TIDMEGU
RNS Number : 2332C
European Goldfields Ltd
10 November 2009
EUROPEAN GOLDFIELDS LIMITED
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE THREE- AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2009
The following discussion and analysis, prepared as at 10 November 2009, is
intended to assist in the understanding and assessment of the trends and
significant changes in the results of operations and financial conditions of
European Goldfields Limited (the "Company"). The following discussion and
analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company's unaudited consolidated
financial statements for the three- and nine-month periods ended 30 September
2009 and 2008 and accompanying notes (the "Consolidated Financial
Statements").
Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company's Annual
Information Form, is available on the Canadian System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com. Except as otherwise noted, all
dollar amounts in the following discussion and analysis and the Consolidated
Financial Statements are stated in United States dollars.
Overview
The Company, a company incorporated under the Yukon Business Corporations Act,
is a resource company involved in the acquisition, exploration and development
of mineral properties in Greece, Romania and South-East Europe.The Company's
Common Shares are listed on the AIM Market of London Stock Exchange plc and on
the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under the symbol "EGU".
Greece - European Goldfields holds a 95% interest in Hellas Gold S.A. Hellas
Gold owns three major gold and base metal deposits in Northern Greece. The
deposits are the polymetallic operation at Stratoni, the Olympias project which
contains gold, zinc, lead and silver, and the Skouries copper/gold porphyry
project. Hellas Gold commenced production at Stratoni in September 2005 and
commenced selling an existing stockpile of gold concentrates from Olympias in
July 2006. Hellas Gold is applying for permits to develop the Skouries and
Olympias projects.
Romania - European Goldfields owns 80% of the Certej gold/silver project in
Romania. In July 2008, the National Agency of Mineral Resources approved the
technical feasibility study in support of its permit application and issued a
new mining permit for the Certej project.
Cautionary statement on forward-looking information
Certain statements and information contained in this document, including any
information as to the Company's future financial or operating performance and
other statements that express management's expectations or estimates of future
performance, constitute forward-looking information under provisions of Canadian
provincial securities laws. When used in this document, the words "anticipate",
"expect", "will", "intend", "estimate", "forecast", "planned" and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the estimation of
mineral reserves and mineral resources, the timing and amount of estimated
future production, costs and timing of development of new deposits, permitting
time lines and expectations regarding metal recovery rates. Forward-looking
statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions
that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to
significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies.
The Company cautions the reader that such forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the
actual financial results, performance or achievements of the Company to be
materially different from its estimated future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements and the
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. These
risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to: changes
in the price of gold, base metals or certain other commodities (such as fuel and
electricity) and currencies; uncertainty of mineral reserves, mineral resources,
grades and recovery estimates; uncertainty of future production, capital
expenditures and other costs; currency fluctuations; financing and additional
capital requirements; the successful and timely permitting of the Company's
Skouries, Olympias and Certej projects; legislative, political, social or
economic developments in the jurisdictions in which the Company carries on
business; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or
development activities; the speculative nature of gold and base metals
exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or
grades of mineral reserves; the risks normally involved in the exploration,
development and mining business; and risks associated with internal control over
financial reporting. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and material
factors or assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements, see
information under the heading "Risk Factors". The Company does not intend, and
does not assume any obligation, to update or revise any forward-looking
statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
except as required by law.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company's results of operations for the three-and nine-month periods ended
30 September 2009 were comprised primarily of activities related to the results
of operations of the Company's 95%-owned subsidiary Hellas Gold in Greece and
the Company's exploration and development programmes in Romania and Turkey.
Corporate Activity
Board and Management Changes
On October 9th 2009 the Company announced that, Mr. Martyn Konig has been
appointed as Executive Chairman and President of the Company.
At the same time Mr. Dimitrios Koutras stepped down as Chairman of the Company
but remains both a Non-Executive Director and Executive Chairman of our
95%-owned subsidiary Hellas Gold. The Company also announced the appointment of
Mr. Bruce James Burrows as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
Following the watershed event of PEIS approval in Greece (see "Permitting
Process - Greece" below) the Company is confident that it has the right set of
skills and experience required to address the next phase of its development. Mr.
Konig has initiated a review of its management, business and affairs that inter
alia will set a revised set of targets for 2010 and the crucial forthcoming
period of project development.
Directors Dealings
Effective upon his appointment as Executive Chairman and President of the
Company, Martyn Konig was granted 600,000 Restricted Share Units ("RSUs"), and
1,300,000 options, having a five year term and an exercise price of C$6.00 each.
The 600,000 RSU's vest in three equal tranches if certain performance criteria
are met and 1,000,000 of the options are also subject to various performance
vesting criteria, with the balance being vested immediately. Mr. Konig has
elected to receive up to half of his total annual remuneration of GBP342,000 in
RSUs, issued on a quarterly basis, and to convert 145,907 deferred phantom
units, which he was awarded in his previous capacity as an independent
non-executive director, into a like number of RSU's which are currently vested.
New appointments
The Company is pleased to announce the appointment of three new Vice Presidents.
Patrick Forward has been promoted to Vice President Projects and Exploration.
Pat graduated in Mining Geology from the Royal School of Mines in 1989. Before
joining European Goldfields as General Manager, Exploration in October 2004, he
had worked for A.C.A. Howe International Limited. Between 1990 and 1995, he
managed exploration projects in Europe, Ghana and Venezuela. For the following
five years, he spent most of his time in Burkina Faso managing exploration
programmes culminating in the discovery of the Nyafé deposit in Semafo Inc's
Mana concession. On returning to the UK in 1999, Pat specialised in exploration
management, geological due diligence, resource estimation, the application of
GIS systems to exploration projects and deposit evaluation. As General Manager,
Exploration he was responsible for European Goldfields exploration programmes
and also involved with feasibility studies and development of European
Goldfields major assets.
Dimitris Dimitriadis has been promoted to Vice President Project Development.
Dimitris graduated in Mining and Metallurgical Engineering from the National
Technical University of Athens and has more than 30 years experience in mining
and metallurgy, as well as exposure to both the construction and financial
sectors. Before joining European Goldfields as Business Development Manager in
July 2006 he had worked for Hellas Gold S.A. as Business Development Manager
principally in the restructuring of the Kassandra Mines and the introduction of
new technology to the process plants, definition of new projects and the
successful opening of new markets for its concentrate production. Before joining
Hellas Gold S.A. he was General Manager and Member of the Board of ELMIN S.A. a
bauxite producing company. His career first started at METBA S.A initially as a
Process Engineer and then as a Project Engineer. Among other highlights during
1995 to 2002 Dimitris worked with TVX Hellas initially as Senior Metallurgist
and then as Business Development Manager.
Sally Schofield has been hired as Vice President Investor Relations. Sally's
career has seen her work in commercial, technical and operational capacities in
geographically and politically diverse regions including Kazakhstan, Albania,
Central America, Brazil and Chile. She gained early exposure to the technical,
corporate and investor relations functions of the mining business before
crossing sectors to work with RMC, now part of CEMEX, the global building
materials giant. Sally returned to mining in 2003 and became a Director of
AIM-listed Latitude Resources plc, a company with copper/gold assets in Chile.
As Chief Operating Officer of the company she relocated to Santiago, Chile in
2006, with direct responsibility for an exploration program that developed a
portfolio of exploration projects into a saleable asset. She then worked for a
natural resource focused fund identifying potential assets. Sally graduated from
the Camborne School of Mines with a First Class B. Eng (hons) Industrial Geology
in 1995, is a Fellow of the Geological Society (FGS) and a professional member
of IOM3 (MIMMM). In connection with Sally's appointment the Company intends to
grant her 50,000 share options and 50,000 RSUs in the near future.
Permitting Process - Greece
In late September the then Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public
Works, completed the Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Evaluation based
on the Preliminary Environmental Impact Study ("PEIS") submitted by the
Company's 95%-owned subsidiary Hellas Gold SA, and issued a pre-approval of the
construction and operation of the Project ("the Pre-Approval") in the province
of Halkidiki, in North-Eastern Greece.
The "Project", consists of:
* The development of mining and processing at the Skouries project.
* The next stages of the Olympias project, namely the mining and processing of ore
and metallurgical treatment of the concentrate, in accordance with the business
plan as originally submitted.
* Continuation of operations at the Mavres Petres deposit of the Stratoni Mine.
* The port facilities at Stratoni in service of the above projects' operations.
This Pre-Approval of the Project, successfully concludes the major stage of
assessment by the authorities and will lead to the preparation and submission of
the Environmental Impact Study ("EIS") and supporting studies required by Greek
and European Legislation. The EIS will be based on terms of reference as now
defined by the Pre-Approval. The EIS will be submitted to the relevant
authorities for review and the normal European Union public consultation
requirements in the near future. The Company is confident that the extensive
detail of the successful Pre-Approval process will in turn now optimise approval
of the EIS.
Skouries Project (Greece)
Highlights
* Outotec equipment contract complete
* Basic Engineering package delivered to schedule
* Outotec continues to advance their Detailed Engineering package
Outotec equipment contract complete
During the quarter, the final payments were made to Outotec in respect of the
technology package for the Skouries project, which consists of the SAG and ball
mills, motors and thickeners. All fabrication of this equipment is therefore
complete, which represents the bulk of the process plant for the project.
Process equipment deliveries to Greece continue and equipment is held at a
storage facility in Thessaloniki which has been approved by Outotec.
Basic Engineering package delivered to schedule
The Greek engineering group ENOIA has issued the Basic Engineering package
including an initial draft of an updated budget cost estimate for the process
plant and associated infrastructure to Hellas Gold. The Basic Engineering
package comprises plant design by ENOIA and Outotec; the mine and roads design
by Geotechnical Consultants Omicron Kappa; architectural design by KION and the
civil structures and works by MHXME. Basic and Detailed level Engineering
studies are currently underway for the tailings facility, infrastructure and
dump design and once completed then revised project capital and operating costs
will be published.
A hydrogeological study by IGME, the Greek geological survey, has been also been
completed and detailed design of the tailings management facility ("TMF") is
currently being undertaken by Omikron Kappa.
Outotec continues to advance their Detailed Engineering package
Outotec continues to advance their Detailed Engineering of instrumentation and
control systems for the Concentrator plant. ENOIA are coordinating the overall
control package including equipment outside of Outotec's supply to provide a
fully integrated system.
Equipment orders which fall outside the scope of Outotec's supply contract such
as the open pit cone crusher, pebble crushers, pumps and flotation cells are
also well advanced.
Olympias project (Greece)
Sale of gold concentrates up by 71% over Q3 2008
The Olympias project benefits from an existing stockpile of gold-bearing pyrite
concentrates which represented, at 1 January 2009, a reserve of approximately
101,000 tonnes grading 23.5 g/t gold (containing approximately 75,000 oz of
gold). Excavation of the concentrate for shipment has indicated that the depth
of stockpile base was underestimated in several areas by historical surveys and
therefore additional concentrate tonnage exists compared to the declared
reserve. In addition there are 2.4Mt of tailings containing 238,000 oz of gold
and substantial underground reserves of gold, lead, zinc and silver.
Hellas Gold completed 16 shipments of Olympias concentrates in Q3 2009 (Q3 2008
- 8). This translates into 21,734 tonnes of pyrite concentrates sold.
Sales of pyrite concentrates were as follows:
+--------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+-------+--------+
| Sale of Gold-Bearing Concentrates from Existing Stockpile |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+-------+--------+
| Sales | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+-------+--------+
| Gold concentrate (dmt) | 21,734 | 32,134 | 26,832 | 18,566 | 12,710 | 22,479 | 9,778 | 21,385 |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+-------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+-------+--------+
Re-processing of the existing tailings will yield further high-grade gold
concentrates of approximately 350,000 tonnes.
Plant and Underground Rehabilitation at Olympias
The engineering study for the Olympias Mill rehabilitation has been awarded to
the Greek engineering company "Renewables".
A study to outline the rehabilitation works and associated costs for the
underground infrastructure is being completed by Scott Wilson Mining.
Refurbishing of the mine offices and the construction of a shotcrete plant on
site are already underway.
Stratoni operations (Greece)
Production
Hellas Gold completed six shipments in Q3 2009 (Q3 2008 - 8), and 19 shipments
for the year to end Q3 2009 (to end Q3 2008 - 20). Hellas Gold's results from
its operations at Stratoni for the eight most recently completed quarters are
summarised in the following table:
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Operational results |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Inventory (start of | | | | | | | | |
| period) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Ore mined (wet tonnes) | 2,293 | 4,010 | 1,778 | 6,489 | 1,003 | 2,816 | - | 4,868 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Zinc concentrate | - | 602 | 2,975 | 2,078 | 5,660 | 2,745 | 1,689 | 2,797 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lead/silver concentrate | 2,106 | 1,393 | 488 | 1,294 | 1,238 | 2,213 | 49 | 2,042 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Production | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Ore mined (wet tonnes) | 57,235 | 60,023 | 56,892 | 70,468 | 69,847 | 73,137 | 58,208 | 50,643 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Ore milled (tonnes) | 50,167 | 60,287 | 52,984 | 73,320 | 63,040 | 73,280 | 53,675 | 53,813 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| - Average grade: Zinc | 9.10 | 8.87 | 7.85 | 8.80 | 8.82 | 10.37 | 9.37 | 9.00 |
| (%) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lead (%) | 5.18 | 5.56 | 6.42 | 6.54 | 6.40 | 6.21 | 5.35 | 8.12 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Silver (g/t) | 133 | 141 | 166 | 167 | 160 | 155 | 134 | 206 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Zinc concentrate | 8,544 | 9,989 | 7,932 | 12,106 | 10,451 | 14,139 | 9,427 | 9,082 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| - Containing: Zinc | 4,248 | 4,971 | 3,827 | 5,914 | 5,132 | 7,004 | 4,644 | 4,425 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lead concentrate | 3,531 | 4,484 | 4,667 | 6,750 | 5,531 | 6,443 | 4,035 | 6,012 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| - Containing: Lead | 2,376 | 3,060 | 3,129 | 4,434 | 3,726 | 4,201 | 2,653 | 4,021 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Silver (oz) | 177,650 | 230,106 | 240,366 | 336,336 | 280,305 | 316,354 | 207,215 | 316,837 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Sales | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Zinc concentrate | 7,937 | 10,646 | 10,306 | 11,210 | 14,033 | 11,224 | 8,371 | 10,191 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| - Containing payable: | 3,325 | 4,427 | 4,152 | 4,591 | 5,818 | 4,633 | 3,454 | 4,209 |
| Zinc (tonnes)* | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lead concentrate | 4,736 | 3,771 | 3,762 | 7,556 | 5,475 | 7,418 | 1,872 | 8,004 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| - Containing payable: | 3,042 | 2,448 | 2,347 | 4,775 | 3,495 | 4,628 | 1,188 | 5,082 |
| Lead (tonnes)* | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Silver (oz)* | 228,574 | 183,452 | 183,504 | 363,205 | 263,464 | 355,298 | 95,582 | 399,272 |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Cash operating cost per | 165 | 144 | 156 | 145 | 164 | 161 | 164 | 175 |
| tonne milled ($) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Cash operating cost per | 116 | 106 | 119 | 109 | 109 | 103 | 110 | 121 |
| tonne milled (EUR) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Inventory (end of | | | | | | | | |
| period) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Ore mined (wet tonnes) | 8,097 | 2,293 | 4,010 | 1,778 | 6,489 | 1,003 | 2,816 | - |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Zinc concentrate | 607 | - | 602 | 2,975 | 2,078 | 5,660 | 2,745 | 1,689 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lead/silver concentrate | 901 | 2,106 | 1,393 | 488 | 1,294 | 1,238 | 2,213 | 49 |
| (tonnes) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
* Net of smelter payable deductions
The completion of a new upper adit marks the finalisation of major mine
infrastructure which has been ongoing over the last four years and includes a
new lower decline, new surface workshops, new backfill plants, two filter
presses and a new water treatment plant. Internal development, including ramp
extensions and access drives, is essentially complete for the year.
Production was under budget for the quarter due to the continuation of the poor
geotechnical conditions which compounded mining cycle conflicts. The mine has
experienced an improvement in the geotechnical conditions as mining has moved
away from the Stratoni Fault and the mining cycle issues have eased as new
levels entered into production late in the quarter.
Process plant performance
Zinc and lead metal recoveries are being maintained on budget at a consistent
92% and silver at 87%. A circuit to improve the quality of the lead concentrate
is in the final design stage and installation is planned for early 2010. Working
conditions in the plant were improved by capturing gases from reagent tanks and
filtering impurities.
Fatality in the mine
On the 14th of October 2009 the death of a miner occurred due to an underground
accident at Stratoni's Mavres Petres mine. The Company reported on 15th October
that a rockfall occurred during roof maintenance 162 metres underground, killing
one worker and injuring a second. The rockfall actually occurred at mine level
162 which is in fact more than 300 metres below surface. The Company reiterates
its condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of the deceased.
Production at the mine resumed after a short closure period of two working days,
in line with the Company's previous announcement. The Health Safety and
Environment Committee of the Board immediately requested a review of procedure
and practices and is considering the resultant recommendations made by Hellas
Gold management.
Exploration in Greece
An airborne electromagnetic (EM) survey has proved highly effective in
confirming an anomaly extending eight km of strike at the Piavitsa massive
sulphide target. Two km of this strike length have historic massive sulphide
drill intercepts which correspond exactly with the EM anomaly. The footprint of
the target is larger than that of the Company's Olympias project.
In addition, the magnetic component of the airborne survey has already
identified a 17 km by six km belt of porphyry ntrusive over which a
three-dimensional inversion model has been completed defining two other major
targets. Follow-up reconnaissance mapping has confirmed the presence of porphyry
style mineralisation on all targets outlined by the magnetic survey.
An EIS is now being considered by the local authorities to allow access to drill
sites on both the massive sulphides and porphyry targets in the near future.
Certej Project (Romania)
Basic engineering completed
The Basic Engineering ("BE") contract for the Certej project process plant and
associated infrastructure awarded to Aker Solutions Engineering & Construction
was completed in September 2009. The BE covers the entire process plant
engineering and Xstrata Technology, who are owners of the Albion Process were
part of the engineering team. Basic and Detailed level Engineering studies are
currently underway for the tailings facilities, infrastructure and mine and dump
design and once completed then revised project capital and operating costs will
be published.
The Romanian contractor Cepromin has been appointed to prepare the Technical
Project Report which involves advancing the BE level studies. They have started
the work to generate the Technical Project Report, which together with the
environmental permits will be required for issuing the Construction Permit. The
Technical Project Report is due for completion in H1 2010.
Golder Associates UK completed the DFS of the TMF designs in Q1 2009 and has now
commenced to assist Cepromin with the Technical Project Report.
Permitting process continues to advance
The Certej project had already received all the technical mining approvals by
September 2008, when the Romanian National Agency for Mineral Resources ("NAMR")
approved the Technical Feasibility Study ("TFS") for the project, as required
under Romanian legislation, including the approval and state registration of the
project's resources and reserves. This completed all the mining approvals
required for the project from NAMR and was a very significant step forward in
the development of the project.
A public consultation process in respect of the environmental permit for the
Zonal Urbanisation Plan ("PUZ") has also been successfully concluded: the public
consultation involved four public hearings in the communities most directly
affected by the Certej project. No adverse comments were raised during the
public notice period, during the meetings themselves or subsequently to the
authorities. The PUZ process is almost complete with 16 of the 17 constituent
permits required being obtained, including that relating to water. A positive
final-outcome of the process is expected in the near future.
In anticipation of the approval of the PUZ, the Ministry of the Environment has
invited the Company to file its EIS application, which will also then be subject
to the last requirement for public consultation prior to the issuance of the
environmental permit. These, together with the construction permit, are the
final approvals required for the construction and operation of the plant, the
tailings design and other related infrastructure.
Certej financing progresses
As part of the project financing process, an internationally recognised
engineering group has been appointed as Independent Technical Consultant for the
Certej Project. A site visit has already been conducted and a review of the
Certej Definitive Feasibility study and all its supporting documents is nearing
completion. The shortlisted group of financing institutions have been sent a
draft term sheet and detailed banking model with a target of agreeing commercial
terms and securing lending commitments over the coming months, subject to final
documentation. The Company aims to have completed the project finance process in
the first part of 2010. As part of the proposed structure, the Company has
stated its intention not to hedge any upside participation in the gold price.
Exploration in Romania
In early 2009 the Company acquired two new prospecting licences for 454 square
kilometres of prospective terrain, covering the westward extension to the area
hosting the Company's Certej deposit and the area containing the Deva Porphyry
deposit. These areas are prospective for disseminated gold, porphyry
mineralisation as well as the more prolific and higher-grade epithermal
deposits.
Work in the quarter has been focused on the Deva Porphyry area, which hosts a
volcanic complex, including the historically mined Deva Porphyry pipe, which
produced some 20Mt at 0.8% Cu with the gold grade unrecorded. The Company has
completed a ground magnetic survey and soil surveys both of which have
highlighted a series of porphyry targets which were not previously recognised.
In addition soil grids, mapping and re-interpretation of existing data have
outlined several epithermal gold targets proximal to the historic Brad mines and
within the same volcanic belt as the Certej deposit.
These targets will be tested with more detailed exploration work and drilling in
2010.
Exploration in Turkey
In April 2008 the Company entered into a joint venture with Ariana Resources plc
("Ariana") with respect to mineral properties in the Eastern Pontide area of
northeast Turkey.
Mapping and sampling has confirmed that porphyry mineralisation continues to the
south of the previously recognised outcrops, and this additional extension
increases the size potential of the porphyry system. A high-grade gold zone has
also been identified at Salinbas, some three km to the southwest of the Ardala
porphyry. Trenching at Salinbas has returned the following bedrock intercepts
over a 360m strike length with mineralisation open to the south and at depth:
* Trench 1, 26 m @ 5.4 g/t Au,
* Trench 2, 6 m @ 2.8 g/t Au
* Trench 3, 46 m @ 8.3 g/t Au
* Trench 4, 6 m @ 2.8 g/t Au
* Trench 5, 14 m @ 7.3 g/t Au and 33 m 9.62 g/t Au
* Trench 6, 9 m @ 4.3 g/t Au
Note: These intercepts are calculated at a 0.5g/t Au cut-off, no upper-cut .
Drilling and further trenching are planned at both Ardala and Salinbas for the
near future.
The Company continues to consolidate ground to the south of the Ardala licence
and finalise paper work in the next few days with Aldridge Minerals Inc
("Aldridge") for the joint development of Aldridge's Derinkoy properties, which
covers an area of 40 square km adjacent to the Company's Ardala Licences. The
properties lie within the area of interest of the Company's joint venture with
Ariana (the "Pontid JV") and as such will be developed within the Pontid JV
vehicle. Mapping and soil sampling over the property will be completed by the
end of the year.
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
Stratoni mine
Base metal prices continued their recovery in Q3 2009 compared to Q2 2009, and
this trend has continued after the quarter end. The increased base metal
revenues in the Q3 2009 allowed the Stratoni operation to generate higher
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA") to
contribute towards capital expenditure and other operating costs.The Stratoni
mine's financial results for the eight most recently completed quarters are
summarised in the following table:
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Financial performance |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| dollars) | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Sales | 11,500 | 9,472 | 4,935 | 8,465 | 13,250 | 13,000 | 10,097 | 18,483 |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| EBITDA | 1,315 | 305 | (3,025) | (5,233) | 1,742 | 1,017 | 4,057 | 8,147 |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Gross profit | (449) | (1,561) | (4,345) | (7,060) | 171 | (198) | 3,060 | 6,147 |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Capital expenditure | 596 | 2,793 | 4,214 | 3,543 | 2,496 | 2,086 | 3,111 | 3,779 |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Amortisation and | 1,764 | 1,866 | 1,320 | 1,827 | 1,571 | 1,215 | 997 | 2,000 |
| depletion | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
Total revenues from concentrate sales fell year on year as a result of lower
quantities sold (primarily in zinc) despite higher prices being realised.
Payable zinc in concentrate sales declined 43%, as a result of lower mine
production in Q3 2009. In addition, payable lead and silver in concentrate sales
both fell by 13% compared to the prior year quarter, reflecting the combination
of lower tonnage mined and lower processed lead and silver grades. Realised
prices for zinc were $1,795 per tonne, 2% up on Q3 2008, and $2,106 per tonne
for lead, an increase of 11% compared to Q3 2008. Overall lower sales volumes
outweighed marginally higher realised prices compared to the prior year quarter
leading to a fall of 25% in payable metal revenues.
+--------------------------+-------+---+-------+-------+--+------------+------+-------+---+-------+-------+----------+
| Reconciliation of Stratoni revenues - Q3 2009 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US | | Zinc | | Lead | | Silver | | Total |
| dollars unless stated | | | | | | | | |
| otherwise) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| Payable metal | | 3,325t | | 3,042t | | 228,574oz | | n/a |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| Realised price | | $1,795/t | | $2,106/t | | $8.12/oz | | n/a |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| Payable metal revenue | | 5,968 | | 6,406 | | 1,855 | | 14,229 |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| TC/RCs | | (2,147) | | (703) | | (192) | | (3,042) |
+--------------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------------------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+
| Transport | | 14 | | - | | - | | 14 |
| recoveries/(charges) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-----------+-------+----------+-------------------+-----------+-------+-------+----------+
| Net revenue | | 3,835 | | 5,703 | | 1,663 | | 11,201 |
+--------------------------+-----------+-------+----------+-------------------+-----------+-------+-------+----------+
| Prior quarter | | (41) | | 354 | | (14) | | 299 |
| adjustments | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-----------+-------+----------+-------------------+-----------+-------+-------+----------+
| Total revenue | | 3,794 | | 6,057 | | 1,649 | | 11,500 |
+--------------------------+-----------+-------+----------+-------------------+-----------+-------+-------+----------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+---+-------+-------+--+------------+------+-------+---+-------+-------+----------+
+--------------------------+-------+--+-------+--+--+--+----+----+--+--+--+--------+--+-------+--+---------+
| Reconciliation of Stratoni revenues - Q3 2008 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US | | Zinc | | Lead | | Silver | | Total |
| dollars unless stated | | | | | | | | |
| otherwise) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| Payable metal | | 5,818t | | 3,495t | | 263,464oz | | n/a |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| Realised price | | $1,758/t | | $ 1,904t | | $7.93/oz | | n/a |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| Payable metal revenue | | 10,228 | | 6,656 | | 2,090 | | 18,974 |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| TC/RCs | | (3,726) | | (2,148) | | (123) | | (5,997) |
+--------------------------+-------+-------------+-----+------------+-----+-----------+----------+---------+
| Transport | | - | | 266 | | - | | 266 |
| recoveries/(charges) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+----------+-------+-------------+-------+-----+--------+----------+------------+
| Net revenue | | 6,502 | | 4,774 | | 1,967 | | 13,243 |
+--------------------------+----------+-------+-------------+-------+-----+--------+----------+------------+
| Prior quarter | | (253) | | 255 | | 5 | | 7 |
| adjustments | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+----------+-------+-------------+-------+-----+--------+----------+------------+
| Total revenue | | 6,249 | | 5,029 | | 1,972 | | 13,250 |
+--------------------------+----------+-------+-------------+-------+-----+--------+----------+------------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+--+-------+--+--+--+----+----+--+--+--+--------+--+-------+--+---------+
Year on year the Company benefitted from improved terms of the 2009 offtake
agreements, particularly in lead, which resulted in a year on year fall in
treatment charges on a gross and proportional basis. As base metal prices
trended upwards, prior quarter revenue adjustments yielded a net benefit for the
current quarter. Therefore, despite lower quantities sold, net revenues only
fell 13%.
Olympias
Hellas Gold completed 16 shipments of Olympias concentrates in Q3 2009
representing 21,734 tonnes of pyrite concentrates sold, an increase of 71% over
the prior year period (12,710 tonnes - Q3 2008). Realised gold prices were
higher than the prior year, so that in dollar terms, revenues from sales of gold
concentrates totalled $5.5 million in Q3 2009, an increase of 94% over the same
period in 2008 ($2.9 million).
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| Financial performance |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| dollars) | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| Sales | 5,537 | 6,732 | 5,807 | 4,309 | 2,851 | 5,461 | 2,611 | 4,232 |
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| Gross profit | 4,012 | 4,747 | 4,003 | 2,995 | 1,222 | 3,668 | 1,789 | 1,279 |
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| Amortisation and | 124 | 184 | 153 | 106 | 72 | 129 | 56 | (134) |
| depletion | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
Consolidated results
Revenues showed increased 5% in the three month period ending 30 September
2009 compared to the three-month period ending 30 June 2009 as a result of
higher base metal prices; however foreign exchange losses, lower hedge income
and higher equity-based compensation expenses and income taxes meant that the
Company recorded a loss for the period of $3.2 million compared to a profit of
$1.5 million in Q2 2009.For the three-month period ending 30 September
2009 compared to the prior year, the trend of improved metal prices improved
gross profit performance. For the nine-month period ending 30 September 2009,
gross and net profit performance underperformed the same period in 2008 because
of stronger base metal prices in the first half of 2008 and lower hedge and
interest income in 2009. Stratoni production continued to be constrained by
challenging operating conditions, but Olympias gold concentrate sales continued
to perform very robustly. The Company's lead hedging programme will expire at
the end of the current financial year and generated income of $1.0 million for
the quarter. Working capital declined as the Company continued its capital
expenditure programmes at its operating mine and development projects, but the
Company's balance sheet remains strong.
The Company's statement of profit and loss for the eight most recently completed
quarters are summarised in the following table:
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+------+--+
| Financial performance |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| dollars, | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
| except per share amounts) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Statement of profit and | | | | | | | | |
| loss | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Sales | 17,037 | 16,204 | 10,742 | 12,774 | 16,101 | 18,461 | 12,708 | 22,715 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Cost of sales | 13,474 | 13,018 | 11,084 | 16,839 | 14,708 | 14,991 | 7,859 | 15,289 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Gross profit | 3,563 | 3,186 | (342) | (4,065) | 1,393 | 3,470 | 4,849 | 7,426 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Interest income | 147 | 133 | 508 | 1,164 | 1,306 | 1,502 | 1,757 | 2,699 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Foreign | (501) | 1,719 | (2,882) | (6,253) | (2,800) | (27) | 2,674 | (2,173) |
| exchange | | | | | | | | |
| gain/(loss) | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Hedge | 1,030 | 1,801 | 2,417 | 3,165 | 1,362 | 391 | - | - |
| contract | | | | | | | | |
| profit | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Share of | (187) | 18 | (26) | (3) | (66) | (36) | - | - |
| profit/(loss) | | | | | | | | |
| in equity | | | | | | | | |
| investment | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Expenses | 5,384 | 4,204 | 3,740 | 5,253 | 6,054 | 5,058 | 5,017 | 6,385 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Profit/(loss) | (1,332) | 2,653 | (3,979) | (11,245) | (4,859) | 242 | 4,263 | 1,567 |
| before income | | | | | | | | |
| taxes | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Income | (1,847) | (1,078) | 540 | 17,067 | (451) | 644 | (621) | 2,062 |
| taxes | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Profit/(loss) | (3,179) | 1,575 | (3,439) | 5,822 | (5,310) | 886 | 3,642 | 3,629 |
| after income | | | | | | | | |
| taxes | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Non-controlling | 56 | (136) | 183 | 519 | 267 | (74) | (233) | (29) |
| interest | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Profit/(loss) for the | (3,123) | 1,439 | (3,256) | 6,341 | (5,043) | 812 | 3,409 | 3,600 |
| period | | | | | | | | |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+---------+
| Earnings/(loss) per share | (0.02) | 0.01 | (0.02) | 0.04 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
+-------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+---------+--------+--------+------+--+
The Company recorded a loss before taxes of $2.66 million for the nine-month
period ended 30 September 2009, compared to a loss before taxes of $0.35 million
for the same period of 2008. The Company recorded a net loss (after taxes and
non-controlling interest) of $4.94 million ($0.03 loss per share) for the
nine-month period ended 30 September 2009, compared to a net loss of
$0.82 million ($0.00 loss per share) for the same period of 2008. This nine
month performance was impacted by lower base metal prices on average, lower than
planned operating performance at Stratoni, lower interest rates and foreign
exchange movements offset by higher hedge income and lower other operating
costs, as described below.
The Company recorded a loss before taxes of $1.33 million for the three-month
period ended 30 September 2009, compared to a loss before taxes of $4.86 million
for the same period of 2008. The Company recorded a net loss (after tax and
non-controlling interest) of $3.12 million ($0.02 loss per share) for the
three-month period ended 30 September 2009, compared to a net loss of
$5.04 million ($0.03 loss per share) for the same period of 2008. For the three
month performance, improving base metal and gold prices, lower other expenses
and foreign exchange losses more than offset lower production from Stratoni and
lower hedging and interest income, resulting in higher levels of operating and
lower pre- and post-tax losses.
In more detail, the following factors have contributed to the above:
* , Average base metal prices in the first nine months of 2009 were significantly
lower (due to weaker prices in the earlier part of the year) than the same
period in 2008: the price of zinc, the Stratoni mine's primary sales product,
averaged approximately $1,502 per tonne, 30% lower than in 2008 which averaged
$2,131 per tonne; the lead price averaged $1,549 per tonne for the same period
in 2009, a 35% reduction compared to $2,374 per tonne in 2008.In addition, the
Stratoni mine was operating at lower production levels in the first nine months
of 2009 than in the same period of 2008, with mine and mill production falling
16% and 14% respectively. Lower metal grades meant that zinc metal in
concentrate production fell 22%, and lead in concentrate production fell 19%.
Payable metal sales in the nine months ended 30 September 2009 were in line with
the overall declining trend in production, with payable zinc sales of 11,904
tonnes, a 14% decrease over the same period in 2008, and payable lead sales down
by 16% to 7,837 tonnes.
* There is a more positive metal price trend when looking at the three-month
periods ended 30 September: for that period in 2008, base metal prices had
fallen dramatically and continued to do so for the rest of the calendar year,
troughing in Q1 2009; subsequently, lead and zinc rallied strongly for the whole
of calendar year 2009. Thus in the three months ended 30 September 2009, zinc
averaged almost $1,800 per tonne and lead $1,940 per tonne compared to $1,800
per tonne and $1,915 per tonne respectively for the same period in 2008. Sales
of payable zinc in Q3 2009 fell 43% compared to Q3 2008, whereas sales of
payable lead fell 13% over the same period.
* The trend in the Company's gold concentrate sales has remained extremely
encouraging: in the first nine months of 2009, Hellas Gold sold a total of
80,700 tonnes of gold bearing pyrite concentrates from Olympias, compared to
44,967 in the same period of 2008. Gold prices have broadly traded in a range
between $850 and $950 per ounce for the majority of the period since the
beginning of 2008, but at the end of the current quarter, the gold price made a
major break towards the psychological $1,000 per ounce barrier, which was broken
immediately after the current quarter end and the gold price has subsequently
maintained a comfortable margin above this level. Therefore the gold price
averaged $931 per ounce in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $897 per
ounce in the same period in 2008, and $961 per ounce in the quarter ended
September 2009 compared to $870 per ounce for the corresponding period in 2008.
* Cost of sales was $37.58 million in the first nine months of 2009 and
$13.47 million in Q3 2009, compared to $37.56 million and $14.71 million,
respectively, for the same periods of 2008, and included $5.41 million in
depreciation and depletion expenses in the first nine months of 2009, compared
to $4.04 million for the same period of 2008. In the first nine months of 2009,
lower production and US dollar unit operating costs reduced Stratoni costs of
production by $5.75 million, but these reductions were more than offset by other
cost increases: transport costs were $3.31 million higher, resulting primarily
from significantly higher gold concentrate sales; amortisation and depreciation
were $1.37 million higher mainly because 2008 had benefited from a one off life
of mine catch up reduction; and $1.10 million lower transfer of costs to
inventory resulting from build of concentrate stockpiles. For the quarter ended
30 September 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, the trends were the same:
there was $2.06 million reduction from lower production levels and US dollar
unit operating costs offset by $0.65 million higher transport costs, $0.25
million higher amortisation and depreciation, and a drawdown of inventory of
$0.10 million.
* As a result, the Company recorded a gross profit of $6.41 million in the first
nine months of 2009 and $3.56 million in Q3 2009, on revenues of $43.98 million
and $17.04 million, respectively, compared to a gross profit of $9.71 million in
the first nine months of 2008 and $1.39 million in Q3 2008, on revenues of
$47.27 million and $16.10 million, respectively. The Company's corporate
administrative and overhead expenses have decreased from $3.92 million in the
first nine months of 2008 and $1.35 million in Q3 2008, to $3.20 million and
$1.14 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2009. This represents the
continuation of cost control initiatives reported on last quarter.
* The Company recorded a non-cash equity-based compensation expense of
$2.33 million in the first nine months of 2009 and $1.37 million in Q3 2009,
compared to $1.55 million and $0.54 million, respectively, for the same periods
of 2008.Equity-based compensation in 2009 relates primarily to restricted share
units ("RSUs") and deferred phantom units ("DPUs"), as the Company in recent
years has favoured the issuance of RSUs and DPUs over share options. Both RSUs
and DPUs are valued by direct reference to the Company's share price, without
the need for estimates to calculate the fair value of these instruments. RSUs
are valued using the share price upon issuance, whilst DPUs are revalued to the
Company's closing share price at the end of each reporting period. The Company
continued a practice of recharging some of its equity-based compensation expense
to its operating subsidiaries, a portion of which is capitalised by such
subsidiaries.
* The Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $1.66 million in the first nine
months of 2009 and a foreign exchange loss of $0.50 million in Q3 2009. In
comparison, the Company incurred a foreign exchange loss of $0.15 million in the
first nine months of 2008, and a loss of $2.80 million in Q3 2008. These
exchange differences arise as a result of changes in the US dollar values of
Hellas Gold's net current assets or liabilities.
* Hellas Gold's administrative and overhead expenses amounted to $4.67 million in
the first nine months of 2009 and $1.90 million in Q3 2009, compared to
$6.20 million and $2.19 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2008.
Hellas Gold's administrative and overhead expenses include the costs of the
Athens based office, environmental and water treatment expenses not directly
attributable to the Stratoni operation. The principal change was a fall in the
total amount spent on local community projects.
* Hellas Gold incurred an expense of $2.55 million in the first nine months of
2009 and $0.78 million in Q3 2009, compared to $3.86 million and $1.76 million,
respectively, for the same periods of 2008, for ongoing water pumping and
treatment at its non-operating mines of Olympias and Stratoni (Madem Lakkos), in
compliance with Hellas Gold's commitment to the environment under its contract
with the Greek State. Lower costs were incurred in line with the continued
strategy of limiting all non essential spend where possible at the operations
and in other areas of the business.
* The Company recorded a charge for income taxes of $2.39 million in the first
nine months of 2009 and $1.85 million in Q3 2009, compared to charges of $0.43
million and $0.45 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2008. This
reflects an increase relating the finalisation of three years of tax accounts at
Hellas Gold.
* The Company recorded a credit of $0.10 million in the first nine months of 2009
and a credit of $0.06 million in Q3 2009 relating to the non-controlling
shareholder's interest in Hellas Gold's profit (after tax), compared to a charge
of $0.04 million and a credit of $0.27 million, respectively, for the same
periods of 2008.
Financial instruments
The Company enters into financial transactions in the normal course of business
and in line with Board guidelines for the purpose of hedging and managing its
expected exposure to commodity prices. There are a number of financial
institutions which offer metal hedging services. As with cash deposits, the
Company deals with highly rated banks and in addition, those institutions who
have demonstrated long term commitment to the mining sector. The Company has one
counterparty relating to the remaining lead hedge contracts. If this
counterparty were unable to honour its obligations under the hedge contracts,
the Company would be exposed up to the entire value of the hedge stated in the
accounts and would be exposed to the difference between the hedge and the then
current market price at the date of the settlement of the hedged item. The
hedges below are treated as cash flow hedges in accordance with CICA 3865:
Hedges.
As at 30 September 2009, the Company had entered into forward hedging
arrangements over tonnes of lead, using options to provide a minimum: maximum
price exposure. The hedging contracts are put/call option collar contracts with
maturity dates between 02 January 2009 and 05 January 2010 where the fair value
amounted to $545 (31 December 2008 - $10,282), established by reference to
market prices for lead.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| | 30 |
| | September |
| | 2009 |
| | |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| | |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| Lead tonnes | 1,800 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| | |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| US dollar price ($/tonne) - Put | 2,500 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| US dollar contract amount ($'000) - Put | 4,500 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| | |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| US dollar price ($/tonne) - Call | 3,500 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
| US dollar contract amount ($'000) - Call | 6,300 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+
During the nine and three month periods ended 30 September 2009, the Company
recorded income relating to its lead hedging activities of $5,248 (2008: $1,753)
and $1,030 (2008: $1,362) respectively.
Related parties
During the nine and three month periods ended 30 September 2009, Hellas Gold
incurred costs of $24,768 (2008 - $28,651) and $6,945 (2008 - $10,393)
respectively for management, technical and engineering services received from a
related party, Aktor S.A., a 5% shareholder in Hellas Gold. As at 30 September
2009, Hellas Gold had accounts payable of $8,673 (2008 - $4,216) to Aktor S.A.
These expenses were contracted in the normal course of operations and are
recorded at the exchange amount agreed by the parties.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's balance sheet and cash flows for the eight most recently completed
quarters are summarised in the following table:
+------------------------+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+------+---+------+---+------+---+-----+---+-----+---+---------+
| (in thousands of US | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| dollars, | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
| except per share amounts) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Balance sheet (end of | | | | | | | | |
| period) | | | | | | | | |
+------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+-------------+
| Cash | 124,112 | 142,728 | 153,995 | 170,296 | 192,456 | 205,908 | 215,582 | 223,739 |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Working capital | 146,158 | 171,185 | 176,319 | 192,675 | 208,609 | 216,822 | 225,673 | 226,431 |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Total assets | 749,870 | 753,196 | 757,206 | 766,095 | 775,369 | 796,537 | 794,911 | 782,131 |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Non current liabilities | 153,882 | 153,544 | 154,882 | 155,727 | 183,881 | 185,897 | 184,635 | 182,092 |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Statement of cash | | | | | | | | |
| flows | | | | | | | | |
+------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+-------------+
| Cash flows from operating | 2,865 | (7,733) | (2,923) | 883 | (6,421) | (609) | (3,832) | 18,976 |
| activities | | | | | | | | |
+----------------------------+---------+-----------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Investing activities | (22,793) | (6,167) | (10,674) | (11,672) | (5,030) | (9,271) | (9,909) | (8,447) |
+----------------------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| * Plant and equipment | (20,649) | (3,450) | (8,953) | (12,998) | (2,971) | (3,065) | (7,147) | (3,779) |
+----------------------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| * Deferred development | (2,137) | (2,600) | (1,481) | (2,837) | (2,007) | (1,798) | (2,372) | (3,048) |
| costs | | | | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| * Other | (7) | (117) | (240) | 4,163 | (52) | (4,407) | (390) | (1,620) |
+----------------------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Financing activities | - | 80 | 558 | (10) | - | 54 | 3,563 | 4,608 |
+----------------------------+-------------+-------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Effect of foreign exchange | 1,312 | 2,553 | (3,262) | (6,229) | (2,001) | 152 | 2,021 | (7,869) |
| on cash | | | | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-------------+-------------+----------+----------+----------+---------+---------+---------+
| Total movement in cash | (18,616) | (11,267) | (16,301) | (17,028) | (13,452) | (9,674) | (8,157) | 7,268 |
+------------------------+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+------+---+------+---+------+---+-----+---+-----+---+---------+
As at 30 September 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $124.11
million, compared to
$170.30 million as at 31 December 2008, and working
capital of $146.16 million, compared to $192.68 million as at 31 December 2008.
The Company has sufficient capital for its needs until all the permits to
construct its new mines are received, at which point additional capital will be
required. The Company is confident that the bank debt and capital markets have
sufficient liquidity to provide any additional capital it may require to bring
its project portfolio into production.
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents as at 30 September 2009, compared to
the balances as at
31 December 2008, resulted primarily from capital
expenditure in Greece ($33.05 million), changes in working capital balances
($11.00 million), deferred exploration and development costs in Romania
($4.17 million), investment in an associate ($0.14 million), deferred
development costs in Greece ($1.35 million), deferred exploration costs in
Turkey ($0.70 million), offset by operating cash flow ($3.21 million) ,the
effect of foreign currency translation on cash ($0.60 million) and proceeds from
exercise of share options ($0.64 million).
The following table sets forth the Company's contractual obligations including
payments due for each of the next five years and thereafter:
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Payments due by period |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| (in thousands of US dollars) |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Contractual | Total | Less than 1 | 2 - 3 | 4 - 5 | After 5 |
| obligations | | year | years | years | years |
| | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Operating lease | 706 | 157 | 314 | 235 | - |
| (London office) | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Operating | 1,102 | 152 | 304 | 304 | 342 |
| lease | | | | | |
| (Athens | | | | | |
| office) | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Outotec | 3,654 | 3,654 | - | - | - |
| OT - | | | | | |
| Processing | | | | | |
| Plant | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Total contractual | 5,462 | 3,963 | 618 | 539 | 342 |
| obligations | | | | | |
+----------------------------+-----------+-------------+------------+------------+------------+
The Company's contractual obligation with Outotec relates to the contract to
supply the large technology services for its Skouries project.
In 2009, the Company expects to spend a total of $49 million in capital
expenditures to fund the development of its project portfolio. This amount
comprises $8 million at its existing operation at Stratoni to complete the
expansion of the internal underground infrastructure at Mavres Petres and
upgrade the mill, $5 million at Olympias as part of the refurbishment of the
mine and process plant, and $30 million at Skouries as the Company expects to
continue to spend on long lead time equipment and engineering studies. At
Certej, the Company expects to spend $6 million as it progresses through the
final stages of environmental permitting, advances through the basic and
detailed engineering phases and continues exploration around Certej. In addition
to its capital expenditure programme, the Company expects to spend $2 million in
exploration over the wider licence area in Greece and Turkey, $9 million on
Hellas Gold administrative and overhead and water treatment expenses, and $5
million on corporate administrative and overhead expenses. The Company expects
to fund all such costs from existing cash balances and operating cash flow
generated from its Hellas Gold operations.
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA
The following represents all equity shares outstanding and the numbers of common
shares into which all securities are convertible, exercisable or exchangeable:
Common shares:180,742,775
Common share options:3,531,665
Restricted share units:1,523,352
Common shares (fully-diluted):185,797,792
Preferred shares: Nil
NON GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The Company uses certain performance measures in its analysis. Some of these
performance measures have no meaning within Canadian GAAP and, therefore,
amounts presented may not be comparable to similar data presented by other
mining companies. The data is intended to provide additional information and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
Cash operating cost per tonne milled is a Non-GAAP measure which the Company
uses as a key performance indicator, which reflects the fact that it is a key
performance measure that Stratoni mine management uses to monitor operating
performance. The Stratoni ore body produces three saleable products, being zinc
lead and silver. Using a measure which focuses on actual cost of the production
process rather than a measurement of cost per product eliminates distortions
resulting from grade mined or realised metal prices, and provides a real
indication of cost management compared to tonnage processed. Management uses
these statistics to assess how well the Company's producing mine is performing
compared to plan and to assess overall efficiency and effectiveness of the
mining operation.
The Company provides this cash cost information as it is a key performance
indicator required by users of the Company's financial information in order to
assess the Company's profit potential and performance relative to its peers. The
cash cost figure represents the total of all cash costs directly attributable to
the related mining and processing operations without the deduction of any
credits in respect of by-product sales. Cash cost is not a GAAP measure and,
although it is calculated according to accepted industry practice, the Company's
disclosed cash costs may not be directly comparable to other base metal
producers. Cash operating cost per tonne milled is a measure denominated in
Euros, and therefore, when stated in US dollars, will be affected by changes in
the Euro - US dollar exchange rate.
The following table reconciles cash operating cost per tonne to cost of sales as
disclosed in our income statement for the most recent 8 quarters:
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| (in thousands of US | 2009 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
| dollars) | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 |
| | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Milled production (dmt) | 50,167 | 60,287 | 52,984 | 73,320 | 63,040 | 73,280 | 53,675 | 53,813 |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Cash operating cost per | 116 | 106 | 119 | 109 | 109 | 103 | 110 | 121 |
| tonne milled (EUR) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Cash operating cost per | 165 | 144 | 156 | 145 | 164 | 161 | 164 | 175 |
| tonne milled ($) | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Cash cost of production | 8,288 | 8,687 | 8,278 | 10,609 | 10,346 | 11,831 | 8,823 | 9,427 |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Movement in concentrate | 1,080 | (175) | (1,300) | 368 | 893 | 423 | (2,782) | 1,827 |
| inventory | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Cash cost of sales - | 9,368 | 8,512 | 6,978 | 10,977 | 11,239 | 12,254 | 6,041 | 11,254 |
| Stratoni | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Amortisation and | 1,888 | 2,050 | 1,473 | 1,933 | 1,643 | 1,344 | 1,053 | 1,866 |
| depletion | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Concentrate transport | 2,218 | 2,666 | 2,423 | 2,977 | 1,565 | 1,664 | 765 | 2,169 |
| costs | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Inventory | - | (210) | 210 | 952 | 261 | (271) | - | - |
| write-down/adjustments | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| Cost of sales | 13,474 | 13,018 | 11,084 | 16,839 | 14,708 | 14,991 | 7,859 | 15,289 |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| | | | | | | | | |
+--------------------------+--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+---------+--------+
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") is a
Non-GAAP measure which the Company uses as an indicator of the cash generation.
For each operation, it is calculated as gross profit adjusted for all
depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges as presented under Canadian
GAAP.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada
("Canadian GAAP"), which assumes the Company will be able to realise assets and
discharge liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable
future. The consolidated financial statements do not include the adjustments
that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern and reflect the following critical accounting estimates.
Deferred exploration and development costs - Acquisition costs of resource
properties, together with direct exploration and development costs incurred
thereon, are deferred and capitalised. Upon reaching commercial production,
these capitalised costs are transferred from exploration properties to producing
properties on the consolidated balance sheets and are amortised into operations
using the unit-of-production method over the estimated useful life of the
estimated related ore reserves.
The proven and probable reserves are determined based on a professional
evaluation using accepted international standards for the assessment of mineral
reserves. The assessment involved the study geological, geophysical and economic
data and the reliance on a number of financial and technical assumptions. The
estimates of the reserves may be subject to change based on new information
gained subsequent to the initial assessment. This may include additional
information available from continuing exploration, results from the
reconciliation of actual mining and plant production data against the original
reserve estimates, or the impact of economic factors such as changes in metal
prices, exchange rates or the cost of components of production. A total of $763
for Q3 2009 (2008: $854) and $2,431 for the year to 30 September 2009 (2008:
$2,008) was charged to the income statement in relation to depletion of mineral
properties, which were subject to these estimates.If actual reserves prove to be
significantly different from current estimates, a material change to amounts
charged to earnings could occur. A total of $480,401 of mineral properties was
stated on the balance sheet that are subject to these estimates now and in the
future.
Long-lived assets - All long-lived assets and intangibles held and used by the
Company are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. If changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset that an entity expects to hold and use may not be recoverable, future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its disposition must be
estimated. If the undiscounted value of the future cash flows is less than the
carrying amount of the asset, impairment is recognised based on the fair value
of the assets. Under Canadian GAAP, a fall in metal prices is the key
determining factor in whether long-lived assets are subject to impairment. In
such circumstances, management would prepare future cash flow forecasts to
establish whether any actual impairment had occurred. These estimates are based
on future expectations, and a number of assumptions and judgments made by
management, the same as those required for the estimation of reserves. Current
metal prices do not suggest there has been any impairment on any of the
Company's long-lived assets. If such an impairment were to occur, this could
result in a material charge to earnings.A total of $480,401 of mineral
properties was stated on the balance sheet that are subject to this estimation
process.
Long lived assets are depreciated against operations using the
unit-of-production method over the estimated useful life of the estimated
related ore reserves.As stated above, the determination of reserves is dependent
upon the reliance on a number of financial and technical assumptions, which may
be subject to change. If actual reserves prove to be significantly different
from current estimates, a material change to amounts charged to earnings could
occur.
Asset retirement obligation - The fair value of the liability of an asset
retirement obligation is recorded when it is legally incurred and the
corresponding increase to the mineral property is depreciated over the life of
the mineral property. The future costs of retirement obligations are estimated
by management based upon knowledge of the cost of these activities and a number
of assumptions and judgments are made by management in their determination.
These estimates are regularly reviewed for reasonableness and any changes to the
original cost estimate reflected in the asset retirement obligation liability.
The liability is adjusted over time to reflect an accretion element considered
in the initial measurement at fair value and revisions to the timing or amount
of original estimates and drawdowns as asset retirement expenditures are
incurred. As at 30 September 2009, the Company had an asset retirement
obligation relating to its Stratoni property in Greece amounting to $7,033
(2008: $6,937) subject to these estimates. A total of $129 for Q3 2009 (2008:
$174) and $365 for the year to 30 September 2009 (2008: $308) was charged to the
income statement in relation to asset retirement obligation, which were subject
to these estimates. A significant change to either the estimated future costs or
to reserves could result in a material change to amounts charged to earnings.
Equity-based compensation - The Company operates a share option plan, an
RSU plan and a DPU plan. The Company accounts for equity-based compensation
granted under such plans using the fair value method of accounting. Under such
method, the cost of equity-based compensation is estimated at fair value and is
recognised in the profit and loss statement as an expense, or capitalised to
deferred exploration and development costs when the compensation can be
attributed to mineral properties. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to estimate fair values of share options granted, and uses the
market price of common shares to determine fair value of RSUs granted and DPUs
issued. This cost is recognised over the relevant vesting period for grants to
directors, officers and employees, and measured in full at the earlier of
performance completed or vesting for grants to non-employees. Any consideration
received by the Company on exercise of share options is credited to share
capital. In relation to DPUs, the trend of cost charged or credited to income
statement relates directly to the fluctuation in the Company's share price. A
total of $1,371 for Q3 2009 (2008: $544) and $2,332 for the year to 30 September
2009 (2008: $1,547) was charged to the income statement in relation to equity
base compensation, which were subject to these estimates.
Future taxes - The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for
future income taxes. Under this method, current income taxes are recognised for
the estimated income taxes payable for the current year. Future income tax
assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences between the tax
and accounting bases of assets and liabilities, calculated using the currently
enacted or substantively enacted tax rates anticipated to apply in the period
that the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Future income tax
inflows and outflows are subject to estimation in terms of both timing and
amount of future taxable earnings, which are subject to assumptions on the
future tax rates and recoverability of any tax losses. Should these estimates
change, the carrying value of income tax assets or liabilities may change, and
consequently the charge or credit to the income statement. A total of $1,110 for
Q3 2009 (2008: $2,090) and $1,554 for the year to 30 September 2009 (2008:
$1,626) was charged to the income statement in relation to future income taxes,
which were subject to these estimates.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") -
In February 2008, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") confirmed
that IFRS will replace Canadian GAAP for publicly listed companies, for interim
and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2011,including comparative figures for the prior years.In April 2008,
the AcSB issued for comment its Omnibus Exposure Draft, Adopting IFRS in Canada.
Early adoption may be permitted, however it will require exemptive relief on a
case by case basis from the Canadian Securities Administrators.
The Company intends to transition to IFRS on 1 January 2011, and will file its
first interim financials under IFRS for the quarter ended 31 March 2011. The
IFRS compliant financial statements will include reconciliations for the quarter
as well as well reconciliations as at the 1 January 2010 transition date. The
Company has identified four phases to its conversion process: design and
planning, detailed assessment and quantification of differences under IFRS,
implementation and post implementation.
During the design and planning phase, the Company focused on ensuring that the
correct skills were available and on the longer term planning to ensure the
smooth transition to IFRS. This commenced in Q2 2008, when the Company
established a project management team which included members of the finance
function at the subsidiary level, who were already experienced in the
preparation of IFRS accounts. Other team members were provided with IFRS
training. In addition, the Company's finance function already had some IFRS
experience from the preparation of a detailed reporting pack under IFRS on a
quarterly basis for its major shareholders. This IFRS pack includes accounting
adjustments for all material differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP, with
the exception of IFRS 1. During 2008, the Company also undertook an IFRS
diagnostic report which included an initial assessment of key accounting areas
where IFRS differs to Canadian GAAP and which may have a significant impact on
the financial statements. The report also outlined the key systems and processes
which would be affected by the conversion process. Concluding the planning and
design phase, the Company also established a timeline for key milestones and
deliverables to be reported to the audit committee on an ongoing basis.
At the end of 2008, the Company moved to the next phase of its IFRS conversion
process, by initiating a detailed review and assessment of the all accounting
differences under IFRS standards, with particular focus on IFRS 1. This included
a detailed assessment of all fixed assets throughout the Group to identify
assets where a different treatment is required under IFRS. This assessment also
identified the following areas where there are potential differences between
IFRS and Canadian GAAP:
* Business combinations
* Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources
* Property, plant and equipment
* Foreign currency
* Impairment of assets
* Rehabilitation provisions
This took place in the first half of 2009 along with further in-depth training
to members of the project management team as well as attendance of seminars
relating to IFRS changeover.
In Q3 2009, the project team commenced the identification and assessment of the
various elections the Company is required to make with regards to IFRS 1. This
will lead to the quantification of the differences under IFRS.
For the remainder of 2009, the Company intends on continuing with the detailed
assessment which will include a full assessment of IT and systems in the
subsidiaries to affect the changeover. In addition the Company will continue to
quantify the potential impacts and begin to focus on the additional disclosures
for the financial statements. This will be reported to the audit committee on a
timely basis.
Goodwill and intangible assets - In February 2008, the Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants ("CICA") issued Section 3064 Goodwill and intangible
assets, replacing Section 3062, Goodwill and other intangible assets. It
establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and of intangible
assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning goodwill are
unchanged from the standards included in the previous Section 3062. The Company
adopted the new standards on 01 January 2009. The adoption of this new Section
had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(EIC 173) - In January 2009, the CICA issued EIC 173, "Credit Risk and the Fair
Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". The EIC requires the
Company to take into account the Company's own credit risk and the credit risk
of the counterparty in determining the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities, including derivative instruments. This EIC applies to
interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years
beginning on or after 01 January 2009. The adoption of this new accounting
policy did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
Mining Exploration Costs (EIC 174) - In March 2009, the CICA issued EIC Abstract
174, "Mining Exploration Costs". The EIC provides guidance on the accounting and
the impairment review of exploration costs. This EIC applies to interim and
annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on
or after 01 January 2009. The adoption of this new accounting policy did not
have any material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Current Global Conditions - Current global financial conditions have been
subject to increased volatility and numerous financial institutions have either
gone into bankruptcy or have had to be rescued by governmental authorities.
Access to public financing has been negatively impacted by both sub-prime
mortgages and the liquidity crisis affecting the asset-backed commercial paper
market. These factors may impact the ability of the Company to obtain equity or
debt financing in the future and, if obtained, on terms favourable to the
Company. If these increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue,
the Company's operations could be adversely impacted and the value and the price
of the Company's Common Shares could continue to be adversely affected.
Market price volatility - The trading price of the Common Shares may be subject
to large fluctuations. The trading price of the Common Shares may increase or
decrease in response to a number of events and factors, some of which are
directly related to the Company's success and some of which are not directly
related to the Company's success and are therefore not within the Company's
control. Such events and factors include: the price of gold and other metals,
the Company's operating performance and the performance of competitors and other
similar companies, the public's reaction to the Company's press releases, other
public announcements and the Company's filings with the various securities
regulatory authorities, changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by
research analysts who track the Common Shares or the shares of other companies
in the mineral resource sector, changes in general economic conditions, the
number of the Common Shares to be publicly traded after an offering, the breadth
of the public market for the Common Shares, the arrival or departure of key
personnel, acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving the
Company or its competitors, developments that affect the market for all mineral
resource sector shares, and the attractiveness of alternative investments.
The effect of these and other factors on the market price of the Common Shares
on the exchanges in which the Company trades has historically made the Company's
share price volatile and suggests that the Company's share price will continue
to be volatile in the future. A decline in the market prices of the Company's
securities could also impair the Company's ability to raise additional capital.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's
securities, shareholders have often instituted class action securities
litigation against those companies. Such litigation, if instituted against the
Company, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention
and resources, which could significantly harm the Company's profitability and
reputation.
Dilution - The Company may require additional funds to fund exploration and
development programs and potential acquisitions. The Company cannot predict the
size of future issuances of Common Shares or the issuance of debt instruments or
other securities convertible into shares or the effect, if any, that future
issuances and sales of the Company's securities will have on the market price of
the Common Shares. If it raises additional funding by issuing additional equity
securities, such financing may substantially dilute the interests of existing
shareholders. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Shares, or the availability
of such Common Shares for sale, could adversely affect the prevailing market
prices for the Company's securities.
No dividends - The Company has never paid cash dividends on the Common Shares.
It currently intends to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development
and growth of its business, and may not pay any cash dividends on the Common
Shares for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the Company may in the future
become subject to contractual restrictions on, or prohibitions against, the
payment of dividends. As a result, investors will have to rely on capital
appreciation, if any, to earn a return on their investment in Common Shares in
the foreseeable future. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be
reviewed periodically by the Company's board of directors and will depend upon,
among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial
condition and capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements,
business opportunities and conditions and other factors.
Foreign country risk - Any changes in regulations in Greece, Romania or Turkey,
or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the Company's control and may
adversely affect its business. Exploration and development of any one or more of
the Company's mineral properties may be affected in varying degrees by
government regulations or policies with respect to restrictions on future
exploitation and production, labour, environmental protection, price controls,
royalties, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes,
expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site
safety.
Currently there are no restrictions on the repatriation from Greece, Romania or
Turkey of earnings to foreign entities. However, there can be no assurance that
restrictions on repatriation of earnings from Romania, Greece or Turkey will not
be imposed in the future.
Exploration and mining risks - The business of exploring for minerals and mining
involves a high degree of risk. Only a small proportion of the properties that
are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Although substantial
benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major mineralised deposit, no
assurance can be given that minerals will be discovered in sufficient quantities
or having sufficient grade to justify commercial operations. The economics of
developing gold and other mineral properties is affected by many factors
including the cost of operations, variations of the grade of ore mined,
fluctuations in the price of gold or other minerals produced, costs of
processing equipment and such other factors as government regulations.
Unless otherwise indicated, mineral resource and mineral reserve figures
presented herein are based upon estimates made by company personnel and
independent geologists. These estimates are imprecise and depend upon geological
interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling
analysis, which may prove to be inaccurate. There can be no assurance that:
these estimates will be accurate, mineral reserves, mineral resources or other
mineralisation figures will be accurate, or this mineralisation could be mined
or processed profitably.
Mineralisation estimates for the Company's properties may require adjustments or
downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work or actual
production experience. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any,
may differ from that indicated by drilling results. There can be no assurance
that minerals recovered in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale
tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.
The mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates contained herein have been
determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and
operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market
prices for gold and silver may render portions of the Company's mineralisation
uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralisation. Any material
reductions in estimates of mineralisation, or of the Company's ability to
extract this mineralisation, could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations or financial condition.
The grade of mineralisation ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by
drilling results and such differences could be material. There can be no
assurance that minerals recovered in small scale laboratory tests will be
duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale
operations. Material changes in geological mineral resources, grades, stripping
ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of projects.
Mining involves various types of risks and hazards, including: environmental
hazards, industrial accidents, metallurgical and other processing problems,
unusual or unexpected rock formations, structural cave-ins or slides, seismic
activity, flooding, fires, periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous
weather conditions, variations in grade, deposit size, density and other
geological problems, mechanical equipment performance problems, unavailability
of materials and equipment including fuel, labour force disruptions,
unanticipated or significant changes in the costs of supplies including, but not
limited to, petroleum, and unanticipated transportation costs.
These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties,
production facilities or other properties, personal injury or death, loss of key
employees, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs,
monetary losses and possible legal liability.
Where considered practical to do so, the Company maintains insurance against
risks in the operation of its business in amounts which it believes to be
reasonable. Such insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on
coverage. There can be no assurance that such insurance will continue to be
available, will be available at economically acceptable premiums or will be
adequate to cover any resulting liability. Insurance against certain
environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other
hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production,
is not generally available to the Company or to other companies within the
mining industry. The Company may suffer a material adverse effect on its
business if it incurs losses related to any significant events that are not
covered by its insurance policies. Payment of such liabilities would reduce
funds available for acquisition of mineral prospects or exploration and
development and would have a material adverse affect on the financial position
of the Company.
Financing risks - Exploration and development of one or more of the Company's
properties will be dependent upon the Company's ability to obtain financing
through joint ventures, equity or debt financing or other means, and although
the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the
sale of equity securities, there can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that the terms of such
financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could
result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and
development of the Company's projects with the possible loss of such properties.
Mineral prices - The mineral exploration and development industry in general is
intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if commercial
quantities of proven and probable mineral reserves are discovered, a profitable
market may exist for the sale of the same. The Company's profitability and
long-term viability depend, in large part, upon the market price of gold and
other metals and minerals produced from the Company's properties. The market
price of gold and other metals is volatile and is impacted by numerous factors
beyond the Company's control, including: expectations with respect to the rate
of inflation, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and certain other
currencies, interest rates, global or regional political or economic conditions,
supply and demand for jewellery and industrial products containing metals, costs
of substitutes, changes in global or regional investment or consumption
patterns, and sales by central banks and other holders, speculators and
producers of gold and other metals in response to any of the above factors.
There can be no assurance that the market price of gold and other metals will
remain at current levels or that such prices will improve. A decrease in the
market price of gold, silver and other metals could adversely affect the
profitability of the Company's existing mines, which would have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. A
decline in the market price of gold, silver, or other metals, may also require
the Company to write-down its mineral reserves which would have a material and
adverse affect on its earnings and profitability.
Exploration, development, mining and other licences - The Company's current
operations, including further exploration, development and mining activities,
require certain licenses, concessions, leases, permits and regulatory consents
(the "Authorisations") from various levels of governmental authorities. The
Company may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access, or
use, certain of its properties in order to proceed to development. There can be
no assurance that all Authorisations which the Company requires for the conduct
of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms or in a timely
manner, or at all, that such terms may not be adversely changed, that required
extension will be granted, or that the issuance of such Authorisations will not
be challenged by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain such
Authorisations or extension thereto, challenges to the issuance of such
Authorisations, whether successful or unsuccessful, changes to the terms of such
Authorisations, or a failure to comply with the terms of any such Authorisations
that the Company has obtained, could have a material adverse impact on the
Company.
Title matters - While the Company has diligently investigated title to all
mineral concessions and, to the best of the Company's knowledge, title to all of
its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee
of title. Title to the properties may be affected by undisclosed and undetected
defects.
Environmental and other regulatory requirements - The Company's activities are
subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from
time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for restrictions and
prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in
association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from
tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach
of such legislation may result in imposition of fines and penalties. In
addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of
environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving in a
manner which means stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for
non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed
projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their
directors, officers and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in
governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of
operations.
The Company's current exploration and development activities require permits
from various governmental authorities and such operations are and will be
governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, labour standards,
occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental
protection, safety and other matters. Companies engaged in exploration and
development activities generally experience increased costs and delays as a
result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits.
There can be no assurance that all permits which the Company may require for
exploration and development will be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a
timely basis, or that such laws and regulations would not have an adverse effect
on any project that the Company may undertake. The Company believes it is in
substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations which currently
apply to the Company's activities. However, there may be unforeseen
environmental liabilities resulting from exploration, development and/or mining
activities and these may be costly to remedy.
Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and
activities of exploration and development companies, or more stringent
implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and
cause increases in expenditures and costs, or require abandonment, or cause
delays in developing new mining properties.
Tax matters - The Company believes that it is, and intends to take all necessary
steps to remain, resident solely in Canada for income tax purposes. The
Company's tax residency is, however, affected by a number of factors, some of
which are outside of its control, including the application and interpretation
of the relevant tax laws and treaties. If ever the Company were to cease to be
tax resident in Canada, it would be liable to pay additional Canadian taxes,
including, but not limited to, capital gains tax based on the difference between
the fair market value and tax cost of its assets at the relevant time. If such
taxes were to become payable, this could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the
income tax consequences to holders of Common Shares would be different from
those applicable if the Company were resident in Canada.
Dependence on management - The Company's development to date has largely
depended and in the future will continue to depend on the efforts of key
management. Loss of any of these people could have a material adverse effect on
the Company and its business. The Company has not taken out and does not intend
to take out key man insurance in respect of any directors, officer or other
employees.
Joint ventures - The Company holds (and expects to hold in the future) interests
in joint ventures. Joint ventures may involve special risks associated with the
possibility that the joint venture partners may (i) have economic or business
interests or targets that are inconsistent with ours; (ii) take action contrary
to the Company's policies or objectives with respect to their investments, for
instance by veto of proposals in respect of joint venture operations; (iii) be
unable or unwilling to fulfil their obligations under the joint venture or other
agreements; or (iv) experience financial or other difficulties. Any of the
foregoing may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition. In addition, the termination of certain of
these joint venture agreements, if not replaced on similar terms, could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial
condition.
Competition - The international mining industry is highly competitive. The
Company's ability to acquire properties and add mineral reserves in the future
will depend not only on its ability to develop its present properties, but also
on its ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects
for mineral exploration. The Company may be at a competitive disadvantage in
acquiring additional mining properties because it must compete with other
individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources,
operational experience and technical capabilities than the Company. The Company
may also encounter competition from other mining companies in its efforts to
hire experienced mining professionals. Competition could adversely affect the
Company's ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable
producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.
Competition for services and equipment could cause project costs to increase
materially, resulting in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a
timely manner due to inadequate availability, and increase potential scheduling
difficulties and cost increases due to the need to coordinate the availability
of services or equipment, any of which could materially increase project
exploration, development or construction costs, result in project delays or
both.
Currency fluctuations - Gold and other metals are sold throughout the world
principally in United States dollars. The Company's operating costs for its
European projects are incurred principally in Euros. As a result, any
significant and sustained appreciation of the Euro against the U.S. dollar may
materially increase the Company's costs and reduce revenues. The Company does
not currently use any derivative products to manage or mitigate any foreign
exchange exposure.
Conflicts of Interest - Certain directors of the Company are, and may continue
to be, involved in the mining and mineral exploration industry through their
direct and indirect participation in corporations, partnership or joint ventures
which are potential competitors of the Company. Situations may arise in
connection with potential acquisitions in investments where the other interests
of these directors may conflict with the interests of the Company. Directors of
the Company with conflicts of interest will be subject to and will follow the
procedures set out in applicable corporate and securities legislation,
regulations, rules and policies.
Legal Proceedings - the Company is a party to the legal proceedings described
under the heading "Legal Proceedings". If decided adversely to the Company,
these legal proceedings, or others that could be brought against the Company in
the future which are not now known, for example, litigation based on its
business activities, environmental laws, volatility in its stock price or
failure to comply with its disclosure obligations, could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition or operations.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS & PROCEDURES AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Executive Chairman and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company (the
"Certifying Officers") have established and maintained in the period ended 30
September 2009 disclosure controls and procedures ("DC&P") and internal control
over financial reporting ("IFCR") for the Company.
The Certifying Officers have caused DC&P, as defined in National Instrument
52-109 ("NI 52-109"), to be designed under their supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance that material information relating to the Company and its
subsidiaries is made known to the Certifying Officers by others within those
entities, as appropriate, to allow decisions regarding required disclosure
within the time periods specified by legislation, particularly during the period
in which interim and annual filings are being prepared.
The Certifying Officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's DC&P
as at 30 September 2009. Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers
have concluded that the DC&P are adequate and effective for the period ended 30
September 2009.
The Certifying Officers have caused internal control over financial reporting,
as defined in NI 52-109, to be designed under their supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
Canadian GAAP.
As of 30 September 2009 the Certifying Officers assessed the effectiveness of
the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Based upon that
evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that the internal controls and
procedures are adequate and effective for the period ended 30 September 2009.
During the period ended 30 September 2009, there has been no change in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.
The Certifying Officers believe that disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control systems can only provide reasonable assurance, and not absolute
assurance, that such objectives are met.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
QRTUUGPPGUPBGBB
European Gold (LSE:EGU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
European Gold (LSE:EGU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024
