UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number 000-51644
VOCUS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
58-1806705
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
12051 Indian Creek Court
Beltsville, Maryland 20705
(301) 459-2590
(Address including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by
check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant (19,569,299 shares) based on the $30.61
closing price of the registrants common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on June 30, 2011, was approximately $599,016,242. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant
are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.
As of March 9, 2012, there were 20,275,934 outstanding shares of the registrants common stock.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K,
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY NOTES REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to:
|
|
|
our plans to develop and market new products and the timing of these development programs;
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;
|
|
|
|
our estimates of expenses and future revenues and profitability;
|
|
|
|
our estimates of the size of the markets for our solutions;
|
|
|
|
the rate and degree of market acceptance of our solutions; and
|
|
|
|
the success of other competing technologies that may become available.
|
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may, will, should,
could, would, expect, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, projects, predicts, intends, potential and similar
expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in greater detail under the heading Risk Factors in Item 1A. Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions
only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report.
This report also contains estimates made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other industry data. These estimates involve a number of assumptions and limitations and
you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of
uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this report. These and
other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by us.
2
PART I
Overview
We are a
leading provider of cloud marketing software that helps businesses attract, engage and retain customers. As consumers buying behavior is increasingly influenced by online information and social networks, our software helps companies reach and
influence buyers across social networks, online and through the media.
Our cloud marketing solution addresses key areas of
modern online marketing, including social media marketing, search marketing, email marketing and publicity. Our software is designed to make it easy for businesses to attract customers through search engines, increase and engage their followers on
social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, communicate with prospects and customers via email and generate and track visibility in traditional and online media. Although our buyers include a wide variety of people that share the common goal of
promoting their businesses, the majority of our buyers are either small business owners, marketing professionals or public relations professionals.
Our sales organization is focused on adding new customers, renewing customer subscriptions and expanding relationships with existing customers. We believe that we have one of the largest sales
organizations devoted to selling cloud marketing solutions in the U.S. and Europe. Our small business and mid-market sales teams sell primarily over the telephone and Internet, while our large market sales team travels onsite to meet with larger
organizations. In addition to new business teams, we have sales representatives focused on account management, including renewal and add-on sales to existing customers.
We deliver our solutions over the Internet using a secure, scalable application and system architecture that allows our customers to quickly deploy and adopt our software. We were an early pioneer in
cloud-based software, and our solutions are now used in multiple languages by thousands of organizations worldwide.
Our Company
We were initially formed in 1988 as First Data Software Publishing, Inc., a Florida corporation, and in 1992 we began
selling desktop software for government relations. In 1999, we reincorporated as a Delaware corporation.
Industry Background
The Internet has had an impact on almost every aspect of business across all functional areas, with
some of the most profound changes happening in the area of consumer behavior and prospect buying patterns. The ubiquity of the Internet, followed by the adoption of search engines and the explosive growth in social networking have all rapidly
accelerated the availability of quality content and shared buyer experiences.
A new buying process has emerged that takes
place prior to engaging with a vendor, and it is taking place online, centered on research, references and trusted sources. Internet search engines are replacing yellow pages, local newspapers and television as a primary source for finding a local
business, and social networks are now the most popular online activity, with nearly four out of five Internet users visiting social networks sites. We believe that the traditional, inside out, one way, seller-driven approach that has been a
cornerstone of marketing for the last fifty years is steadily losing effectiveness due to these new buying patterns. As company-led direct marketing continues to become less effective, organizations are increasingly relying on new digital marketing
channels to attract, engage and retain customers. These new channels include online search marketing, social media marketing, email marketing and publicity.
3
According to Forrester Research, Inc.s
U.S. Interactive Marketing Forecast, 2011 To
2016
, U.S. marketers plan to increase spending on interactive channels (defined as display, search, email, mobile and social media) as a percentage of total advertising spending from 16% in 2011 to 26% in 2016, creating a projected $77.0 billion
market in the U.S. by 2016, of which email, mobile and social media marketing is expected to grow from approximately $4.8 billion in 2011 to nearly $15.7 billion by 2016, representing a compound annual growth rate of 27%.
iContact Acquisition
On
February 24, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of iContact Corporation (iContact), a provider of cloud-based email and social marketing software that enables organizations to create and publish professional-quality emails to
engage, educate and retain customers, adding an email capability component to our cloud marketing suite. For more information, please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Overview and Note 14,
Subsequent Events
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Our Solutions
Our cloud marketing suite addresses the critical functions
of modern marketing including social media marketing, search marketing, publicity, and now, email marketing since our recent acquisition of iContact.
For small and mid-sized businesses, we provide an easy-to-use suite that helps them attract, engage and retain customers online, across social networks and through the media. For larger organizations, we
also provide an in-depth workflow that helps manage publicity campaigns and media relations activities. The key benefits of our solutions include:
Integrated marketing across multiple channels.
Our solutions help attract, engage and retain customers across multiple communications and marketing channels including social networks such as
Facebook and Twitter, search engines such as Google and Bing, media sites including major news sites and thousands of blogs.
Improved productivity.
Our solutions incorporate features and best practices that automate many marketing functions, freeing users
from repetitive, low-value tasks and allowing them to focus on high-value strategic initiatives. Core technology including our recommendation engine monitors and analyzes large volumes of data and content and makes easy-to-follow recommendations
that allow users to maximize their marketing results in much less time.
ROI based analytics.
Our solutions provide a
variety of performance-based analytics that help companies evaluate the success of their marketing campaigns, their search engine marketing and their success online in expanding friends, followers, prospects and customers.
Enhanced collaboration.
Our solutions provide shared, real-time access to a central repository of information related to contacts,
relationships, activities, news, social media, documents and reporting. This enables companies to maintain a history of marketing activities, build better relationships with the media, prospects and customers, and work together more effectively in a
team or department environment.
Rapid time-to-value.
Our cloud-based software can be provisioned quickly and deployed
easily, without the need for special consulting services or marketing expertise. Customers can be up and running in less than thirty minutes, getting relevant news and social content, sending online news releases or launching campaigns on Facebook.
4
Our Growth Strategy
Our objective is to be the leader of cloud marketing for small and mid-sized businesses. Key elements of our growth strategy include:
Expanding our cloud marketing suite.
We believe our current marketing suite addresses key elements of modern marketing including
social media marketing, search marketing, email marketing and publicity. As new channels continue to emerge, we also believe that we have the opportunity to add other features or modules that address emerging channels such as mobile marketing and
social CRM.
Expanding our direct sales force.
We believe the cloud marketing space represents a significant market
opportunity that will allow us to continue our growth for the foreseeable future. The large market opportunity, combined with our strategy of selling an integrated marketing suite on a subscription basis, makes the direct inside sales model an
attractive and differentiated way of driving our growth. We plan to continue to expand our direct sales organization as one of our primary drivers of growth for the foreseeable future.
Increasing alternate channel distribution.
We believe there are alternate channel opportunities that will allow us to generate
additional sales through partnerships and other indirect sales channels. We plan to look for additional opportunities to grow through these alternate distribution channels.
Selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions.
The fragmented nature of our market provides opportunities for selective acquisitions. We have acquired and integrated several private companies to
date, and we will continue to identify and may acquire companies that would either expand our solutions functionality, provide access to new customers or markets, or both.
Our Products
Our cloud marketing solution addresses the critical functions
of marketing including search marketing, social media marketing, publicity and email marketing. Key components of our solution include the following:
Search Marketing and News Distribution.
Our PRWeb online news distribution service helps customers increase their online visibility and organic search engine rankings with press releases
that are optimized for search engines and other online distribution sites.
Social Media.
We provide social media
software solutions that help customers run social marketing campaigns on Facebook, including apps that power coupons, promotions and special fan-only offers. Our social media solutions also help customers monitor and analyze conversations across
multiple social networks and other online websites in order to understand what is being said about their brands, products and industry. In addition, our social media solutions help identify key influencers and allows customers to identify and engage
with prospects and customers on Facebook and Twitter.
Email Marketing.
Our email marketing service provides an
easy-to-use method of keeping in touch with prospects and customers by using professional looking emails to send newsletters, special offers and other useful content.
Publicity.
We provide a comprehensive media database, news monitoring and analytics and publicity opportunities that help companies increase their media exposure, manage relationships with
reporters and monitor and analyze trends unfolding in the media.
Due to our flexible design and technology architecture, we
are able to sell our components as a stand-alone solution, or combine different components and features into integrated suites to meet the needs and budgets of any size organization.
5
Small businesses tend not to be marketing experts and are typically focused on running their
businesses. They are generally interested in using our products to grow their business with minimal time investment and without learning to be a marketing expert.
Mid-sized companies typically have a dedicated marketing resource that will invest more time in marketing activities and consequently tend to buy suites with more features at higher price points.
For larger organizations, we sell primarily to their public relations department, which is typically the same size as the
marketing department in a mid-sized company. Similar to our other customers, public relations departments are interested in building their brand and reaching and influencing buyers online and across social networks. In addition, they typically spend
more time than our other buyers focused on managing relationships with the media and monitoring traditional news.
Each of our
key components is available as a stand-alone subscription and also as a part of either a marketing suite or a public relations suite. Our solutions are generally offered on a subscription basis, although our search marketing and news distribution
services are also offered on a per-transaction basis.
Technology, Development and Operations
Technology
We were an early pioneer in cloud-based software, launching our first version in 1999. Our software solutions leverage a highly scalable, multi-tenant architecture and code written primarily for the .NET
framework. We use commercially available hardware, and a combination of proprietary, open source and commercially available software, with a bias towards Microsoft products. We have developed proprietary core services that are designed specifically
for our architecture to enhance our ability to meet our delivery goals. We have a seamless delivery environment that allows users to be routed in the most optimal way to multiple servers, eliminating the restrictions that come with binding a user to
a single server. This seamless delivery environment, coupled with our proprietary core services, allows us to quickly and cost effectively scale our software deliverability systems as we add additional customers.
Our cloud-based software manages all customers as logically separate tenants in central applications and databases. As a result, we are
able to spread the cost of delivering our service across our user base. In addition, because we do not have to manage thousands of distinct applications with their own business logic and database schemas, we believe that we can scale our business
quickly to meet changes in demand for our products.
Every page of our cloud-based software is dynamically rendered for each
specific user, including a choice of multiple languages. Our customers access our solutions through any web browser without installing software or downloading Java applets, Microsoft ActiveX, or .NET controls. Performance, functional depth and
usability of our solutions drive our technology decisions and product direction.
Development
Our research and development efforts are focused on improving and enhancing our existing solutions as well as developing new features and
functionality. Because of our multi-tenant architecture, we are able to provide all of our customers with a single version of our solutions, which allows us to maintain relatively low research and development expenses, as compared to other software
business models that support multiple versions.
6
Site Operations
We serve all of our customers from third-party data center facilities in the United States and Europe. These facilities provide a
combination of security personnel, photo ID/access cards, biometric hand scanners and sophisticated fire systems. The overall security of each data center (inside and outside) and network operations center are monitored by digital video surveillance
cameras 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Additionally, redundant electrical generators and environmental control devices are used to keep servers up and running. We own or lease and operate all of the hardware on which our applications run in
the third-party data center facilities.
We continuously monitor the performance of our software delivery systems. Our site
operations team provides system management, maintenance, monitoring and back-up. We use custom, proprietary tools as well as commercially available tools to monitor our solutions. We run tests to ensure adequate response from of our sites. We also
monitor site availability and latency from various geographic points around the world.
To facilitate loss recovery, we
operate a multi-tiered system configuration with load balanced web server pools, standby database servers and fault tolerant storage devices. Databases are backed up frequently to standby databases and servers, which are designed to provide near
real-time fail-over service in the event of a malfunction with a primary database or server. Backups of databases take place nightly and are archived to tape. These tapes are rotated off-site to a separate third-party managed facility. We also
maintain a redundant site for our U.S. facility, which would serve as our primary site in the event that a disaster was to render one of the third-party sites inoperable.
Customer Support
We believe that superior customer support is
critical to retaining and expanding our customer base. Our customer support group is responsible for new customer implementations, consulting services, news release editing services and general help desk services. Our help desk services include
identifying, analyzing and solving customer problems or issues. Our customers are able to obtain support from us through their preferred channel, as we offer services to customers on-site, by telephone, and over the Internet through email, live chat
and social media. We also offer a variety of product training on-site and online through live or pre-recorded web-based classes. Customer support is available during standard business in the U.S. and Europe and is also available 24/7 for some
support tasks or at an additional charge.
Sales and Marketing
We sell our cloud-based solutions primarily through our direct sales organization, and over the Internet in an e-commerce model and to a lesser extent through indirect sales channels. Our direct sales
organization is separated into groups that focus either on selling to new customers or selling to existing customers. In our new customer sales group, we employ inside sales and field sales personnel to provide product demonstrations to prospects to
close sales with new customers. Our existing customer sales group focuses on renewing customer relationships and expanding those relationships by selling software with expanded functionality at higher price points. We also employ lead generation
personnel who qualify prospects and setup product demonstrations for our new sales personnel. We currently have sales offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
We also sell several of our products over the Internet in an e-commerce model. Through various marketing activities we drive prospects to one of several websites that offer either a free trial or a free
account for one of our cloud marketing solutions. Some prospects then go on to purchase either a monthly subscription or a single transaction. Going forward we may create additional websites to sell other products over the Internet in an e-commerce
model.
Our marketing strategy is to generate qualified sales leads, build our brand and create market awareness of our cloud
marketing software. Our marketing solutions include search marketing, social media marketing, email
7
marketing and publicity. We also conduct seminars, participate in trade shows and industry conferences, host an annual user conference, publish white papers and develop customer reference
programs. We also use our website to provide company and product information and to attract prospects through organic search.
Our
Customers
As of December 31, 2011, we had 11,907 active annual subscription customers and over 36,000 customers who
purchase our products and services as a monthly subscription or per transaction. These customers represent a wide variety of industries, as well as government agencies, not-for-profit organizations and educational institutions. No single end-user
customer accounted for more than 1.0% of our revenue in 2011.
The typical term of our subscription agreements is one year;
however, our customers may purchase subscriptions with monthly or multi-year terms. We invoice our subscription customers in advance of their subscription term, with payment terms that generally require our customers to pay us within 30 days of
invoice. We had approximately $10.8 million and $13.5 million of these unbilled amounts at December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively. These amounts may fluctuate from year-to-year depending on varying billing cycles for our
subscription agreements, including seasonality in our sales cycle, the timing of renewal agreements and the amount of multi-year subscription agreements. Such fluctuations may not be indicative of our future revenue.
Competition
The cloud
marketing space is fragmented, competitive and rapidly evolving, and there are limited barriers to entry. We expect to encounter new and evolving competition as the market consolidates and matures and as organizations become more aware of the
advantages and efficiencies that can be attained from the use of cloud marketing software. Currently, we primarily face competition from point product solutions focused on a limited subset of the components we offer in our cloud marketing suite and
from public relations agencies focused on providing similar benefits in an outsourced services model.
We compete with a wide
variety of point product solutions from both established vendors and new vendors entering the social media marketing space. Our competitive advantage is our ability to offer an integrated suite that is both comprehensive and unique. Our suite
integrates key components of modern marketing including social media marketing, search marketing, publicity and now, email marketing since our recent acquisition of iContact.
We also compete to a lesser extent with providers of outsourced services, including public relations agencies and other outsourced service providers. While some customers consider outsourcing services and
in-house software to be competing alternatives, many customers view these as complementary options and will often use both. In those cases where customers wish to select a single option, we believe we compete successfully against outsourced service
providers by providing an in-house, automated solution that offers customers a more cost-effective and timely approach to managing marketing efforts.
We believe the principal factors that generally determine a companys competitive advantage in the cloud marketing space include the following:
|
|
|
broad product functionality and depth of integration;
|
|
|
|
low total cost of ownership and easily demonstrable cost-effective benefits for customers;
|
|
|
|
flexibility and configurability to meet customer requirements;
|
|
|
|
rapid deployment and adoption;
|
|
|
|
speed, reliability and functionality;
|
8
|
|
|
system performance, security and scalability;
|
|
|
|
ease of integration with existing applications and data;
|
|
|
|
availability and quality of implementation, training and help-desk services; and
|
|
|
|
competitive sales and marketing capabilities.
|
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Content
We rely on a combination of
patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology and our brand. We have registered, and applied for
the registration of, U.S. and international trademarks, service marks and domain names. Additionally, we have filed U.S. patent applications covering certain of our proprietary technology. We also enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights
agreements with our employees, consultants and other third parties and control access to software, documentation and other proprietary information.
We currently license content included in our cloud-based software from several providers pursuant to data reseller, data distribution and license agreements with these providers. These agreements provide
us with content such as news coverage from print and Internet news sites, as well as contact information for journalists, analysts, public officials, media outlets and publicity opportunities. The licenses for this content are non-exclusive. The
agreements vary in length, and generally renew automatically subject to certain cancellation provisions available to the parties. Fees for the content provided are generally either fixed amounts per subscriber or based upon the number of concurrent
users at a subscriber. Such fees are generally paid quarterly or monthly. During 2005, we developed our own United States content which replaced a significant portion of our acquired third-party content and began providing our internally-developed
content to our customers. In 2008, we developed and began providing to our customers our own content for the United Kingdom and Ireland. In 2010, we acquired a media database through our acquisition of Data Presse SAS and began providing this
content to our customers in France. We do not believe that any of our content providers are single source suppliers, the loss of whom would substantially affect our business.
If a claim is asserted that we have infringed the intellectual property of a third-party, we may be required to seek licenses to that technology. In addition, we license third-party technologies that are
incorporated into some elements of our services. Licenses from third parties may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all. Additionally, the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may not be
adequate. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary rights. Competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the technologies we employ in our services.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2011, we had 808 full-time and part-time employees. Our employees are not covered under any collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe we have good relations with our employees.
9
Executive Officers and Key Employees
Our executive officers and key employees and their respective ages and positions as of March 1, 2012 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
Richard Rudman*
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
|
Stephen Vintz*
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
William Wagner*
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Norman Weissberg*
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, North American Sales
|
Jason Jue
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Chief Marketing Officer
|
Darren Stewart
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Customer Services
|
Mark Heys
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
James Bruno
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development
|
You Mon Tsang
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Products
|
*
|
Denotes an executive officer
|
Richard Rudman
co-founded Vocus and has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman since 1992. From 1986
through 1992, Mr. Rudman served as a senior executive at Dataway Corporation, a software development company. From 1984 through 1986, Mr. Rudman served as an accountant and systems analyst at Barlow Corporation, a privately held real
estate development and management company. From 1979 through 1983, Mr. Rudman served in the United States Air Force. Mr. Rudman holds a B.S. degree in accounting from the University of Maryland and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Stephen Vintz
has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since January 2001 and in October 2010 was also
named as an Executive Vice President. From November 1996 to January 2001, Mr. Vintz was Vice President of Strategic Planning and Analysis at Snyder Communications, Inc., a marketing services company. Prior to November 1996, Mr. Vintz was a
manager at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Vintz holds a B.B.A. degree in accounting from Loyola University of Maryland and is a Certified Public Accountant.
William Wagner
has served as our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President since October 2010. From July 2006 until September 2010, Mr. Wagner was our Chief Marketing Officer. From
January 2000 to June 2006, Mr. Wagner served as Chief Marketing Officer at Fiberlink Communications, a global provider of security and mobility software. From 1989 to 2000, Mr. Wagner held various sales and marketing positions at AT&T.
Mr. Wagner serves on the board of directors of M5 Networks, a privately-held technology company, and the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, a non-profit organization. Mr. Wagner holds a B.A. degree in history from Lafayette College and an
M.B.A. degree from the University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School of Business.
Norman Weissberg
has served as
our Senior Vice President, North American Sales since June 2006. From August 1998 until June 2006, Mr. Weissberg was our Vice President, Account Sales. From March 1997 to August 1998, Mr. Weissberg was a Major Accounts Manager at Xerox
Corporation. Mr. Weissberg holds a B.S. degree in business from the University of Maryland.
Jason Jue
has served
as our Chief Marketing Officer since November 2011. From July 2010 to October 2011, Mr. Jue was the Vice President of Marketing at Rackspace Hosting. From January 1997 through June of 2010, Mr. Jue held various marketing and executive
positions at Dell in the U.S. and Asia. From September 2000 to October 2004, Mr. Jue was not employed at Dell and took a self-imposed sabbatical. From September 1993 to December 1996 Mr. Jue was a consultant at Bain & Company.
Mr. Jue holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Harvard College.
10
Darren Stewart
has served as our Senior Vice President, Customer Services since
February 1996. From January 1994 through February 1996, Mr. Stewart worked for Information Systems Group, a software consulting company. From September 1992 through January 1994, Mr. Stewart was Manager of Customer Service for Job Files
Corporation, a privately held HR software and services company. Mr. Stewart holds a B.S. degree in business administration and finance from the University of Colorado.
Mark Heys
has served as our Chief Technology Officer since February 2008. From December 1998 to until February 2008, Mr. Heys was our Vice President, Development. From February 1996 through
November 1998, Mr. Heys served as Development Manager at T4G Limited, a privately held company. Prior to T4G, Mr. Heys was the founder and CEO of Definitive Ideas, a software company focused on Point-of-Sale applications.
James Bruno
has served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development since May 2010. From June 2009 to May 2010,
Mr. Bruno served as Vice President, Sales for Remedi SeniorCare, a provider of institutional pharmacy services. From August 2008 to December 2008, Mr. Bruno served as Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, North America, for Arpida,
a pharmaceutical company. Mr. Bruno served as Vice President, Sales at MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals from December 2003 to October 2007. From February 2003 to November 2003, Mr. Bruno worked as an Account Manager for Thompson West. From
April 2000 to July 2002, Mr. Bruno served as Vice President, International Marketing at MedImmune, a biotechnology company. Mr. Bruno holds a B.S. degree in Marketing from St. Josephs University and an M.B.A. degree from Drexel
University.
You Mon Tsang
has served as our Senior Vice President, Products since December 2010. From March 2006 to
December 2010, Mr. Tsang served as Chief Executive Officer of Boxxet, Inc., a content aggregation company, and founded Engine140, a social marketing company, in January 2010. From January 2000 to March 2010, Mr. Tsang served in various
positions including as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Marketing Officer and Chairman, of Biz360, a marketing and communications performance monitoring company. From January 1988 to December 1999, Mr. Tsang held various product management
and executive positions at Brio Technology, Milktruck, Traveling Software and Xerox. Mr. Tsang holds a B.A. degree in Urban Studies from Yale University and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeleys Walter A. Haas
School of Business.
Available Information
We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those
reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Our website address is
www.vocus.com
.
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control. This discussion highlights some of the risks which may affect future operating results.
These are the risks and uncertainties we believe are most important for you to consider. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, that we currently deem immaterial or which are similar to those faced by other companies in our
industry or business in general, may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition and operating results would likely suffer.
11
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate in the future. As a result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of
investors or securities analysts which could cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly revenue and results of
operations may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. If our quarterly revenue or results of operations fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock
could decline substantially. Fluctuations in our results of operations may be due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below and identified throughout this Risk Factors section:
|
|
|
our ability to retain and increase sales to existing customers and attract new customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and mix of our solutions sold in a particular quarter;
|
|
|
|
seasonality of our business cycle, given that our subscription volumes are normally lowest in the first quarter and highest in the fourth quarter;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of new product introductions or upgrades by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
costs associated with acquisitions of technologies and businesses;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in the payment terms for our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of non-recurring charges or expenditures related to expanding or discontinuing our operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies or the adoption of new accounting standards;
|
|
|
|
our policy of expensing sales commissions at the time our customers are invoiced for a subscription agreement, while the majority of such revenue is
recognized ratably over future periods;
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimates and assumptions used to determine the fair value of contingent consideration associated with our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our effective tax rate including changes in the mix of earnings in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, the valuation of
deferred tax assets and liabilities and the deductibility of certain expenses and changes in uncertain tax positions;
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
the purchasing and budgeting cycles of our customers; and
|
|
|
|
extraordinary expenses such as litigation or other dispute-related settlement payments.
|
Most of our expenses, such as salaries and third-party hosting co-location costs, are relatively fixed in the short-term, and our expense
levels are based in part on our expectations regarding future revenue levels. As a result, if revenue for a particular quarter is below our expectations, we may not be able to proportionally reduce operating expenses for that quarter, causing a
disproportionate effect on our expected results of operations for that quarter.
Due to the foregoing factors, and the other
risks discussed in this report, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance.
12
The markets for our cloud marketing software are emerging, which makes it difficult to
evaluate our business and future prospects and may increase the risk of your investment.
The market for cloud-based
software specifically designed for marketing is relatively new and emerging, making our business and future prospects difficult to evaluate. We have three distinct types of customers: small business owners, marketing professionals and PR
professionals. These professionals work at companies of all sizes with PR professionals generally concentrated in large and mid-sized organizations and marketing professionals and small business owners generally concentrated in small and mid-sized
organizations. Many large and mid-sized companies have often invested substantial personnel and financial resources in their PR departments, and may be reluctant or unwilling to migrate to cloud-based software and services specifically designed to
address the marketing market. And many small businesses may have a single individual fulfilling multiple roles for marketing, if they have any marketing resource at all. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the willingness of companies
of every size to increase their use of or begin using cloud-based solutions in general and for cloud marketing software and services in particular. You must consider our business and future prospects in light of the challenges, risks and
difficulties we encounter in the new and rapidly evolving market of cloud marketing solutions. These challenges, risks and difficulties include the following:
|
|
|
generating sufficient revenue to attain or, if attained, maintain profitability;
|
|
|
|
managing growth in our operations;
|
|
|
|
managing the risks associated with developing new services and modules;
|
|
|
|
attracting and retaining customers; and
|
|
|
|
attracting and retaining key personnel.
|
We may not be able to successfully address any of these challenges, risks and difficulties, including the other risks related to our business and industry described below. Further, if businesses do not
perceive the benefits of our cloud-based solutions, then the market may not develop further, or it may develop more slowly than we expect, either of which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A majority of our solutions are sold pursuant to subscription agreements, and if our existing subscription customers
elect either not to renew these agreements or renew these agreements for fewer modules or users, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.
A portion of our solutions are sold pursuant to subscription agreements and our customers have no obligation to renew these agreements. As
a result, we may not be able to consistently and accurately predict future renewal rates. Our subscription customers renewal rates may decline or fluctuate or our subscription customers may renew for fewer modules or users as a result of a
number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our solutions, budgetary or other concerns, and the availability and pricing of competing products. Additionally, we may lose our subscription customers due to the high turnover rate in
the marketing or PR departments of small and mid-sized organizations. If large numbers of existing subscription customers do not renew these agreements, or renew these agreements on terms less favorable to us, and if we cannot replace or supplement
those non-renewals with new subscription agreements generating the same or greater level of revenue, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Because we recognize subscription revenue over the term of the applicable subscription agreement, the lack of subscription renewals
or new subscription agreements may not be immediately reflected in our operating results.
We recognize revenue from
our subscription customers over the terms of their subscription agreements. The majority of our quarterly revenue usually represents deferred revenue from subscription agreements entered into during previous quarters. As a result, a decline in new
or renewed subscription agreements in any one quarter will not necessarily be fully reflected in the revenue for the corresponding quarter but will negatively affect our
13
revenue in future quarters. Additionally, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our solutions may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future
periods. Our model also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our subscription-based revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription term.
We are subject to risks related to credit card payments we accept. If we fail to be in compliance with applicable credit card rules
and regulations, we may incur additional fees, fines and ultimately the revocation of the right to accept credit card payments, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Some of the customers of our services, including our newly acquired email marketing service offerings, pay amounts
owed to us using a credit card or debit card. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating expenses and adversely affect our net income. We are also subject to payment
card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted making it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we fail to comply with these rules or
requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our customers which could have an adverse effect on our business, revenue, financial condition and results of
operations.
We might not generate increased business from our current customers, which could limit our revenue in the
future.
The success of our strategy is dependent, in part, on the success of our efforts to sell additional services
to our existing customers. These customers might choose not to expand their use of or make additional purchases of our solutions. If we fail to generate additional business from our current customers, our revenue could grow at a slower rate or
decrease.
Our business model continues to evolve, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate or decline.
Our business continues to evolve, expanding into new markets and new service areas, and is therefore subject to
additional risk and uncertainty. For example, in 2008 we began offering solutions specifically for small businesses, in June 2010, we began providing social media monitoring services to our customers, in October 2011 we began offering a marketing
suite targeted at small to mid-sized businesses, and in February 2012, we acquired iContact Corporation (iContact) which provides email marketing services. We anticipate that our future financial performance and revenue growth will depend, in part,
upon the growth of these services and expansion beyond our current marketing automation solutions including our social media marketing and email marketing offerings.
As more of our sales efforts are targeted at small business customers that are more substantively affected by economic conditions than the large and mid-sized business sectors, economic downturns
may cause potential and existing small business customers to fail to purchase our solutions, which could limit our revenue in the future.
We have increased sales of our services to small organizations, including small businesses, associations and non-profits that frequently have limited budgets and may be more likely to be significantly
affected by economic downturns than their larger, more established counterparts. Small organizations may be more likely to spend the limited funds that they have on items other than our solutions. Additionally, if small organizations experience
economic hardship, they may be unwilling or unable to expend resources on marketing, which would negatively affect demand for our solutions, increase customer attrition and adversely affect our business, revenue, financial condition and results of
operations.
14
We depend on search engines to attract new customers, and if those search engines
change their listings or our relationship with them deteriorates or terminates, we may be unable to attract new customers and our business may be harmed.
We rely on search engines to attract new customers, and many of our customers locate our websites by clicking through on search results displayed by search engines such as Google and Yahoo!. Search
engines typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic search results are determined and organized solely by automated criteria set by the search engine and a ranking level cannot be purchased.
Advertisers can also pay search engines to place listings more prominently in search results in order to attract users to advertisers websites. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased listings to attract customers to our websites. Search
engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search result listings. If search engines on which we rely for algorithmic listings modify their algorithms, then our websites may not appear at all or may appear less
prominently in search results which could result in fewer customers clicking through to our websites, requiring us to resort to other potentially costly resources to advertise and market our services. If one or more search engines on which we rely
for purchased listings modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our expenses could rise, or our revenue could decline and our business may suffer. Additionally, the cost of purchased search listing advertising is rapidly increasing as demand
for these channels grows, and further increases could greatly increase our expenses.
Failure to effectively develop and
expand our sales and marketing capabilities could harm our ability to increase our customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of our solutions.
Increasing our customer base and achieving broader market acceptance of our solutions will depend to a significant extent on our ability to expand our sales and marketing operations. We plan to continue
to expand our direct sales force which may require us to invest significant financial and other resources. Our business will be seriously harmed if our efforts do not generate a corresponding significant increase in revenue. We may not achieve
anticipated revenue growth from expanding our direct sales force if we are unable to hire and develop talented direct sales personnel, if our new direct sales personnel are unable to achieve desired productivity levels in a reasonable period of time
or if we are unable to retain our existing direct sales personnel. We also may not achieve anticipated revenue growth from our existing third-party channel partners if we are unable to maintain or renew such relationships, if any existing
third-party channel partners fail to successfully market, resell, implement or support our solutions for their customers, or if they represent multiple providers and devote greater resources to market, resell, implement and support competing
products and services.
If we fail to develop our brands, our business may suffer.
We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brands is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and
future services and is an important element in attracting new customers. Successful promotion of our brands will depend largely on the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and on our ability to provide reliable and useful solutions. Brand
promotion activities may not yield increased revenue, and even if they do, any increased revenue may not offset the expenses we incurred in building our brands. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brands, or incur substantial
expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brands, we may fail to attract new customers or retain our existing customers to the extent necessary to realize a sufficient return on our brand-building efforts, and our business
could suffer.
If our information databases do not maintain market acceptance, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
We have developed our own content that is included in the
information databases that we make available to our customers through our cloud-based software. If our internally-developed content does not maintain market acceptance, current customers may not continue to renew their subscription agreements with
us, and it may be more difficult for us to acquire new customers.
15
We rely on third-parties to provide certain content for our solutions, and if those
third-parties discontinue providing their content, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on third-parties to provide or make available certain data for our information databases, our news monitoring service and our social media monitoring service. These third-parties may not renew
agreements to provide content to us or may increase the price they charge for their content. Additionally, the quality of the content provided to us may not be acceptable to us and we may need to enter into agreements with additional third-parties.
In the event we are unable to use such third-party content or are unable to enter into agreements with third-parties, current customers may not renew their subscription agreements with us or continue purchasing solutions from us, and it may be
difficult to acquire new customers.
We depend on search engines for the placement of our customers online news
releases, and if those search engines change their listings or our relationship with them deteriorates or terminates, our reputation will be harmed and we may lose customers or be unable to attract new customers.
Our news distribution service depends upon the placement of our customers online press releases. If search engines on which we rely
modify their algorithms or purposefully block our content, then information distributed via our news distribution service may not be displayed or may be displayed less prominently in search results, and as a result we could lose customers or fail to
attract new customers and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
If the delivery of our customers
emails is limited or blocked, customers may cancel their accounts.
Internet service providers (ISP) can block emails
from reaching their users. The implementation of new or more restrictive policies by ISPs may make it more difficult to deliver our customers emails. If ISPs materially limit or halt the delivery of our customers emails, or if we fail to
deliver our customers emails in a manner compatible with ISPs email handling, authentication technologies or other policies, then customers may cancel their accounts which could harm our business and financial performance.
Various private spam blacklists may interfere with the effectiveness of our products and our ability to conduct business.
We depend on email to market to and communicate with our customers, and our customers rely on email to communicate
with journalists, social media influencers, and their customers and members. Various private entities attempt to regulate the use of email for commercial solicitation. These entities often advocate standards of conduct or practice that exceed legal
requirements and classify certain email solicitations that comply with legal requirements as spam. Some of these entities maintain blacklists of companies and individuals, and the websites, ISPs and Internet protocol addresses associated
with those entities or individuals. If a companys Internet protocol addresses are listed by a blacklisting entity, emails sent from those addresses may be blocked if they are sent to any Internet domain or Internet address that subscribes to
the blacklisting entitys service or purchases its blacklist. If our services are blacklisted our customers may be unable to effectively use our services, and as a result we could lose customers or fail to attract new customers and our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
Our customers use of our services and websites to transmit negative
messages or links to harmful websites or applications could damage our reputation, and subject us to liability.
Our
customers could use our services or websites to transmit negative messages or links to harmful websites or applications, reproduce and distribute copyrighted and trademarked material without permission, or report inaccurate or fraudulent data or
information. Any such use of our services could damage our reputation and we could face claims for damages, infringement, defamation, negligence or fraud. Moreover, our customers
16
promotion of their products and services through our services may not comply with federal, state and foreign laws. Facilitating these activities may expose us to liability including fines or
penalties, or expend resources to remedy any damages caused by such actions.
We have incurred operating losses in the
past and may incur operating losses in the future.
We have incurred operating losses in the past and we may incur
operating losses in the future. Our recent operating losses were $3.6 million for 2010 and $4.2 million for 2011. Although we had operating income in 2009, we expect our operating expenses to increase as we expand our operations, and if our
increased operating expenses exceed our revenue growth, we may not be able to generate operating income. You should not consider recent quarterly revenue growth as indicative of our future performance. In fact, in future quarters, we may not have
any revenue growth or our revenue could decline.
Unanticipated changes in our effective tax rate could adversely affect
our future results.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions, and our
domestic and international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of expenses in differing jurisdictions.
Our
effective tax rate could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings and losses in jurisdictions with differing statutory tax rates, certain non-deductible expenses, the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in
federal, state or international tax laws and accounting principles. Changes in our effective tax rate could materially affect our net results.
In addition, we are subject to income tax audits by certain tax jurisdictions throughout the world. Although we believe our income tax liabilities are reasonably estimated and accounted for in accordance
with applicable laws and principles, an adverse resolution of one or more uncertain tax positions in any period could have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
We face competition, and our failure to compete successfully could make it difficult for us to add and retain customers and could
reduce or impede the growth of our business.
The market for marketing solutions is fragmented, competitive and rapidly
evolving, and there are limited barriers to entry to some segments of this market. We expect the intensity of competition to increase in the future as existing competitors develop their capabilities and as new companies enter our market. Increased
competition could result in pricing pressure, reduced sales, lower margins or the failure of our solutions to achieve or maintain broad market acceptance. If we are unable to compete effectively, it will be difficult for us to maintain our pricing
rates and add and retain customers, and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be seriously harmed. We face competition from:
|
|
|
generic desktop software and other commercially available software not specifically designed for marketing;
|
|
|
|
marketing solution providers offering products specifically designed for marketing;
|
|
|
|
outsourced marketing service providers;
|
|
|
|
custom-developed solutions;
|
|
|
|
software companies offering social media solutions;
|
|
|
|
email marketing providers; and
|
|
|
|
press release distribution providers.
|
17
Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, a larger
presence in the marketing market, access to larger customer bases and substantially greater financial, technical, sales and marketing, management, service, support and other resources than we have. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond
more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. To the extent our competitors have an
existing relationship with a potential customer, that customer may be unwilling to switch vendors due to existing time and financial commitments with our competitors.
We also expect that new competitors, such as enterprise software vendors and cloud-based service providers that have traditionally focused on enterprise resource planning or back office applications, will
enter the cloud marketing market with competing products as the cloud marketing market develop and mature. Many of these potential competitors have established or may establish business, financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with
existing or potential customers, alliance partners or other third-parties or may combine and consolidate to become more formidable competitors with better resources. It is possible that these new competitors could rapidly acquire significant market
share.
Traditional press release distribution providers now offer press release distribution services through the Internet.
We had or continue to have partnerships with these providers to co-market and sell our press release distribution services. It is possible that these competitors could rapidly acquire significant market share.
We expect that many companies will offer solutions designed to help businesses promote themselves across social media channels. Given the
rapid adoption of social media and the dynamic nature of the vendors in this market, it is possible that these new competitors could rapidly acquire significant market share.
If we fail to respond to evolving industry standards, our solutions may become obsolete or less competitive.
The market for our solutions is characterized by changes in customer requirements, changes in protocols, new technologies and evolving industry standards. If we are unable to enhance or develop new
features for our existing solutions or develop acceptable new solutions that keep pace with these changes, our cloud-based software and services may become obsolete, less marketable and less competitive and our business will be harmed. The success
of any enhancements, or new services depends on several factors, including timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of our solutions. Failure to produce acceptable new offerings and enhancements may significantly impair our revenue
growth and reputation.
If there are interruptions or delays in providing our solutions due to third-party error, our
own error or the occurrence of unforeseeable events, delivery of our solutions could become impaired, which could harm our relationships with customers and subject us to liability.
Our solutions reside on hardware that we own or lease and operate. Our hardware is currently located in various third-party data center
facilities maintained and operated in the U.S. and Europe. Our third-party facility providers do not guarantee that our customers access to our solutions will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. Our operations depend, in part, on our
third-party facility providers ability to protect systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, criminal acts and similar events. In the event that our third-party
facility arrangements are terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such third-party facilities, we could experience interruptions in our service as well as delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities and services.
Our disaster recovery computer hardware and systems, which are located at third-party data center facilities, have not been
tested under actual disaster conditions and may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage occurring at our third-party facilities. Any or all of these events could cause our customers to lose access to
our cloud-based software. In addition, the failure by our third-party facilities to meet our capacity requirements could result in interruptions in such service or impede our ability to scale our operations.
18
We architect the system infrastructure and procure and own or lease the computer hardware
used for our services. Design and mechanical errors, spikes in usage volume and failure to follow system protocols and procedures could cause our systems to fail, resulting in interruptions in our service. Any interruptions or delays in our service,
whether as a result of third-party error, our own error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm our relationships with customers and our reputation. Also, in the event of damage or interruption, our
insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that we may incur. These factors in turn could reduce our revenue, subject us to liability, and cause us to issue credits or cause customers to fail to renew their subscriptions, any
of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Acquisitions could prove
difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and consume resources that are necessary to sustain our business.
One of our business strategies is to selectively acquire companies which either expand our solutions functionality, provide access to new customers or markets, or both. An acquisition may result in
unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. In particular, we may encounter difficulties assimilating or integrating the technologies, products, personnel or operations of the acquired organizations, particularly if the key personnel of the
acquired company choose not to work for us, and we may have difficulty retaining the customers of any acquired business due to changes in management and ownership. Acquisitions may also disrupt our ongoing business, divert our resources and require
significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our business. We also may experience lower rates of renewal from subscription customers obtained through acquisitions than our typical renewal rates.
Moreover, we cannot provide assurance that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, investment or business relationship would be realized, that we would not be exposed to unknown liabilities, or that such an acquisition will be viewed positively
by our customers, stockholders, analysts or the financial markets. In connection with one or more of these transactions, we may:
|
|
|
issue additional equity securities that would dilute the ownership of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
use cash that we may need in the future to operate our business;
|
|
|
|
be unable to achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
incur or assume debt on terms unfavorable to us or that we are unable to repay;
|
|
|
|
incur large charges or substantial liabilities;
|
|
|
|
encounter difficulties retaining key employees of an acquired company or integrating diverse business cultures;
|
|
|
|
problems arising from differences in the revenue, licensing or support of the acquired business; and
|
|
|
|
become subject to adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation or deferred compensation charges.
|
In 2010, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Two Cats and a Cup of Coffee LLC (dba HARO) and Boxxet, Inc.
(dba Engine140). In 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of North Venture Partners, LLC (North Social). In February 2012, we acquired iContact, an email marketing company.
In 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Data Presse SAS and substantially all of the assets of BDL Media Ltd. Foreign
acquisitions involve risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks and the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with
specific countries.
The consideration paid in connection with an acquisition also affects our financial results. If we should
proceed with one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration includes cash, we could be required
19
to use a substantial portion of our available cash to consummate any such acquisition. For example, the purchase price of the iContact acquisition included approximately $90.5 million in
cash. To the extent that we issue shares of stock or other rights to purchase stock, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease. For example, as part of the purchase price for iContact, we issued 401,701 shares of our
common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock that are initially convertible into 3,025,600 shares of our common stock.
In addition, acquisitions may result in our incurring additional debt, material one-time write-offs, or purchase accounting adjustments
and restructuring charges. They may also result in recording goodwill and other intangible assets in our financial statements which may be subject to future impairment charges or ongoing amortization costs, thereby reducing future earnings. In
addition, from time to time, we may enter into negotiations for acquisitions or investments that are not ultimately consummated. Such negotiations could result in significant diversion of management time, as well as incurring expenses that may
impact operating results.
We may be liable to our customers and may lose customers if we provide poor service, if our
solutions do not comply with our agreements or if there is a loss of data.
The information in our databases may not be
complete or may contain inaccuracies that our customers regard as significant. Our ability to collect and report data may be interrupted by a number of factors, including our inability to access the Internet, the failure of our network or software
systems or failure by our third-party data center facilities to meet our capacity requirements. In addition, computer viruses and intentional or unintentional acts of our employees may harm our systems causing us to lose data we maintain and supply
to our customers or data that our customers input and maintain on our systems, and the transmission of computer viruses could expose us to litigation. Our subscription agreements generally give our customers the right to terminate their agreements
for cause if we materially breach our obligations. Any failures in the services that we supply or the loss of any of our customers data that we cannot rectify in a certain time period may give our customers the right to terminate their
agreements with us and could subject us to liability. As a result, we may also be required to spend substantial amounts to defend lawsuits and pay any resulting damage awards. In addition to potential liability, if we supply inaccurate data or
experience interruptions in our ability to supply data, our reputation could be harmed and we could lose customers.
Moreover,
because our solutions are cloud-based, the amount of data that we store for our customers on our servers is ever-increasing. Any systems failure or compromise of our security that results in the release of our customers data could seriously
limit the adoption of our solutions and harm our reputation causing our business to suffer. In addition, any person who circumvents our security measures could steal proprietary or confidential customer information or cause interruptions in our
operations. We incur significant costs to protect against security breaches, and may incur significant additional costs to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Customers concerns about security could deter them from using the Internet to
conduct transactions that involve confidential information, so our failure to prevent security breaches, or well-publicized security breaches affecting the Internet in general, could significantly harm our business and financial results.
Although we maintain general liability insurance, including coverage for errors and omissions, this coverage may be inadequate, or may
not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that this policy will cover any claim against us for loss of data or other indirect or consequential damages and defending a suit, regardless of
its merit, could be costly and divert managements attention.
If our solutions fail to perform properly or if they
contain technical defects, our reputation will be harmed, our market share would decline and we could be subject to product liability claims.
Our cloud-based software may contain undetected errors or defects that may result in product failures or otherwise cause our solutions to fail to perform in accordance with customer expectations. Because
our customers use our solutions for important aspects of their business, any errors or defects in, or other performance problems with, our solutions could hurt our reputation and may damage our customers businesses. If that occurs,
20
we could lose future sales or our existing subscription customers could elect to not renew. Product performance problems could result in loss of market share, failure to achieve market acceptance
and the diversion of development resources. If one or more of our solutions fail to perform or contain a technical defect, a customer may assert a claim against us for substantial damages, whether or not we are responsible for our solutions
failure or defect. We do not currently maintain any warranty reserves.
Product liability claims could require us to spend
significant time and money in litigation or arbitration/dispute resolution or to pay significant settlements or damages. Although we maintain general liability insurance, including coverage for errors and omissions, this coverage may not be
sufficient to cover liabilities resulting from such product liability claims. Also, our insurer may disclaim coverage. Our liability insurance also may not continue to be available to us on reasonable terms, in sufficient amounts, or at all. Any
product liability claim successfully brought against us could cause our business to suffer.
Our news distribution service is
a trusted information source. To the extent we were to distribute an inaccurate or fraudulent press release or our customers used our services to transmit negative messages or website links to harmful applications, our reputation could be harmed,
even though we are not responsible for the content distributed via our services.
Privacy concerns and laws or other
domestic or foreign regulations may reduce the effectiveness of our solution and adversely affect our business.
We
provide contact information to our customers and our customers can use our service to store contact and other personal or identifying information regarding their marketing contacts. Federal, state and foreign government agencies have adopted or are
considering adopting laws and regulations regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information obtained from individuals. Other proposed legislation could, if enacted, prohibit or limit the use of certain technologies that track
individuals activities on web pages, in emails or on the Internet. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and the technology and marketing industries are considering various new, additional or different self-regulatory
standards that may place additional burdens on us or our customers which could reduce demand for our solutions.
The costs of
compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws and regulations that are applicable to us and to the businesses of our customers may reduce demand for our solutions, or lead to significant fines, penalties or liabilities for any
noncompliance with such privacy laws and could negatively impact our ability to effectively market our solutions. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, could cause our business to suffer.
Changes in laws and/or regulations related to the Internet or changes in the Internet infrastructure itself may cause our business
to suffer.
The future success of our business depends upon the continued use of the Internet as a primary medium for
commerce, communication and business applications. Federal, state or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting the use of the Internet as a commercial medium and the
use of email and social media for marketing or other consumer communications. In addition, certain government agencies or private organizations have begun to impose taxes, fees or other charges for accessing the Internet or for sending commercial
email. These laws or charges could limit the growth of Internet-related commerce or communications generally, result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based services such as ours and reduce the demand for our
products.
The Internet has experienced, and is expected to continue to experience, significant user and traffic growth, which
has, at times, caused user frustration with slow access and download times. If Internet activity grows faster than Internet infrastructure or if the Internet infrastructure is otherwise unable to support the demands placed on it, or if hosting
capacity becomes scarce, our business growth may be adversely affected.
21
U.S. federal legislation and the laws of many foreign countries impose certain
obligations on the senders of commercial emails, which could minimize the effectiveness of our products, particularly our email marketing product, and establishes financial penalties for non-compliance, which could increase the costs of our
business.
The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act,
establishes certain requirements for commercial email messages and specifies penalties for the transmission of commercial email messages that are intended to deceive the recipient as to source or content. The CAN-SPAM Act, among other things,
obligates the sender of commercial emails to provide recipients with the ability to opt out of receiving future emails from the sender. In addition, some states have passed laws regulating commercial email practices that are significantly more
punitive and difficult to comply with than the CAN-SPAM Act. Some portions of these state laws may not be preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act. The ability of our customers constituents to opt out of receiving commercial emails may minimize the
effectiveness of our products. Moreover, non-compliance with the CAN-SPAM Act carries significant financial penalties. If we were found to be in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, applicable state laws not preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act, or foreign laws
regulating the distribution of commercial email such as the laws of Canada and the United Kingdom, whether as a result of violations by our customers or if we were deemed to be directly subject to and in violation of these requirements, we could be
required to pay penalties, which would adversely affect our financial performance and significantly harm our business, and our reputation would suffer.
If we are unable to protect our proprietary technology and other intellectual property rights, it will reduce our ability to compete for business.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our competitors could use our intellectual property to market products similar to
our products, which could decrease demand for our solutions. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements, third-party nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and
technical measures, to protect our intellectual property rights. These protections may not be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying our solutions or otherwise infringing on our intellectual property rights. Existing laws afford only
limited protection for our intellectual property rights and may not protect such rights in the event competitors independently develop solutions similar or superior to ours. In addition, the laws of some countries in which our solutions are or may
be licensed do not protect our solutions and intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. These agreements may not provide
meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information.
Source code, the detailed program commands for our software programs, is critical to our business. Although we take measures to protect
our source code, unauthorized disclosure or reverse engineering of a significant portion of our source code could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products by copying functionality, which could adversely affect our business.
If a third-party asserts that we are infringing its intellectual property, whether successful or not, it could subject
us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses, and our business may be harmed.
The software and
Internet industries are characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, trademarks and copyrights and by frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Third-parties may
assert patent and other intellectual property infringement claims against us in the form of lawsuits, letters, or other forms of communication. We cannot anticipate all such claims or know with certainty whether our technology infringes the
intellectual property rights of third-parties, as currently pending patent applications are not publicly available. We expect that the number of infringement
22
claims in our market will increase as the number of solutions and competitors in our industry grows. These claims, whether or not successful, could:
|
|
|
divert managements attention;
|
|
|
|
result in costly and time-consuming litigation;
|
|
|
|
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all; or
|
|
|
|
require us to redesign our solutions to avoid infringement.
|
We may be liable or alleged to be liable to third parties for software or content that we provide to our customers if the software or content violates a third partys intellectual property rights, or
if our customers violate such rights by providing content using our solutions.
As a result, any third-party intellectual
property claims against us could increase our expenses and adversely affect our business. In addition, many of our customer agreements require us to indemnify our customers for third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which would
increase the cost to us resulting from an adverse ruling in any such claim. Even if we have not infringed any third-parties intellectual property rights, we cannot be sure our legal defenses will be successful, and even if we are successful in
defending against such claims, our legal defense could require significant financial resources and managements time, which could adversely affect our business.
Our growth could strain our personnel and infrastructure resources, and if we are unable to implement appropriate controls and procedures to manage our growth, we may not be able to successfully
implement our business plan.
Rapid growth in our headcount and operations may place a significant strain on our
management, administrative, operational and financial infrastructure. Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011, the number of our full-time equivalent employees increased from 146 to 780. We anticipate that additional growth will be
required to address increases in our customer base, as well as expansion into new geographic areas.
Our success will depend
in part upon the ability of our senior management to manage growth effectively. To do so, we must continue to hire, train and manage new employees as needed. To date, we have not experienced any significant problems as a result of the rapid growth
in our headcount, other than occasional office space constraints. However, our anticipated future growth may place greater strains on our resources. For instance, if our new hires perform poorly, or if we are unsuccessful in hiring, training,
managing and integrating these new employees as needed, or if we are not successful in retaining our existing employees, our business may be harmed. To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will need to continue to improve
our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. The additional headcount and capital investments we expect to add will increase our cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to offset any future
revenue shortfalls by offsetting expense reductions in the short term. If we fail to successfully manage our growth, we will be unable to execute our business plan.
We are dependent on our executive officers and other key personnel, and the loss of any of them may prevent us from implementing our business plan in a timely manner if at all.
Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our executive officers. We are also substantially dependent on the continued
service of our existing development personnel because of the complexity of our service and technologies. We do not have employment agreements with any of our development personnel that require them to remain our employees nor do the employment
agreements we have with our executive officers require them to remain our employees and, therefore, they could terminate their employment with us at any time without penalty. We do not currently maintain key man life insurance on any of our
executives, and such insurance, if obtained in the future, may not be sufficient to cover the costs of recruiting and hiring a replacement or the loss of an executives services. The loss of one or more of our key employees could seriously harm
our business.
23
We may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to
support our planned growth.
To execute our business strategy, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel.
Competition for these personnel is intense, especially for senior sales executives and engineers with high levels of experience in designing and developing software. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. We have
from time to time in the past experienced, and we expect to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of the companies with which we compete for
experienced personnel have greater resources than us. In addition, in making employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the stock options and awards they are to
receive in connection with their employment. Significant volatility in the price of our stock may, therefore, adversely affect our ability to attract or retain key employees. If we fail to attract new personnel or fail to retain and motivate our
current personnel, our business and future growth prospects could be severely harmed.
Because we conduct operations in
foreign jurisdictions, which accounted for approximately 14% of our 2011 revenues, our business is susceptible to risks associated with international operations.
Conducting international operations subjects us to new risks that we have not generally faced in the United States. These include:
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in managing and staffing international operations;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of foreign value added tax systems and restrictions on the repatriation of
earnings; and
|
|
|
|
the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and different legal standards.
|
The occurrence of any one of these risks could negatively affect our international operations and, consequently, our results of
operations generally.
Our debt covenants restrict our operational flexibility.
Our revolving credit facility contains a number of operational covenants, which, among other things, impose certain limitations on us with
respect to expansion of our lines of business, effecting mergers, investments and acquisitions, incurring additional indebtedness, paying dividends or distributions, repurchasing shares of our common stock, entering into guarantees, and incurring
liens and encumbrances. Our indebtedness under the credit facility is secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets and of our subsidiaries, by a pledge of our and certain of our subsidiaries stock and by a guarantee of our
subsidiaries. If the amounts outstanding under the credit facility were accelerated due to an event of default, the lender could proceed against such available collateral by forcing the sale of all or some of these assets.
We might require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available.
We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business
challenges, including the need to develop new solutions or enhance our existing solutions, enhance our operating infrastructure and acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in further equity or debt
financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have
rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive
24
covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we
require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Economic and market conditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Economic downturns, which have resulted in declines in corporate spending, decreases in consumer confidence and tightening in the credit markets, may adversely affect our financial condition and the
financial condition and liquidity of our customers and suppliers. Among other things, these economic and market conditions may result in:
|
|
|
reductions in the corporate budgets, including technology spending of our customers and potential customers;
|
|
|
|
declines in demand for our solutions;
|
|
|
|
decreases in collections of our customer receivables;
|
|
|
|
insolvency of our key vendors and suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
volatility in interest rates and decreases in investment income.
|
Any of these events, which are outside of our scope of control, would likely have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are
subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in
these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.
Compliance with new regulations governing public company corporate governance and reporting is uncertain and expensive.
Many new laws, regulations and standards have increased the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance,
reporting and disclosure practices and have created uncertainty for public companies. These new laws, regulations and standards are subject to interpretations due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may
evolve over time as new guidance is provided by varying regulatory bodies. This may cause continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our
implementation of these reforms and enhanced new disclosures may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a significant diversion of managements time and attention from revenue-generating activities. Any unanticipated
difficulties in implementing these reforms could result in material delays in complying with these new laws, regulations and standards or significantly increase our operating costs.
25
Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure
controls and procedures would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires,
among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Acts requirements relating to internal control over
financial reporting, we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management time on compliance-related issues. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent
registered public accounting firm identify deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material, the market price of our stock may decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NASDAQ
Stock Market, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
Risks Related to our Common Stock and the Securities Markets
JMI Equitys significant ownership interest dilutes the interests of our common stockholders, may discourage, delay or prevent a change in
control of our company and grants important rights to JMI Equity.
The 1,000,000 shares of Series A convertible
preferred stock that we issued in February 2012 to JMI Equity Fund VI, L.P. (JMI Equity) were immediately convertible into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 3.0256 shares of common stock per share of Series A convertible
preferred stock (subject to customary adjustments, and subject to increase if we fail to fulfill our obligation to redeem the preferred stock on February 24, 2017). The investment equates to an initial ownership interest of approximately 13%,
assuming the full conversion of each share of preferred stock into the companys common stock. While the shares of preferred stock issued to JMI Equity, and any shares of common stock into which such shares are converted, are subject to a
lock-up agreement prohibiting their sale until February 24, 2013 (subject to certain limited exceptions), any sales in the public market of the shares of common stock issuable upon such conversion after that date could adversely
affect prevailing market prices of our common stock.
On February 24, 2017, we will be required to redeem each issued and
outstanding share of Series A convertible preferred stock for $77.30 per share from our legally available funds, or such lesser amount of shares as we may then redeem under Delaware law. The shares of preferred stock will vote on an as-converted
basis with the common stock, voting together as a single class, provided that the holders of the preferred stock shall vote separately as a class on certain matters affecting the preferred stock. If any shares of preferred stock are outstanding on
or after February 24, 2017, the holders of the preferred stock will have the right to vote separately as a class on additional actions by Vocus related to acquisitions, redemptions, dividends, capital stock, and indebtedness. In addition, for
so long as the outstanding shares of preferred stock continue to represent at least 5% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock, calculated assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock into shares of common stock,
the holders of the preferred stock, voting as a separate class, will have the exclusive right to elect one director to our board of directors (Series A Director). In addition, pursuant to an Investor Rights Agreement with JMI Equity, the holders of
the preferred stock have the right to nominate a director to the board of directors for as long as they hold 5% or more of our issued and outstanding capital stock (which nominee shall be the Series A Director for so long as the holders of preferred
stock have the right to elect the Series A Director). These provisions, as well as other terms of the Series A convertible preferred stock, may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our stockholders of
an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company.
There can be no assurance that
the interests of JMI Equity or any subsequent holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock are or will be aligned with those of our other stockholders. Investor interests can differ from each other and from other corporate interests and it is
possible that this significant stockholder may have interests that differ from management and those of other stockholders. If JMI Equity or any subsequent holders of the preferred stock were to sell, or otherwise transfer, all or a large percentage
of their holdings, our stock price could decline and we could find it difficult to raise capital, if needed, through the sale of additional equity securities.
26
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if
they downgrade our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock relies in part
on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. There are many large, well-established publicly traded companies active in our industry and market, which may mean it
will be less likely that we receive widespread analyst coverage. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely decline rapidly. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us, we
could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Volatility of our stock
price could adversely affect stockholders.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly as a
result of:
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
seasonality of our business cycle;
|
|
|
|
changes in the markets expectations about our operating results;
|
|
|
|
our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning our company or the on-demand software industry in general;
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
news reports relating to trends in our markets;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;
|
|
|
|
threatened or actual litigation;
|
|
|
|
material announcements by us or our competitors including new product or service introductions and acquisitions of businesses, products, technologies
or services;
|
|
|
|
sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could
occur;
|
|
|
|
any major change in our board of directors or management;
|
|
|
|
economic conditions including a slowdown in economic growth and uncertainty in equity and credit markets; and
|
|
|
|
general political conditions such as acts of war or terrorism.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for cloud-based companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall
market and in the market price of a companys securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, divert our managements attention and resources and harm our business, operating results and financial
condition.
27
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws or
Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change in control
of our company or changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous. These provisions:
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board of directors are elected at one time;
|
|
|
|
provide that directors may only be removed for cause and only with the approval of 66 2/3 percent of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
require super-majority voting to amend our bylaws or specified provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation;
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of blank check preferred stock that our board of directors could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares
and to discourage a takeover attempt;
|
|
|
|
limit the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend, or repeal our bylaws; and
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by
stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company.
Future sales, or the availability for sale, of our
common stock may cause our stock price to decline.
Our directors and officers hold shares of our common stock that
they generally are currently able to sell in the public market. We have also registered shares of our common stock that are subject to outstanding stock options, or reserved for issuance under our stock option plan, which shares can generally be
freely sold in the public market upon issuance. Moreover, from time to time, our executive officers and directors have established trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the purpose of effecting
sales of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could materially impair our future ability to raise capital through offerings of our
common stock.
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, sales, technical support and research and development facilities, are located in Beltsville, Maryland, where we lease
approximately 93,000 square feet under an agreement that expires in 2023. Our content research division is located in College Park, Maryland where we lease approximately 7,300 square feet of space under an agreement that expires in 2020.
We also currently occupy several domestic and international sales and service offices in California, Virginia, Washington, England, France, Morocco and China, where we lease an aggregate of approximately 50,000 square feet under multiple
leases, which have terms that expire at various times through 2016.
28
We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs,
and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate expansion of our operations.
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
From time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, that in our opinion, will have
a material effect on our financial positions, operating results or cash flows.
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
Not applicable.
29
PART II
Item 5.
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market for Common Stock
Since December 7, 2005, our common stock has been listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol VOCS. Prior to such time, there was no public market for our common stock. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.80
|
|
|
$
|
14.09
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
14.41
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
18.48
|
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
27.94
|
|
|
|
17.81
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.33
|
|
|
$
|
22.85
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
30.61
|
|
|
|
24.71
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
32.67
|
|
|
|
16.51
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
22.59
|
|
|
|
15.95
|
|
As of March 1, 2012, there were approximately 71 holders of record of our common stock. This figure
does not reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or street name through various brokerage firms.
Dividends
We have never
declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any future earnings, if any, in the operation and expansion of our business. Any future
determination to pay cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. In
addition, the terms of the revolving credit facility that we entered into in February 2012 preclude us from paying cash dividends.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
In November 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to
$30.0 million of our shares of common stock, and in August 2011 authorized up to an additional $30.0 million. The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market, and there is no expiration date specified for the program. During the
year ended December 31, 2011, we purchased an aggregate of 850,031 shares of our common stock for $16.8 million under the program. As of March 1, 2012, $20.0 million remained available for purchases under the program;
however, the terms of our revolving credit facility limit the dollar value of shares that we may purchase.
30
The following table sets forth a summary of our purchases of our common stock during the
three months ended December 31, 2011, of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plan
|
|
|
Maximum
Dollar Value
of Shares That
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plan
|
|
October 1 October 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase program(1)
|
|
|
206,621
|
|
|
$
|
18.52
|
|
|
|
206,621
|
|
|
$
|
20,000,520
|
|
Employee transactions(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 1 November 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase program(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000,520
|
|
Employee transactions(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 1 December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase program(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000,520
|
|
Employee transactions(2)
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
$
|
22.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(1)
|
All shares were purchased though our publicly announced share repurchase program. On November 25, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to
$30,000,000 shares of our common stock. On August 18, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to an additional $30,000,000 shares of our common stock under the share repurchase program. There is no expiration date specified
for the program; however, the terms of our revolving credit facility limit the dollar value of shares that we may purchase.
|
|
(2)
|
All shares were delivered to us by employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding obligations with respect to the taxable income recognized by these
employees upon the vesting of their stock awards.
|
31
Performance Graph
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder returns for the period December 31, 2006 through December 31,
2011 for (1) our common stock; (2) the Nasdaq Composite Index; and (3) the Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing Index. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2006. The calculations of cumulative stockholder
return on the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing Index include reinvestment of dividends, but the calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our common stock does not include reinvestment of dividends
because we did not pay dividends during the measurement period. The performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2010
|
|
|
12/31/2011
|
|
Vocus, Inc.
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
205.54
|
|
|
$
|
108.39
|
|
|
$
|
107.14
|
|
|
$
|
164.64
|
|
|
$
|
131.49
|
|
Nasdaq Composite
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
109.81
|
|
|
|
65.29
|
|
|
|
93.95
|
|
|
|
109.84
|
|
|
|
107.86
|
|
Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
121.86
|
|
|
|
64.96
|
|
|
|
110.97
|
|
|
|
130.32
|
|
|
|
130.96
|
|
32
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this report. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and the consolidated balance sheet data at
December 31, 2010 and 2011, are derived from audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the consolidated
balance sheet data at December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are derived from audited financial statements not included in this report. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010(2)
|
|
|
2011(2)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
58,076
|
|
|
$
|
77,520
|
|
|
$
|
84,579
|
|
|
$
|
96,760
|
|
|
$
|
114,874
|
|
Cost of revenues(1)
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
|
14,675
|
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
|
|
18,932
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,154
|
|
|
|
62,845
|
|
|
|
69,118
|
|
|
|
77,828
|
|
|
|
93,017
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
26,548
|
|
|
|
35,140
|
|
|
|
41,123
|
|
|
|
49,620
|
|
|
|
57,543
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,822
|
|
|
|
4,998
|
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
5,891
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14,743
|
|
|
|
20,356
|
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
|
|
23,587
|
|
|
|
30,129
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
47,975
|
|
|
|
63,145
|
|
|
|
68,742
|
|
|
|
81,396
|
|
|
|
97,254
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
(3,568
|
)
|
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Interest and other expense
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
(3,497
|
)
|
|
|
(3,958
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
(5,119
|
)
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
6,928
|
|
|
$
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share, basic
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share, diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
(1)
|
Cost of revenues and operating expenses include stock-based compensation expense from equity awards in the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
1,262
|
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,575
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
|
|
6,697
|
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,652
|
|
|
$
|
11,172
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
$
|
12,802
|
|
|
$
|
14,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
(2)
|
The consolidated statements of operations include financial results in the relevant periods since the acquisition dates of Datapresse and BDL Media in April 2010, HARO
in June 2010, Engine140 in December 2010 and North Social in February 2011. Please refer to Note 3,
Business Combinations
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our recent acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
67,480
|
|
|
$
|
87,187
|
|
|
$
|
104,669
|
|
|
$
|
100,414
|
|
|
$
|
108,179
|
|
Working capital(1)
|
|
|
42,013
|
|
|
|
58,427
|
|
|
|
70,594
|
|
|
|
60,085
|
|
|
|
53,662
|
|
Total assets(1)
|
|
|
114,243
|
|
|
|
139,979
|
|
|
|
159,240
|
|
|
|
173,880
|
|
|
|
195,743
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Total deferred revenue
|
|
|
34,964
|
|
|
|
42,854
|
|
|
|
47,750
|
|
|
|
56,576
|
|
|
|
62,997
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
71,004
|
|
|
|
91,408
|
|
|
|
104,381
|
|
|
|
104,434
|
|
|
|
102,721
|
|
(1)
|
Certain changes to December 31, 2010 balance sheet amounts have been made in accordance with the accounting for business combinations to reflect adjustments made
during the measurement period to preliminary amounts recorded for the estimated fair value of acquired net assets of one of our 2010 business acquisitions. For more information, please refer to Note 7
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
|
Item 7.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates
and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in
Risk Factors in Item 1A.
Overview
We are a leading provider of cloud marketing software that helps businesses attract, engage and retain customers. As consumers buying behavior is increasingly influenced by online information and
social networks, our software helps companies reach and influence buyers across social networks, online and through the media. Our cloud marketing solution addresses key areas of modern online marketing, including social media marketing, search
marketing, email marketing and publicity. Our sales organization is focused on adding new customers, renewing customer subscriptions and expanding relationships with existing customers. We deliver our solutions over the Internet using a secure,
scalable application and system architecture that allows our customers to quickly deploy and adopt our software.
As of
December 31, 2011, we had 11,907 active subscription customers and over 36,000 transaction customers who purchase our products and services as a monthly subscription or per transaction. These customers represent a wide variety of industries,
including financial and insurance, technology, healthcare and pharmaceutical and retail and consumer products, as well as government agencies, not-for-profit organizations and educational institutions. We define active subscription customers as
unique customer accounts that have an annual active subscription and have not been suspended for non-payment.
We plan to
expand our cloud marketing suite, expand our direct sales force, increase alternate channel distribution and selectively pursue strategic acquisitions. As a result, we plan to hire additional personnel, particularly in sales and marketing, expand
our domestic selling and marketing activities and develop our operational and financial systems to manage a growing business.
34
On February 24, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of iContact Corporation
(iContact), a provider of cloud-based email and social marketing software that enables organizations to create and publish professional-quality emails to engage, educate and retain customers. We believe the acquisition will provide an email
capability component to our cloud marketing suite. The purchase price consisted of approximately $90.5 million of cash, 401,701 shares of our common stock, with a deemed value at issuance of approximately $9.3 million and 1,000,000 shares of our
newly-created Series A convertible preferred stock, with a deemed value at issuance of approximately $78.8 million, aggregating to approximately $168.6 million of total consideration, net of $10.0 million cash acquired. The acquisition will be
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and we will recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values. We are currently evaluating the purchase price allocation and expect to complete it in the first quarter of
2012. For more information, please refer to Note 14,
Subsequent Events
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Acquisitions
In addition to the iContact acquisition noted above, we
completed several acquisitions of privately-held entities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The consolidated financial statements include the
operating results of each business from its respective acquisition date. Acquisition-related transaction costs incurred are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
North Social
On February 24, 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of North Venture Partners, LLC (North Social), a provider of Facebook applications that enable users
to create, manage and promote their business on Facebook. We believe the acquisition broadens our social media solution. The purchase price at the acquisition date consisted of approximately $7.0 million cash paid at closing and
$5.1 million of contingent consideration for the achievement of certain financial milestones within the following 24 months. In February 2012, we paid $3.0 million of the contingent consideration for the achievement of certain financial
milestones. The contingent consideration could result in additional payments of up to $15.0 million. We recorded $101,000 of identifiable intangible assets, $11.9 million of goodwill which is deductible for tax purposes and $78,000 of other net
tangible assets. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using probability assessments of expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is to be settled and applied a discount rate that appropriately
captures a market participants view of the risk associated with the obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the fair value of the contingent consideration was adjusted based on an updated assessment of the probability of
achievement of the performance metrics and the discount factor reflecting the passage of time. The additional expense of $1.9 million was included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2011. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability as of December 31, 2011 was $6.9 million. Acquisition-related costs incurred for the acquisition were not material.
Datapresse
On April 16, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Data Presse SAS (Datapresse), a provider of media content and cloud-based public relations software in France which expanded our
presence in Europe. Datapresses cloud-based software complements our existing cloud marketing suite. The purchase consideration consisted of approximately $9.7 million in cash paid at closing and $572,000 of contingent consideration for
the achievement of certain financial metrics for the twelve month period ending April 30, 2011. We recorded $4.7 million of identifiable intangible assets and $5.9 million of goodwill. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2011, the fair value of the contingent consideration was adjusted based on the actual performance from the acquisition date through April 30, 2011. The additional expense of $44,000 and $99,000 was included in general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively. During 2011, we made payments in the amount of $715,000 which represented the full settlement of the contingent consideration
liability. We incurred acquisition-related costs of approximately $747,000 in 2010, which are included in general and administrative expenses.
35
Other Acquisitions
In 2010, we completed three additional acquisitions of privately-held entities primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. These acquisitions were not material individually or in the aggregate. The entities were acquired for a total of approximately $3.1 million in cash and $811,000 of contingent consideration for the achievement of revenue targets in
2010 and 2011. We recorded approximately $1.4 million of identifiable intangible assets, $1.8 million of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes and $1.6 million of goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes. In connection with one of the
acquisitions, we identified an uncertain tax position, and, as a result recorded $758,000 in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the fair value of the
contingent consideration was adjusted based on actual performance. The additional expense of $504,000 was included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. The fair
value adjustment to contingent consideration was not material for the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2011, we made payments in the amount of $699,000 related to the contingent consideration. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the
liability remaining for the contingent consideration was $606,000 and is included in accrued expenses. Acquisition-related costs incurred for these acquisitions were not material.
Sources of Revenues
We derive our revenues from subscription agreements
and related services and from news distribution services. Our subscription agreements contain multiple service elements and deliverables, which generally include use of our cloud-based software, news distribution services, hosting services, content
and content updates and customer support and may also include implementation and training services. The typical term of our subscription agreements is one year; however, our customers may purchase subscriptions with monthly or multi-year terms. We
separately invoice our customers in advance of their subscription, with payment terms that generally require our customers to pay us generally within 30 days of invoice. Our subscription agreements typically are non-cancelable, though customers
have the right to terminate their agreements for cause if we materially breach our obligations under the agreement. Our subscription agreements may include amounts that are not yet contractually billable to customers, and any such unbilled amounts
are not recorded in deferred revenue until invoiced.
Additionally, we derive revenue on a per-transaction basis from our news
distribution services. We generally receive payment in advance of the online distribution of the news release.
Professional
services revenue consists primarily of data migration, custom development and training. Our professional service engagements are billed on a fixed fee basis with payment terms requiring our customers to pay us within 30 days of invoice. During
the year ended December 31, 2011, professional services accounted for approximately 1% of our revenues.
Cost of Revenues and
Operating Expenses
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues has consisted primarily of compensation for training,
editorial and support personnel, hosting infrastructure, press release distribution, acquisition, maintenance and amortization of the information database, amortization of purchased technology from business combinations, amortization of capitalized
software development costs, depreciation associated with computer equipment and software and allocated overhead. We allocate overhead expenses such as employee benefits, computer and office supplies, management information systems and depreciation
for computer equipment based on headcount. As a result, indirect overhead expenses are included in cost of revenues and each operating expense category.
We believe content is an integral part of our solution and provides our customers with access to broad, current and relevant information critical to their marketing efforts. We expect to continue to make
investments in
36
both our own content as well as content acquired from third-parties and to continue to enhance our proprietary information database and enhance our news monitoring and social media monitoring
services. We expect in 2012, cost of revenues will increase in absolute dollars but will remain flat or decrease slightly as a percentage of revenues.
Sales and Marketing.
Sales and marketing expenses are our largest operating expense. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for our sales and marketing personnel, sales
commissions and incentives, marketing programs, including lead generation, promotional events, webinars and other brand building expenses and allocated overhead. We expense our sales commissions at the time a subscription agreement is executed by
the customer, and we recognize substantially all of our revenues ratably over the term of the corresponding subscription agreement. As a result, we incur sales expense before the recognition of the related revenues.
We plan to continue to invest in sales and marketing to add new customers, increase sales to our existing customers and increase sales of
our online news release distribution services. Such investments will include adding sales personnel and expanding our marketing activities to build brand awareness and generate additional sales leads. We expect in 2012, sales and marketing expenses
will increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues.
Research and Development.
Research and development
expenses consist primarily of compensation for our software application development personnel and allocated overhead. We have historically focused our research and development efforts on increasing the functionality and enhancing the ease of use of
our cloud-based software. Because of our hosted solutions, we are able to provide our customers with a single, shared version of our most recent application, which enables us to have relatively low expenses as compared to traditional enterprise
software business models. We expect that in 2012, research and development expenses will increase in absolute dollars and increase slightly as a percentage of revenues.
General and Administrative.
General and administrative expenses consist of compensation and related expenses for executive, finance, legal, human resources and administrative personnel, as well as
fees for legal, accounting and other consulting services, including acquisition-related transaction costs, third-party payment processing and credit card fees, facilities rent, other corporate expenses, fair value adjustments to contingent
consideration and allocated overhead. We expect that in 2012, general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars but will decrease as a percentage of revenues.
Amortization of Intangible Assets.
Amortized intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names and agreements
not-to-compete acquired in business combinations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) and include the accounts of Vocus, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain changes to prior year balance sheet amounts have been made in accordance with the accounting for business combinations to reflect adjustments made during the measurement period to preliminary
amounts recorded for the estimated fair value of acquired net assets of one of our 2010 business acquisitions. For more information, please refer to Note 7
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to the
37
allowance for doubtful accounts, software development costs, useful lives of property, equipment and software, intangible assets and goodwill, contingent liabilities, revenue recognition, fair
value of stock-based awards and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 2,
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment or complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition.
We recognize revenues when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided
to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable and the amount of the fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable. Our subscription agreements generally contain multiple service elements and deliverables. These elements include
use of our cloud-based software, hosting services, content and content updates, customer support and may also include news distribution services and professional services. Our subscription agreements do not provide customers the right to take
possession of the software at any time.
Prior to January 1, 2011, all elements in our multiple element subscription
agreements were considered a single unit of accounting, and accordingly, we recognized all associated fees over the subscription period, which is typically one year. We determined that we did not have objective and reliable evidence of the fair
value of the undelivered elements in our arrangements and, as a result, subscription revenues were recognized ratably over the term of the subscription. Professional services sold separately from a subscription arrangement were recognized as the
services were performed.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended the accounting guidance for
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to:
|
|
|
provide updates on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated and how the consideration should be
allocated;
|
|
|
|
eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method; and
|
|
|
|
require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices (ESP) of each deliverable if it does not have vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) of selling price.
|
On January 1, 2011, we
adopted the provisions of the new accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after January 1, 2011 that contain subscription services sold with news distribution services or
professional services on a prospective basis and determined the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements. Our separate units of accounting consist of subscription services, news distribution services and professional
services. We allocate consideration to each deliverable in multiple element arrangements based on the relative selling prices and recognize revenue as the respective services are delivered or performed.
We established VSOE of selling price for certain of our news distribution services as the selling price for a substantial majority of
stand-alone sales falls within a narrow range around the median selling price. We determined TPE of selling price is not available for any of our services due to differences in the features and functionality compared to competitors products.
We determined ESP for the remaining deliverables by analyzing factors such as historical pricing trends, discounting practices, gross margin objectives and other market conditions.
38
We also distribute individual news releases to the Internet which are indexed by major
search engines and distributed directly to various news sites, journalists and other key constituents. We recognize revenue on a per-transaction basis when the press releases are made available to the public.
Sales and other taxes collected from customers to be remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenues.
Sales Commissions.
Sales commissions are expensed when a subscription agreement is executed by the customer. As a result, we incur
sales expense before the recognition of the related revenues.
Stock-Based Compensation.
We recognize compensation
expense for equity awards based on the fair value of the award and on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award based on the estimated portion of the award that is expected to vest. We apply estimated forfeiture rates
based on analyses of historical data, including termination patterns and other factors. We use the quoted closing market price of our common stock on the grant date to measure the fair value of our restricted stock awards. We use the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to measure the fair value of our option awards. We use the daily historical volatility of our stock price over the expected life of the options to calculate the expected volatility. The expected term of option awards granted
through March 31, 2011 was calculated using the simplified method, which is equal to the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term of the award. Based on stock option exercise activity through the three months ended
June 30, 2011, we determined that we had sufficient historical exercise data to estimate the expected term for option awards using a combination of historical exercise data with expected future exercise patterns using the average midpoint
between vesting and the contractual term for outstanding awards for all option awards granted after March 31, 2011. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on our financial statements. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
rate on U.S. Treasury securities with maturities consistent with the estimated expected term of the awards. We have not paid dividends and do not anticipate paying a cash dividend in the foreseeable future and, accordingly, use an expected
dividend yield of zero.
Business Combinations.
We have completed acquisitions of businesses that have resulted in the
recording of goodwill and identifiable definite-lived intangible assets. Definite-lived intangible assets consist of acquired customer relationships, trade names, agreements not-to-compete and purchased technology. Definite-lived intangible assets
are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from two to seven years. We recognize all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and contingent consideration at their fair values on the acquisition date.
Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Accounting for these acquisitions requires us to make
determinations about the fair value of assets acquired, useful lives for definite-lived tangible and intangible assets, and liabilities assumed that involve estimates and judgments.
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets.
Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is assessed for impairment at least annually. Goodwill
impairment is evaluated using a two step process. The first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit
exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair
value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We perform our
annual impairment assessment on November 1, or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. We operate under one reporting unit and, as a result, evaluate goodwill impairment based on our fair value as a whole.
39
We use an income approach based on discounted cash flows to determine the fair value of our
reporting unit. Our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue, operating costs and other relevant factors which are consistent with the plans used to manage our operations. The results of our most recent annual assessment
performed on November 1, 2011 did not indicate any impairment of goodwill, and as such, the second step of the impairment test was not required. We also review the carrying amount of our reporting unit to its fair value based on quoted market
prices of our common stock, or market capitalization. Our market capitalization exceeded our carrying amount. No events or circumstances occurred from the date of the assessment through December 31, 2011 that would impact this conclusion.
Subsequent to December 31, 2011, we experienced a decline in our market capitalization due to a recent decline in our stock price; however, our market capitalization continues to exceed the carrying amount of our reporting unit.
We assess impairment of definite-lived intangible and other long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may no longer be fully recoverable. We determine the impairment, if any, by comparing the carrying value of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets. An impairment
charge is recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. There were no impairment charges for long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. Impairment charges for long-lived
assets for the year ended December 31, 2011 were not material.
Income taxes.
We use the asset and liability
method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating losses and tax-credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the
differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Net deferred tax assets are reduced by the valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, based on recent operating results and our current
projections of future losses, we established a full valuation allowance on our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets as we concluded at this time that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the benefits of our deferred tax
assets. We have historically maintained a full valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets of certain of our foreign subsidiaries because we determined that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the benefits of our foreign deferred
tax assets.
Our estimates related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions require us to make judgments regarding the
sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. If we determine it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits, we record the impact of the position in our consolidated
financial statements at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Our estimates are updated at each reporting date based on the facts, circumstances and information available. We are also
required to assess at each reporting date whether it is reasonably possible that any significant increases or decreases to our unrecognized tax benefits will occur during the next twelve months. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdictions and various state and foreign jurisdictions and are subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign tax examinations for years ranging from 2002 to 2011.
40
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth selected consolidated statements of operations data for each of the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Revenues.
Revenues for 2011 were $114.9 million, an increase of $18.1 million, or 19%, over revenues of
$96.8 million for 2010. The increase in revenues was primarily due to the increase in the number of total active subscription customers to 11,907 as of December 31, 2011 from 8,574 as of December 31, 2010. Total revenue from active
subscription customers through businesses acquired in 2010 and 2011 contributed $3.2 million of incremental revenue in 2011. The remaining increase in active subscription customers was the result of additional sales and marketing personnel focused
on acquiring new customers and renewing exiting customers. Revenue growth from the increase in active subscription customers, excluding revenue from acquired companies, was $15.0 million. Total deferred revenue as of December 31, 2011 was
$63.0 million, representing an increase of $6.4 million, or 11.3%, over total deferred revenue of $56.6 million as of December 31, 2010.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues for 2011 was $21.9 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 15%, over cost of revenues of $18.9 million for 2010. The increase in cost of revenues
was due to an increase of $932,000 in employee related costs, $957,000 in third-party license and royalty fees for content and $731,000 in amortization and depreciation primarily related to the launch of our social media product, acquired
technologies from business combinations and from server expansions and upgrades completed in 2011. We had 210 full-time employee equivalents in our professional and other support services group at December 31, 2011, compared to
208 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2010.
Sales and Marketing Expenses.
Sales and marketing
expenses for 2011 were $57.5 million, an increase of $7.9 million, or 16%, over sales and marketing expenses of $49.6 million for 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $4.1 million in employee related costs from
additional personnel, $1.1 million in sales commissions and incentive compensation, $786,000 in marketing program costs and $873,000 in stock-based compensation. We had 446 full-time sales and marketing employee equivalents as of
December 31, 2011, compared to 334 full-time employee equivalents as of December 31, 2010.
Research and
Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses for 2011 were $7.6 million, an increase of $1.7 million, or 28%, compared to research and development expenses of $5.9 million for 2010. The
41
increase in research and development was primarily due to an increase of $477,000 in employee-related costs and $573,000 in stock-based compensation. For the year ended 2011 and 2010, we
capitalized $258,000 and $511,000, respectively of research and development employee-related costs for internally developed software. We had 43 full-time employee equivalents in research and development as of December 31, 2011, compared to
46 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and
administrative expenses for 2011 were $30.1 million, an increase of $6.5 million, or 28%, over general and administrative expenses of $23.6 million for 2010. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to
increases of $1.5 million in employee-related costs, $1.4 million in rent and facility costs relating to the expansion and relocation of certain of our offices and headquarters, $1.4 million of expense related to the fair value adjustment of
contingent consideration for acquisitions, $682,000 in stock-based compensation and $326,000 in transaction costs from the termination of a potential acquisition. We had 80 full-time employee equivalents in our general and administrative group
at December 31, 2011, compared to 67 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2010.
Amortization of
Intangible Assets.
Amortization of intangible assets for 2011 was $2.0 million, a decrease of $277,000, or 12%, compared to amortization of intangible assets of $2.3 million for 2010. The decrease in amortization is primarily related
to certain intangible assets from the acquisition of PRWeb in 2006 that were fully amortized in the third quarter of 2011, partially offset by increases in amortization of acquired intangible assets from our 2010 and 2011 business acquisitions.
Other Income (Expense).
Other income for 2011 was $279,000, an increase of $208,000, or 293%, compared to $71,000 for
2010, primarily due to changes in foreign currency exchange gains and losses.
Provision for Income Taxes.
The
provision for income taxes for 2011 was $10.6 million, an increase of $10.4 million, or 587%, compared to the provision for income taxes of $178,000 for 2010. The increase primarily relates to the establishment of the valuation allowance against our
U.S. deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate for 2011 differs from the U.S. federal statutory rates primarily due to the establishment of the valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets and, to a lesser extent, due to
certain non-deductible expenses, including stock-based compensation, operating losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is currently available and, state income taxes.
Our effective tax rate for 2010 differs from the U.S. federal statutory rates due to certain non-deductible expenses, including
stock-based compensation, operating losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is currently available and, to a lesser extent, state income taxes.
Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Revenues.
Revenues for 2010 were $96.8 million, an increase of $12.2 million, or 14%, over revenues of $84.6 million for 2009. The increase in revenues was primarily due to the increase in the number of total active subscription customers to 8,574 as of
December 31, 2010, including 1,900 from our acquisition of Datapresse, from 4,438 as of December 31, 2009. Total revenue from acquired companies contributed $3.9 million of incremental revenue in 2010. The remaining increase in active
subscription customers was the result of additional sales and marketing personnel focused on acquiring new customers and renewing existing customers. Revenue growth from the increase in active subscription customers, excluding revenue from acquired
companies, was $8.1 million. Total deferred revenue as of December 31, 2010 was $56.6 million, representing an increase of $8.8 million, or 18%, over total deferred revenue of $47.8 million as of December 31, 2009.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues for 2010 was $18.9 million, an increase of $3.4 million, or 22%, over cost of revenues of $15.5
million for 2009. The increase in cost of revenues was due to an increase of $1.2 million in employee-related costs from additional personnel, $305,000 in third-party license and royalty fees for content, $265,000 in hosting infrastructure
costs, $342,000 in amortization and depreciation primarily related
42
to the launch of our social media product and acquired technologies from business combinations and $137,000 in stock-based compensation. We had 208 full-time employee equivalents in our
professional and other support services group at December 31, 2010, compared to 146 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2009. The increase in our headcount was partially due to our acquisitions in 2010.
Sales and Marketing Expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses for 2010 were $49.6 million, an increase of $8.5 million, or 21%, over
sales and marketing expenses of $41.1 million for 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $4.1 million in employee-related costs from additional personnel, $2.8 million in sales commissions and incentive compensation and $1.4 million
in marketing program costs, offset by a decrease of $500,000 in stock-based compensation. We had 334 full-time sales and marketing employee equivalents as of December 31, 2010, compared to 257 full-time employee equivalents as of
December 31, 2009. The increase in our headcount was partially due to our acquisitions in 2010.
Research and
Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses for 2010 were $5.9 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 26%, compared to research and development expenses of $4.7 million for 2009. The increase in research and development was
primarily due to an increase of $487,000 in employee-related costs from additional personnel and $517,000 in stock-based compensation. For the year ended 2010 and 2009, we capitalized $511,000 and $160,000, respectively of employee-related costs for
internally developed software. We had 46 full-time employee equivalents in research and development as of December 31, 2010, compared to 31 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2009. The increase in our headcount was partially
due to our acquisitions in 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses for 2010
were $23.6 million, an increase of $2.6 million, or 12%, over general and administrative expenses of $21.0 million for 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase of $951,000 in employee-related costs,
$452,000 in incentive compensation, $1.2 million in professional fees primarily for acquisition costs, $548,000 of expense related to the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration for acquisitions, offset by a decrease of $244,000 in
stock-based compensation. We had 67 full-time employee equivalents in our general and administrative group at December 31, 2010, compared to 51 full-time employee equivalents at December 31, 2009. The increase in our headcount was
partially due to our acquisitions in 2010.
Amortization of Intangible Assets.
Amortization of intangible assets for
2010 was $2.3 million, an increase of $372,000, or 19%, compared to amortization of intangible assets of $1.9 million for 2009. The increase in amortization is primarily attributable to the intangible assets related to the acquisitions of businesses
in 2010.
Other Income (Expense).
Other income for 2010 was $71,000, a decrease of $383,000, or 84%, compared to
$454,000 for 2009. The continued decline in interest rate yields for fixed income securities resulted in decreased interest income.
Provision for Income Taxes.
The provision for income taxes for 2010 was $178,000, a decrease of $2.7 million, or 94%, compared to provision for income taxes of $2.9 million for 2009. Our
effective tax rate for each period differs from the U.S. federal statutory rates primarily due to certain non-deductible expenses, including stock-based compensation, operating losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is currently
available and to a lesser extent, state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents totaling $98.3 million, investments
totaling $9.9 million and net accounts receivable totaling $23.5 million. Our cash equivalents and investments primarily consisted of money market funds, commercial paper and government-sponsored agency debt securities.
43
Operating Activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2011 was $31.1 million, reflecting a net loss of $14.6 million, non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $5.2 million, stock-based compensation of $14.9 million, $5.8 million increase in other
liabilities primarily due to an increase in the long-term portion of the leasehold incentive obligation from our new headquarters lease in the third quarter of 2011, and a net change of $3.4 million in accounts receivable and deferred revenue
due to our acquisitions and growth in our subscription agreements invoiced in 2011. Net cash provided by operating activities is also impacted by changes in other working capital accounts in the ordinary course of business.
Investing Activities.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $25.5 million,
which primarily resulted from investments in property, equipment and software of $13.8 million primarily related the relocation of our headquarters in the third quarter of 2011, the acquisition of North Social in the first quarter of 2011 of $6.9
million and net purchase of investments of $4.5 million.
Financing Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2.0 million which primarily resulted from proceeds received from the exercises of stock option awards of $19.0 million, offset by our purchase of 978,709 shares of our common stock at an
aggregate cost of $20.0 million and $1.3 million for payments of contingent cash consideration for certain of our 2010 business acquisitions for the portion of the fair value of the liability at each respective acquisition date.
On March 30, 2010, we signed a twelve year lease for approximately 93,000 square feet of office space in Beltsville, Maryland.
We relocated our corporate headquarters to the leased premises in the third quarter of 2011. Rental payments began on April 1, 2011. The aggregate minimum lease commitment was approximately $21.5 million. In addition, under the terms of
the lease, the landlord reimbursed us approximately $6.4 million for leasehold improvements, which is recorded as a reduction to rent expense ratably over the term of the lease. In May 2010, we established an irrevocable letter of credit in
favor of the landlord in the amount of $714,000. The letter of credit does not require a compensating balance and is active through May 2023. In accordance with the terms of the lease agreement, we are permitted to reduce the letter of credit by
approximately $119,000 annually for each of the first five years commencing May 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance was $714,000, and no amounts had been drawn against it.
In February 2011, we established two letters of credit in favor of our principal landlord in the United Kingdom in the amounts of
$564,000 in the aggregate. The letters of credit do not require a compensating balance and are active through 2016. As of December 31, 2011, the outstanding balances were $545,000 in the aggregate; and no amounts had been drawn against them.
In February 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of North Social. The purchase
price at the acquisition date consisted of approximately $7.0 million cash paid at closing and $5.1 million of contingent consideration for the achievement of certain financial milestones within the following 24 months. In February
2012, we paid $3.0 million of the contingent consideration for the achievement of certain financial milestones. The contingent consideration could result in additional payments of up to $15.0 million.
On February 24, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of iContact for approximately $90.5 million of
cash, approximately $9.3 million of common stock and approximately $78.8 million of redeemable convertible preferred stock, aggregating to approximately $168.6 million of total consideration, net of $10.0 million cash acquired. On February 24,
2017, we will be required to redeem each issued and outstanding share of Series A convertible preferred stock for $77.30 per share from our legally available funds, or such lesser amount of shares as we may then redeem under Delaware corporate law.
Each share of Series A convertible preferred stock is convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at the option of the holder. For conversions occurring on or before February 24, 2017, each share of Series A convertible preferred
stock may be converted into 3.0256 shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments). On and after February 25, 2017, each share of Series A convertible preferred stock which has not been redeemed may be converted into 3.3282
shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments). Please refer to Note 14,
Subsequent Events,
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for more information.
44
On February 27, 2012, in connection with the iContact acquisition, we established a
$15.0 million revolving credit facility with a major lending institution which will be available for use until February 27, 2013. The revolving credit facility is intended to be used for general working capital purposes and to provide increased
liquidity and financial flexibility. The revolving credit facility has a one-year term, renewable annually and bears interest equal to the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus 2.25%. In addition, we will pay a fee equal to 0.4% on any unused funds
under the revolving credit facility. As collateral for extension of credit under the facility, we granted security interests in favor of the institution of substantially all of our assets, and we pledged the stock of our directly owned domestic
subsidiaries and 65% of the shares of our foreign subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2011, $20.0 million remained
available for purchases under our stock repurchase program. Although we have repurchased stock during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, we may or may not do so in future periods, and our revolving credit facility limits our
ability to engage in stock repurchases.
As of December 31, 2011, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards of $24.0 million and $11.1 million, respectively which may be available to offset potential payments of future income tax liabilities and which, if unused, will begin to expire in 2026.
As of December 31, 2011, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities
often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Other than our operating leases
for office space and computer equipment, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these
relationships.
We intend to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditures primarily through cash flows from
operations. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and investments together with our expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for working capital and capital expenditures, contractual
obligations, commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations for at least the next twelve months. Our cash requirements in the future may also be financed through our revolving credit facility or additional equity
financing. There can be no assurance that financing would come at favorable terms, if at all.
The following table summarizes
our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011 that requires us to make future cash payments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period (in thousands)
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3
Years
|
|
|
3-5
Years
|
|
|
More than
5 Years
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
25,589
|
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
$
|
5,506
|
|
|
$
|
4,842
|
|
|
$
|
12,594
|
|
Contractual commitments
|
|
|
6,151
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration(1)
|
|
|
7,537
|
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt under note payable
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt under note payable
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
$
|
39,994
|
|
|
$
|
14,137
|
|
|
$
|
8,259
|
|
|
$
|
5,004
|
|
|
$
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts included in the table above represent the fair value of the liability for contingent consideration as of December 31, 2011, of which $6.8 million and
$742,000 are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively. In February 2012, we paid $3.0 million of the contingent consideration. The contingent consideration could result in additional payments of up to $15.0 million for
the achievement of certain financial milestones. The amounts in excess of $7.5 million are not included in the table above.
|
45
The contractual commitment amounts in the table above are associated with agreements that
are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum services to be used; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Obligations under agreements
that we can cancel without a significant penalty are not included in the table above.
On February 24, 2012, we acquired
iContact. In connection with the acquisition, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our newly created Series A convertible preferred stock, with a deemed value of approximately $78.8 million at issuance. On February 24, 2017, we will be required
to redeem each issued and outstanding share of Series A convertible preferred stock for $77.30 per share from our legally available funds, or such lesser amounts as we may then redeem under Delaware corporate law. Each share of Series A
convertible preferred stock is convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at the option of the holder. For conversions occurring on or before February 24, 2017, each share of Series A convertible preferred stock may be
converted into 3.0256 shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments, and subject to increase if we fail to fulfill our obligation to redeem the preferred stock on February 24, 2017). On or after February 25, 2017, each share of
Series A convertible preferred stock which has not been redeemed may be converted into 3.3282 shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments). This obligation is not included in the table above as the acquisition occurred subsequent
to December 31, 2011.
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our results of operations and cash flows
are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes in the British pound sterling, euro, Philippine peso, Hong Kong dollar and Chinese yuan. As a result, we are exposed to movements in the exchange
rates of currencies against the U.S. Dollar. Revenues denominated in a foreign currency were approximately 6% of our total revenues in the year ended 2009, 11% of our total revenues in the year ended 2010, and 14% of our total revenues in the
year ended December 31, 2011. Exchange rate fluctuations have not significantly impacted our results of operations and cash flows. Our future results of operations and cash flows may be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Historically, we have not utilized derivative financial instruments to hedge our foreign exchange exposure; however, we may choose to use such contracts in the future.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Our cash equivalents and investments consist
primarily of money market funds, corporate notes and bonds, government-sponsored agency securities and other debt securities. Our interest income is subject to interest rate risk. For the year ended December 31, 2011, a fluctuation in interest
rates of 1 percentage point would change interest income by approximately $1.0 million.
Our variable rate debt
consists of a note payable that bears interest at the Euribor rate plus 1.6%. As of December 31, 2011, outstanding borrowings were approximately $189,000, and therefore, fluctuations in interest rates would not have materially affected our
interest expense.
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes required by this item are set forth as a separate section of this report. See Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
None.
46
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried
out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to further periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, our management assessed the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on the framework
in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2011. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which
is included herein.
47
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
We have audited
Vocus, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Vocus, Inc. and subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Vocus, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have
audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Vocus, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 and our report dated March 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, VA
March 15, 2012
48
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
The following disclosure is made in lieu of filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, Item 2.05,
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities
:
On March 14, 2012, we provided notification to certain employees of iContact that we are terminating their employment immediately in an
effort to eliminate redundancies in the combined workforce. As a result, the employees affected will receive cash payments for severance and outplacement services of approximately $1.7 million. We expect to complete payments of these amounts through
the second quarter of 2012.
PART III
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
A listing of our executive officers, key employees and their biographies are included under the caption Executive Officers and Key
Employees under Item 1 of this Form 10-K. The remaining information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our
2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2012 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2012 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
49
PART IV
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
(a)
|
Documents filed as part of this report:
|
|
1.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2011;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011; and
|
|
|
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
|
2.
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule:
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
|
All other financial schedules are not required under the related instructions or are inappropriate and therefore have been omitted.
The exhibits
listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report.
50
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
VOCUS, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/
S
/ R
ICHARD
R
UDMAN
|
|
|
Richard Rudman
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chairman
|
Date: March 15, 2012
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard Rudman and Stephen Vintz, jointly and severally, his attorney-in-fact, each with the full power of substitution, for such person, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might do or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ R
ICHARD
R
UDMAN
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Richard Rudman
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ S
TEPHEN
V
INTZ
Stephen
Vintz
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ K
EVIN
B
URNS
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Kevin Burns
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ G
ARY
G
OLDING
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Gary Golding
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ G
ARY
G
REENFIELD
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Gary Greenfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ R
ONALD
K
AISER
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Ronald Kaiser
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ R
OBERT
L
ENTZ
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Robert Lentz
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ J
IT
S
INHA
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2012
|
Jit Sinha
|
|
|
51
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index to Financial Statements
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vocus, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a)2. These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Vocus, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Vocus, Inc. and
subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, VA
March 15, 2012
F-2
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
94,918
|
|
|
$
|
98,284
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $182 and $244 at December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2011, respectively
|
|
|
20,846
|
|
|
|
23,504
|
|
Current portion of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
125,415
|
|
|
|
133,731
|
|
Property, equipment and software, net
|
|
|
6,183
|
|
|
|
17,843
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
26,278
|
|
|
|
38,029
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion
|
|
|
8,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
173,880
|
|
|
$
|
195,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Current portion of notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
55,722
|
|
|
|
62,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
65,330
|
|
|
|
80,069
|
|
Notes payable and capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
69,446
|
|
|
|
93,022
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2010 and December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized; 20,374,267 and 21,750,525 issued at December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2011, respectively; 17,982,425 and 18,722,384 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011, respectively
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
166,985
|
|
|
|
200,273
|
|
Treasury stock, 2,391,842 and 3,028,141 shares at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011, respectively, at
cost
|
|
|
(28,417
|
)
|
|
|
(48,423
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(34,163
|
)
|
|
|
(48,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
104,434
|
|
|
|
102,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
173,880
|
|
|
$
|
195,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
84,579
|
|
|
$
|
96,760
|
|
|
$
|
114,874
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
|
|
18,932
|
|
|
|
21,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,118
|
|
|
|
77,828
|
|
|
|
93,017
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
41,123
|
|
|
|
49,620
|
|
|
|
57,543
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
5,891
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
|
|
23,587
|
|
|
|
30,129
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
68,742
|
|
|
|
81,396
|
|
|
|
97,254
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
(3,568
|
)
|
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Interest and other expense
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
(3,497
|
)
|
|
|
(3,958
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,077,616
|
|
|
|
17,921,238
|
|
|
|
18,743,305
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,077,616
|
|
|
|
17,921,238
|
|
|
|
18,743,305
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
19,380,866
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
129,897
|
|
|
$
|
(10,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
(28,464
|
)
|
|
$
|
91,408
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
264,133
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
209,586
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
Repurchase of 265,404 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,131
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
19,854,585
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
149,279
|
|
|
|
(14,914
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
(30,488
|
)
|
|
|
104,381
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
349,208
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,163
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
170,474
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
Repurchase of 918,681 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,503
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,675
|
)
|
|
|
(3,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
20,374,267
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
166,985
|
|
|
|
(28,417
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(34,163
|
)
|
|
|
104,434
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,219,643
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
156,615
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax deficiency from equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
Repurchase of 978,709 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,006
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,577
|
)
|
|
|
(14,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
21,750,525
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
200,273
|
|
|
$
|
(48,423
|
)
|
|
$
|
(607
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,577
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and software
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
12,802
|
|
|
|
14,915
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
9,789
|
|
Excess tax benefit from equity awards
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Payments of contingent consideration for business acquisitions in excess of fair value on acquisition date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
|
|
(3,081
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
6,523
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
16,079
|
|
|
|
17,730
|
|
|
|
31,144
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,851
|
)
|
|
|
(6,947
|
)
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software
|
|
|
(1,445
|
)
|
|
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
|
(13,758
|
)
|
Software development costs
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(32,332
|
)
|
|
|
(10,034
|
)
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
35,183
|
|
|
|
23,379
|
|
|
|
18,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
(25,513
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(4,131
|
)
|
|
|
(13,503
|
)
|
|
|
(20,006
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
4,163
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
Excess tax benefit from equity awards
|
|
|
5,048
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Payments of contingent consideration for business acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
Payments on notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
3,102
|
|
|
|
(8,774
|
)
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,388
|
|
|
|
9,101
|
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
65,429
|
|
|
|
85,817
|
|
|
|
94,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
85,817
|
|
|
$
|
94,918
|
|
|
$
|
98,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
1,126
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired under capital leases and other financing arrangements
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
Vocus, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Organization and Description of Business
Vocus, Inc. (Vocus or the Company) is a provider of cloud marketing software that allows organizations of all sizes to reach and influence
buyers across social networks, online and through the media. The Company provides a suite of software for social media marketing, search marketing, email marketing and publicity, creating a comprehensive solution for its customers to generate
awareness and build their reputation. The Company is headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland with sales and other offices in the United States, Europe, Asia and Morocco.
2.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and include the accounts of Vocus, Inc. and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain changes to
prior year balance sheet amounts have been made in accordance with the accounting for business combinations to reflect adjustments made during the measurement period to preliminary amounts recorded for the estimated fair value of acquired net assets
of one of the Companys 2010 business acquisitions. Refer to Note 7,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
for additional information.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, software development
costs, useful lives of property, equipment and software, intangible assets and goodwill, contingent liabilities, revenue recognition, fair value of stock-based awards and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of three months or less at the time
of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Investments
Management determines the appropriate classification of investments at the time of purchase and evaluates such determination as of each
balance sheet date. The Companys investments were classified as available-for-sale securities and were stated at fair value at December 31, 2010 and 2011. Realized gains and losses are included in other income (expense) based on the
specific identification method. Realized gains or losses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011 were not material. Net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. As of December 31, 2010 and 2011, the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities were not material. The Company regularly monitors and evaluates the fair value of its investments to
identify other-than-temporary declines in value. Management believes no such declines in value existed at December 31, 2011.
F-7
Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain financial assets at fair value pursuant to a fair value hierarchy based on inputs to valuation techniques
that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while
unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entitys pricing based upon its own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Estimates are used to determine the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts necessary to reduce accounts receivable to the estimated
net realizable value. These estimates are made by analyzing the status of significant past-due receivables and by establishing provisions for estimated losses by analyzing current and historical bad debt trends. Actual collection experience has not
varied significantly from prior estimates.
Software Development and Information Database Costs
The Company incurs software development costs related to its cloud-based software. Qualifying costs incurred during the application
development stage are capitalized. These costs primarily consist of internal labor and are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally two years. All other development costs are expensed as
incurred. The Company capitalized the initial costs to acquire and develop its proprietary information database, which consists of media contacts and outlets and other relevant data integrated as part of the Companys cloud-based solutions.
These costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of nine to thirteen years. Costs to maintain and update the information database are expensed as cost of revenues as incurred. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Company recorded amortization expense of $310,000, $438,000 and $581,000, respectively.
Property, Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software
are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: two to five years for purchased and internally developed software and computer and office equipment and five to
seven years for office furniture. Assets acquired under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the leases. Amortization of
assets acquired under capital leases is included in depreciation expense. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are
eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in the results of operations.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include property, equipment and software and intangible assets with finite lives. Intangible assets
consist of customer relationships, trade names, agreements not-to-compete and purchased technology acquired in business combinations. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from two
to seven years. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment
F-8
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, the Company evaluates recoverability
by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the assets are impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds
the estimated fair value of the assets. There were no impairment charges for long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. Impairment charges for long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2011 were not material.
Business Combinations
The Company has completed acquisitions of businesses that have resulted in the recording of goodwill and identifiable definite-lived intangible assets. The Company recognizes all of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and contingent consideration at their fair values based on significant estimates and judgments on the acquisition date. The Company refines those estimates that are provisional, as necessary, during the measurement period. The
measurement period is the period after the acquisition date, not to exceed one year, in which new information may be gathered about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date to adjust the provisional amounts recognized.
Measurement period adjustments are applied retrospectively. All other adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred in general
and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company determines the useful lives for definite-lived tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed using estimates and judgments.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is assessed for
impairment at least annually. The first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. The Company performs its annual impairment assessment on November 1, or whenever events or
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company operates under one reporting unit, and as a result, evaluates goodwill impairment based on the fair value of the Company as a whole.
The Company uses an income approach based on discounted cash flows to determine the fair value of its reporting unit. The Companys
cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue, operating costs and other relevant factors which are consistent with the plans used to manage the Companys operations. The results of the Companys most recent annual
assessment performed on November 1, 2011 did not indicate any impairment of goodwill and, as such, the second step of the impairment test was not required. The Company also reviews the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its fair value
based on quoted market prices of the Companys common stock, or market capitalization. The market capitalization of the Company exceeded its carrying amount. No events or circumstances occurred from the date of the assessment through
December 31, 2011 that would impact this conclusion. Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company experienced a decline in its market capitalization due to a recent decline in its stock price; however, the market capitalization continues to
exceed the carrying amount of the Companys reporting unit.
Foreign Currency and Operations
The reporting currency for all periods presented is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for the Companys foreign
subsidiaries is the local currency. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the period
for revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders equity. Transaction
F-9
gains and losses in currencies other than the functional currency are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. Amounts resulting from foreign currency
transactions were not material for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the Companys net income (loss) as well as other changes in
stockholders equity that result from transactions and economic events other than those with stockholders. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency translation adjustments and net unrealized gains and losses on investments
classified as available-for-sale securities. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(175
|
)
|
|
$
|
(617
|
)
|
Unrealized net gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(175
|
)
|
|
$
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenues from subscription arrangements and related services permitting customers to access and utilize the
Companys cloud-based software. The Company also derives revenues from news distribution services sold separately from its subscription arrangements. The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the
service has been provided to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable and the amount of the fee to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.
Subscription agreements generally contain multiple service elements and deliverables. These elements generally include access to the Companys cloud-based software, hosting services, content and
content updates, customer support and may also include news distribution services and professional services. The Companys subscription agreements typically are non-cancelable, though customers have the right to terminate their agreements for
cause if the Company materially breaches its obligations under the agreement. Subscription agreements do not provide customers the right to take possession of the software at any time.
Prior to January 1, 2011, the Company determined that it did not have objective and reliable evidence of fair value of the
undelivered elements in its arrangements. As a result, the Company considered all elements in its multiple element subscription arrangements as a single unit of accounting and recognized all revenue from its multiple element subscription
arrangements ratably over the term of the subscription. The subscription term commenced on the earlier of the start date specified in the subscription arrangement or the date access to the software was provided to the customer. Professional services
sold separately from a subscription arrangement were recognized as the services were performed.
The Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) amended the accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to:
|
|
|
provide updates on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated and how the consideration should be
allocated;
|
|
|
|
eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method; and
|
F-10
|
|
|
require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices (ESP) of each deliverable if it does not have vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) of selling price.
|
On January 1, 2011, the
Company adopted the provisions of the new accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after January 1, 2011 that contain subscription services sold with news distribution services
or professional services on a prospective basis and determined the adoption did not have a material impact on its financial statements. The Companys separate units of accounting consist of its subscription services, news distribution services
and professional services. The Company allocates consideration to each deliverable in multiple element arrangements based on the relative selling prices and recognizes revenue as the respective services are delivered or performed.
The Company established VSOE of selling price for certain of its news distribution services as the selling price for a substantial
majority of stand-alone sales fall within a narrow range around the median selling price. The Company determined TPE of selling price is not available for any of its services due to differences in the features and functionality compared to
competitors products. The Company determined ESP for the remaining deliverables by analyzing factors such as historical pricing trends, discounting practices, gross margin objectives and other market conditions.
The Company also distributes individual news releases to the Internet which are indexed by major search engines and distributed directly
to various news sites, journalists and other key constituents. The Company recognizes revenue on a per-transaction basis when the press releases are made available to the public.
Sales and other taxes collected from customers to be remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenues.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue consists of payments received from or billings to customers in advance of revenue recognition. Deferred revenue to be recognized in the succeeding twelve month period is included in
current deferred revenue with the remaining amounts included in non-current deferred revenue.
Sales Commissions
Sales commissions are expensed when a subscription agreement is executed by the customer.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were $4,955,000, $5,219,000 and $4,291,000, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys share-based arrangements include stock option awards and restricted stock awards. The Company recognizes compensation expense for its equity awards on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award based on the estimated portion of the award that is expected to vest and applies estimated forfeiture rates based on analyses of historical data, including termination patterns and other factors. The Company
uses the quoted closing market price of its common stock on the grant date to measure the fair value of restricted stock awards and the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock option awards. The Company uses the daily
historical volatility of its stock price over the expected life of the options to calculate the expected volatility. The expected term of option awards granted through March 31, 2011 was calculated using the simplified method, which is equal to
the midpoint between the vesting date and the end
F-11
of the contractual term of the award. Based on stock option exercise activity through the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company determined that it had sufficient historical exercise
data to estimate the expected term for option awards using a combination of its historical exercise data with expected future exercise patterns using the average midpoint between vesting and the contractual term for outstanding awards for all option
awards granted after March 31, 2011. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. The risk-free interest rate is based on the rate on U.S. Treasury securities with maturities consistent with
the estimated expected term of the awards. The Company has not paid dividends and does not anticipate paying a cash dividend in the foreseeable future and, accordingly, uses an expected dividend yield of zero.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable. The Company generally
maintains its cash and cash equivalents with various nationally recognized financial institutions. Investments consist of investment grade, interest bearing securities. Customers are granted credit on an unsecured basis. Management monitors the
creditworthiness of its customers and believes that it has adequately provided for any exposure to potential credit losses.
The Company provides cloud-based software and related services to various customers across several industries. As of December 31,
2010 and 2011, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of net accounts receivable. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of revenue. As of December 31, 2010 and
2011, assets located outside the United States were approximately 13% and 12% of total assets, respectively. Revenues from sales to customers outside the United States were approximately 9%, 13%, and 16% of total revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary
differences and operating loss and tax-credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax
bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions by recognizing and measuring tax benefits taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.
A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the position is sustainable, based solely on its technical merits and consideration of the relevant taxing authoritys widely understood
administrative practices and precedents. If the recognition threshold is met, only the portion of the tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement with a taxing authority (that has full knowledge of all
relevant information) is recorded. The tax benefit that is not recorded is considered an unrecognized tax benefit and disclosed. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of income tax expense. The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdictions and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is subject to U.S. federal tax, state and foreign tax examinations for years ranging from 2002 to 2011.
Earnings Per Share
Basic net income or loss per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Nonvested shares of restricted stock are not
included in the computation of basic net income per share until vested. The Companys outstanding grants of restricted stock do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights.
F-12
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Company incurred net losses
and, therefore, the effect of the Companys outstanding stock options and nonvested shares of restricted stock was not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, basic and diluted
net loss per share were identical. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, diluted earnings per share excluded 2,134,979, 2,478,923 and 1,757,240 outstanding stock options, respectively, and 1,229,358, 1,418,731 and 1,282,323
nonvested shares of restricted stock, respectively.
Segment Data
The Companys chief operating decision maker manages the Companys operations on a consolidated basis for purposes of assessing
performance and making operating decisions. Accordingly, the Company reports on its business as one segment.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance regarding the requirement to test
goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis. Existing guidance requires that the test be performed by quantitatively comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill (step one). If the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then step two of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any. Under the new guidance, an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether
the existence of events and circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity
determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to
perform the first step of the two-step impairment test. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted, and will be applied prospectively. The Company will adopt the guidance in the
first quarter of 2012 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance requires the presentation of the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income
and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are
reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in both net income and other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with early
adoption permitted, and will be applied retrospectively. The Company will adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance on fair value measurements. The updated guidance provides clarification on existing fair
value measurement requirements, amends certain guidance primarily related to fair value measurements for financial instruments and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted, and will be applied prospectively. The Company will adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance
will have a material impact on its financial statements.
The Company completed several acquisitions of privately-held entities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2011. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The consolidated financial statements include the operating results of each business from its respective acquisition date.
F-13
Acquisition of North Social
On February 24, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of North Venture Partners,
LLC (North Social), a provider of Facebook applications that enable users to create, manage and promote their business on Facebook. The Company believes the acquisition of North Social broadens its social media solution.
The purchase consideration at the acquisition date consisted of approximately $7,000,000 in cash and $5,059,000 of contingent cash
consideration for the achievement of certain financial milestones within the following 24 months. In February 2012, the Company paid $3,000,000 of contingent consideration for the achievement of certain financial milestones. The contingent
consideration could result in additional payments of up to $15,000,000. The Company recorded approximately $101,000 of identifiable intangible assets, $11,880,000 of goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes, and $78,000 of other net tangible
assets. Goodwill is primarily attributable to North Socials knowledge of applications for Facebook and the opportunity to expand into the rapidly growing social media market. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using
probability assessments of expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is to be settled and applied a discount rate that appropriately captures a market participants view of the risk associated with the obligation.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the fair value of the contingent consideration was adjusted based on an updated assessment of the probability of achievement of the performance metrics and the discount factor reflecting the passage of
time. The additional expense of $1,872,000 was included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the liability for
the contingent consideration was $6,931,000 of which $6,189,000 and $742,000 is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively. Acquisition-related costs associated with the acquisition were not material. Pro forma results of
operations have not been presented because the acquisition was not material in relation to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company deposited $700,000 of the purchase price into an escrow account as security for breaches of representations and warranties, covenants and certain other
expressly enumerated matters by North Social and its shareholders. The amount is excluded from cash and cash equivalents as the deposit is restricted in nature and is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2011.
Acquisition of Datapresse
On April 16, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Data Presse SAS (Datapresse), a provider of media content
and cloud-based public relations software in France which expanded the Companys presence in Europe. Datapresses cloud-based software complements the Companys current suite of cloud-based solutions.
The purchase consideration at the acquisition date consisted of cash paid at closing and contingent cash consideration for the
achievement of certain financial metrics for the twelve month period ending April 30, 2011. The Company incurred acquisition-related costs of approximately $747,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are included in general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. There were no acquisition related costs for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The purchase consideration at the acquisition date consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
9,723
|
|
Fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration at date of acquisition
|
|
$
|
10,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The identifiable intangible assets include a trade name, customer relationships and purchased technology, and are subject to amortization on a straight-line
basis and are being amortized over five to seven years. The Company, with the assistance of a third-party appraiser, assessed the fair value of these assets. The trade name and purchased technology were valued using the relief from royalty method
and the customer relationships were valued using a discounted cash flow method. The relief from royalty method assesses the royalty savings an entity realizes since it owns the asset and does not have to pay a license fee to a third-party for its
use. These methods require several judgments and assumptions to determine the fair value of the intangible assets including royalty rates, discount rates, customer attrition rates, useful lives of assets and expected levels of cash flows, earnings
and revenues. The royalty rates used in the relief from royalty method ranged from 1.5% to 10% based on an analysis of market comparable rates. The discount rate used to estimate future cash flows was approximately 20%. The excess of the purchase
price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill which is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill primarily resulted from the Companys expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the
integration of Datapresses technology with the Companys technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach in Europe.
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Useful Life
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,798
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,941
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
Notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the contingent consideration was adjusted based on actual performance from the
acquisition date through April 30, 2011. The additional expense of $44,000 and $99,000 were included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company made payments in the amount of $715,000 which represents full settlement of the contingent consideration liability.
F-15
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010 assumes that the Datapresse acquisition occurred at January 1, 2009. The unaudited pro forma information combines the historical results for the Company with the historical results for Datapresse for the same
period. The following unaudited pro forma information is not intended to be indicative of future operating results (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Pro forma revenue
|
|
$
|
89,860
|
|
|
$
|
99,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized revenue related to Datapresse of approximately $3,100,000 and incurred a net
loss of $455,000 since the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2010.
Other Acquisitions
In 2010, the Company completed three additional acquisitions of privately-held entities primarily to expand its
product offerings and enhance its technology base. These acquisitions were not material individually or in the aggregate in relation to the Companys consolidated financial statements and, as such, pro forma results of operations have not been
presented. The entities were acquired for a total of $3,182,000 in cash and $811,000 of contingent consideration for the achievement of revenue targets in 2010 and 2011. The Company recorded $1,436,000 of identifiable intangible assets, $1,823,000
of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes and $1,576,000 of goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes. In connection with one of the acquisitions, the Company identified an uncertain tax position, and, as a result recorded $758,000 in
other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the fair value of the contingent consideration was adjusted based on actual performance. The additional expense of
$504,000 was included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. The fair value adjustment to contingent consideration was not material for the year ended
December 31, 2011. In 2011, the Company made payments in the amount of $699,000 related to the contingent consideration. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the liability remaining for the contingent consideration was $606,000 and
is included in accrued expenses. Acquisition-related costs incurred for these acquisitions were not material.
4.
|
Cash Equivalents and Investments
|
The components of cash equivalents and investments at December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
Market
Value
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
23,826
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,826
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
31,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,294
|
|
Government-sponsored agency debt securities
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored agency debt securities
|
|
|
5,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
68,110
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
68,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
The components of cash equivalents and investments at December 31, 2011 were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
Market
Value
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
41,292
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,292
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
U.S. Treasury Securities
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Government-sponsored agency debt securities
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
55,179
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments have original maturity dates greater than three months but less than one year.
5.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
The fair value measurements of the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at
December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,613
|
|
|
$
|
31,319
|
|
|
$
|
31,294
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
68,109
|
|
|
$
|
36,815
|
|
|
$
|
31,294
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration, current portion
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration, net of current portion
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
The fair value measurements of the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured
on a recurring basis at December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,292
|
|
|
$
|
42,292
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
55,187
|
|
|
$
|
50,187
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration, current portion
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration, net of current portion
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
7,537
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy since they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources that utilize market observable inputs.
Contingent consideration liabilities are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy since they are valued using unobservable inputs. The contingent consideration liability represents the
estimated fair value of the additional cash consideration payable that is contingent upon the achievement of certain financial and performance milestones. The fair value of this Level 3 liability is estimated based on a discounted
probability-weighted income approach derived from revenue and earnings estimates and a probability assessment with respect to the likelihood of achieving the milestone criteria. The current portion of the liability for contingent consideration is
included in accrued expenses, and the long-term portion is included in other liabilities.
The changes in the fair value of
the Companys acquisition related contingent consideration for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisition date fair value measurement
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
Adjustments to fair value measurements
|
|
|
548
|
|
Effects of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
Acquisition date fair value measurement
|
|
|
5,059
|
|
Payment of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
Adjustments to fair value measurements
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
Effects of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
7,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
6.
|
Property, Equipment and Software
|
Property, equipment and software consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Purchased software, computer and office equipment
|
|
$
|
7,166
|
|
|
$
|
8,260
|
|
Office furniture
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
Equipment under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
Capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
Information database costs
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,913
|
|
|
|
25,851
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,730
|
)
|
|
|
(8,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and software, net
|
|
$
|
6,183
|
|
|
$
|
17,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense, including depreciation on equipment under capital leases, was
$1,658,000, $1,971,000 and $2,655,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively.
7.
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
|
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
17,090
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
9,957
|
|
Goodwill adjusted in connection with the revision of the purchase price allocation relating to one of our 2010
acquisitions
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
Effects of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
26,278
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
11,880
|
|
Effects of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
38,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company adjusted certain December 31, 2010 balance
sheet amounts for revisions to one of its acquisitions purchase price allocation based on information identified that existed at the acquisition date related to an uncertain tax position identified in connection with the acquisition. The adjustments
resulted in a decrease to goodwill of $617,000 and corresponding decreases to accrued expenses of $70,000 and other liabilities of $547,000.
Intangible assets at December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Amortization
Period
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,231
|
|
|
$
|
(3,241
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,990
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
(2,529
|
)
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
Agreements not-to-compete
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
|
|
(3,456
|
)
|
|
|
457
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,900
|
|
|
$
|
(9,366
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Intangible assets at December 31, 2011 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Amortization
Period
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
|
$
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,063
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
(3,175
|
)
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,943
|
|
|
$
|
(4,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill and intangible assets for certain of its foreign subsidiaries are recorded in
their functional currency, which is their local currency, and therefore are subject to foreign currency translation adjustments.
Amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was $1,926,000, $2,440,000 and $2,501,000, respectively. Future expected amortization of intangible
assets at December 31, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
1,731
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
2014
|
|
|
817
|
|
2015
|
|
|
666
|
|
2016
|
|
|
554
|
|
2017 and thereafter
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loans
The Company entered into loan agreements with the Maryland Economic Development Assistance Authority Fund totaling $440,000 in 2011. The proceeds of the loans were used in the renovation of the new
corporate headquarters in Beltsville, Maryland. The borrowings bear interest at 3.0%, and the term of the loans end on December 31, 2020. The conditions of the loans stipulate that principal and related accrued interest be forgiven if specified
employment levels are achieved and maintained, and the Company maintains the Beltsville, Maryland location as the corporate headquarters through December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has met the conditions of the loans, however,
the conditions are required to be met throughout the term of the loan and, as such, the loan is recorded as a long-term liability. The $440,000 outstanding under these loans is included in notes payable and capital lease obligations, net of current
portion and the related accrued interest is included in other liabilities.
Note Payable
The Company assumed a note payable as a result of its acquisition of Datapresse. Borrowings bear interest at the three month Euribor plus
1.6% (2.9% at December 31, 2011). Principal and interest payments are due quarterly with the final payment due in June 2014. As of December 31, 2011 outstanding borrowings were $189,000.
F-20
Future principal payments under the note payable outstanding at December 31, 2011 are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
2013
|
|
|
65
|
|
2014
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum principal payments
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Repurchases
In November 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $30,000,000 of the Companys shares of common stock, and in August 2011 authorized up to an
additional $30,000,000. The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Company purchased an aggregate of 224,192, 831,773 and 850,031 shares of its common stock for
$3,500,000, $12,203,000 and $16,797,000, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Company also purchased 41,212, 86,908 and 128,678 shares of restricted stock for $631,000, $1,300,000 and $3,209,000,
respectively, which were withheld from employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of their restricted stock awards.
10.
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
The Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan and 2005 Stock Award Plan (the Plans) provide for the grant of
stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and other equity awards to employees, consultants, officers and directors. The 2005 Stock Award Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors and stockholders in November 2005 in
conjunction with the Companys initial public offering. Under the 2005 Stock Award Plan, 7,285,482 shares have been reserved for issuance, subject to annual increases. The Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, which has the authority, among other things, to determine which individuals receive awards pursuant to the Plans, and the terms of the awards. Stock options granted under the Plans have a 10-year term and generally vest annually over a
four-year period. The Companys outstanding equity awards include stock option awards and restricted stock awards. At December 31, 2011, 912,688 shares were available for future grants. All shares available for future grant are restricted
to the 2005 Stock Award Plan.
The following table sets forth the stock-based compensation expense for equity awards recorded
in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,575
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
6,697
|
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
$
|
12,802
|
|
|
$
|
14,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Stock Option Awards
The following weighted-average assumptions were used in calculating stock-based compensation for stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Stock price volatility
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value as of
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
2,478,923
|
|
|
$
|
2.46-$35.98
|
|
|
$
|
15.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
590,147
|
|
|
|
19.02-31.03
|
|
|
|
23.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,219,643
|
)
|
|
|
2.46-26.66
|
|
|
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or cancelled
|
|
|
(92,187
|
)
|
|
|
14.81-26.66
|
|
|
|
17.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1,757,240
|
|
|
$
|
2.46-35.98
|
|
|
$
|
17.54
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1,702,267
|
|
|
$
|
2.46-35.98
|
|
|
$
|
17.42
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
9,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance exercisable at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
694,273
|
|
|
$
|
2.46-35.98
|
|
|
$
|
13.78
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was $10.17, $9.10 and $13.03, respectively. The aggregate fair value of stock options that vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was $5,355,000, $3,137,000 and $4,846,000,
respectively. As of December 31, 2011, $9,627,000 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost is related to nonvested stock option awards and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
equity awards and the quoted closing price of the Companys common stock at the last day of the year multiplied by the number of shares that would have been received by the stock option holders had all holders exercised their stock options on
the last day of each respective year. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was $2,092,000, $3,992,000 and $15,548,000, respectively.
F-22
The following details the outstanding stock options at December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
as of
12/31/11
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
|
|
Exercisable
as of
12/31/11
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
|
$ 2.46 - $ 8.99
|
|
|
29,460
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
$
|
4.69
|
|
|
|
29,460
|
|
|
$
|
4.69
|
|
$ 9.00 - $14.22
|
|
|
408,390
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
408,390
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
$14.23 - $14.80
|
|
|
365,112
|
|
|
|
8.16
|
|
|
|
14.40
|
|
|
|
16,062
|
|
|
|
14.39
|
|
$14.81 - $22.50
|
|
|
322,341
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
|
|
18.40
|
|
|
|
156,071
|
|
|
|
19.13
|
|
$22.51 - $25.79
|
|
|
467,647
|
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
23.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25.80 - $35.98
|
|
|
164,290
|
|
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
|
28.51
|
|
|
|
84,290
|
|
|
|
29.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757,240
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
$
|
17.54
|
|
|
|
694,273
|
|
|
$
|
13.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
The fair value of the restricted stock awards is determined based on the quoted closing market price of the Companys common stock on
the grant date.
The summary of restricted stock award activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
Underlying Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
Balance nonvested at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
1,418,731
|
|
|
$
|
18.50
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
415,471
|
|
|
|
23.49
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(499,025
|
)
|
|
|
19.76
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(52,854
|
)
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance nonvested at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1,282,323
|
|
|
$
|
19.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2011, $16,669,000 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost is related
to nonvested shares of restricted stock and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
11.
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
The Company sponsors defined-contribution, profit-sharing and other benefit plans in the United States, the United
Kingdom and France. Total expenses for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were approximately $370,000, $642,000 and $747,000, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the U.S. and foreign components of income (loss) before
income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
4,545
|
|
|
$
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,906
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,715
|
)
|
|
|
(2,294
|
)
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
(3,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, income tax provision consisted of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Current expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
4,020
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
State
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Deferred expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
9,282
|
|
State
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
884
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,854
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
10,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the Companys effective tax rate to the statutory federal income tax rate for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Statutory federal tax rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of benefit
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Effect of foreign losses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Non-deductible compensation
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Other non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Effect of uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(268
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 differed from the
expected tax provision computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to income or loss before income taxes primarily due to operating losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is currently available, non-deductible
compensation and, to a lesser extent, state income taxes and certain other non-deductible expenses.
The provision for income
taxes for the year ended December 31, 2011 differed from the expected tax provision computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to income or loss before income taxes primarily due to the establishment of the valuation allowance
and, to a lesser extent, operating losses in foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is currently available, non-deductible compensation and, to a lesser extent, state income taxes and certain other non-deductible expenses.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company established a full valuation allowance against its U.S. federal and state net deferred tax
assets because management concluded that it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets based on recent operating results and current projections of future losses and, therefore, recorded a valuation
allowance to reduce the carrying value of these net deferred tax assets to zero. As a result, the valuation allowance on the Companys net U.S. deferred tax assets increased by $11,821,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company maintained a full valuation against certain of its foreign deferred tax
assets. The Company has historically maintained a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of its foreign subsidiaries because management determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefits of its foreign deferred
tax assets and, therefore, recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of these foreign deferred tax assets to zero.
F-24
The Companys deferred tax components consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL carryforwards
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
Other
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
|
|
18,021
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,997
|
)
|
|
|
(13,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,564
|
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software development
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(2,760
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(3,623
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
|
(7,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
7,594
|
|
|
$
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not provided for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings and the other outside
basis temporary differences of foreign subsidiaries as they are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.
As of
December 31, 2011, the Company had net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal and state tax purposes of approximately $23,997,000 and $11,136,000, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2026. The Companys foreign subsidiaries
generated NOL carryforwards of $8,880,000 which will begin to expire in 2015. The utilization of the equity award related portion of the worldwide NOL carryforwards will result in a realization of approximately $4,801,000, of tax effected benefit
that will be recorded to additional paid-in capital.
The exercise and vesting of equity awards has generated income tax
deductions in excess of amounts recorded for financial reporting purposes. In 2009 and 2010, the Company realized a tax benefit from the utilization of NOLs related to stock-based compensation and the exercise and vesting of equity awards. The
Company recorded a tax benefit from equity awards to additional paid-in capital for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. The Company recorded a tax deficiency from equity awards to additional paid-in capital for the year ended
December 31, 2011, as certain equity awards that vested and were exercised in 2011 resulted in a shortfall, however, as the Company generated sufficient excess tax benefits in the previous years, the shortfall only reduced the cumulative
additional paid-in capital from excess tax benefits. The Company has elected to use the with and without method for recognition of excess tax benefits related to equity awards.
The Company had no material uncertain tax positions or interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2009. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company finalized the calculation of the uncertain tax positions relating to certain acquired foreign subsidiaries. The final calculation resulted in a reduction of $547,000 to the acquired goodwill. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2011, included in other liabilities is the estimated liability for the Companys uncertain tax positions of approximately $758,000 and $937,000, respectively, including interest and penalties of $403,000 and $436,000,
respectively. The Company does not believe its unrecognized tax positions will materially change over the next twelve months.
F-25
The change in unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest, for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2011, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions taken in the current year
|
|
|
50
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
355
|
|
Additions based on tax positions taken in the current year
|
|
|
36
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $758,000, if
recognized, would favorably impact the Companys effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2011, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $937,000, if recognized, would favorably impact the Companys effective tax rate.
For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized $73,000 and $33,000, respectively of interest expense in connection with tax matters which is included in income tax expense.
13.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Leases
On March 30, 2010, the Company signed a twelve year lease for approximately 93,000 square feet of office space in Beltsville, Maryland. The Company relocated its corporate headquarters to the leased
premises in the third quarter of 2011. The aggregate minimum lease commitment at the inception of the lease was approximately $21,496,000. In addition, under the terms of the lease, the landlord reimbursed the Company approximately $6,417,000 for
leasehold improvements which is recorded as a reduction in rent expense ratably over the term of the lease.
The Company has
various non-cancelable operating leases, primarily related to office real estate, that expire through 2023, including the office space in Beltsville, Maryland, and generally contain renewal options for up to five years. Lease incentives, payment
escalations and rent holidays specified in the lease agreements are accrued or deferred as appropriate as a component of rent expense which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of occupancy. As of December 31, 2010 deferred
rent of $26,000 and $481,000 is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 deferred rent of $566,000 and $6,135,000 is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively.
The Company also leases computer and office equipment under non-cancelable capital leases and other financing arrangements that expire
through 2016.
F-26
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating and capital leases at
December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
|
Capital
Leases
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
2017 and thereafter
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum payments
|
|
$
|
25,589
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $1,666,000, $1,930,000 and $2,927,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010,
and 2011, respectively.
Purchase Commitments
The Company has entered into agreements with various vendors in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2011, minimum
required payments in future years under these arrangements are $4,467,000, $1,286,000, $393,000 and $5,000 in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 and thereafter, respectively.
Letters of Credit
In May 2010, the Company established a letter of
credit in favor of the landlord of the new corporate headquarters in Beltsville, Maryland. The irrevocable letter of credit is in the amount of $714,000. The letter of credit does not require a compensating balance and is active through May 2023. In
accordance with the terms of the lease agreement, the Company is permitted to reduce the letter of credit by approximately $119,000 annually for each of the first five years commencing May 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance
was $714,000; and no amounts had been drawn against it.
In February 2011, the Company established two letters of credit
in favor of its principal landlord in the United Kingdom in the amounts of $564,000, in the aggregate. The letters of credit do not require a compensating balance and are active through 2016. The letters of credit are denominated in the local
currency, and therefore are subject to foreign currency translation adjustments. As of December 31, 2011, the outstanding balances were $545,000, in the aggregate; and no amounts had been drawn against them.
Self-Insurance
In 2011, the Company enrolled in a self-insured plan for a majority of our U.S. employee health insurance costs, including claims filed and claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) subject to certain stop
loss provisions. The Company estimates the liability based upon managements judgment, historical data and the assistance of third-party actuaries in determining an adequate liability for self-insurance claims. The Companys IBNR accrual
and expenses may fluctuate due to the number of plan participants, claims activity and deductible limits.
Litigation
and Claims
The Company from time to time is subject to lawsuits, investigations and claims arising out of the ordinary
course of business, including those related to commercial transactions, contracts, government regulation and
F-27
matters. In the opinion of management based on all known facts, all such matters are either without merit or are of such kind, or involve such amounts that would not have a material effect on the
financial position or results of operations of the Company if disposed of unfavorably.
On February 24, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of iContact Corporation (iContact), a
provider of cloud-based email and social marketing software that enables organizations to create and publish professional-quality emails designed to engage, educate and retain customers. The Company believes the acquisition will provide an email
capability component to its marketing suite. The purchase price consisted of approximately $90,470,000 of cash, 401,701 shares of the Companys common stock with, a deemed value at issuance of approximately $9,330,000, and 1,000,000 shares of
the Companys newly-created Series A convertible preferred stock, with a deemed value at issuance of approximately $78,788,000, aggregating to approximately $168,588,000 of total consideration, net of $10,000,000 cash acquired. The Series A
convertible preferred stock does not provide for interest and is entitled to participate in any dividends declared on the Companys common stock on an as-converted basis. On February 24, 2017, the Company will be required to redeem each
issued and outstanding share of Series A convertible preferred stock for $77.30 per share from its legally available funds, or such lesser amount of shares as it may then redeem under Delaware corporate law. Each share of Series A convertible
preferred stock is convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at any time at the option of the holder. For conversions occurring on or before February 24, 2017, each share of Series A convertible preferred stock may be converted
into 3.0256 shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments, and subject to increase if we fail to fulfill our obligation to redeem the preferred stock on February 24, 2017). On and after February 25, 2017, each share of Series A
convertible preferred stock which has not been redeemed may be converted into 3.3282 shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments). The acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and will recognize assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values. The Company is currently evaluating the purchase price allocation and expects to complete it in the first quarter of 2012.
On February 27, 2012, the Company established a $15,000,000 revolving credit facility with a major lending institution which will be
available for use until February 27, 2013. The revolving credit facility will be used for general working capital purposes and to provide increased liquidity and financial flexibility. The revolving credit facility has a one-year, annual
renewable term and bears interest equal to the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus 2.25%. In addition, the Company will pay a fee equal to 0.4% on any unused funds under the revolving facility. As collateral for extension of credit under the
facility, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries granted security interests in favor of the institution of substantially all of their assets, and the Company pledged the stock of its directly owned domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the shares of
its foreign subsidiaries.
On February 16, 2012, the Company decided that it will close its operations in China to place
more focus on its investments and efforts on domestic operations and the cloud marketing space. The Companys China-based subsidiaries contributed less than 1% of the Companys consolidated revenues in 2011 and operated in a loss
position. As of December 31, 2011, the Companys China-based total assets and liabilities were $2,665,000 and $1,257,000, respectively. The Company intends to dissolve operations and settle all outstanding contracts within the
next three months.
On March 14, 2012, the Company provided notification to certain employees of iContact that it is
terminating their employment immediately in an effort to eliminate redundancies in the combined workforce. As a result, the employees affected will receive cash payments for severance and outplacement services of approximately $1,700,000. The
Company expects to complete payments of these amounts through the second quarter of 2012.
F-28
15.
|
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2011(1)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Summary consolidated statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
22,271
|
|
|
$
|
23,781
|
|
|
$
|
24,701
|
|
|
$
|
26,007
|
|
|
$
|
26,987
|
|
|
$
|
28,482
|
|
|
$
|
28,886
|
|
|
$
|
30,519
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
17,836
|
|
|
|
19,058
|
|
|
|
19,795
|
|
|
|
21,139
|
|
|
|
21,535
|
|
|
|
23,181
|
|
|
|
23,519
|
|
|
|
24,782
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(11,752
|
)
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.63
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
18,062,306
|
|
|
|
17,955,925
|
|
|
|
17,836,960
|
|
|
|
17,833,206
|
|
|
|
18,145,461
|
|
|
|
18,788,747
|
|
|
|
19,289,740
|
|
|
|
18,736,771
|
|
(1)
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2011, the Company established the valuation allowance against its U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets in the
amount of $11,821,000.
|
F-29
Schedule II
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Vocus, Inc.
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Beginning
of Period
|
|
|
Charged
to
Costs
or
Expense
|
|
|
Deductions(1)
|
|
|
Balance
at
End of
Period
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
11,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,654
|
|
(1)
|
Includes actual accounts written-off, net of recoveries.
|
F-30
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit
Numbers
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1(6)
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
|
3.2(14)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
|
4.1(4)
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate.
|
|
|
10.1(1)
|
|
1999 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
10.2(1)
|
|
Form of Option Agreement under Registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
10.3(5)
|
|
2005 Stock Award Plan.
|
|
|
10.4(10)
|
|
Form of Option Agreement for executive officers under Registrants 2005 Stock Award Plan.
|
|
|
10.5(10)
|
|
Form of Option Agreement for non-employee directors under Registrants 2005 Stock Award Plan.
|
|
|
10.6(1)
|
|
Agreement of Lease, dated December 21, 2000, between MOR FORBES LLLP and Registrant as amended.
|
|
|
10.7(12)
|
|
Deed of Lease dated March 30, 2010 between Indian Creek Investors, LLC and Registrant
|
|
|
10.8(5)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Registrant and each of its executive officers and directors.
|
|
|
10.9(2)
|
|
License Agreement between the Registrant and PR Newswire Association LLC, dated August 1, 2003, as amended.
|
|
|
10.10(10)
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement between the Registrant and PR Newswire Association, Inc., dated August 1, 2006.
|
|
|
10.11(3)
|
|
OEM License Agreement between the Registrant and Moreover Technologies, Inc., dated March 1, 2006, as amended.
|
|
|
10.12(7)
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement for Richard Rudman and Stephen Vintz, and schedule of details omitted therefrom.
|
|
|
10.13(7)
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement for Norman Weissberg, and schedule of details omitted therefrom.
|
|
|
10.14(8)
|
|
Employment Agreement for William Wagner dated July 17, 2006.
|
|
|
10.15(8)
|
|
Indemnification Agreement for William Wagner dated July 17, 2006.
|
|
|
10.16(9)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August 4, 2006, among the Registrant, Vocus PRW Holdings LLC, PRWeb, LLC and the sole stockholder of PRWeb International, Inc. and sole owner of
PRWeb, LLC.
|
|
|
10.17(13)
|
|
Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 16, 2010 between Registrant and Data Presse SAS.
|
|
|
10.18(15)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and North Venture Partners, LLC dated February 24, 2011.
|
|
|
10.19(11)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for executive officers under Registrants 2005 Stock Award Plan.
|
|
|
10.20(11)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for non-employee directors under Registrants 2005 Stock Award Plan.
|
|
|
10.21(16)
|
|
Summary of board of directors compensation.
|
II-1
|
|
|
Exhibit
Numbers
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
List of subsidiaries.
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
|
24.1*
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this report).
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Vocus, Inc. (Registration No. 333-125834) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 15, 2005.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Vocus, Inc. (Registration No. 333-125834) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2005.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2006.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Vocus, Inc. (Registration No. 333-125834) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2005.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Vocus, Inc. (Registration No. 333-125834) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2005.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Vocus, Inc. (Registration No. 333-132206) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 3, 2006.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12,
2005.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2006.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14,
2006.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2007.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14,
2008.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10,
2010.
|
(14)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29,
2010.
|
(15)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Vocus, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2011.
|
(16)
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10,
2011.
|
II-2
Vocus (NASDAQ:VOCS)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Vocus (NASDAQ:VOCS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024