UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________ 
FORM 10-K
__________________________________
(Mark One)
 
x
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
 
 
 
or
 
 
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission file number 000-25731
__________________________________
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia
 
58-2250094
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia
 
30092-3365
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number including area code
(770) 449-7800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
None
 
None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
CLASS A UNITS
 
CLASS B UNITS
(Title of class)
 
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes   o     No   x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes   o     No   x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes   o     No   x
The registrant conducted its offering pursuant to a Form S-11, which commenced on December 31, 1997 and terminated on December 30, 1998. Units in the offering were sold at $10 per limited partnership unit, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers. There is no established market for the registrant's limited partnership units. The number of Class A Units and Class B Units held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2011 was approximately 1,425,593 and 222,556, respectively.
 
 
 
 
 



CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the "Partnership" or the "Registrant") other than historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "continue," or other similar words. Specifically, we consider, among others, statements concerning future operating results and cash flows, our ability to meet future obligations, and the amount and timing of any future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Any such forward-looking statements are subject to unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide dividends to stockholders, and maintain the value of our remaining real estate property, may be significantly hindered. Contained in Item 1A are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.




1

PART I

ITEM 1.
BUSINESS.
General
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the "Partnership," "we," "our" and "us") is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. ("Wells Partners"), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership, serving as its general partners (collectively, the "General Partners"). Wells Capital, Inc. ("Wells Capital") serves as the corporate general partner of Wells Partners. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. ("WREF"). Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the sole director and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on June 20, 1996, for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elected to have their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units. Thereafter, limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units one time during each quarterly accounting period ("conversion elections"). Limited partners may vote to, among other things, ((a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change our business purpose or investment objectives; (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; (f) authorize a merger or a consolidation of the Partnership; and (g) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of our assets, subject to certain limitations. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of class.
On December 31, 1997, we commenced an offering of up to $35,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act. The offering was terminated on December 30, 1998, at which time we had sold approximately 1,302,942 Class A Units and 350,338 Class B Units representing total limited partner capital contributions of $16,532,802.
Operating Phases and Objectives
We typically operate in the following five life-cycle phases and, during which, typically focuses on the following key operating objectives. The duration of each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.
•
Fundraising phase
The period during which we are raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;
•
Investing phase
The period during which we invest the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less up-front fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;
•
Holding phase
The period during which we own and operate our real estate assets during the initial lease terms of the tenants;
•
Positioning-for-sale phase
The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, we expend time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, we continue to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and
•
Disposition-and-liquidation phase
The period during which we sell our real estate investments, distribute net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidate, and terminate the Partnership.

We are currently in the positioning-for-sale phase of our life cycle. While our focus at this time involves leasing and marketing efforts at our remaining property that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing of our asset for our limited partners, we will evaluate offers to sell our remaining property on an as-is basis.
 
Employees

We have no direct employees. The employees of Wells Capital and Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of the General Partners, perform a full range of real estate and administrative services for us including leasing and property management, accounting, asset management, and investor relations. See Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,"


2

for a summary of the fees paid to the General Partners or their affiliates during the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 .

Insurance

Wells Management carries comprehensive liability and extended coverage with respect to remaining property we own through our investments in the joint ventures described in Item 2. In the opinion of management, our remaining property is adequately insured.

Competition

We will experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects that may include the General Partners or their affiliates. As a result, in connection with negotiating leases, we may offer rental concessions, reduced charges for tenant improvements, and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on results of operations. We are also in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for our remaining property.

Economic Dependency
We have engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of our properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days' written notice. As a result of these relationships, we are dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.
 
Wells Capital and Wells Management are both owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital and Wells Management represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, we focus on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers.
 
Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital and Wells Management based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as distribution income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont REIT"), which was acquired in connection with the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction (see "Assertion of Legal Action Against Related Parties" below). As of December 31, 2011 , the General Partners have no reason to believe that WREF does not have access to adequate liquidity and capital resources, including cash flow generated from operations, cash on hand, other investments, and borrowing capacity, necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.

We are also dependent upon the ability of our current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as they become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would be likely to have a negative impact on our results of operations. Situations preventing the tenants from paying contractual rents could result in a material adverse impact on our results of operations. See Item 2, "Properties" for further information.
Proxy to Liquidate

Under Section 20.2 of the partnership agreement, limited partners holding 10% or more of the outstanding units have the right to provide a written request to the General Partners directing the General Partners to formally proxy the limited partners to determine whether the assets of the Partnership should be liquidated.

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, presently styled In re Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Securities Litigation , in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT; Leo F. Wells, III, one of our General Partners; Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, our other General Partner; Wells Management, our property manager; certain affiliates of WREF; the directors of Piedmont REIT; and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007.




3

The complaint alleged, among other things, violations of the federal proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction.

On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempted to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who received and were entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT.

On March 31, 2008, the Court granted in part the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Court dismissed five of the seven counts of the amended complaint in their entirety. The Court dismissed the remaining two counts with the exception of allegations regarding the failure to disclose in the Piedmont REIT proxy statement details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. On April 21, 2008, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which alleges violations of the federal proxy rules based upon allegations that the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction omitted details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages, to nullify and rescind the internalization transaction, and to cancel and rescind any stock issued to the defendants as consideration for the internalization transaction. On May 12, 2008, the defendants answered and raised certain defenses to the second amended complaint. Since the filing of the second amended complaint, the plaintiff has said it intends to seek monetary damages of approximately $159 million plus prejudgment interest.

On June 23, 2008, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On September 16, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for class certification. On September 20, 2009, the defendants filed a petition for permission to appeal immediately the Court's order granting the motion for class certification with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition for permission to appeal was denied on October 30, 2009.

On April 13, 2009, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the second amended complaint to add additional defendants. The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend on June 23, 2009.

On December 4, 2009, the parties filed motions for summary judgment. On August 2, 2010, the Court entered an order denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment and granting, in part, the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court ruled that the question of whether certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT constituted "material" information required to be disclosed in the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction raises questions of fact that must be determined at trial.

On November 17, 2011, the court issued rulings granting several of the plaintiff's motions in limine to prohibit the defendants from introducing certain evidence, including evidence of the defendants' reliance on advice from their outside legal and financial advisors, and limiting the defendants' ability to relate their subjective views, considerations, and observations during the trial of the case. On February 23, 2012, the Court granted several of the defendants' motions, including a motion for reconsideration regarding a motion the plaintiff had filed seeking exclusion of certain evidence impacting damages, and motions seeking exclusion of certain evidence proposed to be submitted by the plaintiff. The suit has been removed from the Court's trial calendar pending resolution of a request for interlocutory appellate review of certain legal rulings made by the Court.

Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Although WREF believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims of liability and damages in these actions, WREF is unable at this time to predict the outcome of these actions or reasonably estimate a range of damages, or how any liability and responsibility for damages might be allocated among the 17 defendants in the action, which includes 11 defendants not affiliated with Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, or Wells Management. The ultimate resolution of these matters could have a material adverse impact on WREF's financial results, financial condition, or liquidity.

Website Address

Access to copies of each of our filings with the SEC is available, free of charge, at the http://www.wellsref.com website, or through a link to the http://www.sec.gov website.



4

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.
Risk Related to Current Economic Conditions
Current economic conditions may cause market rental rates and property values to decline, may impede the disposition of our remaining property at commercially reasonable terms, and have had, and will likely continue to have, an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Current economic conditions, the availability and cost of credit, turmoil in the mortgage market, and declining real estate markets have contributed to increased volatility, lower real estate values, and diminished expectations for real estate markets and the economy going forward. Should such current economic conditions continue for a prolonged period of time, the value of our commercial real estate assets and the market rental rates that we are able to achieve may continue to decline. Deteriorating economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of one or more of our tenants to honor their lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or as space otherwise becomes vacant at our property. While we do not anticipate the need to access the credit markets, the impact of the current crisis in the credit markets may adversely affect the ability of potential purchasers of our property to obtain financing. Therefore, this may affect our timing and/or ability to sell our remaining property at commercially reasonable terms. The current economic conditions and the difficulties currently being experienced in the mortgage and real estate markets have adversely affected our business model, financial condition, results of operations, and the valuation of our units. A worsening of these conditions would exacerbate the adverse effects that the current market environment has had on us and on commercial real estate in general.
Real Estate Risks
Changes in general economic conditions and regulatory matters germane to the real estate industry may cause our operating results to suffer and the value of our remaining real estate property to decline.
Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
•
changes in general or local economic conditions;
•
changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
•
changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds, which may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;
•
changes in tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning laws; and
•
periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.

These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our remaining real estate property.
General economic conditions may affect the timing of the sale of our remaining property and the sale price we receive.
We may be unable to sell our remaining property if or when we decide to do so. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates, and other factors, including supply and demand for real estate investments, all of which are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell our remaining property for the price or on terms which are acceptable to us. Further, we cannot predict the length of time that will be needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of our remaining property.
Near-term tenant rollover at our remaining property could reduce or eliminate future cash distributions to limited partners.
We anticipate that we will be required to expend substantial funds in the future for tenant improvements and other costs necessary to re-lease space (80%) that is currently occupied through October 2012 at the 20/20 Building. If we are unable to re-lease or secure a replacement tenant at the 20/20 Building in a timely manner, property earnings would suffer, and we would be required to continue to reserve cash otherwise available for operating distributions to limited partners. In addition, the residual value of this property would be negatively impacted by vacancy because the market value is largely dependent upon the value of the leases in place at such property.


5

Adverse economic conditions in the geographic region in which we own our remaining property may negatively impact your overall returns.
Adverse economic conditions in the geographic region in which we own our remaining property could affect the real estate values in this area or the business of our tenants if any of our tenants rely upon the local economy for their revenues. Therefore, changes in local economic conditions could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners or the amounts we could otherwise receive upon the sale of a property in a negatively affected region.
Adverse economic conditions affecting the particular industries of the tenants of our remaining property may negatively impact your overall returns.
Adverse economic conditions affecting a particular industry of one or more of our tenants could affect the financial ability of one or more of our tenants to make payments under their leases, which could cause delays in our receipt of rental revenues or a vacancy in our remaining property for a period of time. Therefore, changes in economic conditions of the particular industry of one or more of our tenants could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners and the value of our remaining property at the time of sale of such property.
We are dependent on only a few tenants for substantially all of our revenue.
Our remaining property is occupied by only a few tenants and, therefore, the success of our investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to limited partners holding Class A Units. A default of a tenant on its lease payments to us or a lease termination would cause us to lose the revenue from the property. In the event of a default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. In addition, any event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a general downturn in the business of any of these tenants may result in the failure or delay of such tenant's rental payments, which may have a substantial adverse effect on our financial performance. If any of these events occur, we cannot assure you that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Further, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash to be distributed to limited partners.
Your investment in units is subject to greater risk because we lack a diversified property portfolio.
Because we own an interest in only one remaining property, your investment in units is subject to a greater risk of loss. There is a greater risk that you will lose money in your investment because our portfolio is not diverse by geographic location, property type, or industry group of tenants.
If one or more of our tenants file for bankruptcy, we may be precluded from collecting all sums due.
If one or more of our tenants, or the guarantor of a tenant's lease, commences, or has commenced against it, any proceeding under any provision of the federal Bankruptcy Code, as amended, or any other legal or equitable proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, rehabilitation, receivership, or debtor's relief statute or law (bankruptcy proceeding), we may be unable to collect sums due under relevant leases. Any or all of the tenants, or a guarantor of a tenant's lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. Such a bankruptcy proceeding may bar our efforts to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or their property, unless we are able to obtain an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim against the tenant, and may not be entitled to any further payments under the lease. A tenant's or lease guarantor's bankruptcy proceeding could hinder or delay efforts to collect past-due balances under relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. Such an event could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments, which would result in a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to limited partners holding Class A Units. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, we cannot assure you that the tenant or its trustee will assume our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Class A Units may be adversely affected.
We may not have funding for future tenant improvements, which may reduce your returns and make it difficult to attract one or more new tenants.
When a tenant at our remaining property does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that in order to attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available for investment have been used for investment in our properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves.


6

We also have not identified a funding source to provide funds that may be required in the future for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We cannot assure you that any such source of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are required to use net cash from operations to fund such tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners holding Class A Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended periods of time.
A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or lease.
Our property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. Our remaining property may be leased to a single tenant and/or may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a certain tenant based on the type of business the tenant operates. If a vacancy in our remaining property continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues, resulting in less cash to be distributed to limited partners holding Class A Units. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.
Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage could reduce our net income.
Our General Partners will attempt to obtain adequate insurance at our remaining property to cover casualty losses. However, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses. If our remaining property incurs a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by such uninsured loss. In addition, other than reserves of net cash from operations we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in lower distributions to limited partners.
Uncertain market conditions and the broad discretion of our General Partners relating to the future disposition of our remaining property could adversely affect the return on your investment.
We intend to hold the remaining real property in which we are invested until such time as the General Partners determine that the sale or other disposition thereof appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until the sale of the property is warranted, even if it appears that such objectives will not be met. Our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon the termination of the Partnership as specified in the partnership agreement, or earlier if a majority of you vote to liquidate the Partnership pursuant to a formal proxy to liquidate. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions that may affect the future disposition of our remaining property, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the timing of liquidation of the Partnership and the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.
If any environmentally hazardous material is determined to exist on a property we own, our operating results could be adversely affected.
Under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under, or in such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be potentially liable for such costs. The cost of defending against claims of liability, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, or remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets, or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Class A Units.




7

We and/or other prior Wells public limited partnerships sponsored by our General Partners have sold real estate properties for a sale price less than the original purchase price.
Certain of the real estate properties we and other Wells public limited partnerships sponsored by the General Partners previously purchased have not appreciated to the levels anticipated at the time of purchase. Recently some of these properties have been sold by such partnerships at purchase prices below the prices paid for such properties. We cannot guarantee that any of our properties will appreciate in value.
General Investment Risks
The Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act ("GRULPA") does not grant you any specific voting rights, and your rights are limited under our partnership agreement.
A vote of a majority in interest of the limited partners is sufficient to take the following significant Partnership actions:
•
to amend our partnership agreement;
•
to change our business purpose or our investment objectives;
•
to add or remove a general partner;
•
to elect a new general partner;
•
to dissolve the Partnership;
•
to authorize a merger or a consolidation of the Partnership; or
•
to approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets, subject to certain limitations.
These are your only significant voting rights granted under our partnership agreement. In addition, GRULPA does not grant you any specific voting rights. Therefore, your voting rights are severely limited.
You are bound by the majority vote on matters on which you are entitled to vote.
Limited partners may approve any of the above actions by majority vote of the outstanding units. Therefore, you are bound by such majority vote even if you do not vote with the majority on any of these actions.
Under our partnership agreement, we are required to indemnify our General Partners under certain circumstances, which may reduce returns to our limited partners.
Under our partnership agreement and subject to certain limitations, we are required to indemnify our General Partners from and against losses, liabilities, and damages relating to or arising out of any action or inaction on behalf of us done in good faith and in our best interest. If substantial and expensive litigation should ensue and we are obligated to indemnify one or both General Partners, we may be forced to use substantial funds to do so, which may reduce the return on your investment.
Payment of fees to our General Partners or their affiliates will reduce cash available for distributions to our limited partners.
Our General Partners or their affiliates perform services for us in connection with the management and leasing of our remaining property. Our affiliates may receive property management, leasing, and asset management fees of 4.5% of gross revenues in connection with the remaining property we own. In addition, we will reimburse our General Partners or their affiliates for the administrative services necessary to our prudent operation, which includes actual costs of goods, services, and materials used for or by us. These fees and reimbursements will reduce the amount of cash available for capital expenditures to our remaining property or distributions to our limited partners.
The availability and the timing of cash distributions are uncertain .
We cannot assure you that sufficient cash will be available to make distributions to you from either net cash from operations or proceeds from the sale of properties. We bear all expenses incurred in connection with our operations, which are deducted from cash funds generated by operations prior to computing the amount of net cash from operations to be distributed to our general and


8

limited partners. In addition, our General Partners, in their discretion, may retain all or any portion of net cash generated from our operations and/or proceeds from the sale of our properties for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs or for working capital reserves.
Gains and distributions upon sale of our properties are uncertain.
Although gains from the sale of properties typically represent a substantial portion of any profits attributable to real estate investments, we cannot assure you that we will realize any gains on the sale of our properties. In any event, you should not expect distribution of such proceeds to occur during the early years of our operations. We generally will not sell properties until at least 10 to 12 years after the acquisition of the properties, and our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property; therefore, we have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time. Further, receipt of the full proceeds of such sales may be extended over a substantial period of time following the sales. In addition, the amount of taxable gain allocated to you with respect to the sale of a property could exceed the cash proceeds received from such sale. While the net proceeds from the sale of a property will generally be distributed to our limited partners, the General Partners, in their sole discretion, may not make such distribution if such proceeds are used to:
•
purchase land underlying any of our properties;
•
buy out the interest of any co-venturer or joint venture partner in a property that is jointly owned;
•
establish working capital reserves; or
•
make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements, capital improvements, or other expenditures to our remaining property.
We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs .
Substantially all of the gross proceeds of the offering were used to invest in our properties and to pay various fees and expenses. In addition, we do not anticipate that we will maintain any permanent working capital reserves. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future, such as the funding of tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, or other lease-up costs, we have not identified any sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that any sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs in the future.
We may need to reserve net cash from operations for future tenant improvements, which may reduce your returns.
We may be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to vacated space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available for investment were used for investment in our properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We also have no identified funding source to provide funds that may be required in the future for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We cannot assure you that any such source of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are required to use net cash from operations to fund such tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners holding Class A Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended periods of time.
We may maintain cash balances in our bank accounts that exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and such excess amounts are subject to loss, which may reduce your returns.
We maintain bank accounts with high-credit, quality financial institutions and may concentrate our funds among certain of these banks. At times, our cash balances may exceed the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). In the event of these financial institutions failing, we may lose the amount of our deposits over any amount insured by the FDIC, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our results of operations.
Marketability and Transferability Risks
There is no public trading market for your units.
There is no public market for your units, and we do not anticipate that any public trading market for your units will ever develop. If you attempt to sell your units, you would likely do so at substantially discounted prices on the secondary market. Further, our partnership agreement restricts our ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one by providing that any transfer which may cause us to be classified as a "publicly traded partnership" as defined in Section 7704 of


9

the Internal Revenue Code shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized. Because classification of the Partnership as a "publicly traded partnership" may significantly decrease the value of your units, our General Partners intend to use their authority to the maximum extent possible to prohibit transfers of units, which could cause us to be classified as a "publicly traded partnership."
Your units have limited transferability and lack liquidity due to restrictions under state regulatory laws and our partnership agreement.
You are limited in your ability to transfer your units. Our partnership agreement and certain state regulatory agencies have imposed restrictions relating to the number of units you may transfer. In addition, the suitability standards applied to you upon the purchase of your units may also be applied to persons to whom you wish to transfer your units. Accordingly, you may find it difficult to sell your units for cash or if you are able to sell your units, you may have to sell your units at a substantial discount. You may not be able to sell your units in the event of an emergency, and your units are not likely to be accepted as collateral for a loan.
Our estimated unit valuations should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners' units.
The estimated unit valuations contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners' units, what limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of our properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if our properties were sold and the proceeds distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership in accordance with the net sale proceeds distribution allocation outlined in the partnership agreement. There is no established public trading market for our limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will ever develop. We did not obtain any third-party appraisals of our property in connection with these estimated unit valuations. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. The valuations performed by the General Partners are estimates only and are based on a number of assumptions that may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units. Further, these estimated valuations are applicable only to limited partners who purchased their units directly from us in our original public offering of units. It also should be noted that as properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to limited partners, the remaining value of our properties and the resulting value of our limited partnership units will naturally decline.
Special Risks Regarding Status of Units
If you hold Class A Units, we expect that you will be allocated more income than cash flow.
Since limited partners holding Class A Units are allocated substantially all of our net income, and since substantially all deductions for depreciation and other tax losses are allocated to limited partners holding Class B Units, we expect that those of you who hold Class A Units will be allocated taxable income in excess of your cash distributions. We cannot assure you that cash flow will be available for distribution in any year.
The desired effect of holding Class A Units or Class B Units may be reduced depending on how many limited partners hold each type of unit.
You will be entitled to different rights and priorities as to distributions of cash flow from operations and net sale proceeds and as to the allocation of depreciation and other tax losses depending upon whether you are holding Class A Units or Class B Units. However, the effect of any advantage associated with holding Class A Units or Class B Units may be significantly reduced or eliminated, depending upon the ratio of Class A Units to Class B Units during any given period. We will not attempt to restrict the ratio of Class A Units to Class B Units, and we will not attempt to establish or maintain any particular ratio.
Management Risks
You must rely on our General Partners for management of our business.
Our General Partners make all decisions with respect to the management of the Partnership. Limited partners have no right or power to take part in the management of the Partnership, except through the exercise of limited voting rights. Therefore, you must rely almost entirely on our General Partners for management of the Partnership and the operation of our business. Our General Partners may be removed only under certain conditions set forth in our partnership agreement. If our General Partners are removed, they will receive payment equal to the fair market value of their interests in the Partnership, as agreed upon by our General Partners and the Partnership or by arbitration if they are unable to agree.



10

Leo F. Wells, III has a primary role in determining what is in the best interest of the Partnership and our limited partners.
Leo F. Wells, III is one of our General Partners and is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, the general partner Wells Partners, our other general partner. Therefore, one person has a primary role in determining what is in the best interest of the Partnership and our limited partners. Although Mr. Wells relies on the input of the officers and other employees of Wells Capital, he ultimately has the authority to make decisions affecting our Partnership operations. Therefore, Mr. Wells alone will determine the propriety of his own actions, which could result in a conflict of interest when he is faced with any significant decision relating to our Partnership affairs.
Our loss of, or inability to obtain, key personnel could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could limit our ability to make distributions.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of Leo F. Wells, III, Douglas P. Williams, Randall D. Fretz, and Robert F. Kennedy, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment agreements with Messrs. Wells, Williams, Fretz, Kennedy, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with us. If any of Wells Capital's key personnel were to cease their affiliation with us, we may be unable to find suitable replacement personnel, and our operating results could suffer. We do not maintain key-person life insurance on any person. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon the ability of our General Partners to hire and retain highly skilled managerial and operational personnel. If we lose, or are unable to obtain, the services of highly skilled personnel or do not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of your investment may decline.
Our operating performance could suffer if Wells Capital incurs significant losses, including those losses that may result from being the general partner of other entities.
We are dependent on Wells Capital to conduct our operations; thus, adverse changes in the financial condition of Wells Capital, including changes arising from litigation or our relationship with Wells Capital, could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. As a general partner in many WREF-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may have contingent liabilities for the obligations of such programs. Enforcement of such obligations against Wells Capital could result in a substantial reduction of its net worth. If such liabilities affected the level of services that Wells Capital could provide, our operations and financial performance could suffer.
Our General Partners have a limited net worth consisting of illiquid assets, which may affect their ability to fulfill their financial obligations to us.
The net worth of our General Partners consists primarily of interests in real estate, retirement plans, partnerships, and closely held businesses and, in the case of Wells Capital, receivables from affiliated corporations and partnerships. Accordingly, the net worth of our General Partners is illiquid and not readily marketable. This illiquidity may be relevant to you in evaluating the ability of our General Partners to fulfill their financial obligations to us. In addition, our General Partners have significant commitments to the other investment programs sponsored by Wells Capital ("Wells programs").
Our general and administrative operating expenses, including expenses associated with operating as a public company in the current regulatory environment, could limit our ability to make distributions.
As we evolve through our Partnership life cycle and sell the remaining property in our portfolio, our general and administrative operating expenses become a larger percentage in relationship to our operating cash flow and the value of our property. Further, we bear all expenses incurred in connection with our operations, which are deducted from cash funds generated by operations prior to computing the amount of net cash from operations to be distributed to our limited partners. Therefore, as a result of the general and administrative operating expenses and percentage of such expenses, we cannot assure you that sufficient cash will be available to make future distributions to you from either net cash from our operations or proceeds from the sale of our property.
Conflicts of Interest Risks
Our General Partners will face conflicts of interest relating to time management, which could result in lower returns on our investments.
Because our General Partners and their affiliates have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other business activities, they could have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities, which could


11

affect our operations. You should note that our partnership agreement does not specify any minimum amount of time or level of attention that our General Partners are required to devote to the Partnership.
Our General Partners will face conflicts of interest relating to the sale and leasing of our remaining property.
We may be selling our remaining property at the same time as other Wells programs are buying and selling properties. We may have acquired or be selling properties in geographic areas where other Wells programs own properties or are trying to sell properties, which could lower the return on your investment.
Investments in our joint venture with affiliates and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP will result in additional risks involving our relationship with the co-venturer.
We have entered into a joint venture with affiliates and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP. In addition, Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP has a majority interest in Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Associates (as defined below) and, as a result, holds the controlling vote on significant joint venture matters. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with an investment in real estate, including, for example:
•
the possibility that our co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner in an investment might become bankrupt;
•
that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are, or which may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals; or
•
that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives.
Actions by such a co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner might result in subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.
Our General Partners will face various conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures with affiliates.
Since our General Partners and their affiliates control both the Partnership and other affiliates, transactions between the parties with respect to joint ventures between such parties do not have the benefit of arm's-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture arrangements, neither co-venturer has the power to control the venture, and an impasse could be reached regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In the event that a co-venturer has a right of first refusal to buy out the other co-venturer, it may be unable to finance such a buy-out at that time. It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership or as a co-tenant in property. In addition, to the extent that our co-venturer, partner, or co-tenant is an affiliate of our General Partners, certain conflicts of interest will exist.
Federal Income Tax Risks
The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") may challenge our characterization of material tax aspects of your investment in the Partnership.
An investment in units involves certain material income tax risks, the character and extent of which are, to some extent, a function of whether you hold Class A Units or Class B Units. We will not seek any rulings from the IRS regarding any of the tax issues related to your units.
Investors may realize taxable income without cash distributions .
As a limited partner in the Partnership, you are required to report your allocable share of our taxable income on your personal income tax return regardless of whether or not you have received any cash distributions from the Partnership. For example, if you hold Class A Units, you will be allocated substantially all of our net income, defined in the partnership agreement to mean generally net income for federal income tax purposes, including any income exempt from tax, but excluding all deductions for depreciation and amortization and gain or loss from the sale of our properties, even if such income is in excess of any distributions of cash from our operations. If you hold Class A Units, you will likely be allocated taxable income in excess of any distributions to you, and the amount of cash received by you could be less than the income tax attributable to the net income allocated to you.


12

We could potentially be characterized as a publicly traded partnership resulting in unfavorable tax results .
If the IRS were to classify the Partnership as a "publicly traded partnership," we could be taxable as a corporation, and distributions made to you could be treated as portfolio income to you rather than passive income. We cannot assure you that we will not, at some time in the future, be treated as a publicly traded partnership due to the following factors:
•
the complex nature of the IRS rules governing our potential exemption from classification as a publicly traded partnership;
•
the lack of interpretive guidance with respect to such rules; and
•
the fact that any determination in this regard will necessarily be based upon events that have not yet occurred.

The IRS may challenge our allocations of profit and loss .
While it is more likely than not that Partnership items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit will be allocated among our General Partners and our limited partners substantially in accordance with the allocation provisions of the partnership agreement, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not successfully challenge the allocations in the partnership agreement and reallocate items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit in a manner which reduces the anticipated tax benefits to limited partners holding Class B Units or increases the income allocated to limited partners holding Class A Units.
We may be audited and additional tax, interest and penalties may be imposed upon you.
Our federal income tax returns may be audited by the IRS. Any audit of the Partnership could result in an audit of your tax return, causing adjustments of items unrelated to your investment in the Partnership, in addition to adjustments to various Partnership items. In the event of any such adjustments, you might incur accountants' or attorneys' fees, court costs, and other expenses contesting deficiencies asserted by the IRS. You also may be liable for interest on any underpayment and certain penalties from the date your tax was originally due. The tax treatment of all Partnership items will generally be determined at the Partnership level in a single proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with each partner, and our General Partners are primarily responsible for contesting federal income tax adjustments proposed by the IRS. In this connection, our General Partners may extend the statute of limitations as to all partners and, in certain circumstances, may bind the partners to a settlement with the IRS. Further, our General Partners may cause us to elect to be treated as an "electing large partnership." If they do, we could take advantage of simplified flow-through reporting of Partnership items. Adjustments to Partnership items would continue to be determined at the Partnership level, however, and any such adjustments would be accounted for in the year they take effect, rather than in the year to which such adjustments relate. Accordingly, if you make an election to change the status of your units between the years in which a tax benefit is claimed and an adjustment is made, you may suffer a disproportionate adverse impact with respect to any such adjustment. Further, our General Partners will have the discretion in such circumstances either to pass along any such adjustments to the partners or to bear such adjustments at the Partnership level, thereby potentially adversely impacting the limited partners holding a particular class of units disproportionately to limited partners holding the other class of units.
State and local taxes and a requirement to withhold state taxes may apply.
The state in which you reside may impose an income tax upon your share of our taxable income. Further, states in which we own properties may impose income taxes upon your share of our taxable income allocable to any property located in that state or other taxes on limited partnerships owning properties in their states. Many states have implemented or are implementing programs to require partnerships to withhold and pay state income taxes owed by nonresident partners relating to income-producing properties located in their states, and we may be required to withhold state taxes from cash distributions otherwise payable to you. In the event we are required to withhold state taxes from your cash distributions, or pay other state taxes, the amount of the net cash from operations otherwise payable to you would be reduced. In addition, such collection and filing requirements at the state level may result in increases in our administrative expenses, which would have the effect of reducing cash available for distribution to you. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisors with respect to the impact of applicable state and local taxes and state tax withholding requirements or other potential state taxes relating to an investment in our units.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors .
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our units. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a limited partner. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our units or on the market value or the resale potential of our


13

remaining property. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on your investment in units and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our units.
Retirement Plan and Qualified Plan Risks
There are special considerations that apply to a pension or profit-sharing trust or an Individual Retirement Account ("IRA") investing in units.
If you are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, Section 401(k), Keogh, or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in units, you should satisfy yourself that:
•
your investment is consistent with your fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and the Internal Revenue Code;
•
your investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing your plan or IRA, including your plan's investment policy;
•
your investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA;
•
your investment will not impair the liquidity of the plan or IRA;
•
your investment will not produce "unrelated business taxable income" for the plan or IRA;
•
you will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements; and
•
your investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.
We may dissolve the Partnership if our assets are deemed to be plan assets or if we engage in prohibited transactions.
If our assets were deemed to be assets of qualified plans investing as limited partners, i.e., plan assets, our General Partners would be considered to be fiduciaries of such plans and certain contemplated transactions between our General Partners or their affiliates, and we may then be deemed to be "prohibited transactions" subject to excise taxation under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, if our assets were deemed to be plan assets, the standards of prudence and other provisions of ERISA applicable to plan fiduciaries would apply to the General Partners with respect to our investments. We have not sought a ruling from the U.S. Department of Labor regarding the potential classification of our assets as plan assets.
In this regard, U.S. Department of Labor regulations defining plan assets for purposes of ERISA contain exemptions which, if satisfied, would preclude assets of a limited partnership such as ours from being treated as plan assets. We cannot assure you that our partnership agreement has been structured so that the exemptions in such regulations would apply to us, although our General Partners intend that an investment by a qualified plan in units will not be deemed an investment in our assets. We can make no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the consequences of an investment in our units by qualified plans in this regard. Plan fiduciaries are urged to consult with, and rely upon, their own advisors with respect to this and other ERISA issues which, if decided adversely to us, could result in qualified plan investors being deemed to have engaged in "prohibited transactions," which would cause the imposition of excise taxes and co-fiduciary liability under Section 405 of ERISA in the event actions taken by us are deemed to be nonprudent investments or "prohibited transactions."
In the event our assets are deemed to constitute plan assets or if certain transactions undertaken by us are deemed to constitute "prohibited transactions" under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, and no exemption for such transactions is obtainable by us, the General Partners have the right, but not the obligation, upon notice to all limited partners, but without the consent of any limited partner, to:
•
compel a termination and dissolution of the Partnership; or
•
restructure our activities to the extent necessary to comply with any exemption in the U.S. Department of Labor regulations or any prohibited transaction exemption granted by the Department of Labor or any condition that the Department of Labor might impose as a condition to granting a prohibited transaction exemption.


14

Adverse tax consequences may result because of minimum distribution requirements.
If you hold units in an IRA or you intend to acquire units in a secondary market through your IRA, or if you are a custodian of an IRA or a trustee or other fiduciary of a retirement plan that is holding units or is considering an acquisition of units through a secondary market, you must consider the limited liquidity of an investment in our units as it relates to applicable minimum distribution requirements under the Internal Revenue Code. If units are held and our property has not yet been sold at such time as mandatory distributions are required to begin to an IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant, Sections 408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code will likely require that a distribution-in-kind of the units be made to the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant. Any such distribution-in-kind of units must be included in the taxable income of the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant for the year in which the units are received at the fair market value of the units, and taxes attributable thereto must be paid without any corresponding cash distributions from us with which to pay such income tax liability.
Unrelated business taxable income ("UBTI") may be generated with respect to tax-exempt investors.
We do not intend or anticipate that the tax-exempt investors in the Partnership will be allocated income deemed to be derived from an unrelated trade or business. Notwithstanding this, the General Partners do have limited authority to borrow funds deemed necessary:
•
to finance improvements necessary to protect capital previously invested in a property;
•
to protect the value of our investment in a property; or
•
to make our remaining property more attractive for sale or lease.
Our General Partners have represented that they will not cause us to incur indebtedness unless they obtain an opinion from legal counsel or an opinion from our tax accountants that the proposed indebtedness more than likely will not cause the income allocable to tax-exempt investors to be characterized as UBTI. Any such opinion will have no binding effect on the IRS or any court, however, and some risk remains that we may generate UBTI for our tax-exempt investors in the event that it becomes necessary for us to borrow funds.
Further, in the event we were deemed to be a "dealer" in real property, defined as one who holds real estate primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, the gain realized on the sale of our properties, which is allocable to tax-exempt investors, would be characterized as UBTI.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.


15

ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES.
Overview
We own or owned indirect interests in all of our real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"). Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership, with Piedmont REIT serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, we owned interests in the following joint ventures (the "Joint Ventures") and properties:
 
 
 
 
Ownership %
 
 
 
Leased % as of December 31,
Joint Venture
 
Joint Venture Partners
 
 
Properties
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
 
2007
The Fund IX, Fund X,
  Fund XI and REIT
  Joint Venture (1)
("Fund IX-X-XI-REIT
   Associates")
 
Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P.
Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
39.0%
48.5%
8.8%
3.7%
 
1. 360 Interlocken Building (2)
       A three-story office building located in Broomfield, Colorado
 
—

 
100
%
 
28
%
 
30
%
 
100
%
 
 
 
 
2. Avaya Building (3)
        A one-story office building located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
 
—

 
—

 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
 
 
 
3. Iomega Building (4)
        A single-story warehouse and office building located in Ogden, Utah
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Fund X and Fund XI
  Associates (1)
("Fund X-XI
  Associates")
 
Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
 
58.0%
42.0%
 
This joint venture owns interests only in other joint ventures and does not own any properties directly.
Wells Fremont
  Associates (1)
("Fund X-XI-REIT
  Associates - Fremont")
 
Fund X-XI Associates
Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
22.5%
77.5%
 
4. 47300 Kato Road (5)  
    A two-story warehouse and office building located in Fremont, California
 
 
—

 
0
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture
("Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates")
 
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.
Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
26.1%
17.1%
56.8%
 
5. 111 Southchase Boulevard (6)
        A two-story manufacturing and office building located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
6. 20/20 Building
         A three-story office building located in Leawood, Kansas
 
91
%
 
91
%
 
91
%
 
91
%
 
77
%
(1)  
These joint ventures wound up their affairs in 2011 and will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012.
(2)  
The property was sold in June 2011.
(3)  
The property was sold in October 2010.
(4)  
The property was sold in January 2007.
(5)  
This property was sold in August 2011.
(6)  
This property was sold in May 2007.

Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. are affiliated with us through common general partners. Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P., was affiliated with us through one or more common general partners prior to its dissolution. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis.









16

Lease Expirations
As of December 31, 2011 , the lease expirations scheduled during the following 10 years for the remaining property in which we held an interest through the Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates, assuming no exercise of renewal options or termination rights, are summarized below:

Year of
Lease
Expiration
 
Number
of
Leases
Expiring
 
Square
Feet
Expiring
 
Annualized
Gross Base
Rent in Year of Expiration
 
Partnership
Share of
Annualized
Gross Base
Rent in Year
of Expiration (1)
 
Percentage
of Total
Square
Feet
Expiring
 
Percentage
of Total
Annualized
Base Rent
in Year
of Expiration
2012 (2)
 
2
 
54,301

 
$
1,031,719

 
$
269,795

 
87.7
%
 
87.7
%
2014 (3)
 
1
 
7,647

 
145,293

 
37,994

 
12.3
%
 
12.3
%
 
 
3
 
61,948

 
$
1,177,012

 
$
307,789

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%

(1)  
Our share of annualized gross base rent in year of expiration is calculated based on our ownership percentage in the joint venture that owns the leased property.
(2)  
Expiration of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City lease at the 20/20 Building (approximately 15,000 square feet); and the EPOCH Group, L.C. lease at the 20/20 Building (approximately 39,300 square feet).
(3)  
Expiration of Nolan Real Estate Services, Inc. lease at the 20/20 Building (approximately 7,600 square feet).
Property Descriptions
The properties in which we own or owned an interest through the Joint Ventures during the periods presented are further described below:
Remaining Property We Currently Own
20/20 Building
The 20/20 Building is a three-story office building containing approximately 68,000 rentable square feet on a 7.12-acre tract of land located in Leawood, Kansas. In December 2006, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City ("Blue Cross and Blue Shield") entered into a lease agreement for approximately 22% of the 20/20 Building that commenced in February 2007 and will expire in October 2012. As of December 31, 2011 , annualized base rent payable was approximately $285,000 and remains the same through the expiration of the lease in October 2012.
In December 2006, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and The EPOCH Group, L.C. ("EPOCH") entered into a lease agreement for approximately 58% of the 20/20 Building that commenced in June 2007 and will expire in October 2012. As of December 31, 2011 , annualized base rent payable was approximately $747,000 and remains the same through the expiration of the lease in October 2012.
In October 2008, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and Nolan Real Estate Services, Inc. ("Nolan") entered into a lease agreement for approximately 11% of the 20/20 Building that commenced in December 2008 and will expire in February 2014. Nolan has the right to extend the lease for up to one additional five-year period at a rate equal to the then-current fair market rental rate. As of December 31, 2011 , annualized base rent payable was approximately $141,000 and is scheduled to increase by $0.25 per square foot annually each March. The annualized base rent in 2014 will be approximately $145,000.
Properties Sold in Periods Presented
Iomega Building
The Iomega Building is a single-story warehouse and office building containing approximately 108,000 rentable square feet located in Ogden, Utah. On January 31, 2007, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates sold the Iomega Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $4,867,000. As a result of the sale, we received net sale proceeds of approximately $412,000 and were allocated a gain of approximately $16,000.




17

111 Southchase Boulevard
The 111 Southchase Boulevard property is a two-story manufacturing and office building containing approximately 168,000 rentable square feet located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina. The building is comprised of approximately 135,000 square feet of warehouse space and approximately 33,000 square feet of office space. On May 23, 2007, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates sold 111 Southchase Boulevard to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $7,625,000. As a result of the sale, we received net sale proceeds of approximately $1,892,000 and were allocated a gain of approximately $517,000.
Avaya Building
The Avaya Building is a one-story office building containing approximately 57,000 net rentable square feet on 5.3 acres of land in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On October 15, 2010, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates sold the Avaya Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $5,300,000. As a result of the sale, we received net sale proceeds of approximately $449,000 and were allocated a gain of approximately $60,000.
360 Interlocken Building
The 360 Interlocken Building is a three-story, multi-tenant office building containing approximately 52,000 rentable square feet located on a 5.1-acre tract of land in Broomfield, Colorado. On June 2, 2011, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates sold the 360 Interlocken Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $9,150,000. As a result of the sale, we received net sale proceeds of approximately $763,000 and were allocated a gain of approximately $108,000. In the second quarter of 2010, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates recognized an impairment loss of approximately $1,448,000, of which approximately $127,000 was allocated to the Partnership, in order to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows primarily due to refining the disposition strategy for the Partnership and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset.
47300 Kato Road
The 47300 Kato Road property is a vacant two-story warehouse and office building containing approximately 58,000 square feet, located in Fremont, California.  On August 25, 2011, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont sold the 47300 Kato Road property to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $3,824,553. As a result of the sale, we received net sale proceeds of approximately of $331,000 and were allocated a gain of approximately $8,600. In the third quarter of 2009, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont recorded an impairment loss of approximately $3,316,000, of which approximately $313,000 was allocated to the Partnership, in order to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows, primarily as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us. For a description of pending litigation involving certain related parties, see "Assertion of Legal Action Against Related Parties" in Item 1 of this report.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.


18

PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR PARTNERSHIP'S UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS.
Summary
As of February 29, 2012 , 1,430,724 Class A Units and 222,556 Class B Units held by a total of 1,222 and 77 limited partners, respectively, were outstanding. Original capital contributions were equal to $10.00 per each limited partnership unit. As of February 29, 2012 , we have returned capital in the form of distributions of net sale proceeds to its limited partners equal to, on average, $5.14 per Class A Unit and $9.82 per Class B Unit, as further described below. A public trading market has not been established for our limited partnership units, nor is such a market anticipated to develop in the future. The partnership agreement provides the General Partners with the right to prohibit transfers of units under certain circumstances.
Unit Valuation
Because fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to ERISA and the IRA custodians are required to determine and report the value of the assets held in their respective plans or accounts on an annual basis, the General Partners are required under the partnership agreement to report estimated unit values to the limited partners each year in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The methodology to be utilized for determining such estimated unit values under the partnership agreement requires the General Partners to estimate the amount a unit holder would receive, assuming that our properties were sold at their estimated fair market values as of the end of our fiscal year and the proceeds therefrom, plus the amount of net sale proceeds held by us at year-end from previous property sales, if any, were distributed to the limited partners in liquidation in accordance with the net sale proceeds distribution allocation outlined in the partnership agreement. The estimated unit valuations are intended to be an estimate of the distributions that would be made to limited partners who purchased their units directly from us in our original public offering of units, taking into account conversion elections as provided for in the partnership agreement.
The General Partners of the Partnership recently completed their estimated unit valuations as of December 31, 2011 . Utilizing the foregoing methodology, the General Partners have estimated our unit valuations, based on their estimates of property values as of December 31, 2011 , to be approximately $1.53 per Class A Unit and $1.17 per Class B Unit, based upon market conditions existing in early December 2011 . These estimates should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners' units, how much limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of our properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if our properties were sold and the proceeds were distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership. There is no established public trading market for our limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will ever develop. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. While, as required by the partnership agreement, the General Partners have obtained an opinion from The David L. Beal Company, an independent appraiser certified by the Member Appraisal Institute, to the effect that such estimates of value were deemed reasonable and were prepared in accordance with appropriate methods for valuing real estate, no actual appraisals were obtained due to the expenses that would be involved in obtaining an appraisal for our property.
The valuations performed by the General Partners are estimates only and are based on a number of assumptions that may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units. For example, as a result of the availability of conversion elections under the partnership agreement and the resulting complexities involved relating to the distribution methodology under the partnership agreement, each limited partnership unit of the Partnership potentially has its own unique characteristics as to distributions and value. These estimated valuations are applicable only to limited partners who purchased their units directly from us in our original public offering of units. Further, as set forth above, no third-party appraisals have or will be obtained. For these reasons, the estimated unit valuations set forth above should not be used by or relied upon by our limited partners, other than fiduciaries of retirement plans and IRA custodians for limited ERISA and IRA reporting purposes, as any indication of the fair market value of their units. In addition, it should be noted that ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians may use estimated unit valuations obtained from other sources, such as prices paid for our units in secondary market trades, and that such estimated unit valuations may well be lower than those estimated by the General Partners using the methodology required by the partnership agreement.
It should also be noted that as our properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to limited partners, the remaining value of our portfolio and resulting value of our limited partnership units naturally decline. In considering the foregoing estimated unit valuations, it should be noted that we have previously distributed net sale proceeds in the amount of $5.14 per Class A Unit and $9.82 per Class B Unit to its limited partners. These amounts are intended to represent the per-unit distributions received by limited partners who purchased their units directly from us in our original public offering of units, and who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement. Limited partners who have made one or more conversion elections would have received different levels of per-unit distributions.


19

Operating Distributions
Operating cash available for distribution to the limited partners is generally distributed on a quarterly basis. Under the partnership agreement, distributions from net cash from operations are allocated first to the limited partners holding Class A Units (and limited partners holding Class B Units that have elected a conversion right that allows them to share in the distribution rights of limited partners holding Class A Units) until they have received an amount equal to 10% of their adjusted capital contributions. Cash available for distribution is then distributed to the General Partners until they have received an amount equal to 10% of cash distributions previously distributed to the limited partners. Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Class A Units and the General Partners on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.
No operating cash distributions were paid to the limited partners holding Class A Units or Class B Units, or to the General Partners during the years ended December 31, 2011 or 2010 .
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
A summary of the selected financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 for the Partnership is provided below. The comparability of net income for the periods presented below is impacted by the sale of properties described in Item 2.
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
 
2007
Total assets
$
2,926,309

 
$
2,971,386

 
$
3,219,104

 
$
3,665,811

 
$
4,788,650

Equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures
$
95,124

 
$
(93,414
)
 
$
(301,829
)
 
$
(953,562
)
 
$
621,615

Net income (loss)
$
(42,686
)
 
$
(248,591
)
 
$
(436,239
)
 
$
(1,093,609
)
 
$
598,221

Net income (loss) allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Limited Partners
$
(74,156
)
 
$
(251,274
)
 
$
(436,239
)
 
$
(1,092,949
)
 
$
218,125

Class B Limited Partners
$
31,470

 
$
2,683

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
379,436

General Partners
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(660
)
 
$
660

Net income (loss) per weighted-average
  Limited Partner Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
(0.05
)
 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.30
)
 
$
(0.76
)
 
$
0.15

Class B
$
0.14

 
$
0.01

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1.70

Operating cash distribution to investors
  per weighted-average Class A Limited
  Partner Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment income
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Return of capital
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Operating cash distribution to investors
  per weighted-average Class B Limited
  Partner Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment income
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Return of capital
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Distribution of net sale proceeds per
  weighted-average Limited Partner Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1.88

Class B
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1.70


ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data presented in Item 6 and our accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. See also "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" preceding Part I of this report and "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this report.


20

Overview
Portfolio Overview
We are currently in the positioning-for-sale phase of our life cycle. Following the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property, we have sold 10 of the 11 properties in which we have held interests. While our focus at this time involves leasing and marketing efforts at our remaining property that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing of our asset for our limited partners, we will evaluate offers to sell our remaining property on an as-is basis.
The fourth quarter 2011 operating distributions to limited partners were reserved. We anticipate that operating distributions will continue to be reserved due to various factors, including our intention to fund our pro rata share of property operating costs, anticipated re-leasing costs, and capital improvements at our remaining property.
Property Summary
As we move further into the positioning-for-sale phase, we will continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space and space that may become vacant upon the expiration of our current leases. In doing so, we will seek to maximize returns to our limited partners by attempting to negotiate long-term leases at market rental rates while attempting to minimize down time, re-leasing expenditures, ongoing property level costs, and portfolio costs. As our remaining property is positioned for sale, our attention will shift to locating a suitable buyer, negotiating a purchase-sale contract that will attempt to maximize the total return to our limited partners and minimize contingencies and potential post-closing obligations to the buyer. As of February 29, 2012 , we owned an interest in one property.
Information relating to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the joint ventures is provided below:
•
The Cort Building was sold on September 11, 2003.
•
The Johnson Matthey Building was sold on October 5, 2004.
•
The Alstom Power - Knoxville Building was sold on March 15, 2005.
•
The Gartner Building was sold on April 13, 2005.
•
The 1315 West Century Drive property was sold on December 22, 2006.
•
The Iomega Building was sold on January 31, 2007.
•
The 111 Southchase Boulevard property was sold on May 23, 2007.
•
The Avaya Building was sold on October 15, 2010.
•
The 360 Interlocken Building was sold on June 2, 2011.
•
The 47300 Kato Road property was sold on August 25, 2011.
•
The 20/20 Building, located in Leawood, Kansas, is 91% leased. Approximately 80% of the building is leased to Blue Cross and Blue Shield, who intends to vacate the building at its scheduled extended lease expiration in October 2012. We are actively marketing the space in this building for lease.
General Economic Conditions and Real Estate Market Commentary
Management reviews a number of economic forecasts and market commentaries in order to evaluate general economic conditions and to formulate a view of the current environment's effect on the real estate markets in which we operate.
As measured by the U.S. gross domestic product ("GDP"), the U.S. economy's growth increased at an annual rate of 3.0% in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to estimates. While the data suggest that the economic recovery continues, the rate of recovery has slowed. For the full year of 2011, real GDP increased 1.7% compared with a 3.0% increase in 2010. The growth in real GDP in 2011 reflected positive contributions from private inventory investments, personal consumption expenditures, exports, and residential and nonresidential fixed investments. While management believes the U.S. economy is likely to continue its recovery, we believe this recovery will maintain its gradual progression. Further, this recovery will face certain headwinds as we move through 2012, due to factors such as the rate of employment expansion, election-year uncertainty, and the European sovereign debt crisis.


21

Real estate market fundamentals underlying the U.S. office markets mirrored the broader U.S. economy, with modest improvement in the major indicators in 2011. The vacancy rate for the U.S. as a whole stood at 12.9% for the fourth quarter, compared with the 13.3% vacancy rate this same time a year ago. There was positive net absorption of 40.2 million square feet year-to-date in 2011, up from 16.2 million square feet recorded in 2010. Additionally, 65 of 80 metropolitan statistical areas registered positive net absorption in 2011 compared with only 43 markets that did so in 2010. Average asking rents across all office classes remained fairly flat year-over-year from $22.95 in the fourth quarter of 2010 to $22.81 in the fourth quarter of 2011. If the forecast for continued modest economic recovery holds, the office market should follow suit with improving fundamentals in 2012. Given the lack of new construction in the pipeline and the forecast for continued positive net absorption, which will lower vacancy levels, we believe positive rent growth should return to the broader market in 2013.
The upward trend in transaction volume continued for office properties in 2011 with sales of office properties totaling $63.5 billion, a 37% increase over 2010. Although gateway markets such as New York City; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago once again recorded the strongest transaction volume in 2011, investor attention also shifted to secondary markets and Class-A suburban offices in the major metros, something not seen in 2010. Capitalization rates (first-year income returns) continued to decline across the board, with central business district cap rates declining within 50-75 basis points of the previous cyclical low levels. Average central business district capitalization rates finished the year at 6.2%, while suburban rates remained relatively unchanged at 7.6%.
With 2012 GDP growth forecasted to be in the 2.0% to 2.5% range, the sluggish recovery experienced in 2011 will likely carry forward into the coming year. However, the outlook is for stronger leasing activity in 2012. During the 2011 mild office recovery, a noteworthy tenant-driven trend emerged that has been labeled "flight to quality," meaning that better quality properties in superior locations are outperforming the broader office market. While equilibrium in the office market on a national level is not expected until 2013, Class-A properties in desirable markets are expected to outperform as they did in 2011 due to this trend. Properties that are in top-tier markets, such as New York City; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago, with credit tenants and lack of near-term lease rollover continue to command higher prices and lower cap rates than properties without these qualities.
Impact of Economic Conditions on our Portfolio
While some of the market conditions noted above may indicate expected changes in rental rates, the extent to which our portfolio may be affected is dependent upon the contractual rental rates currently provided in existing leases at the remaining property we own. As the majority of our in-place leases at our remaining property were acquired at times during which the market demanded higher rental rates, as compared with today, new leasing activities in certain markets may result in a decrease in future rental rates. Additionally, the turbulence in the credit markets may adversely affect the ability of potential purchasers of our remaining property to obtain financing.
Less diversified real estate funds that own fewer properties, such as us, and those with current vacancies or near-term tenant rollover, such as us, may face an increasingly challenging leasing environment. The properties within these funds may be required to offer lower rental rates and higher concession packages to potential tenants, the degree to which will depend heavily on the specific property and market. Our investment strategy, which includes either renewing an existing tenant's lease or re-leasing the property prior to marketing it for sale, remains intact. However, the ultimate timing surrounding our leasing efforts will likely be impacted by the economic conditions noted above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our operating strategy entails funding expenditures related to the recurring operations of our remaining property and the portfolio with operating cash flows, including current and prior period operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known future re-leasing costs and other capital improvements. Any residual operating cash flows are generally considered available for distribution to the Class A limited partners and, unless reserved, are generally paid quarterly. To the extent that operating cash flows are insufficient to fund our recurring operations, net sale proceeds will be utilized. As a result, the ongoing monitoring of our cash position is critical to ensuring that adequate liquidity and capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets could adversely impact the ability of one or more of our tenants to honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our ability to provide funding for capital needs could be adversely affected.




22

Short-Term Liquidity
For the year ended December 31, 2011 , net operating cash outflows, including distributions received from the Joint Ventures, were approximately $34,000 , primarily due to (i) Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates retaining its operating cash flow to fund the remaining re-leasing costs at the 360 Interlocken Building, prior to its disposition, (ii) the impact of the vacancy at 47300 Kato Road, prior to its disposition, and (iii) Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates retaining some of its cash flows to fund capital improvements at the 20/20 Building. Operating distributions from the Joint Ventures generally consist of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, less property operating expenses, management fees, general administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. The extent to which any future operating distributions are paid to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows, and determination of near-term cash needs to fund our share of anticipated property operating costs, tenant re-leasing costs, and other capital improvements for our remaining property owned by the Joint Ventures. We anticipate that future operating distributions from the Joint Ventures may decline in the near-term as a result of our intention to fund our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements at the 20/20 Building.
During the year ended December 31, 2011 , we invested (i) approximately $57,000 in Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates to fund our pro rata share of the remaining re-leasing costs at the 360 Interlocken Building incurred in connection with the lease agreement with AVNET, Inc., prior to the property's disposition and (ii) approximately $16,000 in Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont to fund our pro rata share of property operating costs at 47300 Kato Road, prior to the property's disposition. During the year ended December 31, 2011 , we received net sale proceeds of (i) approximately $763,000 from the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building and (ii) approximately $331,000 from the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property.
We believe that the cash on hand is sufficient to cover our working capital needs, including those provided for within our total liabilities of approximately $13,000 , as of December 31, 2011 .
Long-Term Liquidity
We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from operating cash flows generated from the remaining property owned by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and net proceeds generated from the sale of that property. Our future long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding our share of tenant improvements, renovations, expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for the remaining property owned by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates. We expect to continue to use substantially all future net cash flows from operations, including distributions received from Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates, to fund leasing costs and capital expenditures necessary to position our remaining property for sale. To the extent that residual operating cash flows remain after considering these funding requirements, we would then distribute such residual operating cash flow to the limited partners.
Capital Resources
The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties or investing in joint ventures formed for the same purpose, and has invested all of the partners' original net offering proceeds available for investment. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional properties or joint ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally involved acquiring properties that are pre-leased to creditworthy tenants on an all-cash basis through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.
The joint ventures incur capital expenditures primarily related to building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of our properties, and tenant improvements for the purpose of readying our properties for re-leasing. As leases at our remaining property expire, we will work with the Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally, tenant improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market, drive capital costs as well as rental rates.
Operating cash flows, if available, are generally distributed from the joint ventures to us approximately one month following calendar quarter-ends. However, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates will reserve operating distributions, or a portion thereof, as needed in order to fund known capital and other expenditures. Our cash management policy typically includes first utilizing current period operating cash flows until depleted, at which point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital and other required expenditures. In the event that current and prior period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net sale proceeds reserves, if available, would then be utilized. Any capital or other expenditures not funded from the operations of Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates will be required to be funded by us and the other respective joint venture partners on a pro rata basis.



23

As of December 31, 2011 , we had received, used, distributed, and held net sale proceeds allocated to us from the sale of properties as presented below:
  
 
Net Sale
Proceeds
 
Partnership's
Approximate
Ownership %
 
Net Sale Proceeds
Allocated to the
Partnership
 
Use of
Net Sale Proceeds
 
Net Sale Proceeds
Distributed to
Partners as of
December 31, 2011
 
Undistributed Net
Sale Proceeds as of
December 31, 2011

Property Sold
 
Amount
 
Purpose
 
Cort Building
(sold in 2003)
 
$
5,563,403

 
24
%
 
$
1,315,906

 
$
—

 
—

 
$
1,315,906

 
$
—

Johnson Matthey Building
(sold in 2004)
 
$
9,675,000

 
26
%
 
2,529,819

 
—

 
—

 
2,529,819

 
—

Alstom Power – Knoxville Building
(sold in March 2005)
 
$
11,646,089

 
9
%
 
1,023,528

 
—

 
—

 
1,023,528

 
—

Gartner Building
(sold in April 2005)
 
$
12,396,859

 
26
%
 
3,241,531

 
340,000

 
•Partnership operating expenses (2006)
 
•Joint venture operating expenses (2006)
 
•Re-leasing the 20/20 Building (2006)
 
•Re-leasing 111 Southchase Boulevard (2007)
 
2,901,531

 
—

1315 West Century Drive
(sold in December 2006)
 
$
8,059,625

 
9
%
 
708,328

 
120,000

 
•Re-leasing 111 Southchase Boulevard (2007)
 
588,328

 
—

Iomega Building
(sold in January 2007)
 
$
4,685,151

 
9
%
 
411,759

 
—

 
—

 
411,759

 
—

111 Southchase Boulevard
(sold in May 2007)
 
$
7,236,841

 
26
%
 
1,892,289

 
665,000

 
•Re-leasing the 20/20 Building (2007-2008)
 
•Partnership operating expenses (2007-2011)
 
•Capital improvements for the 20/20 Building (2008-2009)
 
•Re-leasing the Avaya Building (2010)
                                                                                                            
•Re-leasing the 360 Interlocken Building (2010-2011)
 
1,099,128

 
128,161

Avaya Building
(sold in October 2010)
 
$
5,107,662

 
9
%
 
448,892

 
—

 
 
 
—

 
448,892

360 Interlocken Building
(sold in June 2011)
 
$
8,685,166

 
9
%
 
763,305

 
—

 
 
 
—

 
763,305

47300 Kato Road property
(sold in August 2011)
 
$
3,503,755

 
9
%
 
330,947

 
—

 
 
 
—

 
330,947

Total
 
 
 
 
 
$
12,666,304

 
$
1,125,000

 
 
 
$
9,869,999

 
$
1,671,305

Upon evaluating the capital needs of our remaining property in which we currently hold an interest, our General Partners have decided to reserve the remaining net sale proceeds in the near-term to fund our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements for our remaining property.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2010 vs. the year ended December 31, 2011
Equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures increased from $(93,414) for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $95,124 for the year ended December 31, 2011 . This increase in income is primarily attributable to (i) the gain recognized on the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building in June 2011, of which approximately $108,000 was allocated to the Partnership; (ii) the gain recognized on the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property in August 2011, of which approximately $8,600 was allocated to the Partnership; (iii) the impairment loss recognized by Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates related to the 360 Interlocken Building in the second quarter of 2010, of which approximately $127,000 was allocated to the Partnership, partially offset by (iv) the gain recognized on sale of the Avaya Building in October 2010, of which approximately $60,000 was allocated to the Partnership. We expect equity


24

in income (loss) of Joint Ventures to decline in the near-term as a result of recognizing non-recurring gains on the sales of the 360 Interlocken Building and the 47300 Kato Road property in 2011.
Interest and other income increased from $1,206 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $2,674 for the year ended December 31, 2011 . This increase is primarily attributable to the increase in the average outstanding cash balance following the receipt of net sale proceeds from the disposition of the Avaya Building in October 2010, the 360 Interlocken Building in June 2011, and the 47300 Kato Road property in August 2011. Future levels of interest income will be largely dependent on the timing of future disposition and net sale proceeds distributions to the limited partners, the amount of operating cash needed to invest in the Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates related to funding our pro rata share of re-leasing costs and capital expenditures, and fluctuations in the average daily yield earned on cash balances.
General and administrative expenses decreased from $156,383 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $140,484 for the year ended December 31, 2011 , primarily due to a decrease in the overhead administrative costs allocated to the Partnership during 2011. We anticipate that future general and administrative expenses will vary primarily based on future changes in our reporting and regulatory requirements.
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2009 vs. the year ended December 31, 2010
Equity in loss of Joint Ventures decreased from $301,829 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $93,414 for the year ended December 31, 2010 . This decrease in loss is primarily attributable to the impairment loss recognized by Fund X-XI-REIT Associates related to 47300 Kato Road in the third quarter of 2009, of which approximately $313,000 was allocated to the Partnership, partially offset by the impairment loss recognized by Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates related to the 360 Interlocken Building in the second quarter of 2010, of which approximately $127,000 was allocated to the Partnership.
Interest and other income decreased from $1,923 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $1,206 for the year ended December 31, 2010 . This decrease is primarily a result of a decrease in the average daily yield earned on cash balances.
General and administrative expenses increased from $136,333 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $156,383 for the year ended December 31, 2010 . This increase is attributable to a temporary difference in accounting fees related to the timing of work performed by our external accountants, and additional administrative reimbursements resulting primarily from a reduction in the economies of scale available to us for investor support services.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk, as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that are intended to help protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax, and insurance reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, the leases may not readjust their reimbursement rates frequently enough to cover inflation.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Summary
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management's judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
Below is a discussion of the accounting policies used by us and the Joint Ventures, which are considered to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.




25

Investment in Real Estate Assets
We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures' assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Buildings
40 years
Building improvements
5-25 years
Land improvements
20 years
Tenant improvements
Shorter of lease term or economic life

In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income would be misstated.
Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which we have an ownership interest through investments in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present that suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale, do not exceed the respective assets' carrying values, we adjust the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognize an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value. We have determined that there have been no additional impairments in the carrying value of our real estate assets to date (see below for historical impairments in periods presented); however, certain of our assets may be carried at an amount more than could be realized in a current disposition transaction.
In the second quarter of 2010, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates recorded an impairment loss on the 360 Interlocken Building of approximately $1,448,000 (approximately $127,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows primarily due to refining our disposition strategy for the Partnership and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset in the second quarter of 2010.
In the third quarter of 2009, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont recorded an impairment loss on 47300 Kato Road of approximately $3,316,000 (approximately $313,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows, primarily as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset in the third quarter 2009 and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing.
Projections of expected future cash flows require that we estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment, among other factors. The subjectivity of assumptions used in the future cash flow analysis, including discount rates, could result in an incorrect assessment of the property's future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the misstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and our net income (loss).
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with Wells Capital and Wells Management, affiliates of our General Partners, or their affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and expense reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management or their affiliates for asset management, the management and leasing of our property; and administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and we incur the related expenses. See Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" for a description of these fees and reimbursements and amounts incurred and "Risk Factors - Conflicts of Interest" in Item 1A of this report.


26

ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Since we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments, or invest in any market risk-sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Our financial statements and supplementary data are detailed under Item 15(a) and filed as part of the report on the pages indicated.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There were no disagreements with our independent public accountants during the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 .
ITEM 9A.
CONTROL AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of one of our General Partners, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2011 . Based upon that evaluation, which was completed as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, 2011 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, as a process designed by or under the supervision of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and effected by our management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:  
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the Partnership;
•
provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or members of the Financial Oversight Committee; and
•
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Partnership's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls, material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes and conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even internal controls determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and represented within the time periods required.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2011 . To make this assessment, we used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management believes that our system of internal control over financial reporting met those criteria, and therefore our management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 .


27

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2011 , all items required to be disclosed under Form 8-K were reported under Form 8-K.




28

PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT'S GENERAL PARTNERS.
Wells Partners
The sole general partner of Wells Partners, one of our General Partners, is Wells Capital, a Georgia corporation. The executive offices of Wells Capital are located at 6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia 30092. Wells Capital was organized on April 18, 1984, under the Georgia Business Corporation Code, and is primarily in the business of serving as general partner or as an affiliate to the general partner in affiliated public limited partnerships ("Wells Public Partnerships”). Wells Capital or its affiliates serve as the advisor to Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc.; Wells Core Office Income REIT, Inc. (formerly Wells Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc.); and Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. (collectively, the "Wells REITs”), each of which is a Maryland corporation. In these capacities, Wells Capital performs certain services for Wells Public Partnerships and the Wells REITs, including presenting, structuring, and acquiring real estate investment opportunities; entering into leases and service contracts on acquired properties; arranging for and completing the disposition of properties; and providing other services such as accounting and administrative functions. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of WREF, of which Leo F. Wells, III is the sole stockholder .
Leo F. Wells, III
Mr. Wells, 68, who serves as one of our General Partners, is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, which is our corporate general partner. He is also the sole stockholder and sole director of WREF, which he founded in 1984 and served as WREF's President and Treasurer until February 2012. WREF directly or indirectly owns Wells Capital, the Advisor; Wells Management; Wells Investment Securities, Inc. ("WIS"); Wells Development Corporation; Wells Asset Management, Inc.; and Wells & Associates, Inc., a real estate brokerage and investment company formed in 1976 and incorporated in 1978, for which Mr. Wells serves as principal broker. He is also the president, treasurer, and sole director of:
•
Wells Management, our property manager;
•
Wells Asset Management, Inc.;
•
Wells & Associates, Inc.; and
•
Wells Development Corporation, a company he organized in 1997 to develop real properties.
Mr. Wells is a director of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. and the president and a director of Wells Core Office Income REIT, Inc., which are public real estate programs not listed on a securities exchange. He is also the president of Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., which is also a public real estate program not listed on a securities exchange. From 1998 to 2007, Mr. Wells served as president and Chairman of the Board of Piedmont REIT, formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a public, non-traded REIT sponsored by WREF, until April 16, 2007, when Piedmont REIT acquired certain entities formerly affiliated with WREF and became a self-advised REIT.
Mr. Wells was a real estate salesman and property manager from 1970 to 1973 for Roy D. Warren & Company, an Atlanta-based real estate company, and he was associated from 1973 to 1976 with Sax Gaskin Real Estate Company. From 1980 to February 1985, he served as Vice President of Hill-Johnson, Inc., a Georgia corporation engaged in the construction business. Mr. Wells holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in economics from The University of Georgia. Mr. Wells is an inaugural sponsor of the Financial Services Institute.
On August 26, 2003, Mr. Wells and WIS entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") relating to alleged rule violations. The AWC set forth the NASD's findings that WIS and Mr. Wells had violated conduct rules relating to the provision of noncash compensation of more than $100 to associated persons of NASD member firms in connection with their attendance at the annual educational and due diligence conferences sponsored by WIS in 2001 and 2002. Without admitting or denying the allegations and findings against them, WIS and Mr. Wells consented in the AWC to various findings by the NASD, which are summarized in the following paragraph:
In 2001 and 2002, WIS sponsored conferences attended by registered representatives who sold its real estate investment products. WIS also paid for certain expenses of guests of the registered representatives who attended the conferences. In 2001, WIS paid the costs of travel to the conference and meals for many of the guests, and paid the costs of playing golf for some of the registered representatives and their guests. WIS later invoiced registered representatives for the cost of golf and for travel expenses of guests, but was not fully reimbursed for such. In 2002, WIS paid for meals for the guests. WIS also conditioned most of the 2001 conference invitations on attainment by the registered representatives of a predetermined sales goal for WIS products. This conduct


29

violated the prohibitions against payment and receipt of noncash compensation in connection with the sales of these products contained in NASD's Conduct Rules 2710, 2810, and 3060. In addition, WIS and Mr. Wells failed to adhere to all of the terms of their written undertaking made in March 2001 not to engage in the conduct described above, and thereby engaged in conduct that was inconsistent with high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2110.
WIS consented to a censure and Mr. Wells consented to suspension from acting in a principal capacity with an NASD member firm for one year. WIS and Mr. Wells also agreed to the imposition of a joint and several fine in the amount of $150,000. Mr. Wells' one-year suspension from acting in a principal capacity ended on October 6, 2004. Mr. Wells continues to represent certain affiliated issuers and perform nonprincipal activities on behalf of WIS.
Section 16(a), Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the officers and directors of the general partner of our general partner, and persons who own 10% or more of any class of equity interests in the Partnership, to report their beneficial ownership of equity interests in the Partnership to the SEC. Their initial reports are required to be filed using the SEC's Form 3, and they are required to report subsequent purchases, sales, and other changes using the SEC's Form 4, which must be filed within two business days of most transactions. Officers, directors, and partners owning more than 10% of any class of equity interests in the Partnership are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all reports they file pursuant to Section 16(a).
Financial Oversight Committee
We do not have a board of directors or an audit committee. Accordingly, as the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Partnership, Wells Capital has established a Financial Oversight Committee consisting of Douglas P. Williams as the Principal Financial Officer; Randall D. Fretz as the Senior Vice President of Wells Capital; and Wendy Gill as Chief Accounting Officer. The Financial Oversight Committee serves the equivalent function of an audit committee for, among others, the following purposes: appointment, compensation, review, and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accountant, and establishing and enforcing the code of ethics. However, since neither we nor our corporate general partner have an audit committee and the Financial Oversight Committee is not independent of us or the General Partners, we do not have an "audit committee financial expert."
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to Wells Capital's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as well as the principal accounting officer, controller, or other employees of Wells Capital performing similar functions on our behalf, if any. The code of ethics is contained in the Business Standards/Code of Conduct/General Policies established by WREF. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics, without charge, upon request by calling our Client Services Department at 800-557-4830 or 770-243-8282.
ITEM 11.
COMPENSATION OF GENERAL PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES.
While we are managed by the General Partners and their affiliates, we do not pay any salaries or other compensation directly to the General Partners or to any of the General Partners' individual employees, officers, or directors. Further, we do not employ, and are not managed by, any of our own employees, officers, or directors. Accordingly, no compensation has been awarded to, earned by, or paid to any such individuals in connection with the operation or management of the Partnership. Due to our current management structure and our lack of any employees, officers, or directors, no discussion and analysis of compensation paid by the Partnership; tabular information concerning salaries, bonuses, and other types of compensation to executive officers or directors of the Partnership; or other information regarding compensation policies and practices of the Partnership has been included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
See Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," for a description of the fees we incurred that were payable to affiliates of the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 2011 .


30

ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
(a)
No limited partner owns beneficially more than 5% of any class of the outstanding units of the Partnership as of February 29, 2012 .
(b)
Set forth below is the security ownership of management as of February 29, 2012 .
Title of Class
 
Name of
Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 
Percent of Class
Limited Partnership Units
 
Leo F. Wells, III
 
5,131.319 Units (1)
 
Less than 1%
(1)
Leo F. Wells, III owns 5,109.22 Class A Units through an individual retirement account and 22.099 Class A Units through Wells Capital.

(c)
No arrangements exist which would, upon execution, result in a change in control of the Partnership.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The compensation and fees we pay to our General Partners or their affiliates in connection with our operations are as follows:
Interest in Partnership Cash Flow and Net Sale Proceeds

The General Partners are entitled to receive a subordinated participation in net cash flow from operations equal to 10% of net cash flow after the limited partners holding Class A Units have received preferential distributions equal to 10% of their adjusted capital accounts in each fiscal year. The General Partners are also entitled to receive a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds equal to 20% of residual proceeds available for distribution after limited partners holding Class A Units have received a return of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions, and limited partners holding Class B Units have received a return of their adjusted capital contributions, plus a 15% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions; provided, however, that in no event shall the General Partners receive in the aggregate in excess of 15% of net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds remaining after payments to limited partners from such proceeds of amounts equal to the sum of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. The General Partners did not receive any distributions of net cash from operations or net sales proceeds for the year ended December 31, 2011 .

Management and Leasing Fees

We entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of our properties owned through the Joint Ventures, equal to (a) 2.5% for management services and 2% for leasing services of the gross revenues collected monthly (aggregate maximum of 4.5%), plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm's-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) in the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net basis (10 or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, are included in equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. Our share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells Management is $2,813 , $4,512 , and $6,731 for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively.
Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, one of our General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for us, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. We incurred administrative expenses of $65,724 , $79,971 , and $71,468 payable to Wells Capital and Wells Management for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively.





31

Real Estate Commissions

In connection with the sale of our properties, the General Partners or their affiliates may receive commissions not exceeding the lesser of (a) 50% of the commissions customarily charged by other brokers in arm's length transactions involving comparable properties in the same geographic area or (b) 3% of the gross sales price of the property, and provided that payments of such commissions will be made only after limited partners have received prior distributions totaling 100% of their capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. No real estate commissions were paid to the General Partners or affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 .
Procedures Regarding Related-Party Transactions

Our policies and procedures governing related-party transactions with our General Partners and their affiliates, including, but not limited to, all transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, are restricted or severely limited by the provisions of Articles XI, XII, XIII, and XIV of our partnership agreement, which has been filed with the SEC. No transaction has been entered into with either of our General Partners or their affiliates that does not comply with those policies and procedures. In addition, in any transaction involving a potential conflict of interest, including any transaction that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, our General Partners must view such a transaction after taking into consideration their fiduciary duties to us.

ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Preapproval Policies and Procedures

The Financial Oversight Committee preapproves all auditing and permissible nonauditing services provided by our independent registered public accountants. The approval may be given as part of the Financial Oversight Committee's approval of the scope of the engagement of our independent registered public accountants or on an individual basis. The preapproval of certain audit-related services and certain nonauditing services not exceeding enumerated dollar limits may be delegated to one or more of the Financial Oversight Committee's members, but the member to whom such authority is delegated shall report any preapproval decisions to the full Financial Oversight Committee. Our independent registered public accountants may not be retained to perform the nonauditing services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accountants

Frazier & Deeter, LLC serves as our independent registered public accountants and has provided audit services since September 22, 2006. All such fees are recognized in the period to which the services relate. A portion of such fees is allocated to the joint ventures in which we invest. The aggregate fees billed to us for professional accounting services by Frazier & Deeter, LLC, including the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 , are set forth in the table below.
 
2011
 
2010
Audit Fees
$
23,313

 
$
24,709

Audit-Related Fees
—

 
—

Tax Fees
—

 
—

Other Fees
—

 
—

     Total
$
23,313

 
$
24,709


For purposes of the preceding table, the professional fees are classified as follows:

•
Audit Fees – These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Q filings, services that are normally provided by independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and services that generally independent registered public accountants reasonably can provide, such as statutory audits, attest services, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
•
Audit-Related Fees – These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent registered public accountants, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, internal control reviews, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.


32

•
Tax Fees – These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent registered public accountant's tax division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. Tax compliance involves preparation of any federal, state or local tax returns. Tax planning and tax advice encompass a diverse range of services, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to acquisitions and dispositions of assets, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
•
Other Fees – These are fees for other permissible work performed that do not meet the above-described categories, including assistance with internal audit plans and risk assessments.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 , 100% of the services performed by Frazier & Deeter, LLC described above under the captions "Audit Fees," "Audit-Related Fees," "Tax Fees," and "Other Fees" were approved in advance by a member of the Financial Oversight Committee. In addition, fees were incurred for tax services performed by an accounting firm separate from our independent registered public accountants in each year presented.




33

PART IV

ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) 1.    A list of the financial statements contained herein is set forth on page F-1 hereof.
2.    Not applicable.
3.    The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
(b)     See (a) 3 above.
(c)    See (a) 2 above.




34

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
By:
WELLS PARTNERS, L.P.
(General Partner)
 
 
 
 
By:
WELLS CAPITAL, INC.
(Corporate General Partner)
 
 
 
March 15, 2012
 
/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III
 
 
Leo F. Wells, III
President, Principal Executive Officer,
and Sole Director of Wells Capital, Inc.
 
 
 
March 15, 2012
 
/s/  DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
 
 
Douglas P. Williams
Principal Financial Officer
of Wells Capital, Inc.





35

EXHIBIT INDEX
TO 2011 FORM 10-K
OF
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report. Those exhibits previously filed and incorporated herein by reference are identified below by an asterisk. For each such asterisked exhibit, there is shown below the description of the previous filing. Exhibits which are not required for this report are omitted.
   
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
*3.1
 
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (Exhibit 3(a) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*3.2
 
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (Exhibit 3(c) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*10.1
 
Leasing and Tenant Coordinating Agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10(d) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*10.2
 
Management Agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10(e) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*10.3
 
Custodial Agency Agreement with The Bank of New York (Exhibit 10(f) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*10.4
 
Joint Venture Agreement of Fund IX and Fund X Associates dated March 20, 1997 (Exhibit 10(g) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P., Commission File No. 333-07979)
*10.5
 
Amended and Restated Joint Venture Agreement of The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture dated July 11, 1998 (Exhibit 10.4 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-32099)
*10.6
 
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Property relating to the 360 Interlocken Building dated
February 11, 1998 between Orix Prime West Broomfield Venture and Wells Development Corporation (Exhibit 10.7 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-32099)
*10.7
 
Joint Venture Agreement of Wells/Fremont Associates (the "Fremont Joint Venture") dated July 15, 1998 between Wells Development Corporation and Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (Exhibit 10.17 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File
No. 333-32099)
*10.8
 
Joint Venture Agreement of Fund X and Fund XI Associates dated July 15, 1998 (Exhibit 10.18 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-32099)
*10.9
 
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Joint Venture Interest relating to the Fremont Joint Venture dated July 17, 1998 between Wells Development Corporation and Fund X and Fund XI Associates (Exhibit 10.19 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-32099)
*10.10
 
Lease Agreement for the Fairchild Building dated September 19, 1997 between the Fremont Joint Venture (as successor in interest by assignment) and Fairchild Technologies USA, Inc. (Exhibit 10.20 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-32099)
*10.11
 
First Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement of Wells/Fremont Associates dated October 8, 1998
(Exhibit 10(w) to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.12
 
Lease Agreement with The EPOCH Group, L.C. for a portion of the 20/20 Building (Exhibit 10(tt) to
Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, Commission File
No. 000-25731)
*10.13
 
Lease Agreement with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City for a portion of the 20/20 Building
(Exhibit 10(uu) to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, Commission File No. 000-25731)


*10.14
 
Guaranty Agreement by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City relating to the lease agreement with The EPOCH Group, L.C. for a portion of the 20/20 Building (Exhibit 10(vv) to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, Commission File No. 000-25731)
*10.15
 
Second Amendment to Net Lease Agreement with Avaya, Inc. for the Avaya Building (Exhibit 10(xx) to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.16
 
Third Amendment to Net Lease Agreement with Avaya, Inc. for the Avaya Building (Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.17
 
Office Lease with AVNET, Inc. for a portion of the 360 Interlocken Building (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.18
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the Avaya Building (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.19
 
First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the Avaya Building (Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.20
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 000-22039)
*10.21
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of 47300 Kato Road (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.22
 
First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate
Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.23
 
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.24
 
Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate
Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.25
 
Fourth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.26
 
Fifth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
*10.27
 
Sixth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 000-23719)
31.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
**101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
**101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
**101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
**101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
**101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
*
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference.
**
Furnished with this Form 10-K, but not filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Page No.
 
 
 
 
 
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE WELLS FUND XI-FUND XII-REIT JOINT VENTURE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the "Partnership") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.




/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC
    
Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2012




F-2

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

 
December 31,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Assets:
Investment in joint ventures
$
1,230,659

 
$
2,239,616

Cash and cash equivalents
1,691,184

 
704,810

Due from joint ventures
—

 
26,960

Other assets
4,466

 
—

Total assets
$
2,926,309

 
$
2,971,386

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
7,068

 
$
9,125

Due to affiliates
6,084

 
6,418

Total liabilities
13,152

 
15,543

 
 
 
 
Commitments and Contingencies

 

 
 
 
 
Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Limited Partners:
 
 
 
Class A – 1,430,724 units issued and outstanding
2,878,060

 
2,952,216

Class B – 222,556 units issued and outstanding
35,097

 
3,627

General Partners
—

 
—

Total partners' capital
2,913,157

 
2,955,843

Total liabilities and partners' capital
$
2,926,309

 
$
2,971,386


See accompanying notes.



F-3

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures
$
95,124

 
$
(93,414
)
 
$
(301,829
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and Other Income
2,674

 
1,206

 
1,923

 
 
 
 
 
 
General and Administrative Expenses
140,484

 
156,383

 
136,333

Net Loss
$
(42,686
)
 
$
(248,591
)
 
$
(436,239
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Limited Partners
$
(74,156
)
 
$
(251,274
)
 
$
(436,239
)
Class B Limited Partners
$
31,470

 
$
2,683

 
$
—

General Partners
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
(0.05
)
 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.30
)
Class B
$
0.14

 
$
0.01

 
$
0.00

 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
1,430,724

 
1,430,949

 
1,431,174

Class B
222,556

 
222,331

 
222,106


See accompanying notes.



F-4

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.
 
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2011 , 2010 , AND 2009
 
 
Limited Partners
 
General
Partners
 
Total
Partners'
Capital
 
Class A
 
Class B
 
 
Units
 
Amount
 
Units
 
Amount
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2008
1,431,174

 
$
3,640,673

 
222,106

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
3,640,673

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
—

 
(436,239
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(436,239
)
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
1,431,174

 
3,204,434

 
222,106

 
—

 
—

 
3,204,434

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A conversion elections
(450
)
 
(944
)
 
450

 
944

 
—

 
—

Net income (loss)
—

 
(251,274
)
 
—

 
2,683

 
—

 
(248,591
)
BALANCE, December 31, 2010
1,430,724

 
2,952,216

 
222,556

 
3,627

 
—

 
2,955,843

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
—

 
(74,156
)
 
—

 
31,470

 
—

 
(42,686
)
BALANCE, December 31, 2011
1,430,724

 
$
2,878,060

 
222,556

 
$
35,097

 
$
—

 
$
2,913,157


See accompanying notes.



F-5

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(42,686
)
 
$
(248,591
)
 
$
(436,239
)
Operating distributions received from joint ventures
110,256

 
143,022

 
68,990

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures
(95,124
)
 
93,414

 
301,829

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(4,466
)
 
—

 
979

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(2,057
)
 
2,514

 
(12,409
)
(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates
(334
)
 
(1,641
)
 
1,941

Net cash used in operating activities
(34,411
)
 
(11,282
)
 
(74,909
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net sale proceeds received from joint ventures
1,094,252

 
448,892

 
—

Investment in joint ventures
(73,467
)
 
(181,994
)
 
(26,148
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
1,020,785

 
266,898

 
(26,148
)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
986,374

 
255,616

 
(101,057
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year
704,810

 
449,194

 
550,251

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year
$
1,691,184

 
$
704,810

 
$
449,194


See accompanying notes.



F-6

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2011 , 2010 , AND 2009
1.
ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. ("Wells Partners"), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership, serving as its general partners (collectively, the "General Partners"). Wells Capital, Inc. ("Wells Capital") serves as the corporate general partner of Wells Partners. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. ("WREF"). Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the sole director and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on June 20, 1996, for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elected to have their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units. Limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; (f) authorize a merger or a consolidation of the Partnership; and (g) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets, subject to certain limitations. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.
On December 31, 1997, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $35,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act. The offering was terminated on December 30, 1998, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 1,302,942 Class A Units and 350,338 Class B Units, representing total limited partner capital contributions of $16,532,802.
The Partnership owns indirect interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont REIT"), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the "Joint Ventures") and properties:
Joint Venture
Joint Venture Partners
Ownership %
Properties
The Fund IX, Fund X,
  Fund XI and REIT Joint
  Venture (1)
("Fund IX-X-XI-REIT
  Associates")
• Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P.
• Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
• Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
• Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
39.0%
48.5%
8.8%
3.7%
1. 360 Interlocken Building (2)
A three-story office building located
in Broomfield, Colorado
 
2. Avaya Building (3)
A one-story office building located
in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Fund X and Fund XI
  Associates (1)
("Fund X-XI Associates")
• Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
• Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
58.0%
42.0%
This joint venture only owns an interest in another joint venture, Wells/Fremont Associates, and does not own any properties directly.
Wells/Fremont Associates (1)
("Fund X-XI-REIT
  Associates - Fremont")
• Fund X-XI Associates
• Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
22.5%
77.5%
3. 47300 Kato Road (4)
 A two-story warehouse and office
building located in Fremont,
California
The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-
  REIT Joint Venture
("Fund XI-XII-REIT
  Associates")
• Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
• Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.
• Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
26.1%
17.1%
56.8%
4. 20/20 Building
A three-story office building located
in Leawood, Kansas
(1)  
These joint ventures wound up their affairs in 2011 and will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012.
(2)  
This property was sold in June 2011.
(3)  
This property was sold in October 2010.
(4)  
This property was sold in August 2011.


F-7

Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. and Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. are affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. was affiliated with the Partnership through one or more common general partners prior to its dissolution. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Partnership's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
Use of Estimates
Preparation of the Partnership's financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investment in Joint Ventures
The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and concluded that none are variable interest entities. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.
Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
The Partnership continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned through the Partnership's investment in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value. The Partnership has determined that there has been no additional impairment in the carrying value of any of its real estate assets (see below for historical impairment); however, certain of the Partnership's assets may be carried at an amount more than could be realized in a current disposition transaction.
While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as little, if any, related market activity or information is available. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Partnership may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Partnership's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Partnership's assessment of


F-8

the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
In the second quarter of 2010, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates evaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of the 360 Interlocken Building pursuant to the accounting policy outlined in Note 2 above and determined that it is not recoverable, as compared to the estimated fair value, due to refining the disposition strategy for the Partnership and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset. Accordingly, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates reduced the carrying value of the 360 Interlocken Building to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows and recognized a corresponding impairment loss of approximately $1,448,000 (approximately $127,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) in the second quarter of 2010.
In the third quarter of 2009, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont evaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of the 47300 Kato Road property pursuant to the accounting policy outlined in Note 2 above and determined that it was not recoverable, as compared to the estimated fair value, as a result of shortening the estimated holding period and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing. Accordingly, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont reduced the carrying value of 47300 Kato Road to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows and recognized a corresponding impairment loss of approximately $3,316,000 (approximately $313,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) in the third quarter of 2009.
Projections of expected future cash flows require that the Partnership estimates future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment, among other factors. The subjectivity of assumptions used in the future cash flow analysis, including discount rates, could result in an incorrect assessment of the property's future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the misstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by Fund XI-XII Associates and net income (loss) of the Partnership.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximate fair value and consist of investments in money market accounts.
Other Assets
Other assets are primarily comprised of prepaid expenses and the Partnership's pro rata share of receivables assumed in connection with the liquidation of Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates and Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont. Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services are provided. Balances without a future economic benefit are written off as they are identified.
Distributions of Net Cash from Operations
Net cash from operations, if available and unless reserved, is generally distributed quarterly to the limited partners as follows:
•
First, to all limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis until such limited partners have received distributions equal to a 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined.
•
Second, to the General Partners until the General Partners have received distributions equal to 10% of the total cumulative distributions paid by the Partnership.
•
Third, to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis and the General Partners allocated on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.
No distributions of net cash from operations will be made to limited partners holding Class B Units.






F-9

Distribution of Net Sale Proceeds
Upon sales of properties, unless reserved, net sale proceeds will be distributed in the following order:
•
In the event that the particular property sold is sold for a price that is less than its original property purchase price, to the limited partners holding Class A Units until they have received an amount equal to the excess of the original property purchase price over the price for which the property was sold, limited to the amount of depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery deductions taken by the limited partners holding Class B Units with respect to such property;
•
To limited partners holding units which at any time have been treated as Class B Units until the limited partners have received an amount necessary to equal the net cash from operations previously distributed to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis;
•
To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined;
•
To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received a cumulative 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined;
•
To limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their respective preferential limited partner return (defined as the sum of a 10% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class A Units and a 15% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class B Units);
•
To the General Partners until they have received 100% of their capital contributions, as defined;
•
Then, if limited partners have received any excess limited partner distributions (defined as distributions to limited partners over the life of their investment in the Partnership in excess of their net capital contributions, as defined, plus their preferential limited partner return), to the General Partners until they have received distributions equal to 20% of the sum of any such excess limited partner distributions plus distributions made to the General Partners pursuant to this provision; and
•
Thereafter, 80% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 20% to the General Partners.
Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale
For the purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery and the gain on the sale of assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportion that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners holding Class A Units and the General Partners. To the extent the Partnership's net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, such excess net income will be allocated 99% to the limited partners holding Class A Units and 1% to the General Partners.
Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter, to the General Partners.
Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership's properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement, (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, and (c) allocations to limited partners holding Class B Units in amounts equal to the deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.
Income Taxes
The Partnership is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their individual income tax returns.



F-10

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASU 2010-6"). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Partnership's financial statements or disclosures.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement Topic Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs ("ASU 2011-04"). ASU 2011-04 converges the GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards definition of "fair value," the requirements for measuring amounts at fair value, and disclosures about these measurements. The update does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 was effective for the Partnership on December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Partnership's financial statements or disclosures.
3.
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
Due from Joint Ventures
As of December 31, 2010 , due from joint ventures represents the Partnership's share of the operating cash flow to be distributed from Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates for the fourth quarter of 2010 .
Summary of Investments
The Partnership's investments and approximate ownership percentages in the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:
 
2011
 
2010
 
Amount
 
Percentage
 
Amount
 
Percentage
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates
$
—

 
9%
 
$
592,016

 
9%
Fund X-XI Associates
—

 
42%
 
325,056

 
42%
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates
1,230,659

 
26%
 
1,322,544

 
26%
 
$
1,230,659

 
 
 
$
2,239,616

 
 
Summary of Activity
Rollforwards of the Partnership's investment in the Joint Ventures for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:
 
2011
 
2010
Investment in Joint Ventures, beginning of year
$
2,239,616

 
$
2,731,688

Equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures
95,124

 
(93,414
)
Contributions to Joint Ventures
73,467

 
181,994

Distributions from Joint Ventures
(1,177,548
)
 
(580,652
)
Investment in Joint Ventures, end of year
$
1,230,659

 
$
2,239,616






F-11

Summary of Financial Information
Condensed financial information for the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 , and for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 is presented below:
 
Total Assets
 
Total Liabilities
 
Total Equity
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates
$
5,006,337

 
$
5,322,362

 
$
299,609

 
$
264,239

 
$
4,706,728

 
$
5,058,123

Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates and Fund X-XI Associates wound up their affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing any residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates and Fund X-XI Associates will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act upon filing final tax returns.
 
Total Assets
 
Total Liabilities
 
Total Net Assets in Liquidation (1)(2)
 
Total Equity
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT
  Associates
$
—

 
$
7,218,303

 
$
—

 
$
481,567

 
$
—

 
$
6,736,736

Fund X-XI Associates
—

 
773,945

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
773,945

 
$
—

 
$
7,992,248

 
$
—

 
$
481,567

 
$
—

 
$
7,510,681

(1)  
Effective July 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts.
(2)  
Effective October 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, Fund X-XI Associates adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts.
 
Total Revenues (1)
 
Income (Loss) From
Continuing Operations (1)
 
Income (Loss) From
Discontinued Operations (1)
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Fund IX-X-XI-
  REIT
  Associates
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(24,668
)
 
$
(38,736
)
 
$
(16,142
)
 
$
1,335,377

 
$
(850,397
)
 
$
(1,401
)
 
$
1,310,709

 
$
(889,133
)
 
$
(17,543
)
Fund X-XI
  Associates
—

 
—

 
—

 
(22,621
)
 
4,741

 
(690,703
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(22,621
)
 
4,741

 
(690,703
)
Fund XI-XII-
  REIT
  Associates
1,208,553

 
1,181,317

 
1,198,983

 
(40,421
)
 
(66,017
)
 
(39,300
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(40,421
)
 
(66,017
)
 
(39,300
)
 
$
1,208,553

 
$
1,181,317

 
$
1,198,983

 
$
(87,710
)
 
$
(100,012
)
 
$
(746,145
)
 
$
1,335,377

 
$
(850,397
)
 
$
(1,401
)
 
$
1,247,667

 
$
(950,409
)
 
$
(747,546
)
(1)  
Prior-period amounts adjusted to conform with current-period presentation, including classifying revenues and income (loss) generated by the 360 Interlocken Building as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing any residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act upon filing its final tax return.





F-12

The following information summarizes the financial position of Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont in which the Partnership held an interest through its interest in Fund X-XI Associates as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 :
 
Total Assets
 
Total Liabilities
 
Total Net Assets in Liquidation (1)
 
Total Equity
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Fund X-XI-REIT
  Associates - Fremont
$
—

 
$
3,496,614

 
$
—

 
$
56,215

 
$
—

 
$
3,440,399

(1)  
Effective October 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts.
 
Total Revenues (1)
 
Loss From
Continuing Operations (1)
 
Income (Loss) From
Discontinued Operations (1)
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
For the Years Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Fund X-XI-
  REIT
  Associates -
  Fremont
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(14,269
)
 
$
(20,674
)
 
$
(15,147
)
 
$
(86,305
)
 
$
41,749

 
$
(3,055,203
)
 
$
(100,574
)
 
$
21,075

 
$
(3,070,350
)
(1)  
Prior-period amounts adjusted to conform with current-period presentation, including classifying revenues and income (loss) generated by 47300 Kato Road as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The Partnership allocates its share of net income, net loss, and gain on sale generated by the properties owned by the Joint Ventures to its Class A and Class B limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by the Joint Ventures are provided below:
 
December 31, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
December 31, 2009
 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Gain
on Sale
 
Total
 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Impairment
Loss
 
Gain
on Sale
 
Total
 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Impairment
Loss
 
Total
Fund IX-X-XI-
  REIT
  Associates
$
108,434

 
$
1,226,943

 
$
1,335,377

 
$
(86,656
)
 
$
(1,448,217
)
 
$
684,476

 
$
(850,397
)
 
$
(1,401
)
 
$
—

 
$
(1,401
)
Fund X-XI-
  REIT
  Associates –
  Fremont
(177,510
)
 
91,205

 
(86,305
)
 
41,749

 
—

 
—

 
41,749

 
260,530

 
(3,315,733
)
 
(3,055,203
)
 
$
(69,076
)
 
$
1,318,148

 
$
1,249,072

 
$
(44,907
)
 
$
(1,448,217
)
 
$
684,476

 
$
(808,648
)
 
$
259,129

 
$
(3,315,733
)
 
$
(3,056,604
)

4.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management and Leasing Fees
The Partnership entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnership's properties owned through the Joint Ventures, equal to (a) 2.5% for management services and 2% for leasing services of the gross revenues collected monthly (aggregate maximum of 4.5%), plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm's-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) in the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net basis (10 or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, are included in equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations.


F-13

The Partnership's share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells Management is $2,813 , $4,512 , and $6,731 for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively.
Administrative Reimbursements
Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, one of the Partnership's General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The Partnership incurred administrative expenses of $65,724 , $79,971 , and $71,468 payable to Wells Capital and Wells Management for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. In addition, Wells Capital and Wells Management pay for certain operating expenses of the Partnership ("bill-backs") directly and invoice the Partnership for the reimbursement thereof on a quarterly basis. As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 , represents administrative reimbursements and bill-backs due to Wells Capital and/or Wells Management.
Conflicts of Interest

Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, is also a general partner or advisor of other public real estate investment programs sponsored by WREF. As such, in connection with serving as a general partner or advisor for other WREF-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may encounter conflicts of interest with regard to allocating human resources and making decisions related to investments, operations, and disposition-related activities.

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, presently styled In re Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Securities Litigation , in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT; Leo F. Wells, III, one of the Partnership's General Partners; Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, the Partnership's other General Partner; Wells Management, the Partnership's property manager; certain affiliates of WREF; the directors of Piedmont REIT; and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007.
The complaint alleged, among other things, violations of the federal proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction.
On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempted to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who received and were entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT.
On March 31, 2008, the Court granted in part the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Court dismissed five of the seven counts of the amended complaint in their entirety. The Court dismissed the remaining two counts with the exception of allegations regarding the failure to disclose in the Piedmont REIT proxy statement details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. On April 21, 2008, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which alleges violations of the federal proxy rules based upon allegations that the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction omitted details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages, to nullify and rescind the internalization transaction, and to cancel and rescind any stock issued to the defendants as consideration for the internalization transaction. On May 12, 2008, the defendants answered and raised certain defenses to the second amended complaint. Since the filing of the second amended complaint, the plaintiff has said it intends to seek monetary damages of approximately $159 million plus prejudgment interest.
On June 23, 2008, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On September 16, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for class certification. On September 20, 2009, the defendants filed a petition for permission to appeal immediately the Court's order granting the motion for class certification with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition for permission to appeal was denied on October 30, 2009.
On April 13, 2009, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the second amended complaint to add additional defendants. The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend on June 23, 2009.


F-14

On December 4, 2009, the parties filed motions for summary judgment. On August 2, 2010, the Court entered an order denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment and granting, in part, the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court ruled that the question of whether certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT constituted "material" information required to be disclosed in the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction raises questions of fact that must be determined at trial.
On November 17, 2011, the court issued rulings granting several of the plaintiff's motions in limine to prohibit the defendants from introducing certain evidence, including evidence of the defendants' reliance on advice from their outside legal and financial advisors, and limiting the defendants' ability to relate their subjective views, considerations, and observations during the trial of the case. On February 23, 2012, the Court granted several of the defendants' motions, including a motion for reconsideration regarding a motion the plaintiff had filed seeking exclusion of certain evidence impacting damages, and motions seeking exclusion of certain evidence proposed to be submitted by the plaintiff. The suit has been removed from the Court's trial calendar pending resolution of a request for interlocutory appellate review of certain legal rulings made by the Court.
Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Although WREF believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims of liability and damages in these actions, WREF is unable at this time to predict the outcome of these actions or reasonably estimate a range of damages, or how any liability and responsibility for damages might be allocated among the 17 defendants in the action, which includes 11 defendants not affiliated with Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, or Wells Management. The ultimate resolution of these matters could have a material adverse impact on WREF's financial results, financial condition, or liquidity.
5.
ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY
The Partnership has engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of its properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days' written notice. As a result of these relationships, the Partnership is dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.
Wells Capital, Wells Management, and Wells Investment Securities, Inc. ("WIS") are owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, the Partnership focuses on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, the Partnership might be required to find alternative service providers.
Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as distribution income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont REIT, which was acquired in connection with the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction (see "Assertion of Legal Action Against Related Parties" above). As of December 31, 2011 , the Partnership has no reason to believe that WREF does not have access to adequate liquidity and capital resources, including cash flow generated from operations, cash on hand, other investments, and borrowing capacity necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.
The Partnership is also dependent upon the ability of its current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as they become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would be likely to have a negative impact on the Partnership's results of operations. The Partnership is not currently aware of any reason why its existing tenants should not be able to pay their contractual rental amounts as they become due in all material respects. Situations preventing the tenants from paying contractual rents could result in a material adverse impact on the Partnership's results of operations.
6.
PER-UNIT AMOUNTS
Income (loss) per limited partnership unit amounts are calculated based upon weighted-average units outstanding during the respective periods. Income (loss) per limited partnership unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, will vary from the per-unit amounts attributable to the individual limited partners due to the differences between the GAAP and tax basis treatment of certain items of income and expense and the fact that, within the respective classes of Class A Units and Class B Units, individual units have different characteristics including capital bases, cumulative operating and net property sales proceeds distributions, and cumulative earnings allocations as a result of, among other things, the ability of limited partners to elect that their units be treated as Class A Units or Class B Units, or to change their prior elections, on a quarterly basis.


F-15

For the reasons mentioned above, distributions of net sale proceeds per unit also vary among individual limited partners. Distributions of net sale proceeds have been calculated at the investor level pursuant to the partnership agreement and allocated between the Class A and Class B limited partners in the period paid. Accordingly, distributions of net sale proceeds per unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, vary from the per-unit amounts attributable to the individual limited partners.
7.
INCOME TAX BASIS NET INCOME AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
A reconciliation of the Partnership's financial statement net loss to net loss presented in accordance with the federal income tax basis of accounting is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 :
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Financial statement net loss
$
(42,686
)
 
$
(248,591
)
 
$
(436,239
)
Adjustments in net income (loss) resulting from:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes
17,490

 
13,625

 
18,007

Amortization expense for financial reporting purposes less than amounts for income tax purposes
(44,350
)
 
—

 
—

Bad debt expense for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes
—

 
—

 
(3,386
)
Rental income accrued for financial reporting purposes less than amounts for income tax purposes
5,491

 
27,630

 
23,500

Gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of income tax purposes
(475,871
)
 
(16,368
)
 
—

Impairment losses taken for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes
—

 
127,278

 
313,189

Other
(36,562
)
 
23,975

 
4,363

Income tax basis net loss
$
(576,488
)
 
$
(72,451
)
 
$
(80,566
)
A reconciliation of the partners' capital balances, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, to partners' capital balances, as presented in accordance with the federal income tax basis of accounting, is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 :
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Financial statement partners' capital
$
2,913,157

 
$
2,955,843

 
$
3,204,434

Increase (decrease) in partners' capital resulting from:
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated meals and entertainment
556

 
556

 
556

Accumulated bad debt expense, net, for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes
86

 
86

 
86

Accumulated depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes
1,047,559

 
1,030,069

 
1,016,444

Amortization expense for financial reporting purposes less than amounts for income tax purposes
(44,350
)
 
—

 
—

Capitalization of syndication costs for income tax purposes, which are accounted for as cost of capital for financial reporting purposes
2,035,389

 
2,035,389

 
2,035,389

Accumulated rental income accrued for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes
(256,527
)
 
(262,018
)
 
(289,648
)
Accumulated expenses deductible when paid for income tax purposes less than amounts accrued for financial reporting purposes
1,981

 
1,981

 
1,981

Accumulated gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes
(984,190
)
 
(508,319
)
 
(491,951
)
Accumulated impairment losses taken for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes
1,433,135

 
1,433,135

 
1,305,857

Equity adjustment for South Carolina nonresident withholding tax treated as a distribution for income tax purposes
(38,021
)
 
(38,021
)
 
(38,021
)
Other
(64,692
)
 
(28,130
)
 
(52,105
)
Income tax basis partners' capital
$
6,044,083

 
$
6,620,571

 
$
6,693,022




F-16

8.
QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
A summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below:
 
2011 Quarter Ended
 
March 31
 
June 30
 
September 30
 
December 31
Equity in income (loss) of joint venture
$
(5,977
)
 
$
106,165

 
$
902

 
$
(5,966
)
Interest and other income
$
419

 
$
503

 
$
901

 
$
851

Net income (loss)
$
(56,316
)
 
$
76,483

 
$
(27,153
)
 
$
(35,700
)
Net income (loss) allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A limited partners
$
(52,689
)
 
$
(21,467
)
 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B limited partners
$
(3,627
)
 
$
97,950

 
$
(27,153
)
 
$
(35,700
)
General partners
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Net income (loss) per weighted-average limited
  partner unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A (a)
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.44

 
$
(0.12
)
 
$
(0.16
)
Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average
  limited partner unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Distribution of net property sale proceeds per
  weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—


 
2010 Quarter Ended
 
March 31
 
June 30
 
September 30
 
December 31
Equity in income (loss) of joint venture
$
5,151

 
$
(122,549
)
 
$
(10,741
)
 
$
34,725

Interest and other income
$
254

 
$
252

 
$
256

 
$
444

Net loss
$
(41,072
)
 
$
(160,968
)
 
$
(40,031
)
 
$
(6,520
)
Net income (loss) allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A limited partners
$
(41,072
)
 
$
(160,968
)
 
$
(39,087
)
 
$
(10,147
)
Class B limited partners
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(944
)
 
$
3,627

General partners
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Net income (loss) per weighted-average limited partner
  unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.11
)
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.01
)
Class B (a)
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.02

Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average
  limited partner unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Distribution of net property sale proceeds per
  weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Class B
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

(a)  
The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual income (loss) for the respective quarters. Conversely, the corresponding annual income (loss) per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that income (loss) was earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective annual per-unit amount presented in the accompanying financial statements.


F-17

9.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
General and administrative costs for the years ended December 31, 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , are composed of the following items:
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Salary reimbursements
$
65,724

 
$
79,971

 
$
71,468

Independent accounting fees
28,567

 
28,428

 
17,026

Printing expenses
23,004

 
25,504

 
23,148

Legal fees
11,014

 
10,742

 
13,086

Postage and delivery expenses
5,314

 
6,157

 
7,823

Bank service charges
1,880

 
812

 
163

Computer costs
1,595

 
1,678

 
1,585

Taxes and licensing fees
1,297

 
800

 
800

Registration and filing fees
908

 
914

 
574

Other professional fees
868

 
1,377

 
660

Other general and administrative expenses
313

 
—

 
—

Total general and administrative costs
$
140,484

 
$
156,383

 
$
136,333

10.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Partnership and its General Partners are parties to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. The Partnership is not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us.



F-18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






The General Partners of
The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") as of December 31, 2010 , and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 . Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture as of December 31, 2010 , and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia
March 22, 2011



F-19

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

AND

BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010

 
December 31, 2011 (unaudited)
 
December 31, 2010
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate assets, at cost:
 
 
 
Land
$
—

 
$
1,650,070

Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $0 and $3,356,998 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
—

 
4,781,248

Total real estate assets, net
—

 
6,431,318

 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
—

 
89,265

Tenant receivables
—

 
112,297

Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $0 and $44,138 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
—

 
528,149

Other assets
—

 
57,274

Total assets
$
—

 
$
7,218,303

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and refundable security deposits
$
—

 
$
228,631

Accrued capital expenditures and deferred leasing costs
—

 
205,844

Due to affiliates
—

 
106

Deferred income
—

 
46,986

Total liabilities
—

 
481,567

Total net assets in liquidation
$
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P.
 
 
2,629,381

Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
 
 
3,266,719

Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
 
 
592,015

Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
 
248,621

Total partners' capital

 
6,736,736

Total liabilities and partners' capital


 
$
7,218,303


See accompanying notes.





F-20

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION

FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2011 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

 
2011 (unaudited)
Balance, July 1, 2011
$
30,250

Changes in net assets in liquidation attributable to:
 
Net loss
(19,780
)
Distributions to joint venture partners
(10,470
)
Balance, December 31, 2011
$
—

See accompanying notes.




F-21

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 (unaudited)
 
2010
 
2009
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
$
20,626

 
$
38,736

 
$
16,142

Total expenses
20,626

 
38,736

 
16,142

Net Loss From Continuing Operations
(20,626
)
 
(38,736
)
 
(16,142
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discontinued Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
122,363

 
(86,656
)
 
(1,401
)
Impairment loss
—

 
(1,448,217
)
 
—

Gain on disposition
1,228,752

 
684,476

 
—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
1,351,115

 
(850,397
)
 
(1,401
)
Net Income (Loss)
$
1,330,489

 
$
(889,133
)
 
$
(17,543
)
See accompanying notes.





F-22

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
Wells Real Estate
Fund IX, L.P.
 
Wells Real Estate
Fund X, L.P.
 
Wells Real Estate
Fund XI, L.P.
 
Piedmont
Operating Partnership, LP
 
Total
Partners'
Capital
Balance, December 31, 2008
$
4,307,537

 
$
5,351,647

 
$
969,890

 
$
407,254

 
$
11,036,328

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(6,847
)
 
(8,507
)
 
(1,542
)
 
(647
)
 
(17,543
)
Partnership distributions
(84,015
)
 
(104,379
)
 
(18,918
)
 
(7,942
)
 
(215,254
)
Balance, December 31, 2009
4,216,675

 
5,238,761

 
949,430

 
398,665

 
10,803,531

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(347,034
)
 
(431,152
)
 
(78,143
)
 
(32,804
)
 
(889,133
)
Partnership contributions
753,291

 
935,882

 
169,620

 
71,207

 
1,930,000

Partnership distributions
(1,993,551
)
 
(2,476,772
)
 
(448,892
)
 
(188,447
)
 
(5,107,662
)
Balance, December 31, 2010
2,629,381

 
3,266,719

 
592,015

 
248,621

 
6,736,736

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
519,298

 
645,172

 
116,931

 
49,088

 
1,330,489

Partnership contributions
253,699

 
315,193

 
57,126

 
23,982

 
650,000

Partnership distributions
(3,390,578
)
 
(4,212,427
)
 
(763,464
)
 
(320,506
)
 
(8,686,975
)
Balance, June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
$
11,800

 
$
14,657

 
$
2,608

 
$
1,185

 
$
30,250

See accompanying notes.





F-23

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
(unaudited)
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
1,330,489

 
$
(889,133
)
 
$
(17,543
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Gain on disposition
(1,228,752
)
 
(684,476
)
 
—

Depreciation
122,418

 
342,883

 
354,010

Amortization
25,516

 
101,166

 
82,411

Impairment loss
—

 
1,448,217

 
—

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in tenant receivables
(263,948
)
 
(60,156
)
 
37,314

Decrease (increase) in other assets
52,504

 
(44,277
)
 
3,313

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(218,737
)
 
6,845

 
(44,144
)
Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates
6,156

 
(6,002
)
 
(4,010
)
(Decrease) increase in deferred income
(46,986
)
 
29,579

 
(12,297
)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(221,340
)
 
244,646

 
399,054

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net proceeds from sale of real estate
8,686,975

 
5,107,662

 
—

Investment in real estate assets
(491,622
)
 
(1,426,239
)
 
(173,332
)
Payment of deferred leasing costs
(1,978
)
 
(822,442
)
 
(117,640
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
8,193,375

 
2,858,981

 
(290,972
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Contribution from joint venture partners
650,000

 
1,930,000

 
—

Net sale proceeds distributions to joint venture partners
(8,686,975
)
 
(5,107,662
)
 
—

Operating distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings
—

 
—

 
(215,254
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(8,036,975
)
 
(3,177,662
)
 
(215,254
)
Net Decrease In Cash And Cash Equivalents
(64,940
)
 
(74,035
)
 
(107,172
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash And Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
89,265

 
163,300

 
270,472

Cash And Cash Equivalents, end of period
$
24,325

 
$
89,265

 
$
163,300

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure Of Noncash Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Accrued capital expenditures and deferred leasing costs
$
—

 
$
205,844

 
$
—

See accompanying notes.




F-24

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED), DECEMBER 31, 2010 , AND 2009

1.
ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

In March 1997, Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. ("Fund IX") entered into a Georgia general partnership with Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. ("Fund X") to form Fund IX and Fund X Associates ("Fund IX-X Associates") for the purpose of acquiring, developing, operating, and selling real properties. On March 20, 1997, Fund IX contributed a 5.62-acre tract of real property in Knoxville, Tennessee, and improvements thereon to Fund IX-X Associates on which an approximately 84,000 square foot, three-story office building, the Alstom Power - Knoxville Building, was constructed and commenced operations. On February 13, 1998, Fund IX-X Associates purchased an approximately 107,000 square foot, two-story office building, 1315 West Century Drive, in Louisville, Colorado. On March 20, 1998, Fund IX-X Associates purchased an approximately 52,000 square foot, three-story office building, the 360 Interlocken Building, in Broomfield, Colorado. On June 11, 1998, Fund IX-X Associates was amended and restated as The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") upon admitting Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. ("Fund XI") and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont REIT"), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. On June 24, 1998, the Joint Venture purchased an approximately 57,000 square foot, one-story office building, the Avaya Building, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On April 1, 1998, Fund X purchased an approximately 108,000 square-foot, one-story office and warehouse building, the Iomega Building, in Ogden, Utah. In 1998, Fund X contributed the Iomega Building to the Joint Venture. Ownership interests were recomputed based on the relative cumulative capital contributions from the joint venture partners.

On March 15, 2005, the Joint Venture sold the Alstom Power -Knoxville Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sales price of $12,000,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $11,646,000 and recognized a gain of approximately $5,032,000.

On December 22, 2006, the Joint Venture sold 1315 West Century Drive to an unrelated third party for a gross sales price of $8,325,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $8,060,000. As of September 30, 2006, the Joint Venture recognized an impairment loss of approximately $354,000 in order to reduce the carrying value of 1315 West Century Drive to its estimated fair value, less costs to sell, and recognized an additional loss on sale of approximately $148,000.
On January 31, 2007, the Joint Venture sold the Iomega Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $4,867,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,685,000 and recognized a gain of approximately $178,000.

On October 15, 2010, the Joint Venture sold the Avaya Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $5,300,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $5,108,000 and recognized a gain of approximately $684,000.

On June 2, 2011, the Joint Venture sold the 360 Interlocken Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $9,150,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $8,685,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $1,227,000. In the second quarter of 2010, the Joint Venture recognized an impairment loss of approximately $1,448,000 in order to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows primarily due to refining the disposition strategy for the Joint Venture and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset in second quarter of 2010.

2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Joint Venture has disposed of all of its real estate assets and does not intend to invest in additional properties. The Joint Venture wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing all residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. The Joint Venture will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act.


F-25

The Joint Venture's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Effective July 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, the Joint Venture adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts, respectively, and statements of operations and statements of cash flows are no longer presented.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Joint Venture's financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets were stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consisted of the cost of acquisition or construction, application of acquisition fees incurred, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extended the useful life of the related asset. The Joint Venture considered the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments had a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements were written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance were expensed as incurred.
The Joint Venture's real estate assets were depreciated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Buildings
40 years
Building improvements
5-25 years
Land improvements
20 years
Tenant improvements
Shorter of lease term or economic life

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
Management continually monitored events and changes in circumstances that could have indicated that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned by the Joint Venture may not have been recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment were present, which suggested that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assessed the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale did not exceed the respective assets' carrying values, management adjusted the real estate assets to the respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognized an impairment loss. Estimated fair values were determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.
While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Joint Venture may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Joint Venture's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date.   In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Joint Venture's assessment


F-26

of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety required judgment, and considered factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Venture's outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.
In connection with recurring quarterly review processes, the Joint Venture evaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of the 360 Interlocken Building pursuant to the accounting policy outlined above and determined that it was not recoverable, as compared to the estimated fair value, due to refining the disposition strategy for the Joint Venture and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset in second quarter of 2010. Accordingly, the Joint Venture reduced the carrying value of the 360 Interlocken Building to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows and recognized a corresponding impairment loss of approximately $1,448,000 in the second quarter of 2010. The fair value measurements used in this evaluation of nonfinancial assets for the 360 Interlocken Building were considered to be Level 3 valuations within the fair value hierarchy outlined above, as there were significant unobservable inputs. Examples of inputs that the Joint Venture utilized in its fair value calculations include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices. In addition, the Joint Venture assigned an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Joint Venture's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Joint Venture considered all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Tenant Receivables
Tenant receivables were comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due from tenants and the cumulative amount of future adjustments necessary to present rental income using the straight-line method. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables were written off to lease termination expense. Tenant receivables were recorded at the original amount earned, less an allowance for any doubtful accounts, which approximates fair value. Management assessed the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provided for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. No such allowances were recorded as of December 31, 2010 .
Deferred Leasing Costs, net
Deferred leasing costs included (i) costs incurred to procure leases, which were capitalized and recognized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the lease, and (ii) common area maintenance costs that were recoverable from tenants under the terms of the existing leases; such costs were capitalized and recognized as operating expenses over the shorter of the lease term or the recovery period provided for in the lease. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred leasing costs were written-off to lease termination expense.
Other Assets
Other assets as of December 31, 2010 , was comprised of the following items:
 
2010
Refundable security deposits
$
51,689

Prepaid expenses
5,585

Total
$
57,274


Refundable security deposits represented cash deposits received from tenants. Pursuant to the respective leases, the Joint Venture could have applied such balances toward unpaid receivable balances or property damages, where applicable, and was obligated to refund any residual balances to the tenants upon the expiration of the related lease terms. Prepaid expenses were primarily comprised of prepaid insurance and contract labor costs. Prepaid expenses were recognized in the period in which coverage/service is provided. Balances without a future economic benefit were written off as they are identified.



F-27

Allocation of Income and Distributions
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions were allocated to the joint venture partners based on their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI, and Piedmont OP held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 39%, 48%, 9%, and 4%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 . Net cash from operations was generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.
Revenue Recognition
The Joint Venture's leases typically included renewal options, escalation provisions, and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint Venture for a pro rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Venture's leases were classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on the Consumer Price Index) was recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Tenant reimbursements were recognized as revenue in the period that the related operating cost is incurred and were billed to tenants pursuant to the terms of the underlying leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance were recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets. Lease termination income was recognized when the tenant lost the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture satisfied all obligations under the related lease or lease termination agreement.
The Joint Venture recorded the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for real estate sales. Accordingly, gains were recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the gain was deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses were recognized in full as of the sale date.
Income Taxes
The Joint Venture was not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI, and Piedmont OP are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASU 2010-6"). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Joint Venture on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Joint Venture's financial statements or disclosures.










F-28

3.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management and Leasing Fees
Fund IX, Fund X, and Fund XI are parties to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of each of their respective general partners.
The various fees payable under each of the respective agreements are summarized as follows:
 
Management Services
Leasing Services
Management and Leasing Services- Industrial and Commercial properties leased on a net basis for 10 years or more
Fund IX
3% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 3% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Fund X
3% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 3% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Fund XI
2.5% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 2% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.

Management and leasing fees were recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned agreements, weighted based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees payable to Wells Management, of $6,031, $25,092, and $43,466, respectively, which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.
In addition, the Joint Venture incurred fees payable to Piedmont Office Management, LLC ("Piedmont Management"), or its affiliates, for the management and leasing of the Joint Venture's properties equal to (a) the lesser of 4.5% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or 0.6% of net asset value calculated on an annual basis, (b) prorated by Piedmont OP's ownership interest in the Joint Venture. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees payable to Piedmont Management, or its affiliates, of $231, $961, and $1,665, respectively, which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.
Administrative Reimbursements
Wells Management performs certain administrative services for the Joint Venture, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incurs the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among these entities based on the amount of time spent on the respective entities by individual personnel. In the opinion of management, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , the Joint Venture incurred administrative expenses of $25, $20,098, and $31,205, respectively, payable to Wells Management, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.



F-29

Due to Affiliates
Due to affiliates as of December 31, 2010 represented amounts due to Piedmont Management and/or Wells Management for administrative reimbursements.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In accordance with GAAP, the Joint Venture has classified the results of operations related to the Avaya Building, which was sold on October 15, 2010 and the 360 Interlocken Building, which was sold on June 2, 2011, as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations. The details comprising income (loss) from discontinued operations are presented below:
 
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2011
 (unaudited)
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2009
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
308,677

 
$
848,428

 
$
1,034,260

Tenant reimbursements
226,001

 
60,684

 
26,902

Total revenues
534,678

 
909,112

 
1,061,162

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
237,946

 
451,683

 
493,561

Management and leasing fees:
 
 
 
 
 
Related-party
6,262

 
26,053

 
45,131

Other
10,322

 
21,600

 
21,600

Depreciation
122,418

 
342,883

 
354,010

Amortization
25,516

 
74,483

 
82,411

General and administrative
9,851

 
79,066

 
65,850

Total expenses
412,315

 
995,768

 
1,062,563

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
122,363

 
(86,656
)
 
(1,401
)
Impairment loss
—

 
(1,448,217
)
 
—

Gain on disposition
1,228,752

 
684,476

 
—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
1,351,115

 
$
(850,397
)
 
$
(1,401
)



F-30

THE FUND IX, FUND X, FUND XI AND REIT JOINT VENTURE

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
$
15,274,245

 
$
4,431,258

 
 
 
 
Additions
168,389

 
354,010

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
15,442,634

 
4,785,268

 
 
 
 
Additions
1,631,776

 
342,883

Impairment (1)
(1,448,217
)
 
—

Dispositions
(5,837,877
)
 
(1,771,153
)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010
9,788,316

 
3,356,998

 
 
 
 
Additions
285,778

 
122,418

Dispositions
(10,074,094
)
 
(3,479,416
)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
$
—

 
$
—

(1)
As of June 30, 2010, The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI, and REIT Joint Venture wrote down the basis of the 360 Interlocken Building to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value due to refining the disposition strategy for the joint venture and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset in second quarter of 2010.






F-31

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The General Partners of
Fund X and Fund XI Associates:


We have audited the statement of net assets in liquidation of Fund X and Fund XI Associates (the “Joint Venture”) as of December 31, 2011 and the related statement of changes in net assets in liquidation for the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.  In addition, we have audited the statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Joint Venture's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Joint Venture disposed of all of its real estate assets during 2011.  Accordingly, the Joint Venture has changed its basis of accounting for periods subsequent to October 1, 2011 (the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets) from the going concern basis to the liquidation basis.

In our opinion, the financial statements, referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation of Fund X and Fund XI Associates as of December 31, 2011, the changes in its net assets in liquidation for the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles applied on the bases described in the preceding paragraph.

/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2012




F-32

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

AND

BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)


 
December 31, 2011
 
December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
Investment in Wells/Fremont Associates
$
—

 
$
773,945

Due from Wells/Fremont Associates
—

 
—

Total assets
$
—

 
$
773,945

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Partnership distributions payable
$
—

 
$
—

Total liabilities
—

 
—

Total net assets in liquidation
$
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.
 
 
448,889

Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
 
 
325,056

Total partners' capital
 
 
773,945

Total liabilities and partners' capital
 
 
$
773,945



See accompanying notes.





F-33

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION

FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2011 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2011

 
2011
Balance, October 1, 2011
$
5,577

Changes in net assets in liquidation attributable to:
 
Net loss
(5,577
)
              Balance, December 31, 2011
$
—


See accompanying notes.




F-34

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
For the Nine
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
2010
(unaudited)
 
2009
Equity In Income (Loss) Of Wells/Fremont Associates
$
(17,044
)
 
$
4,741

 
$
(690,703
)
Net Income (Loss)
$
(17,044
)
 
$
4,741

 
$
(690,703
)


See accompanying notes.




F-35

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND 2009


 
Wells Real Estate
Fund X, L.P.
 
Wells Real Estate
Fund XI, L.P.
 
Total
Partners'
Capital
Balance, December 31, 2008 (unaudited)
$
910,369

 
$
658,903

 
$
1,569,272

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(400,692
)
 
(290,011
)
 
(690,703
)
Partnership distributions
(54,444
)
 
(39,244
)
 
(93,688
)
Balance, December 31, 2009
455,233

 
329,648

 
784,881

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
2,750

 
1,991

 
4,741

Partnership contributions
17,097

 
12,373

 
29,470

Partnership distributions
(26,191
)
 
(18,956
)
 
(45,147
)
Balance, December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
448,889

 
325,056

 
773,945

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(9,888
)
 
(7,156
)
 
(17,044
)
Partnership contributions
22,577

 
16,341

 
38,918

Partnership distributions
(458,437
)
 
(331,805
)
 
(790,242
)
Balance, September 30, 2011
$
3,141

 
$
2,436

 
$
5,577



See accompanying notes.




F-36

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
Nine Months
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
Ended
September 30, 2011
 
2010
(unaudited)
 
2009
Cash Flows From Continuing Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(17,044
)
 
$
4,741

 
$
(690,703
)
Operating distributions received from Wells/Fremont Associates
2,041

 
69,194

 
91,545

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in (income) loss of Wells/Fremont Associates
17,044

 
(4,741
)
 
690,703

Net cash provided by operating activities
2,041

 
69,194

 
91,545

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net sale proceeds received from Wells/Fremont Associates
788,201

 
—

 
—

Investment in Wells/Fremont Associates
(38,918
)
 
(29,470
)
 
—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
749,283

 
(29,470
)
 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Contribution from joint venture partners
38,918

 
29,470

 
—

Net sale proceeds distributions to joint venture partners
(788,201
)
 
—

 
—

Operating distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings
(2,041
)
 
(69,194
)
 
(91,545
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(751,324
)
 
(39,724
)
 
(91,545
)
Net Change In Cash And Cash Equivalents
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash And Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
—

 
—

 
—

Cash And Cash Equivalents, end of period
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure Of Noncash Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Partnership distributions payable
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
24,047



See accompanying notes.





F-37

FUND X AND FUND XI ASSOCIATES

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 , 2010 (UNAUDITED), AND 2009

1.
ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
On July 15, 1998, Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. ("Fund X") and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. ("Fund XI"), entered into a Georgia general partnership to create Fund X and Fund XI Associates (the "Joint Venture"). The general partners of Fund X and Fund XI are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P., a private Georgia limited partnership. The Joint Venture was formed for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, and selling real properties.
In July 1998, Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P., entered into a joint venture agreement with Wells Development Corporation, referred to as Wells/Fremont Associates, which acquired an approximately 58,000 square foot two-story manufacturing and office building, 47300 Kato Road, located in Fremont, California. During 1998, the Joint Venture acquired Wells Development Corporation's interest in Wells/Fremont Associates, which resulted in the Joint Venture becoming a joint venture partner with Piedmont OP.
In July 1998, Piedmont OP entered into a joint venture agreement with Wells Development Corporation, referred to as Wells/Orange County Associates, which acquired an approximately 52,000 square foot warehouse and office building, the Cort Building, located in Fountain Valley, California. During 1998, the Joint Venture acquired Wells Development Corporation's interest in Wells/Orange County Associates, which resulted in the Joint Venture becoming a joint venture partner with Piedmont OP. On September 11, 2003, Wells/Orange County Associates sold the Cort Building to an unrelated third party for a gross selling price of $5,770,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a loss of approximately $213,000 and received net sale proceeds of approximately $3,134,000. Wells/Orange County Associates wound up its affairs in 2004 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing any residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. Wells/Orange County Associates was terminated during 2005 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act.
On August 25, 2011, the Wells/Fremont Associates sold the 47300 Kato Road property to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $3,824,553. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $3,504,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $91,000. Wells/Fremont Associates wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing any residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. Wells/Fremont Associates will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act upon filing its final tax return.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation

The Joint Venture has disposed of all of its real estate assets and does not intend to invest in additional properties. The Joint Venture wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing all residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. The Joint Venture will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act.
The Joint Venture's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Effective October 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, the Joint Venture adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts, respectively, and statements of operations and statements of cash flows are no longer presented.





F-38

Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Joint Venture's financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investment in Wells/Fremont Associates

The Joint Venture evaluated Wells/Fremont Associates and concluded that this entity was not a variable interest entity. The Joint Venture did not have control over the operations of Wells/Fremont Associates, however, did exercise significant influence. Approval by the Joint Venture as well as the other joint venture partners was required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect Wells/Fremont Associates, or their real property investments. Accordingly, the Joint Venture accounted for its investment in Wells/Fremont Associates using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments were recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Joint Venture. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions were allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, were generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
Management continually monitored events and changes in circumstances that could have indicated that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned by the Joint Venture may not have been recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment were present, which suggested that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assessed the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale did not exceed the respective assets' carrying values, management adjusted the real estate assets to the respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognized an impairment loss. Estimated fair values were determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.
While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Joint Venture may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Joint Venture's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date.   In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Joint Venture's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety required judgment, and considered factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Venture's outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.

Allocation of Income and Distributions
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions were allocated to the joint venture partners based upon their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund X and Fund XI held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 58% and 42% respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 . Net cash from operations is generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.


F-39

Income Taxes
The Joint Venture was not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund X and Fund XI are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASU 2010-6"). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Joint Venture on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Joint Venture's financial statements or disclosures.
3.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Management and Leasing Fees

The joint venture partners, Fund X and Fund XI are parties to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of each of their respective general partners.

The various fees payable under each of the respective agreements are summarized as follows:

 
Management Services
Leasing Services
Management and Leasing Services - Industrial and Commercial properties leased on a net basis for 10 years or more
Fund X
3% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 3% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Fund XI
2.5% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 2% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.

Management and leasing fees were recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned agreements, weighted based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. Through its interests in Wells/Fremont Associates, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees through its equity in income (loss) of Wells/Fremont Associates that are payable to Wells Management of $0, $507, and $1,149 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , respectively.
Administrative Reimbursements
Wells Management performs certain administrative services for the Joint Venture's property owned through Wells/Fremont Associates related to accounting, property management, and other administrative activities, and incurred the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among the various Wells Real Estate Funds based on estimates of the amount of time dedicated to each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of management, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. Through its interest in Wells/Fremont Associates, the Joint Venture incurred administrative expenses through its equity in income (loss) of Wells/Fremont Associates of $3,074, $4,636, and $5,960 payable to Wells Management for these services during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , respectively.



F-40

4.
INVESTMENT IN WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES
Impairment of Real Estate Assets
In connection with recurring quarterly review processes, Wells/Fremont Associates evaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of the 47300 Kato Road property pursuant to the accounting policy outlined in Note 2 and determined that it was not recoverable, as compared with the estimated fair value, primarily as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset in third quarter 2009 and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing. Accordingly, Wells/Fremont Associates reduced the carrying value of 47300 Kato Road to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows and recognized a corresponding impairment loss of approximately $3,316,000 (approximately $746,000 of which was allocated to the Joint Venture) in the third quarter of 2009. This impairment loss is included in income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 in the table below.
The fair value measurements used in these evaluations of nonfinancial assets were considered to be Level 3 valuations within the fair value hierarchy, as there are significant unobservable inputs (see Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets in Note 2). Examples of inputs that Wells/Fremont Associates utilized in its fair value calculations include discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices.
Summary of Investments
The Joint Venture's investments and approximate ownership percentages in Wells/Fremont Associates as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:
 
December 31, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Amount
 
Percent
 
Amount
 
Percent
Wells/Fremont Associates
$—
 
22%
 
$773,945
 
22%

Summary of Activity
Rollforwards of the Joint Venture's investment in Wells/Fremont Associates for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:
 
2011
 
2010
Investment in Wells/Fremont Associates, beginning of year
$
773,945

 
$
784,881

Equity in income (loss) of Wells/Fremont Associates
(22,621
)
 
4,741

Contributions to Wells/Fremont Associates
38,918

 
29,470

Distributions from Wells/Fremont Associates
(790,242
)
 
(45,147
)
Investment in Wells/Fremont Associates, end of year
$
—

 
$
773,945


Summary of Financial Information
Wells/Fremont Associates wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing any residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. Wells/Fremont Associates will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act upon filing its final tax return.








F-41

Condensed financial information for the Wells/Fremont Associates in which the Joint Venture held an interest as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below:
 
Total Assets
December 31,
 
Total Liabilities
December 31,
 
Total Net Assets in Liquidation (1)
December 31,
 
Total Equity
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Wells/Fremont Associates
$
—

 
$
3,496,614

 
$
—

 
$
56.215

 
$
—

 
$
3,440,399


(1)  
Effective October 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, Wells/Fremont Associates adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts.
 
Total Revenues
 
Income (Loss) From
Continuing Operations
 
Income (Loss) From
Discontinued Operations
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
For The Years Ended
December 31,
 
For The Years Ended
December 31,
 
For The Years Ended
December 31,
 
For The Years Ended
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Wells/Fremont Associates
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(14,269
)
 
$
(20,674
)
 
$
(15,147
)
 
$
(86,305
)
 
$
41,749

 
$
(3,055,203
)
 
$
(100,574
)
 
$
21,075

 
$
(3,070,350
)

The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by Wells/Fremont Associates are provided below:
 
For the year ended
 
For the year ended
 
For the year ended
 
December 31, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
December 31, 2009
 
Operating loss
 
Gain on Sale
 
Total
 
Operating income
 
Gain on Sale
 
Total
 
Operating income
 
Impairment loss
 
Total
Wells/Fremont Associates
$
(177,510
)
 
$
91,205

 
$
(86,305
)
 
$
41,749

 
$
—

 
$
41,749

 
$
260,530

 
$
(3,315,733
)
 
$
(3,055,203
)




F-42

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The General Partners of
Wells/Fremont Associates:

We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows of Wells/Fremont Associates (the "Joint Venture") for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Wells/Fremont Associates for the year ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia
March 18, 2010




F-43

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

AND

BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

 
December 31,
 2011
(unaudited)
 
December 31,
2010
(unaudited)
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate assets, at cost:
 
 
 
Land
$
—

 
$
2,219,251

Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $0 and $2,606,432 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
—

 
1,222,279

Total real estate assets
—

 
3,441,530

 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
—

 
16,245

Other assets
—

 
38,839

Total assets
$
—

 
$
3,496,614

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
—

 
$
42,566

Due to affiliates
—

 
1,428

Deferred income
—

 
12,221

Total liabilities
—

 
56,215

Total net assets in liquidation
$
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Fund X and Fund XI Associates
 
 
773,945

Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
 
2,666,454

Total partners' capital
 
 
3,440,399

Total liabilities and partners' capital
 
 
$
3,496,614


See accompanying notes.





F-44

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION

FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2011 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

 
 2011 (unaudited)
Balance, October 1, 2011
$
24,811

Changes in net assets in liquidation attributable to:
 
Net loss
(24,811
)
              Balance, December 31, 2011
$
—


See accompanying notes.




F-45

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
Nine Months Ended
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
September 30, 2011
(unaudited)
 
2010
(unaudited)
 
2009
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
$
14,269

 
$
20,674

 
$
15,147

Total expenses
14,269

 
20,674

 
15,147

Net Loss From Continuing Operations
$
(14,269
)
 
$
(20,674
)
 
$
(15,147
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discontinued Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
(152,699
)
 
41,749

 
260,530

Impairment loss
—

 
—

 
(3,315,733
)
Gain on disposition
91,205

 
—

 
—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
(61,494
)
 
41,749

 
(3,055,203
)
Net Income (Loss)
$
(75,763
)
 
$
21,075

 
$
(3,070,350
)

See accompanying notes.




F-46

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND 2009

 
Fund X
and Fund XI
Associates
 
Piedmont
Operating
Partnership, LP
 
Total
Partners'
Capital
Balance, December 31, 2008 (unaudited)
$
1,569,272

 
$
5,406,558

 
$
6,975,830

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(690,703
)
 
(2,379,647
)
 
(3,070,350
)
Partnership distributions
(93,688
)
 
(322,780
)
 
(416,468
)
Balance, December 31, 2009
784,881

 
2,704,131

 
3,489,012

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
4,741

 
16,334

 
21,075

Partnership contributions
29,470

 
101,530

 
131,000

Partnership distributions
(45,147
)
 
(155,541
)
 
(200,688
)
Balance, December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
773,945

 
2,666,454

 
3,440,399

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(17,043
)
 
(58,720
)
 
(75,763
)
Partnership contributions
38,918

 
134,082

 
173,000

Partnership distributions
(790,242
)
 
(2,722,583
)
 
(3,512,825
)
Balance, September 31, 2011 (unaudited)
$
5,578

 
$
19,233

 
$
24,811



See accompanying notes.




F-47

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
Nine Months Ended
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
September 30, 2011(unaudited)
 
2010
(unaudited)
 
2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(75,763
)
 
$
21,075

 
$
(3,070,350
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Gain on disposition
(91,205
)
 
—

 
—

Depreciation
28,980

 
44,545

 
130,751

Amortization
—

 
—

 
17,564

Impairment loss
—

 
—

 
3,315,733

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in tenant receivables
(5,659
)
 
173

 
25,534

Decrease (increase) in other assets
19,687

 
(28,830
)
 
(3,336
)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(42,566
)
 
40,191

 
(12,866
)
(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates
(1,428
)
 
(9,241
)
 
3,599

(Decrease) increase in deferred income
(12,221
)
 
(55,423
)
 
21,966

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(180,175
)
 
12,490

 
428,595

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net proceeds from sale of real estate
3,503,755

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Contribution from joint venture partners
173,000

 
131,000

 
—

Net sale proceeds distributions to joint venture partners
(3,503,755
)
 
—

 
—

Operating distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings
(9,070
)
 
(307,584
)
 
(406,940
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(3,339,825
)
 
(176,584
)
 
(406,940
)
Net (Decrease) Increase In Cash And Cash Equivalents
(16,245
)
 
(164,094
)
 
21,655

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash And Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
16,245

 
180,339

 
158,684

Cash And Cash Equivalents, end of period
$
—

 
$
16,245

 
$
180,339

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure Of Noncash Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Partnership distributions payable
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
106,896



See accompanying notes.




F-48

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED), DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED), AND 2009

1.
ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
On July 15, 1998, Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. ("Fund X") and Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. ("Fund XI"), entered into a Georgia general partnership to create Fund X and Fund XI Associates. The general partners of Fund X and Fund XI are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P., a private Georgia limited partnership. Fund X and Fund XI Associates was formed for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, and selling real properties.
In July 1998, Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P., entered into a joint venture agreement with Wells Development Corporation, referred to as Wells/Fremont Associates (the "Joint Venture"), which acquired an approximately 58,000 square foot two-story warehouse and office building, 47300 Kato Road, located in Fremont, California. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont REIT"), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During 1998, Fund X and Fund XI Associates acquired Wells Development Corporation's interest in the Joint Venture, which resulted in Fund X and Fund XI Associates becoming a joint venture partner with Piedmont OP.
On August 25, 2011, the Joint Venture sold the 47300 Kato Road property to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $3,824,553. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $3,504,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $91,000.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Joint Venture has disposed of all of its real estate assets and does not intend to invest in additional properties. The Joint Venture wound up its affairs in 2011 by, among other things, collecting the outstanding receivables, satisfying outstanding payables, and distributing all residual cash balances to the joint venture partners. The Joint Venture will be terminated in the second quarter of 2012 in accordance with the relevant dissolution and termination provisions of the Georgia Uniform Partnership Act.
The Joint Venture's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Effective October 1, 2011, the first day of the quarter following the completion of the sale of all real estate assets, the Joint Venture adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, under which assets and liabilities are stated at their estimated net realizable values and net settlement amounts, respectively, and statements of operations and statements of cash flows are no longer presented.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Joint Venture's financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets were stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consisted of the cost of acquisition or construction, application of acquisition fees incurred, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extended the useful life of the related asset. The Joint Venture considered the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments had a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements were written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance were expensed as incurred.




F-49

The Joint Venture's real estate assets were depreciated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Buildings
40 years
Building improvements
5-25 years
Land improvements
20 years
Tenant improvements
Shorter of lease term or economic life

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
Management continually monitored events and changes in circumstances that could have indicated that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned by the Joint Venture may not have been recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment were present, which suggested that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assessed the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale did not exceed the respective assets' carrying values, management adjusted the real estate assets to the respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognized an impairment loss. Estimated fair values were determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.
While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Joint Venture may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Joint Venture's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date.   In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Joint Venture's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety required judgment, and considered factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Venture's outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.
In connection with recurring quarterly review processes, the Joint Venture evaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of the 47300 Kato Road property pursuant to the accounting policy outlined above and determined that it was not recoverable, as compared with the estimated fair value, primarily as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset in third quarter 2009 and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing. Accordingly, the Joint Venture reduced the carrying value of 47300 Kato Road to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows and recognized a corresponding impairment loss of approximately $3,316,000 in the third quarter of 2009.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Joint Venture considered all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Tenant Receivables         
Tenant receivables were comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due from tenants and the cumulative amount of future adjustments necessary to present rental income using the straight-line method. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables were written off to lease termination expense. Tenant receivables


F-50

were recorded at the original amount earned, less an allowance for any doubtful accounts, which approximates fair value. Management assessed the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provided for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. No such allowances were recorded as of December 31, 2010 .
Other Assets
Other assets was primarily comprised of prepaid expenses. Management assessed the collectibility of other assets on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. Prepaid expenses were recognized as the related services are provided. Balances without a future economic benefit are written off as they are identified. No such allowances were recorded as of December 31, 2010 .
Allocation of Income and Distributions
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions were allocated to the joint venture partners based upon their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund X and Fund XI Associates and Piedmont OP held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 22% and 78%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 . Net cash from operations was generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.
Revenue Recognition
The Joint Venture's leases typically included renewal options, escalation provisions, and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint Venture for a pro rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Venture's leases were classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on the Consumer Price Index) was recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Tenant reimbursements were recognized as revenue in the period that the related operating cost is incurred and were billed to tenants pursuant to the terms of the underlying leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance were recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets. Lease termination income was recognized when the tenant lost the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture satisfied all obligations under the related lease or lease termination agreement.
The Joint Venture recorded the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for real estate sales. Accordingly, gains were recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the gain was deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses were recognized in full as of the sale date.
Income Taxes
The Joint Venture was not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund X, Fund XI, and Piedmont OP are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASU 2010-6"). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Joint Venture on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Joint Venture's financial statements or disclosures.
3.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management and Leasing Fees
Fund X and Fund XI are parties to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of each of their respective general partners.


F-51

The various fees payable under each of the respective agreements are summarized as follows:
 
Management Services
Leasing Services
Management and Leasing Services - Industrial and Commercial properties leased on a net basis for 10 years or more
Fund X
3% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 3% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Fund XI
2.5% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 2% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.

Management and leasing fees were recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned agreements, weighted based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fee expenses that are payable to Wells Management of $0, $2,254, and $5,109, respectively, which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.
In addition, the Joint Venture incurred fees payable to Piedmont Office Management, LLC ("Piedmont Management"), or its affiliates, for the management and leasing of the Joint Venture's properties equal to (a) the lesser of 4.5% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or 0.6% of net asset value calculated on an annual basis, (b) prorated by Piedmont OP's ownership interest in the Joint Venture. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fee expenses payable to Piedmont Management, or its affiliates, of $0, $7,764, and $17,593, respectively, which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.
Administrative Reimbursements
Wells Management performs certain administrative services for the Joint Venture, relating to accounting, property management, and other Joint Venture administration, and incurred the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among these entities based on time spent on each entity by individual personnel. In the opinion of management, this is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 , the Joint Venture incurred administrative expenses of $13,667, $20,610, and $26,494, respectively, payable to Wells Management, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.
Due to Affiliates
Due to affiliates as of December 31, 2010 represented amounts due to Piedmont Management and/or Wells Management for administrative reimbursements.








F-52

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In accordance with GAAP, the Joint Venture has classified the results of operations related to 47300 Kato Road, which was sold on August 25, 2011, as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations. The details comprising income (loss) from discontinued operations are presented below:
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
(unaudited)
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
2010 (unaudited)
 
2009
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
—

 
$
297,963

 
$
458,178

Tenant reimbursements
17,879

 
18,072

 
49,194

Interest and other income
808

 
—

 
—

Total revenues
18,687

 
316,035

 
507,372

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
118,877

 
174,851

 
47,077

Management and leasing fees:
 
 
 
 
 
Related-party
—

 
10,018

 
22,702

Depreciation
28,980

 
44,545

 
130,751

Amortization
—

 
—

 
4,583

General and administrative
23,529

 
44,872

 
41,729

Total expenses
171,386

 
274,286

 
246,842

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
(152,699
)
 
41,749

 
260,530

Impairment loss
—

 
—

 
(3,315,733
)
Gain on disposition
91,205

 
—

 
—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
(61,494
)
 
$
41,749

 
$
(3,055,203
)






F-53

WELLS/FREMONT ASSOCIATES

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
$
9,363,695

 
$
2,431,136

 
 
 
 
Additions
—

 
130,751

Impairments (1)
(3,315,733
)
 
—

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
6,047,962

 
2,561,887

 
 
 
 
Additions
—

 
44,545

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
6,047,962

 
2,606,432

 
 
 
 
Additions
—

 
28,980

Dispositions
(6,047,962
)
 
(2,635,412
)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
$
—

 
$
—

(1)  
As of September 30, 2009, Wells/Fremont Associates wrote down the basis of 47300 Kato Road to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset in third quarter 2009 and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing.




F-54

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






The General Partners of
The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 , and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 . Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Venture's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 , and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 , in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2012




F-55

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

BALANCE SHEETS

 
December 31, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
Assets:
 
 
 
Real estate assets, at cost:
 
 
 
Land
$
1,766,667

 
$
1,766,667

Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $3,598,807 and $3,280,559 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
2,797,757

 
2,819,471

Construction in progress
19,000

 
—

Total real estate assets
4,583,424

 
4,586,138

 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
169,102

 
254,929

Tenant receivables
159,619

 
308,226

Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $349,814 and $264,432 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
89,434

 
169,481

Other assets
4,758

 
3,588

Total assets
$
5,006,337

 
$
5,322,362

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and refundable security deposits
$
146,443

 
$
150,450

Accrued capital expenditures
151,480

 
—

Due to affiliates
1,686

 
2,133

Deferred income
—

 
8,548

Partnership distributions payable
—

 
103,108

Total liabilities
299,609

 
264,239

 
 
 
 
Partners' Capital:
 
 
 
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
1,230,661

 
1,322,544

Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.
804,429

 
864,479

Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
2,671,638

 
2,871,100

Total partners' capital
4,706,728

 
5,058,123

Total liabilities and partners' capital
$
5,006,337

 
$
5,322,362



See accompanying notes.





F-56

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
1,011,600

 
$
1,009,701

 
$
1,010,826

Reimbursement income
196,953

 
171,616

 
187,344

Interest and other income
—

 
—

 
813

Total revenues
1,208,553

 
1,181,317

 
1,198,983

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
765,198

 
769,910

 
781,521

Management and leasing fees:
 
 
 
 
 
Related-party
20,158

 
18,510

 
21,463

Other
40,330

 
39,846

 
39,254

Depreciation
318,248

 
314,883

 
298,778

Amortization
63,267

 
62,979

 
65,795

General and administrative
41,773

 
41,206

 
31,472

Total expenses
1,248,974

 
1,247,334

 
1,238,283

Net Loss
$
(40,421
)
 
$
(66,017
)
 
$
(39,300
)


See accompanying notes.





F-57

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010, AND 2009

 
Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.
 
Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.
 
Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP
 
Total
Partners'
Capital
Balance, December 31, 2008
$
1,476,498

 
$
965,095

 
$
3,205,309

 
$
5,646,902

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(10,276
)
 
(6,716
)
 
(22,308
)
 
(39,300
)
Partnership contributions
26,148

 
17,089

 
56,763

 
100,000

Partnership distributions
(39,760
)
 
(25,985
)
 
(86,311
)
 
(152,056
)
Balance, December 31, 2009
1,452,610

 
949,483

 
3,153,453

 
5,555,546

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(17,262
)
 
(11,281
)
 
(37,474
)
 
(66,017
)
Partnership distributions
(112,804
)
 
(73,723
)
 
(244,879
)
 
(431,406
)
Balance, December 31, 2010
1,322,544

 
864,479

 
2,871,100

 
5,058,123

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(10,569
)
 
(6,908
)
 
(22,944
)
 
(40,421
)
Partnership distributions
(81,314
)
 
(53,142
)
 
(176,518
)
 
(310,974
)
Balance, December 31, 2011
$
1,230,661

 
$
804,429

 
$
2,671,638

 
$
4,706,728



See accompanying notes.




F-58

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(40,421
)
 
$
(66,017
)
 
$
(39,300
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
318,248

 
314,883

 
298,778

Amortization
85,382

 
82,665

 
76,104

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Decrease in tenant receivables
148,607

 
139,975

 
147,302

(Increase) decrease in other assets
(1,170
)
 
(1,857
)
 
108

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(4,007
)
 
5,423

 
(22,651
)
(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates
(447
)
 
(1,326
)
 
1,118

(Decrease) increase in deferred income
(8,548
)
 
(85,391
)
 
93,939

Net cash provided by operating activities
497,644

 
388,355

 
555,398

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in real estate assets
(164,054
)
 
(25,722
)
 
(502,601
)
Payment of deferred leasing costs
(5,335
)
 
(12,272
)
 
(112,356
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(169,389
)
 
(37,994
)
 
(614,957
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Contribution from joint venture partners
—

 
—

 
100,000

Operating distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings
(414,082
)
 
(435,861
)
 
(44,493
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(414,082
)
 
(435,861
)
 
55,507

Net Decrease In Cash And Cash Equivalents
(85,827
)
 
(85,500
)
 
(4,052
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash And Cash Equivalents, beginning of year
254,929

 
340,429

 
344,481

Cash And Cash Equivalents, end of year
$
169,102

 
$
254,929

 
$
340,429

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure Of Noncash Investing And Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Partnership distributions payable
$
—

 
$
103,108

 
$
107,563

Accrued capital expenditures
$
151,480

 
$
—

 
$
—


See accompanying notes.





F-59

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010, AND 2009

1.
ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
On May 1, 1999, Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. ("Fund XI") and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP ("Piedmont OP"), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P., entered into a Georgia general partnership known as The Wells Fund XI-REIT Joint Venture for the purpose of acquiring, developing, operating, and selling real properties. On June 21, 1999, The Wells Fund XI-REIT Joint Venture was amended and restated as The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") upon admitting Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. ("Fund XII"). The general partners of Fund XI and Fund XII are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P., a private Georgia limited partnership. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont REIT"), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust.
On May 18, 1999, the Joint Venture purchased a two-story manufacturing and office building containing approximately 168,000 square feet, known as 111 Southchase Boulevard, located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina. On July 2, 1999, the Joint Venture purchased a three-story office building containing approximately 70,000 square feet, known as the 20/20 Building, located in Leawood, Kansas. On August 17, 1999, the Joint Venture purchased an office and warehouse building containing approximately 130,000 square feet, known as the Johnson Matthey Building, located in Wayne, Pennsylvania. On September 20, 1999, the Joint Venture purchased a two-story office building containing approximately 62,000 square feet, known as the Gartner Building, located in Fort Myers, Florida.
On October 5, 2004, the Joint Venture sold the Johnson Matthey Building to the sole tenant, Johnson Matthey, Inc., for a gross selling price of $10,000,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $2,419,000 and received net sale proceeds of $9,675,000.
On April 13, 2005, the Joint Venture sold the Gartner Building to an unrelated third party for a gross selling price of approximately $12,520,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $4,481,000 and received net sale proceeds of approximately $12,397,000.
On May 23, 2007, the Joint Venture sold 111 Southchase Boulevard to an unrelated third party for a gross selling price of $7,625,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $1,978,000 and received net sale proceeds of approximately $7,237,000.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Joint Venture's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Joint Venture's financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consist of the cost of acquisition or construction, application of acquisition fees incurred, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extend the useful life of the related asset. The Joint Venture considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements are written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.



F-60

The Joint Venture's real estate assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Buildings
40 years
Building improvements
5-25 years
Land improvements
20 years
Tenant improvements
Shorter of lease term or economic life

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned by the Joint Venture may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective assets' carrying values, management adjusts the real estate assets to the respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value. The Joint Venture has determined that there have been no additional impairments in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets to date; however, the Joint Venture's remaining asset may be carried at an amount more than could be realized in a current disposition transaction.
While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Joint Venture may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Joint Venture's assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date.   In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Joint Venture's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Venture's outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Joint Venture considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of investments in money market accounts.
Tenant Receivables         
Tenant receivables are comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due from tenants and the cumulative amount of future adjustments necessary to present rental income using the straight-line method. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables are written off to lease termination expense. Tenant receivables are recorded at the original amount earned, less an allowance for any doubtful accounts, which approximates fair value. Management assesses the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. No such allowances have been recorded as of December 31, 2011 or 2010.


F-61

Deferred Leasing Costs, net
Deferred leasing costs may include (i) costs incurred to procure leases, which are capitalized and recognized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the lease, and (ii) common area maintenance costs that are recoverable from tenants under the terms of the existing leases; such costs are capitalized and recognized as operating expenses over the shorter of the lease term or the recovery period provided for in the lease. The remaining unamortized balance of deferred leasing costs will be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately one year. Upon receiving notification of a tenant's intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred leasing costs are written-off to lease termination expense.
Other Assets
Other assets is comprised of prepaid expenses. Management assesses the collectibility of other assets on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services are provided. Balances without a future economic benefit are written off as they are identified. No such allowances have been recorded as of December 31, 2011 or 2010.
Allocation of Income and Distributions
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions are allocated to the joint venture partners based their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund XI, Fund XII, and Piedmont OP held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 26%, 17%, and 57%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 . Net cash from operations is generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.
Revenue Recognition
The Joint Venture's leases typically include renewal options, escalation provisions and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint Venture for a pro rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Venture's leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on the Consumer Price Index) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Tenant reimbursements are recognized as revenue in the period that the related operating cost is incurred and are billed to tenants pursuant to the terms of the underlying leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance are recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets. Lease termination income is recognized when the tenant loses the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture has satisfied all obligations under the related lease or lease termination agreement.
The Joint Venture records the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for real estate sales. Accordingly, gains are recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the gain would be deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses are recognized in full as of the sale date.
Income Taxes
The Joint Venture is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund XI, Fund XII, and Piedmont OP are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASU 2010-6"). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Joint Venture on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Joint Venture's financial statements or disclosures.



F-62

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement Topic Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs ("ASU 2011-04"). ASU 2011-04 converges the GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards definition of "fair value," the requirements for measuring amounts at fair value, and disclosures about these measurements. The update does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 was effective for the Joint Venture on December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Joint Venture's financial statements or disclosures.
3.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management and Leasing Fees
Fund XI and Fund XII are parties to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc. ("Wells Management"), an affiliate of each of their respective general partners.
The various fees payable under each of the respective agreements are summarized as follows:
 
Management Services
Leasing Services
Management and Leasing Services - Industrial and Commercial properties leased on a net basis for 10 years or more
Fund XI
2.5% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 2% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Fund XII
2.5% of gross revenues collected monthly
Initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. Recurring fee based on 2% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
Management and leasing fees are recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned agreements, weighted based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fee expenses that are payable to Wells Management of $8,719, $8,006, and $9,283, respectively.
In addition, the Joint Venture incurs fees payable to Piedmont Office Management, LLC ("Piedmont Management"), or its affiliates, for the management and leasing of the Joint Venture's properties equal to (a) the lesser of 4.5% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or 0.6% of net asset value calculated on an annual basis, (b) prorated by Piedmont OP's ownership interest in the Joint Venture. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fee expenses payable to Piedmont Management, or its affiliates, of $11,439, $10,504, and $12,180, respectively.
Due to Affiliates
As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents amounts due to Piedmont Management and/or Wells Management for the following items:
 
2011
 
2010
Property management fees
$
1,686

 
$
1,984

Administrative reimbursements
—

 
149

 
$
1,686

 
$
2,133




F-63

4.
RENTAL INCOME
The future contractual rental income due to the Joint Venture under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2011 follows:
Year ended December 31:
 
2012
$
1,002,828

2013
144,974

2014
24,216

Thereafter
—

 
$
1,172,018

Three tenants generated approximately 64%, 24% and 12% of contractual rental income for the year ended December 31, 2011, and three tenants will generate approximately 53%, 27% and 20% of future contractual rental income.





F-64

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2011

 
 
Initial Cost
Costs Capitalized
 
Gross Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2011
 
 
 
Description
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings and
Improvements
Subsequent
To Acquisition (b)
Impairment Loss
Land
Buildings and
Improvements
Construction
in Progress
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation (c)
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
THE 20/20 BUILDING (a)
None
$1,696,000
$7,850,210
$2,314,157
$(3,678,136)
$1,766,667
$6,396,564
$19,000
$8,182,231
$3,598,807
1992
7/2/1999
(a)  
The 20/20 Building is a three-story office building located in Leawood, Kansas.
(b)  
Includes acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements applied at acquisition as well as write-offs of fully depreciated capitalized costs.
(c)  
Buildings, land improvements, building improvements, and tenant improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over 40 years, 20 years, 5 to 25 years, and the shorter of the economic life or corresponding lease terms, respectively.




F-65

THE WELLS FUND XI - FUND XII - REIT JOINT VENTURE

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2011

 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
$
7,612,657

 
$
2,666,898

 
 
 
 
Additions
228,318

 
298,778

Dispositions
—

 
—

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
7,840,975

 
2,965,676

 
 
 
 
Additions
25,722

 
314,883

Dispositions
—

 
—

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010
7,866,697

 
3,280,559

 
 
 
 
Additions
315,534

 
318,248

Dispositions
—

 
—

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
8,182,231

 
$
3,598,807





F-66