Seabridge Gold Inc. (TSX: SEA)(NYSE Amex: SA) announced today results from a National Instrument 43-101 compliant Preliminary Feasibility Study ("PFS") of its 100% owned KSM project located in northern British Columbia, Canada. The PFS was prepared by Wardrop, a Tetra Tech Company (Wardrop). The Executive Summary from the PFS can be found at www.seabridgegold.net/KSM-PFS.pdf. The complete PFS will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com within 45 days.

Seabridge President and CEO Rudi Fronk stated that "the PFS confirms that the KSM project now hosts the largest gold reserve in Canada and one of the largest in the world. KSM is projected to provide an extraordinary mine life of more than 35 years with estimated cash operating costs well below the current average of the major gold producers. Estimated capital costs are in line with those of comparable, large-scale, undeveloped gold-copper projects and KSM has the advantage of being located in a low-risk jurisdiction."

The PFS envisages a large tonnage open-pit mining operation at 120,000 metric tonnes per day of ore fed to a flotation mill which would produce a combined gold/copper/silver concentrate for transport by truck to the nearby deep-water sea port at Stewart, B.C. A separate molybdenum concentrate and gold-silver dore would be produced at the processing facility.

Reserves

Lerchs-Grossman pit shell optimizations were used to define the mine plans in the PFS which were designed to maximize net present value using a 5% discount rate which is the current industry standard. Mineral Reserves for the KSM project were estimated using a gold price of US$850 per ounce, a copper price of US$2.25 per pound and are stated as follows:

KSM Proven and Probable Reserves


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Reserve     Tonnes
Zone               Category (millions)            Average Grades
                                      --------------------------------------
                                           Gold   Copper   Silver Molybdenum
                                          (gpt)      (%)    (gpt)      (ppm)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitchell             Proven      570.6     0.64     0.17     2.95       58.0
                 -----------------------------------------------------------
                   Probable      764.8     0.59     0.16     2.93       62.3
                 -----------------------------------------------------------
                      Total    1,335.4     0.61     0.16     2.93       60.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sulphurets         Probable      142.2     0.61     0.28     0.44      101.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kerr               Probable      125.1     0.28     0.48     1.26        Nil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals               Proven      570.6     0.64     0.17     2.95       58.0
                 -----------------------------------------------------------
                   Probable    1,032.1     0.56     0.22     2.38       60.2
                 -----------------------------------------------------------
                      Total    1,602.7     0.59     0.20     2.58       59.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Zone                            Contained Metal
                 --------------------------------------------
                        Gold     Copper     Silver       Moly
                    (million   (million   (million   (million
                     ounces)    pounds)    ounces)    pounds)
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mitchell                11.7      2,101       54.1       73.0
                 --------------------------------------------
                        14.5      2,722       72.0      105.0
                 --------------------------------------------
                        26.3      4,823      126.1      178.0
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sulphurets               2.8        883        2.0       31.9
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kerr                     1.1      1,319        5.1        Nil
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Totals                  11.7      2,101       54.1       73.0
                 --------------------------------------------
                        18.4      4,924       79.1      137.0
                 --------------------------------------------
                        30.2      7,024      133.1      209.9
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------

Estimated proven and probable reserves of 30.2 million ounces of gold (1.60 billion tonnes at 0.59 grams of gold per tonne) are derived from estimated total measured and indicated resources of 38.9 million ounces of gold (2.1 billion tonnes at 0.57 grams of gold per tonne) including allowances for mining losses and dilution (see www.seabridgegold.net/KSM-PFS.pdf for details).

Production

At 120,000 tonnes per day, annual throughput for the mill is estimated at 43.8 million tonnes. With 1.60 billion tonnes of proven and probable reserves, KSM's mine life is estimated at approximately 37 years. Production is scheduled to commence at the Mitchell deposit, to be augmented by Kerr and then Sulphurets. The PFS mining plan is significantly improved over the 2009 KSM Preliminary Assessment; the mill feed is increased by approximately 25% and US$160 million in pre-production stripping expenses have been eliminated.

At Mitchell, there is a near-surface higher grade gold zone that would allow for gold production in the first five years substantially above the mine life average. This higher grade gold zone would significantly reduce the project's payback period to approximately 6.9 years for the Base Case. A payback period representing less than 20% of mine life is considered highly favorable. Metal production for the first five years compared to life of mine average production is estimated as follows:

Average Annual Metal Production


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Years 1-5 Average   Life of Mine Average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Grades:
 Gold (grams per tonne)                          0.80                   0.59
 Copper (%)                                      0.19                   0.20
 Silver (grams per tonne)                        2.62                   2.58
 Molybdenum (parts per million)                  54.2                   59.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Production:
 Gold (ounces)                                878,000                634,000
 Copper (pounds)                          149 million            158 million
 Silver (ounces)                          2.7 million            2.6 million
 Molybdenum (pounds)                      1.7 million            2.1 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capital Costs

Start-up capital costs (including contingencies of US$394 million) are estimated at US$3.37 billion, approximately 9% above the start-up capital cost estimate from the July 2009 KSM Preliminary Assessment. Start-up capital costs are higher due to the increase in mine size which requires additional mine waste rock placement and storage as well as associated water diversions, storage dams and water treatment facilities. Additional capital has also been allocated for on-site energy recovery plants to generate power from planned water diversions, process solutions and slurries. A total of five on-site small energy recovery plants would provide green power to the site and the B.C. Hydro grid. Increased capital has also been allocated for offsite concentrate storage and handling facilities. A breakdown of estimated start-up capital costs is as follows:

Start-up Capital Costs


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description                                                          US$'000
                                                   -------------------------
 Overall Site                                                        106,000
 Open Pit Mining                                                     153,000
 Crushing, Stockpiles and Grinding                                   371,000
 Tunnelling                                                          199,000
 Mitchell Teigen Tunnel Transfer System                              127,000
 Plantsite Grinding and Flotation                                    272,000
 Tailings Management Facility                                         72,000
 Water Treatment                                                     185,000
 Site Services and Utilities                                          70,000
 Ancillary Buildings                                                  83,000
 Plant Mobile Equipment                                               10,000
 Temporary Services                                                  142,000
 Permanent Electrical Power Supply                                   146,000
 Energy Recovery Plants                                               51,000
 Permanent Access Roads                                               72,000
 Temporary Winter Access Roads                                        15,000
 Offsite Infrastructure and facilities                                62,000
 Project Indirects                                                   760,000
 Owner's Costs                                                        77,000
 Contingencies                                                       394,000
                                                   -------------------------
Total                                                              3,365,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating Costs

Average mine, process and G&A operating costs over the project's life (including waste mining and on-site power credits) are estimated at US$11.66 per tonne milled (before base metal credits). Estimated unit operating costs are up approximately 10% from the 2009 Preliminary Assessment due primarily to the higher strip ratio required to accommodate the 25% increase in tonnes of ore mined over the project life. A breakdown of estimated unit operating costs is as follows:

Unit Operating Costs


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       US$s
                                                                 (Per Tonne
Cost Category                                                       Milled)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining Costs                                                           4.97
Milling Costs:
 Staff and Supplies                                                    4.48
 Power (Process only)                                                  0.89
G&A                                                                    0.62
Site Services                                                          0.23
Tailings                                                               0.25
Water Treatment                                                        0.36
On-Site Power Credit                                                  (0.14)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                 11.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Economic Analysis

A Base Case economic evaluation was undertaken incorporating historical three-year trailing averages for metal prices as of March 15, 2010. This approach is consistent with the guidance of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, is accepted by the Ontario Securities Commission and is industry standard. An Alternate Case was also constructed using more conservative copper and silver metal prices and a slightly higher gold price. Finally, a Spot Price Case was prepared using recent spot metal prices. The pre-tax economic results in U.S. dollars for all three cases are as follows:

Projected Economic Results


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Base Case  Alternate Case  Spot Price Case
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal Prices:
 Gold ($/ounce)                         878             900             1100
 Copper ($/pound)                      2.95            2.25             3.25
 Silver ($/ounce)                     14.59           14.00            17.00
 Molybdenum ($/pound)                 16.50           16.50            16.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Cash Flow                 $11.7 billion    $8.3 billion    $18.6 billion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV @ 5% Discount Rate         $2.9 billion    $1.6 billion     $5.6 billion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR (%)                                11.4             8.8             16.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payback Period (years)                  6.9             8.5              4.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Costs Per Ounce
 of Gold Produced (life of
 mine)                                  144             313               68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Costs Per Ounce of
 Gold Produced (includes
 all capital)                           373             541              297
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
US$/Cdn$ Exchange Rate                 0.92            0.92             0.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Operating and total costs per ounce of gold are after base metal credits. Total costs per ounce include all start-up capital, sustaining capital and reclamation/closure costs.

National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure

The KSM PFS was prepared by Wardrop, and incorporates the work of a number of industry-leading consulting firms. These firms and their Qualified Persons (as defined under National Instrument 43-101) are independent of Seabridge and have reviewed and approved this news release. The consultants and their QPs are listed below with their responsibilities:


-   Wardrop, under the direction of Frank Grills (overall report
    preparation, process and infrastructure capital costs, infrastructure,
    and financial analysis) and John Huang (metallurgical testing review,
    mineral processing and process operating costs)
-   Moose Mountain Technical Services under the direction of Jim Gray (mine
    planning, rock storage facilities, mine capital and mine operating
    costs)
-   W.N. Brazier Associates Inc. under the direction of W.N. Brazier (power
    supply, energy recovery plants and associated costs)
-   Rescan Environmental Services Ltd. under the direction of Greg McKillop
    (environment and permitting)
-   Bosche Ventures Ltd. under the direction of Harold Bosche (rope
    conveying, slurry, tailings delivery and return water pumping and piping
    and associated capital costs)
-   Klohn Crippen Berger Ltd. under the direction of Graham Parkinson
    (diversion and seepage collection ponds, tailings dam, water treatment
    dam, water treatment plant, water diversions and capital, operating and
    closure costs)
-   Allnorth Consultants Ltd. Under the direction of Mr. Darby Kreitz
    (storage dam and tailings starter dam construction cost estimates)
-   Resource Modeling Inc. under the direction of Michael Lechner (mineral
    resources)
-   McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. under the direction of Robert
    Parolin (main and temporary access roads and associated capital costs)
-   BGC Engineering Inc. under the direction of Warren Newcomen (rock
    mechanics and mining pit slopes)
-   EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. (EBA) under the direction of Kevin
    Jones (winter access roads and associated capital costs)
-   Thyssen Mining Construction of Canada Ltd. under the direction of Adrian
    Bodolan (tunnel design and capital costs).

Seabridge holds a 100% interest in several North American gold resource projects. The Company's principal assets are the KSM property located near Stewart, British Columbia, Canada and the Courageous Lake gold project located in Canada's Northwest Territories. For a breakdown of Seabridge's mineral resources by project and resource category please visit the Company's website at http://www.seabridgegold.net/resources.php.

All reserve and resource estimates reported by the Corporation were calculated in accordance with the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification system. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

This document contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This information and these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements" are made as of the date of this document. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions, expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) the amount of mineral reserves and mineral resources; (ii) the amount of future production over any period; (iii) net present value and internal rates of return of the proposed mining operation; (iv) capital costs, including start-up, sustaining capital and reclamation/closure costs; (v) operating costs, including credits from the sale of copper, silver and molybdenum; (vi) strip ratios and mining rates; (vii) expected time frames for repayment of borrowed funds; and (viii) mine life. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects", "estimates", "envisages", "assumes", "intends", "strategy", "goals", "objectives" or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements are based on Seabridge's or its consultants' current beliefs as well as various assumptions made by and information currently available to them. These assumptions include: (i) the presence of and continuity of metals at the Project at modeled grades; (ii) the capacities of various machinery and equipment; (iii) the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices; (iv) exchange rates; (v) metals sales prices; (vi) appropriate discount rates; (vii) tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operation; (viii) financing structure and costs; (ix) anticipated mining losses and dilution; (x) metals recovery rates, (xi) reasonable contingency requirements; (xiii) receipt of regulatory approvals on acceptable terms, including the necessary right of way for the proposed tunnels; and (xiv) the negotiation of satisfactory terms with impacted First Nations groups. Although management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made assuming the correctness of other forward looking statements, such as statements of net present value and internal rate of return, which are based on most of the other forward-looking statements and assumptions herein. The cost information is also prepared using current values, but the time for incurring the costs will be in the future and it is assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant period.

By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that estimates, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved or that assumptions do not reflect future experience. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual outcomes to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates assumptions and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be generally stated as the risk that the assumptions and estimates expressed above do not occur, but specifically include, without limitation, risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the material identified as mineral reserves from that predicted, variations in rates of recovery and extraction; developments in world metals markets, risks relating to fluctuations in the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar, increases in the estimated capital and operating costs or unanticipated costs, difficulties attracting the necessary work force, increases in financing costs or adverse changes to the terms of available financing, if any, tax rates or royalties being greater than assumed, changes in development or mining plans due to changes in logistical, technical or other factors, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, risks relating to receipt of regulatory approvals or settlement of an agreement with impacted First Nations groups, the effects of competition in the markets in which Seabridge operates, operational and infrastructure risks and the additional risks described in Seabridge's Annual Information Form filed with SEDAR in Canada (available at www.sedar.com) for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in the Corporation's Annual Report Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR (available at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml). Seabridge cautions that the foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive.

When relying on our forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to Seabridge, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. Seabridge does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by Seabridge or on our behalf, except as required by law.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Rudi Fronk, President & C.E.O.

Contacts: Seabridge Gold Inc. Rudi P. Fronk President and C.E.O. (416) 367-9292 (416) 367-2711 (FAX) info@seabridgegold.net

Seabridge Gold (AMEX:SA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Seabridge Gold Charts.
Seabridge Gold (AMEX:SA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Seabridge Gold Charts.