Concentration of
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a
concentration of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents and
accounts receivable.
The Company derives its accounts receivable from revenue earned
from customers located worldwide. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and,
generally, requires no collateral from its customers. The Company
bases its allowance for doubtful accounts on management’s best
estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s
existing accounts receivable. The Company writes off accounts
receivable balances against the allowance when it determines that
the amount will not be recovered.
The following table summarizes the revenue from customers in excess
of 10% of the Company’s revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Apple
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
54.9
|
%
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
Google
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
At September 30, 2020, Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Google Inc.
(“Google”), and Tapjoy Inc. (“Tapjoy”) accounted for 64.9%, 19.2%,
and 10.7%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. At December
31, 2019, Apple, Google, and Tapjoy accounted for 47.2%,
28.5%, and 17.8%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. No
other customer or Digital Storefront represented more than 10% of
the Company’s total accounts receivable as of these dates.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit
Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments”, which requires the
measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial
assets held at amortized cost and replaces the existing incurred
loss impairment model with an expected loss methodology, which will
result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The ASU requires a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings transition
approach and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic
350): Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment. This new accounting standard
update simplifies the measurement of goodwill by eliminating
the Step 2 impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment
loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s
goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The new
guidance requires an entity to compare the fair value of a
reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment
charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
reporting unit’s fair value, limited to the amount of goodwill.
Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any
tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting
unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if
applicable. The new guidance becomes effective
for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure
Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement. This guidance adds, modifies and removes several
disclosure requirements relative to the three levels of inputs used
to measure fair value in accordance with Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurement. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those
fiscal years. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.