UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☐ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒ |
|
Check the appropriate box: |
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☐ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
☒ |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
|
Firsthand
Technology Value Fund, Inc. |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
☒ |
No fee required. |
☐ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An
Urgent Message about
Firsthand
Technology Value Fund (SVVC)
From
Fellow Shareholder
Don
Chambers
Please
read carefully…
Donald
R Chambers
3012
Orourke Road
The
Villages, FL 32163
DonaldRChambers@gmail.com
(610)
360-4176
May
2022
Dear
Fellow Shareholder of Firsthand Technology Value Fund (SVVC):
The
forthcoming meeting of shareholders of SVVC is critical. The price of SVVC has fallen from a high of $17.74 per share in September 2018
to a recent low of $3.06. I have submitted a shareholder proposal for consideration at the next shareholder meeting designed to turn
SVVC around. I am writing to describe that proposal and the reasons that I am supporting the proposal.
The problem is clear: Poor investment decisions and massive expenses (especially investment management fees) are destroying SVVC.
The
solution is also clear: The Fund’s current investment management contract needs to be terminated.
Here
is the shareholder proposal scheduled for the next shareholder meeting:
RESOLVED:
All investment advisory and management agreements between Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. and Firsthand Capital Management, Inc.
shall be terminated.
As
detailed in the attached document, this proposal cuts to the heart of the conflicts of interest and other problems causing SVVC’s
disastrous performance. This action is necessary and will be effective if approved by shareholders.
Management
suggests that I may have ulterior motives. But my sole motive is to reverse the massive destruction of SVVC’s value under its
current investment management contract!
Please
feel free to contact me directly! (my email address and phone number are at the top of this page). I will be happy to discuss my
proposal with you and answer any questions you might have concerning the shareholder proposal. This is not a solicitation for your proxy
or a request for you to vote a particular way and I am not part of a shareholder group. I believe that approval of this proposal is vital
to enhancing SVVC’s value.
Sincerely,
Donald
R Chambers
The
Need for Change at Firsthand Technology Value Fund
The
shareholder proposal to terminate the investment management contract between Firsthand Technology
Value Fund, Inc. and Firsthand Capital Management, Inc. is easily justified by the Fund’s horrendous performance, high management
fees and conflicts of interest.
SVVC’s
stock price has declined from a high of $17.74 per share in September 2018 to a recent low of $3.06. During these 3½ years the
S&P 500 has risen substantially. How can SVVC drop over 75% during a generally upward trend in US equities? The two primary answers
are:
1.
Poor investment decisions by Firsthand Capital Management, Inc.
and
2.
Large management fees paid to Firsthand Capital Management, Inc. and other expenses
The
poor investment decisions by Firsthand Capital Management, Inc. and the massive fees paid to Firsthand Capital Management Inc. have helped
cause the reported net asset value of SVVC to decline from over $25 per share in 2018 to less than $15 per share recently.
The
following graph of the since-inception performance of the market price of SVVC’s stock v. major equity indices is from SVVC’s
12/31/2021 annual report. It shows SVVC losing more than 80% of its market value while the S&P 500 index gained 347% and the NASDAQ
542%!
The
fees and other expenses incurred by SVVC are draining the Fund’s resources. For example, SVVC’s annual report for 2021 describes
over $3 million in expenses with over $2 million of those expenses consisting of investment advisory fees (for the year ended 12/31/2021):
Source
for both exhibits above: 2021 Annual Report of SVVC. That report is available at:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001495584/000139834422006240/fp0074411_10k.htm
Given
SVVC’s recent market cap of about $20 million, the above $3.3 million of fees reflect a devastating annual expense ratio of over
15% of its market value. In my opinion, a fund with an annual expense ratio of over 15% of market value is almost certain to have a negative
long-term expected return unless changes are undertaken.
In
2020 I submitted a non-binding shareholder proposal. Despite a unanimous recommendation of SVVC’s Board of Directors to vote against
that proposal, at the July 2020 annual shareholder meeting SVVC’s shareholders approved the following proposal:
“..seek
and pursue any and all measures to enhance shareholder value including: (1) orderly termination of the fund, (2) orderly liquidation
of SVVC assets with distribution of available cash to shareholders, (3) tender offers for SVVC shares using available cash from any and
all investment exits, (4) merger of the fund into an entity offering shareholder exits near NAV (net asset value), or (5) other measures
likely to allow shareholders to exit SVVC near its NAV.”
The
vote included over 2 million “For” votes and less than 1 million “Against” votes.
Apparently,
the Board of Directors has chosen to ignore the preferences of the shareholders and have continued to oversee the destruction of its
value through massive fees and other expenses. In the last two years SVVC’s stock price has deteriorated further while Firsthand
Capital Management, Inc. keeps charging its massive fees to SVVC (and ultimately to us shareholders).
I
have submitted a proposal to terminate the current investment management contract between our Fund and Firsthand Capital Management Inc.
A copy of that proposal is enclosed.
Support
for change at SVVC has been broad. ISS (Institutional Shareholder Services) noted their support for the 2021 shareholder proposal to
terminate SVVC’s investment management agreements with Firsthand Capital Management, Inc. and the need for the Board to consider
shareholder interests to address the huge discount of SVVC’s market price from its NAV:
“As
such, support for the shareholder proposal to terminate the investment advisory and management agreements (Item 3) is warranted, as it
will require the board to take a decision about the future of the company with the interests of shareholders in mind to shrink or eliminate
the yawning gap between share price and NAV.” [source: ISS Proxy Analysis & Benchmark Policy Voting Recommendations]
SVVC’s
Board of Directors opposes my proposal mostly based on two ridiculous arguments: (1) they need more time, and (2) the allegation that
my motivation for this proposal is to bid for the management contract through a firm at which I was a part-time employee (with no equity
interest). How absurd! I am the shareholder who submitted a proposal in 2020 (passed via tremendous shareholder support) to liquidate
the fund! I still believe that the Fund needs to be liquidated!
This
letter is relatively brief because the case is so strong and clear. Shareholders wishing more detailed explanations of the problems with
SVVC may find a presentation by Scott Klarquist, CIO at Seven Corners Capital and a fellow SVVC shareholder, quite useful. The presentation
can be found at his firm’s website as follows (it is labeled as being the 1/19/22 and 1/26/22 presentations to SVVC shareholders
– Parts 1 and 2):
https://www.sevencornerscapital.com/research
If
you have any questions or comments about my forthcoming proposal or SVVC in general please do not hesitate to contact me:
email:
DonaldRChambers@gmail.com
phone:
(610) 360-4176
I
plan on attending the next shareholder meeting and I encourage all SVVC shareholders to do the same.
Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Donald
R Chambers
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSAL AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Donald
R. Chambers, 3012 Orourke Road, The Villages, FL 32163, beneficial owner of approximately 115,500 shares of Firsthand Technology Value
Fund, Inc. (“SVVC”), submits the following proposal for consideration at the 2022 annual meeting of SVVC shareholders (or
the next shareholder meeting if any shareholder meeting is held prior to the next annual meeting of shareholders).
RESOLVED:
All investment advisory and management agreements between Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. and Firsthand Capital Management, Inc.
shall be terminated.
Supporting
Statement:
The
fees being paid to Firsthand Capital Management and the poor performance of SVVC’s assets must end. I urge shareholders to vote
“Yes” to this proposal for the following reasons (based on publicly available information and personal computations):
The
market returns of SVVC’s stock and two benchmarks over the life of SVVC through 12/31/2020 using data reported in the “Performance
Graph” of SVVC’s 2020 annual report are:
Description
Investment | |
Non-Annualized Return
4/18/2011-12/31/2020 | |
12/31/2020
Value of $10,000 |
SVVC | |
| -78.1 | % | |
$ | 2,190 | |
S&P 500 | |
| +247.5 | % | |
$ | 34,747 | |
NASDAQ Composite | |
| +425.2 | % | |
$ | 52,517 | |
SVVC’s
since-inception market return (-78.1%) has been disastrous and inferior to relevant benchmarks due to high fees and poor asset selection/management.
SVVC’s 2% annual management fee (on gross assets) is roughly a 7.4% annual fee based on the recent market value of the equity (i.e.,
$4.36 on 11/30/21). Accordingly, the discount of SVVC’s market price to its NAV has been very large – recently over 70%.
Disastrous
investment decisions and exorbitant fees have been destroying SVVC. In response, shareholders overwhelmingly approved Proposal #3 at
the 2020 annual shareholders meeting (held July 2020) urging Directors to: “…seek and pursue any and all measures…to
allow shareholders to exit SVVC near its NAV” including orderly termination, liquidation, mergers, or other measures.
Based
on the investment management services needed in light of Proposal #3, SVVC can be more effectively managed by the Board without the expensive
investment advisory agreements with Firsthand Capital
Management, Inc. This proposal does not prevent the Fund’s Board of Directors from overseeing the Fund’s investments
nor does it prevent the Board from executing an orderly exit through liquidation, merger or other measures as shareholders requested.
This proposal terminates the current investment advisory and management agreements and therefore: (1) Terminates the huge fees, and (2)
Removes incentives of the extant investment advisor to delay an orderly liquidation of the Fund’s assets.
The
enormous fees (based on estimated gross asset values) need to be terminated and the disastrous investments need to be liquidated.