TIDMGLR
RNS Number : 5223D
Galileo Resources PLC
26 June 2019
For immediate release
26 June 2019
Galileo Resources Plc
("Galileo" or "the Company")
Star Zinc Initial (JORC 2012) Inferred Mineral Resource
Estimate
Galileo is pleased to announce the completion of an
independently reported initial inferred resource estimate ("MRE")
in accordance with JORC 2012, for the Company's Zambian Star Zinc
project ("the Project") near Lusaka. The MRE reports Inferred zinc
resources with reasonable prospects of future economic extraction
of approximately 500,000 tonnes at 16% Zinc for 77,000 tonnes of
contained metal above a cut off grade of 2% Zinc. This includes
approximately 340,000 tonnes at 21% Zinc for 72,000 tonnes of metal
above a cut off grade of 8%. The Company has a 95% interest in the
Project. The Zambian government holds a 5% interest. To view this
announcement with the illustrative diagrams and JORC code 2012
Table 1 please use the following link:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/5223D_1-2019-6-26.pdf
Highlights
-- Galileo completes an independent initial inferred resource
estimate reported in accordance with JORC 2012 for its Star Zinc
project (Licence tenure 19653-HQ-LEL).
-- The MRE, using a preliminary open-pit optimisation method
reports a high grade hypogene Inferred Zn resource with reasonable
prospects of economic extraction of approximately 500,000 tonnes at
16% Zinc for 77,000 tonnes of contained metal above a cut off grade
of 2% Zinc. This includes approximately 340,000 tonnes at 21% Zinc
for 72,000 tonnes of metal above a cut off grade of 8%.
-- The MRE containing an approximate estimate of 77,000 tonnes
of zinc metal, is suitable for potential direct shipping material
for ROM to the zinc process/refinery facility at Kabwe, located
approximately 120km north of the Project.
-- The MRE model defines a clear boundary between a high-grade
(>8% Zn) domain and a low-grade (<8% Zn) zone.
-- All of the +8% Zn high grade resource blocks, fall within the
preliminary pit shell generated for the purpose of outlining
resources with reasonable prospects of economic extraction.
-- This clear division of high grade and low grade domains
confirms the previously announced (14 November 2018) indications of
the occurrence of a distinct core of high grade massive willemite
(zinc silicate) mineralisation in both the eastern and western
limbs of the deposit.
-- Mineralised hypogene material outside of the preliminary pit
shell remains an Exploration Target(a) estimated as being between
approximately 85,000 and 180,000 tonnes with an estimated average
grade of 3 to 5 % Zn.
-- Similarly, a portion of the mineralised near surface
secondary supergene material remains an Exploration Target(a)
estimated as being between approximately 13,000 and 77,000 tonnes
with an estimated average grade of 3 to 5 % Zn.
-- The Company is encouraged to fast track the Project
development and to apply with minimum delay for a mining permit to
include among other things, undertaking requisite economic and
engineering studies for a shallow open-pit mining operation and
finalising an off-take agreement for direct shipping ore.
Colin Bird, Chief Executive Officer, said: "This initial
JORC-compliant resource estimate confirms the previously announced
Exploration Target and the Company's publicly announced* presence
of a high grade zinc component in the deposit suitable for direct
shipping to the Jubilee Metal Group plc's zinc process/refinery
plant at Kabwe. The MRE clearly identifies an easy access
near-surface mineable zone with a low stripping ratio of one to
one. There will be no requirement for processing equipment other
than possibly a mobile primary crusher. A low grade portion of
mineralised material remains an exploration target and may be
amenable to preconcentrate/upgrade to about 10% Zn either as DSO or
blending, pending further test work and method development.
The MRE will allow for a 6-year life-of-mine small scale
operation to produce rock mass of only 5,500t/month containing
12,000 t zinc metal per year to Kabwe. While in-house attributable
revenues are projected at about USD15 million annually at current
price, the annual all in cost is projected not to exceed to USD2
million.
We intend to apply without delay for a mining permit and target
mining to start coincident with the Kabwe project."
*Galileo RNS 14 November 2018
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes
of Article 7 of Regulation 596/2014.
JORC (2012) Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate
Independent consulting group Addison Mining Services Ltd ("AMS)
completed the mineral resource estimate. The Inferred estimate
utilized data for all drill holes completed by Galileo with the
final drillhole being completed on the 9th of December 2018. The
final drillhole database used for estimation included 52 drill
holes for 2220 m of drilling of which 1412 m were assayed over 1433
samples. All drill core was logged for geology, core recovery and
rock quality designation.
The Company commissioned AMS to undertake the mineral resource
estimate in May 2019.
Block Model
AMS has estimated an Inferred Resource of approximately 500,000
tonnes at 16% Zinc for 77,000 tonnes of contained metal above a cut
off grade of 2% Zinc. This includes approximately 340,000 tonnes at
21% Zinc for 72,000 tonnes of metal above a cut off grade of
8%.
Material below a 2% cut off grade is not considered to have a
reasonable prospect of economic extraction and is not considered
part of the Resource.
The Inferred Resource block model ranges from surface to
approximately 40 m below surface over a length of approximately 300
m from east to west and 20 to 100 m from north to south. Thickness
is typically between 5 and 25 m.
Table 1: Summary of Resources by Status
Category Gross Net Attributable Operator
Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained
(millions) (g/t) Metal (millions) (g/t) Metal
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Mineral resources
per asset
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Measured
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Indicated
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Inferred 500,000 16 77,000 475,000 16 73,150 Galileo
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Sub-total
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
Total 500,000 16 77,000 475,000 16 73,150
------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ---------
1. Mineral resources are reported using a 2% Zn cut-off. Figures
may not sum due to rounding. The contained metal is determined by
the estimated tonnage and grade.
2. Source: Mr J.N. Hogg, MSc. MAIG Principal Geologist for AMS,
an independent Competent Person within the meaning of the JORC
(2012) code and qualified person under the AIM guidance note for
mining and oil & gas companies.
Parts of the hypogene Zn mineralised block model currently
outside the preliminary pit shell remain as an exploration target,
with potential for conversion to a resource with the application of
ore sorting and upgrade methods pending detailed test work and
consideration of cost versus yield.
In addition, small quantities of supergene Zn mineralised
pisolitic cover and karst cavity infill material remain as an
exploration target, pending further investigation into suitable
recovery methods.
These quantities of currently 'sub-economic' mineralisation
offer potential for further development, and a small incremental
addition to resources.
Silver credits for Star Zinc have not been estimated nor
reported as part of this study. Potential exists to add Ag
resources and potential Ag credits to the Star Zinc resource block
model.
Table 2: Gross grade tonnage tables for material inside
conceptual pit shell. Material below a cut off grade of 2% is not
considered to have a reasonable prospect of economic extraction and
is not considered part of the Resource. See notes below for further
explanation.
Star Zinc Gross Inferred Resource Grade Tonnage Table
Cut off VOLUME TONNES DENSITY Av Zn Grade Contained Zn
grade % Metal
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
15 73,000 250,000 3.5 24 61,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
12 91,000 310,000 3.4 22 69,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
10 98,000 330,000 3.4 22 72,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
8 99,000 340,000 3.4 21 72,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
7 100,000 340,000 3.4 21 72,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
6 100,000 340,000 3.4 21 72,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
5 100,000 340,000 3.4 21 72,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
4 110,000 370,000 3.3 20 73,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
3 120,000 400,000 3.3 19 75,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
2 160,000 500,000 3.2 16 77,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
1 170,000 540,000 3.1 14 78,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
0 170,000 550,000 3.1 14 78,000
-------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
1. All material is classified as Inferred Category. Numbers are
rounded to reflect that fact that an estimate has been made, and as
such totals may vary.
2. Zn grades are in situ grades, no estimation of reserves have
been made, resources which are not reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
(a) Potential grade of the Exploration Target presented in Table
2 is conceptual in nature: there is insufficient processing and ore
sorting data to report as a Mineral Resource at this time. It is
uncertain if further technical studies and exploration will result
in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
Table 3: Summary of Hypogene Exploration Target estimated at
above 2% Zn
CASE VOLUME TONNES DENSITY Zn% Zn Metal Tonnes
Conservative 30,000 85,000 2.9 3 to 5 2,900 to 3,900
------- -------- -------- ------- ----------------
Pragmatic 63,000 180,000 2.9 3 to 5 6,100 to 8,300
------- -------- -------- ------- ----------------
Table 4: Summary of Secondary Supergene Exploration Target
estimated at above 2% Zn
CASE VOLUME TONNES DENSITY Zn% Zn Metal Tonnes
Conservative 4,600 13,000 2.9 3 to 5 400 to 600
------- ------- -------- ------- ----------------
Pragmatic 27,000 77,000 2.9 3 to 5 2,100 to 3,400
------- ------- -------- ------- ----------------
Summary of resource estimate and reporting criteria
In accordance the AIM Rules and JORC (2012) reporting
guidelines, a summary of the material information used to estimate
the Mineral Resource is set out below. The JORC code 2012 Table 1
with details of the resource estimate parameters is available via
the link:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/5223D_1-2019-6-26.pdf
Geology and geological interpretation
The Star Zinc deposit is hosted within metasedimentary rocks of
the late Proterozoic Zambezi Supracrustal sequence (the Cheta and
Lusaka Formations), consisting of upper greenschist facies
limestones and dolostones marbles with quartz-muscovite schists and
feldspathic quartzites. The succession in the Star Zinc pit
consists of recrystallized limestone overlain by metamorphosed
slatey limestone and then by coarse marbles overlain by hematite
rich dolomite.
A broad dome is the main structural feature, with two main
fracture trends present, one broadly N-S (typically dipping
approximately 70deg to the east) and one broadly E-W (typically
dipping approximately 70deg to the south), both irregularly
mineralised.
Mineralisation at Star Zinc occurs in a variety of settings. A
mineralized regolith (red soils, terra rossa) often overlies and
forms infill on top of a highly irregular karstically weathered
rock head morphology. The zinc mineralisation in this zone is
predominantly comprised of hemimorphite, smithsonite and
sauconite.
Hypogene willemite mineralisation is observed in many styles,
broadly irregular, in parts tabular, including massive and
semi-massive replacement zones, anastomosing, dilatational at the
intersection of possible structures, in calcite-hematite-willemite
veins and fractures and more brecciated zones.
Bulk density
Measurements were only completed on phase 1 diamond core which
represents holes SZDD001 to SZDD026. Samples were collected for
both mineralised and un-mineralised samples across a range of zinc
grades determined by pXRF measurements and across all observed
lithologies. A total of 261 samples were selected, typically
ranging from 3 to 10 cm in length.
A strong positive correlation exists between bulk density and Zn
laboratory assay grade. The linear regression line of Bulk Density
vs Zn grade was used to calculate a bulk density value for each
cell within the block model as follows:
-- Estimated Bulk Density = 2.75 + 0.03xZn%
Drilling techniques and hole spacing
Galileo has completed two phases of orientated diamond drilling
at the Star Zinc deposit. During the period between December 2017
to and March 2018, a total of 26 holes were completed for 1198.80
metres. A second phase of diamond drilling was completed from
August to October 2018 in which a further 26 holes were completed
for 1022 metres.
A total of 52 diamond drill holes totalling 2,220.80 metres were
used as the input database for geological modelling and resource
estimation.
Drill core diameter was PQ and HQ.
Non-vertical holes were orientated on HQ core only typically at
end of each 3 metre run using a Reflect ACT II RD rapid decent core
orientation tool.
Drill sample data spacing across the current resource area
ranges from approximately 20-25m centres within the most densely
tested area towards the west, stepping out to approximately 30m
centres to the east.
The distribution of drillholes, supported by surface and
underground mapping, is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for a JORC (2012)
Inferred classification of resources.
Sampling and sub-sampling techniques
Sampling was typically completed on a 1 metre basis, though
sampling widths did vary based on the above considerations from
approximately 0.5 to 1.5 metres. Approximately 3 to 5 metres either
side of the zone of interest were sampled and submitted for assay
as well as internal waste up to lengths of 5 metres. Once the
sampling intervals had been determined, the section of core was
sawn yielding a quarter length piece of core for analytical
purposes and the remaining three-quarter piece retained for
reference purposes.
All core samples were submitted to Intertek Genalysis
laboratories, with sample preparation based in Kitwe, Zambia and
analysis in their laboratory in Maddington, Perth.
All samples are analysed for zinc, germanium, silver and
vanadium. Zinc and germanium are determined by sodium peroxide
fusion (zirconia crucibles) with ICP-OES/ICP-MS respectively.
Silver and vanadium are determined via a four acid digest with
ICP-MS.
Core Recoveries
For holes under the phase 1 programme (SZDD001 to SZDD026) the
overall average recovery was 89%, whilst under the phase 2
programme (SZDD027 to SZDD052) the overall average recovery was
90%. Minimal core loss was exhibited, except generally within the
top 20 metres of each hole, where average core recovery fell to
83%.
Reasonable Prospects for Economic Extraction and Cut-off
grades
Galileo proposes to sell Run of Mine (ROM) material to the BRM
PLC/Jubilee Metals Group Plc owned Sable zinc plant at the Kabwe
Mine in Zambia. Kabwe is approximately 100 km to the North by the
T2 paved road.
It is proposed by Galileo that Kabwe will pay a percentage rate
of the market Zinc price per tonne of contained metal for material
above a minimum 8% Zn. Although the minimum cut off grade for a
saleable product is 8% Zn, potential exists to blend mineralised
material below this cut off with higher grade material in order to
maintain acceptable grades.
In order to identify material which has a reasonable prospect of
economic extraction a preliminary pit optimisation to generate a
basic ultimate pit shell was completed using the above selling
prices and the following key parameters;
-- Zinc price - 2700 $/t (LME 3 year trailing average to April 2019)
-- Minimum block grade to be considered - 8% Zn
-- Ore/Waste mining cost - 6 $/t
-- Rehabilitation - 1 $/t
-- Transport - 11 $/t
-- Mining Dilution - 5% (Waste/Ore)
-- Mining Recovery - 95%
-- Pit Slopes - 45deg
The grade tonnage figures for all resource blocks within the
resultant pit shell were then reported with mining dilution factors
applied.
Mineralised blocks below the minimum 'Kabwe DSO' grade of 8% Zn
which are mined to access optimised +8% Zn blocks being included as
having potential value as blending material.
A minimum lower in pit cut off grade of 2% Zn is identified as
the threshold which maintains an average grade in excess of 15% Zn.
It is anticipated that blending of material below 2% Zn has
negligible impact on recoverable metal and would have a negative
impact on potential revenue.
In order to establish the likely economic viability of the above
mining approach AMS have estimated the profitability of the mining
operation linked to a zinc leach-precipitation circuit. The report
"Star Zinc Deposit - Conceptual Project Report", January 2015 by
Scorpion Mineral Processing South Africa refers. The following key
parameters are used:
-- Milling - 11 $/t ore
-- Leaching - 125 $/t ore
-- Precipitation - 640 $/t zinc produced
-- 4y cost price inflation from 2015 - 10 %
-- Process recovery - 91 %
-- Zn precipitate - 60%
The treatment of 15% Zn grade material is shown to be profitable
at a $2,700/t zinc price and therefore AMS considers the +15% Zn
resource using a 2% cut off within the pit shell to have a
reasonable prospect of being economic.
Estimation methodology
AMS verified primary analytical data via cross reference against
original lab certificates and the re-input of all assays for the
project for use in geological modelling and estimation. The
database for use as input for mineral resource modelling and
estimation has also been validated and verified by AMS and the
Competent Person. Micromine 3D geological modelling and estimation
software was used for import, validation and QA/QC verification
assessment, 3D solid modelling, geostatistics and block model grade
interpolation estimation. Data checks include checks for
overlapping and missing intervals, dh trace errors, missing survey
data, lithology and collars.
All wireframe modelling was completed using implicit modelling.
A surface wireframe of the base of the laterite and saprolite
regolith horizon was generated and this model converted to a solid
using the digital terrain model. Cavity areas were modelled as
isolated volumes equal to the vertical thickness of the cavities
with an approximate 5 m diameter. Two mineralized wireframes were
generated to represent the low (>0.5% Zn) and high grade (>7%
Zn) hypogene zinc domains.
Additional control strings and dynamic anisotropy were used to
guide the shape and extents of the models and honour surface
geological observations and legacy cross-sections.
Hypogene models were restricted to the Regolith and DTM and
cavity areas removed. The high grade domain model was restricted so
that it did not extend outside the low grade domain model.
Geological models were extrapolated up to 50m in places between
drillholes, the model is reasonably well constrained by drilling at
periphery, the base of the model is well constrained by
drilling.
All assay values were assigned to their corresponding mineral
domain and composited to 2 m with a minimum accepted length of 1 m,
residual lengths were added to the previous interval, length
multiplied by density weighted average values were calculated for
Zn grade. Top cutting was not applied as no outlying high grade
values were identified.
Directional variography was completed on the low and high grade
domains using the composite data, the median indicator
semi-variograms were found to produce the clearest structure and
model semi-variograms fitted to these experimental models. The
tertiary axis did not produce a clear experimental semi-variogram
in both cases and was given a nominal range of 5m. The same axis
orientations were used for both domains
A Block model with the cell size 10 m x 10 m x 4 m was generated
over the deposit area, based on the approximate 30 m drill spacing
and stratigraphic nature of mineralization. The mineral domain
wireframes were written to the block model and sub blocking applied
to preserve volumes, the block model was restricted to the DTM.
The block model was interpolated on a domain by domain basis
using Ordinary Kriging. A variable search geometry was used to
follow the dip of the deposit where it steepens near to the
historic open pit, elsewhere the geometry of the axis used in
variography were applied.
Additional Kriging Parameters are as follows.
-- Interpolation was conducted at the parent block scale
-- Discretization 5x5x2
-- Negative weights were not set to zero
-- Maximum of 2 composite points per drillhole
-- Single sector search ellipsoid
-- Search Radius 50 x 50 x 10 m for axis 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
-- Maximum of 8 composite samples per search.
Following kriging the bulk density was estimated for each cell
in the block model based on the estimated Zn grade and application
of the linear regression formula described above.
Classification criteria
The Star Zinc deposit defined by drilling has been classified as
an Inferred Mineral Resource in accordance with the JORC Code
(2012) guidelines based on a combination of drill spacing,
geological confidence, grade continuity, previous mining and the
quality control standards achieved.
Mining and metallurgical methods and parameters
Based on the orientations, thickness and depths to which the ore
body has been modelled, as well as the estimated grade, open pit
mining is the intended mining methodology. Current anticipated
processing route is the sale of ROM to the Sable Zinc Kabwe zinc
plant.
Competent Person's statement
The Star Zinc resource estimate was prepared by Mr J.N. Hogg,
MSc. MAIG Principal Geologist for AMS, an independent Competent
Person within the meaning of the JORC (2012) code and qualified
person under the AIM guidance note for mining and oil & gas
companies. The resource estimate was aided by Mr R. J. Siddle, MSc,
MAIG Senior Resource Geologist for AMS, under the guidance of the
competent person. Mr Hogg has reviewed and verified the technical
information that forms the basis of, and has been used in the
preparation of, the updated mineral resource estimate and this
announcement, including all analytical data, diamond drill hole
logs, QA/QC data, density measurements, and sampling, diamond
drilling and analytical techniques. Mr Hogg consents to the
inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on the
information, in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Hogg
has also reviewed and approved the technical information in his
capacity as a qualified person under the AIM Rules for
Companies.
Additionally, Mr Hogg confirms that the entity is not aware of
any new information or data that materially affects the information
contained within the Company's previous announcements referred to
herein.
Forward looking statements
Certain statements in this announcement, are, or may be deemed
to be, forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are
identified by their use of terms and phrases such as "believe",
"could", "should" "envisage", "estimate", "intend", "may", "plan",
"will" or the negative of those, variations or comparable
expressions, including references to assumptions. These forward
looking statements are not based on historical facts but rather on
the Directors' current expectations and assumptions regarding the
Company's future growth, results of operations, performance, future
capital and other expenditures (including the amount, nature and
sources of funding thereof), competitive advantages, business
prospects and opportunities. Such forward looking statements
reflect the Directors' current beliefs and assumptions and are
based on information currently available to the Directors. A number
of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the
results discussed in the forward looking statements including risks
associated with vulnerability to general economic and business
conditions, competition, environmental and other regulatory
changes, actions by governmental authorities, the availability of
capital markets, reliance on key personnel, uninsured and
underinsured losses and other factors, many of which are beyond the
control of the Company. Although any forward looking statements
contained in this announcement
For further information on the Company, please visit
www.galileoresources.com or contact:
Colin Bird, Chairman Tel +44 (0) 20 7581 4477
Andrew Sarosi, Executive Director Tel +44 (0) 1752 221937
Beaumont Cornish Limited - Nomad Tel +44 (0) 20 7628 3396
Roland Cornish/James Biddle
--------------------------
Novum Securities Limited - Joint
Broker
Colin Rowbury /Jon Belliss +44 (0) 20 7399 9400
--------------------------
Shard Capital Partners LLP - Joint Tel +44 (0) 20 7186 9952
Broker
Damon Heath
--------------------------
You can also follow Galileo on Twitter: @GalileoResource
Glossary of technical terms:
"Ag" silver;
"DSO" direct shipping ore;
"facies" observable attribute or attributes of a rock or
stratigraphic unit,
"g" grammes;
"g/t" grammes per tonne;
"hypogene" occurrence deep below the earth's surface,
"Inferred Resource" that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity
and grade (or quality) are estimated on the basis
of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological
evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify
geological and grade (or quality) continuity. It
is based on exploration, sampling and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations
such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and
drill holes;
"JORC" the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, as
published by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of
The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy,
Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals
Council of Australia;
"JORC (2012)" the 2012 edition of the JORC code;
"m" metre;
"Mineral Resource" a concentration or occurrence of material of economic
interest in or on the earth's crust in such form
and quantity that there are reasonable and realistic
prospects for eventual economic extraction. The
location, quantity, grade, continuity, and other
geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource
are known, estimated from specific geological evidence
and knowledge, or interpreted from a well-constrained
and portrayed geological model;
"Mt" million tonnes;
"oz" troy ounce;
"Pb" lead;
"proterozoic" geological eon spanning the time from the appearance
of oxygen in Earth's atmosphere
"pXRF" portable x-ray fluorescence
"QA/QC" quality assurance/quality control;
"quartz-muscovite a foliated metamorphic rock (schist) composed essentially
schist" of quartz and mica,
"supergene" occurrence relatively near the surface as opposed
to deep hypogene processes;
"Supracrustal"
on existing basement rocks of the earth's crust;
"Zn" zinc.
The JORC code Table 1 with details of the resource estimate
parameters is available to view on the Company's website at:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/5223D_1-2019-6-26.pdf
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
END
MSCUNUARKAANUAR
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 26, 2019 07:35 ET (11:35 GMT)
Galileo Resources (LSE:GLR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2024 to Jul 2024
Galileo Resources (LSE:GLR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024