CLWR Clearwire Corp. - Class A (MM)

Golden Parachute Compensation

Preliminary Proposals

2.5 GHz Spectrum

20

Table of Contents

While none of the transactions used in this analysis are identical or involve spectrum assets directly comparable to the Company’s spectrum assets or the Offer, the selected transactions were chosen because they involved spectrum blocks that were considered by Centerview to be most similar to the Company’s spectrum assets for purposes of Centerview’s analysis. In addition to the foregoing transactions, Centerview also reviewed certain information relating to selected precedent transactions involving acquisitions of spectrum blocks in the advanced wireless services, which we refer to as AWS, spectrum. Such transactions were not included in this analysis because Centerview, based on its experience and professional judgment and conversations with senior management and representatives of the Company, considered AWS spectrum insufficiently comparable to the Company’s spectrum assets for purposes of Centerview’s analysis due to, among other things, the fact that (i) AWS spectrum has lower frequencies which allow for better propagation characteristics and more effective penetration of foliage and buildings, (ii) AWS spectrum is subject to a different licensing scheme than spectrum in the 2.5 GHZ block, which utilizes non-standard geographic classifications and involves the management of multiple licenses and lessors, and (iii) there is generally a higher demand for AWS spectrum due to the fact that many industry participants already own significant blocks of AWS spectrum.

For each of the selected transactions, based on publicly available information, the Preliminary 2012 DISH Proposal and the Preliminary 2013 Verizon Proposal, Centerview calculated and compared the transaction value (or proposed transaction value) per MHz-POP, which is the product derived from multiplying the number of megahertz associated with a spectrum license by the population of the license’s service area.

This analysis indicated a minimum transaction value per MHz-POP of $0.176 and a maximum transaction value per MHz-POP of $0.255 (excluding the preliminary proposals). Centerview then applied this range to the Company’s 47.0 billion MHz-POPs based on the internal data and adjusted the resulting transaction values by the Company’s June 30, 2013 projected net debt balance (including the net present value of spectrum leases) as provided by the Company’s management. This analysis resulted in an illustrative implied equity value range of approximately $1.55 to $3.75 per share. Centerview compared the results of this analysis to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. Centerview noted that the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer was above the illustrative range of implied equity values per share derived from this analysis. Centerview noted that the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer implied a transaction value per MHz-POP of $0.277. Centerview noted that the implied transaction value per MHz-POP of $0.277 was above the range of implied transaction value per MHz-POP derived from this analysis.

Premiums Paid Analysis

Cash Transactions

Utilizing a publicly available transaction research database, Centerview identified cash only transactions for U.S.-based, publicly-traded, non-financial and non-real estate target companies with equity values ranging

21

Table of Contents

between $1 billion and $5 billion, announced since January 1, 2009 for which there were relevant premiums paid data, of which there were 119 transactions. Centerview analyzed the premiums paid in such transactions based on the value of the per share consideration received in the relevant transaction relative to the closing stock price of the target company 1-day, 1-week and 4-weeks prior to the announcement date of such transaction.

The following table presents the results of this analysis with respect to the selected transactions:

Based on the foregoing, Centerview applied the median 1-day premium of 32% to the closing price of the shares of our Class A Common Stock on November 20, 2012 (the trading day prior to Sprint’s initial proposal to the Company with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Sprint Merger Agreement) of $2.12 and the mean 1-day premium of 37% to the closing price of the shares of our Class A Common Stock on December 10, 2012 (the trading day prior to the date that information about a potential transaction between the Company and Sprint was reported in the press) of $2.40.

This analysis resulted in an illustrative implied equity value range of approximately $2.80 to $3.30 per share of our Class A Common Stock. Centerview compared the results of this analysis to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. Centerview noted that the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer was above the illustrative range of implied equity values per share derived from this analysis.

In addition, Centerview applied the median 1-day premium of 32% to the closing price of the shares of our Class A Common Stock on October 10, 2012 (the trading day immediately prior to the date discussions between Sprint and SoftBank were first confirmed in the marketplace) of $1.30. This analysis extended the above referenced range and resulted in an illustrative implied equity value range of approximately $1.70 to $3.30 per share of our Class A Common Stock. Centerview compared the results of this analysis to the Offer Price in cash to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. Centerview noted that the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, Softbank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer was above the illustrative range of implied equity values per share derived from this analysis.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Centerview performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company based on two sets of financial projections of the Company for the second half of fiscal year 2013 and for fiscal years 2014 through 2020 prepared by management of the Company: (1) a Single-Customer Case, which we refer to as the SCC, which assumes Sprint will remain the Company’s only major wholesale customer, and (2) a Multi-Customer Case, which we refer to as the MCC, which assumes the Company would achieve substantial non-Sprint network traffic beginning in 2014. See “Item 8. Additional Information—Prospective Financial Information.” The financial projections did not reflect any potential proceeds from the hypothetical divestiture of any of the Company’s excess spectrum assets.

Based on each of the SCC and the MCC, Centerview calculated the forecasted unlevered free cash flows of the Company and determined a terminal value for the Company assuming a perpetuity growth rate range of 1% to 3% based on Centerview’s experience and professional judgment, which was informed, in part, by the EBITDA multiples implied by the terminal value calculated assuming various perpetuity growth rates. Centerview then discounted to present value (utilizing a mid-year discounting convention and discounting back to July 1, 2013) the unlevered free cash flows of the Company and the terminal value, in each case using discount rates ranging from

22

Table of Contents

10.0% to 17.5%, reflecting a range of Centerview’s estimates of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital based on Centerview’s review of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital implied by (i) the Company’s cost of equity derived using the capital asset pricing model and (ii) the yield on the Company’s outstanding traded debt securities. For each, Centerview reviewed values at December 10, 2012 (the trading day prior to the date that information about a potential transaction between the Company and Sprint was reported in the press), October 10, 2012 (the trading day immediately prior to the date discussions between Sprint and Softbank were first confirmed in the marketplace) and October 11, 2011 (the trading day on which the Company’s outstanding traded debt securities were traded at a price that implied the maximum yield to worst on these securities) and June 11, 2013 (the trading day prior to the rendering of Centerview’s opinion). In performing this analysis, Centerview also took into account the present value of the Company’s net operating losses based on the estimated utilization of the Company’s net operating losses per the Company’s management, discounted at a cost of equity ranging from 12% to 24%, which was based on Centerview’s estimate of the Company’s cost of equity assuming a weighted average cost of capital ranging from 10.0% to 17.5%, the Company’s after-tax cost of debt and the Company’s ratio of debt to capitalization.

This analysis resulted in an illustrative implied equity value range of approximately ($2.25) to $0.68 per share of our Class A Common Stock based on the SCC and $3.26 to $13.93 per share of our Class A Common Stock based on the MCC. Centerview compared the results of the above analysis to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer. Centerview noted that the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer was within the illustrative range of implied equity values per share derived from this analysis based on the MCC and above the illustrative range of implied equity values per share derived from this analysis based on the SCC.

Centerview noted, however, that its assessment of the results of the discounted cash flow analysis was impacted by (1) with respect to the MCC, the fact that Centerview had been informed by the management of the Company that there were significant historical and continuing challenges and uncertainty in its ability to attract additional wholesale spectrum customers, and (2) the fact that based on management estimates, both the SCC and the MCC are expected to require significant amounts of capital to fully finance the corresponding business plans (approximately $3.5 billion of peak cumulative cash shortfalls for the SCC in 2017 and approximately $2.1 billion of peak cumulative cash shortfalls for the MCC in 2015), which may not be available to the Company.

Other Considerations

The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Centerview believes that selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Centerview’s opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Centerview considered the results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Centerview made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all of its analyses. In its analyses, Centerview considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. No company or transaction used in the analyses is identical to the Company or the Offer, and an evaluation of the results of the analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading, acquisition or other values of the companies and assets analyzed. The estimates contained in the analyses and the ranges of implied valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, the analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. Centerview prepared the above analyses for the purpose of providing its opinion to the Special Committee regarding whether, as of the date of the written opinion, the Offer Price was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank

23

Table of Contents

and their respective affiliates). Because these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, none of the Company, Centerview or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecasted.

The opinion and analyses of Centerview were only one of many factors taken into consideration by the Special Committee in its evaluation of the Offer. Consequently, the analyses described above should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Special Committee, the Board of Directors or the Company’s management with respect to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, Sprint, SoftBank and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer or as to whether the Special Committee or the Board of Directors would have been willing to determine that a different consideration was fair.

Centerview is a securities firm engaged directly and through affiliates in a number of investment banking, financial advisory and merchant banking activities. Centerview has not in the past two years provided investment banking or other services to the Company. Centerview has not in the past two years provided, and is not currently providing, investment banking or other services to DISH, Offeror, Sprint or Softbank. Centerview may provide investment banking or other services to the Company, DISH, Offeror, Sprint or Softbank, or their respective affiliates in the future, for which Centerview may receive compensation.

Under the terms of Centerview’s engagement letter with the Special Committee, Centerview advised the Special Committee that, to the knowledge of Centerview, its controlled affiliates and the principal members of the team working on its engagement, none of Centerview, its controlled affiliates and the principal members of the team working on its engagement had any direct material economic interests in the Company, Offeror or DISH, other than potential economic interests in accounts over which both (i) such person has no influence or control and (ii) such person has no knowledge of the holdings of such accounts.

In choosing a financial advisor, the Special Committee members discussed whether to engage a number of potential internationally recognized financial services firms to act as financial advisor, including Centerview, based on the knowledge of the members of the Special Committee of firms with expertise in transactions similar to the Offer. The members of the Special Committee then interviewed Centerview and, after consideration and confirmation that Centerview did not have a conflict of interest, selected Centerview as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience and expertise in transactions similar to the Offer. Centerview has acted as financial advisor to the Special Committee in connection with its analysis and consideration of strategic alternatives available to the Company, and have participated in certain of the negotiations relating thereto. In consideration of Centerview’s services, under the terms of Centerview’s engagement letter with the Special Committee (as amended), Centerview received $1 million upon its engagement by the Special Committee and $2 million upon the public announcement of the Sprint Merger Agreement. Centerview also is entitled to receive (1) upon the consummation of the Offer, a transaction fee of $15.0 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence) or (2) upon the consummation of the Sprint Merger Agreement, a transaction fee which is estimated as of June 12, 2013 to be approximately $12.8 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence). The Special Committee was aware of this fee structure, as well as the fact that Centerview would be entitled to receive a transaction fee in the event the Company entered into certain alternative transactions, and took such information into account in considering the Centerview opinion and in making its recommendations to the Company’s board. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Centerview for certain expenses arising, and to indemnify Centerview against certain liabilities that may arise, out of its engagement.

Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Board of Directors

In connection with Clearwire’s board of directors’ analysis and consideration of potential strategic alternatives, on December 7, 2012, Clearwire’s board of directors retained Evercore to act as financial advisor to Clearwire’s board of directors. On June 12, 2013, at a meeting of Clearwire’s board of directors, Evercore delivered its oral opinion to Clearwire’s board of directors, which opinion was subsequently confirmed by

24

Table of Contents

delivery of a written opinion, dated June 12, 2013, to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Evercore as set forth in its opinion, the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of shares of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the Offer was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

The full text of the written opinion of Evercore, dated June 12, 2013, which sets forth, among other things, the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the scope of review undertaken in rendering its opinion, is attached to this Schedule 14D-9 as Annex B . You are urged to read Evercore’s opinion carefully and in its entirety. Evercore’s opinion was directed to Clearwire’s board of directors and addresses, as of the date of such opinion, only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Offer Price to be paid to holders of our Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror and their respective affiliates). The opinion does not address any other aspect of the proposed Offer and does not constitute a recommendation to Clearwire’s board of directors or to any other persons in respect of the proposed Offer, including to any Clearwire shareholder as to how any such holder should vote or act in respect of the proposed Offer. Evercore’s opinion does not address the relative merits of the proposed Offer as compared to other business or financial strategies that might be available to Clearwire, nor does it address the underlying business decision of Clearwire to engage in the proposed Offer. The summary of the Evercore opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion attached to this Schedule 14D-9 as Annex B .

In connection with rendering its opinion, Evercore has, among other things:

25

Table of Contents

For purposes of its analysis and opinion, Evercore assumed and relied upon, without undertaking any independent verification of, the accuracy and completeness of all of the information publicly available, and all of the information supplied or otherwise made available to, discussed with, or reviewed by Evercore, and Evercore assumed no liability therefor. With respect to the Management Projections, Evercore assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of management of Clearwire as to the future financial performance of Clearwire under the business assumptions reflected therein. Evercore expressed no view as to any projected financial data relating to Clearwire or the assumptions on which they are based.

For purposes of rendering its opinion, Evercore assumed, in all respects material to its analysis, that the information regarding DISH and Offeror contained in the Offer to Purchase is true and correct, that each of DISH and Offeror will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the Offer to Purchase and that all conditions to the consummation of the Offer will be satisfied without material waiver or modification thereof. For purposes of rendering its opinion, Evercore also assumed that all holders of Class A Common Stock would be able to tender their shares in the Offer. Evercore further assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents, approvals or releases necessary for the consummation of the Offer will be obtained without any material delay, limitation, restriction or condition that would have an adverse effect on Clearwire or the consummation of the Offer or materially reduce the benefits to the holders of the Class A Common Stock in the Offer.

Evercore did not make or assume any responsibility for making any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Clearwire, nor was Evercore furnished with any such appraisals, nor did Evercore evaluate the solvency or fair value of Clearwire under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. Evercore’s opinion was necessarily based upon information made available to it as of the date of the opinion and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and as can be evaluated on the date of the opinion. It should be understood that subsequent developments may affect Evercore’s opinion and that Evercore does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Clearwire advised Evercore that as of the date of the opinion, Clearwire did not expect to generate cumulative positive cash flows during the next twelve months after the date of the Evercore opinion, that Clearwire would need to raise substantial additional capital to fund its business and meet its financial obligations beyond the next twelve months after the date of the Evercore opinion and that the ability of Clearwire to successfully fulfill its additional capital needs in a timely manner was uncertain. In arriving at its opinion, Evercore took these views into account, as well as the impact of Clearwire’s liquidity position and capital needs on the execution of Clearwire’s business plan.

Evercore was not asked to pass upon, and expressed no opinion with respect to, any matter other than the fairness, as of the date of the Evercore opinion, to the holders of the Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates), from a financial point of view, of the Offer Price as of the date of its opinion. Evercore did not express any view on, and its opinion did not address, the fairness of the proposed Offer to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, the holders of any other securities, creditors or other constituencies of Clearwire, nor as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of Clearwire, or any class of such persons, whether relative to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of the Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) or otherwise. Evercore did not express any view on, and its opinion did not address, the fairness of the transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement or the values of the constituent elements of that transaction. Evercore assumed that any modification to the structure of the transaction will not affect its analysis in any material respect. Evercore’s opinion did not address the relative merits of the Offer as compared to other business or financial strategies that might be available to Evercore, nor did it address the underlying business decision of Clearwire to engage in the proposed Offer.

In arriving at its opinion, Evercore was not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any third party with respect to the acquisition of any or all of the shares of Class A Common Stock or any business

26

Table of Contents

combination or other extraordinary transaction involving Clearwire. Evercore’s opinion did not constitute a recommendation to the board of directors or to any other persons in respect of the proposed Offer, including as to how any holder of shares of Class A Common Stock should act or vote in respect of the proposed Offer or whether to tender any shares in the Offer. Evercore expressed no opinion as to the price at which shares of Clearwire will trade at any time. Evercore’s opinion noted that it is not a legal, regulatory, accounting or tax expert and Evercore assumed the accuracy and completeness of assessments by Clearwire and its advisors with respect to legal, regulatory, accounting and tax matters.

Evercore’s opinion was only one of many factors considered by the board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed Offer and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the board of directors or our management with respect to the proposed Offer or the Offer Price to be paid to holders of Clearwire’s Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates). Consequently, the analyses as described below should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Clearwire board of directors with respect to the Offer Price or of whether the Clearwire board of directors would have been willing to agree to different consideration.

Set forth below is a summary of the material financial analyses reviewed by Evercore with Clearwire’s board of directors on June 12, 2013 in connection with rendering the Evercore opinion. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Evercore. The order of the analyses described and the results of these analyses do not represent relative importance or weight given to these analyses by Evercore. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data that existed on or before June 12, 2013, the most recent trading day before delivery of the opinion, and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.

The following summary of financial analyses includes information presented in tabular format. These tables must be read together with the text of each summary in order to understand fully the financial analyses. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Evercore’s financial analyses.

In conducting its analysis, Evercore used various methodologies to review the valuation of Clearwire to assess the fairness of the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of shares of Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates). Specifically, Evercore conducted analyses of precedent premia paid analysis, selected publicly-traded companies, selected precedent spectrum transactions, discounted cash flow, which we refer to as DCF, historical share price, and research analyst price targets. However, Evercore only relied upon the analyses of precedent premia paid analysis, selected publicly-traded companies, selected precedent spectrum transactions and DCF for purposes of its opinion.

Analysis of Precedent Premia Paid

Evercore conducted a precedent premia paid analysis by analyzing certain all cash transactions since January 1, 2000 wherein equity value purchased was greater than $500 million but less than $10 billion in which the acquirer purchased 100% of the target

There were 611 such transactions, and the median premium paid relative to the trading share prices one day prior to the announcement of these transactions was 26.6%, the median premium paid relative to the trading share prices one week prior to the announcement of these transactions was 28.5%, and the median premium paid relative to the trading share prices four weeks prior to the announcement of these transactions was 31.7%.

27

Table of Contents

Evercore applied these premia above to Clearwire’s closing share price one day, one week and four weeks prior to the speculation in the markets about the Sprint-SoftBank Merger on October 11, 2012 and to Clearwire’s closing share price one day, one week and four weeks prior to Sprint’s initial proposal to acquire the non-Sprint equity stake in Clearwire on November 21, 2012. The results are provided in the table below.

Based on the above table, Evercore selected the high to low range of implied share prices based on Clearwire’s closing share price prior to October 11, 2012 and on Clearwire’s closing share price prior to November 21, 2012. The table below summarizes the implied per share equity value reference ranges for Clearwire:

Evercore noted that the Offer Price to be paid to holders of Clearwire’s Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the Offer to Purchase exceeds the ranges of the share prices implied by Evercore’s analysis of precedent premia paid.

Analysis of Selected Publicly-Traded Companies

In order to derive an implied per share equity value reference range for Clearwire, Evercore analyzed the implied spectrum value (or $/MHz-POP) based on public market trading values of similar companies. Evercore, based on its professional judgment and experience in the wireless telecommunications industry, deemed the following two companies, which have either debt and/or equity trading in public markets, sufficiently comparable to Clearwire to serve as a useful basis for comparison:

However, because of the inherent differences between the businesses, operations, spectrum portfolio, capital structure, regulatory characteristics and prospects of Clearwire and the selected comparable companies, no comparable company is exactly the same as Clearwire.

Evercore reviewed, among other things, enterprise values as a multiple of the total MHz-POPs of the selected comparable companies. For Globalstar, enterprise value was calculated as public market equity value plus debt, less cash and cash equivalents based on publicly available information. No value was attributed to the existing mobile satellite services business for the purposes of this analysis. The implied spectrum value or implied $/MHz-POP for Globalstar was computed by dividing the calculated enterprise value by Globalstar’s MHz-POPs, derived from the spectrum approved by the FCC for Ancillary Terrestrial Component purposes. For LightSquared, enterprise value was calculated based on the market value of LightSquared outstanding indebtedness including the present value of spectrum leases less cash and cash equivalents. Since LightSquared is currently in restructuring, there is no publicly-traded market value for the common equity and no value has been attributed to the common equity for the purposes of this analysis. The implied spectrum value or implied $/MHz-POP for LightSquared was computed by dividing the calculated enterprise value by LightSquared’s MHz-POPs, derived from publicly available information on LightSquared’s total spectrum portfolio. Implied $/MHz-POPs multiples for the selected comparable companies is summarized below:

28

Table of Contents

Evercore then applied the range of selected calculated enterprise value to implied MHZ-POPs multiples of $0.19-$0.21/MHz-POP derived from the selected comparable companies to the corresponding total MHz-POPs for Clearwire as furnished to Evercore by the management of Clearwire. This resulted in an implied enterprise value for Clearwire, which was then used to derive an implied price per share of Common Stock. These implied share prices were derived by subtracting management’s estimate of net debt and the present value of spectrum leases as of June 30, 2013 from enterprise value and then dividing those amounts by the number of fully diluted shares of Clearwire at that particular share price. Net debt is the sum of interest bearing debt, minus the cash balance, in each case based on management estimates.

The table below summarizes the implied per share equity value reference ranges for Clearwire:

As discussed above, because of the inherent differences between the businesses, operations, spectrum portfolio, capital structure, regulatory characteristics and prospects of Clearwire and the selected comparable companies, no comparable company is exactly the same as Clearwire.

Evercore noted that the Offer Price to be paid to holders of Clearwire’s Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the Offer to Purchase exceeds the range of the share prices implied by Evercore’s analysis of selected publicly-traded companies.

Analysis of Selected Precedent Spectrum Transactions

Evercore reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of transactions since 2007 related to the sale of spectrum that Evercore deemed relevant, based on its professional experience with transactions in the wireless telecommunications industry. The set of transactions include (i) the potential sale of Clearwire’s Common Stock at a price of $2.97 per share, or $0.23/MHz-POP, pursuant to the initial Sprint bid on December 17, 2012, (ii) the potential sale of Clearwire’s Common Stock at a price of $3.40 per share, or $0.24/MHz-POP, pursuant to the revised Sprint bid on May 21, 2013, (iii) the potential sale of spectrum pursuant to the proposal delivered by DISH on December 28, 2012, which proposal we refer to as the December DISH Proposal, (iv) the potential tender offer for Clearwire’s Common Stock at a price of $3.30 per share pursuant to the December DISH Proposal and (v) the preliminary non-binding proposal by Verizon on April 8, 2013 to acquire certain spectrum assets of Clearwire, which proposal we refer to as the Preliminary 2013 Verizon Proposal. For each of the selected precedent transactions, Evercore, using publicly available financial and other information, determined the spectrum value or $/MHz-POP for the spectrum sold in each of these transactions. The implied spectrum value or $/MHz-POP for each of the relevant transactions is listed below:

29

Table of Contents

None of these precedent transactions is identical or directly comparable to the Offer. Because the reasons for, and the circumstances surrounding, each of the selected precedent transactions analyzed were so diverse, and because of the inherent differences between the operations and the financial condition of Clearwire and the companies involved in the selected precedent transactions, Evercore believes that a comparable transaction analysis is not solely mathematical and involves complex considerations and judgments. As such, based on this analysis and Evercore’s professional judgment, Evercore applied a range of the $0.18-$0.26 /MHz-POP to the aggregate MHz-POPs of Clearwire to calculate the implied enterprise value of Clearwire. The implied equity value of Clearwire was derived by subtracting net debt and the present value of spectrum leases as of June 30, 2013 from enterprise value and then dividing those amounts by the number of fully diluted shares of Clearwire at that particular share price. Net debt is the sum of interest bearing debt, minus the cash balance, in each case based on management estimates.

The Company is expected to continue to generate negative cash flows for the 12 months after the date of the Evercore opinion. As such, in order to illustrate the impact of reduction in cash on equity value, the equity value was derived as of June 30, 2013 and also as of December 31, 2013 using the same range of $0.18-$0.26/MHz-POPs discussed in the preceding paragraph and the estimated net debt corresponding to June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and the present value of spectrum leases each as based on estimates from management of Clearwire.

The table below summarizes the implied per share equity value reference ranges for Clearwire:

Evercore noted that the Offer Price to be paid to holders of Clearwire’s Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the Offer to Purchase exceeds the ranges of the share prices implied by Evercore’s analysis of selected precedent spectrum transactions.

Analysis of Discounted Cash Flow

As part of its analysis, and in order to estimate the implied present value of the equity value per share for Clearwire, Evercore prepared a discounted cash flow analysis for Clearwire.

A discounted cash flow analysis is a valuation methodology used to derive a valuation of an asset by calculating the present value of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the asset. Present value refers to

30

Table of Contents

the current value of future cash flows or amounts and is obtained by discounting those future cash flows or amounts by a discount rate. Evercore performed a discounted cash flow analysis for Clearwire by adding (1) the present value of Clearwire’ projected after-tax unlevered free cash flows for the second half of fiscal 2013 and for fiscal years 2014 through 2020, (2) the present value of the terminal value of Clearwire as of the end of fiscal year 2020, and (3) the present value of net operating losses of Clearwire. For each year, unlevered free cash flow was derived as follows: EBITDA plus certain non-cash adjustments less taxes less capital expenditures less changes in working capital, where changes in working capital can either be positive or negative. Terminal value refers to the present value of all future cash flows to be generated by an asset for the period after fiscal year 2020. The unlevered free cash flows, range of terminal values and net operating losses were discounted to present values as of June 30, 2013.

Evercore estimated a range of terminal values as of the end of fiscal year 2020 calculated based on perpetuity growth rates of 2.0% to 4.0%, which Evercore selected based on its professional judgment and experience in the wireless telecommunications industry. Evercore performed the discounted cash flow analysis using a range of discount rates from 10.0% to 17.5% which Evercore selected based on discount rate analysis (which took into account macro-economic assumptions and estimates of risk, cost of financial distress, Clearwire’s cost of debt, weighted average cost of capital analysis and other appropriate factors), professional judgment and experience in the wireless telecommunications industry. Evercore calculated per share equity values by first determining a range of enterprise values of Clearwire by adding the present values of the after-tax unlevered free cash flows, certain net operating losses and terminal values for each perpetuity growth rate and discount rate scenario, and then subtracting from the enterprise values the estimated net debt as of June 30, 2013 and then dividing those amounts by the number of fully diluted shares of Clearwire at that particular share price. Net debt is the sum of interest bearing debt, minus the cash balance, in each case based on management estimates at that date.

Evercore prepared discounted cash flow analyses for two sets of projections provided by the Company’s management. One set of projections was based on the assumption that Sprint will continue to be the Company’s only primary wholesale customer, or the SCC; while the other set of projections was based on the assumption that the Company will be able to source additional large wholesale customers in addition to Sprint, or the MCC. Based on management estimates, both sets of projections are expected to require significant amounts of capital to fully finance the corresponding business plans. The SCC and MCC are estimated to have peak cumulative cash shortfalls of approximately $3.5 billion and $2.1 billion in 2017 and 2015, respectively, before the time at which the Company becomes net cash flow positive. The SCC and MCC assume that any existing debt ($3.8 billion of which matures between 2015 and 2017) is refinanced at maturity at existing rates. In addition to the additional capital requirements needed to finance the SCC and MCC, management of Clearwire indicated that Clearwire has encountered historical and continuing significant challenges and uncertainty in its ability to attract additional wholesale spectrum customers.

In the SCC case, the management of Clearwire indicated that the Company may have excess spectrum capacity that may not be required to operate the business. As such, in the SCC case, in addition to the discounted cash flow analysis, Evercore also analyzed the incremental value to the equity of Clearwire from the net proceeds received from a potential sale of excess spectrum. For the purposes of this analysis, Evercore estimated $2.0 billion of net proceeds or $1.19 -$1.32 per share of incremental equity value in addition to the equity value derived from the discounted cash flow analysis.

The table below summarizes the implied per share equity value reference ranges for Clearwire:

31

Table of Contents

Evercore noted that the Offer Price to be paid to holders of Clearwire’s Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the Offer to Purchase exceeds the ranges of the share prices implied by Evercore’s analysis of the DCF (SCC Case) and the DCF (SCC Case + Potential Sale of Excess Spectrum) and is within the range of the share prices implied by Evercore’s analysis of the DCF (MCC Case).

Review of Historical Share Prices

Evercore reviewed the recent stock price performance of Clearwire based on an analysis of public trading prices for the twelve months ended June 11, 2013. During this time period, the closing price of Class A Common Stock ranged from a low of $0.90 to a high of $4.50.

Review of Research Analyst Price Targets

Evercore compared recent publicly available research analyst price targets for Clearwire that were available to Evercore as of December 10, 2012, which was the day before there was speculation in the markets about the Sprint Merger, and as of June 11, 2013. Evercore examined ten such analyst targets as of December 10, 2012 set forth in the table below, and noted that the low and high per share equity value price targets for Class A Common Stock were $1.00 and $4.00, respectively. Given that the low target price of $1.00 represented a forward target price as of December 31, 2013, Evercore discounted this target price to December 31, 2012 assuming a cost of equity of 20.0% based on Evercore’s professional judgment and experience in the wireless telecommunications industry, resulting in an adjusted low per-share equity value price target of $0.83 per share. Evercore also examined eight such analyst targets as of June 11, 2013 set forth in the table below, and noted that the low and high per share equity value price targets for Class A Common Stock were $2.97 and $4.50, respectively. As such, the publicly available analyst price targets indicated a range of $0.83 to $4.50 per share of Class A Common Stock.

32

Table of Contents

General

The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by Evercore. In connection with the review of the proposed Offer by Clearwire’s board of directors, Evercore performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary described above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Evercore’s opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Evercore considered the results of all the analyses and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one analysis or factor considered by it for purposes of its opinion. Rather, Evercore made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment in the wireless telecommunications industry after considering the results of all the analyses. In addition, Evercore considered various assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions, so that the range of valuations resulting from any particular analysis described above should therefore not be taken to be Evercore’s view of the value of Clearwire. No precedent spectrum sale transaction used in the above analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to a potential sale of spectrum by Clearwire. Further, Evercore’s analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies or transactions used, including judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Clearwire or its advisors. The fact that any specific analysis has been referred to in the summary above is not meant to indicate that such analysis was viewed as any more significant or was or should be given any greater weight than any other analysis.

Evercore prepared these analyses for the purpose of providing an opinion to Clearwire’s board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Offer Price to be paid to holders of shares of Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Offeror, and their respective affiliates) pursuant to the proposed Offer. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to necessarily reflect the prices at which the business or securities actually may be sold. Any estimates contained in these analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates. Accordingly, estimates used in, and the results derived from, Evercore’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty, and Evercore assumes no responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecasted in such estimates.

The issuance of the Evercore opinion was approved by an opinion committee of Evercore Group L.L.C.

Under the terms of Evercore’s engagement, Clearwire agreed to pay Evercore a customary fee for its services. In consideration of Evercore’s services, under the terms of Evercore’s engagement letter with Clearwire (as amended), Evercore received $1 million upon its engagement by Clearwire and $2 million upon the public announcement of the Sprint Merger Agreement. Evercore also is entitled to receive (1) upon the consummation of the Offer, a transaction fee of $15.0 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence) or (2) upon the consummation of the Sprint Merger Agreement, a transaction fee which is estimated as of June 12, 2013 to be approximately $12.8 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence). The board of directors of Clearwire was aware of this fee structure, as well as the fact that Evercore would be entitled to receive a transaction fee in the event the Company entered into certain alternative transactions and an expiration fee if the engagement is terminated under certain circumstances, and took such information into account in considering the Evercore opinion and in approving the Sprint Merger. In addition, Clearwire has agreed to reimburse Evercore for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including legal fees, expenses and disbursements) incurred in connection with its engagement, and to indemnify Evercore and its members, partners, officers, directors, advisors, representatives, employees, agents, affiliates or controlling persons against certain losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expense to which any such person may become subject, relating to, arising out of or in connection with Evercore’s engagement, performance of any service in connection therewith or any transaction contemplated thereby. Prior to its engagement, Evercore informed the board of directors of Clearwire that Eduardo Mestre, a Senior Managing Director of Evercore and a member of the Evercore team that would provide services to Clearwire, is a member of the Board of Directors of Comcast. The Clearwire board of directors engaged Evercore and requested Evercore’s opinion after having been so informed.

33

Table of Contents

During the two year period prior to the date hereof, no material relationship existed between Evercore and its affiliates and Clearwire or DISH pursuant to which compensation was received by Evercore or its affiliates as a result of such a relationship. Evercore may provide financial or other services to Clearwire or DISH or their respective affiliates in the future and in connection with any such services Evercore may receive compensation.

In the ordinary course of business, Evercore or its affiliates may actively trade the securities, or related derivative securities, or financial instruments of Clearwire, DISH and their respective affiliates, for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities or instruments.

In choosing a financial advisor, the Company’s board of directors discussed whether to engage a number of potential internationally recognized financial services firms to act as financial advisor, including Evercore, based on the knowledge of the members of the Company’s board or directors of firms with expertise in the industry in which the Company operates and in transactions similar to the Offer. The members of the Company’s board of directors then interviewed Evercore and certain other firms that the board of directors determined did not have conflicts and, after consideration and determination by the board of directors that Evercore did not have a conflict of interest, selected Evercore as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in the telecommunications industry, is familiar with spectrum, had performed work for the Company in the past and has substantial expertise in transactions similar to the Offer. Evercore is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, competitive biddings, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

Intent to Tender

To the knowledge of the Company after reasonable inquiry, each executive officer, director, affiliate and subsidiary of the Company (other than Sprint and its affiliates) who owns Shares currently intends to tender in the Offer all the Shares held of record or beneficially owned by such person, other than (a) Shares underlying stock-based awards, if any, and (b) Shares, if any, that if tendered would cause them to incur liability under the short-swing profits provisions of the Exchange Act.

In connection with the Special Committee’s analysis and consideration of potential strategic alternatives, on November 21, 2012, the Special Committee retained Centerview to act as its financial advisor. In consideration of Centerview’s services, under the terms of Centerview’s engagement letter with the Special Committee (as amended), Centerview received $1 million upon its engagement by the Special Committee and $2 million upon the public announcement of the Sprint Merger Agreement. Centerview also is entitled to receive (1) upon the consummation of the Offer, a transaction fee of $15.0 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence) or (2) upon the consummation of the Sprint Merger Agreement, a transaction fee which is estimated as of June 12, 2013 to be approximately $12.8 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence). The Special Committee was aware of this fee structure, as well as the fact that Centerview would be entitled to receive a transaction fee in the event the Company entered into certain alternative transactions, and took such information into account in considering the Centerview opinion and in making its recommendations to the Company board. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Centerview for certain expenses arising, and to indemnify Centerview against certain liabilities that may arise, out of its engagement.

Centerview is a securities firm engaged directly and through affiliates in a number of investment banking, financial advisory and merchant banking activities. Centerview has not in the past two years provided investment banking or other services to the Company. Centerview has not in the past two years provided, and is not currently providing, investment banking or other services to DISH, Offeror, Sprint or Softbank. Centerview may provide investment banking or other services to the Company, DISH, Offeror, Sprint or Softbank, or their respective affiliates in the future, for which Centerview may receive compensation.

34

Table of Contents

The members of the Special Committee selected Centerview as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience and expertise in transactions similar to the Offer, has acted as financial advisor to the Special Committee in connection with, and has participated in certain of the negotiations leading to, the Sprint Merger.

The board of directors approved a per-meeting fee of $2,000 for each in-person and telephonic meeting and a retainer fee of $40,000 for the chairman and $30,000 for the members of the Special Committee. Compensation of the Special Committee members was not and is not contingent on the Special Committee approving or recommending the Offer or any other strategic alternative or the consummation of the Offer or any other strategic alternative.

In deciding to approve the per-meeting fee, the Clearwire board of directors considered, among other things, the complexities inherent in the strategic financial alternatives to be considered and the time expected to be required by the Special Committee members, the need for the Special Committee to evaluate a variety of matters and the publicly-reported compensation of the special committees of the boards of directors of other companies.

Clearwire’s board of directors has retained Evercore to act as its financial advisor in connection with the Offer and related matters, including any alternative transactions to the Offer. In consideration of Evercore’s services, under the terms of Evercore’s engagement letter with Clearwire (as amended), Evercore received $1 million upon its engagement by Clearwire and $2 million upon the public announcement of the Sprint Merger Agreement. Evercore also is entitled to receive (1) upon the consummation of the Offer, a transaction fee of $15.0 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence) or (2) upon the consummation of the Sprint Merger Agreement, a transaction fee which is estimated as of June 12, 2013 to be approximately $12.8 million (less the fees described in the preceding sentence). The Company has also agreed to reimburse Evercore for certain expenses incurred by it in connection with its engagement, including fees and expenses of outside legal counsel, and to indemnify Evercore and certain related persons under certain circumstances against certain liabilities that may arise from or relate to Evercore’s engagement, including certain liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws. The terms of the engagement letter with Evercore, including the foregoing fee arrangements, were negotiated at arm’s-length between the Company and Evercore, and the Company was aware of the fee arrangements prior to selecting Evercore as its independent financial advisor and at the time of the recommendation of the Offer.

During the two year period prior to the date hereof, no material relationship existed between Evercore and its affiliates and Clearwire or DISH pursuant to which compensation was received by Evercore or its affiliates as a result of such a relationship. Evercore may provide financial or other services to Clearwire, DISH or their respective affiliates in the future and in connection with any such services Evercore may receive compensation.

In the ordinary course of business, Evercore or its affiliates may actively trade the securities, or related derivative securities, or financial instruments of Clearwire, DISH and their respective affiliates, for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities or instruments.

Clearwire selected Evercore as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in the telecommunications industry, is familiar with spectrum, had performed work for the Company in the past and has substantial expertise in transactions similar to the Offer. Evercore is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, competitive biddings, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

Except as set forth above, neither the Company nor any person acting on its behalf has or currently intends to employ, retain or compensate any person to make solicitations or recommendations to the stockholders of the Company with respect to the Offer.

35

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information regarding transactions with respect to Shares effected by the Company or, to the Company’s knowledge after making reasonable inquiry, by any of its executive officers, directors affiliates or subsidiaries during the past 60 days prior to the date of this Schedule 14D-9, showing the date of such transaction, the number of Shares sold and the price received for those Shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the sales set out below represent the automatic sale of Shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

Except as indicated in Items 2, 3 and 4 of this Schedule 14D-9, (a) the Company is not undertaking or engaged in any negotiations in response to the Offer that relate to, or would result in: (i) a tender offer for or other acquisition of the Company’s securities by the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or any other person; (ii) any extraordinary transaction such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (iii) any purchase, sale or transfer of a material amount of assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or (iv) any material change in the present dividend rates or policy, or indebtedness or capitalization of the Company and (b) there are no transactions, resolutions of the board of directors or agreements in principle or signed contracts in response to the Offer that relate to, or would result in, one or more of the events referred to in clause (a) of this Item 7.

Appraisal Rights

No appraisal rights are available to the holders of Shares in connection with the Offer.

Anti-Takeover Statute

The Company is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. In general, Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits an “interested stockholder” (which includes a person who owns or has the right to acquire 15% or more of the corporation’s issued and outstanding voting stock) from engaging in a “business combination” (defined to include mergers and certain other transactions) with a Delaware corporation for a period of three years following the time such person became an interested stockholder unless, among other things, the board of directors of the corporation approved, prior to the interested person becoming such, either the business combination or the transaction in which the interested stockholder became such.

The Company is not aware of any other state takeover laws or regulations that are applicable to the Offer and has not attempted to comply with any other state takeover laws or regulations.

36

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

The information under “Item 3. Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements—Golden Parachute Compensation” is incorporated herein by reference.

Regulatory Approvals

Under the HSR Act and the rules that have been promulgated thereunder by the Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the FTC, certain acquisition transactions may not be consummated unless certain information has been furnished to the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, which we refer to as Antitrust Division, and the FTC and certain waiting period requirements have been satisfied. The initial waiting period for a cash tender offer is 15 days, but this period may be shortened if the reviewing agency grants “early termination” of the waiting period, or it may be lengthened if the parties decide to voluntarily withdraw and re-file to allow a second 15-day waiting period, or the reviewing agency issues a formal request for additional information and documentary material. The purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer is subject to such requirements. The Antitrust Division and the FTC scrutinize the legality under the antitrust laws of transactions such as the acquisition of Shares by Offeror pursuant to the Offer. At any time before or after the consummation of any such transactions, the Antitrust Division or the FTC could take such action under the antitrust laws of the United States as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer or seeking divestiture of the Shares so acquired or divestiture of substantial assets of DISH or Clearwire. Private parties (including individual states of the United States) may also bring legal actions under the antitrust laws of the United States. DISH does not believe that the consummation of the Offer will result in a violation of any applicable antitrust laws. However, there can be no assurance that a challenge to the Offer on antitrust grounds will not be made, or if such a challenge is made, what the result would be.

On May 30, 2013, DISH filed a Premerger Notification and Report Form with the FTC and the Antitrust Division for review in connection with the Offer. The initial waiting period applicable to the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer will expire at 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on June 14, 2013.

FCC approval for the consummation of the Offer is required in the event that as a result of the Offer, DISH acquires 50% or more of the voting interests in Clearwire or otherwise effects a transfer of control as determined by Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Section 1.948 (“47 CFR 1.948”) and the FCC’s decisions. Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.948, DISH will file an application with the FCC for transfer of control of Clearwire and must receive the required FCC Consents in order to consummate the Offer in that event.

Tax Ownership Change

The Company believes that it would experience another “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the “Code”, if DISH completes the Offer in accordance with its terms, which may limit the Company’s ability to use its historical net operating losses, which we refer to as NOLs, to offset its income and gain in the future. In general, after an ownership change, Section 382 of the Code limits the amount of the pre-change NOLs of the Company that may be used to offset income and gain of the Company arising in each taxable year after the ownership change to the product of the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the time of the ownership change and a specified rate based on long-term tax-exempt bond yields. As discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (filed as Exhibit (e)(1) hereto), as of December 31, 2012, excluding NOL carryforwards that the Company permanently will be unable to use, the Company had United States federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $1.3 billion, of which approximately $1.1 billion already is subject to certain annual limitations imposed under Section 382 of the Code. A further ownership change as a result of the completion of the Offer would impose a limitation on the Company’s ability to use its previously unlimited NOLs generated since the time of its most recent previous ownership change. As a result, there may be an increased likelihood that the Company would become a cash taxpayer in the future, requiring Clearwire Communications to make a tax distribution to the Company, together with corresponding proportionate tax distributions to its other members. However, while it is not free from doubt, based on the Offer Price of $4.40 per share of Class A

37

Table of Contents

Common Stock, the Company does not believe that any additional limitation imposed on its ability to use its currently available NOLs as a result of the Offer under Section 382 of the Code would seriously impair its ability to use such losses in the future. The determination of whether the Company has experienced an ownership change and the ability of the Company to use its NOLs after an ownership change is subject to numerous factual and legal uncertainties, including certain unresolved issues as to the proper interpretation of Section 382 of the Code, and there can be no assurance that the United States Internal Revenue Service or a court will agree with the Company’s calculations.

On June 11, 2013, the most recent practicable date before this Schedule 14D-9 was mailed to our stockholders, the closing price for our Class A Common Stock on NASDAQ was $4.35 per share. You are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for our Class A Common Stock in connection with voting your shares of Class A Common Stock.

Prospective Financial Information

Set forth below is prospective financial information based on two sets of financial projections of the Company for fiscal years 2012 through 2020 prepared by management of the Company and updated as of May 10, 2013 to reflect the Company’s actual performance during the past two fiscal quarters: (1) the Single-Customer Case, which we refer to as the SCC, which assumes Sprint will remain the Company’s only major wholesale customer, and (2) the Multi-Customer Case, which we refer to as the MCC, which assumes the Company would achieve substantial non-Sprint network traffic from a second major wholesale partner beginning in 2014. Each of these sets of projections was previously included in the Proxy Statement. The Company, however, does not expect to be able to obtain a second significant wholesale customer and has been unable to obtain a second significant wholesale customer in spite of its efforts to do so for the last two years. The prospective financial information set forth below and included in the Proxy Statement Supplement dated May 30, 2013 was prepared more recently than the prospective financial information initially included in the Proxy Statement on April 23, 2013. While this revised prospective financial information was calculated with the benefit of more recent financial information (including financial results for the last fiscal quarter of 2012 and the first fiscal quarter of 2013) that was not previously available as of April 23, 2013, we do not believe that the projections are materially different from the information initially provided the Proxy Statement on April 23, 2013. Centerview and Evercore prepared their respective financial analysis on the basis of the revised prospective financial information, as well as updated capitalization numbers provided by the Company. Centerview and Evercore concluded that such revised prospective financial information did not have a material impact on their respective financial analysis as related to the Offer.

38

Table of Contents

Neither the Company’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective financial information.

The prospective financial information is subjective in many respects and reflects numerous judgments, estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, including estimates and assumptions regarding industry performance and general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions, as well as other future events. Important factors that may affect actual results and cause this information not to be accurate include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to the Company’s business, our dependence on wholesale partners, suppliers and third-party service providers, competition, conflicts of interest, the regulatory environment, data security breaches, and capital adequacy and other factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and other risk factors detailed from time to time in the Company’s reports filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this Schedule 14D-9. In addition, the prospective financial information does not reflect any events that could affect the Company’s prospects, changes in general business or economic conditions or any other transaction or event that has occurred since, or that may occur and that was not anticipated at, the time the financial projections were prepared. The prospective financial information also covers multiple years and by its nature becomes subject to greater uncertainty with each successive year. Furthermore, and for the same reasons, this information should not be construed as commentary by the Company’s management as to how the Company’s management expects the Company’s actual results to compare to research analysts’ estimates. There can be no assurance that the prospective financial information is or will be accurate or that the Company’s future financial results will not vary, even materially, from this information. None of the Company, its affiliates, representatives or agents undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise to revise the prospective financial information to reflect circumstances existing or arising after the date such information was generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events, even if any or all of the underlying estimates and assumptions are shown to be in error.

39

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Schedule 14D-9 constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and typically can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “target,” “plan,” “providing guidance” and similar expressions, “believe” and similar terms, including any statements that refer to expectations or other characterizations of future events, circumstances or results, including, without limitation: all statements related to the proposed business transactions; the outlook for Clearwire’s businesses, performance and opportunities; the expected timing of the completion of the transactions; the ability to complete the transactions considering the various closing conditions; and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including uncertainties as to the timing of the Offer and the transactions; uncertainties as to how many of the Company’s stockholders will tender their stock in the Offer; the possibility that various closing conditions for the transaction may not be satisfied or waived; the effects of disruption from the transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees, customers, other business partners or governmental entities; other business effects, including the effects outside of the Company’s control; transaction costs; actual or contingent liabilities; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in documents filed with the SEC by the Company from time to time, as well as the Offer documents to be filed by DISH and the solicitation/recommendation statement to be filed by the Company.

All of the materials related to the Offer (and all other Offer documents filed with the SEC) will be available at no charge from the SEC through its website at www.sec.gov. Investors and security holders will also be able to obtain free copies of the documents filed with the SEC by the Company on the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at www.clearwire.com. Clearwire does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to update information contained in this Schedule 14D-9, including forward-looking statements, as a result of facts, events or circumstances after the date of this Schedule 14D-9.

The following exhibits are filed with this Schedule 14D-9:

40

Table of Contents

41

Table of Contents

Annex A: Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC, dated June 12, 2013.

Annex B: Opinion of Evercore Group L.L.C., dated June 12, 2013

42

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.

Dated: June 12, 2013

Table of Contents

Annex A

Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC, dated June 12, 2013

A-1

Table of Contents

June 12, 2013

Special Committee of the Board of Directors

Clearwire Corporation

1425 120 ^th Avenue NE

Bellevue, WA 98005

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We understand that DISH Acquisition Holding Corporation (“Purchaser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”), is offering to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock of Clearwire Corporation (the “Company”), par value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”), at a price of $4.40 per Share, net to the seller in cash (the “Offer Price”), without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated May 30, 2013 (the “Offer to Purchase”) and the related Letter of Transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”), each attached as exhibits to the Schedule TO filed by DISH and Purchaser with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 (as amended on June 4, 2013, the “Schedule TO”). The Offer to Purchase and Letter of Transmittal, together with any amendments or supplements thereto, collectively constitute the “Offer”. The terms and conditions of the Offer are more fully set forth in the Offer to Purchase.

The Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Special Committee”) has requested our opinion, as of the date hereof, as to the fairness of the Offer Price, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Shares (other than DISH, Purchaser, Sprint Nextel Corporation, SOFTBANK CORP. and their respective affiliates).

We have acted as financial advisor to the Special Committee in connection with its analysis and consideration of strategic alternatives available to the Company, and have participated in certain of the negotiations relating thereto. We have received, and will receive, a fee for our services in connection with our engagement, a substantial portion of which is contingent upon the completion of the Offer or the consummation of certain alternative transactions. In addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse certain of our expenses arising, and indemnify us against certain liabilities that may arise, out of our engagement.

We are a securities firm engaged directly and through affiliates in a number of investment banking, financial advisory and merchant banking activities. We have not in the past two years provided investment banking or other services to the Company. We have not in the past two years provided, and are not currently providing, investment banking or other services to Purchaser or DISH. We may provide investment banking or other services to the Company, Purchaser, DISH or their respective affiliates in the future, for which we may receive compensation.

In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, among other things: (i) the Schedule TO (including the exhibits thereto); (ii) the Annual Reports on Form 10-K of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012; (iii) certain interim reports to stockholders, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of the Company; (iv) certain publicly available research analyst reports for the Company; (v) certain other communications from the Company to its stockholders; and (vi) certain internal information relating to the business, operations, earnings, cash flow, assets, liabilities and prospects of the Company

A-2

Table of Contents

Special Committee of the Board of Directors

Clearwire Corporation

June 12, 2013

Page 2

furnished to us by the Company, including certain financial forecasts, analyses and projections relating to the Company prepared by management of the Company and furnished to us by the Company (the “Internal Data”). We have conducted discussions with members of the senior management and representatives of the Company regarding their assessment of the Internal Data and the Offer. We have also reviewed publicly available financial and stock market data, including valuation multiples, for the Company and compared that data with similar data for certain other companies, the securities of which are publicly traded, and we compared certain of the proposed financial terms of the Offer with the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of certain other transactions that we deemed relevant. In addition, we conducted such other financial studies and analyses and took into account such other information as we deemed appropriate.

We have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of the financial, legal, regulatory, tax, accounting and other information supplied to, discussed with, or reviewed by us for purposes of this opinion and have, with the consent of the Special Committee, relied upon such information as being complete and accurate. In that regard, we have assumed, at the direction of the Special Committee, that the Internal Data has been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to the matters covered thereby and we have relied, at the direction of the Special Committee, on the Internal Data for purposes of our analysis and this opinion. We express no view or opinion as to the Internal Data or the assumptions on which it is based. In addition, at the direction of the Special Committee, we have not made any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal, and we have not been asked to conduct, and did not conduct, a physical inspection of the properties or assets of the Company. We have assumed, at the direction of the Special Committee, that the Offer will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Offer to Purchase, without the waiver, modification or amendment of any term, condition or agreement, the effect of which would be material to our analysis or this opinion. In addition, we have assumed that in the course of obtaining the necessary governmental, regulatory and other approvals, consents, releases and waivers for the Offer, no delay, limitation, restriction condition or other change will be imposed, the effect of which would be material to our analysis or this opinion. We have not evaluated and do not express any opinion as to the solvency or fair value of the Company, or the ability of the Company to pay its obligations when they come due, or as to the impact of the Offer on such matters under any state, federal, or other laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, we have not evaluated and do not express any opinion as to the price at which Shares may trade at any time subsequent to the announcement of the Offer. We are not legal, regulatory, tax or accounting advisors, and we express no opinion as to any legal, regulatory, tax or accounting matters.

We express no view herein as to, and our opinion does not address, the Company’s underlying business decision to recommend the Offer, or the relative merits of the Offer as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available to the Company or in which the Company might engage. In particular, we express no view herein as to, and our opinion does not address, the effect of the Special Committee’s decision to recommend the Offer on the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 17, 2012 (as amended on April 18, 2013 and May 21, 2013), by and among the Company, Sprint Nextel Corporation and Collie Acquisition Corp. In connection with our engagement and at the direction of the Special Committee, we were requested to approach, and we held discussions with, selected third parties to solicit indications of interest in the possible acquisition of certain assets of the Company. This opinion is limited to and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of

A-3

Table of Contents

Special Committee of the Board of Directors

Clearwire Corporation

June 12, 2013

Page 3

view, to the holders of Shares (other than DISH, Purchaser, Sprint Nextel Corporation, SOFTBANK CORP. and their respective affiliates), as of the date hereof, of the Offer Price. We have not been asked to, nor do we, express any view herein on, and our opinion does not address, any other term or aspect of the Offer, including, without limitation, the structure or form of the Offer or any other agreements or arrangements contemplated by the Offer or entered into in connection with or otherwise contemplated by the Offer, including, without limitation, the fairness of the Offer to, or any consideration to be received in connection therewith by, or the impact of the Offer on, the holders of any other class of securities, creditors, or other constituencies of the Company or any party. In addition, we express no view or opinion as to the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount, nature or any other aspect of any compensation to be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of the Company or any party, or class of such persons in connection with the Offer, whether relative to the Offer Price to be paid to the holders of Shares (other than DISH, Purchaser, Sprint Nextel Corporation, SOFTBANK CORP. and their respective affiliates) that tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer or otherwise. Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, currency, market and other conditions and circumstances as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of the date hereof, and we do not have any obligation or responsibility to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion based on circumstances, developments or events occurring after the date hereof. Our opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company or any other person as to whether such stockholder or other person should tender their Shares or otherwise act with respect to the Offer or any other matter.

Our financial advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided for the information and assistance of the Special Committee in connection with and for purposes of their consideration of the Offer. This opinion was approved by the Centerview Partners LLC Fairness Opinion Committee.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions and limitations set forth herein, we are of the opinion, as of the date hereof, that the Offer Price is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Shares (other than DISH, Purchaser, Sprint Nextel Corporation, SOFTBANK CORP. and their respective affiliates).

Very truly yours,

/s/ Centerview Partners LLC

CENTERVIEW PARTNERS LLC

A-4

Table of Contents

Annex B

Opinion of Evercore Group L.L.C., dated June 12, 2013

B-1

Table of Contents

E V E R C O R E   G R O U P   L.L.C.

June 12, 2013

The Board of Directors of

Clearwire Corporation

1475 120th Avenue Northeast

Bellevue, Washington 98005

Members of the Board of Directors:

We understand that DISH Network Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“ DISH ”), through DISH Acquisition Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH (“ Purchaser ”), has commenced a tender offer (the “ Offer ”) for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “ Class A Common Stock ”) of Clearwire Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), at a price of $4.40 per share, net to the seller in cash, without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes (the “ Offer Price ”). The terms and conditions of the Offer are more fully set forth in that certain Offer to Purchase, dated as of May 30, 2013, issued by DISH and the Purchaser (the “ Offer to Purchase ”) and terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Offer to Purchase.

The Board of Directors has asked us whether, in our opinion, the Offer Price to be received by the holders of shares of Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Purchaser and their respective affiliates), pursuant to the Offer to Purchase is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

In connection with rendering our opinion, we have, among other things:

(i) reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the Company that we deemed to be relevant, including publicly available research analysts’ estimates;

(ii) reviewed certain non-public historical financial statements and other non-public historical financial and operating data relating to the Company prepared and furnished to us by management of the Company;

(iii) reviewed certain non-public projected financial data relating to the Company prepared and furnished to us by management of the Company (the “ Management Projections ”);

(iv) discussed with management of the Company, the Company’s past and current operations, financial projections and current financial condition, including the Company’s liquidity position and capital needs (and including management’s views on the risks and uncertainties related to the foregoing);

B-2

Table of Contents

(v) reviewed the reported prices and the historical trading activity of the shares of Class A Common Stock;

(vi) compared the valuation multiples relating to the Offer with those of certain other transactions that we deemed relevant;

(vii) reviewed the Offer to Purchase, including the Form of Note Purchase Agreement, among the Company, Clearwire Communications, LLC, Clearwire Finance, Inc. and the Purchaser (the “ Note Purchase Agreement ”) and the Form of Investor Rights Agreement by and between the Company and the Purchaser contained as exhibits thereto;

(viii) reviewed the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 17, 2012, as amended, among Sprint Nextel Corporation, Collie Acquisition Corp. and the Company (the “ Sprint Merger Agreement ”);

(ix) reviewed the Note Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2012, by and among the Company, Clearwire Communications, LLC, Clearwire Finance, Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corporation (the “ Sprint Note Purchase Agreement ”), the First Amendment to the Sprint Note Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2013, the Second Amendment to the Sprint Note Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2013, and the indenture relating to the Company’s 1.00% Exchangeable Notes due 2018, dated March 1, 2013; and

(x) performed such other analyses and examinations and considered such other factors that we deemed appropriate.

For purposes of our analysis and opinion, we have assumed and relied upon, without undertaking any independent verification of, the accuracy and completeness of all of the information publicly available, and all of the information supplied or otherwise made available to, discussed with, or reviewed by us, and we assume no liability therefor. With respect to the Management Projections, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of management of the Company as to the future financial performance of the Company under the business assumptions reflected therein. We express no view as to any projected financial data relating to the Company or the assumptions on which they are based.

For purposes of rendering our opinion, we have assumed, in all respects material to our analysis, that the information regarding DISH and Purchaser contained in the Offer to Purchase is true and correct, that each of DISH and Purchaser will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the Offer to Purchase and that all conditions to the consummation of the Offer will be satisfied without material waiver or modification thereof. We have also assumed that all holders of Class A Common Stock would be able to tender their shares in the Offer. We have further assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents, approvals or releases necessary for the consummation of the Offer will be obtained without any material delay, limitation, restriction or condition that would have an adverse effect on the Company or the consummation of the Offer or materially reduce the benefits to the holders of the Class A Common Stock in the Offer.

B-3

Table of Contents

We have not made nor assumed any responsibility for making any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any such appraisals, nor have we evaluated the solvency or fair value of the Company under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. Our opinion is necessarily based upon information made available to us as of the date hereof and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they exist and as can be evaluated on the date hereof. It is understood that subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion. You have advised us that the Company does not expect to generate cumulative positive cash flows during the next twelve months, that the Company will need to raise substantial additional capital to fund its business and meet its financial obligations beyond the next twelve months and that the ability of the Company to successfully fulfill its additional capital needs in a timely manner is uncertain. In arriving at our opinion, we have taken these views into account, as well as the impact of the Company’s liquidity position and capital needs on the execution of the Company’s business plan.

We have not been asked to pass upon, and express no opinion with respect to, any matter other than the fairness to the holders of the Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Purchaser and their respective affiliates), from a financial point of view, of the Offer Price. We do not express any view on, and our opinion does not address, the fairness of the proposed Offer to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, the holders of any other securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, nor as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of the Company, or any class of such persons, whether relative to the Offer Price or otherwise. We do not express any view on, and our opinion does not address, the fairness of the transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement or the values of the constituent elements of that transaction. We have assumed that any modification to the structure of the transaction will not affect our analysis in any material respect. Our opinion does not address the relative merits of the Offer as compared to other business or financial strategies that might be available to the Company, nor does it address the underlying business decision of the Company to engage in the Offer.

In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any third party with respect to the acquisition of any or all of the shares of Class A Common Stock or any business combination or other extraordinary transaction involving the Company. This letter, and our opinion, does not constitute a recommendation to the Board of Directors or to any other persons in respect of the Offer, including as to how any holder of shares of Class A Common Stock should act or vote in respect of the Offer or whether to tender any shares in the Offer. We express no opinion herein as to the price at which shares of the Company will trade at any time. We are not legal, regulatory, accounting or tax experts and have assumed the accuracy and completeness of assessments by the Company and its advisors with respect to legal, regulatory, accounting and tax matters.

B-4

Table of Contents

We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the Offer and in accordance with the terms of our engagement letter with the Company, we were paid an initial fee at the time we were engaged by the Company on behalf of the Board of Directors as well as an additional fee for our services upon the rendering to the Board of Directors our opinion, dated December 16, 2012, in connection with certain aspects of the Sprint Merger Agreement. The Company has also agreed to reimburse our expenses and to indemnify us against certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. We will also be entitled to receive a success fee if the Offer is consummated. During the two year period prior to the date hereof, no material relationship existed between Evercore Group L.L.C. and its affiliates and DISH pursuant to which compensation was received by Evercore Group L.L.C. or its affiliates as a result of such a relationship. We may provide financial or other services to the Company or DISH or their respective affiliates in the future and in connection with any such services we may receive compensation.

In the ordinary course of business, Evercore Group L.L.C. or its affiliates may actively trade the securities, or related derivative securities, or financial instruments of the Company, DISH and their respective affiliates, for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities or instruments.

This letter, and the opinion expressed herein is addressed to, and for the information and benefit of, the Board of Directors in connection with their evaluation of the proposed Offer. The issuance of this opinion has been approved by an Opinion Committee of Evercore Group L.L.C.

This opinion may not be disclosed, quoted, referred to or communicated (in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever except with our prior written approval, except the Company may reproduce this opinion in full in any document that is required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and required to be mailed by the Company to its stockholders relating to the Offer; provided, however, that all references to us or our opinion in any such document and the description or inclusion of our opinion therein shall be subject to our prior consent with respect to form and substance, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

B-5

Table of Contents

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Offer Price is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the shares of Class A Common Stock (other than DISH, Purchaser and their respective affiliates).

B-6

Clearwire Corp. - Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:CLWR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024

Clearwire Corp. - Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:CLWR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024