enterprise within Israel). The
exemption begins in the first year that the company realizes taxable income from the
Approved Enterprise.
After
expiration of the initial tax exemption period, the company is eligible for a reduced
corporate tax rate of 10% to 25% for the following five to eight years, depending on the
extent of foreign investment in the company (as shown in the table below). The benefits
period under Approved Enterprise status is limited to 12 years from completion of the
investment or commencement of production, or 14 years from the date of the approval,
whichever is earlier.
83
On
April 1, 2005, an amendment to the Investment Law came into effect. The amendment revised
the criteria for investments qualified to receive tax benefits. An eligible investment
program under the amendment will qualify for benefits as a Privileged Enterprise (rather
than the previous terminology of Approved Enterprise). Among other things, the amendment
provides tax benefits to both local and foreign investors and simplifies the approval
process. The period of tax benefits for a new Privileged Enterprise commences in the
Year of Commencement. This year is the later of (1) the year in which taxable
income is first generated by a company, or (2) a year selected by the company for
commencement, on the condition that the company meets certain provisions provided by the
Investment Law (Year of Election). The amendment does not apply to investment programs
approved prior to December 31, 2004. The new tax regime applies to new investment programs
only. Therefore, our four active Approved Enterprises will not be subject to the
provisions of the amendment.
The
tax benefits available under Approved Enterprise or Privileged Enterprise relate only to
taxable income attributable to the specific Approved Enterprise or Privileged Enterprise,
and our effective tax rate will be the result of a weighted combination of the applicable
rates.
Percent of
Foreign Ownership
|
Rate of
Reduced Tax
|
Reduced Tax Period
|
Tax Exemption Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-25%
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
25-49%
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
49-74%
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
74-90%
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
90-100%
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
mentioned above, currently, we have four active Approved Enterprise programs under the
Alternative Track of the Investment Law which entitle us to tax benefits. Our first and
second investment programs benefits period have ended and, therefore, are not entitled to
tax benefits. Currently, we have one Privileged Enterprise program. We have derived, and
expect to continue to derive, a substantial portion of our operating income from our
Approved Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise facilities. We are, therefore, eligible for
a tax exemption for a limited period on undistributed Approved Enterprise and Privileged
Enterprise income, and an additional subsequent period of reduced corporate tax rates
ranging between 10% and 25%, depending on the level of foreign ownership of our shares.
The tax benefits attributable to our current Approved Enterprises and Privileged
Enterprise are scheduled to expire in phases by 2017.
The
benefits available to an Approved Enterprise and a Privileged Enterprise are conditioned
upon terms stipulated in the Investment Law and the related regulations and the criteria
set forth in the applicable certificate of approval (for an Approved Enterprise). If we do
not fulfill these conditions, in whole or in part, the benefits can be cancelled and we
may be required to refund the amount of the benefits, linked to the Israeli consumer price
index plus interest. We believe that our Approved Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise
programs currently operate in compliance with all applicable conditions and criteria, but
we cannot assure you that they will continue to do so. However, we currently have disputes
with the Israeli Tax Authority (ITA) on matters such as the usage of funds
earned by our approved enterprise for investments outside of Israel, deductibility of
employees stock options expenses, percentage of foreign ownership of our shares, taxation
of interest earned outside of Israel and deductibility of research and development
expenses See Item 8 Financial Information under the caption Legal
Proceedings.
84
If
a company requested the alternative package of benefits for an Approved Enterprise under
the old law before the 2005 amendment, it was precluded from filing a Year of Election
notice for a Privileged Enterprise for three years after the year in which the Approved
Enterprise was activated (the Cooling Period). In November 2008, the law was
amended to shorten the Cooling Period to two years. Following the amendment, the Year of
Election for our first Privileged Enterprise is 2006.
If
a company distributes dividends from tax-exempt income, the company will be taxed on the
otherwise exempt income at the same reduced corporate tax rate that would have applied to
that income. Distribution of dividends derived from income that was taxed at reduced
rates, but not tax-exempt, does not result in additional tax consequences to the company.
Shareholders who receive dividends derived from Approved Enterprise or Privileged
Enterprise income are generally taxed at a rate of 15%, which is withheld and paid by the
company paying the dividend, if the dividend is distributed during the benefits period or
within the following 12 years (the limitation does not apply to a Foreign Investors
Company, which is a company that more than 25% of its shares owned by non-Israeli
residents).
The
amendment to the Investment Law treats the repurchase of shares out of Privileged
Enterprise tax exempt income as deem-dividend. Through December 31, 2008, we repurchased
65,775,732 ordinary shares in a total amount of $1,366,305. Our retained earnings
attributed to taxable income are higher than the total shares repurchased and, therefore,
should not trigger a deem-dividend event. See Annual Report (Purchases of Equity
Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers) and Note 12e to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information regarding our repurchase program.
As
a result of the 2005 amendment, tax-exempt income attributed to Privileged Enterprise will
subject us to taxes also upon complete liquidation. As of December 31, 2008, we generated
tax-exempt income in the amount of $297.7 million from our Privileged Enterprise.
Our
board of directors has determined that we will not distribute any amounts of our
tax-exempt income as dividend. We intend to reinvest our tax-exempt income. Accordingly,
no deferred income taxes have been provided on income attributable to our Approved
Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise programs as the undistributed tax-exempt income is
essentially permanent in duration.
Law
for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969
We
believe that we currently qualify as an Industrial Company within the meaning of the Law
for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969 (the Industrial Encouragement
Law). The Industrial Encouragement Law defines an Industrial Company as
a company that is resident in Israel and that derives at least 90% of its income in any
tax year, other than income from defense loans, capital gains, interest and dividends,
from an enterprise whose major activity in a given tax year is industrial production.
The
following are the principal corporate tax benefits that are available to an Industrial
Company:
|
n
|
Amortization
of the cost of purchased know-how and patents over an eight-year period for tax purposes.
|
|
n
|
Accelerated
depreciation rates on equipment and buildings.
|
|
n
|
Under
specified conditions, an election to file consolidated tax returns with related Israeli
Industrial Companies.
|
|
n
|
Expenses
related to a public offering are deductible in equal amounts over three years.
|
85
Eligibility
for the benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior
approval from any governmental authority. We cannot assure you that we qualify or will
continue to qualify as an Industrial Company or that the benefits described above will be
available in the future.
Foreign
Exchange Regulations
Under
the Foreign Exchange Regulations, an Israeli company calculates its tax liability in US
dollars according to certain orders. The tax liability, as calculated in US dollars is
translated into NIS according to the exchange rate as of December 31
st
of each
year.
Dividends,
if any, paid to the holders of our ordinary shares, and any amounts payable upon our
dissolution, liquidation or winding up, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of
our ordinary shares to an Israeli resident, may be paid in non-Israeli currency. If these
amounts are paid in Israeli currency, they may be converted into freely repatriable U.S.
dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion. In addition, the
statutory framework for the potential imposition of exchange controls has not been
eliminated, and may be restored at any time by administrative action.
Taxation
of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends
Under
Israeli tax law, a distribution of dividends from income attributable to an Approved
Enterprise or Privileged Enterprise will be subject to tax in Israel at the rate of 15%,
which is withheld and paid by the company paying the dividend, if the dividend is
distributed during the benefits period or within the following 12 years (this limitation
does not apply to a Foreign Investors Company). Any distribution of dividends from income
that is not attributable to an Approved Enterprise or Privileged Enterprise will be
subject to tax in Israel at the rate of 25%, except that dividends distributed to an
individual who is deemed a non-substantial shareholder will be subject to tax
at the rate of 20%.
Under
the United States-Israel tax treaty, the maximum tax on dividends paid to a holder of
ordinary shares who is a United States resident is 25%. Dividends received by a United
States company that holds at least 10% of our voting rights, will be subject to
withholding tax at the rate of 12.5%, provided that certain other conditions in the tax
treaty are met (or at the tax rate of 15% in respect of dividends paid from income
attributable to our Approved Enterprises or Privileged Enterprise). Dividends distributed
to other foreign shareholders may be subject to different withholding tax rates based on
the applicable tax treaty.
Capital
Gains Taxes Applicable to Non-Israeli Shareholders
Capital
gains from the sale of our ordinary shares by non-Israeli shareholders are exempt from
Israeli taxation under the Israeli domestic tax law, provided that the capital gain is not
derived from a permanent establishment in Israel. In addition, the United States-Israel
tax treaty exempts United States residents who hold less than 10% of our voting rights,
and who held less than 10% of our voting rights during the 12 months prior to a sale of
their shares, from Israeli capital gains tax in connection with such sale.
86
United States Federal
Income Tax Considerations
The
following discussion describes the material U.S. federal income tax considerations
relating to the ownership or disposition of our ordinary shares to a holder who is:
|
n
|
A
citizen or resident (as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of the United
States;
|
|
n
|
A
corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under
the laws of the United States or any of its states;
|
|
n
|
An
estate, if the estate's income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of
its source; or
|
|
n
|
A
trust, if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration
and one or more U.S. persons (e.g., a U.S. citizen, resident, or
corporation) have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions.
|
We refer to any of the above as a
U.S. Shareholder.
This
discussion is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
referred to as the Code, U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code
and administrative and judicial interpretations of the Code, all as in effect as of the
date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F. This discussion generally considers only U.S.
Shareholders who will hold the ordinary shares as capital assets. The discussion does not
consider:
|
n
|
Aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation relevant to U.S. Shareholders by reason of their
particular circumstances (including potential application of the alternative
minimum tax).
|
|
n
|
U.S.
Shareholders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, such as
financial institutions, insurance companies, broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations,
and foreign individuals or entities.
|
|
n
|
U.S.
Shareholders who own 10% or more of our outstanding voting shares, either directly or by
attribution.
|
|
n
|
U.S.
Shareholders who hold our ordinary shares as part of a hedging, straddle, or conversion
transaction.
|
|
n
|
U.S.
Shareholders who acquire their ordinary shares in a compensatory transaction.
|
|
n
|
U.S.
Shareholders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.
|
|
n
|
Any
aspect of state, local, or non-U.S. tax law.
|
The
following summary does not address all of the tax consequences of owning or disposing of
our ordinary shares to you based on your individual tax circumstances. Accordingly, you
should consult your own tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences to you of owning
or disposing of our ordinary shares, including the effects of applicable state, local, or
non-U.S. tax laws and possible changes in the tax laws.
87
Dividends
Paid on the Ordinary Shares
A
U.S. Shareholder, as defined above, will generally be required to include in gross income
the amount of any distributions paid in respect of the ordinary shares to the extent that
the distributions are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The amount of the distribution would
include any Israeli taxes withheld as part of the distributions. A maximum U.S. federal
income tax rate of 15% will apply for individual shareholders and 35% for corporate
shareholders if certain holding period requirements are met. The individual shareholder
rate is applicable in tax years beginning after December 31, 2002, and before January 1,
2011, for qualified dividend income received by an individual as well as
certain trusts and estates. Qualified dividend income generally includes dividends paid by
a U.S. corporation or a qualified foreign corporation. A non-U.S. corporation,
such as ours, generally will be considered to be a qualified foreign corporation if (i)
our shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States,
or (ii) we are eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive U.S. income tax treaty
determined to be satisfactory to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The U.S. Department
of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service have determined that the United
States-Israel tax treaty is satisfactory for this purpose. In addition, the U.S.
Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service have determined that ordinary
shares are considered readily tradable on an established securities market if they are
listed on an established securities market in the United States, such as the NASDAQ Global
Select Market. The information returns, reporting the dividends paid to U.S. Shareholders,
will identify the amount of dividends eligible for the reduced rates.
Any
distributions in excess of earnings and profits will be treated first as non-taxable
return of capital, reducing a U.S. Shareholders tax basis in the ordinary shares to
the extent of the distributions, and then as capital gain from a sale or exchange of the
ordinary shares. Our dividends will generally not qualify for the dividends received
deduction available to corporations. Any cash distribution paid in Israeli Shekels will
equal the U.S. dollar value of the distribution, calculated based on the spot exchange
rate in effect on the date of the distribution.
Credit
for Israeli Taxes Withheld
Subject
to certain conditions and limitations, a U.S. Shareholder will generally be eligible for a
credit against United States federal income tax liability for any Israeli tax withheld or
paid with respect to dividends on the ordinary shares. The Code provides limitations on
the amount of foreign tax credits. These limitations include extensive separate
computation rules under which foreign tax credits allowable with respect to specific
categories of income cannot exceed the U.S. federal income taxes otherwise payable with
respect to each such category of income. A shareholder who does not elect to claim a
foreign tax credit may instead claim a deduction for Israeli income tax withheld or paid,
but only if the shareholder elects to do so for all foreign income taxes in that year.
Special rules for determining a U.S. Shareholders foreign tax credit limitation
apply in the case of qualified dividend income. Rules similar to those concerning
adjustments to the foreign tax credit limitation to reflect any capital gain rate
differential also apply to any qualified dividend income. The rules relating to foreign
tax credits are complex and each shareholder should consult his, her, or its own tax
advisor to determine whether and if the specific shareholder would be entitled to this
credit.
88
Disposition
of the Ordinary Shares
The
sale or exchange of ordinary shares will generally result in the recognition of capital
gain or loss. The amount of gain or loss is the difference between the amounts realized on
the sale or exchange and the tax basis in the ordinary shares. If a U.S.
Shareholders holding period for the ordinary shares exceeds one year at the time of
the disposition, the amount of the shareholders gain or loss generally will be
long-term capital gain or loss. Long-term capital gains realized upon a sale or exchange
of ordinary shares generally will be subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of
15% for taxable years which begin before January 1, 2011. Gain or loss recognized by a
U.S. Shareholder on a sale or exchange of ordinary shares generally will be treated as
U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Under the United
States-Israel tax treaty, gain derived from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of
ordinary shares by a holder, who is a resident of the United States for purposes of the
treaty and who sells the ordinary shares within Israel, may be treated as foreign source
income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Status
Based
upon our income, assets and activities, we believe that we are not currently, and have not
been in prior years, a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. We do not currently anticipate that we will be a PFIC for any subsequent
year. We would be classified as a PFIC if, for any taxable year, either:
|
n
|
75%
or more of our gross income in the taxable year is passive income, or
|
|
n
|
50%
or more of the average percentage of our assets held during the taxable year, produce or
are held for the production of passive income.
|
For
this purpose, passive income includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities,
and the excess of gain over losses from the disposition of assets that produce passive
income.
If
we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which you held shares as a U.S. Shareholder and
you did not timely elect to treat us as a qualified electing fund under
Section 1295 of the Code or elect to mark the ordinary shares to market, you would be
subject to special tax rules on the receipt of an excess distribution on the
ordinary shares. Generally, a distribution is considered an excess distribution to the
extent it exceeds 125% of the average annual distributions in the prior three years. You
would also be subject to special tax rules on the gain from the disposition of the
ordinary shares.
A
U.S. Shareholder may be able to mitigate certain adverse tax consequences of holding
shares in a PFIC by making a qualified electing fund, deemed sale,
or mark-to-market election. However, as a U.S. Shareholder you may make a
qualified electing fund election only if we agree to furnish certain tax information
annually. We do not presently prepare or provide this information, and this information
may not be available to you if we are subsequently determined to be a PFIC. A number of
specific rules and requirements apply to a U.S. Shareholder under either of the elections
available to owners of a PFIC. You are urged to consult your tax advisor concerning these
elections.
89
Information
Reporting and Back up Withholding
Dividend
payments and proceeds from the sale or disposal of ordinary shares may be subject to
information reporting to the Internal Revenue Service and possible U.S. federal backup
withholding at the current rate of 28% (increases to 31% for taxable years beginning in
2011 or later). However, backup withholding will not apply to a holder who furnishes a
correct taxpayer identification number or certificate of foreign status and makes any
other required certification, or who is otherwise exempt from backup withholding (for
example, a corporation). Any U.S. Shareholder who is required to establish exempt status
generally must file IRS Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and
Certification). Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against a U.S.
Shareholders federal income tax liability. A U.S. Shareholder may obtain a refund of
any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate
claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service and furnishing any required
information.
Documents on Display
This
report and other information filed or to be filed by us can be inspected and copied at the
public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at:
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Public Reference Room
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
Copies
of these materials can also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, at
prescribed rates.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a Web site at
www.sec.gov
that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding
registrants that make electronic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
using its EDGAR system. We intend to post our Annual Report on Form 20-F on our website
(www.checkpoint.com) promptly following the filing of our Annual Report with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally,
documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be inspected at our principal
executive offices located at 5 HaSolelim Street, Tel Aviv 67897 Israel.
ITEM 11.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We
are exposed to market risks that result primarily from weak economic conditions in the
markets in which we sell our products, and from changes in exchange rates or in interest
rates.
Securities
representing 35.2% of the portfolio are rated as AAA, securities representing 29.2% of the
portfolio are rated as AA, securities representing 33.2% of the portfolio are rated as A,
and securities representing 2.4% of the portfolio are rated as BBB.
90
The
table below provides information regarding our investments in cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities, as of December 31, 2008.
|
Amortized cost
|
Total
Amortized cost
|
Fair
Value at
Dec. 31,
2008
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
onwards
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debentures - fixed interest rates.
|
|
|
$
|
204,873
|
|
$
|
162,814
|
|
$
|
108,908
|
|
$
|
103,263
|
|
$
|
48,656
|
|
$
|
628,514
|
|
$
|
621,444
|
|
U.S Agencies
|
|
|
$
|
108,016
|
|
$
|
43,528
|
|
$
|
33,836
|
|
$
|
4,943
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
190,323
|
|
$
|
194,254
|
|
Structured notes*
|
|
|
$
|
31,813
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
31,813
|
|
$
|
29,506
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities**
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,991
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities***
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
11,910
|
|
$
|
11,910
|
|
$
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
debentures - floating interest rates
|
|
|
$
|
4,771
|
|
$
|
6,980
|
|
$
|
3,942
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
15,693
|
|
$
|
15,203
|
|
|
|
|
Money market instruments,
|
|
|
cash and short term deposit
|
|
|
$
|
569,492
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
569,492
|
|
$
|
569,492
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
918,989
|
|
$
|
213,322
|
|
$
|
148,677
|
|
$
|
108,206
|
|
$
|
60,566
|
|
$
|
1,449,760
|
|
$
|
1,443,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
The
structured notes include inverse floating interest rate bonds. Inverse floating rate
bonds are bonds where the coupon varies inversely with changes in specified interest
rates or indices (for example, LIBOR). The effective maturity dates may differ from the
contractual maturities because debtors have the right to call the obligations without
penalties.
|
|
Debtors
are likely exercise call options when forward markets rates are below the interest rate
range of the structured note. During 2008, interest rates continued to decrease. This led
some of the debtors to exercise their call option. As a result, in 2008, the structured
notes balance was classified according to their next call date. A total amount of $103
million in structured notes were called and settled during 2008. An additional amount of
$20 million in structured notes were called and settled after December 31, 2008.
|
|
**
|
The
effective maturity may differ from the contractual maturities, because debtors may have
the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties. Therefore, the asset backed
securities balance was classified according to their next anticipated prepayment
date.
|
|
***
|
The balance
is comprised of four auction rate securities, which have suffered from failed auctions
since September 2007. As a result of the auction failures, these auction rate securities
do not have a readily determinable market value. In 2008, we obtained a third party
valuation to determine the fair values of these securities.
|
91
Foreign Currency Risk
Most
of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, and we incur most of our expenses in U.S.
dollars, Euros and Israeli Shekels. According to the salient economic factors indicated in
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, our cash flow, sale price, sales
market, expense, financing and inter-company transactions, and arrangement indicators, are
predominantly denominated in U.S. dollars. In addition, the U.S. dollar is the primary
currency of the economic environment in which we operate, and thus, the U.S. dollar is our
functional and reporting currency.
In
our balance sheet, we remeasure into U.S. dollars all monetary accounts (principally cash
and cash equivalents and liabilities) that are maintained in other currencies. For this
remeasurement, we use the relevant foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Any
gain or loss that results from this remeasurement is reflected in the statement of income
as financial income or financial expense, as appropriate.
We
measure and record non-monetary accounts in our balance sheet (principally fixed assets,
prepaid expenses, and share capital) in U.S. dollars. For this measurement, we use the
U.S. dollar value in effect at the date that the asset or liability was initially recorded
in our balance sheet (the date of the transaction).
We
attempt to limit our exposure resulting from assets and liabilities that are denominated
in Japanese Yen, Israeli Shekels, Euros, Swedish Krona and British Pounds through forward
contracts. We monitor foreign exchange rates and trends periodically to measure the
effectiveness of our foreign currency hedging. If our forward contracts meet the
definition of a hedge, and are so designated, changes in the fair value of the contracts
will be offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities
through earnings.
The
ineffective portion of our foreign currency hedging is recognized in earnings.
As
of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding forward contracts in the amount of $71.4 million.
In addition, we had an outstanding option contract of $25 million. These transactions were
for a period of up to twelve months. The fair value of the above mentioned foreign
currency derivative contracts were $0.9 million as of December 31, 2008.
Interest Rate Risk
Our
exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment
in marketable securities. Our marketable securities portfolio includes government and
government agencies debt instruments (U.S., European and other) and corporate debt
instruments. By policy, we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
Investments
in both fixed rate and floating rate interest bearing securities carry a degree of
interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely
impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less
income than predicted if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our income
from investments may decrease in the future in the event that interest rates fluctuate.
ITEM 12.
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not
applicable.
92
PART II
ITEM 13.
|
|
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
There
are no defaults, dividend arrearages, or delinquencies that are required to be disclosed.
ITEM 14.
|
|
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
There
are no material modifications to, or qualifications of, the rights of security holders
that are required to be disclosed.
ITEM 15.
|
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As
of December 31, 2008, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Our management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our management necessarily applies
its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December
31, 2008, to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in
filings and submissions under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and that such information related to us and our
consolidated subsidiaries is accumulated and communicated to management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions about required disclosure.
Managements Annual
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Registered
Public
Accounting Firm
Our
management report on our internal control over financial reporting (as such defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act), and the related attestation report
of our independent public accounting firm, are included in pages F-2 and F-4 to F-5 of our
audited consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 18 Financial
Statements, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
During
the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F, no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting have occurred that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
93
ITEM 16A.
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
Our
board of directors has determined that Messrs. Yoav Chelouche and Irwin Federman are
audit committee financial experts and that they are independent under the
applicable Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ Global Select Market rules.
In
March 2004, our board of directors adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our
employees, directors and officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, principal accounting officer or controller and other individuals who perform
similar functions. The Code of Ethics is updated from time to time. You can obtain a copy
of our Code of Ethics without charge, by sending a written request to our investor
relations department at Check Point Software Technologies Inc., Attn: Investor Relations,
800 Bridge Parkway, Redwood City, California 94065 U.S.A; Tel: 650-628-2000; Email:
ir@us.checkpoint.com
.
ITEM 16C.
|
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Fees and Services
The
following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us for the audit and other
services provided by Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young
Global, during the years ended December 31, 2007, and 2008:
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Audit-related fees (2)
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees (3)
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
323
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
1,427
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Audit
fees are fees for audit services for each of the years shown in
this table, including fees associated with the annual audit (including audit
of our internal control over financial reporting) and reviews of our
quarterly financial results submitted on Form 6-K, consultations on
various accounting issues and audit services provided in connection
with other statutory or regulatory filings.
|
(2)
|
Audit-related
fees are fees related to due diligence investigations.
|
(3)
|
Tax
fees are fees for professional services rendered by our auditors
for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice on actual or
contemplated transactions, tax consulting associated with
international transfer prices and employee benefits.
|
94
Audit committees
pre-approval policies and procedures
Our
audit committee chooses and engages our independent auditors to audit our financial
statements, with the approval of our shareholders as required by Israeli law. In March
2004, our audit committee adopted a policy requiring our management to obtain the audit
committees approval before engaging our independent auditors to provide any audit or
permitted non-audit services to us or our subsidiaries. The policy was last amended in
October 2004. This policy, which is designed to assure that such engagements do not impair
the independence of our auditors, requires pre-approval from the audit committee on an
annual basis for the various audit and non-audit services that may be performed by our
auditors. In addition, the audit committee limited the aggregate amount of fees our
auditors may have received during 2007 and 2008, and may receive during 2009 for non-audit
services in certain categories.
Our
controller reviews all management requests to engage our auditors to provide services and
approves a request if the requested services are of those that have received pre-approval
from our audit committee. We inform our audit committee of these approvals at least
quarterly and prior to the commencement of the related services. If the services are not
included in those categories that were pre-approved by our audit committee, then specific
approval is needed from our audit committee before these services are commenced. Our audit
committee is not permitted to approve the engagement of our auditors for any services that
would be inconsistent with maintaining the auditors independence or that are not
permitted by applicable law.
ITEM 16D.
|
|
EXEMPTION FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
None.
95
ITEM 16E.
|
|
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
|
Our
board of directors approved five programs to repurchase ordinary shares. The first program
was announced on October 28, 2003, and ended on August 24, 2004, and authorized the
repurchase of up to $200 million of our ordinary shares. The second program was announced
on October 28, 2004, and ended on May 31, 2005, and authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of our ordinary shares. The third program was announced on July 25, 2005, and
ended on May 18, 2006, and authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our ordinary
shares. The fourth program was announced on May 22, 2006, and ended on March 5, 2008, and
authorized the repurchase of up to $600 million of our ordinary shares. The fifth program
was announced on March 26, 2008, and authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million of
our ordinary shares. As of the date of this filing, this program is still in effect.
During
2008, we spent $239.5 million to repurchase approximately 10.9 million ordinary shares,
out of which $73 million were repurchased under the fourth program and the remainder of
$166.5 million was repurchased under the fifth program, as described above. The table
below provides detailed information.
Period
|
(a)
Total
Number of
Ordinary Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price per
Ordinary Share
|
(c)
Total
Number of
Ordinary Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
|
(d)
Approximate
Dollar Amount
Available for
Repurchase
under the Plans
or Programs
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 - January 31
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
64,897
|
|
February 1 - February 29
|
|
|
|
2,745,100
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
2,745,100
|
|
$
|
5,887
|
|
March 1 - March 31
|
|
|
|
246,184
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
246,184
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
April 1 - April 30
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
400,339
|
|
May 1 - May 31
|
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
$
|
24.2
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
$
|
354,264
|
|
June 1 - June 30
|
|
|
|
159,059
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
159,059
|
|
$
|
350,339
|
|
July 1 - July 31
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
350,339
|
|
August 1 - August 31
|
|
|
|
2,049,465
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
2,049,465
|
|
$
|
300,514
|
|
September 1 - September 30
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
300,514
|
|
October 1 - October 31
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
300,514
|
|
November 1 - November 30
|
|
|
|
3,407,800
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
3,407,800
|
|
$
|
233,925
|
|
December 1 - December 31
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
$
|
233,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
10,914,008
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
10,914,008
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
ITEM 16G.
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
As
a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we
are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of
certain requirements of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
As
described in Item 10 Additional Information NASDAQ Global Select Market
corporate governance rules, we do not comply with the NASDAQ requirement that an
issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market have a quorum requirement that in no case
be less than 33 1/3% of the outstanding shares of the companys common voting stock.
However, our articles of association, consistent with the Israeli Companies Law, provide
that the quorum requirements for an adjourned meeting are the presence of a minimum of two
shareholders present in person. Our quorum requirements for an adjourned meeting do not
comply with the NASDAQ requirements and we instead follow our home country practice.
As
a foreign private issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we may also follow
home country practice with regard to, among other things, composition of the board of
directors, director nomination process and regularly scheduled meetings at which only
independent directors are present. In addition, we may follow our home country practice,
instead of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, which require that we obtain shareholder approval
for certain dilutive events, such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity
based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the
company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or
more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another
company. A foreign private issuer that elects to follow a home country practice instead of
NASDAQ requirements, must submit to NASDAQ in advance a written statement from an
independent counsel in such issuers home country certifying that the issuers
practices are not prohibited by the home countrys laws. In addition, a foreign
private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission or on its website each such requirement that it does not follow and describe
the home country practice followed by the issuer instead of any such requirement.
Accordingly, our shareholders may not be afforded the same protection as provided under
NASDAQs corporate governance rules.
See
Item 6 Directors, Senior Management and Employees Board Practices and
Item 10 Additional Information Articles of Association and Israeli Companies
Law for a detailed description of the significant ways in which the
registrants corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S.
companies under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
97
PART III
ITEM 17.
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Check
Point has responded to Item 18.
ITEM 18.
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
See
pages F-1 to F-49 below.
98
1
|
|
Articles
of Association of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (1)
|
4.1
|
|
Form
of Director Insurance, Indemnification and Exculpation Agreement between Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. and its directors (2)
|
4.2
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1996 Israel Stock Option Plan (3)
|
4.3
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. Restated and Amended 1996 Section 102 Share Option Plan
(4)
|
4.4
|
|
Addendum--Israel
to the Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Restated and Amended 1996 Section 102
Share Option Plan (5)
|
4.5
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1996 United Stated Stock Option Plan (6)
|
4.6
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2005 Israel Equity Incentive Plan (7)
|
4.7
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2005 United States Equity Incentive Plan (8)
|
4.8
|
|
Zone
Labs, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (9)
|
4.9
|
|
Pointsec
Mobile Technologies Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan (10)
|
4.10
|
|
Pointsec
Mobile Technologies Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan (11)
|
4.11
|
|
Pointsec
Mobile Technologies Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (12)
|
4.12
|
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (13)
|
4.13
|
|
A
translation of an agreement between Tzlil Ad Ltd. and Check Point Software
Technologies Ltd., for the purchase of the leasing rights of a building
in Tel Aviv, Israel, dated as of March 19, 2006 (14)
|
8
|
|
List
of subsidiaries (15)
|
10
|
|
Consent
of Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global
|
99
12.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant toss.302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
12.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant toss.302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
13
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 1 of Check Points Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Check Points Registration Statement
on Form F-1 originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on May 31, 1996.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 15, 2004.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 19, 2007.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 19, 2007.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 19, 2007.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
(14)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of Check Points Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
(15)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Item 4 Information on Check Point Organizational
Structure in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
|
100
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008
IN U.S. DOLLARS
INDEX
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets,
|
|
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of our management and directors, and
|
|
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
Our
management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any
system of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human
error and the circumvention or override of internal control. Accordingly, even effective
internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation, and may not prevent or detect all
misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting may vary over time.
Our
management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008. In conducting its assessment of internal control over financial
reporting, management based its evaluation on the framework in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO). Our management has concluded based on its assessment, that
our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008 based
on these criteria.
Our
financial statements and internal control over financial reporting have been audited by
Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer (A Member of Ernst & Young Global), an independent
registered public accounting firm.
F - 2
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
3 Aminadav St.
Tel-Aviv 67067, Israel
Tel: 972 (3)6232525
Fax: 972 (3)5622555
www.ey.com/il
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders
and Board of Directors of
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Check Point Software
Technologies Ltd. (the Company) and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 3, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tel-Aviv, Israel
|
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
March 3, 2009
|
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|
F - 3
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
3 Aminadav St.
Tel-Aviv 67067, Israel
Tel: 972 (3)6232525
Fax: 972 (3)5622555
www.ey.com/il
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
We
have audited Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.s (Check Point or the
Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). Check Points management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
F - 4
|
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
3 Aminadav St.
Tel-Aviv 67067, Israel
Tel: 972 (3)6232525
Fax: 972 (3)5622555
www.ey.com/il
|
In
our opinion, Check Point maintained in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Check Point and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated March 3, 2009 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tel-Aviv, Israel
|
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|
March 3, 2009
|
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|
F - 5
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share amounts)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
509,664
|
|
$
|
543,190
|
|
Short-term deposit
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
26,302
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
332,355
|
|
|
344,895
|
|
Trade receivables (net of allowances for doubtful accounts and product returns of
|
|
|
$ 6,535 and $ 9,125 as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
|
201,515
|
|
|
251,771
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
21,595
|
|
|
28,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
|
1,065,129
|
|
|
1,194,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
399,490
|
|
|
529,445
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
56,947
|
|
|
56,435
|
|
Severance pay fund
|
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
14,920
|
|
|
19,003
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
160,133
|
|
|
123,151
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
664,910
|
|
|
664,602
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
long-term assets
|
|
|
|
1,303,446
|
|
|
1,399,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
$
|
2,368,575
|
|
$
|
2,593,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F - 6
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share amounts)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
$
|
6,343
|
|
$
|
7,087
|
|
Employee and payroll accruals
|
|
|
|
45,715
|
|
|
47,004
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
256,407
|
|
|
289,998
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
64,348
|
|
|
58,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
|
372,813
|
|
|
402,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
17,286
|
|
|
40,799
|
|
Income tax accrual
|
|
|
|
78,545
|
|
|
101,230
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
31,465
|
|
|
22,225
|
|
Accrued severance pay
|
|
|
|
11,511
|
|
|
10,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,807
|
|
|
175,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
|
511,620
|
|
|
577,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
Share capital -
|
|
|
Preferred shares, NIS 0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no
|
|
|
shares issued
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred shares, NIS 1 par value, 10 shares authorized, 1 share issued
|
|
|
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ordinary shares, NIS 0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 261,223,970
|
|
|
shares issued as of December 31, 2007 and 2008; 218,553,498 and 210,042,282
|
|
|
shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
774
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
464,330
|
|
|
503,408
|
|
Treasury shares at cost - 42,670,472 and 51,181,688 Ordinary shares as of
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
(907,022
|
)
|
|
(1,105,250
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
(4,673
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
2,297,640
|
|
|
2,621,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
|
|
|
1,856,955
|
|
|
2,015,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
|
$
|
2,368,575
|
|
$
|
2,593,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the consolidated financial statements.
F - 7
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except per share amounts)
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
241,961
|
|
$
|
309,785
|
|
$
|
338,317
|
|
Software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
333,180
|
|
|
421,092
|
|
|
470,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
575,141
|
|
|
730,877
|
|
|
808,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: *)
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses **)
|
|
|
|
13,378
|
|
|
30,276
|
|
|
40,842
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services **)
|
|
|
|
17,639
|
|
|
24,301
|
|
|
27,213
|
|
Amortization of technology
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
27,724
|
|
|
24,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
36,431
|
|
|
82,301
|
|
|
92,609
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
62,210
|
|
|
80,982
|
|
|
91,629
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
157,114
|
|
|
217,491
|
|
|
214,439
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
43,503
|
|
|
53,527
|
|
|
53,313
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
300,318
|
|
|
451,301
|
|
|
451,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
274,823
|
|
|
279,576
|
|
|
356,500
|
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
63,647
|
|
|
49,725
|
|
|
40,876
|
|
Other than temporary impairment on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(11,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
338,470
|
|
|
329,301
|
|
|
386,155
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
|
60,443
|
|
|
48,237
|
|
|
62,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$
|
278,027
|
|
$
|
281,064
|
|
$
|
323,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Ordinary share
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Ordinary share
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*)
|
Includes
stock-based compensation to employees in the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products and licenses
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Cost of software updates, maintenance and services
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
684
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
7,997
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
|
20,230
|
|
|
19,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expenses
|
|
|
$
|
36,392
|
|
$
|
34,052
|
|
$
|
32,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**)
|
Not
including amortization of technology shown separately below.
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F - 8
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share amounts)
|
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
Deferred
stock-based
compensation
|
Treasury
shares
at cost
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
comprehensive
income
|
Total
shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
386,529
|
|
$
|
(2,831
|
)
|
$
|
(380,834
|
)
|
$
|
(8,952
|
)
|
$
|
1,781,035
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,775,721
|
|
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
Issuance of treasury shares under stock
purchase plan and upon exercise of
options (4,630,614 Ordinary shares)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
87,416
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(35,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
51,934
|
|
Treasury shares at cost (23,250,924
Ordinary shares)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(435,491
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(435,491
|
)
|
Reclassification of deferred
compensation to additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,831
|
)
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
related to employees
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax -
|
|
|
Realized losses on hedging derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments to income
on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
268
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable
securities, net of $ 988 tax
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
278,027
|
|
|
278,027
|
|
|
278,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
280,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
422,381
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(728,909
|
)
|
$
|
(6,293
|
)
|
$
|
2,023,580
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,711,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable
securities, net of $ 2,056 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 9
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share amounts)
|
|
Share
capital
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
Treasury
shares
at cost
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
comprehensive
income
|
Total
shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
422,381
|
|
$
|
(728,909
|
)
|
$
|
(6,293
|
)
|
$
|
2,023,580
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,711,533
|
|
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
Issuance of treasury shares under stock plans, upon
|
|
|
exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
units (1,885,379 Ordinary shares net of 16,578 for
|
|
|
taxes)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
31,644
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(7,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
24,640
|
|
Treasury shares at cost (9,021,500 Ordinary shares)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(209,757
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,757
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to employees
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
34,052
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,052
|
|
Issuance of stock options related to the acquisition of
|
|
|
Protect Data
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax -
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments to income on marketable
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
983
|
|
|
983
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of $ 2,430
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
281,064
|
|
|
281,064
|
|
|
281,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
288,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
464,330
|
|
$
|
(907,022
|
)
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
$
|
2,297,640
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,856,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of $ 374 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gains as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
464,330
|
|
$
|
(907,022
|
)
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
$
|
2,297,640
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,856,955
|
|
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,019
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,019
|
|
Issuance of treasury shares under stock plans, upon
|
|
|
exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
units (2,402,792 Ordinary shares net of 29,383 for
|
|
|
taxes)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(6,268
|
)
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
Treasury shares at cost (10,914,008 Ordinary shares)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(239,542
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239,542
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to employees
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
32,327
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,327
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax -
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments to income on marketable
|
|
|
securities, net of $ 403 tax
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
Other than temporary impairment on marketable securities,
|
|
|
net of $2,272 tax
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,949
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,949
|
|
|
8,949
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of
|
|
|
$ (4,304) tax
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,946
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,946
|
)
|
|
(15,946
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
323,966
|
|
|
323,966
|
|
|
323,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
318,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
503,408
|
|
$
|
(1,105,250
|
)
|
$
|
(4,673
|
)
|
$
|
2,621,606
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,015,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of $ 1,255
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the consolidated financial statements.
F - 10
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$
|
278,027
|
|
$
|
281,064
|
|
$
|
323,966
|
|
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|
|
operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
8,813
|
|
Amortization of marketable securities premium and (accretion of
|
|
|
discount), net
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
3,099
|
|
Other than temporary impairment on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
Realized loss on sale of marketable securities, net
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
Acquisition of in-process research and development
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
39,984
|
|
|
36,982
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
34,052
|
|
|
32,327
|
|
Foreign currency on amount due to Protect Data shareholders
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
|
(3,150
|
)
|
|
(19,323
|
)
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
Increase in trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful
|
|
|
accounts and product returns
|
|
|
|
(14,230
|
)
|
|
(29,003
|
)
|
|
(50,256
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other current assets and other assets
|
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
4,761
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in trade payables
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
(3,929
|
)
|
|
744
|
|
Increase (decrease) in employees and payroll accruals
|
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
1,289
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
9,745
|
|
|
(7,594
|
)
|
|
38,423
|
|
Increase in deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
34,538
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
57,104
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
(6,828
|
)
|
|
(13,019
|
)
|
Increase in accrued severance pay, net
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
367,522
|
|
|
375,005
|
|
|
434,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Cash paid in conjunction with the acquisition of NFR, net of acquired
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
(14,371
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash paid in conjunction with the acquisition of Protect Data, net of
|
|
|
acquired cash
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(594,964
|
)
|
Payments made in connection with prior years acquisitions
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
(8,579
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturity of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
883,683
|
|
|
345,389
|
|
|
311,134
|
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
250,201
|
|
|
259,803
|
|
Investment in marketable securities
|
|
|
|
(603,133
|
)
|
|
(187,720
|
)
|
|
(736,781
|
)
|
Investment in short term deposits
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(26,302
|
)
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
(44,890
|
)
|
|
(16,727
|
)
|
|
(8,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
236,489
|
|
|
(206,495
|
)
|
|
(209,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares under stock purchase plan and upon
|
|
|
exercise of options
|
|
|
|
51,934
|
|
|
24,640
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares at cost
|
|
|
|
(435,491
|
)
|
|
(209,757
|
)
|
|
(239,542
|
)
|
Repayment of loans related to NFR
|
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
13,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
(383,099
|
)
|
|
(178,289
|
)
|
|
(191,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
220,912
|
|
|
(9,779
|
)
|
|
33,526
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
|
298,531
|
|
|
519,443
|
|
|
509,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
|
$
|
519,443
|
|
$
|
509,664
|
|
$
|
543,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
|
|
|
$
|
54,158
|
|
$
|
55,345
|
|
$
|
63,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non cash financing and investing activities
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
|
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
$
|
9,956
|
|
$
|
(7,535
|
)
|
Amount due to shareholders in connection with NFR's acquisition
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Fair value of vested Protect Data's options assumed
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,069
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Amount due to shareholders in connection with Protect Data's
|
|
|
acquisition (see Note 3 for liabilities assumed in acquisitions)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,579
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F - 11
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
|
a.
|
Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. (Check Point Ltd.), an Israeli
corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company or Check
Point), are engaged in developing, marketing and supporting software and
combined hardware and software products and services, by offering network
security, data security and management solutions for enterprise networks and
service providers.
|
|
The
Company operates in one reportable segment and its revenues are mainly derived from the
sales of its network and data security products including licenses, related software
updates, maintenance, support and other services. The Company sells its products
worldwide primarily through multiple distribution channels (channel partners)
including distributors, resellers, system integrators, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs),
system integrators and Managed Security service Providers (MSPs).
|
|
b.
|
During
2006 approximately 26% of the Companys revenues were derived from two
channel partners, 15% from one channel partner and 11% from the other. During
2007 and 2008, approximately 30% of the Companys revenues were derived
from the same two channel partners, 16% from one channel partner and 14% from
the other. Trade receivable balance from the two largest channel partners was $ 53,047
as of December 31, 2007 and $ 81,931 as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
c.
|
On
December 22, 2008, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with
Nokia, Inc. (Nokia) to acquire Nokias security appliance
business. The pending acquisition is expected to close in the first or second
quarter of 2009 and is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing
conditions.
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared according to United States
generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").
|
|
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and
assumptions. The Companys management believes that the estimates, judgments and
assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are
made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
b.
|
Financial
statements in United States dollars:
|
|
Most
of the Companys revenues and costs are denominated in United States dollars (dollars).
The Companys management believes that the dollar is the primary currency of the
economic environment in which Check Point Ltd. and each of its subsidiaries operate.
|
F - 12
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
Thus,
the dollar is the Companys functional and reporting currency. Accordingly, monetary
accounts maintained in currencies other than the dollar are remeasured into dollars in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 52
Foreign Currency Translation. Changes in currency exchange rates between the
Companys functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated
are included in the Companys results of operations as financial income (expense) in
the period in which the currency exchange rates change.
|
|
c.
|
Principles
of consolidation:
|
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Check Point Ltd. and its
subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon
consolidation.
|
|
Certain
amounts in prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the current years presentation.
|
|
Cash
equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash
with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition.
|
|
Bank
deposits with maturities of more than three months but less than one year are included in
short-term deposits. Such short-term deposits are stated at cost which approximates
market values.
|
|
g.
|
Investments
in marketable securities:
|
|
The
Company accounts for investments in marketable securities in accordance with SFAS No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
|
|
Management
determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and
reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet date.
|
|
The
Company classifies all of its marketable securities as available for sale. Available for
sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of
tax, reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders equity.
Realized gains and losses on sale of investments are included in earnings and are derived
using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities.
|
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion
of discounts to maturity. Such amortization together with interest and dividends on
securities are included in financial income, net.
|
F - 13
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
In
accordance with the Companys policy and FASB Staff Position (FSP) Nos. SFAS 115-1
(FSP 115-1) and SFAS 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments, the Company recognizes an impairment charge
when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be
other-than-temporary. The Company considers various factors in determining whether to
recognize an impairment charge, including the Companys intent and ability to hold
the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
market value, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than
the cost basis, the credit ratings of the securities and the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuers. During 2008, an other than temporary impairment on
marketable securities of $ 11,221, pretax was recorded. See further details in Note 4.
|
|
h.
|
Property
and equipment:
|
|
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets
at the following annual rates:
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computers and peripheral equipment
|
33-50
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
10-20
|
|
Building
|
4
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
The shorter of term of the lease or the useful life of the asset
|
|
Property
and equipment are reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying
amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the
assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value
of the assets. During 2006, 2007 and 2008, no impairment losses have been recorded.
|
|
i.
|
Goodwill
and other intangible assets:
|
|
Goodwill
and certain other purchased intangible assets have been recorded as a result of
acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business
combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill
is not amortized, but rather is subject to an annual impairment test. The Company
performs an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more
frequently if impairment indicators are present. The Company operates in one operating
segment, and this segment comprises its only reporting unit. Intangible assets that are
not considered to have an indefinite useful life are amortized using the straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to 20 years. The carrying
amount of these assets to be held and used is reviewed whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the
asset to the future undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If the
asset is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the
difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset. During
2006, 2007 and 2008, no impairment loss was recorded.
|
F - 14
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
j.
|
Research
and development costs:
|
|
Research
and development costs are charged to the statement of income as incurred. SFAS No. 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, requires capitalization of certain software development costs subsequent
to the establishment of technological feasibility.
|
|
Based
on the Companys product development process, technological feasibility is
established upon completion of a working model. Costs incurred by the Company between
completion of the working models and the point at which the products are ready for
general release has been insignificant. Therefore, all
research and development
costs have been expensed.
|
|
The
Company derives its revenues mainly from products, licenses, combined hardware and
software products, software updates, maintenance and support services. The Company sells
its products primarily through channel partners including distributors, resellers, OEMs,
system integrators and MSPs, all of whom are considered end-users. The Company also sells
its products directly to end users primarily through its web site.
|
|
The
Company accounts for product sales in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification
of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions (collectively SOP 97-2). Product and software license
revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the software
license has been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance,
there are no significant future performance obligations, the license fees are fixed or
determinable and collection of the license fee is considered probable. Amounts received
in advance of meeting these criteria are deferred. Fees for arrangements with payment
terms extending beyond customary payment terms are considered not to be fixed or
determinable, in which case revenue is deferred and recognized when payments become due
from the customer or are actually collected, providing that all other revenue recognition
criteria have been met.
|
|
As
required by SOP 97-2, the Company determines the value of the software component of
its multiple-element arrangements using the residual method when vendor specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements of the
support and maintenance agreements. VSOE is based on the price charged when an element is
sold separately or renewed. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered
elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the
delivered elements and is recognized as revenue.
|
|
Software
updates and maintenance provide customers with rights to unspecified software product
upgrades released during the term of the agreement. Support services grant the Companys
customers telephone access to technical support personnel during the term of the service.
The Company recognizes revenues from software updates, maintenance and support services
ratably over the term of the agreement.
|
F - 15
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
Deferred
revenues represent mainly the unrecognized fees billed for updates, maintenance and
support services.
|
|
The
Company follows very specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue, several of
which are discussed above. The Company determines the fair value of each type of
undelivered element as follows:
|
|
For
enterprise products, the Company determines the fair value based on the renewal prices
charged for software updates, maintenance and support services. The Company offers
several levels of services, classified by services offered, response time, and
availability. The Company has defined classes of customers, based on the total gross
value of licensed software products the customer purchased from the Company. The Company
prices renewals for each service level and each class of customer as a fixed percentage
of the total gross value of licensed software products the customer purchased.
|
|
For
its consumer products, the Company determines the fair value based on the renewal prices
of software updates, maintenance and support services for the different products offered.
The renewal prices are based on its price list.
|
|
The
Company records a provision for estimated sales returns and allowances on product and
service related sales in the same period the related revenues are recorded in accordance
with FASB Statement No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists.
These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data and
other known factors. Such provisions amounted to $ 912 and $ 2,330 as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
Cost
of products and licenses is comprised of cost of software and hardware production,
manuals, packaging and license fees paid to third parties.
|
|
Cost
of software updates, maintenance and services is comprised of cost of post sale customer
support.
|
|
Amortization
of technology is comprised of amortization of core technology assets which are used in
the Companys operations, and is included separately in cost of revenues.
|
|
The
Companys liability for severance pay for periods prior to December 31, 2006 is
calculated pursuant to Israeli severance pay law based on the most recent salary of the
employees multiplied by the number of years of employment as of the balance sheet date.
The Company records as expenses the increase in the severance liability, net of earnings
(losses) from the related investment fund. Employees are entitled to one months
salary for each year of employment, or a portion thereof. Until December 31, 2006, the
Companys liability is partially provided by monthly payments deposited with
insurers; any unfunded amounts would be paid from operating funds and are covered by a
provision established by the Company.
|
F - 16
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Companys agreements with employees in Israel, are under
section 14 of the Severance Pay Law -1963. The Companys contributions for severance
pay shall be instead of its severance liability. Upon contribution of the full amount of
the employees monthly salary, no additional calculations shall be conducted between
the parties regarding the matter of severance pay and no additional payments shall be
made by the Company to the employee. Further, the related obligation and amounts deposits
on behalf of such obligation are not stated on the balance sheet, as they are legally
released from obligation to employees once the deposit amounts have been paid. Effective
from January 1, 2007, the Company increased its contribution to the deposited funds to
cover the full amount of the employees monthly salary.
|
|
The
carrying value of deposited funds includes profits (losses) accumulated up to the balance
sheet date. The deposited funds may be withdrawn only upon the fulfillment of the
obligation pursuant to Israeli severance pay law or labor agreements.
|
|
Severance
expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, were $ 3,169, $ 3,982
and $ 5,134, respectively.
|
|
n.
|
Employee
benefit plan:
|
|
The
Company has a 401(K) defined contribution plan covering certain employees in the U.S. All
eligible employees may elect to contribute up to 50%, but generally not greater than $ 15
per year, of their annual compensation to the plan through salary deferrals, subject to
IRS limits. Effective from January 1, 2006 the Company matches 50% of employee
contributions to the plan up to a limit of 3% of their eligible compensation. In 2006,
2007 and 2008, the Company matched contributions in the amount of $571, $ 623 and $ 684,
respectively.
|
|
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 prescribes the use of the
liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined
based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities
and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. The Company provides a valuation allowance, if
necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be realized.
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities and assets are classified as current or non current based on the
classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting, or according to
the expected reversal dates of the specific temporary differences if not related to an
asset or liability for financial reporting.
|
F - 17
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax
positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate
the tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that, on an
evaluation of the technical merits, the tax position will be sustained on audit,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is
to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be
realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company accrues interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income tax.
|
|
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008, were $ 3,145, $ 3,736 and $ 2,796, respectively.
|
|
q.
|
Concentrations
of credit risk:
|
|
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposit, marketable securities and
trade receivables.
|
|
The
majority of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposit and
marketable securities is held by the Companys Singaporean subsidiary, invested in
dollar and dollar-linked investments, and is deposited in major banks in the U.S. and
Europe. Deposits in the U.S. may be in excess of insured limits and are not insured in
other jurisdictions. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and,
therefore, bear minimal risk.
|
|
The
Companys marketable securities consist of investment-grade corporate bonds,
asset-backed securities, structured notes, U.S. government agency securities and
sovereign bonds. The Companys investment policy, approved by the Investment
Committee, limits the amount the Company may invest in any one type of investment or
issuer, thereby reducing credit risk concentrations.
|
|
As
a result of the recent turmoil in capital markets, the Company has tightened its control
and monitoring over its marketable securities portfolio in order to minimize potential
risks stemming from current capital markets environment. Such measures included among
others: reducing credit exposure to financial sector securities and increasing the
overall credit quality of the portfolio.
|
F - 18
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
The
Companys trade receivables are geographically diversified and derived from sales to
channel partners mainly in the United States, Europe and Asia. Concentration of credit
risk with respect to trade receivables is limited by credit limits, ongoing credit
evaluation and account monitoring procedures. The Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its channel partners and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts
based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices
not specifically reviewed, provisions are recorded at a specific rate, based upon the age
of the receivable, the collection history and current economic trends. Allowance for
doubtful accounts amounted to $ 5,623 and $ 6,795 as of December 31, 2007
and 2008, respectively. The Company charges off receivables when they are deemed
uncollectible. Actual collection experience may not meet expectations and may result in
increased bad debt expense. Bad debt expense amounted to $ 490, $ 2,316 and $ 1,898
in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Total write offs during 2006, 2007 and 2008
amounted to $ 1,208, $ 571 and $ 726, respectively.
|
|
r.
|
Derivatives
and hedging:
|
|
The
Company accounts for derivatives and hedging based on SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133 requires the Company to
recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivatives meet the
definition of a hedge and are so designated, depending on the nature of the hedge,
changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair
value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings, or
recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
The ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair value is recognized in
earnings.
|
|
The
Company entered into forward and option contracts to hedge the fair value of assets and
liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen, Israeli Shekels, Euros, Swedish Kronas and
British Pounds. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding forward contracts,
that did not meet the definition of hedge accounting, in the amount of $71,400 and
outstanding option contract in the amount of $25,000. These contracts were for a period
of up to twelve months. The Company measured the fair value of the contracts in
accordance with SFAS No. 157 at level 2. The net losses recognized in earnings during
2008 were $ 3,075. The net gains and (losses) recognized in earnings during 2006 and
2007 were immaterial.
|
|
s.
|
Basic
and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Basic
earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of Ordinary shares
outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the
weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding during each year, plus dilutive
potential Ordinary shares outstanding during the year, in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share .
|
|
The
total weighted average number of shares related to the outstanding options excluded from
the calculations of diluted earnings per share, since they would have an anti-dilutive
effect, were 15,474,949, 14,284,200 and 14,461,565 for 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
|
F - 19
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
t.
|
Accounting
for stock-based compensation:
|
|
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R)
requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date
of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is
ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service
periods in the Companys consolidated income statements.
|
|
The
Company recognizes compensation expenses for the value of its awards granted based on the
straight line method over the requisite service period of each of the awards, net of
estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Estimated forfeitures are based on actual historical pre-vesting
forfeitures.
|
|
SFAS
No. 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax deductions in excess of the
compensation costs recognized for those stock options to be classified as financing cash
flows.
|
|
The
Company selected the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model as the most appropriate
fair value method for its stock-options awards and values restricted stock based on the
market value of the underlying shares at the date of grant. The option-pricing model
requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are the expected stock
price volatility and the expected option term. Expected volatility was calculated based
upon actual historical stock price movements. The expected term of options granted is
based upon historical experience and represents the period of time that options granted
are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from
U.S. treasury bonds with an equivalent term. The Company has historically not paid
dividends and has no foreseeable plans to pay dividends.
|
|
The
fair value for options granted in 2006, 2007 and 2008 is estimated at the date of grant
using a Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Employee Stock Options
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
58.87
|
%
|
|
42.81
|
%
|
|
38.57
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Expected term from vesting date (years)
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
21.65
|
%
|
|
22.78
|
%
|
|
31.15
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
F - 20
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
u.
|
Fair
value of financial instruments:
|
|
The
carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
short-term deposits, marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their generally short maturities.
|
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurementsand,
effective October 10, 2008, adopted FSP No. SFAS 157-3, Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, except as
it applies to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP 157-2.
SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that
should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157
establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the
valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
|
|
Level 1
|
Observable
inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in
active markets.
|
|
Level 2
|
Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the
marketplace.
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
|
|
The
fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
|
|
The
Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income. This statement establishes standards for the reporting and
display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose
financial statements. Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in
shareholders equity during the period except those resulting from investments by,
or distributions to, shareholders. The Company determined that its items of other
comprehensive income relates to gain and loss on hedging derivative instruments and
unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.
|
|
The
Company repurchases its Ordinary shares from time to time on the open market or in other
transactions and holds such shares as treasury stock. The Company presents the cost to
repurchase treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity.
|
|
From
time to time the Company reissues treasury shares under the stock purchase plan, upon
exercise of option and upon vesting of restricted stock units. When treasury stock is
reissued, the Company accounts for the re-issuance in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board No. 6, Status of Accounting Research Bulletins and charges
the excess of the purchase cost, including related stock-based compensation expenses,
over the re-issuance price (loss) to retained earnings. The purchase cost is calculated
based on the specific identification method.
In case the purchase cost is lower than the
re-issuance price, the Company credits the difference to additional paid-in capital.
|
F - 21
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
x.
|
Impact
of recently issued accounting standards:
|
|
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles
and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest
in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The impact of SFAS 141R on the Companys
consolidated results of operations and financial condition will depend on the nature and
size of acquisitions, if any, subsequent to the effective date.
|
|
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51". SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that the ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and
presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate
from the parents equity; the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face
of the consolidated statement of income; and changes in a parents ownership
interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be
accounted for consistently. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No.
160 on its consolidated financial statement.
|
|
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-7, Accounting
for Defensive Intangible Assets. EITF 08-7 clarifies the accounting for
certain separately identifiable intangible assets which an acquirer does not intend to
actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to
them. EITF 08-7 requires an acquirer in a business combination to account for a
defensive intangible asset as a separate unit of accounting which should be amortized to
expense over the period the asset diminishes in value. EITF 08-7 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of EITF 08-7
on its consolidated financial statement.
|
|
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FAS 142-3 on
its consolidated financial statement.
|
F - 22
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 2:
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement
under Statement 13", and FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157". Collectively, the Staff Positions defer the effective date
of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value on a recurring basis at least annually, and amend the scope of Statement 157.
As described in Note 4, the Company adopted Statement 157 and the related FASB staff
positions except for those items specifically deferred under FSP No. FAS 157-2.
|
|
a.
|
On
January 17, 2007 the Company completed the acquisition of 98.5% of shares of
Protect Data AB (Protect Data) that at the time of the acquisition
was a public company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. During January
2007, the Company initiated a delisting of the shares in Protect Data from the
Stockholm Stock Exchange. On February 13, 2007, Protect Data has, in
consultation with the Stockholm Stock Exchange, resolved to delist the shares
in Protect Data from the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Protect Datas last day
of trading was February 12, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Company obtained
legal ownership of all of the shares of Protect Data on a fully diluted basis
and recorded a liability to Protect Datas former shareholders in the
amount of $ 8,579, which was fully paid in June 2008.
|
|
Protect
Data operates its business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pointsec Mobile
Technologies AB, a worldwide provider of mobile data protection. Pointsec delivers
solutions for automatic data encryption that keeps sensitive information, stored on
mobile computing devices such as laptops, PDAs, smartphones and removable media (e.g.,
USB devices) confidential and secure. With the acquisition of Protect Data, the
Company entered into the data security market. The acquisition was accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly the operating results of Protect Data
are included in the Companys accompanying consolidated financial statements from
the date of acquisition, January 17, 2007.
|
|
The
total purchase price of Protect Data was composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
$
|
613,361
|
|
|
Amount paid to remaining shareholders in June 2008
|
|
|
|
8,579
|
|
|
Fair value of vested protect data options assumed
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
Acquisition related transaction costs
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
$
|
625,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 23
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 3:
|
-
|
ACQUISITIONS (Cont.)
|
|
The
fair value of the vested option assumed was determined using a Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model with the following assumptions: expected life of 3 years, risk-free
interest rate of 4.69%, expected volatility of 31% and no dividend yield. The fair value
of unvested Protect Data options related to future service is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the remaining service period, while the value of vested options
is included in total purchase price.
|
|
Acquisition
related transaction costs include investment banking fees, legal and accounting fees and
other external costs directly related to the acquisition.
|
|
Purchase
Price Allocation
|
|
Under
business combination accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to Protect Datas
net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as
set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets was recorded as goodwill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
20,436
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
31,179
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
(32,651
|
)
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
(13,315
|
)
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
177,000
|
|
|
In process research and development
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
Goodwill (Not tax deductible)
|
|
|
|
481,243
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities (including payable to remaining shareholders)
|
|
|
|
(13,571
|
)
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
(49,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
$
|
625,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
performing the purchase price allocation, the Company considered, among other factors,
the intention for future use of acquired assets, analyses of historical financial
performance and estimates of future performance of Protect Datas products. The fair
value of intangible assets was based on a valuation completed by a third party valuation
firm using an income approach and estimates and assumptions provided by management. The
following table sets forth the components of intangible assets associated with the
Protect Data acquisition:
|
|
|
Fair value
|
Useful life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
$
|
52,000
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
|
107,000
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
$
|
177,000
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
Weighted
average amortization period of 6 years.
|
|
Customer
relationships represent the underlying relationships and agreements with Protect Datas
installed customer base.
|
F - 24
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 3:
|
-
|
ACQUISITIONS (Cont.)
|
|
Core
technology represents a combination of Protect Data processes, patents and trade secrets
related to the design and development of its software products. This proprietary know-how
can be leveraged to develop new technology and improve the Companys software
products.
|
|
Trade
names value represents the recognition value of Protect Datas brand name as a
result of advertising expenditures for customer relations and the technological
development to provide consistent, leading edge products and a strong research and
development commitment by the Company.
|
|
The
Company expensed in-process research and development (IPR&D) in the
amount of $ 17,000 upon acquisition as it represents incomplete Protect Data
research and development projects that had not reached technological feasibility and had
no alternative future use as of the date of the acquisition. The value assigned to
IPR&D was determined by considering the importance of the project to the Companys
overall development plan, estimating costs to develop the purchased IPR&D into
commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flow from the project
when completed and discounting the net cash flow to its present value based on the
percentage of completion of the IPR&D projects.
|
|
The
Company recorded a deferred tax liability on the purchase date for the difference between
the assigned values and the tax bases of the net assets acquired in the acquisition.
|
|
During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company approved a plan to restructure certain
operations of Protect Data to eliminate redundant costs resulting from the acquisition
and improve efficiencies in operations. The restructuring charges recorded are based on
restructuring plan that have been committed to by management.
|
|
The
total estimated restructuring costs associated with exiting activities of Protect Data
are $ 2,742, consisting of employee severance costs as well as excess facilities
obligations through fiscal 2008. These costs were recognized as a liability assumed in
the purchase business combination and included in the allocation of the cost to acquire
Protect Data and, accordingly, have resulted in an increase to goodwill.
|
|
Summary of the plan
|
Estimated
costs
|
Cash
payments
|
Accrued as
of December
31, 2007
|
Cash
payments
|
Balance as
of December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
$
|
2,153
|
|
$
|
(1,258
|
)
|
$
|
895
|
|
$
|
(895
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
485
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring
|
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
$
|
(1,362
|
)
|
$
|
1,380
|
|
$
|
(1,380
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following unaudited condensed combined pro forma information for the year ended December
31, 2006, gives effect to the acquisition of Protect Data as if the acquisition had
occurred on January 1, 2006. For the purposes of the pro forma information, the Company
has assumed that, net income for the period presented excludes the write-off of acquired
IPR&D of $ 17,000 and includes amortization of intangible assets related to the
acquisition of $ 33,000 per year, stock-based compensation charges for unvested
options assumed of $ 835 in 2006 and related tax effects.
|
F - 25
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 3:
|
-
|
ACQUISITIONS (Cont.)
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$
|
653,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$
|
269,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
acquisition did not have a material effect on pro forma financial data for the period
from January 1, 2007 to January 16, 2007.
|
|
b.
|
In
December 2006, the Company acquired NFR Security, Inc. (the Minor
acquisition) a leader in real-time threat prevention for $ 14,558 in
cash and $ 334 in related acquisition costs. The purchase price was
allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their respective fair values. As part of the allocation, $ 7,820
was allocated to goodwill and $ 8,920 was allocated to amortizable
intangible assets (technology, customer relationships and trademarks) that are
being amortized over their estimated useful lives of one to four years. During
2007, the Company recorded additional goodwill of $ 1,552 as a result of a
change in assumptions related to deferred taxes. At the acquisition
date, the Company recorded a $ 1,060 charge for acquired in-process
research and development (IPR&D) in conjunction with projects
which have not yet reached technological feasibility and which have no
alternative future use. The results of the aforementioned acquisition are
included with that of the Company for the period subsequent to the acquisition
date. Significant liabilities assumed included loans from banks and bridge
loans from investors in a total amount of approximately $ 1,833 that were
settled by December 31, 2006 and accounts payable and other accrued expenses in
a total amount of approximately $ 3,043.
|
|
The
acquisition did not have a material effect on pro forma financial data.
|
F - 26
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 4:
|
-
|
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
|
|
Marketable
securities with contractual maturities of less than 1 year are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
Gross
unrealized
gains
|
Gross
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Amortized
cost
|
Gross
gains
|
Gross
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
corporate
|
|
|
debentures - fixed
|
|
|
interest rate
|
|
|
$
|
185,262
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
$
|
(548
|
)
|
$
|
184,974
|
|
$
|
204,873
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
$
|
(3,645
|
)
|
$
|
201,492
|
|
Government-sponsored
|
|
|
enterprises
|
|
|
|
126,353
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
126,199
|
|
|
108,016
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
109,116
|
|
Structured notes (*)
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
12,981
|
|
|
31,813
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
(3,356
|
)
|
|
29,506
|
|
Government and
|
|
|
corporate
|
|
|
debentures -
|
|
|
floating interest
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
6,315
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
4,757
|
|
Mortgage and asset
|
|
|
backed securities
|
|
|
(**)
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(****)-
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
332,825
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
$
|
(893
|
)
|
$
|
332,355
|
|
$
|
349,497
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
$
|
(7,027
|
)
|
$
|
344,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable
securities with contractual maturities of after 1 year through 5 years are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
Gross
unrealized
gains
|
Gross
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Amortized
cost
|
Gross
gains
|
Gross
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
corporate debentures
|
|
|
- fixed interest rate
|
|
|
$
|
190,843
|
|
$
|
4,214
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
$
|
194,872
|
|
$
|
423,641
|
|
$
|
3,514
|
|
$
|
(7,203
|
)
|
$
|
419,952
|
|
Government-sponsored
|
|
|
enterprises
|
|
|
|
54,808
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
55,021
|
|
|
82,307
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
85,138
|
|
Structured notes (*)
|
|
|
|
121,476
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
120,014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Government and
|
|
|
corporate debentures
|
|
|
- floating interest
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
9,998
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
9,975
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
10,446
|
|
Mortgage and asset backed securities (**)
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
Auction rate securities (***)
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
17,495
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
397,413
|
|
$
|
6,889
|
|
$
|
(4,812
|
)
|
$
|
399,490
|
|
$
|
530,771
|
|
$
|
6,353
|
|
$
|
(7,679
|
)
|
$
|
529,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
2008 unrealized losses from fixed income securities are primarily attributable to the
recent credit crisis in capital markets.
|
F - 27
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 4:
|
-
|
MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cont.)
|
|
Investments
with continuous unrealized losses for less than 12 months and 12 months or greater and
their related fair values were as follows:
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses for less than
12 months
|
Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses for 12 months
or greater
|
Total Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses
|
|
|
Fair value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
unrealized
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debentures - fixed interest rate
|
|
|
$
|
374,248
|
|
$
|
(10,848
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
374,248
|
|
$
|
(10,848
|
)
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
15,431
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,431
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
Structured notes (*)
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
8,556
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
|
18,459
|
|
|
(3,356
|
)
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
|
debentures - floating interest
|
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
14,022
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
14,022
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
Asset backed securities (**)
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(****) -
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(****) -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
413,628
|
|
$
|
(13,262
|
)
|
$
|
8,556
|
|
$
|
(1,444
|
)
|
$
|
422,184
|
|
$
|
(14,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses for less than
12 months
|
Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses for 12 months
or greater
|
Total Investments with
continuous unrealized
losses
|
|
|
Fair value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
unrealized
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debentures - fixed interest rate
|
|
|
$
|
73,843
|
|
$
|
(273
|
)
|
$
|
66,750
|
|
$
|
(460
|
)
|
$
|
140,593
|
|
$
|
(733
|
)
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
38,817
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
62,396
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
101,213
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
Structured notes (*)
|
|
|
|
7,987
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
42,649
|
|
|
(3,852
|
)
|
|
50,636
|
|
|
(3,865
|
)
|
|
Government and corporate
|
|
|
|
debentures - floating interest
|
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
Mortgage and asset backed
|
|
|
|
securities (**)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
489
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
Auction rate securities (***)
|
|
|
|
13,486
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,486
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,123
|
|
$
|
(1,177
|
)
|
$
|
182,258
|
|
$
|
(4,528
|
)
|
$
|
319,381
|
|
$
|
(5,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
The
structured notes include inverse floating interest rate bonds. Inverse floating
interest rate bonds are bonds where the coupon varies inversely with changes in
specified interest rates or indices (for example, LIBOR). The effective
maturity dates may differ from the contractual maturities because debtors have
the right to call the obligations without penalties.
|
|
Debtors
will likely exercise call options when forward markets rates are below the interest rate
range of the structured note. In 2007, structured notes balance was classified according
to its contractual maturity dates. Interest rates decreased during 2007, mainly towards
the end of the year. This trend led some of the debtors to exercise their call option. A
total amount of $47,000 in structured notes were called and settled during December 31,
2007. During 2008, interest rates continue to decrease. This led some of the debtors to
exercise their call option. As a result, in 2008, structured notes balance was classified
according to their next call date. A
total amount of $ 103,000 in structured notes were called and settled during 2008. An
additional amount of $ 20,000 in structured notes were called and settled after
December 31, 2008.
|
F - 28
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 4:
|
-
|
MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Cont.)
|
|
(**)
|
The
effective maturity may differ from the contractual maturities, because debtors
may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties. Therefore
the mortgage and asset backed securities balance was classified according
to its next forecasted prepayment date.
|
|
(***)
|
The
balance is comprised of four auction rate securities, which suffer from failed
auctions since September 2007. As a result of the auction failures these
auction rate securities do not have a readily determinable market value. In
2008, for determining the fair values of these securities, the Company obtained
a third party valuation (see Note 5).
|
|
The
Company reviews various factors in determining whether it should recognize an impairment
charge for its marketable securities, including its intent and ability to hold the
investment for a period of time sufficient for any anticipated recovery in market value,
the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than its cost basis,
the credit ratings of the securities, the nature of underlying collateral, as applicable
and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Based on the Companys
consideration of these factors, the Company recognized in 2008 an other-than-temporary
impairment in a total amount of $ 11,221 pretax, out of which $ 6,290 pretax is related
to auction rate securities. The remaining impairment of $ 4,931 relates to corporate
obligations of U.S Companies with the original principal amounting to $ 7,998. The
Company may recognize additional losses in the future should the market prospects of the
issuers of these securities continue to deteriorate.
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007 and 2008, interest receivable amounted to $ 9,372 and $ 11,371,
respectively, and is included within other current assets in the balance sheets.
|
NOTE 5:
|
-
|
FAIR VALUE MEASURMENTS
|
|
In
accordance with SFAS 157, the Company measures its cash equivalents, short-term deposits,
marketable securities, auction rate securities, severance pay fund and foreign currency
derivative contracts at fair value. Cash equivalents, short-term deposits, marketable
securities, except investments in auction rate securities and severance pay fund are
classified within Level 1 or Level 2. This is because these assets are valued using
quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market
observable inputs. Foreign currency derivative contracts are classified within Level 2 as
the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar
instruments. Investments in auction rate securities are classified within Level 3 because
they are valued using valuation techniques. Some of the inputs to these models are
unobservable in the market and are significant.
|
|
The
Company values the Level 3 investments based on an externally developed valuation using
discounted cash flow model, whose inputs include interest rate curves, credit spreads,
bond prices, volatilities and illiquidity considerations. Unobservable inputs used in
these models are significant to the fair value of the investments.
|
F - 29
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 5:
|
-
|
FAIR VALUE MEASURMENTS (Cont.)
|
|
The
Companys financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding
accrued interest components; consisted of the following types of instruments as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using input type
|
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
$
|
398,534
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
398,534
|
|
|
Commercial papers
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12,502
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12,502
|
|
|
Treasury notes
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
Short-term deposits
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
26,302
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
26,302
|
|
|
Marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
Government and corporate debentures -
|
|
|
|
fixed interest rate
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
621,444
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
621,444
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
194,254
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
194,254
|
|
|
Structured notes
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
29,506
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
29,506
|
|
|
Government and corporate debentures -
|
|
|
|
floating interest rate
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,203
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,203
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
Severance pay fund
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financials Assets
|
|
|
$
|
398,534
|
|
$
|
921,909
|
|
$
|
11,910
|
|
$
|
1,332,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table presents the changes in Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Companys Level 3 instruments consist
of Auction Rate Securities classified as available-for-sale with the unrealized gains and
losses, net of tax, reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)in
shareholders equity.
|
|
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
Auction rate
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Transfer to Level 3
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
Unrealized losses included in earning (other than temporary impairment)
|
|
|
|
(6,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
$
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 30
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 6:
|
-
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computers and peripheral equipment
|
|
|
$
|
47,429
|
|
$
|
46,578
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
5,063
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
|
33,432
|
|
|
36,046
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
12,441
|
|
|
12,441
|
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,832
|
|
|
105,612
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
46,885
|
|
|
49,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
$
|
56,947
|
|
$
|
56,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
March 2006, the Company purchased a land and a building in Tel-Aviv, Israel, for a total
amount of $ 35,250. Additional payments for taxes related to the purchase and for
the building renovations totaled $ 3,580, $ 7,043 and $ 2,614 in 2006, 2007 and
2008, respectively. The Company moved into the new building in May 2007, and commenced
depreciation of the building at that time.
|
|
During
2007 and 2008, the U.S. subsidiary of the Company recorded a reduction of $ 5,041
and $ 6,521, respectively, to the cost and accumulated depreciation of fully
depreciated equipment no longer in use.
|
NOTE 7:
|
-
|
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
|
Changes
in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, beginning of year
|
|
|
$
|
182,115
|
|
$
|
664,910
|
|
|
Acquisition of NFR
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Acquisition of Protect Data
|
|
|
|
481,243
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, end of year
|
|
|
$
|
664,910
|
|
$
|
664,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 31
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 7:
|
|
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (Cont.)
|
|
b.
|
Other
intangible assets, net
|
|
Net
other intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Useful life
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original amount:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
$
|
135,859
|
|
$
|
135,859
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
1-20
|
|
|
25,660
|
|
|
25,660
|
|
|
Customer relationship
|
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
53,580
|
|
|
53,580
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,009
|
|
|
216,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,619
|
|
|
67,173
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
Customer relationship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,362
|
|
|
21,157
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,876
|
|
|
92,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net:
|
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,240
|
|
|
68,686
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,618
|
|
|
22,042
|
|
|
Customer relationship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,218
|
|
|
32,423
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,133
|
|
$
|
123,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
estimated future amortization expense of other intangible assets as of December 31, 2008
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
35,571
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
35,571
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
33,376
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
14,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8:
|
|
EMPLOYEE AND PAYROLL ACCRUALS
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007 and 2008, employee and payroll accruals include a total amount of $ 7,878
and $ 5,569, respectively, related to payroll accrued for the benefit of certain
related parties since 1999 and 2001, respectively.
|
F - 32
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 9:
|
|
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
$
|
20,272
|
|
$
|
18,456
|
|
|
Accrued products and licenses costs
|
|
|
|
6,758
|
|
|
11,118
|
|
|
Liability to former Protect Data's shareholders
|
|
|
|
8,579
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
|
6,691
|
|
|
7,238
|
|
|
Acquisition related restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Marketing expenses payable
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
17,238
|
|
|
17,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,348
|
|
$
|
58,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10:
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
|
The
facilities of the Company are rented under operating lease agreements that expire between
2009 and 2014. Certain of these agreements have free rent payment provisions. We
recognize rent expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis. The Company
leases vehicles under standard commercial operating leases.
|
|
Aggregate
minimum lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31,
2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
4,640
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
3,392
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent
expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, were $ 7,752, $ 8,295
and $ 7,307, respectively.
|
F - 33
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 10:
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)
|
|
Following audits
of the Companys 2002 and 2003 corporate tax returns, the Israeli Tax
Authority (the ITA) issued orders challenging the Companys
positions on several issues including matters such as the usage of funds earned by
its approved enterprise for investments outside of Israel, deductibility of employees
stock options expenses, percentage of foreign ownership of its shares, taxation of
interest earned outside of Israel and deductibility of research and development expenses. The
largest amount in dispute relates to the treatment of investment income on cash that
is held and managed by the Companys wholly-owned Singapore subsidiary, which the
ITA is seeking to tax in Israel. In an additional challenge to this amount,
the ITA reclassified the transfer of funds from the Company to its subsidiary in
Singapore as a dividend for purposes of the Law for the Encouragement of Capital
Investments, which would result in tax on the funds transferred. The ITA
orders also contest the Companys positions on various other issues. The
ITA therefore demanded the payment of additional taxes in the aggregate amount of NIS 963
million with respect to 2002 (assessment received on Dec 27, 2007) and NIS 151
million with respect to 2003 (assessment received on May 29, 2008), in each case
including interest as of the assessment date. The Company has appealed the orders
relating to both years with the Tel-Aviv District Court, and these appeals are pending.
There can be no assurance that the ITA will accept the Companys positions on these
matters or others and, in such an event, the Company may record additional tax expenses
if these matters are settled for amounts in excess of our current provisions.
|
|
The
Company has also been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Information Protection
and Authentication of Texas, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas on
December 30, 2008. The plaintiffs original complaint in the lawsuit
alleges infringement by the Company of U.S. patents nos. 5,311,591 and 5,412,717 and seeks
an injunction and an unspecified amount of damages. The Company currently
intends to vigorously defend against plaintiffs claims, but there can be no
assurance of the outcome of this litigation.
|
|
The
Company is currently engaged in various legal disputes with two minority shareholders of
the Companys subsidiary SofaWare Technologies Ltd., One shareholder alleges the
Company is oppressing him as minority shareholder and is seeking to compel the Company to
purchase his shares which he estimates at NIS 16 million which is subject to change. The
other minority shareholder claims that minority shareholders, himself included, are
entitled to exercise veto rights with respect to certain actions of SofaWare. The same
shareholder also filed a derivative claim against the Company on behalf of SofaWare. On
February 14, 2008, the court partially accepted these claims and ordered that the Company
pay SofaWare NIS 13 million plus interest. The Company has appealed this ruling. The
Companys management believes that the claims filed by these two minority
shareholders are without merit and intends to contest these claims vigorously.
|
|
Further,
the Company is the defendant in various lawsuits, including employment-related litigation
claims, lease termination claims, patent infringement and other legal proceedings in the
normal course of its business. The resolution of these matters is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
F - 34
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME
|
|
a.
|
The
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The adoption
of FIN 48 did not result in a change to the Company retained earning. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits
is as follows:
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
$
|
70,501
|
|
$
|
78,545
|
|
|
Additions for prior year tax positions
|
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
|
18,736
|
|
|
Additions for current year tax position
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,949
|
|
|
Reductions for prior year tax positions
|
|
|
|
(13,322
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
$
|
78,545
|
|
$
|
101,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008, the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could
affect our income tax provision and the effective tax rate.
|
|
In
accordance with the Companys accounting policy, both before and after adoption of
FIN 48, interest expense and penalties related to income taxes are included in the
tax expense line of its consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
During
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded $ 3,400 and $ 5,904,
respectively for interest expense related to uncertain tax positions. As of December 31,
2007 and 2008, the Company had accrued interest liability related to uncertain tax
positions in the amounts of $ 9,600 and $ 15,504, respectively which is included within
income tax accrual on the balance sheet.
|
|
Domestically,
the Israeli Tax Authorities (ITA) are currently examining income tax returns
of the Company for years 2002 and 2003. The ITA disagreed with several of the Companys
positions as it pertains to the treatment of taxes (see Note 10b). The Companys
Israeli income tax returns have been examined for all years prior to fiscal 2002, and the
Company is no longer subject to audit for those periods.
|
|
The
Companys U.S. subsidiaries file income tax return in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and various states. All the Companys tax years are subject to
examination by the U.S. federal and most U.S. state tax authorities due to the Companys
Net Operating Loss and overall credit carry-forward position.
|
|
The
Company believes that it has adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes
related to tax audits and settlement. The final tax outcome of its tax audits could be
different from that which is reflected in the Companys income tax provisions and
accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on the Companys income tax
provision and net income in the period in which such determination is made.
|
F - 35
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
1.
|
Corporate
tax structure:
|
|
Taxable
income of Israeli companies is subject to tax at the rate of 31% in 2006, 29% in 2007,
27% in 2008, 26% in 2009 and 25% in 2010 and thereafter.
|
|
2.
|
Tax
benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959
(the Law):
|
|
Check
Point Ltd. is entitled to tax benefits under the Law. Certain production and development
facilities of Check Point Ltd. have been granted Approved Enterprise status
pursuant to the Law, which provides certain tax benefits to its investment programs.
|
|
A
company that obtained an Approved Enterprise approval may elect to forego the entitlement
to grants and apply for an alternative package of tax benefits (the Alternative
Package). Under the Alternative Package, undistributed income from the Approved
Enterprise operations is fully tax exempt (the tax holiday) for a defined
period.
|
|
On
April 1, 2005, an amendment to the Law came into effect (the Amendment) and
has significantly changed the provisions of the Law (the Old Law). Generally,
investment programs of Check Point Ltd. that have already obtained approval for an
Approved Enterprise by the Israeli Investment Center will continue to be subject to the
Old Laws provisions. On the Alternative Package the Amendment enacted major changes
in the manner in which tax benefits are awarded under the Law so that companies are no
longer required to obtain Investment Center approval in order to qualify for tax
benefits. Such an enterprise is a Privileged Enterprise, rather than the
previous terminology of Approved Enterprise. The period of tax benefits for a new
Privileged Enterprise commences in the Year of Commencement. This year is the
later of: (1) the year in which taxable income is first generated by the company, or (2)
the Year of Election. If a company requested the Alternative Package of benefits for an
Approved Enterprise under the Law, it was precluded from filing a Privileged Enterprise
status for three years after the year in which the Approved Enterprise was activated (Cooling
Period). In November 2008 the law was amended to shorten the Cooling Period to two
years. Following the amendment, the Year of Election for the Companys first
Privileged Enterprise is 2006.
|
|
Check
Point Ltd. has been granted the status of Approved Enterprises, under the Law, in six
investment programs (the Programs). Out of the Programs, the Companys
benefit period related to its first and second investment programs ended, therefore the
Companys income attributed to these investment programs is not entitled to tax
benefits. For all of such Approved Enterprises, the Company has elected the Alternative
Package.
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008 Check Point Ltd. has elected the status of Privileged Enterprise,
under the Amendment, for its seventh and eighth plans.
|
|
The
tax benefits attributable to the Companys current Approved and Privileged
Enterprises are scheduled to expire in phases by 2017.
|
F - 36
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
The
benefits available to an Approved Enterprise and a Privileged Enterprise relate only to
taxable income attributable to the specific investment program and are conditioned upon
terms stipulated in the Investment Law and the related regulations and the criteria set
forth in the applicable certificate of approval (for an Approved Enterprise). If the
Company does not fulfill these conditions, in whole or in part, the benefits can be
cancelled and the Company may be required to refund the amount of the benefits, linked to
the Israeli consumer price index plus interest.
|
|
The
Companys income attributed to the Approved Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise
under the alternative package is tax exempt for a period of two years and is subject to a
reduced corporate tax rate of 10% 25% for an additional period of five to eight
years, based on the percentage of foreign investment.
|
|
In
the event of distribution of dividends from the above mentioned tax-exempt income, the
amount distributed will be subject to the same reduced corporate tax rate that would have
been applied to the Approved Enterprises and Privileged Enterprises income.
|
|
The
amendment to the Investment Law treats repurchase of shares out of Privileged Enterprise
tax exempt income as deem-dividend. Through December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased
65,775,732 of its Ordinary shares in a total amount of $ 1,366,305. The Companys
retained earnings attributed to taxable income are higher than the total shares
repurchased and therefore should not trigger a deem-dividend event. For further
information about the Companys repurchase program refer to Note 12e.
|
|
Out
of the Companys retained earnings as of December 31, 2008, $ 756,263 are
tax-exempt attributable to its Approved Enterprise programs. If such tax-exempt income is
distributed in a manner other than upon complete liquidation of the Company, it would be
taxed at the reduced corporate tax rate applicable to such profits (between 20%-25%),and
an income tax liability of up to $ 172,745 would be incurred as of December 31,
2008.
|
|
In
addition, as a result of the amendment, tax-exempt income attributed to Privileged
Enterprise, will subject the Company to taxes upon distribution in any manner including
complete liquidation. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has $ 297,676 tax-exempt
income attributed to its Privileged Enterprise plan. In case of distribution or complete
liquidation of the Company, it would be taxed at the reduced corporate tax rate of 20%
and an income tax liability of up to $ 59,535 would be incurred as of December 31,
2008.
|
|
The
Companys board of directors has determined that it will not distribute any amounts
of its undistributed tax-exempt income as dividend. The Company intends to reinvest its
tax-exempt income and not to distribute such income as a dividend. Accordingly, no
deferred income taxes have been provided on income attributable to the Companys
Approved Enterprise and Privileged Enterprise programs as the undistributed tax exempt
income is essentially permanent by reinvestment.
|
|
Income
from sources other than the Approved and Privileged Enterprise programs is subject to tax
at regular Israeli corporate tax rate.
|
F - 37
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
3.
|
Foreign
Exchange Regulations:
|
|
Under
the Foreign Exchange Regulations the Israeli company is calculating its tax liability in
US Dollars according to certain orders. The tax liability, as calculated in US Dollars is
translated into NIS according to the exchange rate as of December 31st of each year.
|
|
4.
|
Tax
benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969:
|
|
The
Company qualifies as an Industrial Company within the meaning of the Law for the
Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969 (the Industrial Encouragement Law).
The Industrial Encouragement Law defines an Industrial Company as a company
that is resident in Israel and that derives at least 90% of its income in any tax year,
other than income from defense loans, capital gains, interest and dividends, from an
enterprise whose major activity in a given tax year is industrial production. Under the
Industrial Encouragement Law the Company is entitled to amortization of the cost of
purchased know-how and patents over an eight-year period for tax purposes as well as
accelerated depreciation rates on equipment and buildings.
|
|
Eligibility
for the benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior
approval from any governmental authority.
|
|
c.
|
Income
taxes on non-Israeli subsidiaries:
|
|
Non-Israeli
subsidiaries are taxed according to the tax laws in their respective country of residence.
|
|
Israeli
income taxes and foreign withholding taxes were not provided for undistributed earnings
of the Companys foreign subsidiaries. The Companys board of directors has
determined that the Company will not distribute any amounts of its undistributed earnings
as dividend. The Company intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in their foreign
subsidiaries. Accordingly, no deferred income taxes have been provided. If these earnings
were distributed to Israel in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be
subject to additional Israeli income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax
credits) and foreign withholding taxes.
|
F - 38
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities:
|
|
Deferred
taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Companys deferred taxes
were in respect of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carry-forward tax losses
|
|
|
$
|
288,782
|
|
$
|
276,724
|
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
3,429
|
|
|
Employee stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
12,171
|
|
|
15,344
|
|
|
Accrued employees costs
|
|
|
|
3,930
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances
|
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
319,241
|
|
|
314,725
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
(290,412
|
)
|
|
(280,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
28,829
|
|
|
34,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
(44,118
|
)
|
|
(34,058
|
)
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
(44,732
|
)
|
|
(34,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
$
|
(15,903
|
)
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic:
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
$
|
1,129
|
|
|
Non current deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
6,406
|
|
|
9,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,892
|
|
|
10,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
9,292
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
|
(6,691
|
)
|
|
(7,238
|
)
|
|
Non current deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
8,514
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
|
Non current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
(31,465
|
)
|
|
(22,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,795
|
)
|
|
(10,670
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,903
|
)
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
deferred tax asset, net, is included within other current assets in the balance sheets.
Current deferred tax liability, net, is included within accrued expenses and other
liabilities in the balance sheets.
|
F - 39
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
The
subsidiaries in the U.S. have provided valuation allowance in respect of deferred tax
assets resulting from carry forwards of net operating loss and research and development
tax credit. SFAS No. 123(R) prohibits recognition of a deferred income tax asset for
excess tax benefits due to stock option exercises that have not yet been realized through
a reduction in income tax payable. All net operating loss carry-forwards relate to excess
tax deductions from stock options which have not yet been realized. Such unrecognized
deferred tax benefits will be accounted for as a credit to additional paid-in-capital, if
and when realized. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the research and
development credit carry-forwards due to uncertainties about whether it will be able to
utilize these assets before they expire. The net change in the valuation allowance was $
10,019, which primarily relates to stock option benefits and were accounted for as a
credit to additional paid-in-capital.
|
|
Through
December 31, 2008, the U.S. subsidiaries had a U.S. federal loss carryforward of
approximately $ 683,000 resulting from tax benefits related to employees stock option
exercises that can be carried forward and offset against taxable income up to 20 years,
expiring before 2025. Excess tax benefits related to employee stock option exercises for
which no compensation expense was recognized will be credited to additional paid-in
capital when realized. Through December 31, 2008, the U.S. subsidiaries had a U.S. state
net loss carryforward of approximately $687,000, which expire between fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2024, and are subject to limitations on their utilization. Through December 31,
2008, the U.S. subsidiaries had research and development tax credits of approximately $
7,574, which expire between fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2027 and are subject to limitations on
their utilization.
|
|
e.
|
Income
before taxes on income is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
$
|
282,085
|
|
$
|
304,883
|
|
$
|
350,963
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
*) 56,385
|
|
|
*) 24,418
|
|
|
35,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
338,470
|
|
$
|
329,301
|
|
$
|
386,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*)
|
Including
write-off of acquired in-process research and development of $ 1,060
in 2006 and $ 17,000 in 2007.
|
f.
Taxes on income are comprised of the following:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
$
|
63,593
|
|
$
|
67,560
|
|
$
|
76,223
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
(3,150
|
)
|
|
(19,323
|
)
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,443
|
|
$
|
48,237
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
$
|
42,529
|
|
$
|
45,015
|
|
$
|
59,870
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
17,914
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,443
|
|
$
|
48,237
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 40
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
$
|
45,284
|
|
$
|
47,512
|
|
$
|
62,650
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
(2,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic taxes
|
|
|
|
42,529
|
|
|
45,015
|
|
|
59,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign taxes - US:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal taxes:
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
8,205
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(4,160
|
)
|
|
(2,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
|
State taxes:
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
Other international locations:
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
14,813
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
|
5,822
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,024
|
)
|
|
(8,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,813
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
(2,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign taxes
|
|
|
|
17,914
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
$
|
60,443
|
|
$
|
48,237
|
|
$
|
62,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 41
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 11:
|
|
TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
g.
|
Reconciliation
of the theoretical tax expenses:
|
|
A
reconciliation between the theoretical tax expenses, assuming all income is taxed at the
statutory rate applicable and the actual income tax as reported in the statements of
income, is as follows:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes as reported in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statements of income
|
|
|
$
|
338,470
|
|
$
|
329,301
|
|
$
|
386,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate in Israel
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
Effect of "Approved and Privileged Enterprise"
|
|
|
|
status *)
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
Foreign exchange (see note h below)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
Stock based compensation - non deductible
|
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
**) -
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Others, net
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
**) -
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
Basic earnings per share amounts of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit resulting from the "Approved and
|
|
|
|
|
Privileged Enterprise" status
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share amounts of the
|
|
|
|
|
benefit resulting from the "Approved and
|
|
|
|
|
Privileged Enterprise" status
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h.
|
Measurement
of income tax in foreign subsidiaries:
|
|
Results
of the Companys subsidiary for tax purposes are measured and reflected in terms of
earnings in SEK. As explained in Note 2b, the financial statements are measured in U.S.
dollars. The difference between the annual changes in the SEK/dollar exchange rate causes
a further difference between taxable income and the income before taxes shown in the
financial statements. In accordance with paragraph 9(f) of SFAS No. 109, the Companys
subsidiary has not provided deferred income taxes on the difference between the reporting
currency and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.
|
F - 42
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 12:
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
Ordinary
shares confer upon their holders the right to receive notice to participate and vote in
general meetings of the Company, and the right to receive dividends if declared.
|
|
Dividends
declared on Ordinary shares will be paid in NIS. Dividends paid to shareholders outside
Israel will be converted into U.S. dollars, on the basis of the exchange rate prevailing
at the date of payment. The Companys board of directors has determined that it will
not distribute any amounts of its undistributed tax exempt income as dividend.
|
|
The
Deferred share is not entitled to any rights other than the right to receive its nominal
value upon liquidation of the Company.
|
|
c.
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP):
|
|
The
Company reserved a total of 6,000,000 Ordinary shares for issuance under the ESPP.
Eligible employees use up to 15% of their salaries to purchase Ordinary shares but no
more than 1,250 shares per participant on any purchase date. The ESPP is implemented
through an offering every six months. The price of an Ordinary share purchased under the
ESPP is equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Ordinary share on the
subscription date of each offering period or on the purchase date.
|
|
During
2006, 2007 and 2008 employees purchased 360,289, 389,367 and 474,550 Ordinary shares at
average prices of $ 16.08, $ 16.73 and $ 18.29 per share, respectively.
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008, 3,017,143 Ordinary shares were available for future issuance under
the ESPP.
|
|
In
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the ESPP is compensatory and as such results in
recognition of compensation cost. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
the Company recognized $1,481, $ 1,666 and $ 2,770, respectively of compensation
expense in connection with the ESPP.
|
|
In
2005, the Company adopted two new equity incentive plans: the 2005 United States Equity
Incentive Plan, which is referred to as the 2005 U.S. Plan, and the 2005 Israel Equity
Incentive Plan, which is referred to as the 2005 Israel Plan. Both of these plans will be
in effect until 2015. Following ratification of the new plans by its shareholders in
September 2005, the Company stopped issuing stock options under the plans approved in
1996.
|
F - 43
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 12:
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
Under
the Companys 2005 equity incentive plans (the 2005 Plans), options are
granted to employees, officers and directors at an exercise price equal to at least the
fair market value at the date of grant and are granted for periods not to exceed seven
years. Options granted under the 2005 Plans generally vest over a period of four to five
years of employment. Any options that are cancelled or forfeited before expiration become
available for future grants. The Company can also issue a variety of other equity
incentives under the 2005 Plans. In addition to granting stock options, since 2006, the
Company started to routinely grant Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) under the
2005 Plans. RSUs vest over a four year period of employment and may be subject to
performance criteria. RSUs that are cancelled or forfeited become available for future
grants.
|
|
Under
the 2005 Plans, the Companys non-employee directors receive an automatic annual
option grant.
|
|
In
connection with its acquisition of Protect Data in January 2007, the Company assumed all
of the outstanding stock options under the Pointsec mobile technologies inc. 2003, 2005
and 2006 Stock Option Plans (the Pointsec Plan), which were converted into
options to purchase 751,769 shares of the Companys Ordinary shares. These stock
options generally have terms of between five and six years and generally vest over a
three-year period. Options that are cancelled or forfeited before expiration do not
become available for future grant.
|
|
Under
the terms of the 2005 Plans, options to purchase 50,000,000 Ordinary shares were reserved
for issuance (increasing by 5,000,000 Ordinary shares on January 1 of each year beginning
January 1, 2006), out of which as of December 31, 2008, 54,044,511 Ordinary shares were
available for future grant under the 2005 Plans. As of December 31, 2008, 8,568,051
options and RSUs were outstanding under the 2005 Plans, 14,135,650 options were
outstanding under the plans approved in 1996 72,408 were outstanding under the Zone Labs
plan and 203,622 were outstanding under the Pointsec Plan.
|
|
A
summary of the Companys stock option activity and related information, including
options under the Zone Labs 1998 Stock Option Plan assumed by the Company (in connection
with the Zona Labs acquisition in 2004) and Pointsec plans, is as follows:
|
|
|
Options (in thousands)
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
30,251
|
|
|
24,606
|
|
|
24,156
|
|
$
|
22.03
|
|
$
|
23.17
|
|
$
|
22.02
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
$
|
17.19
|
|
$
|
21.29
|
|
$
|
23.21
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
$
|
13.82
|
|
$
|
16.41
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
$
|
17.56
|
|
$
|
53.17
|
|
$
|
41.89
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
(3,770
|
)
|
|
(995
|
)
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
$
|
24.28
|
|
$
|
26.76
|
|
$
|
21.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
24,606
|
|
|
24,156
|
|
|
21,582
|
(*)
|
$
|
23.17
|
|
$
|
22.02
|
|
$
|
20.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
13,954
|
|
|
15,074
|
|
|
14,629
|
|
$
|
25.15
|
|
$
|
22.32
|
|
$
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*)
|
As
of December 31, 2008, approximately 20.5 million options were outstanding and
expected to vest. Options expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture
rate for purposes of determining related compensation expense.
|
F - 44
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 12:
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Options
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
24,156
|
|
$
|
64,847
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
|
11,957
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
(2,761
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
21,582
|
|
$
|
**) 25,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
14,629
|
|
$
|
***) 22,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**)
|
Represents
intrinsic value of 8,909 thousand outstanding options that are
in-the-money as of December 31, 2008. The remaining 12,673 thousand
outstanding options are out of the money as of December 31, 2008 and their
intrinsic value was considered as zero.
|
|
***)
|
Represents
intrinsic value of 7,306 thousand exercisable options that are
in-the-money as of December 31, 2008. The remaining 7,323 thousand
exercisable options are out of the money as of December 31, 2008 and their
intrinsic value was considered as zero.
|
|
The
following table summarizes information relating to RSUs, as well as changes to such
awards during 2006, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
Number (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
*) 1,037
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*)
|
Includes
441 thousand RSUs granted in exchange for options as described in section
f below.
|
|
The
weighted average fair values at grant date of RSUs granted for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008 were $18.83 $ 23.79 and $ 22.25, respectively.
|
F - 45
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 12:
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
The
options outstanding as of December 31, 2008, have been separated into ranges of exercise
price, as follows:
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise
price
|
Number
outstanding
(in
thousands)
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
(years)
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Number
exercisable
(in
thousands)
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
(years)
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.66-9.99
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
6.09
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
|
10.00-13.99
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
|
14.00-15.99
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
16.00-17.99
|
|
|
|
6,771
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
17.14
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
17.17
|
|
|
18.00-19.99
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
19.28
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
19.36
|
|
|
20.00-23.99
|
|
|
|
7,770
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
22.88
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
22.83
|
|
|
24.00-26.99
|
|
|
|
4,275
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
26.17
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
|
26.99
|
|
|
27.00-40.99
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
27.61
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
27.61
|
|
|
41.00-44.99
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
44.42
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
44.42
|
|
|
45-79.79
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
79.79
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
79.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.66-79.79
|
|
|
|
21,582
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
20.97
|
|
|
14,629
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted average fair values at grant date of options granted for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008, with an exercise price equal to the market value at the date of
grant were $ 9.71, $ 11.92 and $ 9.61, respectively. The weighted average fair
values at grant date of options assumed in Protect Datas acquisition with an
exercise price lower than the market value at the date of grant was $ 12.64.
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $ 62,447 of unrecognized
compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and non-vested restricted stock
awards, expected to be recognized over four years.
|
|
e.
|
The
Companys board of directors approved five programs to repurchase Ordinary
shares for a total of $ 1,600,000. The first program was announced on
October 28, 2003, and ended on August 24, 2004, and authorized the repurchase
of up to $ 200,000 of its Ordinary shares. The second program was announced on
October 28, 2004, and ended on May 31, 2005, and authorized the repurchase of
up to $ 200,000, of its Ordinary shares. The third program was announced on
July 25, 2005, and ended on May 18, 2006, and authorized the repurchase of up
to $ 200,000 of its Ordinary shares. The fourth program was announced on May
22, 2006 and ended on March 5, 2008, and authorized the repurchase of up to
$ 600,000 of its Ordinary shares. The fifth program was announced on March
26, 2008, and as of December 31, 2008 is still in effect, and authorizes the
repurchase of up to $ 400,000 of its Ordinary shares. Under the repurchase
programs, share purchases may be made from time to time depending on market
conditions, share price, trading volume and other factors and will be funded
from available working capital.
|
F - 46
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 12:
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Cont.)
|
|
The
repurchase programs have no time limit and may be suspended from time to time or
discontinued. Under the above programs, the Company repurchased during 2006, 2007 and
2008 approximately 23.2, 9.02 and 10.9 million shares, respectively, at a total cost of $ 435,491,
$ 209,757 and $ 239,542, respectively. The average purchase price per share
during 2006, 2007 and 2008 was $ 18.71, $ 23.26 and $ 21.95, respectively.
Such purchases of Ordinary shares are accounted for as treasury stock and result in a
reduction of shareholders equity. As of December 31, 2008, there is approximately $
233,700 remaining out of the $400,000 authorized under the share repurchase program in
2008.
|
|
Through
December 31 2008, the Company reissued 14,639,642 of its repurchased Ordinary shares in
consideration for the exercise of stock options and restricted shares by employees and
for shares issued under the ESPP.
|
|
f.
|
In
September 2006, the Company offered holders of certain outstanding options
granted on or after January 1, 2004, under the equity incentive plans, whether
vested or not, the opportunity to exchange their options for RSUs under the
2005 Plans. The number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the option
value, which was determined on September 12, 2006, by the market value of Check
Points ordinary share on this date.
|
|
The
option value on September 12, 2006 was determined using Black-Scholes-Merton option
pricing model, based on a number of factors, including: the market value of the Ordinary
shares underlying the option on September 12, 2006, option exercise price, current market
volatility, expected life of the option, and short-term (risk free) interest rate.
|
|
Upon
completion of the exchange offer in October 2006, the Company issued 441,114 RSUs in
exchange for outstanding options to purchase 1,759,160 of its Ordinary shares. The RSUs
vest over a four year period starting on October 23, 2006, as follows: 20% vest in years
one and two, and 30% vest in years three and four.
|
|
The
Company accounted for the offer as a modification in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R) and
as such calculated the fair value before and after the modification, which resulted in no
incremental compensation cost on the modification date. The unrecognized compensation
cost remaining from the original options, is recognized over the service period of the
modified award (RSUs) using the straight line method.
|
F - 47
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 13:
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$
|
278,027
|
|
$
|
281,064
|
|
$
|
323,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Ordinary shares outstanding (in
|
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
|
|
235,519
|
|
|
222,548
|
|
|
214,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect:
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and RSUs (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average Ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
236,769
|
|
|
225,442
|
|
|
216,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Ordinary share
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Ordinary share
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14:
|
|
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND SELECTED STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA
|
|
a.
|
Summary
information about geographical areas:
|
|
The
Company operates in one reportable segment (see Note 1 for a brief description of the
Companys business). The total revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on
the location of the Companys channel partners which are considered as end
customers, as well as direct customers of the Company.
|
|
The
following present total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and
long-lived assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 by geographic area:
|
|
1.
|
Revenues
based on the channel partners location:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas, principally U.S
|
|
|
$
|
265,499
|
|
$
|
329,681
|
|
$
|
349,614
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
|
238,821
|
|
|
319,871
|
|
|
360,161
|
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
|
70,821
|
|
|
81,325
|
|
|
98,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
575,141
|
|
$
|
730,877
|
|
$
|
808,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 48
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share amounts)
|
NOTE 14:
|
|
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND SELECTED STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA (Cont.)
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S
|
|
|
$
|
201,679
|
|
$
|
196,739
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
51,691
|
|
|
52,182
|
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
|
627,667
|
|
|
594,513
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
881,990
|
|
$
|
844,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Financial
income, net:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
$
|
68,943
|
|
$
|
48,375
|
|
$
|
51,776
|
|
|
Amortization of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
premium and accretion of discount, net
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Realized gain on sale of marketable
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
Foreign currency re-measurement gain
|
|
|
|
and others
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,943
|
|
|
52,816
|
|
|
51,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expense:
|
|
|
|
Amortization of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
premium and accretion of discount, net
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
Foreign currency re-measurement loss
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
Realized loss on sale of marketable
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,647
|
|
$
|
49,725
|
|
$
|
40,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 49
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that
it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and
authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
|
|
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
By: /s/ Gil Shwed
Gil Shwed
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
By: /s/ Tal Payne
Tal Payne
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: March 3, 2009
101
Check Point Software Tec... (NASDAQ:CHKP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Check Point Software Tec... (NASDAQ:CHKP)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024