- Amended Quarterly Report (10-Q/A)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

x Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009,

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) Of the Exchange Act

for the Transition Period from to .

Commission File Number No. 0-14555

VIST FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA		23-2354007
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1240 Broadcasting Road

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610

(Address of principal executive offices)

(610) 208-0966

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $5.00 Par Value		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(Title of each class)		(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

		Number of Shares Outstanding
		as of March 26, 2010
COMMON STOCK ($5.00 Par Value)		5,855,976
(Title of Class)		(Outstanding Shares)

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONT ENTS

		PAGE

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	5
Item 1.	Financial Statements	5
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (As Restated) and December 31, 2008		5
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 (As Restated) and 2008		6
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 (As Restated) and 2008		8
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 (As Restated) and 2008		9
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		11
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	43
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	43
Item 5.	Other Information	43
Item 6.	Exhibits	44
SIGNATURES		44
CERTIFICATIONS

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment on Form 10-Q/A amends our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 8, 2009 (Amendment No. 1). We are filing this Amendment No. 1 to the consolidated financial statements of VIST Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 to correct the following accounting errors and the related effects of those errors: (i) correcting the calculation of fair value on junior subordinated debentures and interest rate swaps, (ii) correcting the accounting for changes in fair value of cash flow hedges and the junior subordinated debentures which was incorrectly recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and should have been reflected through operations, and (iii) correcting the misapplication of cash flow hedge accounting to the junior subordinated debentures which were and continue to be accounted for at fair value. The Company’s previously issued financial statements for this period should no longer be relied upon.

The Company concluded that it would revise its financial statements to properly account for interest rate swaps that were incorrectly designated as cash flow hedging relationships under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). Changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps, previously recognized as unrealized gains (losses) in accumulated other comprehensive income, should have been recognized in earnings. In addition, the Company measures the fair value of its interest rate swaps by netting the discounted future fixed or variable cash payments and the discounted expected fixed or variable cash receipts based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities. The Company concluded that an incorrect forward yield curve was applied to the fair value of its interest rate swaps. The Company has adjusted the forward yield curve used in its determination of the fair value of the interest rate swaps which is reflected in these restated financial statements.

The Company has elected to report its junior subordinated debt at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company measures the fair value of its junior subordinated debt utilizing the income approach whereby the expected cash flows over the remaining estimated life of the debentures are discounted using the Company’s credit spread over the current fully indexed yield based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities. The Company concluded that an incorrect credit spread was applied to the fair value of its junior subordinated debt. The Company has adjusted the credit spread used in its determination of the fair value of its junior subordinated debt which is reflected in these restated financial statements.

The Company is not required to and has not updated any forward-looking statements previously included in the initial Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009. The errors discussed above do not affect periods prior to the three month period ended September 30, 2008. Accordingly, the Company has amended our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009. The Company has not amended, and does not intend to amend, any of its other reports filed prior to the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.

This Amendment No. 1 includes changes in “Part I, Item 4 - Controls and Procedures” and reflects Management’s restated assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2009. This restatement of Management’s assessment regarding disclosure controls and procedures results from management’s determination that a material weakness existed with respect to the internal controls over financial reporting related to accounting for the fair value of junior subordinated debt and related interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2009.

The material weakness existed at September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 and was not identified until November 2009. To remediate this material weakness, the Company has added a review specifically for disclosures and accounting treatment for all complex financial instruments acquired or disposed of during each reporting period. The material weakness relates only to the applicable accounting treatment to these complex financial instruments. Although management has implemented these additional control procedures to remediate the material weakness, we believe that additional time and testing are necessary before concluding that the material weakness has been remediated.

Except as described in the preceding paragraph to remediate the material weakness described, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

For additional discussion, see Note 2 included in Part I, Item 1 — Financial Statements of this report.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

VIST Financial Corp. (the “Company”), may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements,” including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to shareholders and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Table of Contents

These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control). The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; the willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Company’s products and services; the success of the Company in gaining regulatory approval of its products and services, when required; the impact of changes in laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the nature, extent, and timing of governmental actions and reforms, including the rules of participation for the Trouble Asset Relief Program voluntary Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which may be changed unilaterally and retroactively by legislative or regulatory actions; and the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. Readers are also cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of this report, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 — Financial Statements

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	March 31,
	2009			December 31,
	(As Restated)			2008
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	20,114		$	18,964
Federal funds sold	13,550			—
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	353			320

Total cash and cash equivalents	34,017			19,284

Mortgage loans held for sale	2,841			2,283
Securities available for sale	238,420			226,665
Securities held to maturity, fair value 2009 - $1,767; 2008 - $1,926	3,054			3,060
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	5,715			5,715
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses 2009 - $8,165; 2008 - $8,124	878,425			878,181
Premises and equipment, net	6,685			6,591
Identifiable intangible assets	4,662			4,833
Goodwill	39,732			39,732
Bank owned life insurance	18,628			18,552
Other assets	27,986			21,174

Total assets	$	1,260,165		$	1,226,070

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	106,510		$	108,645
Interest bearing	824,152			741,955

Total deposits	930,662			850,600

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	127,242			120,086
Federal funds purchased	—			53,424
Long-term debt	50,000			50,000
Junior subordinated debt, at fair value	19,050			18,260
Other liabilities	8,390			10,071

Total liabilities	1,135,344			1,102,441

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares; $1,000 liquidation preference per share; 25,000 shares of Series A 5% cumulative preferred stock issued and outstanding; Less: discount of $2,208 at March 31, 2009 and a discount of $2,307 at December 31, 2008	22,792			22,693
Common stock, $5.00 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued: 5,800,929 shares at March 31, 2009 and 5,768,429 shares at December 31, 2008	29,005			28,842
Stock Warrants	2,307			2,307
Surplus	63,588			64,349
Retained earnings	15,209			14,757
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7,889		)	(7,834		)
Treasury stock; 10,484 shares at March 31, 2009 and 68,354 shares at December 31, 2008, at cost	(191		)	(1,485		)

Total shareholders’ equity	124,821			123,629

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,260,165		$	1,226,070

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008
	(As Restated)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	12,342		$	14,110
Interest on securities:
Taxable	2,870			2,254
Tax-exempt	286			213
Dividend income	34			144
Interest on federal funds sold	3			—
Other interest income	1			4

Total interest income	15,536			16,725

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits	5,154			5,503
Interest on short-term borrowings	17			721
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase	1,063			954
Interest on long-term debt	505			599
Interest on junior subordinated debt	315			405

Total interest expense	7,054			8,182

Net Interest Income	8,482			8,543
Provision for loan losses	825			410

Net Interest Income after provision for loan losses	7,657			8,133

Other income:
Customer service fees	658			620
Mortgage banking activities	267			323
Commissions and fees from insurance sales	2,958			2,684
Brokerage and investment advisory commissions and fees	330			237
Earnings on investment in life insurance	76			168
Gain on sale of loans	—			23
Other Income	957			496
Net realized gains (losses) on sales of securities	159			141

Total other income	5,405			4,692

Other expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	5,688			5,730
Occupancy expense	1,069			1,129
Furniture and equipment expense	606			672
Marketing and advertising expense	270			657
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets	171			150
Professional services	892			535
Outside processing	951			820
Insurance expense	444			271
Other expense	1,188			1,123

Total other expense	11,279			11,087

Income before income taxes	1,783			1,738
Income taxes	252			179

Net income	1,531			1,559
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion	(412		)	—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,119		$	1,559

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2009		March 31, 2008
	(As Restated)
EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA

Average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share	5,735,968		5,673,403
Basic earnings per share	$	0.20	$	0.28
Average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share	5,735,968		5,688,193
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.20	$	0.27
Cash dividends declared per actual share outstanding	$	0.10	$	0.20

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock												Accumulated
	Number of				Number of												Other
	Shares		Liquidation		Shares		Par		Stock					Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Issued		Value		Issued		Value		Warrants		Surplus			Earnings			Loss			Stock			Total
Balance, January 1, 2009	25,000		$	22,693	5,768,429		$	28,842	$	2,307	$	64,349		$	14,757		$	(7,834	)	$	(1,485	)	$	123,629

Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (as restated)	—		—		—		—		—		—			1,531			—			—			1,531
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of tax effect	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			(55		)	—			(55		)
Total comprehensive income (as restated)																							1,476

Issuance of preferred stock	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Preferred stock discount	—		99		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			99
Stock Warrants	—		—		—		—		—		—			(99		)	—			—			(99		)

Reissuance of 57,870 shares of treasury stock	—		—		—		—		—		(870		)	—			—			1,294			424

Common stock issued in connection with directors’ compensation	—		—		28,243		141		—		78			—			—			—			219
Common stock issued in connection with director and employee stock purchase plans	—		—		4,257		22		—		11			(4		)	—			—			29
Compensation expense related to stock options	—		—		—		—		—		20			—			—			—			20

Common stock cash dividends paid ($0.10 per share)	—		—		—		—		—		—			(573		)	—			—			(573		)
Preferred stock cash dividends declared	—		—		—		—		—		—			(403		)	—			—			(403		)
Balance, March 31, 2009 (as restated)	25,000		$	22,792	5,800,929		$	29,005	$	2,307	$	63,588		$	15,209		$	(7,889	)	$	(191	)	$	124,821

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock												Accumulated
	Number of				Number of												Other
	Shares		Liquidation		Shares		Par		Stock					Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Issued		Value		Issued		Value		Warrants		Surplus			Earnings			Loss			Stock			Total
Balance, January 1, 2008	—		$	—	5,746,998		$	28,735	$	—	$	63,940		$	17,039		$	(1,116	)	$	(2,006	)	$	106,592

Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—		—		—		—			1,559			—			—			1,559
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of tax effect	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			139			—			139
Total comprehensive income	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			1,698

Additional consideration in connection with acquisitions (21,499 shares)	—		—		—		—		—		(138		)	—			—			521			383

Common stock issued in connection with directors’ compensation	—		—		10,808		54		—		139			—			—			—			193
Common stock issued in connection with director and employee stock purchase plans	—		—		2,600		13		—		32			—			—			—			45
Tax benefits from employee stock transactions	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Compensation expense related to stock options	—		—		—		—		—		77			—			—			—			77
Cash dividends declared ($0.20 per share)	—		—		—		—		—		—			(1,139		)	—			—			(1,139		)
Balance, March 31, 2008	$	—	$	—	$	5,760,406	$	28,802	$	—	$	64,050		$	17,459		$	(977	)	$	(1,485	)	$	107,849

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			March 31,
	2009			2008
	(As Restated)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,531		$	1,559
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	825			410
Provision for depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment	343			386
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets	171			150
Deferred income taxes	(42		)	7
Director stock compensation	219			193
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts	86			11
Decrease in mortgage servicing rights	53			55
Net realized losses on sales of foreclosed real estate	—			93
Net realized gains on sales of securities	(159		)	(141		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	16,833			11,649
Net gains on sale of loans	(261		)	(308		)
Loans originated for sale	(17,130		)	(11,853		)
Increase in investment in life insurance	(76		)	(168		)
Compensation expense related to stock options	20			77
Net change in fair value of liabilities	790			(197		)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets	(338		)	270
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities	(1,948		)	(254		)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	917			1,939

Cash Flow From Investing Activities
Investment securities:
Purchases - available for sale	(48,927		)	(21,480		)
Principal repayments, maturities and calls - available for sale	18,011			9,670
Principal repayments, maturities and calls - held to maturity	—			6
Proceeds from sales - available for sale	19,156			8,963
Net increase in loans receivable	(7,467		)	(8,133		)
Proceeds from sale of loans	—			399
Net increase in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	—			(480		)
Purchases of premises and equipment	(473		)	(386		)
Disposals of premises and equipment	36			3
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities	(19,664		)	(11,438		)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			March 31,
	2009			2008
	(As Restated)
Cash Flow From Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	80,062			45,313
Net decrease in federal funds purchased	(53,424		)	(46,773		)
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	7,156			3,657
Proceeds from long-term debt	—			15,000
Reissuance of treasury stock	424			383
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and stock purchase plans	29			45
Cash dividends paid on preferred and common stock	(767		)	(1,131		)
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	33,480			16,494

Increase in cash and cash equivalents	14,733			6,995
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
January 1	19,284			25,789
March 31	$	34,017		$	32,784

Cash Payments For:
Interest	$	7,471		$	8,343
Taxes	$	—		$	—

Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Transfer of loans receivable to real estate owned	$	6,398		$	174

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods have been included. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For purpose of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, and interest bearing deposits in other banks. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2008.

2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company concluded that it would revise its financial statements to properly account for interest rate swaps that were incorrectly designated in cash flow hedging relationships under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). Changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps, previously recognized as unrealized gains (losses) in accumulated other comprehensive income, should have been recognized in earnings. In addition, the Company measures the fair value of its interest rate swaps by netting the discounted future fixed or variable cash payments and the discounted expected fixed or variable cash receipts based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities. The Company concluded that an incorrect forward yield curve was applied to the fair value of its interest rate swaps. The Company has adjusted the forward yield curve used in its determination of the fair value of the interest rate swaps which is reflected in these restated financial statements.

The following tables set forth the unaudited consolidated restated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 previously filed in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.

The following is a summary of the adjustments to our previously issued unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009:

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	March 31,								March 31,
	2009								2009
	As Reported			Adjustments			Reclassifications		As Restated
	(unaudited)								(unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	20,114							$	20,114
Federal funds sold	13,550								13,550
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	353								353

Total cash and cash equivalents	34,017								34,017

Mortgage loans held for sale	2,841								2,841
Securities available for sale (a)	244,135						(5,715	)	238,420
Securities held to maturity, fair value 2009 - $1,767; 2008 - $1,926	3,054								3,054
Federal Home Loan Bank stock (a)	—						5,715		5,715
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses 2009 - $8,165; 2008 - $8,124	878,425								878,425
Premises and equipment, net	6,685								6,685
Identifiable intangible assets	4,662								4,662
Goodwill	39,732								39,732
Bank owned life insurance	18,628								18,628
Other assets (b)	26,851			1,135					27,986

Total assets	$	1,259,030		$	1,135				$	1,260,165

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	106,510							$	106,510
Interest bearing	824,152								824,152

Total deposits	930,662								930,662

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	127,242								127,242
Federal funds purchased	—								—
Long-term debt	50,000								50,000
Junior subordinated debt, at fair value (c)	19,805			(755		)			19,050
Other liabilities (b)	7,585			805					8,390

Total liabilities	1,135,294			50					1,135,344

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares; $1,000 liquidation preference per share; 25,000 shares of Series A 5% cumulative preferred stock issued and outstanding; Less: discount of $2,208 at March 31, 2009 and a discount of $2,307 at December 31, 2008	22,792								22,792
Common stock, $5.00 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued: 5,800,929 shares at March 31, 2009 and 5,768,429 shares at December 31, 2008	29,005								29,005
Stock Warrants	2,307								2,307
Surplus	63,588								63,588
Retained earnings (d)	14,913			296					15,209
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (e)	(8,678		)	789					(7,889		)
Treasury stock; 10,484 shares at March 31, 2009 and 68,354 shares at December 31, 2008, at cost	(191		)						(191		)

Total shareholders’ equity	123,736			1,085					124,821

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,259,030		$	1,135				$	1,260,165

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a) Reclassification of Federal Home Loan Bank and American Central Bankers Bank stock from Securities Available for Sale to Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

(b) Adjustment to properly record the interest rate swaps at fair value. The Company adjusted the forward yield curve used in its determination of the fair value of the interest rate swaps to reflect a more appropriate fair value in the restated financial statements.

(c) Adjustment to properly record the junior subordinated debentures at fair value. The fair value is estimated utilizing the income approach whereby the expected cash flows over the remaining estimated life of the debentures are discounted using the Company’s estimated credit spread over the current fully indexed yield based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities. The Company has adjusted the credit spreads used in its determination of the fair value of its junior subordinated debt to reflect a more appropriate fair value in the restated financial statements.

(d) Adjustment related to the change in net income as a result of the correction of the errors related to the measurement accounting for the fair value of certain junior subordinated debentures and the accounting and measurement of interest rate swaps that were improperly designated as cash flow hedges.

(e) Adjustment to reverse the effects of improper accounting treatment for interest rate swaps that were improperly accounted for as cash flow hedges. The change in fair value of the interest rate swaps is included as a component of other income in the restated consolidated statements of income.

The following is a summary of the adjustments to our previously issued unaudited consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2009:

Table of Contents

VIST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Quarter Ended March 31, 2009

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2009								March 31, 2009
	As Reported			Adjustments			Reclassifications		As Restated
	(unaudited)								(unaudited)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	12,342							$	12,342
Interest on securities:
Taxable	2,870								2,870
Tax-exempt	286								286
Dividend income (f)	39						(5	)	34
Interest on federal funds sold	3								3
Other interest income	1								1

Total interest income	15,541						(5	)	15,536

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits	5,154								5,154
Interest on short-term borrowings	17								17
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase	1,063								1,063
Interest on long-term debt	505								505
Interest on junior subordinated debt	315								315

Total interest expense	7,054								7,054

Net Interest Income	8,487						(5	)	8,482
Provision for loan losses	825								825

Net Interest Income after provision for loan losses	7,662						(5	)	7,657

Other income:
Customer service fees	658								658
Mortgage banking activities	267								267
Commissions and fees from insurance sales	2,958								2,958
Brokerage and investment advisory commissions and fees	330								330
Earnings on investment in life insurance	76								76
Gains on sale of loans	—								—
Net realized gains (losses) on sales of securities	159								159
Other Income (f), (g)	1,070			(118		)	5		957

Total other income	5,518			(118		)	5		5,405

Other expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	5,688								5,688
Occupancy expense	1,069								1,069
Furniture and equipment expense	606								606
Marketing and advertising expense	270								270
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets	171								171
Professional services	892								892
Outside processing	951								951
Insurance expense	444								444
Other expense	1,188								1,188

Total other expense	11,279								11,279

Income before income taxes	1,901			(118		)			1,783
Income taxes (h)	292			(40		)			252

Net income	1,609			(78		)			1,531
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion	(412		)						(412		)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,197		$	(78	)			$	1,119

EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA

Average shares outstanding	5,735,968								5,735,968
Basic earnings per share	$	0.21		$	(0.01	)			$	0.20
Average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share	5,735,968								5,735,968
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.21		$	(0.01	)			$	0.20
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.10							$	0.10

(f) Reclassification of dividend income on Federal Home Loan Bank stock from interest income to other income.

(g) Adjustment to record the change in the fair market value of the interest rate swaps, the junior subordinated debentures and to reverse the effect of the treatment of the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.

(h) Adjustment to record the income tax effect of the change in the fair value of the cash flow hedge and junior subordinated debentures.

Table of Contents

3. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income, less Series A Preferred Stock dividends and discount accretion, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding to include the effect of stock options, if dilutive, using the treasury stock method. For 2008, there were no dividends or discount accretion on the Series A Preferred Stock.

Earnings per common share for the respective periods indicated have been computed based upon the following:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009			March 31,
	(As Restated)			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Net Income	$	1,531		$	1,559
Less: preferred stock dividends	(313		)	—
Less: preferred stock discount accretion	(99		)	—

Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,119		$	1,559

Average shares outstanding	5,735,968			5,673,403
Effect of dilutive stock options	—			14,790

Average number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share	5,735,968			5,688,193

Table of Contents

4. Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expense, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income and related tax effects were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009			March 31,
	(As Restated)			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Net income	$	1,531		$	1,559

Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities	76			351
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in income	(159		)	(141		)

Net unrealized (losses) gains	(83		)	210
Income tax effect	28			(71		)

Other comprehensive (loss) income	(55		)	139

Total comprehensive income	$	1,476		$	1,698

5. Guarantees

Outstanding letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company had $13.6 million and $14.5 million of financial and performance standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The majority of these standby letters of credit expire within the next 24 months. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Company requires collateral and personal guarantees supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral and the enforcement of personal guarantees would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for guarantees under standby letters of credit is not material.

Table of Contents

6. Segment Information

The Company’s insurance operations, investment operations and mortgage banking operations are managed separately from the traditional banking and related financial services that the Company also offers. The mortgage banking operation offers residential lending products and generates revenue primarily through gains recognized on loan sales. The insurance operation utilizes insurance companies and acts as an agent or brokers to provide coverage for commercial, individual, surety bond, and group and personal benefit plans. The investment operation provides services for individual financial planning, retirement and estate planning, investments, corporate and small business pension and retirement planning.

	Banking and Financial Services		Mortgage Banking		Insurance Services		Investment Services			Total
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Three months ended March 31, 2009
Net interest income and other income from external sources (as restated)	$	9,155	$	866	$	3,520	$	346		$	13,887
Income before income taxes (as restated)	533		495		698		57			1,783
Total Assets (as restated)	1,164,206		77,129		17,590		1,240			1,260,165
Purchases of premises and equipment	472		—		1		—			473

Three months ended March 31, 2008
Net interest income and other income from external sources	$	9,449	$	838	$	2,689	$	259		$	13,235
Income (loss) before income taxes	1,084		299		370		(15		)	1,738
Total Assets	1,058,447		65,122		17,966		1,288			1,142,823
Purchases of premises and equipment	347		1		37		1			386

7. Stock Incentive Plans

The Company has an Employee Stock Incentive Plan (ESIP) that covers all officers and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and is administered by a committee of the Board of Directors. The total number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to the ESIP is 486,781. The option price for options issued under the ESIP must be at least equal to 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and shall not be less than the stock’s par value. Options granted under the ESIP have various vesting periods ranging from immediate up to 5 years, 20% exercisable not less than one year after the date of grant, but no later than ten years after the date of grant in accordance with the vesting. Vested options expire on the earlier of ten years after the date of grant, three months from the participant’s termination of employment or one year from the date of the participant’s death or disability. As of March 31, 2009, a total of 148,072 shares have been issued under the ESIP. The ESIP expired on November 10, 2008.

The Company has an Independent Directors Stock Option Plan (IDSOP). The total number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to the IDSOP is 121,695. The IDSOP covers all directors of the Company who are not employees and former directors who continue to be employed by the Company. The option price for options issued under the IDSOP will be equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options are exercisable from the date of grant and expire on the earlier of ten years after the date of grant, three months from the date the participant ceases to be a director of the Company or the cessation of the participant’s employment, or twelve months from the date of the participant’s death or disability. As of March 31, 2009, a total of 21,166 shares have been issued under the IDSOP. The IDSOP expired on November 10, 2008.

On April 17, 2007, shareholders approved the VIST Financial Corp. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (EIP). The total number of shares which may be granted under the EIP is equal to 12.5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of approval of the EIP and is subject to automatic annual increases by an amount equal to 12.5% of any increase in the number of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock during the preceding year or such lesser number as determined by the Company’s board of directors. The total number of shares of common stock that

Table of Contents

may be issued pursuant to the EIP is 676,572. The EIP covers all employees and non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and restricted stock grants are authorized for issuance under the EIP. The exercise price for stock options granted under the EIP must equal the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Vesting of awards under the EIP is determined by the Human Resources Committee of the board of directors, but must be at least one year. The Committee may also subject an award to one or more performance criteria. Stock options and restricted stock awards generally expire upon termination of employment. In certain instances after an optionee terminates employment or service, the Committee may extend the exercise period for a vested nonqualified stock option up to the remaining term of the option. A vested incentive stock option must be exercised within three months following termination of employment if such termination is for reasons other than cause. Performance goals generally cannot be accelerated or waived except in the event of a change in control or upon death, disability or retirement. As of March 31, 2009, no shares have been issued under the EIP. The EIP will expire on April 17, 2017.

The Company’s total stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $20,000 and $77,000, respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense, net of related tax effects, was approximately $13,000 and $51,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cash flows from financing activities included in cash inflows from excess tax benefits related to stock compensation were approximately $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options at March 31, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $326,000 and $521,000, respectively.

Stock option transactions under the Plans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were as follows:

							Weighted-
			Weighted-				Average
			Average		Aggregate		Remaining
			Exercise		Intrinsic		Term
	Options		Price		Value		(in years)
Outstanding at the beginning of the year	708,889		$	17.23
Granted	13,000		8.50
Exercised	—		—
Expired	(4,550	)	22.85
Forfeited	(47,736	)	17.54
Outstanding as of March 31, 2009	669,603		$	17.00	$	—	7.3
Exercisable as of March 31, 2009	393,819		$	19.70	$	—	5.9

The fair value of options granted for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008

Dividend yield	7.76		%	6.09		%
Expected life	7 years			7 years
Expected volatility	25.71		%	21.52		%
Risk-free interest rate	1.96		%	2.54		%
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$	0.68		$	1.29

8. Investment in Limited Partnership

On December 29, 2003, the Bank entered into a limited partner subscription agreement with Midland Corporate Tax Credit XVI Limited Partnership, where the Bank will receive special tax credits and other tax benefits. The Bank subscribed to a 6.2% interest in the partnership, which is subject to an adjustment depending on the final size of the partnership at a

Table of Contents

purchase price of $5 million. This investment is included in other assets and is not guaranteed. It is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” using the equity method. This agreement was accompanied by a payment of $1.7 million. The associated non-interest bearing promissory note payable included in other liabilities was zero at March 31, 2009. Installments were paid as requested.

9. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment of Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20” (FSP EITF 99-20-1). FSP EITF 99-20-1 amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets”, to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. FSP EITF 99-20-1 also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, and other related guidance. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and shall be applied prospectively. Retrospective application to a prior interim or annual reporting period is not permitted. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

FSP FAS 157-4 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with Statement 157.

This FSP clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The FSP provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.

In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of

Table of Contents

publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

10. Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year end.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

The three levels defined by SFAS 157 hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level 3: Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy.

	As of March 31, 2009
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale*	$	1,283	$	237,137	$	—	$	238,420

Liabilities (as restated):
Junior subordinated debt	$	—	$	—	$	19,050	$	19,050
Interest rate swaps	—		—		653		653

	As of December 31, 2008
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale	$	1,675	$	224,990	$	—	$	226,665

Liabilities:
Junior subordinated debt	$	—	$	—	$	18,260	$	18,260
Interest rate swaps	—		—		1,325		1,325

*This table has been adjusted to reflect the Company’s reclassification of Federal Home Loan Bank stock from securities available for sale to Federal Home Loan Bank stock. See Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.

The following table presents the assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

	As of March 31, 2009
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	2,841	$	—	$	2,841
Impaired loans	—		—		5,515		5,515
OREO	—		—		6,661		6,661

	As of December 31, 2008
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	2,283	$	—	$	2,283
Impaired loans	—		—		5,270		5,270
OREO	—		—		263		263

OREO totaled $6.7 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $0.3 million at December 31, 2008.

As a result of the change in fair value of the junior subordinated debt and interest rate swaps, included in other non-interest income for the first three months of 2009 and 2008, are pre-tax (losses) gains of approximately ($118,000) and $0, respectively.

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.

Cash and cash equivalents:

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

Investment Securities Available for Sale:

Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U. S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock:

Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The Federal Home Loan Bank stock is carried at cost.

Loans Held for Sale:

The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using Level 2 quoted secondary-market prices. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined based on expected proceeds based on sales contracts and commitments.

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans:

The Company generally values impaired loans that are accounted for under SFAS 114, “Accounting by creditors for impairment of a loan — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 & 15”, based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Loans are determined to be impaired when management has utilized current information and economic events and judged that it is probable that not all of the principal and interest due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement will be collected. Impaired loans are initially evaluated and revalued at the time the loan is identified as impaired. Impaired loans are loans where the current appraisal of the underlying collateral is less than the principal balance of the loan and the loan is a non-accruing loan. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and is classified at a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy or based on the present value of estimated future cash flows if repayment is not collateral dependent. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable and is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. For the purposes of determining the fair value of impaired loans that are collateral dependent, the company defines a current appraisal and evaluation as those completed within 12 months and performed by an independent third party. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.

As of March 31, 2009, 97.3% of all impaired loans had current third party appraisals or evaluations of their collateral to measure impairment. For these impaired loans, the bank takes immediate action to determine the current value of collateral securing its troubled loans. The remaining 2.7% of impaired loans were in process of being evaluated at March 31, 2009. During the ongoing supervision of a troubled loan, the Company performs a cash flow evaluation, obtains an appraisal update or obtains a new appraisal. The Company reviews all impaired loans on a quarterly basis to ensure that the market values are reasonable and that no further deterioration has occurred. If the evaluation indicates that the market value has deteriorated below the carrying value of the loan, either the entire loan or the partial difference between the market value and principal balance is charged-off unless there are material mitigating factors to the contrary. If a loan is not charged down reserves are allocated to reflect the estimated collateral shortfall. Loans that have been partially charged-off are classified as non-performing loans for which none of the current loan terms have been modified. During the first three months of 2009, there were no partial loan charge-offs. In order for an impaired loan not to have a specific valuation allowance it must be determined by the Company through a current evaluation that there is sufficient underlying collateral after appropriate discounts have been applied, that is in excess of the carrying value.

Other Real Estate Owned:

Foreclosed properties are adjusted to fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure in preparation for transfer from portfolio loans to other real estate owned (“OREO”), establishing a new accounting basis. The Company subsequently adjusts the fair value on the OREO on a nonrecurring basis to reflect partial write-downs based on the observable market price, current appraised value of the asset or other estimates of fair value.

Mortgage servicing rights:

The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on observable market prices when available or the present value of expected future cash flows when not available.

Deposit liabilities:

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, savings and certain types of money market accounts) are considered to be equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on time deposits to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased:

The carrying amounts of these borrowings approximate their fair values.

Long-term debt:

The fair value of long-term debt is calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, using rates currently available for borrowings with similar maturities.

Junior Subordinated Debt:

The Company has elected to record its junior subordinated debt at fair value. The Company recorded the fair value of its junior subordinated debt utilizing Level 3 inputs, with unrealized gains and losses reflected in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value is estimated utilizing the income approach whereby the expected cash flows over the remaining estimated life of the debentures are discounted using the Company’s credit spread over the current fully indexed yield based

Table of Contents

on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities. The Company’s credit spread was calculated based on similar trust preferred securities issued within the last twelve months.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements:

The Company has recorded the fair value of its interest rate swaps utilizing Level 3 inputs, with unrealized gains and losses reflected in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value measurement of the interest rate swaps is determined by netting the discounted future fixed or variable cash payments and the discounted expected fixed or variable cash receipts based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.

Accrued interest receivable and payable:

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Off-balance sheet instruments:

Fair values for the off-balance sheet instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

If a decline in market value of a security is determined to be other than temporary, under generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to write these securities down to their estimated fair value. We own single issue and pooled trust preferred securities of other financial institutions and private label collateralized mortgage obligations whose aggregate historical cost basis is greater than their estimated fair value. We have reviewed these securities and determined that the decreases in estimated fair value are temporary. We perform an ongoing analysis of these securities utilizing both readily available market data and third party analytical models. Future changes in interest rates or the credit quality and strength of the underlying issuers may reduce the market value of these and other securities. If such decline is determined to be other than temporary, we will write them down through a charge to earnings to their then current fair value.

11. Derivative Instruments

During October 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $5 million. This derivative financial instrument effectively converted fixed interest rate obligations of outstanding mandatory redeemable capital debentures to variable interest rate obligations, decreasing the asset sensitivity of its balance sheet by more closely matching the Company’s variable rate assets with variable rate liabilities. The Company considers the credit risk inherent in the contracts to be negligible. This swap has a notional amount equal to the outstanding principal amount of the related trust preferred securities, together with the same payment dates, maturity date and call provisions as the related trust preferred securities.

Under the swap, the Company pays interest at a variable rate equal to six month LIBOR plus 5.25%, adjusted semiannually, and the Company receives a fixed rate equal to the interest that the Company is obligated to pay on the related trust preferred securities. Both the interest rate swap and the related debt are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to operations.

In September 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The interest rate swap transactions involved the exchange of the Company’s floating rate interest rate payment on its $15 million in floating rate junior subordinated debt for a fixed rate interest payment without the exchange of the underlying principal amount. Entering into interest rate derivatives exposes the Company to the risk of counterparties’ failure to fulfill their legal obligations including, but not limited to, amounts due under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts are often used to express the magnitude of these transactions, but the amounts due or payable are much smaller. These interest rate swaps are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to other income in the consolidated results of operations.

Table of Contents

Interest rate caps are generally used to limit the exposure from the repricing and maturity of liabilities and to limit the exposure created by other interest rate swaps. In June 2003, the Company purchased a six month LIBOR cap to create protection against rising interest rates for the above mentioned $5 million interest rate swap.

The following table details the fair values of the derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet for the period ended:

	Liability Derivatives
	March 31, 2009
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under FASB 133:	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value

Interest rate swap contracts	Other liabilities	$	653
Interest rate cap	Other liabilities	—
Total derivatives		$	653

The following table details the effect of the change in fair values of the derivative instruments included in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended:

		Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under FASB 133:	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
		(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Interest rate swap contracts	Other income	$	672
Interest rate cap	Other income	—
Total		$	672

12. Loans

Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses, rose slightly to $878.4 million, or 0.1% annualized, at March 31, 2009 from $878.2 million at December 31, 2008.

The components of loans were as follows:

Table of Contents

	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )
Residential real estate - 1 to 4 family	$	181,743		$	185,866
Residential real estate - multi family	33,778			34,869
Commercial	171,982			174,219
Commercial, secured by real estate	320,026			326,442
Construction	92,503			89,556
Consumer	4,157			3,995
Home equity lines of credit	83,189			72,137
Loans	887,378			887,084

Net deferred loan fees	(788		)	(779		)
Allowance for loan losses	(8,165		)	(8,124		)
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	878,425		$	878,181

Loans secured by real estate (not including home equity lending products) decreased $11.6 million, or 8.5% annualized, to $535.5 million at March 31, 2009 from $547.2 million at December 31, 2008. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in commercial real estate loan originations and commercial real estate loans moved to real estate owned included in other assets.

Total commercial loans decreased to $492.0 million at March 31, 2009 from $500.7 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $8.7 million, or 6.9% annualized. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease in commercial real estate loans outstanding. There were no SBA loans sold during the period.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

	As of and For The Period Ended
	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Balance, beginning	$	8,124		$	7,264
Provision for loan losses	825			4,835
Loans charged-off	(809		)	(4,073		)
Recoveries	25			98
Balance, ending	$	8,165		$	8,124

The gross recorded investment in impaired loans not requiring an allowance for loan losses was $1.1 million at March 31, 2009 and $3.2 million at December 31, 2008. The gross recorded investment in impaired loans requiring an allowance for loan losses was $6.9 million at March 31, 2009 and $7.5 million at December 31, 2008, the related allowance for loan losses associated with those loans was $1.4 million and 2.3 million, respectively. For the periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $$8.7 million and $8.8 million, respectively. No interest income was recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and interest income of $33,000 was recognized on impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2008.

13. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as allocated to our reporting units for the periods indicated were:

Table of Contents

	Banking and				Brokerage and
	Financial				Investment
	Services		Insurance		Services		Total
	(In thousands)

Balance as of December 31, 2007	$	27,768	$	10,400	$	1,021	$	39,189
Goodwill acquired during the year 2008	—		223		—		223
Contingent payments during the year 2008	—		320		—		320
Balance as of December 31, 2008	27,768		10,943		1,021		39,732
Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	27,768	$	10,943	$	1,021	$	39,732

On September 1, 2008, the Company paid cash of $1.8 million for Fisher Benefits Consulting, an insurance agency specializing in Group Employee Benefits, located in Pottstown, Pennsylvania. Fisher Benefits Consulting has become a part of VIST Insurance. As a result of the acquisition, VIST Insurance continues to expand its retail and commercial insurance presence in southeastern Pennsylvania counties. The results of Fisher Benefits Consulting operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since September 2, 2008.

Included in the $1.8 million purchase price for Fisher Benefits Consulting was goodwill of $0.2 million and identifiable intangible assets of $1.6 million. Contingent payments totaling $750,000, or $250,000 for each of the first three years following the acquisition, will be paid if certain predetermined revenue target ranges are met. These payments are expected to be added to goodwill when paid. The contingent payments could be higher or lower depending upon whether actual revenue earned in each of the three years following the acquisition is less than or exceeds the predetermined revenue goals.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the Company amortizes other intangible assets over the estimated remaining life of each respective asset. Amortizable intangible assets were composed of the following:

	March 31, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Gross				Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amortization
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Purchase of client accounts (20 year weighted average useful life)	$	4,805	$	1,051	$	4,805	$	992
Employment contracts (7 year weighted average useful life)	1,135		1,011		1,135		968
Assets under management (20 year weighted average useful life)	184		61		184		58
Trade name (20 year weighted average useful life)	196		196		196		196
Core deposit intangible (7 year weighted average useful life)	1,852		1,191		1,852		1,125
Total	$	8,172	$	3,510	$	8,172	$	3,339

Aggregate Amortization Expense:
For the three months ended March 31, 2009	$	171
For the year ended December 31, 2008	$	629

The Company performs an annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter each year. The Company utilizes the following framework to evaluate whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required, given the occurrence of events or if circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or circumstances include:

· a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate;

· an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;

· unanticipated competition;

· a loss of key personnel;

· a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of;

· the testing for recoverability under SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and

· recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.

Table of Contents

The Company acknowledges that a decline in market capitalization may represent an event or change in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of reporting unit below its carrying value. However, management does not place primary emphasis on the Company’s market capitalization for a number of reasons, not the least of which is lack of liquidity of its common shares due to a lack of consistent trading volume. This view also considers that substantial value may result from the ability to leverage certain synergies or control. Therefore, management’s valuation methodology for assessing annual (and evaluating subsequent indicators of) impairment is performed at a detailed level as it incorporates a more granular view of each reporting unit and the significant valuation inputs.

Management estimates fair value utilizing multiple methodologies which include discounted cash flows, comparable companies and comparable transactions. Each valuation technique requires management to make judgments about inputs and assumptions which form the basis for financial projections of future operating performance and the corresponding estimated cash flows. The analyses performed require the use of objective and subjective inputs which include market-price of non-distressed financial institutions, similar transaction multiples, and required rates of return. Management works closely in this process with third-party valuation professionals, who assist in obtaining comparable market data and performing certain of the calculations, based on information provided by management and assumptions developed with management.

Given that the level at which management performs its impairment testing for each reporting unit is more granular than simply market capitalization, management evaluates the underlying data and assumptions that comprise the most recent goodwill impairment test for evidence of deterioration at a level which may indicate the fair value of the reporting segment has meaningfully declined. While the Company’s stock price continues to be influenced by the financial services sector as well as our relative small size, management does not believe that there has been a substantial change in the business climate relative to our valuation analysis. To the contrary, the Company believes the economy shows signs of stabilization.

Given the timing of the completion of management’s annual impairment test (January 2009 as of October 31, 2008) and the evaluation of the relevant inputs that form the basis for management’s estimate for the fair value of each reporting unit, management concluded that there has not been significant deterioration in the underlying inputs and assumptions which would lead it to conclude an interim goodwill impairment test was required.

As of the time of the annual goodwill impairment test, the “Fair Value” of all units was in excess of the carrying amounts. Therefore, a second step test was not required. The Company’s stock, like the stock of many other financial services companies, is trading below both book value as well as tangible book value. The Company believes that the current market value does not represent the fair value of the Company when taken as a whole and in consideration of other relevant factors.

Table of Contents

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.1, for the year ended December 31, 2008) lists significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of its financial statements. This discussion and analysis, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for an understanding and evaluation of the Company and its results of operations.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, revenue recognition for insurance activities, stock based compensation, derivative financial instruments, goodwill and intangible assets, other than temporary impairment losses on available for sale securities and the valuation of deferred tax assets. In estimating other-than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements

As indicated in Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has restated its financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The discussion in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, gives effect to the restatement of the Company’s financial statements.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

OVERVIEW

Net income for the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $1.53 million, a decrease of 1.8%, as compared to $1.56 million for the same period in 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first quarter of 2009 were $.20 and $.20, respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $.28 and $.27, respectively, for the same period of 2008.

The following are the key ratios for the Company as of:

	As Of or For
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	(As Restated)

Return on average assets	0.50	%	0.05	%
Return on average shareholders’ equity	4.99	%	0.54	%
Dividend payout ratio	47.62	%	503.89	%
Average shareholders’ equity to average assets	10.06	%	8.95	%

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is a primary source of revenue for the Company. Net interest income results from the difference between the interest and fees earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits to customers and other non-deposit sources of funds, such as repurchase agreements and short and long-term borrowed funds. Net interest margin is the difference between the gross (tax-effected) yield on earning assets and the cost of interest bearing funds as a percentage of earning assets. All discussion of net interest income and net interest margin is on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE).

FTE net interest income before the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $8.9 million, a decrease of approximately $25,000, or 0.3%, compared to the $8.9 million reported for the same period in 2008. The FTE net interest margin decreased to 3.20% for the first quarter of 2009 from 3.51% for the same period in 2008.

The following summarizes net interest margin information:

Table of Contents

	Three months ended March 31,
	2009
	(As Restated)					2008
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		% Rate	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		% Rate
	(Dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans: (1) (2)
Commercial	$	699,514	$	9,938	5.68	$	656,344	$	11,317	6.82
Mortgage	50,411		763		6.06	46,522		756		6.50
Consumer	139,792		1,883		5.46	126,922		2,228		7.06
Investments (2) (3)	228,417		3,355		5.87	191,706		2,791		5.82
Federal funds sold	6,626		3		0	—		—		—
Other short-term investments	346		1		0.66	519		4		2.86
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,125,106	$	15,943	5.67	$	1,022,013	$	17,096	6.62

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Transaction accounts	$	320,118	$	1,110	1.40	$	316,145	$	1,879	2.39
Certificates of deposit	469,016		4,044		3.49	316,774		3,624		4.60
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	119,503		1,065		3.56	111,150		954		3.39
Short-term borrowings	9,914		17		0.67	84,317		721		3.38
Long-term borrowings	59,167		504		3.41	59,396		599		3.99
Junior subordinated debt	18,173		314		7.02	20,230		405		8.06
Total interest-bearing liabilities	995,891		7,054		2.87	908,012		8,182		3.62
Noninterest-bearing deposits	105,444		—			103,299		—
Total cost of funds	$	1,101,335	7,054		2.59	$	1,011,311	8,182		3.25
Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)			$	8,889	3.20			$	8,914	3.51

(1)	Loan fees have been included in the interest income totals presented. Nonaccrual loans have been included in average loan balances.

(2)	Interest income on loans and investments is presented on a taxable equivalent basis using an effective tax rate of 34%.

(3)	This table has been adjusted to reflect the Company’s reclassification of Federal Home Loan Bank stock from securities available for sale to Federal Home Loan Bank stock. See Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.

Average interest-earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $1.13 billion, a $103.1 million, or 10.1%, increase over average interest-earning assets of $1.02 billion for the same period in 2008. The yield on average interest-earning assets decreased by 95 basis points to 5.67% for the first quarter of 2009, compared to 6.62% for the same period in 2008.

Average interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $995.9 million, an $87.9 million, or 9.7%, increase over average interest-bearing liabilities of $908.0 million for the same period in 2008. In addition, average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $105.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from $103.3 million for the same time period of 2008. The interest rate on total interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 75 basis points to 2.87% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to 3.62% for the same period in 2008.

For the three months ended March 31, 2009, total FTE interest income decreased 6.7% to $15.9 million compared to $17.1 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in total interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily the result of a decrease in the interest rates on average outstanding commercial, mortgage and consumer loans compared to the same period in 2008. Earning asset yields on average outstanding loans decreased due mainly to a decrease in the targeted short-term interest rate, as established by the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”), which

Table of Contents

resulted in a decrease in the prime rate from 5.25% at March 31, 2008 to 3.25% at March 31, 2009. Average outstanding commercial loan balances increased by $43.2 million, or 6.6% from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. Additionally, average outstanding total investment securities increased by $36.7 million or 19.1% from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. Earning asset yields on average outstanding investment securities increased slightly from 5.8% at March 31, 2008 to 5.9% at March 31, 2009.

For the three months ended March 31, 2009, total interest expense decreased 13.8% to $7.1 million compared to $8.2 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in total interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 resulted primarily from a decrease in average rates paid on average outstanding interest-bearing deposits and short-term borrowings compared to the same period in 2008. The average rate paid on total average outstanding interest-bearing liabilities decreased from 3.62% at March 31, 2008 to 2.87% at March 31, 2009. Total cost of funds decreased to 2.59% in 2009 from 3.25% in 2008. The decrease in total average interest-bearing deposit rates was the result of management’s disciplined approach to deposit pricing in response to the decrease in short-term interest rates. Total average interest-bearing deposits increased $156.2 million or 24.7% from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 due primarily to growth in time deposits. The average rate paid on short-term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased from 3.39% at March 31, 2008 to 3.56% at March 31, 2009. The decrease in short-term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase rates was the result of decreases in targeted short term interest rates, as established by the FRB. Average short-term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $66.1 million or 33.8% from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 due primarily to the growth in total average interest-bearing deposits.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $825,000 compared to $410,000 for the same period of 2008. Net charge-offs to average loans was 0.36% annualized for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 0.46% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The provision reflects the amount deemed appropriate by management to provide an adequate reserve to meet the present risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. Management continues to evaluate and classify the credit quality of the loan portfolio utilizing a qualitative and quantitative internal loan review process and, based on the results of the analysis at March 31, 2009, management has determined that the current allowance for loan losses is adequate as of such date. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was .92% and .92%, respectively. Please see further discussion under the caption “Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Other Non-Interest Income

Total other income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 totaled $5.4 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 15.2%, from other income of $4.7 million for the same period in 2008.

Revenue from customer service fees increased 6.1% to $658,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $620,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in customer service fees for the comparative three months periods is primarily due to an increase in commercial account analysis fees, uncollected funds charges and non-sufficient funds charges.

Revenue from mortgage banking activities decreased 17.3% to $267,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $323,000 for the same period in 2008. The decrease in mortgage banking activities for the comparative three month periods is primarily due to a decline in the volume of loans sold into the secondary mortgage market. The Company operates its mortgage banking activities through VIST Mortgage, a division of VIST Bank.

Revenue from commissions and fees from insurance sales increased 10.2% to $3.0 million for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2008. The increase in commissions and fees from insurance sales for the comparative three month periods is mainly attributed to an increase in commission income on group insurance products offered through VIST Insurance, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Revenue from brokerage and investment advisory commissions and fees increased 39.2% to $330,000 in the first three months of 2009 as compared to $237,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in brokerage and investment advisory commissions and fees for the comparative three month periods is due primarily to an increase in investment advisory service activity offered through VIST Capital Management, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Table of Contents

Revenue from earnings on investment in life insurance decreased 54.8% to $76,000 in the first three months of 2009 as compared to $168,000 for the same period in 2008. The decrease in earnings on investment in life insurance for the comparative three month periods is due primarily to decreased earnings credited on the Company’s separate investment account, bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”).

Other income, including gain on sale of loans, increased 84.4% to $1.0 million for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $519,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in other income for the comparative three month periods is due primarily to a settlement of a previously accrued contingent payment and an increase in network interchange income.

Net securities gains were $159,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to net securities gains of $141,000 for the same period in 2008. The net securities gains for the first three months of 2009 are primarily from the planned sale of existing agency mortgage-backed securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net security gains were due primarily to the mandatory redemption of VISA Inc. common stock acquired as a result of VISA’s initial public offering.

Other Non-Interest Expense

Total other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 totaled $11.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 1.7%, over total other expense of $11.1 million for the same period in 2008.

Salaries and benefits decreased slightly remaining at $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 similar to the $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Included in salaries and benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 were pre-tax stock-based compensation costs of $20,000 and $77,000, respectively. Also included in salaries and benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were total commissions paid of $384,000 on mortgage origination activity through VIST Mortgage, insurance sales activity through VIST Insurance and investment advisory sales through VIST Capital Management compared to $389,000 for the same period in 2008. Included in salaries and benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are severance costs of approximately $51,000 relating to the outsourcing of the Company’s internal audit function and staff reductions in the mortgage banking operation. Full-time equivalent (FTE) employees decreased to 300 at March 31, 2009 from 316 at March 31, 2008.

Occupancy expense and furniture and equipment expense decreased 7.0% to $1.7 million for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in occupancy expense and furniture and equipment expense for the comparative three month periods is due primarily to a decrease in building lease expense, equipment repairs expense, software maintenance expense, and equipment depreciation.

Marketing and advertising expense decreased 58.9% to $270,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $657,000 for the same period in 2008. The decrease in marketing and advertising expense is due primarily to a reduction in marketing costs associated with market research, media space, media production and special events.

Professional services expense increased 66.7% to $892,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $535,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in professional services expense is due primarily to increases in legal fees associated with a settlement of a previously accrued contingent payment, outsourcing of the Company’s internal audit function and other general Company business.

Outside processing expense increased 16.0% to $951,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $820,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in outside processing expense is due primarily to costs incurred for computer services, network fees, data-line charges and internet banking expenses.

Insurance expense increased 63.8% to $444,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $271,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in insurance expense is due primarily to higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums resulting from the implementation of the new FDIC risk-related premium assessment.

Other expense increased 5.8% to $1.2 million for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2008. The increase in other expense is primarily due primarily to an increase in foreclosure and other real estate expense.

Table of Contents

Income Taxes

Income tax expense increased to $252,000 for the first three months of 2009 as compared to $179,000 for the same period in 2008. The effective income tax rate for the Company for the first three months ended March 31, 2009 was 14.1% compared to 10.3% for the same period of 2008. The effective income tax rate increased primarily due to an increase in state tax and tax exempt income remaining relatively flat while net income before income taxes increased. Included in income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is a federal tax benefit from a $5,000,000 investment in an affordable housing, corporate tax credit limited partnership.

Financial Condition

The total assets of the Company at March 31, 2009 were $1.26 billion, an increase of approximately $34.1 million, or 11.1% annualized, from $1.23 billion at December 31, 2008.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans held for sale increased $558,000, or 97.8% annualized, to $2.8 million at March 31, 2009 from $2.3 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is primarily related to an increase in loans originated for sale into the secondary residential real estate loan market through VIST Mortgage.

Securities Available for Sale

Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Factors that may be indicative of impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Fair value below cost and the length of time

· Adverse condition specific to a particular investment

· Rating agency activities (e.g., downgrade)

· Financial condition of an issuer

· Dividend activities

· Suspension of trading

· Management intent

· Changes in tax laws or other policies

· Subsequent market value changes

· Economic or industry forecasts

Other-than-temporary impairment means management believes the security’s impairment is due to factors that could include its inability to pay interest or dividends, its potential for default, and/or other factors. When a held to maturity or available for sale debt security is assessed for other-than-temporary impairment, management has to first consider (a) whether the Company intends to sell the security, and (b) whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. If one of these circumstances applies to a security, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized in the statement of operations equal to the full amount of the decline in fair value below amortized cost. If neither of these circumstances applies to a security, but the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment loss has occurred that must be separated into two categories: (a) the amount related to credit loss, and (b) the amount related to other factors. In assessing the level of other-than-temporary impairment attributable to credit loss, management compares the present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost basis of the security. The portion of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss is recognized in earnings (as the difference between the fair value and the present value of the estimated cash flows), while the amount related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The total other-than-temporary impairment loss is presented in the statement of operations, less the portion recognized in other comprehensive income. When a debt security becomes other-than-temporarily impaired, its amortized cost basis is reduced to reflect the portion of the total impairment related to credit loss.

Table of Contents

Investment securities available for sale increased $11.8 million, or 20.7% annualized, to $238.4 million at March 31, 2009 from $226.7 million at December 31, 2008. Investment securities are used to supplement loan growth as necessary, to generate interest and dividend income, to manage interest rate risk, and to provide liquidity. The increase in investment securities available for sale was due to the purchases of mortgage-backed securities used as collateral for the Company’s public funds and structured borrowings.

Loans

Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses, rose slightly to $878.4 million, or 0.1% annualized, at March 31, 2009 from $878.2 million at December 31, 2008.

The components of loans were as follows:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )
Residential real estate - 1 to 4 family	$	181,743		$	185,866
Residential real estate - multi family	33,778			34,869
Commercial	171,982			174,219
Commercial, secured by real estate	320,026			326,442
Construction	92,503			89,556
Consumer	4,157			3,995
Home equity lines of credit	83,189			72,137
Loans	887,378			887,084

Net deferred loan fees	(788		)	(779		)
Allowance for loan losses	(8,165		)	(8,124		)
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	878,425		$	878,181

The gross recorded investment in impaired loans not requiring an allowance for loan losses was $1.1 million at March 31, 2009 and $3.2 million at December 31, 2008. The gross recorded investment in impaired loans requiring an allowance for loan losses was $6.9 million at March 31, 2009 and $7.5 million at December 31, 2008, the related allowance for loan losses associated with those loans was $1.4 million and 2.3 million, respectively. For the periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $8.7 million and $8.8 million, respectively. No interest income was recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and interest income of $33,000 was recognized on impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009 was $8.2 million compared to $8.1 million at December 31, 2008. The allowance at March 31, 2009 was 0.92% of outstanding loans compared to 0.92% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2008. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $825,000 compared to $410,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase in the provision is due primarily to an increase in outstanding loans and the result of management’s evaluation and classification of the credit quality of the loan portfolio utilizing a qualitative and quantitative internal loan review process. At March 31, 2009, total non-performing loans were $8.6 million or 1.0% of total loans compared to $10.8 million or 1.2% of total loans at December 31, 2008. The $2.2 million decrease in non-performing loans from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, was due primarily to three commercial real estate loans totaling approximately $6.0 million transferred to other real estate owned offset by net additions to non-performing loans of approximately $4.0 million. At March 31, 2009, $4.4 million in commercial properties transferred to other real estate

Table of Contents

owned were under contract to sell. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net charge-offs to average loans was 0.36% annualized as compared to 0.46% for the three months ended December 31, 2008.

The allowance for loan losses is an amount that management believes to be adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are charged through the provision for loan losses. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management regularly assesses the adequacy of the allowance by performing both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the loan portfolio, including such factors as charge-off history, the level of delinquent loans, the current financial condition of specific borrowers, the value of any underlying collateral, risk characteristics in the loan portfolio, local and national economic conditions, and other relevant factors. Significant loans are individually analyzed, while other smaller balance loans are evaluated by loan category. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to change. Based upon the results of such reviews, management believes that the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009 was adequate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio at that date.

The following table shows the activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )

Balance of allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	8,124		$	7,264
Loans charged-off:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	(739		)	(384		)
Real estate — mortgage	—			(105		)
Consumer	(70		)	(13		)
Total loans charged-off	(809		)	(502		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	11			2
Real estate — mortgage	—			—
Consumer	14			7
Total recoveries	25			9
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries	(784		)	(493		)
Provision for loan losses	825			410
Balance, end of period	$	8,165		$	7,181

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)	0.36		%	0.24		%
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding	0.92		%	0.87		%
Loans outstanding at end of period (net of unearned income)	$	886,590		$	828,065
Average balance of loans outstanding during the period	$	886,482		$	827,730

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-performing assets:

Table of Contents

	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )
Non-accrual loans:
Real estate	$	7,290		$	2,947
Consumer	—			459
Commercial, financial and agricultural	750			7,298
Total	8,040			10,704

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing:
Real estate	557			28
Consumer	6			—
Commercial, financial and agricultural	4			112
Total	567			140

Total non-performing loans	8,607			10,844
Other real estate owned	6,661			263
Total non-performing assets	$	15,268		$	11,107

Troubled debt restructurings	$	285		$	285

Non-performing loans to loans outstanding at end of period (net of unearned income)	0.97		%	1.22		%
Non-performing assets to loans outstanding at end of period (net of unearned income) plus OREO	1.71		%	1.25		%

Loan Policy and Procedure

The Bank’s loan policies and procedures have been approved by the Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Bank’s President, Chief Lending Officer, Chief Credit Officer, and the Risk Management Officer, who collectively establish and monitor credit policy issues. Application of the loan policy is the direct responsibility of those who participate either directly or administratively in the lending function.

The Bank’s Relationship Managers originate loan requests through a variety of sources which include the Bank’s existing customer base, referrals from directors and various networking sources (accountants, attorneys, and realtors), and market presence. Over the past several years, the Bank’s Relationship Managers have been significantly increased through (1) the hiring of experienced commercial lenders in the Bank’s geographic markets, (2) the Bank’s continued participation in community and civic events, (3) strong networking efforts, (4) local decision making, and (5) consolidation and other changes which are occurring with respect to other local financial institutions.

The Bank’s Relationship Managers have a combined lending authority up to $1,000,000. Loans over $1,000,000 and up to $2,000,000 require the additional approval of the Chief Lending Officer, Chief Credit Officer and/or the Bank President. Loans in excess of $2,000,000 are presented to the Bank’s Credit Committee, comprised of the Chief Lending Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Credit Officer (non-voting), and selected market Executives. The Credit Committee can approve loans up to $4,500,000 and recommend loans to the Executive Loan Committee for approval up to the Bank’s legal lending limit of approximately $14,460,000. The Executive Loan Committee is composed of the Bank President, the Chief Lending Officer, the Chief Credit Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Credit Officer (non-voting member) and selected Board members. The Bank has established an “in-house” lending limit of 80% of its legal lending limit and, at March 31, 2009, the Bank has no loan relationships in excess of its in-house limit.

Through the Chief Credit Officer and the Credit Committee, the Bank has successfully implemented individual, joint, and committee level approval procedures which have monitored and solidified credit quality as well as provided lenders with a process that is responsive to customer needs.

The Bank manages credit risk in the loan portfolio through adherence to consistent standards, guidelines, and limitations established by the credit policy. The Bank’s credit department, along with the Relationship Managers, analyzes the financial statements of the borrower, collateral values, loan structure, and economic conditions, to then make a recommendation to the appropriate approval authority. Commercial loans generally consist of real estate secured loans, lines of credit, term, and equipment loans. The Bank’s underwriting policies impose strict collateral requirements and normally will require the guaranty of the principals. For requests that qualify, the Bank will use Small Business Administration guarantees to improve the credit quality and support local small business.

Table of Contents

The Bank’s written loan policies are continually evaluated and updated as necessary to reflect changes in the marketplace. Annually, credit loan policies are approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors thus providing Board oversight. These policies require specified underwriting, loan documentation and credit analysis standards to be met prior to funding.

A credit loan committee comprised of senior management approves commercial and consumer loans with total loan exposures in excess of $2 million. The executive loan committee comprised of senior management and 5 independent members from the Board of Directors approves commercial and consumer loans with total exposures in excess of $4.5 million up to the Bank’s legal lending limit. One of the affirmative votes on both the credit and/or executive loan committee must be either the Chief Credit Officer or the Chief Lending Officer in order to ensure that proper standards are maintained.

Individual joint lending authority is granted based on the level of experience of the individual for commercial loan exposures under $2 million. Higher risk credits (as determined by internal loan ratings) and unsecured facilities (in excess of $100,000) require the signature of an officer with more credit experience.

One of the key components of the Bank’s commercial loan policy is loan to value. The following guidelines serve as the maximum loan to value ratios which the Bank would normally consider for new loan requests. Generally, the Bank will use the lower of cost or market when determining a loan to value ratio (except for investment securities). The values are not appropriate in all cases, and Bank lending personnel, pursuant to their responsibility to protect the Bank’s interest, seek as much collateral as practical.

Commercial Real Estate
a) Unapproved land (raw land)	50	%
b) Approved but Unimproved land	65	%
c) Approved and Improved land	75	%
d) Improved Real Estate	80	%

Investments
a) Stocks listed on a nationally recognized exchange Stock value should be greater than $10.	75	%
b) Bonds, Bills, Notes
c) US Gov’t obligations (fully guaranteed)	95	%
d) State, county, & municipal general obligations rated BBB or higher	varies: 65 - 80	%
Corporate obligations rated BBB or higher	varies: 65 - 80	%

Other Assets
a) Accounts Receivable (eligible)	80	%
b) Inventory (raw material and finished goods)	50	%
c) Equipment (new)	80	%
d) Equipment (purchase money used)	70	%
e) Cash or cash equivalents	100	%

Exception reporting is presented to the audit committee on a quarterly basis to ensure that the Bank remains in compliance with the FDIC limits on exceeding supervisory loan to value guidelines established for real estate secured transactions.

Generally, when evaluating a commercial loan request, the Bank will require 3 years of financial information on the borrower and any guarantor. The Bank has established underwriting standards that are expected to be maintained by all lending personnel. These requirements include loans being evaluated and underwritten at fully indexed rates. Larger loan exposures are typically analyzed by credit personnel that are independent from the sales personnel.

The Bank has not underwritten any hybrid loans or sub-prime loans. Loans that are generally considered to be sub-prime are loans where the borrower has a FICO score below 640 and shows data on their credit reports associated with higher default rates, limited debt experience, excessive debt, a history of missed payments, failures to pay debts, and recorded bankruptcies.

Table of Contents

All loan closings, loan funding and appraisal ordering and review involve personnel that are independent from the sales function to ensure that bank standards and requirements are met prior to disbursement.

Premises and Equipment

Components of premises and equipment were as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )

Land and land improvements	$	263	$	263
Buildings	873		873
Leasehold improvements	3,913		3,910
Furniture and equipment	11,664		11,567
	16,713		16,613
Less: accumulated depreciation	10,028		10,022
Premises and equipment, net	$	6,685	$	6,591

Deposits

Total deposits at March 31, 2009 were $930.7 million compared to $850.6 million at December 31, 2008, an increase of $80.1 million, or 37.6% annualized.

The components of deposits were as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )

Demand, non-interest bearing	$	106,510	$	108,645
Demand, interest bearing	248,021		231,504
Savings	72,413		75,706
Time, $100,000 and over	261,405		195,812
Time, other	242,313		238,933
Total deposits	$	930,662	$	850,600

The increase in interest bearing deposits is due primarily to an increase in time deposits with the majority of these deposits maturing in one year or less. Management continues to promote these types of deposits through a disciplined pricing strategy as a means of managing the Company’s overall cost of funds, as well as, management’s continuing emphasis on commercial and retail marketing programs and customer service.

Borrowings

Total debt decreased by $45.5 million, or 75.2% annualized, to $196.3 million at March 31, 2009 from $241.8 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in total debt and borrowings was primarily due to an increase in organic growth in total deposits of $80.1 to $930.7 million at March 31, 2009 from $850.6 million at December 31, 2008.

Off Balance Sheet Commitments

The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

Table of Contents

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

A summary of the contractual amount of the Company’s financial instrument commitments is as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )
Commitments to extend credit:
Loan origination committments	$	53,122	$	59,093
Unused home equity lines of credit	46,188		48,919
Unused business lines of credit	150,120		138,181
Total commitments to extend credit	$	249,430	$	246,193
Standby letters of credit	$	13,620	$	14,479

Capital

Total shareholders’ equity increased $1.2 million, or 3.9% annualized, to $124.8 million at March 31, 2009 from $123.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase is the net result of net income for the period of $1.5 million less common stock dividends declared of $573,000, preferred stock dividends declared of $403,000, proceeds of $248,000 from the issuance of shares of common stock under the Company’s employee benefit and director compensation plans, the reissuance of treasury stock of $424,000 primarily in connection with earn-outs of contingent consideration to principals resulting from the Company’s acquisition of VIST Insurance, and stock-based compensation costs of $20,000.

Federal bank regulatory agencies have established certain capital-related criteria that must be met by banks and bank holding companies. The measurements which incorporate the varying degrees of risk contained within the balance sheet and exposure to off-balance sheet commitments were established to provide a framework for comparing different institutions. Regulatory guidelines require that Tier 1 capital and total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets must be at least 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively.

Other than Tier 1 capital restrictions on the Company’s junior subordinated debt discussed later, the Company is not aware of any pending recommendations by regulatory authorities that would have a material impact on the Company’s capital, resources, or liquidity if they were implemented, nor is the Company under any agreements with any regulatory authorities.

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with regard to size, composition and quality of the Company’s resources. An adequate capital base is important for continued growth and expansion in addition to providing an added protection against unexpected losses.

An important indicator in the banking industry is the leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of common shareholders’ equity less intangible assets (Tier 1 risk-based capital), to average quarterly assets less intangible assets. The leverage ratio at March 31, 2009 was 8.95% compared to 9.07% at December 31, 2008. This decrease is primarily the result of an increase in average total assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the capital ratios were above minimum regulatory guidelines.

As required by the federal banking regulatory authorities, guidelines have been adopted to measure capital adequacy. Under the guidelines, certain minimum ratios are required for core capital and total capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets and other off-balance sheet instruments. For the Company, Tier 1 risk-based capital consists of common shareholders’ equity less intangible assets plus the junior subordinated debt, and Tier 2 risk-based capital includes the allowable portion of the allowance for loan losses, currently limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. By regulatory guidelines, the separate component of equity for unrealized appreciation or depreciation on available for sale securities is excluded from Tier 1 risk-based capital. In addition, federal banking regulatory authorities have issued a final rule restricting the Company’s junior subordinated debt to 25% of Tier 1 risk-based capital. Amounts of junior subordinated debt in excess of the 25% limit generally may be included in Tier 2 risk-based capital. The final rule provides a five-year transition period, ending March 31, 2009. Recently, the Federal Reserve extended this transition

Table of Contents

period to March 31, 2011. This will allow bank holding companies more flexibility in managing their compliance with these new limits in light of the current conditions of the capital markets. At March 31, 2009, the entire amount of these securities was allowable to be included as Tier 1 risk-based capital for the Company. For the periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s capital ratios were above minimum regulatory guidelines.

On December 19, 2008, the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) 25,000 shares of Series A, Fixed Rate, Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and a warrant (“Warrant”) to purchase 364,078 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $5.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000,000 in cash. The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $10.30 per share of common stock.

The Series A Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time following consultation by the Company’s primary bank regulator and Treasury. Under FAQ’s (Frequently Asked Questions) issued recently by Treasury, participants in the Capital Purchase Program desiring to repay part of an investment by Treasury must repay a minimum of 25% of the issue price of the preferred stock.

The following table sets forth the Company’s risk-based capital amounts and ratios.

	March 31,
	2009			December 31,
	(As Restated)			2008
	(Dollar amounts in thousands )

Tier I
Common shareholders’ equity excluding unrealized gains (losses) on securities	$	124,821		$	123,629
Disallowed intangible assets	(44,193		)	(44,347		)
Junior subordinated debt	18,900			18,110
Tier II
Allowable portion of allowance for loan losses	8,165			8,124
Unrealized losses on available for sale equity securities	7,022			7,330
Total risk-based capital	$	114,715		$	112,846
Risk adjusted assets (including off-balance sheet exposures)	$	904,179		$	883,949

Leverage ratio	8.95		%	9.07		%
Tier I risk-based capital ratio	11.78		%	11.85		%
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.69		%	12.77		%

The Company is not aware of any pending recommendations by regulatory authorities that would have a material impact on the Company’s capital resources, or liquidity if they were implemented, nor is the Company under any agreements with any regulatory authorities.

Junior Subordinated Debt

On March 9, 2000 and September 26, 2002, the Company established First Leesport Capital Trust I and Leesport Capital Trust II, respectively, in which the Company owns all of the common equity. First Leesport Capital Trust I issued $5 million of mandatory redeemable capital securities carrying an interest rate of 10.875%, and Leesport Capital Trust II issued $10 million of mandatory redeemable capital securities carrying a floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.45%. These debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. These securities must be redeemed in March 2030 and September 2032, respectively, but may be redeemed on or after March 2010 and November 2007, respectively, or earlier in the event that the interest expense becomes non-deductible for federal income tax purposes or if the treatment of these securities no longer qualifies as Tier I capital for the Company. In October 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converts the First Leesport Capital Trust I $5 million of fixed-rate capital securities to a floating interest rate of six month LIBOR plus 5.25%. In September 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate

Table of Contents

swap agreement that effectively converts the Leesport Capital Trust II $10 million of adjustable-rate capital securities to a fixed interest rate of 7.25%. Interest began accruing on the Leesport Capital Trust II swap in February 2009.

On June 26, 2003, Madison established Madison Statutory Trust I in which the Company owns all of the common equity. Madison Statutory Trust I issued $5 million of mandatory redeemable capital securities carrying a floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.10%. These debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. These securities must be redeemed in June 2033, but may be redeemed on or after September 26, 2008 or earlier in the event that the interest expense becomes non-deductible for federal income tax purposes or if the treatment of these securities no longer qualifies as Tier I capital for the Company. In September 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converts the Madison Statutory Trust I $5 million of adjustable-rate capital securities to a fixed interest rate of 6.90%. Interest began accruing on the Madison Statutory Trust I swap in March 2009.

Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity

The banking industry has been required to adapt to an environment in which interest rates may be volatile and in which deposit deregulation has provided customers with the opportunity to invest in liquid, interest rate-sensitive deposits. The banking industry has adapted to this environment by using a process known as asset/liability management.

Adequate liquidity means the ability to obtain sufficient cash to meet all current and projected needs promptly and at a reasonable cost. These needs include deposit withdrawal, liability runoff, and increased loan demand. The principal sources of liquidity are deposit generation, overnight federal funds transactions with other financial institutions, investment securities portfolio maturities and cash flows, and maturing loans and loan payments. The Bank can also package and sell residential mortgage loans into the secondary market. Other sources of liquidity are term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank. In view of all factors involved, the Bank’s management believes that liquidity is being maintained at an adequate level.

At March 31, 2009, the Company had a total of $196.3 million, or 15.6%, of total assets in borrowed funds. These borrowings included $127.2 million of repurchase agreements, $50 million of term borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank, and $19.0 million in junior subordinated debt. The FHLB borrowings have final maturities ranging from May 2009 through January 2011 at interest rates ranging from 3.45% to 4.28%. At March 31, 2009, the Company had a maximum borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of approximately $238.3 million. The Company remains slightly asset sensitive and will continue its strategy to originate adjustable rate commercial and installment loans and use investment security cash flows and non-interest bearing and core deposits and repurchase agreements to reduce the overnight borrowings to maintain a more neutral gap position.

Asset/liability management is intended to provide for adequate liquidity and interest rate sensitivity by matching interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities and coordinating maturities on assets and liabilities. With the exception of the majority of residential mortgage loans, loans generally are written having terms that provide for a readjustment of the interest rate at specified times during the term of the loan. In addition, interest rates offered for all types of deposit instruments are reviewed weekly and are established on a basis consistent with funding needs and maintaining a desirable spread between cost and return.

During October 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $5 million. This derivative financial instrument effectively converted fixed interest rate obligations of outstanding junior subordinated debt to variable interest rate obligations, decreasing the asset sensitivity of its balance sheet by more closely matching the Company’s variable rate assets with variable rate liabilities. The Company considers the credit risk inherent in the contracts to be negligible. The interest rate swap is recorded on the balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to other income in the consolidated results of operations (see note 11 of the consolidated financial statements).

During 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The interest rate swap transactions involved the exchange of the Company’s floating rate interest rate payment on its $15 million in floating rate junior subordinated debt for a fixed rate interest payment without the exchange of the underlying principal amount. These interest rate swaps are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to other income in the consolidated results of operations (see note 11 of the consolidated financial statements).

Table of Contents

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC.

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of March 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded, as a result of the material weakness described in the following paragraph, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date.

On November 9, 2009 the Company concluded that it will amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, to properly account for interest rate swaps that were incorrectly designated in cash flow hedging relationships under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). Changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps, previously recognized as unrealized gains (losses) in accumulated other comprehensive income, should have been recognized in earnings. In addition, the Company applied an incorrect forward yield curve used in its determination of the fair value of the interest rate swaps. The Company has adjusted the forward yield curve used in its determination of the fair value of the interest rate swaps which is reflected in these restated financial statements. The Company has elected to report its junior subordinated debt at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company concluded that an incorrect credit spread was applied to the fair value of its junior subordinated debt. The Company has adjusted the credit spread used in its determination of the fair value of its junior subordinated debt which is is reflected in these restated financial statements.

This accounting error and the corresponding restatements have resulted in management’s determination that a material weakness existed with respect to the internal controls over financial reporting related to accounting for the fair value of junior subordinated debt and related interest rate swaps at March 31, 2009. The material weakness also existed at September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2009 and was not identified until November 2009. To remediate this material weakness, the Company has added a review specifically for disclosures and accounting treatment for all complex financial instruments acquired or disposed of during each reporting period. The material weakness described relates only to the applicable accounting treatment to these complex financial instruments.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1	Legal Proceedings — None

Item 1A	Risk Factors

	There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2008. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the company’s business.

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

	No shares of the Company’s common stock were repurchased by the Company during the three month period ended March 31, 2009. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Company’s current stock repurchase program is 115,000 shares.

Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities — None

Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders — None

Item 5	Other Information - None

Table of Contents

Item 6

Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Title

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of VIST Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2008).

3.2		Bylaws of VIST Financial Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2008).

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Rule 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		VIST FINANCIAL CORP.
		(Registrant)

Dated: March 26, 2010	By	/s/Robert D. Davis

		Robert D. Davis
		President and Chief
		Executive Officer

Dated: March 26, 2010	By	/s/Edward C. Barrett

		Edward C. Barrett
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer