Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AGA MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010

Registration No. 333-170045

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 2
to
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933



ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Minnesota
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  3841
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  41-1276891
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)

One St. Jude Medical Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55117
(651) 756-2000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices)

Pamela S. Krop
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
St. Jude Medical, Inc.
One St. Jude Medical Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55117
(651) 765-2000
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)

Copies to:
Joseph M. Barbeau
Stewart L. McDowell
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94303-1125
(650) 849-5300
  David C. Grorud
Ryan C. Brauer
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.
200 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 492-7000



           Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effectiveness of this registration statement and upon consummation of the transactions described in the enclosed prospectus/offer to exchange.

          If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.  o

          If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o                

          If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o                

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

    Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) o
    Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross Border Third-Party Tender Offer) o



           The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


Table of Contents

THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE MAY CHANGE. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. MAY NOT COMPLETE THIS EXCHANGE OFFER AND ISSUE THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE


ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
OFFER TO EXCHANGE EACH OUTSTANDING SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
OF
AGA MEDICAL HOLDINGS,  INC.
FOR
$20.80 IN CASH
OR
$20.80 IN FAIR MARKET VALUE OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. COMMON STOCK
SUBJECT IN EACH CASE TO ADJUSTMENT AND PRORATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE AND THE RELATED LETTER OF ELECTION AND TRANSMITTAL


           THE EXCHANGE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 12:00 MIDNIGHT (ONE MINUTE AFTER 11:59 P.M.), NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON THE EVENING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2010, UNLESS EXTENDED. SHARES TENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS EXCHANGE OFFER MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER.

          On October 15, 2010, St. Jude Medical, Inc. ("St. Jude Medical"), Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation ("Asteroid"), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical, and AGA Medical Holdings, Inc. ("AGA") entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization (the "Merger Agreement") providing for St. Jude Medical (through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary) to acquire all of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock by means of an exchange offer (the "Offer") and a subsequent merger (the "Merger") pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. AGA's board of directors unanimously approved and adopted the Merger Agreement, determined that the Offer and the Merger are fair to, and in the best interests of, AGA's stockholders and recommends that AGA stockholders accept the Offer and tender their shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer. The factors considered by AGA's board of directors in making the determinations and the recommendation described above are set forth in AGA's solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and is being mailed to the AGA stockholders together with this prospectus/offer to exchange. AGA stockholders are encouraged to review carefully the Schedule 14D-9, together with this prospectus/offer to exchange.

          In the Offer, St. Jude Medical, through Asteroid, is offering to exchange for each share of AGA common stock accepted by Asteroid either $20.80 in cash, without interest, or $20.80 in fair market value of St. Jude Medical common stock. AGA stockholders may elect to receive either cash (the "cash election") or St. Jude Medical common stock (the "stock election") for each share of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer. Cash elections and stock elections made in the Offer will be subject to proration.

          The aggregate amount of cash and of St. Jude Medical common stock available to be paid and issued in the Offer will be determined on a 50/50 basis, such that if the holders of more than 50% of the shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer elect more than the amount of cash or St. Jude Medical common stock available in either case, AGA stockholders will receive on a pro rata basis the other kind of consideration to the extent the kind of consideration they elect to receive is oversubscribed. For example, if more than 50% of the AGA common stock tendered in the Offer is subject to cash elections, then holders who made cash elections in the aggregate will receive all of the cash available for payment in the Offer (50% of the total consideration payable to all stockholders who tender in the Offer), but also will receive some St. Jude Medical common stock on a pro rata basis, since there would have been an oversubscription for cash.

          Stockholders that tender their shares of AGA common stock, but do not elect to receive cash or to receive St. Jude Medical common stock for their AGA common stock will be treated as if they had made no election and the amount of cash and/or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock that they receive will be based on the amount of cash and/or St. Jude Medical common stock remaining after giving effect to the cash elections and stock elections.

          The fraction of a share or number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be exchanged for each share of AGA common stock for which a stock election has been made will be equal to $20.80 divided by the volume weighted average of the daily closing prices of St. Jude Medical's common stock during the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day prior to the final expiration date of the Offer (the "exchange rate").

          With respect to the number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, if any, to be received by AGA stockholders in exchange for such stockholders' shares of AGA common stock, the exchange rate will be determined in advance of the expiration of the Offer based on the final expiration date of the Offer. St. Jude Medical will announce the exchange rate by issuing a press release no later than 9:00 A.M., New York City time, on the trading day prior to the final expiration date. For example, St. Jude Medical will announce an exchange rate by issuing a press release no later than 9:00 A.M., New York City time, on November 16, 2010 that will apply if the Offer expires at 12:00 midnight (one minute after 11:59 P.M.), New York City time, on the evening of November 17, 2010, the initial expiration date of the Offer. If the Offer is extended, St. Jude Medical will recalculate the exchange rate based on the later expected final expiration date and announce the exchange rate in a similar manner.

          St. Jude Medical's obligation to exchange its common stock for AGA common stock in the Offer is subject to the conditions listed in the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Offer" on page 117. St. Jude Medical common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol STJ. AGA common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AGAM.

          If the Offer is completed, the Offer will be followed by the Merger of Asteroid with and into AGA, in which any remaining shares of AGA common stock not tendered in the Offer will be converted into the right to receive $20.80 in cash, without interest or a fraction of a share or number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock equal to the exchange rate, except for shares of AGA common stock with respect to which appraisal rights under Delaware law are properly exercised.

          In the Merger, 50% of the shares of AGA common stock exchanged by each holder in the Merger will be exchanged for cash and 50% will be exchanged for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, subject to adjustment. In no event will the total number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be issued in the Offer and the Merger exceed 19.9% of St. Jude Medical's common stock outstanding on the date on which shares of AGA common stock are first accepted for payment under the Offer. The amount of cash and/or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock payable in the Merger may also be subject to adjustment in the event the Offer, the Merger and the second merger collectively would not qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

          The Merger will entitle AGA stockholders to appraisal rights under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"). To exercise appraisal rights, an AGA stockholder must strictly comply with all of the procedures under the DGCL. These procedures are described more fully in the section entitled "The Transaction—Appraisal Rights" on page 96.

           See "Risk Factors," beginning on page 25, for a description of certain factors that you should consider in connection with the Offer, as well as related matters described in this prospectus/offer to exchange.

          St. Jude Medical has not authorized any person to provide any information or to make any representation in connection with the Offer other than the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus/offer to exchange, and if any person provides any information or makes any representation of this kind, that information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by St. Jude Medical.

          Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus/offer to exchange. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus/offer to exchange is November 15, 2010.


Table of Contents

         This prospectus/offer to exchange incorporates by reference important business and financial information about St. Jude Medical from documents filed and to be filed with the SEC that have not been included in or delivered with this prospectus/offer to exchange. You should carefully read and consider all of the documents filed and to be filed by St. Jude Medical with the SEC and to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange before making an investment decision. This information is available without charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov, as well as from other sources. See "Where You Can Find Additional Information" on page 2.

         AGA stockholders also may request copies of these publicly-filed documents from St. Jude Medical, without charge, upon written or oral request to the Corporate Secretary at St. Jude Medical, Inc., One St. Jude Medical Drive, St. Paul, MN 55117, (651) 756-2000. In order to receive timely delivery of the documents, AGA stockholders must make such request no later than November 9, 2010, or five business days before the expiration date, if any extension, of the Offer.

         Commencing on November 1, 2010, this prospectus/offer to exchange will incorporate by reference important business and financial information about AGA from documents filed with the SEC on and after November 1, 2010 that will not be included in or delivered with this prospectus/offer to exchange. You should carefully read and consider all of the documents filed by AGA with the SEC on and after November 1, 2010 and incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange before making an investment decision. This information will be available without charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov, as well as from other sources. See "Where You Can Find Additional Information" on page 2.

         AGA stockholders also may request copies of these publicly-filed documents from AGA, without charge, upon written or oral request to the Corporate Secretary at AGA Medical Holdings, Inc., 5050 Nathan Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55442, (763) 513-9227. In order to receive timely delivery of the documents, AGA stockholders must make such request no later than November 9, 2010, or five business days before the expiration date, if any extension, of the Offer.

         This prospectus/offer to exchange does not constitute a solicitation of proxies for any meeting of stockholders of AGA. St. Jude Medical is not asking you for a proxy and you are requested not to send in a proxy. Any solicitation of proxies that St. Jude Medical or AGA might make will be made only pursuant to separate proxy solicitation materials complying with the requirements of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

         St. Jude Medical and Asteroid will promptly amend the Schedule TO filed with the SEC to reflect any material amendments in the information set forth in such Schedule TO as required by Rule 14d-3(b) under the Exchange Act.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

        

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  1

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 
2

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

 
3

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

 
4

SUMMARY

 
11

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL

 
20

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF AGA

 
21

COMPARISON OF UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA AND PER SHARE DATA

 
23

RISK FACTORS

 
25
 

Risks Relating to the Offer

 
25
 

Risks Relating to St. Jude Medical's Business

  29
 

Risks Relating to AGA's Business

  39
 

Risks Relating to the Combined Company

  59

ST. JUDE MEDICAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 
61

THE TRANSACTION

 
65
 

General Description of the Offer

 
65
 

Purpose of the Offer

  66
 

Top-Up Option

  66
 

Timing of the Offer

  67
 

Extension; Termination and Amendment

  67
 

Designation of AGA's Directors after the Offer

  68
 

Elections and Prorations

  68
 

Exchange of Shares of AGA Common Stock; Delivery of Cash and Shares of St. Jude Medical Common Stock

  69
 

Treatment of Fractional Shares of St. Jude Medical Common Stock

  70
 

Withdrawal Rights

  70
 

Procedure for Tendering

  71
 

Conditions to the Offer

  73
 

Approval of the Merger

  75
 

Interests of Certain Persons

  75
 

Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approval

  80
 

Certain Relationships with AGA

  80
 

Possible Effects of the Offer on the Market for the Shares; NASDAQ Listing; Exchange Act Registration and Margin Regulations

  81
 

Background of the Transaction

  82
 

The St. Jude Medical Reasons for the Transaction

  88
 

The AGA Reasons for the Transaction

  90
 

Ownership of St. Jude Medical After the Offer and the Merger

  95
 

Plans and Proposals for AGA after the Transaction

  95
 

Source and Amount of Funds

  95
 

Fees and Expenses

  95
 

Tender and Voting Agreement

  96
 

Accounting Treatment

  96
 

Appraisal Rights

  96

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

  100
 

The Offer

 
100
 

The Merger

  105
 

Other Terms of the Merger Agreement

  108
 

Conditions to the Offer

  117
 

Termination of the Merger Agreement

  119
 

Amendment of the Merger Agreement and Waiver of Rights

  123
 

Tender and Voting Agreement

  124
 

Tax Treatment

  125

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. AND ASTEROID SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION

 
126
 

St. Jude Medical

 
126
 

Asteroid

  126

AGA MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. 

 
127

AGA MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 
160

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 
188

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH AGA ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 
188

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF AGA

 
189

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

 
190

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF AGA

 
191

OPINION OF PIPER JAFFRAY & CO. 

 
194

AGA FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS

 
208

COMPARISON OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND AGA STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS

 
210

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

 
216

LEGAL MATTERS

 
220

EXPERTS

 
221

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
F-1


ANNEXES

Annex A   Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization
Annex B   Opinion of Piper Jaffray & Co. to AGA Medical Holdings, Inc.
Annex C   Opinion of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Annex D   Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
Annex E   Information Concerning St. Jude Medical, Inc., Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation and Directors and Executive Officers of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Information both included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus/offer to exchange may contain forward-looking statements, concerning, among other things, St. Jude Medical, Inc.'s ("St. Jude Medical") business strategies or the financial projections of AGA Medical Holdings, Inc. ("AGA"), which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. St. Jude Medical intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 to the fullest extent permitted by such act.

        Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts, and include statements regarding the timing of the transaction and the consideration to be received by the stockholders of AGA, the successful integration of the AGA business into St. Jude Medical, the expansion of St. Jude Medical's product offerings, St. Jude Medical's presence in the medical devices market, the enhancement of value and benefits to physician customers and to St. Jude Medical's and AGA's stockholders, and the ability to realize growth and efficiencies as a result of the Offer and the Merger. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms such as "intend," "plan," "may," "should," "will," "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "continue," "potential," "opportunity," "project," "strategy" and similar terms. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses that St. Jude Medical believes are appropriate under the circumstances, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those expected, estimated, projected, or implied in these forward-looking statements. St. Jude Medical cannot guarantee that it actually will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations, or complete the Offer and the Merger on the terms summarized in this prospectus/offer to exchange. The risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on St. Jude Medical's operations and future prospects or the completion of the Offer and the Merger include, but are not limited to:

    the failure to satisfy the conditions to consummate the Offer and the Merger;

    the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement;

    the failure of the Offer or the Merger to close for any other reason;

    the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Offer and the Merger;

    the failure of St. Jude Medical to integrate AGA successfully;

    general economic and business conditions;

    global economic growth and activity;

    industry conditions; and

    changes in laws or regulations.

        These risks and uncertainties, along with the risk factors discussed under "Risk Factors" in this prospectus/offer to exchange, should be considered in evaluating any forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus/offer to exchange. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus/offer to exchange, and, except as required by law, St. Jude Medical undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of them in light of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to St. Jude Medical or AGA or any person acting on their behalf are qualified by the cautionary statements in this section.

1


Table of Contents


WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

         This prospectus/offer to exchange incorporates and will incorporate documents by reference that are not presented in or delivered with this prospectus/offer to exchange. You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus/offer to exchange and in the documents that St. Jude Medical has incorporated by reference and that AGA will incorporate by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange. St. Jude Medical has not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from or in addition to the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus/offer to exchange.

        St. Jude Medical and AGA file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The public may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that St. Jude Medical or AGA file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information regarding the public reference room. St. Jude Medical's and AGA's public filings also are available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and may be obtained without charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. St. Jude Medical's and AGA's filings with the SEC are also available on their websites at www.sjm.com and www.amplatzer.com , respectively. The contents of those websites are not incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange.

        St. Jude Medical has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4 ("Form S-4") to register the offer and sale of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be issued in the Offer and the Merger. This prospectus/offer to exchange is a part of that registration statement. St. Jude Medical may also file amendments to such registration statement. In addition, on October 20, 2010, St. Jude Medical filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO ("Schedule TO") under the Exchange Act, together with exhibits, to furnish certain information about the Offer. St. Jude Medical may file amendments to the Schedule TO. As allowed by SEC rules, this prospectus/offer to exchange does not contain all of the information in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement. You may obtain copies of the Form S-4 and Schedule TO (and any amendments to those documents) by contacting St. Jude Medical at the following address:

St. Jude Medical
One St. Jude Medical Drive
St. Paul, MN 55117
Attention: Corporate Secretary
(651) 756-2000

        St. Jude Medical has engaged Georgeson Inc. to act as its information agent in connection with the Offer. You can obtain copies of the Form S-4 and Schedule TO (and any amendments to those documents) along with the related letter of election and transmittal by contacting Georgeson Inc. at the following address:

Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street—26th Floor
New York, NY 10038-3560
Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800
All Others Call Toll Free: (877) 278-4774

        On October 20, 2010, AGA filed with the SEC a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 under the Exchange Act ("Schedule 14D-9"), together with exhibits containing the AGA board of director's recommendation with respect to the Offer and certain additional information about the Offer. AGA may file amendments to the Schedule 14D-9. You may obtain copies of the Schedule 14D-9 (and any amendments thereto) by contacting AGA at the following address:

AGA Medical Holdings, Inc.
5050 Nathan Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55442
(763) 513-9227

2


Table of Contents


INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

        The following documents filed by St. Jude Medical with the SEC are incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange. You should carefully read and consider all of these documents before making an investment decision.

    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, filed on March 2, 2010;

    Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and July 3, 2010, filed on May 4, 2010 and August 11, 2010, respectively;

    Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed on January 15, 2010, January 25, 2010, March 15, 2010, March 19, 2010, May 7, 2010, October 18, 2010 and October 26, 2010;

    The following information from Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K furnished on October 20, 2010: (i) The following line items from the table under the heading "St. Jude Medical, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings: Net Sales through Net earnings, Diluted net earnings per share and Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted and (ii) the information in the table under the heading "Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets."

    Proxy Statement for 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed on March 23, 2010; and

    Description of St. Jude Medical common stock set forth in its Registration Statements on Form 8-A, filed on April 28, 1978 and November 8, 1996, including any amendment or report filed for purposes of updating such description.

        All documents filed by St. Jude Medical with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the filing of this document, including documents filed on and after the date of this document and prior to the effectiveness of the Form S-4 to which this document relates, and prior to the date the Offer is terminated, are incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange and are part of this document from the date of filing. You should carefully read and consider all of the documents to be filed with the SEC by St. Jude Medical after the filing of this document and to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange before making an investment decision.

        St. Jude Medical and Asteroid will promptly amend the Schedule TO filed with the SEC to reflect any material amendments in the information set forth in such Schedule TO as required by Rule 14d-3(b) under the Exchange Act.

        All documents filed by AGA with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act on and after November 1, 2010 will be incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange and will be part of this document from the date of filing. You should carefully read and consider all of the documents to be filed with the SEC by AGA on and after November 1, 2010 and to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange before making an investment decision.

        Nothing in this prospectus/offer to exchange shall be deemed to incorporate herein any information furnished but not filed with the SEC.

3


Table of Contents


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

         Below are some of the questions that you as a holder of AGA common stock may have regarding the Offer and the Merger and answers to those questions. You are urged to carefully read the remainder of this prospectus/offer to exchange and the related letter of election and transmittal and the other documents to which we have referred, because the information contained in this section and in the "Summary" section is not complete. Additional important information is contained in the remainder of this prospectus/offer to exchange, the related letter of election and transmittal, and the documents incorporated herein. See "Where You Can Find Additional Information" on page 2.

         As used in this prospectus/offer to exchange, unless otherwise indicated or the context requires, "St. Jude Medical" refers to St. Jude Medical, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, and "AGA" refers to AGA Medical Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Q:
What are St. Jude Medical and AGA proposing to do?

A:
St. Jude Medical and AGA entered into a Merger Agreement on October 15, 2010, pursuant to which St. Jude Medical, through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation ("Asteroid"), is offering to exchange cash or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock for all of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock (the "Offer"). As of October 13, 2010, AGA had 50,268,924 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which St. Jude Medical seeks to acquire in the Offer. In addition, there were 3,235,962 shares of AGA common stock subject to options outstanding as of October 13, 2010 (the "Options"), some of which are exercisable or may become exercisable prior to the expiration of the Offer, and 251,100 shares of AGA common stock subject to restricted stock units (the "RSUs"), some of which have vested or may vest prior to the expiration of the Offer. To the extent these Options or RSUs are exercised or vest in exchange for shares of AGA common stock prior to the expiration of the Offer, St. Jude Medical will seek to acquire the shares issued upon such exercise in the Offer. Promptly after completion of the Offer, St. Jude Medical intends to merge Asteroid with and into AGA (the "Merger"). As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Asteroid will cease and AGA will continue as the surviving corporation of the Merger and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical.

    Options and RSUs to purchase shares of AGA common stock are not subject to the Offer, but will be canceled in connection with the Merger in exchange for which certain cash payments will be made to holders of canceled Options and RSUs. In addition, as of October 13, 2010, 28,725 shares were subject to purchase under AGA's employee stock purchase plan. All rights under this employee stock purchase plan shall be cancelled in exchange for cash payments upon consummation of the Merger.

Q:
What would I receive in exchange for my shares of AGA common stock?

A:
In the Offer, St. Jude Medical, through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Asteroid, is offering to exchange for each share of AGA common stock that is validly tendered and not withdrawn either:

$20.80 in cash, without interest (the "Cash Consideration"); or

a fraction of a share or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock equal to the exchange rate (the "Stock Consideration"), which is $20.80 divided by the St. Jude Medical volume weighted average of the daily closing prices, determined by closing prices on the New York Stock Exchange for the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day preceding the expected final expiration date of the Offer (the "Average Trading Price"), subject to adjustment and proration, as described in this prospectus/offer to exchange and the related letter of election and transmittal. For purposes of calculating the exchange rate, the trading volume of St. Jude

4


Table of Contents

      Medical common stock will be based on the consolidated trading volume across all U.S. exchanges. This consolidated trading volume is reported for St. Jude Medical on bloomberg.com under "Volume." You may elect to receive either cash (the "cash election"), or St. Jude Medical common stock ("stock election") for each of your shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer. You can elect cash for some of your shares and stock for others. If you tender your shares of AGA common stock, but do not elect to receive cash or to receive St. Jude Medical common stock for your AGA common stock, you will be treated as if you had made no election, and you will receive consideration as described in response to the question "What will happen if I tender my shares but do not make an election?"

    The exchange rate will be determined in advance of the expiration of the Offer based on the date on which St. Jude Medical will accept shares of AGA common stock for exchange pursuant to the Offer, which we refer to as the final expiration date. St. Jude Medical will announce the exchange rate by issuing a press release no later than 9:00 A.M., New York City time, on the trading day prior to the expected final expiration date of the Offer. For example, St. Jude Medical will announce the exchange rate by issuing a press release no later than 9:00 A.M., New York City time, on November 16, 2010 that will apply if the Offer expires at 12:00 midnight (one minute after 11:59 P.M.), New York City time, on the evening of November 17, 2010, the initial expiration date of the Offer. If the Offer is extended, St. Jude Medical will recalculate the exchange rate based on the later expected final expiration date and announce the exchange rate in a similar manner.

    The aggregate amount of cash and number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock payable in the Offer are subject to the following limits:

    The maximum amount of cash payable in the Offer is $20.80 multiplied by 50% of the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer. Thus, 50% of the shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will be exchanged for cash.

    The maximum number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock payable in the Offer is the exchange rate multiplied by 50% of the aggregate number of number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer. Thus, 50% of the shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will be exchanged for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock.

    In no event will the number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be paid in the Offer and the Merger exceed 19.9% of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock outstanding on the final expiration date.

    Therefore, elections will be subject to proration if tendering holders of AGA common stock, in the aggregate, elect to receive more than the maximum amount of consideration to be paid as cash or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock.

    The fractional shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to which an AGA stockholder is entitled in the Offer or the Merger shall be aggregated with all other fractional shares of all other AGA stockholders in the Offer or Merger, as applicable. Those aggregated shares will be sold in the open market by the exchange agent, as agent for the AGA stockholders having an interest in those shares, and those AGA stockholders will be entitled to their proportional share of the cash proceeds, without interest, from that sale.

Q:
Is the Offer being made by St. Jude Medical or Asteroid?

A:
The Offer is technically being made by Asteroid, which was formed by St. Jude Medical specifically for the purpose of making the Offer and otherwise facilitating the transaction. Because Asteroid is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical, all of the shares of AGA common stock acquired by Asteroid in the Offer will actually be beneficially owned and indirectly controlled by

5


Table of Contents

    St. Jude Medical. Therefore, although Asteroid is technically making the Offer and is a party to the Merger, when we discuss the Offer and the Merger, we generally refer only to St. Jude Medical.

Q:
How long will it take to complete the Offer and the Merger?

A:
St. Jude Medical hopes to complete the Offer in mid-November 2010. St. Jude Medical expects to complete the Merger shortly after it completes the Offer, or, if the approval of the stockholders of AGA for the Merger is required, shortly after the special meeting of AGA stockholders to approve the Merger.

Q:
Do I have to pay any brokerage fees or commissions?

A:
If you are the record owner of your shares and you tender your shares in the Offer, you will not incur any brokerage fees or commissions. If you own your shares through a broker or other nominee who tenders the shares on your behalf, your broker or other nominee may charge you a commission for doing so. You should consult with your broker or other nominee to determine whether any charges will apply.

Q:
Does AGA's board of directors support the Offer and the Merger?

A:
Yes. AGA's board of directors unanimously approved the Offer and the Merger and recommends that you tender your shares of AGA common stock in the Offer. Information about the recommendation of AGA's board of directors is described in AGA's Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, which is being mailed to you together with this prospectus/offer to exchange.

Q:
Have any of the stockholders of AGA agreed to tender their shares?

A:
Yes. Stockholders of AGA affiliated with Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe ("Welsh Carson") and Franck Gougeon entered into a tender and voting agreement pursuant to which they have agreed to tender into the exchange offer an aggregate of 32,808,507 shares of AGA common stock, which represent approximately 65% of the common stock of AGA outstanding as of October 13, 2010. In the event that the AGA board of directors withdraws or adversely changes its recommendation in favor of the Offer and the Merger, or terminates the Merger Agreement to enter into an agreement with respect to a superior proposal, in each case in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, the shares of AGA common stock subject to the tender and voting agreement in excess of the aggregate of 30% of the outstanding common stock of AGA on a fully diluted basis at that time will be released from the obligations under the tender and voting agreement, which we call a "tender and voting agreement release."

Q:
What percentage of St. Jude Medical common stock will AGA stockholders own after the Merger?

A:
If St. Jude Medical obtains all of the shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the transaction, former stockholders of AGA would own approximately 3.83% of the shares of common stock of St. Jude Medical, based upon the number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock and AGA common stock outstanding on October 13, 2010, not taking into account Options, RSUs or other rights to acquire common stock of AGA or St. Jude Medical, and assuming the Average Trading Price for St. Jude Medical's shares as finally calculated for purposes of the Offer is approximately $39.90, which was the closing price on October 15, 2010.

6


Table of Contents

Q:
What are the most significant conditions to the completion of the Offer?

A:
St. Jude Medical's obligation to accept shares of AGA common stock for exchange is subject to several conditions that must be satisfied or waived by Asteroid prior to the expiration of the offer, including:

there having been validly tendered and not withdrawn (not including shares of AGA common stock subject to a notice of guaranteed delivery unless such shares have actually been delivered) prior to the expiration date of the Offer, a number of shares of AGA common stock, which, together with any shares of AGA common stock that St. Jude Medical, Asteroid or any other subsidiary of St. Jude Medical owns, constitute at least a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of AGA common stock on a fully diluted basis (as though all rights and convertible securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of AGA common stock had been so converted or exercised), which is referred to in this prospectus/offer to exchange as the "minimum condition;"

the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"), and under applicable foreign antitrust laws;

the registration statement of which this prospectus/offer to exchange is a part having been declared effective by the SEC and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement having been issued by the SEC;

the shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be issued in the Offer having been approved for listing on the NYSE;

AGA having not breached or failed to comply in any material respect with any of its obligations, covenants or agreements in the Merger Agreement;

the representations and warranties of AGA contained in the Merger Agreement having been true and correct as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the time for acceptance and payment of the shares (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date), subject to applicable materiality qualifications;

no action by any governmental entity or law that prohibits the Offer or the Merger or imposes material limitations on St. Jude Medical's ownership of the shares of AGA having been taken or enacted;

no event having occurred that has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on AGA;

all of the directors (other than three independent directors) having resigned immediately prior to St. Jude Medical's acceptance of AGA shares for exchange; and

the Merger Agreement not having been terminated.

    The minimum condition will be a majority of 53,784,711 shares of AGA common stock, which is equal to the sum of the total number of outstanding shares of AGA common stock and the total number of shares of AGA common stock issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding Options and RSUs to purchase AGA common stock and employee stock purchase plan rights. Other than the Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights, there are no rights or other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of AGA common stock outstanding. As a result, there must be validly tendered and not withdrawn 26,892,357 shares of AGA common stock in the Offer to satisfy the minimum condition. Assuming that the stockholders of AGA who have entered into the tender and voting agreement tender or cause to be tendered all of the shares they beneficially

7


Table of Contents

    owned as of October 13, 2010, no additional shares of AGA common stock must be tendered in the Offer to satisfy the minimum condition unless there is a tender and voting agreement release. If there is a tender and voting agreement release, an additional 10,756,944 shares of AGA common stock, representing approximately 20.0% of the sum of outstanding shares and shares issuable upon exercise of Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights, or 21.4% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock (excluding shares issuable upon exercise of Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights) as of October 13, 2010, must be tendered into the Offer to satisfy the minimum condition.

    These and other conditions to the Offer are discussed in this prospectus/offer to exchange in the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Offer" beginning on page 117.

Q:
How do I participate in the Offer?

A:
You are urged to read this entire prospectus/offer to exchange carefully, and to consider how the Offer and the Merger affect you. Then, if you wish to tender your shares of AGA common stock, you should complete and sign the enclosed letter of election and transmittal and return it with your stock certificates to Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, the designated exchange agent, or, if you hold your shares in "street name" through a broker or other nominee, ask your broker or other nominee to tender your shares. Please read this prospectus/offer to exchange carefully for more information about the procedures for tendering your shares, making a cash election or a stock election, the timing of the Offer, extensions of the Offer period and your rights to withdraw your shares from the Offer prior to the expiration date.

Q:
What will happen if I tender my shares but do not make an election?

A:
AGA stockholders who tender their shares of AGA common stock, but do not make an election will be allocated whatever form of Offer consideration is remaining (or a proportionate share of each form of Offer consideration if neither is oversubscribed), after taking into account the preferences of the tendering stockholders who made valid elections, as follows. If 50% or more of the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer have made a valid election to receive cash, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will be treated as though they had elected to receive St. Jude Medical common stock. If 50% or more of the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer have made a valid election to receive shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will be treated as though they had elected to receive cash. If neither form of consideration is oversubscribed, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will each receive the remaining cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock after taking into account all valid elections on a pro rata basis, such that after all shares of AGA common stock are exchanged, 50% of the aggregate shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will have been exchanged for cash and 50% of the aggregate shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will have been exchanged for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock.

Q:
What will happen if I do not tender my shares of AGA common stock?

A:
If, after completion of the Offer, St. Jude Medical owns a majority of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, it intends to complete a Merger of its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Asteroid, with and into AGA. Upon consummation of the Merger, except for shares of AGA common stock with respect to which appraisal rights under Delaware law are properly exercised, each share of AGA common stock that has not been tendered and accepted for exchange in the Offer will be converted in the Merger into the right to receive either the Cash Consideration or the Stock Consideration. 50% of the shares of AGA common stock will be converted in the Merger into the right to receive the Cash Consideration and 50% will be converted into the right

8


Table of Contents

    to receive the Stock Consideration, subject to adjustment as described in this prospectus/offer to exchange and the related letter of transmittal to be sent following the Merger. The fractional shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to which an AGA stockholder is entitled in the Merger shall be aggregated with all other fractional shares of all other AGA stockholders in the Merger. Those aggregated shares will be sold in the open market by the exchange agent, as agent for the AGA stockholders having an interest in those shares, and those AGA stockholders will be entitled to their proportional share of the cash proceeds, without interest, from that sale.

Q:
Will I be taxed on the cash or St. Jude Medical shares I receive?

A:
The tax consequences to AGA stockholders who receive shares of St. Jude Medical common stock and/or cash in exchange for AGA common stock if the transaction constitutes a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code") will generally be as follows:

AGA stockholders who exchange all of their AGA common stock for St. Jude Medical common stock in the Offer or the Merger will not recognize any gain or loss from the exchange, except with respect to cash proceeds received upon the sale of a fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock;

AGA stockholders who exchange all of their AGA common stock for cash in the Offer or the Merger generally will recognize gain or loss in the exchange equal to the difference between the aggregate amount of cash received for the AGA common stock and the stockholder's tax basis in the AGA common stock; and

AGA stockholders who exchange their AGA common stock for both St. Jude Medical common stock and cash in the Offer or the Merger will recognize gain, but not loss in the exchange, equal to the lesser of (a) the amount of cash received in the transaction (other than cash attributable to the proceeds from the sale of a fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock) and (b) the amount of gain realized in the transaction. The amount of gain that is realized in the exchange will equal the excess of (i) the sum of the cash plus the fair market value of the St. Jude Medical common stock received in the exchange over (ii) the tax basis of the AGA common stock surrendered in the transaction. These AGA stockholders will also recognize gain or loss with respect to the sale of any fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock received.

    If the St. Jude Medical common stock price as of the completion of the Offer or the second merger is significantly lower than the price of St. Jude Medical stock as calculated for purposes of determining the exchange rate, or if appraisal rights are exercised, there may be a risk that the Offer and the Merger would not qualify as part of a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. In such circumstance, based on the adjustment provisions in the Merger Agreement, more AGA common stock exchanged in the Merger will be converted into a right to receive Stock Consideration in place of some or all of the AGA common stock that would have been converted into a right to receive Cash Consideration so that the aggregate value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued in the transaction constitutes at least 40% of the aggregate value of the cash and St. Jude Medical common stock paid and issued in the Offer and Merger. If it is not possible to increase the aggregate value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued in the transaction to this level, the transaction would be treated as a taxable sale of AGA common stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and no adjustment would be made to the amount of Cash Consideration paid in the Merger for this purpose. Upon completion of the Merger, St. Jude Medical plans to issue a press release as to whether the Offer and the Merger should qualify as part of a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

9


Table of Contents

    You should carefully read the discussion under "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences." Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to you of the Offer, the Merger and the second merger of AGA with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical, as described below, will depend on the facts of your own situation, as well as facts that will not be known until after the Offer has been completed and the Merger has occurred. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of participating in the Offer or the Merger.

Q:
Do the statements on the cover page that the information in this prospectus/offer to exchange may change and that the registration statement filed with the SEC is not yet effective mean that the Offer has not yet commenced?

A:
No. The Offer has commenced and effectiveness of the registration statement is not necessary for you to tender your shares of AGA common stock.

Q:
Where can I find more information about St. Jude Medical and AGA?

A:
You can find more information about St. Jude Medical and AGA as described in the section entitled "Where You Can Find Additional Information" on page 2 of this prospectus/offer to exchange.

Q:
Whom should I contact if I have more questions about the transaction?

A:
If you have questions about the transaction, or to obtain the indicative exchange rate starting on November 1, 2010, and the exchange rate starting on November 16, 2010, please contact our information agent, Georgeson Inc., at (212) 440-9800 (banks and brokers) or toll free at (877) 278-4774 (all others).

10


Table of Contents


SUMMARY

         This section summarizes material information presented in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus/offer to exchange. However, this summary does not contain all of the information that may be important to AGA stockholders. AGA stockholders are urged to read carefully the entire prospectus/offer to exchange and the other documents referred to and incorporated by reference in this prospectus/offer to exchange to fully understand the Offer and the Merger. In particular, AGA stockholders should read the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange by following the instructions in the section entitled, "Where You Can Find Additional Information."

The Transaction (Page 65)

        St. Jude Medical and AGA entered into the Merger Agreement on October 15, 2010, pursuant to which an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical, Asteroid, is offering to exchange cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock for all of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock. In the Offer, Asteroid is offering to exchange cash in the amount of $20.80 or a fraction of a share or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock having a value equal to $20.80 for each share of AGA common stock that is validly tendered and not withdrawn. This amount of St. Jude Medical common stock shall be referred to as the exchange rate. The exchange rate will be determined in advance of the expiration of the Offer based on the final expiration date of the Offer. The exchange rate will be equal to $20.80 divided by the Average Trading Price. The Average Trading Price is the volume weighted average of the daily closing sale prices per share of St. Jude Medical common stock on the NYSE for the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day preceding the final expiration date of the Offer. For purposes of calculating the exchange rate, the trading volume of St. Jude Medical common stock will be based on the consolidated trading volume across all U.S. exchanges. This consolidated trading volume is reported for St. Jude Medical on bloomberg.com under "Volume." Based on $39.63, which is the Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") for the ten trading days up to and including the second trading day prior to October 19, 2010, the exchange rate would be 0.525. AGA stockholders may contact St. Jude Medical's information agent toll free to obtain the indicative exchange rate starting on November 1, 2010, and the exchange rate starting on November 16, 2010. AGA stockholders may elect to receive cash or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, for all of their shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer, subject to proration in the event the amount of cash or St. Jude Medical common stock available in the Offer is oversubscribed.

        Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the initial expiration date for the Offer is November 17, 2010. In certain circumstances, St. Jude Medical is required to or may extend the Offer beyond this date.

        Promptly after completion of the Offer, St. Jude Medical intends to merge Asteroid with and into AGA. Each share of AGA common stock that has not been tendered and accepted for payment in the Offer will be converted in the Merger into the right to receive $20.80 in cash, without interest, or a fraction of a share or number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock equal to the exchange rate, except for shares of AGA common stock with respect to which appraisal rights under Delaware law are properly exercised, treasury shares and shares that St. Jude Medical or Asteroid holds for its own account. 50% of the AGA shares converted in the Merger will receive the Cash Consideration and 50% will receive the Stock Consideration, subject to adjustment in the event the Offer and the Merger collectively would not otherwise qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Asteroid shall cease and AGA shall continue as the surviving corporation of the Merger. St. Jude Medical seeks to acquire ownership of 100% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock through the Offer and the Merger. The Offer and the Merger are sometimes collectively referred to in this prospectus/offer to exchange as the "transaction."

11


Table of Contents

        After completion of the Merger of Asteroid into AGA, St. Jude Medical will cause AGA to be merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical (the "second merger"), unless the value of the cash paid in the transaction constitutes more than 60% of the aggregate value of the cash and St. Jude Medical common stock paid and issued in the transaction such that the transaction would not qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Purpose of the Offer (Page 66)

        St. Jude Medical is making the Offer in order to acquire all of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock. St. Jude Medical intends, as soon as practicable after completion of the Offer, to have its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Asteroid, the purchaser in the Offer, merge with and into AGA. The purpose of the Merger is to acquire all shares of AGA common stock not tendered and exchanged in connection with the Offer. In the Merger, each then outstanding share of AGA common stock, except for treasury shares, shares that St. Jude Medical or Asteroid holds for its own account and shares of AGA common stock with respect to which appraisal rights have been properly exercised under Delaware law, will be converted into the right to receive, the Cash Consideration or the Stock Consideration. 50% of the AGA shares converted in the Merger will receive the Cash Consideration and 50% will receive the Stock Consideration, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

The Companies (Page 126)

St. Jude Medical, Inc.

    St. Jude Medical, Inc.
    One St. Jude Medical Drive
    St Paul, MN 55117
    (651) 756-2000

        St. Jude Medical develops, manufactures and distributes cardiovascular medical devices for the global cardiac rhythm management, cardiology and cardiac surgery and atrial fibrillation therapy areas and neurostimulation medical devices for the management of chronic pain. St. Jude Medical's four operating segments are Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM), Cardiovascular (CV), Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Neuromodulation (NMD). St. Jude Medical's CV operating segment focuses on both the cardiology and cardiac surgery therapy areas. St. Jude Medical's principal products in each operating segment are as follows: CRM—tachycardia implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems (ICDs) and bradycardia pacemaker systems (pacemakers); CV—vascular closure devices, heart valve replacement and repair products and pressure measurement guidewires; AF—electrophysiology (EP) introducers and catheters, advanced cardiac mapping, navigation and recording systems and ablation systems; and NMD—neurostimulation devices. The company markets and sells its products through both a direct sales force and independent distributors. The principal geographic markets for its products are the United States, Europe, Japan and Asia Pacific. St. Jude Medical was incorporated in Minnesota in 1976. Its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol STJ.

Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation

    Asteroid Subsidiary Corporation
    c/o St. Jude Medical Inc.
    One St. Jude Medical Drive
    St Paul, MN 55117
    (651) 756-2000

        Asteroid is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Jude Medical and was incorporated on October 12, 2010 in the State of Delaware. Asteroid has not engaged in any operations and exists solely to make the Offer and otherwise facilitate the transaction. Therefore, although Asteroid is technically

12


Table of Contents

making the Offer and will be a party to the Merger, when the transaction is discussed in this prospectus/offer to exchange, it generally refers only to St. Jude Medical.

AGA Medical Holdings, Inc.

    AGA Medical Holdings, Inc.
    5050 Nathan Lane North
    Plymouth, MN 55442
    (763) 513-9227

        AGA, based in Plymouth, Minnesota, is a leading innovator and manufacturer of medical devices for the treatment of structural heart defects and vascular abnormalities. AGA's AMPLATZER® occlusion devices offer minimally invasive, transcatheter treatments that have been clinically shown to be safe and highly effective in defect closure. AGA is the only manufacturer with occlusion devices approved to close seven different structural heart defects, with leading market positions for each of its devices. More than 1,650 articles supporting the benefits of AMPLATZER products have been published in medical literature. AGA markets its AMPLATZER products in 112 countries worldwide to interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists, interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons. AGA's predecessor and subsidiary, AGA Medical Corporation, was founded in Minnesota in 1995. AGA was incorporated in 2005 in Delaware. Its common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AGAM.

Timing of the Offer (Page 67)

        The Offer commenced on October 20, 2010 and is currently scheduled to expire on November 17, 2010, but may be extended under the circumstances described below.

Extension; Termination or Amendment (Page 67)

        Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Offer:

    shall be extended by St. Jude Medical (but not later than March 1, 2011) if any of the conditions to the Offer shall not have been satisfied or waived;

    may be extended by St. Jude Medical if and to the extent required by the SEC, NASDAQ or the NYSE or any other applicable law; and

    may be extended once by St. Jude Medical (but not later than March 1, 2011) if all of the conditions to the Offer shall have been satisfied or waived, but less than 90% of the shares of AGA common stock on a fully diluted basis have been tendered in the Offer.

        During an extension, all shares of AGA common stock previously tendered and not properly withdrawn will remain subject to the Offer, subject to an AGA stockholder's right to withdraw its shares of AGA common stock. If the Offer has not been consummated by March 1, 2011, AGA or St. Jude Medical may terminate the Merger Agreement.

Withdrawal Rights (Page 70)

        Shares of AGA common stock tendered pursuant to the Offer may be withdrawn at any time prior to the expiration date of the Offer, as it may be extended.

Procedure for Tendering (Page 71)

        For an AGA stockholder to validly tender shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer and make a cash election or stock election, a properly completed and duly executed letter of election and transmittal or manually executed copy of that document, along with any required signature guarantees,

13


Table of Contents


or an agent's message in connection with a book-entry transfer, and any other required documents, must be transmitted to and received by Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, the designated exchange agent, at Corporate Actions Department, P.O. Box 64858, St. Paul, MN 55164-0858 (post office mailing address), or, to Corporate Actions Department, 161 North Concord Exchange, South St. Paul, MN 55075 (overnight/hand delivery). Alternatively, an AGA stockholder may comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures set forth in the section entitled "The Transaction—Procedure for Tendering."

        In addition, certificates for tendered shares of AGA common stock must be received by the exchange agent at one of these addresses, or the shares of AGA common stock must be tendered pursuant to the procedures for book-entry tender, in each case before the expiration date of the Offer.

Exchange of Shares of AGA Common Stock; Delivery of Cash and Shares of St. Jude Medical Common Stock (Page 69)

        Upon the terms of, and subject to the conditions to, the Offer, including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of any extension or amendment, St. Jude Medical is required to accept for exchange, and to deliver cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in exchange for, shares of AGA common stock validly tendered and not withdrawn, promptly after the expiration date of the Offer.

Elections and Prorations (Page 68)

        If you wish to make a cash election or a stock election, you must make a cash election or stock election when you tender shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer to the exchange agent with your letter of election and transmittal.

Top-Up Option (Page 66)

        Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, AGA has granted to St. Jude Medical an irrevocable option to purchase newly-issued shares of AGA common stock in an amount up to the lowest number of shares of AGA common stock that, when added to the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock owned by St. Jude Medical and Asteroid, will constitute one share of AGA common stock more than 90% of the total shares of AGA commons stock outstanding (the "Top-Up Option"). Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the Top-Up Option is exercisable by St. Jude Medical if, following completion of the Offer, St. Jude Medical or Asteroid beneficially own at least 75% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock. The consideration payable by St. Jude Medical upon exercise of the Top-Up Option will have a value equal to the Cash Consideration, payable in cash to the extent of the par value of shares of AGA common stock so purchased, and, as to the balance for the shares of AGA common stock so purchased, payable in cash, shares of St. Jude Medical common stock (valued at the Average Trading Price), a promissory note (bearing interest at the prime rate and with a one-year maturity date), or a combination of the foregoing. If the Top-Up Option is exercised, St. Jude Medical and Asteroid must undertake to consummate as promptly as practicable the Merger described below to acquire all remaining shares of AGA common stock not acquired in the Offer. The Top-Up Option terminates concurrently with any termination of the Merger Agreement. Any dilutive impact on the value of shares of AGA common stock as a result of the existence or exercise of the Top-Up Option, the issuance of shares of AGA common stock in the Top-Up Option or the payment for such shares with a promissory note or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock will not be taken into account in determining the fair value of any shares of AGA common stock for which appraisal rights have been properly asserted.

14


Table of Contents

Approval of the Merger (Page 75)

        If, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any exercise by Asteroid of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns 90% or more of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, the Merger can be accomplished without a vote of AGA stockholders. If, on the other hand, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any such exercise by St. Jude Medical of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns more than 50% but less than 90% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, a special meeting of AGA stockholders and the affirmative vote at such meeting of at least a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for such meeting will be needed to complete the Merger. Because St. Jude Medical will own a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for the special meeting, approval of the Merger by AGA stockholders will be assured.

Interests of Certain Persons (Page 75)

        When you consider the recommendation of AGA's board of directors that AGA stockholders tender their shares in the Offer, you should be aware that some AGA officers and directors may have interests in the transaction that are different from, or in addition to, yours. These interests are described more fully in the section entitled "The Transaction—Interests of Certain Persons."

Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approval (Page 80)

        Under the HSR Act, the Merger may not be consummated unless certain filings have been submitted to the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the "Antitrust Division"), and certain waiting period requirements have been satisfied. St. Jude Medical and AGA have filed notification and report forms under the HSR Act with the FTC and with the Antitrust Division. St. Jude Medical and AGA will also make such foreign antitrust filings as they determine are necessary.

        Notwithstanding the termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act, the FTC or the Antitrust Division could take any action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary in the public interest. In addition, certain private parties as well as state attorneys general and other antitrust authorities could challenge the transaction under antitrust laws in certain circumstances. Foreign antitrust authorities could also take action under their antitrust laws.

Source and Amount of Funds (Page 95)

        The Offer and Merger are not conditioned upon any financing arrangements or contingencies. The amount of cash required to fund the Cash Consideration and to fund transaction-related fees and expenses will be approximately $578 million. St. Jude Medical has sufficient cash on hand to pay such consideration, if necessary.

Appraisal Rights (Page 96)

        AGA stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Offer. However, the Merger will entitle AGA stockholders to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"). To exercise appraisal rights, an AGA stockholder must not tender his or her shares in the Offer, must not submit a letter of election and transmittal in connection with the Offer or a letter of transmittal in connection with the Merger and must not vote in favor of (or consent to) the Merger and must strictly comply with all of the procedures required by the DGCL. These procedures are described more fully in the section entitled "The Transaction—Appraisal Rights."

15


Table of Contents

        You are urged to read the appraisal rights provisions of the DGCL, which are attached as Annex D to this prospectus/offer to exchange.

Ownership of St. Jude Medical After the Offer and Merger (Page 95)

        Based on certain assumptions regarding the number of AGA shares to be exchanged, St. Jude Medical estimates that, if all shares of AGA common stock are exchanged pursuant to the Offer and the Merger, former AGA stockholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 3.83% of the outstanding shares of St. Jude Medical common stock. For a detailed discussion of the assumptions on which this estimate is based, please see the section of this prospectus/offer to exchange entitled "The Transaction—Ownership of St. Jude Medical After the Offer and Merger."

Comparison of St. Jude Medical Shareholder Rights and AGA Stockholder Rights (Page 210)

        After the Offer and the Merger, AGA stockholders who receive Stock Consideration in the Offer and Merger will become St. Jude Medical shareholders and their rights as shareholders will be governed by the articles of incorporation and bylaws of St. Jude Medical. There are a number of differences between the articles of incorporation and bylaws of St. Jude Medical, a Minnesota corporation, and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of AGA, a Delaware corporation, and there are a number of differences between the applicable Minnesota and Delaware corporation statutes. These differences are discussed under the section entitled "Comparison of St. Jude Medical Shareholder Rights and AGA Stockholder Rights."

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (Page 216)

        Provided the Offer, the Merger and the second merger, taken together, qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, the tax consequences to AGA stockholders who receive shares of St. Jude Medical common stock and/or cash in exchange for AGA shares will generally be as follows:

    an AGA stockholder who exchanges all of its AGA shares for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in the Offer or the Merger will not recognize any gain or loss from the exchange, except with respect to cash proceeds received upon the sale of a fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock, if any;

    an AGA stockholder who exchanges all of its AGA shares for cash in the Offer or Merger generally will recognize gain or loss in the exchange equal to the difference between the aggregate amount of cash received for the AGA shares and the stockholder's tax basis in those AGA shares; and

    an AGA stockholder who exchanges its AGA shares for both shares of St. Jude Medical common stock and cash in the Offer or the Merger will recognize gain, but not loss in the exchange, equal to the lesser of (a) the amount of cash received in the transaction (other than cash attributable to proceeds from the sale of a fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock) and (b) the amount of gain realized in the transaction. The amount of gain that is realized will equal the excess of (i) the sum of the cash plus the fair market value of the St. Jude Medical common stock received over (ii) the tax basis of the AGA shares surrendered in the transaction. These AGA stockholders will also recognize gain or loss with respect to the sale of any fractional share of St. Jude Medical common stock received.

         If the St. Jude Medical common stock trading price drops significantly from the Average Trading Price prior to the close of the Offer, or the second merger, or if appraisal rights are exercised, the Offer, Merger and second merger may not qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. In such circumstances, based on the adjustment provisions in the Merger Agreement, more

16


Table of Contents


AGA shares will be converted into a right to receive St. Jude Medical common stock in the Merger so that the aggregate value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued in the transaction constitutes at least 40% of the total consideration in the Offer and the Merger. If it is not possible to increase the aggregate value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued in the transaction to this level, the transaction will be treated as a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and no proration will be made to bring the aggregate value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued in the transaction to 40%. If necessary in order to confirm calculations relating to the impact of potential exercise of appraisal rights under Delaware law on the qualification of the Offer, the Merger and the second merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, AGA stockholders who exchange their shares in the Merger may not receive their merger consideration until approximately 20 days after the date of mailing of the notice of appraisal rights in connection with the Merger.

Accounting Treatment (Page 96)

        In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, St. Jude Medical will account for the acquisition of shares of AGA common stock in the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations.

Share Information and Market Prices for St. Jude Medical Common Stock

        St. Jude Medical common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol STJ. AGA common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AGAM.

        The following table lists the closing price and Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock, the closing price of AGA common stock, and the equivalent value of a share of AGA common stock if a cash election or stock election is made assuming that there was no oversubscription for the cash or stock consideration and that the final expiration date is on:

    October 15, 2010, the trading day before the transaction was announced; and

    October 19, 2010, the last day before commencement of the Offer.

 
   
   
   
  Equivalent Per Share Value
of AGA Common Stock
 
 
   
  Average
Trading Price
of St. Jude
Medical
Common Stock
   
 
 
  Closing Price
of St. Jude
Medical
Common Stock
   
 
 
  Closing price
of AGA
Common Stock
  Cash
Election
  Stock
Election
 

October 15, 2010

  $ 39.90   $ 39.54   $ 14.71   $ 20.80   $ 20.99  

October 19, 2010

  $ 39.76   $ 39.63   $ 20.69   $ 20.80   $ 20.87  

        The "equivalent per share value of AGA common stock" on each of these two days represents the total dollar value of the consideration that an AGA stockholder would have received for one share of AGA common stock if the stockholder had made a cash election or a stock election assuming that there was no oversubscription for the cash or stock consideration and that the final expiration date had been on those dates. The total dollar value of the per share stock consideration for the Offer will be determined based on the Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock during the ten trading days prior to and including the second trading day prior to the final expiration date of the Offer. As of October 15, 2010, the Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock for the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day before the date of determination was $39.54 and as of October 19, 2010, the Average Trading Price for the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day before such date of determination, St. Jude Medical common stock was $39.63. For each of these two days, the total dollar value of the per share consideration for a cash election was calculated as $20.80 and for a stock election by dividing $20.80 by the Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock on each date, and then multiplying such fraction by the closing price of St. Jude Medical common stock on each date.

17


Table of Contents

        The market price of St. Jude Medical common stock may change at any time. Consequently, the total dollar value of the St. Jude Medical common stock that you will be entitled to receive, if any, as a result of the Offer or the Merger may be significantly higher or lower than its current value.

Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends

St. Jude Medical Share Prices and Dividends

        St. Jude Medical common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol STJ. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported closing sale prices per share of St. Jude Medical common stock on the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions reporting system. St. Jude Medical did not declare any dividends on its common stock during the periods shown.

 
  Price Range of Common Stock  
 
  High   Low  

2008

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 44.53   $ 38.95  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 45.52   $ 39.90  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 48.22   $ 40.18  
 

Fourth Quarter

  $ 43.23   $ 25.48  

2009

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 38.28   $ 29.44  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 41.77   $ 33.17  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 40.69   $ 36.08  
 

Fourth Quarter

  $ 38.59   $ 32.79  

2010

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 41.26   $ 37.03  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 42.46   $ 36.07  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 39.34   $ 34.57  
 

Fourth Quarter (through November 12, 2010)

  $ 40.66   $ 37.68  

        On October 15, 2010 the trading day before the public announcement of the Offer and the Merger, the last sale price per share of St. Jude Medical common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $39.90. On November 12, 2010, the most recent practicable date prior to this prospectus/offer to exchange, the last sale price per share of St. Jude Medical common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $38.66.

AGA Share Prices and Dividends

        AGA common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AGAM. The following table sets forth the high and low reported sale prices per share of AGA common stock for the periods indicated as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. AGA common stock began

18


Table of Contents


trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 21, 2009. AGA did not declare any cash dividends on its common stock during the periods shown.

 
  Price Range of Common Stock  
 
  High   Low  

2009

             
 

Fourth Quarter (beginning on October 21, 2009)

  $ 15.00   $ 11.91  

2010

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 16.37   $ 13.08  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 18.95   $ 11.61  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 15.24   $ 11.87  
 

Fourth Quarter (through November 12, 2010)

  $ 21.05   $ 13.84  

        On October 15, 2010 the trading day before the public announcement of the Offer and the Merger, the last sale price per share of AGA common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $14.71. On November 12, 2010, the most recent practicable date prior to this prospectus/offer to exchange, the last sale price per share of AGA common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $20.74.

        The timing and amount of future dividends paid by St. Jude Medical and AGA are subject to determination by the applicable board of directors in their discretion and will depend upon earnings, cash requirements and the financial condition of the respective companies and their subsidiaries, and other factors deemed relevant by the applicable company's board of directors. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, AGA and St. Jude Medical have agreed not to declare or pay any dividends with respect to their common stock, except that St. Jude Medical and AGA may declare and pay ordinary course dividends payable by a subsidiary of St. Jude Medical or AGA, respectively, to St. Jude Medical or AGA, respectively, or to another of their respective subsidiaries. See "The Merger Agreement—Other Terms of the Merger Agreement—Conduct of Business" on page 110.

19


Table of Contents


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL

        The selected annual historical financial data presented below as of and for fiscal 2009-2005 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of St. Jude Medical. The selected historical financial data for the first six months of fiscal 2010 and 2009 have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of St. Jude Medical. The unaudited financial statements for the first six months of 2010 and 2009 include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which St. Jude Medical considers necessary to present a fair statement of the consolidated results of operations and financial position for the period. You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial statements, related notes and other financial information of St. Jude Medical that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange.


(in thousands except per share and ratio amounts)

 
  As of and
for the six
months ended
July 3,
2010
  As of and
for the six
months ended
July 4,
2009
  As of and for
Fiscal Year
 
 
  2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (Unaudited)
   
   
   
   
   
 

Net sales

  $ 2,574,465     2,318,205   $ 4,681,273   $ 4,363,251   $ 3,779,277   $ 3,302,447   $ 2,915,280  

Operating profit

    710,760     586,919     1,113,046     655,047     793,503     743,083     612,730  

Net income

    492,607     420,641     777,226     353,018     537,756     539,042     393,362  

Basic net income per share

    1.51     1.21     2.28     1.03     1.57     1.50     1.08  

Diluted net income per share

    1.50     1.20     2.26     1.01     1.53     1.45     1.04  

Current assets

    3,027,872     2,623,813     2,560,206     2,080,063     2,128,183     1,690,165     1,941,141  

Noncurrent assets

    3,898,426     3,740,010     3,865,605     3,642,441     3,201,221     3,099,629     2,903,699  

Current liabilities

    668,434     1,243,318     1,067,313     1,028,524     1,799,256     676,207     1,519,809  

Noncurrent liabilities

    2,444,558     1,342,147     2,034,947     1,458,074     570,829     1,144,361     432,781  

Long-term debt obligations

    1,961,837     961,022     1,587,615     1,126,084     182,493     859,137     176,970  

Shareholders' equity

    3,813,306     3,778,358     3,323,551     3,235,906     2,959,319     2,969,226     2,892,250  

Diluted weighted shares outstanding

    328,684     350,213     344,359     349,772     352,444     372,830     379,106  

Basic weighted shares outstanding

    326,113     346,308     340,880     342,888     342,103     359,252     363,612  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    17.3     34.2     19.6     8.1     9.7     13.5     35.4  

20


Table of Contents


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF AGA

        The summary below sets forth historical financial data for AGA. AGA derived the selected statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 from AGA's audited consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this prospectus/offer to exchange. AGA derived the selected consolidated statements of operations data for the period from January 1, 2005 to July 27, 2005, the period from July 28, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2006 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 from AGA's audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this prospectus/offer to exchange. AGA derived the consolidated statements of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2009 and 2010 from AGA's unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this prospectus/offer to exchange. AGA has prepared this unaudited information on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and has included all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that AGA considers necessary for a fair presentation of AGA's financial position and operating results for such period. AGA has prepared the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial statements. AGA's historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future and the results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. You should read this data together with AGA's consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus/offer to exchange and the information under "AGA's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

        On July 28, 2005, the stockholders of AGA Medical Corporation contributed all of the outstanding shares of AGA Medical Corporation to AGA in exchange for shares of AGA. As a result of the contribution, AGA Medical Corporation became a wholly-owned subsidiary of AGA. All periods prior to July 28, 2005 are referred to as "Predecessor," and all periods on or after such date are referred to as "Successor." The data for Predecessor periods represents consolidated financial information of AGA Medical Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries and the selected financial information for all Successor periods represents financial information of AGA and its consolidated subsidiaries. The financial statements for all Successor periods are not comparable to those of Predecessor periods.

21


Table of Contents

 
  Successor   Predecessor  
 
  Six Months Ended June 30,    
   
   
   
  Period
From
July 28, to
December 31,
2005
  Period
From
January 1,
to July 27,
2005
 
 
  Year ended December 31,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006  
 
  (in thousands, except per share data)
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                                                 

Net sales

  $ 105,026   $ 94,381   $ 198,710   $ 166,896   $ 147,255   $ 127,529   $ 39,917   $ 58,206  

Cost of goods sold

    14,987     17,004     31,240     26,635     22,819     24,985     8,967     11,580  
                                   

Gross profit

    90,039     77,377     167,470     140,261     124,436     102,544     30,950     46,626  

Operating expenses:

                                                 
 

Selling, general and administrative

    49,843     46,456     98,908     65,669     50,190     37,515     15,035     14,145  
 

Research and development

    21,620     16,477     35,197     32,760     26,556     12,096     3,084     4,012  
 

Amortization of intangible assets

    9,971     9,894     20,115     15,540     15,233     12,682     5,099      
 

Change in purchase consideration

    (153 )   (698 )   (1,149 )                    
 

Litigation settlement

    31,859                         29,000      
 

FCPA settlement

                    2,000              
 

In-process research and development

                            50,800      
 

Loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment

    (1 )   (26 )   63     68     (3 )   709     26      
                                   
 

Total operating expenses

    113,139     72,103     153,134     114,037     93,976     63,002     103,044     18,157  
                                   

Operating income (loss)

    (23,100 )   5,274     14,336     26,224     30,460     39,542     (72,094 )   28,469  

Investment income (loss)

        (2,352 )   (2,352 )   (1,202 )   (751 )   754     193     (166 )

Interest income

    60     61     92     230     426     1,174     423     777  

Interest income—related party

                    6             394  

Interest expense

    (4,451 )   (8,149 )   (17,219 )   (16,492 )   (21,213 )   (22,893 )   (6,418 )    

Other income, (expense), net

    (263 )   1,275     3,220     722     994     957     (91 )   340  
                                   

Income (loss) before income taxes

    (27,754 )   (3,891 )   (1,923 )   9,482     9,922     19,534     (77,987 )   29,814  

Income tax (benefit) expense

    (10,168 )   306     (828 )   386     3,844     6,909     (9,926 )   10,565  
                                   

Net income (loss)

    (17,586 )   (4,197 )   (1,095 )   9,096     6,078     12,625     (68,061 )   19,249  

Less Series A and Series B preferred stock and Class A common stock dividends

        (8,471 )   (14,282 )   (17,067 )   (15,372 )   (59,410 )   (6,271 )    
                                   

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders

  $ (17,586 ) $ (12,668 ) $ (15,377 ) $ (7,971 ) $ (9,294 ) $ (46,785 ) $ (74,332 ) $ 19,249  
                                   

Net income (loss) per common share—basic and diluted

  $ (0.35 ) $ (0.59 ) $ (0.57 ) $ (0.37 ) $ (0.41 ) $ (2.00 ) $ (3.18 )      
                                   

Cash dividends per Class A common stock

      $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 2.15   $ 0.00        

Cash dividends per share of common stock

  $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 0.00   $ 2.15   $ 0.72        
                                   

Weighted average shares—basic and diluted

    50,130     21,482     27,069     21,482     22,550     23,356     23,356        
                                   

 

 
  Successor  
 
  As of June 30,   As of December 31,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):

                                           

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 14,675   $ 8,798   $ 24,470   $ 22,867   $ 13,854   $ 8,190   $ 17,707  

Working capital

    52,344     22,563     50,444     30,546     16,454     27,080     27,061  

Total assets

    316,288     326,282     340,580     272,328     256,015     258,794     282,372  

Long-term obligations, less current portion

    239,659     291,420     219,962     253,442     242,600     242,589     140,151  

Redeemable convertible Series A and Series B preferred stock and Class A common stock

        184,922         174,571     158,701     158,425     154,795  

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)

    13,940     (237,058 )   36,457     (226,458 )   (217,769 )   (210,568 )   (121,140 )

        Presentation for Successor periods gives effect to the 1.00 for 7.15 reverse stock split of AGA's common stock that occurred immediately prior to AGA's initial public offering.

22


Table of Contents


COMPARISON OF UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA AND
PER SHARE DATA

        The following tables present certain historical financial data regarding net sales, gross profit, net income (loss), book value, noncurrent assets, noncurrent liabilities and ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of St. Jude Medical and AGA and unaudited pro forma combined financial data that give effect to the proposed Offer and Merger as a purchase of AGA by St. Jude Medical. The pro forma data of the combined company assumes a 100% acquisition of AGA common stock and the equivalent pro forma per share data for AGA assumes that 0.525 of a share of St. Jude Medical common stock will be issued in exchange for one share of AGA common stock. Please note that the actual final exchange rate will differ from this example calculation. These data have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the selected historical consolidated financial data of St. Jude Medical and AGA included elsewhere in this prospectus/offer to exchange, and the historical consolidated financial statements of St. Jude Medical and accompanying notes thereto that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus/offer to exchange, and the historical consolidated financial statements of AGA and accompanying notes thereto that are included in this prospectus/offer to exchange. Neither St. Jude Medical nor AGA has declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock during the periods shown.

        The unaudited pro forma combined financial data and per share data is presented for informational purposes only and is based on the historical consolidated financial statements of St. Jude Medical and AGA and certain assumptions and adjustments related to a preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired based upon preliminary estimates of fair value. Actual amounts from the final purchase price allocation, determined on the basis of more detailed information, will differ from the amounts reflected below. You should not rely on this pro forma combined data as being indicative of the consolidated results of operations or financial condition of St. Jude Medical that would have been reported had the Merger been completed as of the dates presented, and you should not regard this data as representative of future consolidated results of operations or financial condition of St. Jude Medical. It has been assumed for the purposes of the pro forma financial information as of and for the year ended January 2, 2010 provided below that the Merger was completed on January 4, 2009, for net sales, gross profit, net income per share and ratio of earnings to fixed charges purposes and on January 2, 2010 for noncurrent assets, noncurrent liabilities and book value per share purposes. It has been assumed for purposes of the pro forma financial information as of and for the six months ended July 3, 2010 provided below that the Merger was completed on January 3, 2010, for net sales, gross profit, net income per share and ratio of earnings to

23


Table of Contents

fixed charges purposes and on July 3, 2010 for noncurrent assets, noncurrent liabilities and book value per share purposes.

(in thousands, except per share and ratio amounts)
  Six months ended
July 3, 2010
  Year ended
January 2, 2010
 

St. Jude Medical Historical Data

             

Net sales

  $ 2,574,465   $ 4,681,273  

Gross profit

  $ 1,907,994   $ 3,427,888  

Net income per share:

             
 

Basic

  $ 1.51   $ 2.28  
 

Diluted

  $ 1.50   $ 2.26  

Book value per share at the end of the period

  $ 11.65   $ 10.24  

Noncurrent assets

  $ 3,898,426   $ 3,865,605  

Noncurrent liabilities

  $ 2,444,558   $ 2,034,947  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    17.3     19.6  

Pro Forma Combined (Unaudited)

             

Net sales

  $ 2,679,491   $ 4,879,983  

Gross profit

  $ 1,965,533   $ 3,562,858  

Net income per share:

             
 

Basic

  $ 1.36   $ 2.11  
 

Diluted

  $ 1.35   $ 2.09  

Book value per share at the end of the period

  $ 12.74   $ 11.39  

Noncurrent assets

  $ 5,378,096   $ 5,340,312  

Noncurrent liabilities

  $ 2,909,072   $ 2,492,598  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    15.5     18.6  

 

 
  Six months ended
June 30, 2010
  Year ended
December 31, 2009
 

AGA Historical Data

             

Net sales

  $ 105,026   $ 198,710  

Gross profit

  $ 90,039   $ 167,470  

Net loss per share:

             
 

Basic and diluted

  $ (0.35 ) $ (0.57 )

Book value per share at the end of the period

  $ 0.28   $ 0.73  

Noncurrent assets

  $ 224,110   $ 241,664  

Noncurrent liabilities

  $ 262,514   $ 255,651  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    (4.6 )   0.9  

Pro Forma Combined Per Equivalent AGA Share (Unaudited)

             

Net sales

  $ 2,679,491   $ 4,879,983  

Gross profit

  $ 1,965,533   $ 3,562,858  

Net income per share:

             
 

Basic

  $ 2.59   $ 4.03  
 

Diluted

  $ 2.57   $ 3.99  

Book value per share at the end of the period

  $ 24.27   $ 21.69  

Noncurrent assets

  $ 5,378,096   $ 5,340,312  

Noncurrent liabilities

  $ 2,909,072   $ 2,492,598  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    15.5     18.6  

24


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

         In considering whether to tender your shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer, you should carefully consider the information in this prospectus/offer to exchange, including, in particular, the following risk factors.


Risks Relating to the Offer

The market price of St. Jude Medical common stock may decline as a result of its acquisition of AGA.

        The market price of St. Jude Medical common stock may decline after the transaction is completed if:

    the integration of AGA's business with St. Jude Medical is unsuccessful or takes longer or is more disruptive than anticipated;

    St. Jude Medical does not achieve the expected synergies or other benefits of the AGA acquisition as rapidly or to the extent anticipated, if at all;

    the effect of St. Jude Medical's acquisition of AGA on its financial results does not meet St. Jude Medical's expectations or those of St. Jude Medical's financial analysts or investors; or

    after St. Jude Medical acquires AGA, AGA's business does not perform as anticipated.

        As of October 13, 2010, there were 329,006,642 shares of St. Jude Medical common stock outstanding and 47,520,034 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to various equity compensation plans, of which 31,832,183 shares were subject to outstanding options or other rights. In connection with the transaction, St. Jude Medical estimates that it could issue up to 13.2 million additional shares of St. Jude Medical common stock based on the shares outstanding as of October 13, 2010 and the Average Trading Price calculated as of October 19, 2010. The increase in the number of outstanding shares of St. Jude Medical common stock may lead to sales of such shares or the perception that such sales may occur, either of which may adversely affect the market price of St. Jude Medical's common stock.

The failure to complete the transaction could negatively impact the stock prices and future business and financial results of St. Jude Medical and AGA.

        If the transaction is not completed, the ongoing businesses of St. Jude Medical and AGA may be adversely affected and St. Jude Medical and AGA may be subject to several risks and consequences, including the following:

    AGA may be required, under certain circumstances, to pay St. Jude Medical a termination fee under the Merger Agreement of $32,475,000 (or, in certain circumstances, $21,650,000);

    St. Jude Medical and AGA are required to pay costs relating to the transaction, whether or not the transaction is completed, such as legal, accounting and printing fees;

    under the Merger Agreement, St. Jude Medical and AGA are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of their businesses prior to completing the transaction, which may adversely affect their ability to execute certain of their business strategies; and

    matters relating to the transaction may require substantial commitments of time and resources by St. Jude Medical and AGA management, which would otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to St. Jude Medical and AGA as independent companies.

        In addition, if the transaction is not completed, St. Jude Medical and AGA may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from their respective clients and employees. St. Jude

25


Table of Contents


Medical and AGA also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the transaction or to enforcement proceedings commenced against St. Jude Medical or AGA to perform their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the transaction is not completed, St. Jude Medical and AGA cannot be certain that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the business, financial operations and stock prices of St. Jude Medical and AGA.

The Merger Agreement limits AGA's ability to pursue alternative transactions, and in certain instances requires payment of a termination fee, which could deter a third party from proposing an alternative transaction.

        The Merger Agreement has terms and conditions that make it difficult for AGA to enter into an alternative transaction. These "no shop" provisions impose restrictions on AGA and, subject to limited exceptions, limit AGA's ability to discuss, facilitate or commit to an alternative transaction. See "The Merger Agreement—Other Terms of the Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Transactions" beginning on page 113 of this prospectus/offer to exchange. In addition, under specified circumstances, AGA is required to pay a termination fee as described above if the Merger Agreement is terminated. See "The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement—Termination Fees and Expenses" beginning on page 121 of this prospectus/offer to exchange.

        These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of AGA from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share price than that proposed in the Offer, or might result in a potential competing acquiror proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire AGA than it might otherwise have proposed to pay.

Even if the Offer is completed, full integration of AGA's operations with St. Jude Medical may be delayed if St. Jude Medical does not acquire at least 90% of the issued and outstanding AGA shares pursuant to the Offer.

        The Offer is subject to a condition that, before the expiration date, there shall have been validly tendered and not properly withdrawn at least a majority of AGA's shares of common stock on a fully diluted basis. If St. Jude Medical acquires at least 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of AGA common stock, the Merger will be able to be effected as a "short-form" merger under Delaware law. A short-form merger would enable St. Jude Medical to complete the acquisition of AGA without any action on the part of the other holders of AGA's common stock. If St. Jude Medical does not acquire 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of AGA's common stock in the Offer or upon exercise of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical will be required to obtain the approval of AGA stockholders to consummate the Merger. Although this will not prevent the Merger from occurring, as St. Jude Medical will hold a sufficient number of shares of AGA common stock to approve the Merger, it would delay St. Jude Medical from completing the Merger and could delay the realization of some or all of the anticipated benefits from integrating AGA's operations with its operations.

AGA stockholders who receive St. Jude Medical common stock in the Offer or the Merger will become shareholders of St. Jude Medical. St. Jude Medical's common stock may be affected by different factors and holders will have different rights than those as AGA stockholders.

        Upon completion of the transaction, AGA stockholders receiving shares of St. Jude Medical common stock will become shareholders of St. Jude Medical. St. Jude Medical's business differs from that of AGA, and its results of operations and the trading price of St. Jude Medical common stock may be adversely affected by factors different from those that would affect AGA's results of operations and stock price. In addition, holders of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock will have different rights as shareholders of a Minnesota corporation than those rights they had as stockholders of a Delaware corporation before the transaction. For a detailed comparison of the rights of St. Jude Medical

26


Table of Contents


shareholders compared to the rights of AGA stockholders, see "Comparison of St. Jude Medical Shareholder Rights and AGA Stockholder Rights" beginning on page 210.

        After the effective time of the Merger, AGA stockholders will own in the aggregate a significantly smaller percentage of St. Jude Medical than they currently own of AGA. Following completion of the merger, AGA stockholders are expected to own less than 4% of the outstanding shares of St. Jude Medical common stock based on the number of shares of AGA common stock and St. Jude Medical common stock outstanding on the record date. Consequently, AGA stockholders, as a general matter, will have less influence over the management and policies of St. Jude Medical than they currently exercise over the management and policies of AGA.

AGA stockholders may not receive all consideration in the form elected.

        At the time AGA stockholders tender their shares of AGA common stock in the Offer and make an election, they will not know exactly what form of consideration they will receive because it will also depend upon the elections made by other tendering AGA stockholders. Each tendering AGA stockholder will receive either cash, shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, based upon such stockholder's election (or lack thereof) and the elections of other tendering stockholders. To the extent that the demand for either Cash Consideration or Stock Consideration exceeds the aggregate amount of cash or St. Jude Medical common stock available in the Offer, St. Jude Medical will prorate the total cash or stock, as the case may be, proportionally among the AGA stockholders who elect the form of consideration for which elections exceed availability.

Required regulatory approvals may not be obtained on a timely basis or at all, which could delay or prevent completion of the transaction.

        The transaction is subject to antitrust laws. Completion of the transaction is conditioned upon the applicable waiting period having expired under the HSR Act and applicable foreign antitrust regulations. The requirement that this approval be obtained could delay the completion of the transaction for a significant period of time. St. Jude Medical filed a notification and report form under the HSR Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division on October 18, 2010, AGA filed a notification and report form under the HSR Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division on October 19, 2010, and the waiting period under the HSR Act will expire on November 17, 2010, unless the FTC or the Antitrust Division requests additional information. At any time before the effective time of the Merger, the Antitrust Division, the FTC or others could take action under the antitrust laws with respect to the Merger including seeking to enjoin the consummation of the Merger, to rescind the Merger or to require the divestiture of certain assets of St. Jude Medical or AGA. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the Merger on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if such a challenge is made, that it would not be successful.

AGA's executive officers and directors have financial interests in the transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, the interest of AGA stockholders.

        Executive officers of AGA negotiated the Offer and the terms of the Merger Agreement with their counterparts at St. Jude Medical, and the board of directors of AGA approved the Merger Agreement and recommended that AGA stockholders tender their shares of AGA common stock in the Offer. In considering these facts and the other information contained herein, AGA stockholders should be aware that some of AGA's executive officers and directors have financial interests in the transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, the interest of AGA stockholders. These differences include, among others, the executive officers' interests stemming from severance benefits. For a detailed discussion of the special interests that AGA's executive officers and directors may have in the transaction, please see "The Transaction—Interests of Certain Persons" beginning on page 75.

27


Table of Contents


The receipt of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in the Offer and/or the Merger may be taxable to AGA stockholders.

        If the Offer, the Merger and the second merger are not, taken together, treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, the exchange of AGA shares for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in the Offer and/or the Merger will be taxable to such stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Counsel to St. Jude Medical and AGA are expected to render opinions at the closing of the Merger that the Offer, the Merger and the second merger, taken together, will be treated as an integrated transaction that qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provided other conditions are satisfied. Whether such counsel will render these opinions depends on a number of factors that will not be definitively known prior to completion of the Offer and the Merger. In addition, opinions of legal counsel are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service and there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge the conclusion set forth in counsels' opinions. Further, if the closing price of St. Jude Medical common stock falls precipitously prior to the closing of the Offer or the second merger, or if appraisal rights are exercised, there are circumstances where the Offer, the Merger and the second merger, taken together, may not qualify as a reorganization under section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Merger Agreement contains adjustment provisions that can increase the value of the St. Jude Medical common stock issued pursuant to the Merger Agreement in order to mitigate against such risk. However, the aggregate value of the additional St. Jude Medical common stock issued pursuant to these adjustment provisions may not be sufficient for the Offer, the Merger and the second merger, taken together, to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. If the Offer, the Merger and the second merger do not, taken together, qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, the second merger will not occur and the Offer and Merger will be treated as a taxable sale of AGA common stock in exchange for cash and/or St. Jude Medical common stock. If that occurs, the AGA stockholders will be required to recognize gain or loss based on the value of both Cash Consideration and Stock Consideration received in the Offer and Merger, and depending on a particular stockholder's stock or cash elections and the operation of the proration mechanisms, the related tax liability may exceed the cash received in the transaction. See "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences."

        AGA stockholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the specific tax consequences to them of the Offer, the Merger and the second merger, including any federal, state, local, foreign or other tax consequences, and any tax return filing or other reporting requirements.

AGA stockholders whose shares are exchanged in the Merger have some differing considerations compared to AGA stockholders that tender in the Offer.

        The consideration payable in the Offer and the Merger will each consist of 50% of cash and 50% of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, unless (in the case of the Merger) adjustments are required to be made in order for the Offer, the Merger and the second merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, stockholders who exchange their shares in the Merger will not have the right to elect between Cash Consideration or Stock Consideration, but instead will receive (subject to such adjustments) Cash Consideration for half of their shares of AGA common stock and Stock Consideration for half of their shares of AGA common stock. In the event that adjustments must be made pursuant to the Merger Agreement in order for the Offer, the Merger and the second merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, then AGA stockholders that exchange their shares in the Merger may receive Stock Consideration for more than 50% of their shares of AGA common stock and Cash Consideration for fewer than 50% of their shares of AGA common stock. If necessary in order to confirm calculations relating to the impact of potential exercise

28


Table of Contents


of appraisal rights under Delaware law on the qualification of the Offer, the Merger and the second merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, AGA stockholders who exchange their shares in the Merger may not receive their merger consideration until approximately 20 days after the date of mailing of the notice of appraisal rights in connection with the Merger.

While the value of the consideration AGA stockholders receive is intended to be the same whether a stockholder receives cash or St. Jude Medical common stock, the market value of St. Jude Medical common stock may change after the determination of the Average Trading Price.

        The value of the consideration AGA stockholders receive is intended to be the same whether a stockholder receives cash or St. Jude Medical common stock. This equivalence is based on the Average Trading Price. However, the market value of St. Jude Medical common stock may change after the determination of the Average Trading Price. The market value of St. Jude Medical common stock on the date the Stock Consideration is paid to an AGA stockholder in the Offer or the Merger is likely to be different than the closing stock prices set forth in this prospectus/offer to exchange.


Risks Relating to St. Jude Medical's Business

St. Jude Medical faces intense competition and may not be able to keep pace with the rapid technological changes in the medical devices industry.

        The medical device market is intensely competitive and is characterized by extensive research and development and rapid technological change. St. Jude Medical's customers consider many factors when choosing suppliers, including product reliability, clinical outcomes, product availability, inventory consignment, price and product services provided by the manufacturer, and market share can shift as a result of technological innovation and other business factors. Major shifts in industry market share have occurred in connection with product problems, physician advisories and safety alerts, reflecting the importance of product quality in the medical device industry. St. Jude Medical's competitors range from small start-up companies to larger companies which have significantly greater resources and broader product offerings than it, and it anticipates that in the coming years, other large companies will enter certain markets in which it currently hold a strong position. For example, Boston Scientific acquired one of St. Jude Medical's principal competitors, Guidant Corporation, in 2006. In addition, St. Jude Medical expects that competition will continue to intensify with the increased use of strategies such as consigned inventory, and it has seen increasing price competition as a result of managed care, consolidation among healthcare providers, increased competition and declining reimbursement rates. Product introductions or enhancements by competitors which have advanced technology, better features or lower pricing may make its products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive. As a result, it will be required to devote continued efforts and financial resources to bring St. Jude Medical's products under development to market, enhance St. Jude Medical's existing products and develop new products for the medical marketplace. If it fails to develop new products, enhance existing products or compete effectively, St. Jude Medical's business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

St. Jude Medical is subject to stringent domestic and foreign medical device regulation and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect St. Jude Medical's financial condition and business operations.

        St. Jude Medical's products, development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA and comparable foreign agencies. To varying degrees, each of these agencies monitors and enforces St. Jude Medical's compliance with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of its medical devices. The process of obtaining marketing approval

29


Table of Contents


or clearance from the FDA and comparable foreign bodies for new products, or for enhancements or modifications to existing products, could:

    take a significant amount of time;

    require the expenditure of substantial resources;

    involve rigorous pre-clinical and clinical testing, as well as increased post-market surveillance;

    involve modifications, repairs or replacements of its products; and

    result in limitations on the indicated uses of St. Jude Medical's products.

        St. Jude Medical cannot be certain that it will receive required approval or clearance from the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies for new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis. The failure to receive approval or clearance for significant new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

        Both before and after a product is commercially released, St. Jude Medical has ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations. For example, it is required to comply with the FDA's Quality System Regulation (QSR), which mandates that manufacturers of medical devices adhere to certain quality assurance requirements pertaining to, among other things, validation of manufacturing processes, controls for purchasing product components, and documentation practices. As another example, the Federal Medical Device Reporting regulation requires it to provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or, that a malfunction occurred which would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury upon recurrence. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and is monitored rigorously through periodic inspections by the FDA, which may result in observations on Form 483, and in some cases warning letters, that require corrective action. If the FDA were to conclude that it is not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of St. Jude Medical's medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could ban such medical devices, detain or seize such medical devices, order a recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such devices, or require it to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA has recently been increasing its scrutiny of the medical device industry and the government should be expected to continue to scrutinize the industry closely with inspections, and possibly enforcement actions, by the FDA or other agencies. Additionally, the FDA may restrict manufacturing and impose other operating restrictions, enjoin and restrain certain violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices, and assess civil or criminal penalties against St. Jude Medical, its officers or its employees. The FDA may also recommend prosecution to the Department of Justice. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict it from effectively manufacturing, marketing and selling St. Jude Medical's products. In addition, negative publicity and product liability claims resulting from any adverse regulatory action could have a material adverse effect on St. Jude Medical's financial condition and results of operations.

        Foreign governmental regulations have become increasingly stringent and more common, and it may become subject to even more rigorous regulation by foreign governmental authorities in the future. Penalties for a company's noncompliance with foreign governmental regulation could be severe, including revocation or suspension of a company's business license and criminal sanctions. Any domestic or foreign governmental medical device law or regulation imposed in the future may have a material adverse effect on St. Jude Medical's financial condition and business operations.

30


Table of Contents

St. Jude Medical's products are continually the subject of clinical trials conducted by it, its competitors or other third parties, the results of which may be unfavorable, or perceived as unfavorable by the market, and could have a material adverse effect on St. Jude Medical's business, financial condition or results of operations.

        As a part of the regulatory process of obtaining marketing clearance for new products and new indications for existing products, it conducts and participates in numerous clinical trials with a variety of study designs, patient populations and trial endpoints. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from existing or future clinical trials conducted by it, by St. Jude Medical's competitors or by third parties, or the market's or FDA's perception of this clinical data, may adversely impact St. Jude Medical's ability to obtain product approvals, St. Jude Medical's position in, and share of, the markets in which it participates and its business, financial condition, results of operations or future prospects.

If St. Jude Medical is unable to protect its intellectual property effectively, its financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

        Patents and other proprietary rights are essential to St. Jude Medical's business and its ability to compete effectively with other companies is dependent upon the proprietary nature of its technologies. It also relies upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop, maintain and strengthen its competitive position. It seeks to protect these, in part, through confidentiality agreements with certain employees, consultants and other parties. It pursues a policy of generally obtaining patent protection in both the United States and in key foreign countries for patentable subject matter in its proprietary devices and also attempts to review third-party patents and patent applications to the extent publicly available to develop an effective patent strategy, avoid infringement of third-party patents, identify licensing opportunities and monitor the patent claims of others. It currently owns numerous United States and foreign patents and has numerous patent applications pending. It is also a party to various license agreements pursuant to which patent rights have been obtained or granted in consideration for cash, cross-licensing rights or royalty payments. It cannot be certain that any pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents, that any current or future patents issued to it or licensed by it will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide a competitive advantage to it or prevent competitors from entering markets which it currently serves. Any required license may not be available to it on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, and therefore its competitors may have access to the same technologies as it. In addition, it may have to take legal action in the future to protect its trade secrets or know-how or to defend them against claimed infringement of the rights of others. Any legal action of that type could be costly and time consuming and St. Jude Medical cannot be certain of the outcome. The invalidation of key patents or proprietary rights which it owns or an unsuccessful outcome in lawsuits to protect its intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Pending and future patent litigation could be costly and disruptive to St. Jude Medical and may have an adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical operates in an industry that is susceptible to significant patent litigation and, in recent years, it has been common for companies in the medical device field to aggressively challenge the rights of other companies to prevent the marketing of new devices. Companies that obtain patents for products or processes that are necessary for or useful to the development of its products may bring legal actions against it claiming infringement and at any given time, it generally is involved as both a plaintiff and a defendant in a number of patent infringement and other intellectual property-related actions. Defending intellectual property litigation is expensive and complex and outcomes are difficult to predict. Any pending or future patent litigation may result in significant royalty or other payments or injunctions that can prevent the sale of products and may cause a significant diversion of the efforts of its technical and management personnel. While it intends to defend any such lawsuits vigorously, it

31


Table of Contents


cannot be certain that it will be successful. In the event that its right to market any of its products is successfully challenged or if it fails to obtain a required license or is unable to design around a patent, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Pending and future product liability claims and litigation may adversely affect St. Jude Medical's financial condition and results of operations.

        The design, manufacture and marketing of the medical devices it produces entail an inherent risk of product liability claims. Its products are often used in intensive care settings with seriously ill patients, and many of the medical devices it manufactures and sells are designed to be implanted in the human body for long periods of time or indefinitely. There are a number of factors that could result in an unsafe condition or injury to, or death of, a patient with respect to these or other products which it manufactures or sells, including component failures, manufacturing flaws, design defects or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information. Product liability claims may be brought by individuals or by groups seeking to represent a class.

        St. Jude Medical is currently the subject of various product liability claims, including several lawsuits in the United States and a lawsuit being allowed to proceed as a class action in Canada relating to products incorporating Silzone® coating. The outcome of litigation, particularly class action lawsuits, is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits often seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss relating to such lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. St. Jude Medical believes that the final resolution of the Silzone litigation matters may take a number of years and cannot reasonably estimate the time frame in which any potential settlements or judgments would be paid out or the amounts of any such settlements or judgments. In addition, the cost to defend any future litigation, whether Silzone-related or not, may be significant. It believes that many settlements and judgments relating to the Silzone litigation and its other litigation may be covered in whole or in part under its previously-issued product liability insurance policies and existing reserves. Any costs (the material components of which are settlements, judgments, legal fees and other related defense costs) not covered under its previously-issued product liability insurance policies and existing reserves could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated earnings, financial position and cash flows.

St. Jude Medical's product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of its product liability insurance policies.

        One of St. Jude Medical's prior product liability insurers has filed a suit seeking a court order declaring that it is not required to provide coverage for some of the costs St. Jude Medical has incurred or may incur in the future in the Silzone® litigation described above. This insurer, as well as other insurers from whom it had purchased product liability insurance, may deny coverage of these and other past and/or future losses relating to its products on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of coverage of those previously-issued insurance policies. To the extent that it suffers losses that are outside of the scope or range of coverage of those previously-issued product liability insurance policies, those losses may have a material adverse effect on its consolidated earnings, financial position and cash flows.

St. Jude Medical's self-insurance program may not be adequate to cover future losses.

        Consistent with the predominant practice in its industry, it does not currently maintain or intend to maintain any insurance policies with respect to product liability in the future. This decision was made based on current conditions in the insurance marketplace that have led to increasingly higher levels of self-insured retentions, increasing number of coverage limitations and high insurance premium rates. It will continue to monitor the insurance marketplace to evaluate the value to it of obtaining insurance coverage in the future. It believes that its self-insurance program, which is based on historical loss

32


Table of Contents


trends, will be adequate to cover future losses, although it can provide no assurances that this will remain true as historical trends may not be indicative of future losses. These losses could have a material adverse impact on its consolidated earnings, financial condition or cash flows.

The loss of any of St. Jude Medical's sole-source suppliers or an increase in the price of inventory supplied to it could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical purchases certain supplies used in its manufacturing processes from single sources due to quality considerations, costs or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. Agreements with certain suppliers are terminable by either party upon short notice and it has been advised periodically by some suppliers that in an effort to reduce their potential product liability exposure, it may terminate sales of products to customers that manufacture implantable medical devices. While some of these suppliers have modified their positions and have indicated a willingness to continue to provide a product temporarily until an alternative vendor or product can be qualified (or even to reconsider the supply relationship), where a particular single-source supply relationship is terminated, it may not be able to establish additional or replacement suppliers for certain components or materials quickly. This is largely due to the FDA approval system, which mandates validation of materials prior to use in its products, and the complex nature of manufacturing processes employed by many suppliers. In addition, it may lose a sole-source supplier due to, among other things, the acquisition of such a supplier by a competitor (which may cause the supplier to stop selling its products to it) or the bankruptcy of such a supplier, which may cause the supplier to cease operations. A reduction or interruption by a sole-source supplier of the supply of materials or key components used in the manufacturing of its products or an increase in the price of those materials or components could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cost containment pressures and domestic and foreign legislative or administrative reforms resulting in restrictive reimbursement practices of third-party payors or preferences for alternate therapies could decrease the demand for products purchased by St. Jude Medical's customers, the prices which they are willing to pay for those products and the number of procedures using its devices.

        St. Jude Medical's products are purchased principally by healthcare providers that typically bill various third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. The ability of customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for their services and the products they provide from government and third-party payors is critical to the success of medical technology companies. The availability of reimbursement affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. Reimbursement varies from country to country and can significantly impact the acceptance of new technology. After it develops a promising new product, it may find limited demand for the product unless reimbursement approval is obtained from private and governmental third-party payors.

        Major third-party payors for healthcare provider services in the United States and abroad continue to work to contain healthcare costs. The introduction of cost containment incentives, combined with closer scrutiny of healthcare expenditures by both private health insurers and employers, has resulted in increased discounts and contractual adjustments to healthcare provider charges for services performed and in the shifting of services between inpatient and outpatient settings. Initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation, are also underway in several countries in which it does business. Implementation of healthcare reforms in the United States and in significant overseas markets such as Germany, Japan and other countries may limit the price of, or the level at which, reimbursement is provided for its products and adversely affect both its pricing flexibility and the demand for its products. Healthcare providers may respond to such cost-containment pressures by substituting lower cost products or other therapies for its products.

33


Table of Contents

        In March 2010, significant health care reform was enacted into law in the United States, which included a number of provisions aimed at improving quality and decreasing costs. It is uncertain what consequences these provisions will have on patient access to new technologies and what impacts these provisions will have on Medicare reimbursement rates. Legislative or administrative reforms to the U.S. or international reimbursement systems that significantly reduce reimbursement for procedures using its medical devices or deny coverage for such procedures, or adverse decisions relating to its products by administrators of such systems in coverage or reimbursement issues, would have an adverse impact on the products, including clinical products, purchased by its customers and the prices its customers are willing to pay for them. This in turn would have an adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

St. Jude Medical's failure to comply with restrictions relating to reimbursement and regulation of healthcare goods and services may subject it to penalties and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical's devices are subject to regulation regarding quality and cost by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), as well as comparable state and foreign agencies responsible for reimbursement and regulation of healthcare goods and services. Foreign governments also impose regulations in connection with their healthcare reimbursement programs and the delivery of healthcare goods and services. U.S. federal government healthcare laws apply when it submits a claim on behalf of a U.S. federal healthcare program beneficiary, or when a customer submits a claim for an item or service that is reimbursed under a U.S. federal government funded healthcare program, such as Medicare or Medicaid. The principal U.S. federal laws implicated include those that prohibit the filing of false or improper claims for federal payment, those that prohibit unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable under federally-funded healthcare programs, known as the anti-kickback laws, and those that prohibit healthcare service providers seeking reimbursement for providing certain services to a patient who was referred by a physician that has certain types of direct or indirect financial relationships with the service provider, known as the Stark law.

        The laws applicable to St. Jude Medical are subject to evolving interpretations. If a governmental authority were to conclude that it is not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, it and its officers and employees could be subject to severe criminal and civil penalties, including, for example, exclusion from participation as a supplier of product to beneficiaries covered by CMS. If it is excluded from participation based on such an interpretation, it could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

Consolidation in the healthcare industry could lead to demands for price concessions or limit or eliminate its ability to sell to certain of its significant market segments.

        The cost of healthcare has risen significantly over the past decade and numerous initiatives and reforms initiated by legislators, regulators and third-party payors to curb these costs have resulted in a consolidation trend in the medical device industry as well as among its customers, including healthcare providers. This in turn has resulted in greater pricing pressures and limitations on its ability to sell to important market segments, as group purchasing organizations, independent delivery networks and large single accounts, such as the Veterans Administration in the United States, continue to consolidate purchasing decisions for some of its healthcare provider customers. It expects that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances which may exert further downward pressure on the prices of its products and adversely impact its business, financial condition and results of operations.

34


Table of Contents


Failure to integrate acquired businesses into St. Jude Medical's operations successfully could adversely affect its business.

        As part of St. Jude Medical's strategy to develop and identify new products and technologies, it has made several acquisitions in recent years and may make additional acquisitions in the future. Its integration of the operations of acquired businesses requires significant efforts, including the coordination of information technologies, research and development, sales and marketing, operations, manufacturing and finance. These efforts result in additional expenses and involve significant amounts of management's time that cannot then be dedicated to other projects. Its failure to manage successfully and coordinate the growth of the combined company could also have an adverse impact on its business. In addition, it cannot be certain that the businesses it acquires will become profitable or remain so. If its acquisitions are not successful, it may record unexpected impairment charges. Factors that will affect the success of its acquisitions include:

    the presence or absence of adequate internal controls and/or significant fraud in the financial systems of acquired companies;

    adverse developments arising out of investigations by governmental entities of the business practices of acquired companies;

    any decrease in customer loyalty and product orders caused by dissatisfaction with the combined companies' product lines and sales and marketing practices, including price increases;

    its ability to retain key employees; and

    the ability of the combined company to achieve synergies among its constituent companies, such as increasing sales of the combined company's products, achieving cost savings and effectively combining technologies to develop new products.

The success of many of St. Jude Medical's products depends upon strong relationships with physicians.

        If St. Jude Medical fails to maintain its working relationships with physicians, many of its products may not be developed and marketed in line with the needs and expectations of the professionals who use and support its products. The research, development, marketing and sales of many of its new and improved products is dependent upon it maintaining working relationships with physicians. It relies on these professionals to provide it with considerable knowledge and experience regarding its products and the marketing of its products. Physicians assist it as researchers, marketing consultants, product consultants, inventors and as public speakers. If it is unable to maintain its strong relationships with these professionals and continue to receive their advice and input, the development and marketing of its products could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Instability in international markets or foreign currency fluctuations could adversely affect St. Jude Medical's results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical products are currently marketed in more than 100 countries around the world, with its largest geographic markets outside of the United States being Europe, Japan and Asia Pacific. As a result, it faces currency and other risks associated with its international sales. It is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions denominated primarily in Euros, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Brazilian Reals, British Pounds and Swedish Kronor, which may potentially reduce the U.S. Dollars it receives for sales denominated in any of these foreign currencies and/or increase the U.S. Dollars it reports as expenses in these currencies, thereby affecting its reported consolidated revenues and net earnings. Fluctuations between the currencies in which it does business has caused and will continue to cause foreign currency transaction gains and losses. It cannot predict the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations upon its future operating

35


Table of Contents


results because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures and the volatility of currency exchange rates.

        In addition to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, there are a number of additional risks associated with its international operations, including those related to:

    the imposition of or increase in import or export duties, surtaxes, tariffs or customs duties;

    the imposition of import or export quotas or other trade restrictions;

    foreign tax laws and potential increased costs associated with overlapping tax structures;

    compliance with import/export laws;

    longer accounts receivable cycles in certain foreign countries, whether due to cultural, exchange rate or other factors;

    changes in regulatory requirements in international markets in which it operates; and

    economic and political instability in foreign countries, including concerns over excessive levels of national debt and budget deficits in countries where it markets its products that could result in an inability to pay or timely pay outstanding payables.

The medical device industry is the subject of numerous governmental investigations into marketing and other business practices. These investigations could result in the commencement of civil and/or criminal proceedings, substantial fines, penalties and/or administrative remedies, divert the attention of St. Jude Medical's management and have an adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical's industry is subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. These authorities have been increasing their scrutiny of its industry. St. Jude Medical has received subpoenas and other requests for information from state and federal governmental agencies, including, among others, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. These investigations relate primarily to financial arrangements with health care providers, regulatory compliance and product promotional practices. It is cooperating with these investigations and is responding to these requests.

        In October 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice, acting through the U.S. Attorney's office in Boston, commenced an industry-wide investigation into whether the provision of payments and/or services by makers of ICDs and bradycardia pacemaker systems (pacemakers) to doctors or other persons constitutes improper inducements under the federal health care program anti-kickback law. As part of this investigation, St. Jude Medical has received three subpoenas from the government requesting documents regarding St. Jude Medical's practices related to ICDs, pacemakers, lead systems and related products marketed by St. Jude Medical's CRM operating segment. St. Jude Medical has cooperated with the investigation and has produced documents and witnesses as requested. In January 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts unsealed a qui tam action (private individual bringing suit on behalf of the U.S. Government) filed by a former employee containing allegations relating to the issues covered by the subpoenas. Although in December 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice had declined to intervene in this qui tam suit, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion in August 2010 to intervene. The Court granted the U.S. Department of Justice's motion, without prejudice to St. Jude Medical, and also directed the U.S. Department of Justice to file its complaint by August 31, 2010. The U.S. Department of Justice has indicated that it intends only to pursue alleged claims related to four post-market studies conducted by St. Jude Medical primarily in 2004-2006. The Court also ruled that St. Jude Medical may file its objection to the August 2010 U.S. Department of Justice intervention and argue that the U.S. Department of Justice has not established

36


Table of Contents


good cause to intervene. The Court vacated the deadline for the U.S. Department of Justice to file its complaint, and scheduled the case for a status hearing on November 29, 2010.

        Additionally, in December 2008, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston delivered a subpoena issued by the OIG requesting the production of documents relating to implantable cardiac rhythm device and pacemaker warranty claims.

        In March 2010, St. Jude Medical received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The CID requests documents and sets forth interrogatories related to communications by and within St. Jude Medical on various indications for ICDs and a National Coverage Decision issued by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Similar requests were made of our major competitors.

        St. Jude Medical is fully cooperating with these investigations and is responding to these requests. However, it cannot predict when these investigations will be resolved, the outcome of these investigations or their impact on the company. An adverse outcome in one or more of these investigations could include the commencement of civil and/or criminal proceedings, substantial fines, penalties and/or administrative remedies, including exclusion from government reimbursement programs. In addition, resolution of any of these matters could involve the imposition of additional and costly compliance obligations. Finally, if these investigations continue over a long period of time, they could divert the attention of management from the day-to-day operations of its business and impose significant administrative burdens on it. These potential consequences, as well as any adverse outcome from these investigations or other investigations initiated by the government at any time, could have a material adverse effect on St. Jude Medical's financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory actions arising from the concern over Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy may limit St. Jude Medical's ability to market products containing bovine material.

        St. Jude Medical's Angio-Seal™ vascular closure device, as well as the vascular graft products, contain bovine collagen. In addition, some of the tissue heart valves it markets, such as its Biocor® and Epic™ tissue heart valves, incorporate bovine pericardial material. Certain medical device regulatory agencies may prohibit the sale of medical devices that incorporate any bovine material because of concerns over BSE, sometimes referred to as "mad cow disease," a disease which may be transmitted to humans through the consumption of beef. While it is not aware of any reported cases of transmission of BSE through medical products and is cooperating with regulatory agencies considering these issues, the suspension or revocation of authority to manufacture, market or distribute products containing bovine material, or the imposition of a regulatory requirement that it procure material for these products from alternate sources, could result in lost market opportunities, harm the continued commercialization and distribution of such products and impose additional costs on St. Jude Medical. Any of these consequences could in turn have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

St. Jude Medical is not insured against all potential losses. Natural disasters or other catastrophes could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical's facilities could be materially damaged by earthquakes, hurricanes and other natural disasters or catastrophic circumstances, including acts of war. For example, it has significant CRM facilities located in Sylmar and Sunnyvale, California. Earthquake insurance in California is currently difficult to obtain, extremely costly and restrictive with respect to scope of coverage. Its earthquake insurance for these California facilities provides $10 million of insurance coverage in the aggregate, with a deductible equal to 5% of the total value of the facility and contents involved in the claim. Consequently, despite this insurance coverage, it could incur uninsured losses and liabilities arising from an earthquake near one or both of its California facilities as a result of various factors, including the severity and location of the earthquake, the extent of any damage to its facilities, the

37


Table of Contents


impact of an earthquake on its California workforce and on the infrastructure of the surrounding communities and the extent of damage to its inventory and work in process. While it believes that its exposure to significant losses from a California earthquake could be partially mitigated by its ability to manufacture some of its CRM products at its manufacturing facilities in Sweden and Puerto Rico, the losses could have a material adverse effect on its business for an indeterminate period of time before this manufacturing transition is complete and operates without significant problems. Furthermore, its manufacturing facilities in Puerto Rico may suffer damage as a result of hurricanes which are frequent in the Caribbean and which could result in lost production and additional expenses to it to the extent any such damage is not fully covered by its hurricane and business interruption insurance.

        Even with insurance coverage, natural disasters or other catastrophic events, including acts of war, could cause St. Jude Medical to suffer substantial losses in its operational capacity and could also lead to a loss of opportunity and to a potential adverse impact on its relationships with its existing customers resulting from its inability to produce products for them, for which it would not be compensated by existing insurance. This in turn could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

St. Jude Medical's operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that could require it to incur material costs.

        St. Jude Medical's operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other things, the generation, handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances or wastes, particularly ethylene oxide, the cleanup of hazardous substance releases, and emissions or discharges into the air or water. It has incurred and expects to incur expenditures in the future in connection with compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. New laws and regulations, violations of these laws or regulations, stricter enforcement of existing requirements, or the discovery of previously unknown contamination could require it to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could be material.

Failure to successfully implement a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system could adversely affect St. Jude Medical's business.

        St. Jude Medical is in the process of converting to a new ERP system. Failure to smoothly execute the implementation of the ERP system could adversely affect the company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current economic conditions could adversely affect St. Jude Medical's results of operations.

        The global financial crisis has caused extreme disruption in the financial markets, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability. There can be no assurance that there will not be further deterioration in the global economy, and these and other factors beyond St. Jude Medical's control may adversely affect its ability to borrow money in the credit markets and to obtain financing for acquisitions or other general corporate and commercial purposes. Its customers may experience financial difficulties or be unable to borrow money to fund their operations which may adversely impact their ability or decision to purchase its products or to pay for products they do purchase on a timely basis, if at all. The strength and timing of any economic recovery remains uncertain, and it cannot predict to what extent the global economic slowdown may negatively impact its average selling prices, its net sales and profit margins, procedural volumes and reimbursement rates from third party payors. In addition, the current economic conditions may adversely affect its suppliers, leading them to experience financial difficulties or to be unable to borrow money to fund their operations, which could cause disruptions in its ability to produce its products.

38


Table of Contents

St. Jude Medical's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be significantly and adversely affected by recent healthcare reform legislation and other administration and legislative proposals.

        The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Health Care and Educational Reconciliation Act (the Acts) were enacted into law in March 2010. As a U.S. headquartered company with significant sales in the United States, this health care reform legislation will materially impact it as well as the U.S. economy. Certain provisions of the Acts will not be effective for a number of years and there are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or consequences not fully understood, and it is unclear what the full impacts will be from the legislation. The legislation levies a 2.3% excise tax on all U.S. medical device sales beginning in 2013. This is a significant new tax that will materially and adversely affect St. Jude Medical's business and results of operations. The legislation also focuses on a number of Medicare provisions aimed at improving quality and decreasing costs. It is uncertain at this point what negative unintended consequences these provisions will have on patient access to new technologies. The Medicare provisions include value-based payment programs, increased funding of comparative effectiveness research, reduced hospital payments for avoidable readmissions and hospital acquired conditions, and pilot programs to evaluate alternative payment methodologies that promote care coordination (such as bundled physician and hospital payments). Additionally, the provisions include a reduction in the annual rate of inflation for hospitals starting in 2011 and the establishment of an independent payment advisory board to recommend ways of reducing the rate of growth in Medicare spending. St. Jude Medical cannot predict what healthcare programs and regulations will be ultimately implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation. However, any changes that lower reimbursements for its products or reduce medical procedure volumes could adversely affect it business and results of operations.

Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on St. Jude Medical's financial condition and results of operations.

        St. Jude Medical is subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. It is subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions it has taken and assess additional taxes. It regularly assesses the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of its tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that it will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material impact on its net income or financial condition. Additionally, changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact its effective tax rate. For example, proposals for fundamental U.S. international tax reform, such as the recent proposal by the Obama administration, if enacted, could have a significant adverse impact on its future results of operations. In addition, recent health care legislation levies a 2.3% excise tax on all U.S. medical device sales beginning in 2013.


Risks Relating to AGA's Business

If AGA does not successfully implement its business strategy, its business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

        AGA may not be able to successfully implement its business strategy. Any such failure may adversely affect its business and results of operations. For example, to implement its business strategy AGA needs to, among other things, develop and introduce new products, find new applications for its existing products, obtain regulatory approval for such new products and applications and educate physicians about the clinical and cost benefits of AGA's products and thereby increase the number of hospitals and physicians that use its products. In addition, AGA is seeking to increase its international sales and will need to increase its worldwide direct sales force and enter into distribution agreements with third parties in order to do so, all of which may also result in additional or different foreign

39


Table of Contents


regulatory requirements, with which AGA may not be able to comply. Moreover, even if AGA successfully implements its business strategy, AGA's operating results may not improve. AGA may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of its business strategy and may adopt different strategies due to business or competitive factors.

The market opportunities that AGA expects to develop for its products may not be as large as it expects or may not develop at all.

        The growth of AGA's business is dependent, in large part, upon the development of market opportunities for its new products, and product enhancements and new applications for its existing products. The market opportunities that AGA expects to exist for its devices may not develop as expected, or at all. For example, clinical studies have shown linkages between the existence of PFOs and certain types of stroke and migraines. If the connection between PFO closure and the prevention or reduction of the occurrence of stroke and migraines is not as strong as AGA anticipates, the market opportunity for its AMPLATZER PFO Occluders will not develop as expected, if at all. Moreover, even if the market opportunities develop as expected, new technologies and products introduced by AGA's competitors may significantly limit AGA's ability to capitalize on any such market opportunity. AGA's failure to capitalize on its expected market opportunities would adversely effect its growth.

AGA AMPLATZER Septal Occluders generate a large portion of its net sales. If sales of this family of products were to decline, AGA's net sales and results of operations would be adversely affected.

        AGA's lead family of products, the AMPLATZER Septal Occluders, represented 54.1% of AGA's net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009, and AGA anticipates that this family of products will continue to account for a substantial portion of its net sales for the next few years. If sales of AMPLATZER Septal Occluders were to decline in any of AGA's key markets because of decreased demand, adverse regulatory actions, patent infringement claims, failure to protect AGA's intellectual property, manufacturing problems or delays, pricing pressures, competitive factors or any other reason, AGA's net sales would decrease, which would negatively affect AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

If AGA is unable to successfully develop and market new products or product enhancements or find new applications for its existing products, it will not remain competitive.

        AGA's future success and its ability to increase net sales and earnings depend, in part, on AGA's ability to develop and market new products, product enhancements and new applications for AGA's existing products. However, AGA may not be able to, among other things:

    successfully develop or market new products or enhance existing products;

    find new applications for its existing products;

    manufacture, market and distribute such products in a cost-effective manner; or

    obtain required regulatory clearances and approvals.

        AGA's failure to do any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if any of AGA's new or enhanced products contain undetected errors or design defects or if new applications that it develops for existing products do not work as planned, AGA's ability to market these products could be substantially impeded, resulting in lost net sales, potential damage to its reputation and delays in obtaining market acceptance of these products. AGA cannot assure you that it will continue to successfully develop and market new or enhanced products or new applications for its existing products.

40


Table of Contents

        AGA makes its regulatory status forecasts, including determining expected dates of filings with, or submissions to, relevant authorities, based on the information currently available to it. The actual timing for any of these regulatory steps may vary, and AGA may revise any such forecasts as new information becomes available.

        Moreover, most new or enhanced products or new applications for AGA's existing products require that their safety and efficacy be proven by clinical trials before they receive regulatory approval. AGA's clinical trials may not prove the safety and efficacy of its products, and in such circumstances its products would not receive regulatory approval. In addition, these clinical trials typically last several years, and during that time competing products, procedures or therapies may be introduced that are less expensive and/or more effective than AGA's products and thus render AGA's products obsolete. If AGA does not continue to expand its product portfolio on a timely basis or if those products and applications do not receive regulatory and market acceptance or become obsolete, AGA will not grow its business as it currently expects.

If AGA fails to educate and train physicians as to the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of its products, its sales will not grow.

        Acceptance of AGA's products depends, in large part, on AGA's ability to (1) educate the medical community as to the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of its products compared to alternative products, procedures and therapies and (2) train physicians in the proper use and implementation of its devices. Certain of the structural heart defects and vascular diseases that can be treated by AGA's devices can also be treated by surgery, drugs or other medical devices, some of which have a longer history of use and are more widely used by the medical community. Physicians may be reluctant to change their medical treatment practices for a number of reasons, including:

    lack of experience with new products;

    lack of evidence supporting additional patient benefits;

    perceived liability risks generally associated with the use of new products and procedures;

    lack of availability of adequate reimbursement within healthcare payment systems; and

    costs associated with the purchase of new products and equipment.

        Convincing physicians to dedicate the time and energy necessary to properly train to use new devices is challenging, and AGA may not be successful in these efforts. If physicians are not properly trained, they may misuse or ineffectively use AGA's products. Such misuse or ineffective use may result in unsatisfactory patient outcomes, patient injury, negative publicity or lawsuits against AGA. Accordingly, even if AGA's devices are superior to alternative treatments, AGA's success will depend on its ability to gain and maintain market acceptance for its devices. If AGA fails to do so, its sales will not grow and its business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

The expansion of AGA's product portfolio is dependent upon the success of AGA's clinical trials and receipt of regulatory approvals. If these trials are not completed on schedule or are unsuccessful, or if AGA fails to obtain or experiences significant delays in obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for AGA's product pipeline, AGA will not be able to market the related products.

        A number of AGA products are in the early stages of development. In the United States, before AGA can market a new medical device, or a new application of, claim for, or significant modification to, an existing device, it must first receive either approval of a PMA application from the FDA or clearance under section 510(k) of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or 510(k) clearance, unless an exemption applies. Clinical trials are always required to support a PMA application approval

41


Table of Contents


and may be required to support a 510(k) clearance. Currently, AGA has four studies underway designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of its AMPLATZER PFO Occluder to treat migraine or recurrent stroke, as applicable, in patients with PFOs, as well as a number of post-approval studies.

        AGA's current or future clinical trials contemplated in support of its PMA or 510(k) applications may not commence or conclude in a timely fashion, or at all, or may not produce the desired results. For example, several of AGA's products under development do not yet have agreed-upon protocols or approved Investigational Device Exemptions, or IDEs. Agreeing on clinical trial designs and protocols may be time consuming and requires interaction with and advance approval from regulatory authorities. AGA cannot assure you that it will be able to agree on appropriate trial designs and protocols with the FDA and thus commence clinical trials or, if commenced, that its PMA applications will be approved or its 510(k) clearances will be granted, in a timely fashion or at all. If AGA's trials for any reason do not commence, do not produce the intended results or are delayed or halted due to the occurrence of adverse events, or if AGA does not otherwise obtain FDA or other regulatory agency approval with respect to its products in a timely fashion, AGA's future growth may be significantly hampered. AGA's failure to comply with the regulations relating to the PMA approval and 510(k) clearance processes could also lead to the issuance of warning letters, injunctions, consent decrees, manufacturing suspensions, loss of regulatory approvals, product recalls, and termination of distribution arrangements or product seizures. In the most egregious cases, criminal sanctions or closure of AGA's manufacturing facilities could be imposed.

        Moreover, sales of AGA's products outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. Because a significant portion of AGA's product sales are made in international markets, any failure to comply with directives and regulatory requirements imposed in foreign jurisdictions could also have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Further, AGA continually evaluates the potential financial benefits and costs of its clinical trials and the products being evaluated in them. If AGA determines that the costs associated with attaining regulatory approval of a product exceed the potential financial benefits of that product or if the projected development timeline is inconsistent with its investment strategy, AGA may choose to stop a clinical trial or the development of a particular product, enhancement or application, which could have a material adverse effect on the growth of its business and could result in a charge to its earnings.

AGA depends on clinical investigators and clinical sites to enroll patients in its clinical trials and on other third-party contract research organizations to manage its clinical trials and to perform related data collection and analysis, and as a result, AGA may face significant costs and delays that are outside its control.

        AGA relies on clinical investigators and clinical sites to enroll patients in its clinical trials and other third-party contract research organizations to manage its clinical trials and to perform related data collection and analysis. AGA's agreements with clinical investigators, clinical sites and other third parties for clinical testing place substantial responsibilities on these parties. If clinical investigators, clinical sites or other third parties do not carry out their contractual duties or fail to meet expected deadlines or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to their failure to adhere to AGA's clinical protocols or the FDA's good clinical practice regulations, AGA's clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, AGA may face significant costs and it may be unable to obtain regulatory approval or clearance for, or successfully commercialize, new products, enhancements or applications, in a timely manner, or at all.

        AGA also competes with other manufacturers of medical devices for investigators and clinical sites to conduct clinical trials. If AGA is unable to identify investigators and clinical sites on a timely and cost-effective basis, its ability to conduct trials of its products and, therefore, its ability to obtain required regulatory approval or clearance would be adversely affected.

42


Table of Contents


AGA may be subject to compliance action, penalties or injunctions if it is determined to be promoting the use of its products for unapproved, or off-label, uses.

        AGA products are currently approved for the treatment of certain structural heart defects and vascular diseases. Pursuant to FDA regulations, AGA can only market its products in the United States for approved uses. Physicians may use AGA's products for indications other than those cleared or approved by the FDA, even though AGA does not promote its products for such off-label uses. If the FDA, however, determines that AGA's promotional materials or training constitutes promotion of an unapproved use, the FDA could request that AGA modify its training or promotional materials or could subject AGA to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of warning letters, injunctions, consent decrees, seizures, civil fines or criminal penalties. Other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might also take action if they consider AGA's promotional or training materials to constitute promotion of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties from other statutory authorities.

AGA operates in a very competitive environment.

        The medical device industry is characterized by strong competition. AGA has several competitors, including Boston Scientific Corporation, NMT Medical, Inc., W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Cook, Inc., Occlutech GmbH, Cardia, Inc. and Atritech, Inc. Certain of AGA's competitors have substantially greater capital resources, larger customer bases, broader product lines, larger sales forces, greater marketing and management resources, larger research and development staffs and larger facilities than AGA and have more established reputations with AGA's target customers, as well as global distribution channels that may be more effective than those of AGA.

        AGA's competitors may develop and offer technologies and products that are safer or more effective, have better features, are easier to use, less expensive or more readily accepted by the marketplace than AGA's. Competitors' products could make AGA's technology and products obsolete or noncompetitive. AGA's competitors may also be able to achieve more efficient manufacturing and distribution operations than AGA may be able to achieve and may offer lower prices than AGA could offer profitably. AGA may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of its business and may adopt different strategies due to business or competitive factors or factors currently unforeseen, such as the introduction by AGA's competitors of new products or new medical technologies that would make AGA's products obsolete or uncompetitive.

        In addition, consolidation in the medical device industry could make the competitive environment more difficult. The industry has recently experienced some consolidation, and there is a risk that larger companies will enter AGA's markets.

AGA depends on third-party distributors to market and sell its products internationally in a number of markets. AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by both its distributors' performance and its ability to maintain these relationships on terms that are favorable to it.

        AGA depends, in part, on third-party distributors to sell its medical devices outside the United States. In 2009, AGA's net sales through third-party distributors was 19.3% of its total net sales. AGA's international distributors operate independently of it, and AGA has limited control over their operations, which exposes AGA to significant risks. Distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market and sell AGA's products and may also market and sell competitive products. In addition, AGA's distributors may not comply with the laws and regulatory requirements in their local jurisdictions, which may limit their ability to market or sell AGA's products. If current or future distributors do not perform adequately, or if AGA is unable to locate competent distributors in particular countries and secure their services on favorable terms, or at all, AGA may be unable to

43


Table of Contents


increase or maintain its level of net sales in these markets or enter new markets, and AGA may not realize its expected international growth.

The terms and effects of AGA's Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice relating to potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act may negatively affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

        On June 2, 2008, AGA entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, or DPA, with the Department of Justice concerning alleged improper payments that were made by AGA's former independent distributor in China to (1) physicians in Chinese public hospitals in connection with the sale of AGA's products and (2) an official in the Chinese patent office in connection with the approval of AGA's patent applications, in each case, in potential violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA. The FCPA makes it unlawful for, among other persons, a U.S. company, acting directly or through an agent, to offer or to make improper payments to any "foreign official" in order to obtain or retain business or to induce such "foreign official" to use his or her influence with a foreign government or instrumentality thereof for such purpose.

        As part of the DPA, AGA consented to the Department of Justice filing a two-count criminal statement of information against it in the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, which was filed on June 3, 2008. The two counts include a conspiracy to violate the FCPA and a substantive violation of the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA related to the above-described activities in China. Although AGA did not plead guilty to the statement of information, AGA accepted responsibility for the acts of its employees and agents as set forth in the DPA, and AGA faces prosecution under that information, and possibly other charges as well, if it fails to comply with the terms of the DPA. Those terms require AGA to, for approximately three years, (1) continue to cooperate fully with the Department of Justice on any investigation relating to violations of the FCPA and any and all other matters relating to improper payments, (2) continue to implement a compliance and ethics program designed to detect and prevent violations of the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws, (3) review existing, and if necessary, adopt new controls, policies and procedures designed to ensure that AGA makes and keeps fair and accurate books, records and accounts and maintain a rigorous anti-corruption compliance code designed to detect and deter violations of the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws, and (4) retain and pay for an independent monitor to assess and oversee AGA's compliance and ethics program with respect to the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws. The DPA also required AGA to pay a monetary penalty of $2.0 million. In the fourth quarter of 2007, AGA recorded a financial charge of $2.0 million for this expected settlement, which was paid in June 2008. The terms of the DPA will remain binding on any successor or merger partner as long as the agreement is in effect.

        The effects that compliance with any of the terms of the DPA will have on AGA are unknown and they may have a material impact on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations. The activities of the government-approved independent monitor, as well as the continued implementation of a compliance and ethics program and the adoption of internal controls, policies and procedures to detect and prevent future violations of the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws, may result in increased costs to AGA and change the way in which it operates, the outcome of which AGA is unable to predict. For example, implementing and monitoring such compliance procedures in the large number of foreign jurisdictions where AGA operates can be expensive and time-consuming. As a result of AGA's remediation measures, AGA may also encounter difficulties conducting business in certain foreign countries and retaining and attracting additional business with certain customers, and AGA cannot predict the extent of these difficulties.

        In addition, entering into the DPA in the United States may adversely affect AGA's operations or result in legal claims against AGA, which may include claims of special, indirect, derivative or consequential damages.

44


Table of Contents


AGA's failure to comply with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice would have a negative impact on its ongoing operations.

        As described above, AGA is subject to a three-year DPA dated June 2, 2008 with the Department of Justice. If AGA complies with the DPA, the Department of Justice has agreed not to prosecute AGA with respect to the above-described activities in China and, following the term of the DPA, to permanently dismiss the criminal statement of information that is currently pending against it. Accordingly, the DPA could be substantially nullified, and AGA could be subject to severe sanctions and resumed civil and criminal prosecution, as well as severe fines, penalties and other regulatory sanctions, in the event of any additional violation of the FCPA or any other applicable anti-corruption laws by AGA or any of its officers, other employees or agents in any jurisdiction or AGA's failure to otherwise meet any of the terms of the DPA as determined by the Department of Justice in its sole discretion. The claims alleged in the DPA with the Department of Justice only relate to AGA's actions in China as outlined above, and do not relate to any future violations or the discovery of past violations not expressly covered by the DPA. Any breach of the terms of the DPA would also cause damage to AGA's business and reputation, as well as impair investor confidence in AGA and result in adverse consequences on AGA's ability to obtain or continue financing for current or future projects.

        In addition, although AGA is not currently restricted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, from participating in federal healthcare programs, any criminal conviction of AGA under the FCPA in the future would result in AGA's mandatory exclusion from such programs, and it may lead to debarment from U.S. and foreign government contracts. Any such exclusion or debarment would have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        AGA's ability to comply with the terms of the DPA is dependent, among other things, on the success of its ongoing compliance and ethics program, including its ability to continue to manage its distributors and agents and supervise, train and retain competent employees, as well as the efforts of its employees to adhere to its compliance and ethics program and the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws. It is possible that, despite its best efforts, additional FCPA issues, or issues under anti-corruption laws of other jurisdictions, could arise in the future. Any failure by AGA to adopt appropriate compliance and ethics procedures, to ensure that its officers, other employees and agents comply with the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which it operates or to otherwise comply with any term of the DPA would have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may adversely affect AGA's consolidated results of operations.

        AGA's foreign operations expose AGA to currency fluctuations and exchange rate risks. Approximately 44.8% of AGA's net sales for 2009 were in foreign currencies. Accordingly, AGA's consolidated results of operations have been, and will continue to be, subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Although AGA has benefited from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the past, AGA may not benefit from the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the future, which may adversely affect its consolidated results of operations. During a period in which the U.S. dollar appreciates against a given foreign currency, AGA's consolidated net sales will be lower than they might otherwise have been because net sales earned in such foreign currency will translate into fewer U.S. dollars. At present, based on a foreign exchange rate exposure management policy initiated in the first quarter of 2009, AGA has started to engage in hedging transactions to protect against uncertainty in future exchange rates between particular foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. As AGA grows its international direct sales, AGA expects its foreign currency-denominated net sales will increase, which would increase its risks related to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. AGA cannot assure you that its monitoring of its net foreign currency exchange rate exposure, its foreign currency exchange rate

45


Table of Contents


exposure management policy or any foreign currency hedging activity that it implements will be effective or otherwise adequately protect AGA against fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

AGA's ability to operate its company effectively could be impaired if it loses members of its senior management team or scientific personnel.

        AGA depends on the continued service of key managerial, scientific and technical personnel, as well as its ability to continue to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. AGA competes for such personnel with other companies, academic institutions, government entities and other organizations. Any loss or interruption of the services of AGA's key personnel could significantly reduce its ability to effectively manage its operations and meet its strategic objectives, because AGA may be unable to find an appropriate replacement, if necessary. For example, Dr. Amplatz plays a key role in the early stages of AGA's research and development programs, which are crucial to expanding its product portfolio. AGA has a ten-year research and development contract with Dr. Amplatz that expires in December 2015, and AGA may not be able to renew this contract. The loss of Dr. Amplatz's services may negatively affect AGA's ability to expand its product portfolio beyond its current pipeline. In addition, after termination of AGA's contract with Dr. Amplatz, Dr. Amplatz is not allowed to compete with AGA for 18 months in the United States. Any competition from Dr. Amplatz after that period or outside the United States may negatively affect AGA's business.

Healthcare legislative or administrative changes resulting in restrictive third-party payor reimbursement practices or preferences for alternate treatment may decrease the demand for, or put downward pressure on the price of, AGA products.

        AGA products are purchased principally by hospitals, which typically receive reimbursement from various third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. The ability of AGA customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for their products and services from government and third-party payors is critical to AGA's success. The availability of reimbursement affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. Reimbursement varies from country to country and can significantly impact the acceptance of new products. After AGA develops a promising new product, AGA may experience limited demand for the product unless reimbursement approval is obtained from private and governmental third-party payors.

        Major third-party payors for hospital services in the United States and abroad continue to work to contain healthcare costs. The introduction of cost-containment incentives, combined with closer scrutiny of healthcare expenditures by both private health insurers and employers, has resulted in increased discounts and contractual adjustments to hospital charges for services performed. Initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation, are also underway in several countries in which AGA does business. Implementation of new legislative and administrative changes in the United States and in overseas markets, such as Germany and Japan, may limit the price of, or the level at which reimbursement is provided for, AGA products and, as a result, may adversely affect both AGA pricing flexibility and demand for AGA's products. Hospitals or physicians may respond to such cost-containment pressures by substituting lower-cost products or other treatments for AGA's products.

        Further legislative or administrative changes to the U.S. or international reimbursement systems that significantly reduce reimbursement for procedures using AGA's medical devices or deny coverage for such procedures, or adverse decisions relating to AGA's products by administrators of such systems in coverage or reimbursement issues, would have an adverse impact on the number of products purchased by AGA customers and the prices its customers are willing to pay for them. This, in turn, would adversely affect AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

46


Table of Contents

AGA's business may be adversely affected if consolidation in the healthcare industry leads to demand for price concessions or if AGA is excluded from being a supplier by a group purchasing organization or similar entity.

        Because healthcare costs have risen significantly over the past decade, numerous initiatives and reforms have been launched by legislators, regulators and third-party payors to curb these costs. As a result, there has been a consolidation trend in the healthcare industry to create larger companies, including hospitals, with greater market power. As the healthcare industry consolidates, competition to provide products and services to industry participants has become and will continue to become more intense. This has resulted and will likely continue to result in greater pricing pressures and the exclusion of certain suppliers from important markets as group purchasing organizations, independent delivery networks and large single accounts continue to use their market power to consolidate purchasing decisions. If a group purchasing organization excludes AGA from being one of their suppliers, AGA's net sales will be adversely impacted. AGA expects that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, which may exert further downward pressure on the prices of AGA products.

AGA conducts substantially all of its operations at its corporate headquarters, and any fire, explosion, violent weather conditions or other unanticipated events affecting AGA's corporate headquarters could adversely affect AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        AGA conducts all of its manufacturing and research and development activities, as well as most of its sales, warehousing and administrative activities, at its corporate headquarters in Plymouth, Minnesota. AGA's corporate headquarters are subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events, such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions. This facility and the manufacturing equipment that AGA uses to produce its products would be difficult to replace or repair and could require substantial lead-time to do so. For example, if AGA were unable to utilize its existing manufacturing facility, the use of any new facility would need to be approved by the FDA, which would result in significant production delays. AGA may also in the future experience plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of regulatory issues, equipment failure or delays in deliveries. Any disruption or other unanticipated events affecting AGA's corporate headquarters and therefore AGA's sales, manufacturing, warehousing, research and development and administrative activities would adversely affect AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations. AGA currently carries $80.0 million of insurance coverage for damage to its property and the disruption of its business. Such insurance coverage, however, may not be sufficient to cover all of AGA's potential losses and may not continue to be available to AGA on acceptable terms, or at all.

AGA relies on a single supplier for nitinol, the key raw material in all of its products, which makes AGA susceptible to supply shortages of this material.

        AGA relies on a single supplier for nitinol, the key raw material in all of its products, and has no written agreement with this supplier. If AGA is unable to obtain nitinol from this supplier, AGA may be unable to obtain nitinol through other sources, on acceptable terms, within a reasonable amount of time or at all. Further, even if AGA is able to find an alternative source for nitinol, AGA may not be able to prevent an interruption of production of AGA products. AGA's business would be adversely affected if such interruption was prolonged. For example, if a raw material or component is a critical element, an element that can have a significant effect on performance and safety of the related device, such as nitinol with respect to AGA devices, FDA and foreign regulations may require additional testing and prior approval of such raw material or component from new suppliers prior to AGA's use of these materials or components. As a result, if AGA needs to establish additional or replacement suppliers for nitinol or any other critical component, AGA's access to these components may be delayed while AGA qualifies such suppliers and obtains any necessary FDA and foreign regulatory approvals.

47


Table of Contents


Any disruption in the ongoing shipment of nitinol could interrupt production of AGA's products, which could result in a decrease in net sales, or could cause an increase in cost of sales if AGA has to pay another supplier a higher price for nitinol.

Any failure of AGA's management information systems could harm its business and results of operations.

        AGA's rapid growth may continue to place a significant strain on its managerial, operational and financial resources and systems. AGA depends on its recently implemented management information systems to actively manage its controlled regulatory and manufacturing documents. AGA also depends on its enterprise resource planning system to actively manage its invoicing, production and inventory planning, clinical trial information and quality compliance. AGA must continually assess the necessity for any upgrades to its information systems. The inability of its management information systems to operate as AGA anticipates could damage AGA's reputation with its customers, disrupt its business or result in, among other things, decreased net sales and increased overhead costs. As a result, any such failure could harm AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Being a public company has substantially increased AGA's legal and financial compliance costs, which could harm AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Until the fourth quarter of 2009, AGA operated its business as a private company. As a publicly-traded company, AGA is subject to rules and regulations that increase its legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more time-consuming and costly, and divert management's attention away from the operation of its business. AGA is obligated to file with the SEC annual and quarterly information and other reports that are specified in the Exchange Act, and are also subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements, including requirements of the NASDAQ listing rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, all of which impose significant compliance and reporting obligations upon AGA. AGA may not be successful in complying with these obligations, and compliance with these obligations could be time consuming and expensive. Failure to comply with the additional reporting and corporate governance requirements could lead to fines imposed on AGA, suspension or delisting from the NASDAQ Global Select Market, deregistration under the Exchange Act and, in the most egregious cases, the imposition of criminal sanctions.

AGA may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available to AGA on acceptable terms, or at all.

        AGA may require significant additional debt and equity financing in order to implement its business strategy. In particular, AGA's capital requirements depend on many factors, including the amount of expenditures on research and development and intellectual property, the number of clinical trials that AGA conducts, new product development and the cash required to service AGA's debt. To the extent that AGA's existing or future capital is insufficient to meet these requirements and cover any losses, AGA will need to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, raise additional funds through financings or curtail its growth, reduce its costs or sell certain of its assets. For example, AGA raised additional capital from affiliates of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe IX, L.P., or Welsh Carson, to finance the acquisition of the assets of its Italian distributor. AGA cannot assure you that such investors will agree to provide it with additional financing in the future. AGA's ability to raise additional capital will likely depend on, among other factors, its performance, its prospects, its level of indebtedness and its market conditions. Any additional equity or debt financing, if available at all, may be on terms that are not favorable to AGA. The recent global economic crisis and related tightening of credit markets has made it more difficult and more expensive to raise additional capital. If AGA is unable to access additional capital on terms acceptable to it, AGA may not be able to fully implement its business strategy, which may limit the future growth and development of its business. In addition,

48


Table of Contents


equity financings could result in dilution to AGA's stockholders, and equity or debt securities issued in future financings may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of its common stock. If AGA's need for capital arises because of significant losses, the occurrence of these losses may make it more difficult for AGA to raise the necessary capital.

Product liability claims and uninsured or underinsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on AGA's business.

        The manufacturing and marketing of medical devices involves an inherent risk of product liability claims. AGA's product development and production processes are extremely complex and could expose its products to defects. Any defects could harm AGA's credibility, lead to product liability claims and litigation and decrease AGA's products' market acceptance. AGA's current product liability policies provide $35.0 million of insurance coverage, with a $250,000 deductible per occurrence for new claims. AGA cannot assure you that such insurance will be available or adequate to satisfy future claims or that its insurers will be able to pay claims on its insurance policies. Product liability claims in excess of AGA's insurance coverage would be paid out of cash reserves, adversely affecting its financial condition and results of operations. In the event that AGA is held liable for a claim or for damages exceeding the limits of AGA insurance coverage, such claim could materially damage AGA's reputation and business. AGA currently has no outstanding product liability claims. However, defending a lawsuit, regardless of merit, could be costly, could divert management attention and might result in adverse publicity, and for these reasons, any product liability claims could result in significant costs and harm to AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

AGA may not successfully make or integrate acquisitions or enter into strategic alliances.

        AGA may pursue selected acquisitions and strategic alliances. AGA competes with other medical device companies for these opportunities, and cannot assure you that it will be able to effect acquisitions or strategic alliances on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if AGA enters into these transactions, AGA may experience the following, among other things:

    difficulties in integrating any acquired companies and products into existing business;

    inability to realize the benefits it anticipates in a timely fashion, or at all;

    attrition of key personnel from acquired businesses;

    significant costs, charges or writedowns; or

    unforeseen operating difficulties that require significant financial and managerial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development and expansion of AGA's existing operations.

        Consummating these transactions could also result in the incurrence of additional debt and related interest expense, as well as unforeseen contingent liabilities, all of which could have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations. AGA may also issue additional equity in connection with these transactions which would dilute its existing stockholders.

If AGA fails to comply with the U.S. Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state and foreign laws, it could be subject to criminal and civil penalties and exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental programs.

        A provision of the U.S. Social Security Act, commonly referred to as the U.S. Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by Medicare, Medicaid or any other federal

49


Table of Contents


healthcare program. The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute is very broad in scope and many of its provisions have not been uniformly or definitively interpreted by existing case law or regulations. In addition, most of the states in which AGA products are sold in the United States have adopted laws similar to the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, and some of these laws are even broader than the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute in that their prohibitions are not limited to items or services paid for by a federal healthcare program but, instead, apply regardless of the source of payment. Violations of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute or such similar state laws may result in substantial civil or criminal penalties and exclusion from participation in federal or state healthcare programs. AGA derives a significant portion of its net sales from international operations, and many foreign governments have equivalent statutes with similar penalties.

        All of AGA's financial relationships with healthcare providers and others who provide products or services to federal healthcare program beneficiaries are potentially governed by the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state or foreign laws. AGA believes its operations are in material compliance with the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state or foreign laws. However, AGA cannot assure you that it will not be subject to investigations or litigation alleging violations of these laws, which could be time-consuming and costly, could divert management's attention from operating the business and could prevent healthcare providers from purchasing AGA products, all of which could have a material adverse effect on AGA's business. In addition, if AGA's arrangements were found to violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute or similar state or foreign laws, it could have a material adverse effect on AGA's business and results of operations.

The possibility of non-compliance with manufacturing regulations raises uncertainties with respect to AGA's ability to manufacture AGA products. AGA's failure to meet strict regulatory requirements could require it to pay fines, incur other costs or even close facilities.

        The FDA and other federal, state and foreign regulatory authorities require that AGA's products be manufactured according to rigorous standards, including, but not limited to, Quality System Regulations, Good Manufacturing Practices and International Standards Organization ("ISO"), standards. These federal, state and foreign regulatory authorities may conduct periodic audits of AGA facilities or processes to monitor compliance with applicable regulatory standards. If a regulatory authority finds that AGA failed to comply with the appropriate regulatory standards, it may require product validation, new processes and procedures or shutdown of manufacturing operations. A regulatory authority may impose fines on AGA or delay or withdraw clearances or other regulatory approvals. If a regulatory authority determines that AGA's non-compliance is severe, the regulatory authority may impose other penalties including limiting AGA's ability to secure approvals for new devices and accessories. In addition, many of the improvements AGA makes to its manufacturing process must first be approved by the FDA and other federal, state and foreign regulatory authorities. AGA's failure to obtain the necessary approvals may limit AGA's ability to improve the way in which it manufactures its products.

AGA's business will be harmed if AGA fails to obtain necessary clearances or approvals to market AGA's medical devices.

        AGA's products are classified as medical devices and are subject to extensive regulation in the United States by the FDA and other federal, state and local authorities. Similar regulatory review and approval processes also exist in foreign countries in which AGA products are marketed. These regulations relate to product design, development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, sale, promotion, distribution, import, export and shipping.

        Before AGA can market a new medical device, or a new use of, claim for, or significant modification to, an existing product in the United States, AGA must first receive either PMA approval or 510(k) clearance from the FDA unless an exemption applies. The PMA approval process, commonly

50


Table of Contents


used for riskier devices such as those which support or sustain life or are used invasively in the body, requires an applicant to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the device based, in part, on data obtained in clinical trials. The PMA approval process and clinical trials can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant user fees. In the 510(k) clearance process, the FDA must determine that the proposed device is "substantially equivalent" to a device legally on the market, known as a "predicate" device, with respect to intended use, technology and safety and efficacy, in order to clear the proposed device for marketing. Clinical data is sometimes required to support substantial equivalence. The PMA approval pathway is much more costly and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process. It generally takes from one to three years, or even longer, from the time the PMA is submitted to the FDA until an approval is obtained. The 510(k) clearance process usually takes from three to 12 months, but it can take longer.

        In many of the foreign regions in which AGA markets its products, such as Europe, AGA is subject to regulations substantially similar to those of the FDA, although these foreign regulatory requirements may vary widely from country to country. In Europe, only medical devices which bear a CE Mark may be marketed. Japan has a regulatory process that generally accepts clinical data from either the United States or Europe supplemented by a small study in Japan to establish experience and confirm safety. In addition, as AGA selectively converts into direct sales forces in foreign regions, AGA will be subject to additional regulations in these markets.

        Any failure to receive desired marketing clearances or approvals from the FDA or other federal, state or foreign regulatory authorities may adversely affect AGA's ability to market its products and may have a significant adverse effect on AGA's overall business. Moreover, the value of existing clearances or approvals can be eroded if safety or efficacy problems develop.

AGA may fail to comply with continuing post-market regulatory requirements of the FDA and other federal, state or foreign authorities and become subject to substantial penalties, or AGA products may subsequently prove to be unsafe, forcing it to recall or withdraw such products from the market.

        Even after product clearance or approval, AGA and its contract manufacturers must comply with continuing regulation by the FDA and other federal, state or foreign authorities, including the FDA's Quality System Regulation requirements, which obligate manufacturers, including third-party contract manufacturers, to adhere to stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during the design and manufacture of a device. AGA is also subject to medical device reporting regulations in the United States and abroad. For example, AGA is required to report to the FDA if its products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. AGA must report corrections and removals to the FDA where the correction or removal was initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the U.S. Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act caused by the device that may present a risk to health, and AGA must maintain records of other corrections or removals. The FDA closely regulates promotion and advertising, and AGA's promotional and advertising activities may come under scrutiny. If any medical device reports AGA files with the FDA regarding death, serious injuries or malfunctions indicate or suggest that one of its products presents an unacceptable risk to patients, including when used off-label by physicians, AGA may be forced to recall its product or withdraw it from the market.

        AGA has had several product recalls in the past. For example, in October 2006, AGA recalled catheter and delivery systems after internal testing revealed the potential for a tear to develop in the packaging under extreme shipping conditions. AGA immediately modified its shipping method and subsequently received approval from the FDA and AMTAC in Europe to modify the packaging to prevent tears from developing. Approximately 15,871 devices were returned and replaced by AGA. On February 28, 2007, AGA submitted a letter to the FDA formally requesting the recall to be closed, and on October 9, 2008 the FDA confirmed that the recall has been completed. During the third quarter of

51


Table of Contents


2005, AGA voluntarily recalled 80 of its AMPLATZER Vascular Plug devices over concerns that AGA operators failed to follow internal sterilization procedures. Of the 80 devices, only two had left AGA's possession. After testing the recalled products, none of them were found to be non-sterile. AGA submitted a letter to the FDA formally requesting closure of the recall, and the recall has been closed. In September 2005, AGA recalled its AMPLATZER Duct Occluder device after discovering through in-process testing during manufacturing that the device had the potential to rub against the catheter during the implant procedure. Approximately 2,800 devices were recalled, 92% of which had left AGA's possession. AGA made the required changes to the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder, and these changes have been approved both internationally and by the FDA. AGA submitted letters to the FDA formally requesting closure of the recall, and the recall has been closed. Finally, on December 8, 2004, AGA initiated a voluntary recall of all catheters and delivery systems in the field because of non-toxic contaminated tubing produced by one of its suppliers. AGA received several toxicology tests that confirmed the level of contamination was negligible and posed no threat to patients. AGA submitted letters to the FDA formally requesting closure of the recall, and the recall has been closed.

        AGA is currently conducting two post-approval studies that were required as a condition of approval by the FDA of the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder and the AMPLATZER Muscular VSD Occluder. The studies are designed to monitor, for a period of up to five years after the procedure, patients treated with a device in the clinical studies that supported approval of the product. The objective is to collect and report to the FDA additional data on the long-term safety and efficacy of the device. The majority of patients enrolled in these two studies were children at the time of receiving their implants. In some cases, it has been challenging to follow these patients for up to five years as they and their families move or otherwise stop seeing the physician who performed the treatment.

        Any failure to comply with continuing regulation by the FDA or other federal, state or foreign authorities could result in enforcement action that may include regulatory letters requesting compliance action, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory clearances or approvals, product recall, modification or termination of product marketing, entering into a consent decree, seizure and detention of products, paying significant fines and penalties, criminal prosecution and similar actions that could limit product sales, delay product shipment and harm its profitability. Any of these actions could materially harm AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Modifications to AGA's products may require new regulatory approvals or clearances or may require AGA to recall or cease marketing its modified products until approvals or clearances are obtained.

        Modifications to AGA products may require new approvals or clearances in the United States and abroad, such as PMA approvals or 510(k) clearances in the United States and CE Marks in Europe. The FDA requires device manufacturers to initially make a determination of whether or not a modification requires a new approval, supplement or clearance. A manufacturer may determine that a modification does not significantly affect safety or efficacy or does not represent a major change in its intended use, so that no new U.S. or foreign approval or clearance is necessary. AGA has made modifications that it determined do not require approval or clearance. However, the FDA and foreign authorities can review a manufacturer's decision, including any of its decisions, and may disagree. If the FDA or other foreign authority disagrees and requires new approvals or clearances for the modifications, AGA may be required to recall and to stop marketing its products as modified, which could require AGA to redesign its products and harm its operating results. In these circumstances, it may also be subject to significant enforcement actions.

        If AGA determines that a modification to an FDA-approved or cleared device could significantly affect its safety or efficacy, or would constitute a major change in its intended use, then AGA must obtain a new PMA or PMA supplement approval or 510(k) clearance. Where AGA determines that modifications to its products require a new PMA or PMA supplemental approval or 510(k) clearance, AGA may not be able to obtain those additional approvals or clearances for the modifications or

52


Table of Contents


additional indications in a timely manner, or at all. For those products sold in Europe, AGA must notify AMTAC, its European Union Notified Body, if significant changes are made to the products or if there are substantial changes to its quality assurance systems affecting those products. Delays in obtaining required future approvals or clearances would adversely affect AGA's ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm AGA's future growth.

Healthcare policy changes, including new legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, may have a material adverse effect on AGA.

        On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted and was subsequently amended by the enactment on March 30, 2010 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. Together, these laws are commonly referred to as "Health Care Reform." The Health Care Reform legislation may not be implemented in its present form and any implementation will likely take several years. The full timing and financial impact of Health Care Reform on AGA's business operations and financial statements is uncertain. However, Health Care Reform as enacted includes the following provisions: (i) a medical device tax of 2.3%; (ii) creation of an independent medical advisory board to reduce Medicare spending and other national health expenditures by targeted percentages over several years; (iii) creation of a patient-centered outcomes research institute to conduct comparative effectiveness of medical treatments which may make findings that may be used to make public health care insurance coverage decisions; and (iv) creation of other programs which may reduce public and private health care expenditures. Any of these provisions or other provisions of the Health Care Reform legislation could increase AGA's taxes, limit the prices AGA is able to charge for its products or the amounts of reimbursement available for its products, and could limit the acceptance and availability of AGA's products. The full implementation of some or all of these provisions could have a material adverse effect on AGA's financial position and results of operations.

AGA has been and may in the future become subject to claims that its products violate the patent or intellectual property rights of others, which could be costly and disruptive to AGA.

        AGA operates in an industry that is susceptible to significant patent litigation, and in recent years, it has been common for companies in the medical device industry to aggressively challenge the rights of other companies to prevent the marketing of new or existing devices. As a result, AGA or its products may become subject to patent infringement claims or litigation or interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), or the foreign equivalents thereto to determine the priority of claims to inventions. The defense of intellectual property suits, USPTO interference proceedings or the foreign equivalents thereto, as well as related legal and administrative proceedings, are both costly and time consuming and may divert management's attention from other business concerns. An adverse determination in litigation or interference proceedings to which AGA may become a party could, among other things:

    subject AGA to significant liabilities to third parties, including treble damages;

    require disputed rights to be licensed from a third party for royalties that may be substantial;

    require AGA to cease using such technology; or

    prohibit AGA from selling certain of its products.

        Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        On March 28, 2006, AGA settled a patent infringement suit with NMT Medical, Inc. in which AGA paid NMT Medical and a second patent holder a $30.0 million one-time payment. As part of the settlement, AGA received a fully paid, royalty-free license for the related patents.

53


Table of Contents

        On March 26, 2010, AGA settled a patent infringement suit with Medtronic, Inc. in which AGA agreed to pay Medtronic periodic payments ending the first business day of 2014 and totalling $35.0 million. As part of the settlement, AGA received a fully paid, royalty-free license of the related patents.

        In addition, AGA may have disputes with its licensors regarding the scope of their patents. AGA makes royalty payments with respect to certain patents that were assigned to it by Mr. Curtis Amplatz. In 2008, Mr. Amplatz inquired regarding the scope of the royalty agreements AGA had with him and whether the royalty agreements applied to additional products of Mr. Amplatz. In response, AGA had discussions in which it clarified the scope of the agreements and its payments under the agreements. AGA believes the inquiry of Mr. Amplatz to be concluded. However, any dispute relating to the products included in a portfolio subject to a royalty agreement or license could result in AGA being subject to additional royalty payments, although AGA does not believe any such dispute to limit its right to sell or market any of its devices currently exists.

AGA has filed and may in the future file patent litigation claims in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions to protect its patent portfolio. If AGA is unsuccessful in these claims, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

        AGA may initiate litigation to assert claims of infringement, enforce its patents, protect its trade secrets or know-how, or determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any lawsuits that AGA initiates could be expensive, time consuming and divert management's attention from other business concerns. Furthermore, litigation may provoke third parties to assert claims against it and may put its patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and its patent applications at risk of not being issued.

        In August 2006, AGA brought a patent infringement action in Germany against Occlutech GmbH, an European manufacturer of cardiac occlusion devices, and DRABO Medizintechnik, based on the German part of one of its European patents, which was granted to AGA in October 2005 for intravascular occlusion devices and the method of manufacturing such devices. On July 31, 2007, the District Court in Düsseldorf entered a judgment in AGA's favor finding that Occlutech and DRABO literally infringed the German part of AGA's European patent. Under German practice, the court required AGA to post a bond in the amount of €1.0 million to secure its ability to respond to damages claimed by Occlutech in the event that the decision of the District Court is reversed on appeal or its patent is held invalid in related proceedings in the German patent court. The bond amount is not a limitation on such damages. On August 6, 2007, Occlutech filed an appeal against the District Court judgment before a German Court of Appeals contending that the District Court judgment was based on an overly broad interpretation of its European patent, and in addition, it initiated invalidation proceedings against the patent with the German Federal Patent Court in Munich. On December 22, 2008, the German Court of Appeals dismissed Occlutech's appeal and entered a judgment in AGA's favor finding that Occlutech infringed its patent. On October 6, 2009, the German Federal Patent Court found that AGA's patent was valid in all respects and dismissed Occlutech's invalidation proceedings. Occlutech has filed an appeal against both decisions with the German Federal Court of Justice. A final decision on the appeals with the German Federal Court of Justice is not expected to be reached until 2010 or later. In addition, Occlutech initiated proceedings against AGA's corresponding patents in Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and Sweden, seeking invalidity and non-infringement declarations. On October 29, 2008, the Patent Court in the Netherlands ruled in favor of Occlutech in the non-infringement declaration. The court did not rule on the invalidity claim. AGA has appealed the decision to the Dutch Court of Appeals and a decision is expected by the end of 2010. On July 31, 2009, a United Kingdom patent court upheld the validity of its patent, but it ruled that the Occlutech products do not infringe on its patent. AGA appealed and on June 22, 2010, the UK Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. AGA has appealed to the UK Supreme Court for further

54


Table of Contents

review. Final decisions in all of these actions are also not expected to be reached until 2010 or later. AGA cannot assure you that the outcome in any of these proceedings will be favorable to it, and if it does not prevail in one or more jurisdictions, its faces the risk of increased competition and significant damages being awarded against it.

        AGA has also been forced to defend its patent rights in China against various entities, including Shanghai Shape Memory Alloy Company Ltd., a medical device manufacturer based in Shanghai, China, and Beijing Starway Medical Devices Ltd., a medical device manufacturer based in Beijing, both of which in recent years have been manufacturing and exporting medical devices that AGA believes infringe its patent rights. AGA did not prevail in its lawsuits in China against these entities and two of its patents in China were invalidated as a result. Consequently, AGA is no longer able to assert rights under these patents within China and will need to rely primarily on foreign patents to prevent the importation of products from China into countries in which such importation would violate its local patent rights. In addition, these entities' activities have resulted in litigation in India and could result in future and potentially costly litigation in other countries in which AGA has patent rights against importers and distributors of infringing products originating in China.

        In addition, AGA may not prevail in lawsuits that it initiates, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially valuable. The occurrence of any of these events may have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

If AGA patents and other intellectual property rights do not adequately protect its products, AGA may lose market share to its competitors and be unable to operate its business profitably.

        Patents and other proprietary rights are essential to AGA's business, and AGA's ability to compete effectively with other companies depends on the proprietary nature of its technologies. AGA also relies upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop, maintain and strengthen its competitive position. AGA seeks to protect these, in part, through confidentiality agreements with certain employees, consultants and other parties. AGA pursues a policy of generally obtaining patent protection in both the United States and key foreign countries for patentable subject matter in AGA's proprietary devices and also attempt to review third-party patents and patent applications to the extent publicly available to develop an effective patent strategy, avoid infringement of third-party patents, identify licensing opportunities and monitor the patent claims of others. AGA's patent portfolio includes approximately 199 issued patents, the first of which expires in the United States in 2014 and in Europe in 2015, and approximately 110 pending patent applications. AGA cannot assure that any pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents, that any current or future patents issued or licensed to it will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide a competitive advantage to AGA or prevent competitors from entering markets which AGA currently serves. Any required license may not be available to AGA on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, and therefore AGA's competitors may have access to the same technologies as AGA does. Furthermore, AGA may have to take legal action in the future to protect its trade secrets or know-how, or to defend them against claimed infringement of the rights of others. Any legal action of that type could be costly and time-consuming to AGA, and AGA cannot assure that such actions will be successful. The invalidation of key patents or proprietary rights which AGA owns or unsuccessful outcomes in lawsuits to protect AGA's intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on AGA's business, financial condition and results of operations.

        The laws of foreign countries may not protect AGA's intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. For example, foreign countries generally do not allow patents to cover methods for performing surgical procedures. If AGA cannot adequately protect its intellectual property rights in these foreign countries, AGA's competitors may be able to compete more directly with it,

55


Table of Contents


which could adversely affect AGA's competitive position and, as a result, its business, financial condition and results of operations.

AGA's substantial debt may adversely affect its financial condition and operating activities.

        AGA has a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2010, AGA had net debt of $222.5 million outstanding. Based on that level of indebtedness and interest rates applicable as of September 30, 2010, AGA's annualized cash interest expense would be $6.1 million. In addition, AGA has $40.0 million of available borrowings under its revolving credit facility, and has the ability to increase the aggregate amount of its Tranche B term loan under its senior secured credit facility by up to $75.0 million without the consent of any person other than the institutions agreeing to provide all or any portion of such increase. Although AGA believes that its current cash flow is sufficient to cover its annual interest expense for the foreseeable future, any increase in the amount of debt or any decline in the amount of cash available to make interest payments may require AGA to divert funds identified for other purposes for debt service and impair its liquidity position.

        AGA's substantial level of indebtedness could have other significant consequences to its stockholders, including:

    requiring AGA to use a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to pay interest and principal on its debt, thereby reducing the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital, research and development, including clinical trials, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

    limiting AGA's ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, research and development, including clinical trials, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

    subjecting AGA to the risk of interest rate increases on its indebtedness with variable interest rates;

    subjecting AGA to the possibility of an event of default under the financial and operating covenants contained in the agreements governing its indebtedness; and

    limiting AGA's ability to adjust to rapidly changing market conditions, reducing its ability to withstand competitive pressures and making it more vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions than its competitors with less debt.

AGA's inability to generate sufficient cash flow may require it to seek additional financing.

        If AGA is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt, AGA may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or raise capital through sales of its equity securities. If these or other kinds of additional financing become necessary, AGA cannot assure you that it could arrange such financing on terms that are acceptable to it, or at all.

AGA may incur additional indebtedness from time to time to finance research and development, including clinical trials, acquisitions, investments or strategic alliances or for other purposes.

        AGA may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the agreements governing AGA's senior secured credit facility contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. For example, AGA has $40.0 million of available borrowings under its revolving credit facility, and AGA has the ability to increase the aggregate amount of its Tranche B term loan under its senior secured credit facility by up to $75.0 million without the consent of any person other than the institutions agreeing to provide all or

56


Table of Contents


any portion of such increase. If AGA incurs additional debt above the levels currently in effect, the risks associated with its leverage would increase.

AGA is subject to restrictive debt covenants, which may restrict its operational flexibility.

        AGA's senior secured credit facility contains various financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on its ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on and redeem capital stock, make other restricted payments, make investments, sell its assets or enter into consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all of its assets. AGA's senior secured credit facility also requires it to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy financial condition tests. AGA's ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond its control, and AGA cannot assure you that it will continue to meet those ratios and tests. A breach of any of these covenants, ratios, tests or restrictions could result in an event of default under its senior secured credit facility. Agreements governing any additional indebtedness AGA incurs in the future may contain similar or more stringent covenants. Covenants in AGA's existing or future debt agreements could limit AGA's ability to take actions that AGA believes are in its best interests. If an event of default exists under its senior secured credit facility or any additional indebtedness AGA incurs in the future, the lenders under such agreements could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable. If any such lender accelerates the payment of one of its indebtednesses, AGA cannot assure you that its assets would be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness and its other indebtedness that would become due as a result of any acceleration.

AGA's obligations under its senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all of its assets.

        AGA's obligations under its senior secured credit facility are secured by liens on substantially all of AGA's and its subsidiaries' assets. If AGA becomes insolvent or is liquidated, or if repayment under its senior secured credit facility is accelerated and AGA cannot repay such indebtedness, the lenders will be entitled to exercise the remedies available to a secured lender under applicable law and the applicable agreements and instruments, including the right to foreclose on all of AGA's and its subsidiaries' assets.

AGA's controlling stockholders have substantial control over it and could influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

        AGA is controlled by Welsh Carson, WCAS Capital Partners IV, L.P. and other individuals and entities affiliated with Welsh Carson (the "WCAS Stockholders"), and Franck L. Gougeon, its director and co-founder, and other entities controlled by Mr. Gougeon (the "Gougeon Stockholders"). The WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders beneficially own or control approximately 45% and 20%, respectively, of AGA's common stock outstanding, and they have entered into a shareholders agreement with AGA in relation to their stock ownership. Accordingly, AGA is a "controlled company" as set forth in Rules 5605 and 5615 of the NASDAQ listing rules because more than 50% of AGA's voting power is held by a group formed by the WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders. As a result, the WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders, if acting together, would be able to influence or control matters requiring approval by its stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other material corporate transactions. They may also vote in a way with which minority stockholders disagree and which may be adverse to minority stockholders' interests. Any conflict of interests between the WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders, on the one hand, and the other holders of AGA's common stock, on the other, may result in an actual or perceived conflict of interest on the part of AGA's directors affiliated with the WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders. The existence or perception of such a conflict of interest could materially limit the ability of these directors to participate in consideration of the matter. In addition, the concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of AGA,

57


Table of Contents


could deprive AGA's stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of AGA and might ultimately affect the market price of AGA's common stock.

Some provisions of Delaware law and AGA's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may deter third parties from acquiring AGA.

        Provisions contained in AGA's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and the laws of Delaware, the state in which AGA is incorporated, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire AGA, even if doing so might be beneficial to its stockholders. Provisions of AGA's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws impose various procedural and other requirements, which could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions. For example, AGA's amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes its board of directors to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock, without any vote or action by its stockholders. Thus, AGA's board of directors can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting or other rights of holders of AGA's common stock.

        These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of AGA. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing or to take other corporate actions that they desire.

AGA does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

        AGA currently intends to retain its future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future, to repay indebtedness and to fund the development and growth of AGA's business. AGA does not intend to pay any dividends to holders of its common stock even if permitted to do so under its senior secured credit facility. As a result, capital appreciation in the price of AGA's common stock, if any, will be its stockholders' only source of gain on an investment in its common stock.

        Even if AGA decides in the future to pay any dividends, AGA is a holding company with no independent operations of its own. As a result, AGA depends on its direct and indirect subsidiaries for cash to pay its obligations and make dividend payments. Deterioration in the financial conditions, earnings or cash flow of its subsidiaries for any reason could limit or impair the subsidiaries' ability to pay cash dividends or other distributions to AGA. In addition, AGA's ability to pay dividends in the future is dependent upon AGA's receipt of cash from its subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries may be restricted from sending cash to AGA by, among other things, existing law or certain provisions of its senior secured credit facility, the documents governing its future indebtedness that restrict its ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute cash or other assets.

AGA's results of operations may fluctuate significantly from period to period and cause the market price of its common stock to decline.

        AGA has experienced significant fluctuations in its results of operations from period to period, and AGA cannot assure that it will not continue to do so in the future. Such fluctuations have occurred primarily due to non-recurring items. For example, AGA recorded for 2005 a $29.0 million charge related to its one-time payment in settlement of a patent infringement lawsuit and a $50.8 million charge related to in-process research and development that AGA determined would not reach technical feasibility or hold an alternative use. AGA's results of operations may fluctuate significantly in the future from period to period due to many factors, including current and potential patent infringement lawsuits and the timing of AGA's research and development expenditures, as well as the other factors described in this section. Any such fluctuation may cause the market price of AGA's common stock to decline.

58


Table of Contents


AGA qualifies as a controlled company within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing rules and, as a result, relies and expects to continue to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

        AGA is a "controlled company" as set forth in Rules 5605 and 5615 of the NASDAQ listing rules, because more than 50% of AGA's voting power is held by a group formed by the WCAS Stockholders and the Gougeon Stockholders. Under the NASDAQ listing rules, a "controlled company" may elect not to comply with certain NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors and the requirement that director nominations and executive compensation must be approved by a majority of independent directors or a nominating or compensation committee, as applicable, comprised solely of independent directors. Accordingly, stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NASDAQ corporate governance requirements.


Risks Relating to the Combined Company

Uncertainties exist in integrating the business and operations of St. Jude Medical and AGA.

        There can be no assurance that St. Jude Medical will be able to successfully integrate AGA's operations with those of St. Jude Medical. There will be inherent challenges in integrating the companies' operations that could result in an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined companies and could adversely affect its results of operations. In addition, the overall integration of the two companies may result in unanticipated problems, delays, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses and loss of customer relationships, and may cause St. Jude Medical's stock price to decline. Issues that must be addressed in integrating the operations of the companies include, among other things:

    conforming standards, controls, procedures and policies, business cultures and compensation structures between St. Jude Medical and AGA;

    consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures;

    consolidating sales and marketing operations;

    retaining existing customers and attracting new customers;

    retaining key employees;

    identifying and eliminating redundant and underperforming operations and assets;

    minimizing the diversion of management's attention from ongoing business concerns;

    compliance with AGA's DPA;

    coordinating geographically dispersed organizations; and

    managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating the operations of the combined company.

        In addition, even if the businesses and operations of St. Jude Medical and AGA are integrated successfully, the combined companies may not fully realize the expected benefits of the business combination, including sales or growth opportunities that were anticipated, within the anticipated timeframe, or at all. Further, because the businesses of St. Jude Medical and AGA differ, the results of operations of the combined companies and the market price of St. Jude Medical common stock after the business combination may be affected by factors different from those existing prior to the business combination and may suffer as a result of the business combination. Cross product sales, increased geographical sales coverage and other synergies may not occur or develop to the extent envisioned for the future. As a result, St. Jude Medical and AGA cannot assure you that the integration of the

59


Table of Contents


businesses and operations of St. Jude Medical and AGA will result in the realization of the full benefits anticipated from the business combination.

Failure to retain key employees could diminish the anticipated benefits of the Offer and the Merger.

        The success of the Offer and the Merger will depend in part on the retention of personnel critical to the business and operations of the combined company due to, for example, their technical skills or management expertise. Employees and consultants may experience uncertainty about their future roles with St. Jude Medical and AGA until clear strategies are announced or executed. St. Jude Medical and AGA, while similar, do not have the same corporate cultures, and some employees or consultants may not want to work for the combined company. In addition, competitors may recruit employees during AGA's integration of St. Jude Medical, as is common in medical device mergers. If St. Jude Medical and AGA are unable to retain personnel that are critical to the successful integration and future operation of the companies, the combined company could face disruptions in its operations, loss of existing customers, key information, expertise or know-how, and unanticipated additional recruiting and training costs. In addition, the loss of key personnel could diminish the benefits of the Offer and the Merger actually achieved by the combined company.

The completion of the Offer and the Merger may cause customers or suppliers to terminate their relationships with the combined company.

        Certain customers or suppliers of St. Jude Medical may be uncertain about the combined company or may have prior experience with AGA that causes such customers or suppliers to be dissatisfied with AGA. Likewise, certain customers or suppliers of AGA may be uncertain about the combined company or may have prior experience with St. Jude Medical that causes such customer or supplier to be dissatisfied with St. Jude Medical. This uncertainty or dissatisfaction may cause such customers or suppliers to terminate their existing relationships with or seek to change their existing agreements with St. Jude Medical or AGA. These decisions could have an adverse affect on the business of the combined company.

60


Table of Contents


ST. JUDE MEDICAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation

        Silzone® Litigation and Insurance Receivables:     St. Jude Medical has been sued in various jurisdictions beginning in March 2000 by some patients who received a heart valve product with Silzone® coating, which St. Jude Medical stopped selling in January 2000. Some of these claimants allege bodily injuries as a result of an explant or other complications, which they attribute to these products. Others, who have not had their Silzone-coated heart valve explanted, seek compensation for past and future costs of special monitoring they allege they need over and above the medical monitoring of all other replacement heart valve patients receive. Some of the lawsuits seeking the cost of monitoring have been initiated by patients who are asymptomatic and who have no apparent clinical injury to date. St. Jude Medical has vigorously defended against the claims that have been asserted and expects to continue to do so with respect to any remaining claims. While St. Jude Medical has a small number of individual Silzone cases in federal and state courts outstanding, St. Jude Medical's historical experience with similar cases and St. Jude Medical's expectations for these specific cases are that it will be able to resolve them at minimal, if any, cost to St. Jude Medical.

        St. Jude Medical has been able to successfully resolve class action matters in British Columbia and Quebec. As part of the British Columbia class action settlement, St. Jude Medical made a $2.1 million payment in March 2010. As part of the Quebec class action settlement, St. Jude Medical made a $5.7 million payment in April 2010. The Quebec class action settlement also resolved the claim raised by the Quebec Provincial health insurer seeking to recover the cost of insured services furnished or to be furnished to class members in the Quebec class action.

        St. Jude Medical has two outstanding class action cases in Ontario and one individual case in British Columbia by the Provincial health insurer. In Ontario, a class action case involving Silzone patients has been certified, and the trial began in February 2010. A second case seeking class action status in Ontario has been stayed pending resolution of the ongoing Ontario class action. The complaints in the Ontario cases request damages up to 2.0 billion Canadian Dollars (the equivalent of $1.9 billion at October 2, 2010). Based on St. Jude Medical's historical experience, the amount ultimately paid, if any, often does not bear any relationship to the amount claimed. The British Columbia Provincial health insurer has a lawsuit seeking to recover the cost of insured services furnished or to be furnished to class members in the British Columbia class action, and that lawsuit remains pending in the British Columbia court.

        St. Jude Medical has recorded an accrual for probable legal costs, settlements and judgments for Silzone related litigation. St. Jude Medical is not aware of any unasserted claims related to Silzone-coated products. For all Silzone legal costs incurred, St. Jude Medical records insurance receivables for the amounts that it expects to recover. Any costs (the material components of which are settlements, judgments, legal fees and other related defense costs) not covered by St. Jude Medical's product liability insurance policies or existing reserves could be material to St. Jude Medical's consolidated earnings, financial position and cash flows. The following table summarizes St. Jude Medical's Silzone legal accrual and related insurance receivable at October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 (in thousands):

 
  October 2,
2010
  January 2,
2010
 

Silzone legal accrual

  $ 23,133   $ 23,326  

Silzone insurance receivable

  $ 63,710   $ 42,538  
           

        Part of St. Jude Medical's remaining product liability insurance for Silzone claims consists of a $50.0 million layer of insurance covered by American Insurance Company (AIC). In December 2007, AIC initiated a lawsuit in Minnesota Federal District Court seeking a court order declaring that it is not required to provide coverage for a portion of the Silzone litigation defense and indemnity expenses that St. Jude Medical may incur in the future. The insurance broker that assisted St. Jude Medical in

61


Table of Contents


procuring the insurance with AIC has also been added as a party to the case on St. Jude Medical's behalf. St. Jude Medical believes the claims of AIC are without merit and plans to vigorously defend against the claims AIC has asserted. In September 2010, the District Court issued a decision in favor of St. Jude Medical in response to a motion for partial summary judgment on AIC being required to provide payment of certain indemnity expenses. A second motion for partial summary judgment is scheduled to be heard by the District Court on October 29, 2010.

        Boston U.S. Attorney Investigation:     In October 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), acting through the U.S. Attorney's office in Boston, commenced an industry-wide investigation into whether the provision of payments and/or services by makers of ICDs and bradycardia pacemaker systems (pacemakers) to doctors or other persons constitutes improper inducements under the federal health care program anti-kickback law. As part of this investigation, St. Jude Medical has received three subpoenas from the government requesting documents regarding St. Jude Medical's practices related to ICDs, pacemakers, lead systems and related products marketed by St. Jude Medical's Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM) operating segment. St. Jude Medical has cooperated with the investigation and has produced documents and witnesses as requested. In January 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts unsealed a qui tam action (private individual bringing suit on behalf of the U.S. Government) filed by a former employee containing allegations relating to the issues covered by the subpoenas. Although in December 2009, the DOJ had declined to intervene in this qui tam suit, the DOJ filed a motion in August 2010 to intervene. The Court granted the DOJ's motion, without prejudice to St. Jude Medical, and also directed the DOJ to file its complaint by August 31, 2010. The DOJ has indicated that it intends only to pursue alleged claims related to four post-market studies conducted by St. Jude Medical primarily in 2004-2006. The Court also ruled that St. Jude Medical may file its objection to the August 2010 DOJ intervention and argue that the DOJ has not established good cause to intervene. The Court vacated the deadline for DOJ to file its complaint, and scheduled the case for a status hearing on November 29, 2010. It is not possible to predict the outcome of this matter at this time.

        Additionally, in December 2008, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston delivered a subpoena issued by the OIG requesting the production of documents relating to implantable cardiac rhythm device and pacemaker warranty claims. St. Jude Medical has cooperated with the investigation and has produced documents as requested.

        U.S. Department of Justice—Civil Investigative Demand:     In March 2010, St. Jude Medical received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The CID requests documents and sets forth interrogatories related to communications by and within St. Jude Medical on various indications for ICDs and a National Coverage Decision issued by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Similar requests were made of our major competitors. St. Jude Medical is cooperating with the investigation and is continuing to work with the U.S. Department of Justice in responding to the CID.

        Securities Class Action Litigation:     On March 18, 2010, a securities class action lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Minnesota against St. Jude Medical and certain officers on behalf of purchasers of St. Jude Medical common stock between April 22, 2009 and October 6, 2009. The lawsuit relates to St. Jude Medical's earnings announcements for the first, second and third quarters of 2009, as well as a preliminary earnings release dated October 6, 2009. The complaint, which seeks unspecified damages and other relief as well as attorneys' fees, alleges that St. Jude Medical failed to disclose that it was experiencing a slowdown in demand for its products and was not receiving anticipated orders for CRM devices. Class members allege that St. Jude Medical's failure to disclose the above information resulted in the class purchasing St. Jude Medical stock at an artificially inflated price. St. Jude Medical intends to vigorously defend against the claims asserted in this lawsuit.

        Derivative Litigation:     In September 2010, two derivative actions involving St. Jude Medical were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Derivative suits permit a

62


Table of Contents


shareholder to bring an action in the name of the corporation against the parties allegedly causing harm to the corporation. In both of these matters, the defendants consist of members (or a former member) of St. Jude Medical's board of directors as well as various officers and former officers of St. Jude Medical. No demand has been made to St. Jude Medical (or its board of directors). Rather, the plaintiffs are simply arguing that it would be futile for them to make such a demand and, accordingly, they ought to be allowed to represent the interests of the shareholders against St. Jude Medical and its board of directors. On October 15, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion before the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation requesting that the two cases be transferred to the District of Massachusetts and consolidated with what they claim are related actions there. St. Jude Medical intends to oppose the transfer request and to vigorously defend against the claims asserted in these two derivative lawsuits.

        Putative Stockholder Class Action:     On October 29, 2010, a putative stockholder class action complaint was filed in Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, State of Minnesota. The complaint, captioned Michael Rubin v. AGA Medical Holdings, Inc., et al., names as defendants the members of the AGA board of directors, as well as AGA, St. Jude Medical, Offeror, Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe IX, L.P., WCAS Capital Partners IV, L.P., Gougeon Shares, LLC and The Franck L. Gougeon Revocable Trust. The plaintiff alleges that AGA's directors breached their fiduciary duties to AGA's stockholders. The complaint also alleges that AGA's purported controlling stockholders owed fiduciary duties to AGA's minority stockholders in connection with the transaction and breached such duties. The plaintiff further claims that St. Jude Medical and its subsidiaries aided and abetted the purported breaches of fiduciary duty. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that in approving the proposed transaction between AGA and St. Jude Medical, AGA board members accepted an inadequate price, failed to make full disclosure, and utilized unreasonable deal protection devices and that the AGA board members acted to put their personal interests ahead of the interests of AGA stockholders. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, including to enjoin the transaction, in addition to unspecified compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, other fees and costs and other relief. AGA believes the plaintiff's allegations lack merit.

        On November 10, 2010, the proceedings related to this putative class action filed in the Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, State of Minnesota were stayed by the Hennepin County District Court, pending resolution of the Delaware Action, at which time the parties expect to present a stipulated dismissal with prejudice.

        On October 28, 2010, a putative stockholder class action complaint was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the "Delaware Action"). The complaint, captioned Jennifer Walling v. AGA Medical Holdings, Inc., et al., names as defendants the members of AGA's board of directors, as well as AGA, AGA, St. Jude Medical and Offeror. The plaintiff alleges that AGA's directors breached their fiduciary duties to AGA's stockholders and further alleges that AGA and St. Jude Medical aided and abetted the purported breaches of fiduciary duty. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that in approving the proposed transaction between AGA and St. Jude Medical, AGA board members accepted an inadequate price, failed to make full disclosure, and utilized unreasonable deal protection devices and that the AGA board members acted to put their personal interests ahead of the interests of AGA stockholders. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, including to enjoin the transaction, in addition to unspecified compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, other fees and costs and other relief.

        On November 8, 2010, the parties to the Delaware Action entered into a memorandum of understanding (the "MOU"). The MOU sets forth an agreement in principle to settle the litigation, including that St. Jude Medical and AGA file with the SEC documents setting forth certain additional disclosures. The additional disclosures filed by St. Jude Medical and AGA include information concerning the background of the negotiations in connection with the Offer and the Merger and clarifications relating to the procedures and considerations underlying the financial analyses performed by Piper Jaffray in connection with the Offer and the Merger. AGA also agreed to extend the time its stockholders can submit a written demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware

63


Table of Contents


General Corporation Law by an additional fifteen days. The settlement contemplated by the MOU is subject to several conditions, including the negotiation and execution of a stipulation of settlement and the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery. As a result of the MOU, the Delaware Court of Chancery removed from its calendar the hearing on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, previously scheduled for November 15, 2010.

        The defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing or liability with respect to all claims, events and transactions challenged in the Delaware Action or otherwise. The defendants have entered into the MOU to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, risk, expense and distraction of further litigation.

Regulatory Matters

        The FDA inspected St. Jude Medical's manufacturing facility in Minnetonka, Minnesota at various times between December 8 and December 19, 2008. On December 19, 2008, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying certain observed non-conformity with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) primarily related to the manufacture and assembly of the Safire TM ablation catheter with a 4 mm or 5 mm non-irrigated tip. Following the receipt of the Form 483, St. Jude Medical's AF division provided written responses to the FDA detailing proposed corrective actions and immediately initiated efforts to address the FDA's observations of non-conformity. St. Jude Medical subsequently received a warning letter dated April 17, 2009 from the FDA relating to these non-conformities with respect to this facility.

        The FDA inspected St. Jude Medical's Plano, Texas manufacturing facility at various times between March 5 and April 6, 2009. On April 6, 2009, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying certain observed non-conformities with cGMP. Following the receipt of the Form 483, St. Jude Medical's Neuromodulation division provided written responses to the FDA detailing proposed corrective actions and immediately initiated efforts to address FDA's observations of nonconformity. St. Jude Medical subsequently received a warning letter dated June 26, 2009 from the FDA relating to these non-conformities with respect to its Neuromodulation division's Plano, Texas and Hackettstown, New Jersey facilities.

        With respect to each of these warning letters, the FDA notes that it will not grant requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve pre-market approval applications for Class III devices to which the quality system regulation deviations are reasonably related until the violations have been corrected. St. Jude Medical is working cooperatively with the FDA to resolve all of its concerns.

        On April 23, 2010, the FDA issued a warning letter based upon a July 29, 2009 inspection of our Sunnyvale, California facility and a review of our website. The warning letter cites St. Jude Medical for its promotion and marketing of the Epicor™ LP Cardiac Ablation System and the Epicor UltraCinch LP Ablation Device based on certain statements made in St. Jude Medical's marketing materials. St. Jude Medical has worked diligently to address the points raised in the warning letter and believes it has addressed all of the FDA's concerns. The warning letter is not expected to have any material impact on St. Jude Medical's business.

        Customer orders have not been and are not expected to be impacted while St. Jude Medical works to resolve the FDA's concerns. St. Jude Medical is working diligently to respond timely and fully to the FDA's requests. While St. Jude Medical believes the issues raised by the FDA can be resolved without a material impact on St. Jude Medical's financial results, the FDA has recently been increasing its scrutiny of the medical device industry and raising the threshold for compliance. The government is expected to continue to scrutinize the industry closely with inspections, and possibly enforcement actions, by the FDA or other agencies. St. Jude Medical is regularly monitoring, assessing and improving its internal compliance systems and procedures to ensure that its activities are consistent with applicable laws, regulations and requirements, including those of the FDA.

64


Table of Contents


THE TRANSACTION

General Description of the Offer

        St. Jude Medical is offering to exchange, as each holder of AGA common stock may elect, either:

    cash in the amount of $20.80, without interest; or

    a fraction of a share or number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock having a value equal to $20.80 divided by the Average Trading Price;

for each outstanding share of AGA common stock validly tendered and not properly withdrawn, subject to the terms and conditions described in this prospectus/offer to exchange and the related letter of election and transmittal. AGA stockholders may elect to receive cash, St. Jude Medical common stock or a combination of cash and stock, for the aggregate of their shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer. The elected consideration to be exchanged for each validly tendered and not withdrawn share of AGA common stock consideration is subject to adjustment and proration in certain circumstances. For a discussion of these circumstances, see "—Elections and Proration." Stockholders that tender their shares of AGA common stock, but do not elect to receive cash or to receive St. Jude Medical common stock for their AGA common stock, will be treated as if they had made no election and the amount of cash and/or shares of St. Jude Medical common stock that they receive will be based on the amount of cash and/or St. Jude Medical common stock remaining after giving effect to the cash elections and stock elections.

        The expiration time and date of the Offer is 12:00 midnight (one minute after 11:59 P.M.), New York City time, on the evening of November 17, 2010, unless St. Jude Medical extends the period of time for which the Offer is open, in which case the term "expiration date" means the latest time and date on which the Offer, as so extended, expires.

        The exact fraction of a share or number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock that constitutes the exchange rate will be determined on the second trading day preceding the final expiration date of the Offer by dividing $20.80 by the Average Trading Price of St. Jude Medical common stock on the NYSE for the ten trading days ending on and including the second trading day preceding the final expiration date. For purposes of calculating the exchange rate, the trading volume of St. Jude Medical common stock will be based on the consolidated trading volume across all U.S. exchanges. This consolidated trading volume is reported for St. Jude Medical on bloomberg.com under "Volume."

        If, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any exercise by St. Jude Medical of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns 90% or more of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, the Merger can be accomplished without a vote of AGA stockholders. If, on the other hand, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any exercise by St. Jude Medical of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns more than 50% but less than 90% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, a special meeting of AGA stockholders and the affirmative vote at such meeting of at least a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for such meeting will be needed to complete the Merger. Because St. Jude Medical will own a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for the special meeting, approval of the Merger by AGA stockholders will be assured.

        If you are the record owner of your shares of AGA common stock and you tender those shares directly to Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, the exchange agent, you will not incur any brokerage fees or commissions. If you own your shares of AGA common stock through a broker or other nominee, and your broker or other nominee tenders those shares on your behalf, your broker or other nominee may charge you a commission for doing so. You should consult with your broker or nominee to determine whether any charges will apply. St. Jude Medical is required to be responsible for any

65


Table of Contents


transfer taxes on the exchange of shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer that are imposed on the acquiror of the shares of AGA common stock. You will be responsible for any transfer taxes that are imposed on the transferor.

        St. Jude Medical's obligation to deliver cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in exchange for shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer is subject to several conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to the expiration of the Offer, including the minimum condition referred to below in the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Offer" on page 117.


Purpose of the Offer

        St. Jude Medical is making the Offer in order to acquire all of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock. St. Jude Medical intends, as soon as practicable after completion of the Offer, to have its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Asteroid, the purchaser in the Offer, merge with and into AGA. The purpose of the Merger is to acquire all shares of AGA common stock not tendered and exchanged in connection with the Offer. In the Merger, each then outstanding share of AGA common stock, except for treasury shares, shares that St. Jude Medical or Asteroid holds for its own account and shares of AGA common stock for which appraisal rights have been properly exercised under Delaware law, will be converted into the right to receive either the Cash Consideration or the Stock Consideration. 50% of the shares of AGA common stock will be converted in the Merger into the right to receive the Cash Consideration and 50% will be converted into the right to receive the Stock Consideration, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. For a discussion of these circumstances, see "The Merger Agreement—The Merger—Manner and Basis of Converting Shares of AGA Common Stock in the Merger" on page 106.

        If after completion of the Offer, either as a result of the Offer alone or in conjunction with the exercise the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical beneficially owns more than 90% of the outstanding shares of AGA, St. Jude Medical may effect the Merger without the approval of AGA stockholders, as permitted under Delaware law. If, on the other hand, St. Jude Medical beneficially owns more than 50%, but less than 90%, of the outstanding shares of AGA, a meeting of AGA stockholders and the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for such meeting will be needed to complete the Merger. Because, in that instance, St. Jude Medical would own a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date, approval of the Merger by AGA stockholders will be assured. See "—Approval of the Merger" on page 75.


Top-Up Option

        Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, AGA has granted to Asteroid an irrevocable Top-Up Option to purchase newly-issued shares of AGA common stock in an amount up to the lowest number of shares of AGA common stock that, when added to the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock owned by St. Jude Medical and Asteroid, will constitute one share of AGA common stock more than 90% of the total shares of AGA common stock outstanding. Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the Top-Up Option is exercisable by Asteroid if, following completion of the Offer, St. Jude Medical or Asteroid beneficially own at least 75% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock. The consideration payable by Asteroid upon exercise of the Top-Up Option will have a value equal to the Cash Consideration, payable in cash to the extent of the par value of shares of AGA common stock so purchased, and, as to the balance for the shares of AGA common stock so purchased, payable in cash, shares of St. Jude Medical common stock (valued at the Average Trading Price), a promissory note, or a combination of the foregoing. The promissory note will bear interest at the prime rate and have a one-year maturity date, may be prepaid without premium or penalty, and shall provide that the unpaid principal and interest will become immediately due and payable if

66


Table of Contents


St. Jude Medical fails to make payment for 30 days or St. Jude Medical files or has filed against it any petition under bankruptcy or insolvency law. Any promissory note issued in connection with the Top-Up Option will remain an asset of the surviving corporation in the Merger and the second merger. If the Top-Up Option is exercised, St. Jude Medical and Asteroid must undertake to consummate as promptly as practicable the Merger described below to acquire all remaining shares of AGA common stock not acquired in the Offer. The Top-Up Option terminates concurrently with any termination of the Merger Agreement.


Timing of the Offer

        The Offer commenced on October 20, 2010 and is currently scheduled to expire on November 17, 2010, pursuant to the Merger Agreement between St. Jude Medical and AGA, dated October 15, 2010. However, the Offer may be extended in certain circumstances as described below.


Extension; Termination and Amendment

        Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Offer:

    shall be extended by St. Jude Medical (but not later than March 1, 2011) if any of the conditions to the Offer shall not have been satisfied or waived;

    shall be extended by St. Jude Medical if and to the extent required by the SEC, NASDAQ, the NYSE or any other applicable law; and

    may be extended once by St. Jude Medical (but not later than March 1, 2011) if all of the conditions to the Offer shall have been satisfied or waived, but less than 90% of the shares of AGA common stock on a fully diluted basis have been tendered in the Offer.

        During an extension, all shares of AGA common stock previously tendered and not properly withdrawn will remain subject to the Offer, subject to your right to withdraw your shares of AGA common stock. If the Offer has not been consummated by March 1, 2011, AGA or St. Jude Medical may terminate the Merger Agreement. See the section entitled "—Withdrawal Rights" on page 70 for more details.

        St. Jude Medical reserves the right to make any changes in the terms and conditions of the Offer by giving oral or written notice of the change to the exchange agent and by making a public announcement thereof. However, without the prior written consent of AGA, except pursuant to St. Jude Medical's matching right in the event of a competing offer, St. Jude Medical cannot make any changes that:

    reduce the Cash Consideration or Stock Consideration;

    change the form of consideration to be paid for shares of AGA common stock in the Offer (except to add consideration, pursuant to the proration or adjustment provisions in the Merger Agreement or pursuant to St. Jude Medical's matching right in the event of a competing offer);

    decrease the number of shares of AGA common stock sought in the Offer;

    waive or amend the minimum condition or the condition relating to the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the HSR Act or the effectiveness of the registration statement to which this prospectus/offer to exchange relates;

    add to the conditions in the Offer or impose conditions to the Offer in addition to those set forth in the Merger Agreement;

    extend the Offer except as required or permitted by the Merger Agreement;

67


Table of Contents

    make any other change to any of the terms and conditions to the Offer that is adverse to the holders of shares of AGA common stock; or

    abandon or terminate the Offer except as provided for in the Merger Agreement.

        St. Jude Medical is required to follow any extension, termination, amendment or delay, as promptly as practicable, with a public announcement. In the case of an extension, the announcement is required to be issued no later than 9:00 A.M., New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration date. Subject to applicable law, including Rules 14d-4(d) and 14d-6(c) under the Exchange Act, which, in the case of the Offer will require that any material change in the information published, sent or given to AGA stockholders in connection with the Offer be promptly sent to AGA stockholders in a manner reasonably designed to inform AGA stockholders of the change, and without limiting the manner in which St. Jude Medical may choose to make any public announcement, St. Jude Medical assumes no obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate any public announcement other than by making a release through PR Newswire.

        If St. Jude Medical makes a material change in the terms of the Offer or the information concerning the Offer, or if it waives a material condition of the Offer, St. Jude Medical will extend the Offer to the extent required under the Exchange Act. If, prior to the expiration date and after obtaining AGA's prior written consent, St. Jude Medical changes the percentage of shares of AGA common stock being sought or the consideration offered to you, that change will apply to all stockholders whose shares of AGA common stock are accepted for exchange pursuant to the Offer. If at the time notice of that change is first published, sent or given to you, the Offer is scheduled to expire at any time earlier than the tenth business day from and including the date that the notice is first so published, sent or given, St. Jude Medical is required to extend the Offer until the expiration of that ten business day period. For purposes of the Offer, a "business day" means any day other than a day on which the SEC is closed.


Designation of AGA's Directors after the Offer

        Upon the first acceptance of payment of shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer, St. Jude Medical will be entitled to designate a majority of the directors on AGA's board of directors, the exact number to be determined in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. As of this time, St. Jude Medical has not determined who will be its designees on the AGA board of directors. However, the designees will be selected from a list of potential designees comprised of officers of St. Jude Medical, which officers are set forth in Annex E. After St. Jude Medical's designees are elected to AGA's board prior to the completion of the Merger, the affirmative vote of a majority of the continuing directors will be required for AGA to, among other things, amend or terminate the Merger Agreement.


Elections and Prorations

        The cash elections and stock elections made by tendering AGA stockholders whose shares are accepted by St. Jude Medical in the Offer will be subject to adjustment and proration. Stockholders of AGA may make a cash election with respect to some of their shares of AGA common stock and a stock election with respect to others. If more than 50% of the total shares of AGA common stock validly tendered and accepted by St. Jude Medical in the Offer are represented by cash elections, AGA stockholders that have made a cash election, will receive their pro rata share of the available cash. If more than 50% of the total shares of AGA common stock validly tendered and accepted by St. Jude Medical in the Offer are represented by stock elections, AGA stockholders that have made made a stock election will receive their pro rata share of the available shares of St. Jude Medical common stock. The available St. Jude Medical common stock is subject to the limitation that the aggregate number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be paid in the Offer and the Merger may not

68


Table of Contents


exceed 19.9% of the number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock outstanding on date on which shares of AGA common stock are first accepted for payment under the Offer.

        AGA stockholders who do not make an election will be allocated whatever form of Offer consideration is remaining (or a proportionate share of each form of Offer consideration if neither is oversubscribed), after taking into account the preferences of the tendering stockholders who made valid elections, as follows. If 50% or more of the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer have made a valid election to receive cash, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will be treated as though they had elected to receive St. Jude Medical common stock. If 50% or more of the aggregate number of shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer have made a valid election to receive shares of St. Jude Medical common stock, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will be treated as though they had elected to receive cash. If neither form of consideration is oversubscribed, AGA stockholders who do not make an election will each receive the remaining cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock after taking into account valid elections on a pro rata basis, such that after all shares of AGA common stock are exchanged, 50% of the aggregate shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will have been exchanged for cash and 50% of the aggregate shares of AGA common stock tendered in the Offer will have been exchanged for shares of St. Jude Medical common stock.

        Holders of AGA common stock who do not exchange their shares in the Offer and whose shares are cancelled in the Merger will not have election rights, but instead, will receive the Cash Consideration for 50% of their shares of AGA common stock and the Stock Consideration for 50% of their shares of AGA common stock, subject to certain adjustments. The available St. Jude Medical common stock is subject to the limitation that the aggregate number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be paid in the Offer and the Merger may not exceed 19.9% of the number of shares of St. Jude Medical common stock outstanding on the date on which shares of AGA common stock are first accepted for payment under the Offer. The available cash payable in the Merger is subject to adjustment whereby the aggregate Cash Consideration to be paid in the Merger would be decreased and the aggregate shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to be issued in the Merger would be increased, but not in excess of the limitation described in the preceding sentence, in order that the Offer, the Merger and the subsequent second merger may qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.


Exchange of Shares of AGA Common Stock; Delivery of Cash and Shares of St. Jude Medical Common Stock

        Upon the terms of, and subject to the conditions to, the Offer including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of such extension or amendment, St. Jude Medical is required to accept for exchange, and to deliver cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in exchange for shares of AGA common stock that are validly tendered and not properly withdrawn, promptly after the expiration date. In all cases, exchange of shares of AGA common stock tendered and accepted for exchange pursuant to the Offer will be made only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:

    certificates for the shares of AGA common stock or a confirmation of a book-entry transfer of the shares of AGA common stock in the exchange agent's account at The Depository Trust Company, which is referred to in this prospectus as "DTC;" and

    a properly completed and duly executed letter of election and transmittal or a manually signed copy of that document, and any other required documents.

        For purposes of the Offer, St. Jude Medical will be deemed to have accepted for exchange shares of AGA common stock validly tendered and not properly withdrawn as, if and when St. Jude Medical notifies the exchange agent of its acceptance of the tenders of those shares of AGA common stock. The exchange agent is required to then deliver cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock in

69


Table of Contents


exchange for the shares of AGA common stock promptly after receipt of the notice referred to in the preceding sentence. The exchange agent will act as agent for St. Jude Medical for the purpose of receiving cash and shares of St. Jude Medical common stock and transmitting a certificate or certificates for St. Jude Medical common stock or cash, or a combination thereof, to AGA stockholders that have tendered their shares of AGA common stock in the Offer. You will not receive any interest on any cash that St. Jude Medical pays to you, even if there is a delay in making the exchange, and your consideration will be subject to applicable tax withholding.

        If St. Jude Medical does not accept any tendered shares of AGA common stock for exchange pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Offer for any reason, St. Jude Medical is required to return certificates for the unexchanged shares of AGA common stock to the tendering stockholder or, in the case of shares of AGA common stock tendered by book-entry transfer of unexchanged shares of AGA common stock into the exchange agent's account pursuant to the procedures described below in the section entitled "—Procedure for Tendering" on page 71, the shares of AGA common stock will be credited to an account maintained within DTC, as soon as practicable following expiration or termination of the Offer.


Treatment of Fractional Shares of St. Jude Medical Common Stock

        The fractional shares of St. Jude Medical common stock to which an AGA stockholder is entitled in the Offer or the Merger shall be aggregated with all other fractional shares of all other AGA stockholders in the Offer or Merger, as applicable. Those aggregated shares will be sold in the open market by the exchange agent, as agent for the AGA stockholders having an interest in those shares, and those AGA stockholders will be entitled to their proportional share of the cash proceeds, without interest, from that sale.


Withdrawal Rights

        Your tender of shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer is irrevocable, except that shares of AGA common stock tendered pursuant to the Offer may be withdrawn at any time on or prior to the expiration date, and, unless St. Jude Medical previously accepted them for exchange pursuant to the Offer, may also be withdrawn at any time after December 19, 2010.

        For your withdrawal to be effective, the exchange agent must receive from you a written, telex or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal at its address on the back cover of this prospectus/offer to exchange, and your notice must include your name, address, social security number, the certificate number(s) and the number of shares of AGA common stock to be withdrawn as well as the name of the registered holder, if it is different from that of the person who tendered the shares of AGA common stock.

        A financial institution must guarantee all signatures on the notice of withdrawal unless the shares of AGA common stock have been tendered for the account of any eligible institution. Most banks, savings and loan associations and brokerage houses are able to provide these signature guarantees for you. The financial institution must be an "eligible institution," which means it is a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program. If shares of AGA common stock have been tendered pursuant to the procedures for book-entry tender discussed under the caption below entitled "—Procedure for Tendering," any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited with the withdrawn shares of AGA common stock and must otherwise comply with the DTC procedures. If certificates have been delivered to the exchange agent, the name of the registered stockholder and the serial numbers of the particular certificates evidencing the shares of AGA common stock withdrawn must also be furnished to the exchange agent, as stated above, prior to the physical release of the certificates. St. Jude Medical will decide all questions regarding the form

70


Table of Contents


and validity (including time of receipt) of any notice of withdrawal, in its sole discretion, and St. Jude Medical's decision shall be final and binding.

        Neither St. Jude Medical, the exchange agent, Georgeson Inc. (the information agent), nor any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in any notice of withdrawal or will incur any liability for failure to give proper notification. Any shares of AGA common stock properly withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of the Offer. However, you may re-tender withdrawn shares of AGA common stock by following one of the procedures discussed below in the section entitled "—Procedure for Tendering" at any time on or prior to the expiration date.


Procedure for Tendering

        For you to validly tender shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer, (a) the enclosed letter of election and transmittal, properly completed and duly executed or a manually executed copy of that document, along with any required signature guarantees, or an agent's message in connection with a book-entry transfer, and any other required documents, must be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent at P.O. Box 3301, South Hackensack, NJ 07606-3301 (post office mailing address), or, to Attn: Corporate Actions Dept., 27th Floor, 480 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ 07310 (overnight/express mail/hand delivery), and certificates for tendered shares of AGA common stock must be received by the exchange agent at that address or the shares of AGA common stock must be tendered pursuant to the procedures for book-entry tender described below (and a confirmation of receipt of the tender received, which confirmation St. Jude Medical refers to below as a "book-entry confirmation"), in each case before the expiration date, or (b) you must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below.

        The term "agent's message" means a message, transmitted by DTC to, and received by, the exchange agent and forming a part of a book-entry confirmation, which states that DTC has received an express acknowledgment from the participant in DTC tendering the shares of AGA common stock that are the subject of the book-entry confirmation, that the participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the letter of election and transmittal and that St. Jude Medical may enforce that agreement against the participant.

        The exchange agent is required to establish accounts with respect to the shares of AGA common stock at DTC for purposes of the Offer within three business days after October 20, 2010, and any financial institution that is a participant in DTC may make book-entry delivery of the shares of AGA common stock by causing DTC to transfer tendered shares of AGA common stock into the exchange agent's account in accordance with DTC's procedure for the transfer. However, although delivery of shares of AGA common stock may be effected through book-entry at DTC, the letter of election and transmittal (or a manually signed copy thereof), with any required signature guarantees, or an agent's message in connection with a book-entry transfer, and any other required documents, must, in any case, be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent at the address on the back cover of this prospectus prior to the expiration date, or the guaranteed delivery procedures described below must be followed.

        Signatures on all letters of election and transmittal must be guaranteed by an eligible institution, except in cases in which shares of AGA common stock are tendered either by a registered holder of shares of AGA common stock who has not completed the box entitled "Special Issuance Instructions" on the letter of election and transmittal or for the account of an eligible institution. If the certificates for shares of AGA common stock are registered in the name of a person other than the person who signs the letter of election and transmittal, or if certificates for unexchanged shares of AGA common stock are to be issued to a person other than the registered holder(s), the certificates must be endorsed or accompanied by appropriate stock powers, in either case signed exactly as the name or names of the

71


Table of Contents


registered owner or owners appear on the certificates, with the signature(s) on the certificates or stock powers guaranteed in the manner St. Jude Medical has described above.

         The method of delivery of AGA stock certificates and all other required documents, including delivery through DTC, is at your option and risk, and the delivery will be deemed made only when actually received by the exchange agent. If delivery is by mail, St. Jude Medical recommends registered mail with return receipt requested, properly insured. In all cases, you should allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery.

        If you wish to tender shares of AGA common stock pursuant to the Offer and your certificates are not immediately available or you cannot deliver the certificates and all other required documents to the exchange agent prior to the expiration date or cannot complete the procedure for book-entry transfer on a timely basis, your shares of AGA common stock may nevertheless be tendered, so long as all of the following conditions are satisfied:

    you make your tender by or through an eligible institution;

    the enclosed notice of guaranteed delivery, properly completed and duly executed, substantially in the form enclosed with this prospectus/offer to exchange, is received by the exchange agent as provided below on or prior to the expiration date; and

    the certificates for all tendered shares of AGA common stock or a confirmation of a book-entry transfer of tendered securities into the exchange agent's account at DTC as described above, in proper form for transfer, together with a properly completed and duly executed letter of election and transmittal or a manually signed copy thereof, with any required signature guarantees (or, in the case of a book-entry transfer, an agent's message) and all other documents required by the letter of election and transmittal are received by the exchange agent within three NYSE trading days, after the date of execution of the notice of guaranteed delivery.

        You may deliver the notice of guaranteed delivery by hand or transmit it by facsimile transmission or mail to the exchange agent and you must include a signature guarantee by an eligible institution in the form provided in that notice. In all cases, St. Jude Medical is required to exchange shares of AGA common stock tendered and accepted for exchange pursuant to the Offer only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of certificates for shares of AGA common stock (or timely confirmation of a book-entry transfer of tendered securities into the exchange agent's account at DTC as described above), properly completed and duly executed letter(s) of election and transmittal or manually signed copy(s) thereof, or an agent's message in connection with a book-entry transfer, and any other required documents. If an AGA stockholder does not timely deliver any AGA shares that are the subject of a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, then such shares will not be deemed validly tendered in the Offer and no cash or stock election will have been made with respect to such shares. Shares of AGA common stock delivered pursuant to a notice of guaranteed delivery will not be counted toward the minimum condition until the shares are actually delivered.

        By executing a letter of election and transmittal as described above, you irrevocably appoint St. Jude Medical's designees as your attorneys-in-fact and proxies, each with full power of substitution, to the full extent of your rights with respect to your shares of AGA common stock tendered and accepted for exchange by St. Jude Medical and with respect to any and all other shares of AGA common stock and other securities (other than the shares of St. Jude Medical common stock) issued or issuable in respect of the shares of AGA common stock on or after October 13, 2010. That appointment is effective if and when, and only to the extent that, St. Jude Medical accepts the shares of AGA common stock for exchange pursuant to the Offer. All of these proxies shall be considered coupled with an interest in the tendered shares of AGA common stock and therefore shall not be revocable. Upon the effectiveness of the appointment, all prior proxies that you have given will be revoked, and you may not give any subsequent proxies (and, if given, they will not be deemed effective). St. Jude Medical's designees will, with respect to the shares of AGA common stock for which the appointment is effective, be empowered, among other things, to exercise all of your voting and other rights as they, in their sole discretion, deem proper at any annual, special or adjourned meeting of AGA stockholders or otherwise. St. Jude Medical reserves the right to require that, in order for shares of AGA common stock to be deemed validly tendered, immediately upon St. Jude Medical's exchange of the shares, St. Jude Medical must be able to exercise full voting rights with respect to the tendered shares of AGA common stock.

72


Table of Contents

        St. Jude Medical will determine questions regarding the validity, form, eligibility (including time of receipt) and acceptance for exchange of any tender of shares of AGA common stock, in its sole discretion, and its determination shall be final and binding. St. Jude Medical reserves the absolute right to reject any and all tenders of shares of AGA common stock that it determines are not in proper form or the acceptance of or exchange for which may, in the opinion of its counsel, be unlawful. St. Jude Medical also reserves the absolute right to waive any defect or irregularity in the tender of any shares of AGA common stock. No tender of shares of AGA common stock will be deemed to have been validly made until all defects and irregularities in tenders of shares of AGA common stock have been cured or waived. Neither St. Jude Medical, the exchange agent, the information agent nor any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in the tender of any shares of AGA common stock or will incur any liability for failure to give notification. St. Jude Medical's interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Offer (including the letter of election and transmittal and instructions thereto) will be final and binding.

        The tender of shares of AGA common stock pursuant to any of the procedures described above will constitute a binding agreement between St. Jude Medical and you upon the terms and subject to the conditions to the Offer.

        Procedure for Beneficial Owners to Tender.     If an AGA stockholder holds its shares in "street name" through a broker of other nominee, the AGA stockholder should ask its broker or other nominee to tender its shares or follow the instructions provided by the broker or other nominee with this prospectus/offer to exchange.


Conditions to the Offer

        Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Asteroid is not required to accept for payment or, subject to any applicable rules of the SEC, to pay for any shares of AGA common stock tendered pursuant to the Offer, and may delay the acceptance for payment or payment of any shares of AGA common stock or terminate or amend the Offer if the following conditions are not met:

Minimum Condition

        Prior to the expiration date of the Offer, as it may be extended pursuant to the Merger Agreement, there must be validly tendered and not withdrawn (not including shares of AGA common stock subject to a notice of guaranteed delivery unless such shares have actually been delivered) prior to the expiration date of the Offer, a number of shares of AGA common stock, which, together with any shares of AGA common stock that St. Jude Medical, Asteroid or any other subsidiary of St. Jude Medical owns, which constitute at least a majority of the sum of:

    the total number of shares of AGA common stock outstanding; and

    the number of shares of AGA common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of all outstanding rights and convertible securities.

        The minimum condition will be a majority of 53,784,711 shares of AGA common stock, which is equal to the sum of the total number of outstanding shares of AGA common stock and the total number of shares of AGA common stock issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding Options and RSUs to purchase AGA common stock and employee stock purchase plan rights. Other than the Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights, there are no rights or other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of AGA common stock outstanding. As a result, there must be validly tendered and not withdrawn 26,892,357 shares of AGA common stock in the Offer to satisfy the minimum condition. Assuming that the stockholders of AGA who have entered into the tender and voting agreement tender or cause to be tendered all of the shares they beneficially owned as of October 13, 2010, no additional shares of AGA common stock must be tendered in the Offer to satisfy

73


Table of Contents

the minimum condition unless there is a tender and voting agreement release. If there is a tender and voting agreement release, an additional 10,756,944 shares of AGA common stock, representing approximately 20.0% of the sum of outstanding shares and shares issuable upon exercise of Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights, or 21.4% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock (excluding shares issuable upon exercise of Options, RSUs and employee stock purchase plan rights) as of October 13, 2010, must be tendered into the Offer to satisfy the minimum condition.

Other Conditions

        The Offer is also subject to conditions that must be satisfied or waived by Asteroid prior to the expiration of the Offer, including the following:

    the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act, and under applicable foreign antitrust laws;

    the registration statement, of which this prospectus/offer to exchange is a part, having been declared effective by the SEC and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement having been issued by the SEC;

    the shares of common stock of St. Jude Medical to be issued in the Offer having been approved for listing on the NYSE;

    AGA having received written letters of resignation from the current members of its board of directors, other than three independent directors, and each subsidiary;

    AGA having not breached or failed to comply in any material respect with any of its obligations, covenants or agreements in the Merger Agreement ( provided that St. Jude Medical will not assert this condition unless it has determined in its reasonable judgment that AGA has breached or failed to comply in a material respect with any obligations, covenants or agreements in the Merger Agreement);

    the representations and warranties of AGA contained in the Merger Agreement having been true and correct as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the time for acceptance and payment of the shares (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date), subject to applicable materiality qualifications;

    the Merger Agreement not having been terminated in accordance with its terms, or amended in accordance with its terms to provide for such termination;

    no event having occurred that has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on AGA; and

    there not having been any action, suit, claim, arbitration, investigation, inquiry, grievance or other proceeding pending by any governmental entity, or any federal, state, local or foreign law (including common law, FDA laws, and foreign drug laws), statute, ordinance, rule, code, regulation, injunction, judgment, order, decree or other legally enforceable requirement enacted, entered, or promulgated by a governmental entity that seeks to:

    make illegal or otherwise prohibit the consummation of the Offer or the Merger;

    impose material limitations on St. Jude Medical's ability to acquire, hold or effectively exercise full rights of ownership of the shares of AGA common stock, including the right to vote the shares of AGA common stock purchased or owned by St. Jude Medical;

    prohibit or limit the ownership, operation or control by AGA, St. Jude Medical or any of their respective subsidiaries of any material portion of the business or assets of AGA,

74


Table of Contents

        St. Jude Medical or any of their respective subsidiaries which would be material in the context of either the value of AGA and its subsidiaries, taken as whole, to St. Jude Medical upon consummation of the Offer and Merger, or to St. Jude Medical and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or

      compel AGA, St. Jude Medical or any of their respective subsidiaries to dispose of or hold separate any material portion of the business or assets of AGA, St. Jude Medical or any of their respective subsidiaries which would be material in the context of either the value of AGA and its subsidiaries, taken as whole, to St. Jude Medical upon consummation of the Offer and Merger, or to St. Jude Medical and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

If any one of the above conditions is not met, including the minimum condition, then St. Jude Medical is not required to accept for payment or, subject to any applicable rules of the SEC, to pay for any shares of AGA common stock tendered pursuant to the Offer. St. Jude Medical and Asteroid, however, have reserved the absolute right, in their sole discretion, subject to terms of the Merger Agreement, to waive, in whole or in part, any of the conditions to the Offer, or to modify the terms or conditions of the Offer consistent with the terms of the Merger Agreement, except that, without the prior written consent of AGA, neither St. Jude Medical or Asteroid may (except, in certain circumstances, in connection with its matching rights in the event of a competing offer), (i) reduce the Cash Consideration or Stock Consideration, (ii) except pursuant to the Merger Agreement, change the form of consideration payable in the Offer, (iii) reduce the number of shares to be purchased by Asteroid in the Offer, (iv) waive or amend the minimum condition or the requirement that the waiting period under the HSR Act be expired or terminated or that the registration statement to which this prospectus/offer to exchange relates be effective and not subject to a stop order by the SEC, (v) add to the conditions to the Offer or impose any other conditions to the Offer, (vi) extend the expiration date of the Offer except as required by the Merger Agreement, (vii) otherwise amend, modify, or supplement any condition to the Offer or any term of the Offer in a manner adverse to the holders of the shares of AGA common stock, or (viii) abandon or terminate the Offer except as provided for in the Merger Agreement. See "The Transaction—Extension; Termination and Amendment."


Approval of the Merger

        If, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any exercise by Asteroid of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns 90% or more of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, the Merger can be accomplished without a vote of AGA stockholders. If, on the other hand, after completion of the Offer, as it may be extended, or any such exercise by St. Jude Medical of the Top-Up Option, St. Jude Medical owns more than 50% but less than 90% of the outstanding shares of AGA common stock, a special meeting of AGA stockholders and the affirmative vote at such meeting of at least a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for such meeting will be needed to complete the Merger. Because St. Jude Medical will own a majority of the shares of AGA common stock outstanding on the record date for the special meeting, approval of the Merger by AGA stockholders will be assured.


Interests of Certain Persons

    Interests of AGA's Executive Officers

        AGA's executive officers are as follows:

Name
  Position
John R. Barr   President and Chief Executive Officer
Brigid A. Makes   Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ronald E. Lund   Sr. Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

75


Table of Contents