UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
(Mark One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-51991
Basin Water, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-4736881
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
9302 Pittsburgh Avenue, Suite 210
Rancho Cucamonga, California
|
|
91730
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(909) 481-6800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $131.8 million based upon the closing price of the Registrants common stock
on the NASDAQ Global Market on June 29, 2007. On February 2, 2009, there were 22,205,843 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement delivered to stockholders in
connection with the Registrants 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on April 7, 2008 by the Registrant are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. With the exception of those portions that are
specifically incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, such Proxy Statement shall not be deemed filed as part of this Report or incorporated by reference herein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Form 10-K/A) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the 2007 Annual Report) filed by Basin Water, Inc. (the Company) originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2008. The Form 10-K/A includes amended and restated consolidated financial
statements and related financial information for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, including the financial results in each of the quarterly periods in 2007 and 2006. This information is disclosed in Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated
financial statements. The Company has also restated its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and will file an amendment to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for such period.
The effects of this restatement are reflected in the comparative amounts included in this Form 10-K/A.
Background of the Restatement
In connection with its review in late June 2008 with respect to certain transactions and in July 2008 with respect to the preparation of its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company identified issues relating to its revenue recognition for certain specific transactions. The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Audit
Committee), acting on behalf of the Board, had previously retained independent legal counsel in February 2008 in connection with an inquiry into allegations contained in certain private shareholder litigation brought against the Company, the
Companys directors and certain Company officers. The Audit Committee then asked its independent counsel to broaden its inquiry into other transactions relating to the Companys revenue recognition. The Audit Committees counsel also
retained independent forensic accountants to review the foregoing transactions.
On August 6, 2008, the Audit Committees
counsel, together with the independent forensic accountants, conveyed interim findings to the Audit Committee. On August 11, 2008, the Company announced that it would delay the filing of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 and that the Company believed it may be necessary to restate previously issued financial statements for certain periods as a result of the Companys revenue recognition relating to certain specific transactions.
On September 23, 2008 and October 28, 2008, the Audit Committee met with its counsel and the forensic accountants to discuss their further
report on the findings with respect to the Companys accounting for the transactions. On October 29, 2008, the Audit Committee discussed the findings of the review with SingerLewak LLP, the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm. On October 29, 2008, the Company announced that the Audit Committee concluded that the Company incorrectly accounted for certain specific transactions in 2006 and 2007. As a result, the Company incorrectly recognized revenues
relating to such transactions, including revenues incorrectly recognized as a result of the failure to apply Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -Deferral for Certain
Interests, Revised December 2003
(FIN 46(R)).
The Company also announced that the Audit Committee concluded that the Companys financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007,
including each of the fiscal quarters in 2006 and 2007, and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, should no longer be relied upon. The consolidated financial statements and related financial information contained in our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K for 2006 and 2007 should be read only in conjunction with the information contained in this Form 10-K/A. See Notes 3 and 4 of our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K/A for further discussion.
The Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation with respect to the Companys accounting and
related disclosure and other matters. The Company is cooperating with the SEC.
Subsequent to the Companys announcement that it would
restate its consolidated financial statements, the Companys auditors, SingerLewak LLP, commenced an audit of the Companys restated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
1
The Restatement and Other Related Matters
Set forth below is a summary of the significant determinations regarding the restatement.
|
1.
|
Failure to Apply FIN 46(R)
|
In 2007, the Company
entered into four transactions with respect to the sale of water treatment units to two special purpose entities (VL Capital, or VLC, and Water Services Solutions, or WSS) that were to be funded by third-party financial institutions. The underlying
agreements provided that the Company would sell VLC and WSS water treatment units subject to water service agreements (WSAs) between the Company and its customers. The special purpose entities would then have the right to receive the scheduled lease
payments from the customers subject to the WSAs. In two transactions with VL Capital, the Company recognized a total of $4.4 million of revenues. In two transactions with WSS, the Company recognized a total of $3.9 million of revenues. The Company
has concluded that the financial statements of VLC and WSS should be consolidated with those of the Company in accordance with FIN 46(R). This analysis is based on the fact that the structure of the transactions with VLC and WSS did not effectively
transfer sufficient risk to the other parties to the transactions, leaving the Company with the majority of the risks. In addition, in the transactions with WSS, the contract conditions of the transactions were not fulfilled. As a result, the
Company incorrectly recognized revenues from these transactions.
|
2.
|
Revenue Recognition Issues
|
In 2006 and 2007, the
Company entered into water treatment unit sale transactions with a number of customers. Those transactions being restated are described below.
In the first transaction, the Company sold a water treatment unit in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, although the purchase agreement was not executed until August 2006. The customer terminated the purchase agreement shortly after its
execution, and the Company recorded a bad debt expense for the profit recognized on the sale due to the termination of the agreement in the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that it should reverse the revenues in the
amount of $0.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the bad debt expense in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.4 million in the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively, associated with this transaction.
In the second transaction, the Company was negotiating the sale of a water treatment unit with a customer up to and including September 29, 2006,
when the customer sent the Company an email instructing it to release the unit for delivery and indicating that the customer would be contacting the Company early the next week to finalize the agreement. The Company shipped a water treatment unit in
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, but the terms of the contract were not finalized until February 2007. The Company has determined that the revenues from this transaction in the amount of $0.2 million should have been recognized in the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 rather than the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
In the third transaction, the Company recognized
revenues of $1.5 million with respect to a transaction in the quarter ended March 31, 2006, based on a unit purchase agreement dated March 30, 2006, but portions of the agreement were still being negotiated until June 2006. The agreement
provides for 10% of the transaction amount to be paid upon signing the letter of intent, which occurred in December 2005, with the remaining 90% of the amount due to be paid in March 2009. Based on its review, the Company has concluded that it
should have recognized 10% of the transaction amount, or $0.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 when the transaction documentation was completed and executed, and that it should recognize the remaining $1.3 million as revenues upon
collection. Subsequently, in February 2009, the water treatment units were returned to the Company as part of the settlement of a dispute with the third party (see Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements).
In the fourth transaction, the Company received a purchase order from one of its suppliers for the purchase of two water treatment units in the third
quarter of 2006 upon which it recognized revenues pursuant to percentage of completion accounting. However, the terms of the purchase order did not specify the shipping date for the units, the supplier never specified a shipping date and the units
were never shipped. In addition, the customer claimed a right of return which the Company disputes. The transaction is being restated and the revenues reversed in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.6 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In the fifth transaction, the Company entered into a letter of intent with a customer in the third quarter of 2007 for the sale of a water
treatment unit and recognized revenues during that quarter. Pursuant to the terms of the letter of intent, the customers purchase of the unit was subject to the satisfaction of test criteria and data delivery under a previously-executed
demonstration agreement
2
relating to the unit. These conditions were not satisfied as of the end of the third quarter of 2007. Based on these facts, the Company has concluded that it
should reverse the revenues of $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2007 from this transaction.
|
3.
|
Accounting for Warrants
|
The Company reviewed its
treatment of the non-cash expense related to the warrants that were issued to Aqua America, Inc. (Aqua) in connection with a $2.0 million loan to the Company in February 2006 and a proposed strategic relationship between Aqua and the Company. The
loan matured on the first anniversary of the Companys initial public offering, and the proposed strategic relationship was intended to have a term of five years. Documents memorializing the exact terms of the strategic relationship were
exchanged with Aqua; however, a formal agreement reflecting the strategic relationship was never executed. Based on the fact that no formal agreement related to the strategic relationship was entered into and the fact that the loan agreement
specifically referenced issuance of the warrants, the Company has concluded that the warrant expense should have been recognized over the life of the loan, rather than over the anticipated life of the proposed strategic relationship. As a result of
this correction, the Company recorded additional interest expense of approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, the Company reversed amortization expense of $0.3 million in both 2007 and 2006.
In reviewing the accounting for
the December 2007 sale to Empire Water Corporation of the right to purchase certain water rights and related assets, the Company determined that errors were made relating to the gain recorded with respect to such transaction. The Company originally
recorded a $2.5 million gain upon receipt of shares of Empire Water Corporation stock in such transaction. The gain was incorrectly recorded due to rounding and mathematical errors, as well as a revision of the Companys basis in the assets
sold to Empire Water Corporation. As a result, the Company has determined that the recorded gain should have been $3.1 million. The Company recorded $0.6 million additional gain on sale to affiliate in 2007.
The Company has determined
that an error was made in the calculation of the reserve for contract losses at September 30, 2007. Specifically, with regard to one of its service contracts, it was assumed that a possible facility expansion would result in higher service fees
to the customer, thus eliminating estimated operating losses on this contract beyond 2008. This expansion (and anticipated fee adjustment) was not contractually committed to and therefore should not have been considered in estimating the contract
loss reserve at September 30, 2007. As a result, the Company has increased the reserve for contract losses (and related cost of contract revenues) in the restated consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
by approximately $1.8 million to correct this error.
|
6.
|
Balance Sheet Reclassification for Purchase Accounting
|
During the course of its review of the final purchase accounting for the acquisition of Mobile Process Technology Co. (MPT), the Company determined that an error in the approximate amount of $2.3 million had been made in recording deferred
tax liabilities and goodwill. As a result, the Company has reduced deferred tax liabilities and goodwill by this amount as of December 31, 2007. This correction had no effect on the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
In connection with the review of
its financial statements as part of the restatement, the Company has reviewed various other adjustments and reclassifications from prior years and determined these other adjustments and reclassifications should be made in the consolidated financial
statements.
3
Effect of Restatement
The cumulative effect of the adjustments relating to all of these errors reduced revenues by approximately $9.1 million and $3.2 million in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net
loss increased by approximately $3.0 million and $2.3 million in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on net loss (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Loss
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Cumulative
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Failure to apply FIN 46(R)
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
Revenue recognition errors
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
Errors in accounting for warrants
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Error in recording Empire transaction
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Error in recording contract loss reserves
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
Other adjustments, net
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on EPS (in thousands, except per
share items):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
2007 As
Reported
|
|
|
(Increase) to
Net Loss
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006 As
Reported
|
|
|
(Increase) to
Net Loss
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share - assuming dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share - diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred net losses. The
impact of common stock equivalents has been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect on net loss per share is anti-dilutive.
4
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on the balance sheets for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) in
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,177
|
)
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
6,859
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
(7,295
|
)
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Controlling Interest
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of these restatements are reflected in the consolidated financial statements and other
supplemental data, including the unaudited quarterly data for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 and selected financial data, included in this Form 10-K/A. The Company has not amended and does not intend to amend any of its previously filed annual reports
on Form 10-K for the periods affected by the restatement or adjustments other than in this Form 10-K/A or any of its previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q other than its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 being filed after this report.
We have updated information in this filing to reflect the effects of the restatement as
well as certain developments in our business and operations since December 31, 2007.
5
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, which are subject to the Safe Harbor created by those sections. Any such forward-looking statements would be contained principally in Business, Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry
environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of regulation. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as anticipates, believes,
could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential, predicts, projects, should, will, would or
similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause
our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in greater detail in Item
1A. Risk Factors. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our managements beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A
.
You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.
We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
PART I
Overview
Basin Water, Inc. designs, builds and implements systems for the treatment of contaminated groundwater, industrial process water, and air streams from
municipal and industrial sources. It provides reliable sources of drinking water for many communities, and the ability to comply with environmental standards and recover valuable resources from process and waste water streams.
In 2007, we derived most of our revenues from designing, assembling and servicing our proprietary ion-exchange systems for the treatment of contaminated
groundwater for use as drinking water. Also, in 2007 and 2008, we launched major initiatives, both external and internal, to facilitate our transformation into a water services company focused on development of our technology+services business
model. Using this model, we seek opportunities to combine proprietary or specialized technologies with long-term relationships built through performance-based service agreements to meet groundwater treatment, industrial water and wastewater
treatment and resource recovery needs. By expanding the array of technologies we offer through our technology+services model beyond our proprietary ion-exchange technology, we believe we can expand the potential pool of customers, markets and
geographic areas for our services.
While we have commenced a number of new initiatives since 2007, we continued in 2008 to derive
substantially all of our revenues from our proprietary, ion-exchange, onsite regenerable treatment system. That system reduces groundwater contaminant levels in what we believe is an efficient, flexible and cost-effective manner. Our system produces
what we believe are very low waste rates, can effectively treat medium-to-high volume requirements and is capable of removing multiple chemical contaminants at a single site. These systems regenerate the resin by using a salt brine solution to
remove the contaminants from the resin so that it can be used again in the ion-exchange process. We market these systems to utilities, cities, municipalities, special districts, real estate developers and other organizations for use in treating
groundwater that does not comply with federal or state drinking water regulations due to the presence of chemical contaminants.
We are
defining our municipal market opportunities in targeted geographic regions and our industrial market opportunities on a national basis. In the West, our companys historic base, rapid population growth and decreasing drinking water supplies
continue to provide opportunities for our technology and services. In addition, we believe that concerns over specific contaminants throughout the country will also provide opportunities for our technology and services, such as for treatment of the
chemical contaminants.
6
Building on our success in the market for treating groundwater to be used for drinking water, we are
taking steps to become a next generation water services company that succeeds by combining the strengths of our existing businesses and employees with the offering of cutting edge technology and site-tailored solutions. We plan to employ this model
across a broad range of treatment scenarios in municipal and industrial markets for the treatment of water and air streams.
We make
available free of charge through our internet website our press releases, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all other required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practical after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our internet website also contains our Code of Ethics. Our principal executive offices are located at 9302 Pittsburgh Ave.,
Suite 210, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, and our telephone number is (888) 481-6811. Our website address is
www.basinwater.com
. The information on our website is neither part of nor incorporated by reference into this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A.
Company History
Originally incorporated in California in 1999, Basin Water reincorporated in Delaware in connection with our initial public offering which was completed in May 2006. Our operations from 1999 until 2001 consisted primarily of research and
development activities, as we developed our proprietary ion-exchange process. Our proprietary process was conceived by Peter L. Jensen, our founder and former Chief Executive Officer, and the late Dr. Gerald Guter, who served as our Chief
Scientific Officer. Also during this time, we developed a groundwater treatment system for commercialization of our proprietary process and increased our personnel to include additional engineers and sales and marketing personnel. We successfully
completed a prototype for our groundwater treatment system in May 2002, and shortly thereafter we assisted one of our customers in submitting an application with the California Department of Health Services (DHS) for a permit to operate our system
for treatment of nitrate. In June 2002, our customer received the first permit from DHS for operation of our system to treat groundwater. We also received our first revenues in 2002 from sales of our groundwater treatment system and operations.
From 2002 through 2006, we focused our efforts on developing systems that could treat other contaminants, increasing our engineering
workforce, developing our sales and marketing force, obtaining patents, and improving our internal finance and accounting capabilities.
Beginning in the last quarter of 2006, and continuing throughout 2007, we focused our efforts on becoming a more diversified and predictable growth company by developing our technology+services business model and also implementing internal
and external initiatives.
Our internal initiatives included:
|
|
|
Recruiting top personnel with an emphasis on people with experience in the water and wastewater industries or in combining technology with performance-based service
agreements;
|
|
|
|
Expanding beyond our base of municipal customers (such as utilities, special districts, municipalities and other similar organizations) to include potential
customers in the industrial marketplace (such as oil and gas, power, mining and chemical companies);
|
|
|
|
Installing business and financial systems to accommodate our growth and new system and service initiatives;
|
|
|
|
Developing regional sales, process engineering and field service groups aligned with both our municipal and industrial marketplace customers; and
|
|
|
|
Developing our technology+services offering to include the treatment of a variety of organic and inorganic contaminants.
|
Our external initiatives included the Mobile Process Technology, Co. acquisition, and entering into a strategic alliance with Rohm and Haas Chemicals
LLC, among others. In addition, in September 2008, we acquired the assets of a bioreactor and biofilter business, which we refer to as Envirogen, from Shaw Environmental, Inc. and its affiliates, which we refer to as Shaw.
Market Opportunity
Demand for drinking water
treatment technologies and services.
Population growth has resulted in increased demand for drinking water in much of the United States. This is a problem throughout the United States but is particularly acute in California and other states
in the Southwest United States, which we refer to as the arid West, where population growth and chronic shortages of drinking water have resulted in rapidly increasing demand for drinking water.
7
Though we believe groundwater is a cost-effective and advantageous source of water supply, it is at
substantial risk of contamination from a number of chemical contaminants; such as arsenic, nitrate, perchlorate, radium, chromium VI, uranium and radionuclides, as well as organic contaminants, such as methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE),
trichloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (PCE), which have been linked to various cancers, diseases, metabolic disorders and other health problems. Because of these health concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and state
regulatory agencies have been active in establishing and lowering maximum containment levels, or MCLs, for contaminants in drinking water to ensure that the public has access to a safe drinking water supply. In addition, improvements in water
testing and treatment technologies have allowed the EPA and state regulatory agencies to lower the MCL for certain contaminants.
We
believe that a large market opportunity exists in providing a solution for treatment of groundwater for drinking water. There are few economically attractive alternatives for treating groundwater at the wellhead. Customarily, water providers either
shut down a contaminated well or blend the water with non-contaminated water to meet an MCL. Ion-exchange technology is acknowledged as a leading technology for groundwater treatment, including being designated by the DHS and EPA as a best
available technology for treating groundwater for removal of contaminants. As compared to our ion-exchange technology, many existing contaminant treatment technologies are costly, produce large amounts of waste, or are generally designed for
large industrial installations rather than for wellhead treatment. We believe there is significant demand for cost-effective groundwater treatment using our ion-exchange technology. We are actively pursuing opportunities to introduce our groundwater
treatments systems across the United States where the opportunity exists to provide our technology+services offerings.
Demand for
technology+services.
We believe our technology+services offerings can be valuable to municipal and industrial customers. We believe there is demand by our customers for an offering that includes our technology combined with a long-term
services agreement to provide services and maintenance with our performance guarantee for the life of the agreement.
Demand for
treatment of wastewater and air streams, water reuse and the recovery of valuable commodities.
We also believe there is demand for treatment of wastewater and air streams, water reuse and metals and commodities recovery systems and
services. Many industrial facilities face increasingly stringent discharge requirements for industrial wastewater, driving demand for technological solutions like ours for wastewater treatment. We also believe that demand exists for
applications through which our customers can reuse and recycle wastewater for process water needed for manufacturing or other industrial uses. Furthermore, in light of the high cost of metals and other materials, we believe there is demand for
technologies that are able to recover valuable commodities from wastewater streams.
Our Solution and Strengths
Basin Water onsite regenerable ion-exchange.
Our proprietary onsite regenerable ion-exchange system is designed to treat groundwater
contamination at the wellhead. We believe our multiple-bed system provides a safe, reliable and sustainable source of drinking water to our customers. Our system effectively treats water resulting in low waste rates, can be scaled to meet a
customers requirements and has a small footprint. These systems are designed using the Basin Water IX Program and are installed with telemetry to allow independent functionality. Approximately 95% of our revenues in 2007 were derived from
sales and service related to these systems.
Our expanded technologies.
We have made concerted efforts to expand our
technology portfolio beyond proprietary onsite regenerable ion-exchange technology. While our ion-exchange technology continues to have potential in a variety of applications in the groundwater treatment market, we believe that additional
opportunities exist for ion-exchange and absorptive media systems utilizing alternative methods of regeneration or media handling, and also technologies that can remove organic contaminants from water. Therefore, during 2007 we sought out and
acquired the rights to ion-exchange technologies and other technologies that would enable us to address these opportunities through our September 2007 acquisition of Mobile Process Technology Co., which we refer to as MPT (see Note 5 to our restated
consolidated financial statements), our November 2007 strategic alliance with a wholly owned subsidiary of Rohm and Haas Company named Rohm and Haas Chemicals, LLC, which we refer to as Rohm and Haas, and our 2007 agreement with Purifics ES Inc.,
which we refer to as Purifics, a licensed engineering firm headquartered in London, Ontario, Canada. In 2008, we also acquired Envirogen, providing us with a bioreactor and biofilter business that includes the design and supply of fluidized bed,
membrane, and suspended carrier bioreactors for the treatment of groundwater, wastewater and air streams in industrial, municipal and federal applications.
We believe these expanded technologies will enable us to address a large market of potential customers.
8
Our experienced management team.
One of our developing strengths is our management team.
Beginning in late 2006 and continuing into 2008, we bolstered our existing management team by hiring veterans from the water industry as well as other leading industries that have experience with technology and service offering business models. Most
notably, our President and Chief Executive Officer joined Basin Water in October 2006 and brought the knowledge and experience to develop our business model. In addition, we hired four senior managers all of whom had past experience in the water,
wastewater and other related industries. We believe the management team we have assembled has significantly strengthened our ability to achieve our goal to develop and implement our technology+services business model.
Our Strategy
Next generation water services
company.
In our view, water treatment companies who are able to profitably offer predictable, competitive life-cycle costs will become the next generation of water treatment companies
.
Our goal is to define, test
and then implement the strategies necessary to become a next generation water services company. To do that we believe we must develop offerings and select opportunities that will generally involve pairing a proprietary or specialized
technology with a service agreement to meet a defined set of customer needs. To date we continue to make progress as a provider of groundwater treatment systems and services to our customers throughout the United States, with an initial focus on the
arid West. We plan to achieve these goals through the following strategies:
Develop and implement our technology+services
model
.
We have developed and will now implement our technology+services business model that combines proprietary or specialized technologies with long-term relationships built through performance-based service agreements to meet
groundwater treatment, industrial water and wastewater treatment, and resource recovery needs. Over time, we may also seek to offer this technology+services model to the technologies acquired in our Envirogen acquisition.
Extend our business and geographic reach throughout the United States
.
We intend to expand our business reach beyond the arid West
into all areas of the United States. Our expansion plans include the creation of five regions (West, Southwest, Southeast, Great Lakes and Northeast) encompassing all of the continental United States to serve as our marketing, sales and technical
services platforms for municipal customers within each of those regions. Marketing to municipal customers typically requires a local presence within the customers geographic region. In 2007, we began an internal organizational change and
expansion through the assignment of dedicated management, sales, marketing, and technical support to certain of these regions. In addition to our West regional office in Rancho Cucamonga, we now have a footprint in the Southeast with our facility in
Memphis, a footprint in the Northeast with our Envirogen acquisition and a new Southwest regional office in Houston. We currently have a sales presence in the Great Lakes. We believe sales and marketing teams at the local level will be more
effective because of their knowledge of and relationships with the municipalities within their region. We expect marketing to industrial customers to be more effective on a nationwide basis from one central location. Thus, for our industrial
customers, we have a national sales and marketing team supported by our Memphis facility.
Expand our business by continuing to
develop strategic relationships with companies serving and supplying the water industry on a national basis
.
We have identified and will continue to identify companies servicing and supplying the water industry on a national basis
that can provide strategic benefits to the marketing of our groundwater treatment system. As part of this strategy, we have entered into a strategic alliance agreement with Rohm and Haas. We believe that by partnering with companies like Rohm and
Haas, we can efficiently leverage their existing infrastructure to provide our technology+services offering in new markets.
Our Technology and Services
Our ion-exchange treatment systems.
Our groundwater treatment services generally utilize our ion-exchange technology. To
treat contaminated groundwater, the water is pumped from the wellhead into our system which contains a bed of ion-exchange resin. Through the ion-exchange process, the contaminants remain on the resin while the clean water exits the system and
enters the drinking water distribution system. This process continues until the resin inside the bed is saturated with contaminants. We offer our customers three types of ion-exchange treatment systemsonsite regenerable systems, offsite
regeneration systems, and disposable resin systems. The primary difference among these three types of systems is how resin is used in the treatment process. For our onsite regenerable system, once the resin bed is saturated
9
with contaminants, sometimes referred to as being spent or exhausted, a saturated salt brine solution is pumped into the tank which regenerates the resin
onsite. For our offsite regeneration systems, we remove the spent resin to be regenerated offsite, and replenish the system with regenerated resin. The spent resin is transported for processing, such as at our Memphis central regeneration facility.
There the resin is regenerated to be returned to service at the customers site. For some contaminants, such as radionuclides, regeneration is not feasible. In those situations we use a disposable resin system whereby we dispose of the resin in
accordance with the particular regulation applicable to the contaminant being removed.
Our ion-exchange treatment systems are assembled on
a build-to-order basis using raw materials from suppliers typically located in the United States and from predominantly off-the-shelf components for which there are generally multiple suppliers. In the past, we assembled our onsite
regenerable and disposable ion-exchange treatment systems at our facility in Rancho Cucamonga, California and our offsite regenerable systems at our facility in Memphis, Tennessee. As of December 31, 2007, eight onsite regenerable ion exchange
treatment systems were in process at our Rancho Cucamonga location, and no systems were in process at our Memphis location. We plan to outsource all future assembly operations that were previously conducted at our Rancho Cucamonga location.
Our customers must obtain a license and/or a permit from the applicable state regulatory agency in order to operate each system that we
install at their wellheads. We work with our customers to secure required licenses and permits from state regulatory agencies, including assisting with the completion of the license or permit application and responding to inquiries or requests from
these regulators regarding our system.
Our onsite regenerable, and certain disposable resin systems, use a multiple-bed system design,
providing flexibility to meet different volume requirements. These systems allow resin beds to be sequenced in and out of service to optimize performance and offer users a wide range of production rates up to 12,000 gpm.
Typically our systems are installed adjacent to a wellhead. The systems use the well pumps pressure to move water through the ion-exchange process.
Our onsite regenerable systems require at least one waste brine tank to be placed onsite. The brine tank is connected to a waste line that allows for a contracted waste removal company to remove the brine without entering the well site. For our
offsite regenerable systems, which service low flow wells, there is no onsite brine tank. Instead, we remove the resin vessel from the customers site for regeneration at our facility.
During the course of the groundwater treatment process, we do not take ownership of the water or title to the waste generated from the treatment of
water, with the potential exception for recovery of valuable materials from the waste generated which we may then sell to third parties.
All of our onsite regenerable systems and some of our offsite regenerable systems and disposable resin systems are fully automatic and use a Program Logic Controller, or PLC, that runs advanced control programs to maximize treatment system
performance and reliability while also minimizing waste products.
Our technology+services offering.
The exact
technology+services offering we use in a given situation is dependent upon the customers needs. Our most frequently offered technology to date is our onsite regenerable ion-exchange system, which we incorporate into our offering by combining
our treatment system with an ongoing services agreement. This agreement incorporates a variety of services requested by our customers. For our offsite regenerable systems and disposable resin systems, our service component might include such
services as replacing media, conducting vessel exchanges on a periodic basis as the resin becomes exhausted, performing regeneration services at our central facility in Memphis, periodic testing of the system and ongoing support as required to
optimize system operations.
We anticipate that service contracts for our expanded technology portfolio may include services similar to
those listed above, and may also include the management of site-based operations involving a treatment system.
Customers
Historically, we have marketed our ion-exchange treatment systems and services to groundwater customers that included utilities, municipalities, cities
and other organizations that supply drinking water. By enhancing our technology+services offerings to include smaller ion-exchange treatment systems, offsite regeneration and organic removal capabilities, we believe we have significantly expanded
our potential customer base in the municipal market.
10
This expansion of our offerings also addresses industrial customers needs for wastewater treatment,
water reuse and the recovery of valuable commodities from wastewater streams including for oil and gas, power, mining and chemical companies.
As of December 31, 2007, we had a total of 79 systems on order or under contract with 24 different customers (not including approximately 200 small customers from our Memphis facility), of which 46 systems are installed, permitted and
can process water. Six systems are awaiting regulatory permits with the remaining 27 systems in various stages of contracting or manufacturing. These 79 systems on order or under contract nationwide represent an aggregate installed capacity of
approximately 115,000 acre-feet per year, or approximately 37.4 billion gallons per year.
The following customers accounted for more
than 10% of our revenues in the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Baldy Mesa Water District
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
*
|
|
California Water Services Company
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
Shaw Environmental, Inc.
|
|
*
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
Coachella Valley Water District (1)
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Del Valle Capital Corp.
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Arizona American Water Company
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Indicates a less than 10% customer during such period.
|
(1)
|
We were formerly parties to an arrangement pursuant to which Shaw provided site work, bonding and other services to Coachella Valley Water District.
|
As of December 31, 2007, our revenues backlog, assuming no further renewal of our long-term contracts, was $38.4 million, compared to our revenues
backlog of $41.6 million at December 31, 2006.
Competition
We believe successful competition in our industry and markets is dependent on the following factors: (1) superior technology and (2) customer relationships.
Superior technology is an important factor for competition in our industry. The EPA has reviewed and accepted certain well-established technologies for
use in drinking water applications and designated them as best available technology. Ion-exchange technology has already been designated as a best available technology by the EPA and by many state regulatory agencies.
Ion-exchange technology is also frequently sought for industrial applications. We believe our rights to proprietary technologies provide us a competitive advantage in the municipal and industrial markets.
There are significant competitive challenges even for companies relying on superior and cost-effective technologies. There are a large number of
established and well-capitalized companies that already implement cost-effective technologies such as ion exchange in their solutions, and many of these large companies have strong and longstanding relationships with customers in the marketplace. We
believe these relationships are critical in establishing credibility and in maintaining steady business. This is particularly true in the municipal market where a local presence and knowledge of the region contributes to a companys ability to
effectively market its services to municipalities. We are developing relationships with municipal customers on a local basis by implementing our regional structure.
We believe our geographic expansion plans, placing our marketing and sales force closer to our customer locations, coupled with the ongoing interactions between our field service force and customers, also provide us
with a competitive advantage. For those existing customers, our field services staff is often our onsite ambassadors who are able to spot and kindle future opportunities to increase the number of systems, or expand on our existing services at an
existing customer site.
11
Finally, many of our current and potential competitors have significantly stronger financial resources,
larger marketing and service organizations and significantly greater market expertise than we have. However, we believe that we can compete favorably based on the efficacy of our proprietary technology, our newly acquired technological expertise,
our technology+services business model, and our significant relationships with our customers.
Sales and Marketing
We market our technology+services offerings through a direct sales force, independent contractors and strategic relationships. In addition, members of our
management team leverage their numerous business contacts to capitalize on opportunities to sell our technology+services offerings. Regulatory changes also trigger sales opportunities. For example, in 2006 and 2007, changes in MCLs, especially
arsenic and radium, have caused customers to seek solutions such as ours to assist in their efforts to keep their groundwater supplies in compliance with regulatory standards. As a result, we periodically receive inquiries and are asked for
referrals about our systems and services. Finally, our existing client base refers our services to other water providers. We also secure business through a procurement bid process in which we compete with others in qualification and proposal
processes.
We intend to expand our sales and marketing efforts beyond the arid West into other geographic areas of the United States. Our
expansion plans include the creation of five regions (West, Southwest, Southeast, Great Lakes and Northeast) encompassing all of the continental United States to serve as our marketing, sales and technical services platforms for municipal customers
within each of those regions. This expansion should assist our marketing efforts, because marketing to municipal customers typically requires a local presence within the customers geographic region. In 2007, we made organizational changes to
assign dedicated management, sales and service, marketing, and technical support to certain of these regions. In addition to our West regional office in Rancho Cucamonga, we now have a footprint in the Southeast with our facility in Memphis and in
the Northeast with our Envirogen acquisition, and we opened a new Southwest regional office in Houston in mid-2008. We currently have a sales presence in the Great Lakes. We believe sales and marketing teams at the local level will be more effective
because of their knowledge of and relationships with the municipalities within their region. We expect marketing to industrial customers to be more effective on a nationwide basis from one central location. Thus, for our industrial customers, we
have a national sales and marketing team supported out of our Memphis facility.
We have expanded our sales and marketing efforts through
strategic relationships, including the Rohm and Haas alliance and the agreement with Purifics. Our sales team plans to use Rohm and Haas expertise and contacts in the water treatment industry to develop and manage our relationships with
customers and our strategic relationships.
Other Significant Transactions
Rohm and Haas Alliance
Rohm
and Haas Company is a global company that develops advanced materials for customers around the world. Its business spans the world: North America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific, with more than 100 manufacturing,
technical research and customer service sites in 27 countries. It had annual sales of approximately US $9 billion in 2007. It is a publicly owned company whose stock is traded under the ROH symbol on the New York Stock Exchange.
On November 14, 2007, we entered into an exclusive alliance with Rohm and Haas to provide technology solutions and service offerings
in both the drinking water market and certain areas of the industrial market. We expect the alliance to also develop new technologies to address other groundwater treatment issues, such as produced water from oil and gas operations and emerging
water recovery applications. Each member of the alliance will contribute its respective core strengths to the alliance: Rohm and Haas its research and development capabilities, global infrastructure and ion exchange resins and our company its
systems designs, channels to market and service capabilities. We expect the alliance to initially market offerings in the United States and Canada using our technology+services business model to provide guaranteed performance and guaranteed costs
over the lifetime of a project. As part of the alliance, we have exclusive access to Rohm and Haas ion-exchange resin technology for certain selected markets.
The initial term of the alliance is five years. The parties agreed to renew the alliance agreement if at the end of the initial term the alliance has met projected budget, earnings and growth projections.
12
Investment in Empire Water Corporation (Empire)
In May 2007, we entered into an agreement to acquire certain water rights and related assets. In December 2007, we sold to Empire the rights to purchase
certain collective assets from unrelated parties including (a) a canal located in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in Southern California that is approximately eighteen miles in length, (b) rights to pump water from the San Bernardino
Basin, and (c) other equipment and tangible and intangible personal property of the sellers. As consideration for the sale of these assets, we received 6,000,000 shares of Empire common stock, which represents an ownership interest of
approximately 32% in Empire as of December 31, 2007.
Envirogen Acquisition
On September 18, 2008, we acquired Envirogen, Shaws bioreactor and biofilter business, for approximately $1.5 million cash (subject to
adjustment for working capital) plus the settlement of a disputed claim against Shaw for amounts we claimed to be owed by Shaw. The bioreactor and biofilter business includes the design and supply of fluidized bed, membrane, and suspended carrier
bioreactors for the treatment of groundwater and wastewater streams in industrial, municipal and federal applications. The business also includes the design and supply of biofilters for the treatment of air streams from municipalities and industry
for the removal of odor-causing and other contaminants.
Shaw Agreement
Our national arsenic sales agreement with Shaw expired on December 9, 2007. As a result of the expiration of this agreement with Shaw, we have now
reacquired rights to market our arsenic treatment systems in all territories to which Shaw had previously been granted exclusive rights.
Government
Regulation
Our customers are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations concerning emissions to the air, discharges to
waterways and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials and also are subject to other federal and state laws regarding health and safety matters. Under the contracts with our customers, we assist
them in meeting these regulations and obtaining any required permits and/or licenses in order to implement our systems. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving, and it is difficult to predict the effect these laws and regulations may have
on us or our customers in the future.
In the United States, many different federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the
treatment of contaminated groundwater, wastewater, air streams, disposal of attendant wastes, and distribution of potable water. Changes in such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. The increased interest in the
treatment of contaminated groundwater due to increased attention to the adverse health effects from contaminated drinking water may result in intervention by governmental regulatory agencies in the United States or elsewhere under existing or newly
enacted legislation and in the imposition of restrictions, fees or charges on users and providers of products and services in this area. Conversely, the failure of the EPA or state regulatory agencies to act on a timely basis to set interim or
permanent standards for pollutants, or to delay effective dates for standards for pollutants, grant waivers of compliance with such standards or take other discretionary actions not to enforce these standards, may decrease demand for our systems and
services and thus harm our business significantly.
Each groundwater treatment solution, including our contaminant treatment systems, must
be permitted by applicable state regulatory agencies prior to use of such systems by our customers. Typically, our customers apply for a permit from the applicable state regulatory agency to use our systems, and we assist our customers in completion
of the permit application process. The application process for our system is time consuming and often involves several information requests to our customers by the regulatory agencies with respect to our systems.
Furthermore, we cannot predict the impact of changing drinking water standards on the approval of our technology for groundwater treatment. The MCLs for
contaminants are subject to review and revision by the EPA and applicable state regulatory agencies. The MCLs may be changed to levels below that which our systems can treat on a cost-effective basis, and if we are unable to design systems that
remove contaminants below the designated MCL, then the state regulatory agencies will fail to approve our systems. Without regulatory approval, our systems could not be used by our customers, and we would be required to develop technology that meets
any revised MCLs.
13
Although our customers retain title to the brine waste generated by our systems, we facilitate the
removal of the waste with a licensed waste disposal service and in some cases contract directly with the waste transporter on behalf of our customers. As such, we may become subject to the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or CERCLA. CERCLA, which is also known as Superfund, addresses problems created by the release or threatened release of hazardous substances (as defined in CERCLA) into the environment. CERCLA
imposes strict, joint and several liability for remediation of certain disposal sites on: current owners and operators of the site, on former site owners and operators at the time of disposal, on parties who arranged for disposal or treatment or
arranged for transportation for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at the site, and on parties that transport hazardous substances to a site. Because CERCLA liability is joint and several, the costs of a CERCLA cleanup can be substantial.
Because liability under CERCLA is strict, it is not premised upon the violation of any law, statute, rule or regulation but is rather based upon a partys status as an owner, operator, transporter or arranger (as those terms are described
above). Such liability can therefore be based upon the release or threatened release, even as a result of lawful, unintentional and non-negligent action, of any one of the more than 700 hazardous substances listed by the EPA, even in
small amounts.
Our Memphis Facility.
Our facility in Memphis supports services that include catalyst recovery, service
exchange programs for containers of spent filtration media, and media processing and regeneration of ion-exchange media for other water service providers and end users that have applied the media to capture or recover various metals, organics, or
inorganic compounds. Because our facility does not accept or receive materials that have been profiled as hazardous wastes, it does not maintain environmental permits as a treatment, storage, and disposal facility for hazardous wastes as defined by
the EPA and the State of Tennessee. The Memphis facility performs its own independent waste stream profiling and acceptance criteria review to ensure that all materials received for processing and regeneration are applicable to the Memphis facility
processes and are in accordance with the facilitys environmental permits.
The Memphis facilitys environmental permits include
a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to discharge process wastewater to the City of Memphis, Tennessees publicly owned treatment works (POTW), an NPDES Stormwater Discharge permit issued by the
State of Tennessee, and Special Solid Waste Disposal Permits issued by the facilitys solid waste disposal contractor for the land disposal of certain non-hazardous special waste streams.
Since the Memphis facility is also a Small Quantity Generator (SQG) of hazardous waste, we maintain an EPA generator registration and identification
number for their hazardous waste disposal activities.
We are also pursuing business opportunities involving the removal of radionuclides
from groundwater and/or industrial wastewater streams. Our plans are to sell or lease the removal systems to third party customers, with an associated service contract for removal and disposal of the resin material upon exhaustion. We would use
a licensed subcontractor for transportation and disposal of the media. These activities would fall under regulations governed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). All subcontractors, transporters, and disposal facilities would be
required to possess the required NRC permits and licenses to engage in these roles. However, should any of the spent radionuclide-containing resins also contain characteristic or listed hazardous wastes, the resins would be classified as mixed
wastes and would no longer be regulated by the NRC, but, would be subject to the EPAs Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste regulations.
Given our Memphis facilitys onsite chemical inventory and disposal and/or release of chemical substances / wastes / residues as a part of doing
business, the Memphis facility is subject to annual reporting requirements as specified by the EPA Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act (SARA) (specifically the SARA 312, Tier II Hazardous Chemical Inventory, and SARA 313, Toxic Release
Inventory, regulations).
To the extent we do not comply with the various laws and regulations applicable to our activities, we may be
subject to fines, regulatory action or private litigation that may adversely affect our business.
Research and Development
Product development activities primarily focus on project related field work that include 1) the design and evaluation of experimental ion-exchange
processes and groundwater treatment systems for the removal of various contaminants, and 2) development of processes involving an array of technologies useful in our expansion from an ion-exchange company to a commercial water treatment company.
These development activities include extensive piloting efforts on applications related to the removal of nitrate, arsenic and radionuclides from groundwater.
14
As a result of our acquisition of Envirogen in the third quarter of 2008, we have enhanced our internal
research and development capabilities.
We had a sponsored research arrangement with UNLV under which they were researching and testing
certain aspects related to the regeneration of exchange resins that may be useful in a technology for biologically removing and destroying perchlorate load from spend ion-exchange resins, which we refer to as the BIONExchange process. Any
intellectual property developed by us under the agreement is owned by us, any intellectual property developed by UNLV under the agreement is owned by UNLV, and intellectual property developed jointly will be jointly owned by the parties. Due to
uncertainties surrounding the future commercial viability of this technology, we intend to write off certain related costs totaling approximately $0.7 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. We have an option to acquire
intellectual property from UNLV not solely owned by us, and we paid $0.3 million to UNLV from 2005 to 2007. Such arrangement was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2008.
In 2007, we sponsored research and testing at the University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, which we refer to as UMBI. This research involved the
biological destruction of nitrates from residual brine solutions resulting from ion exchange processes to remove nitrates from groundwater. We paid $5,000 to UMBI in the year ended December 31, 2007. We have discontinued further research
projects with UMBI.
Our total research and development expenses were $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
We intend to continue our active development efforts internally and through our existing strategic alliances and our
Envirogen operations to strengthen the position of our groundwater and other treatment technologies through the development of new and improved processes. The principal goals of our program are maintaining our position as a technological leader in
solving customers problems with technology+services, and acquiring access to and developing new products and services.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property is the result of many years of research and development efforts as well as strategic acquisitions and contract
relationships. We have pursued a broad strategy of protecting our developed and owned intellectual property, including seeking patent protection, safeguarding trade secrets, registering trademarks and using non-disclosure and other contractual
agreements to protect other intellectual property rights.
We have developed what we believe to be an innovative process design that
significantly improves the economics of using ion exchange for groundwater treatment. As of December 31, 2007, we have two issued United States patents directed to a system and process for the removal of arsenic, one issued United States patent
directed to a process for the removal of nitrate and two issued United States patents directed to processes for the removal of perchlorate. We also have one issued patent in the United States and in five European countries directed to our
BIONExchange process, a proprietary process for biologically removing and destroying perchlorate load from used ion-exchange resins and alternatively from perchlorate-laden ion-exchange resin regeneration brines. We currently are developing
technology related to the removal of radium, for which we plan to seek patent protection.
In addition, we hold eight pending United States
patent applications and eleven pending foreign patent applications on various aspects of our treatment processes. Our patents and patent applications as a group are related to ion exchange and the treatment of one or more of the following
contaminants:
We employ the Basin Water IX software program for the operation of our system. We also use this software program for the design of our system to determine the most efficient operating parameters for our
system based upon the contaminant profile of the water source being treated. We have pending trademark applications in the United States for Basin Water
®
and Basin Water IX.
15
As part of our business procedures, we typically enter into confidentiality and invention assignment
agreements, or have confidentiality provisions in agreements with our employees, independent contractors and consultants, and non-disclosure agreements with our customers, partners, independent contractors and consultants.
MPT, which we acquired in September 2007, holds five United States patents and twelve foreign patents related to various chemical manufacturing
processes. These patents relate to 1) an improved process for the recovery of ethylene glycol from spent glycol generated in the manufacture of polyethylene terephthalate, 2) an improved separation process for the continuous catalytic oxidation of
aromatic alkyls for the production of aromatic carboxylic acids in a liquid solvent medium, 3) an apparatus and method for the purification of waste wash water derived from the production of aromatic acids, 4) a method of polyester manufacturing
using cross flow membrane filtration, and 5) a process for the recovery of molybdenum catalyst from the epoxidation reaction product of olefins with organic hydroperoxides.
MPT also has three pending United States patent applications related to processes for the treatment of the following contaminants: nitrate, ammonia and
radium.
The pending patent application related to the treatment of radium has been assigned to us pursuant to our acquisition of MPT. In
2008, we plan to have the other patents and pending patent applications assigned to us.
MPT also holds trademark registrations for Hypersorb
®
, Hyperflux
®
and Chromasep
®
.
In connection with our acquisition of Envirogen, we are in the process of obtaining the rights to a
number of patents relating to the bioreactor and biofilter business.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we employed 107 full-time and 5 part-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining
agreement. There are no pending labor-related legal actions against us filed with any state or federal agency. We believe our employee relations are good.
Risks Related to the Restatement
The restatement of our consolidated financial statements has had a material adverse impact on us, including increased costs and the increased
possibility of legal or administrative proceedings.
We determined that our consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the first quarter of 2008 should be restated. As a result of these events, we have become subject to a number of additional risks and uncertainties.
We have incurred substantial unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees in 2008 in connection with the restatement of our consolidated financial
statements. We will be filing an amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to restate our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. Until the restatement is complete, we expect to continue to incur
additional costs. In addition, the restatement has caused and may continue to cause a significant diversion of managements time and attention.
We have been named in a number of lawsuits that began in December 2007. As a result of our restatement, the plaintiffs in these lawsuits have made additional claims, expanded existing claims and expanded the time
periods covered by the complaints. Other plaintiffs may bring additional actions with other claims, based on the restatement. As a result, we may incur additional substantial defense costs regardless of their outcome. Likewise, such events might
cause an additional diversion of our managements time and attention. If we do not prevail in any such actions, we could be required to pay substantial damages or settlement costs.
16
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has instituted an investigation with respect to the
Companys accounting and related disclosure and other matters. The Company is cooperating with the SEC. This investigation has diverted and will likely divert more of our managements time and attention and cause us to incur substantial
costs. Such investigation could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief, including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or administrative relief. The nature of the relief or remedies the SEC may
seek, if any, cannot be predicted at this time and can lead to further substantial costs and diversion of management time and attention.
Failure to
satisfy the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market could result in our common stock being delisted, which may have an adverse effect on our stock price.
Timely filing of annual and periodic reports with the SEC is required for continued listing under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14). On August 14, 2008, we received a staff determination letter from The Nasdaq
Stock Market stating that our common stock is subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market for our failure to file with the SEC by the required deadline a quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008. We appealed
Nasdaqs determination at a hearing held before the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel (the Panel) on October 16, 2008. On November 10, 2008, the Panel granted us continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market provided
that the Company files its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008 and any restatement of prior periods that may be required by February 10, 2009. On November 11, 2008, we
received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market stating that our failure to file with the SEC a quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 by the required deadline serves as an additional basis for delisting our common
stock from the Nasdaq Global Market and requesting that we present our views on the matter in a written submission to the Panel by November 18, 2008. We provided a written submission to the Panel in a timely manner requesting an extension to
file the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008.
In addition, the Nasdaq Global Market imposes, among other requirements,
minimum bid and public float requirements. The price of our common stock must close at or above $1.00 to comply with Nasdaqs minimum bid requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market. Our common stock has been trading at a
price below $1.00 per share. On October 16, 2008, The Nasdaq Stock Market announced the immediate suspension of its enforcement of the rules requiring a minimum $1.00 closing bid price and that it will not take any action to delist any security
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market that fails to comply with the minimum $1.00 closing bid price requirement until January 19, 2009. On December 19, 2008, The Nasdaq Stock Market announced a further suspension of its enforcement of these
rules until April 20, 2009. Consequently, for as long as Nasdaqs rule suspension remains in effect, Nasdaq will not delist our stock if the closing bid price for our common stock falls below $1.00 per share during the rule suspension
period. If the closing bid price of our common stock continues to fail to meet Nasdaqs minimum closing bid price requirement at any time on or after April 20, 2009, or if we otherwise fail to meet all other applicable Nasdaq requirements,
Nasdaq may make a determination to delist our common stock.
If our common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market, our common
stock would be traded over-the-counter, more commonly known as OTC. OTC transactions involve risks in addition to those associated with transactions in securities traded on the Nasdaq Global Market. Many OTC stocks trade less frequently and in
smaller volumes than securities traded on the Nasdaq Global Market. Accordingly, our common stock would be less liquid than it would otherwise be, and the value of our common stock could decrease. Finally, any such delisting could also adversely
affect our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations and/or result in the loss of confidence by investors, customers, suppliers and employees.
Material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting could harm stockholder and business confidence on our financial reporting, our ability to obtain financing and other aspects of
our business.
Maintaining an effective system of internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable
financial reports. As discussed in Notes 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we have restated our consolidated financial statements for the years ended
2006 and 2007, including each of the quarterly periods in 2007 and 2006, and will be filing an amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to restate our consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of 2008. As previously reported,
we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that resulted from
17
certain control deficiencies stemming from several significant changes within our Company, including changes in the organization structure, new accounting
information systems and our acquisition of MPT in the third quarter of 2007. In connection with the restatement of our consolidated financial statements, we have identified the following additional material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting:
|
|
|
A lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training in applying GAAP to transactions and the correct application of revenue
recognition principles required under GAAP;
|
|
|
|
A lack of effective checks and balances between the former CFO and accounting and legal functions with respect to the negotiation, structuring and accounting for
transactions, including water treatment unit sales and water service agreements;
|
|
|
|
A failure to maintain adequately organized business records and complete documentation for sales contracts, many of which lacked execution dates, signatures by
Company or counterparty representatives; the use of draft or non-standard arrangements; and the lack of adequate written agreements to memorialize significant transactions;
|
|
|
|
Insufficient information systems and processes to accumulate information to timely identify and address business and accounting issues;
|
|
|
|
A lack of sufficiently detailed written accounting policies and procedures with respect to the timing and recognition of sales transactions and an insufficient
process at the time of the transactions to monitor compliance with such policies and procedures; and
|
|
|
|
A failure to maintain an effective internal audit function.
|
As a result of these material weaknesses, managements assessment concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting continue to be ineffective. Some of the identified material weaknesses have not been
fully addressed. It is also possible that additional material weaknesses will be identified in the future. Until we remediate the remaining material weaknesses, we have the risk of another restatement.
We have incurred and expect to incur substantial expenses relating to the remediation of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting may in the future be limited by a variety of factors including without limitation:
|
|
|
failure of the effectiveness of our policies, procedures and information systems and processes;
|
|
|
|
delay in upgrading financial software system; and
|
|
|
|
the possibility that any enhancements to disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls may still not be adequate to assure timely and accurate financial
information.
|
Because we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective and our
independent registered public accountants issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, and to the extent we identify future weaknesses or deficiencies, there could be material misstatements in our consolidated financial
statements and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. As a result, our ability to obtain additional financing, or obtain additional financing on favorable terms, could be materially and adversely affected, which, in turn, could
materially and adversely affect our business, our financial condition and the market value of our securities. In addition, perceptions of us could also be adversely affected among customers, lenders, investors, securities analysts and others.
Current material weaknesses or any future weaknesses or deficiencies could also hurt confidence in our business and consolidated financial statements and our ability to do business with these groups.
Risks Related to Our Business
We will need additional
capital to continue to operate our business, and if we cannot obtain additional financing, we may not be able to continue operations.
As of December 31, 2007, excluding the cash of VLC, we had $35.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, and as of December 31, 2008, we had approximately $11.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have experienced significant
negative cash flows from operating and investing activities between 2006 and 2008, and we expect to use additional cash for such activities for the foreseeable future. Our net losses incurred during the past two fiscal years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 amounted to $18.3 million and $13.5 million, respectively. Unless and until we are able to generate sufficient revenues from our system sales and
18
contract services, we expect such losses to continue in the future. Therefore, our ability to continue to operate our business is highly dependent on the
amount of cash and cash equivalents on hand combined with our ability to raise capital to support our future operations.
Additional
capital, whether obtained through financial markets or collaborative or other arrangements with water providers, corporate partners or from other sources, may not be available at all, when needed, or on terms acceptable to us. If additional funds
are raised through the issuance of additional common stock, other equity securities or indebtedness, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders may be diluted substantially and the equity or debt securities issued to new investors may
have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our then-existing capital stock. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to continue operations, resulting in
significant harm to our financial condition and prospects and a decline in our stock price.
The U.S. credit markets have recently
experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have caused spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for
borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. These events in the credit markets as well as deteriorating market conditions have also had an adverse effect on other financial
markets in the United States, including the equity markets, which may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of common stock or other equity securities. These disruptions in the financial markets may have other
adverse effects on us or the economy generally, which could cause our stock price to decline.
We have a limited operating history, have incurred
significant operating losses in our first few years of operation and have not consistently achieved profitability on an annual basis.
We have a limited operating history and limited revenues derived from our operations. We began our business operations in December 1999 and did not generate our first revenues until 2002. Our revenues grew from $12.2 million in 2005 to
$13.9 million in 2006, followed by a decline to $9.7 million in 2007. We have incurred significant net losses since our inception, including net losses of $1.3 million in 2003, $0.6 million in 2004, $13.5 million in 2006 and $18.3 million in
2007. Our net loss in 2006 resulted in part from reserves we recorded in connection with certain of our contracts which have ongoing operating costs in excess of our contract revenues. In addition, our net loss in 2007 resulted in part from
additional reserves we recorded in the third quarter of 2007. We took these reserves in connection with certain older legacy contracts when it became apparent that these projects would be operating at a loss for some period of time. In addition, we
may find that additional contracts have ongoing operating costs in excess of revenues, which could have an adverse effect on future results of operations. Though we have taken steps in an effort to improve our business processes, we cannot assure
you that these improved processes will positively impact our results of operations. At December 31, 2007, we had an accumulated deficiency of approximately $35.8 million.
Our operations prior to 2006 primarily focused on development of our technology and onsite regenerable ion exchange treatment systems, building our sales
and marketing capabilities, commencing the commercial launch of these systems and developing and maintaining customer relationships. In late 2006 and throughout 2007, we implemented several initiatives to improve our business model, but we cannot
assure you that any of these initiatives will result in increased revenues or positively impact our financial results. In addition, our ability to successfully sell our systems and services depends on, among other things, the level of demand for
contaminated groundwater treatment, which is an evolving market, and the demand for our technology and services in those geographic areas and markets into which we are expanding.
In 2007 and 2006, we had significant net losses and expect to continue to have significant net losses from our operations in 2008 through the foreseeable
future. Even if we do achieve significant revenues from our business operations, increased operating expenses associated with any expansion of our business may result in future operating losses in the near term as we, among other things:
|
|
|
market our technology+services offering to our customers;
|
|
|
|
seek to acquire new customers in the markets in which we are currently active;
|
|
|
|
expand our technology offering to broaden our reach into new markets, such as the industrial marketplace;
|
|
|
|
expand geographically throughout the United States pursuant to our regional structure;
|
19
|
|
|
make significant capital expenditures to support our ability to provide services under our recurring revenue contracts;
|
|
|
|
expand our internal sales force and develop strategic relationships with companies serving the water, wastewater, waste reduction, and resource recovery industries
on a national basis;
|
|
|
|
fund development costs for our systems and technology;
|
|
|
|
incur costs associated with our litigation matters; and
|
|
|
|
incur increased general and administrative expenses as our company grows, including increased costs as a result of being a public company.
|
As a result of these and other factors, we may not achieve, sustain or increase our profitability on an ongoing basis.
Our future operating results will likely fluctuate significantly from reporting period to reporting period.
We expect our future revenues and operating results to fluctuate significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
customer budgets or commitments for our systems and/or services, including availability of Federal and state funding to our customers;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our internal sales and marketing organization;
|
|
|
|
demand for our systems and/or services;
|
|
|
|
demand for low life-cycle cost solutions among our current and potential customers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and market new and enhanced technology and our technology+services business model in a cost-effective manner;
|
|
|
|
our product and price competition in our market;
|
|
|
|
length of our sales cycle;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into third-party financing arrangements where a customer selects a long-term capital contract, thus recognizing revenue over longer periods of
time;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
ability to control our costs, including labor and the cost of materials included in our systems;
|
|
|
|
increases in the costs of salt, resin, chemicals, waste disposal and other materials necessary to fulfill our obligations under our recurring revenue contracts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to pass through increased operating costs to our customers under our recurring revenue contracts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to work with companies with whom we enter into strategic alliances and relationships in a cost-effective manner; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to build and install systems and provide services on a timely and low life-cycle cost basis.
|
Any of the foregoing factors, some of which are not within our control, may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately high or cause our
revenues and operating results to fluctuate, which could prevent us from maintaining or increasing our business or could harm our results of operations. In addition, our future revenues or our future operating expenses may not be consistent with our
past results, which could adversely affect our stock price.
Our financial success will depend in part on the efforts of strategic relationships we may
work with in the future.
In November 2007, we announced the formation of an exclusive, service-based alliance with Rohm and Haas. This
alliance provides us with exclusive access in selected markets to the Rohm and Haas ion-exchange resin technology which we intend to deploy as part of our business model. Our alliance also provides us access to technology for the removal of organic
contaminants from water, support for our business model through access to the Rohm and Haas scientific and laboratory resources and Rohm and Haas developed channels to the specified markets. In late 2007, we entered into an agreement with
Purifics to provide us with unique engineered systems, solutions and products effective in removing organic contaminants from groundwater. Under this agreement, we can exclusively market the Purifics photocatalysis technology in certain areas of the
United States, and we have access to the technology on a non-exclusive basis in a larger
20
market area. We may enter into other such strategic relationships with other companies focused on the water, wastewater, waste reduction and resource
recovery industries on a national basis. Our financial success and our anticipated growth will depend in part on the efforts of these strategic relationships as we market and sell our treatment systems and solutions. If Rohm and Haas, Purifics or
any other strategic relationships fail to perform satisfactorily under their respective agreements with us, or if we fail to maintain these relationships, or establish new relationships as required, then we may lose our access to their technologies,
and our ability to market our treatment systems and our technology+services offering will likely suffer. In addition, our revenues resulting from these strategic relationships may not grow as anticipated, and we could be subject to additional costs
which could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition significantly.
Our long sales cycles make predicting our financial results
difficult.
Many of our service contracts have a term of five or more years, and some contain an option either to purchase the system
or to renew the contract at the end of the initial contract term. Since most of our sales are based on long-term contracts, our customers generally take a longer time to decide to purchase our system and/or services, thus creating a lengthy sales
cycle. Other reasons for our long sales cycle include:
|
|
|
the size of the capital outlay to be incurred by our customers;
|
|
|
|
the budget constraints of municipal and industrial customers that may cause delays in project selection;
|
|
|
|
extensive contract negotiations over the specific terms of the sale of our system and/or services;
|
|
|
|
the unfamiliarity of some of our customers with utilizing third parties for water and wastewater treatment, waste reduction and resource recovery services;
|
|
|
|
our customers perception of our financial capability;
|
|
|
|
the resistance by customers to granting control of support functions such as water treatment to external parties;
|
|
|
|
the availability of many competitive alternatives that may be considered by our customers in the municipal market, including water importation, water blending,
coagulation microfiltration (a process of destabilizing charges on contaminants in water by adding chemical coagulants that can then be filtered and removed), reverse osmosis (a pressure-driven separation process that removes contaminants from water
by forcing them through a membrane barrier), electrodialysis reversal (a process that transfers contaminants by direct electric current flow through membranes thus removing them from water) and ion exchange processes of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the availability of competitive alternatives to our existing and developing technology+services offerings;
|
|
|
|
the availability of competitive alternatives to our existing and developing offerings in the wastewater treatment, waste reduction and resource recovery industries;
|
|
|
|
the long approval procedures imposed by government agencies; and
|
|
|
|
the lengthy approval process of many customers equipment/contract procurement procedures due to multiple approvals that may be required by, for example,
municipal boards, public bidding or state public utility commission requirements, which is sometimes exacerbated by the capital outlay needed to enter into and support contracts for our systems and services.
|
In addition, to the extent we expand our service to international markets, we may face additional factors that contribute to long sales cycles, including
additional time required for travel to foreign locations as well as potential problems caused by language barriers, cultural differences, differing business practices, differing contracting practices, and varying regulatory requirements. Our long
sales cycles, as well as the placement of large orders with short lead times on an irregular and unpredictable basis, may cause our revenues and operating results to vary significantly and unexpectedly from period to period. Since our operating
expenses are largely based on anticipated revenue trends and a significant portion of our expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed, any delay in generating or recognizing revenues could harm our operating results or financial condition
significantly.
Our ion-exchange treatment systems and the technologies upon which they are based may not achieve widespread market acceptance among our
customers which may impact demand for our system and services.
We have developed our proprietary ion-exchange technology and processes
for groundwater treatment based on ion-exchange technology that competes with other forms of groundwater treatment technologies that currently are in operation
21
throughout the United States. This proprietary technology is used in our onsite regenerable and disposable resin treatment systems. Through our acquisition
of MPT, we have expanded our capabilities into central regeneration for ion exchange, smaller ion-exchange systems and technologies to serve customers in the industrial markets. These treatment systems and the technologies on which they are based
may not achieve widespread market acceptance. Our success will depend on our ability to market our systems and services to businesses and customers on terms and conditions acceptable to us and to establish and maintain successful relationships with
municipal and industrial customers.
We believe that market acceptance of our systems and technology and our related success will depend on
many factors including:
|
|
|
the perceived advantages of our systems over competing treatment solutions;
|
|
|
|
the actual and perceived safety and efficacy of our systems;
|
|
|
|
the availability and success of alternative treatment solutions;
|
|
|
|
the pricing and cost effectiveness of our systems;
|
|
|
|
our ability to market effectively to municipal and industrial customers that may use our systems;
|
|
|
|
the permitting of our technology by regulatory agencies;
|
|
|
|
the willingness of potential customers to enter into long-term service contracts;
|
|
|
|
publicity concerning our systems and technologies or competitive solutions;
|
|
|
|
timeliness in assembling and installing our systems on customer sites;
|
|
|
|
whether or not our existing customers continue to use our system and services and/or renew service contracts after their expiration;
|
|
|
|
our customers perception of our financial viability and ability to fulfill our obligations under our long term service contracts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to respond to changes in the regulatory standards for maximum contaminant levels of various contaminants;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our strategic relationships to provide necessary support to our efforts to market their technologies now available to us from our strategic alliance
and other agreements;
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide effective service and maintenance of our system to our customers satisfaction; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to control operating costs.
|
If our systems or technologies fail to achieve or maintain market acceptance or if new technologies are introduced by others that are more favorably received than our technology, are more cost effective or otherwise render our technologies
obsolete, we may experience a decline in demand for our systems and services. If we are unable to market and sell our systems and services successfully, our revenues would decline and our operating results and prospects would suffer.
We may be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel which could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects significantly.
Our future success also will depend, in large part, on our ability to identify, attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly skilled
employees, particularly qualified sales, marketing and engineering personnel. As of December 31, 2007, we had 107 full-time and 5 part-time employees. Although we have expanded our sales force somewhat, we have a limited number of sales and
marketing employees and consultants, as well as service employees who provide field and other services to our treatment systems. We may not succeed in identifying, attracting and retaining individuals who qualify for these positions. Further,
competitors and other companies may attempt to recruit our employees. If we are unable to hire and retain adequate staffing levels, it may be difficult to increase sales of our systems or services or adequately support our installed systems, which
could harm our business and prospects.
Our future success also depends on the experience and expertise of our President and CEO, whose
talents, efforts and relationships within the water industry have been, and continue to be, critical to our success. We have an employment agreement with our CEO that provides for at will employment. However, we cannot prevent our CEO
from leaving our employ if he chooses to do so. We do not currently carry key man insurance upon the life of our CEO or the lives of any of our employees or officers. The loss of our CEOs services and access to his abilities and
relationships could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our customer base and could harm our operating results and prospects significantly.
22
The current geographic concentration of our customers in California and Arizona and the location of our headquarters
in California make our business particularly vulnerable to adverse conditions affecting these markets.
Currently, our customers are
concentrated geographically, primarily in the states of California and Arizona. Our revenues and operating results are therefore subject to local regulatory, economic, demographic and weather conditions in those areas. A change in any of these
conditions could make it more costly or difficult for us to conduct our business or decrease demand for our treatment systems. The current economic climate in California has resulted in a decrease in new home development and population migration to
California. Additionally, in December 2008, the California Department of Public Health, Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management was directed by the State of California to cease entering into any new construction related to the
expenditure of state bond funds, which may impair the ability of municipalities and other governmental entities to pay for capital expenditures. As a result of these events, we may experience lower sales of our water treatment units to developers,
municipalities and other governmental entities in California.
In addition, we are subject to greater risk of loss from earthquakes and
wildfires because our headquarters, where we assembled our onsite regenerable systems and most of the well locations that utilize our system are concentrated in California. Either of these occurrences could result in increased costs and a disruption
in our operations, which would harm our operating results and financial condition significantly.
Due to our current client concentration, a loss of one
of our significant customers could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
As of December 31,
2007, we had 24 customers, not including approximately 200 small customers we added as a result of our acquisition of MPT. Our top two customers collectively accounted for 36% of our revenues during 2007 and typically have more than one contract
with us for services provided to different groundwater wells. Our customers, including these top two customers, may, upon the occurrence of certain circumstances, elect to terminate their contracts with us prior to their contractual expiration date
and seek services from our competitors. In addition, upon the expiration of these contracts, our customers may decide not to renew such contracts with us. If we were to lose one or more of these significant customers for any reason, our revenues
would decline significantly and our business, operating results and prospects would suffer.
We may face risks associated with our geographic expansion.
We are implementing a regional structure in which we plan to open offices in five regions throughout the United States to support our
municipal customers and one office to support our industrial customers. Our ability to expand our offering geographically will depend on our ability to recruit, hire, train and motivate sales, operations and field services personnel. If we are
unsuccessful in gathering a critical mass of projects in a regional office, we may find it additionally difficult to leverage our overhead costs or to achieve and maintain the profitability of such regional office. Our operations in these regional
offices, including our industrial operations office, will be far from our Southern California headquarters and will require additional management time and attention. Failure to properly supervise the personnel in these offices could result in loss
of new business and potentially harm future sales prospects. In addition, as our systems and services for industrial customers become accepted in North America, these customers may require us to support their international activities which will
require additional time and resources. Supporting the marketing, development, process design, and operations of potentially distant operations will further challenge our management team and operations and could cause harm to our business or
operating results.
Most of our operations are conducted in our facilities in Southern California and our facility in Memphis, Tennessee. Disruptions at
these facilities could increase our expenses.
In 2007, a significant portion of our fabricating operations for our onsite regenerable
and disposable resin treatment systems were conducted in one facility in Southern California. In addition, our headquarters are also located in Southern California. Our central resin regeneration operations for our offsite regenerable treatment
systems and our base of our operations servicing the industrial markets are located at our facility in Memphis, Tennessee. We take precautions to safeguard our facilities, including obtaining insurance, maintaining health and safety protocols, and
using off-site storage of computer data. However, a natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood in Southern California or a tornado,
23
flood or earthquake in Memphis, could cause a substantial interruption in our operations, damage or destroy our fabricating equipment, resin regeneration
facility or inventory and cause us to incur additional expenses. The insurance we maintain against natural disasters may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case, which would require us to expend significant resources to replace
any destroyed assets, thereby harming our financial condition and prospects significantly.
We face risks associated with the historical and current
operations at our Memphis facility.
We acquired our Memphis facility in September 2007 and have limited operating experience with this
facility. From our Memphis facility, we regenerate the ion-exchange resins associated with our offsite regenerable treatment systems and for other customers that have not purchased one of our systems but who require resin. Any problems we face in
shipping or transporting resins to our Memphis facility for regeneration, the inability to regenerate certain resins, or any other problems at our Memphis facility that would prevent us from timely providing regeneration services on a cost-effective
basis would adversely affect our relationships with our customers, our business and our results of operations.
In connection with our
acquisition of MPT, we obtained indemnification from the MPT stockholders for any violations of environmental laws that occurred prior to the acquisition date. We cannot assure you that there are no environmental risks associated with the Memphis
facility or that indemnification obligations of the MPT stockholders with respect to any such problems will adequately protect us from any liability we may face. In addition, we cannot be certain that the materials characterization procedures at our
Memphis facility are adequate to properly identify and dispose of hazardous waste. If these procedures are deficient, then we may be in violation of certain environmental laws which could result in potential liability or disruptions in our
operations.
Our Memphis facility is over 50 years old and may also contain latent defects or other damage of which we are unaware. In the
future, this facility may also lack the capacity to meet our needs for central regeneration of resins or for conducting our industrial market operations. Any of these occurrences could require us to make substantial investment in this facility so
that it meets our needs, or require us to relocate our operations from this facility, which would result in significant disruptions in our operations at this facility.
Also in connection with our acquisition of MPT, we assumed certain legacy contracts and other arrangements to which MPT was a party. Some of these contracts may have terms that we do not find to be favorable or
compatible with our business plans, including our ability to expand and/or penetrate markets. We may be unable to renegotiate these contracts on more favorable terms or at all, which may adversely impact our business and results of operations.
We face risks associated with the design and operation of our systems which may prevent us from increasing our revenues.
We take responsibility for the design, construction, initial maintenance and installation of our ion exchange systems. However, we cannot predict whether
we will be able to design our systems for every particular contaminant. Thus, we may be required to turn away customers that require treatment of chemical contaminants that our systems do not treat. We also cannot guarantee that once constructed,
our systems will operate according to their design or be free from defects. Because many of our systems treat groundwater for dangerous contaminants, if our systems fail to operate properly, it could cause significant public harm, especially for
drinking water applications.
Following installation, testing and regulatory certification of a system, actual day-to-day operation of our
groundwater treatment systems is transitioned to our customers personnel. Though we retain ownership of many of our systems, our customers take responsibility for operation of some of these systems. We, however, continue to be responsible for
the maintenance of the installed systems in most cases. We may not be able to provide sufficient employees for the maintenance of those systems. In addition, because our systems are located at our customers sites, we will not always be
physically present should problems arise.
If there are defects in our system or if significant reliability, quality or performance
problems develop with respect to our system or services, this may have a number of negative effects on our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects, including:
|
|
|
failure to attract new customers and achieve market acceptance;
|
|
|
|
delays in collecting accounts receivable;
|
24
|
|
|
diversion of management and development resources and the attention of engineering personnel;
|
|
|
|
significant customer relations problems and loss of existing customers;
|
|
|
|
high service, support, repair, warranty and insurance expenses;
|
|
|
|
removal of our systems from service by state regulatory agencies for failure to operate properly; and
|
|
|
|
legal actions for damages by our customers.
|
In
order to operate our business successfully, we must meet evolving municipal customer requirements for groundwater treatment and invest in the development of our technology.
If we fail to develop or enhance our system and services to satisfy evolving municipal customer demands, our business, operating results, financial
condition and prospects may be harmed significantly. The market for groundwater treatment in the municipal markets is characterized by changing technologies, periodic new product introductions and evolving customer and industry standards. For
instance, competitors in the groundwater treatment industry are continuously searching for methods of groundwater treatment that are more cost-effective and more efficient. Our current and prospective municipal customers may choose future
groundwater treatment solutions and/or services that might be offered at a lower price than our system and/or services. To achieve market acceptance for our system and services, we must effectively and timely anticipate and adapt to customer
requirements and offer products and services that meet customer demands. Our municipal customers may require us to provide water treatment solutions for new contaminants or higher volumes of water or to decrease the presence of contaminants well
below an applicable MCL which may increase our operating costs for those systems and harm our results of operations. We also may experience design, engineering and other difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or
marketing of any modifications to our system or our new services. Our failure to successfully develop and offer systems or services that satisfy customer requirements would likely cause a decrease in our financial performance. In addition, if our
competitors introduce solutions and/or services based on new or alternative water treatment technologies, our existing and future systems and/or services could become obsolete, which would also weaken demand for our systems or services, thereby
decreasing our revenues and harming our operating results.
Serving customers in industrial markets presents numerous risks.
We face numerous risks as we expand our services to customers in the industrial markets. We have limited experience in serving industrial market customers
and have never provided systems or services to customers in the oil, gas or mining industries. Industrial customers have different requirements and goals than our municipal customers. Our industrial customers may choose treatment solutions and/or
services that are offered on a low life-cycle cost basis or that give them an advantage from a technological standpoint. They also require us to tailor our systems to meet their specific business needs, which often results in additional development
and design costs. We may have difficulty in developing technologies and services that address the needs of these customers and in hiring the appropriate engineering or other talent that can develop such technologies. In some cases, we may be
required to conduct a pilot project to address an industrial market customers needs. We may expend significant time and resources in building and conducting the pilot project, and there can be no assurance that the pilot will successfully
uncover all key process variables required to successfully scale up a particular process or meet the customers requirements. Since these processes have not been successfully commercialized, more extensive or other pilot testing may be
required.
Even if we meet the customers treatment requirements at the pilot stage, when we build the full-scale treatment system,
positive results from a pilot test might not provide an accurate indication of the treatment capabilities of and the cost of operation of a full-scale treatment system, and thus, we may have problems meeting the relevant treatment requirements on an
economically feasible basis or at all. Additionally, startup of new industrial process facilities could cause increased safety risks until processes and procedures for normal operation, upset conditions and emergency conditions are established and
well understood by our employees. To the extent we are unable to meet these customers demands and requirements, our expansion into these markets may not be successful which would adversely affect our business, operating results, financial
condition and prospects. The economics of the systems for some of our industrial customers may rely on the recovery of a valuable resource from waste streams. Should the underlying economics of the resource deteriorate significantly, demand for
these types of our systems and services may decline which could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Industrial
market customers may pose credit risks that we do not necessarily face to the same degree with our municipal market customers. Our industrial market customers may not be economically viable, might be newly formed
25
without adequate capitalization and/or may be highly dependent on commodity prices, such as companies in the oil, gas and mining industries. Changes in
commodity prices will particularly impact the viability of our business in recovery of valuable materials. Finally, when we install our treatment system onsite for an industrial customer, we must take into account the location which our customer
provides us for the installation. We, our systems or the hazardous chemicals we use in our systems, may damage the property or harm our customers personnel that may be in proximity to our systems, or we may adversely impact our customers
operations while we install, service and/or repair our systems. In addition, our employees may be injured by hazardous chemicals, machinery or other dangers at our customers site during the installation, operation and/or servicing of our
systems. Because of our unfamiliarity with building systems for the industrial markets, we may not understand all of the safety and other risks associated with these systems until we have more experience servicing this industry. Any of these risks
could have an adverse effect on our ability to address the industrial market.
Our reliance on third party suppliers and manufacturers poses significant
risks to our business and prospects.
We contract for all of the components in our system and for all of the commodities necessary to
fulfill our service obligations, including salt, chemicals and replacement resin, with third-party suppliers. We plan to rely on third party suppliers and manufacturers for systems we market to our customers. We are subject to substantial risks
because of our reliance on these suppliers and manufacturers. For example:
|
|
|
our suppliers may increase prices for these commodities that exceed contract provisions to recover such costs;
|
|
|
|
our suppliers may not provide components that meet our specifications in sufficient quantities;
|
|
|
|
our suppliers and manufacturers may face a reduction or an interruption of supply of our components;
|
|
|
|
our manufacturers may lack the capacity and resources to continue to manufacture our systems or supply them in sufficient quantity to meet our demands;
|
|
|
|
our suppliers and manufacturers may face production delays due to natural disasters or strikes, lock-outs or other such actions;
|
|
|
|
one or more suppliers or manufacturers could make strategic changes in its or their product lines;
|
|
|
|
there may be a lack of alternative suppliers for certain product lines; and
|
|
|
|
many of our suppliers and manufacturers are small companies which are more likely to experience financial and operational difficulties than larger, well-established
companies, because of their limited financial and other resources.
|
As a result of any of these factors, we may be
required to find alternative suppliers for the components of our system or alternative manufacturers for our systems marketed to industrial customers. It may take considerable amounts of time to identify and qualify such alternative suppliers. In
addition, we may be required to redesign our system to conform to the components provided by these alternative suppliers. As a result of these factors, we may experience delays in obtaining raw materials and components on a timely basis and in
sufficient quantities from our suppliers, which could result in delays in the production and installation of our system. We may also face delays in the manufacture and assembly of our systems from third party manufacturers. These delays could impact
our ability to sell our systems, enter into recurring revenue contracts or profitably execute our service agreements, which would cause our revenues and operating results to decline. In addition, we have lacked the leverage or have otherwise been
unable to negotiate consistently long-term contracts for the supply of components and commodities necessary to build our systems and fulfill our service obligations. As a result, rising component or commodity prices could increase our expenses and
adversely affect our results of operations.
We often place our systems through a party other than the party with whom we enter into a long-term
contract which may cause difficulties in selling our systems and offering our services.
When we sell a system to a municipal or
industrial customer, we often contract with a general contractor as opposed to our actual customer. We often enter into a separate long-term contract for servicing the system directly with our municipal or industrial customer. Contracting with
different parties can create difficulties for us, including having inconsistent terms between the two contracts which makes it more difficult to successfully close the transaction and could harm our relationships with our customers. These
difficulties may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
26
The revenues from certain of our long-term contracts for onsite regenerable treatment systems are moderately seasonal,
with higher processing fees received in the summer months and lower processing fees received in the winter months.
Our business,
particularly the revenues we receive from our long-term contracts, is moderately seasonal due to the impact of summer and hot weather conditions on the water requirements of our customers. In the summer and warmer months, our customers have a higher
demand for water and generally increase the utilization of their groundwater resources resulting in a higher volume of groundwater treated during a period and thus higher revenues from our long-term contracts. However, this increased utilization
results in increased operating costs for us, which could adversely affect our profit margins and results of operations. Conversely, our customers experience lower demand in cooler months in the first and fourth calendar quarters, resulting in lower
revenues from our long-term contracts during those periods. This seasonality in processing fees has resulted in fluctuations in our revenues and operating results. These moderate seasonal trends can cause some reductions in our profit margin and
variations in our financial condition.
Impairment of our significant long-lived assets may reduce our profitability.
Our long-lived assets consist of property, equipment, acquired intellectual property, patents, trademarks and other intangible assets and goodwill. We
regularly review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets. Some factors we consider important in assessing whether or not impairment exists include performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant
changes in the manner of our use of the assets or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds projected undiscounted cash flows, the asset will be written
down to its fair value, which could result in an impairment of our long-lived assets. Any impairment of our long-lived assets in the future may reduce our profitability and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition. In our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we intend to record an impairment charge in the approximate amount of $5.0 million to reduce the recorded goodwill resulting from our MPT acquisition. We may be
required to record further impairment charges related to these or other assets in the future.
We own a large stake in Empire Water Corporation, and to
the extent that it does not succeed, the value of our investment in Empire Water Corporation may decline further.
We recently disposed
of our rights to purchase certain water assets to Empire Water Corporation, or Empire, in exchange for approximately 32% of the outstanding stock of Empire. To the extent that Empire does not succeed in its operations or business or Empire
experiences any material adverse event, the value of Empires common stock will likely decline, which would cause the value of our investment in Empire to decline. Because we record our investment in Empire under the equity method, a decline in
the value of our investment would have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
In the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, we determined that the value of our investment in Empire had declined and, as a result, we intend to record a reduction of our investment and a related reduction in deferred revenue-affiliate through a charge to earnings in
the approximate amount of $1.3 million. Any further decline in the value of our investment in Empire would require us to record additional charges to our earnings.
We have been named as a party to lawsuits, including class action and derivative action lawsuits, and we may be named in additional litigation, all of which could require time and attention from certain members of management and result
in significant legal expenses. An unfavorable outcome in one or more of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
On or about February 22, 2006, GBM Newco, LLC (GBM), filed a lawsuit against our company, and our then Chief Executive Officer, Peter L. Jensen, in
the District Court of El Paso County, Texas. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants breached a certain marketing agreement between the parties. The lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, and
transferred from that court to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Thereafter, GBM amended its complaint to add claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. On February 13,
2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by our paying GBM approximately $0.2 million in exchange for a Release of All Claims from GBM, and the litigation was dismissed with prejudice on or about February 28, 2008.
On October 26, 2007, Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC and certain other related parties filed a lawsuit in the
United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, naming as defendants Basin
27
Water-MPT, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Basin Water, Inc.) and two of its employees, one of whom is the son of our President and Chief Executive
Officer. Subsequently, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to add as defendants Basin Water, Inc. and Michael M. Stark, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, certain claims related to
trade secrets and unfair trade practices relating to treatment of by-products produced as a result of the phosphate mining industry. In December 2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by agreement, resulting in a
payment by the Company of approximately $0.2 million with the remainder of the settlement being paid by our insurer.
On December 27,
2007 and January 2, 2008, two purported securities class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against our company., Peter L. Jensen, Michael M. Stark and Thomas C. Tekulve
(collectively referred to as the Basin defendants) for violations of the Exchange Act. These lawsuits, which contain similar allegations, are captioned
Poulos v. Basin Water, et al
., Case No. CV 07-8359 GW (FFMx) and
Nofer v. Basin Water,
et al
., Case No. CV 08-0002 SGL (JCRx). The lawsuits were subsequently consolidated, and on October 3, 2008 a Consolidated Amended Complaint (CAC) was filed which alleges that the Company deliberately understated the reserves it took for
certain unprofitable contracts, and committed various intentional violations of GAAP during a putative class period between November 14, 2006 and August 8, 2008 (the Federal Lawsuit). The suit does not state a specific amount of damages.
On January 23, 2008, we received a letter dated January 17, 2008, from attorneys representing a purported stockholder demanding
that we investigate and remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by certain unnamed officers and directors of the Company. In the demand letter, the attorneys allege that the unnamed officers and directors violated their duties to the Company by,
among other things, participating in or permitting the company to issue false and misleading statements regarding our business and financial results giving rise to the above named lawsuits.
On January 31, 2008, Loren Charif, a purported stockholder of our company, filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State
of California, County of San Bernardino, against certain of our executive officers and our current directors. The complaint assumes the truth of the aforementioned allegations in the federal securities class action lawsuits and in connection with
those allegations alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and violations of California Corporations Code pertaining to allegations of improper selling. The suit does not state a
specific amount of damages. On November 12, 2008, we obtained an order staying this action until a final determination occurs in the Federal Lawsuit.
From time to time, we are involved in legal and administrative disputes and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which we believe are not material to the conduct of our business.
We are subject to risks related to our international operations.
We currently serve some international customers. We may serve additional international customers or expand our operations internationally. As we expand our international operations, we will be increasingly susceptible
to the following risks associated with international operations:
|
|
|
import and export license requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs and taxes;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on repatriating foreign profits back to the United States;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of foreign and domestic governmental controls;
|
|
|
|
unfamiliarity with foreign laws and regulations and ability to enforce obligations of foreign partners;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
|
|
|
|
product registration, permitting and regulatory compliance;
|
|
|
|
significant, time-consuming and expensive travel to foreign locations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
language and cultural barriers;
|
|
|
|
thefts and other crimes; and
|
|
|
|
geopolitical conditions, such as terrorist attacks, war or other military action.
|
28
In addition, we may develop formal and informal relationships with existing and new local business
partners who can provide local expertise and sales and distribution infrastructure to support our expansion in our target international markets, which will be time-consuming and costly. Several of the risks associated with our international business
may be within the control (in whole or in part) of these local business partners with whom we have established relationships or may be affected by the acts or omissions of these local business partners. No assurances can be provided that these local
business partners will effectively help us in their respective markets and the inability to do so would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Failure to
protect, or uncertainty regarding the validity, enforceability or scope of, our intellectual property rights could impair our competitive position.
Our treatment systems and services utilize a variety of proprietary rights that are important to our competitive position and success. Because the intellectual property associated with our technology is evolving and
rapidly changing, our current intellectual property rights may not protect us adequately. We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets and contractual restrictions to protect the intellectual property we use in our business. In
addition, we generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements, or have confidentiality provisions in agreements, with our employees, consultants, strategic relationships and customers and control access to, and distribution of, our
technology, documentation and other proprietary information. Our pending patent applications may not be granted or, if granted, the resulting patent may be challenged or invalidated by our competitors or by other third parties. Despite our efforts
to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. In addition, monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult, and we cannot be certain the steps
we have taken to protect our intellectual property will prevent unauthorized use of it.
Because legal standards relating to the validity,
enforceability and scope of protection of patent and intellectual property rights in new technologies are uncertain and still evolving, the future viability or value of our intellectual property rights is uncertain. Furthermore, our competitors
independently may develop similar technologies that limit the value of our intellectual property or design around patents issued to us. If competitors or third parties are able to use our intellectual property or are able to successfully challenge,
circumvent, invalidate or render unenforceable our intellectual property, we likely would lose a significant portion of our competitive advantage in the market. We may not be successful in securing or maintaining proprietary or patent protection for
the technology used in our systems or services, and protection that is secured may be challenged and possibly lost. We may have to prosecute unauthorized uses of our intellectual property and the expense, time, delay and burden on management of such
litigation could prevent us from maintaining or increasing our business. Our inability to protect our intellectual property adequately for these and other reasons could result in weakened demand for our systems or services, which would result in a
decline in our revenues.
In addition, we have entered into an alliance agreement with Rohm and Haas and an agreement with Purifics,
pursuant to which we have access to certain of their technologies. In connection with our acquisition of Envirogen, we are in the process of obtaining the rights to a number of patents relating to the bioreactor and biofilter business. To the extent
that each of these parties faces a challenge to its intellectual property rights in those technologies, it could have an adverse effect on our ability to market our systems and/or services that incorporate those technologies which would result in a
decline in our revenues.
We could become subject to litigation regarding intellectual property rights, which could harm our business significantly.
Our commercial success will continue to depend in part on our ability to make and sell our systems or provide our services without
infringing the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. We face these risks with respect to intellectual property that we have developed internally, as well as with respect to intellectual property rights we have acquired from third parties.
For example, pursuant to our alliance agreement with Rohm and Haas and our agreement with Purifics, we have access to the technologies owned by each of these companies. To the extent either of these parties has failed to adequately protect the
technologies upon which we rely or if these technologies infringe upon the patents or proprietary rights of third parties, we may be unable to continue using such technologies or we may face lawsuits related to our past use of these technologies. In
addition, our competitors, many of which have substantially greater resources than us and have made significant investments in competing technologies or products, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that will prevent, limit or interfere with
our ability to make or sell our systems or provide our services.
29
If we are unsuccessful in any challenge to our rights to market and sell our systems, our rights to use
third party technologies or to provide our services, we may, among other things, be required to:
|
|
|
pay actual damages, royalties, lost profits and/or increased damages and the third partys attorneys fees, which may be substantial;
|
|
|
|
cease the development, manufacture and/or marketing of our systems or services that use the intellectual property in question through a court-imposed sanction
called an injunction;
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to modify or redesign our systems or other technology or services so that they do not infringe others intellectual property
rights or to develop or acquire non-infringing technology, which may not be possible; or
|
|
|
|
obtain licenses to the disputed rights, which could require us to pay substantial upfront fees and future royalty payments and may not be available to us on
acceptable terms, if at all.
|
Even if we successfully defend any infringement claims, the expense, time, delay and burden
on management of litigation could prevent us from maintaining or increasing our business. Further, negative publicity could decrease demand for our systems and services and cause our revenues to decline, thus harming our operating results
significantly.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology, systems and
services could be harmed significantly.
We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information in operating our
business. We seek to protect this information, in part, through the use of confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants, advisors and others upon commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements require that all confidential
information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individuals relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. Our agreements with employees also provide that
any inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us are our exclusive property. Nonetheless, those agreements may not provide adequate protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information and
prevent their unauthorized use or disclosure. In the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or proprietary information, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection, particularly for our trade secrets or other
confidential information.
To the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties apply technological information
independently developed by them or by others to our proposed products, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to such information which may not be resolved in our favor. The risk that other parties may breach confidentiality agreements or
that our trade secrets become known or independently discovered by competitors, could harm us by enabling our competitors, who may have greater experience and financial resources, to copy or use our trade secrets and other proprietary information in
the advancement of their products, methods or technologies. The disclosure of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position, thereby weakening demand for our systems or services and harming our ability to maintain or increase our customer
base.
In addition, to the extent that we do not fulfill our contractual or other obligations to adequately protect the technologies to
which we have been granted access by Rohm and Haas or Purifics, we could be liable to either of them for any resulting harm to their businesses or could lose further access to those technologies, which could harm our business, operating results or
financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Industry
We are subject to environmental risks that may prevent us from selling our systems and, if such risks are realized, may subject us to clean-up costs or litigation that could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial
condition and prospects.
We are subject to a number of governmental regulations with respect to our business activities and
operations. See BusinessGovernment Regulation. For example, our onsite regenerable ion-exchange technology generates a byproduct known as brine waste, which may contain hazardous contaminants such as arsenic. Any waste materials or
byproducts from our treatment process are required to be disposed of in a manner mandated by the EPA or state regulatory agencies. The EPA or state regulatory agencies may consider these or other byproducts of the ion-exchange process to be
hazardous, and in such cases, our customers will be subject to additional requirements relating to the treatment, storage, disposal and transportation of hazardous substances. With respect to our onsite regenerable treatment
30
systems, though our customers take title to all brine waste, together with all other byproducts of the ion-exchange technology process, we generally contract
with third parties to secure waste disposal services on our customers behalf. We cannot predict whether any new laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations will be enacted that may require significant modification to our system or our
services, which may weaken demand for our system or services and harm our business significantly.
In addition, we cannot predict whether
any third party will assert against us any claims for violations of any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, law, rule or regulation relating to hazardous or toxic substances in connection with the brine waste or groundwater treatment process
or as a result of any actions of the third-party waste disposal services with whom we contract on behalf of our customers who use our onsite regenerable treatment systems. We face similar risks with respect to resins containing contaminants that we
transport to our Memphis facility for regeneration, as these resins may contain hazardous substances with our knowledge. CERCLA and analogous state laws provide for the remediation of certain contaminated facilities and impose strict, joint and
several liability for remediation costs on current and former owners or operators of a facility at which there has been a release or a threatened release of a hazardous substance. This liability is also imposed on persons who arrange for
the disposal or transportation of such substances, and on those who transport such substances to the facility. Because we generally contract for waste disposal and transport on our customers behalf, we may be subject to liability as an
arranger of the disposal or transportation of hazardous substances, and our contracts with our customers may not adequately protect us from this liability. Hundreds of substances are defined as hazardous under CERCLA and analogous state
laws and their presence, even in small amounts, can result in substantial liability. The expense of conducting a cleanup can be significant. The actual costs for these liabilities could be significantly greater than the amounts that we might be
required to accrue on our financial statements from time to time. In addition to the costs of complying with environmental regulations, we may incur costs to defend against litigation brought by government agencies and private parties. As a result,
we may be required to pay fines to governmental agencies if we are found to have violated these environmental laws. In addition, we may in the future be a defendant in lawsuits brought by private parties who assert claims alleging environmental
damage, natural resource damages, personal injury, property damage and/or violations of permits and licenses by us. If such claims are asserted against us, and if we do not prevail in defending such claims, we may be required to pay significant
damages, causing our financial condition to suffer. Even if we successfully defend against such claims, we may devote significant time and resources to litigation, which would likely prevent us from maintaining or increasing our customer base and
business.
We face additional environmental risks related to the parties with whom we do business, particularly those parties that send
resin to our Memphis facility for regeneration. Our customers may not be in compliance with federal, state or local statutes, ordinances, laws, rules or regulations relating to hazardous or toxic substances and to the extent we assist them with
water and wastewater treatment services, offsite regeneration of resins or waste reduction or resource recovery services, we could be subject to liability under these various laws and regulations. In addition, our contracts with these customers may
not adequately protect us from these liabilities, and even if our contracts provide these legal protections, these customers may not have the financial resources to provide us with the protection to which we are legally entitled such as the ability
to pay indemnity obligations to which they are contractually obligated.
We also face environmental risks associated with our operations
targeted to serve industrial customers. These operations involve wastewater treatment, water reuse and the recovery of valuable commodities and often require the discharge of wastewater and other materials. We plan for these activities to take place
at our Memphis facility. These activities subject us to numerous stringent permitting requirements as well as numerous federal, state or local statutes, ordinances, laws, rules or regulations relating to hazardous or toxic substances. For example,
our Memphis facilitys environmental permits include a NPDES wastewater discharge permit and Special Solid Waste Disposal Permits. In addition, this facility is required to maintain an EPA generator registration and identification number for
its hazardous waste disposal activities. Additionally, to the extent these activities involve radionuclides, they would be subject to regulations governed by the NRC. If we do not comply with the applicable environmental laws and regulations
applicable to our activities or obtain and maintain the appropriate permits necessary to conduct these activities, we would be subject to numerous legal and administrative disputes and proceedings.
Changes in governmental regulation and other legal uncertainties could adversely affect our customers or decrease demand for our systems, and thus harm our business,
operating results and prospects.
In the United States, many different federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the
treatment and distribution of contaminated groundwater and disposal of attendant wastes. The increased interest in the treatment of contaminated groundwater due to increased media attention on the adverse health effects from contaminated drinking
31
water may result in intervention by the EPA or state regulatory agencies under existing or newly enacted legislation and in the imposition of restrictions,
fees or charges on users and providers of products and services in this area. These restrictions, fees or charges could adversely affect our customers, which could negatively affect our revenues. Conversely, the failure of the EPA or state
regulatory agencies to act on a timely basis to set interim or permanent standards for pollutants such as MCLs, or to delay effective dates for standards for pollutants, grant waivers of compliance with such standards or take other discretionary
actions not to enforce these standards, may decrease demand for our systems and services because our customers would not be required to bring their water into compliance with such regulatory standards. Changes in regulations affecting our industrial
customers, such as with respect to wastewater treatment or water reuse processes, could also impact their need for our systems and/or services. We cannot predict whether there will be future legislation regarding the treatment and distribution of
contaminated groundwater, the disposal of attendant wastes, wastewater treatment or water reuse processes. If there are significant changes in such laws and regulations, particularly if such laws and regulations become less stringent, such changes
could weaken demand for our systems or services and cause our revenues to decline, thus harming our operating results and prospects.
Each groundwater
treatment solution must be permitted by a regulatory agency prior to its use by our customers, and changing drinking water standards and other factors could affect the approval process with respect to our system by such regulatory agencies.
Each groundwater treatment solution, including our groundwater treatment system and those of our competitors, must be permitted by
applicable state regulatory agencies prior to use of such systems by our customers. We cannot assure you when or whether the various regulatory agencies will approve our systems for use by our customers. The application process for our systems is
time consuming and often involves several information requests by the regulatory agencies with respect to our systems. Any long waiting periods or difficulties faced by our customers in the application process could cause some of our customers to
use competing technologies, products, services or sources of drinking water, rather than use our technology.
Also, we cannot predict the
impact of changing drinking water standards on the approval of our technology for groundwater treatment. Our systems currently treat groundwater so that it meets the MCL for several different contaminants. MCLs are set by the EPA and/or state
regulatory agencies that regulate drinking water contaminants. However, the MCL for any contaminant is subject to review and revision by the EPA or state regulatory agencies. MCLs may be changed to levels below that which our systems can treat,
resulting in state regulatory agencies failing to approve our systems. Without regulatory approval, our systems could not be used by our customers, and we may be required to develop technology that meets any revised MCLs, and to the extent we cannot
do so, sales of our systems will suffer. The development of such technology may require increased expenditures, and during this development, we could be delayed in selling our systems, which would cause our revenues to decline, thus harming our
operating results significantly.
Demand for our groundwater treatment systems would be adversely affected by a downturn in government spending related
to groundwater treatment solutions, or in the cyclical residential or non-residential building markets.
Our municipal market business
is dependent upon spending on groundwater treatment solutions by utilities, municipalities and other organizations that supply water, which in turn is often dependent upon residential construction, population growth, continued contamination of
groundwater sources and regulatory responses to this contamination. As a result, demand for our water treatment systems could be impacted adversely by general budgetary constraints on our governmental or regulated customers, including government
spending cuts, the inability of government entities to issue debt to finance any necessary groundwater treatment projects, difficulty of our customers in obtaining necessary permits or changes in regulatory limits associated with the chemical
contaminants we seek to address with our groundwater treatment system. It is not unusual for the implementation of water treatment solutions to be delayed and rescheduled for a number of reasons, including changes in project priorities and
difficulties in complying with environmental and other government regulations. We cannot assure you that economic conditions will continue such that state and local governments will address groundwater contaminant needs and consider purchasing or
entering into long-term contracts for our systems. In addition, although in past years our target markets have experienced population growth in recent years along with related residential building market growth, we have recently witnessed a
significant slowdown in the residential building industry and a decrease in new home development and population migration to California. A slowdown of growth in residential and non-residential building has reduced demand for groundwater treatment
solutions such as our systems. The residential and non-residential building markets are generally cyclical, and, historically, down cycles have typically lasted a number of years. Because of the dramatic declines in the housing market in the past
few years and the significant deterioration of the economic climate, this down cycle may be significantly longer than past
32
down cycles, which could affect the demand for drinking water and water treatment services. Any significant decline in the governmental spending on
groundwater treatment solutions or residential or non-residential building markets could weaken demand for our systems or services, thus harming our operating results and prospects significantly.
We operate in a competitive market, and if we are unable to compete effectively, our business, operating results and prospects could suffer.
The market environment in which we operate is very dynamic and is characterized by evolving standards, the development of new technology, regulations
which continually reduce the acceptable levels for contaminants and affect the means, methods and costs of disposing of wastes derived from groundwater treatment. Though barriers to entry in this market are arguably high, we expect that competition
will intensify in the future. We believe that in such a rapidly changing market, key competitive factors include:
|
|
|
development and use of technology;
|
|
|
|
cost and effectiveness of treatment and waste disposal methods;
|
|
|
|
changing requirements of the EPA or state regulatory agencies;
|
|
|
|
changing requirements of customers in the industrial markets; and
|
|
|
|
availability of capital to meet evolving customer needs and requirements for the treatment of contaminated water.
|
We compete with large groundwater treatment companies, such as Severn Trent PLC, GE Water and Siemens AG, in our business aimed at the municipal markets.
We compete with large industrial market companies, such as GE Water and Layne Christensen, in our business aimed at the industrial markets. Many of our current and potential competitors have technical and financial resources, marketing and service
organizations and market expertise significantly greater than ours. Many of our competitors also have longer operating histories, greater name recognition and larger customer bases. Moreover, our competitors may forecast the course of market
developments more accurately and could in the future develop new technologies that compete with our systems and/or services or even render our system and/or services obsolete. Due to the evolving markets in which we compete, additional competitors
with significant market presence and financial resources may enter those markets, thereby further increasing competition. These competitors may be able to reduce our market share by adopting more aggressive pricing policies than we can or by
developing technology and services that gain wider market acceptance than our system and/or services. Existing and potential competitors also may develop relationships with distributors of our systems and services or third parties with whom we have
strategic relationships in a manner that could harm our ability to sell, market and develop our systems and services significantly. If we do not compete successfully we may never achieve significant market penetration and we may be unable to
maintain or increase our business or revenues, causing our operating results and prospects to suffer.
We could become subject to litigation as a result
of claims brought against our customers, which could harm our operating results and financial condition significantly.
Our municipal
customers are water providers that supply drinking water treated by our system to the general public. If our customers faced claims from consumers related to the quality of the drinking water, such consumers also may bring claims against any other
party with whom the customer contracted in the groundwater treatment process. Even if our system treated the groundwater successfully for the contaminants it was designed to remove, we still may be subject to claims from such consumers. Our
industrial customers may also face liability from consumers or regulatory agencies with respect to their wastewater treatment or waste reduction activities. These parties may also bring claims or actions against us because our systems and services
were utilized in our customers activities. Despite any success in defending such claims, the expense, time, delay and burden on management of litigation would likely prevent us from maintaining or increasing our business and negative publicity
could weaken demand for our services, cause our revenues to decline and harm our operating results and financial condition significantly.
33
Risks Related to our Finances and Capital Requirements
We may incur indebtedness that contains terms that place restrictions on the operation of our business; our failure to comply with these terms could put us in default,
which would harm our business and operations.
We may incur indebtedness in the future that contains a number of significant covenants.
These covenants may limit our ability to, among other things, do the following:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
merge, consolidate or dispose of our assets;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or repurchase our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
change our line of business;
|
|
|
|
accept any prepayments under or otherwise modify contracts with our customers;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
grant liens on our assets.
|
If we
were to incur such indebtedness, a material breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under this indebtedness which could result in significant harm to our business and operations.
Our customers may need financing to purchase our systems, which exposes us to additional business and credit risks.
Availability and cost of financing are significant factors that affect demand for our systems and services. Many of our customers can purchase our
systems only when financing is available at a reasonable cost. Some customers seek to acquire our systems and services through a long-term contract. We may rely on third parties to purchase the systems that are then subject to long-term contracts
with our customers. In certain cases, we may indemnify the third party for any financial damages caused by our default under our long-term services agreement with our customer. This exposes us to potential additional costs in the event of our
failure to perform. In addition, if we are unable to contract with third parties to purchase our systems in connection with the placement of our systems with municipal or industrial customers, we would be faced with either keeping these systems on
our balance sheet or requiring our customers to purchase the equipment outright. In the latter case, this may delay or prevent the sale to our customer, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
We have recorded and will record non-cash expense in future periods that result in a decrease in our net income for a given period.
As required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, we record expense for the fair value of stock options and restricted stock granted and
this expense is reflected in our operating results. We rely on stock options to motivate current employees and attract new employees. As a result of the requirement to expense stock options, we may choose to reduce our reliance on stock options as a
motivation tool. If we reduce our use of stock options, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified employees. However, if we do not reduce our reliance on stock options, our reported net loss may increase or our reported net
income may decrease.
We have also applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
, to warrants issued to
lenders and other third parties including Cross Atlantic Partners, Aqua America and BWCA. The fair value of these warrants is expensed over the period of the related agreements, as appropriate. As a result, we recognized expense in 2005 and 2006
which affected our interest expense or selling, general and administrative expense, depending upon the nature of the underlying transaction. In May 2006 and May 2007, we repaid certain of our indebtedness. The remaining fair value of the associated
warrants attributed to the debt was charged to interest expense during that period. In connection with the restatement of our financial statements, we determined to recognize the fair value of the warrants issued to Aqua America as interest expense
at the time of the repayment of our indebtedness to Aqua America in 2007.
We face a number of risks related to our acquisitions.
Our growth strategy included several acquisitions. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including the following:
|
|
|
we may experience adverse short-term effects on our operating results;
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to successfully and rapidly integrate the new businesses, personnel and products with our existing business, including financial reporting,
management and information technology systems;
|
34
|
|
|
we may experience higher than anticipated costs of integration and unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures;
|
|
|
|
an acquisition may be in a market or geographical area in which we have little experience;
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulty in retaining key employees, including employees who may have been instrumental to the success or growth of the acquired business; and
|
|
|
|
we may use a substantial amount of our cash, common stock and other financial resources to consummate an acquisition.
|
In September 2007, we acquired MPT, which is located in Tennessee, for approximately $12.2 million, consisting of $6.9 million in cash and 462,746 shares
of our common stock with a fair value of $5.3 million. In September 2008, we acquired Envirogen from Shaw. There can be no assurance that we will achieve higher revenues or benefit from any synergies as a result of these acquisitions.
In addition, we may require additional debt or equity financing for future acquisitions, and such financing may not be available or on favorable terms,
if available at all. We may not be able to successfully integrate or profitably operate any new business we acquire, and we cannot assure you that any such acquisition will meet our expectations. Finally, in the event we decide to discontinue
pursuit of a potential acquisition, we will be required to immediately expense all costs incurred in pursuit of the possible acquisition which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the expense is recognized.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We expect
that the price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially.
The price of our common stock may decline, and the price of our common
stock that prevails in the market may be higher or lower than the price you pay, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include:
|
|
|
the effects of the restatement of our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
failure of our systems or technology to achieve commercial success;
|
|
|
|
announcements of the introduction of new products or services by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in our industry sectors;
|
|
|
|
developments concerning product development results or intellectual property rights of others;
|
|
|
|
litigation or public concern about the safety of our systems and services;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
securities analysts coverage of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
deviations in our operating results from estimates;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of litigation;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends; or
|
|
|
|
sales of large blocks of our stock.
|
In addition, the equity markets in general, and the Nasdaq Global Market in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often appeared to be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
those companies. Further, the market prices of securities of water-related companies have been particularly volatile. These broad market and industry factors may affect the market price of our common stock adversely, regardless of our operating
performance.
35
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents, as amended and restated, and under Delaware law could delay or
discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Some of these provisions include:
|
|
|
a board of directors divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms;
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called only by the chairman of our board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or by a
majority of the total number of authorized directors;
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations;
|
|
|
|
a requirement of approval of not less than 66
2/3
% of all outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote to amend any bylaws by stockholder action, or to amend specific provisions of our certificate of incorporation; and
|
|
|
|
the authority of our board of directors to issue preferred stock on terms determined by our board of directors without stockholder approval.
|
In addition, because we are a Delaware corporation, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These and other provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and
restated bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors, including to delay or
impede a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Facilities
Our corporate headquarters, finance and administration offices are located in Rancho Cucamonga, California where we occupy approximately 10,000 square
feet under a lease expiring on February 14, 2013 at an initial annual cost of approximately $0.3 million with annual escalations. We also occupy approximately 35,000 square feet under an additional lease expiring on March 31, 2011
comprising our former engineering and manufacturing facilities. We have an option to extend the lease for an additional three years. Our rental expense in 2007 was approximately $0.2 million for this facility.
We lease our Memphis facility from a limited liability company owned by the former stockholders of MPT. The facility is approximately 55,000 square feet.
The lease provides for an annual base rent of $81,900 and an initial lease term of five years, with three 5 year options to extend the lease term. As of December 31, 2007, we also leased warehouse and office space in Pasadena, California and
outside Phoenix, Arizona, respectively. We terminated the Pasadena lease in the fourth quarter of 2008.
In March 2008 we leased
approximately 6,400 square feet for our Southwest Region office and certain executives in Kingwood, Texas under a lease expiring on April 30, 2012 at an initial annual cost of approximately $130,000 with periodic escalators. Additionally, in
September 2008, in connection with our acquisition of the Envirogen business, we entered into subleases with Shaw for facilities in Lawrenceville, New Jersey and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The subleases expire no later than July 31, 2009 at an
annual cost of approximately $0.2 million.
36
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
As Restated
|
Water treatment facilities
|
|
$
|
8,084
|
|
$
|
11,437
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
514
|
Vehicles and trailers
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
501
|
Software and other
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
704
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
1,921
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
169
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
24,885
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
14,300
|
|
$
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of the restatement.
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
On or about February 22,
2006, GBM Newco, LLC (GBM), filed a lawsuit against the Company, and its then Chief Executive Officer, Peter L. Jensen, in the District Court of El Paso County, Texas. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants breached a certain marketing agreement
between the parties. The lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, and transferred from that court to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Thereafter, GBM amended its
complaint to add claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. On February 13, 2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by the Company paying GBM $0.2 million in exchange for
a Release of All Claims from GBM, and the litigation was dismissed with prejudice on or about February 28, 2008.
On October 26,
2007, Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC and certain other related parties filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, naming as defendants Basin Water-MPT, Inc. (a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company) and two of its employees, one of whom is the son of the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer. Subsequently, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to add as defendants the Company and Michael M.
Stark, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, certain claims related to trade secrets and unfair trade practices relating to treatment of by-products produced as a result of
the phosphate mining industry. In December 2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by agreement, resulting in a payment by the Company of approximately $0.2 million with the remainder of the settlement being paid by our
insurer.
On December 27, 2007 and January 2, 2008, two purported securities class action complaints were filed in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company, Peter L. Jensen, Michael M. Stark and Thomas C. Tekulve (collectively referred to as the Basin defendants) for violations of the Exchange Act. These lawsuits, which
contain similar allegations, are captioned
Poulos v. Basin Water, et al
., Case No. CV 07-8359 GW (FFMx) and
Nofer v. Basin Water, et al
., Case No. CV 08-0002 SGL (JCRx). The lawsuits were subsequently consolidated, and on
October 3, 2008 a Consolidated Amended Complaint (CAC) was filed which alleges that the Company deliberately understated the reserves it took for certain unprofitable contracts, and committed various intentional violations of GAAP during a
putative class period between November 14, 2006 and August 8, 2008 (the Federal Lawsuit.) The suit does not state a specific amount of damages.
On January 23, 2008, we received a letter dated January 17, 2008, from attorneys representing a purported stockholder demanding that we investigate and remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by certain
unnamed officers and directors of the Company. In the demand letter, the attorneys allege that the unnamed officers and directors violated their duties to the Company by, among other things, participating in or permitting the company to issue false
and misleading statements regarding our business and financial results giving rise to the above named lawsuits.
37
On January 31, 2008, Loren Charif, a purported stockholder of our company, filed a shareholder
derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino, against certain of our executive officers and our current directors. The complaint assumes the truth of the aforementioned allegations in the federal
securities class action lawsuits and in connection with those allegations alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and violations of California Corporations Code pertaining to
allegations of improper selling. The suit does not state a specific amount of damages. On November 12, 2008, we obtained an order staying this action until a final determination occurs in the Federal Lawsuit.
From time to time, we are involved in legal and administrative disputes and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which we believe are
not material to the conduct of our business. With respect to these ordinary matters, management believes that the Company has adequate accruals for related costs, and the Company may also have effective legal defenses.
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market Information
The following table shows the
range of market prices of Basin Waters common stock since its initial public offering in May 2006. Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol BWTR. There were approximately 5,600 stockholders as of
February 4, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price Range
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Period from initial public offering to December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11, 2006- June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
17.50
|
|
$
|
8.66
|
Third Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
$
|
6.88
|
Fourth Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
9.86
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2007
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
$
|
6.18
|
Second Quarter 2007
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
|
$
|
6.20
|
Third Quarter 2007
|
|
$
|
12.50
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
Fourth Quarter 2007
|
|
$
|
13.06
|
|
$
|
5.66
|
38
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, stockholders will need to sell shares of our common stock to realize a return on their investments, if any. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of
our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.
Repurchases of Securities
In May 2007, our Board of
Directors authorized management to repurchase up to $10.0 million of shares of our common stock in the market from time to time. The shares could be repurchased at times and prices as determined by management, and may be completed through open
market or privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program provides that repurchases must be made in accordance with the terms and subject to the restrictions of Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In November 2007, we repurchased 85,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.45 per share. These repurchased shares have been classified as
treasury stock in the December 31, 2007 balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
|
|
(b) Average Price
Paid per Share
|
|
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or
Programs
|
|
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares the May Yet
be
Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2007 (October 1 through October 31)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
November 2007 (November 1 through November 30)
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
9,451,750
|
December 2007 (December 1 through December 31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
85,000
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
$
|
9,451,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
The selected financial
data set forth in this Item 6 have been restated to reflect the adjustments to our consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. See
Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of the restatement. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our audited financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007 (1)
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
9,660
|
|
|
$
|
13,890
|
|
|
$
|
12,231
|
|
|
$
|
4,307
|
|
|
$
|
2,095
|
|
Cost of revenues (2)
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
7,130
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(23,258
|
)
|
|
|
(11,881
|
)
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
Other income (expense) (3)
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
|
9,507
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
12,849
|
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
|
9,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
2,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
$
|
23,798
|
|
|
$
|
11,723
|
|
|
$
|
6,582
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,157
|
|
|
$
|
2,825
|
|
|
$
|
7,357
|
|
|
$
|
4,264
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,779
|
|
|
$
|
8,183
|
|
|
$
|
4,990
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
$
|
73,817
|
|
|
$
|
77,335
|
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
$
|
(2,290
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
-
|
|
Includes the results of operations of Mobile Process Technology Co. (MPT) acquired in September 2007 (see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements).
|
(2)
|
|
-
|
|
For years 2007 and 2006, includes the impact of reserves for future contract losses of approximately $6.8 million and
$3.7 million, respectively (see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements).
|
(3)
|
|
-
|
|
For 2007, includes $3.1 million gain related to our transaction with Empire Water Corporation (see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements).
|
40
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the
notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties
.
See
Forward-Looking Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under Item 1A. Risk Factors, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated
in such forward-looking statements.
Overview
We design, build and implement systems for the treatment of contaminated groundwater, industrial process water and air streams from municipal and industrial sources. We provide reliable sources of drinking water for
many communities, and the ability to comply with environmental standards and recover valuable resources from process and waste water streams. We were initially incorporated in December 1999 and during our first two years of operations primarily
focused on the development of our ion-exchange regenerable, onsite treatment system. The first permit to be issued by the California Department of Health Services, or DHS, to one of our customers for the operation of our system was issued in 2002.
As of December 31, 2007, we had 79 systems on order or under contract with an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 115,000 acre-feet per year, or approximately 37.4 billion gallons per year.
In 2007, we marketed our treatment systems and services primarily to utilities, cities, municipalities, special districts, real estate developers and
other organizations for use in treating groundwater that does not comply with federal or state drinking water regulations due to the presence of chemical contaminants. We marketed our treatment systems and services through our direct sales force,
independent contractors and strategic relationships. Our customers include Arizona American Water, California Water Service Group and American States Water Company, three of the largest investor-owned water utilities in the United States based on
population served.
Our operations necessitate a significant investment in receivables and property and require significant working
capital. In the case of sales of ion-exchange regenerable, onsite treatment systems, we must expend all of the costs to build and deliver our systems to the customer, and we receive payment for the system primarily when the delivery is completed and
the system has been placed into service. For systems that we deliver to customers under our long-term contract arrangements, we must incur the costs to build and deliver our treatment systems, and we receive payment over a typical period of five or
more years.
In May 2006, we completed our initial public offering which resulted in the issuance of 6,900,000 shares of our common stock
at a price of $12.00 per share for net proceeds of approximately $75.2 million.
On September 14, 2007, we completed the acquisition
of Mobile Process Technology Co. (MPT), a provider of technology and services to the water treatment and industrial process markets. This acquisition provides additional capabilities including expanded technological solutions, geographic presence
and expanded customer base. The new company provides the ability to service and treat smaller capacity water systems than our product offering. In addition, in September 2008, we also acquired Envirogen from Shaw Environmental, Inc. and its
affiliates.
Outlook
We believe that
the following trends and uncertainties, among others, may impact our revenues, income, liquidity and cash flows:
|
|
|
The success of our internal marketing and sales organization in developing new customers and placing our treatment systems through sales or long-term contracts,
which would increase our revenues;
|
|
|
|
Our success in placing our treatment systems throughout the nation pursuant to strategic relationships, expansion of our marketing and sales organization, expansion
of our regional structure which would increase our revenues and may decrease our customer concentration and associated risk;
|
|
|
|
Public awareness of the effects of groundwater contamination, which may increase demand for our groundwater treatment systems;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to renegotiate our long-term contracts to mitigate our contract losses;
|
|
|
|
The outcome of our litigation, including our securities class action and shareholder derivative litigation;
|
41
|
|
|
The effects of the restatement of our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
Changes in federal and state government regulation with respect to drinking water standards which may impact demand for our water treatment systems;
|
|
|
|
The potential increase in demand for placement of our systems through long-term contracts rather than sales, which will likely require higher capital expenditures
and adversely affect our liquidity;
|
|
|
|
Changes in Federal and state government regulation of discharge requirements for wastewater may impact our demand for wastewater treatment systems and services;
|
|
|
|
Changes in commodity prices, particularly commodities that might be recoverable from waste streams, may impact the demand for our resource recovery system and
services;
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions and the current significant economic decline, which may affect capital expenditures in our markets and demand for our
treatment systems and services;
|
|
|
|
Availability of federal and state funding to our potential customers;
|
|
|
|
Acceptance by potential customers to utilize third parties for water and wastewater treatment, waste reduction and resource recovery services, including through
long-term service agreements;
|
|
|
|
Continued expansion of our workforce resulting in increased expenses but also supporting our growth; and
|
|
|
|
Increased utilization and productivity of our personnel, which we anticipate will positively impact our gross profit under our contract revenues.
|
Restatement of Historical Financial Statements
In connection with its review in late June 2008 with respect to certain transactions and in July 2008 with respect to the preparation of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the
Company identified issues relating to its revenue recognition for certain specific transactions. The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Audit Committee), acting on behalf of the Board, had previously retained
independent legal counsel in February 2008 in connection with an inquiry into allegations contained in certain private shareholder litigation brought against the Company, the Companys directors and certain Company officers. The Audit Committee
then asked its independent counsel to broaden its inquiry into other transactions relating to the Companys revenue recognition. The Audit Committees counsel also retained independent forensic accountants to review the foregoing
transactions.
On August 6, 2008, the Audit Committees counsel, together with the independent forensic accountants, conveyed
interim findings to the Audit Committee. On August 11, 2008, the Company announced that it would delay the filing of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and that the Company believed it may be necessary to
restate previously issued financial statements for certain periods as a result of the Companys revenue recognition relating to certain specific transactions.
On September 23, 2008 and October 28, 2008, the Audit Committee met with its counsel and the forensic accountants to discuss their further report on the findings with respect to the Companys accounting
for the transactions. On October 29, 2008, the Audit Committee discussed the findings of the review with SingerLewak LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. On October 29, 2008, the Company announced that the
Audit Committee concluded that the Company incorrectly accounted for certain specific transactions in 2006 and 2007. As a result, the Company incorrectly recognized revenues relating to such transactions, including revenues incorrectly recognized as
a result of the failure to apply Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -Deferral for Certain Interests, Revised December 2003
(FIN 46(R)).
The Company also
announced that the Audit Committee concluded that the Companys financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, including each of the fiscal quarters in 2006 and 2007, and for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2008, should no longer be relied upon. The consolidated financial statements and related financial information contained in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for 2006 and 2007 are being restated in this Form 10-K/A. See
Notes 3 and 4 of our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K/A for further discussion.
The Division of Enforcement of
the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation with respect to the Companys accounting and related disclosure and other matters. The Company is cooperating with the SEC.
42
Subsequent to the Companys announcement that it would restate its consolidated financial
statements, the Companys auditors, SingerLewak LLP, commenced an audit of the Companys restated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on our previously reported net loss for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
(in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Loss
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Cumulative
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to apply FIN 46(R)
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
Revenue recognition errors
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
Errors in accounting for warrants
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Error in recording Empire transaction
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Error in recording contract loss reserves
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
Other adjustments, net
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on our previously reported net loss
for the quarterly periods of 2007 and 2006 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Loss by Quarter
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Failure to apply FIN 46(R)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(375
|
)
|
|
$
|
(870
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue recognition errors
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Errors in accounting for warrants
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Error in recording Empire transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Error in recording contract loss reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,770
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments, net
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(954
|
)
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
$
|
(463
|
)
|
|
$
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on EPS (in thousands of dollars, except
per share items):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007 As
Reported
|
|
|
(Increase) to
Net Loss
|
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006 As
Reported
|
|
|
(Increase) to
Net Loss
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per shareassuming dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common sharediluted
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred net losses. The
impact of common stock equivalents has been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect on net loss per share is anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the effects of the above errors on the balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) in
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,177
|
)
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
6,859
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
(7,295
|
)
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below is a summary of the significant determinations regarding the restatement.
Failure to Apply FIN 46(R)
In 2007, the
Company entered into four transactions with respect to the sale of water treatment units to two special purpose entities (VL Capital, or VLC, and Water Services Solutions, or WSS) that were to be funded by third-party
44
financial institutions. The underlying agreements provided that the Company would sell VLC and WSS water treatment units subject to water service agreements
(WSAs) between the Company and its customers. The special purpose entities would then have the right to receive the scheduled lease payments from the customers subject to the WSAs. In two transactions with VL Capital, the Company recognized a total
of $4.4 million of revenues. In two transactions with WSS, the Company recognized a total of $3.9 million of revenues. The Company has concluded that the financial statements of VLC and WSS should be consolidated with those of the Company in
accordance with FIN 46(R). This analysis is based on the fact that the structure of the transactions with VLC and WSS did not effectively transfer sufficient risk to the other parties to the transactions, leaving the Company with the majority of the
risks. In addition, in the transactions with WSS, the contract conditions of the transactions were not fulfilled. As a result, the Company incorrectly recognized revenues from these transactions.
Revenue Recognition Issues
In 2006 and 2007,
the Company entered into water treatment unit sale transactions with a number of customers. Those transactions being restated are described below.
In the first transaction, the Company sold a water treatment unit in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, although the purchase agreement was not executed until August 2006. The customer terminated the purchase agreement shortly after its
execution, and the Company recorded a bad debt expense for the profit recognized on the sale due to the termination of the agreement in the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that it should reverse the revenues in the
amount of $0.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the bad debt expense in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.4 million in the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006 respectively, associated with this transaction.
In the second transaction, the Company was negotiating the sale of a water treatment unit with a customer up to and including September 29, 2006,
when the customer sent the Company an email instructing it to release the unit for delivery and indicating that the customer would be contacting the Company early the next week to finalize the agreement. The Company shipped a water treatment unit in
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, but the terms of the contract were not finalized until February 2007. The Company has determined that the revenues from this transaction in the amount of $0.2 million should have been recognized in the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 rather than the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
In the third transaction, the Company recognized
revenues of $1.5 million with respect to a transaction in the quarter ended March 31, 2006, based on a unit purchase agreement dated March 30, 2006, but portions of the agreement were still being negotiated until June 2006. The agreement
provides for 10% of the transaction amount to be paid upon signing the letter of intent, which occurred in December 2005, with the remaining 90% of the amount due to be paid in March 2009. Based on its review, the Company has concluded that it
should have recognized 10% of the transaction amount, or $0.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 when the transaction documentation was completed and executed, and that it should recognize the remaining $1.3 million as revenues upon
collection
.
Subsequently, in February 2009, the water treatment units were returned to the Company as part of the settlement of a dispute with the third party (see Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements).
In the fourth transaction, the Company received a purchase order from one of its suppliers for the purchase of two water treatment units in the third
quarter of 2006 upon which it recognized revenues pursuant to percentage of completion accounting. However, the terms of the purchase order did not specify the shipping date for the units, the supplier never specified a shipping date, and the units
were never shipped. In addition, the customer claimed a right of return which the Company disputes. The transaction is being restated and the revenues reversed in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.6 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In the fifth transaction, the Company entered into a letter of intent with a customer in the third quarter of 2007 for the sale of a water
treatment unit and recognized revenues during that quarter. Pursuant to the terms of the letter of intent, the customers purchase of the unit was subject to the satisfaction of test criteria and data delivery under a previously- executed
demonstration agreement relating to the unit. These conditions were not satisfied as of the end of the third quarter of 2007. Based on these facts, the Company has concluded that it should reverse the revenues of $0.9 million in the third quarter of
2007 from this transaction.
Accounting for Warrants
The Company reviewed its treatment of the non-cash expense related to the warrants that were issued to Aqua America, Inc. (Aqua) in connection with a $2.0 million loan to the Company in February 2006 and a proposed
strategic relationship between Aqua and the Company. The loan matured on the first anniversary of the Companys initial public
45
offering, and the proposed strategic relationship was intended to have a term of five years. Documents memorializing the exact terms of the strategic
relationship were exchanged with Aqua; however, a formal agreement reflecting the strategic relationship was never executed. Based on the fact that no formal agreement related to the strategic relationship was entered into and the fact that the loan
agreement specifically referenced issuance of the warrants, the Company has concluded that the warrant expense should have been recognized over the life of the loan, rather than over the anticipated life of the proposed strategic relationship. As a
result of this correction, the Company recorded additional interest expense of approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, the Company reversed amortization expense of $0.3 million in both 2007 and 2006.
Empire Transaction
In
reviewing the accounting for the December 2007 sale to Empire Water Corporation of the right to purchase certain water rights and related assets, the Company determined that errors were made relating to the gain recorded with respect to such
transaction. The Company originally recorded a $2.5 million gain upon receipt of shares of Empire Water Corporation stock in such transaction. The gain was incorrectly recorded due to rounding and mathematical errors, as well as a revision of the
Companys basis in the assets sold to Empire Water Corporation. As a result, the Company has determined that the recorded gain should have been $3.1 million. The Company recorded $0.6 million additional gain on sale to affiliate in 2007.
Contract Loss Reserve
The
Company has determined that an error was made in the calculation of the reserve for contract losses at September 30, 2007. Specifically, with regard to one of its service contracts, it was assumed that a possible facility expansion would result
in higher service fees to the customer, thus eliminating estimated operating losses on this contract beyond 2008. This expansion (and anticipated fee adjustment) was not contractually committed to and therefore should not have been considered in
estimating the contract loss reserve at September 30, 2007. As a result, the Company has increased the reserve for contract losses (and the related cost of contract revenues) in the restated consolidated financial statements for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 by approximately $1.8 million to correct this error.
Balance Sheet Reclassification for Purchase Accounting
During the course of its review of the final purchase accounting for the acquisition of MPT, the Company determined that an error in the
approximate amount of $2.3 million had been made in recording deferred tax liabilities and goodwill. As a result, the Company has reduced deferred tax liabilities and goodwill by this amount as of December 31, 2007. This correction had no
effect on the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Other Adjustments
In connection with the review of its financial statements as part of the restatement, the Company has reviewed various other adjustments and
reclassifications from prior years and determined these other adjustments and reclassifications should be made in the consolidated financial statements.
46
Effect of Restatement
The following tables set forth the effects of the restatement on our previously reported consolidated statements of operations, balance sheets, statements of stockholders equity and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
13,477
|
|
|
$
|
(9,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,980
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
18,784
|
|
|
|
(9,124
|
)
|
|
|
9,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
13,790
|
|
|
|
(7,347
|
)
|
|
|
6,443
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
10,698
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
24,931
|
|
|
|
(5,404
|
)
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
(6,147
|
)
|
|
|
(3,720
|
)
|
|
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
13,685
|
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(20,396
|
)
|
|
|
(2,862
|
)
|
|
|
(23,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.91
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
47
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
13,861
|
|
|
$
|
(3,268
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,593
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
17,114
|
|
|
|
(3,224
|
)
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
12,161
|
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
20,106
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
(2,992
|
)
|
|
|
(1,810
|
)
|
|
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(10,453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(11,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,781
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
48
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Cumulative Effect
of Prior Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
11,443
|
|
|
|
(1,166
|
)
|
|
|
(2,920
|
)
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
975
|
|
Current portion of notes receivable
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
52,692
|
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
|
48,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
24,885
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
6,859
|
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
31,220
|
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
(7,295
|
)
|
|
|
21,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,934
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Deferred revenue - affiliate
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,923
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
18,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
110,354
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
110,193
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
79,289
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
(1,166
|
)
|
|
|
7,957
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
676
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
67,454
|
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
66,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
15,112
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,227
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
13,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
10,371
|
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,562
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
10,315
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
95,002
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(15,285
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
79,737
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Deficiency
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
As Restated
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
Reincorporation at time of initial public offering
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales of common stock in the initial public offering
|
|
|
75,171
|
|
|
75,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Fair value of options issued
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2006
|
|
|
95,002
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
|
(15,285
|
)
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
79,737
|
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
110,354
|
|
$
|
110,193
|
|
$
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
79,289
|
|
|
$
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
798
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(3,094
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
(1,515
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(1,741
|
)
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
(4,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes receivable
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(13,256
|
)
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(5,347
|
)
|
|
|
(3,358
|
)
|
|
|
(8,705
|
)
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(6,214
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(6,169
|
)
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,592
|
)
|
|
|
(3,313
|
)
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(19,111
|
)
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
(18,529
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
748
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
Issuance of warrants for services
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Write off of loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(7,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
(8,783
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(12,361
|
)
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
(11,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,942
|
)
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,941
|
)
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Loan origination fees
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(9,095
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
68,145
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
68,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
The following tables set forth the quarterly information as reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, along with the restated amounts, for each of the quarterly periods in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
5,199
|
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
$
|
3,773
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
3,576
|
|
|
$
|
1,241
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
6,414
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
12,125
|
|
|
|
11,464
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(6,779
|
)
|
|
|
(9,058
|
)
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
(3,046
|
)
|
|
|
(10,651
|
)
|
|
|
(12,609
|
)
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
(4,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
54
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
|
|
$
|
3,936
|
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
5,035
|
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
3,628
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
9,448
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(5,846
|
)
|
|
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
|
|
(8,742
|
)
|
|
|
(9,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(2,280
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(2,073
|
)
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
|
(8,619
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
55
The following table sets forth quarterly trend information on a restated basis for the eight quarterly
periods ended December 31, 2007.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
$
|
1,241
|
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
3,628
|
|
|
|
11,464
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
(9,058
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
(3,046
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(12,609
|
)
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
|
|
(4,929
|
)
|
|
|
(9,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
(2,073
|
)
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|
|
(8,619
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|
|
(8,619
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Quarterly Operations Analysis
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Revenues were $1.8 million and $2.1 million during the first quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from system sales decreased approximately
$0.4 million in the first quarter of 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006. Contract revenues were $0.6 million during the first quarter of both 2006 and 2007, respectively.
56
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues were $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $1.9 million during the same period in 2006. Cost of system sales were approximately $1.3 million for both of the three month periods ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006. Operating costs for our contract revenues were approximately $0.6 million during the first quarters of 2007 and 2006. Operating costs include salt, waste disposal and field service labor expense, as well as depreciation
expense. Contract revenue operating costs for the first quarter of 2007 were offset by the reversal of $0.1 million of reserves for contract operations which were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2.2 million during the first three months of 2007 compared to $1.1 million during the same period of 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel and related costs to support
our overall growth, as well as increased stock-based compensation expense recorded in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Additionally, our professional fees and public company costs were much higher in the first quarter of 2007
when compared to 2006 because our initial public offering was not completed until the second quarter of 2006.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income was $0.3 million during the first quarter of 2007 compared to $0.4 million other expense during the first quarter of
2006. Interest expense decreased due to the payoff of existing debt in the second quarter of 2006. We earned interest income on the net proceeds from our initial public offering in mid-May, 2006.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Revenues were $2.2 million and $4.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from
system sales decreased $3.1 million in the second quarter of 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to the recognition of a groundwater system sale completed in the second quarter of 2006. Contract revenues increased from $0.8
million during the second quarter of 2006 to $1.2 million during the same period of 2007 as the number of systems placed in service with customers during 2007 increased.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues decreased to $2.8 million during the second quarter of 2007
compared to $3.6 million during the same period in 2006. The decrease reflects the reduction of groundwater system sales in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Operating costs for our contract revenues were $1.2 million
during the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.9 million in the comparable period of 2006. Operating costs include salt, waste disposal, field service labor and depreciation expense, and the increase in cost is reflective of additional systems in
service in 2007 when compared to 2006. Contract revenue operating costs for the second quarter of 2007 were partially offset by the reversal of $0.3 million of reserves for future contract losses which were previously recorded in the fourth quarter
of 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $2.4 million during the second quarter of 2007 from $1.4 million during the same period of 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel and related
costs to support our overall growth, as well as increased stock-based compensation expense recorded in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Additionally, we experienced increases in our sales, marketing and promotion expense as our
sales force and marketing efforts expanded in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006. Our professional fees and public company costs were higher in the second quarter of 2007 when compared to 2006 because our initial public
offering was not completed until the middle of the second quarter of 2006.
57
Other Income (Expense)
Other income was $0.5 million income during the second quarter of 2007 compared to $2.1 million expense during the second quarter of 2006. Interest expense decreased due to the payoff of existing debt in the second
quarters of 2006 and 2007. Meanwhile, since receiving the net proceeds of our initial public offering in mid-May, 2006, we earned interest income on our invested cash balances.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Revenues were $2.4 million and $4.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from system sales
decreased $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006. Contract revenues were $1.8 million compared to $0.9 million during the same period of 2007 as the number of systems placed in service with customers
during 2007 increased, as well as the addition of our newly acquired subsidiary, Basin WaterMPT, Inc. (MPT), which contributed $0.1 million to contract revenues for the third quarter of 2007 after its acquisition in mid-September 2007.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of
revenues were $11.5 million during the third quarter of 2007 compared to $4.1 million during the same period in 2006. Costs from system sales were $2.5 million for the third quarter of 2007 compared to $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2006. In
the third quarter of 2007, our cost of system sales included certain reserves and anticipated cost overruns of $0.5 million on three large systems. Operating costs for our contract revenues increased $7.8 million to $8.9 million during the third
quarter of 2007 from $1.0 million in the comparable period of 2006. In the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a $6.8 million increase in the reserve for contract losses as a result of managements evaluations of certain loss contracts, which
was partially offset by reserve reversals of $0.3 million of reserves for future contract losses with were previously recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006. Operating costs include salt, waste disposal, field service labor expenses and depreciation
expense. The increase in costs is reflective of additional systems in service in 2007 when compared to 2006, as well as $0.1 million in costs of contract revenues as a result of the acquisition of MPT in mid-September 2007.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $3.4 million during the third quarter of 2007 from $1.5 million during the same period of 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel and related costs to support our
overall growth, as well as increased stock-based compensation expense recorded in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. We had increased legal accruals in the third quarter of 2007 when compared to 2006. Additionally, we experienced
increases in our sales, marketing and promotion expense as our sales force and marketing efforts expanded in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006. Selling, general and administrative expenses included approximately $0.1
million during the third quarter of 2007 as a result of our acquisition of MPT.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income was approximately $0.7 million during the third quarter of 2007 compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2006. Interest expense
decreased due to the payoff of existing debt in the second quarters of 2006 and 2007. During the third quarter of 2007, we reversed $0.1 million of expense associated with the early retirement of debt which was ultimately not realized.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Revenues were $3.3 million and $2.6 million during the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from system sales
decreased approximately $0.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006. Contract revenues increased from $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2006 to $2.0 million during the same period of 2007 due to the
increased number of systems placed into service during 2007.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues was $3.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to $9.0 million during the same period in 2006. Cost of system sales during the
fourth quarter of 2007 was $1.1 million compared to $3.9 million in the same period of 2006. Cost of contract revenues was $1.9 million during the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to $5.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2006. The higher fourth
quarter 2006 cost of contract revenues is primarily the result of a $3.7 million reserve for contract losses which was recorded at the end of 2006. Operating costs include salt, waste disposal, field service labor expense and depreciation expense.
Contract revenue operating costs for the first quarter of 2007 were offset by the reversal of $0.1 million of reserves for contract operations which were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $4.8 million during the final three months of 2007 compared to $2.5 million during the same period of 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel and related costs to support
our overall growth, as well as increased stock-based compensation expense recorded in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.
Other Income
(Expense)
Other income was $3.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to $0.4 million other expense during the first
quarter of 2006. The increase in other income was attributable to a $3.1 gain on sale of certain water rights and assets to an affiliate, which was recorded in December 2007.
58
Financial Operations Review
We evaluate our business using a variety of key financial measures:
Revenues
Our revenues tend to vary from period to period, because customers can choose between purchasing our groundwater treatment systems and entering into
long-term contract arrangements for our treatment systems. If a customer chooses to purchase a system, we recognize revenues over a much shorter period of time, generally within one or two quarters, than we would recognize for the same system if the
customer chose a long-term contract arrangement for the system. Thus, our revenues will tend to be higher in periods in which we sell rather than place our systems under long-term contracts. For any customers selecting a long-term capital
arrangement, we may enter into third-party financing arrangements.
Sales
For treatment systems sold to customers which are sold under fixed-price contracts, or that we enter into a sale under a third-party financing
arrangement, we recognize revenues using the percentage-of-completion method. This method takes into account the cost, estimated earnings and revenues to date on systems not yet completed. This method is used because management considers total cost
to be the best available method of measuring progress on systems sold to customers. In general, financial statements based on the percentage-of-completion method present the economic substance of production-type activities more clearly than the
completed-contract method, and present the relationships between sales, cost of sales and related period costs more accurately. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, estimates used may change in the near term. Such estimates are
adjusted under the cumulative-catch-up method. Unless contractually agreed to otherwise, the sales contract is deemed to be substantially complete when the treatment system has been physically completed and a performance test has been passed.
Historically, our sales consisted of large system sales and standard system sales. Our large systems consisted of large site regenerable treatment systems that we constructed at our customers site as opposed to standard systems which are
fabricated at our facilities.
Contract Revenues
Our recurring contract revenues are generated from three sources. The first source of recurring contract revenues is from long-term fixed contracts under which we install our system at the customers site and
treat the customers water. We retain ownership of the installed system. Under this contract we recognize monthly revenues on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract, which represents a return of the capital value of the installed
system. The amount of this fixed monthly revenue is based on both the capacity of the system and the type of contaminant(s) being treated. The straight-line method best reflects the value of having the systems capacity available to the
customer at all times and is similar to the method used for calculating depreciation.
The second source of recurring revenues is from
long-term contracts for the treatment of the water produced from installed treatment systems, which we also refer to as service revenues. Service revenues are recognized based on the actual volume of water treated each month. Such water-treatment
revenues bear a direct relationship to the variable costs for the purchase and delivery of salt, chemicals and resin used in the system, the removal of waste and the cost to maintain and service the system. This revenue stream is generated both by
systems that were purchased by our customers and by systems in which we retain ownership and recognize revenue for the monthly capital component.
The third source of contract revenues relates to providing other services for the processing of water, replacement of resins or equipment parts and other water treatment related services.
Under each of the long-term contracts, the customer is typically obligated to pay us for the treatment of its waternot for specific hours worked,
supplies purchased or waste-hauls provided.
Under the criteria set forth in EITF 00-21, we have determined that the multiple deliverables
of each of our long-term contracts specifically, the capital component and the volume-related service charge, qualify for separate accounting treatment. The three criteria required for separate accounting treatment are: 1) that each deliverable has
a stand-alone value to the customer, 2) that there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value of each deliverable and 3) that there are no general refund rights for the deliverables.
In the case of contracts under which we own the system, the customer is obligated to pay us the fixed capital component of the system on a monthly basis.
These arrangements are classified and treated as operating leases under
59
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13,
Accounting for Leases,
because they meet the four criteria of an operating lease: 1)
there is no transfer of title; 2) there is not a bargain purchase option; 3) the lease term is substantially shorter than the economic life of the system; and 4) the present value of the capital component payments is less than 90% of the fair value
of the water treatment system at the inception of the contract. For water treatment systems which are owned by us and leased to our customers, the capital recovery portion of the payment stream from the customer is determined at the outset of the
lease contract based on capital value and the lease term. Consequently, these payments, and the recoverability of the related assets, are not affected by the operating losses sustained under the water services agreements, as described below.
In connection with long-term contracts, we may receive payments from our customers prior to the system being placed in service. Such
payments are recorded as deferred revenues. In addition, we may receive payments from our customers in excess of that which can be recognized on a straight-line basis. These payments are also recorded as deferred revenues. All deferred revenues
amounts are recognized as revenues in the periods in which services are rendered to the customer.
In each of these arrangements, the
contract term is typically five or more years, provided our customers may elect to terminate their contract with us prior to the expiration upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. In the case of the long-term water treatment contracts, they
generally contain a purchase option at the end of the agreement.
Cost of Revenues
Our cost of revenues varies based on the type of revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Cost of Systems Sold
. Our cost of revenues for a sold system includes our cost of materials included in such system plus costs associated with deploying the
system, warranty costs, payroll and payroll related costs for our manufacturing personnel and other manufacturing overhead costs. These costs are recorded under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. This method takes into account the
cost, estimated earnings and revenues to date on systems not yet completed.
|
|
|
|
Cost of Contract Revenues.
Cost of revenues in connection with contract revenues consist of costs associated with the processing of waters, including the
cost of salt and other consumables used in our systems, waste removal on behalf of our customers, maintenance and other service costs of our systems. Cost of revenues in connection with contract revenue that includes capital for systems Basin
retains ownership under a water treatment contract includes depreciation expense using a 20-year life under the straight-line method.
|
During the latter half of 2006 and in 2007, improvements to our management controls and accounting systems enabled us to more thoroughly analyze operating results for each water service agreement (WSA) and determine
that certain, generally older contracts were operating at net cash flow losses. Under the WSAs, we provide to our customers operations and maintenance services for water treatment units previously sold or leased to our customers. These contracts
have sustained increasing operating costs such as waste disposal and salt purchase costs as the direct result of higher fuel, salt and other third-party costs. These contracts did not allow for the renegotiation of terms to recover such increased
costs. Management determined that these contracts would continue to generate net operating cash flow losses through the end of the contract period, and those additional contracts that were not yet operational, but which were scheduled to go on-line
thereafter could have similar problems. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve for future contract losses in the amount of $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2006. This amount represented the losses which we expected to incur during the initial
period of these contracts and does not include renewal periods, if any, related to such contracts. Actual losses on the underlying contracts are being charged against the reserve as incurred.
During 2007, as these contracts progressed and as additional older legacy contracts became operational and were operated during the busy, higher volume
summer months, it became apparent by the third quarter of 2007 that the original reserve was not adequate. Management reviewed each contracts financial performance and identified the future expected losses for these contracts, resulting in a
$6.8 million increase to the reserve (offset by $1.4 million of actual contract losses charged against the reserve during 2007) for future contract losses, which was charged to cost of contract revenues during the third quarter of 2007. The
increased contract loss reserve as of September 30, 2007, after restatement to correct an error of approximately $1.8 million relating to one contract (see Background of the Restatement in Explanatory Note elsewhere in this Form
10-K/A and Notes 3 and 14 to our consolidated financial statements), amounted to approximately $9.7 million.
As part of its customary
process and in connection with the preparation of its financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company conducted its review of the adequacy of its reserve for contract losses. Based on the results of that review, which
included the benefit of additional operating history, the Company determined that the overall contract loss reserve as of that date required only minor adjustment. As part of the process, certain adjustments were necessary to reallocate the total
contract loss reserve to specific contracts to give effect to current estimates of future losses for such contracts. Included in the total contract loss reserve at June 30, 2008 is approximately $1.3 million related to service contracts for
water treatment systems which have not yet become operational but are anticipated to go online in the future.
60
In December 2007, other than in contracts that had been previously negotiated, we began including
provisions in our WSAs that allowed for us to pass through certain increased costs (primarily costs related to salt and waste transportation) to our customers.
The cost of revenues for a system also varies by the contaminant(s) that the system is designed to address. We purchase components and raw materials from third party vendors which are then assembled into our treatment
systems in our manufacturing facilities or assembled at our customers site. We are not dependent on any sole source suppliers and generally have multiple vendors for each of our components and raw materials, all of which are located within the
United States.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense consists primarily of research material costs, payroll and payroll related costs for our research and development personnel and outside sponsored research and consulting expenses
associated with the design, development and testing of new and existing technologies and systems.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily of payroll and payroll related costs for our corporate management,
finance, accounting, sales, marketing and administrative personnel, including commissions for our sales and marketing personnel. Also included in selling, general and administrative expense are overhead costs associated with these activities,
marketing and promotion expenses, public company costs, director fees, and audit and legal expenses.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) included in the statements of operations consists primarily of interest income and income from affiliate, partially offset by
interest and other expense.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
In accordance with the provisions of FIN 46(R), we have concluded that we are required to include VL Capital (VLC) and Water Services Solutions (WSS),
which are special purpose entities, in our consolidated financial statements. However, because we have no ownership interest in VLC, and no control over its management or business operations, we have recorded the net income of VLC as attributable to
a noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements commencing with the sale of certain equipment to VLC in June 2007. The results of WSS were not material to the consolidated financial statements. For further discussion, see Note 3
to our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our audited financial statements, which have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, long-lived assets, accrued liabilities, and income taxes. These estimates are based on historical experience,
information received from third parties and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Predicting future events is inherently an imprecise activity and, as such, requires the use of assumptions. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be based on assumptions about matters that are
highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact our consolidated
financial statements.
61
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our financial statements:
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition.
Our revenues are recognized in two different ways. For groundwater treatment systems that we sell to our customers, revenues are
recognized under the percentage-of-completion method by comparing actual costs incurred to total estimated costs to complete each system. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes revenues and associated costs as work progresses on a system,
based on the expected total system revenues and costs. In general, financial statements based on the percentage-of-completion method present the economic substance of production-type activities more clearly than the use of the completed-contract
method, and present the relationships between sales, cost of sales and related period costs more accurately. For all other groundwater treatment systems delivered to our customers under various contractual arrangements, we recognize revenues for a
periodic fee we receive over the life of the contract using the straight-line method and recognize a processing fee as our systems treat the customers contaminated water.
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment.
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property consists primarily of
groundwater treatment systems which we place with customers under various arrangements. For our groundwater treatment systems placed with our customers under long-term contracts, we capitalize materials, labor, overhead and interest. Depreciation is
calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. We capitalize expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment. We charge expenditures for
maintenance and repairs to expense as incurred. Estimated useful lives are generally as follows: vehicles and trailersthree to five years; furniture and fixturesthree to seven years; other equipmentthree to 10 years, and
groundwater treatment systems20 years. Judgments and estimates made by us related to the expected useful lives of these assets are affected by factors such as changes in operating performance and fluctuations in economic conditions. If our
assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill.
In conjunction with our September 2007 acquisition of MPT, we engaged an independent third party to assess the fair
value of the assets acquired in this transaction. The purchase price was allocated to net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values, with approximately $4.2 million allocated to intangible assets with a
weighted-average useful life of approximately 11 years. Such intangible assets consist of a covenant not to compete in the amount of $0.3 million (three year useful life), trade name in the amount of $0.2 million (two year useful life), service
agreements and contracts in the amount of $1.3 million (six year useful life), customer relationships in the amount of $0.6 million (15 year useful life) and patents in the amount of $1.8 million (17 year useful life). The excess of the net purchase
price over the estimated fair value of assets acquired was approximately $6.3 million, which was recorded as non-tax deductible goodwill. Judgments and estimates made by us related to the expected useful lives of the intangible assets are affected
by factors such as changes in operating performance, loss of existing customers or service contracts, failure to obtain final approval for patents, fluctuations in economic conditions and expected future performance. If our assumptions change in the
future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets, including goodwill.
|
|
|
|
Inventory.
Inventory consists primarily of raw materials and supplies used in the fabrication of our groundwater treatment units, as well as the
reprocessing and conditioning of resins. Inventory items are stated at the lower of cost, on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. Physical counts of inventory items are conducted periodically to help verify the balance of inventory. A reserve is
maintained for obsolete inventory, if appropriate. We consider inventory to be obsolete when it is no longer usable as a system component.
|
|
|
|
Stock-based Compensation.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
. This
statement requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards in financial statements. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation expense is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated
fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employees requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided under SFAS
No. 123(R). This method applies to all new awards or awards modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after January 1, 2006. Accordingly, financial statement amounts for the periods prior to 2006 presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation.
|
The adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in approximately $1.5 million and $0.7 million of expense in 2007 and 2006, respectively, and we anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will result in approximately
62
$1.6 million of expense in 2008 and $1.5 million of expense thereafter, based upon options and other stock-based awards outstanding as of December 31,
2007. In addition, the adoption of this standard will result in difficulties comparing our operating results for current and future periods to those of our prior periods, since prior periods through 2005 do not reflect stock-based compensation
expense under SFAS No. 123(R).
|
|
|
Deferred Charges:
During the fourth quarters of 2006 and 2005, we recorded deferred charges in an amount equal to the excess of the deemed fair value
of our common stock over the exercise price of warrants issued during these periods. During these same two quarters, we also recorded deferred charges in an amount equal to the excess of the deemed fair value of our common stock over the exercise
price of stock options issued during these periods. Such deferred charges have been or will be amortized as charges to the appropriate income statement classification over the period of the underlying transaction for which the warrants were issued
in accordance with SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
.
|
|
|
|
FIN 46(R):
In 2007, we entered into four transactions with respect to the sale of water treatment units to two special purpose entities (VL Capital,
or VLC, and Water Services Solutions, or WSS). These sales were to be funded by third-party financial institutions. In addition to the sale of these units, the underlying agreements provided that the special purpose entity would have the right to
receive the scheduled lease payments from the customers subject to the WSAs. VLC issued us a secured note as consideration for the water treatment units and related scheduled lease payments. We have concluded that the financial statements of these
special purpose entities should be consolidated with those of the Company in accordance with FIN 46(R), as we retained the majority of the risks underlying these transactions.
|
|
|
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Entity:
We have a 32% ownership investment in Empire Water Corporation (Empire). This investment is evaluated under the
requirements of FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46(R
), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51,
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. (APB) 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in
Common Stock
, and other applicable guidance to determine the appropriate accounting treatment, including whether we must consolidate the investee company. Our 32% ownership investment in Empire is accounted for using the equity method of
accounting since the investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee as outlined under APB 18. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if we have an ownership interest of between 20%
and 50%, although other factors are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate.
|
This investment is classified as an investment in affiliate on our consolidated balance sheet. We monitor this investment for impairment and will make appropriate reductions in carrying values if we determine that an impairment
charge is required based primarily on the near-term prospects and financial condition of Empire. Any significant intervening events relating to Empire in the period since the latest available financial statements will be disclosed in future filings.
Results of Operations
The following
table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the years indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007 Restated
|
|
|
% of
Revenue
|
|
|
2006 Restated
|
|
|
% of
Revenue
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% of
Revenue
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
3,980
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,593
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,016
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
9,660
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
12,231
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
6,443
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
202
|
%
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
|
7,130
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
-102
|
%
|
|
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
-35
|
%
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
133
|
%
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(23,258
|
)
|
|
-241
|
%
|
|
|
(11,881
|
)
|
|
-86
|
%
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
-11
|
%
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
-4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
-189
|
%
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
-97
|
%
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
-189
|
%
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
-97
|
%
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
-97
|
%
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Loss
The following table summarizes the significant
components of revenues, cost of revenues and gross profit (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
$
|
1,927
|
|
|
$
|
5,694
|
|
|
$
|
(3,767
|
)
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
|
|
(2,846
|
)
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
9,660
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
(4,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
|
4,274
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
(2,126
|
)
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
(2,138
|
)
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
Net change in contract loss reserve
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
Net change in contract loss reserve
|
|
|
(5,388
|
)
|
|
|
(3,724
|
)
|
|
|
(1,664
|
)
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loss
|
|
$
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Revenues decreased by $4.2 million, or 30%, to $9.7 million in 2007 from $13.9 million in 2006. This occurred primarily as a result of a decrease in our revenues from system sales. Revenues recognized for sales of
groundwater treatment systems decreased from $10.6 million in 2006 to $4.0 million in 2007, a decrease of $6.6 million, or 62%, primarily due to decreased groundwater treatment systems sales volume. Revenues from system sales represented 41% and 76%
of our total revenues during 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease in system sales revenue was partially offset by (i) our acquisition of MPT in September 2007 and (ii) growth in our contract revenues. Contract revenues increased to
$5.7 million in 2007 from $3.3 million in 2006, an increase of $2.4 million, or 73%, as the number of systems placed in service with customers increased in 2007 compared to 2006.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased by $0.8 million, or 5% to $19.5 million in 2007
from $18.7 million in 2006. This decrease was primarily due to decreased sales of groundwater treatment systems. The cost of systems sold in 2006 was $10.7 million compared to $6.5 million in 2007. This decrease in cost is consistent with the
decreased sales of groundwater treatment systems. Operating costs for our contract revenues increased by $3.3 million, or 87%, to $7.1 million in 2007 from $3.8 million in 2006. The increase in operating costs was primarily due to higher costs of
waste disposal, salt, chemicals and increased field service labor expense, all as a result of having more systems placed in service with customers in 2007 compared to 2006. During 2007, we recorded an additional $6.8 million reserve for future
contract losses (offset by approximately $1.4 million of charges against the reserve for actual contract losses during 2007) as a result of managements evaluations of certain loss contracts, compared to a $3.7 million reserve for future
contract losses recorded in 2006 (see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial ConditionFinancial Operations Review for a further discussion of this reserve).
64
Gross Loss
Our gross loss increased to $9.9 million in 2007 from $4.8 million in 2006. Our gross loss as a percentage of revenue was negative 102% compared to negative 35% in 2006. This increase in gross loss was primarily the
result of a decrease of $2.4 million in our gross margins on system sales.
In addition, as noted above, in both 2007 and 2006, we recorded
a reserve for future contract losses of $6.8 million (net of $1.4 million of charges against the reserve for actual contract losses during 2007) and $3.7 million, respectively, which severely impacted our operating profit. In addition to this
reserve, the gross loss on our contract operations was $2.0 million prior to applying any charges against the contract loss reserve; this compared to $1.0 million gross loss in the prior year. The increased gross loss was due primarily to the
certain legacy contracts booked in prior periods that became operational in 2007 that included, among other things, poor pricing and inadequate contract terms.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense was approximately $0.6 million in both 2007 and
2006. We incurred research and development costs for outside consultant expense, research material costs and personnel costs.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expense
The following table summarizes the significant changes in selling, general and administrative expense for
the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
5,126
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
$
|
2,591
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
87
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
178
|
Amortization - intangibles
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
Outside selling, marketing & promotion
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
396
|
Insurance
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
66
|
Directors fees and public company costs
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
440
|
Sarbanes Oxley 404 expense
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
Travel & entertainment
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
205
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
782
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
893
|
Other SG&A expense
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SG&A Expense
|
|
$
|
12,827
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
$
|
6,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $6.4 million, or 100%, to $12.8 million
in 2007 from $6.4 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation expense and related employee benefits of $2.6 million attributable to additional executive and management personnel and related costs to support our
overall planned growth (including approximately $0.8 million added expense as a result of the September 2007 acquisition of MPT); an increase in professional fees of $0.9 million, primarily due to higher legal fees incurred in connection with
various litigation; an increase in restricted stock expense of $0.8 million, primarily for restricted stock granted in October 2006; approximately $0.4 million of increased expense incurred in connection with the development and implementation of
internal controls over financial reporting to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002; an increase of $0.4 million in directors fees and public company costs (as 2007 was our first full year as a public company); and an
increase of $0.4 million in outside selling, marketing and promotion.
65
Other Income (Expense)
The following table summarizes the significant changes in other expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
Expense
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
|
$
|
2,061
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
Interest expense - notes & loans
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Other income - affiliate
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
Amortization - fair value of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Write off - fair value of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Write off - loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
Capitalized interest & other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income (Expense)
|
|
$
|
5,066
|
|
|
$
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded other income of $5.1 million in 2007 compared to other expense of $1.6 million in
2006. The overall increase in other income is primarily due to a gain on sale to an affiliate of $3.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 as the result of the assignment to Empire of our contract to purchase certain water assets in
exchange for Empire common stock (see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements) and an increase in interest income of $0.7 million, or 33%, to $2.7 million in 2007 from $2.1 million in 2006.
In addition, during 2006, the write-off of approximately $1.5 million in unamortized fair value of warrants and the write-off of approximately $0.4
million in unamortized loan costs in connection with the repayment of amounts outstanding under our BWCA loan and our XACP Notes, as well as the amortization of fair value of warrants outstanding under our Aqua Note, all of which are more fully
discussed below under Liquidity and Capital Resources, resulted in higher interest expense.
66
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit (Loss)
The following table summarizes the
significant components of revenues, cost of revenues and gross profit (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
$
|
5,694
|
|
|
$
|
3,489
|
|
|
$
|
2,205
|
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
12,231
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
Net change in contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
7,130
|
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large system sales
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
(1,893
|
)
|
Standard system sales
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
(3,770
|
)
|
Net change in contract loss reserve
|
|
|
(3,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,724
|
)
|
Contract operations
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Profit (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,101
|
|
|
$
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Revenues increased by $1.7 million, or 14%, from $12.2 million in 2005 to $13.9 million in 2006. This increase occurred primarily as a result of growth in sales of our groundwater treatment systems. Revenues
recognized for sales of groundwater treatment systems increased from $10.0 million in 2005 to $10.6 million in 2006 primarily due to increased groundwater treatment systems sales volume. Revenues from system sales represented 77% and 82% of our
total revenues during 2006 and 2005, respectively. Contract revenues increased from $2.2 million in 2005 to $3.3 million in 2006, an increase of $1.1 million, or 50%, as the number of systems placed in service with customers increased in 2006
compared to 2005.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased by $11.6 million, or 163% from $7.1 million in 2005 to $18.7 million in 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the cost of systems sold of $6.3 million, or 140%, from $4.5 million in 2005 to
$10.8 million in 2006. This resulted largely from significantly higher than anticipated costs on our largest project, including a $1.3 million reserve. Operating costs for our contract revenues also increased by $1.5 million, or 65%, from $2.3
million in 2005 to $3.8 million in 2006. The increase in operating costs was primarily due to higher costs of waste disposal, salt, and increased field service labor expense, as well as higher depreciation expense, all as a result of having more
systems placed in service with customers in 2006 compared 2005. In addition, in 2006 we recorded a provision in the amount of $3.7 million as a reserve for future contract losses as a result of managements evaluations of certain loss contracts
(see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial ConditionFinancial Operations Review for a further discussion of this reserve).
67
Gross Profit (Loss)
We recorded a gross loss of $4.8 million in 2006 compared to gross profit of $5.1 million in 2005. Our gross profit percentage in 2006 was negative 35% compared to a 42% profit in 2005. This decrease in gross profit
was primarily the result of a 2006 reserve for future contract losses in the amount of $3.7 million as discussed above, and higher than anticipated costs on our largest system sale project. Additionally, the 2006 system sales gross loss reflects the
low margins on two projects with special requirements for the construction of buildings through the use of subcontractors during 2006.
Our
contract operations gross profit was impacted by higher volume-related contract operating costs, particularly waste hauling charges and increased field service labor and engineering expense, especially on certain older contracts. In general, our
gross profit percentage is higher on systems we sell than on systems we place with customers under long-term contracts. As noted above, in 2006 we recorded a $3.7 million reserve for future losses primarily on older contracts which severely impacted
our operating profit.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense was approximately $0.6 million in both 2006 and 2005. We incurred research and development costs for outside consultant expense, research material costs, and personnel costs. Our
research and development expense constituted a higher percentage of our revenues in prior periods when we were selling our first systems.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
The following table summarizes the significant changes in selling, general and administrative
expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
2005
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
713
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
43
|
Outside selling, marketing & promotion
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
201
|
Insurance
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
196
|
Directors fees and public company costs
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
Travel & entertainment
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
107
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
293
|
Other SG&A expense
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SG&A Expense
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
$
|
3,334
|
|
$
|
3,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $3.1 million, or 94%, from $3.3 million
in 2005 to $6.4 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to stock-based compensation of $0.7 million recorded in 2006 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R); and an increase in compensation expense and related employee
benefits of $1.1 million due to increased personnel and related costs to support our overall growth. In addition, we incurred approximately $0.4 million in higher liability insurance costs and certain professional fees directly related to our
becoming a publicly traded company in 2006.
68
Other Expense
The following table summarizes the significant changes in other expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expense
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
2,061
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
Interest expense - notes & loans
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Amortization - fair value of warrants
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
Amortization - loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Write off - fair value of warrants
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
Write off - loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
Capitalized interest & other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
$
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
(553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense increased by $1.0 million, or 167%, from $0.6 million in 2005 to $1.6 million in
2006. The overall increase in other expense is primarily due to higher overall interest expense, including the write off of approximately $1.5 million in unamortized fair value of warrants and approximately $0.3 million in unamortized loan costs in
connection with the repayment of amounts outstanding under our BWCA loan and our XACP Notes, as well as the amortization of fair value of warrants outstanding under our Aqua Note. These increases in interest expense were partially offset by an
increase of approximately $2.0 million in interest income earned on net proceeds from our initial public offering in mid-May 2006. See Liquidity and Capital Resources in following paragraphs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
From our inception
until our initial public offering in May 2006, we financed our growth and operations primarily with proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock and common stock, as well as the incurrence of indebtedness under the BWCA loan, our subordinated notes
payable to The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, LP, Cross Atlantic Technology Fund II, LP and Catalyst Basin Water, LLC (the XACP Notes), and our $2.0 million subordinated note to Aqua America, Inc. (the Aqua Note).
In connection with our initial public offering in May 2006, we received net cash proceeds of approximately $75.2 million, of which $11.0 million was used
to repay the $4.0 million BWCA loan, $5.0 million in XACP Notes and the $2.0 million Aqua Note.
Our long-term future capital requirements
will depend on many factors, including our level of revenues, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the success of our strategic relationships in the marketing of our treatment systems, our ability to place our systems under long-term
contracts and provide service under our long-term contracts, our need to make capital expenditures to increase our resin regeneration capacity including through building new or expanding existing facilities and the continuing market acceptance of
our systems and services.
Any revenue growth would impact our liquidity and place increased demands on our capital resources. For example,
as our system sales to customers increase, we require an increased investment in accounts receivable, as system sales accounts receivable may have repayment terms from several months to one year or beyond. Additionally, as we lease systems to
customers as opposed to selling systems, we will experience much higher capital expenditure requirements.
As of December 31, 2007,
our cash and cash equivalents were sufficient to fund our anticipated future growth and operations for at least the next 12 months. We anticipate that we may need additional capital to finance our operations after such 12-month period. In such an
event, we would seek to raise additional capital through a combination of bank credit facilities, issuance of long-term debt and private or public equity offerings. If we were unable to obtain additional capital through one or more of these sources,
our ability to continue our operations, invest in groundwater treatment systems and grow our revenues may be adversely impacted, and we would focus our sales and marketing on the sales of systems (with related WSAs) as opposed to placing such
systems under long-term contracts. We also may seek third-party financing with respect to systems placed through long-term contracts as a source of liquidity to finance future anticipated growth.
69
The U.S. credit markets have recently experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions
which have caused spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted in
the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. These events in the credit markets as well as deteriorating market conditions have also had an adverse effect on other financial markets in the United States, including the equity markets, which
may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of debt, common stock or other equity securities.
We
also expect to consider opportunities to acquire or make investments in other technologies, products and businesses that could enhance our technical capabilities, complement our current products and services or expand the breadth of our customer
base. These activities would require additional capital resources.
At December 31, 2007, we had $36.0 million in cash and cash
equivalents, including $0.6 million resulting from the consolidation of VL Capital, which funds of VL Capital are not available to us to support our liquidity needs. We have invested substantially all of our available cash funds in money market
funds placed with reputable institutions for which credit loss is not anticipated.
The following table summarizes our primary sources of
cash in the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
Restated
|
|
|
2006
Restated
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,409
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
68,139
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(18,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
51,843
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash used by operating activities was $9.7 million during 2007 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $11.6 million during 2006. In addition to our net loss of $18.3 million, this increase in net
cash used by operating activities was due primarily to an approximate $1.7 million decrease in accrued expenses and a $0.5 million increase in prepaid assets. This use of cash was partially offset by a $3.3 million decrease in accounts receivable
and a $1.6 million increase in accounts payable. In 2007, we recorded an additional $6.8 million contract loss reserve, offset by $1.4 million of actual charges against the contract loss reserve.
Net cash used by operating activities was $11.6 million during 2006 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $6.4 million during 2005. In
addition to our net loss of $13.5 million in 2006, the increase in net cash used by operating activities was due primarily to a $6.4 million increase in accounts receivable offset by a $2.2 million increase in accrued expenses, including much higher
insurance premiums incurred for our corporate liability coverage, most notably directors and officers liability insurance. Additionally, in 2006, we recorded a $3.7 million contract loss reserve.
In general, accounts receivable arising from systems sales to customers are due in accordance with the provisions of the sales contract, which may
provide for extended payment terms ranging from several months to one year or more for a significant portion of the contract price. In contrast, accounts receivable from systems placed under long-term contracts with customers are usually due within
a much shorter period, generally within one month after the date services have been performed and the customer has been billed.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $14.9 million in 2007 compared to $4.7 million in
2006. The increase in cash used in investing activities was due primarily to $6.2 million in cash paid as partial consideration for the acquisition of MPT, net of cash acquired. In addition, we experienced a $4.0 million increase in capital
expenditures in 2007 compared to 2006. This increase in capital expenditures was the result of more systems placed with customers under long-term contracts during 2006 than during 2005 since more customers chose to pay us under long term contracts
rather than purchase systems.
70
Net cash used in investing activities was $4.7 million in 2006 compared to $1.7 million in 2005. This
increase was due primarily to a $2.8 million increase in capital expenditures in 2006 compared to 2005. This increase in capital expenditures was the result of more systems placed with customers under long-term contracts during 2006 than during
2005, since more customers chose to pay us under long-term contracts rather than purchase systems from us.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $6.1 million in 2007 compared to $68.1 million in 2006. This decrease was due
primarily to $75.2 million in net proceeds from sales of common stock (attributable to our initial public offering) and $2.0 million in net proceeds received from notes payable receipt. These decreases in net cash provided by financing activities
were offset in part by $8.1 million in net proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants and a decrease of $6.8 million in repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations during 2007 compared to the prior year.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $68.1 million in 2006 compared to $9.1 million in 2005. The increase was due primarily to an increase of
$71.6 million in net proceeds from sales of common stock (attributable to our initial public offering in May 2006), offset in part by a $3.2 million decrease in net proceeds from notes payable and an $8.9 million increase in principal payments on
notes payable and capital leases.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures are primarily for groundwater treatment systems that we build and then contract to customers under long-term contracts. Capital expenditures totaled $8.7 million, $4.7 million and $1.9 million
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our future capital expenditures will fluctuate depending on the number of our systems we place with customers under long-term contracts.
As of December 31, 2007, we anticipated that our capital expenditures would continue to increase in future years. We anticipate the use of cash of
approximately $5.0 million to $7.0 million for capital expenditures during 2008 for increases in our resin regeneration capacity, development of certain pilot plants for treatment technologies and improving or expanding our existing facilities. In
addition, capital expenditures could increase further relative to any increases in the number of treatment systems delivered to customers under long-term contract arrangements, though it is our intent to sell these arrangements to a third party
financing company, thus reducing the use of cash for that customer system.
Outstanding Indebtedness
At December 31, 2007, we had no outstanding indebtedness except for approximately $0.4 million in notes payable to a finance company, resulting from
the consolidation of VL Capital. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Warrants Issued in connection with
Indebtedness and other Transactions
In connection with the BWCA loan (which was repaid in full in May 2006), we issued to the lender
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 717,450 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. These warrants are immediately exercisable and expire in November 2008, provided, that the warrant shall no longer be exercisable on the
date of a change in control of our company.
On August 13, 2007, we entered into an Omnibus Amendment to Business Loan Agreement and
Warrants dated October 3, 2003, April 30, 2004 and February 10, 2006 (Omnibus Amendment) with BWCA I, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Omnibus Amendment, the prepayment penalty associated with the May 2006 repayment of the loans
previously outstanding and owed to BWCA I, LLC was reduced from 5.0% to 2.5%, and each of the warrants previously issued to BWCA I, LLC was amended to allow the holder thereof to effect a net or cashless exercise of the
warrant.
The number of shares of common stock that will be issued to BWCA I, LLC upon cashless exercise will be reduced from the 767,450
shares originally issuable under the warrants. These warrants have an aggregate exercise price of $3.3 million, which the warrant holder would normally pay in cash to us. Instead, upon exercise the warrant holder will receive a reduced number of
shares of our common stock, effectively foregoing shares equal to $3.3 million in market value at the time of exercise.
71
Subsequent to the Omnibus Agreement, during the last two quarters of 2007, holders of 56,066 warrants
exercised such warrants through cashless exercises, and received 38,995 shares of our common stock.
In connection with the XACP Notes
(which were repaid in full in May 2006), we issued to the purchasers warrants to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.50 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share. These warrants were immediately exercisable and expired on the earliest of November 11, 2008 and immediately prior to a change in control of our company. During the third and fourth quarters
of 2007, the holders of the XACP warrants exercised 725,000 warrants at an exercise price of $5.50 per share and 225,000 warrants at an exercise price of $7.00 per share, resulting in the issuance of 950,000 shares of our common stock and net
proceeds to us of approximately $5.6 million.
In connection with the issuance of the Aqua Note (which was repaid in full in May 2007), we
granted to Aqua America a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share. During the fourth quarter
of 2007, the holders of the Aqua warrants exercised all of their warrants, resulting in the issuance of 400,000 shares of our common stock and net proceeds to us of $2.5 million.
In addition, in connection with the consent granted by BWCA I, LLC with respect to our issuance of the Aqua Note, we granted to BWCA I, LLC a warrant to
purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.00 per share.
Pursuant to our December 2005 binding commitment
letter with Shaw, Shaw committed to purchase a total of $5.0 million of our groundwater treatment systems prior to December 31, 2006. As part of that commitment letter, we granted to Shaw a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock
at an exercise price of $7.00 per share in connection with its purchase of our groundwater treatment systems. As of December 31, 2007, no shares had vested under the Shaw warrant. Subsequently, as part of our September 18, 2008 acquisition of
Envirogen from Shaw, we entered into a settlement agreement with Shaw which cancelled the Shaw warrants.
We have applied the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123(R) to the warrants issued in connection with these transactions. Accordingly, the total fair value of the warrants issued has been calculated using the Black-Scholes method. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
, the fair values of those warrants primarily related to indebtedness have been or will be recorded as a discount to notes
payable, with a corresponding increase in common stock. The fair value of such warrants is being amortized through the end of each respective loan term under the interest method.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In 2007, the Company entered into four transactions with respect to
the sale of water treatment units to two special purpose entities (VL Capital, or VLC, and Water Services Solutions, or WSS) that were to be funded by third-party financial institutions. The underlying agreements provided that the Company would sell
VLC and WSS water treatment units subject to water service agreements (WSAs) between the Company and its customers. The special purpose entities would then have the right to receive the scheduled lease payments from the customers subject to the
WSAs. The Company has concluded that the financial statements of VLC and WSS should be consolidated with those of the Company in accordance with FIN 46(R). This analysis is based on the fact that the structure of the transactions with VLC and WSS
did not effectively transfer sufficient risk to the other parties to the transactions, leaving the Company with the majority of the risks.
Other than as described above, as of December 31, 2007, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which
would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we
are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships. We do not have relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their
non-independent relationship with us or our related parties.
72
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Less than
1 Year
2008
|
|
1 to 3
Years
(2009-2010)
|
|
3 to 5
Years
(2011-2012)
|
|
More than
5 Years
(After 20112)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Principal payments - notes payable
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
352
|
Interest payments - fixed rate notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
3,082
|
Capital commitments (1)
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
Purchase commitments (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
3,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents estimated costs to complete groundwater treatment systems under current contracts with customers.
|
(2)
|
|
There were no minimum purchase arrangements with vendors.
|
Effect of Inflation and Seasonality
We do not believe that inflation will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe current contracts and pricing
policies will allow for these costs to be appropriately passed on to our customers. We identified certain older contracts where we did not provide for the ability to offset cost increases and recorded a $3.7 million reserve in 2006 for these future
losses.
During 2007, as these contracts progressed and as additional older legacy contracts became operational and were operated during
the busy, higher volume summer months, it became apparent by the third quarter of 2007 that the original reserve was not adequate. Management reviewed each contracts financial performance and identified the future expected losses for these
contracts, resulting in a $6.8 (as restated) million increase to the reserve for future contract losses (offset by $1.4 million of actual contract loss charges against the reserve during 2007) which was charged to cost of contract revenues during
the third quarter of 2007. The reserve for future contract losses included on our balance sheet, both short- and long-term, as of December 31, 2007 was approximately $9.1 million.
Our business, particularly the revenues we receive from our long-term contracts, is moderately seasonal due to the impact of summer and hot weather
conditions on the water requirements of our customers. In the summer and warmer months, our customers have a higher demand for water and must increase the utilization of their groundwater resources resulting in a higher volume of groundwater treated
during these periods and thus higher revenues from our long-term contracts. Our net sales and net income have historically been lowest in the three-month periods ending December 31 and March 31, when the Arid West generally faces cooler
weather that reduces the utilization of groundwater sources which in turn reduces the processing fees we receive from our long-term contracts. Historically, the impact of seasonality has been mitigated through the impact of the sales of our systems
in certain periods.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109
, Accounting for Income Taxes
. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial application of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48, if any, must be reported as an adjustment to the opening
balance of retained earnings or other appropriate components of equity for the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on our financial statements.
73
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
. This statement
establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out framework for establishing fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies only to fair value measurements that are already
required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. Adoption of SFAS 157 is required for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008, and will be applied prospectively under most
circumstances. We do not expect adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
. This statement permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments
and other specified items at fair value. This statement is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. We do not expect adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). This statement
replaces SFAS No. 141 in its entirety and retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141, including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This
standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is
transferred. SFAS 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination, including business combination, including business combinations achieved in states (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual
contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008, and may not be applied before that date. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 141(R) could have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB
No. 51
(SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1,
2009 and will be applied prospectively. We do not expect adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and foreign exchange rates. At December 31, 2007, we had no outstanding indebtedness except for $0.4 million of notes payable to a finance company
through VL Capital. The amount of our outstanding debt at any time may fluctuate and we may from time to time be subject to refinancing risk. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on our annual
interest expense, our results of operations or financial condition. We derive substantially all of our revenues from sales within the United States. Since transactions in foreign currencies are immaterial to us as a whole because we do not currently
have any significant foreign customers nor do we enter into contracts with foreign entities except contracts denominated in United States currency, we do not consider it necessary to hedge against currency risk.
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Our
financial statements, supplementary financial data and financial statement schedules are included in a separate section at the end of this Report. The financial statements, supplementary data and schedules are listed in the index on page F-1 of this
Report and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
74
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), as
appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Management, with participation by our CEO and CFO, has designed the Companys disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), in connection with filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, management conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2007, the end of the period covered by this report.
Based upon the evaluation conducted by management in connection with the audit of the Companys financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and, in connection with the restatement of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, management
identified additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that existed as of December 31, 2007. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting
such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As a result of these material weaknesses, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable
assurance level as of December 31, 2007.
(b) Managements Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Restated).
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule
13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting refers to a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and disposition of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based upon the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2007 as a result of the material weaknesses described below.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which
is included in Item 8 of this Report.
75
The ineffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 stemmed
from several significant factors. The organization structure was changing as we hired additional management, and we were establishing new accounting information systems. This placed additional stress on the organization and our internal controls as
these new structures were being instituted within the Company. Additionally, the acquisition of MPT in the third quarter of 2007 caused additional changes to our organization structure and accounting systems. These changes in our management,
reporting structure and our accounting information systems resulted in a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
In connection with the restatement of our consolidated financial statements, we have identified the following additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that existed as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
A lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training in applying GAAP to transactions and the correct application of revenue
recognition principles required under GAAP;
|
|
|
|
A lack of effective checks and balances between the former CFO and accounting and legal functions with respect to the negotiation, structuring and accounting for
transactions, including water treatment unit sales and water service agreements;
|
|
|
|
A failure to maintain adequately organized business records and complete documentation for sales contracts, many of which lacked execution dates, signatures by
Company or counterparty representatives; the use of draft or non-standard arrangements; and the lack of adequate written agreements to memorialize significant transactions;
|
|
|
|
Insufficient information systems and processes to accumulate information to timely identify and address business and accounting issues;
|
|
|
|
A lack of sufficiently detailed written accounting policies and procedures with respect to the timing and recognition of sales transactions and an insufficient
process at the time of the transactions to monitor compliance with such policies and procedures; and
|
|
|
|
A failure to maintain an effective internal audit function.
|
In light of these material weaknesses, we performed additional analyses and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A were fairly presented in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that despite our material weaknesses, our restated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 are fairly presented in
accordance with GAAP.
Based on our remediation efforts described below, we expect to enhance our internal control over financial reporting
with the goal of remediating the foregoing material weaknesses by December 31, 2009. The effectiveness of the measures we implement in this regard will be subject to ongoing management review supported by confirmation and testing by management
and by our internal auditors, as well as audit committee oversight. As a result, we expect that additional changes could be made to our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we may in the
future identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we have not identified as of the date of this report.
(c) Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
We have implemented a number of changes designed to improve our internal
control over financial reporting such as:
|
|
|
We hired a new CFO in June 2008;
|
|
|
|
We retained an experienced consultant to assist us in our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
We have developed and are implementing our accounting policies and procedures with enhanced controls surrounding expenditures, cutoff dates and payroll processing
and procedures;
|
|
|
|
With respect to revenue recognition, we now require the CFO and either the General Counsel or the CEO to provide formal written or electronic approval of all sales
contracts;
|
76
|
|
|
We have developed procedures and internal documentation to reduce the risks associated with non-routine transaction documents;
|
|
|
|
We have developed policies and procedures designed to ensure that the appropriate authorized officers receive on a timely basis information regarding proposed
transactions prior to execution and approval of such transactions;
|
|
|
|
With respect to non-routine transactions, we have adopted additional procedures designed to ensure the correct accounting treatment of such transactions including,
where appropriate, retention of outside accounting specialists where additional expertise is determined to be advisable based upon the nature of the transaction; and
|
|
|
|
We have implemented new financial systems designed to enhance our financial reporting process.
|
We intend to take the following additional remediation efforts:
|
|
|
increase our accounting and finance resources and/or the accounting qualifications of current personnel;
|
|
|
|
conduct additional employee training relating to existing and newly implemented policies and procedures;
|
|
|
|
realign our internal audit review and internal reporting function in a manner designed to ensure compliance with written accounting and revenue recognition
procedures;
|
|
|
|
adopt additional procedures with respect to monitoring and internal communication within the organization; and
|
|
|
|
implement new policies and procedures designed to improve cutoff, reporting and processing functions.
|
We believe these remediation efforts will continue to improve our internal control over financial reporting.
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial expenses relating to the remediation of the material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting may in the future be limited by:
|
|
|
failure of the effectiveness of our policies, procedures and information systems and processes;
|
|
|
|
delays in upgrading financial software systems; and
|
|
|
|
the possibility that enhancements to our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting may not adequately assure timely and
accurate financial information.
|
(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
77
PART III
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors
Information relating to the officers and directors of the Company, other corporate governance matters and other
information required under this Item 10 is set forth in our Proxy Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers
Michael M. Stark
has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer
since February 2008, and as our President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2006 to February 2008. Mr. Stark served from 1997 to 2005 as President of Veolia Water North America, previously known as USFilter, a water services company.
From 2005 to 2006, Mr. Stark has been an independent consultant to companies in the water industry. From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Stark served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mobley Environmental Services, a company specializing in
non-hazardous hydrocarbon recycling. Prior to that time, Mr. Stark has held executive positions at a variety of companies, and has been in the water, environmental and specialty chemical industry since 1965. Mr. Stark holds a B.S. in
Biology from Marietta College.
W. Christopher Chisholm
has served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since June
2008. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Chisholm served as Executive Vice President, Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Veolia Water North America. Subsequent to the 1999 acquisition of USFilter by Veolia Environment,
Mr. Chisholm served as Executive Vice President, Finance of US Filter until 2003. In 1997, Mr. Chisholm joined US Filter (prior to it becoming Veolia Water) as its Vice President and Group Controller for North American operations and later
served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of USFilters Water & Wastewater Group until 1999. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Chisholm served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Mobley Environmental Services, which
was acquired in 1997 by USFilter. Prior to his career in the environmental services and water industries, Mr. Chisholm spent 11 years in the audit practice of KPMG, an international public accounting and consulting firm, serving clients in a
wide variety of industries. Mr. Chisholm is an accounting graduate of Northeast Louisiana University and obtained his certification as a Certified Public Accountant in 1981.
Scott B. Hamilton
has served as the Companys General Counsel since July 2007 and as the Companys Secretary since August 2007. From
2005 to 2007, Mr. Hamilton served as Associate General Counsel of Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC, previously known as USFilter Operating Services, Inc., a water services company, and from 1999 to 2004, served as Senior
Counsel of the same company. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Hamilton served as the Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of USFilter Operating Services, Inc., and Regional Counsel of USFilter, before its acquisition by Veolia Water
North America. From 1992 to 1998, Mr. Hamilton served in the enforcement division of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and prior to that was involved in the private practice of law for several years. Mr. Hamilton holds a B.A. in
Comparative Area Studies and History from Duke University and a J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law.
Richard A.
Reese
joined Basin Water in September of 2007 as the Marketing Vice President, and was named an Executive Officer in January of 2008. From 1997 to 2008, Mr. Reese served in management roles within Siemens Water Technologies, Inc.,
previously known as USFilter. These roles included Vice President, General Manager of Aftermarket within the Services & Products segment (2003 2007), Senior Vice President, Marketing within the Services Group of USFilter/Veolia Water
(2002 2003), Vice President, Customer Service & Satisfaction (2000 2002) for USFilter, and Vice President, General Manager of the Recovery Services Southwest business unit of USFilter (1997 2000). Prior to joining
USFilter, Mr. Reese served in Regional Vice President and Business Development roles with Mobley Environmental Services, Inc., as an Operations manager for Browning Ferris Waste Management Systems Inc., and as an engineer for R.J. Brown and
Associates of America and J.P. Kenny Offshore Engineering. Mr. Reese holds a B.S. in Ocean Engineering from Texas A&M University and an MBA from the University of Texas.
Thomas C. Tekulve
served as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Administrative Officer from October 2004 until June 2008, and as our
Vice President of Finance Business Development from June 2008 until October 2008. Mr. Tekulve resigned from the Company in October 2008. Mr. Tekulve also served as our Secretary from February 2006 until August 2007. From January
1999 to September 2004, Mr. Tekulve served as Vice President of
78
Finance and Treasurer of Southwest Water Company, a company engaged in the business of water production and distribution, wastewater collection and
treatment, public works services and utility submetering. From 1995 to 1998, he served as Chief Financial Officer of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, a provider of dental and vision care benefit programs. From 1984 to 1994, Mr. Tekulve served in a
variety of executive positions at Beckman Coulter, Inc., including as Director of International Finance. Mr. Tekulve is a certified public accountant and holds an MBA from Portland State University and a B.S. in accounting from California State
University, Northridge.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted the Basin Water, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code of Ethics). The Code of Ethics applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (who
is also our principal accounting officer), and is available to the public in the Investor Relations section of our website at
www.basinwater.com.
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
Information relating to
executive compensation and director compensation and other information required under this Item 11 is set forth in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference, except for the information set forth under the caption
Compensation Committee Report which specifically is not incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information concerning ownership of our common stock and other securities by certain persons and other information required under this Item 12 is set
forth in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
The information concerning certain relationships and related transactions and director independence and other information required under this Item 13 is set forth in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information
regarding principal accounting fees and services and other information required under this Item 14 is set forth in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
79
PART IV
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(A)
Documents filed as part of this report.
1. The following consolidated financial statements of Basin Water, Inc. and subsidiaries and
Reports of SingerLewak LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, are included in this report:
|
|
|
Report of SingerLewak LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
2. List of financial statement schedules-Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts.
3. List of exhibits required by
Item 601 of Regulation S-K. See part (B) below.
(B) Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
2.1
|
|
(1)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 31, 2007, by and among the Registrant, Basin Water, Inc., BW Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., Basin Water-MPT, Inc., Mobile Process Technology, Co. and
the stockholders of Mobile Process Technology, Co.
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of the Registrants Common Stock Certificate
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
(2)
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 28, 2005, among the Registrant and holders of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Common Stock Warrant
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Preferred Stock Warrant
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Note issued to BWCA I, LLC
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Warrant issued to BWCA I, LLC
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Senior Subordinated Note issued to The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P. and other purchasers
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Warrant issued to The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P. and other purchasers
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
(2)
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, among The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P. and other purchasers
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
(2)
|
|
Senior Subordinated Note issued to Aqua America, Inc. dated February 10, 2006
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form of Warrant issued to Aqua America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
(2)
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 10, 2006, between the Registrant and Aqua America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Voting Trust Agreement, dated September 20, 2005
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
#(3)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
#(2)
|
|
2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated and form of option agreement thereunder
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
#(4)
|
|
Amended and Restated Director Compensation Policy, dated March 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
#(2)
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan and forms of option and restricted stock agreements thereunder
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
#(2)
|
|
2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
#(2)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Peter L. Jensen dated October 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
#(2)
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Registrant and Peter L. Jensen
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
#(2)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Thomas C. Tekulve dated August 27, 2004, First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 31, 2005 and Second Amendment to Employment
Agreement dated June 27, 2005
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
#(2)
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Registrant and Thomas C. Tekulve
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
(2)
|
|
Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease, dated June 7, 2002 between the Registrant and White Oak, LLC for the property located at 8731 Prestige Court, Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
(2)
|
|
First Amendment to Standard Industrial Commercial Single Tenant LeaseGross, dated August 4, 2004, between the Registrant and White Oak, LLC
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
(2)
|
|
Business Loan Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between BWCA I, LLC and the Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
(2)
|
|
Commercial Security Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between BWCA I, LLC and the Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
(2)
|
|
Subordinated Note with Warrants Purchase Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, among the Registrant, The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P. and the other purchasers party thereto
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
(2)
|
|
Security Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, among the Registrant, The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P. and the other purchasers party thereto
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
(2)
|
|
National Arsenic Sales Agreement, dated December 9, 2005, between the Registrant and Shaw Environmental, Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(2)
|
|
Sales Commitment Letter, dated December 23, 2005, between the Registrant and Shaw Environmental, Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
(2)
|
|
Subordinated Note with Warrants Purchase Agreement, dated February 10, 2006, between the Registrant and Aqua America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
(2)
|
|
Security Agreement, dated February 10, 2006, between the Registrant and Aqua America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
(2)
|
|
Second Amendment to Standard Air Industrial Commercial Single-Tenant Lease-Gross, dated February 15, 2006, between the Registrant and White Oak, LLC
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
#(5)
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated October 27, 2006, between Michael Stark and Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
#(6)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan dated May 10, 2007
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
#(7)
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, between Scott Hamilton and Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
(8)
|
|
Omnibus Amendment to Business Loan Agreement and Warrants dated October 3, 2003, April 30, 2004, October 26, 2004 and February 10, 2006 between Registrant and BWCA I, LLC
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
(9)
|
|
Escrow Agreement, dated September 14, 2007, among Registrant, Mobile Process Technology, Co., the Stockholders Representative and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
(9)
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated September 14, 2007, by and between Basin Water-MPT, Inc. and Craft Real Property, LLC
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
(9)
|
|
Form of Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated September 14, 2007, by and between Registrant and the other parties thereto
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
(3)
|
|
Alliance Agreement, dated November 14, 2007, between Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC and Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
(10)
|
|
Assignment and Amendment Agreement, dated December 21, 2007, among Empire Water Corporation, Basin Water Resources, Inc. and Indian Hills Water Conservation Corporation, West Riverside Canal
Company, West Riverside 350 Inch Company, Henry Cox and John L. West
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
(10)
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Empire Water Corporation and Basin Water Resources, Inc., dated as of December 21, 2007
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
#(11)
|
|
Employment Transition and Consulting Agreement, dated February 19, 2008, between Peter L. Jensen and Registrant
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
|
|
Agreement to Sell and Purchase, dated September 14, 2007, between VL Capital LLC and Registrant (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Agreement, dated September 2007, and amendment, between VL Capital LLC and Registrant (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
Security Agreement, dated September 14, 2007 between VL Capital LLC and Registrant (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of SingerLewak LLP, independent registered public accounting firm (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
82
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 6, 2007.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on February 13, 2006, as amended.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2008.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 2, 2007.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2007.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2007.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 17, 2007.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Schedule 13D/A filed by the Registrant with respect to Empire Water Corporation on January 10, 2008.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25, 2008.
|
#
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit.
|
*
|
These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not being incorporated by reference into any filing of Basin Water, Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
|
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized and in the capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basin Water, Inc. (Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL M. STARK
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ W. CHRISTOPHER CHISHOLM
|
|
|
Michael M. Stark
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Christopher Chisholm
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Date: February
10
, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the date indicated.
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ SCOTT A. KATZMANN
|
|
|
Scott A. Katzmann
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ ROGER S. FAUBEL
|
|
|
Roger S. Faubel
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ VICTOR J. FRYLING
|
|
|
Victor J. Fryling
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN A. SHARPE
|
|
|
Stephen A. Sharpe
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ SUSAN H. SNOW
|
|
|
Susan H. Snow
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ KEITH R. SOLAR
|
|
|
Keith R. Solar
|
|
|
Director
|
Date: February
10
, 2009
84
B
ASIN WATER, INC.
INDEX TO RESTATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Basin Water, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Rancho Cucamonga, California
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Basin Water, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Basin Water, Inc. listed in Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Our report dated
February 10, 2009 expressed an opinion that the Company had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the 2007
and 2006 financial statements and the related financial statement schedule listed in Item 15 have been restated for various errors including errors relating to revenue recognition, variable interest entity consolidation, loss contract reserves,
stock based compensation accounting, calculated gains from related party transactions and purchase price allocation.
/s/ SingerLewak LLP
Irvine, California
March 17, 2008 (updated February 10, 2009)
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Basin Water, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Rancho Cucamonga, California
We
have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Basin Water, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material
weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial statements will not
be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in managements assessment:
During the Companys assessment of internal control over financial reporting, there were numerous significant control deficiencies. If assessed on an individual basis, none of these deficiencies was determined to be a material
weakness. However, taken in the aggregate, they constitute a material weakness.
Financial Statement Close Process
|
|
|
Timely reconciliation of certain non-routine transactions and the related financial statement disclosures were not performed.
|
Purchasing Process
|
|
|
Certain expenditures were not properly authorized based on the Companys delegation of authority policy.
|
Treasury Process
|
|
|
Certain bank account reconciliations were not reviewed and approved on a timely basis.
|
F-2
Payroll Process
|
|
|
Timely review of certain payroll changes was not performed.
|
|
|
|
Timely review by management of certain time cards was not performed.
|
Information Technology Controls
Information Technology Controls are policies and procedures that
relate to many applications and support the effective functioning of application controls by helping to ensure the proper operation of information systems. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had ineffective information technology controls
relating to:
|
|
|
Periodic user access review
|
|
|
|
Configuration of active directory password parameters not in compliance with the Companys Information Security Policy
|
|
|
|
Lack of a formal process to add new users and modify or terminate existing users
|
In addition to the material weakness described above, managements assessment also identified the following material weaknesses related to the
restatement of financial statements for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
Lack of sufficient knowledge in applying Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to certain revenue transactions
|
|
|
|
Failure to maintain organized business records which resulted in incomplete and unexecuted sales contracts
|
|
|
|
Failure to monitor compliance with the Companys revenue recognition policies and the lack of detailed policies and procedures with respect the recognition of
revenue
|
|
|
|
Failure to maintain an effective internal audit function
|
|
|
|
Lack of effective checks and balances between accounting and legal functions with respect to negotiating, structuring and accounting for transactions
|
|
|
|
Insufficient information systems and processes to accumulate information to timely identify and address business and accounting issues
|
These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2007 financial
statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 17, 2008 (updated February 10, 2009) on those financial statements.
In
our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity and cash flows of the Company for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated March 17, 2008 (updated February 10, 2009) expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ SingerLewak LLP
Irvine, California
February
10
, 2009
F-3
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of $92 and $65 allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of $208 and $0 allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
7,957
|
|
Inventory, net of $79 and $38 reserve
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
48,700
|
|
|
|
66,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
24,885
|
|
|
|
15,112
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
13,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
21,017
|
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Deferred revenue - affiliate
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,466
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
110,193
|
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Independent Registered Public Accountants Report.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
3,980
|
|
|
$
|
10,593
|
|
|
$
|
10,016
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
9,660
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
12,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
6,443
|
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
7,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(23,258
|
)
|
|
|
(11,881
|
)
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
563
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
563
|
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
12,849
|
|
See accompanying Independent Registered Public Accountants Report.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficiency
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - January 1, 2005
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,290
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
Fair value of options and warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2005
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reincorporation at time of initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,917
|
)
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales of common stock in the initial public offering
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
75,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Fair value of options issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2006 (Restated)
|
|
19,888
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock issued for acquisition
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2007 (Restated)
|
|
21,949
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
110,193
|
|
$
|
(552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Independent Registered Public Accountants Report.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
(3,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Write off of loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
(6,279
|
)
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
(8,783
|
)
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
(1,762
|
)
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
|
(11,630
|
)
|
|
|
(6,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8,705
|
)
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(6,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collection of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
Issuance of redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
Loan origination fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
(9,102
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
68,139
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(18,529
|
)
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Independent Registered Public Accountants Report.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1Business Activity
Basin Water, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) design, build and implement systems for the treatment of contaminated groundwater, industrial process
water, and air streams from municipal and industrial sources. Customers can choose between purchasing the Companys systems and entering into long-term contracting arrangements for the Companys systems.
The Company markets its treatment systems and services primarily to utilities, cities, municipalities, special districts, real estate developers and
other organizations for use in treating groundwater that does not comply with federal or state drinking water regulations due to the presence of chemical contaminants. The Company markets its treatment systems and services through its direct sales
force, independent contractors and strategic relationships.
In May 2006, the Company registered for sale and sold 6,900,000 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock at a price of $12.00 per share in its initial public offering. After underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses in the amount of $7,600, the net proceeds from the Companys initial public offering
were approximately $75,200.
In connection with the initial public offering, all 2,361,625 shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock
were converted into shares of common stock. After the initial public offering, the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a total of 100,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, $0.001 par value. Also,
immediately prior to the initial public offering, the Company reincorporated in Delaware.
On September 14, 2007, the Company
completed the acquisition of Mobile Process Technology Co. (MPT), a provider of technology and services to the water and wastewater treatment and industrial process markets. This acquisition provides additional capabilities including expanded
technological solutions, geographic presence and customer base. Additional services the new Company provides include: (1) central regeneration for ion-exchange, in which we replace the resin vessel on a periodic basis and regenerate the resin
offsite, (2) smaller ion exchange systems permitting the servicing of low-flow wells, and (3) technologies to treat process water and to provide resource recovery from wastewater. The new company also provides the ability to service
and treat smaller capacity water systems than the Companys current product offering.
In 2007, the Company entered into transactions
with respect to the sale of water treatment systems to two special purpose entities (VL Capital, or VLC and Water Services Solutions, or WSS) that were to be funded by third-party financial institutions. In accordance with the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities Deferral for Certain Interests, Revised December 2003
(FIN 46 (R)), the Company has concluded that the financial statements of
VLC and WSS should be consolidated with those of the Company. Accordingly, the Companys consolidated financial statements for the periods presented herein include these entities.
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years financial statement presentation to conform to the current year presentation.
F-8
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenues in two different ways. For groundwater treatment systems that are sold to customers, revenues are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method by comparing actual costs incurred
to total estimated costs to complete each system. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes revenues and associated costs as work progresses on a system, based on the expected total system revenues and costs. In general, financial statements
based on the percentage-of-completion method present the economic substance of production-type activities more clearly than the use of the completed-contract method, and present the relationships between sales, cost of sales and related period costs
more accurately. For all other groundwater treatment systems delivered to customers under various contractual arrangements, the Company recognizes revenues for a periodic fee received over the life of the contract using the straight-line method and
recognizes a processing fee as the Companys systems treat the customers contaminated water.
The Company recognizes revenues
either from a sale of a system or as recurring revenues from a long-term contract under which a system is placed.
Sale.
For
treatment systems which are sold to customers under fixed-price contracts, the Company recognizes revenues using the percentage-of-completion method. This method takes into account the cost, estimated earnings and revenues to date on systems not yet
completed. This method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available method of measuring progress on systems sold to customers. In general, financial statements based on the percentage-of-completion method present the
economic substance of production-type activities more clearly than the completed-contract method, and present the relationships between sales, cost of sales and related period costs more accurately. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating
costs, estimates used may change within the near term. Such estimates are adjusted under the cumulative-catch-up method. Unless contractually agreed to otherwise, the sales contract is deemed to be substantially complete when the treatment system
has been physically completed and a performance test has been passed. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred losses on the sale of certain groundwater treatment systems and has recorded a provision for
anticipated losses on system sales as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 in the amount of $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Contract Revenue
.
The Company generates recurring contract revenues from three sources. The first source of recurring contract revenues is from long-term contracts under which the system is installed at the
customers site and treats the customers water. We retain ownership of the installed system. Under this contract, the Company recognizes monthly revenues, on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract, which represents a return
of the capital value of the installed system. The amount of this fixed monthly revenue is based on both the capacity of the system and the type of contaminant(s) being treated. The straight-line method best reflects the value of having the
systems capacity available to the customer at all times and is similar to the method used for calculating depreciation.
The second
source of recurring revenues is from long-term contracts for the treatment of the water produced from installed treatment systems, also referred to as service revenues. Service revenues are recognized based on the actual volume of water treated each
month. Such water-treatment revenues bear a direct relationship to the variable costs for the purchase and delivery of salt, chemicals and resin used in the system, the removal of waste and the cost to maintain and service the system. This revenue
stream is generated both by systems that were purchased by the Companys customers and by systems in which the Company retains ownership and recognizes revenue for the monthly capital component.
F-9
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The third source of contract revenues relates to providing other services for the processing of
water, replacement of resins or equipment parts and other water treatment related services, including the services provided by MPT described previously.
Under each of the long-term contracts, the customer is obligated to pay the Company for the treatment of its waternot for specific hours worked, supplies purchased or waste-hauls provided. Certain of the
Companys long-term contracts allow it to recover increased operating costs, including costs for salt, resin and removal of waste.
Under the criteria set forth in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 00-21, the Company has determined that the multiple deliverables of each of its long-term contracts, specifically the capital component and the volume-related service charge,
qualify for separate accounting treatment. The three criteria required for separate accounting treatment are: 1) that each deliverable has a standalone value to the customer, 2) that there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value of each
deliverable and 3) that there are no general refund rights for the deliverables.
In the case of contracts under which the Company owns the
system, the customer is obligated to pay the Company the fixed capital component of the system on a monthly basis. These arrangements are classified and treated as operating leases under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 13,
Accounting for Leases
, because they meet the four criteria of an operating lease: 1) there is no transfer of title; 2) there is not a bargain purchase option; 3) the lease term is substantially shorter than the economic life of
the system; and 4) the present value of the capital component payments is less than 90% of the fair value of the water treatment system at the inception of the contract. For water treatment systems which are owned by the Company and leased to its
customers, the capital recovery portion of the payment stream from the customer is determined at the outset of the lease contract based on capital value and the lease term. Consequently, these payments, and the recoverability of the related assets,
are not affected by the operating losses sustained under the water service agreements, as described in Note 14 Contract Loss Reserve.
Accounts
Receivable
In general, accounts receivable arising from systems sales to customers are due in accordance with the provisions of the
sales contract, which may provide for extended payment terms ranging from several months to one year or more for a significant portion of the sales price. In contrast, accounts receivable from systems placed under long-term contracts with customers
are usually due within a much shorter period of time, generally within one month after the date services have been performed and the customer has been billed. Accordingly, in periods in which the Companys revenues from system sales are higher
relative to revenues from long-term contracts, the collection of accounts receivable will be much slower due to the nature of the sales contracts. Management has assessed the collectability of accounts receivable and recorded an allowance for
doubtful accounts of $300 and $65 based upon this assessment at the end of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Unbilled
receivables generally arise from the recording of revenue under the percentage-of-completion method. As such, unbilled revenues are reclassified as accounts receivable when the invoice is sent to the customer in accordance with contractual terms.
Inventory
Inventory consists
primarily of raw materials and supplies. Inventory items are stated at the lower of cost, on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, or market. Physical counts of inventory are conducted periodically to help verify the balance of inventory. A reserve is
maintained for obsolete inventory, if appropriate. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded increases to its reserves for slow-moving inventory of $41 and $38, respectively. The Company considers inventory to be
obsolete when it is no longer usable as a system component.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property consists primarily of treatment systems which the
Company places with customers under various arrangements. For groundwater treatment systems placed with customers under long-term contracts, the Company capitalizes materials, labor, overhead and interest. Depreciation is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
F-10
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The Company capitalizes expenditures for significant renewals and betterments that extend the useful
lives of property and equipment. The Company charges expenditures for maintenance and repairs to expense as incurred. Estimated useful lives are generally as follows: vehicles and trailersthree to five years; furniture and fixturesfive
to seven years, other equipmentfive to 10 years, and groundwater treatment systems20 years. Judgments and estimates made by the Company related to the expected useful lives of these assets are affected by factors such as changes in
operating performance and fluctuations in economic conditions.
Construction in progress is recorded when costs related to the construction
of water treatment systems are incurred.
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount, the Company would measure an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the discounted cash flows. No impairment losses were
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Deferred Revenues
In connection with long-term contracts, the Company may receive payments from its customers prior to the system being placed in service. Such payments are
recorded as deferred revenues. In addition, the Company may receive payments from its customers in excess of that which can be recognized on a straight-line basis. These payments are also recorded as deferred revenues. All deferred revenues amounts
are recognized as revenues in the periods in which services are rendered to the customer. The Company also recorded deferred revenue- affiliate which represents the Companys deferral of a portion of the gain on the sale to Empire
equal to its proportional 32% interest in Empire.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the asset and liability method under SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
, which requires deferred income tax assets and liabilities to be computed
annually for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the
temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
Valuation of Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Company assesses intangible assets, excluding
goodwill, for recoverability in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). Such intangible assets are assessed for recoverability whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable through the estimated future discounted cash flows arising from the use of such assets. If the Company determines that the carrying value of intangible
assets may not be recoverable, the amount of impairment expense is determined by using the projected discounted cash flow method in accordance with SFAS 144.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). SFAS 142 requires annual testing for impairment, or more frequent testing if
events or circumstances indicate that carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment using discounted cash flow methods, transaction values for comparable companies, and other recognized valuation
techniques.
F-11
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Patents
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company has incurred cumulative legal fees in the amount of $626 and $387, respectively, as a result of application for a series of patents. At the time the patents are
received, all costs incurred in obtaining the patents are then amortized over their estimated useful lives of 17 years. In addition, the Company acquired patents with a fair value of $1,812 as a result of the acquisition of MPT in September 2007.
These acquired patents also have estimated remaining useful lives of 17 years. The amount of patent amortization expense was $29, $3 and $2 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Research and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses are charged to operations in the year incurred. Research and development expenses totaled $564, $634 and $651 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entity
The
Company has a 32% ownership investment in Empire Water Corporation (Empire). This investment is evaluated under the requirements of FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46(R
), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB
No. 51,
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. (APB) 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock
, and other applicable guidance to determine the appropriate accounting treatment, including whether the Company
must consolidate the investee company. The Companys 32% ownership investment in Empire is accounted for using the equity method of accounting since the investment gives the Company the ability to exercise significant influence, but not
control, over the investee as outlined under APB 18. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if the Company has an ownership interest of between 20% and 50%, although other factors are considered in determining whether the equity method
of accounting is appropriate.
Empire has a fiscal year end of June 30 while the fiscal year end of the Company is December 31.
The Company does not control the management or accounting functions of Empire and thus cannot control the determination of the June 30 fiscal year end. In accordance with paragraph 19 of APB 18, the Company records its share of the earnings or
losses of Empire from the most recent available financial statements. For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded an estimate of its share of Empires net loss. For the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2008 and
September 30, 2008, the Company recorded its share of Empires loss based upon Empires actual financial results. After the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company expects to record its equity in the income or loss of Empire
three months in arrears, which will be calculated based upon the most recently available financial statement published by Empire in accordance with APB 18.
This investment is classified as an investment in affiliate in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The Company monitors this investment for impairment and will make appropriate reductions in
carrying values if the Company determines that an impairment charge is required based primarily on the near-term prospects and financial condition of Empire. Any significant intervening events relating to Empire in the period since the latest
available financial statements will be disclosed in future filings.
The long-term liability deferred revenue affiliate
represents the Companys deferral of the gain on sale to Empire of its proportional 32% interest in Empire.
Net Income Attributable to
Noncontrolling Interest
In accordance with the provisions of FIN 46(R), the Company is required to include VL Capital (VLC) a
special purpose entity, in its consolidated financial statements. However, because it has no ownership interest in VLC and no control over its management or business operations, the Company has recorded the net income of VLC as attributable to a
noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements commencing with the sale of certain equipment to VLC in June 2007. See Note 3 to consolidated financial statements.
Stock-based Compensation
2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan
In May 2006, the Company adopted the Basin Water 2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan, or 2006 Equity Plan. The 2006 Equity Plan replaces the 2001 Stock
Option Plan, and became effective immediately prior to the completion of the initial public offering in May 2006. Under the 2006 Equity Plan, 2,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock were reserved for issuance. This replaces the 2,100,000
shares of common stock initially reserved under the 2001 Stock Option Plan.
F-12
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
2001 Stock Option Plan
On August 27, 2001, the Company established the Basin Water 2001 Stock Option Plan. Under the plan, 900,000 shares of Company common stock were initially reserved for issuance upon exercise of options pursuant to
the plan. In June 2005, the plan was amended to increase the number of shares of Company common stock reserved for issuance to 2,100,000. In May 2006, the 2001 Stock Option Plan was replaced by the 2006 Equity Plan.
Change in Accounting Principle
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)). This statement requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards in financial statements. Under
the provisions of SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation expense is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employees requisite service period (generally
the vesting period of the award). The Company elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided under SFAS 123(R). This method applies to all new awards or awards modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after
January 1, 2006. Accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented herein have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation.
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
The
Company sold 149,250 shares of no par value Series B preferred stock for $4.00 per share during the year ended December 31, 2005. Also, at December 31, 2004, the Company had committed to issue an additional 37,500 shares of Series B
preferred stock for which it had received proceeds of $4.00 per share as of that date. Such stock was issued in January 2005. Costs of the offering totaled $2 in 2005. Additionally, as part of the offering, the Company issued seven-year warrants to
purchase 78,488 shares of Series B convertible stock at an exercise price of $4.40 per share. The estimated fair value of the warrants granted was determined to be approximately $61 based on the Black-Scholes valuation model. The warrants are fully
exercisable and expire in 2010. In connection with the initial public offering in May 2006, all 2,361,625 shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock outstanding were converted into shares of common stock.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109
, Accounting for Income Taxes
. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The
provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial application of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48, if any, must be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings or other appropriate components of equity for the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
. This statement establishes a single authoritative definition of
fair value, sets out a framework for establishing fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies only to fair value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. Adoption of SFAS No. 157 is required for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008, and will be applied prospectively under most circumstances. The
Company does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
F-13
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
. This statement permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and other specified items at fair value. This statement is effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141 (R)). This statement replaces SFAS 141 in its entirety and
retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141, including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is transferred. SFAS 141(R) requires an
acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in steps (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at
their fair values of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair
values. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and may not be applied before that date.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS 141(R) could have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160) which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and will be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Financial Restatement
Background of the Restatement
In connection with its review in late June 2008 with respect to
certain transactions and in July 2008 with respect to the preparation of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company identified issues relating to its revenue recognition for certain specific transactions.
The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Audit Committee), acting on behalf of the Board, had previously retained independent legal counsel in February 2008 in connection with an inquiry into allegations
contained in certain private shareholder litigation brought against the Company, the Companys directors and certain Company officers. The Audit Committee then asked its independent counsel to broaden its inquiry into other transactions
relating to the Companys revenue recognition. The Audit Committees counsel also retained independent forensic accountants to review the foregoing transactions.
On August 6, 2008, the Audit Committees counsel, together with the independent forensic accountants, conveyed interim findings to the Audit
Committee. On August 11, 2008, the Company announced that it would delay the filing of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and that the Company believed it may be necessary to restate previously issued
financial statements for certain periods as a result of the Companys revenue recognition relating to certain specific transactions.
On September 23, 2008 and October 28, 2008, the Audit Committee met with its counsel and the forensic accountants to discuss their further report on the findings with respect to the Companys accounting for the transactions.
On October 29, 2008, the Audit Committee discussed the findings of the review with SingerLewak LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. On October 29, 2008, the Company announced that the Audit Committee
F-14
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
concluded that the Company incorrectly accounted for certain specific transactions in 2006 and 2007. As a result, the Company incorrectly recognized revenues
relating to such transactions, including revenues incorrectly recognized as a result of the failure to apply Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -Deferral for Certain
Interests, Revised December 2003
(FIN 46(R)).
The Company also announced that the Audit Committee concluded that the Companys financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007,
including each of the fiscal quarters in 2006 and 2007, and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 should no longer be relied upon.
The Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation with respect to the Companys accounting and related disclosure and other matters. The Company is cooperating with the SEC.
Failure to Apply FIN 46(R)
In
2007, the Company entered into four transactions with respect to the sale of water treatment units to two special purpose entities (VL Capital, or VLC, and Water Services Solutions, or WSS) that were to be funded by third-party financial
institutions. The underlying agreements provided that the Company would sell VLC and WSS water treatment units subject to water services agreements (WSAs) between the Company and its customers. The special purpose entities would then have the right
to receive the scheduled lease payments from the customers subject to the WSAs. In two transactions with VL Capital, the Company recognized a total of approximately $4,400 of revenues. In two transactions with WSS, the Company recognized a total of
approximately $3,900 of revenues. The Company has concluded that the financial statements of VLC and WSS should be consolidated with those of the Company in accordance with FIN 46(R). This analysis is based on the fact that the structure of the
transactions with VLC and WSS did not effectively transfer sufficient risk to the other parties to the transactions, leaving the Company with the majority of the risks. In addition, in the transactions with WSS, the contract conditions of the
transactions were not fulfilled. As a result, the Company incorrectly recognized revenues from these transactions.
Revenue Recognition Issues
In 2006 and 2007, the Company entered into water treatment unit sale transactions with a number of customers. Those transactions
being restated are described below.
In the first transaction, the Company sold a water treatment unit in the quarter ended June 30,
2006, although the purchase agreement was not executed until August 2006. The customer terminated the purchase agreement shortly after its execution, and the Company recorded a bad debt expense for the profit recognized on the sale due to the
termination of the agreement in the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that it should reverse the revenues in the amount of approximately $900 in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the bad debt expense in the amount of $100
and $400 in the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively, associated with this transaction.
In the second transaction, the Company
was negotiating the sale of a water treatment unit with a customer up to and including September 29, 2006, when the customer sent the Company an email instructing it to release the unit for delivery and indicating that the customer would be
contacting the Company early the next week to finalize the agreement. The Company shipped a water treatment unit in the quarter ended September 30, 2006, but the terms of the contract were not finalized until February 2007. The Company has
determined that the revenues from this transaction in the amount of approximately $200 should have been recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 rather than the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
F-15
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
In the third transaction, the Company recognized revenues of $1,500 with respect to a transaction in
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, based on a unit purchase agreement dated March 30, 2006, but portions of the agreement were still being negotiated until June 2006. The agreement provides for 10% of the transaction amount to be paid upon
signing the letter of intent, which occurred in December 2005, with the remaining 90% of the amount due to be paid in March 2009. Based on its review, the Company has concluded that it should have recognized 10% of the transaction amount, or $150 in
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 when the transaction documentation was completed and executed, and that it should recognize the remaining $1,350 as revenues upon collection. Subsequently, in February 2009, the water treatment units were
returned to the Company as part of the settlement of a dispute with the third party (See Note 22 Subsequent Events).
In the fourth
transaction, the Company received a purchase order from one of its suppliers for the purchase of two water treatment units in the third quarter of 2006 upon which it recognized revenues pursuant to percentage of completion accounting. However, the
terms of the purchase order did not specify the shipping date for the units, the supplier never specified a shipping date, and the units were never shipped. In addition, the customer claimed a right of return which the Company disputes. The
transaction is being restated and the revenues reversed in the amount of approximately $100 and $600 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In
the fifth transaction, the Company entered into a letter of intent with a customer in the third quarter of 2007 for the sale of a water treatment unit and recognized revenues during that quarter. Pursuant to the terms of the letter of intent, the
customers purchase of the unit was subject to the satisfaction of test criteria and data delivery under a previously- executed demonstration agreement relating to the unit. These conditions were not satisfied as of the end of the third quarter
of 2007. Based on these facts, the Company has concluded that it should reverse the revenues of approximately $900 in the third quarter of 2007 from this transaction.
Accounting for Warrants
The Company reviewed its treatment of the non-cash expense related to
the warrants that were issued to Aqua America, Inc. (Aqua) in connection with a $2,000 loan to the Company in February 2006 and a proposed strategic relationship between Aqua and the Company. The loan matured on the first anniversary of the
Companys initial public offering, and the proposed strategic relationship was intended to have a term of five years. Documents memorializing the exact terms of the strategic relationship were exchanged with Aqua; however, a formal agreement
reflecting the strategic relationship was never executed. Based on the fact that no formal agreement related to the strategic relationship was entered into and the fact that the loan agreement specifically referenced issuance of the warrants, the
Company has concluded that the warrant expense should have been recognized over the life of the loan, rather than over the anticipated life of the proposed strategic relationship. As a result of this correction, the Company recorded additional
interest expense of approximately $900 and $500 in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, the Company reversed amortization expense of $300 in both 2007 and 2006.
Empire Transaction
In reviewing the accounting for the December 2007 sale to Empire Water
Corporation of the right to purchase certain water rights and related assets, the Company determined that errors were made relating to the gain recorded with respect to such transaction. The Company originally recorded a $2,500 gain upon receipt of
shares of Empire Water Corporation stock in such transaction. The gain was incorrectly recorded due to rounding and mathematical errors, as well as a revision of the Companys basis in the assets sold to Empire Water Corporation. As a result,
the Company has determined that the recorded gain should have been approximately $3,100. The Company recorded $600 additional gain on sale to affiliate in 2007.
F-16
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
Contract Loss Reserve
The Company has determined that an error was made in the calculation of the reserve for contract losses at September 30, 2007. Specifically, with regard to one of its service contracts, it was assumed that a
possible facility expansion would result in higher service fees to the customer, thus eliminating estimated operating losses on this contract beyond 2008. This expansion (and anticipated fee adjustment) was not contractually committed to and
therefore should not have been considered in estimating the contract loss reserve at September 30, 2007. As a result, the Company has increased the reserve for contract losses (and the related cost of contract revenues) in the restated
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 by approximately $1,800 to correct this error.
Balance Sheet
Reclassification for Purchase Accounting
During the course of its review of the final purchase accounting for the acquisition of
MPT, the Company determined that an error had been made in recording approximately $2,300 of deferred tax liabilities with a corresponding increase in goodwill. As a result, the Company has reversed this entry as of December 31, 2007. There is
no effect on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Other Adjustments
In connection with the review of its financial statements as part of the restatement, the Company has reviewed various other adjustments and
reclassifications from prior years and determined these other adjustments and reclassifications should be made in the consolidated financial statements.
Cumulative Effect of Adjustments on Statements of Operations
The cumulative effect of the adjustments relating to
all of these errors in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 reduced revenues by approximately $9,100 and $3,200, respectively. Net loss increased for 2007 and 2006 by approximately $3,000 and $2,300, respectively. The following
table sets forth the effects of the above errors on net loss (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Loss
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Cumulative
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to apply FIN 46(R)
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
Revenue recognition errors
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
Errors in accounting for warrants
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Error in recording Empire transaction
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Error in recording contract loss reserves
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
Other adjustments, net
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
The effects of the restatements on reported amounts for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 are presented below in the following tables:
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
13,477
|
|
|
$
|
(9,497
|
)
|
|
a, b, c, j
|
|
$
|
3,980
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
a, j
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
18,784
|
|
|
|
(9,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
9,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
13,790
|
|
|
|
(7,347
|
)
|
|
a, b, c, j
|
|
|
6,443
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
10,698
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
a, f
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
24,931
|
|
|
|
(5,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
(6,147
|
)
|
|
|
(3,720
|
)
|
|
a, b, c, f, j
|
|
|
(9,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
13,685
|
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
c, d, j
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(20,396
|
)
|
|
|
(2,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(23,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
a, d
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(18,192
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-18
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
13,861
|
|
|
$
|
(3,268
|
)
|
|
g, j
|
|
$
|
10,593
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
17,114
|
|
|
|
(3,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
12,161
|
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
g, j
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
20,106
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
(2,992
|
)
|
|
|
(1,810
|
)
|
|
g, h, j
|
|
|
(4,802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
i, j
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(10,453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(11,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,781
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
h
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
Equity in loss of affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
g, h, i, j
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-19
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Cumulative Effect
of Prior Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
a
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
11,443
|
|
|
|
(1,166
|
)
|
|
|
(2,920
|
)
|
|
a, b, c, j
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
975
|
|
Current portion of notes receivable
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
52,692
|
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
48,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
a, b, c
|
|
|
24,885
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
6,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
i, j
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
b, c, j
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,015
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
31,220
|
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
(7,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
21,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
239
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
a, j
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,934
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
Note payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
391
|
|
Deferred revenue - affiliate
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
e
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,268
|
)
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,923
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
18,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
110,354
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
110,193
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
a, b, c, d, e, f, j
|
|
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
79,289
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-20
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
(1,166
|
)
|
|
g, j
|
|
|
7,957
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
676
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
67,454
|
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
66,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
g, j
|
|
|
15,112
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,227
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
h
|
|
|
383
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
10,371
|
|
|
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,562
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
j
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
h
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
10,315
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
95,002
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
h, j
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(15,285
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
g, h, j
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
79,737
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-21
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Deficiency
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reincorporation at time of initial public offering
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales of common stock in the initial public offering
|
|
|
75,171
|
|
|
75,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
l
|
Fair value of options issued
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
k, l
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2006
|
|
|
95,002
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
|
(15,285
|
)
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
79,737
|
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
l
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
110,354
|
|
$
|
110,193
|
|
$
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
79,289
|
|
|
$
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-22
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
798
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
d
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
243
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
e
|
|
|
(3,094
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
84
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
530
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
a,b,c,j
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
145
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
(1,515
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
a, j
|
|
|
(1,741
|
)
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
(4,091
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes receivable
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(13,256
|
)
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(5,347
|
)
|
|
|
(3,358
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
(8,705
|
)
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(6,214
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
(6,169
|
)
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,592
|
)
|
|
|
(3,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
500
|
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(19,111
|
)
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,529
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-23
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Current Year
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
a
|
|
|
748
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
676
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
g
|
|
|
65
|
|
Issuance of warrants for services
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
95
|
|
Write off of loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(7,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
g, j
|
|
|
(8,783
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
j
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(12,361
|
)
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,942
|
)
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
g
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,941
|
)
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
163
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Loan origination fees
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(9,095
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
j
|
|
|
(9,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
68,145
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
68,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See explanatory notes on pages F-25 and F-26.
F-24
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 3Financial Restatement (continued)
Explanatory Notes to Restated Consolidated Statements of Operations, Balance Sheets and Statements of Cash Flows
|
a)
|
As the result of the consolidation of VLC in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46(R), net of elimination entries, as of December 31, 2007: cash and cash equivalents
increased by $582, unbilled receivables decreased by $500, the current portion of notes receivable decreased by $338, prepaid expense decreased by $70, property and equipment increased by $3,359, accumulated depreciation increased by $96, long-term
notes receivable decreased by $3,015, the current portion of notes payable increased by $239, accrued expenses decreased by $20, the long-term portion of notes payable increased by $113, noncontrolling interest increased by $84 and accumulated
deficiency increased by $494. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2007, system sales decreased by $3,853, contract revenues increased by $416, cost of system sales decreased by $3,359, cost of contract revenues increased by $10,
depreciation expense increased by $96, gross loss increased by $184, interest expense increased by $228 and interest income decreased by $2.
|
|
b)
|
The correction of transactions with special purpose entities which were incorrectly recognized as revenue in the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in a decrease in unbilled
receivables of $1,822, a decrease in long-term unbilled receivables of $2,614, an increase in property and equipment of $3,150 and an increase in accumulated deficiency of $1,286 as of December 31, 2007. Additionally, for the year ended
December 31, 2007, system sales decreased by $4,436, cost of system sales decreased by $3,150 and gross loss and net loss increased by $1,286.
|
|
c)
|
The correction of errors in the recognition of revenue in the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in a decrease in unbilled receivables of $742, an increase in property and
equipment of $798 and a decrease in accumulated deficiency of $56 as of December 31, 2007, and a decrease in system sales of $1,133, a decrease in cost of system sales of $798, an increase in gross loss of $335, a decrease of $391 in selling,
general and administrative expense and a decrease in net loss of $56 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
d)
|
The restatement of amortization expense arising from the fair value of warrants issued to Aqua America in the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in a decrease of $155 in
intangible assets and an increase in accumulated deficiency of $155 as of December 31, 2007, and a decrease in selling, general and administrative expense of $294, an increase of $449 in interest expense and an increase in net loss of $155 for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
e)
|
The correction of the recorded gain on sale to an affiliate in the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in an increase of $594 in gain on sale to affiliate and a decrease in
net loss of $594 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and an increase of $130 in investment in affiliate, a decrease of $464 in deferred revenue-affiliate and a decrease in accumulated deficiency of $594 as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
f)
|
The correction of an error to contract loss reserve resulted in a $1,800 charge to earnings through an increase in cost of contract revenues for the quarter ended September 30,
2007.
|
F-25
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
g)
|
The correction of errors in the recognition of revenue in the year ended December 31, 2006 resulted in a decrease in unbilled receivables of $2,815, an increase in property and
equipment of $1,492 and an increase in accumulated deficiency of $1,323 as of December 31, 2006, and a decrease in system sales of $3,250, a decrease in cost of system sales of $1,492, an increase in gross loss of $1,758, a decrease of $435 in
selling, general and administrative expense and an increase in net loss of $1,323 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
h)
|
The restatement of amortization expense arising from the fair value of warrants issued to Aqua America in the year ended December 31, 2006 resulted in a $600 decrease in
intangible assets and an increase in accumulated deficiency of $600 as of December 31, 2006, and a decrease in selling, general and administrative expense of $257 and an increase in interest expense of $857 for the year ended December 31,
2006. In addition, the recognition of the fair value of these warrants over the life of the loan from Aqua America resulted in a decrease in intangible assets of $610, a decrease in current portion of long-term debt of $449 and a decrease in
additional paid-in capital of $161 as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
i)
|
The correction of the purchase accounting for MPT resulted in the reversal of $2,268 of deferred tax liabilities with a corresponding decrease in goodwill at December 31, 2007.
There was no effect on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
j)
|
Other adjustments and reclassifications were made for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, which are not considered individually or collectively material, affecting
selling, general and administrative expense and accumulated deficiency.
|
Explanatory Notes to Restated Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity
|
k)
|
Certain adjustments and reclassifications were made for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, which are not considered individually or collectively material, affecting
additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficiency.
|
|
l)
|
The recognition of the fair value of certain warrants over the life of the loan from Aqua America resulted in a decrease in additional paid-in capital for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
m)
|
The effects of all other restatement adjustments on the statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 resulted in an increase in net loss of $3,026
and $2,285, respectively. The following table depicts the nature of these restatement adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Loss
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Cumulative
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to apply FIN 46(R)
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
Revenue recognition errors
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
Errors in accounting for warrants
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Error in recording Empire transaction
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Error in recording contract loss reserves
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
Other adjustments, net
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 4Restated Quarterly Financial Statements Unaudited
The following tables set forth the quarterly information as reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each of the quarterly periods in the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and as restated.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
5,199
|
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
$
|
3,773
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
3,576
|
|
|
$
|
1,241
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
6,414
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
12,125
|
|
|
|
11,464
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(6,779
|
)
|
|
|
(9,058
|
)
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
(3,046
|
)
|
|
|
(10,651
|
)
|
|
|
(12,609
|
)
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
(4,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
|
(11,907
|
)
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,708
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
21,485
|
|
F-27
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 4Restated Quarterly Financial Statements Unaudited (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
|
|
$
|
3,936
|
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
Cost of contract revenues
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
5,035
|
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
3,628
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
9,448
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(5,846
|
)
|
|
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
|
|
(8,742
|
)
|
|
|
(9,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(2,280
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(2,073
|
)
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
|
(8,619
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
19,628
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
F-28
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 4Restated Quarterly Financial Statements Unaudited (continued)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
51,218
|
|
|
$
|
51,218
|
|
|
$
|
48,364
|
|
|
$
|
48,864
|
|
|
$
|
38,707
|
|
|
$
|
39,207
|
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
9,422
|
|
|
|
8,402
|
|
|
|
6,634
|
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
|
8,988
|
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
|
|
11,443
|
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
Current portion of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
64,636
|
|
|
|
63,605
|
|
|
|
60,085
|
|
|
|
58,704
|
|
|
|
54,163
|
|
|
|
52,051
|
|
|
|
52,692
|
|
|
|
48,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
|
|
15,818
|
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
17,330
|
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
|
|
21,792
|
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
24,885
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,981
|
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
|
|
10,649
|
|
|
|
15,565
|
|
|
|
12,497
|
|
|
|
19,849
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
6,369
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
5,818
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
5,818
|
|
|
|
7,177
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
|
|
7,295
|
|
|
|
13,673
|
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
25,039
|
|
|
|
16,786
|
|
|
|
31,220
|
|
|
|
21,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
87,745
|
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
|
|
$
|
84,407
|
|
|
$
|
81,785
|
|
|
$
|
91,699
|
|
|
$
|
88,686
|
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,786
|
|
|
$
|
1,786
|
|
|
$
|
3,711
|
|
|
$
|
3,711
|
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
6,797
|
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
8,934
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Deferred revenue - affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
|
|
7,365
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
9,719
|
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
|
7,836
|
|
|
|
8,556
|
|
|
|
16,018
|
|
|
|
18,386
|
|
|
|
18,923
|
|
|
|
18,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
95,448
|
|
|
|
95,287
|
|
|
|
97,374
|
|
|
|
95,621
|
|
|
|
106,351
|
|
|
|
104,598
|
|
|
|
110,354
|
|
|
|
110,193
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(17,442
|
)
|
|
|
(19,915
|
)
|
|
|
(19,231
|
)
|
|
|
(22,412
|
)
|
|
|
(29,099
|
)
|
|
|
(34,393
|
)
|
|
|
(30,535
|
)
|
|
|
(35,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
78,026
|
|
|
|
75,392
|
|
|
|
76,571
|
|
|
|
73,229
|
|
|
|
75,681
|
|
|
|
70,226
|
|
|
|
79,289
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
87,745
|
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
|
|
$
|
84,407
|
|
|
$
|
81,785
|
|
|
$
|
91,699
|
|
|
$
|
88,686
|
|
|
$
|
98,212
|
|
|
$
|
92,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,386
|
|
|
$
|
3,386
|
|
|
$
|
66,310
|
|
|
$
|
66,310
|
|
|
$
|
59,717
|
|
|
$
|
59,717
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
5,014
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
8,735
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
12,770
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,508
|
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
7,957
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Current portion of notes receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
9,612
|
|
|
|
9,550
|
|
|
|
76,018
|
|
|
|
74,416
|
|
|
|
73,476
|
|
|
|
71,246
|
|
|
|
67,454
|
|
|
|
66,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
10,892
|
|
|
|
11,522
|
|
|
|
11,868
|
|
|
|
12,435
|
|
|
|
13,707
|
|
|
|
14,710
|
|
|
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
15,112
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
10,453
|
|
|
|
10,685
|
|
|
|
11,252
|
|
|
|
12,454
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
12,227
|
|
|
|
13,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivable
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled receivables, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Patent costs, net
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Investment in affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,569
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
|
|
4,773
|
|
|
|
8,107
|
|
|
|
6,718
|
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
7,126
|
|
|
|
10,371
|
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
27,157
|
|
|
$
|
24,776
|
|
|
$
|
94,810
|
|
|
$
|
92,386
|
|
|
$
|
94,405
|
|
|
$
|
91,829
|
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,581
|
|
|
$
|
1,581
|
|
|
$
|
2,389
|
|
|
$
|
2,389
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue and advances
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Current portion of contract loss reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
10,240
|
|
|
|
10,244
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
6,378
|
|
|
|
5,654
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Contract loss reserve, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
Redeemable convertible Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
6,529
|
|
|
|
6,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
21,512
|
|
|
|
20,264
|
|
|
|
6,714
|
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
|
|
6,952
|
|
|
|
6,228
|
|
|
|
10,315
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
10,134
|
|
|
|
9,955
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,555
|
|
|
|
94,394
|
|
|
|
94,693
|
|
|
|
94,532
|
|
|
|
95,002
|
|
|
|
94,885
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficiency
|
|
|
(4,489
|
)
|
|
|
(5,443
|
)
|
|
|
(6,479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,707
|
)
|
|
|
(7,260
|
)
|
|
|
(8,951
|
)
|
|
|
(15,285
|
)
|
|
|
(17,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
|
|
4,512
|
|
|
|
88,096
|
|
|
|
86,707
|
|
|
|
87,453
|
|
|
|
85,601
|
|
|
|
79,737
|
|
|
|
77,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
27,157
|
|
|
$
|
24,776
|
|
|
$
|
94,810
|
|
|
$
|
92,386
|
|
|
$
|
94,405
|
|
|
$
|
91,829
|
|
|
$
|
90,052
|
|
|
$
|
87,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 4Restated Quarterly Financial Statements Unaudited (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Gain on sale to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,094
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(599
|
)
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
(1,357
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,515
|
)
|
|
|
(1,762
|
)
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
|
(2,733
|
)
|
|
|
(2,874
|
)
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|
|
(8,188
|
)
|
|
|
(6,133
|
)
|
|
|
(13,256
|
)
|
|
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
(2,069
|
)
|
|
|
(2,162
|
)
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(4,489
|
)
|
|
|
(5,347
|
)
|
|
|
(8,705
|
)
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,192
|
)
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
|
|
(6,214
|
)
|
|
|
(6,169
|
)
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,256
|
)
|
|
|
(9,629
|
)
|
|
|
(10,845
|
)
|
|
|
(11,592
|
)
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
(2,296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(1,929
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
|
(6,997
|
)
|
|
|
(5,703
|
)
|
|
|
(16,696
|
)
|
|
|
(15,360
|
)
|
|
|
(19,111
|
)
|
|
|
(18,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
51,218
|
|
|
$
|
51,218
|
|
|
$
|
47,570
|
|
|
$
|
48,864
|
|
|
$
|
37,871
|
|
|
$
|
39,207
|
|
|
$
|
35,456
|
|
|
$
|
36,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 4Restated Quarterly Financial Statements Unaudited (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
As
Previously
Reported
|
|
|
As
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,833
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Issuance of warrants for services
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Write off of loan acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
(4,335
|
)
|
|
|
(5,479
|
)
|
|
|
(5,822
|
)
|
|
|
(4,486
|
)
|
|
|
(8,783
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
Net book value of systems sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
(2,260
|
)
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
(2,597
|
)
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net provided by cash (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
(2,546
|
)
|
|
|
(2,514
|
)
|
|
|
(7,109
|
)
|
|
|
(6,759
|
)
|
|
|
(12,361
|
)
|
|
|
(11,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,077
|
)
|
|
|
(2,076
|
)
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(3,915
|
)
|
|
|
(4,265
|
)
|
|
|
(3,942
|
)
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
(3,992
|
)
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
|
|
(3,941
|
)
|
|
|
(4,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,296
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
|
|
75,178
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Loan origination fees
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(8,959
|
)
|
|
|
(8,959
|
)
|
|
|
(8,984
|
)
|
|
|
(8,984
|
)
|
|
|
(9,095
|
)
|
|
|
(9,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
68,237
|
|
|
|
68,119
|
|
|
|
68,094
|
|
|
|
68,094
|
|
|
|
68,145
|
|
|
|
68,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
63,586
|
|
|
|
63,586
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
56,993
|
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
|
|
51,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
3,386
|
|
|
$
|
3,386
|
|
|
$
|
66,310
|
|
|
$
|
66,310
|
|
|
$
|
59,717
|
|
|
$
|
59,717
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
$
|
54,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 5Acquisition
On September 14, 2007, a newly formed subsidiary of the Company acquired 100% of the business of Mobile Process Technology Co., an Arkansas corporation based in Memphis, Tennessee, through the means of a merger
agreement, and upon completion of the merger and acquisition, the business was renamed Basin Water-MPT, Inc. (MPT). MPT is a provider of technology and services to the water treatment and industrial process markets.
The aggregate purchase price was approximately $12,200, consisting of approximately $6,900 of cash and 462,746 shares of Company common stock with a fair
value of approximately $5,300. The fair value of the common stock issued was determined based on the average closing market price of the Companys common stock over the period beginning five business days before and ending five business days
after the terms of the acquisition were agreed upon and announced.
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,585
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
15,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,754
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(3,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
12,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net assets acquired in the table above represent cash consideration of approximately $6,200
(net of cash acquired), approximately $700 of cash acquired included in current assets above and common stock consideration of approximately $5,300. The purchase price was allocated to net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their
estimated fair values, with approximately $4,200 allocated to intangible assets with a weighted-average useful life of approximately 11 years.
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $1,250 of the cash portion of the purchase price was placed into an escrow account as a reserve for unidentified liabilities of the acquired business. This balance was subsequently released in
full to the former shareholders of MPT during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
In addition, $750 of the cash portion of the
purchase price was placed into an escrow account until the working capital of MPT at the date of acquisition was finalized. In February 2008, $326 was released from the escrow account to the Company, reducing the purchase price, and the balance of
the working capital escrow account was released to the former shareholders of MPT.
Such intangible assets consist of a covenant not to
compete in the amount of $322 (three year useful life), trade name in the amount of $180 (two year useful life), service agreements and contracts in the amount of $1,355 (six year useful life), customer relationships in the amount of $569 (15 year
useful life) and patents in the amount of $1,812 (17 year useful life). The excess of the net purchase price over the estimated fair value of assets acquired was approximately $6,300, which was recorded as non-tax deductible goodwill.
F-33
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 5Acquisition (continued)
The results of MPTs operations have been included in the Companys consolidated financial
statements since it was acquired on September 14, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations table
below reflects the results of operations of the Company and MPT for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, as if the acquisition of MPT had occurred at the inception of each of the periods presented. Unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the transaction been consummated as of the date indicated or had the entities been a single entity during these periods. The unaudited
pro forma statements of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited pro forma)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
14,075
|
|
|
$
|
18,928
|
|
|
$
|
16,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Note 6Earnings Per Share
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share
, the Company reports earnings per share (EPS) by computing both basic
and diluted EPS. Basic EPS measures the Companys performance for a reporting period by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS
measures the Companys performance for a reporting period by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Common stock
equivalents consist of all potentially dilutive common shares, such as stock options and warrants, which are convertible into shares of common stock.
The Company incurred a net loss for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. As a result, approximately 529,000 and 719,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, as well as 823,000 and
1,034,000 warrants and 0 and 908,000 shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS in 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to the antidilutive effect of such common stock equivalents.
F-34
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 6Earnings Per Share (continued)
Also, approximately 105,000 stock options have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for
2007, and approximately 414,000 stock options and 50,000 warrants have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for 2006 as the exercise prices of such options and warrants were higher than the weighted average price of the Companys
common stock during those years. The following tables contain a reconciliation of the numerators (net income or loss) and denominators (weighted average shares) used in both basic and diluted EPS calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
2005
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share - assuming dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(18,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
Add shares issued on assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,185
|
|
|
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
12,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7Concentrations of Risk
Cash
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its
cash and cash equivalents with high-credit quality financial institutions. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had cash balances of $35,975 and $54,567, respectively, in excess
of the FDIC insured limit. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash equivalent accounts.
F-35
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 7Concentrations of Risk (continued)
Major Customers
In 2007, the Company had two customers from which it received approximately 36% of revenues. The largest customer represented 24% of revenues. In 2006, the Company had two customers from which it received
approximately 59% of revenues. The largest customer represented 38% of revenues. In 2005, the Company had four customers from which it received approximately 71% of revenues. The largest customer represented 34% of revenues. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, accounts receivable from these same customers amounted to 12% and 55% of total accounts receivable, respectively.
Note 8Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of raw materials and supplies used in the fabrication of the Companys groundwater treatment units,
as well as the reprocessing and conditioning of resins. Inventory items are stated at the lower of cost, on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. Physical counts of inventory items are conducted periodically to help verify the balance of
inventory. A reserve is maintained for obsolete inventory, if appropriate. The Company considers inventory to be obsolete when it is no longer usable as a system component. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the value of the Companys
inventory was $976 and $676, respectively, net of reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventory of $79 and $38, respectively.
Note 9Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
2006
(Restated)
|
Water treatment facilities
|
|
$
|
11,437
|
|
$
|
9,436
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
423
|
Vehicles and trailers
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
206
|
Software and other
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
186
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
95
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,885
|
|
|
15,112
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
22,650
|
|
$
|
13,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment was $766, $538, and $435 for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-36
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 10Equipment Placed with Customers
As discussed in Note 2, for those systems not sold to customers, the Company retains ownership of such systems and bills the customers a fixed monthly
amount, which represents a return of the capital value of the installed system. These long-term contract arrangements are classified as operating leases, and the systems are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, typically 20 years.
Equipment under such long-term arrangements and the related accumulated depreciation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Equipment on long-term contracts
|
|
$
|
11,437
|
|
$
|
9,436
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment on long-term contracts - net
|
|
$
|
10,390
|
|
$
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the systems placed under these long-term arrangements was $508, $407 and
$340 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Companys long-term contract arrangement terms are
generally for five to ten years, with an option to renew or to purchase the system. The purchase option is not a bargain purchase. As of December 31, 2007, scheduled minimum future contract revenues on these operating lease arrangements with
original terms of one year or longer are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,724
|
2009
|
|
|
1,467
|
2010
|
|
|
1,115
|
2011
|
|
|
808
|
2012
|
|
|
618
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,962
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had no contingent long-term contract revenues during any of the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Note 11Other Assets
Goodwill
The table below summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
Acquisition of business during the period
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 11Other Assets (continued)
Long-term Unbilled Receivables
The Company has two customer system sales agreements which provide for payment terms ranging from two to five years, unless certain conditions are met, in
which case the payment terms are accelerated. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the amount of long-term unbilled receivable was $3,653 and $5,816, respectively, which represents the balance due from these two customers under the extended payment
terms.
In 2004, in connection with the sale of a system, the Company received a $300 unsecured note that provides for interest at a rate
of 3% per annum. The Company received a payment of $200 in connection with this note in 2005. The final principal payment of $100 became due in 2006, and as such, the note has been classified as current. The Company has recorded an allowance
for doubtful accounts of $65 of this note as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. Both the note and the related allowance for doubtful accounts have been classified as current assets and are included in the accounts receivable balance at
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Intangible Assets
Net intangible assets are as shown in the following table as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Deferred stock based compensation
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
$
|
346
|
Service agreements and contracts
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
Covenant not to compete
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
Loan costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization period of intangible assets are as follows: customer relationships15 years;
covenant not to competethree years; trade nametwo years; service agreements and contractssix years; and deferred stock-based compensationthree years.
Patent Costs
The Company capitalizes costs of patent applications. As a result of the
September 2007 acquisition of MPT, the Company recorded an additional $1,812 representing the fair value of patents acquired. When patents are issued, the Company amortizes the patent cost over the life of the patent, usually 17 years. Future
amortization of patent costs at December 31, 2007 is approximately $107 per year for each of the five years ended December 31, 2008 through 2013, and $107 each year thereafter through 2024. If a patent is denied, capitalized patent costs
are written off in the period in which a patent application is denied.
Investment in Empire Water Corporation (Empire)
In May 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire certain water rights and related assets. In December 2007, the Company sold to Empire its
rights to purchase certain collective assets from unrelated parties including (a) a canal located in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in Southern California that is approximately eighteen miles in length, (b) rights to pump water from
the San Bernardino Basin, and (c) other equipment and tangible and intangible personal property of the sellers. As consideration for the sale of these assets, the Company received 6,000,000 shares of Empire common stock, which represents an
ownership interest of approximately 32% in Empire as of December 31, 2007.
F-38
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 11Other Assets (continued)
The Company recorded the transaction under the equity method; therefore, under EITF 01-2 the Company
recorded a partial gain of approximately $3,100 on the transaction. The Company determined the gain by (1) estimating the fair value of such stock based upon concurrent sales of Empire common stock to third parties; (2) subtracting the
Companys basis in the assets sold; and (3) reducing the resulting gain by the Companys ownership interest in Empire. This reduction of approximately $1,500 has been recorded as deferred revenueaffiliate in the consolidated
balance sheet of the Company at December 31, 2007.
In addition, the Company has concluded that the assets sold under the agreement
did not constitute the sale of a business as contemplated by EITF 98-3, as the rights conveyed to Empire were not an integrated set of activities and assets conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return or other economic benefits. The
Company also does not believe the transaction was covered under SAB Topic 5.U., as 1) Empire is not a highly leveraged entity; 2) the underlying assets sold to Empire have historically produced cash flows; 3) substantial capital has been raised by
Empire from outside investors; and 4) the Company does not have any actual or implied commitment to support Empire. According to Empires Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, Empire raised a total of $4,750 in financing
through June 2008 and had $1,300 in cash as of June 30, 2008. Empire also disclosed that it intends to raise an additional $16,000 or joint venture its assets with a municipal or financial partner to fully implement its plan of operation. The
Company is not aware of any parties obliged to provide Empire with financial support in the future.
The Company has recorded its
investment in Empire at approximately $4,500, while the amount of underlying equity in the net assets of Empire is approximately $3,100. The difference of approximately $1,500 represents the excess of the market value of the Companys
investment in Empire over the Companys 32% interest in the net assets of Empire.
As of December 31, 2007, Empire had assets of
$9,460 and liabilities of $101. For the six months ended December 31, 2007, Empire had $0 revenue and net losses of $11. For the year ended June 30, 2007, Empire had $0 revenue and net losses of $33.
The following table presents summarized information as to the assets and liabilities for Empire at December 31, 2007 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
Land and water rights
|
|
|
6,280
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
100
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
9,360
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12Notes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Notes payable to a finance company, non-interest bearing, due in monthly installments through March 2014
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aqua note, interest payable semi-annually at 7.0% per annum, principal due in full in May 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Contract payable to a financing company in monthly installments including interest at 1.9% per annum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
Less: current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Less: unamortized discount on Aqua note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aqua Note
In February 2006, the Company issued a $2,000 subordinated note to Aqua America, Inc. (the Aqua Note). The Aqua Note was secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, including its water contracts and
water services agreements. The Aqua Note accrued interest at a rate of 7.0% per annum, payable on a semiannual basis beginning July 1, 2006. The Aqua Note matured on May 11, 2007 and was repaid in full, including all accrued interest.
In connection with an anticipated nationwide strategic relationship with Aqua America and issuance of the Aqua Note, the Company issued to
Aqua America a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share. These
F-39
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 12Notes Payable (continued)
warrants are immediately exercisable and expire on the earliest of November 11, 2008 and immediately prior to a change in control of the Company. The
Company has applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
, to the warrants issued to Aqua America. Accordingly, the total fair value of the warrants issued is approximately $406. The fair value of this warrant was
amortized over the term of the Aqua Note (see Note 3).
Notes Payable to a Finance Company
In June 2007, the Company sold 10 of its water treatment systems to a special purpose entity, VL Capital (VLC). The total sales price was $3,853,
consisting of $500 in cash to be paid to the Company plus notes issued by VLC to the Company payable in 72 monthly installments of $56 beginning April 2008, with a net present value of $3,353, calculated using an imputed interest rate of
5.0% per annum.
VLC, in turn, received a loan of $500 from a finance company to fund the cash payment to the Company. This
non-interest bearing loan is due in nine monthly installments of $63 plus 71 monthly installments of $7 beginning August 2008.
The Company
has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46(R), the financial statements of VLC should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Accordingly, both the sale of equipment to VLC and the notes receivable
from VLC have been eliminated in consolidation, and the Company has now included in its consolidated financial statements the notes payable by VLC to the finance company. As of December 31, 2007, there was $352 outstanding under the notes payable.
Repayment of Notes Payable
Pursuant to the terms of a business loan agreement with BWCA I, LLC (the BWCA loan), after completion of the Companys initial public offering in May 2006, the Company repaid $4,000 to BWCA I, LLC, plus all accrued interest. In
addition, the remaining unamortized fair value of warrants issued to the lender in connection with the BWCA loan in the amount of $400 was written off in the second quarter of 2006, as the principal on the loan was repaid in full.
In accordance with the terms of the $5,000 in subordinated notes payable to The Co-Investment 2000 Fund, L.P., Cross Atlantic Technology Fund II, L.P.
and Catalyst Basin Water, LLC (the XACP Notes), after completion of the Companys initial public offering in May 2006, the Company repaid in full the XACP Notes, plus all accrued interest. In addition, the remaining unamortized fair value of
warrants issued in connection with the XACP Notes in the amount of $1,100 was written off in the second quarter of 2006, as these notes were repaid in full.
Also, the remaining unamortized loan costs of $400 for the BWCA loan and the XACP Notes were written off in the second quarter of 2006, as the principal amount of these debt instruments was repaid in full.
F-40
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 13Capital Lease Obligations
The Company leases vehicles and certain office equipment under capital leases. The economic substance of the leases is that the Company is financing the
acquisitions of vehicles and equipment through leases and, accordingly, they are recorded in the Companys assets and liabilities. Included in depreciation expense is amortization of vehicles and equipment held under capital leases. At
December 31, 2007, the net book value of assets subject to capital leases was $26. The following is a schedule by year of the future minimum lease payments required under capital leases together with their present value as of December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
2008
|
|
$
|
11
|
2009
|
|
|
11
|
2010
|
|
|
4
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future capital lease payments
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Net present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
26
|
Less: current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14Contract Loss Reserve
During the latter half of 2006 and in 2007, the Company analyzed operating results for each water service agreement (WSA) and determined that certain,
generally older contracts were operating at net cash flow losses. Under the WSAs, the Company provides to its customers operations and maintenance services for water treatment units previously sold or leased to those customers. These contracts have
sustained increasing operating costs such as waste disposal and salt purchase costs as the direct result of higher fuel, salt and other third-party costs. These contracts did not allow for the renegotiation of terms to recover such increased costs.
Management determined that these contracts would continue to generate net operating cash flow losses through the end of the contract period, and those additional contracts that were not yet operational, but which were scheduled to go on-line
thereafter, could have similar problems. Accordingly, the Company recorded a reserve for future contract losses in the amount of $3,700 in the fourth quarter of 2006. This amount represented the losses expected over the remaining term of the initial
period of these contracts and does not include renewal periods, if any, related to such contracts. Actual losses on the underlying contracts are being charged against the reserve as incurred.
During 2007, as these contracts progressed and additional older legacy contracts became operational and were operated during the busy, higher volume
summer months it became apparent by the third quarter of 2007 that the original reserve was not adequate. Based on the new operating history, especially during the third quarter of 2007, the Company determined that the original reserve was not
adequate. Management reviewed each contracts financial performance and identified the future expected losses for these contracts, resulting in a $6,800 (as restated, as described in the following paragraph) increase to the reserve (offset by
$1,400 of actual contract losses charged against the reserve) which was charged to cost of contract revenues during the third quarter of 2007.
F-41
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 14Contract Loss Reserve (continued)
The Company has determined that an error was made in the calculation of the reserve for contract
losses at September 30, 2007. Specifically, with regard to one of its service contracts, it was assumed that a possible facility expansion would result in higher service fees to the customer, thus eliminating estimated operating losses on this
contract beyond 2008. This expansion (and anticipated fee adjustment) was not contractually committed to and therefore should not have been considered in estimating the required contract loss reserve at September 30, 2007. As a result, the
Company has increased the reserve for contract losses (and the related cost of contract revenues) in the restated consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 by approximately $1,800 to correct this error.
As part of its customary process and in connection with the preparation of its financial statements for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, the Company conducted its review of the adequacy of the reserve for contract losses. Based on the results of that review, which included the benefit of additional operating history, the Company determined that the overall contract loss reserve
as of that date (as restated) required only minor adjustment. As part of the process, certain adjustments were necessary to reallocate the total contract loss reserve to specific contracts to give effect to current estimates of future losses for
such contracts. Included in the total contract loss reserve at June 30, 2008 is approximately $1,300 related to service contracts for water treatment systems which have not yet become operational but are anticipated to go online in the future.
In December 2007, other than in contracts that had been previously negotiated, we began including provisions in our WSAs that allowed for
us to pass through certain increased costs (primarily costs related to salt and waste transportation) to our customers.
These reserve
amounts are being reversed (or applied) as actual losses are incurred on the underlying contracts. The reserve for contract losses included in the restated consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 was approximately $9,100. The changes
in the reserve for contract losses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
|
$
|
|
Additions to contract loss reserve
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
Actual contract losses charged against the reserve
|
|
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
9,112
|
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
$
|
2,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,321
|
Long-term
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,112
|
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 15Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(2,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,096
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,229
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,569
|
)
|
|
|
(2,643
|
)
|
|
|
(1,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,910
|
)
|
|
|
(2,087
|
)
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
State
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,681
|
)
|
|
|
(2,668
|
)
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal income tax impact
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
Less: impact of valuation allowance
|
|
(39.1
|
)%
|
|
(39.3
|
)%
|
|
(43.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, the Company has Federal and state income tax net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $24,900 and $24,500, respectively. The Federal net operating losses begin to expire in 2020. The California net operating losses have been suspended for two years and will begin to expire in 2010. Pursuant to the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the utilization of Federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards in future years may be subject to substantial annual limitations if a change of more than 50% in the ownership of the Company occurs. The
Company has determined that, through the year ended December 31, 2007, there has been no ownership change of more than 50%. Accordingly, all NOL carryforwards are available to the Company.
F-43
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 15Income Taxes (continued)
The following summarizes the Companys net deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL carryforwards
|
|
$
|
10,521
|
|
|
$
|
7,146
|
|
Contract loss reserve
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
Capital gain
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other reserves and allowances
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Other
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
17,085
|
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Deferred state taxes
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
Revenue recognition
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(4,893
|
)
|
|
|
(3,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12,192
|
)
|
|
|
(7,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 common shares of $0.001 par value
common stock, of which approximately 21.9 million and 19.9 million shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, there were also options outstanding to purchase
1,710,250 shares of common stock, and warrants outstanding to purchase 1,397,622 shares of common stock. Also, as of December 31, 2007, there were approximately 5,600,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of all
options, warrants and for future issuances under the 2006 Option Plan.
Initial Public Offering
In May 2006, the Company registered for sale and sold 6,900,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a price of $12.00 per share in its initial
public offering. After underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses in the amount of $7,600, the net proceeds from the Companys initial public offering were approximately $75,200.
After the initial public offering, the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a total of 100,000,000 authorized
shares of common stock, $0.001 par value. Also, immediately prior to the initial public offering, the Company reincorporated in Delaware.
F-44
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 16Stockholders Equity (continued)
Other Sales of Common Stock
During the period from May 2005 through September 2005, the Company sold 717,000 shares of no par value common stock at a price of $5.00 per share. After
offering costs in the amount of $1, the net proceeds from these stock sales were approximately $3,584.
Issuance of Non-Vested Stock
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued non-vested common stock grants to certain of its
officers and management, as well as to the members of its Board of Directors. The grants to officers and management are subject to a three-year vesting period from date of grant, with one-third of the stock vesting on the anniversary dates of the
grants each year during the three-year period. The grants to directors are subject to a one-year vesting period.
The fair value of these
non-vested stock grants is based on the grant date closing price of the Companys common stock, and is recorded as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of each grant, with a corresponding credit to
common stock and additional paid-in capital.
The fair value of non-vested common stock granted in 2007 and 2006 was $641 and $1,886,
respectively. The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized was $875 and $93 during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the amount of unamortized grant date fair value of
non-vested stock grants was $1,560 and $1,788, respectively. The unamortized amount of grant date fair value at December 31, 2007 will be amortized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
Repurchase of Common Stock
In May 2007, the
Companys Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock in the market from time to time.
In November 2007, the Company repurchased 85,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $6.45 per share. These repurchased shares have been classified as treasury stock on the Companys balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.
Note 17Related Party Transactions
The Company paid legal fees to a legal firm whose partner is a director. The total payments for legal fees to this firm were $315, $192 and $154 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company also leases office space and equipment from two individuals, one of whom was a director and employee and the other an employee in 2007, under
month-to-month agreements. The total payments under these related party rental agreements were $57, $54 and $55 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In May 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire
certain water rights and related assets. In December 2007, the Company sold its rights to purchase these assets to Empire. As consideration for the sale of these assets, the Company received 6,000,000 shares of Empire common stock, which represents
an ownership interest of approximately 32% in Empire as of December 31, 2007.
The Company accounted for the December 2007 transaction
under the equity method. Specifically, the Company recorded $3,094 as gain on sale to affiliate upon the receipt of the shares of Empire common stock by (1) estimating the fair value of such stock based upon concurrent sales of Empire common stock
to third parties; (2) subtracting the Companys basis in the assets sold; and (3) reducing the resulting gain by the Companys ownership interest in Empire.
In addition, Empire agreed to purchase one water treatment system from the Company concurrent with the December 2007 closing for a total price of $900. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a $600 receivable
due from
F-45
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 18Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Empire on June 30, 2008 associated with this system sale. The receivable balance was subsequently paid to the Company on June 30, 2008. During the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $653 of system sales revenue and $287 of gross margin on this transaction under the percentage-of-completion method of revenue recognition. The Company has recorded $92 as a charge against other
income under the equity method, which represents 32% of the Companys gross margin on this system sale to a related party.
The
following information supplements the Companys consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
11,682
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition (net of cash acquired)
|
|
$
|
6,214
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisition
|
|
$
|
5,266
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for services and other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,941
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans
2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan
In May 2006,
the Company adopted the Basin Water 2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan, or 2006 Equity Plan. The 2006 Equity Plan became effective immediately prior to the completion of the initial public offering in May 2006. The 2006 Equity Plan replaces the 2001
Stock Option Plan. Under the 2006 Equity Plan, 2,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock were initially reserved for issuance. During 2007, the authorized number of shares under the 2006 Equity Plan was increase by approximately 995,000
shares. As of December 31, 2007, there were 2,451,925 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2006 Equity Plan. Options issued under the plan are issued at the closing price of the stock on the date of the grant. Option grants
are generally exercisable over three years, starting one year from the date of grant, and they expire 10 years from the date of grant.
Prior to becoming a publicly traded company in May 2006, the Company granted stock options with exercise prices equal to the estimated fair value of its common stock. However, to the extent that the deemed fair value of the common stock
exceeded the exercise price of stock options on the grant date, the Company recorded deferred stock-based compensation expense and amortizes the expense over the vesting period of the options. The fair value of the Companys common stock was
determined by the Board. In the absence of a public trading market for the Companys common stock, the Board considered both objective and subjective factors in determining the fair value of the Companys common stock and related stock
options. Consistent with the guidance provided by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in its Technical Practice Aid (TPA) entitled
The Valuation of Privately Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation
, such
considerations included, but were not limited to, the following factors:
|
|
|
The liquidation preference, anti-dilution and redemption rights of the preferred stock and the lack of such rights for the common stock;
|
F-46
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued)
|
|
|
The per share price for concurrent or recent sales of common stock and redeemable convertible preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
Historical performance and operating results at the time of the grant;
|
|
|
|
Expected future earnings performance;
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
Stage of development and business strategy;
|
|
|
|
Marketplace developments and major competition;
|
|
|
|
Market barriers to entry;
|
|
|
|
Strategic relationships with third parties;
|
|
|
|
Size of workforce and related skills;
|
|
|
|
The illiquidity of the common stock; and
|
|
|
|
The likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the shares of common stock, such as an initial public offering or a sale.
|
In connection with the Companys initial public offering, the Company re-evaluated the historical fair value of its common stock. As a result of
this re-evaluation, the Company recorded deferred stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 in the amount of $401 and $229, respectively, which represents the difference between the exercise price of stock options
granted in the first quarter of 2006 and in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the revised fair value of the common stock underlying such options on the date of grant.
Pursuant to FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 28, the Company is amortizing these deferred compensation amounts using the straight-line attribution method over the vesting period of the options, which is generally
three years. As a result of the amortization of the deferred compensation amounts, the Company recorded $205, $205 and $31 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Change in Accounting Principle
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
. This statement requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards in financial statements.
Under the provisions of SFAS No.123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employees requisite service period
(generally the vesting period of the award). The Company elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided under SFAS No.123(R). This method applies to all new awards or awards modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after
January 1, 2006. Accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented herein have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
, and related interpretations. In addition, the Company complied with the disclosure only requirements of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
, as
amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure
.
F-47
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued)
Had the Company accounted for stock-based compensation awards issued prior to 2006 using the fair
value based accounting method described in SFAS No. 123 for the periods prior to fiscal year 2006, the Companys net income per share for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2005
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
Add: employee stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income
|
|
|
31
|
|
Less: stock-based compensation expense determined using the fair-value accounting method
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
The Company estimated the fair value of stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 using the Black-Scholes method. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant,
the expected option term, the risk free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility of the Companys common stock over the expected option term, and the expected annual dividend yield on the Companys common stock.
The fair value of each option grant during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was estimated on the date of grant using
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
Expected option term in years
|
|
5.0 to 7.0
|
|
6.5 to 7.5
|
|
0.8 to 7.5
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
4.5% to 4.8%
|
|
4.3% to 5.0%
|
|
4.0% to 4.2%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
26.9% to 28.4%
|
|
28.3% to 29.6%
|
|
30.0%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
F-48
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued)
The expected option term in years was calculated using an average of the vesting period and the
option term, in accordance with the simplified method for plain vanilla stock options allowed under Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107. The risk free interest rate is the rate on a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a
remaining term equal to the expected option term. The expected volatility was derived from an industry-based index, in accordance with the calculated value method allowed under SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities to estimate the number of forfeitures expected to occur and record expense based upon the number of awards
expected to vest. Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred, as permitted under SFAS No. 123. The cumulative effect of adopting the method change of estimating forfeitures is not material
to the Companys financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Stock Option Activity
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except exercise prices)
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
Granted
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
Exercised
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
1.48
|
Forfeited
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
Granted
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
Exercised
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
2.36
|
Forfeited
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
$
|
5.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except exercise prices)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
841
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life in years
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
6.1
|
Weighted average exercise price per share
|
|
$
|
5.85
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
Aggregate intrinsic value (at December 31, 2007 closing price of $8.27 per share)
|
|
$
|
4,138
|
|
$
|
3,919
|
F-49
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued)
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the
difference between the Companys closing stock price as of December 31, 2007 and the weighted average exercise price multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised
their options on December 31, 2007. This intrinsic value will vary as the Companys stock price fluctuates.
The weighted average
grant-date fair value of options granted by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $2.94 and $1.88 per share, respectively.
Compensation expense arising from stock option grants was $626 and $539 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, all of which expense was included in selling, general and administrative
expense for each year. No related income tax benefit was recorded as the Company has significant net operating loss carryforwards (see Note 15).
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $1,588 of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years. The total fair value of options vested during the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $195 and $494, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Number of
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life of Options
Outstanding
|
|
Number of
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
$0.83 - $1.33
|
|
247
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
3.7 yrs
|
|
247
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
$4.00
|
|
308
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
6.4 yrs
|
|
292
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
$5.00
|
|
325
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
7.6 yrs
|
|
271
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
$6.79 - $9.00
|
|
725
|
|
$
|
7.87
|
|
9.3 yrs
|
|
31
|
|
$
|
8.49
|
$9.87 - $12.29
|
|
105
|
|
$
|
11.33
|
|
9.6 yrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
$
|
5.85
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 was $1,736 and $629, respectively.
F-50
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 19Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued)
Non-vested Stock
Under the 2006 Equity Plan, the Company has granted non-vested common stock to management, officers and directors, which is subject only to a service condition. In general, such non-vested stock vests over three years
for management and one year for directors. The total cumulative number of shares of non-vested stock granted under the 2006 Equity Plan through December 31, 2007 is 283,125, of which 70,999 shares had vested as of December 31, 2007.
The fair value of non-vested stock is measured at the date of grant based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock on
that date, and such fair value is recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite vesting period. Compensation expense arising from grants of non-vested stock during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $875 and $93,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $1,560 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock grants is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
2001 Stock Option Plan
On August 27,
2001, the Company established the Basin Water 2001 Stock Option Plan. Under the plan, 900,000 shares of the Companys common stock were initially reserved for issuance upon exercise of options pursuant to the plan. In June 2005, the plan was
amended to increase the number of shares of Company common stock reserved for issuance to 2,100,000. In May 2006, the 2001 Stock Option Plan was replaced by the 2006 Equity Plan, and no further shares may be issued from the 2001 Stock Option Plan.
Note 20Warrants
From time to
time, the Company has issued common stock warrants to non-employees in connection with various transactions, primarily the issuance of notes payable (see Note 12). During the year ended December 31, 2007, the holders of 1,350,000 warrants
exercised such warrants, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $8,060. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2007, the holders of 56,066 warrants elected cashless exercise of such warrants, and the Company issued 38,995 shares
of common stock in these cashless exercises. A summary of common stock warrant activity during the three years ended December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Balance - January 1, 2005
|
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
4.01
|
Warrants issued
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2005
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
$
|
5.30
|
Warrants issued
|
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
6.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2006
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
$
|
5.48
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2007
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
$
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 20Warrants (continued)
The Company has applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to estimate the fair market value of
both the common stock and preferred stock warrants on the date of issuance using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.5 to 3.0
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The expected life in years was calculated using an average of the vesting period and the option
term, in accordance with the simplified method for plain vanilla stock options allowed under SAB 107. The risk-free interest rate is the rate on a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a remaining term equal to the expected
life of the option. The volatility was derived from an industry-based index, in accordance with the calculated-value method allowed under SFAS No. 123(R).
As a result of these computations of the fair value of warrants issued, the following amounts have been recorded in the financial statements:
|
|
|
Warrants to purchase 717,450 shares of stock issued to the lender under the BWCA loan in 2003 and 2004 with an aggregate fair value of $435 have been recorded as a
discount to debt with a corresponding credit to common stock, and this discount was being amortized to interest expense over the life of the BWCA loan until after completion of the Companys initial public offering in May 2006, when the Company
repaid the BWCA loan in full pursuant to the terms of a business loan agreement with BWCA I, LLC. The remaining unamortized fair value of warrants in the amount of $392 was written off in the second quarter of 2006 (see Note 12).
|
|
|
|
Warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of stock issued to the purchasers of the XACP Notes in October 2005 with an aggregate fair value of $1,337 have been recorded
as a discount to debt with a corresponding credit to common stock, and this discount was being amortized to interest expense over the life of the XACP Notes until after completion of the Companys initial public offering in May 2006, when the
Company repaid the XACP Notes in full pursuant to the terms of a business loan agreement with BWCA I, LLC. The remaining unamortized fair value of warrants in the amount of $1,132 was written off in the second quarter of 2006 (see Note 12).
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to a $1,500 binding commitment letter with a customer in September 2005, the customer committed to purchase two of the Companys groundwater treatment
systems. As part of this transaction, the Company granted to the customer a warrant to purchase 180,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.50 per share. This warrant is fully vested upon issuance, and may be exercised for five years
after the date of grant. This warrant has a fair value of $168, which is being recorded as a charge to revenues as the related revenues are recognized. Such charges totaled $14 and $154 during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to a binding commitment letter with Shaw Environmental, Inc. (Shaw) in December 2005, Shaw committed to purchase a total of $5,000 of the Companys
groundwater treatment systems prior to December 31, 2006. As part of that commitment letter, the Company granted to Shaw a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share in connection with Shaws
purchase of the Companys groundwater
|
F-52
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 20Warrants (continued)
|
treatment systems. As of December 31, 2007, no shares had vested under the Shaw warrant. Subsequently, as part of its
September 18, 2008 acquisition of Envirogen from Shaw, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Shaw which cancelled the Shaw warrants.
|
|
|
|
In February 2006, in connection with the consent granted by BWCA I, LLC with respect to the Companys issuance of the Aqua Note, the Company granted to BWCA I,
LLC a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $8.00 per share. This warrant is immediately exercisable and may be exercised for five years after the date of grant. This warrant has a fair value of
$91, and was written off with the repayment of the BWCA loan in the second quarter of 2006 (see Note 12).
|
|
|
|
Warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of stock issued to Aqua America in connection with an anticipated nationwide strategic relationship with Aqua America and
issuance of the Aqua Note in February 2006 with an aggregate fair value of $406 have been recorded as a discount to debt, and the related amortization to interest expense was $140 and $266 in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively (see Note 12).
|
To the extent that the deemed fair value of the common stock exceeds the exercise price of
warrants on the date of the grant, the Company records deferred charges and amortizes such deferred charges over the life of the underlying transaction with which the warrants were issued. Prior to the Companys initial public offering in May
2006, the fair value of the Companys common stock was determined by the Board.
In the absence of a public trading market prior to
the initial public offering for the Companys common stock, the Board considered both objective and subjective factors in determining the fair value of the Companys common stock and related warrants. Consistent with the guidance provided
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in its Technical Practice Aid (TPA) entitled
The Valuation of Privately Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation
, such considerations included, but were not limited to,
the following factors:
|
|
|
The liquidation preference, anti-dilution and redemption rights of the preferred stock and the lack of such rights for the common stock;
|
|
|
|
The per share price for concurrent or recent sales of common stock and redeemable convertible preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
Historical performance and operating results at the time of the grant;
|
|
|
|
Expected future earnings performance;
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
Stage of development and business strategy;
|
|
|
|
Marketplace developments and major competition;
|
|
|
|
Market barriers to entry;
|
|
|
|
Strategic relationships with third parties;
|
|
|
|
Size of workforce and related skills;
|
|
|
|
The illiquidity of the common stock; and
|
|
|
|
The likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the shares of common stock, such as an initial public offering or a sale.
|
F-53
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 20Warrants (continued)
In connection with the Companys initial public offering, the Company re-evaluated the
historical fair value of its common stock. As a result of this re-evaluation, the Company recorded deferred charges for warrants issued during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 in the amounts of $925 and $60, respectively, which
represent the difference between the exercise price of warrants granted in the first quarter of 2006 and in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the revised fair value of the common stock underlying such warrants on the date of grant. Pursuant to FASB
Interpretation (FIN) No. 28, the Company is amortizing such deferred charges over the appropriate period of the underlying transaction.
The deferred charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005 related to the warrants granted to Shaw totaled $60. The Company recorded $39 and $18 of non-cash charges against revenues in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
respectively. There was no amortization of these deferred charges during the year ended December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the remaining unamortized deferred charge related to the Shaw warrants was $3, which was written off in
connection with the cancellation of the warrants in 2008.
Deferred charges recorded in the first quarter of 2006 related to the warrants
granted to BWCA I, LLC totaled $25. The Company amortized this amount in full as non-cash interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Additionally, the Company recorded $900 as a discount to debt in the first quarter of 2006 related to the warrants granted to Aqua America. The Company amortized $309 and $591 of these deferred charges as interest
expense during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 21Commitments and Contingencies
Customer Contracts
The Company has long-term
water treatment contracts with various customers. Under the terms of these contracts, the Company is entitled to monthly standby fees from these customers for periods ranging from three to five years. Additionally, the Company has received
prepayments in conjunction with certain long-term treatment contracts. These prepayments are recorded as deferred revenues. As of December 31, 2007, deferred revenues are expected to be recognized as revenues in future years as follows:
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
2008
|
|
$
|
342
|
2009
|
|
|
235
|
2010
|
|
|
169
|
2011
|
|
|
169
|
2012
|
|
|
164
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 21Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Operating Leases
The Company has entered into operating leases for office space, facilities and equipment. The office space lease agreements provide for extensions of the leases. The facility lease requires payment of common area
maintenance, insurance and property taxes in addition to rental payments. The total gross rental expense for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $441, $254 and $173, respectively. As of
December 31, 2007, the minimum future payments under these operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
2008
|
|
$
|
645
|
2009
|
|
|
737
|
2010
|
|
|
737
|
2011
|
|
|
555
|
2012
|
|
|
408
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation
On or about February 22, 2006, GBM Newco, LLC (GBM), filed a lawsuit against the Company, and its then Chief Executive Officer, Peter L. Jensen, in the District Court of El Paso County, Texas. The lawsuit alleged
that the defendants breached a certain marketing agreement between the parties. The lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, and transferred from that court to the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona. Thereafter, GBM amended its complaint to add claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. On February 13, 2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by the
Company paying GBM $213 in exchange for a Release of All Claims from GBM, and the litigation was dismissed with prejudice on or about February 28, 2008.
On October 26, 2007, Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC and certain other related parties filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division,
naming as defendants Basin Water-MPT, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Basin Water, Inc.) and two of its employees, one of whom is the son of the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer. Subsequently, the plaintiffs amended their
complaint to add as defendants the Company and Michael M. Stark, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, certain claims related to trade secrets and unfair trade practices
relating to treatment of by-products produced as a result of the phosphate mining industry. In December 2008, this litigation and the underlying disputes were resolved by agreement, resulting in a payment by the Company of $230 with the remainder of
the settlement payment being paid by the Companys insurer.
On December 27, 2007 and January 2, 2008, two purported
securities class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company, Peter L. Jensen, Michael M. Stark and Thomas C. Tekulve (collectively referred to as the Basin defendants)
for violations of the Exchange Act. These lawsuits, which contain similar allegations, are captioned
Poulos v. Basin Water, et al
., Case No. CV 07-8359 GW (FFMx) and
Nofer v. Basin Water, et al
., Case No. CV 08-0002 SGL (JCRx). The
lawsuits were subsequently consolidated, and on October 3, 2008 a Consolidated Amended Complaint (CAC) was filed which alleges that the Company deliberately understated the reserves it took for certain unprofitable contracts, and committed
various intentional violations of GAAP during a putative class period between November 14, 2006 and August 8, 2008 (the Federal Lawsuit). The suit does not state a specific amount of damages.
On January 23, 2008, the Company received a letter dated January 17, 2008, from attorneys representing a purported stockholder demanding that
we investigate and remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by certain unnamed officers and directors of the Company. In the demand letter, the attorneys allege that the unnamed officers and directors violated their duties to the Company by, among
other things, participating in or permitting the company to issue false and misleading statements regarding its business and financial results giving rise to the above named lawsuits.
F-55
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 21Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
On January 31, 2008, Loren Charif, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a shareholder
derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino, against certain of the Companys executive officers and its current directors. The complaint assumes the truth of the aforementioned allegations in
the federal securities class action lawsuits and in connection with those allegations alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and violations of California Corporations Code pertaining
to allegations of improper selling. The suit does not state a specific amount of damages. On November 12, 2008, the Company obtained an order staying this action until a final determination occurs in the Federal Lawsuit.
From time to time, the Company is involved in legal and administrative disputes and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which
management believes are not material to the conduct of the Companys business. With respect to these ordinary matters, management believes that the Company has adequate insurance coverage or has made adequate accruals for expected costs, and
the Company may also have effective legal defenses.
Note 22Subsequent Events
Employment Transition and Consulting Agreement
On February 19, 2008 (the Separation
Date), the Company entered into an Employment Transition and Consulting Agreement (the Transition Agreement) with its former chief executive officer. The Transition Agreement provides the former chief executive officer with the following benefits:
(1) he will receive a cash lump sum payment of $423, (2) the Company will pay for his healthcare insurance for 18 months following the Separation Date (or until he accepts employment with another employer providing comparable benefits),
(3) he will be retained as a consultant to the Company for two years after the Separation Date for which he will receive $200 per year (payable each year in 12 equal monthly installments), (4) he will be entitled to receive compensation
for his services as a director in accordance with the Companys Amended and Restated Director Compensation Policy for non-employee directors, (5) he will be entitled to retain all Company personal property, including computer equipment,
printers, cameras and a used Company truck, that is in his possession as of the Separation Date and (6) he will not be entitled to any further benefits under his employment agreement in effect prior to the Separation Date except as provided in
the Transition Agreement.
Goodwill Impairment
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company assessed goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS 142, which requires annual testing for impairment, or more frequent testing if events or circumstances
indicate that carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Companys assessment included analysis using discounted cash flow methods. As a result of this testing, the Company recorded a charge to earnings for goodwill impairment of
approximately $4,952 in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 related to its acquisition of MPT. The primary factors impacting managements assessment of value included slower-than-anticipated growth and a decline in the customer base of
MPT, both of which have resulted in a significant decline in MPTs future revenues and cash flows since its acquisition in September 2007.
Impairment of Investment in Affiliate
Also during the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company assessed its
investment in an affiliate, Empire. This investment in affiliate represents the value of the Companys ownership of approximately 32% in Empire, consisting of 6,000,000 shares of Empire common stock. The Company evaluated this investment
through a combination of methods, including a review of the market trading price of Empires common stock and an analysis of the value of Empires common stock. Based upon current market conditions, Empires financial condition and
the Companys understanding of Empires business prospects, the Company has determined that the carrying value of its investment should be reduced by approximately $2,600 in the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
F-56
BASIN WATER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO RESTATED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 22Subsequent Events (continued)
Acquisition of Envirogen and Settlement of Dispute with Shaw
In September 2008, the Company acquired the bioreactor and biofilter business (Envirogen) of Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (Shaw) for $1,500 million
cash (subject to adjustment for working capital) plus the settlement of a disputed claim against Shaw for amounts Basin Water claimed to be owed by Shaw. The dispute involved an ion exchange unit purchase agreement executed by the Company and Shaw
in December 2005 which was structured as a $5,000 sale of water treatment units by the Company to Shaw in two parts. In the settlement, Shaw relinquished its claims or rights under the 2005 purchase agreement generally, and in particular to the ion
exchange units that were the subject of the agreement. In the transaction, the Company acquired the assets of Envirogen, which includes the design and supply of fluidized bed, membrane, and suspended carrier bioreactors for the treatment of
groundwater and wastewater streams in industrial, municipal and federal applications. The business also includes the design and supply of biofilters for the treatment of air streams from municipalities and industry for the removal of odor-causing
and other contaminants.
Opus Trust Settlement
On February 5, 2009, Basin Water, Inc., BionBasin, Inc. (Bion), Opus Trust, Inc. (Opus Trust) and Martin Benowitz, individually and as Trustee of the Martin A. Benowitz Qualified Profit Sharing Plan (Benowitz),
entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release Agreement (the Settlement Agreement) to settle, among other things, certain claims related to (a) ion exchange units previously sold to Opus Trust by Bion, including a unit that
was damaged by an uninsured motorist, (b) Benowitz acquisition and sale of the Companys common stock and (c) Opus Trusts acquisition of Bion common stock (the Dispute). Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement,
(a) the Company paid $125,000 to Opus Trust and transferred to Opus Trust 150,000 shares of Empire Water Corporation common stock, (b) Opus Trust transferred to the Company all shares of Bion common stock (500,000 shares) held by Opus
Trust and title to the ion exchange units previously sold to Opus Trust, (c) Opus Trust and Benowitz released the Company and Bion from any and all claims and actions arising from the Dispute, (d) the Company and Bion released Opus Trust
and Benowitz from any and all claims and actions arising from the Dispute and (e) the parties agreed not to make negative references to the character or business reputation of the parties to the Settlement Agreement.
F-57
BASIN WATER, INC.
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts (Restated)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
|
Valuation
Account
Increases
|
|
Valuation
Account
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Year
|
Valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(316
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
$
|
5,596
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
7,148
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
7,148
|
|
$
|
5,044
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
|
Valuation
Account
Increases
|
|
Valuation
Account
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Year
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
|
Valuation
Account
Increases
|
|
Valuation
Account
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Year
|
Contract loss reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
$
|
6,842
|
|
$
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
|
Valuation
Account
Increases
|
|
Valuation
Account
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Year
|
Inventory reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
|
Valuation
Account
Increases
|
|
Valuation
Account
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Year
|
Cost of System Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
|
$
|
285
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
F-58
Basin Water (MM) (NASDAQ:BWTR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Basin Water (MM) (NASDAQ:BWTR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024