UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant
¨
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
x
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
x
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
|
Clearwire Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Crest Financial
Limited
Crest Investment Company
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of
Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify
the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
This filing consists of the following documents:
|
|
|
Letter by Crest Financial Limited to the Board of Directors of Clearwire Corporation dated June 11, 2013
|
|
|
|
Press Release by Crest Financial Limited dated June 11, 2013
|
CREST FINANCIAL LIMITED
JPMorgan Chase Tower
600 Travis, Suite 6800
Houston, Texas 77002
June 11, 2013
VIA FEDERAL
EXPRESS AND FACSIMILE
The Board of Directors
c/o John W. Stanton
Chairman
Clearwire Corporation
1475 120th Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98005
Ladies and Gentlemen:
As our prior letters explained, Crest Financial Limited (
Crest
) believes that DISH Network
Corporations (
DISH
) tender offer for all outstanding shares of Clearwire Corporation (
Clearwire
or the
Company
) for $4.40 per share is both actionable and superior
in every way to Sprint Nextel Corporations (
Sprint
) current offer of $3.40 per share. SoftBank Corp.s (
SoftBank
) incremental bump to its offer for Sprint demonstrates that the bidding
war for Sprint goes on. The battle over Clearwire must continue as well. The clear path to unlocking Clearwires true value for all stockholders remains a direct, competitive bidding process for the Company. In order for that to occur, you the
Clearwire Board of Directors (the
Board
) must reconstitute the Boards Special Committee, fully consider DISHs tender offer to the stockholders of Clearwire, recommend against Sprints inferior offer, allow
Clearwires stockholders to reject the Sprint-Clearwire merger at Thursdays special meeting, and subsequently terminate the oppressive Sprint merger agreement.
SoftBanks increased offer for Sprint confirms that the desire to obtain Clearwires goldmine of spectrum, through control of Sprint, has only increased. On the eve of Sprints stockholder
vote, and faced with its own competing offer from DISH, SoftBank has upped its bid for Sprint. As we have maintained all along and SoftBank has confirmed in public statements, Clearwires wealth of spectrum is SoftBanks ultimate target in
its pursuit of Sprint. Thus, its incremental bump for Sprint is in fact a bump to its indirect bid for Clearwire. Clearwires stockholders should therefore receive the benefit of SoftBanks sweetened deal. If Sprint wishes to accomplish
its plan of locking up Clearwire for its ultimate suitor, it must pay an adequate price that reflects the true value of the Company.
Instead, Sprint has attempted to squeeze-out Clearwires minority stockholders on the cheap, while redirecting the bidding war to itself. Those fiduciary breaches continue. While objecting to
DISHs tender offer for Clearwire with hastily manufactured legal challenges, Sprint has set a deadline for DISH to respond to SoftBanks latest bid with its own best and final offer for Sprint. We believe that the clear intent
of these actions is to prevent DISH from bidding directly for what it most desiresClearwire and its spectrum assetsso that it is forced to pay a premium for Sprint. Although that course might be more beneficial to Sprint and its
1
stockholders, it visits great harm on Clearwires stockholders and is thus an egregious breach of Sprints fiduciary duties as Clearwires controller.
There can be no doubt that DISHs tender offer is better for Clearwires stockholders than Sprints most recent bid for
Clearwire. DISH has offered Clearwire stockholders a full dollar more per share than Sprint, and DISHs tender offer does not require any stockholder to sell against its will. Moreover, DISHs proposed note purchase agreement would permit
Clearwire to draw down the same $800.0 million that Sprint has offered in financing, but at an exchange ratio of $2.50 per shareas compared to Sprints much more dilutive rate of $1.50 per share. To be sure, DISHs offer might not
turn out to be Clearwires best option. But it is plainly superior to Sprints proposal. And it is certainly a step in the direction toward the open, competitive bidding process that is essential to realizing the true value of the Company.
The Clearwire Board is duty-bound to promote this competitive process. In order for that to occur, the Board must close the
polls for the scheduled stockholder meeting on June 13, so that the Companys stockholders can finally reject the oppressive terms of the Sprint merger agreement. Twice now the stockholders have been poised to vote down the
Sprint-Clearwire merger, and twice the Board has adjourned the vote to keep the onerous Sprint merger agreement alive. Enough is enough. No more adjournments. There is no justification for forcing Clearwires true minority stockholders to
continue living under Sprints oppression. It is time for the Board to honor the stockholder vote and put an end to the burdens of the Sprint merger agreement. It would be an undue interference with the stockholder franchise to adjourn again
just because the stockholders have not given Sprint the answer it wants. Clearwires stockholders have spoken loud and clear and the Board should now finally listen.
There is nothing preventing the Board from entering into the investor rights and note purchase agreements requested by DISH if consummating the DISH tender offer proves to be in the best interests of
Clearwires minority stockholders. As explained in prior letters from DISH and Crest, entering into the agreements requested by DISH does not breach any of Clearwires contractual obligations or violate any Delaware law. Sprints
suggestions to the contrary are baseless and, in fact, only further evidence of its oppressive stance toward the Companys minority investors.
You have a duty to resist Sprints efforts to divert Clearwires true value. The only way to do so is to reconstitute the Special Committee with truly independent directors, fully consider
DISHs tender offer to the stockholders of Clearwire, and free the Company from Sprints oppressive grip by terminating the merger agreement following stockholders rejection of the Sprint-Clearwire merger on Thursday. Sprint, of
course, remains free to submit a competing proposal that is superior to DISHs tender offerbut it should be required to do so on a level playing field, without the unfair, coercive terms of the current merger agreement and related
agreements. And others could respond with their own offers to top DISHs and Sprints bids. That is how the free market is supposed to work. That is the competitive bidding process that will capture the Companys true value for
all
of Clearwires investors. That is what you have an obligation to pursue.
|
Sincerely yours,
|
|
/s/ David K. Schumacher
|
David K. Schumacher
General
Counsel
Crest Financial Limited
|
****************************************************************************************************
2
About Crest Financial Limited
Crest is a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. Its principal business is investing in securities.
Important Legal Information
In connection with the proposed merger of Clearwire Corporation (
Clearwire
) with Sprint Nextel Corporation (the
Proposed Sprint Merger
), Crest and other persons (the
Participants
) have filed a supplement to its definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (
SEC
). The definitive proxy statement and the supplement have been mailed to the
stockholders of Clearwire. SECURITYHOLDERS OF CLEARWIRE ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND THE SUPPLEMENT, WHICH ARE AVAILABLE NOW, AND THE PARTICIPANTS OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE,
BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTICIPANTS, CLEARWIRE AND THE PROPOSED SPRINT MERGER. The definitive proxy statement, the supplement and all other proxy materials filed with the SEC are
available at no charge on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov
. In addition, the definitive proxy statement and the supplement are also available at no charge on the website of the Participants proxy solicitor at
http://www.dfking.com/clwr
.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements that are predications of or indicate future events, trends, plans, or objectives. Undue
reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future activities and are subject to many risks and
uncertainties. Due to such risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the future tense or other
forward-looking words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, should, may, will, believes, continue, strategy,
position, or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or by comparable terminology.
3
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT: Jeffrey Birnbaum, (202) 661-6367, JBirnbaum@BGRPR.com
Following SoftBank
Corp.s Increased Bid for Sprint, Crest Financial Demands that Clearwire Board Allow Clearwire Stockholders to Reject the Sprint Merger and Open the Company to a Competitive Bidding Process
Sends letter to Clearwire Board urging it to reconstitute the Boards Special Committee, fully consider DISHs superior
offer, allow stockholders to reject the Sprint-Clearwire merger, and terminate the oppressive Sprint merger agreement
HOUSTON, June 11, 2013 Crest Financial Limited, the largest of the independent minority stockholders of Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR),
sent a letter to Clearwires Board of Directors reiterating its view that DISH Network Corporations tender offer for all outstanding shares of Clearwire for $4.40 per share is both actionable and superior in every way to Sprint
Nextel Corporations current offer of $3.40 per share. Crest noted that SoftBank Corp.s increased bid for Sprint confirms that SoftBanks desire for Clearwires spectrum has only increased. Thus, Crest urged
the Clearwire Board to pursue a direct, competitive bidding process for the Company. In order to pursue that process, Crest demanded that the Clearwire Board reconstitute the Special Committee with truly independent directors,
fully consider DISHs tender offer to the stockholders of Clearwire, and free the Company from Sprints oppressive grip by terminating the merger agreement following stockholders rejection of the Sprint-Clearwire merger on
Thursday.
In Crests letter to the Clearwire Board, David K. Schumacher, Crests General Counsel, stated:
SoftBanks increased offer for Sprint confirms that the desire to obtain Clearwires goldmine of spectrum, through control of Sprint, has only increased. On the eve of Sprints stockholder vote, and faced with its own competing
offer from DISH, SoftBank has upped its bid for Sprint. As we have maintained all along and SoftBank has confirmed in public statements, Clearwires wealth of spectrum is SoftBanks ultimate target in its pursuit of Sprint. Thus, its
incremental bump for Sprint is in fact a bump to its indirect bid for Clearwire. Clearwires stockholders should therefore receive the benefit of SoftBanks sweetened deal. If Sprint wishes to accomplish its plan of locking up Clearwire
for its ultimate suitor, it must pay an adequate price that reflects the true value of the Company.
According to Schumacher:
Instead, Sprint has attempted to squeeze-out Clearwires minority stockholders on the cheap, while redirecting the bidding war to itself. Those fiduciary breaches continue. While objecting to DISHs tender offer for Clearwire with
hastily manufactured legal challenges, Sprint has set a deadline for DISH to respond to SoftBanks latest bid with its own best and final offer for Sprint. We believe that the clear intent of these actions is to prevent DISH from
bidding directly for what it most
desiresClearwire and its spectrum assetsso that it is forced to pay a premium for Sprint. Although that course might be more beneficial to Sprint and its stockholders, it visits great
harm on Clearwires stockholders and is thus an egregious breach of Sprints fiduciary duties as Clearwires controller.
Schumacher added: There can be no doubt that DISHs tender offer is better for Clearwires stockholders than Sprints most recent
bid for Clearwire. DISH has offered Clearwire stockholders a full dollar more per share than Sprint, and DISHs tender offer does not require any stockholder to sell against its will. Moreover, DISHs proposed note purchase agreement would
permit Clearwire to draw down the same $800.0 million that Sprint has offered in financing, but at an exchange ratio of $2.50 per shareas compared to Sprints much more dilutive rate of $1.50 per share. To be sure, DISHs offer might
not turn out to be Clearwires best option. But it is plainly superior to Sprints proposal. And it is certainly a step in the direction toward the open, competitive bidding process that is essential to realizing the true value of the
Company.
Crests letter explained: The Clearwire Board is duty-bound to promote this competitive process. In order for that
to occur, the Board must close the polls for the scheduled stockholder meeting on June 13, so that the Companys stockholders can finally reject the oppressive terms of the Sprint merger agreement. Twice now the stockholders have been
poised to vote down the Sprint-Clearwire merger, and twice the Board has adjourned the vote to keep the onerous Sprint merger agreement alive. Enough is enough. No more adjournments. There is no justification for forcing Clearwires true
minority stockholders to continue living under Sprints oppression. It is time for the Board to honor the stockholder vote and put an end to the burdens of the Sprint merger agreement. It would be an undue interference with the stockholder
franchise to adjourn again just because the stockholders have not given Sprint the answer it wants. Clearwires stockholders have spoken loud and clear and the Board should now finally listen.
Schumacher further stated: There is nothing preventing the Board from entering into the investor rights and note purchase agreements requested by
DISH if consummating the DISH tender offer proves to be in the best interests of Clearwires minority stockholders. As explained in prior letters from DISH and Crest, entering into the agreements requested by DISH does not breach any of
Clearwires contractual obligations or violate any Delaware law. Sprints suggestions to the contrary are baseless and, in fact, only further evidence of its oppressive stance toward the Companys minority investors.
The letter to the Clearwire Board concluded: You have a duty to resist Sprints efforts to divert Clearwires true value. The only way to
do so is to reconstitute the Special Committee with truly independent directors, fully consider DISHs tender offer to the stockholders of Clearwire, and free the Company from Sprints oppressive grip by terminating the merger agreement
following stockholders rejection of the Sprint-Clearwire merger on Thursday. Sprint, of course, remains free to submit a competing proposal that is superior to DISHs tender offerbut it should be required to do so on a level playing
field, without the unfair, coercive terms of the current merger agreement and related agreements. And others could respond with their own offers to top DISHs and Sprints bids. That is how the free market is supposed to work. That is the
competitive bidding process that will capture the Companys true value for
all
of Clearwires investors. That is what you have an obligation to pursue.
D.F. King & Co, Inc. has been retained by Crest to assist it in the solicitation of proxies in opposition to the proposed Sprint-Clearwire
merger. If stockholders have any questions or need assistance in voting the GOLD proxy card, please call D.F. King & Co. at (800) 949-2583. The full letter to the Clearwire Board can be found at http://www.dfking.com/clwr or
http://www.bancroftpllc.com/crest.
About Crest Financial Limited
Crest Financial Limited (
Crest
) is a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. Its principal business is investing in securities.
Important Legal Information
In
connection with the proposed merger of Clearwire Corporation (
Clearwire
) with Sprint Nextel Corporation (the
Proposed Sprint Merger
), Crest and other persons (the
Participants
) have filed a
supplement to its definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (
SEC
). The definitive proxy statement and the supplement have been mailed to the stockholders of Clearwire. SECURITYHOLDERS OF CLEARWIRE
ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND THE SUPPLEMENT, WHICH ARE AVAILABLE NOW, AND THE PARTICIPANTS OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE, BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTICIPANTS, CLEARWIRE AND THE PROPOSED SPRINT MERGER. The definitive proxy statement, the supplement and all other proxy materials filed with the SEC are available at no charge on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov
. In addition, the definitive proxy statement and the supplement are also available at no charge on the website of the Participants proxy solicitor at
http://www.dfking.com/clwr
.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain
statements contained herein are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements that are predications of or indicate future events, trends, plans or objectives. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by
their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future activities and are subject to many risks and uncertainties. Due to such risks and uncertainties, actual events may
differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the future tense or other forward-looking words such as believe, expect,
anticipate, intend, plan, should, may, will, believes, continue, strategy, position or the negative of those terms or other variations
of them or by comparable terminology.
SOURCE: Crest Financial Limited
Clearwire Corp. - Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:CLWR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Clearwire Corp. - Class A (MM) (NASDAQ:CLWR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024